Your ISP sells you a product which they know is oversold in capacity. Instead of fixing their capacity problem they now try to get you a their consumer to not use their product (the cap limit).
The concept of TOECDN solves the distribution of static content on the Internet. NetFlix, Youtube, Steam and whatever you are using to go over your cap can and should be fixed by TOECDN.
TOECDN place the cache server as close as possible to you as a consumer - even with the possibility to have your own cache server at home!
If you place cache-servers within the ISP networks, they, as a benefit, don't have to upgrade their networks connection to be able to push out more data to their consumers.
Before anyone reply and say: it won't work, it will never work, I will make sure its not going to work, I have invested heavenly in CDN companies stocks so your solution can not see the light, etc...
I would like to ask you: How does _your_ solution looks like to be able to let anyone on the Internet to cache their content on cache-servers within a ISP?
they did get the MD5 hashes from Disqus, from their api.
to know which e-mail address it belongs to, Expressen.se did generate MD5 hashes of all their e-mail addresses that they have in their (e-mail) system.
now they know which hash belongs to which e-mail address and can then continues the search for who his/she is what that specific MD5 hash.
you are all thinking about generating electricity and after that making compressed air with the electricity from the wind mill.
instead, generate compressed air directly at the wind mill and store it for later use. you can also use this stored compressed air for your car or bus or whatever.
when you need electricity you run it through a compressed air driven generator.
don't forget that adding heat to the pipe will making more energy available as well.
Slashdot Mirror
I prefer my router so that it can cache the content from all the device on my network. But that's just me.
Since we are talking about static content, you can have it cached right next to the consumer, if you want.
BUT.
No one is interested in a solution which not only solve this, but also let anyone to use and cache their content, independent of the provider.
What everybody in the Internet industry is doing instead is trash-talking each other.
Your ISP sells you a product which they know is oversold in capacity. Instead of fixing their capacity problem they now try to get you a their consumer to not use their product (the cap limit).
The concept of TOECDN solves the distribution of static content on the Internet. NetFlix, Youtube, Steam and whatever you are using to go over your cap can and should be fixed by TOECDN.
TOECDN place the cache server as close as possible to you as a consumer - even with the possibility to have your own cache server at home!
If you place cache-servers within the ISP networks, they, as a benefit, don't have to upgrade their networks connection to be able to push out more data to their consumers.
Before anyone reply and say: it won't work, it will never work, I will make sure its not going to work, I have invested heavenly in CDN companies stocks so your solution can not see the light, etc...
I would like to ask you: How does _your_ solution looks like to be able to let anyone on the Internet to cache their content on cache-servers within a ISP?
http://www.toecdn.org/
take a look at hyperdex if your are looking for a NoSQL DB: http://www.hyperdex.org/
What do you think of The Open Edge Content Delivery Network as a concept?
http://www.toecdn.org/
turn of javascript for slashdot.org, fsdn.com, googleadservices.com and truste.com.
problem solved.
*whoooosh*
butterfly labs and josh "inaba" zerlan.
he's is they guy how can fix anything in just two weeks (tm).
BFL is known for their accurate power calculation when they are designing their products. that's why nvidia hired them.
what pirates?
you going to see that the japs doesn't kill any whales, right?
please do tell us where the weakest link in DNSSEC are?
Dear samzenpus,
Please don't include any link directly to the documentation.
Regards
The Community.
no I didn't. I sad HOW they got hand of the e-mail addresses.
they did get the MD5 hashes from Disqus, from their api.
to know which e-mail address it belongs to, Expressen.se did generate MD5 hashes of all their e-mail addresses that they have in their (e-mail) system.
now they know which hash belongs to which e-mail address and can then continues the search for who his/she is what that specific MD5 hash.
that's why you using username-vendor@yourowndomain.com. works everywhere.
comment not available.
to kill children with and you are ok!
that we going to get "the evidence" that we need for the attack later this week.
"The evidence" will not, of course, say that the chemical did not come from the US.
...on the moon aswell.
just saying.
and get all of it.
since I'm using X11 ;-(
you are all thinking about generating electricity and after that making compressed air with the electricity from the wind mill.
instead, generate compressed air directly at the wind mill and store it for later use. you can also use this stored compressed air for your car or bus or whatever.
when you need electricity you run it through a compressed air driven generator.
don't forget that adding heat to the pipe will making more energy available as well.
Snowden is not on the plane to cuba.
So that I've got 36-bits of this securitybits!
is the republican party, right?