Slashdot Mirror


SBC-Yahoo Partnership Cuts User Privacy

simeonbeta2 writes "The San Francisco Chronicle is running a story about Pac Bell's dsl partnership with Yahoo. Initially touted as a new service, Pac Bell is apparently now mailing existing dsl customers to urge them to install additional client software that will enable 'incredible new features and services'. While SBC's privacy policy is not excessively intrusive, use of the new software is covered by Yahoo's privacy policy, which is just a bit more Orwellian." The story's a little overblown - Yahoo's privacy policy reads that way because they offer financial services and the like, where they may well need financial information from you to provide the service. The reporter needed to investigate this new software DSL users are being asked to install, and find out what sort of user tracking it enables.

217 comments

  1. What a surprise! by unterderbrucke · · Score: 2

    Less privacy?
    Hasn't that been happening as revenue (def. not profits) collapse for shitty free sites like Yahoo?

    1. Re:What a surprise! by gabec · · Score: 1, Redundant
      The story's a little overblown

      Then why report it on slashdot? Surely there's more interesting things to talk about...

    2. Re:What a surprise! by nogoodmonkey · · Score: 2

      no, its just a slow day. when there is a post on getting a piano into the amazon, you know they are accepting anything. i sent in a picture of the mole i have on my big toe, maybe it will make the front page. ;-)

      yeah, i know this is off topic, but its up to the users of the dsl service (which i will be a user of SBC dsl in about a week) to read the policies of the company. i opted for the self install kit so that no technicians are installing anything on my computer. plus i will be passing through either a linksys or netgear firewall.

    3. Re:What a surprise! by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "...its up to the users of the dsl service...[]...to read the policies of the company."

      Uh, not exactly. I have had SBC DSL for just over a year now, previously it was speakeasy - before that northpoint/covad.

      I moved to PacBell DSL when they installed a CO across the street from my house, and they offered higher speeds off their new equipment than whatever speakeasy DSL equipment my line was previously provisioned on....

      anyway - I also happen to have and use a yahoo email account. I have had this email account since 1996 or 1997.

      I am now seeing a redirection to a FULL SCREEN advertisment from SBC & Yahoo when I log into my account from my home machine.

      Basically they check the IP thats logging into the yahoo account - and if its an SBC provisioned IP - they first redirect you to this AD. It sucks.

      Yes you can close the AD pretty quickly, but its still bugs me for many many reasons here are some:

      1) I never signed up for Yahoo/SBC DSL. So I dont want the ads that people who signed up for this package are subjected to. *Especially* since they signed up at a lower rate than I pay because of the promotion. If they are going to show me these ADs I should pay the same as the Yahoo/SBC DSL subscribers.

      2) My account on both SBC/PacBell DSL and Yahoo Mail PREDATES any of these policies - and in some cases predates the *existance* of SBC-PacBell as a merged company. I agreed to certain things when i signed up years ago for Yahoo, but apparently since the laws are so fucked up - if you agree to a contract these days - you also agree that the other party can make any changes, any time for any reason to any part of the contract you agree to - and you are not required to re-examine any terms and re-agree to anything. That's bull shit.

      3) There is no switch for me to turn this option off - I wasnt asked if I wanted it - I cant "opt-out". The way I feel is that I should show up to their offices and hit them in the face with a shovel. They didnt opt-out of the shovel in the face program I run.

      4) It is pretty much fact that this type of forced marketing doesnt work too well. Show me any users who actually read the ad - and show me the click-through numbers on these ads. Show me the *actual* conversion ratio. I'd bet its not even enough to make the whole effort worth while.

      Basically, I would like to see the Yahoo agreement I entered into way back in 1997. I also want to see the SBC agreement I entered from last year - and I want to see if they allow for this sort of thing. I doubt that in '97 the agreement I actually clicked "I Agree" on says that I agree to bend over and get fucked in the ass by any affilate Yahoo ever decides to every do any sort of marketing arangement with.

      so its not as simple as saying "its up to the user to read the policies that they agree to with any company"

    4. Re:What a surprise! by nogoodmonkey · · Score: 2

      to get it out of the way: use mozilla or opera. that popup will be nonexistant and your webmail will work just like it did in internet explorer.

      also, i am just getting it for the connectivity. i already have an email account at hotmail so ads on yahoo.com (which i still get even though im not a sbc/yahoodsl customer yet) do not bother me. i just choose not to use yahoo's website. at one time, it was a great website. their time is past though.

      i agree that changing a contract without notification or agreement is not right. but if they put a clause in that said that they would notify you, they could just change it right away and say that they didnt have to notify you anymore. most companies are still curtious enough to send emails out that it changed though. then you can stop using the service if you do not agree with it.

      the agreements that most companies use are usually very interesting. for example, msn can use any data you submit to any msn website (message boards, hotmail, etc) in advertising, publushing, documentation. they dont have to give you credit, and they can change any part of the text/image. they recently changed it to remove that they own the data. probably protects them from liability. joe emails himself the source for decss. microsoft owns the source to decss. got em! ;-)

    5. Re:What a surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They give you the network settings...you don't even need to login to the web page, nor have thier software installed...even works on linux (though they claim they don't support it ), so instead of posting to slashdot bitching about this, take 5 mins to uninstall the software, set ur network connection up, and be done with it..

    6. Re:What a surprise! by termigator · · Score: 1
      to get it out of the way: use mozilla or opera. that popup will be nonexistant and your webmail will work just like it did in internet explorer.

      Plus, you can define your own auto-proxy configuration file that blocks ad URLs. Therefore, when Yahoo changed there mail interface awhile back to be more "ad friendly", it did not really affect me. Though, I did get larger blank areas where big-assed ads should be.

      BTW, for mozilla, the auto-proxy can redirect to a non-exist host:port to quietly drop ads in case you are unable to run a server to absorb ad proxy redirects. This works for my mother's PC where I did not want to mess with running a web/proxy server on.

    7. Re:What a surprise! by Gooba42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We just in the past couple of months switched from AT&T cable to Pacbell DSL which within a month was saying we had to fill out their forms re: Yahoo and this wasn't such an issue. What bothers me is I've already done the Yahoo thing and they're still sending mail to our house advertising this crap.

      Worse yet, we just recently had our router up and die and I didn't have the password handy so I called their tech support. Part of the reason we switched to the DSL service was because they were "router friendly" and would let my household all connect without freaking out and wanting $10/head or what-have-you. In this latest call I asked the guy what the password was, mentioned that it was so I could put the data into the new router. As soon as I said the word "router" he told us flatly "we don't support routers, you'll have to talk to your router manufacturer". A previous tech support guy had even suggested what brand of router to buy and now *this* guy stonewalls a question about account information because I said the word "router".

      If they change policy's they could at least be courteous about it. Better yet their "free self nistall" cost $500 for "line checks". Now we forfeit $500 if we want to back out and sign up with someone who won't pull this crap.

      --
      I just found out there's no such thing as the real world. It's just a lie you've got to rise above. - John Mayer
    8. Re:What a surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand that you are upset about the new happenings going on with sbc yahoo I only have one question for you....Did you read the contract and liscence agreement, I really doubt it

    9. Re:What a surprise! by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      Its not a popup. Its a URL redirect. when you *log in* to yahoo mail from a pacbell/SBC *IP* it redirects you to this ad prior to forwarding you onto your inbox in the same window....

    10. Re:What a surprise! by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      try reading the whole post that you are replying to before actually posting....

      You will see that the time that I read the agreement ('97 for Yahoo and late 2000 for pacbell) they would not have mentioned this...

  2. HOLY CRAP!! by Stigmata669 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Big companies still don't care about your rights!

    --
    Yawn.
    1. Re:HOLY CRAP!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't like to think of crap as holy, per se.. merely an object of affection, in some cases. good effort tho!

      this insightful observation was brought you by p00p. Pumpin' nasty funk outt tha butt since the late 70's!

    2. Re:HOLY CRAP!! by neurostar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Big companies still don't care about your rights!

      Nevermind that!

      A /. editor actually researched a story!

    3. Re:HOLY CRAP!! by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Of course they do. Any right you have they might be able to sell back to you.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:HOLY CRAP!! by ryochiji · · Score: 2
      > Big companies still don't care about your rights!

      Yeah, I don't see what the big deal is either. Especially for the slashdot crowd... I mean, everybody here should know that when an ISP sends you a "new and improved" version with "amazing new features," installing it is the last thing you want to do.

  3. Well... by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does this herald the end of an era? Hardly...

    Is it even news?

    --
    Fuck it
    1. Re:Well... by SkewlD00d · · Score: 2

      Maybe SBC is trying to sabotage DSL and other low-cost broadband "solutions?"

      --
      The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
    2. Re:Well... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      No, they are just greedy and tryying to make more money. I'm sure if you install their software it will make you some kind of personalised homepage that will be chock full of ads. I'm sure it also does things like collect data on your surfing habits and then they can sell the results of that.

      Basically, SBC isn't content just being a wire provider and getting paid for that, they want to be like AOL and use information on their users to make more money.

  4. They can install all the software that they like.. by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny

    On my Commodore Amiga.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  5. My question is does anyone have SDSL? by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2

    Symetric DSL is said to be available on the SBC site but it is apparently rolled out nowhere. My only alternative is to get a T-1 which is about 450 more a month.

    I cannot believe it's taking this freaking long to get decent service and access to the internet.

    1. Re:My question is does anyone have SDSL? by SkewlD00d · · Score: 2

      I had 784k SDSL through Northpoint for $60/mnth. Now 784k SDSL is ~$200/mnth. Shit, for $1000/mnth you get a whole T-1 and "business-priority" support. SDSL supposedly has "best-effort" service, that means "whenever we choose to not 'upgrade' our damn switches." Telocity (DirecTVDSL) seems to be a better ISP than most, PacHell (SBC) are a bunch of morons.

      --
      The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
    2. Re:My question is does anyone have SDSL? by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2

      I pay $80/mo for my Business Class DSL (1 year contract) and I only get 1.5M down and 128K up. Although I do get static IP's which makes life easier.

      They advertise SDSL for around 280/month for 1.5/Up and Down. But it's never going to be available is what the rep I talked to said. You can get a T-1 (on a 3 year contract) for 815 installed and 715/month. Not too bad but still worse than 280/month.

    3. Re:My question is does anyone have SDSL? by SkewlD00d · · Score: 2

      What about a fractional T-1 or frame relay (leased line)?

      --
      The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
    4. Re:My question is does anyone have SDSL? by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      "Telocity (DirecTVDSL) seems to be a better ISP than most
      Thisseems to negate that option.

    5. Re:My question is does anyone have SDSL? by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      I have covad sdsl 768 via megapath. I was a long time pac bell dsl customer but the 45 min wait times for support got really annoying. Megapath answers the phone quickly and has covad standing by in less than 5 mins usually. My speed is rock solid but it is more expensive.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    6. Re:My question is does anyone have SDSL? by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2

      It costs around 90% of a T-1 for fractional at 384k both ways. (I tried)

    7. Re:My question is does anyone have SDSL? by SkewlD00d · · Score: 2

      Sounds like you're better off getting a bunch of neighbors in on splitting a T-1. T-1 + solar cells + WiFi + top of a telephone pole?

      --
      The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
  6. Install Software??? by 1stflight · · Score: 2

    Wait a sec I run Linux with RASPPPOE, how am I supposed to install the software? :)

    Yeah install it where the sun don't shine SBC

    1. Re:Install Software??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Isn't RASPPPOE Windows only? Anyways I've been getting bombarded with Yahoo/SBC emails urging me to go and download this new Yahoo software, but at least one SBC email stated the Yahoo software wasn't required for ADSL, obviously, so only idiots are going to go and download this shit. Besides my line is hooked into my FreeBSD machine running NAT and built in kernel support for PPPOE (*cough*can Linux do that yet?*cough*). So Yahoo can keep the spyware, and if SBC wants to force the issue I will just get a cable connection instead.

    2. Re:Install Software??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and I got the static IP's when they offered them (business dsl). I don't know if they offer it anymore or not.

      NO NEED for pppoe and I've got some nice static IP's to use as SERVERS.

      guess I won't even be bothered with all of this.

  7. Modems... by EverStoned · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I haven't even touched the CD that came with my cable modem, thank you very much. It's full of that transfer monitering crap - isn't it?

    Comcast...grumble...

    1. Re:Modems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      no -- they can watch everything you do without
      you installing special software. The other end
      of your cable modem hooks right into their headend
      servers. If they wanted to, it's simple to watch
      the traffic there. Nothing you can do about it.

    2. Re:Modems... by EverStoned · · Score: 1

      Oh well. "Why wait till 1984? You can panic now, and avoid the rush." ~Gil Scott Heron

    3. Re:Modems... by Life2Short · · Score: 1

      I signed up with PacBell about 4 years ago. They stuck me with a crappy USB DSL modem, and crappy software to go along with it. Since I had a roomate who wanted to share internet access, I had to start from scratch. After wrestling quite unsuccessfully with software solutions for Wintel machines, I went out and bought a "real" (ethernet) DSL modem, rewired the pins on the DSL wall box, and bought a Linksys switch with built-in hub. The USB modem and PacBell software went into the closet never to be seen again. Even PacBell support people would tell me their software was pretty crappy, and that 3rd party alternatives were better.

    4. Re:Modems... by UnixRevolution · · Score: 1

      Same here. I use a Router, so if comcast wants to install something to my router, and if they can figure out how to do it, they can go on ahead :)

      --
      You like your new Mac more than you like me, don't you, Dave? Dave? I asked...She said Yes.
    5. Re:Modems... by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 1

      A Linksys switch with built in hub? I hope you meant a Linksys router with built in hub! ;o)

      I used to use SBC PacBell, just linked the *ethernet* modem to my Linux box and away I went using RP PPPOE, which SBC Support actually recommend!

      I've since moved to AT&T cable and now get consistent 1.4Mbps/240Kbps instead of the maximum 1.2Mbps/100Kbp with PacBell.

      When the Cable Guy came with his software I made sure I had a Windows box ready and formatted the drive back to Linux as soon as he went out the door!

      --
      #include <sig.h>
    6. Re:Modems... by netringer · · Score: 1
      I signed up with PacBell about 4 years ago. They stuck me with a crappy USB DSL modem, and crappy software to go along with it.
      You could have just called up and asked for the ethernet version of the DSL modem and shipped the USB version back. That's what I did. I guess that was too easy.

      Mine now goes to a NetGear firewall/switch/router that does the PPPOe, DHCP, and all.

      As a warning to others, when you call to order DSL don'tlet the words PC or USB leave your lips. Tell them your have ETHERNET and the drone^H^H^H^H^H rep will select that DSL modem for you in the first place.
      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
  8. I went through the same thing... by twilightzero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    when Prodigy was bought out by SBC. They went on and on about no changes, same service, etc. Then I started getting almost weekly mails with cd's in nice bright colorful cases urging me to install my new SBC Yahoo! Dial software to enable new worlds of features! Of course I didn't because I just kept my Prodigy account around for the old email address and never dialed in, so what was the point of installing new software?

    Finally they started bombarding me with emails that extolled the virtues of the new software. My guess is when you install it then it checks you off on the master list on the server that you installed it, nevermind if you never needed to or didn't care at all. Finally after trying to register on the web site and failing miserably, I just called and cancelled the account. And ya know what? My spam amount is down 95% since then ;) There's something to be said for smaller ISP's...

    --

    "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    1. Re:I went through the same thing... by PetiePooo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone remember rocketmail? I had a great email address on rocketmail about a decade ago. Yahoo bought them out, and urged everyone to switch. I didn't.. until they forced it. One day I logged in and my rocketmail account was just a profile under my Yahoo account. They said I could receive mail on it, but it would just be forwarded to my Yahoo mail. Grrr!

      I still use Yahoo, but had to compromise on my email handle since the one that I had in rocketmail was already taken. Now, I'm going to start using my own domain for email. They make a good portal, but they're rather obtrusive. And they haven't learned yet how annoying popups are to their users...

    2. Re:I went through the same thing... by Apathy+costs+bills · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "There's something to be said for smaller ISP's..."

      Yes, and I will say it. Smaller ISPs are wonderful, except they always get bought out by large ISPs, and then you get screwed. It's happened to me three times. Now there are no local ISPs left in my area.

      --
      Kill Trolls Dead. Here's
    3. Re:I went through the same thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just called and cancelled the account. And ya know what? My spam amount is down 95% since then ;) There's something to be said for smaller ISP's...

      Maybe your spam went away because you stopped checking the email address you have pasted all over the intarweb?

    4. Re:I went through the same thing... by twilightzero · · Score: 1

      Nope, all of the other email addresses I have (including the one I use on here) receive hardly any spam. Altogether I might get 2-4 pieces a day, as opposed to my Prodigy account that was up to 95+ spam per day.

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    5. Re:I went through the same thing... by kevcol · · Score: 2

      Yep- same here, that process was hilarious. I got the Prodigy acct last spring on a $9.95 deal and then a month or 2 later the SBC/Ya-Poo snail mail spam started. I ignored the mess and finally opened one of the missives. I never even logged into my prodigy email account until then and when I did it was nothing but crap about how GREAT the New Internet was going to be with SBC/Ya-Poo. I actually did install what I thought was one piece of the s/w on my windows system (the Y! messenger) and instead it loaded some lame browser and hijacked a bunch of settings. I then realized that eventually I would not be able to dial into the account on my Linux systems much longer so I cancelled too. I told the guy that 'The Internet I was using was just fine, thank you very much, I don't need marketing drones at SBC deciding what I needed to see.

      Also about SBC, it looks like they are finalizing the take over of PacBell's identity. PacBell Park in SF will change to SBC Park and they are running these ads on TV about how you can trust SBC when the chips are down because they are the ones that actually repair the lines when they go down in a storm. Oh, and don't bother switching to the other phone companies for service, since they do not. Bastards.

    6. Re:I went through the same thing... by indiigo · · Score: 2

      yep... free e-mail for life. I went from them to usa.net, who also proclaimed the same thing, and then they started charging. Now I'm on spamcop, and I pay, but it's 100% worth it!

      --
      fslg503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-86 8650 3-985-fdsg8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-9
    7. Re:I went through the same thing... by fermion · · Score: 1

      Or they get screwed by the upstreanm provider in the case of service outages. In my experience, the smaller ISPs never could negotiate appropriate uptime agreements.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    8. Re:I went through the same thing... by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      There are no less then 3 loacly-owneb-and-operated ISPs where I live, and I work for one of them. Since the one I work for does not offer DSL, I have it through one of the others. I've talked to the sysadmin at that ISP a few times, very cool guy. As to SBC.... They can kiss my fuzzy white ass. At work, we use them to provide the DSL lines to run our wireless service on, and they break one of the lines every few months. At least the tech support people there are reasonable about giving me IPs when I call with out making me do any useless crap.

    9. Re:I went through the same thing... by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      try softhome.net. they rock, but I'm not sure how they manage to stay in business.

    10. Re:I went through the same thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Anyone remember rocketmail"

      Yep, still using it.

      "I had a great email address on rocketmail about a decade ago. Yahoo bought them out, and urged everyone to switch. I didn't.. until they forced it. One day I logged in and my rocketmail account was just a profile under my Yahoo account. They said I could receive mail on it, but it would just be forwarded to my Yahoo mail. Grrr!

      Eh? I may log onto yahoo.com, but my address is still @rocketmail.com. Whats the problem again? you want it to say `rocketmail` at the top of the page,instead of `yahoo`? Why? What functionality have you lost?

      "I still use Yahoo, but had to compromise on my email handle since the one that I had in rocketmail was already taken. "

      I still have my rocketmail handle. I just have to type .rm at the end of my username when i log on. As far as my contacts are concerned, i never changed my address. I`ve had the account for 6 years, sent thousands of emails, never paid a cent. And i've had ad-blocking software so i don't see banners. And i have intelligent filters, so i only get email from people who i want to receive email from.

      Either you're doing something wrong, or you have to quit whining and pay for a proper email account.

  9. No Linux Client by zrodney · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I got a flyer in the mail from SBC/Pacbell/Yahoo about
    this new service. I have dsl via pppoe on a linux
    box running as a vpn router, and I use mozilla/phoenix
    as my browser.

    I tried going to the web page on the flyer, but it
    just doesn't do anything.

    I wonder what happens if I never sign up for this
    yahoo service? Guess we'll see eventually.

    1. Re:No Linux Client by twilightzero · · Score: 1

      See previous post - they just annoy the HELL out of you til you either install it or cancel the account ;) I tried to do it in Mozilla also, same result, too bad, so sad, I cancelled =)

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    2. Re:No Linux Client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what happens if I never sign up for this yahoo service?

      I can tell you one thing; they refuse to give you any tech support unless the software is installed. I'm having about 40% packet loss (not a local problem, but somewhere upstream at SBIS) and their tech support refused to help at all until I installed their software.

    3. Re:No Linux Client by zrodney · · Score: 2

      that's true -- once things are working there's no
      problem for the most part. In fact, I've gotten
      the tech support people to understand that if the
      little blinky light on the adsl modem is always
      flashing, then it's their problem. It just takes
      some understanding about the life of a phone tech
      support person, and how to have them actually help.

      Sometimes, you might have to "pretend" that the
      software is installed. They really can't tell
      either way, and you will eventually get to talk to
      a higher level of support when they give up.

    4. Re:No Linux Client by rela · · Score: 1
      Sometimes, you might have to "pretend" that the software is installed.

      As a first-level tech for a company in a different line of business, I'd just like to point out that I hate it when people do this. If you don't level with me as to what is REALLY going on, how the hell am I supposed to help?

      I understand your point; some of the people I work with ARE clueless. But all too often I find myself with callers that think they know it all and won't let me lead the call. Even people that ARE clued in do this, and it's a bad idea. 95% of the time when people do this, it takes 5 times as much time to solve the problem because I have to argue them into listening to me.

      The other 5%, when I know it's over my head, I don't act like I do know, and send it up to second tier. So people, remember, next time you call a phone shop, remember there's other people on the end of that line and give them the benefit of the doubt for at least two minutes or so.

      End of rant.

    5. Re:No Linux Client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an account-merge page out there, though you may have to dig for it. IIRC, trying to login to mail.yahoo.com with "user@[sbc-owned-domain].net" as your username will also get you there- and it has to be performed for all sub-accounts, anyway, if you have multiple mail accounts.

      Once you convert, you can use http://sbc.yahoo.com as your home page, which gives you access to some of the "free features" - the 'briefcase,' webmail access to your mail account (also doable through mail.yahoo.com, of course), and there's probably a web interface to upload files to your webspace, though I've yet to find it.

      DSLReports' forums have some SBC-types lurking who can explain what's going on, at least. Basically, if you merge and don't install any software, you just get the benefit of national dialup for traveling, and maybe some slightly more stable mailservers.

    6. Re:No Linux Client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      First of all, you have my condolences. Tech support sucks all too often from either end of the discussion. Been there, done that.

      When I'm making a call to tech support, the last three calls being spread over as many years to my ISP, I work at going above and beyond my usual level of patience and good-naturedness largely because I know that whomever handles my call will have already had their share of people who weren't. However, I'd like to point out that in my experience levelling with my provider has given less than stellar results. It's always my first approach because there's no better way to diagnose a problem than when you're getting the truth, and every time they've used an irrelevant detail I've given them to explain away the problem without pestering somebody who knows at the company (the occasional dropped Ethernet packet does not to the best of my knowledge indicate hardware failure, I'd be willing to bet that a ping or a traceroute from a Linux box is just as good as from a Windows box, and I'm pretty sure the policy of the company does not state that their router should prevent any connectivity whatsoever between their customers' machines).

      It's never antagonistic, to be sure, but the first call always ends up where they're telling me something intended to sound helpful but intended to get me off the line, and I'm polite enough to agree and hang up. Then I work on confirming my hunch on where the problem is and a potential solution before I call again. I immediately let them know that this is a second call on the same problem and that I have additional information, then spend the next ten or twenty minutes flooding them with it (the last time required an explanation of Internet routing fundamentals and how RIP fits into the equation).

      Without fail, this information goes into a record sent at my request to the folks who set things up and gets me a phone call by the end of the day from a fellow in the local area who knows his shit inside and out. He confirms the starting tenth of the information in the file and goes "Yeah, I'm seeing what you're talking about, no problem, we'll get that fixed up by tomorrow." and then we end up discussing their setup and the latest computer game du jour. And, indeed, it's fixed by tomorrow.

      I can't think of anywhere in my scenario where lying or leaving out things would actually help the process, and I agree that in general it's a horrible idea, but as bad as a system like this is for clued people (or people skilled in shovelling BS, take your pick) it's a complete stonewall for the average user that just wants to browse the web and get their e-mail. And I consider my ISP to have one of the better non-fee customer service departments out there -- nevermind the ones that'd tell Grandma to reinstall Windows when she can't get her e-mail. You can see where such a system can reduce one to duplicity.

  10. Huh?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried to install their new software, but when I tried to double click the .exe in Nautilus it wouldn't work! hmmmm...

  11. I got some of those emails by cheezedawg · · Score: 1

    They are wanting you to "upgrade" to this new great service, but they make it clear that your email address, mothly price, connection speed, and support stay the same. I was confused how they could consider that an upgrade.

    --
    "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
  12. reporters research? by CrazyDwarf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since when are reporters supposed to actually research something before writing their opinions, er... articles?

    --
    It's easy to stand out when the general level of competence is so low.
    1. Re:reporters research? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since we have the editor's opinions right at the end of the article! Just like the MTV "Think like we think" blitz.

      I think the article is overblown and the reporter needs to investigate....

      Why can't they post their opinions like everyone else? Ego? You would think First Post would be enough for anyone.

    2. Re:reporters research? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er... This was written by a COLUMNIST. He's paid to express an opinion.

  13. Well I guess you'd better do what they say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? You're not sure? You don't want to be labelled a terrorist, do you?

    I bet you even have that dangerous 802.11b equipment, don't you?

  14. Don't need it. by dirvish · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have SBC DSL and haven't installed any of their software. I am just using a Lynksys router. I would never install any of their software.

    1. Re:Don't need it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to install their software for them to take a big steaming dump on your privacy.

      whois -h whois.arin.net your.sbc.ip.address.

      .. and you'll see your name and account id smiling back at you.

    2. Re:Don't need it. by joedavis123 · · Score: 1

      I also have DSL through SBC (Pacbell). I have had it since it became available in my area a few years ago (northern cali). Since SBC started working with Yahoo I have only gotten one piece of mail from them, just giving instructions on how to switch over my mail to Yahoo. Since I haven't had access to my primary mailbox in about 1-2 years, I jumped on it quickly. Was able to chat with someone online to help me get my password reset and access all my mailboxes again in about 10 minutes. So far I am happy with the partnership, it has definitely helped out customers (atleast SBC ones) in respect to e-mail support and such. Pacbell/SBC was always horrible at supporting that side of the business. Now if I start getting SBC/Yahoo discs in the mail then that will be another story - I guess I might have to add them to my Wall O' AOL.

    3. Re:Don't need it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't call for support. They won't help you unless you are running a supported platform and their supported software.

    4. Re:Don't need it. by zrodney · · Score: 2

      hmm. this is one time I'm happy that I use the
      dynamic ip service from them. All it says back
      is that the ip is from a dynamic pool.

      Of course, you also need to use dynamic dns to
      have a server reachable from outside, but thats
      free.

      [whois.arin.net]
      Pac Bell Internet Services PBI-NET-8
      64.160.0.0 - 64.175.255.255
      PPPoX Pool - rback29 SBCIS-10137-15141
      64.173.40.0 - 64.173.43.255

      # ARIN Whois database, last updated 2002-12-12 20:00

      The lameness filter tells me to use fewer junk
      characters here. Not very helpful.

    5. Re:Don't need it. by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      They will if you know what you want. I have to call them at work a lot, they are morons, but will resopond nicely to "Can I please have the IP information for this line?". They still suck though :P

  15. This is just my opinion... by craenor · · Score: 2

    But for the most part, privacy online is what you make of it. Essentially, you are the controller of your online privacy. You let out as much info as you choose too. Don't want your shopping habits shared with some marketing weenie...don't shop online.

    Craenor

    1. Re:This is just my opinion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderators: don't waste karma modding this lame-ass post up. He's just building upon the comments aside his own post. (Probably saving the karma for the Score:1 postings and the occasional jewel AC post). Personally, I suspect most Karma whoring here is done to build up points for troll-building. Because of the filtering Slashdot attempts to use to PREVENT this, it has the net effect of NEVER selecting capped karma faggots like "Craenor" (I post 2x a week and that's not enough stupidity to get knocked off my Karma cap).

    2. Re:This is just my opinion... by craenor · · Score: 2

      If I wanted to flame someone...or just in general be rude. Why bother trying to build my karma to accomplish that. I can just flame anonymously...like you.

  16. That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot knows I'm a troll and discriminates against me because of it. how do they know that and why is my privacy and right to upwardly mobile moderation being trampled upon?

  17. One of their privacy invading UNIX tools. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of their privacy invading UNIX tools is openDK(). The only thing it is good for is a takedown of your privacy.

  18. FUD...as susual by BubbaTheBarbarian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Great...so all a writer has to do to make a name for itself in the geek community is yell "LOSS OF PRIVACY! and they come running to see what it is and defending the piece. I just wish it was not so easy, but it is.
    Seriously folk, some measures to protect privacy need to be taken, but every single time you read about this on /. it is like someone taking a knife to a guys balls. Nice to see the write up saw that called the SFC out on it. I wish more were like him and took an honest look at internet use and how we need to balance out the commerce uses with it's awesome ability to share info.
    Please flame me. I am in a bad enough mood without having to put up with the "Everything should be free!!!!" rants. If yahoo is using a EULA to protect privacy for my stock transactions, then I like it. If they are using the EULA to track to my surfing habits (like every other ISP does not or cannot already) then to hell with them and hope they enjoyed sexwithrats.com.
    War having a brain.

  19. New software by Dylan_t_p · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was to be a sbc dsl user about a year ago, and I recently went to help my friend mike set up his dsl with sbc/Yahoo! while there is more software than the enternet 300 program that I had to load (now you have enternet 300 AND the connection manager) no biggie though becuase it all hides down in your task bar or system tray depending on how you set it up.

    I don't think it's a real big "invasion of privacy" or even a major privacy cut for that matter I still use sbc/yahoo! dial-up and I have no complaint about it at all the only thing that they really want you to install for "added features" is the yahoo browser which hey if you can put up with msn explorer you can live with installing the yahoo browser

    1. Re:New software by Dylan_t_p · · Score: 0, Redundant

      wow wonderful typo there "i was to be" should have been I used to be..........and I even hit preview and missed that one GOOD GOING MAN!

    2. Re:New software by twilightzero · · Score: 1

      What if I can't stand either MSN Exploder *OR* the Yahoo browser? And what if I'm running Linux? And what if I already use Mozilla and can't get to the website to register even on my Win98 partition because I used 98lite to rip out IE?

      It's not a major invasion of privacy, just an annoying pain in the ass as they constantly harrass you to install it when you don't want to/can't/whatever.

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    3. Re:New software by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2

      I don't think it's a real big "invasion of privacy" or even a major privacy cut for that matter I still use sbc/yahoo! dial-up

      Maybe you aren't seeing past what software is installed on your system. On the server-side, they can track you in many ways. Plus, they have your credit card information (which must be accurate) so it's all tied back to a real person! With an email address and a mailing address... and a social security number, driver's license #, and hordes of other information associated with the above.

      I specifically avoided SBC-Yahoo DSL because of their EULA. This year is the last year for my Yahoo mail account - I'll be closing it as soon as the subscription ends. Figure I might as well pay for web hosting and just use that webmail! No ads, no loss of privacy.

  20. "The reporter needed to investigate" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe you (slashdot editor/_reporter_) should have researched that and either not posted the story or posted the story with your additional information.

  21. odd by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    My private email account on my own server gets no spam.

    Can you show me a hotmail/yahoo account like that?

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whats your email address I can make your email just like a hotmail or yahoo account in just couple of minnutes.......man I love the taste of spam in the morning

    2. Re:odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I can. I use hotmail and only allow people in my address book to send me messages. And since it's MS's server, I don't even have to download anything to filter it :).

    3. Re:odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get no spam on my yahoo account(s)... three of them... no spam at all... okay sure once in awhile I may get one which gets marked as spam and sent to the bulk mail folder.

      Now hotmail open an account and get spammed 2 mins later.

  22. No need to worry....All the software does is... by JDRipper · · Score: 0

    Automatically change any documents on your PC that have Pacbell Park references to SBC Global Park. Go Giants!

    --
    "You know Myra, some people might think you're cute. But me, I think you're one very large baked potato."
  23. What do I care ..... by taniwha · · Score: 2
    I'm a long time PacBell DSL customer .... every time I call them with a problem I've gotten "you're running Linux we can't help you" from the 1st level tech support people - one person even hung up on me claiming it was my fault the line was broken BECAUSE I was running Linux (even though I explained exactly how they had broken the routing tables) ...

    So now they want me to download this wonderfull new software onto my Windows/Mac box .... to invade my privacy .... HA! ha! (as Nelson would say) .... tough

    1. Re:What do I care ..... by muon1183 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah,

      I know, most of the first level tech support people are morons. However, sometimes, if you confuse them enough and give evasive enough answers, they'll let you through to a higher level person if you ask. Some of the higher level people actually know stuff. My roommate managed to get all the way through to one of their sysadmins (we have problems establishing reliable UDP connections to some ISP's, but only if it goes through one link, and they were able to confirm where the problem was). So, the answer is, confuse the hell out of the first level people by talking about networking protocols and you might actually get through to a real sysadmin.

      --

      There's no sig like SIGSEG
    2. Re:What do I care ..... by bcboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow. I've had exactly the opposite experience. Fast, effective help. No odd looks about running linux. The installer was actually pretty interested, and asked for info on configuring the network settings so he could help less experienced linux users.

    3. Re:What do I care ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should just tell them your running windows. I always say that, that I'm running windows when I'm really running linux. It makes things a lot easier in the long term, since they don't have an easy way out of their problems (thuogh I must admit I've never had any problems with any broadband/tech subscription) The only problem I had was that when I left the apartment in which we had dsl, it took them a while to switch the billing plan so they stopped billing me (verizon).

    4. Re:What do I care ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the SBIS arm of it myself, and I've seen them break routing to the entire /20 that I'm in. Then the people on the other side had the gall to suggest all kinds of ridiculous things.

      The trick is to get them to try to ping or tracert (yeah, they're on Windows boxes...) something in your extended netblock that isn't actually your address. Then have them try another, and so on. Point out that none of these are under your control, and they're all broken the same way.

      I wouldn't mind the outages so much if they would just update the damned status page rather than pretending that everything is fine.

      Oddly, things are doing pretty well now that the crufty DIGEX/ICIX connectivity is gone. Just look out for 3 AM - that's when they seem to reboot stuff. It must be their maintenance window.

    5. Re:What do I care ..... by Leme · · Score: 1

      even though I explained exactly how they had broken the routing tables

      Yeah, there's your problem. Your assuming that the person you are talking to has a clue what you are talking about. On top of that, nothing irritates me more than when a call get's escalated to me and it's some guy who *thinks* he knows what the problem is.

      For good service, please play dumb and keep from making your own observations, no matter if you are right or wrong.

    6. Re:What do I care ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the difference between someone with a clue and a bottom-feeding first-line phone firewall "tech support" droid:

      Me: well, I looked it up on nitrous (as in nitrous.digex.net) and it's not being advertised

      Clued person: ever think of working here?

      Droid: have you rebooted your router?

      True story. I reported a routing outage to Qwest (shortly after they ate Colorado Supernet) and one of their guys practically offered me a job.

      I also reported a routing outage to SBIS once, and they pulled out the standard checklist lameness. It takes a lot of patience to finally make them realize that something much bigger is actually broken out there.

    7. Re:What do I care ..... by lpontiac · · Score: 2
      reliable UDP connections

      UDP is connectionless ;)

    8. Re:What do I care ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know Yahoo! doesn't even really support Macs... they just have one developer working on the Messenger product that is akin to AIM 1.0a

  24. I've got SBC DSL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...and I never installed the software, who needs it? I plugged the DSL router into the wall and a hub and everyone's online. Does anyone use this software?

  25. Whenever I see one of their commercials... by dagg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Whenever I see a commercial for SBC-Yahoo-DSL, there is only one thought that comes to mind: ten years ago, did any of those three words mean anything (maybe SBC meant something to some of you). It cracks me up that three terms that meant nothing to me 10 years ago all teamed up to make one huge-freaking-term: SBC-Yahoo-DSL. How can other companies compete with that?

    --
    Sex - Find It
    1. Re:Whenever I see one of their commercials... by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1
      How can other companies compete with that?


      Im sure billy g will think of something...
    2. Re:Whenever I see one of their commercials... by unicron · · Score: 2

      Compuglobalhypermeganet?

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    3. Re:Whenever I see one of their commercials... by Yankovic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Conover: Unfortunately, Bart, your little escapade could not have come at a worse time. [sets up screen]
      Americo-Australianian relations are at an all-time low.
      [talks over a slide show]
      As I'm sure you remember, in the late 1980s the US experienced a short-lived infatuation with Australian culture. For some bizarre reason, the Aussies thought this would be a permanent thing. Of course, it wasn't.
      [a slide shows "Yahoo Serious Festival"]
      Lisa: I know those words, but that sign makes no sense.

    4. Re:Whenever I see one of their commercials... by HiThere · · Score: 2

      I don't know what the other terms used to mean, but yahoo was the name given by the houyhnhnms to the humanoid animals that shared their country. They considered them both disgusting and absurd.

      (See Gulliver's Travels by Swift)

      Somehow it seems appropriate.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  26. Just sign here, don't worry, we'd never enforce it by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In a novel by John D. MacDonald, a condominium buyer is told by the sales agent that the long fine-print contract he's signing is "a formality." Later, when the buyer discovers all sorts of problems with the condo and the agent is stonewalling him on getting them fixed, the agent says "After all, it says in the contract you signed that..."

    The buyer protests "But you said that was just a formality." The agent says "That's right--it is a formal, binding legal contract enforceable in a court of law."

    In real life, when it is honestly a negotiating situation, when I see things I really don't like in contracts I test them. "Can I strike this out?" "Can I write here, 'I have sixty-day return privileges and ask you to initial it?'" The results are very unpredictable. When the clause really IS just boilerplate that they don't actually plan to use, very often they will be perfectly agreeable, and you can get the verbal understanding down on paper. But occasionally, they'll freak out--that clause is in there for a reason and they've been ordered not to let anyone mess with it.

    Unfortunately, none of this shrink-wrap and click-through stuff is a situation where you really have any power or any ability to negotiate. You can't strike out clauses and see if they'll agree to accept them.

    Nevertheless, it's a very good idea to assume that contracts really do mean what they say and that all the fine print and boilerplate really might become operative someday.

  27. Shhhhhocking! by Longinus · · Score: 4, Funny
    Those accursed SBC Yahoo!DSL ads have been saturating the airwaves recently, and its driving me apeshit crazy to see SBC touting the wonderful new service as "personalized Internet" (the exact slogan is "Internet that logs onto you"--insert Soviet Russia joke here). All it is a Yahoo! page created dynamically (they make a big deal out of this fact) based on users interests that they set when installing the "upgrade". There may be some lame toolbar or other IE customizations or something useless and obtrusive like that.

    They're just bundling in consumer profiling into the ISP, so people basically pay to be advertised to under the guise of having a homepage that displays things they're interested in (and apparently everyone is interested in consumer goods, top 40 music, and celebrity gossip). Obviously this is a staggering innovation, perhaps patent worthy (if Amazon hasn't beaten them to the punch, natch).

    The whole scheme is just retarded and I had a nice chuckle when SBC (my ISP...) emailed me offering a free (!) upgrade to Yahoo!DSL. Fortunately this "service" isn't supported under Linux, so I could use it even if I wanted to.

    1. Re:Shhhhhocking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately this "service" isn't supported under Linux, so I could use it even if I wanted to.

      You have a web browser don't you?

      I'm using it under linux right now, in fact. The portal is a little wiz-bang, but it DOES work under linux & something our parents might find neat.

      Basically, the biggest thing switching from SBC to SBC/Yahoo meant was that I got POP access again & a bigger mail box on yahoo mail account. I didn't really pay to much attention to the other stuff, but I was hoping I could get that gaming service free. Hopefully soon though.

  28. "Privacy" by thellamaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just love the way everything's been portrayed so positively in recent years. Very rarely now do you hear the prefix "anti-". Everything has a warm, fuzzy sound to it. My point being.. why has every site's "policy of how much we use your info to screw you" become a "privacy policy"? If someone started a crummy site up that gleefully sucked in SSNs and credit card numbers only to auction them off for identity theft, no doubt there would still be a cute little link that said "Privacy Policy." I presume it would say:

    • We understand that your personal information is very valuable to you. We just thought you'd like to share the wealth! It's very valuable to us, too. Hehe, yes, very valuable! We'll give your information to only the best identity thieves, so they'll make sure your assets are done away with quickly and easily

    Don't get me wrong, I enjoy Yahoo! services and think their policy is quite reasonable. It just seems like a little more truth is in order sometimes.

    1. Re:"Privacy" by Absurd+Being · · Score: 1

      I'll just have to bombard them with "pro"matter and watch as GeV of energy rip them apart.

      --
      Karma: Excellent^(-t/Tau), Tau=Wittiness/Trollishness
  29. Soon to be required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This software is optional for the moment, but according to my boss, within a year it will be required in order to keep your DSL line. They are waiting for the macintosh version, since about 10% of their customers are mac freeks. When they had meetings with my boss, they talked about how they can't make any money (yeah, right!) unless they force everyone to install this software so they can sell all your private data, and they mentioned that linux users were criminals who only used hacker software. Very clueless, but my boss smells $$$ and he thinks this will be great This software is remotely upgradeable, and later they will add specific modules to do things like examine quicken files and send them the results, scan all the email headers in outlook and help them compile buddy lists/friends&family lists, and will monitor all instant messenger traffic. They will then combine all this data with their customer records, phone numbers, social security numbers, and allow marketing companies like ours to mine the data for narrow-target campaigns. My job is to create custom software to pull out relationship data (parents, brothers, sisters, cousins, employers) to drive personalized mailshots. They will have headings like "Your mother, Mary, thought you would like to buy..." They are also going to sell the data to insurance companies so if you IM your best friend about your auto accident or doctors checkup, then someone will know about it. They also said this is perfect for fighting terrorism, and waved the flag a lot.

    1. Re:Soon to be required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn...this is very scary...hope it isn't a trend that catches on. Unfortunately, so many of the 'sheep' out there won't see how much of an intrusion this is...and if you say anti-terrorism in front of what they want to to...well, I can't believe how easily people in this country (US) are so ready to throw their rights away...so, they'll just go with the flow...This sounds like something a former company I used to work for would try , Acxiom in Conway, AR. They compile data on everyone in the country...I'll be they get ahold of this new source of data soon too..... :-(

    2. Re:Soon to be required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can mine all the data you want from my BEFSR41 el-cheapo router that blocks your sorry ass from my stuff.

    3. Re:Soon to be required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wow, for once I'm glad I have AIDS and will be dead by the time the software upgrade is mandatory.

    4. Re:Soon to be required by Graff · · Score: 2
      ...they mentioned that linux users were criminals who only used hacker software...

      ...things like examine quicken files and send them the results...

      ...They are also going to sell the data to insurance companies so if you IM your best friend about your auto accident or doctors checkup, then someone will know about it. They also said this is perfect for fighting terrorism, and waved the flag a lot.

      Lol, I'm sure. Great try at a troll attempt but I doubt that even the guys over at SBC are this clueless. Even if they want to do this, they have to have someone who will realize that this sort of behavior will cause such a backlash if it is found out that it won't be worth it to even attempt doing it. I doubt that any big company would attempt an effort like you are describing, especially considering the strong, healthy dose of paranoia that much of the computing field currently harbors.

      Why don't you and the anonymous coward non-account you are hiding behind go back to the sandbox and play with the rest of the trolls. Thank you for playing...
    5. Re:Soon to be required by RealTimeFreeAgent · · Score: 1

      I weep for the moderators who believe everything they read on the internet, especially posting anonymously. If you are truly involved in something so ridiculously Orwellian, why don't you throw your job to the wind and post logged in?

      --
      "You get what you pay for after all." --
    6. Re:Soon to be required by rutledjw · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Bah! USWorst, errr, I mean Qworst/Qwest pulled this same stunt trying assimilate people to MSN. They tried to make it look like if you get DSL from Qwest, you have to get MSN. You _could_ switch providers, but it wasn't evident.

      I personally wussed out and am paying an extra $20/month for "corporate" access which means I still have my regular service and don't have to use that POS MSN. Customer response was so positive to their new service that Qwest has a link on the order page that allows you to use a non-MSN ISP.

      If SBC is smart, they'll learn from Qwest. IMHO, the only thing worthwhile about Qwest was their DSL. These guys have managed to alienate their customers from one of their only decent services.

      --

      Computer Science is Applied Philosophy
  30. The Note (and my opinion) by Valen0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I still have the note about this in my mailbox from Monday...
    *begin note*
    Dear SBC DSL Internet Services Member,

    SBC Internet Services* has been working to improve your member benefits. We've recently joined forces with the world's number one Internet destination -- Yahoo!(R) -- to bring you SBC Yahoo! DSL, a powerful new, feature-rich Internet experience that will replace your existing SBC Internet service.

    Upgrade here: http://yahoo.sbc.com/activatedsl/upgrade.html

    Upgrade to SBC Yahoo! DSL today. We've designed your new service so you can upgrade in just minutes, and of course, upgrade is free. All you have to do is follow the on-screen
    instructions. It's that easy. Before you know it, you'll be enjoying a whole new set of nhancements, but 4 important aspects of your account won't be affected by this upgrade:

    Your email address will stay the same.
    Your monthly price will stay the same.**
    Your billing method will stay the same.
    Your high speed DSL Internet connection will stay the same.

    _

    With SBC Yahoo! DSL, you are in control. You have the power to choose which software to download based on the features you want: ***

    + SBC Yahoo! Browser Environment Software
    This software package gives you the SBC Yahoo! DSL custom browser with built-in Messenger and LAUNCHcast Radio plus easy access to email, finance, games, and more. In addition, this package also includes Parental Controls and Firewall software.

    + SBC Yahoo! Dial Connection Manager Software
    Loading this software gives you unlimited remote dial-up access to your account, so you have the ability to log in
    with your existing email and password even when you're on
    the road.

    + SBC Connection Manager Software (coming early 2003)
    This software includes a large set of support tools that monitor, test, and repair your DSL connection to ensure high-quality service. In addition, the SBC Connection Manager will diagnose any connection problems and provide automated help to resolve the issue.

    Mac users can also upgrade to the SBC Yahoo! DSL experience.
    Download for Mac users is coming soon.

    _

    Once you upgrade... you'll receive incredible new features and services, including:

    + A home page you can customize to give you the information and features you want.
    + Email account with 25MB of online storage space.
    + 10 FREE additional email addresses - each with 10MB online storage space.
    + 110MB of online storage with SBC Yahoo! Photos and Briefcase.
    + 3 premium listings in both SBC Yahoo! Classifieds and SBC Yahoo! Auctions.
    + 2 select premium services like Bill Pay and Games memberships.
    + 20% discount on additional Premium Services in select categories.

    Don't wait. Upgrade now and start enjoying your enhanced Internet experience right away. And be sure to check your email for additional information about your account update.

    Upgrade here: http://yahoo.sbc.com/activatedsl/upgrade.html

    P.S. Remember - your email address stays the same, your monthly price stays the same, your billing method stays the same, and your high speed DSL Internet connection stays the same. Act now. It only takes a few minutes to upgrade to the custom features of SBC Yahoo! DSL.

    If you have any questions please go to http://yahoo.sbc.com/activatedsl/ for additional
    information. For technical support please call:
    1-877-SBC-DSL5

    * Pacific Bell Internet Services, Nevada Bell Internet Services, Southwestern Bell Internet Services, Ameritech Interactive Media Services, SNET Diversified Group and Prodigy Communications, L.P.

    ** Your basic monthly price does not change during your existing term commitment.

    *** Download of software is not required for the upgrade.
    Download available for Windows users with
    Internet Explorer 5.0 or above. Mac users can also upgrade to the SBC Yahoo! DSL experience. Download for Mac users is coming soon. Minimum systems requirements are provided online for the options you choose to download.

    SBC Yahoo! DSL is an information service that combines DSL transport, Internet access and applications from SBC Internet Services, with customized content, services, and applications from Yahoo! Inc., to provide the customer with
    high-speed broadband access to the World Wide Web. Further details on offers/packages provided during enrollment and registration. Acceptance of Terms of Service required.

    Yahoo!, the Yahoo! logo and other Yahoo! logos and product and service names are the trademarks and/or registered trademarks of Yahoo! Inc. SBC, the SBC logo and all other SBC logos and product and service names are the trademarks and/or registered trademarks of SBC Properties, L.P. All
    other brand names may be trademarks or registered
    trademarks of their respective owners.

    (c) 2002 SBC Properties, L.P. and Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.

    Privacy Policy: http://yahoo.sbc.com/privacy
    *end note*
    My thoughts: I don't think I'm going to "upgrade". From the note at the bottom about "your price will not change during your term commitment", I'm thinking that it's a trial of a more expensive service. I staying with the regular service. My server computer runs Mozilla on FreeBSD anyway. I don't need any of the Yahoo stuff.

    NOTE: This post was edited to pass the "Lameness/Junk" filter. Slashdot didn't like the long horizontal lines that were in the Email.

    NOTE2: This post was edited to pass the "too few characters for line" filter. Slashdot didn't like the way the lines were broke up.

    --
    -Valen
    1. Re:The Note (and my opinion) by JamMasterJGorilla · · Score: 1

      No download is necessary ???? Then what is http://download.yahoo.com/dl/sbcy/dsl/dslreg.exe that the link points too? 8. What happens if I do not upgrade my account? To join thousands of others who are already enjoying the benefits of SBC Yahoo! DSL, click here and upgrade your service today. No download is necessary. And your email address, price, billing method, and the speed of your DSL Internet connection all stay the same as they are now.

    2. Re:The Note (and my opinion) by BroncoInCalifornia · · Score: 1

      email address stays the same but the pop and smtp servers change. It sounds like they are planning to discontinue the old pop and smtp servers and move us to the new.

      If you install their software etc, it changes the servers for you. Otherwise you have to set them by hand. They have a web page to tell you the names of the new servers.

      I do not think it will change the settings of kmail for me!

      --

      Religion is the main cause of atheism.

    3. Re:The Note (and my opinion) by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and that software they tout breaks Windows 98 - when I got my DSL line, I tried the standard install and it broke Windows so it would'nt boot - which has never happened on my system before. So I called SBC support, and after restoring my registry (at my suggestion), I told the guy I didn't really want the Yahoo crap. So he said he could not by contract walk me through it, but he could tell me how to install the EnterNet connection client, which is all you need to access the service. I did that, and no Yahoo crap is on my machine...

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  31. Michael's right by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2, Troll

    Before everyone goes jumping all over SBC and Yahoo (trust me - I'm not an apologist for either of them), michael is right - the reporter did a really poor job looking into why Yahoo might need a user's Social Security number or info about their assets. It's akin to asking why someone needs your street address when they want to send you something you've ordered (oh, wait, Bezos is trying the patent that, isn't he? ;).

    1. Re:Michael's right by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2
      "Troll?" Troll my ass...I think this post clearly points out (when you look at the postings before it) that people jump the gun and don't read the source material before bitching that some corporate entity somewhere is trying to cornhole them.

      The reporter on the article screwed up. He made mistakes a Journalism 101 student is taught not to make (considering that I took Journalism 101 as an undergrad, I should know a little about that).

      Poor form, moderator-baby. Poor form.

  32. There is more here than you think. by immanis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was involved in a DSL project in Japan that used a piece of third-party software that was, essentially, a program that would examine your system and create a file that contained things like OS, Memory, CPU, Disk Size, monitor type, and anything else like this that it could find out.

    This file was supposed to sit there until the DSL provider requested it behind the scenes. The purpose? Database Marketing. By knowing how old your system is, they can target you for new system sales. By knowing how small your monitor is, they can target you for sale of a bigger one. And so on.

    I left before I heard about successful launch. So I don't know if it ever went live. But do _NOT_ for one minute believe that there is "nothing to this kind of report." I've seen it. I can't say for sure that this is, in fact, what the Yahoo!DSL in the US is up to, but let's say it would not surprise me.

  33. The scary thing... by Click+0+Nett · · Score: 1

    I've seen the commercials for this. They actually call it "Internet that logs onto You." I almost did a spit-take when I heard it.

    --

    Like eagles on pogo-sticks! -- Glottis

    1. Re:The scary thing... by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2, Funny
      I've seen the commercials for this. They actually call it "Internet that logs onto You."


      Thank you for having the self control to not make that a soviet russia comment....
    2. Re:The scary thing... by nojomofo · · Score: 2

      "... or else Pizza is going to send out for you."

    3. Re:The scary thing... by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      Test-post? Is that what I'm supposed to do right before I fire up my Linux box and wait for it to POST?

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    4. Re:The scary thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I saw that commercial. I think the company was started in Soviet Russia.

  34. I don't agree with this post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, you may be right. But, Windows XP is better than the two of them put together!

    1. Re:I don't agree with this post by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      Yes yes, and 2k's better than that. This could go on forever.

      BeOS rules!

      Even RISC OS could rule... though after using it again recently I have my doubts about that one.

  35. SBC Yahoo offers by hekler37 · · Score: 1

    I've had DSL from Pacbell ever since it was available, and then it was gobbled up by SBC. Anyway, I've been getting those offers by Email and snail mail... but they really aren't offering anything I need. Therefore... nope.

  36. Michael: Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SBC is annoying enough, but Yahoo! takes the cake. Its fundamental business model relies upon dubious advertising practices including banner ads, pop-ups/unders, spam and mass-mailings.

    <SBC-RANT>
    I suspect that SBC sells call information to third-parties. Almost every time I talk to anyone for more than just a few minutes, 4-5 min later I get these automated sales pitches. Fscking tele-spam. I don't even bother answering the phone anymore since 90% of the calls are dead-air/spam.
    </SBC-RANT>

  37. Re:They can install all the software that they lik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Same goes for my OpenBSD router, FreeBSD desktop... and eventual AmigaOne/Pegasos. ;)

    Seriously though, having just jumped at the chance to "merge" my account, the additional software is just a mess of IE/Windows addons to create the illusion of AOL-like integration. SBC is betting that non-technical users will appreciate this (Yahoo! Messenger, cute shortcuts/search buttons, a spiffy homepage-portal that lets you access the little X-Drive-like 10mb "briefcase" they give you, etc), and technical users will fling the frisbees out the window and keep on truckin'.*

    *Truckin' in the sense of performing the online account merge and ignoring the add-on "experience." You get the benefit of webmail access to your mail account and national dialup, and all the other freebie crap (online Britannica, etc) they're offering.

    See, the interesting thing is that both SBC and Yahoo! actually have half a brain in producing the services they offer- SBC doesn't bitch anyone out for SSHing into their home machines or running servers, and Yahoo actually provides instructions on configuring a real mail client on the webmail page... ...it's just that SBC's political practices suck, on their quest to become the next monopoly.

  38. Oh goodie by Nonillion · · Score: 1

    do they have a version for Solaris and SuSe??? ;)

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
  39. Slashdot Editors by Yankovic · · Score: 2, Troll

    michael's behavior continues to astound. If MS had done something even remotely similar to this, he would have launched into them with a tirade that would still be going on, yet, here, he equivocates for Yahoo. I realize this is not much of a surprise to some, but it still amazes me how utterly biased the slashdot editors are.

    ObTopic: Generally, i think the EULA game is just a giant CYA exercise. Companies absolutely have to do this kind of stuff because you never know how you're going to get sued. MS had to word the EULA that way because thhe web-updates would download and install only IF you gave the auto-updater the chance to do so. Yahoo, similarly, IS exchanging financial info, and has to be restrictive. EULAs are EULAs. If you don't like them, don't play.

    1. Re:Slashdot Editors by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      I agree in principle, but in practice, the EULAs are overbroad and are enforced that way. In other words, the corps get not only the rights they need, but a whole class of rights.

      It's as if MS needs the number 4 and 2000 but asserts that they have a right to all the integers. Sure, they just want to be sure that you don't misuse the numbers that are theirs, but you can be sure that some enterprising manager will find a way to take advantage of all those extra numbers.

      The GIF patent is another example of this. It is clear by the actions of the patent holders that they did not intend (originally) to maliciously enforce it, but somebody at the corp that held the patent saw a great way to produce revenue for the corp and (more importantly) inflate his/her own importance (look at the cash I generated for the company!). Intentions don't matter, really. No matter how much you trust the current management of the corporation, future management may decide to follow through on doing all that you said they could.

  40. Re:Just sign here, don't worry, we'd never enforce by Xzzy · · Score: 2

    > Unfortunately, none of this shrink-wrap and
    > click-through stuff is a situation where you
    > really have any power or any ability to negotiate.

    Yes we do.. just do what everyone else does. Ignore it. ;)

    EULA's are almost never enforced, because for the most part they're unenforcable. They mostly serve as CYA tactics in case problems ever do come up. Why do you think XP forces users to validate? Because Microsoft knows that EULA's are easily ignored and broken and they're powerless to stop it.

    This stuff is only used when someone is actually going to court.. for stealing the software. And I'd wager you hardly need a EULA to realize that stealing is bad..

  41. Simple Solution by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just use my 56k modem after dropping my DSL. No funky software to install.

    *locks himself in the bathroom and cries like a baby*

  42. I did it I lateral-graded by moankey · · Score: 2, Informative

    I recently did the switch although I knew it was to my detriment one day. So far I had some choices on what premium Yahoo services I wanted. I opted for additional briefcase storage for photos and files, and premium games ( which seems to just be so that I can enter tournaments with other Yahoo users that paid to play the free games) Plus it helps appease my wife since she can have 8 additional premium email boxes from Yahoo with POP access, vs SBC only giving us 2.

    I think the incessant bombarding of commercials may have brainwashed me for an instant as well "My wife didnt even know I liked Salsa music..."

  43. Re:They can install all the software that they lik by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    Why would they have a problem with you ssh'ing into your computer at home or running server processes...as long as you aren't blowing away bandwith?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  44. Yeah, tell me about it by karmawarrior · · Score: 2, Informative
    Yahoo!'s actions are yet another example of the fascist imperialist corporate state forcing ordinary people to lose their privacy or become second class citizens. Not content with subscriptions and adverts, they want to own your computer too. This is just another example of the type of corporate control we should expect with the current regime, ie the Bush administration, in power, which exists to funnel money from hard working ordinary people into the coffers of the already obscenely rich while trying to divert attention from what it's doing by setting up fake wars - ie Iraq, Afghanistan, France, etc.

    The agenda of Yahoo is the same as it is for all the giant corporations, ie Microsoft, WalMart, AT&T, Sam Adams, AOL Time Warner, etc; it's to turn you into a wage earning slave exploiting your production on one hand, while controlling what you spend with the pitiful money they give you.

    This quagmire of big business and big gubmint working together to exploit you must end. But it will not happen by itself. Resources need to be devoted, and unless people are prepared to actually act, not just talk about it on Slashdot, nothing will ever get done. Apathy is not an option.

    You can help by getting off your rear and writing to your congressman or senator, or to the Bush Family Evil Empire at the White House. Tell them that personal freedom and privacy combined with decent working conditions, a fair wage for a fair day's work, and decent, affordable, universal health care, are important to you - that you should have the rightt to control that that you store on your own disks. Tell them that you are appalled at Yahoo!'s and the pResident's efforts in this area, but that in the absense of full disclosure, you will have to find a less secure and intelligently run country to live in. Let them know that SMP may make or break whether you can efficiently deploy OpenBSD on your workstations and servers. Explain the concerns you have about freedom, openness, and choice, and how a corporate state run for greed's sake that exploits the workers destroys all three. Let them know that this is an issue that effects YOU directly, that YOU vote, and that your vote will be influenced, indeed dependent, on his or her policy on the rights of ordinary, hard working, people.

    You CAN make a difference. Don't treat voting as a right, treat it as a duty. Keep informed, keep your political representatives informed on how you feel. And, most importantly of all, vote.

    --
    KMSMA (WWBD?)
    1. Re:Yeah, tell me about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh brother...you're an idiot.

    2. Re:Yeah, tell me about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just what I'd expect an imperialist lackey of the capitalist bourgeoisie to say. No doubt you expect your master, ie your boss, to reward you for such toadying to his exploitative corporatist demands. Well, you'll see how much you laugh when he cuts your pay for posting on Slashdot. Hahahahaha!

    3. Re:Yeah, tell me about it by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah, yeah...

      Although I think that there are ligitimate grounds to complain on about software and phone service, I think that your rant goes over the edge. The majority of people out there doing business are people like you or I who choose operating a business as what to do with their life. There is certainly nothing evil about running a business. You talk about Wal-mart, Pac Bell, Yahoo! like they have a mind of their own. I will point out to you that these companies are founded and continue to be operated by human beings.

      If you want to complain about a monopoly that provides inefficient service and crushes any competition, go complain about the US Postal Service

      Finally, if you are reading this comment and remember only one thing, remember this: "Free Universal Health Coverage" is 100% pure BS. Someone is going to pay for it - we are. I suppose that since you imply that you aren't in business, you are a wage-earner. That money that you never see, that is taken from you paycheck every pay period, is where the money for "free" health care will come from. The US government can't just create free health care out of thin air any more than you or I could. Just remember, when you see the likes of Hillary Clinton, Robert Byrd, John Kerry, and Tom Daschle talk about providing you free healthcare, just remember where the money is going to come from. They want to raise your taxes until they own you and you are eating out of their hand of the US government.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    4. Re:Yeah, tell me about it by karmawarrior · · Score: 1
      remember this: "Free Universal Health Coverage" is 100% pure BS.
      Which is why I said "decent, affordable, universal health care".

      So nuhnuh, suck on that imperialist capitalist lackey!

      --
      KMSMA (WWBD?)
    5. Re:Yeah, tell me about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Aaaaalright, generally, I just let the constant dull roar of idealism around Slashdot slide, but yours just cannot be ignored.

      Son, voting is the ultimate excercise in futility. Do you honestly think, for one second, that the election of one party over another is going to do anything to stem the behavior described in the original Slashdot post? Do you really believe that any one party cares about you and your rights? Furthermore, is there a politician from any major party who wants into an office of any consequence for any reason other than personal gain? You don't really expect any of these puppets to maintain campaign promises, do you? For shame.

      I will concede that some of the smallest, insignificant "PTA-esque" candidates may certainly have more than pure greed at heart (although it is still a prime factor) when running for an office, but the chance of such a person ever having any real authority in this world where money has become God, is less than zero. In the obscenely unlikely event that it ever does happen, I would not want to be that person's family or friends when the threats start rolling in from those on the wrong financial end of his perhaps ethical decision making.

      On a more realistic plane, all candidates are merely pathetic clones of each other and, by voting, you are merely choosing whether to be punched or kicked in the face. No one likes this particular reality, but there is no way you will ever leave this type of invasion behind while living in a technologically "advanced" part of the world, regardless of which of the devils to whom you attach your checkmark. They are in it for they, not for you. And, needless to say, it's only going to get worse as the endless march toward perfect capitalism continues.

      So, vote if you wish and convince anyone you can, but all you're doing is building a nice, cozy bed of false security for yourself and those to whom to preach.

  45. Re:Just sign here, don't worry, we'd never enforce by donutello · · Score: 2

    Unfortunately, none of this shrink-wrap and click-through stuff is a situation where you really have any power or any ability to negotiate. You can't strike out clauses and see if they'll agree to accept them.


    The same holds true when you're signing, say a morgage. The person in front of you is typically a minion from a third-party (escrow company). They don't have the power to accept or reject changes and asking for any change will only result in a several-day delay.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
  46. they dont allow servers anymore either by heff · · Score: 3, Informative

    I refused to upgrade my account,
    the new contract prohibits the running of any kind of server on their service.

    It wont be long before they start portscanning people and sending off nasty letters like @home did back in the days.

    I really dont see what the problem is, they limit your upstream data to around 12/Ks. It's not like anything could clog the network.

    --

    --

    |-_-| . o O ( bEef!)

  47. Re:Just sign here, don't worry, we'd never enforce by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Stealing is bad. That's good to know.

    Is installing a program on more than one computer stealing? Is installing bitkeeper and contributing to cvs without paying $5000 stealing? Is installing a program on a multi-processor box without paying for the multi-processor version stealing? Is using frontpage to make an anti-Microsoft web site stealing?

    Existing law makes no provisions for a seller to dictate to a buyer what he may or may not use a product for.

    But a EULA does. And if a EULA is equivalent to a binding contract, then it can be enforced as a contract can be.

    Twenty years ago no one would ever have considered a EULA the same as a contract--no one signs it, there is no proof of who exactly agrees to it. But no one should underestimate the power of established tradition. As EULA's become more and more ubiquitous, they will become more and more accepted by the legal community. And eventually and gradually, without a single legislature passing any law on the matter, the courts will rule by precedent and make EULA's legally binding. And then you can trust that the consequences of forcing average consumers to agree to long and complex legal documents whenever they want to buy a common consumer good will be felt. The law will intrude even deeper into people's everyday lives, making everyone less free. No, people won't read them more carefully--that's impossible anyway, the EULA's necessary to install something as common as Windows with the necessary updates already includes more pages than the Bible. People won't choose to live as hermits in the woods, either--rather they will simply bend their backs and bear the burdens of a few more laws.

  48. Installed SBC/Yahoo as a new customer. by slackpad · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just set up a new account with SBC/Yahoo. They no longer send you your PPPOE username/password - you have to run their monolithic installer to set up your account the first time. After that, though, it's regular PPPOE. I set up a sacrificial Windows machine to get my account info, then blew it all away and set up my Linksys router to do the PPPOE - it's working fine. None of their crappy software seems to be required at the moment.

    1. Re:Installed SBC/Yahoo as a new customer. by simeonbeta2 · · Score: 1

      Good point. I noticed the same thing... It's nice that Linux supports PPPOE nowadays, but as far as i could tell it was impossible to get my Mandrake distro on the net without installing their software on a windows partition, running through their installation program, and then going back to Linux with the username and password...

      Also I think my install directions said that win9x/ME was the only user installed supported system. If you ran winNT4/2K and did the install yourself, don't call them for tech support on the install (which was a bit of a pain with 3 different CDs just to get nic card drivers, the dsl modem drivers, and their "Enternet" software.)

      Not to be totally negative though... Since getting the install done I've used my dsl regularly for something like 9 months without a single service outage...

      I'm going to give their "incredible new features" a pass though...

    2. Re:Installed SBC/Yahoo as a new customer. by slackpad · · Score: 1

      Yeah - the install was a pain time-wise. It was an hour of churning on my old PIII-500. They installed a new branded browser, Yahoo Messenger, games, the EnterNet PPPOE software, and the NIC stuff; as well as the usual half-dozen desktop icons.

    3. Re:Installed SBC/Yahoo as a new customer. by LostCluster · · Score: 2

      Writing your own AOL-like dialer interface is expensive. Writing a program that looks like you have your own dialer, but really is just quitely going down the the Windows Registry and setting up DUN/RAS connections is easy.

      The dialer program is really designed to cut down on the number of "how do I set this thing up?" tech support calls. Speaking of tech support, notice how they're not exactly blasting an easy to remember 1-800 number like "1-800-PRODIGY" that they had before.

    4. Re:Installed SBC/Yahoo as a new customer. by Rocinante · · Score: 1

      Actually, all their lame installer does is dump a bunch of crappy software on your machine, then point it's web browser at a site of theirs where you do the actual initial registration. The site has Microshaft-specific JS, but you can access it from any Windows machine (think public library). I forget the web site, but if you call tech support they'll give it to you (and in my limited experience, their tech support is pretty good). After that SBC DSL works fine with anything that can talk PPPoE.

      --
      Just trying to open someone's head! I mean "mind!" Open someone's mind, um, to the possibilities! With explosives!
  49. Thats the answer!! by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Send Travis McGee down there to discuss your privacy with them!!!.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  50. ITS TRUE! SHOUT IT FROM THE ROOFTOPS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I recently switched over to Yahoo!/SBC DSL thinking it would be neat to have access to the Yahoo! features. I had a problem with the install (after agreeing to the Orwellian user agreement) and decided to call tech support. A fellow named O'Brien answered. It started out friendly and he guided me through setting up online Solitaire, but things rapidly deteriorated. He began to question me about my sexuality - pointed questions that were quite disturbing. I tried to deflect them and get back to my Yahoo! DSL problems but he wouldn't let up. Finally I told him that he was behaving inappropriately and I wanted to talk to his manager. He called me a "thought criminal" and said I was dressing too flamboyantly. He said he was watching me through my webcam (apparently I agreed to this in the Orwellian user agreement) and to remain seated, as he was dispatching a team of Yahooligans to begin my re-education. I sit here paralyzed with fear, knowing that all that once was is no more. Pray for me.

  51. Re:Just sign here, don't worry, we'd never enforce by dillon_rinker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it's a very good idea to assume that contracts really do mean what they say

    This should be hammered into every person - there is no such thing as "boilerplate" in a contract. There is a REASON for EVERY SINGLE WORD (unless the attorney who prepared it is guilty of malpractice) It doesn't "become operative someday" - it is in force the second you agree to it. You may not understand the purpose of all the text in the contract, but the attorneys who prepared it do, and will enforce it if you arouse their ire.

  52. Re:DirecTVDSL is out of business... by dagg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    DirecTVDSL just went out of business. I have a feeling that'll be the next slashdot news story. Out of business.

    --
    Sex - Find It
  53. Inevitability... by WeaponOfChoice · · Score: 3

    I find it endlessly amusing that the same people who hark on about the hopelessness of the DRM cause and the certainty that the onwards march of technology will defeat every effort to maintain conventional copyright control of digital works somehow fail to make the connection that that self-same march will achieve much the same ends when it comes to their own online privacy. Technology is a two (or n) edged sword, it can give us freedoms we never dreamed of and expose us to scrutiny the likes of which Orwell himself never imagined. The common thread is the inevitability of it all - the technology will find a way and cares not as to whether the use to which it is being put is benign or malignant...

    --


    It's not that I'm Anti-American - I'm Pro-Freedom
  54. Well..... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 3, Funny

    They do bill it as: "The Internet that knows you" They simply don't elaborate how much it knows....

  55. SBC, CPNI, and targeting small ISPs by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the Note:


    > Your email address will stay the same.
    >Your monthly price will stay the same.**
    >Your billing method will stay the same.
    > Your high speed DSL Internet connection will stay the same.

    "**"? Why did I just instinctively reach for my wallet?

    >[...]With SBC Yahoo! DSL, you are in control. You have the power to choose which software to download based on the features you want: ***

    "***"? ...and my firewall? :-)

    Interestingly enough, just a few weeks ago, I got a snail mailing regarding an opportunity to opt out of SBC's sell^H^H^Hharing of my CPNI (Customer Proprietary Network Information) data.

    Unless I opted out, SBC promised that it would dutifully use the record of every phone number I dialled to figure out what sorts of crap^H^H^H^Hexciting products and services I might be interested in.

    I wondered how the fuck a phone company could use that, and then I realized that if SBC is partnering up with Yahoo in order to provide DSL, that going through every phone user's CPNI records to target ad campaigns to users of competing (dial-up) ISPs would be a perfect application of this.

    After all, with CPNI data, SBC could easily send "u wan2 swtch frm AOL" mailings to AOL users, "Tired of seeing Sky Dayton buggering the rotting corpse of Mindspring/Netcom every day?" mailings to Earthlink users of Mindspring or Netcom POPs, and "Why are you still with these small-timers" to users of independent/local ISPs.

    Rant: I hate telcos. I hate marketroids. They seem to feed off each other, in an evil, sickening way that makes spammers seem honest by comparison.

    At any rate, if you do business with SBC, I'd strongly recommend that you opt-out of having your calling records used for marketing purposes. (You'll need a copy of your phone bill to use that link. A few days later, you'll get a receipt in the snail-mail confirming your opt-out. No word on how long it lasts, but knowing the DMA, you'll probably have to jump through the hoop on at least an annual basis. )

    1. Re:SBC, CPNI, and targeting small ISPs by Telastyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And you know what the great thing is? when you call the CPNI hotline to opt-out, the guy ends it by trying to sell you 'value added services'!

    2. Re:SBC, CPNI, and targeting small ISPs by el_chicano · · Score: 2
      At any rate, if you do business with SBC, I'd strongly recommend that you opt-out [sbc.com] of having your calling records used for marketing purposes.
      Is the CPNI opt-out some sort of California regulatory action or something? The link you provided only covers PacBell and if you search the SBC website and look for a personal info opt-out for the old Southwestern Bell (including Texas) there is nothing there.

      SBC are bastards deluxe. When I signed up for DSL months ago they were advertising 384 Kbps minimum speeds. I have only gotten over 300 Kbps TWICE in that period.

      A friend of mine who lives nearby only gets 150 Kbps! We both live in a barrio, maybe I need to poll DSL customers here in North Houston to see if there is a pattern of substandard service in minority neighborhoods.

      If there is I am sure the Texas Public Utility Commission would like to hear about it, but seeing as how Texas is "governed" by pro-business Republican assholes I am not holding my breath...
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
    3. Re:SBC, CPNI, and targeting small ISPs by unxman · · Score: 1

      Here is the link for the main SBC CPNI page listing contact info for all SBC companies.
      http://www.sbc.com/sbc_privacy_policy/ 0,5870,8,00. html

  56. flashne-- prodig---sbc--yahoo by Wakkow · · Score: 2

    I was first with flashnet. Prodigy bought them so it became Flashnet by Prodigy or something like that. Then they merged with SBC and became SBC Prodigy or something. Now all this with Yahoo. Is my isp called Flashnet-Prodigy-SBC-Yahoo?

    Funny, after Flashnet gave us a cd, prodigy gave us a couple cd's, sbc gave us one, and yahoo gave another, I've never installed any of it. I had to change my dialup number once, but besides that, everything works great.

  57. what a pinko commi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MUM'S THE WORD: Speaking of keeping things quiet, perhaps you saw a federal judge's decision the other day rejecting Congress' efforts to find out whom Vice President Dick Cheney met with last year while formulating national energy policy

    Why is this crap even in the article? And democrats wonder why the republicans cry about liberal bias in the news. They can't even talk about DSL without bringing their political crap into the article. Maybe we'll stop calling them reports and start calling them what they are -evangelist.

  58. So what's the point? by Squirrel+Killer · · Score: 3, Funny
    The story's a little overblown - Yahoo's privacy policy reads that way because they offer financial services and the like, where they may well need financial information from you to provide the service.
    So if the story is an overblown, muck raking, piece of non-news, why are you bothering to post it to the front page? It's like yelling, "Hey guys, listen up! Nevermind!"
  59. Why A Blanket Policy? by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > Yahoo's privacy policy reads that way because
    > they offer financial services and the like, where
    > they may well need financial information from you
    > to provide the service.

    Why can't they have different policies for different services?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  60. Absolution by pongo000 · · Score: 2

    The story's a little overblown - Yahoo's privacy policy reads that way because they offer financial
    services and the like, where they may well need financial information from you to provide the service. The reporter
    needed to investigate this new software DSL users are being asked to install, and find out what sort of user tracking
    it enables.


    This disclaimer simply magnifies the fact that Slashdot would like to be something more than simply a headline mirror, without all the trappings that come with journalistic integrity. What, exactly, do Slashdot editors "edit" if not the stories they post? Shouldn't the stories be checked out first? And if a story is bogus (as this one seems to be), wouldn't the appropriate action be to pull the story?

    I can't quite figure out what /. wants to be when it grows up (if it ever does). Neither can I, so I can sympathize.

  61. What software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had PacBell DSL since '99, and not once did I get mail asking me to upgrade. As for privacy, well, I think the fact that my box receives at least 200 spam messages a day tells you how much SBC cares about user's privacy...

  62. Dynamic EULAs by _KhlER3L · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You mention the ability to alter contracts when doing business face to face.

    Maybe digital EULAs could do the same. They could have checkboxes that would change the installation process, maybe leaving parts out, or adding parts, or changing things like expiry dates, depending on what the user agreed to, with background logic creating a balance of acceptable terms for the software developer. A DEULA could be returned to the software developer via the web to automate a custom fee structure.

    Right now, they are, at least in every instance I've found them, monolithic documents with a single, giant checkbox. Perhaps the future EULA will be a tree heirarchy of optional clauses.

    Thinking the idea might be useful as software becomes more and more a mix of commercial and free software, with their possibly conflicting licenses.

    Just an idea.. Maybe a bad one since it would keep lawyers employed.

    _KhlER3L

  63. Not a reporter by basso · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The reporter needed to investigate this new software DSL users are being asked to install, and find out what sort of user tracking it enables.
    David Lazarus is a columnist for the Chronicle's business pages. Michael's point may be good but it's important to realize that the writer isn't under the same sort of obligations that a reporter would be.

  64. Create account on their website. by catsRus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I called tech support and got the URL for signing up on line. (might have to try a few techs) it was something like http://register.sbcglobal.net sorry i forget.
    Then installed enternet 300 only
    E:\Setup\Efficient\reboot\setup.exe on my cd. No need for all their crap.

    Going to try raspppoe next.
    http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~normanb/

    They dont support it but their tech support is worthless anyway, they want you to uninstall anything that is not their network, seems thats always the problem in their mind, even when their field tech cant ping their server. :)
    OH well it is better than 56K

  65. SBC is defiling our nation's pastime by llamaluvr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Remember, when stadiums had cool names, like "Candlestick", or "Ebbet's", or "Joe Robbie", or "Municipal" (well, okay, not "Municipal")? Or when bowl games were called "Rose" and "Orange"? Now our stadiums are called "Comerica" and "Pro Player" and "Gilette" and "Tampax" or whatever! And our bowls are called "Tostitos" and "Chic-Fil-A"(!)! Corporate influences have destroyed sports in America.

    Anyway, there once was a park called Pac Bell. Granted, the name indicated that it was one of those "corporately defiled" stadiums, but it had a nice ring to it. But now we're going to have to call it SBC?!?! They have gone too far...

    Comapnies need to 1) Stop being so schizophrenic, and 2) go away.

    Okay, you can mod me -1: Offtopic now

    --
    Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
    1. Re:SBC is defiling our nation's pastime by edwdig · · Score: 2

      I'll grant you that Pac Bell Park sounds a lot better than SBC Park, but, you can't say you don't miss the Candlestick Park name.

  66. Microsoft at the gate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Of course you cant even sign up for this "service" unless you are running Windows or Macos. I made the switch for may account using a windows machine at work. So far it is working fine with my Linux machine at home. The sign up process was just a simple form filling exercise, which could easily have been done in HTML, can't help but wonder about their motivation to go the executable route.
    On the positive side their technical support people were actually apologetic about not being able to sign up using Linux and were prepared to tell me that the "service" would work fine if I found a way to get through the registration. I liked this response much better than the usual "get lost wierdo" that I'm more used to as a Linux user.

  67. They are doing the same thing with Dial up by Ambience · · Score: 1

    They keep sending me Emails to "upgrade" to yahoo dial up, when I know it's just spyware. I haven't installed, nor will I install this stuff on my computer. Since when has anyone needed a 3rd party program to dial an internet service for you? The spam on their main website is annoying enough, especially for the $25 price tag the service has. I'll get a new ISP before I install this crap.

    1. Re:They are doing the same thing with Dial up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I finally caved in and installed their crappy software. Boy, was that a mistake.

      I figured it would be loaded with stuff I didn't want, but I was astounded at what was installed with NO CHOICE, including Yahoo Messenger - didn't want and didn't need.

      The software also hijacked my IE start page and installed the YAHOO toolbar on it, again without my permission.

      I did the account upgrade and quickly uninstalled the crap and even went back to the previous system checkpoint (XP).

      Sneaky bastards!!!

  68. Crack smoke detected! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ITYM, "From the no-brainer dept."

    Yahoo was always the McDonalds of web portals, and they never had any concept of honesty or fair treatment with respect to their members. We all saw that fact become as plain as daylight when they acquired GeoCities and WebRing.

    So now, given that most of their services are inferior with declining profits, people expect them to improve? Psshhh. Uh-huh, and I have a bloody great bridge I'd like to sell you.

    If you don't like the fact that your e-mail provider is a tosser, then LEAVE. After all, it's not costing you anything, is it?

    If enough of their customers get fed up and leave, the geniuses who are running the company might finally take a hint -- shape up or ship out, because there are only about 5,000 other free e-mail providers on the Web that care more about their subscribers.

    It's sort of like that comparison with the snobs who block people from their site who don't use MSIE: "There's always a better site, it's just that you haven't found it yet."

  69. I just love your posts! by NineNine · · Score: 2

    They're so amazingly great! So, do you just copy and paste, or do you have a script that posts for you? And, is this a formal experiment in karma, or just a fun little game you're playing, or is this maybe a sociology experiment? Whichever it is, it seems to be working! Every time you post this rant with the blanks filled in, you get modded up, and not as funny either! You actually are hooking suckers with every single post! Too bad karma numbers aren't available any more to check your progress.

    1. Re:I just love your posts! by karmawarrior · · Score: 1
      I can assure you this is the first posting I have ever made to Slashdot concerning workers rights and universal healthcare.

      I'd remember something like that.

      --
      KMSMA (WWBD?)
  70. Internet that logs on to YOU by joe_bruin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i swear this is not an "in soviet russia" post.

    around here (l.a.), sbc-yahoo has all these billboards and radio commercials and their slogan is "internet that logs on to you" (yes, this is too stupid to make up). their website indicates that they've now changed that to "internet at the speed of you", perhaps realizing that having the internet log on to you may not be the ideal user experience.

    but this may explain their privacy issues.

    1. Re:Internet that logs on to YOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for that... it always struck me as kinda FUCKING FREAKY!

    2. Re:Internet that logs on to YOU by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Yup - those ads are all over the place here in San Francisco and painted on their trucks, too.

      And every time I see one, I instinctively think, "I DON'T WANT an Internet that 'logs onto me'!"

      BTW, I am in a Yahoo Group set up by the teacher of one of my City College classes, and when I logged into it yesterday, I got one of those full-page ads which recognized that I am a SBC Yahoo DSL line customer.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  71. Re:Just sign here, don't worry, we'd never enforce by stephanruby · · Score: 3, Informative
    This should be hammered into every person - there is no such thing as "boilerplate" in a contract.

    Yes, there is. In real estate, a boiler plate contract is when you go to your local printer and have him print a copy of your contract with the header "STANDARD CONTRACT" on top.

    Ideally, you should have two different copies of your "STANDARD CONTRACT" -- one for when you're buying real estate and one for when you're selling real estate. And of course, you should always impose your own copy of your contract on your adversary.

  72. I called "them" last night... by lunadude · · Score: 1

    I called to make sure that this wasn't a "ugrade now, because we are cutting our old services out" kind of call (like AT&T's wireless DSL experiment last year). There was no good reason to switch, no "features" I wanted, so I chose to stay with the current package.

    Scarey tactics.

  73. don't do the upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my mother was on prodigy.net dialup and asked me to upgrade it to the sbc yahoo. boy, were we sorry!!! she lost all her email from prodigy. it disappeared into the void. cant get it back, even with the old prodigy email settings. their tech support was worthless. then that crappy browser and email interface and those popups they stick you with. she isn't a sophisticated user, but she got sick of that quickly. so i cfg'd standard outlook and ie for her, and am thinking about getting her the phoenix browser to stop the popups.

  74. Re:Don't need it, don't want it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed. There's very little in the Yahoo "upgrade" that a Slashdot reader would want.

    Basically, the upgrade involves putting the Broadjump Client Platform on your machine, switching to their customized browser, a GeoCities home page (!), spam from them you can't stop, more ads in their browser, and opening yourself up to the possibility that they'll raise the rates on their "bundled services".

    I, too, have a Linksys router with PacBell DSL. and just hope they don't break it. For that matter, right now I'm running on a QNX machine.
    Does this SBC/Prodigy thing support anything other than Microsoft?

    Covad remains an option; if you have PacBell/SBC DSL, you can switch to Covad, which is less obnoxious but has to fight with SBC over access to the local loop.

  75. I saw my congresscritter on C-Span this morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Might have been C-Span 2, I can't remember. They were talking about the whole Trent Lott scandal, and the delectable Ms Johnson answered a question about what her constituents were saying about the scandal with words to the effect of (and I'm not making this up: "To be honest, my constituents are writing to me about what they always write to me about, taxes, healthcare, I even received a lot of mail this week about opening up the codes used on the Internet for multimedia, and about getting help for a computer software project called OpenBSD."

    I was pretty much dumbfounded and had to check karmawarrior's posts just to make sure.

  76. Re:They can install all the software that they lik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dunno. Ask those with horror stories from some of the other providers. ;)

    Seriously, I have no great love for SBC, but I'm happier to have been "stuck" with them as my lowest-cost option, vs. those poor souls on Comcast or similar.

    I gather Speakeasy has a reputation for no-bullshit-guaranteed, but as a CLEC, the rates can't help but be higher- thanks, of course, to politicking by ILECs like SBC.

  77. Political Writings of George Orwell by vinsci · · Score: 2
    "[...] use of the new software is covered by Yahoo's privacy policy, which is just a bit more Orwellian."

    As everybody seems to know the name already, perhaps you'd be interested in reading some of his essays, newspaper columns, letters and editorials.

    From the page: Orwell was 47 years old when he succumbed to tuberculosis in January 1950.

    --

    Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
    1. Re:Political Writings of George Orwell by Gopedder02 · · Score: 1

      Jahwol mein Fuhrer=Microsoft's/Yahoo's attitude to us Untermenschen(normal people)

  78. Re:DirecTVDSL is out of business... by srvivn21 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Uncanny... Four minutes after you post, your premonition came true.

    Any lottery tips?

  79. Need another +1 mod: by Soulfader · · Score: 2

    Psychic. =)

  80. The truely scary thing by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    Who attaches a windows box directly to there DSL? If you dont have a cheap somewhat functional hardware firewall or better yet a Linux/BSD/Sun/Cisco box functioning as a firewall then it's a simple DHCP/Static IP setup and some ethernet/wireless no software outside an IP stack and the applications I you want to use. Branding comarketing and all that drivel is what is killing business. Can we not decide what to buy based upon specs and a little marketing to get us to relize it's there? I dont want Yahoo intergrated into my browser or anything else for that matter. If I run Be or AmigaOS or whatever it shouldent matter there responcibility ends at the CPE just like the phone company will it take legislation to make them relize that. This is what ammounts to the old phone company only allowing there phones to be connected. For DSl this should mean you can run PPPoE ok better yet DHCP up an address and your golden. I think the funniest thing is my old cable provider didn't have my first hop respond to pings this would be what I consider connection verification 101 can you ping your default gateway? yes ok if you still have problems it's probably not the low level network (Yes I know that this is not perfect but it gets the Tier 1 techs in the call center out of a jam)

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  81. Berrik's 3-step Spyware Squash by Berrik · · Score: 1

    1)Download and install Zonealarm (any ver). 2)Connect to the Net. 3)When spyware attempts to get past your shiny new firewall, give it the finger. Being able to see which programs are trying to connect to the Net and being able to allow or deny them is the fastest way possible of detecting spyware.

    --
    Current karma: Terrible (due to mods without a sense of humor)
  82. How to install WITHOUT Windows by JayAndSilentBob · · Score: 1

    I had problems logging in because they partially deleted my account after I had connection troubles (very long story). I ended up demonstrating to the tech that my account info was damaged on their end by logging in to PPPoE with a newuser name and password I found buried deep inside the Macintosh instructions. This username allowed me to only access pages on sbcyahoo.com and related domains. From there, I could register a new name (and I tried to many times). I think the relevant info was under the OS X section, as OS X has PPPoE built in. They provided a temporary userid/password and the website at which to point your browser to set everything up. I could have done it all with my Linksys router if I'd really wanted to. No Windows required.

    --


    Love,
    Jay and Silent Bob
  83. Im switching providers by kstumpf · · Score: 2

    I have PacBell DSL (or SBC... whatever). I've gotten bombarded with things in the mail touting this SBC/Yahoo! thing. I went through the transition process and, after reading some of the license agreement, declined. I'll be switching soon, probably to SpeakEasy. I just don't like, or understand, all of the things going on behind my back here.

  84. Contents of EULA by duck_prime · · Score: 3, Funny
    I doubt that in '97 the agreement I actually clicked "I Agree" on says that I agree to bend over and get fucked in the ass by any affilate Yahoo ever decides to every do any sort of marketing arangement with.
    Dude, you didn't read it too carefully then. Hark:

    NO LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, in no event shall Yahoo! or its suppliers be liable for any special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of business profits, business interruption, loss of business information, or any other pecuniary loss) arising out of the use of or inability to use thE software product, even if Yahoo (WHO, INCIDENTALLY, RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE YOU BEND OVER AND GET FUCKED IN THE ASS BY ANY AFFILIATE YAHOO EVER DECIDES TO EVER DO ANY SORT OF MARKETING AGREEMENT WITH) has been advised of the possibility of such damages. Because some states and jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion or limitation of liability for consequential or incidental damages, the above limitation may not apply.
    For God's sake man, don't you read?
  85. And on the 8th day by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2

    On the 8th day, the Lord created Coyote linux (www.coyotelinux.com).

    And the masses thanked the lord for a floppy disk based linux router with simple PPPoE support.

    And verily the masses did get IP addresses from SBC without the use of cheesy 'client software.'

    And the masses touted a simple, open source solution that even the unenlighted masses could benefit from, and could be used to show heathens the path towards enlightenment.

    And the masses did continue to enjoy the use of their DSL lines.

    And there was much rejoicing.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  86. SBC/Yahoo Sucks! by luxin · · Score: 1

    My family has had Prodigy for the last 5-6 years and recently as of 2 years ago stopped using the dial up, just keeping it for the e-mail address. They kept sending e-mails to my dad about installing the crap on the CD and when I called to find out what it installed and why he needed it he couldn't get a straight answer from anyone. After about 3 months of the constantly bombarding him with e-mails telling him he had to install it, he did. Apparently the master user of the account has to run this, and any other accounts can just do it via the web based access (The software basically switches your account from old prodigy to the new SBC/Yahoo). After that he immediately uninstalled it and we go on not having any problem getting our mail. Although, I have noticed the amount of SPAM I get from this account went up to 100% right after the merger. (I have not used this address for a year), I haven't even given it out to anyone in a much longer period. They have in your face tactics that are rude and unless you know what you are doing with computers their software hi-jacks your browser. I personally hate going to their web page, I always get socked with ads everywhere. Why should I have to look at adds and not get an opt out when I'm paying full service charges for Prodigy's (SBC/Yahoo) service. I am a paying customer, not some bum using a free yahoo account! On that note, SBC/Yahoo sucks! ~ Luxin

    --
    ~ Luxin There's no place like 127.0.0.1
  87. Merkac Dot - Google Links, Slashdot Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Merkac Dot - The Slashdot Summariser
    In the footsteps of alterslash comes another slashdot summariser - Hoping to ease your slashdot browsing.
    This is the story with all links pointing to the google cached versions. See Merkac Dot for the full summary

    SBC-Yahoo Partnership Cuts User Privacy Privacy [G] | Posted by michael on Friday December 13, @04:17PM
    from the yahoo-knows-you're-a-dog dept.
    simeonbeta2 writes "The San Francisco Chronicle is running a story [G] about Pac Bell's dsl partnership with Yahoo. Initially touted as a new service, Pac Bell is apparently now mailing existing dsl customers to urge them to install additional client software that will enable 'incredible new features and services'. While SBC's privacy policy [G] is not excessively intrusive, use of the new software is covered by Yahoo's privacy policy [G], which is just a bit more Orwellian." The story's a little overblown - Yahoo's privacy policy reads that way because they offer financial services and the like, where they may well need financial information from you to provide the service. The reporter needed to investigate this new software DSL users are being asked to install, and find out what sort of user tracking it enables.

  88. Re:Just sign here, don't worry, we'd never enforce by el_chicano · · Score: 2
    Is using frontpage to make an anti-Microsoft web site stealing?
    That sounds like Captain Kirk logic there -- an oxymoronic contradiction intended to crash the computer! :->

    IMO, if you want to write anti-MS webpages at least do it right and do it on a Linux box or a Mac! And if you HAVE to do it on Winblows, at least use gvim!!!
    --
    A man who wants nothing is invincible
  89. no self install option for static address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you have to pay $250 to have one of their techs come into your home, plug in their laptop and make sure your dsl connection is working ...but they will include a modem of their choice for free if you sign a one year contract

  90. Pacific Bell = NULL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The name Pacific Bell will soon cease to exist, thanks to father SBC.

  91. Yes, you could by Kylow · · Score: 1

    Just because its not supported doesn't mean you can't use it. You would just have to do your own tech support, which you're probably already accustomed to doing anyway. As to top 40 and celebrities, those would be things that the greatest number of users are interested in. The most popular CD's, and the most popular people.
    -An SBC phone tech

  92. the "upgrade" process was worrisome. by Artifex · · Score: 2

    I helped my mother through the "upgrade," reading all the new agreements and not letting her download any new software. We got to a point in the activation where it said "upgrading your system" and then it said it had changed her Outlook Express settings automatically - this from within what was either a Java or ActiveX-based browser page, without us hitting any "ok" on any downloads, and running IE with "medium" level security, no default acceptance of certificates, etc.

    I'm wondering, how could it do this? She never had the original software installed (I set up RASPPPoE instead until I could get her a router - SBC is still behind the times here, using PPPoE and not ATM), and the idea that something could just start changing settings in other programs from within a browser, without any warning, worries me. Shouldn't this be considered a security vulnerability?

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  93. Not Support != Not allow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't care that you are using a router. They just haven't, and won't, train people in the use of routers with your connection.

    Most of these companies don't care that you are sharing the connection, especially DSL, since you can't go over their set limit anyway. They just don't support (i.e. can't answer any questions about) alternate OSes and alternate connectivity options.

  94. You did agree to take it in the ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that i should allow all of you access to the terms and conditions you agreed to: and if you look hard enough (I believe it is in the first few paragraphs) you get the shaft. Sorry I cannot link to the site but here is the url http://sbc.yahoo.com/terms

  95. SBC-Yahoo by Wan2Be · · Score: 1

    Way overblown. I'm a user, and don't even bother with their software anyway. I didn't have to tell them anything, just get the new server addresses.

  96. Marketing and the idiots that drive it by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    The amount of money that SBC/BooHoo(yahoo) put up for their advertising campaign would have enabled another 15-20K users to get barebones DSL access by installing and upgrading their telco equipment.

    I run a small business, so I know that marketing is a needed facet of maintaining a operation. BUT when it comes to spying on your own customers to get demographic information to resell just to make a quick buck, I think that its time to talk with your local congresscritter and senator to see if there is a law that needs to be created to bitchslap the jerks in marketing down.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  97. Re:Don't need it, don't want it by dirvish · · Score: 2

    They have Apple and Microsoft software which they support. They don't bother with anything else.