Slashdot Mirror


Replacing a Thinkpad?

An anonymous reader writes "As a very happy Thinkpad T20 user (still working after 7 years), I always planned on replacing it with another Thinkpad T-series. However, Thinkpads are now produced by Lenovo, a Chinese company, and I can't quite bear to buy Chinese while the Burmese military are shooting at monks with the Chinese Government as their biggest backer. Maybe this is silly, as whatever I buy is likely to be made (at least in part) in China... but still, what are my options for something as well built as the Thinkpad T-series?"

902 comments

  1. Yes, you're being silly by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where exactly do you think the other laptop manufacturers make their gear? A hint: "Designed in California, Made in China", and that is just one of the favourites around here on slashdot.

    1. Re:Yes, you're being silly by smtrembl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, yes, but ALL the money, at least in this case, goes to china. IBM also sold their designs, wich where very good, but I doubt lenovo keeps them for long, or know how to make them evolve like IBM did!

    2. Re:Yes, you're being silly by p0tat03 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Standing up for one's moral convictions is now silly? How far we've fallen...

    3. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do not misunderstand me... I find it great that he does that. However, I fear, he's going to have to stick to his current laptop. There is no was to get a computer that isn't manufactured at least partially in China.

    4. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Applekid · · Score: 1

      Standing up for one's moral convictions is now silly? How far we've fallen... The point was: what's the alternative? Really, I hope the "how far we've fallen" applies to the western world simply allowing a manufacturing mono-culture to exist in China of all places.

      Which, I suppose, was the point of ask.slashdot.org, to ask knowledgeable folks and find an alternative morally compatible laptop to the Thinkpad.
      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    5. Re:Yes, you're being silly by p0tat03 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True, though he can certainly minimize the dollar count going to China. Buying Lenovo would be giving every single dollar of the purchase to a Chinese company (though how they are directly related to the atrocities there... I'd never know), whereas buying, say, Dell, would only be giving manufacturing costs, while R&D remains here.

      As a Chinese-Canadian I'm glad there are people who, at the very least, are willing to think along this guy's lines. There are awful, horrifying things going on in that country and it's nice to see some people who aren't so American-centric they can't point out China on a map, much less the atrocities being committed there.

      As a side note... From my experience, more Americans know about these atrocities than Chinese. It's depressing, really. It's also depressing the number of new Chinese immigrants who are totally blown away by Canada's democratic government, since they thought (or were taught) that they had democracy all along.

    6. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you say something negative for a particular company supported by legions of fanboys? Ah, never mind- I see its marked flamebait. Apple fanboys seem to have taken day off from work today.

    7. Re:Yes, you're being silly by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      no, it's not silly, but in this case where 99% of computers from the major manufacturers are built in china of chinese parts it is quite silly. IBM's thinkpads before they were sold to lenovo were built in china for years, probably in computer sweatshops. sure, the money went to an american company, but that american company sent their work to china.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    8. Re:Yes, you're being silly by bwalling · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do you think the factory workers, or even the management at Lenovo have anything to do with China's military decisions? The US has a behavioral problem as well, do you think that world consumers should punish the people of the US economically because of it? When you boycott an entire country, keep in mind that the employees of the companies are people just like you who are working for a living. "China" is not some collection of a billion evil people shooting at monks - it's a country full of good people working to feed themselves and take care of their families.

    9. Re:Yes, you're being silly by kwanbis · · Score: 2, Informative

      IBM has 20% of Lenovo, so if you buy from them, 20% goes to IBM (more or less). Besides, what development/r&d you really think Dell does on their laptops? If there are any two companies that do research, IMHO, are Lenovo and Apple.

    10. Re:Yes, you're being silly by siufish · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If I disapprove of the war in Iraq, should I go out to buy PS3 instead of xbox? How will this change the course of the government in the United States? You're being delusional if you base your purchases on some imaginary ethical decisions.

      BTW, a Chinese-Canadian to me has no more authority on issues about China than any other Canadian, especially when you (or your father) came from Hong Kong (which I am assuming from the name of your website).

    11. Re:Yes, you're being silly by king-manic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As a side note... From my experience, more Americans know about these atrocities than Chinese. It's depressing, really. It's also depressing the number of new Chinese immigrants who are totally blown away by Canada's democratic government, since they thought (or were taught) that they had democracy all along.

      Depends on where your from, my relatives in Xin Hua and Guangzhou are acutely aware of the deficiencies with their government. They are aware of the bad things that go on but persist to live a quiet live to avoid that trouble. But they're in a different socio economic class then the rest of China. They're owners of factories, doctors, accountants, the upper middle class of china. Their proximity to HK might be part of it too.

      They have had brushes with some of it. My uncle was offered a promotion to Dean of one of the medical schools in the region. He had been a professor for a long time and was about to retire. He smelled a fish and took early retirement instead. Turns out they were attempting to find a scape goat for some embezzlement that happened. The person they did promote was arrested for embezzlement.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    12. Re:Yes, you're being silly by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

      There is no was to get a computer that isn't manufactured at least partially in China.

      Correct me if I'm wring, but isn't a sizable part of the PC manufacturing industry not located in Taiwan ROC, vs "Red China" (Lenovo is in Beijing)? Taiwian may be considered by greater china to be a "Rogue state" within their country, however Taiwan's democratically elected government steadfastly asserts its independence from the communist regime and isn't a likely supporter of the repressive Burmese government. Furthermore there are still a lot of Japanese manufacturers out there, are there not?

      Perhaps there IS not way to avoid purchasing ASAIN-made computer components, however you could greatly reduce and perhaps eliminate the use of those made in communist China..or at LEAST avoid companies that are headquartered there, as Lenovo is.

    13. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in the same boat. I love the specs of the X61 tablet, but refuse to support the Chinese government. If you look it up, you'll find the Chinese government owns 27.5% of the Lenovo(and is the single largest shareholder).

      Even if Dell/HP/whomever are manufactured in China, at least the Chinese government isn't the single largest shareholder. That's a huge difference.

    14. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Knara · · Score: 2, Informative

      ++ this

      Not buying a laptop from a country doesn't hurt the people whose actions you object to, but rather the people who make the laptop (who, by and large, have a way better standard of living working in assembly plants than they did in rural, dirt-poor farms).

    15. Re:Yes, you're being silly by PinkPanther · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Buying Lenovo would be giving every single dollar of the purchase to a Chinese

      And how exactly is it that Lenovo gets the billions of dollars in sales each year out of the U.S. ? Do they go to a bank and ask to deposit the monies into their $CZ account?

      And then there are the Lenovo employees who work in the US, that help get that laptop into the customers' hands. Or does Lenovo ship Chinese workers into the US in order to complete the transactions?

      "Voting with your wallet" works on a local scale, but not on an international scale. And attacking a successful "chinese company" because you do not agree with the policies of the (oppressive) government of China is racist (though I can see why it might not feel that way). Do you think that people should stop buying from Coke, Microsoft, Apple, GM, Ford, yada-yada-yada because they aren't happy with the occupation in Iraq??

      To effect change in China, you need to get your government to push for that change. The reality is that no US government has ever truly set out to do that.

      --
      It's a simple matter of complex programming.
    16. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Roadmaster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Correct me if I'm wring, Um.. I think you are, it should say "wrong". :P

      Nothing's so smiple that it can't be screwed up.

    17. Re:Yes, you're being silly by technomom · · Score: 1

      Then buy a used Thinkpad from someone in the US.

    18. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First: In a democracy it makes perfect sense to punish the people for what the government does. Second they pay taxes, from which weapons are bought. Drinking coke is actually killing innocent people in Iraq.

    19. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From my experience, more Americans know about these atrocities than Chinese.

      Is this too ironic that it might suggest the things Americans "know" is not true? Just a different way to think about the problem.

    20. Re:Yes, you're being silly by p0tat03 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One the truly puzzling things about most Chinese that I meet is there bottomless capacity to defend the snake of a government they have - even the ones that have already immigrated away. I find that the upper-middle class tends to be the worst - the ridiculously rich are too educated to fall for the government's lies, while the poorest suffer too much to believe anything the government says. It's the people who fall down the middle that actually believe the things the government teaches them.

      I've known many Chinese who admit their government's deficiencies, and admit that officials are almost always corrupt and self-serving. But for some reason they still declare their allegiance to the government, claiming that as a Chinese by blood they cannot possibly turn away from the Chinese government. This puzzles me greatly, since I've long ago refused to consider myself a supporter of anything BUT a Western democracy - if the government is shooting your kind by the hundreds, is corrupt, etc etc, what kind of loyalty do you owe to them? It seems very ego-driven, and amounts to stubborn refusal to admit that perhaps the West has a better sociopolitical system.

      In a sick way, it's like Stockholm syndrome... a whole race of people who are culturally conditioned to remain loyal to their government, despite the innumerable atrocities that are committed against them in front of their own eyes.

      As another side note... it's depressing the "history" they learn in their schools...

    21. Re:Yes, you're being silly by thosf · · Score: 0, Troll

      Apparently so. I just noticed (after one posting) that the 'slashdot thought police' have branded me with a karma of "bad". I guess being politically incorrect, bringing truth to a discussion, and causing some people to uncomfortably squirm is a hallmark of being Politically Incorrect (i.e., someone who should be censored).

      I have my own take on this problem of chineeze goods - if you care to listen to someone with "bad" karma...

      First, I'm suprised Lenovo didn't just "copy" the computer and sell it as their own. These days, that's a huge problem that affects us all (just ask the president of Calloway Golf Club company who loses millions because of these low quality chin-eeze knock-offs, the Video and Music industries, and pretty much any industry you can think of.).

      And it's going to get worse when all the auto manufacturers, who are breaking a leg trying to "do business" with these bastards, find out that once these agents of evil reverse-engineer everything, they'll kick out ford, christ-ler, gm, etc. and 'nationalize' all the resources these companies paid to get up and running. What was their thinking anyway - - that they could sell oodles of $50,000 cars to people who the bulk of make about $4,000 a year?? Idiots, they are.

      And to have a totalitarian regime (i.e., chin-a) cop a whine "we can't eliminate all the copying" just doesn't fly. This is the same government that suppresses freedom of speech, freedom of the press, internet freedom and freedom of religion - but can't supress counterfeiting? Ha-roo?

      If I were the President of Callaway, here's what I would do: I'd hire the absolute best counterfeit plate maker to make several common denominations of current chin-eeze currency. Then I'd print about 20 TRILLION DOLLARS worth and hire people to scatter it across their totalitarian-infested country.

      It would be interesting to see how the chin-eeze government likes being on the receiving end of counterfeiting - especially if it has the potential to topple their government financially. Interestingly, there appears to be no law that specifically bans producing counterfeit currency of totalitarian regimes. Of course our government would probably issue a canned response that would "sternly object to this type of behavior from its citizens."

      Gee, for about twenty thousand dollars, someone could financially topple an evil empire (greenpeace, are you listening??)

      Perhaps the chin-eeze government should consider making knock-off condums. Come to think of it, they may already have done so - that's why they're so overpopulated.

    22. Re:Yes, you're being silly by _Qiang_ · · Score: 0

      er. give me a break. chinese people know what they are having in china are not democracy. and Chinese know more about U.S or just the western countries more than western people know about China.

      it still surprised me that the western people think china is still a fucking cave that nobody knows what's going on in the outside world.

    23. Re:Yes, you're being silly by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I don't think it is silly. But probably misplaced.
      You will have little choice but to buy a notebook that is made in China. Buying from a company other than Lenovo is probably a good idea since less of the profit will got to China.
      However this is probably more of a single act that in the long run means very little. If you are going to do this then you should also make the effort to not buy clothing made in China. Food made in China. Toys made in China and so one.
      Frankly compared to everything else that the Chinese government has done the shooting the monks is just isn't that big of a deal. In the grand scheme of things where he buys a notebook computer from will mean very little in the balance of good vs bad in the world.
      To make a real difference volunteer for Habitat for Humanity, Big Brother/Big Sisters, or some other group of your choice.
      Somehow I just don't see taking the small amount of time to state how out raged you are on Slashdot and then picking a different company to buy a notebook from as "Standing up for one's moral convictions". I don't find it silly but it is at best in the category of "It is the least that I could do".

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    24. Re:Yes, you're being silly by king-manic · · Score: 4, Insightful



      One the truly puzzling things about most Chinese that I meet is there bottomless capacity to defend the snake of a government they have - even the ones that have already immigrated away. I find that the upper-middle class tends to be the worst - the ridiculously rich are too educated to fall for the government's lies, while the poorest suffer too much to believe anything the government says. It's the people who fall down the middle that actually believe the things the government teaches them.

      I've known many Chinese who admit their government's deficiencies, and admit that officials are almost always corrupt and self-serving. But for some reason they still declare their allegiance to the government, claiming that as a Chinese by blood they cannot possibly turn away from the Chinese government. This puzzles me greatly, since I've long ago refused to consider myself a supporter of anything BUT a Western democracy - if the government is shooting your kind by the hundreds, is corrupt, etc etc, what kind of loyalty do you owe to them? It seems very ego-driven, and amounts to stubborn refusal to admit that perhaps the West has a better sociopolitical system.

      In a sick way, it's like Stockholm syndrome... a whole race of people who are culturally conditioned to remain loyal to their government, despite the innumerable atrocities that are committed against them in front of their own eyes.

      As another side note... it's depressing the "history" they learn in their schools...


      It's not just a Chinese thing. Everybody will carry some portion of the place they grew up with them. It's part of who they are and they are part of that too. So when you attack someones homeland it's partially an attack on them (or so they perceive). Unless the party that is being attacked hurt them directly they will usually try to defend or justify it.

      It's not just countries but any affiliation. The foaming at the mouth republicans and democrats who defend their side against all logic. The Reform, NDP, Bloc, Liberal supporters here in Canada who will rationalize everything about their party. It's not the nature of just Chinese people. It's people as a whole will defend what ever they have some investment in. China does horrible things but the odds of you getting caught up in one of those things are small. Just as Canada and the US have done some pretty bad things but by and large most people been a part of that. Forced sterilization, internment camps, gitmo, Arar, Chinese head tax, residential schools, successful native American genocide, etc.. The difference is after the fact we can talk about it while in china talking about it too publically will often get you in toruble.

      Thus Chinese aren't unique in lamenting that they don't really have a democracy but will say it isn't that bad. Which for a large majority of Chinese is true. The current Gov is better then any china has ever had. But the bar isn't as high as the West.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    25. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is a communist state. Most Chinese businesses are owned by the Chinese government. Boycotting Chinese businesses because of the actions of the government makes perfect sense, because they are one and the same. Furthermore, a large enough boycott of Chinese businesses might be enough to cause Chinese businesses to revolt against the government. But this would probably take a simultaneous embargo against China by the US, Europe, and Japan.

      On the other hand, Lenovo is an oddity. They are registered in Hong Kong as an independent corporation, but their headquarters is in Beijing.

    26. Re:Yes, you're being silly by tloh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Taking a stand should always be applauded as an act of courage. However, I think brandishing one's wallet in this case is a hollow gesture that is far from the impact a real nerd can make on these events. Money comes and goes but knowledge and information moves the spirit and changes regimes. I think it would be far more effective for those of us with the technical know-how to exercise our convictions by aiding those inside Burma to get the word out(and in) by circumventing the censorship that has been put in place by the Junta. The monks and other who've been arrested (or killed) are not going to be relieved if China sells one less laptop. But realization the world over (including Burma's own citizens) of what is going on will make it that much harder for the military to wield legitimate power.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    27. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Kohath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Standing up for one's moral convictions is now silly?

      - If they're silly morals, then yes.
      - If "standing up" means doing something that makes you feel good, hurts people who weren't involved, and has no affect on the people who were involved, then yes.
      - If you need to announce on a web site how virtuous you are for your so-called morals, then yes.
      - If you don't care when people do bad things, but you pretend to care when the news media tells you to care, then yes.

      In other words, it seems like you have "standing up for one's moral convictions" confused with shallow media-influenced groupthink, politics, hand wringing, feel-good symbolism, and public self-congratulation.

      This is the modern substitute for morals and values that doesn't require actually believing in anything or making any hard choices -- just follow the crowd and say the words the press tells you to say.

    28. Re:Yes, you're being silly by PFAK · · Score: 0

      Just as Canada and the US have done some pretty bad things but by and large most people been a part of that. Forced sterilization, internment camps, gitmo, Arar, Chinese head tax, residential schools, successful native American genocide, etc..

      The difference is, most of those things were done in the past, when the country was young. The chinese government does not have the excuse of being young or having these actions done in the past.

      --

      Free means no restrictions, ironic the FSF's GPL forces restrictions, isn't it? What's your definition of free?
    29. Re:Yes, you're being silly by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well, yes, but ALL the money, at least in this case, goes to china

      Of course not. Unless you mail order it from Beijing. Where are you going to buy it? In the US. At least half the money will stay in the US. From Wikipedia

      Its executive headquarters are located in Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, the home of IBM's former ThinkPad group, and in Beijing, China. It is incorporated in Hong Kong. As of May 31, 2007, 39.6% of Lenovo is owned by public shareholders, 42.4% by Legend Holdings Limited, 7.9% by IBM and 10.1% by Texas Pacific Group, General Atlantic LLC and Newbridge Capital LLC. Because the Chinese Academy of Sciences, a Chinese government agency, owns 65% of Legend Holdings, effectively the Chinese government owns about 27.5% of Lenovo and is the largest shareholder.
      Buy a second-hand Thinkpad in the US, then 100% of your cash will stay here.
    30. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "As a very happy Thinkpad T20 user (still working after 7 years), I always planned on replacing it with another Thinkpad T-series. However, Thinkpads are now produced by Lenovo, a Chinese company, and I can't quite bear to buy Chinese while the Bush administration prolong the oil seeking war in IRAQ. US military are shooting at insurgents with the Chinese Government as their biggest backer as they are the biggest US Treasury Bond buyer. Maybe this is silly, as whatever I buy is likely to be made (at least in part) in China... but still, what are my options for something as well built as the Thinkpad T-series?"

    31. Re:Yes, you're being silly by wellingj · · Score: 1

      What you say sounds good, but in these days trade is the ultimate diplomatic tool and you would be a fool not to voice your opinion with your money because that's the only thing people listen to any more.

    32. Re:Yes, you're being silly by marimbaman · · Score: 1

      The US has a behavioral problem as well, do you think that world consumers should punish the people of the US economically because of it?

      Well.... YES.

    33. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      When you boycott an entire country, keep in mind that the employees of the companies are people just like you who are working for a living.
      google banality of evil or just realize that no snowflake in an avalanche feels responsible can lead to bad results.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    34. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Omega996 · · Score: 1

      Is it standing up, though? The Original Poster mentions that he/she knows that any computing device is going to be at least assembled with Chinese parts, but he'd prefer not to purchase a Lenovo laptop, since it's made in China. WTF? I fail to see the difference WRT components vs. assembly - if it's important that the device is made in China, then it should be important whether the components are from there, as well. In for a penny, in for a pound, don't you think?
      This sounds like pseudo-activist posturing to show how hip, cool, and socially-conscious the OP is. Picture him/her at his fave corporate-overlord coffee shop, chatting up his/her mates about how he/she REFUSED to buy a Thinkpad, because it was made in China, as he/she surfs on his/her new Toshiba, HP, Dell, MacBook, etc... to help 'Free Tibet'. is there a difference?
      If his/her convictions draw the line at 'assembled in', but 'assembly contains parts from' is ok, then doesn't that sound less like conviction and more like posturing to you? Sounds like bullshit to me.

      I have a Lenovo Thinkpad T61, in the interests of full disclosure ;)

    35. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is that most of them defend the government only when they are talking to foreigners, because of silly national pride. I am Chinese and personally know few supporters of our government.

    36. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      "Voting with your wallet" works on a local scale, but not on an international scale. And attacking a successful "chinese company" because you do not agree with the policies of the (oppressive) government of China is racist That's a load of crap.

      Do you think that people should stop buying from Coke, Microsoft, Apple, GM, Ford, yada-yada-yada because they aren't happy with the occupation in Iraq?? Yes, as a matter of fact, I do. And it's already happened; the popularity of American 'cultural exports' (which includes movies and music as well as luxury goods like branded soft drinks) has taken a hit in some parts of the world due to the sinking popularity of the U.S. That's part of how the market works, and it's one of the reasons why there's a lot of anti-Bush sentiment in Hollywood (and was even before it became really cool to be anti-Bush); foreign-policy bungling costs them big bucks on the international market.

      I'm really glad that the OP is taking a stand for something he believes in; just by doing that he's head and shoulders above most of America. Although a single person's actions might be insignificant, if more people avoided Chinese-branded (or if they can, Chinese-made generally), in favor of Korean, Taiwanese, Japanese, etc., or even domestic products, it might give them a bit of a wake-up call, particularly since it would directly affect the businessmen and factory-owners who hold real power there.
      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    37. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 2, Funny
      What?!! You're thinking logically and taking actual facts into account? What are you, nuts? You're crazy! If we all get together and paint a mural with happy things like flowers and butterflies, everything will be whole again. It will be healed. Democracy will sprout. People will be liberated.

      Just imagine how beautiful the world would be if people stopped buying laptops made in China! Their repressive regime would magically vanish! It would inspire the feudal quasi-dictatorships of the rest of Asia, Latin America, Africa, and Eurasia to also disappear, and a New Age of peace and happiness would reign!

      Blah blah blah. Good look having anyone pay attention to you. You're being reasonable and realistic, and therefore boring and politically incorrect.

    38. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      You're making a very bad assumption that the poster doesn't already do those things you mentioned in addition to finding an alternative supplier for laptops. This person is also raising the issue in a public forum raising awareness and asking questions which is only considered a good thing. I don't think it's misplaced at all, I just think there's no choice. If you buy one laptop from Lenovo and it lasts you 7 more years that is less money to the Chinese government than 7 laptops from another manufacturer because it doesn't last as long.

      Ultimately when dealing with an International entity you have very little choice individually but when you raise the issue in a public forum you get other people thinking, a million people making the same decision will make a noticeable difference. Will it effect the Chinese government's policies? Of course not but it's better than condoning it outright. If the whole world did it then maybe some officials would change their minds.

      Some others have raised the issue attempting to turn the tables on Americans. If you don't agree with the government then of course exercise the only vote you have from far away. The wallet is a powerful force for change when organized and used responsibly.

      Of course one need only look at the diamond trade to see that it is most definitely not an easy task to sway people from their actions by not purchasing their exports. So perhaps it is silly afterall.

    39. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      1) Lenovo is 100% "mainland China" controlled. Apparently it has quite a few direct connections to the political parties in power.
      2) Many computer designers/manufacturers have headquarters/engineers in Taiwan but manufacturing facilities are often on the mainland.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    40. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Mitreya · · Score: 1
      I got a Fujitsu a few days ago. I am sure some of it was built in China, but it was certainly assembled in and shipped from Japan.

      Very happy with it, too...

    41. Re:Yes, you're being silly by drix · · Score: 1

      Do you think the factory workers, or even the management at Lenovo have anything to do with China's military decisions? Yes. China's military goals are dictated by the same thing as those of the US: money. Nearly every geopolitical or military event occurring in the world today can be traced directly back to economic motives. In the case of Myanmar, it's energy. Happy dictators in Burma means more natural gas for China means more electricity for Lenovo.

      The US has a behavioral problem as well, do you think that world consumers should punish the people of the US economically because of it? Yes. And, before you ask, I am an American born and raised.

      "China" is not some collection of a billion evil people shooting at monks - it's a country full of good people working to feed themselves and take care of their families. I certainly agree with that. And for the most part, Americans are too. But in both cases their leadership is rife with corruption and greed, and harbors a rather flagrant disregard for human rights and the suffering of others. The reason they are able to get away with this is because a growing number of people in both countries are wealthy and complacent. Certainly the masses you speak of bear no direct responsibility for the actions of their country. But we are all indirectly culpable through our inaction. Hitting the only place people seem to care about--the bank account--seems to be the only way to wake anyone up.
      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    42. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I chat regularly with a Chinese woman at a partner company of ours. I can assure you that she knows exactly (and most Chinese do) that they have zero democracy and are heavily lied to. (Sound familiar?)

    43. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      I've got a Fujitsu-Siemens myself... Gonna check when I'm home....

    44. Re:Yes, you're being silly by HiThere · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      O, how I wish that weren't accurate.

      Still, it does put a slightly different frame on the question. If you save money, the US govt gets a rake off. If you spend money, the US govt gets a rake off. And the US Govt is much more directly involved in atrocities than the Chinese govt. (Well, at least in the ones mentioned. I'm sure you can find other examples...but then so could I, on both sides.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    45. Re:Yes, you're being silly by StarWreck · · Score: 1

      I understand that in the 50's and 60's that Japan only produced cheap, low-quality, and non-technological goods. Then they started producing goods that were comparable in quality and in cost by purchasing liscenses to American technology (ie Color TV). Thats when they started pulling a dirty trick to take over the market. The Japanese market became very patriotic at this time and refused to buy anything not made in Japan. Japanese companies took advantage of this by using their own people to subsidize their products sold in America. Products like Color TV's that were sold for the same price in both Japan and in America were now sold for half-price in America and double the price in Japan. Selling at half-price in the USA allowed Japanese companies to take over the entire market. Soon Japan took over technologically too as they were able to produce the first affordable and reasonably sized VCR's (American VCR's were thousands of dollars and the size of a refridgerator). They were able to copy this success with hundreds of types of products including Cars. Think about this though, Japan has a significantly smaller population than the USA and they were able to pull this off. China has a population more than 3 times as large. If China is at the point Japan was in maybe the 70's, what happens to the USA when China reaches the point Japan was in in the 80's and 90's? Will the USA even matter anymore? Being patriotic and only purchasing local goods may have allowed Japanese companies to rip off Japanese consumers in the short-term but it worked out for the Japanese people in the long term. Maybe copying the Japanese form of patriotism is the only chance we have.



      p.s. It was only American/Canadian innovators like those at the now defunct Commodore company that were able to keep the Japanese out of the personal computer market as long as they were by beating them to the CHEAPER punch by producing the VIC-20 with color and sound for $300, shortly followed by the Commodore 64 with more memory, better graphics, and better sound than any computer even planned at the time for only $600.

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    46. Re:Yes, you're being silly by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      communist China..or at LEAST avoid companies that are headquartered there, as Lenovo is.

      Actually, Lenovo's executive headquarters are located in Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, the home of IBM's former ThinkPad group.

    47. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Do you think that people should stop buying from Coke, Microsoft, Apple, GM, Ford, yada-yada-yada because they aren't happy with the occupation in Iraq??

      Yes, people in other countries should stop buying American products, since this would influence Coke, Microsoft, etc. to get the politicians in their pockets to end the war. America is, de facto, ruled by corporations; you must influence the corporations to influence the nation. (Or, we could have massive economic and political reform that returns control to the citizens. Good luck with that.)

      More so, we should stop buying from companies that use prison labor,whether in China or in the U.S..

      Lenovo probably has much less influence on the Chinese government than Microsoft has on the U.S. government, so the first point probably applies much less to Chinese companies. I don't know about Lenovo's involvement with prison labor.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    48. Re:Yes, you're being silly by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Perhaps in Canada you can say "These things were mostly done in the past". I haven't looked into the matter. In the US we can't even say "We're only doing it to foreigners.".

      You can't go entirely by the fraction of the population in prison...but that's a strong indicator. And by THAT indicator the US is the worst country on the planet. (Still...that's only one metric, even though it is an important one.) If a large percentage of the population is in prison, then people are either rather unhappy with the government, or the govenment is using prison as a source of "temporary" slaves. Or, of course, both.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    49. Re:Yes, you're being silly by alienw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you have so much trouble understanding this stuff, then just look at the US. How many people voted to re-elect Bush, even after seeing how incompetent he was? You don't think it's the same phenomenon?

    50. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they are being silly standing up for the citizens of Burma because most of our electronics products are made in Taiwan which wants to be independent of china and should be! Our clothes made in mainland china. and if you can find something not made in china give it a few years and it might be, just look at your former American car maker Chrysler for example.
      Why should you be concerned? Because workers rights are so far lagging they have to take a few steps up to be called horrible.
      China could address this issue but the corruption of the local governments are so bad they will not.

      Good luck China you forgot one basic principle about governing your people and it is "Our land"!
      TSS

    51. Re:Yes, you're being silly by griffjon · · Score: 1

      Depends on how you count Taiwan; AsusTek and Quanta both manufacture laptops for Dell and Apple (among others) and are Taiwanese. Now, they may farm components out to the mainland. Quanta itself has something like 1/3rd of the mfg market for laptops.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    52. Re:Yes, you're being silly by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      > do you think that world consumers should punish the people of the US economically because of it?

      They don't have to. Bush is doing it all for us.

    53. Re:Yes, you're being silly by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      60 years, in a civilization that has been around for millenia? The Communists certainly are a "young" government. Most of the things you point out as happening in the "past" took place well outside the first 60 years of America.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    54. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the original poster should take it one step further. If a company doesn't know why potential clients are burying elsewhere, they will have no reason to change their policies or to try to influence policies of the countries in which they are established. Asking questions about child labour, for instance, forces some companies to come clean and to adopt a policy to prevent child labour. It's not perfect, but it's a step in the right direction.

    55. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Best for minimizing cost going to China is http://www.unionbuiltpc.com/home.php, their laptop sources American made parts first, free world parts second, Chinese parts last.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    56. Re:Yes, you're being silly by pitu · · Score: 1

      I can't quite bear to buy Chinese while the Burmese military are shooting at monks with the Chinese Government as their biggest backer. hehe right, how can you bear buying US stuff then ?!
    57. Re:Yes, you're being silly by mike260 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And ignore IBM's role in the Holocaust?

    58. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Wolvey · · Score: 1

      Parent says: "China" is not some collection of a billion evil people shooting at monks. Damn, that was funny. That is all.

    59. Re:Yes, you're being silly by LokiSnake · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wong,

      There, fixed that for you.
    60. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, Thinkpads are now produced by Lenovo, a HUMAN company, and I can't quite bear to buy HUMAN-made while HUMANS are shooting at monks with the HUMANS as their biggest backer.

    61. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buying Lenovo would be giving every single dollar of the purchase to a Chinese company

      Not true. The LCD is the single most expensive part of the machine and, up until recently, all LCDs were manufactured in Taiwan (hoo boy...I don't want to get into that political issue...) or possibly Japan. Ditto for most of the other discrete electronics. Most of the logistics are still done by the best middlemen in the world: shipping, billing, legal: all USA. If they are smart, they are probably doing like everyone else there too and outsourcing a lot of the design work to Europe.

      As for Burma, I would have to say that they are doing a much better job of sorting out their corrupt leadership than, for example, China itself and the USA. In that region, if you've lost the monks, you've lost the people. This one is all but over.

    62. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather buy a laptop from Hu Jintao directly than from an American union.

      That's why I buy a new Nissan Titan every 3 years.

    63. Re:Yes, you're being silly by The+Assistant · · Score: 0

      Now, now...

      If you have something to say, just say it!!

    64. Re:Yes, you're being silly by thegnu · · Score: 1

      It's not just a Chinese thing. Everybody will carry some portion of the place they grew up with them. It's part of who they are and they are part of that too. So when you attack someones homeland it's partially an attack on them (or so they perceive). Unless the party that is being attacked hurt them directly they will usually try to defend or justify it.

      An interesting aside is that I noticed while growing up in Mexico that while the Mexicans have the same response to people belittling their country, the majority of their pride is with the people, not the government. I've thought a lot about this (hooray for me!), and I think it must be from the way their fight for freedom went.

      In brief, it's a story of the corrupt government fighting the heroes of the revolution, most of whom were killed. Hidalgo, for example, was a priest involved in a conspiracy to fight the government. The typical image of Hidalgo is him ringing the church bell signalling to conspirators that they government was coming to put the resistance down. Thus ensued a bloody (I imagine fairly brief) battle, and Hidalgo and co. were lined up in front of a wall and shot. Jose Maria Morelos was president, and during a coup, he fled into the wilderness, where he stayed for several years. Los Ninos Heroes (the Hero Children) were six teenage military cadets who died defending their country from the US. The indians--armed with sticks and machetes--ran the French Army out of the country.

      Even in the 5th grade textbooks they paint Carranza as a cruel dictator, but also laud him for building all the railroads.

      Mexicans sort of assume their government isn't watching out for them. Salinas embezzled (in the 90s) so much money from the country that the peso devalued about 1000 fold. They have no illusions as to the intentions of those in power.

      I think this is much more healthy than the view that, while the great leaders of China, Egypt, Greece, Rome, Italy, Russia, Germany, Britain, France, Spain, Japan, Korea, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Oprah etc are vile power-hungry murdering thieves, our government loves and cherishes us.
      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    65. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This gets modded insightful? What the crap?! That's like comparing George Bush to Hitler, Stalin, or Mao.

    66. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think the factory workers, or even the management at Lenovo have anything to do with China's military decisions?


      Do you think that the Chinese government is going to do anything to change their ways if all we do is wag our fingers at them as we continue to hand over our money? I assume that you wouldn't be willing to start an armed conflict, so what other recourse is there? I don't buy from companies that have bad business practices, even though the front-line workers have no say in those things. I treat countries the same. If you won't vote with your dollars, then you are telling them that it is okay.

      The US has a behavioral problem as well, do you think that world consumers should punish the people of the US economically because of it?


      Yes. How else are we going to get them to demand that their government behave?
    67. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Hey, if you like supporting a lack of human rights and like being a traitor to your neighbors, go ahead- but remember that your own job is supported by the consumers that you're putting out of work.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    68. Re:Yes, you're being silly by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      As a side note... From my experience, more Americans know about these atrocities than Chinese. It's depressing, really. It's also depressing the number of new Chinese immigrants who are totally blown away by Canada's democratic government, since they thought (or were taught) that they had democracy all along.
      What was depressing to me was talking to a senior java developer at my company, who immigrated to the US from China several years ago for college. Her father is some type of government figure there (well connected to the corrupt government I guess) and when I asked her what her thoughts were on Tiananmen square, she thought it was merely some low life rioters that had to be put down because they were causing problems. It just goes to show how the educational system and media which are state controlled can completely brainwash people into believing they live in a free country, when in fact, they do not. I had to stop talking with her about politics and other issues like that because it became obvious that there was some mental disconnect. She didn't want to hear about the human rights abuses perpetrated by the country that she most likely still feels is her home. I think it's sad really, and she has a husband and her newborn child will probably grow up speaking only chinese at home and believing the same lies about the Chinese government.

      I'm encouraged to hear from people like you that seem to be the opposite, and have realized the Chinese government is not a democracy, as much as they pretend to be.
      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    69. Re:Yes, you're being silly by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Do you think the factory workers, or even the management at Lenovo have anything to do with China's military decisions?


      Employees? Maybe not. Owners? Definitely. Since, you know, the Chinese Government is one of those. Punishing the Chinese government for the actions of the Chinese Government seems pretty reasonable by any standard.

      The US has a behavioral problem as well, do you think that world consumers should punish the people of the US economically because of it?


      The US is prone to adopt economic sanctions banning trade with entities associated with governments whose actions it disapproves of. Why shouldn't individuals treat the US the same way the US treats other nations?

      When you boycott an entire country, keep in mind that the employees of the companies are people just like you who are working for a living.


      So are the people I give my business to instead of those in the country I'm boycotting. So what?

    70. Re:Yes, you're being silly by dave562 · · Score: 1

      To a certain extent I'm sure that they are proud to just be Chinese and be members of one of the oldest civilizations on the planet. They can trace their roots back through numerous dynasties (Ming, Han, Chou, etc.) Their government may suck right now, but their culture is extremely deep and rich.

    71. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why dont you go live in china then if you want to support their economy. Personally I beleive in personal freedom and the Americans in this country are so complacent with "well what can I do about it". This country once was great, powerful and self-sustaining but not anymore! Between greed and glunty this country is going to hell in a hand basket thanks to people like you. I dont care about world Economy I care about the US economy. BUY AMERICAN ONLY!

    72. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One the truly puzzling things about most Americans that I meet is there bottomless capacity to defend the snake of a government they have - even the ones that have already immigrated away. I find that the upper-middle class tends to be the worst - the ridiculously rich are too educated to fall for the government's lies, while the poorest suffer too much to believe anything the government says. It's the people who fall down the middle that actually believe the things the government teaches them.

      I've known many Americans who admit their government's deficiencies, and admit that officials are almost always corrupt and self-serving. But for some reason they still declare their allegiance to the government, claiming that as a American by blood they cannot possibly turn away from the American government. This puzzles me greatly, since I've long ago refused to consider myself a supporter of anything BUT a [non-imperialist] Western democracy - if the government is shooting [people in entirely different countries] by the hundreds, is corrupt, etc etc, what kind of loyalty do you owe to them? It seems very ego-driven, and amounts to stubborn refusal to admit that perhaps the West has [an awful] sociopolitical system.

      In a sick way, it's like Stockholm syndrome... a whole race of people who are culturally conditioned to remain loyal to their government, despite the innumerable atrocities that are committed against [countries thousands of miles away from them] in front of their own eyes.

      As another side note... it's depressing the "history" they learn in their schools...

      -----------

      Not my actual opinion but really a rationalization of how some people could be duped by their own government into believing *their* way is not the wrong way

    73. Re:Yes, you're being silly by KLizard · · Score: 1

      And it's ok if just some of the money goes to China? How much is the "ethical tax"?

    74. Re:Yes, you're being silly by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      One word: Extradition.

      Causing enough economic trouble to force a nation of a billion people to seriously consider going to war if you're not extradited is likely to stamp your Chinese Organ Donor card pretty quickly. Even if the US doesn't have any treaties specifically stating cooperation on counterfeiting, and has in general a policy of forbidding extradition to China.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    75. Re:Yes, you're being silly by HexaByte · · Score: 1
      It's not just a Chinese thing. Everybody will carry some portion of the place they grew up with them. It's part of who they are and they are part of that too. So when you attack someones homeland it's partially an attack on them (or so they perceive). Unless the party that is being attacked hurt them directly they will usually try to defend or justify it.

      Not everyone. My grandmother immigrated form the Austro-Hungarian Empire in the early 1900's. Whenever someone talked about how "x" was better where they came from, her reply was always the same: "You like the Old Country so much, you go back to the Old Country! We're Americans now!"

      This was despite the fact that here English reading comprehension was so poor that she and my Great Aunt would sit together in Church with their German Bibles to catch the full meaning of the passages read!

      --
      HexaByte - he's a square and a half!
    76. Re:Yes, you're being silly by spitek · · Score: 1

      When IBM sold the ThinkPad and ThinkCenter lines to Lenovo a group of 30 or so engineers in move over and are now Lenovo employees. Do you really think IBM would sell their name to a company that wouldnt keep on innovating? Lenovo was smart enough to buy these lines from IBM, they are now, what number 3 or 4 as far as PC sales in the world, and not keep the ball rolling. I think the answer is no. For one reason. To much money to be made. Just got keep making it a little bit better. Name reconition etc etc is alteady there. Also I have personally bought two Lenovo workstations and one IBM ThinkCenter M55p over the last six months. Great machines. The ThinkCenter is the quitist desktop I have ever owned and I got a pile, well a whole storage room with many piles.. :)

    77. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The first line of the text you linked to reads, "The neutrality and factual accuracy of this section are disputed." and yet someone saw fit to mark this post as "Insightful".

      Amazing.

    78. Re:Yes, you're being silly by darkshadow · · Score: 1

      Too rich to be able to afford to piss off the government and to poor to be able to ignore the government?

      --
      -Darkshadow (There was a thing called Heaven; but all the same they used to drink enormous quantities of alcohol.)
    79. Re:Yes, you're being silly by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      If I disapprove of the war in Iraq, should I go out to buy PS3 instead of xbox?

      If you feel very strongly about the issue, then yes.

      How will this change the course of the government in the United States?

      Less money for Microsoft equals less taxation for the US regime equals less funds available for the occupation of Iraq. One less xbox doesn't make much difference, but if large numbers of people decided to buy Japanese machines in protest against America's behaviour then it might indeed get noticed.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    80. Re:Yes, you're being silly by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Notice that I didn't say it was silly. I maybe jaded from personal experience but all too often I see people thinking that by putting a Free Tibet bumper sticker on their car that they are making a difference.
      Oh and the diamond thing... Man did I get into hot water over that. Back when I was getting engaged my wife got made at me for asking where the diamonds on the rings came from. Then when they asked my why did I care I told the people in the stores in great detail why I wouldn't buy designer coal that cost people their lives. She is a sweet woman she was right in that the person at the store really has no control over where the diamonds came from. She was very happy when a store that only sells Canadian diamonds opened near us :(

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    81. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (1) You have to be blind to think Bush is incompetent, and (2) at least we didn't have to suffer at the hands of the two morally bankrupt imbeciles who opposed him in two separate elections. Thank goodness the political process works. With the notable exception of 1992 and 1996, that is. That still leaves me wondering how gullible folks can be.

    82. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      My Asus G1S says "Made in Taiwan" on the back.

      I think most Taiwanese manufacturers could sell you a computer which was designed and assembled in Taiwan rather than the PRC if you asked them - they take the difference very seriously indeed. And nothing annoys the Chinese government more than Taiwan.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    83. Re:Yes, you're being silly by xappax · · Score: 1

      "Voting with your wallet" works on a local scale, but not on an international scale.

      Yeah, that whole movement to divest from South Africa was a total waste of time. As if we could end apartheid in a foreign nation just by being responsible and ethical about who we give our money!

    84. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To help you solve your puzzle, you don't understand the unique Chinese history
      and culture because you make too many assumptions based on western civilization.
      And no, it is not like Stockholm syndrome.

    85. Re:Yes, you're being silly by mkmccarty · · Score: 1

      I think you have it wrong, those were all votes against Kerry.

    86. Re:Yes, you're being silly by triso · · Score: 1

      Liberal attitudes like that will get you nowhere in the computer world.

    87. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you don't get to be upper middle class (or even lower middle class) in China without being complicit in that government. Even the grandparet poster's family.

    88. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many people voted to re-elect Bush, even after seeing how incompetent he was?

      Interesting perspective, do you also believe that anyone that doesn't share your opinions is ignorant of the 'facts'. How do you fit all of that ego into such a tiny head?

    89. Re:Yes, you're being silly by xappax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, facts and reason, and also logic! For example, logically why should we care about those people when they're way over in some other country and don't even speak American? And what's reasonable about withholding funding from institutions who rely on funding to do unethical things? If people just looked at facts more, they'd see that all the facts say I should buy whatever I want from China, supplying their government with tax money to build up their oppressive military and propaganda efforts! Factually! Furthermore, people who take personal responsibility to do their part to end fascism and repression are air-headed hippies, and probably smoke the dope!


      See? I can sarcastically mis-characterize and exaggerate your argument too. And no, it doesn't add anything to the discussion because we're just inventing caricatured positions to argue against. It may be easier and more fun to diss imaginary "nutjobs", but it doesn't accomplish anything but turning what could be reasonable, constructive discourse into an episode of the Jerry Springer show.

    90. Re:Yes, you're being silly by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes it's in dispute because IBM doesn't like their history. Here's a photo of your "disputed text" in the holocaust museum:

      http://www.ushmm.org/outreach/9048-1.htm

      You're a cocksucker, but there's a cure. Handguns are cheap and plentiful. Buy one and drill a hole in your head asshole puppyfucker.

    91. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Your point would be what?

    92. Re:Yes, you're being silly by gentlemen_loser · · Score: 1

      Do you think that people should stop buying from Coke, Microsoft, Apple, GM, Ford, yada-yada-yada because they aren't happy with the occupation in Iraq??

      Yes. And I say that as an American citizen. Perhaps if the individuals or entities with the most money and thereby direct access to leadership in Washington felt the international communities displeasure with American foreign policy, change could be effected. Same goes for Chinese corporations.

    93. Re:Yes, you're being silly by mistahkurtz · · Score: 1

      Dell? R&D? Are you serious?

      --
      not only is time travel possible, it's irrelevant.
    94. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... but their culture is extremely deep and rich.

      I get so damned tired of all this crap about how very deep Chinese culture is (5000 years, blah, blah) and how it is therefore to be respected and revered. So why, with all this time in the past to have evolved into a superior society, can they still commit atrocities as were seen in the cultural revolution? What the hell were they doing all those centuries?

      No matter how they tidy things up for the Olympics, remember -- they're still using their new railroad to inject massive numbers of ethnic Chinese into Tibet, so they'll eventually have a majority which, in a "democratic" vote, will elect to consider themselves a part of the vicious, culture-destroying motherland.

      Despite all the history, and for all their "culture", they're still savages.

    95. Re:Yes, you're being silly by hey! · · Score: 1

      How many people voted to re-elect Bush, even after seeing how incompetent he was?


      Interesting question, but first we'll have to figure out how many people voted to re-elect Bush before we can speculate on their motives.
      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    96. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Grave · · Score: 1

      At the risk of being modded off-topic for biting at this bait...

      That's not at all how it works. Corporate America collectively pays only about $200 billion in taxes. That's nowhere near as much as private citizens pay. Now, if large numbers of people insist on continuing to buy foreign goods instead of domestically produced products (as is the current trend), those corporations you seek to injure will simply close down production facilities here and outsource production, or go out of business entirely. Either way, they will cease to employ Americans. Those people will then collect unemployment and stop paying taxes. In case you hadn't noticed, the federal budget runs at a deficit anyway, so reducing tax revenue isn't going to magically stop the war. Only Congress has the authority to control where the money (whether it exists or not) is spent, and they have thus far been unable to utilize that ability for anything other than increasing minimum wage.

      Now, if you believe that increasing unemployment is going to somehow stop the war in Iraq, then you should probably evaluate very carefully what your priorities are. Improving and securing our domestic economy is pretty damn important to me and all the other folks out there trying to make ends meet in a nation that increasingly buys Chinese-made goods. Large numbers of people already decided to buy Japanese machines instead of American ones in just about every electronic and automotive market segment during the past thirty years, resulting in considerable loss of jobs and economic damage to the long-term security of the country.

      It's also quite important that we make sure the mess we are in with Iraq does not become a quagmire like Vietnam, but also that it does not become a problem in the future. Like it or not, we are now stuck with the consequences of our actions in Iraq. If we abandon them right now and bring our troops home, we'll just see the country collapse into further chaos (yes, that is easily possible).

      If you feel very strongly about the issue of Iraq, write your elected leaders, stage a protest rally, or campaign for office yourself. Attempting to somehow affect that situation by enacting personal economic sanctions against your own people only makes you look woefully ignorant of the situation.

      To be briefly on-topic, there is almost nothing electronic in the world that doesn't have some part produced in China, but the lower the Chinese content, the better. Automobiles are required to have domestic-vs-foreign content notices on their window stickers. To my knowledge, there is no such information available for consumer electronics aside from "Made in x" being stamped on it somewhere. Given the global nature of our economy, having that kind of information would be pretty helpful for a lot of people.

    97. Re:Yes, you're being silly by DELNI-AA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Replace all: "Chinese" for "American". Any difference in a post War-on-Iraq world?

    98. Re:Yes, you're being silly by cicho · · Score: 1

      Read "IBM And the Holocaust" by Edwin Black, then figure out for yourself if "neutrality and factual accuracy" of the piece in Wikipedia is in fact debatable. The fact that someone tagged a section that way means maybe that person also needs to read this book.

      --
      "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
    99. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. My family is the same way about India. They enjoy the occasional trip back to see relatives and obviously miss their places of birth and early life, but they badmouth the current government and culture all the time. My grandpa's only regret in life is that he didn't immigrate earlier.

      Believe it or not, a lot of people have enough sense about them to be able to tell when their situation has improved. But I can still understand national pride, even in immigrants out of the country.

    100. Re:Yes, you're being silly by capnal · · Score: 1

      Corporations don't pay taxes. People pay taxes. Taxes are just another cost that gets passed on to the consumer. I would recommend people look into the FairTax which would make it much clearer what and when we all pay taxes in the U.S. Plus, removing the inefficiency of embedded taxes in products of these companies would make them that much more competitive against overseas competition here and abroad. Not to mention numerous other benefits.... More at http://fairtax.org/

    101. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      There's a great program for the Mac called Coconut Identity Card that tells you where your Apple gear is from (computers and iPods).

      It tells me my PowerBook was made in Taiwan. Something my wife had (iBook maybe?) was made in Ireland. Her iPod is from Shanghai, though.

      There's stuff out there, but you have to look really really hard.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    102. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      I did notice that you didn't say it was silly but I know you're not comparing an in-depth discussion with a bumper sticker as far as raising awareness. A bumper sticker is ineffectual. It's the same problem with the elections in the U.S. Politicians can only speak in sound bites so they can't fully present their ideas.

      On a forum such as this though the more people talk about it the more peripheral conversations happen like you and I discussing it. I could see not wanting to buy a diamond from Africa as it more than likely contributed to some atrocity at some point. Diamonds from Russia are probably the same way. Diamonds from Australia probably not so much. As long as it's no De Beers it's largely okay.

      Of course Canadian diamonds probably don't have blood on them either. It's definitely a challenge to vote with your wallet and is largely ineffectual but that doesn't mean the principle should be abandoned.

    103. Re:Yes, you're being silly by omegashenron · · Score: 1

      because the US is such a leader in the field of human rights...

      --
      Excuses Are Like Assholes - Everybody's Got One
    104. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the picture you linked to is of something benign (a census taking machine), IBM did indeed help the nazis systemize their ethnic cleansings. I found it particularly funny that they, apart from for Jew, Gay or Communist in the same field had the option of classifying someone as "Bibelforscher", a "bible researcher". (This was, as I understand it, used for Jehova's Witnesses)

    105. Re:Yes, you're being silly by G+Fab · · Score: 1

      China taxes at an enormous rate. So the connection between high margin items and China's ability to support this stuff is clear. If you have bought Chinese stuff, you have bought bullets that wound up in innocent people's heads. I'm not judging you for that; it's damn near impossible to avoid buying Chinese stuff, but it's still our reality. My three Lenovo laptops (I'm a thinkpad fan) gave hundreds of dollars to China's government.

      It's not fair that Chinese workers have a crappy life. I think moving manufacturing to places with human rights will incentivize human rights. Wal-Mart, etc, and our nation's weak dollar and insistence on cheaper more disposable stuff is also making human life cheaper and more disposable. I'm not some douchebag hippie. I'm a normal man who can read the writing on the wall. If we do not start now with China, things are going to SUCK in the near future.

    106. Re:Yes, you're being silly by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      I am Chinese, I understand Chinese history and culture - I was born into it. What does the current communist regime have ANYTHING to do with Chinese history and culture, besides the last 50-odd years? Why should anyone hold any allegiance to a government that has no hesitation towards killing them? This whole "we must stand by our gov't" spiel sounds like too much pride and too little thought, and reeks of brainwashing from a young age.

      Please do tell what assumptions I'm making, because I was under the impression that pledging allegiance to someone who wouldn't bat an eye about killing you (and in fact does so, very often), is poor sense in ANY culture.

    107. Re:Yes, you're being silly by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1

      This gets modded insightful? What the crap?! That's like comparing George Bush to Hitler, Stalin, or Mao.

      What're you suggesting, that he insulted Hitler, Stalin or Mao?

    108. Re:Yes, you're being silly by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Count me in that camp. I still despise myself for it too. And more despicably, I'd still do it. Of course, I live in california, so my vote still counted for john kerry, but hey, lets not split hairs. The electoral college sucks.

    109. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many people voted to re-elect Bush, even after seeing how incompetent he was?

      After everything you have seen and learned in the last seven years, do you really believe that Bush is incompetent? Take a closer look at everything, look at it from a different perspective. Is he really incompetent, or is he or the those around him, really good at deceit?

      I voted for Bush twice. The second time was a combination of a few things. I did not and still do not like Kerry. I believed Bush to continue doing what he was doing. It looks like he has pretty much stayed the course since 2002*. I did not have any information about third-party candidates. I live in Illinois. Both times IL electoral votes went against Bush, so my official vote meant nothing in the electoral system (I am fine with that).

      *Whether that is good or bad is dependent on the individual. Every person is different, and some people have benefited, while others have not. That is life.

    110. Re:Yes, you're being silly by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      BUY AMERICAN ONLY!

      I agree with your sentiment, but that is no longer possible for an increasing array of products. China has, deliberately and with malice aforethought, stripped us of much of our key manufacturing capability (much like Japan before it, but only on a vastly grander scale.) China has systematically purchased as much heavy equipment and machine tools from U.S. manufacturers as it can get its hands on ... a lot of it for pennies on the dollar, after the previous owners either sold out to China or went out of business (no real difference there, when you get right down to it.) Much of that hardware we are no longer capable of reproducing. They may or may not have need of it themselves, but because we don't have it anymore we can't make anything with it.

      Good for China. Not so good for us. I grew up thinking we were smarter than that ... I'm sorry to find out I was wrong.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    111. Re:Yes, you're being silly by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Yes. And, before you ask, I am an American born and raised. And you even pay taxes to the USA federal government?!

      According to your logic, you should grab as much money as you can, run out of the country and emigrate to another peace loving country and spend all your money there to punish the US economy...
      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    112. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Goonie · · Score: 1

      One the truly puzzling things about most Chinese that I meet is there bottomless capacity to defend the snake of a government they have - even the ones that have already immigrated away. I find that the upper-middle class tends to be the worst - the ridiculously rich are too educated to fall for the government's lies, while the poorest suffer too much to believe anything the government says. It's the people who fall down the middle that actually believe the things the government teaches them.
      Everything you just said could equally be said about American tourists, particularly middle-aged ones from flyover country. Certainly up to about 2006, at least.
      --

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
      --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    113. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      Scapegoat, America is #1 in Scapegoating! America RULES at the use of whipping boys and patsies as a quick and easy way to solve crime.

      The problem in the US of A is that judges and prosecutors are elected officials, they have to posture and mug for the electorate (you know that Billy-Bob voter Luuuves to get tough on crime) and the surefire way to have a great record is to charge the first person who you are absolutely sure cannot mount an (pay for an) effective defense.

      In short, an entire nation full of Mike Nifongs.

      P.S. Mike Phuked up and Phuked with rich folks, and you know that you can't do that!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    114. Re:Yes, you're being silly by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Less money for Microsoft equals less taxation for the US regime equals less funds available for the occupation of Iraq.

      Now, if large numbers of people insist on continuing to buy foreign goods instead of domestically produced products (as is the current trend)

      So: less money for Microsoft

      those corporations you seek to injure will simply close down production facilities here and outsource production, or go out of business entirely. Either way, they will cease to employ Americans. Those people will then collect unemployment and stop paying taxes.

      Equals less taxation for the US regime

      In case you hadn't noticed, the federal budget runs at a deficit anyway, so reducing tax revenue isn't going to magically stop the war.

      Everyone's got a credit limit. Even the federal budget. Equals less funds available for the occupation of Iraq. Although I'll grant that the current leaders seem perfectly happy to spend money they don't have for as long as they can get away with it. You'd have to reduce revenues an awful lot before they seriously started to consider reducing 'defence' expenditure.

      If you feel very strongly about the issue of Iraq, write your elected leaders, stage a protest rally, or campaign for office yourself. Attempting to somehow affect that situation by enacting personal economic sanctions against your own people only makes you look woefully ignorant of the situation.

      Not my people. Much the same as the original story submitter, it's just some foreigners whose policies abroad I strongly disapprove (not that I approve of our own spineless acquiescence to every fresh horror out of Washington, mind, but it's starting to look like Gordon's got the message and is quietly planning to get us out of there.) American console, Japanese console, it's all just money going abroad. Money paid to Japan, however, isn't very likely to get spent on invading anybody, and other things being equal that might just make the difference when you decide which to buy.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    115. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think the factory workers, or even the management at Lenovo have anything to do with China's military decisions?

      do you think the average American has anything to do with the U.S. military policies?

      The US has a behavioral problem as well, do you think that world consumers should punish the people of the US economically because of it?

      I can only hope that the average person finally realizes the consequences of his vote, or failure to vote. If it takes a horrible economy to wake us up, I'd say we got off cheap.

      When you boycott an entire country, keep in mind that the employees of the companies are people just like you who are working for a living.

      and apparently the average person doesn't understand what the hell their country is doing unless it hits them at home.

      "China" is not some collection of a billion evil people shooting at monks - it's a country full of good people working to feed themselves and take care of their families.

      The United States is not some collection of 300 million evil people shouting at Muslims and commies. But that's how we are illustrated.

    116. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, you know you're doing the same thing don't you? You say "I've known many Chinese who admit their government's deficiencies, and admit that officials are almost always corrupt and self-serving. But for some reason they still declare their allegiance to the government, claiming that as a Chinese by blood they cannot possibly turn away from the Chinese government." then just afterwards say you won't support anything but a western democracy. Is this just because it's the form you are most familiar with? Then you're doing the same thing as the Chinese -- the system is corrupt as hell, but it's what they're used to, so they support it.

                Now, I don't like the form of China's gov't too well either -- but, they could have a western democracy that is still corrupt as hell, brutal, and unsupportable. As we are beginning to get here in the US (hopefully when bush is out it'll turn around, but the democrats have so far been big blubbering pussies about standing up to bush regarding civil rights so I don't see them doing much to restore them when he's out.)

    117. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Lars512 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We all take pride in our heritage. For a long time China was in many ways in front of the rest of the world. At some point they stagnated technologically, and eventually they were essentially humiliated by foreign powers which were much more advanced and powerful, forcing them to do business (think opium, Hong Kong, Maccau...). This cultural wound is still open and fresh. They want to prove themselves to the world again, and on the whole, their government has been steadily improving. The word from students in China is that more open discussion and criticism of government is more and more readily tolerated, that the more extreme talk may still be censored, but that nobody's just disappearing. There's a feeling that things are moving forward, despite problems of corruption and inequality.

      Furthermore, China has a long history of warring states, turmoil and revolution. In comparison, the stability and progress that they enjoy today is a thing to be treasured. They are grateful to the current government that there has not been another cultural revolution, and that the last 30 years have provided peace and prosperity to many, especially urban Chinese.

      In light of all this, your post is basically calling for more open defiance and conflict. Honestly, the people as a whole aren't ready for that. BUT, the increasing criticism of government can only be a good thing. Once the reins have been loosened enough on this form of criticism, then expect social change to happen more rapidly, as people are more aware of problems, more eager to voice their concerns, and put more pressure on their government to fix its inadequacies.

    118. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Lost+my+religion · · Score: 1

      One voice might be drowned in the cacophony that is the global economy today. However, if more people start thinking along those lines, the Chinese will have to sit up take notice I am aware that this is wishful thinking. However, that does not invalidate it - at the very least, one will feel good about oneself for having stood up for one's principles.

    119. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude your english sucks, are you chinese?

    120. Re:Yes, you're being silly by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      I'm an ethnically Chinese American, and i have to say- is America any better? People still remain blind enough that they keep voting Democrat or Republican even when both parties are now essentially the same thing with a few minor differences. The Iraq war- not going to go there, but Bush's reelection could have easily been avoided by people that hate him and Kerry if they had voted for a third party. Enough people doing that could have brought a third party into power instead of having the two-party system we see in America now.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    121. Re:Yes, you're being silly by jamar0303 · · Score: 2, Informative

      off-topic, but I can see the iPod factory from my school classroom window in Shanghai (at least, all my classmates tell me that).

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    122. Re:Yes, you're being silly by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      That's why I buy Japanese- my Toshiba cellphone is made in Japan, and so is my Panasonic laptop (wonder why they cost so much? That's because they're made in Japan).

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    123. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, you pos chink. The chink government or chink people don't buy US goods and services because they are US. I hope all the little chink fuckers die eating their own shit when they over populate and starve. Else the US will have to waste them during WW III.

    124. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what a sack of shit. i'd have to ask if you'd ever been to china? what cities? do you even speak the proper langauge to communicate with them? im curious as to where your assumptions come from. as you've already agreed with, they recognize the chinese gov't deficiencies AND acknowledge that the west, more often than not can offer a better life, a better gov't. being a canadian you should realize how many chinese immigrants come into canada and how many more are wanting to come here with people even paying for fake marriages. thats how desperate some are.

    125. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One the truly puzzling things about most Chinese that I meet is there bottomless capacity to defend the snake of a government they have

      Whenever you wonder that, the next question you should ask is what practical alternatives you are offering and whether you're criticising for the sake of criticising or whether you're actually offering any constructive advice.
      - Liberation by foreign military forces? That has gone well in Iraq and a dozen other places.
      - A revolution? People die in revolution, tens if not hundreds of millions of people would die in China. And the country will likely go backwards in every way for the common man. I hear Russia is doing well.

      For all the absolutely atrocious things performed by the Chinese government over the past 50 years, things have undoubtedly improved and they're on the right track. Sure, things are happening slowly, but it's a big country and it takes time to change momentum.

      The difference is, it's easy to moralise from afar about how a country and its people should rule itself. But you don't have to live (or not live) with the consequences of any mistakes. Tell you what, you exercise your brilliant theories on industrialising and democratising an agricultural society on smaller countries first, then we'll let you play with the lives of a billion people. BTW How's your experiments in Middle East, South America, Africa going? Oh yeah, damn natives, it's their fault, if only they took more of our advice...

    126. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      do you think the average American has anything to do with the U.S. military policies?

      Maybe I'm naive about American politics, but being a democracy, I'd think that the average American has more of a say with American military policies than a citizen in a non-democratic government. Therefore, relatively speaking, it makes much more sense to hold the average American to account for their government's policy than the citizen of a third-world despot.

    127. Re:Yes, you're being silly by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yes but I think that one should also vote with your heart and your hands.
      Not buying something is as I said "the least that one can do". But actually giving your time to help someone else. That is making a real difference IMHO.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    128. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Ironspork · · Score: 1

      Actually quite an interesting read. I tried picking it up to do some stupid school report on it a few years ago, and ended up spending 6 hours in the library reading it. It's still baffling to me that companies can't accept their past, not cover up the mistakes, and ADMIT THAT THEY WERE WRONG. Seriously, IBM could use that as a marketing scheme: "IBM: Making up for our past transgressions" or some shit like that.

    129. Re:Yes, you're being silly by ngworekara · · Score: 1

      I was curious about the same thing recently. A search brought up a few Vaios that are constructed entirely in Japan, though not many, and any third party hardware on the device, probably down to the chips on the board, will likely be Chinese made. Sony outsources to China too.
      I gotta say though, I'm 100% with you on this. I'm not an economist but I don't see the value in paying for China to build a stronger totalitarian society. That and I'm a computer science major. It would be nice to have a job someday.

    130. Re:Yes, you're being silly by ngworekara · · Score: 1

      I try not to buy Chinese products because labor is treated terribly there. That is one reason among many that you might have for disliking the Chinese governments policies, but it is one that is certainly not going to change if it is the main reason that the US's corporations continue to invest there. There is a financial incentive for corporations to lower the standards by which they have to treat their employees. The difference between the two countries response to those corporations is what keeps me attempting to buy from democracies. Even if we choose to remain, for the most part, willfully ignorant of the declining compensation for most labor in the United States, when things get bad enough, we will be able to vote for change. We can protest. We can go on strike. No one will get shot, or indefinitely imprisoned (one hopes). In China it is openly and obviously not the same. As far as your comparison to the Iraq war, the American voters supported it. While I may not agree, at least we had a say. The idea in a democracy is that even when mistakes are made, they are learned from, and the system is corrected. Buy American, buy Mexican, buy German, buy Japanese, buy Polish. They all have corrupt pro-corporate governments, but at least they have a vote, and the right to be heard.

    131. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop buying from Lenovo would not affect the Bush policy, stop buying from Lenovo would not affect Burmese military policy. If people don't like the policy of X, tell it to the X's face.

    132. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the Chinese government is Lenovo's largest shareholder.

    133. Re:Yes, you're being silly by mindstormpt · · Score: 1

      Certainly the masses you speak of bear no direct responsibility for the actions of their country.


      I believe the Chinese didn't elect their government, so they have no direct responsabiility. The same can't be said for the US.
    134. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not buying a laptop from a country doesn't hurt the people whose actions you object to, but rather the people who make the laptop (who, by and large, have a way better standard of living working in assembly plants than they did in rural, dirt-poor farms).

      I see you've drunk deeply of the management kool-aid. When in doubt, use the workers as human shields for the unreachable management which is truly behind the evil. Don't chew out the clerk or the telemarketer -- they're "just doing their jobs" (good little Nazis). Fine, give me a direct shot at the management fuckers. Otherwise, the cannon fodder in front of them dies.

      When an industry is built on just pissing people off (telemarketing) or dismissing clients as nothing more than annoyances to be ignored into oblivion (most tech support), I consider it my personal responsibility to abuse them into high turnover rates. If an entire industry has to be taken down, so be it. Otherwise, let them clean up the industry from within -- quitting, strikes, sabotage, whatever it takes.

      By the way, the same goes for us. If we can't survive in a moral way, we deserve to die.

    135. Re:Yes, you're being silly by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Do you think the factory workers, or even the management at Lenovo have anything to do with China's military decisions?

      Nice rant -- if you were right. But Lenovo is 30% state-owned, so its success benefits China's gerontocracy, who are behind a lot of smashed skulls in that part of the world.

    136. Re:Yes, you're being silly by acvh · · Score: 1

      "Everyone's got a credit limit. Even the federal budget. Equals less funds available for the occupation of Iraq. "

      A "credit limit" that can be raised by the very entity who it is purportedly limiting is no limit at all. Congress just raised it again this past week.

      The only way to reduce funding for the occupation of Iraq is for Congress to vote to reduce funding for Iraq. Which, in their cowardice, they refuse to do.

      What any of that has to do with not buying a laptop from a Chinese company I have no idea. My personal experience with Lenovo computers has been very positive. Politically speaking, at least they are partially owned by IBM, retain manufacturing and development facilities in the US, and have a name that sounds more Italian than Chinese.

    137. Re:Yes, you're being silly by crucini · · Score: 1

      I've noticed it too. And to those who say that all nationalities are like that: far from it. People from America, Britain, India, and African countries are quite skeptical of their governments, while still taking pride in the good parts.

      Here's what I've learned from Chinese people. While we in the west see the government "oppressing the citizens" in China they see it punishing the jerks. Falun Gong, for example, is like a Chinese Scientology, and I think most Chinese want it shut down forcefully.

      Also, China is sharply divided between City people, who get most of the benefits of modernization, and country people, who remain third world. One role of the government is to keep the country people down. For example, country people can't move to Beijing without a special permit; otherwise they all would. Chinese people in the US tech industry are overwhelmingly City people. So it's like asking a Sunni in Saddam-era Iraq about his government; since his 40% of the population gets 90% of the benefit, it would be understandable if he resists change.

      China has a bloody history, and I think most Chinese want a government with a very firm grip to prevent internal conflicts from exploding into civil war.

    138. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, your manners suck, are you American?

    139. Re:Yes, you're being silly by nikhilvgs · · Score: 1

      Also, please don't buy from the US either because it is killing innocent civilians in Iraq. Dont buy from Japan either, since it killed so many people during WWII. Recurse over all countries this way and i would suggest you not to buy a laptop at all. Have a good day.

    140. Re:Yes, you're being silly by fuliginous · · Score: 1

      It's one of those silly things really. Unless you can make sure that who ever you do buy from actually delivers less than a Lenovo one would into the foreign hands.

      Plus it also misses the point that the more success capitalism has in China the less support for none democratic regimes there will be. So in the end sending the money to China through the purchase is an incentive for China to move in the direction of the rest of the world.

      The current single debate is too narrow and you really need to get a view of the whole picture of ethics. I'm going to be (at least sound) slightly flippant (I do think the killing etc is bad) and say in the big picture the monks are taking less risk than I would be because they will be re-incarnated. The point of saying that is to highlight that the ethics also has a cultural element to consider.

    141. Re:Yes, you're being silly by goober1473 · · Score: 1

      Why can't the Chinese evolve the development? Do their brains work slower or something? There seems to be a whole nation just over the water in Japan that have proved to be rather good at the entire electronics/engineering thing so why not Leveno? And all the money - do US sales types get nothing? Working for charity to help their inept-at-developing design cousins?

    142. Re:Yes, you're being silly by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Their government may suck right now, but their culture is extremely deep and rich.
      And can you name a period when their government didn't suck?
      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    143. Re:Yes, you're being silly by alienw · · Score: 1

      OK, maybe "incompetent" was a poor choice of words. "Corrupt" or "dishonest" would be more accurate phrases. The thing is, I've met plenty of people that support Bush, but might agree that his administration is dishonest and/or corrupt. My point is, this phenomenon is not limited to China. People respect authority figures even after they manage to discredit themselves.

    144. Re:Yes, you're being silly by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Standing up for one's moral convictions is now silly? How far we've fallen... People get bashed for this ALL the time. Every day. Look around, it happens here too.
      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    145. Re:Yes, you're being silly by PinkPanther · · Score: 1
      So the appropriate approach in a democratic society is not to go to your government directly, but instead to attack the capitalistic infrastructure to cause a ripple effect? Hurting US workers (because you know the execs aren't taking a fall for any downturn in sales) is the way to effect change in federal politics?

      Bizarre.

      And even if this process would work in a theoretically democratic/capitalist society, how does one extrapolate that similar outcomes would be had in an oppressive/communist regime?

      Truly bizarre.

      Not giving $200 or so (that's what will actually get to China), on which taxes will be extrapolated (what, $20??), is going to topple CPC?

      Don't forget, it isn't the /. crowd that needs winning over; it is the "attention Department Store shoppers" crowd...and there are orders-of-myriad more of them.

      --
      It's a simple matter of complex programming.
    146. Re:Yes, you're being silly by dave562 · · Score: 1
      And can you name a period when their government didn't suck?

      I'm not a scholar on the subject by any stretch of the imagination, but how about during the Tang and Song dynasties (roughly 618-1279AD). It was during those dynasties that the government actively encouraged Ch'an (Zen) Buddhist and Taoist monastaries as cultural institutions to educate the masses.

    147. Re:Yes, you're being silly by neverhadachoice · · Score: 1

      hahahahahahahhhahha hah ha hah hah hahahah

      ahhhhhhhh thats the best thing i've read all day

    148. Re:Yes, you're being silly by leemcg · · Score: 1

      True the outsourceing of america and the high cost of a low price wal-mart and toshibia is the best laptop in the pc marketplace followed by sonys or generic oem systems or off brand notebooks or alienware or falcon northwest etc

      --
      Lee McInnis Gaetjens Ind Contractor / Sole Proprietor leemcg.com Media Group PO Box 425081 San Francisco, CA 94142 mcinn
    149. Re:Yes, you're being silly by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      You know, I'd like answers to a few questions that seem germane to this thread. I'm sure that all of you can help me out here.

      1. Given that we are experiencing a continuously falling standard of living, a rapidly shrinking middle class, increased economic insecurity, and substantial dependence upon inimical foreign powers, how is America's participation in the Global Economy of benefit ... to America? Is that participation worth what we are giving up in the process?

      2. How does any nation which willingly disposes of its manufacturing sector and transitions to a "service economy" sustain itself and its people?

      3. What the hell is a "service economy", anyway? When carried to its logical conclusion (e.g. minimal manufacturing and creation of wealth) is it not synonymous with "third world economy"?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    150. Re:Yes, you're being silly by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      how is America's participation in the Global Economy of benefit ... to America?

      Your focus on trade is a red herring. Trade makes both participants richer. Otherwise, they wouldn't trade. Artificially limiting trade makes people poorer.

      If you're concerned about inequality, then focus on the causes of inequality. Get upset about deficit funding of tax cuts for the rich. Get upset about poor education. Get upset about large corporations, who take most of the value generated and give it to a few people at the top. Get upset about crony capitalism. Get upset about the way rich people and large companies buy the laws they want.

      But don't get in the way of trade. Since trade makes people richer, you can take part of that extra money to help everybody else.

    151. Re:Yes, you're being silly by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Your focus on trade is a red herring. Trade makes both participants richer. Otherwise, they wouldn't trade. Artificially limiting trade makes people poorer.

      I disagree. That's too simplistic an answer, really. You only have to look at the current situation between China and the United States. The net effect of our trading with China, to date, has been their getting richer and our getting poorer. In essence we have a massive transfer of wealth to China, in exchange for ... what, exactly? That's the question that nobody seems willing to answer, although we all know what it is. NOTHING. And no, what's on the shelf at Wal-mart doesn't count.

      You are assuming that "trade" is automatically equitable and of benefit to both parties. That's a dangerous assumption. Interestingly enough, truly "free" trade among nations invariably results in one or more parties being completely screwed by another. Put it this way: free trade is like depending, for your very life, on another man's better nature.

      Now that's risky ... because he might not have one. You're better off having some defenses in place.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    152. Re:Yes, you're being silly by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      You are assuming that "trade" is automatically equitable and of benefit to both parties.

      I don't have to assume it. I can prove it. Every time you buy something, you're engaging in trade. When you buy something, it's because you think you'll be better off with the thing than the money. The seller thinks that they'll be better off with the money than the thing. Sure, sometimes you're wrong. But you're usually right, or you'd stop trading.

      That's all trade is. People deciding to trade one thing for another because they think it's good for them. If you think it's a bad idea, stop buying things for a few weeks.

      Interestingly enough, truly "free" trade among nations invariably results in one or more parties being completely screwed by another.

      Nice assertion. Got facts?

      I do. If you look at the rise of global trade versus pretty much any useful metric over the last 300 years (standard of living, lifespan, health, education, wealth) they are positively correlated with trade. America is one of the most open nations to trade, and one of the most wealthy. Hong Kong's another great example. A lot of the places most resistant to trade are poor, miserable places to live.

      Put it this way: free trade is like depending, for your very life, on another man's better nature.

      Hardly. The guy at the corner store who sells me milk doesn't do it because he's nice. It's because he makes his living that way. The same thing for the guy delivering the milk, the ones processing it, and the ones with the cows. None of them are in it because they'd be sad to think of me eating dry cereal in the mornings.

      Trade only depends on other people behaving in their own interest. That's much more reliable than somebody's good nature. Trade binds us together into networks of mutual benefit.

      Of course, I don't expect to convince you, but let's move the discussion ahead a few steps. If you're going to explain why trade is bad, start off by explaining why whatever effect you're going to point at is large enough to overwhelm comparative advantage. And if you don't know what comparative advantage is and how it works, then you should probably stop now. Arguing about trade without understanding that is like arguing about physics without understanding atoms: possibly entertaining, but unlikely to be useful.

  2. the t series by bakamaki · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've repaired and issued a lot of laptops in my day and I'm not aware of a true competitor to the T series in terms of chassis design. The current T lineup is really nice, but expensive. I'm starting to think I'll get myself a Dell 1420n with Ubuntu for my next box. Granted it's not a rugged laptop but I don't really need that kind of durability. You could consider the Toughbooks, but I really don't have any practical knowledge of them.

    1. Re:the t series by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Here's a thought: an OLPC laptop. Decent (if low-end) specs, supports charity, and durable.

      As was brought up recently, you can buy one starting Nov. 11 if you live in the U.S.

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    2. Re:the t series by MarkGriz · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd go with the T-1000. Those things are rugged as hell.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    3. Re:the t series by fymidos · · Score: 1

      What do you mean expensive? You can buy a thinkpad for $1500 - this is *cheap* for a T.
      In the good old days, T600 used to cost more than $3000 ...

      --
      Washington bullets will simply be known as the "Bulle
    4. Re:the t series by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

      Sorry, Nov. 12 (though I thought it was supposed to be the 11th...).

      Also, the people involved don't have any direct ties to the Chinese government, much less Myanmar/Burma.

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    5. Re:the t series by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      I considered that option, but I work in a steel mill, so it wouldn't work for me.

    6. Re:the t series by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1

      And considerably lower in performance than the T20 he's replacing.

    7. Re:the t series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      OLPC is cool and all, but you do realize that they are ergonomically designed for kid-size hands, right? Do you just mindlessly parrot whatever news fads you read about on the Internet?

    8. Re:the t series by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

      Given that he's using a 7-year old laptop, I doubt that peak performance is the key factor in this purchase.

      I'd also not call the OLPC "considerably lower in performance" to the T20 - they're just differently-optimized devices (i.e., weight, battery life, ruggedness), both of which would handle most non-intensive work. Here are the OLPC specs, while here are the T20 specs.

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    9. Re:the t series by samkass · · Score: 2, Informative

      The toughbooks have the mindshare, but the Mercedes of rugged laptops is IMHO the Itronix GoBook XR-1. (disclaimer: I work for General Dynamics.) But unless you're planning on taking this aboard a bouncing Stryker in desert heat or into a swamp in combat situations, any "MIL-STD 810F"-ruggedized laptop is almost certainly overkill.

      For an office environment, the consumer/business laptops are all basically made by the same people at the same facilities out of the same parts these days. Get whichever one has the features you need at the price you like with the plastic shaped the way you think looks good.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    10. Re:the t series by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      The Thinkpads do have an edge in durability, but I'm not their target market. Warranty and insurance for accidental damage is good enough for most people. If I was my money, I'd either buy low end and take my chances with the regular 1 year warranty or buy high end and get the best warranty, 3 years plus accidental damage. A $399 laptop is a perfectly fine system for non-power users. Most just need a RAM upgrade and wipe the OEM Vista.

      For all the complaints about Dell tech support, their warranty service is pretty good once you run through the script and convince them it's a hardware problem.

    11. Re:the t series by pcguru19 · · Score: 1

      I've seen the thoughtfulness of the engineering slip since IBM stepped away from the table. Example, the friggin wireless off switch is on the front of some of the new thinkpads. When I tested it, I caught myself turning it off when running the box on my lap. In the multinational corporate environment, it's impossible to say who owns a company and where the profits from that company benefit others. From a practical point-of-view, my suggestion is find the best machine and run it.

      --
      STFU & GBTW
    12. Re:the t series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My school uses Thinkpads (and IBM/Lenovo branded boxes) almost exclusively. This fall the incoming freshmen and returning juniors received an R61 laptop with the 14.1" widescreen. Let me just say that these laptops are far more rugged than even the last T40-series of laptops. The case is metal with the nice T series coating on it, and there is a roll cage behind the LCD, so you can (technically) step on it without cracking the screen.

      If you want to save some $$$, the current R series is the way to go. Since Lenovo is soon discontinuing the R series, it is being beefed up to be absorbed into the T series lineup (Lenovo will soon only have the T and X series), so you can get much better quality at a good price. I must say that the difference in build quality between my R51 & R60 and the R61 is BEYOND night and day.

    13. Re:the t series by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I too work in a steel mill, and I have to recommend the Toughbooks. We've had a couple of them survive being dropped into vats of molten metal. The hard part was removing them from the steel slab afterwards as the oxy-fuel cutting torch set a bit of the magnesium casing on fire on one of them.

      Boy, was that a strange meeting with the fire dept...

    14. Re:the t series by PlatyPaul · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd rather go with the T-X for its... erhm... features.

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    15. Re:the t series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From a similar background, I'll agree the dells aren't a bad replacement with the business-class machines, but another good place to look is the Toshiba business class machines.

      Their service and support is excelent, even for home class machines (unlike most others, like Dell/IBM, where home sucks, and business is good), but also, the machines are made with good solid hardware.

    16. Re:the t series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious?

      That's one hell of a recommendation for a ToughBook!

    17. Re:the t series by Verteiron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Any pictures of that? I'd love to see 'em.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    18. Re:the t series by Wolvie+MkM · · Score: 1

      It's not one of those 'work hard but play harder' steel mills is it?

      cue - Everybody Dance Now

      --
      I Like Pie...
    19. Re:the t series by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I much prefer the T-X. Sexy machines are fun.

    20. Re:the t series by ptelligence · · Score: 1

      Brings whole new meaning to the term "Killer App"

    21. Re:the t series by melstav · · Score: 5, Funny

      While the Toughbooks may survive a drop into a vat of molten metal, I have on good authority that they don't take well to being dropped into a spinning dynamometer.

      Buddy of mine who works for one of the "Big Three" had the Toughbook on the hood of a car on one of the dynos. Walked away from the laptop and the testing tech gunned the engine. Computer vibrated off the hood and went into the dyno's rollers.

      My friend picked up all the pieces, put 'em in a box, went back to his desk, and called the HelpDesk and said: "There's something wrong with my laptop. It won't boot. It booted up fine this morning. I think you need to send someone out to take a look at it."

      The look on the HelpDesk technician's face when he looked into the box is said to have been priceless.

    22. Re:the t series by Khopesh · · Score: 1

      My company has ordered about four T60s so far. While we've never had a problem with an older T-series laptop, two of our T60s broke with questionable mainboard issues (mouse/keyboard use locks system, won't boot, batteries are bricks two months after warranty expires).

      We now buy Dell. The D830 is roughly equivalent to the T60, or the D630 if you want the lighter widescreen. Dells use the NVIDIA Quadro graphics card, which makes Linux easier to use, plus it has very good support for dual-head (using either the dock or a GXM, which lets you go dual-1920x1200 or triple-1280x1024). I've found the Dell keyboard layout preferable to the Lenovo keyboard layout, specifically the placement of Ctrl vs. Fn and Esc vs F1.

      --
      Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
    23. Re:the t series by raddan · · Score: 1

      I had a Toughbook CF-W2. Since it was a consumerized version of their actually-tough Toughbooks, I don't know how well my experience reflects on the rest of them. My company gave me the option of getting one of the really rugged ones, but that seemed kind of silly, not to mention, heavy.

      Anyway, the CF-W2 was very pleasant, lightweight, portable. Seemed to withstand a fair amount of abuse from me except for little plastic caps over the hinges-- those were smashed pretty quickly.

      Then I had a hard disk go bad. Being the tech-person I am, I decided to replace it myself. Just a regular laptop HDD job, nothing special right? Well, the CF-W2 doesn't seem to be designed to be taken apart. The hard disk is *buried* inside the machine. Later, I also decided to swap out the wireless card (Intel Pro, yuck!) with something that had better BSD support (Ralink), and I discovered that was nontrivial as well. Because one of the BNC connectors was in a slightly different place, I didn't have enough slack. Ok, get another antenna wire, but then... it seemed like all of the problems were recursive in that manner. I think I spent two evenings on that particular repair.

      I have disassembled dozens of Thinkpad T40-series machines at work for repair. Maintenance is a breeze. Hard disks, especially so. I love how you just twist a screw and the whole thing slides out. T60-series machines follow in that vein.

      Like the article submitter, China's behavior disturbs me deeply, and the fact that we subsidize this behavior indirectly, even more so. But from a technical standpoint, Lenovo's stuff is still the best. Someday I hope to be able to put together a laptop in the same way that I put together my desktop PC, but I suspect that's a ways off, if ever.

    24. Re:the t series by nmos · · Score: 1

      I'm in a similar boat wanting to replace an A series and looking at Dell as an alternative due in part to official Linux support on a wider variety of machines. One thing I've always liked about Thinkpads is that you can download maintenance manuals and purchace replacement parts easily and at reasonable prices (ok, that's two things but they're related). How does Dell stack up in the ease of maintenance area?

    25. Re:the t series by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 1

      Sorry everyone. That was a joke. A little too much Wikipedia on that one... and not enough smileys.

      I mean, people thought the electronics would survive in a 2861 C (5182 F) metal vat??? Even the magnesium casing will melt lower than that.

      Sorry about that. Carry on.

      (And BTW, the magnesium casing can burn, but it's hard to do)

    26. Re:the t series by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      I've had the same problem with my gut pressing the buttons under the touchpad. I just figured it was a sign I ought to lose some weight though!

    27. Re:the t series by firesyde424 · · Score: 1

      Toughbooks are almost an entirely different level of ruggedness than even a T series Thinkpad. To give you an idea what I mean by that, while I was in the Air Force we needed some more rugged laptops because the response team leaders kept dropping and breaking them. To sell the squadron CO on the purchase of some Toughbooks for our disaster response teams, we took one that had been purchased for testing and threw it out the front door where it was in the middle of a torrential downpour outside. We sent a 2 stripe airman to retrieve it, and promptly booted it right back up in front of the CO, dripping with mud and water. He ordered 20 of them on the spot.

      Toshiba does make some less rugged versions of the Toughbook and most major manufacturers have some kind of tough laptop, even if they aren't on par with the actual Toughbook.

    28. Re:the t series by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I mean, people thought the electronics would survive in a 2861 C (5182 F) metal vat?

      That was my first thought, especially given the widely-publicised Athlon fires of a few years back.

      Components that need active cooling to avoid damage in normal operating surviving in a vat of molten steel? (For that matter, solder joints surviving!) And yet people modded you up something other than "Funny" for it. Sometimes I truly despair of this site's readership.

    29. Re:the t series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But will it blend?!?

    30. Re:the t series by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Be nice to yourself, and skip the Dell. Maybe the Inspiron 8000 are a special case, but the screen hinges on those went out fairly quickly. Others have different design deficiencies.

      The only good replacement for a thinkpad is another thinkpad. (typed on an A22m)

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  3. Ummmm by tgd · · Score: 5, Informative

    You do realize Lenovo is selling the Thinkpads now because... *drumroll* they were the company that made them all along?

    1. Re:Ummmm by anthonyclark · · Score: 5, Funny

      You do realize Lenovo is selling the Thinkpads now because... *drumroll* they were the company that made them all along? Lenovowned!
      --
      ----- Documentation is worth it just to be able to answer all your mail with 'RTFM' - Alan Cox.
    2. Re:Ummmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!!!!

    3. Re:Ummmm by OS24Ever · · Score: 5, Informative

      How do you define 'make'?

      Reason I ask is the same building where Lenovo computers are 'made' (IE Physically Assembled) is also the same building Apple, Dell, HP, Acer, and many others are made. The company is contracted out to make just about everyones laptop.

      China has taken over the manufacturing of *so* many products that we use day to day in the United States (and every other country) that it would be downright impossible to function by 'boycotting' anything Made in China.

      I started to look into it after the tenth toy of my kids was recalled. My son's wooden trains, my daughters dolls. Fun stuff. Not that my kids chew on them or anything but still, figured I'd send em in.

      So I started wondering what I could get as far as a toy without Made in China on it.

      in Short, you can't easily. A specialty store sometimes you can find things made in maybe Europe somewhere, but US made things are hard to find and anything non-chinese is pretty hard as well. Forget about shopping at Wal-Mart. That's the retail arm of China now.

      In this current global environment it's impossible for a company to be cost competitive because as a consumer we've been trained to throw out everything and focus on price. If this toothpaste is $0.50 cheaper than that toothpaste, I'm gonna buy it. Never mind that one keeps a family in the US employed and has strict laws about what can go in it vs. the other guy putting antifreeze in his mixture in china.

      What's a person to do? It can be done, but it's not something that is easy.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    4. Re:Ummmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting rid of the Thinkpad he previously bought before he was interested in boycotting Chinese made goods is different than refusing to by any new Chinese goods.

    5. Re:Ummmm by jaweekes · · Score: 5, Interesting

      NPR did an interview with the author of "A Year Without "Made in China": One Family's True Life Adventure in the Global Economy" and they admitted that it was almost impossible to avoid goods from China. It's a very good interview if you want to reduce your purchases from "Made in China".

    6. Re:Ummmm by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      You do realize Lenovo is selling the Thinkpads now because... *drumroll* they were the company that made them all along?

      And isn't almost everything mass produced coming from China or nearby anyway?

      I guess my .sig makes sense today.

    7. Re:Ummmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... or, more correctly,

      L3n0vPwn3d!!!!!111111oneone!!!eleven

    8. Re:Ummmm by pipatron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lower quality, questionable security.

      Sources, or gtfo.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    9. Re:Ummmm by eln · · Score: 1

      Step 1: Naval blockade of China

      That's a nice idealistic viewpoint and all, but I'm pretty sure China would consider a naval blockade an act of war (and rightfully so). I doubt the US would want a war with China now or at any point in the foreseeable future.

    10. Re:Ummmm by foxtrot · · Score: 0, Redundant

      So I started wondering what I could get as far as a toy without Made in China on it.
      in Short, you can't easily.A specialty store sometimes you can find things made in maybe Europe somewhere, but US made things are hard to find and anything non-chinese is pretty hard as well. Forget about shopping at Wal-Mart. That's the retail arm of China now.


      Bah. You can get great toys not made in China in every Wal-Mart in the US.

      They're called "Lego". I'm sure you've never heard of 'em, but since every last brick is made in Denmark or the Czech Republic, with packaging made in one of those places or Enfield, CT, there's nothing Chinese about 'em.

      Of course, you can also get 'em in specialty stores, but why pay the extra markup?

      -F

    11. Re:Ummmm by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Never mind that one keeps a family in the US employed

      Is there really someone left in the US who believes that people are unemployed because of production moving overseas? We are at full employment; people aren't starving here, just doing non-manufacturing jobs. It's okay.

    12. Re:Ummmm by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Interesting
      it was almost impossible to avoid goods from China. It's a very good interview if you want to reduce your purchases from "Made in China"


      While I will admit it is tough to not buy products made in China, I have found that with the exception of sunglasses and most electronics, I can buy the products I need which aren't made in China.

      Granted, I'm the exception to most Americans in that I don't want or need a ton of stuff so I'm probably not a representative sample, but if one were to take the time and not buy products which are made in China, it can be done.

      It's almost comical when I and my parents are out somewhere because both my dad and I look at where products are made. In fact, my dad refers to WalMart as "The China store". I'm sure some day someone in a store will ask what we're doing as we look at the labels on products. When that day occurs, I'll be happy to tell them why we're looking at the labels.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    13. Re:Ummmm by BiggestPOS · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      This is totally off-topic, but I really want to hear this, but I don't run Windows at work. Can anyone tell me how to listen to these streams on Linux? Does "Real Alternative" work for Linux in Firefox?

      --
      What, me worry?
    14. Re:Ummmm by OS24Ever · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, the appropriate term is LEGO and my son is 4 and daughter is 6 and they're not touching my collection for a few more years. the last time I let me daughter play with my LEGO sets she lost the face plate on one of my astronauts and those things are expensive to replace (Astronaut Series from mid 90s, not late 90s) ;)

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    15. Re:Ummmm by mr_mischief · · Score: 2, Informative

      At one time, they were making them as a contractor for IBM. IBM designed them, and paid people to do that. IBM sold them, and kept the markup. Now the money is going all to Lenovo. Yes, they got part of it before, but part is not all.

      When IBM was selling them and having Lenovo make them, the story about Burmese police shooting at monks hadn't really broken yet, which is part of the OP's problem with supporting Chinese companies. Their tax yuan go to support this kind of stuff.

      Many laptops are actually made in large part in Japan, South Korea, Singapore, or Taiwan still, aren't they? Perhaps someone needs to have a list of where components are sourced for the different brands and where the different models go through final assembly.

    16. Re:Ummmm by OS24Ever · · Score: 4, Informative

      Strange, the 10,000 some employees here in research triangle park, nc would probably disagree with you about their nationality.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    17. Re:Ummmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want a toy that is not made in China, you can either make (or better yet, have the child use their imagination to make) a toy, or you can buy Lego. Lego brand toys are made exclusively in Denmark.

    18. Re:Ummmm by austinpoet · · Score: 1

      maybe you could get them their own instead of letting them trash your coveted classic collection.

    19. Re:Ummmm by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      Oh I do. My son has the Thomas the Tank engine trains, carries them around all day in his Backpack. My daughter so far hasn't been a big fan of any of the 'older kid' sets and still plays with my son making giant towers of bricks.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    20. Re:Ummmm by MECC · · Score: 1

      Step 1: Naval blockade of China.

      Doubtfull we could even try because:

      1. We don't have enough military leftover from Iraq to pull it off. Countries that try to wall themselves off don't last long.

      2. Even if we did, its unlikely we'd suceed

      Step 2: Wall at the Mexican border.

      Also unlikely to work even if we were able to pull it off.

      without having to work for it like Bill Gates.

      WTF are you talking about? He was just better at stealing than his competitors to get where he is today, and he was born rich.

      --
      "We are all geniuses when we dream"
      - E.M. Cioran
    21. Re:Ummmm by gmletzkojr · · Score: 1

      many products that we use day to day in the United States (and every other country)
      As I understand it, and hopefully some /.ers from Europe can fill us in, many countries in Europe don't buy things from China, but from more local places. In this respect, I am talking about household items, foods (people and pet). Is that true?

      --
      I for one welcome our new [insert main topic] overlords.
    22. Re:Ummmm by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

      Reason I ask is the same building where Lenovo computers are 'made' (IE Physically Assembled) is also the same building Apple, Dell, HP, Acer, and many others are made. The company is contracted out to make just about everyones laptop.

      I can't speak for the others, but a sizeable number of Dell notebooks (ie. pretty much the entire Latitude line) are made in Malaysia, NOT in China. Also make sure you don't lump Taiwan in with China--they are NOT the same thing and a lot of computers are assembled there instead.

      It's hard to ELIMINATE Chinese-made goods from your life, however a lot can be done to reduce your dependency on them.

    23. Re:Ummmm by xx01dk · · Score: 1

      How true. Just last week, the wife and I went shopping for a toaster. They are all made in China now! So we settled for a brushed-aluminum model that contained no paint at least. Works great, but I think I'm probably going to be spending an innordinate ammount of the rest of my life trying to find well-made stuff that isn't made in China. Unless, of course, they clean up over there...

      --
      There is simply too much glass..
    24. Re:Ummmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this current global environment it's impossible for a company to be cost competitive because as a consumer we've been trained to throw out everything and focus on price. If this toothpaste is $0.50 cheaper than that toothpaste, I'm gonna buy it. Never mind that one keeps a family in the US employed ... yeah it keeps a family employed and they can spend all that money they're making at their toothpaste job on more expensive american goods.
    25. Re:Ummmm by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Also, considering the intense frugality often displayed here, I wonder how many people would actually be willing to pay the higher prices that would result from American manufacturing? Probably not enough to get it going again, considering how quickly it shut down.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    26. Re:Ummmm by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      You think Walmart's bad? Check out Hobby Lobby. The only products in there that are -not- made in China are the candles. And only some of them.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    27. Re:Ummmm by Xonstantine · · Score: 1

      Yep. We're at "full" employment, with a growing, growing, growing service economy based on $8/hr jobs with people (not infrequently illegal aliens) asking "Would you like fries with that" instead of manufacturing jobs (of which we've been losing a million or so permanently every few years) paying $25/hr, or, gasp, IT jobs paying 70-150k a year.

      If you take a hard look at the numbers, employment numbers for whites, blacks, and teenagers has gone down over the last decade, not up. We're busy exporting the the good jobs overseas (including stuff like radiology in addition to manufacturing and IT), and giving away menial and entry level jobs to illegal aliens. At the same time we are overburdened with government, business, and personal debt. What a recipe for economic success!

    28. Re:Ummmm by Deagol · · Score: 1

      A specialty store sometimes you can find things made in maybe Europe somewhere, but US made things are hard to find and anything non-chinese is pretty hard as well.

      Check out Lehman's. They're smack in the middle of the Ohio Amish/Mennonite community, and cater to their need for simple and non-electric tools. Some of their stuff is hand-made by the locals, including some toys. Sure, they're not the snazzy plastic baubles you can get everywhere else, but are more simple things, often made of wood. I see that the "Toys" link off the main page boasts "Made in the USA".

    29. Re:Ummmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... or, more correctly,

      L3n0vPwn3d!!!!!111111oneone!!!eleven Or...

      Owned by Chinese!
    30. Re:Ummmm by levork · · Score: 1


      They're called "Lego". I'm sure you've never heard of 'em, but since every last brick is made in Denmark or the Czech Republic

      Being a die-hard Lego fan, I wish this was still true. Alas, if you've bought kits lately (for example, try the new Castle line), you'll notice some of the packaging now reports "Components made in DENMARK, HUNGARY, CHINA, and the CZECH REPUBLIC". Given the Lego company's financial troubles in the last couple of years, it's a sad state of affairs that this move is not entirely surprising.

    31. Re:Ummmm by adlucem · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere (.....) that Japanese manufacturers are starting to build some of their new plants in Japan. IIRC, they started a few years ago (like 2 or 3) with Plasma TVs.

    32. Re:Ummmm by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      If you want to boycott mainland China, you could buy items "Made in Taiwan" or "Made in Korea".

    33. Re:Ummmm by ktappe · · Score: 1

      Is there really someone left in the US who believes that people are unemployed because of production moving overseas? We are at full employment; people aren't starving here, just doing non-manufacturing jobs. It's okay.
      What is it like going through life with your eyes closed? If you were to open yours, you would see that there are a lot of people who are not "okay". Our lovely government counts people who only work 5 hours per week as 'employed' and while I'm sure you are going to say 'they should work more', it isn't that easy. Many employers, such as WalMart, purposely prevent employees from working more than 20-30 hours to ensure they do not get benefits, and yet we count them as 'employed' just as if they were working 40+ hours. To you it is apparently 'okay' if we round all numbers, even if they are .1, up to 1. This is a very 'black and white' mindset that does not in any way reflect the real world. So go on, keep your eyes shut and believe the 5% unemployment numbers the government tells you without questioning them. But don't come here and post claiming you know what's really going on.
      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    34. Re:Ummmm by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Just for a lark once I tried to find something in Canadian Tire NOT made in China (that wasn't automotive). After about an hour I found some Corningware cleaner that was actually made in the US.

      Interestingly I found the reverse true in Berlin when I was there once. Everything I found in the hotel (Adlon) I was in was made in Germany and in fact there was a store called "The China Store" mearby that had really cool and well made but very expensive stuff made in China. I'd guess all of Germany isn't like that but near the Brandernburg gate that's what I saw.

      Aren't Toshiba and Sony laptops made in Japan any more?

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    35. Re:Ummmm by troll · · Score: 1

      Back in the 1960s AquaFresh put chloroform in their toothpaste. It was a blast! :-)

      --
      Official Pi Ambassador -- inquire for details!
    36. Re:Ummmm by goofballs · · Score: 1

      While I will admit it is tough to not buy products made in China, I have found that with the exception of sunglasses and most electronics, I can buy the products I need which aren't made in China. you weren't looking too hard, eh? Luxottica (Italian) is one of the largest (maybe IS the largest?) sunglasses company in the world, w/ it's own brands (luxottica, ray ban, soon oakley) and outsources to many others(versace, prada, d&g, etc), and does most of their production in italy (oakley's mostly made in us).
    37. Re:Ummmm by Andrewkov · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, Lenovo owns you!

    38. Re:Ummmm by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      There's really no problem with Chinese laptops, just don't lick them.

    39. Re:Ummmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't many of the manufacturing jobs that we're exporting the same ones that also tend to be dangerous? In the US life is very highly valued (much more so than in say China), and it is expensive to use manufacturing equipment that is safer, and even more expensive to deal with insurance and lawsuits. Not to mention that the average american demands much much higher salaries than people in 3rd world countries. Even the $8/hour job pays MUCH better than most of the jobs in China. Unless you have an idea for how to pay american workers $3/hour to work in hellish conditions, I'd suggest you don't complain about moving manufacturing jobs overseas.

    40. Re:Ummmm by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      Ok, let me clarify. With the exception of the higher end sunglasses, I have not been able to find sunglasses which were not made in China.

      Yes, I know Oakley and the like are out there but I'm not willing to spend $60 or more on a pair of sunglasses which I know for a fact I will drop on their lenses.

      That and the fact that I can't find ones which fit me well or even look good on me.

      So yes, you are correct in that there are sunglasses not made in China out there. The problem is one of cost.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    41. Re:Ummmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure KitchenAid appliances are made in the US.

    42. Re:Ummmm by hawk · · Score: 1

      If you take an honest look at it, you find things such as,

      --there are two jobs "insourced" for each outsourced job

      --on average, workers who lose their jobs to imports ultimately end up with a higher paying job

      and so forth.

      hawk

    43. Re:Ummmm by apt142 · · Score: 1

      For the last time, Redneck is not a nationality!

    44. Re:Ummmm by ryanov · · Score: 1

      One has an ever-increasing myriad of reasons to forget about shopping at Wal*Mart.

    45. Re:Ummmm by ryanov · · Score: 1

      It's a WMA stream, looks like, or probably other things too if you want. Just look for how to play Windows Media files in your distro on Google.

    46. Re:Ummmm by Xonstantine · · Score: 1

      Aren't many of the manufacturing jobs that we're exporting the same ones that also tend to be dangerous? In the US life is very highly valued (much more so than in say China), and it is expensive to use manufacturing equipment that is safer, and even more expensive to deal with insurance and lawsuits. Wait, so you are saying chip fabrication is dangerous? Manufacturing of computers is dangerous?

      Not to mention that the average american demands much much higher salaries than people in 3rd world countries. It's largely because of something called "purchasing power parity". On a cash valuation basis, China's GDP is about 1/8th of the US GDP. On a PPP basis, their GDP is almost 4/5th the size of the US GDP. It takes more money to live at a certain level in the West than it does to live at the same level in China or India.

      Unless you have an idea for how to pay american workers $3/hour to work in hellish conditions, I'd suggest you don't complain about moving manufacturing jobs overseas. How about we don't engage in no-tariff "free trade" with countries that run slave labor factories rather than trying to figure out how we can being US workers down to the level of the Chinese?
    47. Re:Ummmm by yani · · Score: 1

      Actually the T20 (and A20/X20) the poster had were made in Mexico.. IBM switched to China for manufacturing later

    48. Re:Ummmm by mnmn · · Score: 1

      It's NOT impossible.

      The Amish do it.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    49. Re:Ummmm by Valkarie70 · · Score: 1

      You just made my new catch phrase for my T60...nice

    50. Re:Ummmm by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      How does that happen? Or where do I go to find an honest look at it?

    51. Re:Ummmm by Gabrill · · Score: 1

      LEGO Bricks. Not just LEGO's.

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    52. Re:Ummmm by hawk · · Score: 1

      I don't have cites handy, but those were some of the things I picked up over the years as an economist. I remembered them because I was teaching at a penn state campus in an area hit with constant trade disruptions (west-central).

      I *want* to say that the 2:1 was covered in an Economist article 3-4 years ago. I think that you can get the "better job" data from Department of Labor sites. (Part of the reason for the "better job on average" is plethora of retraining programs from the government. My gut says that it would probably be the case without those, but that the portion that end up with worse jobs would be significantly higher--and for older workers, might reverse the effect entirely).

      The best bet for research would be economic journals focusing on trade, Department of Labor websites & publications, and possibly publications of the regional Federal Reserve Banks (they produce economic research you wouldn't expect at times). Avoid political websites; they'll be spinning the data one way or another--but you might find links to real work in those.

      I wish I could offer you the sites, but it's the kind of data that's in my field but not my subfield, so I absorb the data if the source appears credible.

      As for how it works: trade comes from "comparative advantage"--even though the US has an absolute edge over nearly all other nations in nearly all fields, the relative tradeoffs are different. If one of our workers can make 200 shirts or 50 televisions, it costs us a quarter of a television to make a shirt. If another country has workers that can produce 5 shirts or one television, it only costs them a fifth a television to make a shirt. The result will be that we ship them shirts and they send us televisions.

      Overall, we get our best advantages in higher-end fields, such as technological development. The result is that we trade this for "stuff" from other countries. As a technology gets more widespread throughout the world, we shift to something newer.

      Our technology multiplies the output of each worker, but the workers do need training for this. The more advanced the training, the more value the worker adds, and his wage increases.

      hmm, this may be more than you wanted :)

      hawk

    53. Re:Ummmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we can't find enough qualified applicants here then that is just speaking to the quality of our schools.

  4. by that logic... by onemorehour · · Score: 5, Insightful

    avoid Dell, too, since the American government is doing such horrible things around the world. Yes, it's flawed logic. Move on.

    1. Re:by that logic... by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Are dell's made in the US?
      (I highly suspect not, but I really don't know)

      --
      No Comment.
    2. Re:by that logic... by operagost · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm certainly not buying American until the government allows freedom of speech, assembly, and religion. Oh wait... they do!
      Ascribing moral equality between the governments of China and the USA is an insult to the innocent people executed and imprisoned by the vile, corrupt government of China.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:by that logic... by Gregb05 · · Score: 0

      Isn't Dell based in the U.K.?

      --
      --
    4. Re:by that logic... by Liquidrage · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure because every degree above absolute zero is same the temperature.

      Think what you will of America and it's policies. But to even compare it with China is absurd in that regard. American government has, for the majority of the time, been a boon to the world as a whole. Yes, there are conflicts where wonderful leaders like Saddam are overthrown and it makes people unhappy. And no, I'm not justifying Iraq with that sarcastic statement. But I am pointing out that no matter what side of the fence you're on, Iraq was an issue that should have been delt with. It wasn't Atlantis being invaded. American foreign policy is enormous. The most influential country in the world. While it easy to find examples of harm in there, there is more good then harm in the case of American foreign policy. Where as my biggest gripe with China is how the entire world stands by and let's a country like that into open markets so easily considering how disgraceful that country's government is.

    5. Re:by that logic... by BlueF · · Score: 1

      avoid Dell, too, since the American government is doing such horrible things around the world. Yes, it's flawed logic. Move on.
      Agreed. While I appreciate your willingness to take a personal stance, there's little-to-no chance of buying consumer electronics 100% guilt-free. That's not the world we live in.

      If you do want to ease your conscience and support a good cause, how about OLPC? http://www.xogiving.org/
    6. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hmm, how about allows these freedoms to people in others countries, like Iraq?

    7. Re:by that logic... by s4m7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      FYI: An article in the New York Times on December 19, 2004 said that Dell laptops are made in Malaysia. In contrast, full size Dell computers are made in the U.S.A. (at least those sold in the USA are made here). Other Dell products, such as PDAs, printers and music players are made by "third party manufacturers" primarily outside of the USA.

      (found here)

      So, maybe, maybe not, depending on model. But GP is being rather extreme comparing the horrible things the US is doing and the horrible things china is doing. We're not imprisoning dissidents and journalists yet, and the country we're occupying is at least still free to practice their religion, short of the call to drive the infidels out of the holy land. Contrast with tibet.

      I'm not saying we're not bad, but we're no China

      --
      This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
    8. Re:by that logic... by DaveCar · · Score: 1

      Well, at least they don't shoot demonstrators in the US.

    9. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Habeas Corpus.
      Guantanamo.
      Abu Graib.

      Need I say more?

      The difference between China and the US is that China at is open about their oligarchy while the US pretends to be a democracy.

    10. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot Guantánamo Bay and that it really is "limited freedom of speech". All governments are corrupt. Some more to the core than the others. But if your need is higher than you morals then you will still buy American or European (75% made in China).

    11. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    12. Re:by that logic... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      I'm certainly not buying American until the government allows freedom of speech, assembly, and religion. Oh wait... they do!
      Ascribing moral equality between the governments of China and the USA is an insult to the innocent people executed and imprisoned by the vile, corrupt government of China. Really? I thought it was an insult to the innocent people executed and imprisoned by the vile, corrupt government of the United States. At least I don't see the Chinese leaders on television mocking Death Row inmates. Remember that Bush interview with Fucker Carlson concerning Carla Faye Tucker? "Please, don't kill me," chuckles Bush.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    13. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, that's silly. There are much better reasons to avoid Dell.

    14. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is an insult to the innocent people tortured and imprisoned by the vile, corrupt Bush administration.

      Maybe 8 years ago the USA had a moral leg to stand on. Not anymore.

    15. Re:by that logic... by Liquidrage · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, their freedom to be killed by Saddam sure was great.

      Iraq is a cluster now. It was before too.

      The worst part about the US going into Iraq is the entire world should have gone. Leaders like Saddam who routinely kill their own people en masse should not be allowed. While everyone was busy living in their free little NA or Europe, few seemed to care what was actually happening in Iraq. Until the US went in there.

      No, I don't buy the reasons given to us all as to why the US went in. But Saddam was a threat. To the world, to the region, and to his own people. He was a disgrace. The type of leader that the world shouldn't tolerate. So forgive me for not weeping that some shoddy reasoning (and who really knows the true purpose) was used to go in there.

      A bigger disgrace is that the world didn't join. Again, not for the reasons listed in a SoTU. But because getting him out was the right (morally) thing to do.

    16. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference between China and the US is that China at is open about their oligarchy while the US pretends to be a democracy.

      That's because the Chinese government actually acknowledges the intelligence of their population, and doesn't feel like insulting it, unlike the American government, which feels that it's people are all as dumb as the puppet they "elected".

    17. Re:by that logic... by denisbergeron · · Score: 1, Insightful

      May be you should read newspaper or listen news on radio or tv.
      Oh Wait, if you protect the USA gouvernment, is because you are an unitedstatian.
      So, in your country, you don't have real newspapers ou real news on TV. Try a satellite radio or TV receiver and try to read Canada or UK newspaper, you will learn a lot of things about your so perfect country.
      But, usualy, you will see that people who really try to use they freedom of speech or freedom of assembly, and religion are arrested and jailed sometime, without trial.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    18. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the guys in Gitmo.

    19. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Dell based in the U.K.? Nein. Dell is based in Texas.
    20. Re:by that logic... by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      And an insult to the innocent people executed and imprisoned by the vile, corrupt government of America. These are two very distinct varieties of evil, lets not conflate the two.

      In all seriousness though, if one were theoretically not buying American or Chinese... there are plenty of Japanese laptop makers, and those guys haven't committted a fresh atrocity in generations.

    21. Re:by that logic... by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      full size Dell computers are made in the U.S.A.

      I don't believe that is true for all systems anymore. Furthermore, I would expect the "base" system to be assembled in China (or wherever) with the motherboard, etc. pre-installed and just options added by a tech in the US.

      Also, "assembled" is different than "made". I pretty sure that nearly all the parts are in China or some other Asian country. About the only possible exception I can think of is the CPU, but no guarantees there either.

      But anyway, this is about laptops. I don't think any (outside of some military or rugged models) are made in the US. Can't compete on labor costs, and all the parts are made in China anyway.

    22. Re:by that logic... by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's the only difference. Good point!

      So why don't you move to China and 1st hand report on the freedoms there?

      I'm sure you'll come away thinking a few one-liners can summerize a country where billions of one-liners are possible.

      It's amazing that despite giving more then any other nation in the world, and that includes the government, everything America does is so evil. I'm sure all the wars America has faught on foreign soils were evil. All the humanitarian aide is hands out is evil. All the medical supplies and donations and the whole works. All evil America.

      What a bunch of crap you wrote. And it was purely out of ignorance that you wrote it.

    23. Re:by that logic... by sogoodsofarsowhat · · Score: 0

      the author of the original article request...is an A-HAT tool! No i dont give a rats arse about my Karma....the truth is the truth...and the article writer is a stupid self centered idiot!

      --
      . I love the sound of burning women and screaming rubber....
    24. Re:by that logic... by kalirion · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Except Saddam was the lesser evil compared to what's going on there right now. Sure, he deserved to die, but more innocent people are dying now in Iraq than did during Saddam's rule.

    25. Re:by that logic... by djbckr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agreed. I was a guest of China for a couple of weeks (adopting a girl). My translators (who shall remain nameless) told me how bad/corrupt things are. It was very dangerous for them to even tell me and my wife, but they wanted to make sure as many people as possible knew how bad it was. I fear for their lives.

    26. Re:by that logic... by hoyeru · · Score: 5, Insightful

      by your logic, why isn't USA in Sudan RIGHT THIS VERY MINUTE? Do you know by UN estimates 1.5 million women and children has been killed, raped etc in Sudan.

      by your logic, why did USA turn their back when simular genocide was happening in Rwanda?

      by your logic, why isn't USA invading Burm, sorry Mun-whetever its called?

      I can continue for a long long time you know. It would appear USA selectively decided who is bad and who isn't.

      Oh and also, remember that photo of Saddam and Rummy shaking hands back in 1980s-something? How come Saddam was good enough to do business with back then but NOT in 2003?

      Hello? hoyeru00@yahoo.com eagerly and breathlessly a-waiting your reply.

      Surprise me, PLEASE by saying something, anything intelligent instead of coming up with YET another new reason as to why USA illegally attacked a sovereign country without provocation.

        fuck karma, I like the truth better

      --
      fuck karma, I like saying the truth better
    27. Re:by that logic... by king-manic · · Score: 5, Insightful


      The worst part about the US going into Iraq is the entire world should have gone. Leaders like Saddam who routinely kill their own people en masse should not be allowed. While everyone was busy living in their free little NA or Europe, few seemed to care what was actually happening in Iraq. Until the US went in there.

      No, I don't buy the reasons given to us all as to why the US went in. But Saddam was a threat. To the world, to the region, and to his own people. He was a disgrace. The type of leader that the world shouldn't tolerate. So forgive me for not weeping that some shoddy reasoning (and who really knows the true purpose) was used to go in there.


      You invaded a fairly stable dictatorship and destroyed almost all of the infrastructure over 15 years, then remove the government and promoted civil war. It was bad under Saddam it's worse under the US. Unlike Japan or Germany there isn't multi billions pouring in to rebuild the infrastructure, we have multi-billion pouring in just to try to maintain order and supply your troops there. There wasn't a good reason to go in and that is why few countries did. Unlike Serbia or Rwanda there was no hope of making the situation better.

      You remember whose payroll Saddam was on in the 70's and 80's? Remember who was training and supplying Osama? Saddam is the type of leader The US promotes. It's asinine for you to say much about it. It's a bigger disgrace that your knowledge of history or world politics seems to come directly from fox news. Any an all action by Saddam were indrectly sanctioned by their main backer the US. So if the submitter has a problem with Chinese products because they backed the oppressive myanmar government then he should also boycott US products due to us backing Saddam and various other tyrannical dictators.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    28. Re:by that logic... by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 2, Funny

      Leaders like Saddam who routinely kill their own people en masse should not be allowed And yet here we are, trying to figure out how a guy in the US might possibly buy a laptop without funding the Chinese government.
      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    29. Re:by that logic... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Not entirely correct. Dell computers are assembled in Austin, TX, with motherboards made in Mexico by a supplier, computer cases made either offshore or in Mexico by other suppliers, keyboards made in China, monitors made in Mexico, and peripherals made in an assortment of offshore countries. The components on the motherboard, of course, vary by vendor and component. Drives also vary by manufacturer. The Dell I'm using right now has a Samsung hard drive, probably made in either Japan or Malaysia.

      My source

    30. Re:by that logic... by thegnu · · Score: 1

      A bigger disgrace is that the world didn't join. Again, not for the reasons listed in a SoTU. But because getting him out was the right (morally) thing to do.

      Right, but the BIGGEST disgrace is that WE said we were going into Iraq and that everyone will stand behind us. Then the rest of the world said they wouldn't aid us based on our shoddy premises. Then we went in ANYWAY, without the necessary backing. Giving very expensive no-bid contracts to many many people for RECONSTRUCTION, yet we didn't pay for armored hum-vees. How long have we been in Iraq? We're currently working on getting armored vehicles for the people on the ground.

      That's the biggest disgrace.

      On China, I think it's difficult to compare their country with our country, but I think that their government is roughly comparable to our government. The people have less historical inertia towards freedom, and are therefore less free. From what I can see, the Chinese population's freedom is growing, and ours is shrinking. I think that if you look at the description of the Chinese government, it's working well within the bounds of their self-description. Our government, however, is not working within the bounds of its self-description. So I do think our government is somewhat sicker organizationally than the Chinese. Which is not to say it's worse.
      -Nathan
      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    31. Re:by that logic... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Sure because every degree above absolute zero is same the temperature.

      Think what you will of America and it's policies. But to even compare it with China is absurd in that regard. American government has, for the majority of the time, been a boon to the world as a whole. Yes, there are conflicts where wonderful leaders like Saddam are overthrown and it makes people unhappy. And no, I'm not justifying Iraq with that sarcastic statement. But I am pointing out that no matter what side of the fence you're on, Iraq was an issue that should have been delt with. It wasn't Atlantis being invaded. American foreign policy is enormous. The most influential country in the world. While it easy to find examples of harm in there, there is more good then harm in the case of American foreign policy. Where as my biggest gripe with China is how the entire world stands by and let's a country like that into open markets so easily considering how disgraceful that country's government is.


      You do realize for a long time the US backed Saddam directly? America is good to it's people. Less so then most western powers but more so then the third world or the former warsaw pact countries. However it backs the worst allies. So if the submitters problem was with china and Myanmar then he really should boycott the US for Iraq, egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, much of Africa and much of South America.

      America aims only to look out for it's own economic interests which is what all countries do. But if you want to point figures at who causes the most human suffering you really have to point it back at the US. They fund more human misery then almost anyone besides the former British empire.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    32. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on how you define freedom I guess... Are these examples of free speech? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_v._Frederick http://graphic.pepperdine.edu/perspectives/2007/2007-09-27-Leonard.htm http://www.hecklerspray.com/sally-field-bleeped-for-saying-goddamn-at-the-emmys/200610097.php Would a country that truly had freedom of assembly have "free speech zones"? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone http://baltimorechronicle.com/052704FreeSpeechZones.shtml http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/08/04/hilden.freespeech/ Are these signs of a government respecting the freedom of religion? http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/09/15/wiretap_mosques_romney_suggests/ http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20070918-1624-ca-mosquesurveillance.html All of these are a lot milder than being run over by tanks, but in the U.S. things are definately moving in the wrong direction.

    33. Re:by that logic... by Luke+Dawson · · Score: 1

      Ascribing moral equality between the governments of China and the USA is an insult to the innocent people executed and imprisoned by the vile, corrupt government of China.

      Because the US would never consider executing innocent people now, would they?

      BTW, I understand your point, just playing devil's advocate.

    34. Re:by that logic... by BVis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Two words: No oil.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    35. Re:by that logic... by non · · Score: 1

      no, i'm not going to say that living in the US is worse than living in China. it isn't. but i don't think thats the point of most of the posters who responded to you. their point is that we pretend we don't do anything of things when we do, whenever any issue of National ________ Security arises (fill in the blank, try petroleum for starters, or remove the blanks entirely).

      no, living in china is definitely worse. but i'm more interested in trends. things are trending towards China in the US; this started after 9/11, but it actually deteriorated as time went on. why? well, look at the actions of karl rove; never cede power to your opponent if you can retain it. the 'republican century' is a quip that i believe can be ascribed to him.

      now extend that. make sure that your state is never challenged. certainly not in the way that myanmar's rulers are currently being challenged. turkey's leaders were challenged once; they lost. so they threw a 'coup by memorandum'. and for that george bush calls them a 'democracy'.

      so, in case i haven't made plain, thats what we're talking about, a government or style of government that can never be changed, at least not from the point of view of the current government.

      answer me one question. not that i'm a communist (i'm not), but if it really was such an inferior system, what was everyone afraid of?

      --
      ...vividly encapsulates that post-Watergate/pre-punk/coked-up moment when you could trust no one, least of all yourself.
    36. Re:by that logic... by eli+pabst · · Score: 1

      Is there a lot of oil in Serbia?

    37. Re:by that logic... by bwen · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      We did sit on the sidelines while the UN bungled Rwanda. So much for the UN. And I am sure the American people would be really happy to be directly involved in another war right now when recent experience has taught us that we will be going it alone. We can't afford to make peace in Iraq, Afghanistan and another nation. Bush has learned that the US will be going it alone on any of these missions (I know, our allies have "contributed") will be expensive and drawn out. A lame-duck president can't do that especially with the very real possibility of a looming recession

    38. Re:by that logic... by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      Iraq is a cluster now. It was before too.


      How many Beowulfs is that?
    39. Re:by that logic... by plover · · Score: 1
      As long as you're mentioning "guilt-free electronics", the author might want to be concerned about other social issues around his laptop:
      • Ensure that any tantalum used in the capacitors was mined from a source other than the Congo -- the money is funding a horrifying civil war with unbelievable atrocities being committed on both sides, and the coltan miners themselves are killing the eastern lowland gorillas for food.
      • Check for RoHS compliance -- help keep the future electronics waste stream lead-free.
      • Recycle the old laptop -- since it still works, donate it to charity or mod it and use it as a picture frame. If it no longer works, bring it to a household hazardous waste collection site. Our local site charges $0.15 per pound.
      --
      John
    40. Re:by that logic... by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

      I would like to be in those places right now. The fact that we, the entire world, are not doing more in places like those sickens me.

      That does not mean I'm going to weep for the US being in a place that needed to be toppled.

      Sometimes you get what you ask for. And with you acting like a smart-ass because you think your rehashed point fit here due to you making stupid assumption, my reply is what you were asking for. And you got it.

      You got any other questions you want to ask me?

    41. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      A lot of people would argue that non-citizens are not given constitutional protections.

      A lot of people would argue the gray areas and specifics of "spying on citizens".

      A lot of people would argue that deporting people to their home nation is just.

      Don't get caught blowing up a military base. Don't call terrorists in other countries or call terrorist supporting states. Don't live in a country that tortures.

      And don't give me that crap about the US torturing. My wife makes me watch reality TV, that should be torture enough for anyone.

    42. Re:by that logic... by Mix+Master+Nixon · · Score: 1

      We're not imprisoning dissidents and journalists yet

      Be patient.
      --
      Oppressing an entire population is never cheap.
      --Jeckler (/. Beta IS GARBAGE!)
    43. Re:by that logic... by Miltazar · · Score: 1

      That is exactly what I think as well. I don't buy for a second that Saddam had "Nuclear Weapons". Did we go in for oil? Probably. Did we go in for some sort of family revenge? Possible. Honestly I don't care.

      Saddam may not have been a threat to America, but he was an evil dictator. There are alot of reasons why going in was a good idea. I agree that its a morally right thing to do, but thats not a reason I choose to list as why I agree with it. The United States is hardly anything close to "good". The only good thing about us is that we have a lot of(soon to be diminished) freedom. We have supported many dictators(including Saddam at one point) over the years. We overthrew a democratically elected president because he was gonna ruin one of our corporations banana fields.

      In the end we do what will continue to serve our purpose, but in this case I feel that every dictator we take down is one step closer to making up for all the dictators we've supported. Plus Saddam was an ass, he totally deserved it(joke, sorta).

      --
      "Hold! What you are doing to us is wrong! Why do you do this thing?"
    44. Re:by that logic... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you left out what happens to peaceful protesters at a Bush public speaking

    45. Re:by that logic... by chill · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was waiting for one of you uneducated morons to pipe up.

      The Sudan and Burma are loaded with oil. Burma also has massive reserves of hardwoods, precious gems and several other resources.

      These are the reasons China is neck deep in both countries and the primary arms suppliers to both governments. India just signed oil exploration agreements with Burma and Russia is negotiating with them for Natural Gas rights.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    46. Re:by that logic... by Phorion · · Score: 1

      I'm certainly not buying American until the government allows freedom of speech, assembly, and religion. Oh wait... they do! Yeah, it's good to know we have our free speech zones when the president comes to town. Without them, we'd be just like China!

      While I do agree that comparing the US and China is a matter of degree, China's a big fucking country. Causing some poor working sap to lose his/her job due to a general purpose Chinese boycott can't ever be called "sticking it to the man," so make sure not to congratulate yourself as such if you do it.
    47. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, there are other big differences between the US and China. For example, China is a growing economy, and the US Dollar just keeps on shrinking. China has a net trade surplus. China is not massively in debt. I could go on, but I think I've made my point, jingo.

    48. Re:by that logic... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      And yet here we are, trying to figure out how a guy in the US might possibly buy a laptop without funding the Chinese government.

      Just be glad we haven't invoked Hitler for some rude analogy. Oops.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    49. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's amazing that despite giving more then any other nation in the world, and that includes the government, everything America does is so evil.."

      You know what? You're right. Everything we do is tinged with a deeper evil than you realise.

      First off, we don't give more than other nations. Have you looked at how we count the figures? In any case, we only give when we can be sure of getting a lot more in return. But the key point is that we deceive ourselves. We pretend that, whatever it is, we're the greatest in the world. Then we lie to ourselves to prevent ourselves ever finding out.

      You know what embarrasses me about our country more than anything else? Our unquestioning arrogance and insularity. EVERYTHING must be about us, and we must be the greatest. Then we make up stories to pretend this, and Hollywood puts them out.

      A little while ago, I was watching a minor comedy. At one point the heroine got stuck in a record-breaking jet car. Somone commented that it was supersonic. The movie mock-up looked exactly the same as Thrust-SSC, the current world record holder, and the first supersonic car. But the car did not have a Union Jack on it - it was covered in the Stars and Stripes of America. Are we that far gone that we routinely steal other countries achievements and present them as our own? That is the mark of a deeply insecure country.

    50. Re:by that logic... by graphicsguy · · Score: 1

      We're not imprisoning dissidents and journalists yet

      It's apparently not for lack of trying, though. This couple was arrested for wearing anti-Bush t-shirts at a speech on public property. The police had trouble coming up with charges, and eventually tried "trespassing". They were later released, and successfully sued with the help of the ACLU.

    51. Re:by that logic... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Isn't Dell based in the U.K.?

      Only if we've managed to pawn off Texas to the Brits. Be absolutely wonderful if somebody pulled that one off. Texas doesn't really think it's part of the US anyway and most of the rest of the country is happy to leave it at that.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    52. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey fucktard, I'm happy Bush has "learned" something that history obviously couldn't teach him. It only cost a trillion dollars and several thousands more American lives and international mayhem.

      The reason the war is so expensive is because the money is literally being given away by the truckload to some very lucky people. What I wouldn't give for a few pallets of $100 bills...

    53. Re:by that logic... by aquatone282 · · Score: 1

      Right, the US would never hold people without a trial, spy on its citizens, or deport people to be tortured

      But the US does allow Anonymous Cowards to question, accuse, and insult our nation and its leaders without fear of reprisal, whereas in China you'd be getting a knock on your door any minute now.

      --
      What?
    54. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather die in a free society, than live under an unfree one.

      0wned.

    55. Re:by that logic... by Khazunga · · Score: 1

      The worst part about the US going into Iraq is the entire world should have gone.

      No it shouldn't. Invading countries to 'correct' their regimes assumes you know, from the outside, what is best for them. The result is in plainsight. Iraqis are worse today than under Saddam.

      Countries should find their own course. If under revolution then, and only then, should the international community intervene, in order to protect civilians as much as possible.

      Countries need to grow socially to adopt socially evolved forms of civilization. You can't cram democracy into countries without basic democratic infrastructures, like press, and without the basic democratic culture.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    56. Re:by that logic... by Knara · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ever heard any Japanese rap? There's an atrocity, and I don't even really listen to rap.

    57. Re:by that logic... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I think most Iraqis would take having to not slag-off Saddam to keep safe than having to dodge roving gangs of militia/US army/Blackwater guys shooting whatever moves. We in the west put Freedom up on this massively-tall pedestal and worship as if it's all that matters. When you get shot at trying to get your daily food, you realise security is far, FAR more important. Iraqis had that under Saddam (they did have to shut up about Saddam, though). Dead people can't vote, so freedom before security makes as much sense as food before oxygen.

    58. Re:by that logic... by vishbar · · Score: 1

      Why is it flawed logic? Maybe he SHOULD avoid Dell if he so disagrees with the current US policies as well.

      --
      Ride the skies
    59. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leaders like Saddam who routinely kill their own people en masse should not be allowed.

      I'm so sick of this crap.

      1. This was not the stated reason AT ANY POINT for the US invasion of Iraq in 2003.
      2. The attack that killed the Kurds was nearly 20 years ago, during the Iran/Iraq war. It was not routine.
      3. The Iraqi city of Halabja, where the attacks occurred, had been seized by Iranian troops.
      4. The Kurds were allied with Iran during the war. These were not exactly "his own people".
      5. There is evidence that chemical attacks took place by both Iraq and Iran during the war, and that Iran may have even used chemical weapons in Halabja as well.

      What is true is that Saddam carried out chemical attacks against his enemies during a war, causing the deaths of innocent people. These are war crimes. But please stop repeating the slogan about Saddam "routinely killing his own people en masse". It's false.

    60. Re:by that logic... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      I avoid Dell because of the 3 hour support calls I had for my laptop to replace the LCD screen while it was still under warranty. Apparently my first attempt at getting help got me sent to a department where the operator screamed in panic at me that they were under attack by a virus and couldn't help me, another attempt had me figuring out hindi, and finally I got a hold of someone who could help me at the three hour mark.

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    61. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't forget that the un also bungled the first gulf war which is why the us has to be in there in the first place.

      i love how you us bashers talk about how the us shouldn't be there but it was the un who fumbled the ball and no one has the nuts to say it.

      but i guess once you get to the point in the history chain where the us has involvement there is no need to continue to examine history? that sounds like that's the rule of thumb around here.

    62. Re:by that logic... by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can't buy a laptop or anything else. There's no one in the world who can't be at least associated with something that someone did wrong at one time in the past. Not even you -- so making it yourself isn't an option either.

      I suggest digging a hole and climbing in it.

    63. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saddam Hussein was never a threat to the world. His power was entirely regional. Aside from some seriously bad conflict with Iran, his government did little that could be considered bad outside his country's own borders. For instance, Iraq's invasion of Kuwait followed the U.S. ambassador to Iraq giving the Iraqi government the green light to undertake the invasion. It should be noted that the borders of Iraq were drawn by countries from the West decades ago. The murder of innocent people by the government of Iraq generally involved tribal conflicts with peoples who were only a part of Iraq due to the West's drawn borders. The most well-known atrocities came after violent attempts at destabilizing the Iraqi government by outlying tribes. One who supports Bush should not be arguing against tit-for-tat conflict styles.

      Iraq was not a cluster fuck before the United States invaded.

    64. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point isn't that America and China are morally equivalent. Rather, the USA lost its moral authority when we started a war of aggression, sanctioned torture, and started curtailing civil liberties one by one.

      There's always going to be pockets of America haters in any country, sure. But I'm a fucking American! And I was raised in a different America than the one I live in today.

    65. Re:by that logic... by BVis · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info.

      Now why don't you explain why we're not in the Sudan, if it's not 'because they have no oil'.

      Also, there's really no need to call people names when it's just as easy to politely correct them. You don't know me, yet you've already assumed that I'm an 'uneducated moron'. There's a difference between not knowing a single fact and being an 'uneducated moron'. Just like there's a difference between correcting somebody and being rude.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    66. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 1

      At least the Chinese haven't attacked any country in modern times.


      I suggest you google for "Tibet", "East Turkestan" or "Xinjiang", or "South Mongolia" along with "occupation", "genocide", "oppression", "repression", "mass settlement of chinese", "paramilitary", "PLA" plus "exploitation", "oil", "gas" and "natural resourcing" just to get started.

      I suppose the last sixty years and ongoing every single second counts as "modern times".

      You could also look up communist China's history with pretty much every one of their neighbors (not forgetting the nations under ongoing genocidal occupation) to learn more about the CCP's "peaceful" foreign policy. (if, somehow, you're exposed to the Official CCP Truth then you can naturally forget any useful analysis of their murderous rule.)

      It is fashionable (and largely true) to point out how screwed up the USA and their self-centered foreign policy really is, but they still have a long way to go before they can be compared with the likes of China (since Mao, and occasionally earlier too), Soviet Russia (esp. before 1991) or Nazi Germany (Hitler's 12 year reich). Or even the past European imperial powers like Spain or England.

      --

      Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

    67. Re:by that logic... by onemorehour · · Score: 1

      You can read my clarification, if you want.

    68. Re:by that logic... by sjf · · Score: 1
      There's no one in the world

      What about The Grand Duchy of Luxemburg ? They seem pretty innocent. Could he/she at least get someone from Luxemburg to dig the hole, if they don't actually manufacture laptops ?

    69. Re:by that logic... by bentcd · · Score: 1

      A bigger disgrace is that the world didn't join. Again, not for the reasons listed in a SoTU. But because getting him out was the right (morally) thing to do. But then, /those/ should have been the reasons that were brought forward, and /those/ should have been the facts presented to the UN. The US could have used this as an excellent opportunity to shame the rest of the world into following their lead. That case, however, was never made.

      When trying to convince someone to support you, it seems silly to expect that they will follow you for all the arguments that you are /not/ making.
      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    70. Re:by that logic... by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

      If you're sick of that crap, maybe you should learn to read. No really. Go try reading what I wrote. You're responding to some fluff piece of political rhetoric. That isn't what I wrote. People like you are what I'm sick of. People that can't see a discussion for what it is, but instead interject their own false assumptions.

    71. Re:by that logic... by confused+one · · Score: 2, Informative

      Assembled is correct. My Dell Dimension came from an assembly plant in North Carolina. The Dell parts, however, are almost all stamped or labelled Foxconn -- a Chinese manufacturer. The drive is a WD (I think); I don't know where that's made. The processor is an Intel, the silicon is processed in a Fab in the US, but is packaged in asia somewhere (Malaysia?) ....

    72. Re:by that logic... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      full size Dell computers are made in the U.S.A. (at least those sold in the USA are made here).

      If by "made" you mean "assembled from parts made in China", yes.

    73. Re:by that logic... by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      Just how ignorant are you?

      The US has shot it's own citizens in the past, Kent State ring any bells. More recently Wacko and Ruby Ridge. You can also look at force able clearances that resulted in deaths although no shots were fired.

      If you want the conspiracy nuts to go off on one ask them what happened on Sept 11. I'm still not sure how three buildings collapsed at close to the speed of gravity, in their own foot print, brought down by fire when no other steel framed tower has been so affected. Well that's not true I know damn well what happened the question is was it justified?

      Then start looking at the medical experiments performed without permission. Executions. etc etc.

      Then start to take a look at the drugs issues.

      In short the US is like any other country, it treats it's citizens as a resource to be exploited.

    74. Re:by that logic... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      We did sit on the sidelines while the UN bungled Rwanda.

      Duh. If the US SITS ON THE SIDELINES, the most powerful member of the UN, of course it's going to be "bungled". America wasn't alone in failing to stand up, but if it had, it could have led an effective UN force.

    75. Re:by that logic... by kamochan · · Score: 1

      So if the submitter has a problem with Chinese products because they backed the oppressive myanmar government then he should also boycott US products due to us backing Saddam and various other tyrannical dictators.

      You make a good point, sir.

      I'm european, and I have boycotted US products for years now, for the reasons you mention, among others. Due to the collapsing $, US-made things are cheap, so there are temptations -- for example, Chrysler makes semi-decent cars which are quite cheap here. Still I bought a Korean car instead. I eat often in fast food places and McD's is the cheapest, but I choose to use locals instead. Most entertainment produced in the US is fast food too and it's easy to find more entertaining alternatives. And so on. I am voting with my wallet, and I know I'm not alone in this. So what you posit perhaps in sarcasm is in fact happening.

      The only real thing that I haven't found a non-US replacement is Apple. And their products are made in China. Grr, argh.

      (Yes, I am not idealistic enough to actually inconvenience myself...)

    76. Re:by that logic... by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      We rebuilt a whole bunch of infrastructure that we damaged during the invasion. Then it got blown up. By Iraqis. I was totally against the Iraq war, but the reason it's in shambles right now is because there are many, many Iraqis who are perfectly willing to kill their neighbors and put their country in flames than see their religious opponents exercise their democratic majority power or exercise basic personal freedoms. If you want to blame the USA for that, go ahead and do so. But be honest and admit that what America really did by removing Saddam was free Iraqis to show the world their theocratic totalitarianism and their pure hatred they have for each other.

    77. Re:by that logic... by Khazunga · · Score: 1

      That phrase was there with the sole purpose of directing angry replies to it. The fact that you did not dispute any affirmation about the US but instead tried to paint China black says a lot about the current state of the democracy in the States.

      Of course China is no clean regime, and that was not my point.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    78. Re:by that logic... by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      Have you been to china? I don't think you have. I have.

      They allow a certain level of dissent as long as that dissent doesn't interfere with the status quo. A bit like the USA. It gives the illusion of free will.

    79. Re:by that logic... by deets · · Score: 1

      You need to stop drinking whatever it is you are drinking and find out why "Chemical Ali" has that nickname.

    80. Re:by that logic... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      We rebuilt a whole bunch of infrastructure that we damaged during the invasion. Then it got blown up. By Iraqis. I was totally against the Iraq war, but the reason it's in shambles right now is because there are many, many Iraqis who are perfectly willing to kill their neighbors and put their country in flames than see their religious opponents exercise their democratic majority power or exercise basic personal freedoms. If you want to blame the USA for that, go ahead and do so. But be honest and admit that what America really did by removing Saddam was free Iraqis to show the world their theocratic totalitarianism and their pure hatred they have for each other.

      Iraq wasn't a theocratic totalitarian regime. It was a secular military dictatorship. Your confusing Iraq with Iran and the Us was partly responsible for placing the current theocracy in Iran as well. Iraq was deeply divided along religious and ethnic lines for a long time. Ironically Saddams sadism kept the various factions form killing each other. There was a very common belief in non-Us nations that civil war would occur once Saddam was gone. It was partly why the Sr. Bush didn't invade after desert storm. He couldn't see a good chance at a positive outcome.

      Part of the problem is Bush removed too few troops so once they disposed the republican guard they also removed the rule of law. Leading to the chaos we see. Instead of fearing Saddams troops they now fear Saddams former troops, bandits, each other, the American soldiers.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    81. Re:by that logic... by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      We playing a logic game now?

      > Iraq was an issue that should have been delt with.

      Who made you the world police? It was brought to the UN and was being dealt with and yet the US still went in when told to wait.

      So we should invade and kill leaders of a country who are bad? So you won't have a problem when some other country assassinates the US President when he is as bad as those you are going on about.

      >The most influential country in the world.

      Rome, Victorian England, and many others have said the same thing. You stopped being the most influential country in the world sometime in the last 8 years.

      The America you are going on about is a pipe dream.

    82. Re:by that logic... by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1

      You do realize for a long time the US backed Saddam directly? America is good to it's people. Less so then most western powers but more so then the third world or the former warsaw pact countries. However it backs the worst allies. So if the submitters problem was with china and Myanmar then he really should boycott the US for Iraq, egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, much of Africa and much of South America.
      I love it when someone brings this up. So they backed Saddam.... It would have made more sense to back the Ayatollah instead (after he kept a bunch of it's citizens hostage and brutalized them as a first course)? Then they would have been funding Iranian 10-year olds sent in wave to clear minefields with their feet. That doesn't exactly conjur up a nicer, cleaner image. You can't back out of that saying they should just stay out altogether. It'd just be a race to see who can wipe Israel off the map first.

      It's not so much a shortsighted, bad choice as it is the most tolerable of a set of potential bad choices.

      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    83. Re:by that logic... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      The worst part about the US going into Iraq is the entire world should have gone. Leaders like Saddam who routinely kill their own people en masse should not be allowed.

      What would happen if we tried to enforce this? First, while the world can gang up on Slobodan Milosevic or Saddam Hussein, we can't do so for Stalin or Mao. Second, the only significant offensive military force that has any sort of moral standing to fight for human rights is NATO, and I don't think NATO conquering the rest of the world is a good thing. (As you may recall, the same group of countries did, collectively, conquer most of the world a long time ago and it didn't turn out well.) The East Asian powers are either human rights violators themselves, or are too weak to even defend themselves against attack without foreign help. African states are often both, as are the Middle Eastern states. Third, war is not exactly preferable to dictatorship, and a world war to destroy all dictatorships would take longer to work than peaceful means. Finally, the US chose Iraqi-occupied Kuwait and later Iraq over Saudi Arabia, China, North Korea, Syrian-occupied Lebanon, Zimbabwe, Rwanda, Sudan, Chinese-occupied Tibet, and so forth for entirely self-serving reasons. "The world", even if they were as warmongering as the United States, has largely different interests and won't join the US because their interests lie in other cases where they can easily rationalize serving their interests by starting a war. Norway has no reason to lower oil prices by making Iraqi oil available on the open market, Germany has no grudge against Iran because their embassy wasn't taken hostage in 1979, America's currency is too vulnerable to China to join in a war against them, and so forth.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    84. Re:by that logic... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Iraq vs Iran was a military aggression initiated by Iraq with the blessing and funding of the Americans. America didn't need to take one side or the other. This wasn't an intellectual "well if I had to choose I'd pick Iraq." it was a "well I hear you don't like your neighbors. Did you know they called your father a pig fucker? yes I know.. well let me tell you what I'll do for you. I have these tanks..."

      It was 1 of 3 choices. Do nothing, Back a murderer, back a zealot. They chose to back the murderer. Not only back him but to encourage and fund his war.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    85. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course China is no clean regime, and that was not my point.

      Well guess what, China's government has been far worse than the US's. It's too politically correct to say so, but you don't have to like truth.

    86. Re:by that logic... by blhack · · Score: 1

      For God's sake, echelon has existed since the 1970's and the "torturing" that you're talking about involves making a bunch of murderous psychos listen to christina aguilera tapes.

      Personally i think that people like you are the result of the "bubble wrapping" of the country. When i was just a pup, we stayed out all night, disappeared into the woods camping for days at a time without cellphones or GPS, i drove a boat by myself and pulled my brothers around on inner-tubes (as in the actuall inner-tube of a tractor tire) when i was 13 years old in my dad's boat. We shot at rabbits, and ate them. I went deer hunting, i killed pheasants. I didn't take stupid gun safety course, and starting learing how to hunt with my dad when i was like 7 years old.

      Fortunately for me, my parents DIDN'T just let me sit in front of the television or the computer all day long. If i wanted something to happen I actually had to go outside and DO IT! Oh, the kids are picking on you at school? Well deal with it. You want a new bike? Well go and track down a neighbor who will let you mow the grass for some money and buy one, no i won't do it for you. Your dog is misbehaving? Well either learn how to train it to stop misbehaving, or we're going to get rid of it.

      Unlike some of the youth of today, I was NOT taught that if you want something, you can just sit down and talk with somebody until it happens. Try that first (because its easier) but eventually, if you want it bad enough, you're going to have to figure out a way to make it happen on your own.

      So I say to you, if you hate the government so bad, and you think that we are just this big pack of evil baby-seal-killers, DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! Run for public office, if enough people agree with you, you'll have the oppurtunity to change something. Do you believe in your cause enough to die for it? The people who FOUNDED this country did, so show some goddamned respect.

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    87. Re:by that logic... by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1

      It was 1 of 3 choices. Do nothing, Back a murderer, back a zealot. They chose to back the murderer. Not only back him but to encourage and fund his war.
      It was more like, pit a fascist murderer against a murdering zealot, to keep both of them busy and away from a real ally. Subterfuge is a valid strategy.
      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    88. Re:by that logic... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Saddam was indeed a fascist Murderer. However the Islamic revolution was a populist one. It wasn't a story of a small group of zealots seizing a country against it's will but rather a country of zealots who kicked out a monarchy and installed a theocracy. Murderer isn't a good tag for that as the revolution wasn't that violent. Iran ideology is very dangerous but don't believe the PR. If the Us invades Iran it'll find ~70 million hostile zealots on it's hands. Real allies? that region is led by snakes and murderers. They aren't' even real allies to each other let alone a universally despised Imperialist power. UAE, Saudi Arabia, Egypt have more direct links to 911 then Iraq. Remember the guys who flew the plans were all from those 3 nations. Those 3 nations are the closest thing to a US ally in the region aside from Israel. It might have damaged 2 of Israels enemies but Israel itself has a very fickle alliance withe the Us that mostly goes 1 way.

      PS. I'm not a "Zionist conspiracy" nut, but can Israel hasn't gone out of it's way to help it's primary benefactor.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    89. Re:by that logic... by iserlohn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That illustrates the differences in how Americans think of themselves and how the world thinks of America. In the case of China and the issues with Taiwan, Tibet and Xinjiang, China (and many observers) regards these as territorial and succession issues. It doesn't make it right to suppress these peoples, but such infractions are mainly played out as domestic issues on the world stage. Some would consider such as human rights issues and this is a view I subscribe to personally considering the history of the ruling Communist party in China. However, you cannot discount the fact there is a bit of a double standard also. For an example closer to home, take a look at the U.S. from the point of view of Civil Rights in the past 50 years. How much involvement from foreign powers was The U.S. willing to take?

      On the other hand, America since the start of the cold war, has been *projecting* power to far reaches of the globe. Pretty much like how Great Britain and the colonial powers used to. However, the British and other European powers (and Japan) were at least forthright in their motives (ie. empire building and that famous burden). The reason why America is viewed with so much suspicion (ie. Iraq) nowadays is because the stated reasons of intervention are often very different from the actual reasons for doing so, or at least so it seems. For many people, America embodies the new imperialism and personally I find it surprising that so many are apparently oblivious to this fact. Maybe it is because people of recent generations living in the developed world isn't really aware of the suffering of the many peoples of the colonial era. For many in the developing world, however, this memory is still fresh in the collective consciousness.

      You can argue that the U.S. has no alternative as the U.S.S.R was leveraging its might to maintain her own sphere of influence (a proxy war against free-market liberal nations). There is some truth in that also, but you might be aware that the cold war has ended some years ago. The troubling thing is the nature of international politics hasn't changed much. If developed nations subscribe more to a "do as I do" policy on the international stage, it will make it much harder for rouge nations to have any ammunition to fire back at all. Indeed, it may even win over peoples' hearts in the developing world, making the task of improving the governance of such countries a tad easier.

    90. Re:by that logic... by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1
      And there is a 4th choice you left out: they could have gone in and done the job themselves, but we all know what unilateral action nets anyone in the court of world opinion.

      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    91. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sudan's oil is nowhere near as pure as the Persian/Arabian gulf area, it requires a lot more processing/purification to get usable oil out of it.

      Sudan's oil is also mainly located in southern Sudan, Darfur is in the west.

      And yes, I am Sudanese.

    92. Re:by that logic... by alfarid · · Score: 1

      Liquidrage! You are not thinking. If you think USA did a nice thing by going to Iraq you are an idiot, and i suggest you take airplane there , i.e straight to Baghdad and walk around ask people how nice it is that US invaded them. Just go!!! Oh and BTW before US invaded you COULD GO ANYWHERE without getting shot at. Awesome change. Before invasion: schools were working, hospitals functioning, people had water, electricity, food etc. DO YOU HAVE food, water, electricity LIQUIDRAGE? How about if you meet a kid, having no hands cause US missile took them away while they were ramping up the invasion ( Shock and Awe ). Do YOU, LIQUIDRAGE, WANT TO HAVE YOUR KID HAVE NO HANDS BECAUSE OF STUPID OIL AND POLITICS?? so before you say something else as stupid as you have said, consider that whatever you saying is hardwired in your brain by military strength propaganda that you got brainwashed with in US, THE INVADER, which happens to be home to a lot of good people same as Iraq. And these people don't want to get bombed, shot at, invaded, governed by outside country etc.

    93. Re:by that logic... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      And there is a 4th choice you left out: they could have gone in and done the job themselves, but we all know what unilateral action nets anyone in the court of world opinion.

      Apathy? Everyone gave some lip service to "US is bad" and did nothing about it.

      I don't think anything short of a WWII style mobilization would have done much. The American people aren't into a war like that so it'd be Vietnam but worse because the opposition in better armed. As well do what yourselves? install a puppet regime? Saddam was a pseudo puppet regime. Iran was run by one until it was over thrown. Install a democracy? the US doesn't tend to favor democracies in it's puppets. Democracies are hard and expensive to control while a pupper dictatorship requires the bribing and kissing of only a few asses.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    94. Re:by that logic... by Kohath · · Score: 1

      What about The Grand Duchy of Luxemburg ? They seem pretty innocent. Could he/she at least get someone from Luxemburg to dig the hole, if they don't actually manufacture laptops ?

      I think the ancestors of the citizens of Luxembourg were involved in a war at some point in history.

      Plus, in World War 2, the people of Luxembourg were either on the Axis side, the Allied side, or neutral, or somewhere in between one of those.

      If they were on the Allied side, then their bombs killed innocent people.
      If they were on the Axis side, then they are complicit in the holocaust.
      If they were neutral, then they turned a blind eye to the holocaust.
      If they were somewhere in between, then they are partially guilty on two or more of these points.

      So no. Maybe he can just find a hole that already exists. Or steal one.

    95. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      holy crap, do you want me to to put great big fucking IRONY tags in there? i even linked to kent state on wikipedia ffs.

      sheesh.

    96. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why isn't the US in Sudan ?

      Because in Sudan the muslim government is killing blacks, because they're black. They call em infidels, and blow them up, take them as slaves, ...

      It would obviously be very racist to state the reason these people do this ... they feel they're entitled ... they had this prophet a few hundred years ago who told them it's okay ...

      The democrats would be up in arms, because it would be loads harder to deny islam's evil. And you know, it "really" isn't ("really" in the chinese government meaning of the word).

    97. Re:by that logic... by bwen · · Score: 1

      "Fucktard" here, gotta love an ignorant Bush hater AC. You only prove my point: If the US is going to be expected to be world police "Why won't the Americans save us?," then yes, it will be expensive and yes, it will cost lives. And the war is expensive.. because wars are expensive. Money "given" to "lucky people" ??? Source? Maybe if we outsourced some more to the Chinese...

    98. Re:by that logic... by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1
      The real ally I referred to is Israel. And you are right, they don't always pay back in kind. But as you point out, they're not hijacking US planes, taking US hostages, or trying to fsck over the US economy any way they can either.

      And no, I haven't forgotten 9/11. FWIW, I was less than three miles from the Pentagon that morning and someone I worked with was on the very plane that crashed into it, smartass. Incidentally, the populist revolution didn't serve the minority Kurdish or Jewish communities, or westernized Persians in Iran very well. The revolution may have been largely peaceful, but it wasn't exactly 100% support. A lot of those people died as result of the power shift, or were shoved in a very dark hole never to be heard from again. Or if they were lucky, maybe they fled the country (and left a large chunk of their family behind to try and get by in a place that hates them) -- I've met a few of those poor bastards, can't say I got the impression they blame the US for their situation.

      I'm not a nut of any kind. I'm just an American, weary of the world constantly asking for stuff from us then criticizing us for getting involved in world affairs. Maybe the UN and EU should stop dithering and do their share for once.

      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    99. Re:by that logic... by big_paul76 · · Score: 0

      I always thought that the worst thing about the Iraq invasion is that the Americans managed to turn the only secular middle-class country in the region into something more like Iran.

      Before gulf war I, Iraq had some things that were rare in the region, like, say, women working as doctors and lawyers and stuff. Free education and healthcare for everybody.

      Now, what was a stable secular state (granted it was ruled by a guy who intentionally modeled himself after Stalin,) is being taken over by fundamentalists, and most of the middle class (anybody who could manage it) has fled to Syria. Syria's managed to accommodate over 1 million Iraqis.

      Hmmmm... Since Bush came in, we've got Iraq, global war on terror, killed Kyoto, and that other treaty on bio-weapons. As a Canadian comedian said, "Mr Bush, all we're saying is, 'Slow down'! Rome wasn't burnt in a day!"

      --
      The plural form of "anecdote" is "anecdotes", not "evidence".
    100. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, it's not like you posted that story on Slashdot or anything. And anyhow, it's not like the Chinese government are employing widespread censorship of the net. I'm sure their lives are really safe

    101. Re:by that logic... by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      More like we gave up on Southeast Asia a long time ago. Also, intervention in Africa has never been popular over here.

    102. Re:by that logic... by chill · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the snappy reply. That one line "because they have no oil" has become a meme propagated by people who seem to have distilled the U.S. invasion of Iraq down to one simple, black & white issue. It isn't, and wasn't ever that simple.

      To answer your question, as to why we don't (or didn't) intervene in the Sudan, Burma, Rwanda, DPR Congo, Zimbabwe, Liberia or any other of those hot-spots is rather complicated, but if you want a simple answer -- it isn't in the best interests of the United States.

      Leave Burma for last, simply because it is the only one I listed that isn't in Africa.

      The memory of colonialism is still strong in Africa. A western power stepping in would be perceived by many as white people not believing black people are capable of running a country and having to step in to "save the poor savages from themselves". Add to that the fact that none of them would be a "quick fix" and establishing stable, working, representative government would take a DECADE or more of occupation. Ditto for Iraq -- a DECADE or more, without outside interference. By that time even the people who you tried to help will be calling you an occupying power and be working against you.

      Not a one of them is worth all the trouble from a U.S. perspective, especially when you consider most of the "rebels" would be more interested in exacting revenge as to reconciliation and building bridges. For recent examples, see DPR Congo, Uganda, Zimbabwe and Liberia.

      As for Burma, it too has a colonial past with Britain. The Junta do their best to blame every problem they have on the outside interference of Britain and the U.S. They also share a border with China, who I'm fairly certain wouldn't be interested in having U.S. troops that close.

      They're also a short hop from Vietnam. The press in the U.S. would be making comparisons before the President finished any sentence about sending troops over there.

      Sudan's current gov't is militantly Islamic and forceably imposed Sharia Law on the southern States in direct abrogation of the Addis Ababa Agreement that ended their first Civil War. And to put things in perspective, Osama bin Laden's latest message to the world called from mujhadeen to travel to Sudan to expel the infidel U.N. and African Union peacekeepers. Then there are issues with cross-border incursions into Chad and Uganda... it is a mess.

      Watch the movie "Lord of War" for general info on the way politics and gun-running is handled by the big boys. The last scene where Costner explains to the guy that arrested him how it all works and why he was going to be free soon is enlightening.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    103. Re:by that logic... by chill · · Score: 1

      The location of the oil is irrelevant. It is still controlled by the Sudanese gov't and if the U.S. invaded, I'm fairly certain they wouldn't be okay with "we're just gonna be in Darfur, so ignore that tank brigade and go about your business".

      As for the purity, it still beat the pants off of oil shale and oil sands. The Chinese seem to be happy with it.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    104. Re:by that logic... by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Umm but you're not boycotting slashdot?

      NASDAQ:LNUX

    105. Re:by that logic... by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      Have you been to china? I don't think you have. I have.

      They allow a certain level of dissent as long as that dissent doesn't interfere with the status quo. A bit like the USA. It gives the illusion of free will.


      A bit like the USA???!!!

      In the USA you can have a rally about anything you want. A student newspaper in Colorado just recently ran an editorial that read, "Taser This...FUCK BUSH." Can you do the same thing in China using their head of states name and not fear getting called by the police?

      Can you organize a rally in Tiananmen Square in China to protest against their government? I doubt it but in the USA you can protest the USA government on the Washington Mall and say whatever you want.

      Hell! There are people in the USA that protest the government and TRY to get arrested!

      I don't think it's a bit like the USA

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    106. Re:by that logic... by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 1

      AC, you would have gotten my mod points today, if I had any.

      --

      "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

    107. Re:by that logic... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      recent experience has taught us that we will be going it alone

      On behalf of the rest of the UK, fuck you too.

    108. Re:by that logic... by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the current plan is to cede it to Mexico.

    109. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, now you are describing one of the key arguments of your own post as a "fluff piece of political rhetoric"? You don't make the slightest bit of sense.

    110. Re:by that logic... by Phil06 · · Score: 0

      Saddam Hussein was a genocidal tyrant. He started two wars of agression. If you include the missiles he fired at Israel, he tried to launch a third. You hand-wringers never lifted a finger when he was killing thousands of his own people, yet you use your freedom of speech to defend a tyrant who would have tortured your family and then killed you for disagreeing with him. There are only a few tyrants like him left in the world, Kim Il-Sung comes to mind, care to defend him?

      --
      "...and yet, I blame society" Duke - Repo Man
    111. Re:by that logic... by mypalmike · · Score: 1

      Iraq wasn't a theocratic totalitarian regime. It was a secular military dictatorship.

      Look. Saddam = Evil. US = good. It's real simple. Stop trying to bring facts into the discussion!

      --
      There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
    112. Re:by that logic... by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Unlike Japan or Germany there isn't multi billions pouring in to rebuild the infrastructure, we have multi-billion pouring in just to try to maintain order and supply your troops there.


      I think you're a bit mistaken. We bombed over 100 German cities to rubble, and Japan was not far off. They were also nuked. The American public simply doesn't have the tolerance for terror campaigns anymore. I can assure you that if we had simply nuked Basra the first time there was a major revolt there, the area would be quite peaceful too.

      Unlike Serbia or Rwanda there was no hope of making the situation better.


      Let's see, Serbia, a nation working to finally free itself of the legacy of Muslim conquest and prevent the UN from creating a country that never even existed in the past is in the same league as a barbarian nation where people simply hacked each other to death for sport? Things were not "made better" in Serbia. They easily could have been made better by deporting every last muslim to Turkey or Iraq or wherever. Rwanda? Well, stopping the bloodshed will never be possible. Violence is their way.
      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    113. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      king-manic wrote: "Install a democracy? the US doesn't tend to favor democracies in it's puppets. Democracies are hard and expensive to control while a pupper dictatorship requires the bribing and kissing of only a few asses."

      It has worked pretty well in Canada and they don't even have to kiss any ass! Leave the yanks alone. They have been better friends to you than anyone else.

    114. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'd boycott you right back but you don't make anything! Except an occasionally decent bottle of booze, bad political ideologies, bureaucracy, even worse pop music than ours, and maybe a few cars that are ridiculously expensive even if they are good. Sadly, the US seems to be headed the same direction, minus the cars. Boycotts are stupid.

    115. Re:by that logic... by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      I know it's really about having different cultural and historical contexts, given that the USA is a country established by claiming a continent as their own (displacing natives) and basically saying "go fsck yourself" to their "mother" country (i.e. Britain) But I digress.

      The fact is, the present boundaries of China is pretty much more or less the same as the China (when it had strong influence) had been for some thousands of years.

      You may have a point with border conflicts and rather sick stuff going on on the China western borders, but generally modern China has not been keen on sending troops to attack any sovereign states. And to nit pick, the places you mention don't really count as "counties". Perhaps it's just a nitpick, but then there's a difference between something which can be arguably said to be "suppressing rebellions/civil wars" and outright invasion of a country on the other side of the globe. The means (killing the innocent, torture, etc.) are another matter, and there's really no point in arguing who's the lesser evil (You killed your OWN PEOPLE while we only killed an EVIL MUSLIM!!).

      The point is, what the USA currently is doing is going around the world threating all countries around the world with outright invasion if they don't like you -- it's not like China's going to do that in any foreseeable future (except maybe Taiwan, duh, but in the present political climate not even that).

      So most "Chinese apologists" here I can guess are not really defending the status of things in China, but are genuinely perplexed by how these "Americans" (note: last I heard USA was still a democracy so generalizations are presumably > 50% correct) can violate human rights by secret prisons, torture, invading another country and wrecking it up, outright lying to citizens, heavy use of death penalty, etc, turn around and accuse China for basically the same things. Maybe China is worse, but to get pounded by the one who's merely slightly "less bad" isn't convincing. It's a valid argument that things which need to be done ought be done regardless whether others are doing the same wrong things, but just that it's not fscking convincing.

      [OT rant follows]

      Since you brought up the issue of "Tibet", "East Turkestan" or "Xinjiang", or "South Mongolia", perhaps I could lend you some comparative perspectives. I understand that USA was founded by breaking free of British rule and declaring independence and war against Britain that ultimately succeeded. That's the "ideal model" of creating a "free and democratic country" according to USA history. I further understand that most people tend to see their home country under a positive light, which is why this "declare independence from evil totalitarian regime" mindset is so perfect and pristine for so many Americans. I understand why they think that the same model would work on Iraq, even though it's basically untested and the only "really" successful example is the USA itself. I'll also briefly note that what they tend to deemphasize is where the native Americans have gone to.

      However, Chinese history has a different story to tell. Most times of war, poverty and turmoil were when China was having difficulty either internally (struggling with civil wars) or externally (when "barbaric" tribes were strong and attacking the borders). Usually both. So as I understand it, most Chinese would view a strong and unified China as *the* path to prosperity. Military rebellions by non-Han ethic groups (seen as the "bad guys" in Chinese history) on the Chinese borders were something to be frowned at, and inaction by the central government was usually a sign of impotence. And the worst times in Chinese history are usually times when individual regions of China declare themselves sovereign and get into messy infighting. So the general mindset is -- if all is (apparently) stable, don't "fix" things by having regions go independent; The keywords are control, centralization and unification. (c.f. USA values of "freedom, liberty, independence") Anythin

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    116. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, which is why we saw all those abrahms tanks littering the side of the road when we invaded. Oh, wait... ...and the multi-billions are going to repair infastructure.

      Don't let facts get in the way.

    117. Re:by that logic... by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

      It's amazing that that jackass's post is still sitting at +5 insightful.
      He did nothing but reply to an assumed argument. And his assumption was wrong.

      There is a common argument people use to justify Bush's entrance into the war. That is as a humanitarian effort.
      This of course is easily countered by naming other humanitarian crisis that we've not gone into with such vigor.

      It was out of place and context. I didn't attempt to justify the reasons for Bush deciding to go to war. In fact, I flat out stated I didn't buy the reasons given.

      I simply stated I didn't care what the reasons were, I believe getting out Saddam was worth it. You could argue against that of course. But that +5 he has is probably the worst, and most biased, moderation I've seen here. The fact is his argument is 100% misplaced.

    118. Re:by that logic... by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      > I'm certainly not buying American until the government allows freedom of speech, assembly, and religion.
      > Oh wait... they do!

      Oh wait. Unless you're Muslim. Or Arab. Or just got some dark skin and speak in funny accents. And yes, China does have freedom of religion -- unless for religions that like to mess with politics (Western, especially US, notions of separation of Church and state is a joke)

      And I'm not really sure whether anybody has tried this in the USA, but I'm betting that something bad will happen if you (seriously) openly declare support for Bin Laden, Al'Qaeda. Oh and you're not allowed to swear on public broadcast channels too, and you're not allowed to show a tit. *think of the children!!*

      Suck it up. Most societies have their own taboos. There are a lot of "but" qualifications for your so called freedoms. Admittedly as I understand it the USA is still freer than that in China, but an unqualified statement that they "do" have such freedoms (as if they're binary) isn't an accurate representation of the situation either.

      > Ascribing moral equality between the governments of China and the USA is an insult to the innocent people executed
      > and imprisoned by the vile, corrupt government of China.

      Could go either way. I'm pretty sure the number of casualties (both US military and Iraqi) in Iraq, Afghanistan (and all the places USA put its nose into) scale up pretty nicely to match to the number of people "executed and imprisoned" by the Chinese government.

      Well, to sum it up more fairly, ascribing a moral quality to governments is basically an insult to your common sense. We all like to be the "good guys", but alas that's just not the ways things are...

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    119. Re:by that logic... by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      I'm not actually confusing Iraq with Iran. I'm saying that the insurgents (that is to say, many Iraqis) WANT a theocratic regime, not that they had one. I agree with everything else you are saying though.

    120. Re:by that logic... by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      > We're not imprisoning dissidents and journalists yet

      Terrorists. Or lookalikes.

      > country we're occupying is at least still free to practice their religion

      China has freedom of religion as long as it's not political... there are Christian, Muslim, etc. groups within China. It's just that there's something in the "separation of church and state" that that most western religious groups seem to fail to grasp. Somehow relgious groups seem to be most keen on "fixing" the "problems" in China, through political means and whatnot. Unless freedom of religion means freedom of politics, and then I can tell you that China doesn't even pretend to have "freedom of politics" unless you join the communist party (or if you overthrow them.. that's the problem)

      > short of the call to drive the infidels out of the holy land. Contrast with tibet.

      That's because the guy was a political threat... some guy who threatens to lead a large chunk of your territory into independence and you'd expect a nice and warm treatment? What if somebody manages to rally California to declare independence from the Federal government? I doubt the USA government is going to say "sure, No problemo, we'll just remove a star from our flag. Good job." bleh.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    121. Re:by that logic... by khallow · · Score: 1

      So what does this author say about the US's economic policy. Not the failed World Bank/IMF stuff, but the tens of trillions of dollars in trade with the rest of the world. Or the end of the USSR?

    122. Re:by that logic... by s4m7 · · Score: 1
      Sure, buddy.

      China has freedom of religion as long as it's not political... there are Christian, Muslim, etc. groups within China. All of which must be sanctioned by the government. Christianity, especially the catholics, have been persecuted and imprisoned in china for decades. Falun Gong, well we know how well that went over. Oh wait, they were a "cult" not a religion.

      That's because the guy was a political threat I assume by "the guy" you are referring to the dalai lama.

      guy who threatens to lead a large chunk of your territory into independence Tibet has been separate on the map from china for my entire lifetime (30 years or so), and is recognized as such by most international bodies. China is constantly trying to annex bits of surrounding countries, including india, hong kong, mongolia, and I'm sure there's some I'm leaving out. I don't know which part of the Chinese government you're in, but move the propaganda train back to asia, thanks.
      --
      This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
    123. Re:by that logic... by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Because our president has an Oedipus complex and his Veep an oil fetish?

      Personally, I'd like to see us do something about Zimbabwe, but that's not going to happen either.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    124. Re:by that logic... by Khazunga · · Score: 1

      Or even the past European imperial powers like Spain or England.

      I happen to be from a past European imperial power (Portugal). It so happens that every European imperial power, except for Spain, decolonized their empires in a pretty constructive fashion. You have to understand that losing a colony means losing a lot of power, so secession wars are inevitable. However, credit is due to the huge diplomatic effort and excellent results that the Brits produced when creating the Commonwealth, or to the excellent relations French kept with their African colonies or to the great relationship between Portugal and Brazil and East Timor, Angola and Mozambique.

      For a very fond example of good colonization, Portugal is a prime example. Portuguese colonies were established by mingling with natives, producing unique cultures that flourished on their own with unique features. Look at the average Brazilian, and you'll find a mix of native South Americans with European colonizers. I digress. My generic point is: While the United States haven't, historically, committed large blunders, they are doing their first one right now, with the invasion of Iraq and the political destabilization of a whole region of the globe. Worse, they don't seem to recognize it. Worse yet, and really scaring, is that this is coming from a country that is a developed democracy as they come. It shows how fragile freedom is, and how easily a good people can commit atrocious acts.

      And I can't stop being amazed on how self-righteous Americans are, with the ingrained idea that they are, and that they should be, policemen (and jury and executioner) of the World. Your effect outside of your borders is on par with China, veering for the worst. The historical evaluation of your current actions will be much much worse than the historical evaluation of the acts of European colonizers.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    125. Re:by that logic... by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      China is constantly trying to annex bits of surrounding countries, including india, hong kong, mongolia, and I'm sure there's some I'm leaving out. I live and grew up in Hong Kong and I take offense. Are you implying that Britain had the right to rule over Hong Kong? The country that's more or less on the other side of the Earth? and FYI nobody here mentions about independence (hint: we don't want it). The most "activist" people only ask for a greater degree of democracy, and beside drudging that China is too conservative on reforms, don't really have a problem in principle with China being the new boss here.

      You may have a point about Tibet, Mongolia etc. I admit that I'm short of facts, so I dunno. But once you mention Hong Kong and I justly dismiss your statements as utter BS. I mean, there's no point in discussing when you don't even have the basic facts right. You may have some of the conclusions correct, by chance. But then it's a waste of time listening to what you have to say.

      So shove your ignorance elsewhere. I'm sure you believe Hong Kong is an internationally recognized independent state because we send separate teams to the Olympics too.

      Oh and Hong Kong is not, and has never been a country. It's not a matter of political correctness (like Taiwan, you missed that out), it's a matter of fact.

      And if I've misunderstood you and you really mean "You say you don't want independence but you really do! China is evil! Nobody wants to be ruled by Chinese! Not even Chinese!", I can tell you to go fsck yourself.
      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    126. Re:by that logic... by Professor+Fate · · Score: 1

      by your logic, why isn't USA in Sudan RIGHT THIS VERY MINUTE? Do you know by UN estimates 1.5 million women and children has been killed, raped etc in Sudan.

      Africans don't want Western troops in Africa. They would see it as a return to colonialism.

      by your logic, why did USA turn their back when simular genocide was happening in Rwanda?

      See above.

      by your logic, why isn't USA invading Burm, sorry Mun-whetever its called?

      China.

      I can continue for a long long time you know. It would appear USA selectively decided who is bad and who isn't.

      Of course there is a selection process.

      Oh and also, remember that photo of Saddam and Rummy shaking hands back in 1980s-something? How come Saddam was good enough to do business with back then but NOT in 2003?

      I doubt that Rummy and friends really liked Saddam in the 80s. He was just a pawn to use against Iran.

      --
      Push the button, Max!
    127. Re:by that logic... by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      well, as of 10 years ago lots of people born and raised in a British HK were scared to death about the Chinese hand over. It happens to be that the last 10 years have been nice and people's feelings have changed. And I wasn't talking to the upper class that generally always gets away unscathed. Taxi drivers, shop keepers, etc. were pretty unanimous that they now have good feelings about the current govt and it's far far better than what they expected 10 years ago.

      but if you don't even know the horrific things your government does every day in Tibet then you are just ignorant, far more so than the parent. The fact you don't know now but would have been accutely aware of 15 years ago when the British controlled HK should tell you something as well.

    128. Re:by that logic... by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      yeah the french did a great job with Vietnam and the Brits did amazing things with Hindustan(now 6 countries) and the middle East (Israel, etc). /sarcasm

      I'm not saying what american is doing right now is good, but you are just being revisionist.

    129. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China do not want all their kids. A lot of female kids have no parents. The situation gets better, but it is a long way to go.

      Western couples adopt some of those girls that Chinese do not want.

      My wife is Chinese.

    130. Re:by that logic... by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      > as of 10 years ago lots of people born and raised in a British HK were scared to death about the Chinese hand over.

      It tells something about the FUD western media have on the Chinese government too actually. I think we've heard enough "after the handover Hong Kong is going go become a communist city! sheesh!! it's going to fall!! run!!" FUD by western media... and then those people go "oh wait..." now. There's a reason people here don't easily fall for such crap now.

      Well in fact I think people were scared at the beginning of the talks... (and things got a bit messy in 1989 for obvious reasons), the really paranoid got up and left. But then there was enough soothing during the 1990's that at the time of handover that I'd say the feeling was generally "mixed feelings" or "uncertainty" more than fear. "Scared to death" is a bit of exaggeration really. Last I heard nobody committed suicide at the handover ;-p

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    131. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is the US the only one that can stand up to the plate. Are there other nations with moral standing and $ or is the US alone?

    132. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No we're not as bad as China, we don't lock up dissidents and journalists, we just kidnap and hold so called 'terror' suspects in undisclosed locations for years and years without letting them out; oh wait a minute that's exactly what China does.

    133. Re:by that logic... by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      I bet those students are up for a nasty surprise next time they try to fly anywhere.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    134. Re:by that logic... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      That's ridiculous moral relativism. That because the USA has a few dozen people at Camp X-Ray (which I won't defend), it's somehow on the same level as a government that has no democracy, no freedom of speech and will shoot people who protest.

    135. Re:by that logic... by Khazunga · · Score: 1

      Vietnam isn't in Africa, last I checked, sor is Israel in the Commonwealth. Read before replying.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    136. Re:by that logic... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      "Oh and also, remember that photo of Saddam and Rummy shaking hands back in 1980s-something? How come Saddam was good enough to do business with back then but NOT in 2003?"

      You could say the same thing about Stalin from 1941 to 1945.

      Because back then, we needed him. It's called realpolitik. As one British politician put it "we have no friends, only strategic allies".

      He helped to keep the oil flowing, which reduced the price which helped bankrupt the Soviet Union and forced them down a democratic path.

    137. Re:by that logic... by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      It so happens that every European imperial power, except for Spain, decolonized their empires in a pretty constructive fashion.


      the simple fact is they didn't. for many of the colonies, it was a complete clusterfuck that the european imperial colonies left and generally, it was a complete clusterfuck in the non-white countries. That you can cite some moderate success stories doesn't mean there weren't horrific consequences in many areas of the world.

      Now, in all but a few instances, most modern problems in those countries have little to do with colonialism but don't try and act like the europeans somehow did something other than partially clean up a mess they created in many countries.

    138. Re:by that logic... by onemorehour · · Score: 1

      That's inferring quite a lot from what I said, and in quite the wrong direction. Please feel free to read the clarification I posted earlier (and the subsequent replies to that) if you want.

    139. Re:by that logic... by Khazunga · · Score: 1

      Is the glass half-empty or half-full? De-colonization was a troublesome process, and 'clusterfucks' were inevitable. I stand by what I said. The Commonwealth was a huge diplomatic achievement, in the same line as what French and Portuguese created with their ex-colonies (only better). Were there disasters? Of course. Angola and Mozambique were left to internal civil wars, for example. Were there huge successes? Take South Africa for an example. South Africa, pre-english colonization, was an eternal battleground between Zulu and other tribes. After the Brits left, it was a relatively stable country.

      Every scenario is different. I was just noting that US external intervention has nowhere the success rate that Europe's external intervention had in the XVI-XX century period. Worse yet, Europeans learnt from their mistakes and have no destructive external intervention nowadays.

      It should be obvious, today, that the best control democracies can exert onto other countries is economic: Pump up their economies, establish solid international commerce, and any war becomes so economically destructive, puts so many people on the negative side of the balance sheet, that it becomes impossible to push countries into war. What do you think is the secret for ending wars in Europe? The European Union, namely the Unified Market.

      McCarthy did it with Europe, China is doing it with Africa. The US keep pounding on old confrontation models.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    140. Re:by that logic... by kamochan · · Score: 1

      Umm but you're not boycotting slashdot?

      Of course not. What actual impact would boycotting slashdot have?

      Besides, this is where actually mentally active americans seem to hang out...

    141. Re:by that logic... by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      wow..... I didn't realize that raping, killing, and demoralizing the native populace into either subjugation or slavery was considered an option in order to be successful at intervention....

      you're right, lots of the commonwealth countries are great successes. It's just like the US's intervention into NA outside the original 13 colonies was very successful. I hear when you kill/subjugate/enslave the entire native populace and put your own people in power over an area, it can give the look of stability. Maybe I should be on the phone with our people in Iraq and tell them it's perfectly acceptable to go from house to house, destroying everything people own and killing at random until the country lays down(south africa is where I'd get that method from). we can also bring back the concentration camps if you really want.....try to look at why those certain countries were successful and others weren't.

      btw, McCarthy was American. the model you are pointing to was started by the US(maybe not, but I know of no other effort until the US did it after WWII where a country completely rebuilt the economies of the defeated nations to try and create allies, up to that point it had been a system of demanding money out of the country). turns out that it requires a completely cooperative population(or at least a vast vast majority) in order to work.

    142. Re:by that logic... by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      Right, the USA only executes (blows up, sorry--not the same as execution at all) innocent people in OTHER countries.  That makes it okay.

    143. Re:by that logic... by s4m7 · · Score: 1

      I apologize, I've not done any research specifically on Hong Kong in this regard, however I remeber hearing reports of outrage from Hong Kong over the switch. Perhaps my memory is blowing this out of proportion, or maybe there is a vocal minority that is what I heard rather than the "silent majority."

      And no, I certainly don't ascribe to the notion that the British ought to hold dominion. I was under the impression that HK was independent from china though, not as a nation, but independent nonetheless, and that China asserted control.

      don't throw the baby out with the bathwater however. One inappropriately inserted reference does not detract from the other, as you admit, viable examples of Tibet and Mongolia (and India).

      --
      This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
    144. Re:by that logic... by vistic · · Score: 1

      God, like 99% of what you just said was completely stupid and irrelevant.

    145. Re:by that logic... by Khazunga · · Score: 1

      wow..... I didn't realize that raping, killing, and demoralizing the native populace into either subjugation or slavery was considered an option in order to be successful at intervention....

      No it isn't. Not nowadays. That's why I advocate that current democracies should stay the fuck away from other countries, unless they present a clear and immediate danger. It's in my post, read it.

      btw, McCarthy was American

      News at 11. Of course he's American, and is a great marker of how much you regressed in half a century -- or, how I put it, it reminds us how fragile is freedom in a democracy.

      turns out that it requires a completely cooperative population(or at least a vast vast majority) in order to work.

      You either have: a) a cooperative population, and then the best effort you can make is pump investment money in the economy to bond their economy to yours, therefore creating a stable country, or; b) You have an uncooperative population, and then you are better off away: brute force will only breed extreme positions and destroy essential infrastructures. Again, check Iraq to observe what 'freeing' uncooperative populations results into.

      Note that even if only a small fringe (10%) of the population rejects the invader, the invasion effort will be fraught with trouble. So, don't come out with the theory that Iraqis love American soldiers and only a few dirty rejects cause all the trouble.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    146. Re:by that logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm confused by your examples. First, the "good decolonization by Portugal" had a lot to do with the fact that Portugal was occupied by Napoloeon and Portugese leadership (royal family) was forced to go into exile *into* Brazil. So it was not like Portugal was in charge of its own destiny at the time.

      Second, your examples* are echoed in some of Latin America (which is HUGE! Have you looked at a political map?). So I'm not sure why you single out Spain. There is huge diversity in the region (historical, political, ethnic).

      * how is the fact that the natives in Brazil were brought close to complete genocide, and the modern population reflects an active African slave trade and European colonization as a sign of something to follow? This is exactly what you see in all the rest of Latin America -- with some exceptions where the majority still look native (which I would think would be a better mark of colonizers behaving with some decency to the native folk).

      Portugal didn't behave any better, just on a much smaller scale than Spain -- and in many examples much worse.

      One possible exception is Argentina, where the replacement of the local flaura, fauna and humanity was almost complete -- it's like a little piece of Europe in America.

  5. check ebay for a used thinkpad by elwinc · · Score: 1, Informative

    Check ebay for a used thinkpad. IBM still made them in 2005, though they were made in a Chinese factory.

    --
    --- Often in error; never in doubt!
    1. Re:check ebay for a used thinkpad by crush · · Score: 1

      But watch out and make sure it's not one of the models that has the crappy ATI video chip which is mounted by a Ball Grid Array that tends to break loose even if you treat the laptop like your firstborn.

    2. Re:check ebay for a used thinkpad by korbin_dallas · · Score: 2, Informative

      I got my T-40 from this place.
      http://www.usedpc.com/
      It was flawless, and I buy used laptops exclusively.

      I was not aware the the new Lenovos were like the 'T' series, more like the old 'R' series, am I wrong?

      --
      They Live, We Sleep
    3. Re:check ebay for a used thinkpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea. I recently purchased a high end t43p on EBay, and it works great. You may not be getting a 64bit dual core processor, but the performance is not that much worse. Just think about it this way: they come standard with Windows XP, so you don't have to upgrade from vista yourself.

    4. Re:check ebay for a used thinkpad by Knara · · Score: 1

      Lenovo has two "lines" they sell in the US. "Lenovo" and "Thinkpad". Both are Lenovo, but the Thinkpad has some brand value, so they keep the name. Both have been made by Lenovo for quite a while, and I don't think the T-/R-/X- series model names are gonna go anywhere anytime soon.

  6. I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >> Thinkpads are now produced by Lenovo, a Chinese company

    If that was your problem, you should never have bought a Thinkpad ever. They were always manufactured by Lenovo which has always been a Chinese comopany, the country which it belongs to has always been the same. Can I call this a sudden attack of morality?

    Aside from the obvious hypocrisy mentioned above, I am sure you will get a lot of suggestions from the cult of Mac, but believe me - its hard to find a replacement for Thinkpad. No matter how slick other notebooks may look, in terms of fineness, usability and sheer joy of typing (yes, thats critical factor for me at least), nothing comes near.

    1. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of BS, did Lenovo manufacture the ones that were made in Mexico? Or was that before they wqere "Always made in China."

      That's a 750Cs, BTW.

    2. Re:I call BS by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      They were always manufactured by Lenovo...

      Actually, I don't think that's true. I believe at one point (and in particular 7 years ago), they were manufactured by various IBM subsidiaries in different countries. I saw at least one reference on the Internet to a T23 made in Mexico. Lenovo has been making them for several years now, though. However, the point of the poster was that prior to Lenovo taking over the brand, unless IBM was selling the laptops at cost, at least some of the money was going to IBM. Now it is _all_ going to Lenovo.
       

      However, if someone wants to "vote" with their wallet, I think a more conscientious approach would be to not just look at the rare laptop purchase, but instead to avoid buying any product that was made in China when there is an alternative. That's pretty tough to do nowadays, though. It might be helpful if it were mandatory for each and every product to be labeled on the box and in the catalog (online or paper) with its country of origin and perhaps the countries of origin for its components. That's probably not going to happen anytime soon, and regulating it would probably only make already big government even bigger.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    3. Re:I call BS by deets · · Score: 1

      I would not buy one because it is a Chinese company. I don't care that things are made in China, I would rather it be by an American company.
      Here are my two rules...
      1. Buy American if possible.
      2. Buy non-union if possible.

      Now, If an American company builds something in China, most of the money still comes to America (otherwise there is no reason to build it in China)*. I also don't agree with unions, so I try not to support them.
      *This is also why I don't like to pay illegal aliens to do work for me. Not that I don't like them, but most of their money goes to support another country.

    4. Re:I call BS by Wazukkithemaster · · Score: 1

      This isn't hypocritical... if people aren't allowed to modify their beliefs based upon acquiring new information without being called a hypocrite then everybody on the planet is, indeed, a hypocrite.

      --
      Live according to the Categorical Imperative. If the Categorical Imperative tells you not to live by it... ignore it
    5. Re:I call BS by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      "Can I call this a sudden attack of morality?"

      No it's simply a "sudden" cry for attention. "Look how moral I am ! The evil chinese government witholds a super luxery from me, I am a terrible victim".

    6. Re:I call BS by yani · · Score: 1

      The T20 was made in Mexico.. I call BS on you

    7. Re:I call BS by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      However, the point of the poster was that prior to Lenovo taking over the brand, unless IBM was selling the laptops at cost, at least some of the money was going to IBM. Now it is _all_ going to Lenovo.
      How do you figure that? Don't forget that Lenovo bought the Thinkpad business from IBM. So part of this money that Lenovo is getting now from customers goes straight toward repaying the loans for the initial purchase. In other words, if you buy Thinkpads now, you're still paying off IBM in part.
    8. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hold in my hands an authentic, IBM manufactured T22 laptop.

      I turn it over.

      I read the label on the back:

      Manufactured by IBM
      Made in Mexico

      So, no all thinkpads were made by lenovo in China.

    9. Re:I call BS by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      How do you figure that? ... So part of this money that Lenovo is getting now from customers goes straight toward repaying the loans for the initial purchase. In other words, if you buy Thinkpads now, you're still paying off IBM in part.

      I assume you're questioning my statement "Not it is _all_ going to Lenovo." OK, maybe it's not all going to Lenovo, but unless Lenovo borrowed the money from IBM to buy the brand from IBM, then none of it is going to IBM. The question is, from where did Lenovo borrow the money (if they had to borrow any at all)? I'm willing to bet it was some organization in China.
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    10. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is incorrect. IBM had manufacturing facilities in Mexico, Canada and Ireland before. I am a long time Thinkpad user (on my fourth machine now) and the X32 I currently own is the first one to be manufactured in China.

      I might add that there has been a very noticeable drop in physical quality after the 6/700 series but I doubt this has anything directly to do with them being made in China. More likely it is caused by the general collapse of laptop pricing, new machines now have to cost $1000 to have a market at all and many cost less than $500 new (compare that to my 770X that cost $5000 back in 1998).

      But of course this in turn IS a direct consequence of the Chinese government's subsides, non-existent environmental regulations and aggressive export policies.

      Some would say that ever cheaper machines is a good thing, but I don't agree. We have turned programmed obsolescence into a fine art and as product lifecycles become ever shorter, the junk is piling up all around us.

      Lomax

      P.S. All my three older TPs (600E, 600X, 770X) are intact and fully functioning with the 600X still seeing daily usage...

  7. Buy it anyway by ispeters · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is cynical of me, but your private little boycott is not going to do the monks any good. If you buy a new Thinkpad now, it'll outlast the problem in Burma. Just buy another one. Lenovo has always produced Thinkpads, it's just that IBM doesn't support them directly anymore. Thinkpads are still the most reliable laptops in the market.

    Ian

    1. Re:Buy it anyway by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

      Given the length of the current struggle, that Thinkpad would have to last at least 17 years. That is, if the past is anything to go by.

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    2. Re:Buy it anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The military has been running things for the last 45 years, with China's full support. The last uprising was in 1988, 19 years ago. There are few computers that have lasted as long as either time period.

    3. Re:Buy it anyway by ispeters · · Score: 1

      I admit to speaking from ignorance regarding the expected length of the political turmoil in, I guess it's Myanmar, not Burma?, but I meant the immediate problem of monks getting shot, rather than the overarching problem of Myanmar finding a government that its people are happy with. I doubt the current Malevolent Dictator For Life can go about shooting monks for 7+ years without some kind of retaliation from the rest of the world. (Hmm... there I go switching from cynicism to blinding optimism!)

      Ian

    4. Re:Buy it anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Myanmar is the name given to the country by the current government, the Junta.

      It was also it's historical name several hundred years ago.

      However native people deeply involved in the issue would prefer the country to be called Burma because the name change was by the Junta, and not by the people.

      Hence the British news has been calling the country Burma, refusing to recognise the current government's changes. I assume this is the same elsewhere in the world.

    5. Re:Buy it anyway by analog_line · · Score: 1

      I doubt the current Malevolent Dictator For Life can go about shooting monks for 7+ years without some kind of retaliation from the rest of the world.

      The outside world has almost as little influence on Myanmar as on North Korea. As long as the Chinese will deal with them, it flat out doesn't matter, and the Chinese aren't likely to stop dealing with them any time soon.

    6. Re:Buy it anyway by ispeters · · Score: 1

      OK, I'm obviously completely ignorant, but it would seem that my main point--that boycotting Lenovo will do nothing--is only strengthened by the fact that the military has been in power for the last 45 years and will evidently remain in power for the foreseeable future.

      Ian

    7. Re:Buy it anyway by nametaken · · Score: 1

      I was told the customer support for Lenovo customers is handled out of IBM's Atlanta facility. Is that incorrect?

    8. Re:Buy it anyway by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      17 years?? It says right there in that same article that the military dictatorship of Myanmar (nee Burma) first started using armed troops to suppress anti-government protests in 1974.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  8. Maybe a T41, T42 or T43 by Myrrh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Buy a newer, but still-made-by-IBM-not-Lenovo Thinkpad off eBay?

    1. Re:Maybe a T41, T42 or T43 by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Sure, I recommend the T42...the T42p being the best. The T43 had some strange design decisions, that made it have decreased battery life.

      I understand what you are asking for, but I have a nice business dell for work, and it still doesn't compare to an Thinkpad... they were the best.

  9. Panasonic Toughbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've supported a large number of thinkpads over the years, and never thought of them as being that well made. Certainly no more reliable than a Dell latitude. Anyway, if you're looking for a tough relaible laptop, get a Panasonic Toughbook. It's the best we've found, YMMV.

    1. Re:Panasonic Toughbook by Chirs · · Score: 1

      According to "http://www.lenovoblogs.com/insidethebox/?m=20070809", the thinkpad T61 and R61 passed 5 of the ~25 mil-spec tests for "ruggedness", beating out Dell's "ruggedized" Latitude machines, and equalling Panasonic's "semi-rugged" models.

      The "fully-rugged" toughbook would do better in rain or low temperature, but would be heavier, more expensive, and slower.

    2. Re:Panasonic Toughbook by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      Anyway, if you're looking for a tough relaible laptop, get a Panasonic Toughbook.

      Amen to that. We've got an older one that we bring out when clients ask for a robust laptop. It's fun to watch their faces as we lightly bounce that Toughbook around, but not nearly so much fun as the look when they ask the price for a new one...

      Hardy? MIL-STD-810F rated. Pricey? Not really, considering what you're getting. Less than some boutique laptops, for sure. Worth it? You tell us!

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  10. Way of life by packetmon · · Score: 1, Funny

    and I can't quite bear to buy Chinese while the Burmese military are shooting at monks with the Chinese Government as their biggest backer. You're right. By the way didn't I just see you leave Walmart?

    1. Re:Way of life by msblack · · Score: 1

      I've never been inside a WalMart or Sams Club!

      Human rights organizations have been complaining about Myranmar for years

      --
      signature pending slashdot approval
    2. Re:Way of life by mrslacker · · Score: 1

      > I've never been inside a WalMart or Sams Club!

      I'm jealous. I have, just once (WalMart), and I had to make a real effort since there isn't one nearby. I didn't buy anything, and I swore never to go back, since the atmosphere was so unpleasant.

      Of course, in true hypocritical style, I own many things bought at Target, and I used to go to Asda (UK grocery chain owned by WalMart), but at least that was mostly reasonably local food products.

      About the only thing I have that I could name off the top of my head that was actually made in the US would be my car. Oh, and my in laws.

    3. Re:Way of life by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1
      About the only thing I have that I could name off the top of my head that was actually made in the US would be my car.

      Unless you drive a Toyota or a Honda, that may not be applicable.

  11. Support Münich Maglev! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look for Fujitsu-Siemens. From my experience, they make rather rugged and good business-class laptops and at least some of them are Made in Germany!

    So you can support the Münich Maglev. :)

  12. Toughbook by PyJockey · · Score: 1

    I'm also a longtime Thinkpad fan. But I've also had very good luck with Panasonic's Toughbook line. Very well made machines and manufactured in Japan. They cost a little more but should last considerably longer than many of their competitors.

    1. Re:Toughbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the Japanese kill exotic whales!

  13. Boycot USA products by supersnail · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I certainly wouldnt want to by anything from the USA while children are dying of cholera in Iraq because the USA backed regime has blocked imports of Chlorene.

    --
    Old COBOL programmers never die. They just code in C.
    1. Re:Boycot USA products by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

      Flamebait? How? It is rigt on target showing the hypocrisy on the part of the person who asked the original question. Never mind - I see /. is an american website.

    2. Re:Boycot USA products by operagost · · Score: 1

      I looked it up and found (so far) absolutely no reports of problems getting chlorine at water treatment facilities. That being said, you do understand that terrorists have been setting off chlorine bombs all year? That seems to indicate that controlling the chlorine might be a good idea!

      I suppose the bigger question might be why I'm responding to an ignorant troll.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Boycot USA products by schnikies79 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Maybe because it's bullshit? There is no evidence what-so-ever of anyone blocking Cl shipments to Iraq.

      --
      Gone!
    4. Re:Boycot USA products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Click the link at the bottom for all the links that were in Bruce Schneiers original text.

      September 25, 2007
      Chlorine and Cholera in Iraq

      Excellent blog post:

              So cholera has now reached Baghdad. That's not much of a surprise given the utter breakdown of infrastructure. But there's a reason the cholera is picking up speed now. From the NYT:

                      "We are suffering from a shortage of chlorine, which is sometimes zero," Dr. Ameer said in an interview on Al Hurra, an American-financed television network in the Middle East. "Chlorine is essential to disinfect the water."

              So why is there is a shortage? Because insurgents have laced a few bombs with chlorine and the U.S. and Iraq have responded by making it darn hard to import the stuff. From the AP:

                      [A World Health Organization representative in Iraq] also said some 100,000 tons of chlorine were being held up at Iraq's border with Jordan, apparently because of fears the chemical could be used in explosives. She urged authorities to release it for use in decontaminating water supplies.

              I understand why Iraq would put restrictions on dangerous chemicals. And I'm sure nobody intended for the restrictions to be so burdensome that they'd effectively cut off Iraq's clean water supply. But that's what looks to have happened. What makes it all the more tragic is that chlorine -- for all the hype and worry -- is actually a very ineffective booster for bombs. Of the roughly dozen chlorine-laced bombings in Iraq, it appears the chlorine has killed exactly nobody.

              In other words, the biggest damage from chlorine bombs -- as with so many terrorist attacks -- has come from overreaction to it. Fear operates as a "force multiplier" for terrorists, and in this case has helped them cut off Iraq's clean water. Pretty impressive feat for some bombs that turned out to be close to duds.

      I couldn't have said it better. In this case, the security countermeasure is worse than the threat. Same thing could be said about a lot of the terrorism countermeasures in the U.S.

      http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/09/chlorine_and_ch.html

    5. Re:Boycot USA products by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      I am amazed at all the made up things, where there are plenty of things that we have done wrong in Iraq (and in our own country). But, guessing that the troll was not ignorant, just chose to bash.

      But, I have to agree with your last point.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:Boycot USA products by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      You link to a blog and expect anyone to take it seriously?

      Repeat after me. A blog is not a source.

      --
      Gone!
    7. Re:Boycot USA products by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      You link to a blog and expect anyone to take it seriously?

      Repeat after me. A blog is not a source. Sorry, but a blog IS a source. There's nothing mystical about a book, a newspaper, or a broadcast. They are all valid sources of information. It is the information itself with additional emphasis on the speaker that rates the value of that source. The only reason to put less immediate value on a blog is that blogs are available to everyone - to include a lot of unknown individuals with unknown track records and motivations. I would put Bruce Schneier above many such unknowns.
    8. Re:Boycot USA products by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      Blogs lack accountability and can't be cited in any proper journal or paper. That is the reason they are not a source.

      --
      Gone!
    9. Re:Boycot USA products by Knara · · Score: 1

      You can cite a blog APA style, so it can indeed be a source.

      It might not be a GOOD source, but it can be a source.

    10. Re:Boycot USA products by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Blogs lack accountability and can't be cited in any proper journal or paper. That is the reason they are not a source. I'm curious as to what forms of media can be cited and what makes them accountable? I suspect it has less to do with the fact that, say, one form of media is a newspaper as it is a question of credibility. Not all newspapers have the same degree of credibility.

      Let's attack this from a slightly different angle. Is there a difference between what Bruce Schneier writes in his blog, in his emailed newsletter, a printed version of said newsletter, or published in a book? It all comes from the same author. Does the media itself matter? Or is it the mechanism of the media that adds some value to the author's work?
    11. Re:Boycot USA products by supersnail · · Score: 1

      Well the blog in question is Bruce Schniers and it is certainly a more authroitive and balanced source than say USA Today or FOX news in matters related to security in all its forms.

      This was where I came accross the this ludicrus bit of reality, however Bruce's original source was an New York Times article so it was also reported as a fact in Dead Tree Space by "A Newspaper of Record".

      Maybe I should have just gone for the bland and overused (but true) " over 1,000,000 Iraqi civilians dead due to US (and UK) intervention ".

      The basic point is the the sheer lack of logic of someone who lives in a country which is currently engaged in a war which has resulted in the death of 1,000,000 civilians, and, has an appalling record of supporting represive regimes (Saudi Arabia is current favourite) not buying a product because it comes from a country which half heartedly supports a represive nieghbouring regime ( and has consitently encourgedged the uniformed dickheads to "lighten up" ).

      --
      Old COBOL programmers never die. They just code in C.
  14. Don't buy from any american company by protomala · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You know, they are shooting at the musulman priests in Badga desert.

    Unfortunaly this will left you with almost no option, because AMD and Intel are american companies, so sorry, you better go to a cave and forget about human kind. :)

    1. Re:Don't buy from any american company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you can provide links....

  15. You may be out of luck by scubamage · · Score: 1

    SE Asia is the haven for most OEM's to purchase their laptops. For instance, old alienware laptops were actually Prostar laptops with a different logo (a Taiwanese manufacturer). Its going to be hard for you to find something that will allow you to divorce yourself from hardware without Chinese connections.

    1. Re:You may be out of luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Taiwan is NOT China, duh.

    2. Re:You may be out of luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems a bit harsh to blame Taiwan for the polices of the PRC (mainland) government.

    3. Re:You may be out of luck by scubamage · · Score: 1

      I didn't say Taiwan WAS China dumbass, learn to comprehend what you read, mmmk? All I did was use Taiwan as an example of how pretty much everything made laptop-wise comes from SE Asia. Prostar laptops wouldn't work for what he needs because he needs something durable and dependable, neither of which Prostar laptops are.

    4. Re:You may be out of luck by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      It really makes you wonder how thier economies have remained in such a mess when we are all so dependant on them, and really have moved a lot of the industrial stuff over there...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:You may be out of luck by Knara · · Score: 1

      That, my anonymous friend, depends greatly on who you ask.

    6. Re:You may be out of luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Taiwanese think that it is...

  16. MPC by Askjeffro · · Score: 2, Informative

    Expensive, but well built and assembled mostly in the US to my knowledge. I recommend doing more research and not just taking my word for it. :) Good luck.
    http://www.mpccorp.com/
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPC_Corporation

    1. Re:MPC by oyenstikker · · Score: 1

      I just checked out their website, and their stuff looks good. Except the pointing devices. I will only buy a laptop with a track point 3 mouse buttons that can be reached without moving my hands from the keyboard. An email to MPC confirmed that none of their laptops have a third button nor a track point; and they have no plan to add them.

      --
      The masses are the crack whores of religion.
  17. Another IBM T Series by Qfour20 · · Score: 1

    I was in your situation a short while ago, replacing an early T series laptop provided by my employer, and I also did not want to support lenovo. I purchased a refurbished T40 from buy.com for about $500, and am incredibly happy. Yes, it's only a single core processor at 1.5Ghz, but it serves my needs very well. In my opinion, IBM's T series laptops are the best non-apple laptops ever to grace this planet.

    -q

  18. It doesn't matter... jabroni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you think it really matters what laptop you buy? Every single company anywhere is doing something horrible to someone. Your best bet is to go into the forest and widdle a laptop from a tree; but then you'd be killing a tree.

  19. Live like Tarzan by Aneurism75 · · Score: 1

    If you want to boycott Chinese products all together, head to the nearest forest, take off all your clothes, and live like Tarzan in the wilderness.

    1. Re:Live like Tarzan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't work. You'll still be breathing some oxygen produced by chinese plants.

  20. HP by Nexx · · Score: 1

    I use Thinkpads. However, one of my major clients have switched to HPs (from Dells), and ones they have seem quite nice. I'm not sure what model range, though.

    1. Re:HP by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      I've used Thinkpads forever, but the most recent two have been poorly made and lasted slightly longer than the warranty (sitting on a desk most of the time). I really almost could rave about my new HP 2710p - the system works well and the build quality is (so far) good. The mis-sizing of of some of the keys on the keyboard is a great irritation. The HP version of the ThinkNipple just ain't up to the same feel (why not just license that wonderful device?). The simply ridiculous inability to custom order exactly what I want via their website has to be a hangover from their "minimal quality for the dollar" days of Carly Fiona's reign. All that said, it meets my needs fairly well, but it could have been great. I'll likely buy another one for myself with the recently announced Flash Drive once they get off their duff and start offering it via their webstore, warts and all.

    2. Re:HP by Nexx · · Score: 1

      I have too -- I've started with the 600E, I skipped the T20, but had a T40 and I'm now typing this on my employer's T60p. I'm not quite sure I like the T60 design -- it feels cheaper than my T40 did in many respects.

      Thank you for the usage report on the HP, though. I was wondering what I should get for myself.

  21. Buy a Macbook Pro Fool! by Microsift · · Score: 1

    Of course, they are also made in China...

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  22. huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just heard the Chinese are telling the Burmese to cool it on the monk-killing...

  23. no, actually your logic is flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    1. Re:no, actually your logic is flawed by nuzak · · Score: 1

      Yet another kid who read a list of fallacies on Wikipedia and thinks he's mister Spock. Maybe you should read a little more, you might learn something. Like the fact that it would only apply to the argument if it were Dell making the accusations. Another harder subject to master is rhetoric, in which you learn that logical invalidity doesn't negate every argument.

      Hey, at least it's not ad hominem. Well, actually it is, but at least it's a new term.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    2. Re:no, actually your logic is flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the fact that it would only apply to the argument if it were Dell making the accusations.

      No, it still applies to the argument because 20781847 was making the case that the OP wasn't acting consistently with his beliefs and values by rejecting stuff made in China, and yet accepting Dell. But we don't know what the OP's values are, or even if he hasn't already been avoiding things that are made in America. Thus, the argument is fallacious.

      Another harder subject to master is rhetoric, in which you learn that logical invalidity doesn't negate every argument.

      It was never claimed that 20781847 was wrong, only that his logic was flawed.

    3. Re:no, actually your logic is flawed by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > It was never claimed that 20781847 was wrong, only that his logic was flawed.

      It goes with the territory. "Your logic is flawed and therefore your argument is worthless". It's argumentum ad logicam when you take the extreme of actually saying someone is wrong because of a fallacy; I can present an invalid proof of slashdot's existence, but it doesn't mean I'm wrong.

      I suppose you're partly right about the fallacy being applicable -- while I don't agree that Tu quoque (literally, "you too") is quite equivalent to outright hypocrisy, the rationale behind the accusation is still the same. But hypocrisy is also a seriously lame and overused argument to cover for the lack of an actual counter. It's the same reason I don't bother going after ultra-conservatives with examples of their moral terpitude when I'd rather attack the basis of their arguments, such as outright wrong facts.

      So while the GGP wasn't making a claim about correctness, he was still doing the ever-so annoying "haha, logical fallacy, gotcha, aren't I so smart, nyeah nyeah nyeah" routine. I suppose I shouldn't let myself be baited by wikipedia-slinging self-styled logic-ninjas.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    4. Re:no, actually your logic is flawed by nuzak · · Score: 1

      Argh. I meant to say I don't agree that inconsistency is perfectly equivalent to hypocrisy. I really need to stick to one-liners, much easier to edit :p

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  24. Why upgrade? by MilesNaismith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is wrong with your T20?

    I have an X23 that I refurbished. Maxed out the RAM and put in a new hard-drive. I can't see any reason to replace until it dies.

    Eventually I will replace the spinning hard-drive with a flash-drive. I'd love to find a way to replace the CCFL backlight with LED were that possible, to make it even more long-lived.

    The American fascination with tossing perfectly adequate technology into a landfill is apalling.

    1. Re:Why upgrade? by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      The American fascination with tossing perfectly adequate technology into a landfill is apalling.

      Why do you get to define "adequate" for anyone other than yourself?

    2. Re:Why upgrade? by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      The t20 only supports a max of 512M ram. And those chips are REALLY expensive... A 256M module costs quite a bit more than a 1G module of current tech.

    3. Re:Why upgrade? by quanticle · · Score: 1

      Why do you get to define "adequate" for anyone other than yourself?

      Ok, replace "adequate" with "functional". His point still stands - Americans have an awful tendency of throwing out perfectly functional hardware to deal with software problems. I personally know people who threw (or were about to throw) out laptops because they were infested with spyware, or because Windows had become slow and unusable. In one of the cases, I was able to make the machine adequate simply by backing up, reformatting and reinstalling.

      I've noticed this in other consumer goods as well. Whereas before, if a toaster broke, people would take it into a repair shop and have it looked at, now people just throw the old one away and buy a new model. I've seen this tendency on increasingly (mechanically) complex pieces of hardware - to the point where even lawnmowers are fair game for replacement rather than repair.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    4. Re:Why upgrade? by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      replace "adequate" with "functional". His point still stands

      Functional is not equivalent to adequate.
      before, if a toaster broke, people would take it into a repair shop and have it looked at, now people just throw the old one away and buy a new model.

      It's called economics. I recently had an expensive (at the time) kitchen mixer repaired - the damn repair bill was three-fourths the price of a new one - and what guarantee (i.e. warranty) is there of it functioning x more years? None.

    5. Re:Why upgrade? by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Again, "functional" for what? MS Word? Sure. Multiple VM sessions? Not hardly. Those old thinkpads only supported 512M. Even 2G sucks in certain situations, and the CPU on the old T20 is way too slow too. There are many modern apps that have minimum requirements well beyond the capability of the T20.

      So it depends on what you do / use it for.

      As for toasters etc., the QUALITY of modern items tends to be horrible. They frequently are not realistically repairable, due to labor costs / parts availability.

    6. Re:Why upgrade? by XanC · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find people's spyware-infested laptops and broken toasters fail the "functional" test also.

      True, you could make them functional, by repairing the toaster or "simply" backing up, reformatting, and reinstalling. A normal person faced with that decision either has to take weeks to learn everything required about computers or take it to a shop. At that point, it's spend $200 and ending up with an old laptop or $500 and having a new one.

    7. Re:Why upgrade? by MilesNaismith · · Score: 1

      DID THE ORIGINAL POSTER STATE WHAT WAS INADEQUATE TO THEM? NO! Therefore I am free to generalize them with the other 95% of people I meet in my working life who classify their current PC or laptop as "inadequate" based simply on the fact that it's 3 years old. I work in IT. All day long I see people with 1 gig+ laptops complaining about how they want the shiny NEW model. Anything wrong with their current one? Nope. I can't tell you how much it irks me to see someone "upgrade" from a great XP-based laptop to the latest laptop with Vista, just so they can read email and look at YouTube at the SAME SPEED. 95+% currently in circulation could use some more RAM, maybe a faster hard-drive, and an OS re-install and they work just great.

    8. Re:Why upgrade? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I've noticed this in other consumer goods as well. Whereas before, if a toaster broke, people would take it into a repair shop and have it looked at, now people just throw the old one away and buy a new model. I've seen this tendency on increasingly (mechanically) complex pieces of hardware - to the point where even lawnmowers are fair game for replacement rather than repair. The problem is the dropping prices. You can buy a new toaster for $10 or perhaps $40 if you go with the uber deluxe model with electronic toast level sensors. If it breaks, now you have to take it to a repair guy who runs about $60/hour. So forget even bothering with the basic toaster... it's more efficient in all ways to simply replace it. But if your expensive model breaks, take it in, the guy spends 15 minutes of billable time looking at it, identifies that it needs a new widget part, discover that there is no readily available supplier of that widget, custom order it from someone else in China, pay for the part plus shipping and duties, wait three weeks, pay for the guy to install said replacement part, and hopefully you now have a functioning toaster again. Meanwhile, three weeks and fifty dollars in parts, shipping, and labor have elapsed... not to mention your time, cost of driving back and forth, etc.
      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    9. Re:Why upgrade? by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

      Haha, oh yeah? How well are those youtube videos playing? How's the contrast ratio and viewing angle on that 7-year-old LCD? How much use are you getting out of those USB1.0 ports?

    10. Re:Why upgrade? by quanticle · · Score: 1

      As for toasters etc., the QUALITY of modern items tends to be horrible. They frequently are not realistically repairable, due to labor costs / parts availability.

      Right, but I'm saying that the quality of modern items has declined because no one bothers repairing thing. Why would I, as a manufacturer, spend money building to standards and spending time stocking spares for consumers when I know my buyers are going to throw the widget away when it breaks and buy a new one?

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    11. Re:Why upgrade? by mixenmaxen · · Score: 1

      I agree

      I have a perfectly fine T 0.1 that's been going steady for almost 30 years. Fits snugly into my SUV if I don't bring the wife along.

      Only thing is it is damn hard to find spare vacuum tubes for it anymore.

  25. HP or IBM are my favorites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just as another poster noted, just about any laptop you purchase will be assembled (or come from parts) in China. If you really like Thinkpads that much, I would suggest maybe looking at getting another one? I am currently typing this on a Thinkpad T40 and I absolutely love it. The only other laptop I would suggest getting is an HP. At my work we use their business series notebooks (not the Pavilion), such as the nc6000/nc8000/nc9000 series, and they are very durable and clean looking. I'm not sure if this is a renamed or a different model line, but they have newer ones that are just "6000" series laptops now (6510, 6710, 6910). I've used the 6910p and it appears to be just as good as the others I previously mentioned.

  26. Compaq by jcuervo · · Score: 1

    I've always liked Compaqs. I had one with a busted LCD that I actually full-on stomped on. It kept ticking, after a badblocks. It was a much older model, a 486 with 16 megs running 2.0 kernels, but I managed uptimes of over a year (I wrote a kernel module to patch the ptrace vulnerability on the fly, and some firewall rules took care of most of the rest :-)).

    I currently have a Toshiba Satellite (for some reason) and a pre-Lenovo Thinkpad A20m, and my girlfriend has a Compaq. The Thinkpad and the Compaq are pretty solid. I'll let you know about the Satellite. :-)

    As far as getting something that isn't made in China, I'd say, offhand: you're screwed.

    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  27. General Strike November 6th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you really give a shit about helping other people, we've got to end the two wars that we are bogged down in. The Democrats don't appear to be able to even attempt to stop the war, so it's up to us citizens to do it ourselves.

    We are going to strike on November 6th. Basically, nobody in America is going to work, and nobody is going to buy anything. If our government isn't going to listen to us, the people, then we are going to SHUT IT ALL DOWN.

    1. Re:General Strike November 6th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. That strike on 9/11 was a big hit too.

      Good luck toolbag.

    2. Re:General Strike November 6th by CRiMSON · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that.

      --
      oogly boogly!
    3. Re:General Strike November 6th by NeoTerra · · Score: 1

      I plan on not going to work on the 6th, and so should most of you. Spend some time with the family on that Saturday. :)

    4. Re:General Strike November 6th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      October 6th is a saturday. November 6th is a tuesday. But I mean, if you don't want to go to work that day it's still cool by me.

    5. Re:General Strike November 6th by The+Slashdot+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      November 6th is not a good day for me. I have to work. Could you reschedule it for a Sunday?

  28. panasonic maybe. by bombastinator · · Score: 1

    The last Lenovo I saw in a store actually had a case so fragile it flexed when I pressed my finger on it. Panasonic toughbooks might not be bad. They recently greatly increased their rated fall distance. If you're looking for a metal case there are also the power pros. They have the tidy little advantage of being able to run all the current major OSes

    1. Re:panasonic maybe. by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Every laptop's case flexes when you push on it from an old 600, T20, T40, or T61. No better or worse. Ditto for Macs, HP's, Dells, etc.

    2. Re:panasonic maybe. by bombastinator · · Score: 1

      Depends on how hard you are pushing. Heck so will a car wheel rim for that matter. I found the lenovo to be alarmingly flexible. It felt like I could break it accidentally just by pushing on it. Much more so than either my dell 7410 or may macbook pro which barely does so at all even under (relatively) hard pressure. I'm sure not all models are like that, but the one I saw was fairly disturbing.

    3. Re:panasonic maybe. by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      As I said, the brand-new Lenovo T61 I have here on my desk is no worse than the T20 I ALSO have on my desk, and no worse than any other laptop I have in my office (I have about a dozen at the moment... Most are getting wiped and sent out to donation.)

    4. Re:panasonic maybe. by bombastinator · · Score: 1

      I don't know from T61 to T72. The thing I saw was black, it had lots of vents and what might be termed open work on the sides, and a round front edge. It said both "lenovo" "thinkpad" on it. On the top front of the case on the left when one faces the screen was a space where either a hard drive or battery was supposed to go. It was made of really thin plastic and was so flexible that I feard I might break the thing if i picked it up without the bay being full. That may or may not be one of the models you've dealt with, I don't know. It did convince me not to buy it though.

      Make of that what you will.

  29. Good luck by Bullfish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After Tiananmen Square I stopped buying Chinese. In the last few years it has been almost impossible. If the main thing isn't made in China, components are, and that goes for almost everything. I am sure my shoes are made from the finest Falun Gong hides. In terms of a laptop, I don't any that would have most of the parts made in China. Not much has changed in terms of Chinese regard for human rights, but no one seems to care much as long as they can get what they want cheap, regardless of the treatment of the labour that produces them and the regime that allows it.

    We used to liberate people, now we liberate markets.

    1. Re:Good luck by king-manic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am sure my shoes are made from the finest Falun Gong hides

      I am from canada, I have never had a positive non creepy encounter with a Falun Gong practitioner. China is severely over stepping the bounds of what is right or just but I get the same vibe from Falun Gong people that I do from Scientology's. A sort of creepy vibe, sort of like the person in front of me is just a shell of a real human being.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    2. Re:Good luck by Knara · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they're kinda nutty. I agree that China overreacts to them, but these aren't hippies wanting to sit around, smoke pot, and "be cool". Rather, I'm just waiting for Falun Gong's version of Tom Cruise to start jumping on Oprah's couch.

    3. Re:Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boots made from Tom Cruise's hide would be sweet, and you could market them as snakeskin...

    4. Re:Good luck by Timothy+Chu · · Score: 1

      Perhaps creepy to you, but there's no reason the government needs to step in and "protect" its citizens from the religion by jail time and execution. It's one of the freedoms that Canada and the US are founded upon. Just because you may not enjoy the same freedom doesn't make it any less valuable to the country as a whole.

    5. Re:Good luck by king-manic · · Score: 1

      As I said. They over step the limits of what is right or just. I do not condone the actions. I may think certain ideologies are vacuous but I would not support the forcefully abolishment of that ideology.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    6. Re:Good luck by humpy101 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they're creepy. Real good reason to imprison them without trial, torture them, and maybe kill them huh?
      I have quite a few Chinese friends, and they all agree that yes, Falun Gong are a pretty whacked out cult, more like Jehovah's witnesses than Scientologists. However, in a *free* society you are able to ignore them, let them go on their way.
      The Chinese government is scared of any threat to their sovereignty. Similar to JW, one of teh core beliefs of FG is non-allegiance to any "earthly" government. Now do you see the problem here???

      --
      Wherever you go There you are
    7. Re:Good luck by Mex · · Score: 1

      Could you expand on this? What sort of experiences have you had?

    8. Re:Good luck by hacker · · Score: 1

      It's not just electronics. We also purchase a majority of our concrete from China, as well as our own copper products back. We sell our copper to them (at market rates), and then we buy back what they don't use (at marked-up prices). This is why the price of copper has skyrocketed in the last 3-5 years. Tried to rewire your house lately? Check the prices... its insane.

      The U.S. budget deficit is also financed by borrowing. More and more of that money comes from China, now the United States' second-largest lender, after Japan.

      We're deeper in the hole with China than many realize. If they stopped lending us money to pay back our own debts, our economy would crash in a second.

    9. Re:Good luck by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      So are you saying we should lock up Scientologists?

      Just because a cult gives you the creeps doesn't mean they should be oppressed.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    10. Re:Good luck by king-manic · · Score: 1

      So are you saying we should lock up Scientologists?

      Just because a cult gives you the creeps doesn't mean they should be oppressed.

      - RG>


      For Falun Gong no. Their just empty headed new age creeps. Their not dangerous yet.

      For the heavily aggressive, often criminal Scientologists it might be a good idea. The scam is already illegal in many countries and it's openly a scam and incident of abuse of the legal system are common.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  30. Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've used Macs for years, especially the Powerbook line, and they are long lasting & durable. Plus, you'll be able to run 3 different OS's with Bootcamp.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by DrDitto · · Score: 1

      Macs lack a TrackPoint. Its a show-stopper for me. Dell Latitude and Thinkpads have them.

    2. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't you get a real woman?

    3. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Designed by Apple in California"

      "Made in China"

    4. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like Macs as much as the next guy (I have a Macbook Pro), but since the original request was for something as durable as a Thinkpad, I'm not sure a Mac is the answer. Macs are generally made of good-quality parts, and are not flimsy... they withstand daily wear-and-tear just fine. But they are made to be very light and thin, which inevitably slightly compromises durability. Based on the thin case, I'm guessing a Mac won't handle a drop that well (pure speculation: I've never tried!)... whereas a Thinkpad just "feels" strong, based on the thickness of the case.

      Basically, I've never been afraid to toss a Thinkpad around, whereas I've always been fairly delicate with Mac laptops. Maybe I'm just paranoid, but that's how they "feel" to me. Anyone with real-world experience with dropping Macs vs. Thinkpads?

    5. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by russlar · · Score: 1

      Based on the thin case, I'm guessing a Mac won't handle a drop that well (pure speculation: I've never tried!)
      I've dropped my 12" Powerbook G4 out of my car onto asphalt. It's still going strong, once I banged out the dings in the metal case. It also landed on the bottom corner of the battery, so the motherboard and HDD were spared a direct impact
      --
      Anybody want my mod points?
    6. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't dropped my MacBook too far yet (only an inch or two), but I dropped my iBook five feet inside a poorly padded case. End result? The CD tray got stuck open (and wouldn't work any more) and the power jack was slightly damaged (not enough to cause any issues). Worked fine with scotch tape to hold the CD drawer in and an external CD drive until I sent it in for repair, got it back three days later good as new. It still runs, three years after the drop.

      That said, I think the old ThinkPads were even tougher, and the Toughbooks are perfect for someone who drops a lot.

    7. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      Apple makes nothing comparable to the size of the X series thinkpads and I assure you they are very durable. Cost a fortune for their performance, too.

    8. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      That and only one mouse button. Mac fanatics insist that it's the "one true way", but then apple turns around and sells external mice that have 2, or even 3. I just don't understand why they can't make the built-in button act like the apple mighty mouse, where it behaves like one or two, depending on your settings.

    9. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by thebonafortuna · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't take this as trolling against Mac, but in my experience, they're nowhere near as durable as a ThinkPad. For example, my primary home laptop is an old ThinkPad A31, which is over five years old. It lasted me throughout college, and survived numerous drops, liquid spills into the keyboard, hits, etc. It still runs better than most of my friends and colleagues brand new laptops.

      By comparison, my little brother brought his brand new MacBook Pro to school with him last year, and after his first semester, the keyboard had completely died from a beer spill. Now, while this is obviously a stupid move on his part, that's not the point. My ThinkPad stood up to numerous beer spills, and kept on ticking. From what he told me, Apple wanted $1,400.00 to fix his computer (I never verified this myself, but he insists its true). Instead, I had him order a new keyboard online for $75.00, and after 45 minutes of work (my first time taking apart a Mac laptop, cut me some slack -- and yes, they are impressively designed), I had it fixed for him.

      Anyways, this is one example of a major difference in durability between a MacBook Pro (a great computer, in its own right), and a ThinkPad. At least, an old ThinkPad. I'm not sure if the new ones are built as well.

      The other kicker, for me at least, is the lack of a TrackPoint. I personally can't stant touch pads. That alone is a difference maker right there.

    10. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by lexarius · · Score: 1

      On the upside, the trackpad does at least support some gesture-type stuff. Click with two fingers on the trackpad = right click. Or a two-finger tap, if you're using tap-to-click

    11. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by oyenstikker · · Score: 1

      I've seen an iBook go flying off of a table into a wall 6 feet away, courtesy of a 3 year old girl fleeing from her 5 year old sister. Cracked the case, but it still works fine 2 years later.

      --
      The masses are the crack whores of religion.
    12. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Does it do that when you are running Windows (via bootcamp?) I'm making the assumption that the person replacing a Thinkpad will run Windows...

    13. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by lexarius · · Score: 1

      Yes, actually. The Boot Camp drivers attempt to replicate the behavior of most Apple peripherals.

    14. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The problem with a Mac is that it's as much a fashion statement as a computer. He's had his current laptop for 7 years. In 7 years, a the Macbook Pro's styling is going to be incredibly dated, and will look just as silly as a toilet seat iBook looks today. When was the last time you've seen one of those around?

      The nice thing about the Thinkpads is that the design is both functional and timeless. You're not going to get both of those with a Mac. Actually, you're not going to get that with most non-Thinkpad PC laptops either, as the black/silver and blue LED laptops we have today will also end up looking just as dated as the Mac in a couple of years.

    15. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by rk · · Score: 1

      "The other kicker, for me at least, is the lack of a TrackPoint."

      Whereas I use a TrackPoint for a half hour and start to wonder where I left my wrist brace. Different strokes for different folks. :-)

    16. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the keyboard is unusable compared to the thinkpad.

    17. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a T20 and a T30 and I am using a Macbook Pro now. The touch pad on the MBP is better than the touch point on the T30.

    18. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      The Mac Book Pro is made in China. I ordered mine from the Apple Store online, and according to the UPS web site it shipped from Shanghai.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    19. Re:Any reason to not get a Mac Book Pro? by thebonafortuna · · Score: 1

      You, my friend, are exactly right.

  31. You're aware? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That reducing the wealth of people in an area makes them more subservient and dependent on the wealthy? In this case, the state... Sanctions ironically simply cement the power of the powerful.

    You make people more independent by making them wealthy.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:You're aware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make people more independent by making them wealthy.

      The reverse is also true, which explains some of the behavior in the US.

    2. Re:You're aware? by kilgortrout · · Score: 3, Informative

      What about South Africa? The extensive boycotts there were instrumental in ending apartheid.

    3. Re:You're aware? by Foolicious · · Score: 1

      You make people more independent by making them wealthy.

      You need to consider the means by which they were made wealthy, of course, in order to determine how independent they really are. You also need to consider that wealth is a relative term. And finally, you need to consider that independent is a relative term, as well. All that to say that some of the wealthiest people people in the world are completely dependent on many factors to maintain their current wealth and some of the "unwealthiest" people function completely independently from many of those same forces to which the wealthy are beholden. Conversely, as you've said, the "unwealthy" may come to depend so much on the support of others that they lose a great deal of independence that the wealthy have, simply because the wealthy have enough resources to buy themselves time to survive the dry times of life.

      Don't get me wrong, I completely agree with your statement, but I think there are a great number factors more than simply money. Using the example of China, give Foo Long in some rat hole inland Chinese province more money because the garment dyeing factory at which he works is making boatloads of money and his quality of life may improve. But he's still dependent on that factory, as well as restricted in his independence by "his" government. His newfound "wealth" isn't bad, but depending on the situation, could be considered table scraps.

      --
      Please don't use "umm" or "err" or "erm".
    4. Re:You're aware? by pipatron · · Score: 1

      Well, the larger the gap between the rich and the poor is, the less independence.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    5. Re:You're aware? by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      That reducing the wealth of people in an area makes them more subservient and dependent on the wealthy? In this case, the state... Sanctions ironically simply cement the power of the powerful.

      Bah, do you think that by buying from a Chinese company you somehow increase the wealth of anyone who isn't already wealthy?

    6. Re:You're aware? by drgreening · · Score: 1

      That reducing the wealth of people in an area makes them more subservient and dependent on the wealthy? In this case, the state... Sanctions ironically simply cement the power of the powerful. You make people more independent by making them wealthy.

      How do you explain Saudi Arabia (wealthy people, subservient)? Or South Africa (wealthy country, converted to broad democracy by sanctions)? Sanctions do work when you can enforce them, but I'm guessing they'll be impossible to enforce with China due to its vast export economy and huge number of trading partners.

    7. Re:You're aware? by rhizome · · Score: 1

      Sanctions do work when you can enforce them, but I'm guessing they'll be impossible to enforce with China due to its vast export economy and huge number of trading partners.

      Not to mention the enforcers being stabbed in the back by ignint Americans who only think of sanctions in terms of Dick Cheney's talking points.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    8. Re:You're aware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the decline of communism was instrumental in the ending of apartheid since the western governments (USA, UK) didn't have a reason to prop up the apartheid regime anymore. It's not a coincidence that South Africa became a democracy right after communism collapsed in the USSR. The black liberation movements had close ties to communists.

    9. Re:You're aware? by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      You make people more independent by making them wealthy.
      Except is isn't "the people" that get wealthy. Instead, the already-wealthy get more wealthy and buy more arms to protect themselves from their people.
    10. Re:You're aware? by kramulous · · Score: 1

      No, it was the inability to play cricket internationally.

      --
      .
    11. Re:You're aware? by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      You're assuming the sactions are meant to cause problems for the state.  We keep slapping sanctions on dictators and they keep staying in power.  Maybe the sanctions are working great, just as you described--and just as expected by our gov't.

      What? You say the good old US of A would never support a dictator?  Really?

  32. Original Device Manufacturers by cerelib · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most companies, even Lenovo, use ODM companies to make laptops. Some of these companies are Chinese, but Taiwan is also a major competitor. Look for names like Quanta, Compal, or ASUS if you want to go with a Taiwanese company instead of a Chinese company. The ODM relationships are not advertised, so you will have to do some digging. Join forums like notebookreview.com and ask people to tell you where their laptops label says it was manufactured if you want to be sure.

    1. Re:Original Device Manufacturers by elinenbe · · Score: 1

      I work on the manufacturing side of Quanta. While the offices are in Taiwan, all manufacturing has been moved to Shanghai. Same with a number of these companies you just stated. The suburbs of Shanghai are one of the main electronics manufacturing areas in the world.

      --
      -eric
    2. Re:Original Device Manufacturers by cerelib · · Score: 1

      That is a very interesting point. So are there any notebook ODM companies that do not export their manufacturing to China? It would be nice if someone with inside knowledge could provide a short list of major ODMs, where they manufacture, and who their main customers are.

    3. Re:Original Device Manufacturers by jay-be-em · · Score: 1

      The two best things about a t-series are the keyboard and options for high resolution screens. I don't see how a Mac laptop of any variety fulfills either (having owned powerbooks and ibooks).

      --
      "Orthodoxy means not thinking--not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." --Eric Blair
    4. Re:Original Device Manufacturers by Marsmensch · · Score: 1

      I agree with the parent on this 100%. I would seriously consider several Compal models, they are some of the best notebooks I have ever seen. If you live in Europe have a look at Zepto computers. I bought my last ntbk in Denmark and have been extremely pleased with it.

      --
      Slashdot: news from nerds.
  33. You get what you pay for by archen · · Score: 1

    If you want something built well, look into Panasonic. They're not cheap because they're not built cheap.

  34. I'm also a fan of the T series by zymurgyboy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    and I've replaced it with this and this and couldn't be happier. If you're looking for something with a similar lifespan, look no further.

    I carried my little white 2001 iBook in a gym bag back and forth to the office for 4 years, before retiring it for it's final year to home only as a couch computer. It finally gave up the ghost after 5.5 years, and two drops to the linoleum covered floor in my living room -- once from 2 feet, once from three and a half. I wish Apple still used the bullet proof glass for iBook cases. That iBook sure took a beatin' before it belly-uped .

    --
    If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    1. Re:I'm also a fan of the T series by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1

      Trolling for what? It's a review of products I've owned. My gods, you're dumb.

      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    2. Re:I'm also a fan of the T series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recommending the use of VMware to run Windows on a Mac is trolling.

    3. Re:I'm also a fan of the T series by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      As much as I trust the quality of Apple hardware, I could never replace my thinkpad T series with an Apple for a number of reasons:

      Lack of high-resolution screens (>120dpi)

      One button pointing device (as opposed to a true 3 button one on the T series)

      No erasehead pointer in the keyboard

    4. Re:I'm also a fan of the T series by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about Windows? Backup and start over, sir.

      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    5. Re:I'm also a fan of the T series by njriley · · Score: 1

      I'm worried I may be straying off topic, but I do have to disagree. I broke from a string of Linux machines a year ago to buy a MacBook Pro, and I'd have to suggest you think very carefully about that decision. I have nothing against Macs, mind you, but I find the reliability just isn't there, and I'm starting to wonder about the relative merits of OSX versus Linux. I would still certainly recomend a MacBook over most consumer laptops I've seen, but I do have to say that in ten years I've never seen the equal of a Thinkpad. I like my MacBook, but I'll be buying a Thinkpad again as soon as I can manage. Just a data point for you.

  35. Replacing an iPod? by Xochi77 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    An anonymous reader writes
    "As a very happy iPod user (still working after 7 years), I always planned on replacing it with another iPod. However, iPods are still produced by Apple, an American company, and I can't quite bear to buy American while the Blackwater are shooting civilians with the US Government as their biggest backer. Maybe this is silly, as whatever I buy is likely to be made (at least in part) in the USA... but still, what are my options for something as well built as the iPod?"

    there, fixed that for ya!

    1. Re:Replacing an iPod? by pshumate · · Score: 1

      Yes, by all means, don't bother to avoid doing business with a country whose tactics you don't like because your own has done a good deal of horrible things, most beyond your control.

    2. Re:Replacing an iPod? by Xochi77 · · Score: 1

      dude, grow a brain...

      iraq: 73,922-1,000,000 dead...

      dead monks 9-???

      ok, so as many people died violently in Burma as say, everyday in Iraq before lunch?

      OHHHHhhhh, wait... I forget, American only have a five minute attention span, and a phobia of Communism...

    3. Re:Replacing an iPod? by pshumate · · Score: 1

      "Grow a brain" Classy, I like that. Does it matter how many are dead? And is that the only atrocity China has committed? Should we quantify our horrors and set a "allowable death and atrocity threshold"? Keep your generalizations of America to yourself, especially if you're going to bring that "lesser of two evils" B.S.

    4. Re:Replacing an iPod? by Xochi77 · · Score: 1

      Yes Sir! No generalizing about the Good Ol' USA then!

  36. I know... by denzacar · · Score: 0

    Wait for couple of months and THEN buy a Lenovo laptop.

    By then, this monk business should be over, and you can explain to your conscience that China (or Lenovo) are not backing monk-shooters NOW.

    Still.. I'd hate to be you.
    I mean... giving up everything made in USA because of current troubles in Iraq.
    Giving up everything made in Germany, Italy and Japan because of WWII.
    And Spanish Inquisition...

    Damn! Come to think of it... What do you eat and drink then?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  37. Get a Mac? No nipple! by DrDitto · · Score: 1

    I would happily buy a MacBook if it had the pointing_stick/nipple/TrackPoint/etc (the thing that sits between the G and H keys to move the mouse pointer).

    I can't stand the Trackpad.

  38. MacBook Pro by Overbyte · · Score: 1

    My T21 died back in February. I really loved that thing even though it was pretty slow at 1Ghz. I replaced it with a 15" MacBook Pro. I run VMWare fusion on it for those times I need to run a Windows partition. I'm at a point now where I rarely use those Windows sessions. I use the Mac primarily for Java development using Eclipse, JBoss, Tomcat. I had to do some testing on a Vista desktop a couple weeks ago. After that experience, I appreciated my Mac a whole lot more...

  39. And where were the components made??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhm. Almost all electronic components are manufactured in China anyway. Even if you buy a laptop that hasn't been assembled as a whole in China, Laptops are made from resistors, capacitors, ICs and so forth: the bulk of the parts will have been made in China. It *might* still be possible to buy a "100% China Free" laptop. But I doubt it. Overreaching intellectual monopoly laws have completely gutted the manufacturing capacity of the West (without patents and copyrights, it's a free market and manufacturing is locally profitable. With them, lawyering supplants engineering as the road to market domination).

  40. Worst. Article. Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This might be the worst of the slashkos stories yet. And from an anonymous source no less.

    Everything probably has blood on it by your standards. Sell all your electronics, stop heating and lighting your home. Sell your home and live in a grass shack.

  41. I would answer... by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

    I would answer your question but I have a feeling you won't read it, since this comment is also made in China!

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:I would answer... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could answer a question I have...

      I've heard that there are basically two levels of Chinese goods. Those produced for the domestic market, and those produced for export. I've also heard that the quality of the former is vastly superior than the latter.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:I would answer... by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      I... was actually being facetious, sorry for the confusion there :/ I'm Greek and in Greece.

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    3. Re:I would answer... by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      I think for most goods you have it backwards.
      Stuff for export means stuff that needs to meet import requirements of another country.
      They are less likely to kill you.

      There are many horror stories of domestic goods in China... have you heard of soy sauce made with HAIR? (yes, human HAIR)

      Well I haven't tried that brew before, but I'd suspect it's anything but "vastly superior".

      For some local fresh produce, I dunno. Maybe that's the case, but then I'm not exactly living in mainland China (I'm living in Hong Kong) so I can't tell. I've been to the mainland for quite a few times, and last I was there everybody cautioned me to look out for cheap stuff because the quality may be so bad that they could be health hazards.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  42. You could try... by Bin_jammin · · Score: 2, Funny

    an abacus. They're great for math, unless you've developed something against the ancient Babylonians while living under your rock. The fact is that you're looking at Chinese mad goods no matter what you buy, you said it yourself. You're either going to buy an OLPC when they're available (at only slightly less power than you've already got) or buying Chinese. Don't like it? Who do you think made that T20 for IBM before?

  43. apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "what are my options for something as well built as the Thinkpad T-series?""

    You could try Macbook pro.

    1. Re:apple by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      They're made in china as well, at least the fedex tracking for them comes from Shanghai area.

      how is that any better?

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  44. clarification by onemorehour · · Score: 1

    The point I was trying to make, for those who missed it, was not that America is the same as China, but that Lenovo and Dell are not responsible for governmental policy.

    1. Re:clarification by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      ah, Lenovo is owned by the Chinease government, IIRC, and Dell is not owned by the US government.

    2. Re:clarification by onemorehour · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to wikipedia, the Chinese government owns a large share of one of the companies that owns stock in Lenovo, and so it effectively owns 27.5% of the company.

      If the original poster is advocating for responsible consumerism, and suggesting that we look up the shareholders of a company and only support the company if we support the shareholders, then I'm all for it. However, it sounded like the original poster was saying: "Lenovo is Chinese. China is bad. Therefore, I don't want to buy a laptop from Lenovo."

  45. Thinkpads were ALWAYS made in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ordered my mom a custom Thinkpad several years ago and it was drop shipped from China. They even sent me the tracking number so I could watch the progress.

    Good luck finding any computer part today that doesn't have at least 50% of it's components made in China.

  46. Desktops are made in Hungary by REBloomfield · · Score: 2, Informative

    The last lot of Lenovo desktops we brought were made in Hungary. Get one of them instead...

  47. Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if your $500 were used to buy a gun used to shoot little girl scouts? What then?

    1. Re:Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would take a big healthy dump while looking at pictures of said girl scouts.

      corncrap..

  48. A Macbook pro? by soupforare · · Score: 1

    Never owned a thinkpad, then?

    --
    --- Do you believe in the day?
  49. Actually, I would worry about home first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10's of million Chinese products were shortcutted and endanger our children. In addition, you can probably count on Leveno products now having some interesting BIOS code (the company is losing the American and Europeans designers and hiring just Chinese).

    Smart to walk away from Chinese products. The hard part will be picking what you want. In general, check the various dell models. In addition, the bulk of the Japanese models are made in Japan or South Korea. Apple is a china made item. Regardless, good luck.

  50. That's a tough one. by ErichTheRed · · Score: 4, Informative

    Very little compares to the durability of the ThinkPads, at least in the non-rugged category. You pay dearly for them, but they last forever compared to other notebooks.

    Even Dell's Lattitude business line still feels like a toy. Dell really improved their notebooks over the last iteration, and they're still crap. HP's business line (not the consumer junk with the blinky blue lights and 17" monitors) is the only one IMO that comes close to IBM/Lenovo's case design and construction.

    If you really want rugged or semi-rugged, you probably need to look at the Panasonic Toughbooks. They're solid, but they're 20% heavier than they should be and you compromise on case design for durability. (Side note, if you buy the true rugged Toughbook, it's assembled in the US (probably for military contract requirements.) You pay accordingly too...list on some of the rugged models is in the $2000-$3000 range.

    Your other choice might be a MacBook Pro, but those aluminum cases don't look like they can take a beating the way the old ThinkPads can.

    (By the way, everything's made in China now. If it wasn't, you wouldn't be paying the cheap prices you get for hardware now.)

    1. Re:That's a tough one. by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are not assembled in the US. For that matter, neither are many cisco products, which are used across the entire dod/federal infrastructure. However, the requirements for use in DOD and Federal entities are strict, and every component in the device has to be accounted for. Checkpoint is a prime example, the Feds got to peek at the underlying source code for revue before it was certified.

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    2. Re:That's a tough one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why everyone loves Lenovo so much. I got my t40 about a year ago - it's got a dead screen, and the battery won't hold even a minute of charge. And they charged me $199 for the recovery CDs - after the hard drive crashed so I couldn't use the partition to reinstall... at least they paid for the new HD.

  51. Panasonic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not take a look at Panasonic Business class toughbooks? They are very lightweight, yet meant to stand up to a decent beating. Plus they have ridiculously long battery life to boot!

    They are a bit expensive but if you are looking for build quality + longevity, I can't think of a better alternative.

  52. hate to break it to ya but... by jollyreaper · · Score: 0

    I can't quite bear to buy Chinese while the Burmese military are shooting at monks with the Chinese Government as their biggest backer. If that sort of thing is bothering you and that's why you want to buy American, you better not watch any of the news coming out of Iraq. Our private contractors kill more people in an afternoon than some governments do in an entire repressive crackdown.

    (If you mod this down, the terrorists win)
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  53. Ignoring the politics, the quality has changed by Plug · · Score: 1

    IBM had a range of ThinkPads aimed at home users (the G series from memory?) but they fell by the way a few years ago.

    Lenovo came along (they didn't necessarily make ThinkPads beforehand, I'm not sure if Legend were the company that IBM gave their build contracts to) as the combination of Legend and the IBM PC division. So, the same people are still working on ThinkPads, but with new management. I am typing this on a ThinkPad T60, and while it's nice, it doesn't feel as solid as the T41 I had before it.

    Lenovo introduced a number of home-market-esque features - obvious ones include widescreen/titanium covers on the Z series and the Windows key. They also got rid of the IBM branding (at least in advertising) as quickly as they could, which I find interesting; they had the right to use it for 5 years, and "ThinkPad" was definitely associated with IBM, and with quality.

    You can now buy cheap Lenovo laptops (C series), which I'd personally keep far away from, as they feel really cheap. At least they've not branded them ThinkPad. The Z series seem to be what they're pitching at "home" to compete with Dell/HP, and in general, the quality (plastic, keyboard, construction) all just seems a little more flimsy now.

    I worked for an IBM business partner, and we stopped selling ThinkPads when the quality fell. We moved to HP NC/NX series laptops (much better value for money, at least in New Zealand) - these were not without their problems also. We had one that would cause a right mouse button click when the hood was closed and you tapped the case (or the table, for that matter), because the trackpad was too close to the screen. That was fun to diagnose!

    Friends with Dells say they're good; friends with MacBooks say you can't get any better. You pay a little premium for the MacBook's ability to run MacOS, obviously; if you don't value that, you might not want to consider one. I read that they may be bringing out a lower priced line of them soon.

    Have a play around and see what you like, but not just at stores - the business quality ones are better specced, often cheaper and not always available in retail stores.

    1. Re:Ignoring the politics, the quality has changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree. we are a dell shop and the d series of latitude has been okay, but the latest thinkpads aren't built as solid as the older ones. plus, one arrived damaged and we had to wait another month for one to be shipped from china. AND they tried to tell us the damage was our fault (even though we had a complete care warranty etc, etc)and finally said that they would make an 'exception' and send one to us. personally, i have used hp, ibm, dell,sony and recently a macbook pro and all have something that irritates me. right now i think the best combo of cost, customer service is dell. the macbook is good (keyboard could be a little more solid) but you pay a lot for it....

    2. Re:Ignoring the politics, the quality has changed by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Over the past 8 years, we've used a variety of systems. Our bread and butter laptop was the Toshiba Tecra line (8000, 8100, 9100, M2 or M3). We also have used Thinkpad T43, X61s, and T61.

      The T61 build feels about as solid as the older Tecra 9100 (which I used for 5.5 years). It's black, it's not flashy, and overall feels pretty solid. Our user with the T43 loves his, and the X61s is too new.

      I have a few complaints about the Thinkpads:

      1) The Ins/Del/Home/End/PgUp/PgDn keys are in an awkward location. I prefer the non-standard location on the Toshiba Tecra keyboards that put those six keys along the right side, just past the enter/backspace area. That made it easy to find PgUp/PgDn and Home/End with my right-pinky without taking fingers off the home row. Still, I'm slowly getting used to it after 7-8 years of using Tecras. We also have a bunch of MacBook Pros in use by the creative folks, and they've held up well.

      2) The Function / Control keys are swapped... again, I'm adjusting after using the Tecra keyboard. The ESC key is also slightly moved.


      3) No DVI output. I'm dissapointed that PC makers haven't followed Apple's lead and put DVI outputs on their notebooks (and supply the stupid $10 DVI->VGA adapter).

      4) Sometimes the ThinkVantage software gets in my way when it guesses wrong. I'm still adjusting to that.

      Other then that, the 15.4" widescreen is lovely. The dual-core CPU is a dream compared to my old 1.8GHz single-core P4. The keyboard is fairly nice, with good tactile feedback. And I have a nubby mouse! Hopefully this system lasts 5-7 years like my older Tecra did.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    3. Re:Ignoring the politics, the quality has changed by Vector7 · · Score: 1

      As an emacs user, I am particularly sensitive about the issue of laptop keyboard layout. I can immediately rule out 95% of the laptops I see as potential purchases just on account of poor keyboard layouts. Taking into consideration the absence of a second Alt key on the Macbook, and the addition of the useless "Windows" keys on the newer Thinkpad models which squashes all the modifier keys to an uncomfortable size, I may have to revise that figure to 100% and hope that my current T40p never dies. In any case, you have touched a nerve here:

      > I have a few complaints about the Thinkpads: ..
      > 2) The Function / Control keys are swapped... again, I'm adjusting after using the Tecra keyboard.

      NO! No, no, and no. God no. Adjust your expectations. The 'function' key has no business down there, and certainly not between Control and Alt. It isn't even that useful -- they could put it anywhere on the keyboard and you'd never care. Instead almost every laptop in the damn world sticks it right down there where you'll hit it by accident and wreak havoc with ten years of emacs training (and if you're not an emacs user, you can't possibly that sensitive to the keyboard layout anyway =p). Due to firmware magic you usually can't remap the stupid thing, in contrast with the Windows key of a desktop keyboard. In short, if you think that this is a noteworthy feature, please don't unduly dismiss my suggestion that a frontal lobotomy might do you some good.

  54. Re:Get a Mac? No nipple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'd be nice if it had more than a 1-button mouse, too... that button is like 4 inches wide!

  55. A simple question. by zzztkf · · Score: 1

    Is buying Amerincan made product among your options, while invasion of Iraq by U.S. caused ten thouthands innocent civilian death?

    More lives are lost in Iraq than in Burmese.

    If refusing chinese product makes sense for you, think again.

  56. Re:Get a Mac? No nipple! by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1
    Have to partially disagree. Rubbing the clit point all day hurts my finger. But I hate the track pad too. The behavior of the trackpad on the MacBooks and MacBook Pros is much more configurable than any non-Apple notebook I've ever used, at least.

    More practically, mice are fairly portable and avoid the stupid one-button problem on the Macs nicely.

    --
    If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
  57. end it by gumbico · · Score: 1

    what a tard. if you want to go down that path, you might as well sell off all your crap and go live in a cave. no wait, you can't do that either. go read up on american history and talk to native americans and blacks to see their side of the story. you probably won't want to stay here after that. all countries have done some "not so nice things". get over it and get a T61. if you can't, then go kill yourself cuz you're made in america.

  58. Singapore, not China by qw0ntum · · Score: 2, Informative
    For what it's worth, I just looked at the bottom of my T60 and it's from Lenovo Singapore. Granted, it's made in China, but you'd be hard-pressed to find a laptop these days that isn't.

    I love my T60, too, by the way. Runs great with Ubuntu as well.

    --
    'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
    1. Re:Singapore, not China by benmhall · · Score: 1

      "I love my T60, too, by the way. Runs great with Ubuntu as well."

      I beg to differ. I have a T60 and sleep and resume has been a problem since day one. To be more precise, the ATI X1300 has been a problem since day one.

      By contrast, the first-gen MacBook runs Ubuntu brilliantly. Sleep, DRI, brightness, wifi, bluetooth. It all works. The best part: Used MacBooks can be picked up for a song.

  59. Apple, Used by MBCook · · Score: 1

    There are two options. First, buy a Mac. I've had great luck with 'em, they tend to be lovely hardware, and I've had great results with Apple service.

    But you probably don't want it. Plus, they are made in China, I think.

    Your best bet: used Thinkpad. You can get one made by IBM, or Lenovo. But if you buy it used, then you aren't giving money to the Chinese. At most, you are raising the average resale value on the things which would very slightly raise demand on new ones if many other people did the same.

    Of course, unless you are lucky, you can't get the latest and greatest this way.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Apple, Used by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      As I understood it, Lenovo always made Thinkpads. If you have a Thinkpad, even used, you are using a Chinese product.

      On the bright side, Americans are slowly deciding to pay attention to the fact that they really don't make anything anymore. To enrich the CEOs and stockholders, we outsourced manufacturing. Now, our dollar is tanking for that very reason. Karma: the shrinking dollar value means that the prices of overseas goods will double or more. We be screwed. The only real winners of the outsourcing ideology will be the select few who gamed the movement and made hundreds of billions of bucks by canning Americans. Soon to come: where will they be spending that money? They sure as hell aren't about to build factories for those spoiled Americans who want health insurance and regular raises. They are waiting for the economy to tank, so they can buy up real estate at rock bottom prices, and wait for better times to sell at even more insane profit. Capitalism is fun! If you are at the top five percent income bracket. The rest of us, oh well, that's life.

  60. Buy an external moose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure they've got nipples and think how cool it would be to own a moose ;)

  61. Computers and pr0n by ellem · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I cannot, in good conscience, buy a new computer until they put new pr0n on the internet!

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  62. Paranoia... by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 1

    There are a number of reasons not to buy Chinese products, but really this is not one of them, as most products these days are manufactured in the Asiapac area. However, with regards to lenovo, the US gov no longer purchases products not designed or owned by US entities unless it can not be avoided. Specifically *put on your tinfoil hat* that the chinese are embedding hardware that is designed to spy on the owner of that hardware *remove tinfoil hat* While is has not been proved, atleast when the products where designed in the US, all components were accounted for, there are a few components in some products coming out of Asia that are installed on the pcb's but have no description and are unaccounted for.

    Granted, the above, is all pure speculation, but not completely out of the question.

    I would be more worried about food products coming out of China at this point, then about boycotting electronics due to a political stance, because if that were the case.. you may as well stop buying products made in South America, most of Asia, hell even some places in EU, none of the gov's on this planet have clean hands.

    --
    I came, I conquered, I coredumped
  63. You're a troll - always made by Lenovo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry troll, Thinkpads have always been made by Lenovo. Just that before they were under contract to IBM. Then IBM wanted out of the PC game and sold the entire operation over to the manufacturer (Lenovo). Go back to Digg.

  64. You're right to listen to your conscience, but... by fm6 · · Score: 1

    It doesn't make sense to stop buying from Lenovo and continue buying goods made by other Chinese companies. Are you going to boycott all Chinese-made goods? Then be ready for some serious inconvenience.

    Also, it's kind of sad that you're focusing on what's happening in Burma. It's evil, all right, but it also happens every day, all over the world. (And a lot of it is perpetrated by our very own beloved leaders.) If you really give a shit about human rights, stop reacting to headlines and start doing stuff day-to-day. Like joining the organization linked above, or one like it.

  65. We use Apple MacBooks at our middle school... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    We use Apple MacBooks at our middle school and they've held up really well. No one is harder on computer equipment than little kids. The laptops have been real durable. So from personal experience, I'd recommend an Apple MacBook. You might like Mac OS X, but if you don't, you can always load it with Windows and/or Linux.

  66. The point about America... by tjstork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In America, you can have a website and a donate money to form an organization saying "Bush sucks". In China, if you did that, you would wind up in jail.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:The point about America... by Stonent1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No I think donating to a "Bush Sucks" organization would be highly encouraged in China. :P

    2. Re:The point about America... by Copperhead · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't think the Chinese would mind if you put up a website that said "Bush sucks".

      --
      Your reality is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. - Baron Munchausen
    3. Re:The point about America... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      In America, you can have a website and a donate money to form an organization saying "Bush sucks". In China, if you did that, you would wind up in jail.

      But you stand up in a public Q&A and do the yell the same stuff and act like an obnoxious prick you get tasered.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    4. Re:The point about America... by tjstork · · Score: 1

      But you stand up in a public Q&A and do the yell the same stuff and act like an obnoxious prick you get tasered.

      Then you make a YouTube video of the whole thing, become a hero for the left wing, maybe get a book deal, and suddenly, make a ton of money being a victim of persecution, and that's even before you file your first lawsuit for excessive force against the cops, the city, the feds, and even the taser makers.

      America is a great country, because even the people who protest wealth, get rich by doing so.

      --
      This is my sig.
    5. Re:The point about America... by Initi · · Score: 1

      Old Cold War Joke:

      A US and Soviet Diplomat are talking one day, when the American says "You know the difference, Ivan, between our two countries? In America, I can stand on Pennsylvania Avenue and say 'Regan is an idiot.'" The Soviet says "Our countries are not so different; I can stand in Red Square and say 'Regan is an idiot.'"

  67. Re:Get a Mac? No nipple! by ejtttje · · Score: 1

    Once you experience the two-finger scroll feature, you might change your tune ;)

  68. recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a 486 Thinkpad with DOS, and donate the rest of your budget to support "democracy" and "freedom" in Burma. Are you willing to do that?

  69. Hello? Yes, this is the SPDC. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    An anonymous coward on Slashdot has just refused to buy a new Thinkpad?
    CEASE FIRE!
    Get the Red Cross in here NOW!
    Tell the monks no hard feelings, no?
    What were we thinking?!

    See how that works?

  70. Panasonic Toughbook? by cheros · · Score: 1

    You did mention you wanted it to be sturdy, I think those are designed for it.

    Strangely enough, I've had good mileage out of a VAIO and the only upsetting thing there was that my spare HAD to come with Vista (which I promply zapped for Kubuntu and a VMWared XP session where needed). It seems I'm no longer the only one with a savage dislike for Vista :-).

    Anyway, how are you going to check that your laptop doesn't contain Chinese parts? I think you're a bit late for that, but that's my personal opinion - I actually do the same, just for a different country :-)

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  71. use the anti-RIAA/MPAA tactic... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    Use the anti-RIAA/MPAA tactic and buy used, hopefully from some CEO who has to have this months model of stuff, etc.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  72. Re:Get a Mac? No nipple! by grommit · · Score: 1

    So you're the single person in the entire world that they keep making those annoying eraser heads for? Damn you.

  73. Re: Repairing instead of dumping by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    I fixed my fan, added 1 Meg of memory, and got a cheap 250 gig drive for my work machine. I plan to use XP and Office 2003 until it completely caves.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  74. Macbook or MacBook Pro by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1
    If you aren't using any graphic intensive apps and can live with the Intel 950GMA, or if you travel a lot on airplanes, the MacBook is a nice option. I generally suggest buying from MacMall.com as they sell and support units with both OSX and XP preinstalled side by side. I highly recommend getting 2GB of Ram if you plan to use both Windows and MacOSX. (Get Parallels it's a $10 option and you can then boot windows from Mac OS and run windows the way it was meant to be run....in a window!

    If you can afford it, then the MacBook Pro is the way to go. I had a PowerBook Titanium up until last spring when I sold it and purchased a MacBook Pro. (I'm in video production and a 1Ghz G4 wasn't going to cut it for FCP 6.) I got a model on closeout for $1300. It only had an 80GB HDD and 512MB of ram, but considering that a 320GB external HDD and 1GB of Ram set me back an extra $330, not a bad deal. I boot XP Pro off an external via Parallels when I need to use Windows, say to export a model from 3D Studio Max to something usable in Lightwave.

    Now you are going to pay the Apple premium, but I haven't had many problems with Apple products unless it's a first Gen product. (I had a 1st gen snow white iBook G3 as my first Mac...there is a reason why I refuse to buy an iPhone at the moment...well that and ATT coverage in this area sucks.)

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  75. get real! by dummkopf · · Score: 1

    you might as well go to the outback, live from kangaroo meat and drink your own piss. cause everything else, at least part of it, it made somewhere in china.

  76. Dell Latitude by ajegwu · · Score: 1

    The Dell Latitude is the closest competetor I've seen to the T-series Thinkpad. It has the magnesium alloy durable chasis, the hard drive head parking software, fingerprint reader option, and all that other neat stuff. I personally got one, and it was a lemon, so I returned it and got a T50, but a friend of mine has migrated his entire company to Latitudes and he couldn't be happier.

    1. Re:Dell Latitude by wdolez00 · · Score: 1

      I haven't had a good experience supporting Latitude models D410 and D610. The company I worked for at the time actually dropped their contract with Dell and switched to Lenovo. The only thing I liked about them was that they were super easy to work on.

    2. Re:Dell Latitude by Knara · · Score: 1

      The D400's are decent, but not awesome. The D610's are larger and slightly more robust than the 400's, but not much.

      However, the D620's are actually pretty nice machines, I gotta say. Much improved over the C/D400-610 lines.

    3. Re:Dell Latitude by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Do NOT get a Dell Latitude. I've been using mine from work for the past month and it is the biggest hunk-of-junk I've ever used. Too many problems to detail here.

  77. That makes sense... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    Laptops, from any manufacturer, come in just a handful of known configurations, and generally are customizable only by RAM, and maybe hard drive upgrades. Easy to make them in advance overseas.

    Dell's big schtick with desktops though... and it's true of plenty of other makers as well... is building the machine to your specs as you order it, and having it to you within 48 hours, maybe even overnight. That's hard, and exorbitantly expensive, to do if you have to deal with international shipping and customs.

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
    1. Re:That makes sense... by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      Laptops, from any manufacturer, come in just a handful of known configurations, and generally are customizable only by RAM, and maybe hard drive upgrades. Easy to make them in advance overseas. Really? The last laptop I got (a Lenovo x61s) was configurable by memory, hard drive, processor, screen type, wireless antenna, wireless LAN card, wireless WAN card, fingerprint reader, onboard Bluetooth, Robson cache, battery, smart card reader, and a host of software options. The screen type and wireless antenna were bundled, but everything else was independent.
      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  78. Chinese backing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you find a company that makes laptops, sand to bootable, without Chinese backing, be sure to shout their name from the mountain tops.

    Sure, Lenovo is a Chinese company. How many components of a Dell, a Gateway, and Acer, an HP/Compaq, or even an Apple do you suppose are made without Chinese backing in terms of components, manufacturing, assembly, etc?

    Welcome to the Global Economy.

  79. Lenovo and the Ghinese Gov.different entities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Lenovo owned by the Chinese Government or not? This was the rule in the old communist (well socialist) countries, each and every business was owned by the government, this is the essence of the economic communist doctrine. I understand that China is not Communist anymore,at least not economically, they have private companies, etc.

    Sure, according to Marxist theory a country with a private economic sector is not communist.

    Anyway in case Lenovo is not owned by the Chinese Government you should not blame them for the actions of the Chinese Government.

    Do you blame Sun Microsystems, Microsoft or Novell for the current US external policy? Are these companies responsible in any way for whaterver the US Government does?

  80. Fujitsu by James+Jazz · · Score: 3, Informative

    First off go to notebookreview.com to see which Laptop suits your needs. In your case, I would seriously look at a Fujitsu Lifebook. They are excellent machines, an E series or S series would be the perfect thin and light for you. But they are assembled in Osaka, Japan and NOT in Third Word mainland China. Checkout Panasonic Toughbooks although they are somewhat pricey. I believe Dell Latitude are assembled in Malayasia. HP Compaq are made in China. I think Samsungs are put together in Korea (although loads of Samsung products, especially Consumer Electronics are made in China). I really hope these Burmese Generals end up in front of a firing squad. I also hope no more monks or civilians get hurt. The way fucking Russia and China have backed the Burmese Junta sickens me. These two countries spawned Stalin (Georgian) and Mao. The biggest butchers in history. They also backed Pol-Pot in Cambodia in the 1970s. Maybe the Russians and Chinese are the greatest threat to the Free World and not some deluded Muslims.

    1. Re:Fujitsu by goatpunch · · Score: 1

      I agree about Fujitsu; I have a LifeBook E8410 and it's superbly built, with a 3-year warranty as standard. Lovely WSXGA+ non-reflective screen too.

    2. Re:Fujitsu by foobsr · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I really hope these Burmese Generals end up in front of a firing squad.

      Where do you want those to end up who pay (US taxpayers) contract killers murdering at random (aka 'Blackwater')?

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    3. Re:Fujitsu by inKubus · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Maybe the Russians and Chinese are the greatest threat to the Free World and not some deluded Muslims.

      It's important to make a distinction in your mind that People != Bad Leadership. I think the majority of humans want the same things out of life. It's just that the power-hungry float to the top...because they WANT it. So, you tend to have power-hungry, seven-deadly-sin embracing douchebags at the top and regular folks like us at the bottom. The problem with Russia and China is not their people, but the fact that their leadership has little or no checks and balances and so the power-hungry douchebags at the top can do evil with no consequences. It has been like that here in America lately, since everyone was so paralyzed in "fear" of "terror" (that sounds funny, doesn't it?) that we let the government (which was also free of the normal R vs. D dichotomy) and especially the Executive branch have it's way. And what happens? The power-hungry snatch more power at the expense of the people.

      Now, back to your comment. The Russian leaders and the Chinese leaders have shown a willingness to play in the global economy. They've also shown a willingness to direct their people in a decent way. They have embraced capitalism, even if they are trying to back out constantly, I don't think they can go back. As generations pass, the "old" leadership in Russia and China will gradually be replaced by the "new", and just like in America they progress, slowly, toward a more perfect union with a free-market economy.

      In the world stage no one can really CONTROL the world economy. You can only set the trends. And as America is the biggest, and American companies in that economy are the world's biggest, we set the economic trends that the rest of the world follow. The problem is we are not being wise with our spending, and we're borrowing a lot of money as a country and it's going to be a long time before we can make that up. That's what we get for letting power-hungry people print their own money and increase their own power.

      You are correct, however, that under the right (wrong) leadership, China and Russia represent the greatest threat to the American idea of the "Free World" (ie: free market), simply because they muster so many people under them, along with massive resources and land assets. Islam is merely a religion, not unlike Catholic or Hindu. Bush, an evangelical Christian, would like you to believe that the Muslims represent some sort of apocalyptic society (because that's what he believes), but in reality, the almost 1.8 Billion muslims are as a majority good people. I don't care if they don't believe in Jesus.

      Now, in the middle east, Muslims have been used as tools by the Anglo Saxons since Christianity began. Naturally the rise of Radical Imams and the like occurs during times of great poverty and this is one of those times. During the 60's and 70's the exponential rise of oil fortunes in the middle east has resulted in, you guessed it, power-hungry people getting lots of money and power and using it to keep down their people. If we are so concerned about "democracy" in Iraq, why don't we get the Saudi MONARCHY to let it's people go democratic? Or Jordan. Because you see, radical islam is bred in spots where there are leaders like this who keep their people down. It's the people's way of fighting back. The fact that they've turned their attention to the suppliers of power over there (America) is only natural. We supply the money, weapons and other gear to the Israelis, Saudis, Jordanians, and more that they use to keep the poor people down. It's no wonder they don't like us very much.

      But no, they are not a "threat" per se, since Radical Islam only flourishes with poverty, lack of education and of course a power-hungry person at the top to keep the poor down. There are MANY Muslims in America and you would never know them becuase they are no different than Christians, other than they don't believe in the Jesus myth, they believe in the Mohammed myth.

      Anyway, I'm not scared of China and Russia either, but I do agree that Burma is a hotbed and could produce terrorists also, because they are being kept down and not allowed to be free.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    4. Re:Fujitsu by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      You won't be keeping your Fujitsu for 7 years: they stop supporiting the machines very soon compared to IBM/Lenovo.I had a lifebook, and could nto get drivers for it when the newer verison of WIndos cale out (I think it shipped with 95, and would not run98, but I could be wrong).

      I personally still use my T21 (but with FreeBSD now) and recently bought a T43, and I agree, I would find it difficult to buy another machine from Lenovo while the Chinese government fails to denounce people who intentionally shoot unarmed monks, but then as others have said, the Blackwater business was not a whole lot better. And you might want to check into human rights in Malasia (Mal Asia?) before you buy anything made there.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    5. Re:Fujitsu by Paperweight · · Score: 1

      I have a Thinkpad T23 and it's really excellent (made in Mexico), but a 1.13 GHz PIII, but good enough for NASA. But since they went down in quality from the T40 onwards, remember that Lifebooks are made in Japan and they're Nuckin' Fice.

    6. Re:Fujitsu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes like the West hasn't supported monsters.... Half of the "leaders" of Africa, Arab "royalty", and South American (drug)lords....

      Stick with the Lenovo while the IBM magic is still there... Just got a X61s after having a T21, T30 and T42 and couldn't be more happy. Nothing like a IBM!! How I will miss them in a couple of years.

    7. Re:Fujitsu by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "These two countries spawned Stalin (Georgian) and Mao."

      The extreme failure of the Russian monarchy and the extreme failures of Chinese warlordism spawned Stalin and Mao.

      "The biggest butchers in history."

      They saved their countries and brought the backward masses into the modern world.

      "They also backed Pol-Pot in Cambodia in the 1970s."

      Pawns are pawns, not something else. Power realities matter more than little people. A destroyed Cambodia was no threat. If Iraq could turn into Khmer Rouge Cambodia, it would be the best outcome because it would remove the problem.

      "Maybe the Russians and Chinese are the greatest threat to the Free World and not some deluded Muslims."

      The Putinists and ChiComs are rational. The Jihadists are religious.
      There is no detente with superstitious madmen.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    8. Re:Fujitsu by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      I just want to second your recommendation for Panasonic Toughbooks. I just got one about a year ago. Pricey, but excellent quality. The "tough" part of the name is the truth, too. That's why I got it, since I consider myself a klutz. I did not get one of the fully rugged ones (waterproof, shockproof, etc.) but mine is semi-rugged (shockproof, magnesium alloy case).

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  81. Why cant we mod stories themselves? by kasek · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have moderator points, and i'd much rather mod the story as Troll or Flamebait, than go through and mod up all the comments pointing out the flaws in this guys logic behind avoiding lenovo.

  82. Buy a Mac - for Windows by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    1) The Chinese are trying to get Burma to calm down as well (it's not like they are sanctioning the violence despite funding them), so I wouldn't feel too bad about supporting China in this case...

    2) If you decide not to get a Thinkpad, get a Powerbook or Macbook Pro. Very well built with a great deal of connectivity options, and you can simply run Windows (or Linux) on it from the word go if that is your thing.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  83. trade supports rights by Ivan+Matveich · · Score: 0, Troll

    The gradual advancement of economic freedom in China has dramatically weakened its rulers, who now must justify their policies to a ever-growing urban middle class while simultaneously creating tens of millions of factory jobs every year for a rural population that now hopes one day to join the civilized world. A surfeit of export trade is the present catalyst for this process, so you should be thankful that you have the privilege of buying goods from emerging markets like China and Vietnam.

    1. Re:trade supports rights by Bullfish · · Score: 1

      Simply, you're fooling yourself. All it's done is given China a huge reserve of foreign currency which is can use to threaten foreign markets to force them into turning a blind eye to their excesses.

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/08/07/bcnchina107a.xml

      "The imperialists are so hungry for profits that they will sell us the rope with which to hang themselves." - V. Lenin.

  84. Forget the politics by oyenstikker · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Don't buy a Thinkpad anyway, the quality has gone through the floor in the last few years. My company bought some new T43's, and they are pieces of crap.

    --
    The masses are the crack whores of religion.
    1. Re:Forget the politics by BASICman · · Score: 1

      I beg to disagree; my company issued me a T60 not all that long ago, and the thing kicks some serious ass. I have a coworker who slipped on the ice last winter with his T60 in his backpack. He hit the ground so hard that he had whiplash. Anyway, as he's going down he flings his bag out to the side to try and save the laptop. Didn't help, the thing smashed on the ground. Oh, the fall broke it. But the point of the story is that it didn't finally go until a full 6 months after the accident (something got busted and now the thing overheats).

      --
      An enlightenment painter would paint a grand house on a lawn; A romantic painter would paint it on fire.
  85. I'll sell you my T-22 by StCredZero · · Score: 1

    The money won't go to China, and it's likely to be compatible with whatever distro you were using with your T-20. All it needs is a new battery.

  86. Would not work. by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    China would just flood the market with American dollars and ruin the US without having to fire a shot.

    1. Re:Would not work. by Knara · · Score: 1

      They need those petrodollars to buy oil. Seems unlikely.

    2. Re:Would not work. by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

      That asumes that OPEC does not start pricing oil in a more stable currency, say the EURO.

    3. Re:Would not work. by Knara · · Score: 1

      I know this is the current trendy speculation, but there's a lot of reasons that the Saudis agreed to use the USD as the effective petrodollar, only one of which was the nature of the USD in relation to other currencies.

  87. Dell? by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    I went from a thinkpad t20 (which I also really liked) to a Dell Latitude d600, which is a VERY similar product cosmetically. I think the Latitudes and the Thinkpads are some of the only laptops I have seen (does not mean they are the only ones, just the only ones I have seen) that come with both the fingger mouse and the trackpad.

    My d600 is about to go back on lease return, and I am getting a latitude d630, which is a very nice machine.

    I do not see any chinese stickers, but I do see parts made in malaysa and singapore. Maybe if I open the laptop up, I can find some chinese parts. Strange, before I got the latitude, I thought they were all built in Round Rock, Texas.

    Nah, good luck finding a company that is completely Asian free. I bet even the one laptop per child has something made in SE Asia. Let me know if you find a company that sells laptops in which nothing in them is made in China.

  88. China is still much worse than USA by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    with regard to internal affairs, even if the situation in USA is getting worse, and the situation in China is getting better, they are still far from being in the same league.

    With regard to foreign affairs though, US is providing life support to far more dictatorial regimes than China is. US gives lip service to democracy and freedom, but not when the local dictators are seen as allied against communism (old days) or terrorists (modern days).

    US is also typically allied with conservative Muslim countries in international organizations for social issues such as birth control, although that is a development new with the current administration.

    1. Re:China is still much worse than USA by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are right, China is worse that USA.
      But USA is really not the leader to follow.
      The crime of one doesn't excuse the crime of the other one.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    2. Re:China is still much worse than USA by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      > even if the situation in USA is getting worse, and the situation in China is getting better

      For the sake of argument, let us assume that the above assumption is true.
      If you're criticizing people on moral grounds, the one who's improving should get the props, and the one who's slacking off should be slapped. It's that simple. Or are you the delusional ones who think that China's human rights issues could be solved by the current leaders simply nodding their heads and say "sure, let's do it!"?

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  89. Two-pronged response. by gafisher · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Order a new Thinkpad for yourself; they're built where and as they've always been built, at least for now. There's nothing better in its class.

    Then go to http://www.xogiving.org/ and order up a couple of XO laptops so the poor kids in Burma have a shot (pardon the expression) at a real future. If you like, you can sign up to buy a pair of XO laptops, one for a poor kid in some third-world country and one for your own kid or a neighbor or even for yourself. You'll pay less for those two XOs than Microsoft gets for a retail copy of Windows, and they'll do a lot more good (and, um, work a lot better ...)

  90. Dell is made in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    as all the cardboard boxes they come packed in will proudly display
    PRODUCT OF CHINA

    Dell is nothing more than a sticker on someone elses hardware

  91. Economic retaliation is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some poor people are opressed by their own government. They are not punished enough, let us punish them further with economic sanctions!. This type of politics is enforced in order to make local people suffer more and overthrow their own governments. The world powers using this policy are bullies who who do not care they make millions suffer, if necessary they would step on corpses in order to achieve their political goals, it does not matter if tens of thousands of (foreign) people die as a result of their actions, all these people are not as important as their grandiose political objectives.!.

  92. Boycott the right things. by PixelSlut · · Score: 1

    I think you need to pick better battles than this, because there is no real connection between Lenovo (or the Chinese computer industry) and the Chinese government's policies that I am aware of. If you really want to boycott something based on governmental policies, you should buy a bike or start walking everywhere and try to not use so much oil. Alan Greenspan has now said in his latest book what politicians won't say about Iraq, which we all knew before, and that is that it was about oil. There is also a UK study indicating that about 1.2 million Iraqis have died as a result of violence since the US invasion began.

    So boycott something that governmental policies actually affect.

  93. I see what you did there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a very happy user (still working after 7 years), I always planned on replacing it with another . However, are now produced by , an American company, and I can't quite bear to buy American while security companies like Blackwater are shooting at Iraqis with the American Government as their biggest backer. Maybe this is silly, as whatever I buy is likely to be made (at least in part) in America... but still, what are my options for something as well built as the ?"

  94. Political considerations aside... by MythMoth · · Score: 1
    I'd be hard to dissuade from buying another Thinkpad. I have an X40 and an R60e. The latter is definitely post-lenovo vintage. The R60e does sterling duty as a desktop XP machine (I don't do games), the X40 ditto as a lightweight carry-anywhere Linux box.

    The selling points on Thinkpads for me are:
    • Construction quality e.g. stainless steel hinges on current models.
    • Life expectancy I've never had one break - ever - despite reasonable punishment.
    • Keyboard feels like a "real" keyboard, has a desktop-like layout for special keys.
    • Trackpoint personal preference.

    I dread that Lenovo will fritter away the Thinkpad's well-earned reputation for quality now they're unhooked from IBM - but so far things are still ok.
    --
    --- These are not words: wierd, genious, rediculous
    1. Re:Political considerations aside... by darjen · · Score: 1

      My company (a mid-size IBM e-commerce partner) uses T series thinkpads for every employee. I have a T43 while many coworkers have been upgraded to T60s. Honestly, I'm not all that much of a fan. I prefer using my own Asus laptop which has a wide screen, dedicated graphics chip, and a 7200rpm hard drive.

    2. Re:Political considerations aside... by MythMoth · · Score: 1

      Sounds suspiciously like you're after performance as your number one priority, whereas I'm partly looking for reliability (remember, a series of Thinkpads and I've never had one break), and partly for ergonomic features.

      I wouldn't suggest that Thinkpad's perfect for everyone, but the reliability alone makes it easy to see why they're the corporate workhorse of choice.

      --
      --- These are not words: wierd, genious, rediculous
  95. not many choices at all... by capsteve · · Score: 1

    since all your options seem to have some part of manufacturing in china, and typically in the greater south east asian sector. perhaps you can base it on component manufacturers(nvidia, seagate, samsung, etc). frankly i'd lean towards a macbook pro, even if you're running windows only. or if your absolutely deadset against owning an apple product, you can build your own using a barebones/whitebook kit, specifying your components, and installing only what you need without the bloatware that come bundled with all retail pc's.

    --
    three can keep a secret, if two are dead - benjamin franklin
  96. ASUS!!! by Micah · · Score: 1

    I *love* my ASUS Z84JP. Monster power laptop, feels well built, runs Linux like a dream, has an eSATA port. Only disadvantage (besides its 8lbs if that matters) is it is not yet Santa Rosa. But ASUS has a new 15", the G1 I think it's called, that is SR and lighter.

    I'll keep buying ASUS just for its built in eSATA port if no other reason, until others follow suit. Much better than USB2 for hard drives, and better than firewire too IMHO. And built in is much better than through an ExpressCard like you'd need to do with other vendors.

    Of course, I don't think ASUS uses ATi cards, only nVidia. That's good for now, but when the open source 3D for ATi is complete, I won't want nVidia anymore.

  97. Re:Get a Mac? No nipple! by soupforare · · Score: 1

    Thinkpads have had it for years, finger on the nub, thumb on the middle button. It's very precise.
    You do have to sacrifice MOUSE3 for it, but that still leaves us with one more than the macbook.

    --
    --- Do you believe in the day?
  98. Panasonic Toughbooks. by iOsiris · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out the Panasonic Toughbook lineup. Our police force uses these and I assure you they are rugged and they work anywhere. There are different types of ruggedness: like the fully one, I know for a fact works even in -50c, rain, etc. (our police force uses these) and then the semi-rugged kind which may be more practical for an office setting. Although, I think they're a bit expensive, if you were planning on getting a Thinkpad anyways, its build quality is up there. Also, Panasonic Toughbooks are not manufactured in China and are made by its parent company Matsushita.

    1. Re:Panasonic Toughbooks. by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Yep- they're all made in Japan.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
  99. good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope you don't own a car or any electronic device or ever plan on owning any such device.

    [tag]politically "correct" moron[/tag]

  100. Insightful?!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the fuck is this comment insightful?? The parent post says its an insult that say that the US and Chinese governments are on any equal moral footing. Tossing back gitmo or any perceive evil of the US as a counterargument doesn't change that one iota.

    The US has their problems, but if you want to compare them to China, it's not even close. Where are the listings for the Chinese government's transgressions?

    1. Re:Insightful?!!!!! by FauxPasIII · · Score: 3, Funny

      > The US has their problems, but if you want to compare them to China, it's not even
      > close. Where are the listings for the Chinese government's transgressions?

      Forgive me for not having an orgasm of patriotism at the revelation that we're not the
      single most oppressive regime in the world. Lowering the bar much?

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    2. Re:Insightful?!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it;s insightful cuz it's true. fine, u feel insulted, suck it up. cuz it's true. if you ain't white in america, you might as well be living in china. the chinese gov't doesn't bother you if u aren't a threat. same as in the us.

      so it's a matter of degrees, is it? the us isn't that bad?

    3. Re:Insightful?!!!!! by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      He never said the USA was perfect, or that was even acceptable. He made the statement that we are pretty free, especially compared to China. This is a very defensible statement. Lots of citizens are really pissed off about that stuff and are actively protesting and trying to change it. You can't even do that in China, which makes us an entire degree of separation better off than the Chinese. That is not lowering standards, that is pointing out what should be the fucking obvious, but apparently wasn't to YOU.

    4. Re:Insightful?!!!!! by FauxPasIII · · Score: 1

      > He made the statement that we are pretty free, especially compared to China.

      But how is that even a useful comparison? We're failing, in my opinion, to live up to
      our own ideals. Why is it even worth _mentioning_ that there are places that fail even
      more dramatically to live up to our ideals?

      I hear what you're saying, but I don't understand your reasons for saying it.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    5. Re:Insightful?!!!!! by jc42 · · Score: 1

      But how is that even a useful comparison? We're failing, in my opinion, to live up to our own ideals. Why is it even worth _mentioning_ that there are places that fail even more dramatically to live up to our ideals?

      It's worth mentioning because the topic is "Replacing a Thinkpad", and some people consider more than just price when they buy things. In particular, some people here are obviously aware of the slave-like conditions in some parts of the world, especially several east-Asian countries, and would like to avoid supporting such economies even if it costs them a few more dollars.

      If you consider price the only significant thing, you should just skip over these kinds of message threads. But objecting to them will fall on many deaf ears, as some of us do take more than price into account, incomprehensible as that may seem to others.

      It may also be worth mentioning that slavery still exists in the US. Perhaps not to the level that it exists in China, Malasia, and other countries, but there are US court cases dealing with it every year. Some of the US sweatshops are producing goods for some well-known companies. If you consider this significant, you might look into it, too. Such problems aren't limited to just China and a few other poor countries.

      (For that matter, there is also non-slave labor in China. Thought you might like to know. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  101. WTF ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't buying something from china bc they are shooting pple ?

    I hope you don't buy American then ...

  102. T* series rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think I could ever bring myself not to buy a stinkpad. I was not too happy when the first thing Lenovo did was add a stupid windows key to their T series line... Most likely the last mainstream notebook on the planet to not have one. Its nothing against windows its just space is limited and craming a windows key that can be best accomplished by software mapping into a notebook is not ideal. The keyboards and j-key mouse on the thinkpads have always rocked and excellent QC are always a salient reason for sticking with them.

    China is like the plastics SIG commercials on TV where everything disappears because there is plastic in pretty much everything nowadays. Computers are the same way. Its nice to make a stand against crap thats going on in the world but at the same time everyone must live within the context of their time. Write your Senator about the issue and your concerns regarding Berma. That will do a lot more good than one person not buying a cool notebook.

    In the end I believe global markets and interdepdenancy are the only thing that keep various nations from scratching the itch to lob cannon balls or Tasar bombs or whatever at each other and IMHO can serve just as much for good as bad.

    Nation focused pressure rather than millions of individuals making a stand is much more constructive and effective as if everyone were to ban Chinese goods then Condi and crew have that much less leverage to make others have their way in a constructive rather than what would be a destructive I hate china, people against people campaign.

    Also last I checked Windows is still made by an american company, the CPUs, north/south chipsets, graphics subsystems..are all mostly designed by US based companies. Don't buy into the crap people are spouting here that everything goes to China.

  103. Where does the Government get their laptops? by rueger · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Aside - am I alone in chuckling at the stream of people suggesting Apple products, even though the original poster specifically stated that he doesn't want a Chinese made laptop? Has no Mac user ever turned their machine upside down and looked at the little sticker on the bottom?

    Anyhow, I have to think that somewhere in the US secuirity establishment there must be a company supplying laptop gear designed and built in the U.S. specifically because folks like the CIA might not want to trust hardware built in China.

    Or, in other words, if all laptops are built in China, could the Chinese government be dumb enough not to include some super-secret features that they can use when needed?

    1. Re:Where does the Government get their laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude. There are no stickers on macs. Laser engraving or screen printing all the way! Don't give me that tacky sticker crap...

  104. Define cheap... by ran6110 · · Score: 1

    Over the past 10 or more years I've noticed that the prices are not that much cheaper from China. Lower cost doesn't mean lower prices for the consumer, it means lower for the company to make so the executives and managers can have larger bonuses and salaries. Now, I have a T-20 and recently upgraded to a T-60. It works like a champ and seems to be solidly build, but I haven't dropped it yet (but soon)... Regards, ran6110

  105. Buy the support, not the laptop by bevoblake · · Score: 1

    So, the one thing I've been happy about with my most recent laptop purchase (Dell D620): I bought the uber-support package - a tech shows up at my house the next day, hardware-in-hand to fix the problem. Compare that to my last computer support without anything fancy (Toshiba Satellite) - a 3 week wait while my laptop was out of commission waiting for the warranty support center to order and re-order parts. I don't have any particular affiliation with Dell or Toshiba (both the computers have been great), but that fancy support has been spectacular.

  106. Buy a refurbished IBM T4X by nassif · · Score: 1

    Last non-lenovo generation. Solved ethical issue plus saves some $.

  107. Possibly Asus? by Entropius · · Score: 5, Informative

    You could get an Asus laptop. Owned by the Taiwanese, and made in Taiwan (or at least that's what's stamped on the bottom of mine).

    Why just buy from not-China when you can buy from their enemies?

    1. Re:Possibly Asus? by MostAwesomeDude · · Score: 1

      I'm on an Asus laptop. Excellent, although not as "rugged" as the Thinkpads. Also, since it's made by a Taiwanese MNC, you're not getting a Vista refund, period. (Of course, it's not much easier to get Windows refunds from MNCs here in the USA, either...)

      --
      ~ C.
    2. Re:Possibly Asus? by confused_demon · · Score: 1

      I've got an asus laptop and love it. I bought it b/c my boss in my prior job got one and loved it. As it turns out the repair center for their laptops (if not their notebook division, I'm not sure) is actually in the US within driving distance. I had a hard disk problem and was able to drive it over to have it repaired (saving time sans-laptop). They are also great if you're linux-oriented but still have to keep windows around b/c at least until a few months ago they came with their hard-disks partitioned making a linux install for a dual-boot system almost brainless. The only hardware that takes any work to get functioning properly under linux is the wireless because it isn't enabled at boot (which is a good security feature IMO). As far as durability goes, I think they're good, but definitely not at the toughbook standard. I'ld guess they're on-par with macbook-pro or higher-end dells for durability (although they don't have the exploding batteries from sony like both of those).

    3. Re:Possibly Asus? by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Taiwan is part of China. You may not think that, and a lot of Taiwanese don't think that either. However the Chinese government does and forbids any companies doing business with China (or companies they do business with) from saying Taiwan is a country.

      That includes pretty much all US companies. Ironic.

    4. Re:Possibly Asus? by Dead_Smiley · · Score: 0

      You could get an Asus laptop. Owned by the Taiwanese, and made in Taiwan (or at least that's what's stamped on the bottom of mine). Why just buy from not-China when you can buy from their enemies? Ok, that was pretty good! =)


      But... I have talked to a Chinese co-worker. According to him, Taiwan is just part of China and not a separate country. Interesting... the different viewpoints.

      --
      I know what the Internet is, what the hell is this Interweb business?!
    5. Re:Possibly Asus? by Entropius · · Score: 2

      Taiwan isn't part of China according to the Taiwanese. They don't pay taxes to the Chinese government. Supporting Taiwanese companies isn't supporting China.

      Isn't that what matters here?

    6. Re:Possibly Asus? by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      The view that Taiwan might be a (officially) separate country is relatively recent.

      Unless I'm mistaken, not too long ago (around the 1970's), the official stance of the Taiwanese (KMT) government was that Taiwan was only a "temporary" place of residence, and their ultimate goal was to retake China back from the communists. So back then, the PRC and RoC could agree that Taiwan is a part of China (what they really disagreed on was which party should rule it).

      However, admittedly Taiwan was never really given much attention by the Chinese until the KMT fled there. It's only famous as a popular place when you're militarily pwned in the mainland and want to flee (when there's a lot of in-fighting, I'd expect that they won't have large navies to conveniently pursue the "exiles" into Taiwan), but really, nobody really gave the island a damn until quite recently. (Before the Qing dynasty, it was basically an island up for grabs)

      But for the KMT's occupation, Taiwan *could* have been an independent country, or even a part of Japan. The Taiwanese "natives" don't really consider themselves part of China, but those who originally came from the mainland do. The de-facto political separation of Taiwan from China in the past few decades resulted in the younger generations considering themselves "Taiwanese" instead of "Chinese". It's basically a natural thing. I live and grew up in Hong Kong, and most of us prefer to be referred to as "Hong Kong people" instead of "Chinese" (though the trend seems to reverse the handover -- there's not a lot of hardcore propaganda, as I've said it's mostly a natural thing that people have for their own countries)

      So it really depends on who you ask and what you mean by a "separate country". Quite a lot of political stigma there. Fact is, things aren't that clear cut. Examples that you might be able to relate to: Canada was (is?) supposed to be a part of the British Empire, but now it's recognized as a separate country. And is, say, California a sovereign state? (the US Federal govt was supposed to have very little powers...) etc. It's just that until the past 2-3 decades, mainland China was busy shunning the rest of the world and Taiwan trying not to admit defeat on the mainland that the two sides have only been recently started to seriously sort out the matter in a civilized manner (and I suspect that China trying their experiments on Hong Kong before tackling Taiwan played a part in the delay, but that's just ungrounded speculation on my part), and obviously for mainland China to have any say on Taiwan matters, they have to insist that Taiwan is a part of China.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    7. Re:Possibly Asus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my $500 asus 5100 bought from CC came with 160gigs, dual core tk-53 turion, 1gig ram. 15.4" widescreen, hd audio and ethernet/wifi/bluetooth all working in debian etch.

    8. Re:Possibly Asus? by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      I am aware of what you are saying but any country that does any kind of business with China has to clearly define Taiwan as part of China.

      If your going to support Taiwan in that sense you better make sure your company never does any kind of business directly or indirectly with China.

  108. Non-Chinese Laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taiwan is a nice democratic country which produces a heap of notebooks. Check out the Taiwanese options. :)

  109. The T60p is Great by glowimperial · · Score: 1

    Issues about Chinese politics aside, I recently purchased my first Thinkpad, the T60p. With all the options, 3Gb of RAM (some models will take 4Gb, but the processor will only support 3.25 Gb, so that 4th Gb is money down the tubes) and the dedicated 256 Mb video card, it's a graphics powerhouse. Even though the card isn't optimized for gaming, it can handle anything you throw at it. I use mine for mainly photo editing, and it can't be beat. The only disappointment is that it wasn't available with a solid state hard drive when I bought it. Lenovo runs pretty good deals all the time, mine was 25% off when I bought it, and that definitely made buying a top of the line unit easier. I'm running XP Pro on it, and it's treating me great. Even the built in "Thinkvantage" software is useful, making it really easy to synch with projectors and such for presentations, and it's really good at finding your networks if you're like me and you work in multiple places and on the road. The only software problem I had involved the security software, and that was a conflict of my own making. The biometric scanner works great - totally not frustrating or inconvenient. The chassis is awesome. Nothing beats basic black for design, and it's built like a tank, but still very light, even when running with two batteries installed. The keyboard is natural and easy, almost as good as my Saitek gaming keyboard, and I get a lot less fatigue working on it than other laptops. The hinges seem to be indestructable, too.

    1. Re:The T60p is Great by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      some models will take 4Gb, but the processor will only support 3.25 Gb, so that 4th Gb is money down the tubes

      This should only happen on a 32-bit operating system. If your T60p has a 64-bit CPU, you can install the full 4Gigs and use them all, provided you install a 64-bit operating system. From my own experience the maximum used on a 32-bit system ranges from 3.2GB to 3.7GB.

  110. Dell=blech. Hp=Nice by TheGreatOrangePeel · · Score: 1

    1. Anything you believe is morally right is not silly at all. Trying to do the right thing and failing is far better than not doing anything at all, in my opinion.

    2. I work for giant consulting company and the client I'm assigned to started with Dell's business models. Those are a rather flop. I wasn't one of the (un)lucky few to get one, so I can't detail what was so horrible about them, but I do know they suffer from what I call "the mysterious dell slowdown" which is where the machine gets slower with age even with no new software installations. If I haven't seen this effect myself, I wouldn't believe it and blame it on crapware. I also wouldn't belive it unless it were anywhere other than this client. They're EXTREMELY restrictive about their machines and as a result, I can vouch that these machines don't have any crapware on them.

    The whole dell thing came to a very abrupt halt and people started getting HP Business models (nc6400). They're nowhere near as small and light as the Thinkpad X31 they've got me on, but they're durable and have a solid feel to them, are more portable/lighter than the Dells and have quite a nice display. Overall they seem like a rather comparable step up from the older ThinkPad models.

    1. Re:Dell=blech. Hp=Nice by Knara · · Score: 1

      They're EXTREMELY restrictive about their machines and as a result, I can vouch that these machines don't have any crapware on them.

      Why are you buying retail machines? If you're buying real business-oriented machines you either have a Ghost image they get when you deploy them, or a sysprep'd ghost image already on the drive from the factory. Either way, there's no software on there that you didn't spec yourself.

    2. Re:Dell=blech. Hp=Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Those are a rather flop. I wasn't one of the (un)lucky few to get one, so I can't detail what was so horrible about them, but I do know they suffer from what I call "the mysterious dell slowdown""

      Why are you posting that Dells are "blech" when you do not even know what was bad about them. I work for the government and we use Dells almost exclusively and have never experienced "the mysterious dell slowdown".

      I have, however, worked on lots of coworkers HP's (seems that they're popular 'cuz they're inexpensive at big box retailers). ALL of the HP's that I have worked on have a serious heat distribution problem and as a result have various problems, including death.

    3. Re:Dell=blech. Hp=Nice by TheGreatOrangePeel · · Score: 1

      Oh, you'd think so, wouldn't you. That's how they did things where I went to college (they had a Laptop for students program) but they do all fresh installations when you ask to have your machine rebuilt here.

  111. The new Ts are crap by VampireByte · · Score: 1

    Bought a new T60 last spring, it's flimsy and definitely won't hold up to use as an on-the-road laptop, so I've gone back to my old T30 until I can find an alternative. I'll probably just give the new T60 to my sister since it will just sit on her desk and won't be used in a mobile manner. Too bad.

    --

    Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.

  112. Sorry for the lenght but it needs to be said. by webweave · · Score: 0

    Saddam was a threat to the world because the US supported him.

    ===========

    Saddam Hussein was our employee since 1959 when we used him to assasinate several high power individuals. Here is the rather longish UPI report.
    Exclusive: Saddam key in early CIA plot

    By Richard Sale
    UPI Intelligence Correspondent
    Published 4/10/2003 7:30 PM

    U.S. forces in Baghdad might now be searching high and low for Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, but in the past Saddam was seen by U.S. intelligence services as a bulwark of anti-communism and they used him as their instrument for more than 40 years, according to former U.S. intelligence diplomats and intelligence officials.

    United Press International has interviewed almost a dozen former U.S. diplomats, British scholars and former U.S. intelligence officials to piece together the following account. The CIA declined to comment on the report.

    While many have thought that Saddam first became involved with U.S. intelligence agencies at the start of the September 1980 Iran-Iraq war, his first contacts with U.S. officials date back to 1959, when he was part of a CIA-authorized six-man squad tasked with assassinating then Iraqi Prime Minister Gen. Abd al-Karim Qasim.

    In July 1958, Qasim had overthrown the Iraqi monarchy in what one former U.S. diplomat, who asked not to be identified, described as "a horrible orgy of bloodshed."

    According to current and former U.S. officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, Iraq was then regarded as a key buffer and strategic asset in the Cold War with the Soviet Union. For example, in the mid-1950s, Iraq was quick to join the anti-Soviet Baghdad Pact which was to defend the region and whose members included Turkey, Britain, Iran and Pakistan.

    Little attention was paid to Qasim's bloody and conspiratorial regime until his sudden decision to withdraw from the pact in 1959, an act that "freaked everybody out" according to a former senior U.S. State Department official.

    Washington watched in marked dismay as Qasim began to buy arms from the Soviet Union and put his own domestic communists into ministry positions of "real power," according to this official. The domestic instability of the country prompted CIA Director Allan Dulles to say publicly that Iraq was "the most dangerous spot in the world."

    In the mid-1980s, Miles Copeland, a veteran CIA operative, told UPI the CIA had enjoyed "close ties" with Qasim's ruling Baath Party, just as it had close connections with the intelligence service of Egyptian leader Gamel Abd Nassar. In a recent public statement, Roger Morris, a former National Security Council staffer in the 1970s, confirmed this claim, saying that the CIA had chosen the authoritarian and anti-communist Baath Party "as its instrument."

    According to another former senior State Department official, Saddam, while only in his early 20s, became a part of a U.S. plot to get rid of Qasim. According to this source, Saddam was installed in an apartment in Baghdad on al-Rashid Street directly opposite Qasim's office in Iraq's Ministry of Defense, to observe Qasim's movements.

    Adel Darwish, Middle East expert and author of "Unholy Babylon," said the move was done "with full knowledge of the CIA," and that Saddam's CIA handler was an Iraqi dentist working for CIA and Egyptian intelligence. U.S. officials separately confirmed Darwish's account.

    Darwish said that Saddam's paymaster was Capt. Abdel Maquid Farid, the assistant military attaché at the Egyptian Embassy who paid for the apartment from his own personal account. Three former senior U.S. officials have confirmed that this is accurate.

    The assassination was set for Oct. 7, 1959, but it was completely botched. Accounts differ. One former CIA official said that the 22-year-old Saddam lost his nerve and began firing too soon, killing Qasim's driver and only wounding Qasim in the shoulder and arm. Darwish told UPI that one of the assassins had bullets that did not fit his gun and that anoth

    1. Re:Sorry for the lenght but it needs to be said. by Liquidrage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It didn't need to be said. And it does not even come close to telling the entire story. Almost all Iraqi arms under Saddam were French and Russian made.

      That the US backed Iraq due to *the enemy of my enemy* policy is no secret. And I personally do not like that type of policy, even if the enemy was Iran. Do you have any idea what actually went on in Iran and how disgusting of a government that is even to this day?

      However, as much as I don't like it I'm not going to pretend a case can't be made for it.

      Bottom line is, just because you can copy-n-paste an article from the internet doesn't mean you understand anything about the the article. And it doesn't mean the article is with merit.

      I personally find most of the touting of US-Iraq relations prior to GWI to be very simplistic in nature. It's rare to see someone discussing it in detail and in regards to the region and world as a whole over the lsat 40 or 50 years.

      Life isn't always so simple that a trite copy-n-paste can make a good point on your behalf.

    2. Re:Sorry for the lenght but it needs to be said. by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea what actually went on in Iran and how disgusting of a government that is even to this day?

      Yeah, because they Shah we installed in the 50's was SUCH a good leader. Pft.

      The US needs to stay they leader of the "Free World" and get away from the leader of the "Christian World" thing. That is so 1950. Then JFK got elected and we actually got somewhere. Til they killed him. For being Catholic.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    3. Re:Sorry for the lenght but it needs to be said. by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and France and England never should have created the *modern* instability in the Middle East anyways. And the turks never should have picked such horrible allies. And after that the Germans. And before that the Irgun. And way before that the Greeks never should have covertly replaced the Romans and formed the Byzantine, aka the Eastern Roman Empire, to begin with.

      The whole region is full of Europe and America messing with it, and the whole region is full of it creating problems for itself. And it always has been.

  113. Get a MacBook Pro by terminal.dk · · Score: 1

    It does not support docking station, but it is a good solid machine, and runs OS-X in addition to Windows and Linux.

    But all laptops are made, or at least uses parts made in Asia, so you can not go free of that.

  114. Re:Get a Mac? No nipple! by Hatta · · Score: 1

    You're not supposed to use it all day. It's there for easy access when 95% of your input is through the keyboard. I wish my desktop keyboard had a nipple, my hands would never have to leave the home row.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  115. Topic? Shmopic? by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 1

    Please somebody mod this guy up. He's actually on topic and informative.

    Moderators, the topic is "Replacing a Thinkpad", NOT boycotting China, not atrocities committed by various nations, and certainly not the Iraq War or Saddam Hussein. These are all good topics.
    They are not the topic of this thread.

    I was excited to read here about replacing a Thinkpad. I did not click on "Replacing a Thinkpad" to read about human rights violations or the erosion of the US constitution.
    This is not DIGG. There is a -1 Off Topic mod. Please use it. Or at least don't mod stuff up that is so totally off topic while Mr. Plug here sits at a (Score:2) for talking about.. wait for it....
    laptops!

    Thank you.

    (Now I'll sit and watch as I get modded Off Topic. Oh the irony.)

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
  116. Before thinking of getting a Dell... by moosejaw99 · · Score: 0

    Consider how many jobs are now outsourced to India and the Philippines, paying people slave wages. I am unsure if you can buy any product nowadays without it having a positive financial impact for a communist dictatorship, 3rd world country with slave wages, or something you are morally opposed to. I say hit craigslist and buy a Commodore 64, monitor, and 1581 disc drive...yep THE 1581! That way you won't be helping or hurting anyone.

  117. Great Idea .. by kwandar · · Score: 1

    I've wondered what I could do to help Burma/Myamar, as this situation has dragged on for years. If I can't get to them directly, this is a brilliant idea to do it indirectly. China through various funds owns 50% or more of Lenovo.

    So, I'm not buying Lenovo - Dell gets the business. I get equivalent value anyway, and maybe the message will travel up chain from Lenovo to the Chinese government, that they have a PR problem they may want to deal with. I know this isn't as precisely targeted as I'd like, but still, how much less effective can it be than the sanctions have proven to be?

    Great idea!

  118. Really by island_tux · · Score: 0

    how about when American shoot People in IRAQ or Afganistan ?? Don't you feel bad buying anything that's produced by U.S ? Cut the crap and get on with it...

    --
    What Sig
  119. Systemax by amigascne · · Score: 1
    From the Systemax website:

    Systemax(TM) is the Great American PC Maker.

    Ask your current PC Vendor 3 questions:
    1. Are 100% of their systems assembled in the USA by US workers?
    2. Are 100% of their tech support calls and emails answered in the USA by US workers?
    3. Do they have a company policy to NEVER export American jobs?

    If they can't answer YES to all 3 questions, then come ask Systemax(TM). We say "Yes" to the American worker. We are the largest, most-reliable PC manufacturer in the country that can make these claims. We've been assembling and supporting the highest quality PCs for American businesses and families in Fletcher, Ohio for over 20 years. And here's a link to one of their ruggedized laptops: Item # BTO 038651
  120. Toys not made in china... by Rhys · · Score: 1

    Easy, at least so far: LEGO products. Done. Used to be made only in Denmark. They've expanded outside that (Switz., USA, Czech Rep., Mexico) but so far it doesn't include China. When the big deal about your product is the high quality standards, producing in China just doesn't make sense.

    --
    Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
    1. Re:Toys not made in china... by hughk · · Score: 1

      When the big deal about your product is the high quality standards, producing in China just doesn't make sense.

      Not strictly sure about that one. It is more a case that if I buy a car made in Germany, whether VW or Mercedes, I can make certain assumptions about quality. The Germans actually find it difficult to do low quality/low cost manufacturing, it is against their nature (and most importantly, work culture).

      If I buy from China, I cannot make those assumptions so I can cushion myself by buying something with a western label and hoping to god they have implemented a quality management process for their supplier. The Chinese can do quality work, but you must have it in the contract as well as the test procedures they are expected to do. You then have to implement your own quality layer to sample the output and assess the level of compliance as the quality may not be consistent (polite name for easing off on quality once the contract is in the bag).

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  121. Dell Vostro by KnarfO · · Score: 1

    I'm using one to type this post. It is pretty sweet!

    --


    "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
    1. Re:Dell Vostro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

      IMHO, Vostros (even the lower-end ones) are totally the best-kept new secret from Dell. I just bought one, and I can honestly say I am -extremely- happy.

      Don't be scared of the "small business" tagging, they're pretty awesome machines - functionality is top-notch for the dollar value, even if there's a slight penalty of carrying around a 56k modem you likely won't ever use, and a weight of about 6 pounds on the 1000 w/ the better battery.

      But if you don't care about that, for about 650 $CDN, you can hook yourself up real well - it's got broadcom wifi, Debian works really well with it too.

  122. What do you mean by well-built? by KillerBob · · Score: 1

    Can be read a few different ways: you could mean a computer that's ruggedized, you could mean a computer that's reliable, you could mean a combonation of the above...

    If you want a ruggedized laptop, try the Dell Latitude ATG series. I've actually seen one be dropped from a height of about 4 feet, while running, without causing a hard drive crash or any appreciable damage to the thing. It didn't even crash/shut down.

    As far as reliability goes, I can't complain about my Compaq R4000-series lappy. But it's 2 years old, so things may have changed... my next laptop is probably going to be one of the new Dells (not ruggedized, but the cheaper 1500 series Inspirons), but I haven't made up my mind yet. A pity it's so hard to get laptop parts and build your own these days. As far as reliability goes, my father is back on his old Dell Latitude again today, after his newer laptop fried itself again. He's never had any complaints with it, and it's certainly more reliable than the one he'd replaced it with, which has crapped out on him twice since he bought it a year ago. The first time was the screen, and this time it's the CPU fan, which caused the CPU itself to crater.

    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  123. Get another T20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a fellow *20-generation ThinkPad compatriot, I say stick with what you know. I've read nothing but bad things about anything with a number higher than 23 after its letter. Badly soldered motherboards, superloud fans, you name it. Linux + XFCE will be usably fast on *20 ThinkPads for years to come and at a fraction of the price you'll pay for a more finicky newer model.

    If it's performance you need, then Get A Fucking Desktop. That's what they're for. If you just want to get your work done, get another T20, swap the hard-drive over, and *BAM*, you're productive again. No OS reinstallation. No driver bullshit. Keep your software, keep your settings, and keep bringing home the bacon.

  124. Re: Repairing instead of dumping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    added 1 Meg of memory
    where'd you manage to find a 1 MB dimm?

    :)
  125. Re:Get a Mac? No nipple! by thegnu · · Score: 1

    the multitouch thing is nice. I don't own a mac, but I think it's:

    one finger tap: left click
    two finger tap: right click
    hold left finger while dragging right finger: scroll

    actually far easier to use than "a trackpad."

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  126. Yes, but.. that's different. by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    Iraq doesn't have Monks, they have Clerics.

    So it's not the same thing, see?

    Clerics can fight back, only they can't use any weapon with a blade.

    Burmese Monks, I mean, what, I don't think they even know Kung Fu!

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  127. Re:Get a Mac? No nipple! by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1
    Agreed. Most of the time I could deal without a pointing device at all. There are some things, like resizing graphics imported into PowerPoint or some of the video editing apps I have to use, where a pointing device of some sort is pretty much a requirement.

    I got trapped in a conference room with a bunch of people doing that once with no mouse and a notebook with nubbin. Ouch. Index finger was raw after 12 hours. It sounds stupid, I know, but there was literally no time to stop and go get a mouse. Now I make sure there's at least one in the bag at all times, if not a USB drawing tablet as well. The WACOM drawing tablets trump damn near anything as a pointing device, BTW.

    --
    If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
  128. time to really see where its manufactured by rashanon · · Score: 1

    as a reseller of notebooks, and yes i sell Thinkpads as well. If you want it i will get in what you want. Ultimately the choice is yours but... Flip your notebook over and look for the words "Assembled in XXXXXXX" The answer is not China. The answer is Mexico. Lenovo 3000s are made in China, Thinkpads are assembled just to the south. Go to a store, look at a Thinkpad and flip it over. Now the final profits go to a chinese company. Thats the other issue, but along the way if americans stop buying Thinkpads because of Chinese ownership you put Mexicans out of work. and they have a bigger need for a job so they sneak accoss the border illegally to find a job. Now you have a another problem, so its not always black and white. So if you want to do something about Manymar, call your congressman and tell him to speak up. As we look at the news, Iraq is not the only country outside of the United States.

  129. another reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's another reason one might want to avoid IBM products: active collaboration with Nazi Germany.

    http://www.ibmandtheholocaust.com/

    Many popular companies of course had ties to the Nazis, but IBM's seem particularly strong. I'm surprised they are not more haunted by this legacy.

  130. What about Toshiba or Panasonic? by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    I've repaired and issued a lot of laptops in my day and I'm not aware of a true competitor to the T series in terms of chassis design.

    I'd have to disagree--I'd have to say Toshiba from my experience is competitive in terms of build quality looking at the overall lineup.

    If you are looking for durability Panasonic ToughBooks are far superior to Lenovos. Lenovos might have a good chassis design but I find they are "too dainty" in other ways (keyboards for example). Speaking from practical knowledge I'd much rather go with a ToughBook or maybe a Toshiba Tecra or Sattelite than a Thinkpad--also because they aren't Chinese companies (they are Japanese).

  131. Useless gesture... by Schnoogs · · Score: 1

    ...seeing as 99% of the other things you own or are going to buy are made in China. Billions worth of products are sold each month but one line of notebooks will bring about great reform as the Chinese economy is crippled. Like so many "statements" they're more for show than anything else.

  132. Shoes: New Balance by moosehooey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since you mentioned shoes, I'll say that New Balance makes most of theirs in the US (and clearly labels which they are). In addition, they seem to hold up very well. I usually wear out shoes quickly (read: I'm a fat motherfucker) but the New Balance ones seem to last about twice as long as comparable "sweat shop" shoes.

    1. Re:Shoes: New Balance by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      Manufactured in America is not the same as Made in America. I would be very surprised if 100% of the shoe came from the USA.

    2. Re:Shoes: New Balance by moosehooey · · Score: 1

      From their website:

      "We believe most consumers think "Made in USA" means that real manufacturing jobs were provided to U.S. workers in order to make that product. The shoes produced in our U.S. factories are made by U.S. workers using both U.S. and imported materials. Where the level of domestic value is at least 70%, we have labeled the shoe "Made in USA." Where it falls below that level, we have qualified it as containing both domestic and imported materials. This determination is based in part on a survey of consumers conducted by the FTC." --New Balance Inc.

  133. Fujitsu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Their T2010 is touchpad-less like ThinkPads.

  134. Re:Get a Mac? No nipple! by toddestan · · Score: 1

    The current Lenovo's (except the small X series) have both the trackpoint, a trackpad, and no less than 3 mouse buttons. Superior to the Mac in every way possible.

  135. Sweet Merciful Hay Soos... by absurdist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...is there no one left on Slashdot who grasps the concept of sarcasm?

    1. Re:Sweet Merciful Hay Soos... by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      No. ...

      am i doin it rite?

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    2. Re:Sweet Merciful Hay Soos... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The what now?

  136. Don't look inside your computer by Calyth · · Score: 1

    You probably don't want to look inside any of your computers if you're going to be stupid enough to link what's going on in Myanmar with the Chinese - you'll find plenty of made in China parts inside.
    Also, by your logic, don't buy anything Made in America, Made in UK, etc...

  137. Yes, its very silly by davmoo · · Score: 1

    While I admire your stance, there's just one tiny little flaw in it...

    What company do you think made your original Thinkpad?

    IBM never did their own laptop production, its always been in Asia, and most of it was by Lenovo. All IBM did was finally sold them the rights to the name "Thinkpad" to put with the hardware they had been making under contract for IBM all along.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  138. made in ireland by Interested+Guy · · Score: 1

    Is what my last few Dells have said on the bottom.

    1. Re:made in ireland by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

      Put together, or rather - configured - in Ireland from Chinese-made parts, that is. Whether you buy a laptop from Apple, Dell, HP, Lenovo or Toshiba, they are ALL built in China or made from Chinese-made components, usually by the very same companies. Made in the USA or Europe? Forget about it.

      --
      Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
  139. Time travel? by iabervon · · Score: 1

    If you can't stand the thought of buying a computer from a Chinese company while the mess is going on in Myanmar, just do what I did and buy a computer from Lenovo last year. Or, if your time machine isn't working, buy a used one made last year.

    Alternatively, plan to buy a new Thinkpad as soon as the mess is over, and use your current computer until then. If you want to be political, call up Lenovo and let them know. It does nobody any good to silently boycott a company, since they don't know why their sales are dropping, so they don't know what to do to rectify the situation.

    Anyway, I don't see you getting a new computer any time soon, since you'll obviously have to wait until 2009 at the earliest to get one from an American company, right?

  140. X-60/61 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got an X-60 recently. It is my first Thinkpad and i cannot say enough about how good it is. I have owned a Dell & Toshiba before (personally and through work) and they had extreamly poor build quality in comparison. I had no idea at the time how bad they were. The Dell would flex horribly and the Tosh was super powerful but performed poorly and its fan sounded like a 747 taking off. The X-60 is very quite, super lightweight & performs very well. I got the tablet as i do a lot of meetings and MS OneNote is my choice for taking notes. The tablet also has much better screen res that the non-tablet. Cant recommend it enough.

  141. what the? by einer · · Score: 1

    Every single component in every single computer is... MADE IN CHINA!!!! You can't compute ethically so you may as well shoot yourself. Luckily for me, I'm a hypocrite.

  142. China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, this should probably start people (and corporations) thinking. We've recently seen several things (lead paint, Burma, etc.) that make me think that we should *not* be contracting to China so much. I would think that more socially aware companies (i.e. Apple) would get on the "China is bad" bandwagon and STOP contracting with them. As with silk and child labor, WE here in the US can apply pressure to corporations that can make positive change around the world. There are plenty of other countries (i.e. most of South America, etc.) that can do what China is doing. As much as Clinton was a good president, most favored nation status for China with no provisions for human/labor rights was a serious mistake.

  143. Seconding a T42 or T40 by eclectist · · Score: 1

    http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=311455&cid=20781875/ Seconding this. A T40 or T42 is your best bet. Secondly, an R series, next a G series, and only as a last resort, an X series.

  144. Racist? by JewGold · · Score: 3, Informative
    And attacking a successful "chinese company" because you do not agree with the policies of the (oppressive) government of China is racist

    That's quite an assertion there. When you give money to a Chinese company, that income is taxed by the Chinese government and part of the purchase price goes directly to support the atrocities committed by the Chinese government. This isn't speculation, this is fact.

    At what point does anybody's race enter into this?

    --
    Is this a news report or a trailer for a motion picture?
    1. Re:Racist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By your reasoning, it's unethical to do business with the majority of companies in the world. Most governments do nasty things, we just don't get our panties in a bunch when it doesn't serve a useful purpose.

    2. Re:Racist? by XchristX · · Score: 1

      At what point does anybody's race enter into this? Not so much "race" as racism. Specifally, racist Han Chauvinism, which is the belief (held by the ethnic Han dominated CCP) that any part of the world that has a Mongoloid ethnic stain rightfully belongs to the CCP (incl. Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia, Burma, Northeastern India, and, of course, Tibet).
      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
  145. MOD PARENT OVERRATED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    At least two idiots moderated the parent post "Interesting".

    1. Re:MOD PARENT OVERRATED by xs650 · · Score: 1

      Just think of the hundreds of idiots without mod points that would have modded it interesting if they could have.

  146. Ownership links to the communist Party by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Besides Lenovo being partially "state-owned" and thereby directly funding the one-party dictatorship of China, the non-state Chinese owners are also generally deeply entangled in supporting the Party machinery. If guangxi ("connections" ie. corruption) was a huge problem under communism, it has really blossomed under the new and improved fascist system.


    Most of the Taiwanese OEMs have practically all of their manufacturing facilities in China, but at least they aren't directly involved in feeding the Party hierarchies. One or two of the Taiwanese manufacturers have kept their facilities in Taiwan though. Google should help identify them.

    The Japanese makers have likewise most of their factories in China, but there has been a recent trend to look at other less hostile and more democratic Asian countries to host more of the manufacturing.

    Some China trivia: How many knew that the "peoples' liberation army" (PLA) is "constitutionally" loyal to the Chinese "communist" Party instead of the state or the "government"? Or that the current CCP and PLA head honcho Hu Jintao (aka "president of the PRC") was nicknamed the Butcher of Tibet thanks to his bloody crackdown on Tibetan demonstrators in Lhasa while he was the Party supremo there in the late 80s. In the immediate aftermath tens of thousands of Tibetans were forced to watch how the Chinese executed their freedom-fighters in a sports stadium. That bloody act loyal to the Chinese communist Party helped fast-track him into the top Party leadership. What if the Burmese generals were massacring monks and civilians in a neighboring country..?

    --

    Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

    1. Re:Ownership links to the communist Party by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Yep- that's why I buy Panasonic and Sharp. All their manufacturing is in Japan.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
  147. Re:Get a Mac? No nipple! by Helmholtz+Coil · · Score: 1

    Ask and ye shall receive:
    http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/mightymouse.html
    http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/migmousblac.html
    http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/en104wh.html

    Can't vouch for any of these, having never tried 'em, but worth a look perhaps.

  148. Seriously: MacBook Pro by mstrobel · · Score: 1

    Like you, I'm a long-time ThinkPad owner (I've had 5). When the time came to replace my beloved ThinkPad T41p, I ordered the then-brand-new T60p. Unfortunately, the release got delayed, and being a full-time student, I needed something comparable in terms of power, size (1" thin), and durability, and I needed it yesterday. The next closest thing not made by Dell (boo hiss) was the MacBook Pro. I figured "what the hell" and went over to the Apple store and picked up the high-end 15" model. I run Windows Vista on it exclusively, and it runs great. Being really anal about needing two mouse buttons, I figured I'd never get used to the single button on the touchpad, but I've actually come to prefer one button and the quick Fn+Click action to bring up a context menu. Just make sure you load up Input Remapper to restore all the shortcut key functionality (as well as keyboard and screen backlight settings).

    1. Re:Seriously: MacBook Pro by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I would agree that the MacBook Pro is the best Windows XP laptop for the money on the market. You do know about right clicking the track pad, don't you? BTW, what the hell is Input Remapper? I have a MacBook (not a pro) and have no idea what this is.

    2. Re:Seriously: MacBook Pro by mstrobel · · Score: 1

      Yep, it feels weird to say that my MacBook Pro is the best Windows machine I've ever owned... Input Remapper is a nifty little Windows Service that lets you change the mappings of the modifier keys on the keyboard, and it also interprets the function keys for volume control, brightness, etc. I installed it back before Apple included better input device support in their drivers, so it may not be completely necessary now, but it's worth checking out anyway. And yes, I know that you can use two fingers to click the trackpad, though I still prefer the Fn+Click combo.

  149. Re:Ummmm - Sunglasses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a pair of Smith brand "Slider01" sunglasses from REI on my face right now. They are clearly marked "France" on one of the arms, with no mention of China anywhere. Time to go shopping!

  150. Stephen Colbert? ... by natophonic · · Score: 1

    ... is that you? Seriously, "liquidrage" and that meandering rant?

  151. Speaking for corpses, are we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How confidently you speak for the one point two million corpses in Iraq, plus the four million or so refugees. You must have mad psychic powers.

    1. Re:Speaking for corpses, are we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are claiming that just shy of 5% of Iraq's population has been killed in this war? For comparison, 10% of the USSR's population was killed in WWII, think about that for a minute, 1% of the population I might buy, considering that the length might make up for the lower intensity of combat. Also, > 1/7 of the country as refugees seems rather far fetched.

    2. Re:Speaking for corpses, are we? by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

      People also like to point to a study based on 500K death certificates. Even though only 50K have been issued.

  152. a philosophical perspective by poetmatt · · Score: 1

    While I agree not supporting China's stance is a good thing, there are better ways to make your impact known than simply "not giving them your money". In fact, I think if China had less money in some way or fashion, it wouldn't make a difference to the overall society. On the same note, replace china with anything. Even Iraq/Syria/Iran. Does fueling a country mean it is automatically (insert negative verb). Is giving money to a (noun related to same verb) even going to help when it is resources they need, not economy? If you give a (noun from above) a physical resource is one thing, if you give them money is another. Etc etc. If someone makes a quality product, are you going to deny it because of where it is made? Sadly, reforms are needed in a country, and purchasing power speaks nil about anything as far as ethics when it comes to grey areas of opinion. I mean like it or not but the asian market makes (some) great electronics parts. Are you just going to not use electronics? Asus makes nice laptops too. I've had great experience with a c90. I'd suggest going to notebookreview.com or forum.notebookreview.com and looking through some reviews to see what laptops are good to go with, from that perspective.

  153. HP Business Notebooks by modulo · · Score: 1

    The nc6000's were great, but practically every nc6220 and nc6320 I've bought lately have had some sort of power problem (AC Adapter, battery, or charging circuit on the system board)

    Most of them have been from HP's refurbished division, but still.

    At least the cases have some metal to them (Note: Magnesium (HP) or Titanium (Lenovo) "composite" means, "mostly plastic"

    Hopefully they have that fixed now that they seem to be retiring those models, but now I'm stuck with no laptop with a builtin serial port. Working on making a custom USB-to-serial adapter with a voltage doubler to make old equipment happy.

    --

    ...but the language is MUMPS, which I will not utter here

  154. Dell Latitudes made in Ireland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To some extent, our Latitude laptops for the past 18 months have come with assembled in ireland. that may help.

  155. Why not just get another pre-Lenovo Thinkpad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently had to replace a 600X that served me for over 7 years.... didnt want to get one of the new-fangled Lenovo-made systems, so I just bought a used T40 series on craigslist for under $500. Thing works awesome for me, but then Im not really doing any heavy lifting with it.

  156. Just don't buy a laptop, period by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Well, (assuming he's American) it's silly to the extent that the US, rightly or wrongly, has killed more innocent bystanders in Iraq than the Burmese regime has killed monks in Burma, and I don't see him wanting to move to France or anything.

    Plus there's no direct evidence that China is supporting the crackdown, and more evidence that they, in fact, are not happy about it.

    Not too many regimes that don't have blood on their hands. Just don't buy a laptop, period. It's probably the kindest thing you can for our plundered old planet.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  157. Taiwanese manufacturing in Mainland by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Sure, the Chinese government is still hung up about the KuoMinTang government fleeing to Taiwan and claiming to still govern the mainland after Mao ran them out of the country, but that's not really relevant.


    Yes, there's lots of computer manufacturing in Taiwan. But some of it's _really_ in Taiwan, and some of it's Taiwanese companies doing the design and high-level work with the factories themselves in China. In general you can't tell which ones are which, but less of the money goes to China if you're buying from Taiwan.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Taiwanese manufacturing in Mainland by terrymr · · Score: 1

      The other issue for confusing people is that Taiwan also refers to itself as the Republic of China, wheras mainland China is the Peoples Republic of China. Made in china may well mean either one check the smallprint. The national airline of Taiwan is China Airlines for example.

    2. Re:Taiwanese manufacturing in Mainland by ahfoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, I don't know what a nice guy like me is doing in a thread like this-- slow news day I suppose. Anyhow I'll go ahead and pitch in a few cents.
              You won't find anything directly exported from Taiwan intentionally labeled as "Made in China". No way. Not by a long shot. The "Made in Taiwan" label is a big deal here. There are ads on TV all the time showing examples of Europeans and Americans using low quality flimsy products like umbrellas that fall apart and then focusing in on the label that says "Made in Taiwan" with the idea that these commercials are meant to shame local manufacturers into improving their quality standards to raise the brand value of the "Made in Taiwan" label. It works. People get pissed when they buy local stuff that sucks and shopkeepers catch hell over it if it says "Made in Taiwan". Generally stuff made in Taiwan isn't as cheap as mainland stuff. For mainland stuff it's expected to be low quality just as "Made in Japan" is assumed, sometimes dubiously, to mean quality. Sometimes in certain product categories nobody cares as long as it more or less works and the price is right.
              There are some product categories where Taiwan is still weak though.Capacitors is one. There are great electronics shops here and you can get Taiwanese caps for a few cents or Japanese ones for about five times as much.Local solder is also like a third the cost of imports even from China. Lots of electronics stuff from Taiwan is just dirt cheap but good luck reading the freakin' manuals. Gotta love a Chinese spec sheet. Even standard units like ohms get translated into characters that mean something totally unrelated but sound like oh mu. Everybody can guess that one right?
              Anyway, back to the thread here. You're right that China Airlines is a Taiwanese carrier and both sides have their own China Telecom and China Rail, China post and other similarly named industry players, but that does not extend to labeling Taiwanese goods with a tag that says "Made in China". That would not happen. Thats not to say that there aren't Taiwanese operated and owned factories in mainland, but if a product is made in Taiwan and exported from Taiwan you can be certain the tag will say "Made in Taiwan" and not "Made in China".

    3. Re:Taiwanese manufacturing in Mainland by terrymr · · Score: 1

      Made in Taiwain has probably become a big deal more recently. But I still have products that came with Republic of China labels on them - enough to confuse a lot of people who don't realise that it is the official name of the country.

  158. Get a used late-model IBM ThinkPad. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    If you know someone at IBM (seriously, they have like 250-300,000 employees, if you don't know someone who works there, one of your friends does) it's still possible to buy used IBM-branded ThinkPads from the employee surplus store. I know a friend who just did it, and there aren't any restrictions on buying gear from the store for non-employees ("family and friends"); in fact they encourage it. The employee doesn't even need to pay for it or anything.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Get a used late-model IBM ThinkPad. by AVIDJockey · · Score: 1

      I think all Thinkpads (except for some purchased through business channels) are still IBM branded.

      My brand new T61p still has "IBM ThinkPad" emblazoned on the lid and wrist rest, but "Lenovo" in small print under the screen.

    2. Re:Get a used late-model IBM ThinkPad. by corerunner · · Score: 1

      I recently purchased a ThinkPad X61 Tablet, one of their latest models, and it still has the IBM branding. My ThinkPad 600 (9 years old!) still runs the same as new, except the battery died a long time ago, but that's to be expected for any battery-powered device manufactured in 1998. As I understand the situation, the majority of engineers in the ThinkPad division stayed onboard after the Lenovo split. I have nothing but great opinions of my new ThinkPad and would recommend one to anyone purchasing a new notebook.

      --
      "Don't hate the media, become the media." -Jello Biafra
    3. Re:Get a used late-model IBM ThinkPad. by iocat · · Score: 1
      Anyway... IBM owns a massive chunk of Lenovo now, and they bought the whole ThinkPad DIVISION, not just the name. So... your ThinkPad is still designed in the US and made in China. Also, IBM still provides service and warantee support until 2010. So, ThinkPads may suck in the future, but as long as the IBM name is still on them (until 2010), IBM is still involved.

      Frankly, the most important part of a laptop to me is the keyboard, and while I usually don't support Chinese companies, Lenovo can have my money until they screw that up.

      Bottom line: Everyone I know who has a ThinkPad loves it, and everyone else with some lesser Windows laptop makes excuses. (Macs are obviously their own deal.)

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  159. Americans are Der Juden, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But Americans are still Der Juden right?

    I mean China can shot people in the back of the head and charge the family for the bullet. They can violate as many human rights as they want.
    Islam can cut off a homosexuals head and force women into a role as chattel (as opposed to human beings).

    But it is still the fault of The Jew Puppet Bu$Hitler Chimpy McHaliburtin, right?

    Oh Canada.

  160. Why do you care now? by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    The military junta running Myanmar has been doing so, with Chinese (and Russian and Indian) support, since 1962.

    In that time, they've wrecked their environment, brutally oppressed dissent, and generally been a bunch of assholes. Why do you suddenly feel bad about it because some monks are involved?

    Don't get me wrong. They're evil fuckers and should be wiped off the earth. But you're a little late to the "giving a shit" game, and refusing to buy a laptop from a Chinese run company is kind of like pissing into a forest fire.

    1. Re:Why do you care now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you want to prevent or ridicule someone for "giving a shit" because they are a little late to the party?

      Just because they didn't know about said atrocities when they occurred, they should never care about it or try to do anything about it? Well shit, I wasn't aware or alive during a lot of the attempted genocides around the world when they started...I guess I was just trying to be cool or seek your approval for trying to inform myself about such things, or trying to make a small difference at a grassroots level, because it's obvious that no single person could ever make a difference or inspire others to make a difference.

      So instead of the snide remarks about being a douche for not knowing Thinkpads where always made by Lenovo, or being late to the party, just STFU and continue not doing anything for anyone unless you jump in at the ground level, and let the douchebags and dumbasses of the world worry about continuing atrocities.

    2. Re:Why do you care now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear, hear! How dare that scurrilous mustache-washer try to contribute at this point! Coward! I care not if you were born not until 1982! Fie!

      Stop turning attempts of altruism into exclusive snobbery. Go fuck yourself.

    3. Re:Why do you care now? by flooffy · · Score: 1

      i don't have anything to add to this thread.

      USCARRp70a

    4. Re:Why do you care now? by paulthomas · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it isn't that he didn't care about it until monks were involved. Perhaps he didn't know about it until monks were involved.

  161. A thinkpad R series! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The quality is still just as good. The service is a bit better. The fact that you get no CDs with your purchase is a bit tiresome, but at the same time being able to recreate your OS from scratch without any CDs is nice.

  162. Offset by twistedfuck · · Score: 1

    Just buy some Chinese Human Rights Abuse offsets. Then you can feel guilt free about buying chinese products.

  163. Made in America(?) by krygny · · Score: 1

    This is like the kick I get out of (mostly ignorant, closed-minded, but well-meaning) people who buy cars only from US automakers. Most GMs and Fords are final-assembled in Canada or Mexico. Hondas are assembled in Alabama. Toyotas are assembled in California. Hyundais are assembled in Georgia. I dare you to figure out what % of any manufacturer's major components (engines, trannys, etc.) are made where.

    I do right by me. The best product, as best I can determine, at the best price. Keep it simple.

    --
    Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
  164. Dell from Ireland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My laptop at work is a Dell.....which according to the tag physically on the laptop was made in Ireland. I wondered why I was constantly thirsty for Guinness at work!

  165. You assume too much. by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Regimes can only really be replaced from the inside. This is why our military is such an utter failure in Iraq. Since the Chinese people don't have the grapes or the desire to over-throw the oppressive Commie regime, I just don't care about what happens to them because it's NOT MY BUSINESS. The actions of the Chinese government do affect me through their lack-luster quality standards. It just so happens that the only way I can affect the Chinese government is to affect their economy as best I can...and the best way to do that is to buy as little of their goods as possible.

    Would you be spouting the same shit if it were pre-war Nazi Germany who made Thinkpads?

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:You assume too much. by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1
      You are missing the point. I lived in Mexico for many years. It is truly a repressive regime, and most of the population is resigned to chronic hopelessness which will be with their descendants for generations to come. There is no conceivable mechanism for overall improvement, not the least because it requires a colossal entropy change and quantities of material resources that simply do not exist. China is probably worse, but that is hardly comforting. These regimes are everywhere. They have existed forever, and are very, very difficult to correct. To emigrate from such societies is to escape from them. Many try, few succeed.

      The purpose of my post was to mock the self-righteousness and folly of the "don't buy things from China" crowd. It won't work because 1) you will never get anything remotely near critical mass, and 2) it will be replaced by another repressive, feudal regime able to provide the cheap human labor we want so that we can continue to buy laptops.

      And there's the rub. The problem isn't China, it is our consumerism. The people who piously claim to want to save the Chinese from their dictators by purchasing laptops from somewhere else are the problem, not the dictators. I want a laptop, a cool and powerful car, a cool lifestyle, a fun and pleasant job, health and dental insurance, lots of money, leisure time, my own home, a huge TV, a fast internet connection, lots of gourmet coffee, cheap and plentiful chocolate, an overabundance of food, decent wine, personal entertainment 24/7 with my iPod (or other such gadget), blah blah blah. That's why there are slaves in China, Mexico, and the rest of the Third World, to sell crap to US consumers.

      There's no free ride, and boycotting chinese laptops is a fool's errand. Of course, you can close your eyes and pretend that the world is simple, and morality is simple, and all you have to do is something simpleminded like buy a Prius or boycott Chinese laptops. And when some asshole such as myself intrudes with unpleasantries, trot out the old "what if the Nazis [insert peeve of the moment here]" or something equally pretentious and contrived. You can believe that "If we all got together" or "we can all start now" "at least I tried" or some other childish excuse. Then pat yourself on the back for taking the moral high ground and vanquishing the offending slashdot killjoy, and brag about your intrinsic noble character to your friends.

  166. eBay is your friend by mikeraz · · Score: 1

    Buy a used Thinkpad on eBay. There's a whole channel dedicated to inventory coming off of corporate leases.

    For years my laptop buying method has been "the best T series Thinkpad I can get off of eBay for $500." It works great. I'm up to a T23 now.

    --

    There's more to it than this.

  167. The US does far worse in waaaay more countries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so what?

    people might hate all our retarded governments the past 100 years which have bombed, invaded, overthrown and sabotaged more countries than many empires but they still buy and crave US goods.

    worry more about what YOUR govt does than the neighbors.

  168. T20 Replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I too replaced my old T23 about a year ago and was faced with the same dilemma..
    I finally chose one of the HP business laptops.... I went with a NW8440 it is a mobile workstation and I have been very happy with it..... I was very seriously thinking of the T60P or the T43P but I wanted a wide format screen, which is not offered in the T43. I think the T40 series are probably the best laptops ever produced, and I have heard of problems with the T60's especially with static discharge while docking them in cold climates The HP business machines have been rock solid for me and it is a performer.

    I have also heard alot of people suggest the MacbookPro's as a suitable replacement, but I dismiss this.. the Mac's are no where near as durable as the T' series... I have several powerbooks that are made with the same alumimim case as the MacbookPro and somthing as harmless as a laptop bag rolling of an airport waiting area chair onto a carpeted floor. (like a two foot drop in in a protective bag) will deform the soft alumimum case of the laptop.

  169. Acer is Taiwanese by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    The biggest manufacturer (under its own brand) that I'm aware of in Taiwan is Acer. They recently spun off their manufacturing arms as Wistron, but it's still based in Taiwan also. You can read about their global operations here.

    Granted, like most everybody else, they do a lot of manufacturing in the PRC, but I find something that's only manufactured there (with the bulk of the profits going elsewhere) to be a lot less offensive than something that's designed, manufactured, and wholly brought to market by a PRC firm. (Of course, if what you find offensive about the PRC is worker abuses and not its geopolitics, then you should probably be even more bothered by stuff outsourced there for manufacturing.)

    But Wistron is pretty diversified, in addition to the three locations in the PRC, they have their HQ, main R&D, and a manufacturing center in Taiwan, a service center in Japan, a factory in the Czech Republic, a service center in the Netherlands, a factory in Juarez, a service center in Dallas and a customer service center in Round Rock. They're openly traded on the Taiwan exchange and although I can't find a breakdown of all major holders that would definitively exclude the PRC government, their major holder is Acer (at ~35%).

    I think you could buy from them in reasonably clear conscience, plus you'd have the additional bonus of giving the profits to a Taiwanese company, which ought to get you some sort of anti-PRC karma points somewhere.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  170. Thinkpad Replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being a huge fan of thinkpads also, i've been reluctant to use other machines. I was a big fan of my old t43, then one of my contractors bought me a t60 which is nice also but still not an original thinkpad. One of the laptops that i've been suprised i actually like and almost prefer over the thinkpad is the HP NC series. My company just picked up an NC6400 for me and the thing is pretty bad ass. Nicely built, feels good using it, the screen is great and so is the keyboard. Havn't noticed it being flakey or anything and aside from not having something similar to a thinklight it reminds me of older thinkpads. The new HP business class laptops i would venture to say are worth keeping an eye on. HP is making a comeback, and its about time one of the big boys stepped up and started making some nice equipment.

  171. Italian sunglasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get Italian sunglasses.

    I have a pair of Arnette sunglasses that I love, and they're made in Italy. I don't remember how much they cost.

    Yes, they're prescriptionable. The model I have is "STANCE 4020-01/81".

  172. Yes! by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    If a citizen of another country believes that the U.S. is supporting immoral policies in the world they should ABSOLUTELY take it out on U.S. businesses in the sense of withholding their business.

    Same applies to citizens of the U.S. with respect to any other country.

    Same applies to citizens of any country with respect to their own country.

    Never support what you believe to be immoral. Always take a stand. If everyone took a stand, this kind of crap would stop.

    Chains find only willing wrists!

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    1. Re:Yes! by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Yes. I think shopping exclusively at Wal*Mart would take care of that. Save for those Makin' Bacon pans. Don't buy those, they're American. Bonus points if you get the reference.

  173. Myth of destroyed Iraqi infrastructure by Iloinen+Lohikrme · · Score: 1

    I just had to comment on this one as I'm very much fed up with the myth that US destroyed the infrastructure of Iraq.

    The truth of the matter is that even before first Gulf war, there wasn't much infrastructure up in Iraq compared to developed countries. In Iraq you basically had few roads, few railroad connections, oil production industry and some civil infrastructure. When the US in the first Gulf war attacked Iraq, US didn't do blind bombing of Iraqi cities as they did in the second world war. In the second Gulf war US did even less damage to infrastructure as they had more advanced weaponry available and as they were making a land invasion there was no need for massive world war two style bombing runs. The fact of the matter is that Iraq was before first Gulf war a third world country without industrial production and transportation infrastructure, and that should not be counted to the fault of US.

    It should be also said that it's a myth that Germany and Japan were totally destroyed. They weren't. After the second world war both Germany and Japan had most of their industrial and transportation infrastructure up. Yes, the population centers in both countries were very heavily bombed and to late 50s you could find ruins in many Germans cities, but the factories, electric plants and damns, railroads, roads and harbors were very much intact. Actually the German infrastructure was in so good shape that the allies had to do demolishing to try to achieve the vision of pasteurized Germany as visioned in Morgenthau plan. It should also be noted that after the war, German agricultural and industrial production didn't collapse because of failure of the infrastructure, but for the politics of occupying forces: there were no effective occupation government, monetary system was by purpose shut down and major German corporations were halted. After the implementation of remnants of Morgenthau plan was shut down and there some governing happening, the economy recovered and started to boom. In this context Marshall loans given to German government didn't start the recovery, but made the recovery more snappier.

    Now I want to point out that I'm not denying that the US as and occupation force in Iraq hasn't had difficulties and they wouldn't be free from critic. What I'm saying is that Iraq was before a third world country without developed infrastructure and it still is, and that is not the fault of US.

    PS. I'm not an American, and I'm not trying to defend US nor it's action. I just want that false arguments are not used in a discussion. The myth of destroyed Iraq infrastructure is one and the same myth about post war Germany and Japan is second.

    1. Re:Myth of destroyed Iraqi infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have some references. I'd be interesting to read up on it. I'd been led to believe Iraq had been damaged a fair amount. As well I am aware billions flowed into Germany and Japan but the extent of industrial damage had not been made explicit to me. I could not find definitive sources online. Many of the civilian centers in both places suffered a great deal of damage which is what I was referring to. The reconstructions of cities such as Dresden. In Iraq there are reports of sewage plants being destroyed and other large civilian targets.

    2. Re:Myth of destroyed Iraqi infrastructure by king-manic · · Score: 1

      apologizes. The AC was me. If you had some references I always enjoy reading more about history. I click AC by accident. I wanted "no karma bonus".

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    3. Re:Myth of destroyed Iraqi infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The truth of the matter is that even before first Gulf war, there wasn't much infrastructure up in Iraq compared to developed countries.

      What a devious misdirection. Iraq may not have been as thoroughly developed as the U.S., but what industry and infrastructure it did have was still an order of magnitude more than that of any other Arab country. The Iraqis had reliable electrical and sewage systems, for instance, before the Chimp "improved" the country.

      There is little doubt that Iraq (before the first Gulf War) was the most developed and successful Arab country in the world. Riverbend, the blogger from Iraq, said once that her country had more than 100,000 engineers. This density of technical talent rivals that of most developed countries; and it is more than enough, when combined with the wealth from oil, to build some serious infrastructure.

      In fact, Saddam's biggest crime in American eyes may have been his use of the wealth from oil to improve Iraq, instead of pocketing the revenues and keeping his people poor and helpless, as a U.S. puppet dictator is supposed to do. The contrast with the Shah of Iran and the kleptocracies in Saudi Arabia and most of Central America could not have been more glaring. Saddam clearly had to go.

      And of course, Israel could not tolerate having a strong, industrialized country nearby. Which is another reason Saddam had to go. Why do you sppose most of the neocons are Jewish?

      The U.S. is paying heavily, in lives, wealth, and reputation, for invading Iraq. The Israelis have benefited hugely, and it has cost them exactly nothing. What a deal.

    4. Re:Myth of destroyed Iraqi infrastructure by Iloinen+Lohikrme · · Score: 1

      Well I would advice these Wikipedia articles to you. They have quite good sources, so if you don't want to settle just for the agregated information you can go directly to the source.

      Morgenthau Plan

      The Industrial Plans for Germany

      Science and technology transfer from Germany

      Eisenhower and German POWs

      German Economic Miracle

      And when talking about war, you can always see what is happening from the production statistics...

      German armored fighting vehicle production

      German aircraft production

      And here is more about how effective bombing dams really was. Not very.

      Attacks on German dams

      I would say that reading those articles, you get a quite good idee on what was happening in Germany before and after the war. To me these articles tell that the industrial machine was quite much alive and well after the war. Yes the civilian centers were in ruins, but then again if you have your industries running then just by diverting resources for a while from normal civilian production quickly repairs and constructs what was lost in the war. It's much easier to construct a house than a steel mill or rail road. In war it's also more harder to destroy factories as they are heavily defended and roads and rail road lines are just too big to be totally destroyed.

      As what comes to Iraq, yes they have problems with electricity production, water and waste management, but the reason isn't that they don't have their pre-war plants, it's more about they either don't have working equipment as the current equipment is so old, or because sabotage made by the insurgency. Even so, the Iraqi civilian infrastructure was far from developed world even before first Gulf war. After basic civilian infrastructure the only industry that you can find in Iraq is oil production and that's running fine when oil lines are not cut by sabotage. All in all the two Iraq wars have been very non destructive when you compare on what was done in second world war and especially what you can do even with a one fully loaded B-52.

      Thought I would like to add here that in both cases in Germanny and Iraq, the occupaying force has done big mistakes. In Germanny millions died in hunger after the occupiers had disabled the industrial machine and couldn't realize that their actions in the long term would put more people to grave than the war alone. In Iraq it could be said that US could have made more friends and created much more security if they had diverted more resources to serving the civilian centers and making sure that basic infrastructure works. That would have not even costed or taken time much as the pre-war levels of service were so low.

    5. Re:Myth of destroyed Iraqi infrastructure by Iloinen+Lohikrme · · Score: 1

      I don't know even where to start so...

      For instance 100000 engineers in a country of 26 million is not big archievement. Even here in Finland where have we only 5 million people, we have over 70000 engineers. Also it's a one thing to get a degree from a third world countries collage or university than get them from European, American or Japanease school. So comparing numbers in more or less meaningless if we can't measure what does the degreas give to their holders. I'm not saying that there weren't good school, what I'm saying that 100000 engineers is an empty number if we can't have data on what the quality was.

      What comes to Saddam and how he spent money, then that is something to also discuss. Saddam didn't start huge infrastructure projects, what he did with the money was to please ordinary Sunnis and keep others from starting a rebellion. The rest of the money he put on his army and his weapon research projects. This army was used to invade Iran and Iraq-Iran war did swallow lots of money. The money put on research allowed Saddam to kill Kurds with gas and almost gave him nuclear weapon. What Saddam didn't do with the oil money was to build serious infrastructure and industrialize Iraq. Actually in Saddams rule previously rich and developed places such as Basra fell to misery and poverty.

      As what comes to first Gulf war, that happened only as Saddam tried to avoid bankruptcy and invaded Kuwait and tried to take over Saudi-Arabia to form an oil imperium. If Saddam hadn't invaded Kuwait nor threatened Saudi-Arabia there would have not been any war. As what comes to second Gulf war and US invasion to Iraq, that was solely because of strategic circumstances. Everybody knew that Saddam and his regime would eventually fall, but nobody knew when. As in the time Russia was still, China didn't have the muscle and Europe was to divided it was the perfect opportunity to try to replace Saddam. Other option would have been to wait Saddam fall and see who at the aftermath of collapse of the regime, probably after an civil war would have come as victorious.

      So what more can be said. Saddam and his regime wasn't good. It's good that they are not in power anymore. It's sad there had to be war before Iraq was free from him, and it's sad that the US is still there and seems unable to go home as the country is in the brink or in fact in the state of civil war. It's also sad in what state the civil infrastructure in Iraq is. That however should not be put on US blame as US in reality didn't destroy that infrastructure as it did in second world war or could have done now.

    6. Re:Myth of destroyed Iraqi infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For instance 100000 engineers in a country of 26 million is not big archievement. Even here in Finland where have we only 5 million people, we have over 70000 engineers.

      I call bullshit. Here in Ontario, the largest province of Canada, we have 60,000 engineers in a population of 13 million. That is enough engineers to sustain a nuclear energy industry (the CANDU reactors).

      Iraq's 100,000 in a population of 26 million is very comparable. I am not going to argue about their quality as there is no way to settle that argument. I will just say that before the first Gulf War, students from all over the Middle East were happy to enroll at Iraqi universities, because of their quality. And Iraq was by far the most industrialized Arab country in the world.

      And I still stand by my comment that the invasion of Iraq was primarily about two things: (1) control of oil; and (2) destruction of one of Israel's strategic threats.

    7. Re:Myth of destroyed Iraqi infrastructure by Iloinen+Lohikrme · · Score: 1

      The only one talking bullshit is you. If you had some knowledge about the world, about industries, about business and the overall size of development you wouldn't been so quick to call something bullshit.

      To make my case, please in example look to Finnish Association of Graduate Engineers. They have 40000 graduated engineers as their members and this represents only a part of all engineers in Finland. Wikipedia tells that there are 70000 engineers in Finland practising their profession. Every year 7500 student graduate and become engineers. (Referens in second page of the PDF) If you now think "gee, where do they need so much engineers", well the answer is for the service of industries mainly to telecommunication, electronics, software, electricity, machine building etc.. There is just so huge amount industrial production going and the amount of engineers required to work is huge. Multinationals like Nokia, Kone, UPM, Stora-Enso, Wärtsilä, Fortum, ABB, TietoEnator, EADS etc.. and also great number of small and medium sized firms employ lots of engineers.

      Going back to Iraq, okay 100000 is a good number for developing/third world country, but not comparable with developed countries. And as there isn't more data about Iraqi collages and universities I won't touch that subject more, only saying that in all Arab countries the university system is very weak / low. As what comes to Iraq being the most industrialized Arab country, that unfortunately doesn't still make much of it as when you compare it to other then developing countries as South-Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia it paled in comparison.

      And what goes to reason for war, yes the oil was the motivator and I'm not denying it. I only said that first Gulf war happened because of Iraq invaded Kuwait and threatened to invade Saudi-Arabia. The second war, as I said happened as the time was right to try to replace Saddam and hopefully avoid civil war. What comes to Israel, they are not a reason to go war, oil is. Besides Israel has it's own quite large amount of nuclear weapons, so having an Arab state industrializing doesn't make it a threat to Israel. Only if an Arab state would have an nuclear weapon, then that would be threat to Israel. Even so, that wouldn't be a reason to go war. As you said and as I believe too, oil and control of it and control currency on which oil is traded are reasons to go war. Thought not morally right.

    8. Re:Myth of destroyed Iraqi infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I call bullshit because Iraq's engineering capacity was at least comparable to Canada's, and Canada is one of the 8 largest economies in the world. So what if Iraq was not as good as Finland? In time, Iraq's engineers could have built up the country to Canada's level, and that would have been more than good enough. Canada is a high tech country with a large industrial base and a nuclear power sector (we developed the CANDUs ourselves). Iraq had a long way to go to match us, but they had enough engineers to do it.

      Engineers backed by wealth from oil can do wonders -- and that was why Israel was so frightened. All the Jewish neocons in the U.S. (i.e. nearly all the neocons) lied their asses off, and Iraq was destroyed at enormous cost to the United States -- and at absolutely no cost to Israel. What a deal.

  174. Let's all sing together now: "four dead in O-hi-o" by rs79 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Well, at least they don't shoot demonstrators in the US. "

    You mean recently I presume?

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  175. Re:Get a Mac? No nipple! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    If I were in a job that trapped me in conference rooms for 12 hours at a time, I'd just shoot myself and get it over.

  176. Non chinese notebooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I researched this a couple of weeks ago, there are some notebooks not made in China, but these are mostly high-end expensive ones (as expected) from Japanese,Taiwanese and Korean manufacturers. However, i was unable to find something quite like a T series (I'm writing this on a T42), unless you live in Europe where Fujitsu-Siemens sells several interesting models like the http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/products/deskbound/workstations/celsius_h.html Celsius H mobile workstation. The high-end models are even made in Germany in what must be the last notebook factory in the "west".

  177. Re:Anonymous COWARD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you're gonna beat someone to death with Mr Hardass? your keyboard? Oooo, you are soooo hard. i'm scared.....

  178. Toshiba is fairly reliable. by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    From my job experience, Toshiba Satellites were the most reliable laptop. When I had to choose mine, I got Satellite as well, and had it over 4 years without a single problem (I did put more memory and got a faster and bigger drive). Still using it, and don't feel a need to upgrade.

  179. Re:Get a Mac? No nipple! by thegnu · · Score: 1

    The current Lenovo's (except the small X series) have both the trackpoint, a trackpad, and no less than 3 mouse buttons. Superior to the Mac in every way possible.

    I'm not saying that they shouldn't have a couple buttons on the mac. Mac zealots piss me off. But here's a list of things unbelievably better than the options:

    1. magnetic power connector (admittedly because they had the big power-connector-snapping-off-and-remaining-unsupported issue)
    2. multitouch on the trackpad.

    I'm just saying that calling a mac trackpad with multitouch "a trackpad with a single button" is like calling the iPhone a Blackberry with single button. Think about it.

    Oh, by the way, I just saw Steve Wozniak speak at a WorkNet Pinellas event, and I am now aware where a good portion of the Apple Is A Loving God mythology comes from. That guy is freaking amazing. Wonderful talk.
    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  180. "I am sure my shoes are made from the finest Falun by cbraescu1 · · Score: 1

    Dr. Mengele, is that you?

    --
    Catalin Braescu
    Ofaly.com
  181. Buy a used thinkpad? by simontek2 · · Score: 1

    Either buy a used thinkpad or a refurb. www.ibm.com still sells thinkpads that are refurbs. Also IBM does the tech support for the thinkpads out of Atlanta GA.I miss working thinkpad support.

    --
    SimonTek
  182. Worst metric *Ever* by ePhil_One · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You can't go entirely by the fraction of the population in prison...but that's a strong indicator.

    So by this metric, if the US simply executed its criminals w/o trial, we would be the BEST country on the planet.

    Awesome

    --
    You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    1. Re:Worst metric *Ever* by HiThere · · Score: 1

      That's a *part* of why I said "you can't go entirely by this metric". There are lots of other reasons. E.g., if it were customary to bribe one's way out of jail, with the bribe being set to what the accused could pay, the metric would also fail. I'm sure that both cases happen somewhere.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  183. Apples are made in China too dumbasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sheesh you people are retarded. Apple may be an American company but the stuff is assembled in Taiwan and 90%+ of the components are made in China.

    I would say it's impossible; Impossible to buy anything electronic that contains no Chinese made components.

    How about those lead based toys the Chinese are selling you?

  184. Re:Anonymous COWARD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  185. You need the practice by rs79 · · Score: 1

    "Rubbing the clit point all day hurts my finger "

    Uh-huh.

    Ya know what? I recently bought a few guitars and haven't played in years. At first my fingers hurt from fingering chords but after a while they calloused up, got stronger and I could finger chords like a madman.

    Think of it as exercise.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  186. Association fallacy by slysithesuperspy · · Score: 1

    Loveno employees and stockholders are not the Chinese government, right? I guess some tax money would go to the Chinese government but is there a good government in the world? That point is moot.

    1. Re:Association fallacy by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Loveno employees

      What a cute play on words, oh Mr PHB =)

      Pun intended? Nintendoed?

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  187. Re:Get a Mac? No nipple! by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1

    Oh, but it pays. Quite handsomely. Sometimes a little suffering is worth it. ;)

    --
    If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
  188. Chinese.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh.. then we should all quit using anything american because americans are fscking around in Iraq and Afghanistan

  189. Japanese Laptop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A computer vendor and repair person told me today that Fujitsu's are still made in Japan. He likes them. Since I have a brand new Lenovo Thinkpad, I mentioned that I wondered whether the quality would start going down. He laughed at me, and said it already had. Regarding making purchasing decisions partially based on personal ethics, I don't really understand what's wrong with the approach. You have to live with yourself and if others have no problem buying Chinese, that's their business not yours.

  190. No, you're being silly by HBI · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did it occur to you that some of us voted for him *precisely* for that reason?

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:No, you're being silly by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      ...voting for someone BECAUSE they are incompetent? Now that's just dumb. And before you go into the whole "Kerry is worse" issue- remember that just because third parties don't get a lot of media coverage doesn't mean that they're not there. You could easily have voted for one of them.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    2. Re:No, you're being silly by HBI · · Score: 1

      How about just believing government does not do good things for us, and the most incompetent possible administration is the best overall for me. It gets less done.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    3. Re:No, you're being silly by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Or it gets the same amount of stuff done, but with dumber outcomes. Not fun.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
  191. Im a happy Lenovo/IBM customer by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    I ordered this system from IBM, along with a Ultrabay battery. As it looks, it kicks ass, considering that I've seen what IBM quality is. It's good.

    1 SYS.6465CT CONFIGURED SYSTEM $1,200.35 $1,200.35
                The above product code consists of the following component(s):
      1 6465CTO CTO THINKPAD T61 WIDESCREEN-1Y $1,129.55
      1 42V8190 SBB INTEL CORE 2 DUO PRCESST7300 $0.00
      1 42V8012 VBB MS WIN VISTA HOME BASIC $0.00
      1 42V8568 SBB MS WINVISTA HM BS32 US ENG $0.00
      1 42V8286 SBB 15.4 WXGA TFT $0.00
      1 42X0817 SBB INT GMAX3100 GM965W $0.00
      1 41W2063 VBB 2GB PC2-5300 667MHZ 2DIMM $0.00
      1 42V8195 SBB KEYBOARD US ENGLISH $0.00
      1 42V8295 SBB UN(TRACKPOINT TOUCHPAD) $0.00
      1 42V8165 SBB 120GB HDD,5400RPM $0.00
      1 42V8172 SBB DVD REC.8XMAXDUAL LAY UB-S $0.00
      1 42X0805 VBB PC CARDSLOT EX CARDSLOT $0.00
      1 41W1501 SBB INTELPRO/WL3945ABGUSCNLAAP $0.00
      1 62P6054 VBB INTEGR.BLUETOOTH PAN $0.00
      1 39T6651 SBB 9 CELL LI-ION BATTERY $0.00
      1 41W1787 SBB CPK NORTH AMERICA $0.00
      1 42V8339 SBB LPACK US ENGLISH $0.00
      1 41C9170 LENOVO THINKPLUS EXTENDED SERVICE AGREEMENT - 3 YEARS - PICK-UP AND RETURN

    Total of $1,368. Damn fair from what I've had to go through with Hewlett Crapard with their "tech support".

    --
  192. Follow this formula: Quantity=Chinesse != Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel, based on my observations of the past two years, (when every company moved their manufacturing to China) quality of every laptop is not what it used to be. I'm typing this on R32 so I have a different take on quality. I don't think one can get a laptop that performs as good as my R32 and I support HP, Toshibas, Panasonic (TOUGHBOOK) and Lenovo.

    On the other note I paid $1800 for it which would easily buy me two laptops of the same speed.

    Thinkpads are gone the way that HP 4M(VL) laser printer is gone. Those times will never come back.

    My question to the reader is where else than China are laptops made? So much for freedom of choice. At least you're entitled to your opinion.

  193. They're all most likely built in China by nnull · · Score: 1

    You can buy a Panasonic Toughbook, that's about it.

    Chances are, any new laptop you buy, is most likely at least produced in China. Even Clevo, a Taiwanese company, produces its laptops in China. Just buy another Thinkpad, they're still great and Lenevo has a better record than all the other laptop producers in terms of labor and pollution.

  194. Quality laptop! Like my Fuji LifeBook by Carlk · · Score: 1
    Chinese Junks are not just sailing ships.

    Get the lead out and look at Fujitsu LifeBook! I just spent ~$2k on a 1610 mini with added DVD burner, floppy, and bonus Lexmark Scan/Print/Fax!

    Quality piece. Was made in and shipped from Japan.

    Like NT5; this is my only NT5.1/XP & I spooked at the End-Usage-misLicense-disAgreement I Called Fuji once, got support from CANADA. Guys said 24/7 lifetime Fujitsu support.

  195. Re:Get a Mac? No nipple! by Hatta · · Score: 1

    Oh my, the endurapro looks awesome. It actually has buckling springs like a Model M. That's awfully tempting, thanks!

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  196. MacBook by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

    I'm also a long-time Thinkpad user (I still have a working 600X running Linux), and the only notebook I've ever used that I think is as good (albeit very different) than a ThinkPad is the MacBook Pro I'm using at work. If you really want something other than a ThinkPad, give one a look.

    That said, there isn't anything you can buy that won' have a bunch of its components made and/or assembled in China. That's just a fact on the ground. Another poster mentioned that Fujitsu notebooks are still made in Japan. Assuming that as true without verifying it, even if the machine is made in Japan, some of its components will almost certainly be made in China, especially electrical things like power supplies.

    Whether that matter of degree (a Japanese-made machine with some Chinese parts Vs. a Chinese-made machine with some non-Chinese parts) is important or not is something you'll have to decide for yourself, but one thing is pretty sure: it's very, very hard, if not impossible, to buy a computer that doesn't have at least some Chinese-made parts.

    Finally, while China is a major vendor (at least) to the Burmese government for arms, and has human rights problems of its own, it is not China that is doing this, it is the Burmese government. Also, AFAIK, Lenovo is not a state-owned company (someone correct me on that if I'm wrong), so they are sort of an innocent bystander to this. Still, if you feel China is culpable enough here that you want to boycott all Chinese products, then do what you have to do.

  197. here, here! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    A coworker bought one a year ago, again claiming it was the most reliable thing ever. It overheated and died within a month. Under warentee, he returned it for another one. That one summarily died at the hands of a 12 oz can of coke, falling from a shelf on his desk spitting the plastic case. The thrid one seems to be working ok though, and he's decided to stop storing cans of coke on the shelf.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  198. T20 made in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I'm pretty sure the T20 was made in USA or Mexico. That used to be why they were so expensive compared to the R and A series, which are all made overseas. Most IBM contractors I knew carried the T series at the time so that's what I got, after having used R and A series for years at work.

    I'm currently working on a Dell Latitude at work, though I still have my T23 at home. I can't recommend a Dell Inspiron, too many of my friends have had terrible times with those. The latitude is a decent machine, all things considered. Also, consider a MacBook, even if you want to run Windows on it.

  199. Spend your $$ on buying political muscle ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you think that your spending patterns will affect how business is done ... well it's time to leave Wonderland and come to reality.
    If you really want to make a change - spend your $$ to buy a politician. Yes I really mean BUY.
    Most democracies (at least that I know of - i.e. USA/UK/India) have become farces where the people don't matter. They get to choose between say 4-5 equally rotten, mutually indistinguishable, scoundrels (in the US' case it's a binary choice between an ass and a donkey).
    So given this state of affairs - it's best to buy a politician - plainly and directly (say an ad on CraigsList or ...eBay!!).
    Rather than go from
    we-the-people==>companies==>"the economy"==>Dollars==>policies
    why don't we cut the crap and just go from
    we-the-people==>Dollars=>policies!

  200. Learn to Read, Idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'd rather die in a free society, than live under an unfree one.

    Where do I try to speak for anybody in this sentence? The corpses in Iraq don't matter to me. If you had any reading comprehension skills, you'd notice I'm only speaking for myself.

    I just owned you again.

  201. How about a Panasonic Toughbook? by mariushm · · Score: 1

    You could try buying a Panasonic Toughbook. Not really cheap but as far as I know, they're made in Japan. AND they're quality stuff.

  202. Yes, Support Taiwan by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    Taiwan is a modern, peaceful democracy. You could think of it as "the anti-China." I think MacBooks and iPods are manufactured there.

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  203. Hardened Notebooks by BulletMagnet · · Score: 1

    I'm the IT Manager of a large construction company and my employees put a lot of strain on their laptops (jobsite's are very dusty and whatnot)

    I've looked into the Panasonic Toughbook series and they aren't nearly as bulletproof as everyone thinks they are....at least the older ones weren't....

    Dell does make a single hardened model: the Latitude ATG 630. It has all the requirements of a hardenend unit but from a Cost Benefit point of view, the extra $900.00 for the body and internal armor, the piddly 32GB Solid State HD, and the bright-light viewable screen.

    http://www.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/latit_atg_d630?c=us&l=en&s=bsd&cs=04

    The only drawback with these machines is they come with integrated graphics, but that might not be an issue for you. You can get it with either XP or Vista, and they have some Ubuntu drivers listed on their support page.

    You can also look at these guys: http://www.ruggednotebooks.com/ but I think that would probably be overkill

  204. Won't American? by murreyaw · · Score: 1

    Good luck. I would say the closest would be either Apple or HP.

    --
    God, Root, Whats the difference?
  205. SAGER by Efialtis · · Score: 1

    There are several places on the net that sell SAGER LapTops...
    These are MONSTER Machines...
    DURABLE, RELIABLE, PACKED WITH EVERYTHING...

    The only drawback is, they are expensive...

    http://www.sagernotebook.com/default.php
    (machine packed with everything - and I do mean EVERYTHING) $4814.00

    --
    --E--
  206. Lenovo rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinese or not, my Z61t is da bomb.

  207. The only sensible choice is T23 by Technomancer · · Score: 1

    The last of the great T line of IBM laptops. You could also try Toshiba Portege 3490CT which is pretty much the same hardware in a smaller magnesium casing.

  208. i stand corrected by Ivan+Matveich · · Score: 1

    China in 2007 is just like China in 1977 except that its central bank owns more Treasuries. Why didn't I realize that?

    Look, anyone who reads a newspaper knows that, since that time, (a) a panoply of totalitarian institutions have been dismantled, leading to unprecedented levels of personal autonomy from the state; (b) standards of living have grown dramatically, as peasants join the industrial economy and the middle class swells; (c) economic freedoms have gone from negligible to moderate, and even in some ways robust; and that (d) these changes are strongly correlated with massive exports of manufactured goods and an influx of foreign risk capital. You draw your own conclusions.

    1. Re:i stand corrected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have been given bread and circuses, but not the power to effect real politcal change

  209. Re:Quality laptop! Like my by wdolez00 · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Insert Apple, Lenovo, Fujitsu, Dell, etc.... I swear that 50% of the posts are ads.

  210. China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess you can't buy anything from American companies either, since the US govt. borrows vast sums of money from China. It's admirable that you have a cause that you believe in, but it's misguided.

  211. Re:Let's all sing together now: "four dead in O-hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    er, yeah. the exact same link i gave in *my* post ...

  212. FYI: China (Republic of Taiwan) by asphaltjesus · · Score: 1

    For the geographically challenged moderators: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_China

    Another FYI: Sure Asus appears to be made in Taiwan. But assembly costs are still 1/2 or less of Taiwan's in China. I'll bet the last dollar in my pocket that Asus, like every major Taiwanese manufacturer is practically building the laptop in China.

    Technically it may say Made in Taiwan, but practically, it's not. It just can't be. The wikipedia says so: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASUS

    --
    Got Trader Joe's? friendwich.com RSS feeds work now!
  213. in or out by oktokie · · Score: 0

    If you feel strongly against what Chinese government stands for, then you should not buy anything coming from China. It does not make sense that you are searching for ways to pay as little as possible to China. Actually, you should not pay any, otherwise you are being a hypocrite. T20 is P3 laptop and you can find plenty of used ThinkPads on an eBay. I think P4M 2.0GHz line of ThinkPad is priced at $350 on an eBay and every penny would stay in the US.

  214. Don't buy that by aevans · · Score: 1

    Most everything else is made in Taiwan, a separate country, containing the exiles who fled China when the communists took over.

  215. Re:Quality laptop! Pride not ad. QUALITY by Carlk · · Score: 1
    Duh. Human psychology is to assert YOUR decision was a good one. Ford/Chev/Toyo, etc.
    I manage a university bio materials lab and do not work for any electronics firm.

    My Fuj 1610 mini has faults due to size. ~9" screen, narrow keys, deficits due to size. But is is easy to carry & use.

    And QUALITY and not supporting the country selling bad tires, toxic food, lead toys was his goal!

  216. japanese manufacturing and protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to my knowledge, there was more than protectionism involved in the massive boom in japanese electronics manufacturing (and cars, for that matter).

    this might just be my bias coming from my backfround in mathematics and statistics, but SPC (statistical process control) was a huge part of their success. the japanese made good use of deming theory, shewhart charts, and sample based quality-checking (instead of manual inspection of all output). basically, they used the best scientific knowledge related to manufacture to produce a higher quality product and reduce costs.

    my other bias come into it now. i work in the area labor market economics, and labor costs played a large part in it. when labor is cheaper, then the products are cheaper. wages were lower in postwar japan than here in the states, for a number of reasons. firstly, they lost the war, which ment that the country was a little worse off and the going rate for labor was in general cheaper. next, us manufacturing was largely unionized, leading to increased labor costs (not an argument for or against unions... just saying that unionized workers are more expensive than nonunion counterparts... real cheese is more expensive than velveeta...).

    so for japanese manufacturing exports:
    better quality control = cheaper products
    cheaper labor costs = cheaper products
    protectionism = cheaper products

    on to china: i figure that in today's world, what with WTO and NAFTA and FTAA and all the globalization and free trade stuff, china would not be able to systemically put up protectionist barriers to trade, akin to those used by japan.

  217. Lenovo Thinkpad T-series still designed in Japan by WormyOne · · Score: 1

    I have worked with all of the notebook OEMs and can tell you that:

    - The Thinkpad T-series have always been designed in the Yamato design centre near Tokyo
    - When Lenovo acquired IBM's PC business, this design centre and its employees became part of lenovo
    - The very same people are designing the T-series machines today as did in the IBM days
    - The design rigour, testing and general quality level is the highest in the industry, BAR NONE.

    Note that all this applies for the T-series Thinkpads only. I know that some of their other lines are designed in Japan, but other Thinkpads may be designed in Taiwan or China.

    Hope this helps. I love my T42p, would love to replace it with another T-series...

  218. Regardless of "made in China" by spanner8 · · Score: 1

    I own a t41p th servell serves me well. I used my friends T60 and the new keyboard arrangement annoyed me. I was impressed by the build quality of the dell Vostro and the HP NC8460(they have the nub which I still like to use sometimes)

  219. Foxconn is NOT a Chinese Company by nationality by denobug · · Score: 1

    Foxconn is a Taiwanese company, with facilities in China. It also has operations here in Houston, TX as well as across the border in Mexico. It is true that a majority of assembly work or low-end, intensive labor are done in China. It's owner/Chairman of the company is one of the wealthiest person in Taiwan. And yes, his residency is in Taiwan. The information above are well documented and available on the Internet.

    Foxconn is also a public traded company in Taiwan's stock market.

    The Land of Taiwan has a fully democratic government with a president directly elected by its people. The official name of the government is The Republic of China. However the mainland Chinese government (with the official name People's Republic of China) does not rule Taiwan. The last time I checked (few minutes ago) people in Taiwan still runs their own government without directions from the Chinese government. It has laws and regulations to protect its citizens, just as it is here in Western countries.

    Please check your resources before dogging another company who are in the same position as Dell, HP. Those are OEM companies, but they are OEMs that are based in Taiwan and have the same delima as HP and Dell does.

    A side note: Most of the WD harddrives I have come across are made in Singapore. Another Democratic country. Seagate's harddrive are partly made in Malaysia and partly made in China.

  220. Japanese Panasonic Laptop by mattis_f · · Score: 1

    Panasonic has a series of amazing laptops that's mostly sold in Japan, although one model (the Y series) has made it to the US. I'm using an R6 that I got through geekstuff4u, a company in Tokyo that exports stuff for geeky foreigners... The R6, the smallest model, has a 10" screen, core 2 duo processor, 4+ hours of battery time, 80gb harddrive, weighs about 2 pounds - and can withstand a drop from 2.5 feet, 200 pounds of pressure and the keyboard is waterproof. (No, I haven't tried it myself ... but there are videos on Youtube with people confirming this.)

    The Y is the largest in the series. It has the same durability specs (drop, water et.c.) as the smaller ones, but it comes with a built in optical drive and a 14" screen, and weighs about 3 pounds. That one is officially for sale in the US.

    Oh, and I've been told that this Panasonic series is all manufactured in Japan. In the US, the Y5 (latest model, I believe) is sold as part of the toughbook series, but in Japan the series is called "Let's note!".

    Good luck.

  221. Moderators! by Serpentegena · · Score: 1

    Mod up pls kthx

    For those who didn't get it, please refer to post 20783211 above.

    --
    Microsoft put the "sucks" in "success".
  222. Give it time by Bill+the+Cat · · Score: 1

    With the steady slide of the value of the US dollar compared to every other currency in the world, it'll get easier to get products that are made in the US.

  223. Had Lenovo Thinkpad T60p by capnal · · Score: 1

    I got this about a month ago and in less than a week it was freezing 2-3 times a day. I suspected Norton or some of the other installed software. Well, I uninstalled Norton. Still freezing up. Tried to uninstall as much of the built-in tools/security software I could, but still froze. Alas, I put in for a new laptop and got a MacBook Pro instead. I'm a PC guy in a mac world now, but it feels better than the Lenovo Thinkpad did.

    1. Re:Had Lenovo Thinkpad T60p by BASICman · · Score: 1

      Lenovo's built-in software is pretty bad. I ordered one for my sister and when it came, I had to wipe the thing clean. It runs beautifully now, but its a shame that I had to nuke the hard drive to do it.

      --
      An enlightenment painter would paint a grand house on a lawn; A romantic painter would paint it on fire.
  224. Sweet Merciful Hay Sarcasmoos... by KWTm · · Score: 1

    ...is there no one left on Slashdot who grasps the concept of sarcasm?

    Nawwww...
    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  225. The state of LEGOland by lahi · · Score: 1

    It's been a while since I last bought LEGO for my son - he has plenty! - so I can't say whether there is any LEGO production in China at the moment. It may be so. I just checked Google ('"LEGO" "produktion" "Kina"', yielding mostly Danish results, which are perhaps a little more likely to be accurate) and there are several hits that seem to indicate that LEGO has no or very little production based in China. Not out of ethical concerns, but because it didn't really make economical sense.

    However, the financial troubles LEGO was in just a few years ago are over now, and LEGO is doing very fine again. This success is partly based on outsourcing the production almost completely from Denmark (where the industries are now fast running out of hands due to a workforce shortage - we are fast going towards zero or negative unemployment, and our economy is stronger than ever), and on reinstating classic/basic LEGO values and principles, and the traditional product lines. (The huge success of Star Wars LEGO may also have played a part.)

    So, regarding China, LEGO is not a big player. I suspect another good reason is that the quality achievable would not be up to the extreme standards of LEGO, whether it be plastic composition and color, or dimensional tolerances. Back in the 80es, LEGO was criticized sharply in Denmark because the yellow bricks were suspected to contain cadmium. I doubt they want to repeat that on a world scale, like what happened recently with Mattel. Chinese plastic just stinks - literally.

    Regarding finance, LEGO is doing very well right now, and saving up to ensure they can withstand another crisis if necessary. So, to sum things up, all is well in LEGOland. (Although LEGO doesn't actually own the first LEGOland themepark anymore, which I think is a big shame, LEGO still controls its "spirit".)

    -Lasse

    1. Re:The state of LEGOland by Benwick · · Score: 1

      While you're on the subject, Lego has had issues over the years with knock-off Legos made in China under names like "Ligao". I have to admit I bought a bunch of sets of them when I was in Vietnam two years ago. It was impossible to resist the chance to buy a Border Crossing set featuring guards carrying little plastic AK-47s, and other sorts of indoctrination toys (tanks and such) -- http://www.skrzat-online.pl/images/bric%200494.jpg .

      Anyway, I guess my point is, Lego could conceivably want to avoid Chinese production. They have squabbled over Chinese trademark violations of their brand in the past, although I think they focused not on the Chinese companies directly but rather on their European importers.

    2. Re:The state of LEGOland by lahi · · Score: 1

      You're probably right. The LEGO (rec.toys.lego) FAQ mentions a Chinese clone that was called 0937.

      Nice tank, btw. I really need to take some time out to play with my son and his huge box of LEGO. It's a great way to relax and boost creativity, and I should do it more often. He and I both need to get away from our computers - computers are terrible.

      -Lasse

  226. Logic and chinese jingoism by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 1

    to all those Tibet etc apologists out there who know nothing about the historical, geographical and cultural contexts of China, please do us a favor and shut up, or at least gain a proper understanding of the issues before expecting a civilized reply.


    Here's something to get you started.

    Considering that the modern idea of civilized behaviour entails peoples' rights to such incomprehensible things as self-determination and the freedom of speech and religion and especially from the fear of remorseless genocide by expansionist neighbours, the chinese Han-chauvinists certainly have great deal of catching up to do in terms of civilization. The jingoistic Party indoctrination appears to work wonders on Chinese people's critical thinking faculties.

    --

    Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

    1. Re:Logic and chinese jingoism by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      > The jingoistic Party indoctrination appears to work wonders on Chinese people's critical thinking faculties.

      I sure sound like somebody indoctrinated with "Party propaganda". But hate to break it I don't think I am even capable of being indoctrinated.

      Um, I have vague impressions of what indoctrination is like (and it basically gives me the chills). However what I see is that your views if taken whole is just the other side of the same coin. What I do believe is that both sides to the story are vastly exaggerated (and in the case of the Chinese media, vastly silenced). What will convince me (and many other Chinese) is a neutral accounts of FACTS, not emotional assertions (eg "history's most murderous dictator Mao Zedong..." [hate to break it to you, the first emperors of every dynasty in China were at least as equally "murderous" as Mao, if not much much "worse", and I'm not quoting this as an excuse for Mao, but as a counterexample to show you how emotionally worked up your statement is])

      Well I'll grant you that Tibetans are not Chinese in any way is true.

      Now let me respond to a few of your other bolded texts:

      Han-Chinese nationalism (which other Qing-ruled "minorities" weren't keen on), which had arisen from the modern concept of nationalism.

      Han-Chinese nationalism, as far as I understand it, already existed. The Qing dynasty is generally referred to as "invaders", and their ancestors (the Jin) were basically mortal enemies of the Han people of the Song dynasty.

      Death ... adds up to over 1,2 million corpses,

      Tell me where you're getting that data from. Trusting a "free tibet" zealot on slashdot for "facts" without sources is not advisable. Same way that you won't trust "facts" from a person who thinks Mao is basically a god and never makes mistakes... ever.

      Now tell me that Tibet isn't criminally occupied by their historical neighbours and that the Tibetans simply deserve to be wiped out and humiliated as yet another boring sinicized "ethnic song and dance troupe" because a brutal and massively militarized Chinese regime far away in Beijing can't afford to let those people regain their freedom?

      Ah... I see the problem now. The Chinese government is too nice. They should have exterminated the Tibetans and the world would have shut up. I mean, since there's no more native Americans the white guys from Europe has taken over and nobody seems to give a damn about that. I mean, the US is full of nice guys who are peaceful and would never even think of invading another country now.

      Well apart from this semi-sarcastic comment I'd grant you that... only if your facts are accurate.

      Who knows, maybe you really are just a decent youngster who didn't know any better and who is now faced with a choice.

      Maybe I am. There's a choice? Uh. The best I might have done (to your favor) is to recognize your claims and cause.

      But then I have a clue for you here. If you intend to make a real difference (instead of ranting around and recruiting more ignorant zealots), take some time to learn WHY things are the way it is, and HOW to (practially) make things better. I hope you have the common sense that emotional rants all over the place hardly have any effect except as a channel to vent your frustrations, and most of the "facts" from anti-Chinese (communists) organizations give me the impression that maybe Chinese Communist's propaganda in the 1960's is more closer to the truth.

      In short, I don't believe in your facts simply because you state them. Tell me, for example, HOW you got the numbers (and no, a major news agency from a western country is not reliable. If you tried to argue that it were I'd point you to Chinese news agencies and see if you agreed with me...), like did the reporters actually count the corpses there and managed to get out of China alive? Or smuggled some secret document? Or is everything actually from the Chinese government and they funded the free Tib

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    2. Re:Logic and chinese jingoism by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      So let's go about answering your very complex quesitons:
      Why is Tibet in such a terrible situation:
      The Chinese government has killed, raped, and tortured their way to control of the country adn continue to do these things on a regular basis.

      you want a pratical solution for tibet, it's easy:
      Chinese folks who have no right to be there and are causing all the problems should get the hell out. Yeah, it is that simple. Tibet was an autonomous nation for an extremely long period of time and has never had any cultural connection to China.

      There is still a functioning tibetan government living in exile in India.

      Now why is this solution not practical? Easy, the CCP would have to admit they are a bunch of douchebags. Worse yet, they would then lose access to the massive amounts of natural resources in Tibet they use to fuel development in the Easy. So if you mean how can we fix this problem while maintaining China's access to a large network of free resources and labor, well, that is more difficult. But then again, I didn't realize that was considered a solution.....

  227. Re:Get a Mac? No nipple! by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    I guess for the authentic nipple experience you need an IBM Space Saver. I have one, and it's pretty much the best keyboard I know.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  228. Panasonic Toughbooks, still made in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There might be some parts from China, but Panasonic is famously known as being the last Japanese computer maker that still designs and builds their machines in Japan (not to mention tortures them there). Not all of the Toughbooks are huge and klunky. They have a "business rugged" or "semi rugged" line. Fanless (fans wear out and clog with dust and lint). Keys you can pop off and back on without breaking them. Foam padding around the harddrive. Extra durable hinges. I love my CF-R1. It goes with me just about everywhere and it's the only machine I've had that survived more than a year of that abuse. dynamism.com imports them. They're pricey for the specs, but if you look at it in terms of dollar per operating hour, they're actually a really *good* deal. If Americans weren't hell bent on buying disposable garbage at bottom dollar, these things would be a lot more popular. Oh yeah, Panasonic actually did start reselling those things here themselves from their own website, at least for a few models (the 2.0 pound CF-R series is the smallest and isn't available directly from Panasonic but dynamism had it, but you probably want one of the larger ones anyway).

    Cheers,
    -scott

    scott@slowass.net

  229. Bunch of f***ing hypocrites by GBuddha · · Score: 1

    The U.S. is invading every damn country in the world and is responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent civilians and you're not going to buy a laptop from a Chinese company because of civil rights issues? Maybe you should also use leaves from your backyard instead of toilet paper from now on.

    1. Re:Bunch of f***ing hypocrites by LostInTaiwan · · Score: 1

      Plenty of people are speaking out against the US policy everywhere in the world, US included. Try doing that in China. That's the difference. The is no civil right issues in China. The term "civil rights" doesn't even exist yet in China. US is not perfect but US is way ahead in the democratic evolutionary ladder than China.

      Hypocrisy is when people using free speech to defend authoritarian governments.

  230. Re:Anonymous COWARD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    beat someone to death with your keyboard?

    Pray that it's not Made in China, Mr Hardass. My Model M keyboard will have that for lunch!!

  231. Maybe too late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My company hands out laptops on a two year cycle - leasing helps maintain a fresh line while making the costs bearable.

    The R50 series was the last release and was well received. Not the cutting edge hardware like the T series, but a fast P4, 2gb of ram, ati video, and dvd-rw drive made for a healthy product. So far these were bullet proof, equally well received by windows and linux users.

    The new T-60 series (made by lenovo) have not been well received. Many driver issues and hardware failures have lead to a sour review. But like any other big company, they continue to roll them out. We're now seeing T60p and T61's hitting the desks and seem to be better. Maybe it was the typical V1.0 of the T60s that showed they were released prematurely.

    But, in my experience - Lenovo ThinkPad series still trumps most other manufacturers in regards to Technical Support, Latest Tech, and linux driver support.

  232. BRAINWASHED is silly, not one's OWN convictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The silly part is being subjected to propaganda and take that as your own moral convictions.

  233. IBM Laptops were always made by Lenevo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To the submitter:

    I don't know about 7 years ago, but IBM laptops were always manufactured for IBM by Lenovo. IBM simply gave them the rights to it and sold off their whole business to them, exclusively.

    So, in reality, nothing has changed. You have been using a Lenovo laptop this whole time...

    I have a Lenovo, and its pretty good (not the best, but good). So suck up and buy one, or pay more and get a Dell

  234. Re:Spend your $$ on buying political muscle ... by DNAtsol · · Score: 1

    Frankly, I appreciate you cynical outlook. Global industry is much more pervasive than we are willing to admit . When made in America means 50% + .000000...1 what action is possible to alter world politics? Well, my perspective is to do what YOU can. There is this thing, I don't know if you've heard about it, called the internet. Search for where parts are sourced, invest in companies promoting human rights, have third party verified labour practices. You will find that there is a large and GROWING community that is pushing shareholder votes on these issues. Why do think that DELL is offering recycling and vostro lines of computers? Take advantage. Get involved. One person can and does make a difference.

    --
    DNA, the splice of life.
  235. Whats wrong with used? by mnmn · · Score: 1

    Get a used R60 or T42p. You'll be able to extract years out of it. They were the last laptops sold just before Lenovo stepped in. I'm not sure but I think early T60 laptops were also IBM.

    If you're feeling nationalist... buy a Gateway. And while you're at it, get a Dodge Neon as well. And drink American beer.

    Just kidding...

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  236. what about US atrocities? by doktorjayd · · Score: 1

    certainly your moral fabric should also recoil in horror if you were to purchase an _american_ laptop.

    theres a little police action happening in a small oil-rich country in the middle east that has been shown to have been predicated on fabrication and hubris, clearly against all international law, and has left anywhere between 100,000 and 500,000 dead ( not to mention many more displaced ).

    whats more, even long term public figures are publicly acknowledging it was entirely about the oil: link , literally bush and co invaded a sovereign nation in order to take control of that nations natural resources.

    now, if you can overlook this little indiscretion, i'm sure you can also manage to overlook one sovereign state ( china ) _not_ intervening in another sovereign states' affairs ( burma ).

    just buy the lenovo.

    1. Re:what about US atrocities? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      theres a little police action happening in a small oil-rich country in the middle east that has been shown to have been predicated on fabrication and hubris, clearly against all international law, and has left anywhere between 100,000 and 500,000^W 1,200,000 dead
      There, fixed that up for you.
      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  237. MAC by weazzle · · Score: 1

    I suggest one of the new macbooks. They are very well built, better even than the thinkpad in my opinion. You can install any OS you want on them. I ended up getting a Thinkpad T60 simply because I didn't like the price for the model I wanted on the macbook (black cover), and I don't really like the wide screen.

  238. I second the Fujitsu recommendation by lma · · Score: 1

    I've had T-series notebooks for years, most recently a T42p. About 9 months ago I switched to a Fujitsu P7230 Lifebook and I love it. It's been rock solid. I can swap the DVD drive for a second battery and I get 7 hours of battery life with both batteries combined. It's amazing. It's a well-built solid machine and I would buy one again. The Dell and HP machines I looked at in comparison were all heavier and had worse battery life. The Sony's are nice (if you get one made by Sony), but they're expensive and they come with features I don't want (will Sony please just kill the Memory Stick). For comparison. The Fujitsu has an SD slot. I can't say enough good things about the Fujitsu. Larry

  239. Good on you by codingmasters · · Score: 1

    I think it takes a lot of moral fibre to make a stand like that Good on you

  240. Good to know. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    When I first read about the IBM/Lenovo split, I recall that Lenovo got the rights to some very specific uses of the IBM and "Think" (e.g. "ThinkPad", ThinkWhatever) trademarks, for a certain amount of time. I'm not sure when that expires, but I don't doubt that they could be making ones and still using the brand (and why not, it's a solid brand -- I would).

    From what I've heard, most of the negative comments about the "new" Lenovo units are about the value-priced (grey) ones, and fewer are about the actual ThinkPads. Most of the negative things I have heard about the ThinkPads are about the keyboards, and it seems to be a hit-or-miss thing (the keyboards from one factory are preferred by some users over the others).

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  241. I doubt it. And, don't buy the Japanese either! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a chinese myself, I hate the communist government too. Trust me, very much hated! However, a violent revolution is NOT, definitely NOT, in the interest of the Chinese people. Trust me, only the people will suffer. Look at Iraq. How many innocent people are killed everyday, by the militia or by the U.S. soldiers?

    To some extent, I do have to give some credit to the current Chinese government. The life of the Chinese people are way better than 30 years ago. It gives me hope that a peaceful transition might be possible.

    I have one thing in common with you: for at least 15 years, I have been refusing to buy (or trying my best not to buy) any Japanese made stuff. However, sometimes what can you do when you found out that the DVD-ROM in the T40 you have is a fucking Fujitsu? (btw: I simply hated what the Japanese did to China in WWII and their current very hostile military movement. Let's hope there will never be another disaster in Asia caused by the Japs.)

  242. Re:Replacing a thinkpad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How dumb! It seems to me Lenovo would be loaded with computer nerds, insulting Lenovo in this situation would be like going after Dianne Feinstein for the wrongdoings of the Republican administration. One should stick up for one's friends. In the year 2007, Machiavellianism is supposed to be a bad joke, apparently some people haven't figured this out. Attacking Lenovo for the problems of the PLA, I think I saw something like this on The Brady Bunch a long time ago. Or was it Full House, when the twins were blamed for something that that neighbor kid did? Or maybe it was Urkel. Or was it on Little House, when Nellie Oleson breaks something in her parents' store and blames it on Laura Ingalls? Isn't that kind of plot structure on TV every night? Why do I, a Slashdot reader, have to put up with political philistinism from a bunch of people who can't stop showing off how smart they are in other areas? And why are we as a society producing all this electronic mediaware if people aren't learning anything from it? It's not like there is some shortage of sitcoms. And its not like this Myanmar situation isn't a real emergency that needs expert attention and thoughtful consideration instead of this long uninterrupted sociopolitical discussion group malpractice. Maybe some normal people in the Chinese government will decide to punish the liberal nerd community for this chronic malpractice by blaming Apple or Linux for the corporate deeds of Microsoft!

  243. Which 'Union'? by martrootamm · · Score: 1

    Exactly which Union (as in 'non-union') do you have in mind?

  244. Not 'always manufactured by Lenovo' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For example, one ThinkPad R30 that I know of, was manufactured in the UK by IBM United Kingdom Ltd.

  245. An Apple MacBook Pro is a good replacement by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

    The MacBook Pros are very solidly built and offer all the whizz bang you could ever want. They run Windows XP or Vista natively too if you absolutely and foolishly insist... Linux too, but probably not as easily, since Apple uses EFI and not BIOS.

    --
    Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
  246. Oh and the US is so great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With your CIA jails and Mr Bush. You are a joke.

  247. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of german piece of shit stores cans of soda anywhere but the fridge. Nazis...

    1. Re:WTF by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      We just have a small dorm fridge at work and don't do a good job of coordinating soda purchases. So sometimes there isn't enough room in the fridge. That having being said, I am the odd ball that prefers my soda at room temperature, so I always leave some out as well.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  248. Re: nomenclature by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Bah.

    1 Gig.

    Hooray for the AC currents on slashdot.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  249. Boycots are silly and impractical. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I hate what the US and the UK are doing in Iraq.

    Now pray tell me, what should I boycott? If I add that to a boycott against China then my only option would be to live in a cave, but not here in the UK I suppose because I would still be aiding the disastrous foreign UK policies. I suppose I should get rid of my job and feed myself with wild strawberries and road kill....

    When you stand for your principles you have to strike a balance between what you would like to do and between what you can do and will have any real effect.

    Nowadays media shamming is the most successful tool against any government, any person committed enough can help a lot with that.

    Or give money to one of several organizations doing work in the ground documenting abuses of human rights and helping political prisoners.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  250. Lack of historic perspective by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Say what you may wish, but Chinese people live in general terms better today than what they did 50 or 100 years ago, and many of them are old enough to remember those times and tell their younger relatives about them.

    Somebody that is working in a manufacturing plant in China earning a reasonable living will have on his mind the bad times when granddad almost starved to death during the first half of the last century or will recall the histories of the disastrous Cultural Revolution that dad had to endure. Compared to that the current lot, promoting economic development, are real saints.

    People in the West think that democracy with multi party elections is the only way to achieve material progress, places like Singapore (a dictatorship in all sense but name), Malaysia (an "apartheid light" Muslim state) and of course China (which defies definition nowadays, they are not a dictatorship strictly speaking, they are not a democracy in the western sense, but they have elections) probe that people can be bettered by different social means and they will fierce loyal to their respective leaderships even if by Western standards the governments are dismal in one way or another.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  251. Loaded language. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    guangxi is not corruption, no matter how you want to spin it. Corruption is corruption and it is completely different from the concept of guangxi.

    Also naming the Chinese government as fascist shows a lack of education that should not go unnoticed.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  252. In todays world it would not make difference by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    In today's world Nazi Germany would have investments everywhere and would produce good for many countries.

    But in today's world a country like Nazi Germany can't exists, by the simple fact that Nazi Germany has already happened and it is highly unlikely it will happen again.

    In the years previous to WWII international commerce was not as big as it is today, so any boycott would have been pointless.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  253. Keep patting yourself in the back. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    In the meantime between 30000 and 600000 people (depending who you believe) have died in Iraq as a consequence of the US invasion.

    But they are free to pray.

    Give me a fucking brake.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  254. Your country has aided to kill bw 30000 and 600000 by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    And you still insist to mkae it appear as a good and heroic endeavour.

    It seems not only Chinese citizens are completely idiotic when it comes to judge their own governments actions.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  255. And then Bush goes and kills thousends of people by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    And somehow that makes the US system better.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  256. Not according to your post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "While it easy to find examples of harm in there, there is more good then harm in the case of American foreign policy."

    Well, lets have a quick look over your post then...

    Examples of American foreign policy failures: 1 (Iraq)
    Examples of American foreign policy successes: 0

    Hmmmm.

  257. Oh China by blondenerd · · Score: 1

    I think I understand where you're coming from. Even though everything is made in China it's still different to buy something from a Chinese owned corporation. I have a T40 from just before the switch. It's 4 yrs old and still amazing. But heck I'm not gonna buy a Lenovo again. I worked in IT at my university and the T60s broke all the time. I would go for a Toshiba, Sony, Acer, or Apple. Good luck. It's so sad when one has to replace their baby.

    1. Re:Oh China by RMH101 · · Score: 1
      You worked in IT and are still prepared to recommend Sony and Acer?
      Sony are consumer-hostile: they restrict driver downloads, they don't sell spares, and they're generally pretty much the worst for aftersales in the industry. Pretty much, however, because there's someone worse: Acer.

      Acer don't do spares or support. As an example: their laptops are rebadged by a lot of other companies for sale to the public. Acer will quote a price for, say, a thousand laptops to the OEM. They will then supply 1000 + 6% to cover hardware failure, and supply 1060 laptops to that OEM. The OEM are then on their own when it comes to support and hardware break/fix. Once they've used their stock of "spares" then you *cannot* get spare parts.

  258. Can't help you... by seebs · · Score: 1

    ThinkPads were always made in China, you know. :)

    Anyway, I replaced mine with a Mac. I wanted the ability to drive most printers, scanners, etc., without booting Windows. I had about one choice.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  259. Re:Anonymous COWARD! by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

    Aye, mine was made in Scotland..... from girders

  260. Replacing a Thinkpad by dmhall · · Score: 1

    I thought my Thinkpad was a great laptop until I replaced it with a MacBook Pro. It is a far superior laptop and a much more enjoyable computing experience. It's fun! I run Windows XP and Ubuntu Linux as virtual machines in Parallels. Windows application, especially Photoshop Elements, seem to run much better in the Windows XP Virtual Machine than it did on my old 2 GHz Thinkpad. Good luck.

  261. Re:And then Bush goes and kills thousends of peopl by tjstork · · Score: 1

    And somehow that makes the US system better

    The US system is better. People wrote that Putin was a murderer for Chechnya. One by one, as all of them were squeezed out of business, assasinated, or other otherwise silenced. You may not agree with the invasion, but, at least you can criticize it and even take action to a point, to undermine the US military effort there. In most other countries, you could be assasinated as a traitor for even coming out against a war that nation is fighting, wheras in America, all you have is people calling you names but with really no other consequence to you. I'd say that's a freer system.

    --
    This is my sig.
  262. Social Experiment by kramulous · · Score: 1

    American beer is the worst in the world and I'd prefer to drink cat's piss.

    Test why your argument fails. Let modding commence.

    --
    .
  263. do what? by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

    you realize,  your logic is the same as "I can't bear to buy American because the American government invaded Iraq".

  264. The entire premise is off-base by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy smokes. "Lenovo" as a Chinese company... that doesn't even mean anything anymore. It'd be like declaring McDonalds as an American company. It sounds nice, but it just ain't true. All multi-nat companies are now GLOBAL companies. They have money and workers all over the world. Intel is migrating more and more design and manufacturing work to India and China. Does that mean you'll gladly go buy Intel products just because the company is still traded on the NY stock exchange?

    Anyhow, the ThinkPad is still entirely the same product as it was in years past. The ThinkPad design team is still in Japan. The factory is still in China. The management and planning teams are still in the US. What's different is that the HQ is no longer in NY (it's in NC), and the company is traded on the Hong Kong exchange instead of as a part of IBM. Basically the ONLY thing is totally Chinese about Lenovo is the Consumer business, and the hand-held business. But for now, those products are only sold in China.

    So if you buy a ThinkPad you're supporting the exact same engineers who designed the products 10 years ago. And the profit that is earned goes to pay their salaries, and to re-invest in the development budget for those same engineers to design the next generation of ThinkPads.

  265. What's the consensus? ? ? by LostInTaiwan · · Score: 1

    Um, what's the consensus? I'm still using my "Made in Mexico" T23 and I need a replacement. . . . Lenovo and anything "assembled in China" is not an option. I'm realist and I do my best to void things made or assembled in China. Some interior parts may be made in China, but that's something I will have to live with. What can I buy these days with SXGA or better screen and a trackpoint that runs Linux? BTW, ASUS is great in that quite a few of them are still being made in Taiwan but none of them have trackpoints. Regardless of whatever crap the Chinese government wants to say about Taiwan, unless they can fly their five star flag over Taiwan and install a puppet government like Hong Kong, Taiwan is still a democratic country and is NOT a part of China. C'mon people. USA is not exactly the model democracy under GW Bush, but is is still a long way to becoming a single party government where people can't vote, can't voice their oppositions, government regulates reincarnation, and government banned the voting part of American Idol because it may give its audience the wrong ideas. . . . I'm a registered Republican, but I want to see GW Bush impeached and I never thought I will miss President Clinton. . . enough politics. . . What's the consensus on non-assembled in China, non-Lenovo Thinkpad replacement?

  266. The unquotable encyclopedia anyone can edit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first line of the text you linked to reads, "The neutrality and factual accuracy of this section are disputed."

    Um, no it doesn't. :)

  267. No difference by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

    The IBM/Lenovo deal was just a ploy to offload some debt to another company and get better access to Chinese markets. For the most part, Lenovo bigshots are same IBMers that were there before.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK