You are skipping the first problem. Its not to where.?. its from where.?.
I'd be impressed if he had a disk/memory, device that could transmit that fast to the network equipment.
I'm pretty sure this would be used by telcoms for their communications lines. Long distance voice calls are sometimes (always?) converted to a digital form and sent over these types of data lines. I think though the use of compression technologies, this is cheaper then analog.
I was wondering... How does this stack up next to the transferrates of those fiberoptic telecomunication cables, like the ones they lay underwater and I beleave are used in the net's backbone?
I remeber reading... a long time ago... that NT was going to be(is?) built on a Mach-like kernel, which, from my limited understanding is used by several UNIX OSs. This may be where the misunderstanding came from...
I believe the problem is that, especially in highly competitive fields, one company can use the legal system to basically steal corporate secrets. Once you get the documents out of the company they become much easier to get a hold of. It comes down to the fact that the more people who see secret files the more chances there are for a leak. Of cource this is just my view, and I have trust issues so...
AOL for Macs up to ver 4 used MSIE for Mac. I assmue the same for higher, but I do not know this for a fact. Befor IE bacame intergrated with AOL's client AOL did not ship with a Browser. Was very late in support of the web, there was a great deal of speculation that AOL felt threatened by the web because it was simular to what AOL thought was its greatest asset... A GUI. Slowly AOL begain pointing its users to netscape as it became apparent that this web thing wasn't going away. I think there was even a CD or two that provided netscape. (I beleave this was all happening around ver 2 and 3 of the AOL client). Finally AOL fully embraced the web though a Deal with MS. AOL agreed to promote IE by intergrating it with AOL's client and AOL got prime placement on windows descktop. so to recap...
1 MacOS AOL uses IE (or did)
2 AOL promoted Netscape, but never required it.
3 AOL switched to IE because of a marketing deal.
Re:"eightythree" TM infringing on TI-83?
on
Tiqit Handheld PC
·
· Score: 1
It was 8bit. It was a Z80. Of cource it is nothing like the handheld computer in the article, so I guess that TI could care less... As a side note, is it just me or is that thing ugly? I want a handheld mac.
Step 1...
Set up where the tornados are likely to be. Any trailor park will be a good place to start because as everyone knows tornados are naturally attracted to mullet hair cuts
I found it interesting that he would prefer not to visit the US because of current copyright issues. I wonder what people in other countries think of our copyright schemes, I know each country has its own intellectuall property protection problems, but our (US) system seems generally more basterdized then most.
Have you ever said something you thought was funny and then the more you thought about it the more obvious it became that it wasn't... I extend my deepest apologies.
I love living in Redneck town. A friend of mine who was looking over my shoulder at this article, commented "Dang... their clonein' um now? Just what the world needs... More Chinese."
I checked my school's CIS web site and signed up for the MS introduction of.NET studio, when I go I will get a "gift pack" with Windows XP pro, Visual Studio and other assorted item "of value". I can't wait to see what I get... I'm taking my laptop so I try it all out while they are talking. Back to my point, my school (Georgia State BTW) hosts tons of these things, and if you know where to look you can get a bunch of free software... and no befor you ask it not usually criple ware.
Sorry for the non computer ones, but these crack me up.
Toyota Racing Development
Ford Racing Team
I'm waiting for honda and GM to merge so we can have Acura Super Sport
I think Ford's is SVO now BTW...
I don't get it. Everyone (well maybe not everyone) who is against this says is worried about one company monopolizing the market. Well guess what... That's what we have now. If a second big company with the marketing ability to match MS's gets into the market, don't we have competition.?. The opposite of what some of you are worried about. Who says that one company must dominate. I know it's a possibility, but how can you be against the opportunity of having a truly,or mayby just a slightly more, competitive OS/Net-Access market? Now before everyone starts flaming me... Please remember this is my oppinion, and I am not a qualified economist but I think this will lead to better products and value for the consumer. BTW thanks for reading my first post on slashdot... err I mean "first reply to the slashdot message board." I know slashdoters hate "first post" kids.
Slashdot Mirror
You are skipping the first problem. Its not to where.?. its from where.?. I'd be impressed if he had a disk/memory, device that could transmit that fast to the network equipment.
I'm pretty sure this would be used by telcoms for their communications lines. Long distance voice calls are sometimes (always?) converted to a digital form and sent over these types of data lines. I think though the use of compression technologies, this is cheaper then analog.
I was wondering... How does this stack up next to the transferrates of those fiberoptic telecomunication cables, like the ones they lay underwater and I beleave are used in the net's backbone?
I remeber reading... a long time ago... that NT was going to be(is?) built on a Mach-like kernel, which, from my limited understanding is used by several UNIX OSs. This may be where the misunderstanding came from...
I believe the problem is that, especially in highly competitive fields, one company can use the legal system to basically steal corporate secrets. Once you get the documents out of the company they become much easier to get a hold of. It comes down to the fact that the more people who see secret files the more chances there are for a leak. Of cource this is just my view, and I have trust issues so...
AOL for Macs up to ver 4 used MSIE for Mac. I assmue the same for higher, but I do not know this for a fact. Befor IE bacame intergrated with AOL's client AOL did not ship with a Browser. Was very late in support of the web, there was a great deal of speculation that AOL felt threatened by the web because it was simular to what AOL thought was its greatest asset... A GUI. Slowly AOL begain pointing its users to netscape as it became apparent that this web thing wasn't going away. I think there was even a CD or two that provided netscape. (I beleave this was all happening around ver 2 and 3 of the AOL client). Finally AOL fully embraced the web though a Deal with MS. AOL agreed to promote IE by intergrating it with AOL's client and AOL got prime placement on windows descktop. so to recap... 1 MacOS AOL uses IE (or did) 2 AOL promoted Netscape, but never required it. 3 AOL switched to IE because of a marketing deal.
It was 8bit. It was a Z80. Of cource it is nothing like the handheld computer in the article, so I guess that TI could care less... As a side note, is it just me or is that thing ugly? I want a handheld mac.
Step 1... Set up where the tornados are likely to be. Any trailor park will be a good place to start because as everyone knows tornados are naturally attracted to mullet hair cuts
I found it interesting that he would prefer not to visit the US because of current copyright issues. I wonder what people in other countries think of our copyright schemes, I know each country has its own intellectuall property protection problems, but our (US) system seems generally more basterdized then most.
Have you ever said something you thought was funny and then the more you thought about it the more obvious it became that it wasn't... I extend my deepest apologies.
I find it amazing that there could be half a billion people online and I still can't find decent content... Slashdot excluded of cource.
I love living in Redneck town. A friend of mine who was looking over my shoulder at this article, commented "Dang... their clonein' um now? Just what the world needs... More Chinese."
I checked my school's CIS web site and signed up for the MS introduction of .NET studio, when I go I will get a "gift pack" with Windows XP pro, Visual Studio and other assorted item "of value". I can't wait to see what I get... I'm taking my laptop so I try it all out while they are talking. Back to my point, my school (Georgia State BTW) hosts tons of these things, and if you know where to look you can get a bunch of free software... and no befor you ask it not usually criple ware.
Sorry for the non computer ones, but these crack me up. Toyota Racing Development Ford Racing Team I'm waiting for honda and GM to merge so we can have Acura Super Sport I think Ford's is SVO now BTW...
Oh, man I wasn't thinking.... I clicked the link to the Web site... I bet the FBI knows... What do I do.?. OK Cal, stay clam... Just stay clam...
I don't get it. Everyone (well maybe not everyone) who is against this says is worried about one company monopolizing the market. Well guess what... That's what we have now. If a second big company with the marketing ability to match MS's gets into the market, don't we have competition.?. The opposite of what some of you are worried about. Who says that one company must dominate. I know it's a possibility, but how can you be against the opportunity of having a truly ,or mayby just a slightly more, competitive OS/Net-Access market? Now before everyone starts flaming me... Please remember this is my oppinion, and I am not a qualified economist but I think this will lead to better products and value for the consumer. BTW thanks for reading my first post on slashdot... err I mean "first reply to the slashdot message board." I know slashdoters hate "first post" kids.