I hope FreeBSD is doing the same. I think it's pretty reasonable, given the amount of religious nuts out there.
Yet again, we tolerate their craziness. Yet they seek to put their nose in everywhere it is not wanted.
I will sign the keep the old logo petition, not because I use FBSD, but because I dislike meddling.
I was logged in as root once, and the keyboard fell on the floor, and it managed to press rm / -rf somehow.
Oh, alright, it didn't. But it would be amazing though.
I dislike it when projects say "This is under the GPL v2, or any subsequent version." Imagine if an evil company bought out the rights to create the GPL (could it happen?), and released a GPL v99 that said whatever they wanted.
I think any lawyer would never advise you to agree to something whereby you accept any future versions.
Is unbreakable encryption even theoretically possible?
Yes, but it's the one-time pad. If you're asking is asymmetric encryption theoretically unbreakable, no. As long as there are a finite amount of keys to try, you can just keep trying them all. How long it takes is the question.
Wasn't RC4 closed source until the source leaked out on the web, and they soon found flaws in it, which were patched, and it was a better algorithm for being "open sourced", albeit against it's will.
Stick to stuff like 3DES, and AES, and I think you'll be fine. But don't listen to me - I'm no cryptographer.
I went with my ISP **because** they provide newsgroups. There are lots that don't - and I don't mind paying slightly more for an ISP that sees that porn and warez, I mean Usenet access is a part of what an ISP should provide. Usenet and IRC - the original P2P and IM.
Agreed. I always appreciate when people explain how large scale outages happened, were able to happen, how they fix it, and what they do to prevent it happening again. It's useful (and good for your employment status) to learn from other people mistakes rather than your own.
So Slashdot - what are all the 500 errors about then?:)
I was reading some of the AUP for UK ADSL ISPs. They basically say: Do what you want.
From freedom2surf
What restrictions do you place on your service?
None, except of course that we require no illegal use! We block no ports, we do not restrict bandwidth or traffic (excluding our Connect and Connect Lite products - see Comparision Chart for details), we do not practice transparent caching, we do not specify what hardware you use, or how many machines you connect to our service.
Slashdot Mirror
We need some kind of underground network, where everyone is unknown, untraceable and unaccountable.
I wonder if it exists.
Wow, their DNS is stuffed.n =nyud.net
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domai
Not my fault if Coralise isn't working. Try meta.fshell.org
Some kind of anonymous, underground internet, you mean? http://meta.fshell.org.nyud.net:8090/
That sounds like the sort of spam I get.
Yet again, we tolerate their craziness. Yet they seek to put their nose in everywhere it is not wanted.
I will sign the keep the old logo petition, not because I use FBSD, but because I dislike meddling.
I was logged in as root once, and the keyboard fell on the floor, and it managed to press rm / -rf somehow.
Oh, alright, it didn't. But it would be amazing though.
I dislike it when projects say "This is under the GPL v2, or any subsequent version." Imagine if an evil company bought out the rights to create the GPL (could it happen?), and released a GPL v99 that said whatever they wanted.
I think any lawyer would never advise you to agree to something whereby you accept any future versions.
It's mutual.
No, no matter what they do, we'll still hate them, right? :)
I know that it has been in the pipeline for a while.
But how do apps take advantage of it?
I've compiled 2.6.10 recently, and I didn't see any options for "Enforce NX", or anything? Or is it a glibc thing?
Slightly unrelated: What about NX under Linux on the amd64 architecture. Anyone know if/when it is supported?
Can't be important to you though - I mean, otherwise, you'd have tested one machine first, and not upgraded if there were problems, right?
Yep. Windows 2003!! Not as good as the next version!
Yes, but it's the one-time pad. If you're asking is asymmetric encryption theoretically unbreakable, no. As long as there are a finite amount of keys to try, you can just keep trying them all. How long it takes is the question.
Wasn't RC4 closed source until the source leaked out on the web, and they soon found flaws in it, which were patched, and it was a better algorithm for being "open sourced", albeit against it's will.
Stick to stuff like 3DES, and AES, and I think you'll be fine. But don't listen to me - I'm no cryptographer.
Not the kind of models I was hoping to see... Just some boring laptops....
Maybe they don't have enough support people that know about Linux? They know where to ask... :)
I went with my ISP **because** they provide newsgroups. There are lots that don't - and I don't mind paying slightly more for an ISP that sees that porn and warez, I mean Usenet access is a part of what an ISP should provide. Usenet and IRC - the original P2P and IM.
DL360s have 2 onboard eepro100s in them. They have never failed on me.
That's what Compaq Lights-Out cards are for. Lovely things. Very handy.
Agreed. I always appreciate when people explain how large scale outages happened, were able to happen, how they fix it, and what they do to prevent it happening again. It's useful (and good for your employment status) to learn from other people mistakes rather than your own. :)
So Slashdot - what are all the 500 errors about then?
I think the way round this is to build a separate internet with VPNs..... :)
But does the slony ebuild work yet? :)
I was reading some of the AUP for UK ADSL ISPs. They basically say: Do what you want.
From freedom2surf
What restrictions do you place on your service? None, except of course that we require no illegal use! We block no ports, we do not restrict bandwidth or traffic (excluding our Connect and Connect Lite products - see Comparision Chart for details), we do not practice transparent caching, we do not specify what hardware you use, or how many machines you connect to our service.