IMHO, many or most of the web developers available today don't know how to develop web page with good compatibility and accessibility is because of their arrogance and ignorance, and partially, lack of good guidance of web developing.
However, we are all arrogant and ignorant, nobody can change this. So a good guide of web developing is the solution to the problem.
But the web was constructed in such a quick manner that most of the developers are not well trained. I bet, third of the web developers around the world don't know what or where is W3C. I also bet, fifth of the web developers around the world don't know ssh and scp, or even ftp. I can even bet tenth of the web developers of the world don't know the difference between Internet Explorer and Internet. And those well payed web developers are so well payed and pround of themselves that, I believe, half or two third of the web developers around the world don't show any respect to people with disabilities, like blindness and deafness.
Nonetheless, the bubble of web was broken so quickly that though some wise people saw the problem here, and provided the solutions like xhtml and css, nobody in the avalanch will care about it anymore. As the web has broken, who cares about the flaw of the web anymore.
Now everything has calmed down, and dawn of light arrived again. But these can not be a solution to the arrogant people. The solutions to that people could be a law that enforce them to show respect to the people with disability and improve the accessiblity of their products and fierce competetion.
As the new Internet Explorer, it may improve the CSS and XHTML support, but I am wondering what kind of trick they will play to keep web developers stupid and arrogant and happy and dreaming...
one of my workmates keeps pressing "yes" and insists on those pop-up windows provided by M$. And she also asked my such a question after a major network breakdown, "Do FTP need internet?"
That's life, funny life. But the sad thing is I am the guy to fix computers.
one thing should be point out, it should be a professional web developer, not the one just finshed online training of http://www.w3schools.com/, which only tell you something about IE.
I believe they are DOM related javascript, there is a "document.all" to refer an object in IE, and KHTML either, correct me if it is not, and many web developer simply use it rather than the W3C standard "document.getElementById()" function.
And unless gecko get enough marcket share, I don't think those lazy web developers will change "document.all" to "document.getElementById"
And I believe this will happen eventually.
I have IBM notebook, and I eject stuff by the method you just mentioned, however, I always have several equipments ready for ejecting, and I clicked wrong one for many times.
But on my G4, I simply drag what I want to eject to the right bottom corner, and release it.
actually we drag something to the "eject" icon, not trash can, or where used to be a transh can, so we know we are ejecting the dragged stuff rather than "destroy" it.
On OS X, the size of button is different from windows and solaris, i didn't really compile java on linux, so i can say nothing. And a result is that some dialogue boxes or applets won't work because you can not see the button labeled with "OK". but i think this problem can be solved by proper design of layout.
windows: http://hlbr.onlinedown.net/down/EIO200 3_for_Win.ex e http://crc.onlinedown.net/down/EIO2003_for_Win. exe
And for other platform, I heard some people simply unpack the tar ball and run the jar files, i had never tried personally, so I don't warrantee it works.
it is a china company, if you ever bother to learn the statistic data of browser usage in China, you can understand it immediately.
Only developers use browsers like firefox and mozilla, common people don't care about "new browser". And Opera doesn't display Chinese well, so almost nobody in China use opera.
Slashdot Mirror
No, they are under construction, that means the big Mac will provide a large frech fry for free when it comes back.
IMHO, many or most of the web developers available today don't know how to develop web page with good compatibility and accessibility is because of their arrogance and ignorance, and partially, lack of good guidance of web developing.
However, we are all arrogant and ignorant, nobody can change this. So a good guide of web developing is the solution to the problem.
But the web was constructed in such a quick manner that most of the developers are not well trained. I bet, third of the web developers around the world don't know what or where is W3C. I also bet, fifth of the web developers around the world don't know ssh and scp, or even ftp. I can even bet tenth of the web developers of the world don't know the difference between Internet Explorer and Internet. And those well payed web developers are so well payed and pround of themselves that, I believe, half or two third of the web developers around the world don't show any respect to people with disabilities, like blindness and deafness.
Nonetheless, the bubble of web was broken so quickly that though some wise people saw the problem here, and provided the solutions like xhtml and css, nobody in the avalanch will care about it anymore. As the web has broken, who cares about the flaw of the web anymore.
Now everything has calmed down, and dawn of light arrived again. But these can not be a solution to the arrogant people. The solutions to that people could be a law that enforce them to show respect to the people with disability and improve the accessiblity of their products and fierce competetion.
As the new Internet Explorer, it may improve the CSS and XHTML support, but I am wondering what kind of trick they will play to keep web developers stupid and arrogant and happy and dreaming...
I remember I saw such a slogan in sevral books, and here again.
Becaus developers think common users don't need it, and high level user like you could figure it out by "about:config"
"Hi, I am a professor from X university, and I was wondering if we could get a license of your compiler for research?"
"I am sorry, blah blah blah..."
"May I talk with your boss?"
"Sure, just a second...du...du..."
"Hi, can I help you?"
"Hi, I am a professor from X university, and I was wondering if we could get a license of your compiler for research?"
"Ah...May I know your research topic?"
"It's about the speed of C++ and java...blah blah blah"
"As a company sponsored a lot of research, you know, we'd like to support your research, but, you know...blah blah blah."
"So how much it could be?"
"something between your arm and your leg"
"I am going to think about it, thank you for your help, have a nice day"
"you too, feel free to contact us, bye."
"Bye"
"OK, boy, we use gcc firstly, and after we got enough funding, we may buy a better compiler!"
"Yes, sir, and the result of GCC is here."
"Nice..."
Verizon DSL will loose more to the Comcast high speed internet?
Or Gigabit internet will come true?
one of my workmates keeps pressing "yes" and insists on those pop-up windows provided by M$. And she also asked my such a question after a major network breakdown, "Do FTP need internet?"
That's life, funny life. But the sad thing is I am the guy to fix computers.
I personally don't like the metal brush interface of safari, and from my test, the CSS layout speed of safari is far behind firefox.
garage band of iLife
I could see a big future of heatsink business in Intel and AMD's plans.
see the new icons at http://cheeaun.phoenity.com/weblog/
one thing should be point out, it should be a professional web developer, not the one just finshed online training of http://www.w3schools.com/, which only tell you something about IE.
I believe they are DOM related javascript, there is a "document.all" to refer an object in IE, and KHTML either, correct me if it is not, and many web developer simply use it rather than the W3C standard "document.getElementById()" function. And unless gecko get enough marcket share, I don't think those lazy web developers will change "document.all" to "document.getElementById" And I believe this will happen eventually.
The carjack scene of "Enemy of the State" was in Baltimore, right? En... I guess it is NSA behind these carmeras rather than police cadet.
Sorry that you page looks not transparent in either MSIE for Mac or Safari or firefox.
you can learn more about opacity from http://www.quirksmode.org/css/opacity.html
if you want to learn more about CSS, you can try http://www.quirksmode.org/css/contents.html
Good luck.
I have IBM notebook, and I eject stuff by the method you just mentioned, however, I always have several equipments ready for ejecting, and I clicked wrong one for many times. But on my G4, I simply drag what I want to eject to the right bottom corner, and release it.
if you drag a disk to the place of transh can, you will find a big "eject" button rather than a "trash can". maybe your OS X is different from mine.
actually we drag something to the "eject" icon, not trash can, or where used to be a transh can, so we know we are ejecting the dragged stuff rather than "destroy" it.
It's still CMOS, only CMOS with "nanotubes in CMOS", doesn't mean it is nanotube semiconductor.
If this could end up cheaper french fry... i think I like this idea.
On OS X, the size of button is different from windows and solaris, i didn't really compile java on linux, so i can say nothing. And a result is that some dialogue boxes or applets won't work because you can not see the button labeled with "OK". but i think this problem can be solved by proper design of layout.
Sorry for a little confusing information, i think these direct links may work better for non-Chinese dudes.
4 81 &svr=1c e2003_fo r_linux.tar.gz
0 3_for_Win.ex e. exe
linux:
http://soft.66169.com/dl.php?id=1032591&cknum=7
http://www.evermoresw.com/download/eioffi
windows:
http://hlbr.onlinedown.net/down/EIO20
http://crc.onlinedown.net/down/EIO2003_for_Win
And for other platform, I heard some people simply unpack the tar ball and run the jar files, i had never tried personally, so I don't warrantee it works.
it is a china company, if you ever bother to learn the statistic data of browser usage in China, you can understand it immediately.
Only developers use browsers like firefox and mozilla, common people don't care about "new browser". And Opera doesn't display Chinese well, so almost nobody in China use opera.
And then this small Chinese company could sue everyone, aha! After several years, I finally figure out how could they make money!
there is a free trial version at http://www.evermoresw.com/webch/download/download_ f.jsp
I was only wondering why they don't provide download in their english website.