"The difference is, the ones that come set up to run at 1.42 gigaherz passed the factory testing to qualify for that clock rating."
Sorry, what I said was 100% correct and your answer did no refute it.
Yes they test the chips to make sure they can go 1.42, then put all the ones that can't in another bin.
But they're all THE SAME CHIP.
And just because you're getting a ship that's set to go 1.25 doesn't mean it isn't perfectly capable of going 1.42. Sometimes they run out of the poorer 1.25 chips, then they just use 1.42 in their place.
How pathetic. Tremble in fear, for you have voided the almighty Mac Warranty!
Seriously, did you think that someone with the knowelege and skills to do this hack DOESN'T realize that taking a soldering iron to the inside of the Mac will void the warranty?
And you, tell me, what's the difference between the 1.25 and the 1.42? Just those jumpers. That's it. It's the SAME CHIP. They just overclock it themselves and sell it to the end user for more money.
Oh BS. The study that produced that number made it up. They gave the range of Iraqi deaths to be between 2,000(confirmed) to 200,000(Upper concievable limit), and they picked a number near the middle.
I find it amazing at how many people are sticking up for the guy who had government sanctioned rape gangs and childrens jails.
When my web site has the traffic of CNN, I'll take your advice to heart. But my site is medium sized and is doing great. In fact, I'm in the middle of adding more dynamic content.
Dynamic content rocks and isn't a problem for the vast majority of the people who use it.
Yep. And the great thing about having a licence to use a computer is the immense power it gives the government over you.
Piss off someone in power? Take away your licence.
Mistakenly accused? Take away your licence until you clear things up.
Go up against the latest policial hotbutton that no one takes seriously? To make it serious, they come up with a new punishment. Take away your licence!
A licence to operate a computer is a horrible, horrible idea.
Red hat supports it out of the box. FreeBSD you have to make install the lynx-ssl port.
My new web host uses freebsd. Little things like "Yeah, lynx used to be able to connect to secure sites, but for some reason on FreeBSD it doesn't." has made me appreciate Red Hat and Cpanel.
I don't label my CDs with labels you send through the printer because they bubble up and don't last long. I've been forced to use a pen to label my CD-Rs.
Er, don't you mean it IS "Nosy and intrusive" if you don't injure or kill anyone?
You've a huge army in someone elses country, poking around, and doing stuff, and not killing or injuring anyone. That seems VERY "Nosy and intrustive" to me.
Partially. Mostly to point out that the US military is used in both roles. And to force it out of the county for things you don't like, will also force it out for things you do like.
I shouldn't of said anything really. The original poster's statement was like some guy going up to an invading army and saying "You guys! Go home! Shoo!"
"Fear isn't rational. People fear nuclear power because of nuclear bombs. Don't bother denying it because you know that's the truth."
I do?
That's strange, I thought I knew no such thing.
"Yeah, I'm sure all the dead Japanese are fucking falling over themselves to praise the Americans for creating such a beautiful location."
Nuclear bombs will kill you just as dead as chemical bombs, or even cement warheads.
Still has nothing to do with Nuclear power.
"The cost of handling the waste is horrendous, partially because the waste can be used to make weapons."
Oh? The cost of handling waste is horrendous? Hm, I wonder how that happened? Oh, I know, the enviromentalists made an effort to kill nuclear energy and one of the ways to do that is to drive the costs of handling the wastes up though the roof.
Nuclear energy still viable? Get the populace whipped up about something that isn't a problem and force the plants to spend more money on handling the waste.
There is no limit to costs you can add when you do it in the name of "Safety" and the "Enviroment"
Three Mile Island did nothing. People pulled death esimates out of their ass.
Hiroshima was a nuclear bomb. You should fear nuclear bombs, but nuclear power? So, after being hit by all that radioactivity from the most dirty nuke ever made, what happened to Hiroshima? Oh yeah, it's a tourist spot. Blooming with wildlife.
People were already fearing nuclear power when Chernobl happened. The FUD has already set in.
Instead of treating it as an engineering problem, enviromentalists refuse to see nuclear as a solution.
And why would you say those stories are made up? Man, you're crazy too.
If it wasn't the enviromentalists pushing this anti-nuclear adjenda, who was it? The Amish?
Slashdot Mirror
"The difference is, the ones that come set up to run at 1.42 gigaherz passed the factory testing to qualify for that clock rating."
Sorry, what I said was 100% correct and your answer did no refute it.
Yes they test the chips to make sure they can go 1.42, then put all the ones that can't in another bin.
But they're all THE SAME CHIP.
And just because you're getting a ship that's set to go 1.25 doesn't mean it isn't perfectly capable of going 1.42. Sometimes they run out of the poorer 1.25 chips, then they just use 1.42 in their place.
Get it?
I'd say the good people are still out there, it's just that the hiring process filters them out.
They used to be willing to take a chance on you because they needed people so badly.
I got a PDA because I was sick of keeping track of all those little pieces of paper.
But a cheap palm will do that.
How pathetic. Tremble in fear, for you have voided the almighty Mac Warranty!
Seriously, did you think that someone with the knowelege and skills to do this hack DOESN'T realize that taking a soldering iron to the inside of the Mac will void the warranty?
And you, tell me, what's the difference between the 1.25 and the 1.42? Just those jumpers. That's it. It's the SAME CHIP. They just overclock it themselves and sell it to the end user for more money.
The machine can handle it.
Oh BS. The study that produced that number made it up. They gave the range of Iraqi deaths to be between 2,000(confirmed) to 200,000(Upper concievable limit), and they picked a number near the middle.
I find it amazing at how many people are sticking up for the guy who had government sanctioned rape gangs and childrens jails.
This is for all the people who live under REAL brutal dictators. Screw you and your whiny, pampered American ass.
Seriously, why do you bother? Anyone who hasn't figured things out by this time doesn't WANT to figure things out.
When my web site has the traffic of CNN, I'll take your advice to heart. But my site is medium sized and is doing great. In fact, I'm in the middle of adding more dynamic content.
Dynamic content rocks and isn't a problem for the vast majority of the people who use it.
Change can be good or bad. But it doesn't matter, since everything changes.
Unless you can stop time. Then you're probably not worried about change.
I thought it was Universal also.
From what people are saying, ISPs can't even manage the spam and virii coming from their own customers computers.
I doubt they'll be able to handle anything like a licence.
Yep. And the great thing about having a licence to use a computer is the immense power it gives the government over you.
Piss off someone in power? Take away your licence.
Mistakenly accused? Take away your licence until you clear things up.
Go up against the latest policial hotbutton that no one takes seriously? To make it serious, they come up with a new punishment. Take away your licence!
A licence to operate a computer is a horrible, horrible idea.
Rabid? We're not rabid! Sure, I suppose the fact that I make everyone I know watch the DVDs, so they turn into fans, could be considered contagious.
But I've never foamed at the mouth!
And they're called "Love bites"
Buy the DVDs at Amazon! For the price, it's a fantastic deal.
That's because you didn't do a seperate make install for ssl support on FreeBSD.
But if you just installed plain lynx it won't go to encrypted pages. You have to deinstall it and install lynx-ssl.
I must be reading that wrong. Revenue of 144 million, 2.6 million subscribers = average 55.3 dollars per subscriber per quarter.
They don't display their tiers anymore on the main page, but I was paying 22$ a month when I quit. They changed it to 18$ a month it seems.
So assuming that's their basic package, it should be closer to 72$ a month.
Which reminds me, I've lost my rock that keeps away tigers...
Seriously. My site gets many hits from non-standard browsers and people who mask their browser.
Red hat supports it out of the box. FreeBSD you have to make install the lynx-ssl port.
My new web host uses freebsd. Little things like "Yeah, lynx used to be able to connect to secure sites, but for some reason on FreeBSD it doesn't." has made me appreciate Red Hat and Cpanel.
What about those of us with bad handwriting?
I don't label my CDs with labels you send through the printer because they bubble up and don't last long. I've been forced to use a pen to label my CD-Rs.
This seems like a cool system.
Get a PVR-250 and let me know how it works for you.
Er, don't you mean it IS "Nosy and intrusive" if you don't injure or kill anyone?
You've a huge army in someone elses country, poking around, and doing stuff, and not killing or injuring anyone. That seems VERY "Nosy and intrustive" to me.
Partially. Mostly to point out that the US military is used in both roles. And to force it out of the county for things you don't like, will also force it out for things you do like.
I shouldn't of said anything really. The original poster's statement was like some guy going up to an invading army and saying "You guys! Go home! Shoo!"
I do?
That's strange, I thought I knew no such thing.
Nuclear bombs will kill you just as dead as chemical bombs, or even cement warheads.
Still has nothing to do with Nuclear power.
Oh? The cost of handling waste is horrendous? Hm, I wonder how that happened? Oh, I know, the enviromentalists made an effort to kill nuclear energy and one of the ways to do that is to drive the costs of handling the wastes up though the roof.
Nuclear energy still viable? Get the populace whipped up about something that isn't a problem and force the plants to spend more money on handling the waste.
There is no limit to costs you can add when you do it in the name of "Safety" and the "Enviroment"
And I'm curious, where are the people that go "Slavery! Yeah!"
Who doesn't want freedom?
Three Mile Island did nothing. People pulled death esimates out of their ass.
Hiroshima was a nuclear bomb. You should fear nuclear bombs, but nuclear power? So, after being hit by all that radioactivity from the most dirty nuke ever made, what happened to Hiroshima? Oh yeah, it's a tourist spot. Blooming with wildlife.
People were already fearing nuclear power when Chernobl happened. The FUD has already set in.
Instead of treating it as an engineering problem, enviromentalists refuse to see nuclear as a solution.
And why would you say those stories are made up? Man, you're crazy too.
If it wasn't the enviromentalists pushing this anti-nuclear adjenda, who was it? The Amish?