Fine, telcos aren't public utilities. When can the public expect all the back rent to be paid for allowing the telcos to lay lines all over the public's property?
ESPN2's replacement programming (college basketball, mostly) has on average been getting double the ratings of an average NHL game. Good riddance, I say.
Recently, he blamed the intelligence failures on President Bush while the senate committed determined in a bipartisan manner that the failures had nothing to do with the president, and everything to do with practices at the CIA.
That's because the report that examines the White House's part in the intelligence mess isn't due until after the election. Convenient, that.
The original post by Ho-Lee-Cow called for the catalog bombing treatment, previously reserved for spammers but which is has now expanded to people who do things that we don't like, apparently. I think that goes a little above and beyond the few thousand angry phone calls, don't you?
If the above is true, why are they only unwilling to hire SCO employees who worked there after May 2003? Certainly employees who worked there before that date were tainted with SCO's IP.
Face facts, this is purely a political statement by chrisd's company and has nothing to do with a fear of being sued by McBride & co.
That's not the problem. The problem is they certainly looked at your resume to determine that you worked at SCO after May 2003. They said they would immediately delete any resumes that had such employment history. That is illegal under state law.
This has got to be the worst Ask Slashdot ever. Next in the series will be "Do We Still Need To Walk?", "Do We Still Need Procreation?" and "Do We Still Need Water?"
Right...as if they couldn't find thousands of more qualified choices who actually work with real, honest-to-god privacy advocacy groups....
...whose foam-mouthed zealotry would instantly get him and his office ignored and marginalized in the halls of power, if the parent poster is of any indication.
I think the parent poster's point was there might possibly be a more environmentally friendly way to protest the SUV than dropping them out of a gas guzzling airplane. Taking your argument and beating it into the ground, it's akin to protesting starvation by holding a hot dog eating contest at the local country club.
Also in my experience, sarcastic ad hominem attacks are the last vestiges of a defeated argument.
I weep for the moderators who believe everything they read on the internet, especially posting anonymously. If you are truly involved in something so ridiculously Orwellian, why don't you throw your job to the wind and post logged in?
that slashdotters can't see that every silver lining has a gray cloud. I imagine in a story "Bill Gates Donates Kidney to Complete Stranger," you'll have a dozen posters saying that "M$" will go to any lengths to keep people from migrating to Windows.
Slashdot Mirror
Fine, telcos aren't public utilities. When can the public expect all the back rent to be paid for allowing the telcos to lay lines all over the public's property?
ESPN2's replacement programming (college basketball, mostly) has on average been getting double the ratings of an average NHL game. Good riddance, I say.
TECMO bowl had a license from the NFL Player Association, but not from the NFL.
That's because the report that examines the White House's part in the intelligence mess isn't due until after the election. Convenient, that.
Sounds familiar, I seem to remember someone else saying that...
Sir, how dare you throw cold water on my uninformed paranoia with your undeniable common sense.
The original post by Ho-Lee-Cow called for the catalog bombing treatment, previously reserved for spammers but which is has now expanded to people who do things that we don't like, apparently. I think that goes a little above and beyond the few thousand angry phone calls, don't you?
And have you catalog-bombed him, as Ho-Lee-Cow! suggested in his post?
I wonder how long your sophistry will hold up in a court of law. Have you called his honor yet?
Yes, harassing an officer of the court is well looked upon by federal authorities. No thanks.
You do realize if you toss resumes with SCO on them instead of keeping them on file, you're likely violating California law, right?
Face facts, this is purely a political statement by chrisd's company and has nothing to do with a fear of being sued by McBride & co.
That's not the problem. The problem is they certainly looked at your resume to determine that you worked at SCO after May 2003. They said they would immediately delete any resumes that had such employment history. That is illegal under state law.
This has got to be the worst Ask Slashdot ever. Next in the series will be "Do We Still Need To Walk?", "Do We Still Need Procreation?" and "Do We Still Need Water?"
Just for the rich. How many rich chimps do you know?
When they get a solution to that, I hope they let California in on the secret.
What a piece of junk!
They send the DVD in a sleeve, not the case, and you get a business reply envelope to return the DVD through the US post office.
once a year is one time too many. I have better ways to spend my time. Is there a webcast of paint drying somewhere I could watch instead?
Let's run an experiment to see if not-very-subliminal advertising works on the moderators.
Also in my experience, sarcastic ad hominem attacks are the last vestiges of a defeated argument.
Way to plagiarize ESPN.com's Tuesday Morning Quarterback. The football gods will not look kindly upon you.
I weep for the moderators who believe everything they read on the internet, especially posting anonymously. If you are truly involved in something so ridiculously Orwellian, why don't you throw your job to the wind and post logged in?
that slashdotters can't see that every silver lining has a gray cloud. I imagine in a story "Bill Gates Donates Kidney to Complete Stranger," you'll have a dozen posters saying that "M$" will go to any lengths to keep people from migrating to Windows.