Slashdot Mirror


PDA Sales Fall for Third Year in Row

A reader writes "Reports ZDNet on how PDA sales have slipped for a third year in a row now at a five-year low." Anyone have numbers for sales of cell phones? My cell phone has almost every piece of functionality I got from my PDA 3 years ago. Plus a crappy camera. Still no dice roller.

312 comments

  1. There can be only one... by danielrm26 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This doesn't surprise me. I am selling my T3 Tungsten Palm right now, and it's because I just don't use it. I mean, I *want* to use it, or, more accurately, I want to *need* to use it, but it's just not something I keep with me constantly.

    I am torn between being geeky and liking tons of devices, but also moving toward simplification as a central theme in my life. Simplication, in the world of gadgets, unfortunately means using a single, do-it-all device. That for me equates to my Blackberry, which I am now syncing with my OS X machine (I refuse to be a M** person).

    Anyway, that's the trend I think -- single devices doing everything. Few people want to lug around multiple contraptions.

    --
    dmiessler.com -- grep understanding knowledge
    1. Re:There can be only one... by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 4, Informative

      Note that smartphone sales are on the rise. Standalone PDAs are suffering, but the integrated devices are taking off.

      Eric
      J2ME articles and stuff
    2. Re:There can be only one... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This doesn't surprise me. I am selling my T3 Tungsten Palm right now, and it's because I just don't use it. I mean, I *want* to use it, or, more accurately, I want to *need* to use it, but it's just not something I keep with me constantly.


      I have found this with every variation on organizers, day-planners, scheduling software, etc. They're fun to look at and play with for a few days, and you try to convince yourself this time you'll actually use it.

      The reality is, some people (like me) just don't use that kind of organizing tool and it's just a gadget. I know a lot of people who don't/won't use any such critter. I figure except for a small fraction of people, most people simply do not need this kind of thing.

      Maybe they've already sold them to everyone who cares.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:There can be only one... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've found that I never use my Palm anymore. It sits on the cradle for months at a time whereas I got through 2 or 3 of those yellow sticky notepad things a month. If I need to write something down I find a sheet of paper with some unused space and jot down a note. Who needs a $500 PDA for that???

    4. Re:There can be only one... by DarKry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Marketing strategy for Palm:

      Build in a damn phone already.

    5. Re:There can be only one... by danormsby · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking of selling my Zire 72. I was thinking of moving to a Tungsten C to enjoy wireless web page browsing but with the new Sony PSP available soon in the UK I've decided to wait for that.

      --
      Omnis amans amens
    6. Re:There can be only one... by EdHockery · · Score: 1

      A couple of years ago I quit buying PDA's because I did *not* used them longer than a year. So it turned out to be cheaper to use a paper and pencil PDA, and I stuck to that ever since

      --
      "Each man has his price Bob, and yours was pretty low...", Roger Waters, Amused To Death.
    7. Re:There can be only one... by jridley · · Score: 1

      The reality is, some people (like me) just don't use that kind of organizing tool and it's just a gadget. I know a lot of people who don't/won't use any such critter. I figure except for a small fraction of people, most people simply do not need this kind of thing.

      I like PDAs but not enough to carry one just for the organizer part. I now do carry one because I have a Tungsten that plays MP3s and RAs, and has a good enough screen that I can read books and view photos on it. Just the PDA functions weren't enough to keep me carrying one.

      I personally disconnected my cell phone a few months back, I just don't use a phone that much so I wouldn't want an integrated phone/pda, but a PDA with more than just PDA is good for me. If I wanted a phone, I'd want it all in one. Less crap to carry is good.

    8. Re:There can be only one... by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      hahaha
      Funny because it's true!
      Dead tree and a pencil are more reliable, cheaper to replace, less likely to be stolen, and has less of a learning curve than a PDA. No weird stylus moves to learn, just your basic english. :)

    9. Re:There can be only one... by mausmalone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I say this in all seriousness, and I will be flamed for it.... but if somebody writes a phonebook/notepad/general PDA program for the Nintendo DS that supports WiFi e-mail and AIM/Yahoo Messenger/MSN/ICQ, I would buy it in a heartbeat (and a DS for that matter). As much as I like PDA's in general, it's not as constantly useful as gaming to me.

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
    10. Re:There can be only one... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Informative

      You selectively quoted the poster, and changed the sense of their post. They don't just lose the novelty of a new toy, they don't want to carry multiple devices:

      "That for me equates to my Blackberry, which I am now syncing with my OS X machine (I refuse to be a M** person)."

      The point is that, faced with carrying two devices, one of which (a phone) they want to carry everywhere, they choose that one, and drop the other. Smartphones are neat gadgets, with all the PDA functions that don't quite justify carrying them everywhere for many people. But their phone puts them over the threshold of just a gadget, into an essential tool for lots of people.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    11. Re:There can be only one... by batemanm · · Score: 2, Informative
      Build in a damn phone already.

      Done.

    12. Re:There can be only one... by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      I missed the part where $500 was the minimum price for a PDA? I carry a Tungsten T2 that I paid less than $200 for that has voice recording (even easier to "jot" down an idea by just pressing a button and saying it), bluetooth access to my cellphone (that was free when I signed up for service) for email, web, SSH, etc. in addition to "sticky note" capability. It syncs with my work PC wirelessly and picks up my scheduled appointments (which are added by authorized people).

    13. Re:There can be only one... by plumby · · Score: 1

      I've had many electronic organisers for over 10 years now, from stand alone thing with single line displays, through various Psions/Palms/iPaqs, upgrading every 18-36 months as a new shinier/fancier device came out, and I pretty much can't live without them.

      However, there's been nothing in the past few years in the PDA world that's offered any features (except size) that my second iPaq didn't have (or at least any that I would use). Instead, my last 2 organisers have both been phones (the Nokia 3650, and now the Orange Smartphone). This last one does everything that I need from an organiser (calendar, contacts, sync with Outlook at work, and at home etc), all in a v. small mobile phone.

      This is the problem that stand alone PDAs have - most of their market has been eaten up by Smartphones.

    14. Re:There can be only one... by vettemph · · Score: 1

      Simplification is good. I have a Nokia 6800. Got it for free from AT&T before they were bought by cingular which is just as well. It looks like a phone and flips open to reveal a keyboard. They now have the 6810 and 6820. To me it is a good mix of features. Cell phone with great coverage, Planner, email, prioritized TODO, IRDA, text notes and mesaging, internet to check/buy/sell your stocks (and lots of kids features too).
      I was about to buy a PDA when I found 6800. I recommend that any should at least have a look at the 68xx before buying a cell phone/plan. It's small and has a (thumb) keyboard.

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    15. Re:There can be only one... by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      I would rather have ten devices that do their jobs very well than one device that does ten jobs poorly.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    16. Re:There can be only one... by mikers · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They're fun to look at and play with for a few days, and you try to convince yourself this time you'll actually use it.

      Maybe you just never found your killer app. I did.

      The PDA for me has worked the best as a raw text entry device. I used it in any university and extension courses where there is a huge amount of text or material that doesn't involve a lot of math or derivations or drawing (like History, Economics, Marketing. I even used it in my Intro to Databases course). Occasional diagrams can be put on a paper notepad, but try doing text search through 100 pages of notes. Or cleaning up and reorganizing notes -- talk about time consuming and clunky.

      Plain text editing without all the formating crap is where its at on PDAs. Unfortunately, this required an external keyboard, something others didn't dish out for. Data entry techniques on the PDAs without a keyboard are almost impossible, and built in keyboards like the zaurus are almost useless.

      Contrast this with taking a notebook computer to class. In university, my experience has been that usually the people using them are just fiddling with fonts, or colors or text layout... Anything but actually taking notes. It seems to be more a toy than an actual tool -- something to show off. But with my pda, I had no fonts or text layout to play around with: I could just take notes. And its tiny compared to a notebook computer, 10% of the cost and liability, the battery lasts weeks (besides being easy to replace at 2 AAA batteries) and it is light and small.

    17. Re:There can be only one... by Pionar · · Score: 1

      The next killer app in the mobile world will be a device that combines a music player, a video game system, a PDA, a phone, and a camera. Does the PSP have phone capabilities?

    18. Re:There can be only one... by Jheaden · · Score: 1

      For me I've found that I mostly use my PDA as a eBook reader. Occasionally I put appointments in it, but its still mostly an eBook reader

    19. Re:There can be only one... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there is a term for "being attracted to new techonolgical devices which you have no earthly use for". If not there should be because I am suffering from it.

    20. Re:There can be only one... by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      I would expect Archos to fill this need LONG before Sony would with the PSP.

    21. Re:There can be only one... by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      Take a look at the Treo 600 and 650. Although video gaming on this thing is still quite low-tek, there is a gameboy emulator evailable for it.

    22. Re:There can be only one... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So, you're going to carry them in what, a fanny pack? A purse? My cellphone has an adequate contact list (you can enter multiple contact types for someone at once, but it generates separate phone book entries for each contact type) and an acceptable date book, plus I can jot down notes under the messaging section (the phone does email but I haven't paid for GPRS so I'm not using it) and play games. The input system is pretty simplistic, though it does have multiple keypress support which apparently no one uses. Guess you have to be Nokia to define cellphone functionality. And, of course, it has a camera. It is very small and convenient to carry around. I don't need to add to my wardrobe to accomodate it :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:There can be only one... by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      You know, I do the same thing, but with a twist:

      I take those stickies and later enter everything I've written down into my Zaurus. I use my Zaurus as a data storage tool, so to speak. That includes pdfs, word docs, xls, whatever I might need to refer back to often. I have all the apps on the Zaurus I need to read or write these formats, so that's not a problem.

      It's a lot easier having all your data in a single place (which you can back up, I might add), and not have to spend the time firing up a laptop. PDAs are instant-on devices.

    24. Re:There can be only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am torn between being geeky and liking tons of devices

      You've chosen the right path, as one that likes a ton of gadgets to carry around is a faux geek that is trying to make up for some other inadequacy. Maybe they are using all this stuff as a shield against the outside world?

    25. Re:There can be only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, this required an external keyboard, something others didn't dish out for.

      Ah, so you're the dork that brings a noisy keyboard into a lecture. Why do people feel that putting notes into a computer is better than just writting them down and then typing them in later on? Oh you're too busy to type something in again? Think of it as re-reading what you would of typed in the first time (and probably will never reread anyway).

    26. Re:There can be only one... by Schnapple · · Score: 1
      Yeah this pretty much hits the nail on the head. I still have, in my briefcase, an original Handspring Visor PDA. Like 2MB of RAM and PalmOS 3.1 on it. It occasionally alarms me - either to buy it more batteries or some meeting which has long been cancelled but I haven't resynched it in forever.

      My Wife has an iPaq something and barely uses it. A waste of money. I thought about getting one but why? So I can schedule meetings? I'm at my desk all day - Outlook tells me what I need to know. Perhaps if I had a lot of appointments outside of the office I'd need one, but I don't have kids to take to little league or tons of parties to go to (married and posting to slashdot - what a surprise).

      I thought about getting a top-of-the-line Windows PDA but why? To develop things for it? Might be neat, but who would buy it if the PDA market is slumped? To run games? My GBA SP does this much better than a PDA can.

      In the battle for the PDA versus the cell phone, the cell phone wins. I thought about getting a phone with PDA integrated but they're way too expensive.

      And it occurs to me - a lot of people (non-techies) who really need a PDA won't ever use one. Too busy - it would just slow them down. The really busy people have assistants and secrataries.

    27. Re:There can be only one... by The+Bender · · Score: 1

      Given that choice, I'll have neither.

      I'd rather have one device that does ten jobs well.

    28. Re:There can be only one... by midknight32 · · Score: 1

      I used to use a PDA quite a bit when I was working in an environment that it just wasn't practical to bring my laptop into on a regular basis. I could take notes and synch them to my computer later, play games when bored, didn't have to rewrite multiple entries as I tore out pages of material that were mostly crossed out/checked off, etc.

      Now, as a computer tech, I always have my laptop with me, so the "Dorkalator" got sidelined....

      What brought it back was using it as an e-book reader for ebooks I'd downloaded from baen.....

    29. Re:There can be only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, my problem isn't how much I do or don't need one...

      I got a used palm vx a while back, and I thought "This'll be sweet!" And it was pretty sweet. Then, like the 3rd day I had it I put it in my back pocket and carried it around all day. Sat on it. Bent the fram, which pushed against the touchscreen, which set the whole centering thing way off. It was fixable, but man if I can't carry the thing around in my back pocket then fuck it! I don't believe that any of the modern analogues look any more robust. I've seen super burly ones, but they won't even fit in my back pocket.

      If I can't carry it around like a wallet then it's a no go.

    30. Re:There can be only one... by sxmjmae · · Score: 1

      My company supplies me with the cheapest simpliest cell phone they can find. It good enough what I use it for - a phone!

      The company sees no need to buy a phone that can snap pictures, sprout into a flower, do the wash etc.

      I do have a T3 as well but I use it read books while on the plane, play some games and keep track of important dates.

      I understand that it would be nice to have everything in one unit but why should I expect the company I work for to pay for it.

      --
      My Sig indicates the end of the comment I posted.
    31. Re:There can be only one... by will-el · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The point is that, faced with carrying two devices, one of which (a phone) they want to carry everywhere, they choose that one, and drop the other.

      There are two ways (two independant axis, if you will) to increase the usefulness of a device. You can add more and more features/capability/power, or you can increase the probability that you will have the device with you -- by making is smaller, more durable, make the battery last longer, lowering the cost. The last one has been completely overlooked by the PocketPC manufacturers. I'm not going to go snowboarding with a $599 PDA in my pocket, because I don't want to worry about breaking it. But a $70 phone or a $199 Palm I'll take with me.

    32. Re:There can be only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I need to write something down I find a sheet of paper with some unused space and jot down a note. Who needs a $500 PDA for that???

      The point of a PDA is not to 'jot down a note'. It is to keep hundreds of pieces of information organized, up-to-date, and quickly accessible.

      It's actually a very old concept.

      If you don't understand why some people like filing cabinets with color-coded hanging and interior folders, then you probably won't appreciate why some people like having a PDA.

      I'll make an unfair generalization here, and shift from talking about "like" to "need":

      If you are a programmer, you don't need a PDA. If you are a manager, you really do need a PDA, or else the old-fashioned equivalents (day planner, secretary with rolodex, etc.).

    33. Re:There can be only one... by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      We all hated the kid with the laptop when I was a Freshman in Comp Sci. That was 8 years ago, so things are probably a lot different now, but man I wanted to change my major to "Kicking That Kid In The Nuts" every time I was in class.

    34. Re:There can be only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he probably hated you too, you self-important fuck

    35. Re:There can be only one... by StressedEd · · Score: 1
      The PDA for me has worked the best as a raw text entry device.

      I second that... doesn't involve a lot of math or derivations

      I tend to use LaTeX for documents so even that works out fine. Once you've go the hang of how to write equations etc (a few hours) it's dead easy. I've really come full circle regarding word processing, if you don't have this-or-that feature you don't play with it and inevitably end up doing more work!

      As an aside, for those using PalmOS type devices I can recommend peditPro http://home.columbus.rr.com/nevai/palm/. In the end most people don't really need that colour screen and multimedia capability my trusty second hand Handspring does everything I need.

      --
      Be nice to people on the way up. You will meet them again on your way down!
    36. Re:There can be only one... by MarkedMan · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I use my Palm constantly. It is always with me (I am 6' 1" and it fits easily in my pants pocket). In addition to 1500 contacts, my calendar, I have the oddest things tucked away in notes such as what type of bag my vacuum cleaners use, the type of battery in my watch, the connection info for my various ISP's, rest stops along various highways with Burger Kings that have a kids play zone, in other words, all kinds of things I use only once in a great while. I don't remember where they are, I simply search for them. I keep some photos on there when people ask about my kids, I listen to books-on-tape. I keep Scrabble on it for when I'm waiting for something. I always keep a text book on it and read it while I am waiting in line. In a restaurant I'll often play tic-tac-toe on the notepad with my 5 year old to keep him busy, or let him draw pictures. I have my grocerie list in it, arranged in the same order as my supermarket. We make a 3 minute annual video to send to friends and families and I keep a copy on the palm. I use it a half dozen or a dozen times a day. Possibly because it is easy to carry and possibly because I travel so much. (I put in all my travel info - hotel numbers, which terminal the flight is leaving from, confirmation codes, and the phone number of anyone I'm meeting when I arrive. Who wants to carry paper or god-forbid boot up a computer just to give someone a 10 digit number? For that matter, who wants to carry around the dozen hotel club membership cards, or two dozen airline frequent flyer number cards? I just select the number and hand the whole thing to the clerk.

    37. Re:There can be only one... by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      I'm going to carry what I need when I need it. If I only need my phone, I'll carry my phone. If I need other things, I'll carry them. A device that does one thing is always smaller than a device that does more than that. Remember the cell phone on a chip?

      I carry my cell phone and my iPod with me everywhere in my jacket. If I need to, I have an extra pocket for my eTrex GPS reciever, which I don't always need. I bought a sleeve for my powerbook so i can carry that to and from work, and it fits inside another bag for longer trips.

      I don't have trouble carrying anything.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    38. Re:There can be only one... by cakefool · · Score: 2, Funny

      successful marketing

    39. Re:There can be only one... by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      This is why i also dumped my Palm m505/ SonyEricsson T68 combo...

      I ended up with a SonyEricsson P800, which was a better phone than the T68i, and a better PDA than the Palm. Plus it had decent MP3/Ogg support (Ogg via software). Did more, read word files direct, blah blah blah...

      After 2 years of INTENSIVE service, i have just replaced the P800 with a SOnyEricsson S700i, which despite NOT being a smartphone, has enough PDA features to satisfy me.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    40. Re:There can be only one... by Java+Ape · · Score: 5, Insightful
      LOL! I am the laughing stock of WSU, where I'm working on an M.S. in computer science. EVERYONE has a laptop, and most of them play games or chat during lecture. I bring a $0.75 spiral notebook and a pencil, just like when I was a kid.

      It works surprisingly well -- I get highly-formatted text, including greek and cyrillic characters as needed. I can reproduce complex drawings, including simple gray-scale shading. In shorthand mode, I can capture output in near real time, and in high-quality output mode other students can generally read my notes. Pretty amazing things, these pencils.

      I watched a fellow student using both thumbs to frantically poke tic-tac sized buttons on his PDA's integrated keyboard, and offered him a piece of paper and a spare pencil. "No way", he said, "this is a $500 PDA!". Sigh.

    41. Re:There can be only one... by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      FWIW, I use my Palm constantly. It is always with me (I am 6' 1" and it fits easily in my pants pocket).


      You lost me at this point. :-P (Sorry)

      My problem is that I'm just too pathologically disorganized to try and use anything to help in that regards.

      I'd probably just end up losing/breaking the palm and losing everything that was on it.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    42. Re:There can be only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still use a Palm Vx because the newer Palm devices are too big.

    43. Re:There can be only one... by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 1

      I should probably look at all-in-ones again soon, but my experience last time around was that I can't stand them.

      I want to only have to carry around one device... but when I'm wanting to listen to music, I don't want to deal with a stylus or phone buttons... I want the iPod's wheel (and storage). When I'm entering notes, I don't want the iPod's wheel or a thumb-sized keyboard, I want a pen-like device (unless it's reasonably close to full-sized, I'll write it out faster than I can type it out). When I want to talk on the phone, I don't want a big screen pressed up against my face... and I don't want the bulk of a PDA in my pocket whenever I want to carry my phone.

      The net result is that I have three devices, and depending on circumstances I might carry 1, 2, or 3 of these devices at a time. I have to get creative with pockets, wearing a jacket, and so on... but the pay off is that everything really is quite easy to use. Using iSync to keep my address book straight across the phone and PDA and computer, and Bluetooth when I want to dial a number that isn't synchronized (uncommonly used numbers), I get along pretty well. It's not ideal, but neither is trying to use a smart phone to hold 150 albums of music, or make a PDA be a decent phone.

      In addition to all that, I want Bluetooth in my phone: OS X's AddressBook is pretty slick with Bluetooth, never mind wireless synchronization and headsets. OS X-supported, Bluetooth-capable smart phones are in pretty short supply right now :-)

      --
      --Matthew
    44. Re:There can be only one... by tetsuji · · Score: 1

      I definitely concur about having to find a killer app for the Palm to make it worthwhile. For me, it was storing passwords securely for a large collection of accounts (using Keyring for PalmOS.)

      Once I started using Keyring, it meant that my Palm was always with me and it became the planner/notebook/toy that I use constantly. I use it to store my recipes, to record my games when I play Go, lists of ideas for gifts (since I regularly have good ideas for what to get people, except for when I actually need to get them a gift), music want lists... it's indispensable.

      Of course, my cellphone is something of an antique, so that could have something to do with it as well...

    45. Re:There can be only one... by SillyKing · · Score: 1

      There is 1 device if it came to market that I would use to upgrade my older cell phone and PDA.

      A GPS/PDA/CDMA phone. MP3 player added on might be usefull, but not required.

      I have a Motorola StarTac phone, 4+ years old, it simply works, better than newer phones for reception.

      I have a Palm IV. It simply works. Have a couple small programs on it, great for a contact list and little reminder notes to myself.

      I would like to get a GPS as well, but don't want to carry around another device.

      I don't need a camera, don't need a color screen or customizable ringtones.

      So the first company that makes a CDMA phone with built in PalmOS and GPS system will get my business. It can't have a camera (could not bring it to work, defeating the purpose of having it in part). Color screen I suppose would be nice for GPS maps, but again not needed.

      SillyKing

    46. Re:There can be only one... by gonzoxl5 · · Score: 1

      the crazy thing is that I had an argument with the lead analyst at Gartner for mobile devices a few years ago about just this subject.

      My argument was that device convergence would be consumer demand led and was inevitable, he was convinced that people 'wanted' to have a phone that was a phone, a PDA that was a PDA etc.

      its easy to see how/why the PDA vendors trip up when they pay these people money for so called market 'intelligence'!

    47. Re:There can be only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya, i do the same thing. i have a palm 3xe.
      oops gtg histry 20th centery europ....

    48. Re:There can be only one... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Cool! How much you want for it? Seriously. I am in the market. I lost my Visor Edge, and it's like I lost a third of my brain. Dead serious: Email me if you want to sell this thing.

      Yay secondary market!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    49. Re:There can be only one... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I lose paper, and there's no backup.

      If I lose or break my Palm, I get another one cheap, push the "sync" button, and I'm ready to go.

      The only thing that's important is my data. I want the most reliable data storage and retrieval medium. Paper doesn't work for me.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    50. Re:There can be only one... by browngb · · Score: 1

      I believe that trend will rise. Up until November, I owned an HP iPAQ, that I sold to my boss. I had talked him and another coworker into buying pda's, because it's important that we have the information we need on us. (We're project managers for a construction company). After hooking them, I went and bought my new MPx220 Smartphone. I showed them all the cool functionality, and now they're wondering how they can sell their pda's (that I just made them get) to get smartphones. The ability to call anyone in my contacts with a voice command far outways any use a stylus gives me.

      --
      Generally, I get bored with my replies and give up on making sense halfway through.
    51. Re:There can be only one... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      I disagree. (In fact, I'm in the market for a T3 right now, since my venerable Palm III isn't cutting it anymore). I don't like lugging multiple devices around, but I've had about 5 cellphones in the last 7 years or so and have kept the same PDA througout. I would truely be lost without it (contacts, calendar, to-do list, expense tracking, memos my primary uses). I dont want to have to throw out my PDA every time I get a new cell phone (or vice-versa).

    52. Re:There can be only one... by Asphalt · · Score: 1
      The next killer app in the mobile world will be a device that combines a music player, a video game system, a PDA, a phone, and a camera. Does the PSP have phone capabilities?

      Already here.

      The PPC-6600, and to a lessor extent, the Samsung i700.

      Better games than a gameboy, IMHO (and yes I will admit to having a gameboy). You can get a Madden NFL SD card, and play the title right on the phone. It's got an MP3 PLayer, DIVX Player (I can watch a couple of feature length DVD's on a 1GB card), MPG Player, AVI Player, camera, and yes ... an excellent phone with voice dailing, speakerphone, caller ID, etc. And of course, email, web browsing, IRC, SSH, and what have you. And the PPC has a keyboard too.

      The Treo's have most of these features as well, although the gaming, multimedia capabilities, and especially the internal memory are notoriously lacking. Treo's are darn good telephony and email devices though.

    53. Re:There can be only one... by Asphalt · · Score: 1
      Why do people feel that putting notes into a computer is better than just writting them down and then typing them in later on?

      I'm on of the three people on the planet that actually bought a tablet PC, and I have to tell you ... it's pretty darn awesome.

      I write directly onto the computer, and it will text recognize everything.

      Windows Journal and One Note are the way to go if you need this kind of thing.

      Granted it won't fit in your pocket, but it will in a briefcase or small backpack.

    54. Re:There can be only one... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, this required an external keyboard, something others didn't dish out for.

      Now that you mention it, what I could really use is an external keyboard without the PDA. Seriously. Give me a small, quiet keyboard with an append-only text buffer that gets wiped clean every time it's synced with its host computer, and maybe a small LCD to show the last 50 or so characters I've typed.

      That's it. No editing, so searching, nothing else - just raw text input at high speed. I'm a good enough typist that I could pay attention to a speaker or jot notes without looking at a display, and I have absolutely zero desire for the ability to change fonts and formatting on anything smaller than a PC.

      Of course, the odds of anyone actually making this are roughly zero, unless you count using a Bluetooth keyboard with a small Bluetooth computer or PDA hidden away nearby. Too bad. I think I really would have liked my little keyboard.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    55. Re:There can be only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in college (1976-1980) nobody brought a computer to class. There just wasn't enough room in the class for a "real" computer like a Univac or a PDP-10, and I'd love to see somebody trying to take notes in binary on one of those Altair machines. Or an IBM card punch.

    56. Re:There can be only one... by aussersterne · · Score: 1

      Data entry techniques on the PDAs without a keyboard are almost impossible, and built in keyboards like the zaurus are almost useless.

      I took almost all my notes for my B.A. and my M.A. on my Newton 2100, writing anywhere on the screen, in natural handwriting, at full speed.

      Just wanted to let everyone know that handwriting recognition isn't bad by nature, it's just that the marketplace (as often happens) has disposed of some of the best technologies in favor of some of the worst.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    57. Re:There can be only one... by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      I find the inside of my Tungsten E flip-cover is a great place to stick a Post-it when I need to take it with me.

      Best of both worlds :-)

    58. Re:There can be only one... by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      Headset, man, headset.

      Then you can also walk down the street looking like you are talking to yourself.

    59. Re:There can be only one... by eoyount · · Score: 1

      Are you selling it online? I might be interested if the price is right. You can email me at eoyount at gmail or just reply here.

      By the way, will 50 gmail invites sweeten the pot?

      --
      To understand recursion,
      you must first understand recursion.
    60. Re:There can be only one... by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      Maybe they've already sold them to everyone who cares.

      I'd say this is highly likely - the people who use PDAs long term don't really need the bells and whistles of new units, as the major use of PDAs is to enter, store, organise and retrieve plain text. The other features might be nice, but I don't know anyone who regularly upgrades their PDA because of them.

    61. Re:There can be only one... by OECD · · Score: 1

      what I could really use is an external keyboard without the PDA.

      The original Alphasmart was exactly that. Now they're more of a PDA+Keyboard device. You might find the originals on Ebay or somesuch. The new ones are at Alphasmart.com.

      --
      One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    62. Re:There can be only one... by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      I got a PDA because I was sick of keeping track of all those little pieces of paper.

      But a cheap palm will do that.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    63. Re:There can be only one... by Storm · · Score: 1
      Personally, I would rather carry two devices, in this case, than a combined device. The problem is that I use my phone as a phone, and my PDA for a slew of other things. Not only games, but mp3 player, password repository, one-time password generator, and other apps. I do information assurance for a living, and the main thing I use my PDA for is a portable mobile library for the manuals etc that I use on the job (yeeeaaah, Plucker). In addition, thanks to Baen Free Library, I do much of my leisure reading on my Palm. (Bosses get far less uptight if you pull out your PDA in a staff meeting than they do if you whip out a paperback during his diatribe...)

      That said, they are completely different form factors. I like compact phones (I still have a Motorola V60), and hate talking on a pda form factor. On the other hand, the display of a phone is too small for prolonged reading. So I prefer separate devices.

      I personally think its a shame that the PDA seems a dying breed.

      --
      --Storm
    64. Re:There can be only one... by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      I absolutely lothe teeny weeny phones. That is why I like my PDA/phone Handspring Treo. But it looks like they did away with this because the rest of the world likes holding their fragile phone with a pair of tweesers.

      I used to carry a Palm V, and I had a phone and pager. The Treo does all 3 of those jobs without sacrificing any of them. Bugs notwithstanding...

      Now I carry a Treo and an iPod. That is the next natural evolution. Just add music to it. I dont need any video games, chess is enough and I only play that on the pot.

    65. Re:There can be only one... by johnrpenner · · Score: 1


      the palm m500 works great as a plain text device
      as long as you use QED -- i use it all the time to
      read online ascii books. so far, i've read about
      seven books this way, and it works great.

      it provides what i really want in a palm-sized device:
      a file browser and a decent text editor. i never use
      the built-in appointment or calendar apps. i actually
      find the black & white screen better than the colour
      screens, because it doesn't burn your eyes out in
      low light conditions (it uses reverse backlight).

      j.

  2. Yes but by 2.7182 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is a technology trend, noted by a study at UPenn that new technology almost always has a dip after its first big increase. So the jury is still out.

    1. Re:Yes but by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

      Seems plausible...it certainly happened with cellphones (which are now recovering) and PC's (around 1985). But then again it happened to CB's, which never recovered and turned out to be a fad. Nor do I think telephone installations ever dipped after explosive growth in the 19-teens. Gotta link for that study?

    2. Re:Yes but by nharmon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But then again it happened to CB's, which never recovered and turned out to be a fad.

      You don't consider the popularity of FRS and GMRS radios as being the CB's second coming?

    3. Re:Yes but by twalk · · Score: 1

      Yes but... If you add the 1.5M treo 600 sales to the P1's PDA sales, you find that P1 shipped over a million units more total in '04 than in '03...

    4. Re:Yes but by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      In some ways I suppose it is. Vehicle-to-vehicle communications has pretty much gone from CB to FRS. But FRS, being FM, is technically superior. And the UHF band is better suited to portable radio. (Why the FCC mandated amplitude modulation for CB is beyond me...any cost saved by a cheaper reciever is lost on a more expensive transmitter...and designating the 10 meter band for short range line-of-sight is something of a travesty.) And CB had a usenet-like community flavor (channel 19 for truckers, channel 11 as a meeting place, channel 9 for emergency, a well-developed jargon, etc.). FRS seems to be used exclusively to talk to people you already know who are traveling with you.

      It just seems to me that there was too long of an hiatus, and the technologies a bit too different, to count the two as manifestations of the same phenomenon.

  3. Logical by mirko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I personally had a Zaurus SL5500 which suffered from stupid autonomy problems as well as a poor ergonomy and a lack of decent performance (try to edit a decently sized Excel sheet in his spreadsheet).
    So, I swapped it for a read-only PDA : An iPod, that is.
    I think people now either get a smartphone or an iPod for such needs.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:Logical by pdbogen · · Score: 1

      So... you can edit a decently sized Excel sheet on your iPod? /just sayin'

    2. Re:Logical by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      uh.. that's very illogical.

      you had a 'need' to edit LARGE excel spreadsheets.. so you switched to a music player with some note-reading functionality.

      more to note would be that in most countries where phones commonly come through the carrier, you'll get price-cuts on the phone (that you of course pay with your subscription ultimately but that's another thing)- you can't get them on the pda.. so the pda seems more expensive anyhow(good pda's are pretty expensive).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Logical by mirko · · Score: 1

      No, I just realised I should just avoid paying for a device that pretend to be able to do it : The keyword was simplicity : I want music and reminders.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
  4. What I need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I guess PDA is not enough. Cell phone, camera, mp3 player, wifi and PDA would be nice, tough...

    1. Re:What I need... by hotgazpacho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My friend, you are talking about the PalmOne Treo 650 with SanDisk's Wi-Fi SD card.

    2. Re:What I need... by natron+2.0 · · Score: 1

      can it get me a beer as well? that would be nice. Actually, I have opted not to get a PDA ever since I got my Motorola V220 phone. It does everything I need and I can sync it up with my laptop and pc via usb cable.

    3. Re:What I need... by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      Or the i-Mate PDA2K, which comes with GPRS, Bluetooth and WiFi.

  5. Not a suprise... by Bolshoy+Pimpovich · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Laptops are shrinking, your iPod can store contacts and has a calendar, and mobile phones have the same functionality...

    not really a shock.

    --
    Ehta nyeh IBM, ehta Macintosh!
    1. Re:Not a suprise... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I found this ability in the iPod completely useless. My 'phone syncs automatically when it enters bluetooth range (thanks to Romeo and some AppleScript). My iPod, on the other hand, needs the cable plugged in, which almost never happens (the cable is usually plugged into the mains. I drop the 'Pod in the dock when I get in, and it charges. It only touches my computer when I have new music to add to it. If Apple had combined the Airport Express and the iPod dock so that syncing could be done over 802.11 (or even bluetooth - at least for contacts, if not for music) then this might have been a useful feature.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. No Dice Roller? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    If your phone has J2ME (it likely does) you could probably get it to run jSimpleDice.

  7. No Blackberrys? by thewldisntenuff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    TFA states that no Blackberry or Blackberry-like devices were counted.....Could this have pulled the numbers up?

    I think the line between pda/cell phone is starting to blur....Might as well have counted the Blackberry....Hell, you can do most of what you need to on a PDA on a cell phone these days. And they come free/relatively cheap with new service

    thewldisntenuff

    1. Re:No Blackberrys? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      smartphone sales are up.

      traditional pda sales are down.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:No Blackberrys? by rdc_uk · · Score: 1

      " TFA states that no Blackberry or Blackberry-like devices were counted.....Could this have pulled the numbers up?"

      hardly insightful, really. Adding a load of sales of a DIFFERENT class of device, is not a sensible way to pull up numbers.

      Sales of steam trains are falling; could adding in sales of cars pull the numbers up?

    3. Re:No Blackberrys? by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

      It's not all that different at all. The original ones were a different class, but the current BBs are as much a PDA as an average Palm/PPC.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    4. Re:No Blackberrys? by chris09876 · · Score: 1

      They're a "smartphone". They're counted differently. This study only measured the sales of plain old PDAs. As other studies show (http://www.mobilizedsoftware.com/news/showArticle .jhtml?articleId=59201653 the sales of smartphone devices are up.

      Blackberries have some PDA functionality, but they do much more. Web browsing (although it's slow) and e-mail are great features that you can't get with a typical 'unconnected' PDA.

    5. Re:No Blackberrys? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      what defines a smartphone? my last phone presented itself as just a cellphone but had appointments in it, and supports J2ME with MIDP 1.0. where is the line?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:No Blackberrys? by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      It's easy to tell if it has the IP address.

      You can telnet to its management port (
      # telnet pda 8443) and you will see "smartphone" or "pda" in the prompt.
      Greet it with HELO:
      HELO "ip address"
      The word you're looking for is going to be the first word that appears after EHLO such as:
      200 EHLO "device" "manufacturer" "version" "language" "features"

    7. Re:No Blackberrys? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point entirely. A string a phone responds with doesn't mean shit unless smartphone is a brand name, at which point it's meaningless. What separates a "smart" phone from a non-smartphone? Is there even such thing as a non-smartphone today? After all, they can pretty much all run java applets. (MIDlets.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:No Blackberrys? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, what defines a pda?

      generally though, you could consider symbian, palm and ms smartphone based phones as smartphones.

      the point is that a pda without a phone is dying.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  8. Just an observation by JamesD_UK · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I've noticed that whilst maybe three years ago people would like to show off their latest PDA with all the latest features, now mobile phones appear to be the fashionable gadget that that people want to show off with all the latest wiz-bang features.

    Another thought is that modern mobile phones have more akin with PDAs (albiet in a different format package) than they do with older generation phones and that the 'phone' feature was the killer applications.

  9. my PDA is still better but... by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    It has a large display, much better quality. I can put games on it (without paying Verizon for them), easy to hookup to my computer, much more memory, more functional calendar, todo list, address book.

    All around it's better.

    butcomplete lack of quality products on the market.

    If a company came out with a decent priced good PDA... it would be a whole new market. Unfortunately, there are none.

    [dream]I'm still hoping Apple will eventualy step up with a PDA, Phone, Mp3 player deal that will knock everyone's socks off.[/dream]

    1. Re:my PDA is still better but... by usernotfound · · Score: 1

      Yes, but would you like to be "one of those people" who uses it? Just imagine what their marketing machine would do...you'd be assured that 50% of it's users dont use even 50% of it's functionality. They bought it because they didn't know what else to get and it was pretty.

      --
      You call it excessive, I call it ambitious.
    2. Re:my PDA is still better but... by pdbogen · · Score: 1

      What, have you not heard about the new iSockKnocker?
      ...I've got nothing. But anyway, if you have a PDA, you don't need extra functionality to make it an MP3 player. Just a good, readily available player, plenty of memory, and good battery life.

  10. Question about your blackberry by 2.7182 · · Score: 1

    I've been thinking about getting one and syching it with OS X. How well have you been finding it works ? Often things are a little bumpier for OS X since people make hardware with windows in mind,

    BTW. nice highlander reference.

    1. Re:Question about your blackberry by danielrm26 · · Score: 3, Informative

      " I've been thinking about getting one and syching it with OS X. How well have you been finding it works?"

      Yes, it seems to be working quite nicely. Alarmed events from iCal don't come over with alarms in the device (unless I'm missing something), but other than that it seems pretty decent.

      --
      dmiessler.com -- grep understanding knowledge
    2. Re:Question about your blackberry by 2.7182 · · Score: 1

      Ah that's just what I wanted to know though. I need to have my phone ring and warn me about appointments that are on ical. So if I understand you correctly, that doesn't work ?

    3. Re:Question about your blackberry by SLASHAttitude · · Score: 1

      Try the Treo devices. My office just got me one and I am in love. It syncs with OSX and Linux, and has good email functinality. I just wish the keyboard was better. Just my 2 cents.

  11. It's not just cell phones by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    that are replacing pda functionality. Hell, even the iPod has most of the functions of a basic pda sans an input method. I use it as my pda because my phone sucks, I just plug it into the cradle at night and it charges, updates my calendar, to do list, contacts etc.
    Might not be good for people who constantly have to write stuff down, but for me it does what I need to do, oh yeah and plays music.

    1. Re:It's not just cell phones by aug24 · · Score: 1

      That's odd cos my new phone does everything I need plus plays MP3s (and takes a gig card to store them on) ;-)

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    2. Re:It's not just cell phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a P910 by any chance? In my opinion these are the best as it:

      a) runs Opera.. check!
      b) runs Aglie Messenger.. check!
      c) owns. check!

      Plus you must get Lemmings for it! Touchscreen + lemmings = godly.

  12. I can see why by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Funny

    I took mine back when I found out that you could not point them at a settlement and see on the readout how many humanoid life forms there were in it, and that they were not capable of detecting nearby warp drive fields.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:I can see why by General+Newcomb · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think you can do this with tricorder for Palm.

    2. Re:I can see why by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they can't count mitichlorians, either.

      --
      Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
    3. Re:I can see why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I took mine back when I found out that you could not point them at a settlement and see on the readout how many humanoid life forms there were in it, and that they were not capable of detecting nearby warp drive fields.

      You don't have the right software. My Pocket PC has never failed to detect a nearby warp field.

  13. dice roller? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    ?

    wtf?

    just download or code a j2me, c++, python, opl or vb program to do it..

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:dice roller? by toddbert · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, if you're using a Palm device there is a decent dice roller called Gamer's Dice Roller. Can't remember where I downloaded it from, but the help screen says...

      http://palm.dahm.com/

      Hope this helps!

      --
      "When half of your head is metal, having a few screws loose takes on a greater meaning". - Jack
    2. Re:dice roller? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and there's always "Sexy Dice" for Palm-powered devices, but then again, this _is_ Slashdot ("You geek!" ;) ), so why would you need this anyway?

      FWIW--Palm-powered=running Palm OS, not meaning one's own hand...

    3. Re:dice roller? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      The odds are that if you're on a cellphone, it isn't a Palm device. Sure, there are a few people who bought a Treo, but nowhere near as many people as those with Symbian devices.

      I think you'd be safer grabbing one of the dozen or so J2ME dice rollers which are around. Google dredges up a hell of a lot of them, and writing one yourself is only a couple dozen lines of code, which is probably where there are so many. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  14. What's the Difference? by Morphix84 · · Score: 1

    I'm using a Treo 600. For all those out there with PDA2Ks and Kyocera Devices that are both a PDA and a cellphone, does that contribute to both?

    1. Re:What's the Difference? by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      I have a Siemens SX66 (a rebadged PDA2K without the camera) and use both phone & PDA functions. The phone quality is pretty good -- it's outperfomed a Nokia in weak signal areas.

      The big plus for me is the built-in Bluetooth and WiFi. The former allows for wireless hands-free phone use, and the latter is great for surfing (or using Skype if you're so inclined).

  15. What's needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    really is a combination girlfriend/cook/investment banker/porn star, and the market will really take off.

    1. Re:What's needed by vettemph · · Score: 1

      I would set the screensaver for no more than five minutes.

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  16. My cell phone is better than yours... by Rahga · · Score: 1, Funny

    My cell phone has almost every piece of functionality I got from my PDA 3 years ago. Plus a crappy camera. Still no dice roller.

    Sure, but can you use it like a CB radio (DJ Convoy)? Is it Shatner-compliant?

  17. Ebooks by Cheesy+Fool · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I only use my PDA nowadays for reading ebooks, nothing else.

    --

    Hail to the king, baby!
    1. Re:Ebooks by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      Hail to bw!

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    2. Re:Ebooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup - Reading eBooks and listening to http://www.audible.com/ books is my iPAQ's main duty although I also have http://www.mobipocket.com/ on my SmartPhone.

    3. Re:Ebooks by DarKry · · Score: 1

      absolutely, I will consider buying one of these fancy new phones when I can carry a library around with me.

      I too "ONLY" use my Zire 71 to read. But I spend several hours every day doing it sooooo.

    4. Re:Ebooks by Isando · · Score: 1

      You can. I do. I have a Nokia 6600, which runs the Symbian Series 60 operating system. There are tons of apps for this phone, one of which is ReadM, a book reader. I have about 30 books on my phone. As far as I am concerned, Opera, ReadM, Agile Messenger (AIM, Yahoo, MSN), Vexed and Blacklist are the killer Symbian apps. Anyway, you can carry your library with you right now. I do.

  18. because by myom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am currently workign on a project where PDAs would be used in the industry. I helped a student with a thesis and attached project a year ago and I've had a HP Jornada 620 since 2000.

    For every generation of the PDA the operating systems have gotten much slower, bloated, hiding necessary functions, doing the usual MS oversimplification of the interface (hiding file extensions, not actually closing the apps etc).

    Add more crashes, data loss and an abysmal battery duration and I'd say it's no wonder why the PDA sales drop, especially with phones getting more and more PDA functionality.

    PDAs never got their killer application, which could have been a few of: phone capability, superior data input method compared to phones, instant messaging, mail, cheaper packet based data transfer or porn.

    I can only see one way PDAs can go, and that is to be smaller, have a longer battery duration and have phone and instant messaging support and by that definitely Edge/GPRS/UMTS or other 3G telephony and data transfer capability, in effect becoming a lot of things at once.

    The only way this can be achieved is with a total rewrite or replacement of PocketPC/WindowsCE

    1. Re:because by Glock27 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The only way this can be achieved is with a total rewrite or replacement of PocketPC/WindowsCE

      It's called "PalmOS". PalmSource has announced a future version will be based on Linux, which is exciting.

      Now if someone will just build some compelling hardware... :-)

      Wearable devices are a dark horse in all this also, and might make a better base for converged comm/computer functionality (since you can comfortably carry bigger batteries that way).

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    2. Re:because by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      not actually closing the apps

      This is not always a bad thing. OS X apps don't exit when they have no open documents, they stay in memory until you next click on them and then respond instantly. The first machine I had that did this was a Psion Series 3 (remember them? Great machines). Closing a document would sometimes drop you out of the application, but the app would still be memory resident unless explicitly killed. The machine only had 256K of RAM (I remember paying £30 for a 128K flash disk for it. Now you can buy 1GB for almost the same price), and so you sometimes did need to close apps, but leaving the commonly used ones running gave it a performance boost. Ideally, apps should not exit unless their memory is required by something else, and then they should automatically exit (assuming that they have no open documents) based on some kind of least recently or least frequently used algorithm.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:because by hanshotfirst · · Score: 1

      My Blackberry gives all this. (granted, it is the companies blackberry, so part of its usefulness is due to Blackberry server tying into Exchange, etc) pr0n would be avoided on the company's nickel.

      --
      Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
    4. Re:because by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Uh their are 'Smartphones' using the latest version of the Pocket PC OS that combine PDA & Cellphone capabilities... Lots of them in fact... But I have to ask you quite a few questions because some of what you say just doens't make much sense...

      "that is to be smaller"

      You realy want an even tinier screen?!? PDA's these days are pretty much teh right size to still be functional... If you'd look at smartphones you'd see their are generally two types with Palm opting for a inbetween unit (Treo 600 & 650), one is PDA sized (with complete PDA functionality) the other is cellphone sized (with less PDA functions)... I'd rather they not try to shrink them as that would hurt what they can do as the 'smartphone' that is cellphone sized shows...

      "have a longer battery duration"

      Uh haven't tried any newer PDA's like the HP Ipaq RX3115 have you? Besides the fact that HP sells a double powered battery that fits the RX3115 even the standard battery is enough to last 8 hours of general use or 3-4 hours of WIFI use... Doubling that gives enough battery life for most people & adding things like wall & car chargers makes them easy to charge wherever you are if you do get low...

      "instant messaging support"

      Um while I know it's not quite AIM or Yahoo's IM client all the new ones do come with MSN Messenger... Unless you don't count that as IM support?

      "by that definitely Edge/GPRS/UMTS or other 3G telephony and data transfer capability"

      I'd rather they expand those 3G style networks first to make it worthwhile & for the US at least this would only be a bad thing as it would tie certain 'PDA's' to certain Cell service providers... Heck it already does with smartphones with this ability... For instance Verizon (I work right next to a verizon kiosk so I know what they carry) carries an LG smartphone, two Samsung Smartphones, Black Berries, & Treo 600 & 650 models... But they won't let you use any other smartphone with their network and not every provider in the US uses some sort of 3G network anyways... Maybe a 'phone expansion' slot or something that ties the PDA to a certain network might appeal, but that would seem to put it to close to just changing Sim cards for most US cellphone providers to like...

      All in all I think you need to take a look at the current models of PDA's before you comment, things have significantly changed in the last 5 years... Heck a RX3115 for instance adds the ability to act as an extension of a desktop computer over wireless and control most electronics that use a remote in your house which is a big jump from the self-contained days 5 years ago... & Smartphones are obviously a big priority since most smartphones already do what you want, so you may want to go take a look at them...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    5. Re:because by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

      This is actually a problem for my brittle users who use Windows at home. They complain that the computer is getting "slow" and I inevitably find four or five memory resident applications running on the thing. Even pure Mac users do this because they think that closing the last window closes the app. Telling them to use File -> Quit goes in one ear and out the other. This memory resident behaivor needs to at least be configurable. My life would be a bit easier if closing all windows killed an app.

    6. Re:because by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      Obviously you've not been using the devices for long enough, nor have you seen a wide enough sampling of device types.

      I've been writing software for Windows CE devices full-time since 1996 (Windows CE 1.0). I can tell you beyond any doubt that beyond a few specific devices (DELL Axim X5 Basic comes to mind) performance has improved steadily across the board. CE 3.0 brought a new kernel that was vastly superior to the versions before it. The RAM is constantly increasing, the displays are now VGA resolution, the processor speed is increasing, hardware capability is growing (my a716 has Bluetooth, WiFi, CF and SD slots, and many devices now have cameras and cell), and Pocket PCs are already on the market with 3D hardware (DELL X50v)

      What you are complaining about is the Pocket PC shell. When Microsoft introduced Pocket PC (in place of "Palm Sized PC - PSPC" CE 2.11) they did take a few steps backwards. They grossly oversimplified the shell in order to mimic Palm. This brought inconsistencies (shell related widgets are now at the bottom and top of the display instead of consolidated in one place, no Cancel button to escape out of a dialog when you don't want to save changes, etc). However all in all it was an improvement, as evidenced by MS finally surpassing Palm-OS devices in sales. All in all the shell is not fundamentally broken.

      Since 3.0 Windows CE has been more stable than any incarnation of Windows I've ever used.

      You make a list of hardware changes (smaller, battery life, connectivity) that need to occur. How is a total rewrite of the OS supposed to bring that along?

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    7. Re:because by Sir_Real · · Score: 1

      Sort of OT, but why insist on WINCE? Linux runs on most PDA's and with java it's programmer friendly as well. I run familiar on my ipaq. It's perfect (aside from the battery life problems you mentioned). And now with phone on chip tech coming around, we're marching steadily towards a unified device. I'd love an ipaq form factor computer that I can plug my hands free set into and make a call.

      But back to the original OT question, why WINCE?

    8. Re:because by myom · · Score: 1

      I am very much aware of the smartphones, better batteries and different apps. I am just saying that they came too late, and PDAs never found their killer app before the bloat of PocketPC and the competition from smartphones and mobile phones.

      PDAs need to be smaller if they want to compete with smartphones.

      OR

      PDAs need to be a LOT better if they are to retain their current sizes with their nice screens etc.

      They simply are not good enough, and that is why the sales drop.

    9. Re:because by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      The only way this can be achieved is with a total rewrite or replacement of PocketPC/WindowsCE
      It's called "PalmOS". PalmSource has announced a future version will be based on Linux, which is exciting.
      There used to be a thing called EPOC. I still use my Psion 5mx. I have a smartphone, but some things just require a keyboard.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:because by myom · · Score: 1

      I am not pointing out ONE single thing that needs to change, just giving my thoughts on why the PDAs are not cutting it. I think they are trying to be too many things at once, while not excelling at any, and not being attractive enough as they are.

      For example, I say that they need to be smaller - if they want to compete with smartphones, or be more feature-rich and have a longer battery life when it comes to communication possibilities, if they are to stand their ground in their current configuration.

      I think you are wrong about the need of a less bloated operating system. It is a fact that PDAs are slower and buggier and drain the power now, and packed with features that noone will want (why would I want to have 3D graphics on a PDA unless I want to play with one, another exampel of trying to be too many things at once). More efficient OSes, like PalmOS exist although their newer versions have also started getting huge and slow, with corresponding lower battery duration. I did point out that the battery duration has gotten worse with time, and I have experience travelling with and using PDAs since the late 90es.

      And I can not do more things with a modern PDA than with my 5 year old Jornada. Instead I do the same stuff, for half the duration.

    11. Re:because by superflippy · · Score: 1

      I am currently workign on a project where PDAs would be used in the industry.

      Me too, which is the only reason I have a PDA. It's a Dell PocketPC, purchased by the company I work for solely for interface testing. I thought I might actually use it for more than QA purposes, but so far it's just sat there, literally gathering dust, connected to my PC by a cable. I turn it on when I need to make sure that the mobile stylesheets on the web app are working, then forget about it until I need to test something again.

      I've thought about actually using it, but then realized that there's nothing I need it for. My phone has a calendar and stores phone numbers, and I can check my work Outlook account via the web. The PocketPC with no wireless is just about useless.

      A ruggedized PDA is useful to emergency personnel who use it as a mini computer they can take to disaster sites and input information. Phones can serve that purpose sometimes, but voice interfaces don't work for all applications.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
    12. Re:because by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Mind you, these macs typically come with 256MB or even only 128MB of memory. 128MB isn't even enough for the OS - even 10.2.3 which is probably somewhat more lightweight than 10.3.whatever (I sold my mac) swaps by quite a bit when you load it up on a 128MB machine, with a stock install, and no classic environment. Win2k uses just about 128MB even when you start it up with nothing but a virus scanner. XP is somewhat higher but I'm not sure where the line is. Anyway, where I was going with this is that Apple shouldn't even sell machines with only 128MB when OSX chokes on 256, and the default certainly shouldn't be to have apps hanging around when you ship systems with too little memory to even run the OS smoothly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:because by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      You know. Microsoft PocketPC is not the only PDA OS our there. Ever heard of Palm OS?

      As for killer apps. PDAs already have them: Calander, contacts, notes, todo lists etc. Not everyone is the same as you, you know. I use these apps all the time.

      Also, those killer apps you listed that PDAs never got; my Treo 600 has them all! Sure, it's called a "smartphone", but it's really just a plain old Palm OS PDA combined with a cellphone.

    14. Re:because by maxpuppy · · Score: 0

      How about a GPS capability? That would be real functional.

    15. Re:because by cakefool · · Score: 1

      yay 5mx!

      Nothing on the market like it at the moment. Which is good, because I'm skint.

    16. Re:because by Skuto · · Score: 1

      >There used to be a thing called EPOC.

      It's now called Symbian and used on phones.

      (It's ass to program for, though)

    17. Re:because by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Windows applications receive a similar effect. Even though you close them, the libraries and components required for the application remain resident until that memory is needed for something else. All good operating systems cache like this.

      What, have you never noticed on Windows and Linux that applications tend to load faster after you've loaded them, closed them, then loaded them again in the same session?

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    18. Re:because by dangineer · · Score: 1

      I have wondered for a while why instead of the bloat they couldn't just stick with the core OS and get the thing so small I could keep it in my wallet, all screen, credit card size, a little thicker.

      I love my Sony and the others I had before it, but I don't carry it in my pocket and all the other (brands/models) are just as big.

    19. Re:because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the clamshell Zauri are compelling, Sharp just won't sell them here in the US.

    20. Re:because by danila · · Score: 1

      The big problem is that the heavyweight monster Microsoft is persuading others to get PocketPCs. I've seen a lot of people with PocketPCs and always saw them struggle with basic operations. A horrible "Windows" interface is absolutely counterproductive in a PDA, but no customer would consult a usability study (and select a Palm) and Microsoft would never admit that their handhelds still suck (despite winning in the market).

      A Palm PDA can be extremely useful and still has the potential to win a lot of customers. There are many things that you simply can't do comfortably on a cellphone because of a small screen and poor input. But alas, the PDA manufacturers are too bad at using their potential advantages.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  19. Does this include cell-phones? by Valkyre · · Score: 1

    I work at RadioShack, and almost every cell-phone we carry has PDA-like functionality. There is little room for 3rd party apps, but every one contains a calendar, address book, memo pad, and the ability to recieve or send email. Unless you're an active hotsyncer, why bother?

    Also, do Palm-based cell-phones or PDAphones count in these numbers?

    --
    What the heck is a 'sig'?
  20. PDA friendly websites by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

    Modern mobile phones have proper HTTP (not WAP) browsers and sites formatted for PDA fit on their little screens quite well. Not many people are using PDAs to surf the Internet, but it's worth keeping the PDA sites going - if you had one - to cater for the new style phones. Here's the cute little Google search page for PDAs.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:PDA friendly websites by RailGunner · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Modern mobile phones have proper HTTP (not WAP) browsers and sites formatted for PDA fit on their little screens quite well.

      Interestingly enough, this is how Opera makes most of it's money. While their PC browser is excellent, (IMHO), it's the ability to render sites on small screen's that's making the company money.

    2. Re:PDA friendly websites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern mobile phones have proper HTTP (not WAP) browsers

      Wow, so a mobile phone can talk to a website using something other than HTTP? That's amazing!

  21. Tablet PC by windex · · Score: 1

    I bought a Tablet PC instead of a new laptop to fill the need of both a PDA and a Laptop given circumstances. It's done that job well, and while it's not as small, it's small enough to keep nearby and weighs so little (it's a slate) that it's easy to hold with one hand.

    It's also a hell of a lot easier to work with email and web tasks than on a little 4" 640x480 (at best) display.

    1. Re:Tablet PC by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was always skeptical of tablets until my business partner got one (he wasn't at the time).

      1. Impresses the hell out of potential clients, most of whom have not seen anything like it.
      2. Makes it very easy for a designer to mark up a design during a client meeting.
      3. Swivel screen is convenient when you're meeting with others and need to show them what's going on.
      4. We carry our laptops everywhere anyway... no need for a PDA, especially when it can't match up on features and usability.

      Now I want one. :)

    2. Re:Tablet PC by bmalek · · Score: 1

      I think one of the more interesting gadgets to come out recently are laptops with (passive) touch screen technology. Sure the battery powered pens have been around for a little while, but I haven't found too many that can use a stylus. For me this works great, I hate laptop mice in all forms, and I can use it to take notes/draw/image editing etc. Fujitsu has a nice little version of this.

    3. Re:Tablet PC by windex · · Score: 1

      Battery powered pens?

      Mine is magnetic? Its based on wacom stuff. Fujitsu Stylistic ST5010.

      I have never seen a battery powered pen, but being able to switch between passive and active would be nice.. sometimes I'd like to use my finger over the stylus.

  22. Newton - PalmPilot - iPod by treerex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When the PalmPilot came out I found that it could do 90% of what I could do on my Newton in a smaller package. I was using Grafiti on my Newton anyway, so it didn't make sense to keep using it.

    Then I stopped taking notes on the Palm and just used it for calendar and contacts. One more thing to remember to take with me.

    Now I can sync my (iCal) calendars and my address book to my iPod. I take that little white gem with me pretty much everywhere anyway, and it's doing 80-90% of what my PalmPilot did. And it "just works" on my Mac OS X box.

    So it isn't a surprise that this is happening: few people really need to read and write email on the Blackberry. Can you not be disconnected for a few minutes a day?

    1. Re:Newton - PalmPilot - iPod by pdbogen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Interestingly enough, you just indicated that your iPod only does 72-81% of what your Newton did...

    2. Re:Newton - PalmPilot - iPod by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      Now I can sync my (iCal) calendars and my address book to my iPod. I take that little white gem with me pretty much everywhere anyway, and it's doing 80-90% of what my PalmPilot did. And it "just works" on my Mac OS X box.

      How do you enter phone numbers or new calendar items on your iPod without hooking it up to a laptop? Is there another interface built into it to type stuff in?

    3. Re:Newton - PalmPilot - iPod by treerex · · Score: 1

      How do you enter phone numbers or new calendar items on your iPod without hooking it up to a laptop? Is there another interface built into it to type stuff in?

      I don't. For my usage I rarely if ever find myself needing to do this. Either I'm just adding someones business card, which I can just do as easily at my desk, or an appointment card, which I can also do at my desk.

    4. Re:Newton - PalmPilot - iPod by treerex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interestingly enough, you just indicated that your iPod only does 72-81% of what your Newton did...

      Yup, which means I have pretty modest needs. And my Newton didn't carry around 36G of music either.

  23. Smartphones by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    Smartphone says are strong and this affects PDA sales. The only thing I ended up using my PDA for was GPS software, I have that on my phone now. I always keep my phone with me, my PDA is too bulky to be pocketable.

  24. OSX by Psychofreak · · Score: 2, Informative

    MAC is supposed to natively talk to palm devices. I do not have first had knowledge, but Mom is the Technology coordinator at her gradeschool where everything is Macintosh. She has an older Symbol scanner/palm like they use in hospitals to help keep track of hardware. I know she didn't have to load any new software to get the palm and the Mac to talk.

    I am using Windows and Linux, but I gave up trying to use a palm a while ago. I have a Garmin IQue that I really need to get working again, especially since I have a new job that puts me on the road a bit.

    I hope someone has first hand information out there.

    Phil

    --
    Laugh, it's good for you!
    1. Re:OSX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs do talk very well with Palms, with a few exceptions.

      iSync (bundled as part of the OS) will talk nicely with most PalmOS devices (and sync things with iCal, Address Book and the like), however to sync Sony Clies you need to buy 'The Missing Sync' software.

      In fact, the Mac OS used to come with Palm Desktop bundled; however I'm unsure as to whether that is the case now.

      For older serial Palms you will of course need a USB-to-serial adaptor ;)

    2. Re:OSX by Phil1 · · Score: 1

      Don't know about syncing with PDAs, but Panther handled syncing with my phone beautifully. I just bought my phone into range (Sony Ericsson T630), iMac detected it, displayed a picture of it on iMac screen, iSync kicked in and exported all my contacts and iCal across within a few seconds. I would expect no less with a compatible PDA.

      --
      I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy
  25. Not surprised. by Misch · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not surprised...

    I had a Palm Vx. Most stable piece of hardware I ever owned. But, then it got stolen from me at my workplace. (Bastards). I replaced it with a Palm Zire 71. Nice color screen. Software was slightly unstable. Sometimes it would freeze up while doing something (usually while playing a game).

    I just replaced it with a Tungsten T5. The software is total crap. It fried its own memos database during a hotsync. Luckily I had a backup of that... and, oh yeah... Palm dropping the Universal Connector platform... real smart idea there.

    Idiots. I'm not surprised.

    --

    --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    1. Re:Not surprised. by dapprman · · Score: 1

      I loved my Palm Vx as well until I some how managed to gouge a chunk out of the graffiti area (still to this day not sure how).
      Replaced it with a T2, but after 6 months I had almost thrown it at a wall so many times, that when I found a SE P900 satisfied most of my needs I jumped across. Not looked back since though it could (and in the P910 guise does) do with more memory.

      It must be noted though, that I am a heavy PDA user and can't live without one (o.k. maybe I could go back to a filofax in it's mini format).

    2. Re:Not surprised. by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think this is the problem. Not enough innovation, and the older devices were better. I still have my Vx (actually, an IBM Workpad C3, which is the same thing only painted black) and it works great. I use it constantly. The battery recently went tits up, so I replaced it rather than buying a new PDA. I see no reason to upgrade. The new ones offer no functionality that I do not already have in other devices (that is, unless I can find a PDA with an organizer that organizes me better than my Vx, an mp3 player better than my iPod and a camera better than my Powershot A75?) and sacrifice stability and battery life for fancy useless dodads like colour screens.

      I'll stick with my Palm Vx, and when it finally gives up the ghost, I MIGHT replace it with an m505. PALM: If you are reading this, go back to the good old devices. The ones that WORKED and didn't waste time and battery life and money on things like colour screens and sound beyond BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP. Make me a Palm Vx with Bluetooth and I will be happy.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    3. Re:Not surprised. by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      Some of the instability with the old applications may be related to the transition from a Motorola 68k-like processor to the ARM-based processor in the Zire. Some applications didn't coexist with the emulation environment that well.

    4. Re:Not surprised. by robertjw · · Score: 1

      I had a Palm VII for a couple years - company supplied it. Totally stable, a little big, and batteries were a pain to replace all of the time. Decided I wanted to upgrade a m500 style. Found an IBM C500 on ebay for really cheap (like you said, just a m500 painted black). I have had more stability and battery problems with it than I ever did on my VII. Twice in the last few months the battery has been totally dead. The first time I lost a couple weeks worth of data. Couldn't get the USB connector to work under Linux - then discovered it stopped working under Windows. Appearantly this is a common problem with the m500 series.

      I think PDA's in general need to be smaller, have more battery life and CHEAPER. Personally I will not spend $400+ on a PDA, especially when it could be a real piece of junk. Give me some basic functionality, a good amount of storage, excellent stablility and the thickness of a piece of paper and I might buy one. I think most of the hard core PDA users aren't going to upgrade from a unit that's getting the job done to an unknown unless there are MAJOR improvments, or the unit is inexpensive.

    5. Re:Not surprised. by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      Good to know. I guess I won't be upgrading if/when my current unit dies, I will just look around for another old used one somewhere, and replace the battery if nessicary.

      I agree totally on your second paragraph. I know I won't upgrade, becuase I have just about everything I need in my current PDA, and the only thing I can afford of the modern offerings is an absolute bottom of the line model with a tiny screen.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
  26. Supply/Demand by Tuffsnake · · Score: 0

    Just like everyone is saying, cellphones are providing many of ther services that PDA's do for cheaper with the cell phone capability. This, in theory, reduces the ammount of demand (thus lower sales). What will be interesting to see is if this does follow the standard model and drive prices down.

    And for the record, I liked my old non-flip phone that I could smash on the floor, drop in a toilet, etc and it would still work ... and the batter lasted twice as long....I still think the answer is to combine all these things into mini chips to put into peoples brains and then you don't even have to worry about carrying anything around!

  27. Its the russians by DarKry · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I have been in ukraine for around half a year now and can say this, if cell phone sales are skyrocketing its the Russians doing it. In a country where the average income per year if a littl less that 500 US dollars at least 90% of the population that I see not only have cell phones, but never stop using them. I personally can't see spending a 5th of my income for the year on a phone but then again I wasn't born here. If scientists discover in 10 years that cellphones cause cancer it will be because Ukraine has turned into one giant tumor.

    1. Re:Its the russians by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1, Funny
      "If scientists discover in 10 years that cellphones cause cancer it will be because Ukraine has turned into one giant tumor."

      It might also be because of top politicians' consumption of that wonderful Ukrainian delicacy: dioxin-and-borscht soup.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    2. Re:Its the russians by DarKry · · Score: 1

      You know, you may be on to something.. I have noticed recently a third ear growing on the back of my head. Perhaps I need to use a cellphone more often.

  28. what's in a name by rmolehusband · · Score: 1

    I'll bet the total number of devices with PDA like functionality sold is still growing. 'People' know and understand phones so a phone with a built in PDA is a big seller.

    On the other hand, 'people' think PDAs are for geeks, so a PDA with a built in phone stays on the shelves, even if it were identical to the phone with the built in PDA.

    On most high end phones now, the actual phone probably represents less than a third of the functionality, but it's still called a phone. That's amrketing.

    If it stores my contacts, diary, memos and whatnot, I don't care what the marketdroids choose to call it, it's a PDA.

    --
    Reginald Molehusband. Edinburgh, Scotland
  29. About "converged" devices.... by StressGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just got a new PDA actually - a Tungsten E. I don't really need all the "bells and whistles" of some of the multi-media PDA's and converged cell-phone/PDA's out there right now. What I needed was new calculator. For a bit more than what a good calculator cost, the Tungsten E also provides the following:
    -
    A way for me to keep a material/hardware reference commonly used in my industry right on hand via SD card (FAA document MMPDS-01 in case your wondering).
    -
    A "lightweight" Octave (LyME) for more complex calculations (I use NeoCal otherwise).
    -
    An organizer that's independant of my office scheduler so I can integrate my personal and work schedules without storing personal information on my office computer.
    -
    A means to check my home e-mail without storing personal data on my work machine. (although I could use the web).
    -
    A way to securely store my ever increasing number of passwords, pin #'s, etc. (yes, my handheld is password protected).
    -
    So, for me, it works out. I thought about getting a converged phone/PDA, but I take my phone places I'd never take my PDA. A phone can be replaced, the data I have stored on my PDA would be a much more severe loss.
    -
    -
    Anyway, my 2 cents.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:About "converged" devices.... by Matje · · Score: 1

      out of curiosity, how are you going to check your email? There's no connectivity on the Tungsten E is there?

    2. Re:About "converged" devices.... by javatips · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Versa Mail application included with Palm One devices is able sync your mail when you do a hotsync. The computer will d/l e-mail from an IMAP or POP3 account and store it on the PDA. It will also send e-mail your wrote on the PDA via a SMTP server.

      And there is always the infrared port which can be use to connect to a cell phone.

    3. Re:About "converged" devices.... by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      I am one (of the apparent minority) who, like you, resist the trend toward integrating PDA's into cellphones or musicplayers.

      Any phone with non-sucky PDA function will be much bigger than a non-smart phone (dumbphone?) can be. That makes a big difference when wearing a suit (sometimes you gotta). You can leave the PDA in your briefcase. Further, I would never let my long-in-tooth Palm IIIxe out of my sight with all that personal information inside. But I can lend a cellphone to a co-worker as needed. Also, my PDA has lived through 3 cellphones, so having separate devices has spared me 2 device migrations.

      For similar reasons, I resist phones with cameras on them. When visiting customers' premises, that camera is a liability; you can't take your phone with you anymore.

      These are ergonomic and social considerations; I don't see technical solutions no matter how many MIPS/watt we get. Therefore I expect to be a separate PDA-cellphone user for many more years.

      A decent digital camera needs optics of a respectable aperture simply because the photonic performance of silicon is not as good as film (or the human retina), so cameras integrated into PDA's are going to be mediocre (or bulky) no matter how finely we can etch circuits. So I don't expect to be able to combine PDA and camera (without it sucking) until a new type of photosensor becomes available, and that's no happening nytime soon.

      Though when 100 GB of flash memory costs $10, I do see PDA's and musicplayers merging.

    4. Re:About "converged" devices.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Though when 100 GB of flash memory costs $10, I do see PDA's and musicplayers merging.

      And/or, phones and music players merging.

    5. Re:About "converged" devices.... by gotem · · Score: 2, Informative

      for storing passwords, pins, etc. I really recomend Keyring (http://gnukeyring.sf.net/)

  30. Simplicity counterpoint by sczimme · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Simplication, in the world of gadgets, unfortunately means using a single, do-it-all device.

    That will simplify one's cartage/storage needs - using one device is pretty straightforward, after all - but can very easily complicate other aspects.

    I carry a laptop, a PDA (Clie), and a mobile phone. I don't need all of them all the time, so I carry what is necessary. However, if one item goes south I will still have the other two. If the all-in-one device breaks it becomes an all-are-gone. I find this unacceptable - YMMV.

    Small all-in-one devices also frequently suffer from substandard input options and user interfaces. A fair compromise might be a PDA/phone device with an optional full-size (e.g. folding) keyboard, but that still leaves the user with the risk of losing all functionality with one mishap.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:Simplicity counterpoint by Mark_Uplanguage · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering how the effort it takes to keep all 3 devices sync'd so that they're all valid backups of each other is easier than backing up one all purpose device? Sure there's a time delay in getting a replacement and syncing it up vs. having a less functional backup ready to go immediately (if you happen to be carrying it with you at the time), but how does that justify sync'ing 3 devices rather than backing up 1?

      --
      "The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." -- Albert Einstein
    2. Re:Simplicity counterpoint by veg · · Score: 1

      A fair point about the input devices - they why I still used my aged Palm III.
      As for the other argument about loosing everything in one go - sorry don't see it.
      Surely syncing is much simpler with a single device ? Also, if the device has GSM (I don't know about other mobile standards) when you loose it, you can get the network to bar it thus making it a less desirable item to steal. You loose a PDA, someone gains one.

    3. Re:Simplicity counterpoint by scumdamn · · Score: 1
      I work at Dell and my commodity is our Axims. I got a few (quite a few) free ones to play with and at first, I wasn't quite looking forward to it because I also had tried to be a PocketPC guy and it just didn't work for me.

      Now, a couple months later, though, I use mine all the time. Not only do I take it to all my meetings, but I now no longer take my laptop with me and I really enjoy not having to lug that thing everywhere.

      So here's what changed:

      • I have a Bluetooth keyboard. This takes care of the input thing.
      • I figured out that if I synced my calendar and kept it synced that I wouldn't have to open my laptop, connect to the network, run Outlook, and look up my meeting to determine which room it's in.
      • GPS for both navigating on the road and geocaching.
      • Games (I have a VGA PDA with excellent video. If you haven't played Enigmo yet, you're missing out!)
      • Integrated wireless. I LOVE reading slashdot while I'm pooping!

      Basically, PDA technology has really improved for me enough that I find it nearly indespensible.

  31. Treos not counted either by johnpaul191 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    you figure a lot of people that were happy to carry a Palm Pilot may have upgraded to a Treo (or one of the other Palm OS phones) and those do not count as PDA sales either.....

    i have not carried my Palm in a few years, but if i was still willing to deal with the bulk of it i would have gotten a Treo already. my cell phone is not all that smart, but it keeps more contact info than just phone number, schedule, memo pad (to do list, shopping lists) and some other stupid things. i miss the Palm OS and the bonus apps.... but i do not miss the size of it.

    1. Re:Treos not counted either by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      Yep I love my treo, and use it's PDA functionality constantly. I was just like the folks that never had a pressing need for a handheld device before until this one. I use it to keep appointments, play some music (streaming off shoutcast over it's inet connection), look up phone numbers, read slashdot (front page only), etc. It's a great tool, and I'm sure that all of the other phone enabled PDA's get the same user rave reviews.

    2. Re:Treos not counted either by Reapman · · Score: 1

      Yeah I bought a Treo 600 (probably getting the 650 when it is released in Canada) and I find I use it a LOT more then my old Dell Axim. The Treo is small enough to not get in the way carrying it on you and you don't have dozens of device hanging off your belt. But other people I know have zero interest in convergence and just want either a cell or a pda.

      at work we completely skipped PDA's, did'nt see a good enough reason to use em.. but now we're rolling out the Black/Crack berry and our managers love em.

      I think there will always be a market for a pda, or a cellphone, or a device that does both, so I'd guess eventually the market will level itself out.

  32. PDAs aren't upgraded as often as cell phones by xylix · · Score: 1
    My cell phone has almost every piece of functionality I got from my PDA 3 years ago

    My cell phone goes almost everywhere with me. It is tiny and light and has all important contacts. But it isn't a complete replacement for my PDA.

    The problem is that I don't have any need to replace my PDA. I have a 5 year old Handspring Visor that still does everything I want it to do. The only really important things I use it for are playing chess (lets see a really good program for a cell phone), storing passwords and important information in a locked database, and storing config information and miscellaneous notes about my server. These are not things I NEED a PDA for however. It is just convienient to use it for that. If I lost or broke it I would probably buy another one cheaply, but it has worked without any problems for 5 years now.

    On the other hand, after a year with my cell phone I am wondering if it might be time to upgrade. I live in Japan and there are ever-increasing discounts on the price of new phones based on how long you have owned your old one. I know it sounds stupid, but I am thinking of changing to a bright red phone with a better display rather than the miniture black one I have now. That kind of upgrading likely has something to do with why cell phone sales are brisk and PDA sales are not.

  33. cell phone sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    664.5 million units in 2004, a 29% rise compared to 2003. Source: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap /20050129/ap_on_hi_te/cell_phone_shipments

  34. no dice roller by usernotfound · · Score: 1

    be a (geeky) man and flip a coin repeatedly for random binary numbers.

    --
    You call it excessive, I call it ambitious.
  35. Newton by russellh · · Score: 1

    But the Newton community is growing!

    --
    must... stay... awake...
  36. Try this Yahoo Group... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    I have a VX4400 as well...

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vx4400support/

    Good luck,

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  37. Wireless offices play a part, as well. by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not only are mutli-functional cell phones talking away from pda sales but, now that we have wireless in our building, everyone in my office just carries their laptops to our meetings. No syncing necesary; just type your notes straight on the network. I do keep mine around (mainly out of force of habit) but I'm one of the few that do.

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  38. I'm in the market for a new PDA, but by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    i need more than a few hours of battery life !

    I still don't see any reason for a color screen, but I'd be willing to pay for it if colour didn't come at the cost of battery life.

    I do use my palm m500 a lot, for contacts and calendar and ebooks, and very rarely for email or SMS.

    I could use a better screen (more contrast & rez), and maybe remote internet so I could surf from my bed, and auto-synch to my PC.

    Still waiting after all these years ;-)

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    1. Re:I'm in the market for a new PDA, but by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      I'm with you on color displays. They are a waste of money, space, and most importantly, battery energy, not just on PDA's but on cellphones. If you want the long battery life of a monochrome display, your only choices are the cheap low end stuff (cellphones with no IR for example). All the good stuff is hobbled by color displays. Color displays are for cameras.

      You can still find used Psion Revos/Diamond Makos, the best monochrome PDA ever made, on eBay. The chiclet keyboard, Opera web browser and IR modem is not too bad, enough to get by anyhow.

  39. No surprise by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I don't work in IT so it generally means that I spend more time in meetings than quite a lot of people here - as such, I heavily rely on a diary, something that syncs with Outlook, can be easily modified on the go and means that my secretary can access and modify the information on it.

    Therefore it isn't much of a surprise than standalone PDA's are dying when my current pda/phone combo is nearly the same size as a Nokia 7610 and comes with a decent input method (which always was the killer issue with using a standard phone pad to enter details), sends and receieves phone calls/sms/mms and works as a PocketPC with a large base of useful applications. A Nokia simply doesn't cut it and the SonyEricsson P9xx is only discounted because it's syncing with Outlook isn't particulary great (especially with the categorisation of tasks and notes).

    A friend of mine is selling his iPaq after getting a Blackberry from work. Sure it doesn't have a NES emulator, PocketScumm and a few other of the niceties - but it does everything he needs.

    I'm going to really hate having to give this back.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:No surprise by koniosis · · Score: 1

      The line just keeps blurring. The Motorola A1000 runs on the same OS as the P9xx phones but has a faster processor and more RAM, sports a 1.3MP camera and GPS and all that in a smaller phone! Oh yeah and it can run the NES/Megadrive/Gameboy emulator and EScummVM as well as syncing with Outlook :)

      --
      I spent ages trying to think of sig, but never did :(
  40. Three advantages (still) held by PDAs over phone by ceeam · · Score: 0

    1. Larger screen
    2. Touchscreen/stylus
    3. Price

  41. Declining Quality? by cyranoVR · · Score: 5, Informative
    Unfortunately, it seems that PalmOne's current strategy isn't to innovate, but to make crappy devices that need to be replaced after 9-12 months.

    I bought my Tungsten | E less than a year ago (April 2004). After less than three months, the chrome had completely chipped off the "down" button, last week its stereo jack stopped working, and the battery is on its way to dying.

    I went to the Palm website to see about at least getting my TE's stereo jack fixed. Turns out the warranty only spans 90 days(!), after which repairs cost a $125 flat-fee(!!). Coincidence that this is almost as much as some new Palm handhelds? The support section of their website offers the following "advice:"
    palmOne does not provide replacements for lost or out-of-warranty parts and accessories. If the warranty has expired for your accessory, we recommend you purchase a new one (palmOne Store).
    Huh? Why would I spend $499 on a "new one" when I can easily obtain spare parts from a third party?. I smell the work of a MBA.

    (I ended up opening up the Tungsten myself and soldering the headphone jack connections back into place. There was barely any solder on them to begin with. Hmmmmm....)

    Now don't get me wrong, I like my TE and I use it a lot. It's just too bad that Palm designed a device that isn't meant to be used that much!

    For $200 + shipping, you'd think they could give me something a little more sturdy.

    1. Re:Declining Quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to the Palm website to see about at least getting my TE's stereo jack fixed. Turns out the warranty only spans 90 days(!), after which repairs cost a $125 flat-fee(!!).

      Let this be a lesson to you:

      When buying expensive consumer electronics which is likely to break, check the manufacturer's warranty first.

      If it's puny, then make your purchase at a retail store and get an extended warranty.

      If you can afford to shell out $499 for a T|E, I would think you could handle giving CompUSA ten bucks for a 3-year warranty.

    2. Re:Declining Quality? by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

      If you re-read my comment, you will notice that I didn't "whine" about Palm's paltry warranty.

      Rather, I made an observation that - based on specific language I found on their web site - Palm's strategy appears to be focused on having customers to buy a new device every 3-6 months (rather than, say, manufacturing quality hardware).

      Based on the same language, it seems that the genius MBA that developed this winning strategy doesn't want people going to third-party vendors for replacement parts, either. Compare with other tech companies that actually recommend third-part parts vendors.

      If Palm believed in the quality of their hardware, then they would at least offer a reasonable warranty period (one year), don't you think?

    3. Re:Declining Quality? by CyberHippyRedux · · Score: 1

      Sad to hear, as my old PalmV has just hit 5.5 years of daily use! I'm thinking this might be a part of the declining sales - those who have a good one and use it for basic tasks (calendar is the only app I use regularly) don't have a need to upgrade. Those who have a crappy one give up. There may be a bit of an up-tick when my battery finally dies, but for now it still goes for weeks on a charge so who cares?

    4. Re:Declining Quality? by khallow · · Score: 1

      Contrapositively, if they don't offer at least a reasonable warranty period, then they don't believe in the quality of their hardware. That appears to be the point the prior author was making. And it fits with Palm's apparent desire to sell you a new PDA every few months.

  42. Pda's still useful by mikapc · · Score: 1

    I don't know about anyone else but I've found my Sony Clie SJ30 to be incredibly useful. Besides scheduling, with a 128meg memory stick, I use it as an English, philosophy, and music dictionary. With a gps transmitter I've used my pda to route and drive those maps on the road. I've also used all the basic scheduling as well. As far as I know I know I haven't heard of many cell phones that can be used for all those purposes I listed above except scheduling. I know there are cellphones now that can be used as a gps map, but I've heard it's slow, and you have to pay a monthly fee to use that service.

  43. Mine works as intended, no need for new one. by stuntpope · · Score: 1

    I still use my one and only PDA, a Palm III. I used to try out 3rd party applications, but hardly do anymore. When I rode the subway to work, I'd download the news and read it, but now, notes to self, alarms, and contact list are its purposes for me. I don't expect I'll buy a newer all-in-one PDA/Web browser/MP3 player/balance-my-checkbook device. But then again, I don't even have a cellphone (you ignorant clod!).

    1. Re:Mine works as intended, no need for new one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No cell phone? You lucky bastard!

    2. Re:Mine works as intended, no need for new one. by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1

      Your subject sums it up, really.

      A PDA works, does its job, and tends to last a while. People tend not to get a new one until the old one packs in, starts to fail, or simply lacks required features.
      You also tend to have to pay full unit price in most cases.

      Cellphones tend to get replaced often. Most people tend to either upgrade or replace their phones after a year or two. Personally I'm on my fourth handset since 1999 but only just (this week) bought my second PDA since 2001. (One of the buttons on my m105 was failing and I wanted a unit that was rechargable)
      A new feature comes out on a phone (Hey dude, I can, like, take really fuzzy photos on my phone and play music out of tinny speakers that ticks off everyone on the bus) and everyone's all over it. Plus handsets are so heavily subsidised that the initial payout seems to provide more bang for buck.

      Plus if the study doesn't take Blackberries and Smartphones into account then, as has been mentioned elsewhere in this thread, they're discounting combination PDA+phone units from counting as PDAs. Even if the reason that someone's buying one rather than getting a simple cellphone is that they need the PDA functionality.

      Personally I like having a separate PDA. I like my PDAs just small enough to still be usable (and readable), but I like my cellphones to me pocket-sized. if I really wanted combined functionality I'd buy stuff with Bluetooth capability.
      Those smartphones always seem to me to be smaller than I wants out of a PDA, yet bigger than i want out of a phone.

      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
    3. Re:Mine works as intended, no need for new one. by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much the way I felt about my Handspring. It did everything I wanted out of a PDA and had some fun free games on it too (BlackJack, Breakout and Galaga clones, etc.).

      Now I have a Tungsten T3 provided for me by work. It has a nice big color screen, so I have stored some pics of my fiancée on it, and a few MP3's on the SD card I bought. Even though these features are nice, they still wouldn't be enough to make me want to upgrade--especially for the price. Who wants to pay $300-$400 for a device where you can get a lot of the same functionality out of a $5.00 paper pocket organizer?

      I do think it will see a lot more use once I buy that new PowerBook G4 w/built in BlueTooth though. I'll finally

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  44. PDAs down, smart phones up by jfanning · · Score: 2, Informative

    It all depends where you are looking.

    If you look at the smart phone sales figures they are skyrocketing, only stand-alone PDA unit sales are dropping.

    The Register has an article that counts both sales figures together and has a nice table of figures at the end. Nokia alone shipped 4,949,5590 units with PDA functionality in Q4 2004.

  45. No real innovation in PDAs recently by crashmstr · · Score: 1

    I am a heavy PDA user, and have been for years (about 1996). Yes, combined devices (PDA/phone, Phone with PDA functions, Blackberry, etc) have gained over standard PDAs, but I do not see that as the only trend.

    There have not been any really large innovations in the hardware in some time (and not in the OS either).
    Big improvements in the past: Larger Memory, Color Screens, High Resolution Screens, Expansion Cards, Fast Processors

    I've been through a lot of these, and they made we want to upgrade, or others possibly to want to get one. Now the hardware improvements are much less important, the OS and built-in software improvements are more subtle, and some of the players have been getting out of the market (Sony out of the US PalmOS market, for one).

    So fewer manufacturers. Less improvements. Less reason to upgrade. And when there aren't as many new models, prices don't drop as quickly so getting the "nice" PDA still takes a lot of cash.

  46. Nevvton Communiity by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny
    "But the Newton community is growing!"

    It's 6ood xo see that somehbv4 else is vsing a Nevvton t0 make Slabbbot entries #

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Nevvton Communiity by russellh · · Score: 1

      It's 6ood xo see that somehbv4 else is vsing a Nevvton t0 make Slabbbot entries #

      yow think Yom awe so funny @
      4 have a Newtonad i + works j USt fine x OK? Much better rm MA Graffxti c -wok .

      --
      must... stay... awake...
  47. HP Omni GO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could have told you this the day Palm Pilots went on sale. You see, I had a PDA before most people knew what PDA's were. I had a HP Omni Go.

    It had everything palm pilots had: Calendar, address book, to-do list, games, calculator - oh yeah, a full keyboard in addition to the glyph style hand writing recognition.

    I used it for a while then I realized it wasn't helping me. Rather, it was hindering me.

  48. Form factor by marktoml · · Score: 1

    I find that a smartphone is just too small a form factor for me to be effective with when using it as a PDA. The PDA fits nicely between the phone and a tablet (which is a little too large IMHO).

    If you need a PDA, you need it and for some I guess the phone form factor isn't an issue if your primary need for the PDA is contact/task management. The smaller size does make it less useful for things that require more interaction (documents, notes, etc.) Toss in a small wireless keyboard and they are great for notes, quick documents and the like.

  49. demise of PDAs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could the demise of PDAs be contributed to VNC and RDC? The more we access our "central" computers remotely, the less we need to have our contact information handy.

  50. Low Tech by jmrSudbury · · Score: 1

    Before I bought a PDA, I never used to carry everyone's phone number around with me where ever I went. After years of carrying my pda around barely using it for anything other than a calendar (I had all my friends numbers memorized anyway), it did not seem useful anymore. Actually, it got the most use when I was doing comparison shopping, but I found using a pen and paper was much faster than typing on a tiny keyboard. Low tech was still the better solution for me.

  51. No innovation by z1d0v · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Where's the new stuff? Every now and then we see a new PDA, with Bluetooth, WiFi, and all...

    But where is the innovation? I want a few-gigas-hardrive (those I hear from toshiba might do the trick...), a nice-to-have-640x480-screen, decent battery, GSM/GPRS or UMTS, and even an integrated projector to do some presentations... I want a real personal assistant that makes me use it, or I will (again) leave my PDA at home and just bring along my cellular.

    It seems the PDAs that come out simply don't have anything really new, besides an extra Mhz from a new Intel processor.

  52. Heh by Lao-Tzu · · Score: 1

    The company I work for decided to call our primary software product "PDA", as an acronym for "Production Data Analysis". As I am currently working on this software right this second, the title of this article surprised me. What, huh, our software sales are slipping? Why would slashdot care?

    TLAs are far too overloaded already, but bad marketing decisions keep pushing more meanings on them.

  53. IDC marketing frame by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    another report, from Canalys, shows that the recent trend is over 100% growth (doubling) in smartphones, while "PDAs" without phones shrank by about 5%. So clearly the trend is a transition to smartphones, rather than "PDAs are dying" - smartphones are PDAs, too. IDC's report is phrased to make Blackberry look good, without even mentioning their #1 competitor, Palm, which is the leader in the PDA/smartphone dual marketplace. #1 smartphone seller Nokia is surfing the same wave. But the real story, that PDAs, and Palm, have transitioned to smartphones, is the kind of story that the mainstream media missed when networking happened to PCs in the early 1990s. While the media was fascinated by their favorite corporate success, Microsoft's desktop rise, they all missed the Internet. Perhaps a similar benevolent neglect will help give the mobile Web the element of surprise when it delivers its own killer apps in the next couple of years.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  54. Am I the only one by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

    that uses my Palm? My phone book is on my cell especially now that I have a phone without IR and I can't beam to it. My calendar is on Exchange/Outlook at work, but I keep my personal cal on my Palm. I use todo's and keep a lot of notes on the Palm because it replaces the 20 little scraps of paper I normally carry. If I need to remember something, I can even take a snapshot of it instead of taking the time to write it down. I read ebooks on my Palm whenever I'm waiting for a meeting, a car repair, the workday to end, or a corn-eyed brown trout. It's much smaller than even a single paperback and gives me the choice between reading Lord of the Rings or Thinking in Java. I can work on my pathetic chess skills or just stare at a photo of Gabrielle Reese on it.

    1. Re:Am I the only one by British · · Score: 1

      I have my years old(and by PDA standards, decades old) Handspring Visor.

      1. I use the to-do list a lot
      2. I play extensive amounts of bookworm on it.

      I can't do much else with it. Since support for it has disappeared, i can't go to Best Buy to get software/hardware for it. Why? they have already made shelf space for the 1000000 other PDAs and their pricey accessories.

      Sadly, every place i've seen online that sells Handspring gear still sells it at ungodly high prices. Yeah, they will be sitting on the shelf for years. I'm talking to you, mr $200 medical dictoionary module, and you mr $300 WiFi unit, and you mr $150 56K modem.

      I can see why PDA sales are dropping. They find it necessary to release one every month it seems. Good luck getting all sorts of fun freeware when developers probably moved onto the next latest greatest PDA.

  55. Listen to Apple by SamSeaborn · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is another example of how Apple is *so* on top of market trends.

    A couple years back (and even today!) people whined about how Apple should make a PDA -- bring back the Newton, or whatever. Steve Jobs repeatedly said Apple isn't interested in that market; now we see why.

    Sam

  56. Give me my PSION... by silverdr · · Score: 1

    ... 5mx or Revo plus upgraded with decent mobile phone, headset socket and bluetooth. Colour screen may also fit in there. Then I would buy them all and make a rise in sales! Without a decent keyboard (being always and immediately available) there is no way to use the (vertical) PDAs longer than a couple of struggling months to realise that it takes more than it gives. All of my friends who were using ipaqs, palms and similar stuff have long dropped them. PSION using friends are still in love with their aging beauties...

    --
    Now, mod me down freely. My karma can't get any worse...
  57. PDA sales? Who cares? by ms139us · · Score: 1

    I mean really.

    According to the numbers, http://www.canalys.com/pr/2005/r2005012.htm smartphones sell more each quarter than PDAs sell all year.

    The smartphone market is still young and growing at a blistering pace, while the PDA market is in decline.

  58. I had a Palm Pilot by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    But I eventually went back to a paper based system. The Palms just seemed to be more of a pain to use. I was actually really good at Graffiti, and made fun of and put dirt in the hair of all the whiners who said it was too hard to learn. Cripes, 95% of the letters were what you'd naturally expect them to be. What pussies!.

    But I just found myself going to paper more often. I think the main problem was the need to sometimes sketch a small picture of something along with some text, and there was no easy way to do that. The PDA was always a solution looking for a problem.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  59. They're mature, "perfected." Why would sales grow? by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    Remember that old word "perfected?" PDAs were perfected years ago. They do everything they need to do. They do it fairly well. Almost everyone that needs one has it already, they are durable, and nobody desperately needs any spiffy new features that it doesn't already have.

    This just in: sales of pencils, shoelaces, and clothespins are not growing, either.

    Despite my warnings, my wife bought a $30 battery-powered PDA with no PC connectivity about five years ago. She loved it. It did everything she needed. Then she failed to change the batteries in time and lost everything. She hasn't used one since. When a high-quality PDA with a reasonable way to sync to a PC drops to about $30, she'll probably by another one.

    Me, I'm happy with my black-and-white--correction, dark-green-snot-on-light-green-snot--Palm. Why would I buy anything more? It's not as if my friends' addresses will be all that much more legible in color.

    (Plus, I haven't checked all the latest models--why would I?--but it utterly baffles me why anyone would prefer a model with a rechargeable battery that needs daily charging--a battery that will deteriorate and require difficult and expensive replacement in about three years--over a model that runs six months on a set of cheap AAA's I can pick up in any supermarket checkout line).

  60. Vx, P800, Qtek S100 by Sprotch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had, successively, a Palm Vx, Sony-Ericsson P800 and now a Qtek S100. The latter two are not "PDAs" as such, but did not have anything to envy to any PDA. While I enjoyed the Vx a lot (probably the best Palm Pilot ever), I soon stopped carrying it around (keys + wallet + cell phone + palm = too much). It probably the best organizer ever, but there's just not enough room in my pockets... So I was overjoyed when the P800 came out. It really is a fantastic device. The form factor is ideal, and it's a really good phone. The best part is the sony "jogdial" (that small wheel on the side, whatever it's called) that allows you to do all you need with one finger. But the sync could be improved a lot, it only synchronised basic items with Outlook. Furthermore, there was no easy (or even logical) way to access phone specific items, such as contact photos. None the less, I loved this phone and kept it for two years until I broke it a while ago (bad fall). I thought of buying a P910, but SE had disapointed me with its marketing strategy. They never improved the sync and the P910 just seemed like a slightly upgraded P800. In addition, I had a really bad experience with a sony VAIO portable CD burner, which I paid a fortune 2 months before the release of XP, and never got XP drivers. So my impression of SE and Sony is that they release wonderful product from time to time, but don't expect any improvement or support for their products from them. The Qtek S100 (HTC Magician) goes around under several names, but it's basically a tiny Pocket PC with some mobile phones capabilities. So the Pocket PC part is excellent, albeit standard. The phone part is a bit disappointing however. It works fine, but the sound quality and form factor is not as good as the P800. I'm extremely happy with all it's pocket pc features (including skype) and wifi connectivity (with a special SD card) but I am disappointed by the phone. Overall, I would recommend it, but be aware that the phone experience is adequate but not fantastic.

  61. Cell Phone Sales by Aeron65432 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cell phone sales have risen 35%, and Nokia leads with 46 million cellphones sold in the 2nd quarter alone. That means Nokia sells approximately 185million cell phones a year, and thats only one company. Just mind boggling.

    http://news.com.com/Cell%20phone%20sales%20keep%20 booming/2100-1016_3-5345047.html

  62. A proper keyboard. by BillGodfrey · · Score: 1
    Please. I want a PDA with a proper integrated keyboard, just like the Psion 3c I had ages ago.

    I can't get the hang of "graffiti" and I don't like typing by stabbing at a tiny on-screen keyboard with a stick. These days, I only use my Palm T3 for Acid-Solitaire, the alarm clock and playing MP3 files.

    1. Re:A proper keyboard. by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Try a Treo 650. The keyboard is much smaller than a Psion. But it's still faster than an on-screen keyboard or a cellphone keypad. Plus you get a free cellphone with it ;)

  63. PDA == Long term investment by Drakonite · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I'm sure all the geeks here have a hard time grasping the idea, but for the majority of people who need and buy PDAs they aren't looking to upgrade every other week and be forced to reenter a million pieces of information. They want to buy the one PDA that does what they need and stick with it for as long as possible.

    So how is it surprising that sales have dropped now that 99% of those people have their PDAs?

    --
    Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    1. Re:PDA == Long term investment by ivrcti · · Score: 1

      Yep, my Clie 360 is about 4 years old and still does everything I need, without the interruption of a cell phone. I'll replace it when it dies a horrible, tragic, unrepairable death.

    2. Re:PDA == Long term investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a matter of buying what you need. I just bought a 2 year old palm m130 on eBay because it had all the features I could possible want. I didn't need to spend $400+ on a new model with functionality I wouldn't use. So far I love it and can't imagine being without some type of device in the future. Whether that device has phone capibilities, wireless connectivity, whatever, will depend on my changing needs.

      So, to summarize: buy for the features you need, no matter what the device is called or looks like.

    3. Re:PDA == Long term investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "be forced to reenter a million pieces of information" ???

      I upgraded from a Palm III to a Palm Vx to a Kyocera 6035 and never had to re-enter data. Isn't that the point of a PDA?

    4. Re:PDA == Long term investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What???

      I first bought a US Robotics PalmPilot in 1997. Via full backup and restores, I migrated from it to a PalmPilot Pro, Palm IIIe, and finally a PalmV. I never had to re-enter anything

      In fact, because of vcard and IR standards, most everything from my PalmV now sits on my Zaurus 6000SL. I just beamed it over.

      It's a bit freaky seeing phone number of people I haven't dealt with in 8 years.

  64. Future Fone by unfortunateson · · Score: 1

    I'm with another poster, where my old Palm m515 is only good for a few games and e-books on flights where there isn't really room to unlimber my laptop.

    Of course it would really, really help if Verizon would 'open' the phone, so it wasn't a fee to play any games on it. C'mon, at least my old Nokia had MasterMind, Concentration and Snakes!

    But what would I really want? I've been debating to myself recently whether I'd want a 'does everything' box, or a Bluetooth (or its successor)-controlled personal network sitting on my (cough) utility belt.

    MP3/Movie Player -- I figure these will be up to 200GB by Xmas 2006, a 40GB player should be squeezable into a phone and still leave space for a decent battery life. This and the screen will *have* to be part of the 'main' unit even if I go with the utility belt scheme.

    Headset should be wireless, for both music listening and making calls. An eyephone is probably more than I can ask for (would that be more bandwidth than Bluetooth can handle?).

    But the other features...
    Gotta have an OS that will permit loading personally-chosen software. Linux, some portable Windows OS of the week, or Palm would all be acceptable to me. Gotta run MAME.

    I can see that with decent wireless networking (WiMax), this could be my PC, portable at all times if the voice-activated, thumbboard and touchscreen all work well together (ooh, touchscreen is something my phone needs too). A trip to an internet cafe would be just to have a bigger screen and keyboard to use with my truly personal computer.

    Camera? Sounds like a good case for a utility belt. There's no way to strap a decent zoom lens to a PDA. Now we're talking higher-speed wireless, if we want automatic transfer to the main unit.

    GPS? Probably on the base. Today's phone-based stuff won't be too useful out of cell range for the geocachers. You can already get headless bluetooth modules for Palm/Win PDAs.

    Anything else on a possible utility belt? heart rate or blood sugar monitoring, laser pointer, multitool, avalanche airbag, hydration pack, pencil...

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
  65. Games, etc. by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

    I have a Tungsten T3 from work, and usually the only thing I use it for is checking the time (I don't wear a watch), occasionally using the calendar or playing Black Jack and Solitaire. The T3 is woefully inadequate as a game device because of the button placement, and the lack of quality games.

    Now, if there was some way to combine the Palm OS with a Gameboy Advance or Nintendo DS, you'd really have something!

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  66. out: PDAs --- in: smartphones by gearmonger · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have several nice, expensive, capable PDAs in a drawer at home. Instead, I carry my Treo 600 -- it has a lower resolution screen, smaller keyboard, less RAM, and a slower processor than my PDAs, yet it's small, capable, and always with me.

    Smartphones will continue to get better and PDAs, like boomboxes and those camcorders you used to attach to a VCR, will be another personal electronics form-factor that just won't make much sense in a few years.

  67. A pen and a pad of paper! by jacobcaz · · Score: 1
    I've owned a lot of PDAs. I started with a Sharp ExpertPad (a rebranded Apple Newton MP100). I then moved up to a Message Pad 110, traded that for a Message Pad 120. I drooled over the backlighting on the Message Pad 130, but I couldn't afford it when it came out.

    I saved my pennies and bought a Message Pad 2000 when it came out. Then I upgraded it to the 2100 model. It was the best PDA ever despite it's unweildy size. If you wear cargo pants everywhere it might be considered a "pocket" computer.

    Somewhere around 1997 a friend let me use an IBM PDA which was just a re-branded Pilot. It was pretty slick, but the funcationality was nowhere near the Newton. The biggest benefit of the Pilot was it's size. It truly was a pocket computer.

    I ran out and bought a Palm III when it came out, and about a year later I got a Palm V. Then in late 2003 I picked up an HP 1945 iPaq running PocketPC.

    None of them functioned as well as the Newton, but they did "okay". I would use each device for a few months and then find myself slowly moving back to a pad of paper and a pen. Without fail, I abandoned every PDA I tried, though the Newtons held my useage the longest. Their form factor made them difficult to keep nearby. Now I have this tiny iPaq which I can easily keep nearby and I have no desire to do so.

    I've since bought some nice fountain pens, and I take joy in stroking the nib across the page with the ink trailing smoothly behind. I had to learn to not press as hard as I do with a Bic, as to not break the nib!

    I am off the PDA scene until Apple gets back in. They had it nailed years ago before technology was at a place where it was small enough to carry everywhere easily. Once they do another PDA I'll take another look - they'll do it right.

    Until then I keep a bottle of ink on my desk and a Parker in my pocket. It's also fun to watch the faces of others when you pull out a fountain pen in a meeting. Many people even older than I have never used one and everyone wants to check it out.

    1. Re:A pen and a pad of paper! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If they had it nailed, they would have sold them a lot cheaper. Price is a part of the equation that can never be ignored. Also, messagepads were HUGE! Again, it's just an issue of technology marching on. To me, the question is what OS they'd run on a handheld. I can't see them wanting to license something else. They already passed up Be so they can't put BeOS on it - for a 200+MHz PDA, BeOS would probably work very well. Newtons were fun toys for rich people but they missed the point that in order to be the first successful product in a space you must be ubiquitous (at least in terms of your market), and in order to get there you must be affordable. Either that, or everyone has to do it at the same time and convince consumers that there is a need. Apple has a long history of poor timing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:A pen and a pad of paper! by jacobcaz · · Score: 1
      They were HUGE - that was mostly a limitation of the tech of the day. It was also partly a design compromise, as the original MP was destined to be a "slate" computer.

      The price point got lots of complaints, but there were plenty of buyers. I shelled out a lot for my MP2000 and it was worth the money in terms of its features (my opinion).

      The biggest win for the Message Pad was the OS (which was called "Newton OS"). Forget a scaled down BeOS, that would still be like craming Windows into a PDA (oh wait, they do). Newton was graceful, well thoughout and worked amazingly well for pen input.

      It was designed from the ground up to be a new paradigm in the way we interact with a computer and that is what Apple nailed. I have tried a lot of different PDAs and hardware over the years, and no PDA-OS or add-on software has provided the overall feeling that Newton did.

      It's part of the "Mac experience" and hard to describe other than, "excellent." The interaction with the MP was simply excellent.

      If Apple could take their then way-ahead-of-everyone-today technology, give it some updates and put it in a small package you would have the ubiquitous PDA. It would sell like mad.

      Everyone pooh-pooed the iPod when it came out at what, $400? And they sold like hot cakes. They're still $300 for a basic MP3 player and yet I see no shortage of people carying iPods where I live.

  68. Some possibly telling numbers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.infobaseventures.com/blog/categories/ma rketResearchStatistics/

    According to his quote of the AP article, 164 million cell phones were sold in the second quarter of '04, while 2.2 million PDA's were sold in third quarter '03 (sales were down by 2nd quarter '04).

    At the top of the same page, he links to an article which claims that 1 million copies of Opera for Symbian-based smart phones were downloaded and installed by the end of September last year, which shows another interesting trend: smart phones replacing Wintel desktops, especially noticeable in Japan and Korea.

    According to several articles I've read (notably one over at TheRegister.com), the Korean government has launched a program called the "Post-PC Era" to encourage development of smart phone technologies to replace business lost to the decline of the desktop (and PDAs as well). Meanwhile, I read an interesting article (at 'Japan Review' online, I believe) noting that basically, nobody under age 30 in that country uses desktops or PDAs anymore. They've been replaced for an entire generation with smart phones.

    Another way to look at this: there are estimated to be around 600 million Windows-running x86 machines on the planet--including every box made since that initial IBM Personal Computer (1982 I believe) which is still functioning and capable of running one version of Windows or another. In contrast, more new smart phones were sold in a single year last year than all the running x86 Windows boxes in existence.

  69. Cause and effect? by Moggie68 · · Score: 1

    (begin incendiary comment)Am I the only one seeing a connection here: Windows CE has become the biggest OS on PDA's. And PDA sales have been dropping... hmmmm.... :) (end incendiary comment)

  70. I know it firsthand... by DoubleDangerClub · · Score: 1

    I bought a PDA over a year ago and I thought I would be using it constantly, well I was wrong. I found that the hand recognition software wasn't THAT good and the little keyboards are exactly what they are "LITTLE keyboards." So I've not used it in months and I agree with most people saying that they have most of the essential functionality on their cell phones. Has snyone looked at the upcoming cell phones from overseas? They are even starting to run linux with managing software for email, appointments, and so on. I think the days of the PDA are almost done.

    --
    Ubuntu, the way linux should be.
    Try Ubuntu FREE! --
  71. Bing! Beep! Whoowhoo! by Capt_Troy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This guy I used to work for used his iPaq to make him appear to be constantly busy. He refused to turn off the crazy sounds because its sole purpose was to inflate his perceived importiance to the organization. Beep! I'm importiant. Buzz, got 1000 things to do!

    This is the same guy who came into every meeting jabbering on his cell phone before saying, "I've got to go, I'm in a meeting. I'll get back to you", slamming down a huge briefcase full of worthless printouts and filtering through them before settling down and pronouncing, "Ok, let's begin."

    He was a master among masters. Never did anything, but his bosses deemed him invaluable.

  72. T-Mobile PocketPC by C_Kode · · Score: 1

    I have a T-Mobile PocketPC. I've had it for almost 3 years now. It *is* a PDA plus a phone. I like it a lot except for few problems with it. 1) I will NEVER buy another PDA/Phone or whatever else unless it has a *REAL* qwerty keyboard on it. Using a stylis and a virtual keyboard really blows. 2) I've had (3) of these PocketPCs (replacement when something goes wrong with the one I have) One thing that is consistant screwing up is any word that starts with the letter B it likes to capitalize no matter where in a sentense it appears. (annoys me beyond belief) 3) The fact that if I'm writing a text message and I use an apostrophe it errors on the first attempt on a word telling me that I'm using a non-supported character. (then I just retype it and it accepts it)

    I got the PocketPC because it had MS Word and MS Excel, but I find I do not use them. Instead I find using the regular "Note" (notepad) which is plain text much easier. Word and Excel are very limited in use compared to the full version (obviously) and are just not worth the trouble. I've looked at the Sidekick 2 and the new Blackberry. They both look great. I cannot decide which one I will go with. Although, extended use of the first version Sidekick's ear peice seems to screw up after a few months (or weeks in some cases) Living in New York, hah you have to use it when you're driving. (not that you shouldn't anyhow) Hopefully, the Sidekick 2s ear piece jack is of much better quality.

    1. Re:T-Mobile PocketPC by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      Take a look at the Siemens SX66 or the i-Mate PDA2K (the latter is basically the former with a built-in 1.3 megapixel camera). Both run WinCE 2003 2nd Edition with PocketPC phone support and have a slide-down mini-keyboard similar to that on the Treo 6xx or the Blackberry.

      Re your capitalization issues, there should be a config option to turn off autocapitalization; there is on the newer units.

  73. UTC Mars base blamed? by HollyHopper · · Score: 1

    from the future..

    Obviously the loss of Mars research installation and its personel have hit
    sales of PDA's.

    Usual sales to the installation were good - with alot of those attributed to replacements
    for ones that had been lost or stolen.

    The influx of 2nd hand PDA's from the single surving marine from the base has also been reported
    to have affected the current trend..

  74. Monthly Fees Suck by Rambo · · Score: 1

    I'm on my fifth PDA (a Tapwave Zodiac) and it's beautiful. Long battery life, BT wireless, dual SD slots, large screen. It combines all the features I want, and I go everywhere with it. What I can't understand is how people will settle for matchbook-sized screens on "smart" phones, dimunitive amounts of storage, and craptastic input methods. Then there's the biggest gotcha-- the monthly fee. Basically they keep your device's functionality hostage, predicated on your ability to keep making payments. No payment == a crippled device, semi-permanently tied your wireless provider's network. At least I can depend on my PDA working without the need to keep paying each month.

    1. Re:Monthly Fees Suck by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Uh... Monthly fee? I don't need to pay any fees at all to keep my Treo 600 running. Perhaps you're refering to cellphone network fees? I'm on pre-paid, and the credit lasts for an entire year. Plus I can still use my Treo as a perfectly good PDA if I turn the cellphone part off.

      As for craptastic input methods. I'll take a Qwery keyboard over Graffiti any day.

      Please find out what the hell you're talking about before posting next time, huh?

    2. Re:Monthly Fees Suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      dude, shut the fuck up

      why can't anyone come to slashdot and read some comments and say, "Hmmm, that is a point" without seeing dick-size envious punks that trash it all.

      GO AWAY

    3. Re:Monthly Fees Suck by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps some of us just get sick of people who spew out false information?

  75. Dice by MuMart · · Score: 1
    Still no dice roller.
    Really? Don't know about your phone, but mine has has 6 sides. Works a treat. Has a tendency to come up with ones and sixes a lot, though.
  76. Went to Blackberry by TheSync · · Score: 1

    When my Palm rechargable batteries died, I went to a Blackberry. No looking back. I can even IM from it!

  77. I dont think cell phones are the answer by neckdeepinspecialsau · · Score: 1
    I hear a bunch of people saying cell phones do almost everything their pda could do. To a certain degree I agree but for the most part I think cell phones fall far short and are not going to kill the pda.

    What I would really like ot see happen is build a simple phone and pda functionality into an Ipod or similar device.

    I don't like carrying a bunch of things and the interface on phones is cumbersome. The things I need/want are:

    - very large portable hard drive - cell phone w/ wireless headphones - pda - music player - email(maybe?)

    Put something like this out and even if it is a little bigger than an Ipod I would buy it.

  78. i know so many people that dont use them by Exter-C · · Score: 1

    I know so many people that own pdas and never actually use them. the concept is great but the usability is the killer. Its just not really viable for most people to use them all the time.

  79. Re:They're mature, "perfected." Why would sales gr by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You can probably get a used palm 3 for $20 or $30 and they are perfectly adequate PDAs. Why not just get her one of those? Personally I do prefer a PDA with rechargable batteries, like the visor edge, but now I carry a cellphone with a Li-Ion battery. Since I play games and take pictures, I do have to charge it every night, but Motorola made a cradle that you can hook a USB charging cable to, so I have one of those.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  80. You are being sold a bill of goods by gelfling · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously my phone costs $0. My Palm is quite old but I could replace it for less than $200 bucks. If I want those functions in my phone I have to pay AT LEAST twice that amount. On the other hand there are already crude features like that in my phone but no way to connect them to my PC or any other service I can think of.

    I mean how many of you have a cheap candy bar or flip phone that has an obscure data port connector in the bottom that no one can describe to you what it does or sell you a cable of any kind that will connect to it? Let alone show you some software that will at least sync to a Palm desktop or something quick and dirty?

    I bet the numbers are huge.

    On the other hand I think that people are discovering that PDAs are for the most part unusable devices on their own. Everyone has struggled for years with Graffiti, T9, Fitaly and all the others. Data entry just sucks. And when you're done entering data, then what? Are you really going to trade your stock portfolio i real time with one? Are you really going to bust out that Powerpoint presentation?

    Nah, you're going to browse the sports pages, the weather report, CNN and that's about it besides some games.

    So PDS sales are decreasing because PDA function really hasn't increased in 5 years. We're still limited in the same ways doing the same halfassed things we were doing 5 years ago.

    I'll tell you what I use my PDA for: Avantgo, the address book, a DB of passwords and special calendars I need. Everything else is a waste of time.

    But - if phone companies could provide this level of functionality I'd dump my PDA in a second. Even with the smaller screen and reduced battery life.

  81. Usability by Thanatopsis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone find the utility of a PDA somewhat limited? I mean the form factor is somewhat limited and what do you actually use it for >? Contacts? Schedule? I have owned 5 PDAs and I simply find them too muc work to effectively use.

    1. Re:Usability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone find the utility of a PDA somewhat limited? I mean the form factor is somewhat limited and what do you actually use it for >? Contacts? Schedule? I have owned 5 PDAs and I simply find them too muc work to effectively use.

      Then why have you owned five? If they're too much work (or too muc work), then why have you bought five of them? Wouldn't you have figured it out by number one or two?

      Thank you sir, for keeping our economy rolling.

  82. PDA is good for one thing for me by SsShane · · Score: 1

    eBooks (reference, fiction, etc) Too bad most eBooks are DRM'd into extinction.

  83. Axim to Blackberry by smilheim · · Score: 0

    I have an Axim X30 which I no longer use since purchasing a Blackberry 7520. Simplifying is what I have been doing.

    A PDA that isn't connected to the net almost seems pointless to me. I want to be able to access my data/email anywhere/anytime.

    --

    Sean Milheim
    iDREUS Corporation

  84. Fscking technophobes. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I am pretty sure your pen is ideal for:
    -Search one entry amongst 200+ in a phone list.
    -Keep encrypted information accesible.
    -Play and analyze chess.
    -Find the fastest route in a subway network (London, Mexico City, Hambutg, etc.)
    -Check the kamasutra's positions to impress a nice lady when it matters.

    Etc., etc., etc.

    Keep your pen matey ....technophobes ....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Fscking technophobes. by jacobcaz · · Score: 1
      I never said there were no benefits to a PDA. I can do a lot of what you've outlined with my phone and I certianly wouldn't call it a PDA.

      Regardless, what I'm saying is this: I've used a lot of PDAs since late 1995 or early 1996 and while they've all held me attention for a few weeks, maybe a month or two, they've all fallen short - for me - of the usefulness of a pen and pad.

      I'll hold my final reservation for Apple if or when they ever bring another PDA out. I'll try it again and see if they still "have it" when it comes to PDAs.

  85. People still use their existing PDAs... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    why should they buy new ones?

    people don't need Moore's Laws regarding simple tasks as jotting down an address or write down the to-do list for the day... heck, my dad did that with his PC-XT 20 years ago.

    If PDA makers are so worried, well then stop producing so many, like it's too hard?

  86. Use mine as an MP3 player (ipod fad makes me sick) by falser · · Score: 1

    I bought a PDA specifically for use as an MP3 player (ok, and handheld gaming device). Yes, it's more money than an iPod - especially if I want a 1GB or 2GB memory card. But for that price I get a much more sophisticated music player, can play games, and organize stuff. I've really come to like listening to music while playing Bejewelled on my ride home from work - so much that I no longer even desire a dedicated mp3 player.

    And the fact that so many people have iPod's now make me sick. Every time a middle aged man pulls out his iPod and white earphones with a cocky attitude ("hey look at me, I own an iPod, yes I'm cool") I get a little closer to vomiting.

  87. How about instant obsolescence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time I bought a Palm device, it was obsolete 3 months later and people stopped making accessories for it. Remember the m500? Neither does anyone else.

    Plus gratuitous changes, like the different side rail on the Tungsten so that the hard case for the Tungsten won't fit an m500.

    That's why my next "PDA" will be something I can run Linux or Python on, and PalmOS is on the list of "things not to have"

  88. Usage of PDAs by Gruuk · · Score: 1

    One of the reasons why a lot of people who bought a PDA leave it behind after a few months of (mis)use is that they don't really know how to use it. Oh, they may know how to use the software on it, but they don't see how it makes any difference at all in their daily life, so they put it aside, considering it a waste of money.

    I bought a Palm IIIx in 2000 and still use it to this day, multiple times every day. While the phone book is useful, my main usage is concentrated around two things: calendar and ebooks. Every day of the week, I enter the the time I get to and leave work and write a short summary of what I did that day; very useful if I need to know when I worked on a particular problem and *searchable*, so I can easily find that info later on. I also write my future appointments, meetings, grocery lists as well as notes about weights/reps/series, since I bring it to the gym.

    But ebooks takes the lion's share of the time I spend using it. Baen's free library and Project Gutenberg provide me with a wide variety of free books (I also buy ebooks, but that's a different story). Even in the small amount of memory this beat up device has (4MB), I can cram 10 novels (assuming novels that would be 250-300 pages in a pocket edition). Since I travel a lot (half of the time via bus, 7-8 hours ride), having all these available to me is much more practical than carrying even one pocket edition, which would be bulkier anyway. So far, I wouldn't be surprised if I had read over a hundred books on it so far. I find I prefer reading on it than in a "regular" book, as I only need one hand to hold the book and "turn" the pages, without resorting to strange finger gymnastics, which is practical when I'm standing in the subway or on an exercise bike at the gym.

    These days, the old workhorse is showing its age; I have to whack it once in a while when the display starts acting strangely. I'll have to find a replacement, but 5 years of constant use speaks well of how helpful this device has been to me.

    --
    De gustibus et coloribus non est disputandum
  89. PDA vs. mobiles by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

    from this article:

    http://www.techtree.com/techtree/jsp/showstory.j sp ?storyid=57471

    According to research agency IDC's Worldwide Handheld QView, shipments of such devices fell nearly 20 percent year-over-year in the fourth quarter of 2004....

    In contrast, in another report that was released on January 27, IDC had said that mobile phone purchases had been the highest ever.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  90. Is it any wonder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got my second HP hx4705. The first one had to be replaced because the card slots died and it started frequently crashing. The second one has a power button problem and will probably be replaced soon. If I have to press reset and lose anything that is open just to get it to come one, it is a piece of crap. I used to use Palm, but I needed a good web browser. I got a Zaurus, but I needed a good PIM suite. Rather than carry both, I got the Pocket PC. Now I need something that won't die on me within a few days of taking it out of the box. I hope PalmOne releases the Linux PDA soon. It should have the networking of the Zaurus combined with the PIM of the existing Palm. Opera over wifi on a Palm would be great. Too bad nobody thought of this a few years ago before I spent so much money on the Clié TH-55, Zaurus CL-5600, and iPaq hx4705.

  91. no compelling reasons to upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still using a Palm V (acquired in the late 90s - the $300 price tag was well worth it at this point). If I were to upgrade, I could look forward to: decreased battery life, a bulkier device, and less money in my bank account.

    That said, I have been eyeing a GPRS-enabled Pocket PC. I want blackberry-like functionality. Having to never synch manually would be a HUGE plus and definitely worth the upgrade. Unfortunately, the whiz's at MS decided that activesync for Exchange server shouldn't sync the tasks! So, being a user of tasks I would still have to sync manually. Thanks, MS! :P

    Anyhow, I think the key to triggering new device upgrades is improved productivity-enabling features. If I can justify that my productivity will be improved, I'll happily buy it. At present, the only compelling reasons I see to upgrade are blackberry-like instant-email and syncs-over-air technology.

    Now Compare PDAs to desktops. Not only are desktops considerably more useful than PDAs, but their feature set has been improving at a much stronger pace. Ergo, desktop sales are strong and PDA sales weak. Though, it's quite arguable that the PDA sales figures are bogus if they don't include blackberries.

  92. This is all thanks to a triumph of marketing. by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    What has happened to PDAs is that they've started adding "features."

    The early Palm Pilots were excellent devices. You had all the functionality of a daytimer, a rolodex, an alarm clock, a deck of cards and a library in a tiny, easy to use package that was exceptionally reliable. The palm pilot's strength was (and should still be) in its simplicity. I used it in place of post-it notes for quick jottings and for checklists and to-do lists, because my desk was a flurry of post-it notes that were more likely to get lost than not.

    Now they're all trying to be a laptop in your pocket by being a media player with a colour screen and sound, a fast processor and a hard drive. This just drains the battery really, while adding toy functionality.

    You know what's really needed? PDAs in different sizes. Small ones for use as a notepad and larger ones for use as a clipboard (like the notepad computers, only way lighter, faster, and less irritating to use). The point really is to replace paper. It would also help if you made them cheaper, instead of adding more "features" to intentionally make them more expensive.

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  93. PDA sales figures are meaningless by argent · · Score: 1

    When they calculate PDA sales figures, they exclude ALL PDAs with Cellphone functionality, including the tremendously popular Treo and all models from Samsung. No wonder they look bad, they're putting a huge percentage of PDA sales in the Cellphone column.

    Until this is changed, take anything anyone says about PDA sales with a grain of salt... hell, you'll probably need half the Dead Sea to disguise the taste of BS in the figures they use.

  94. egg freckles? by totoanihilation · · Score: 1

    egg freckles?

  95. what a PDA needs by whitis · · Score: 1

    The problem with existing PDAs is that they are uninspired, underpowered, overpriced, lack adequate expandability/scalability, and are too fragile. Hundreds of dollars for a device that is lucky to last a year and only does 20% of what you want it to do is not a good investment.

    If I was designing a PDA (which I could do if I had the capitol, so this isn't all pie in the sky), these are some of the unusual features it would have:

    At least one compact flash slot, preferably two. Cellular modems don't appear to be availible in SDIO.

    A dozen or mor MMC/SD/SDIO slots. At least half of these would be designed to protect protruding antennas/connectors without shielding them. These slots would be used for bluetooth, wifi, GPS, landline modem, ethernet, TV/FM tuner, RFID modem, etc. The other slots would be used for storage. At 1GB per flash card, you could store 6 gigs that way without moving parts. And these slots could support optional sensor modules: temperature, humidity, accelerometer, inclinometer, noxious gas sensor (flamable gas, carbon monoxide, etc), sound pressure level, magnetism, light intensity.

    A very large battery to power all of that.

    1/4" of silicone rubber for protection (think fluke DMM).

    USB master and slave ports. Almost all PDAs forget the master port. The master port could connect to a full size keypord and mouse, USB serial adapters for use as a terminal emulator, USB flashdrives, ham radio equipment, modems, game controllers, ethernet adapters, USB headsets, printers, TV/FM tuners, DMM, Oscilliscope, and logic analyzer and portable hard drives. With an externally powered hub, you could even connect power hungry devices such as a USB scanner or bus powered DVD or hard drive. The slave port is used for hot sync, battery charging, acting as a portable hard drive, etc. Both ports could be used simultaneously, allowing the PDA to double as a smart controller or daisychain USB hub.

    An optional hard drive of the sort found in ipods and other portable media devices.

    A belt clip that won't break and won't fall of your belt. This means a full size metal clip. I broke belt clips about once a month until I switched to a modified ham radio clip.

    An optional camera with a decent lens (bulky) that could actually collect some photons and also double as a barcode scanner. The base unit would have a port intended for use with a camera with the means for very secure attachment.

    An optional keyboard that doubles as a screen cover (the screen being the only part not well protected by rubber).

    An optional wrist harness for wearable use.

    optional DVD+/-RW dock.

    IRDA port with bright IR remote control transceiver.

    An LED flash light (capable of being modulated) and also serving as illuminator for the camera/bar code scanner and a signaling device.

    Optional replacement front panel "case" for embedded controller applications.

    Color display with mpeg/HD decoder.

    When a PDA can offer simultaneous wireless connectivity on a variety of networks simultaneously and has enough storage space to store a reasonable linux distribution, at least a full days worth of OGG/MP3 files, wikipedia (1GB), urban dictionary, sourcewatch (so you can lookup the bias of sources cited in news articles), a couple novels, a couple newspapers, dilbert, userfriendly, roadmaps, weathermaps, a photo library, and a movie, then it becomes worth carrying. And because the I/O would be removable, you could start small and add features and even unplug those peripherals and install them in the model you upgrade to in a year or two with a faster processor, more ram, and a better screen. And it would be scalable from junior geek to senior geek. So, you spend $500 on the basic unit, $500 for more peripherals and storage next two years, and the year after that you spend $500 to upgrade the basic unit but keep you

  96. (faux) Security concerns by netruner · · Score: 1

    I loved using my Visor Prism, and when I bought it, it was top of the line. I have since transferred into a job where PDAs are banned from our work area due to "security" concerns. What it comes down to is a knee-jerk reaction to technology that is not understood by physical security people with little or no (current) technical training.

    I have had many problems due to the removal of the PDA I had come to depend on.

    Has anyone else had this problem?

    --



    DISCLAIMER: This post was not checked for speling and grammar- if you complain- you're a whiner
  97. crappy built in software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been a palm user and I will agree their built in organizer just plain bad.
    To be a useful piece of organizer one would need to buy additional software like DateBook 5, Contacts, Shadow, etc.
    Yes it will cost extra money but it will transform your pda from a cool looking toy into a useful gadget. Ideally Palm should license these software and include it with their hardware.

  98. Not many people need PDA's anyway! by vortex2.71 · · Score: 1

    The popularity of PDA's has always surprised me as virtually no one actually uses them... Why spend $200 dollars on a toy that most people use to replace their $5 address book and a couple of note cards? The only people that I have ever seen really "use" their PDA's are doctors. They can put all of their patient records, reference and diagnosing books and language translators on there making them an indispensible tool. If the PDA industry was smart, they would design one just for doctors. I'm a physicist and I won't buy a PDA untill I can get one that will connect to the internet, support ssh networking and run Mathematica all ffor about $150.

    1. Re:Not many people need PDA's anyway! by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      If the PDA industry was smart, they would design one just for doctors.

      As a doctor who uses a PDA (where I work everyone has them from students to attendings), I really don't see how one could be designed just for us. What we use them for are 1) as a calculator where we can quickly find formulae and calculate the results that we need to interpret some labs or adjust dosages for medications or 2) as a reader so that we can review certain topics during slow nights on call, or settle arguments with colleages over the subtleties of X Y or Z pathology of the type: "No, I say it affects 1:2500 women not 1:5000... ok let's see what Harrison has to say..." (fires up PDA), and finally to look up dosage information/side effects/pregnancy info for some of the less frequently used medications.

      I myself live in a 3rd world country and our telecommunication infrastructure is such that we really don't have access to wireless or bluetooth, so the uses are pretty much limited to the two above. What I originally thought I would be using my PDA for - storing patient information and lab results in order to have it handy - is actually what I LEAST use it for, since the data entry process is just too tedious - there's no time for that. So I use the old biological backup instead.

      Of course I have a CLIE that came with a low quality digital camera, and that's yet another use - for those very rare or very weird cases you see once in a while - great for taking pics of X-rays, surgical procedures etc.

      You can't really improve on the above uses my colleagues and I currently use ours for - 256Mb of memory is more than enough for our needs and we can't complain about speed. I personally can say that I am limited by the speed/technique used for data entry. This limitation keeps my PDA functioning as a portable calculator/reference book rather than being useful for something else.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  99. This sounds about right. by aggies11 · · Score: 1

    Whenever I hear these forecasts, it always makes me wonder. I mean, when people make these estimates, do they think we live on a planet with an UNLIMITED POPULATION? Sales have gone down? Maybe thats because *most people who want one, already have one* PDA's for the most part, are a niche market. They are not something that "everyone and his dog" are going to find usefull. That being said, for most PDA users I'd say there is no need to upgrade. I mean, the fancy mp3, cell phone, full computer in your hand products are nice, but they probably only appeal to a tiny fraction of the already small PDA niche market. You buy a PDA, and thats it, you don't need to "upgrade" to a new one every year. I have had a Sony Clie for almost 2yrs now. Sure I envy the fancier *do it all* PDA's, but they are more of a wow type gadget. My trusty CLIE still does everything I (and probably most average PDA users) need it for. Managing appointments, contacts, schedules, reading e-books, taking notes, looking at maps, and playing the occasional game of yahtzee. Until this unit is physically damaged, I have no need for another one. It does it all, just fine. So maybe it's not that they are being replaced by other more usefull gadgets (eg cell phones), but rather that most people who would find one usefull, already have one. Aggies

  100. Good Form Factor, bad timing by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have always loved the "idea" of a PDA, but I have never found one that meets the "idea."

    My idea was that a PDA was a portable interface to a larger, networked computing environment, not just a portable hand held version of your desktop. You use your PDA as a portable means to access applications and data residing on the network with a little compute power in you hand for other things.

    The reality is, unfortunately, this just doesn't exist. The network wasn't there and when it was, a PDA couldn't connect to it - it has only been recently that you could get 802.11x connectivity for you Palm. WinCE\WindMobile devices like the iPAQ had them but they were difficult to configure (type a 28 character WEP key in by hand with a stylus?!?!). And once you got them configured, what to use them for except surfing the net.

    And then there are the other technical issues. If I leave my iPAQ in my bag overnight or over a weekend and the battery is sucked dry, it is the equivelent of a soft-reset. I loose many of my installed programs and data as the device resets to factory settings. They aren't easily upgradable for the expense of buying one. The data storage and capabilities of some of the OS are lacking. I would love to run full JVM (or at least a stripped down version that is customizable) on a PDA.

    Just imaging an environment where your PDA can run some fairly powerful programs, can easily connect, or be configured to connect, to a network. It can display highspeed graphics, dynamically download code (via say Jini) and can connect to devices and service with say jxta - one minute it can be your remote control for the TV\DVD\Stereo, the next your VOIP soft phone, the next you are using an application to enter data at work. This PDA can be easily upgraded and wounldn't lose data unless you format the storage device.

    Until the day comes when all of this is available in a consumer device rather than a geek-hacked, one-off experiment (cuz I know ALL of the above can be done with the right tools, apis and a soldering iron), PDAs will never live up to thier promise.

    --
    Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
    1. Re:Good Form Factor, bad timing by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      WinCE\WindMobile devices like the iPAQ had them but they were difficult to configure (type a 28 character WEP key in by hand with a stylus?!?!). And once you got them configured, what to use them for except surfing the net.

      You can browse shared folders from your iPaq. I've even played MP3's from my hard drive on my desktop over the network.

      I would love to run full JVM (or at least a stripped down version that is customizable) on a PDA.

      A company called Access makes JV-Lite 2 which comes with their Netfront browser, which is far better than using pocket IE...

    2. Re:Good Form Factor, bad timing by drunken+dash · · Score: 1

      if you're looking to control your desktop with your PDA, you can, as this guy did.

      also, just to clarify, i think you meant your device does a hard reset when the battery dies (the backup too!)
      normally the backup battery is a safeguard to protect your data until you can recharge (you can't turn on your PDA while running on the backup). so unless your backup battery was dead, or you left a long time between battery dying and getting a recharge, you shouldn't have lost anything.

      --
      Enjoy an e-piphany
    3. Re:Good Form Factor, bad timing by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 1

      Yes, hard reset...sorry...I need more coffee

      --
      Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
  101. No obvious upgrade for me... by singularity · · Score: 1

    I started out with a Handspring Platinum. I eventually upgraded to a Sony Clie T665C after falling in love with the PalmOS.

    I really like the PalmOS (even running old PalmOS 4) and I have several small applications that I love and do not want to give up (Vindigo, AvantGo, MetrO).

    The battery life on my Clie is getting worse and worse, so I keep looking at Palm to see what is new and exciting.

    There is nothing that makes me willing to pull my wallet out and buy a new one. Modern Palms seem to have basically the same feature set as my current Clie, and want me to pay up to twice as much as I paid for the Clie a couple of years ago.

    A decent color screen, no keyboard, and Bluetooth. That is all I want. How is that $349? How is Bluetooth a $150 option? Cell phones with Bluetooth can be had for free, and Palm treats Bluetooth the same way SprintPCS does - an overly expensive option.

    I would not mind paying $349 if the Palm at that price point if it had other desirable features. Other than Bluetooth, it seems identical to my Clie, though.

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    1. Re:No obvious upgrade for me... by dunsel · · Score: 1

      I still use my Palm V, and it is definitely over 5 years old. What they need to do to boost sales is make ones that break (cellphones) or force the software to demand new technology (computers). Untill one of those happens, I'll stick with my Palm V.

  102. organizer midlet by austad · · Score: 1

    Someone needs to make a killer PDA midlet for java based phones. Limited screen space? Maybe, but if you've ever used the Picsel browser, you'll see what you can do with limited screen space.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  103. PDAs are general-purpose computers!! by SilicaiMan · · Score: 1
    This is a fact that everyone seems to overlook. Your PDA is a stripped down PC. Mobile phones are not. iPods and other MP3 players are not. PIM devices are not. Your PDA is potentially a much more powerful and versatile machine.

    Unfortunately, no killer app has been invented for the PDA that can make use of its power. The main reason for this, IMHO, is the inefficient input methods available at the moment: Either an external keyboard, or very unreliable handwriting recognition.

    The first step towards a solution is to solve the input problem. If accurate voice recognition, coupled with decent natural language processing, can be added to a PDA, then that would go a long ways. Imagine being able to tell your PDA: "Find me that email from Mr. Gates that talks about his latest trip to OSCON," and have it oblige.

    1. Re:PDAs are general-purpose computers!! by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, no killer app has been invented for the PDA that can make use of its power. The main reason for this, IMHO, is the inefficient input methods available at the moment: Either an external keyboard, or very unreliable handwriting recognition.

      My Tungsten C has a built-in keyboard. And believe me, I use that sucker constantly.

      (Killer app? I recommend Agendus and Shadow Plan -- that's 90% of my work/task/project management needs right there.)

    2. Re:PDAs are general-purpose computers!! by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      I disagree with your analysis.

      My mobile phone IS a PC. I can do about as much or more with my cellphone as I could with my first 486.

      A PDA doesn't need a "killer" app. There are many applications for PDA's. What's the problem though? Lack of an internet connection! What good is a device that is stand alone and unable to communicate with the world? This is why my cellphone is so much more useful than a PDA. I can send e-mail, browse webpages, etc. You cannot do that without a use anywhere internet connection on a PDA.

      PDA's do have one advantage over cellphones: input method. I know a lot of people think handwriting recognition is "inefficient" but if you actually use it regularrly 30WPM is not uncommon.

    3. Re:PDAs are general-purpose computers!! by SilicaiMan · · Score: 1
      My mobile phone IS a PC. I can do about as much or more with my cellphone as I could with my first 486.

      Fair enough. But, I never said you can't do the same thing on a cell phone and a PDA. My point is that you can POTENTIALLY do more with a PDA. After all, you can (potentially) write a C program, compile it, and run it on your PDA. It is a general-purpose processing machine. You can not do that on your mobile phone because it is not. You might say that Java has enabled phones to run arbitrary code. But then, you are limited to what Java offers.

      That is precisely the problem I'm alluding to. There is no app to distinguish PDAs from cell phones. PIMs used to be PDAs' killer app, but cell phones quickly adopted similar functionality, and now PDA sale is suffering.

      PDA's do have one advantage over cellphones: input method. I know a lot of people think handwriting recognition is "inefficient" but if you actually use it regularrly 30WPM is not uncommon.

      That's not good enough, IMHO. One very good use of a PDA is to take notes in a meeting or a classroom. 30WPM is definitely not fast enough. PDAs need a faster, more reliable input method. Being better than cellphones in that respect does not mean that problem has been solved.

      Just my 2 cents :)

    4. Re:PDAs are general-purpose computers!! by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      My point is that you can POTENTIALLY do more with a PDA. After all, you can (potentially) write a C program, compile it, and run it on your PDA. It is a general-purpose processing machine. You can not do that on your mobile phone because it is not.

      My cellphone (Nokia 3660) is a general-purpose processing machine though. It runs Symbian OS. If you don't want to program in java, you can always use C if you really want to.

      I really think the main stumbling block for PDA input is the lack of creativity of the end user. They always expect a "QWERTY" style keyboard, in fact, manufactures have even gone to great lengths to include useless QWERTY thumb keyboards in the devices.

      Other than voice, which can be impracticle in some situations (in public?), there are several more input methods that could be created, but there would be too much reluctance from the end user to learn something new, something radically different from what they are used to. For example, the T9 onscreen keyboard for PDA's is much more efficient than the onscreen QWERTY layout, but I always see people use the QWERTY layout instead. They just are unaware, or are unwilling to learn something else.

  104. Here are the latest cell phone numbers by writertype · · Score: 1
    As part of a recent story from ExtremeTech:

    " Among these could be new products from Motorola. Motorola, the second-ranked mobile phone vendor in terms of unit sales, enjoyed the strongest growth during the fourth quarter according to iSuppli Corp, with shipments growing by 36.5 percent. Overall, the mobile phone market expanded to 195 million units in the fourth quarter, an all-time high, up 14.7 percent from 170 million in the third quarter."

  105. I suggest freemind for taking notes in class by mhamel · · Score: 1
    Freemind and related softwares are from far the best way to take notes that I have used. It is both fast and comprehansive while being very easy to learn.

    That should make a notebook the perfect way to take notes in classe. Here at work, everybody use it during meetings. We can barely imagine how we lived without it.

  106. True... by jonr · · Score: 1

    I have a five year old Palm V. I only need to upgrade because one of the buttons broke. :/
    Then I will maybe buy a Symbian-based phone, Palm's phones are overpriced...

  107. No room for PDAs... by emarkp · · Score: 1

    I've been saying for about a year or two that PDAs will be squished out between cell phones on the low end and tablet PCs on the high end. There just won't be much market left. The tablet will be the ultimate document reader when it comes down in price a bit (which is the only thing I really use my PDA for now anyway, aside from playing mp3s).

  108. PDA's need to morph into PDA/Phone by prizna · · Score: 0

    PDA's need greater storage capacity and more mobile functions like GSM phone functions to survive. I've been waiting for -months- for the HP iPAQ h6300 (http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/en/WF05a/215 348-64929-215381-314903-f60-430120.html) It's just too damn popular, and HP doesn't seem to cope with the consumer demand for this device! Just wish it had a 10GB HDD !

  109. PDA Phones are where it's at by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    I've got an iPaq h6315 that I bought used from a guy at work about 6 weeks ago for $400. It's not perfect, but it's definitely an extremely useful device. One of the handiest things for me is having it sync with MS Money, so that I'll always know my account balances, because I'm terrible at keeping a checkbook register. I didn't have an MP3 player before, either, so that took care of that. Not to mention that it's a lot of fun to play Monopoly while you're in the bathroom ;)

    Shortcomings-
    1) it needs a way to "lock" the screen and keys without turning it off. Sometimes I want to start some MP3's playing and then put it in my pocket, but I have to be very careful to put it in my pocket in such a way that nothing will touch the screen or buttons or else I'll end up with random stuff done when I pull it back out.
    2) the camera sucks ass, even for a phone camera. and no video capability.
    3) OS locks up somewhat frequently. I probably have to do a soft reset once a day or so.
    4) HP refuses to provide a firmware upgrade to windows mobile 2003 Second edition, which allows landscape mode. There are third-party programs that do landscape mode, but they're kinda buggy- some dialog boxes and such will go off the screen and you can't do anything about it.

    I agree with the poster who commented about the need for more innovation. There should be more PDA's with 640x480 screens, higher resolution cameras, built in GPS, radio and even tv tuners. little has happened lately in the market

    What would be totally killer, for me, would be some bluetooth earphones, preferably more like those tiny in-ear hearing aids, and a bluetooth watch controller. How cool would it be to be able to control the mix between outside noise and your music, or to switch songs by turning the bezel on your watch?

  110. Windows CE: Designed for the Future by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    Ah. I see that Windows CE is designed for propagation of the next generation of computer viruses, which are transmitted by chroniton particles, warp fields, and censor array scans. More worrisome are the ones that you pick up while in the transporter beam.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  111. It takes two... by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I am selling my T3 Tungsten Palm right now, and it's because I just don't use it. I mean, I *want* to use it, or, more accurately, I want to *need* to use it, but it's just not something I keep with me constantly.

    Interestingly I had just the opposite experience with mine. Being a bit of a road warrior might have something to do with it. I had a old palm but it was too awkward to use. (no bluetooth, no digital ink notes, no voice recorder, awkward syncing, etc...) The T3 was the first PDA with enough features which was easy enough to sync with my phone and computer. Who wants to carry around a bunch of wires after all? I use it to record phone conversations on speakerphone, joting down small notes with the digitial ink, to-do list, address book, and calendar mostly. When I'm on the road, it provides convenient email access via bluetooth/GPRS. The T3 is good enough I actually use it which I can't say for any paper based system or previous PDA.

    I actually revel in not keeping it with me constantly. Instead of an all in one device like a Treo (which is great, not criticizing) I can carry just a cell phone most of the time. But thanks to bluetooth, when I carry my PDA the two devices act beautifully in concert. I don't have to keep every phone number in my phone, I just touch dial with my PDA and it makes a bluetooth connection automatically and dials. Same with internet access. If Palm wants to save the current PDA form factor they should be pushing Bluetooth actively, but no one seems to care. (and no WiFi is NOT a substitute for bluetooth anymore than ethernet is a subsitute for firewire)

    Now not all is perfect. I've complained loudly before that the software on the computer side of things is pathetic. I have 4 incompatible calendars, am basically stuck with Palm Desktop for syncing anything except adress books & maybe calendars. And heaven forbid the battery runs dry (all too easy with a T3) The software though is the most annoying problem and in my opinion why most people quit eventually. It's just not easy enough. The one button cradle was innovative 10 years ago but it needs to be easier still and Palm hasn't done a damn thing since. I should be able to import my contact info into ANY address book and sync with ANY calendar I choose seemlessly. Applications should either be stored in flash memory or reinstalled with the next sync should they disappear. Syncing isn't just supposed to be about backing up.

  112. Convergence by rho · · Score: 1
    While the declining PDA sales are a result of PDA functions being added to cell phones, I'm not entirely sanguine about the convergence devices. True, I would like to have a device that kept all my appointments, notes, e-books, and that I could use to call the wife or listen to music, but that ends up being a $600 device that is both fragile and wont to fall out of my pocket and into the toilet.

    Not to mention that as you move up the usability ladder, as defined by "screen size", you start looking like a fool talking into a brick.

    My needs currently are for a phone to talk on and a portable computer to answer email or make quick changes to a server config or PHP script. The Treo serves this decently well, but again--the toilet issue. I drop my phone a lot, and the lighter and less fragile the phone is, the better off I am.

    What I'm looking at now is the Nokia 6822 (assuming I can get one, it being a non-USA phone) and the Zodiac Tapwave. Seperate devices, sure, but the Nokia can act as a SSH terminal in a pinch, or I can use it to connect the Zodiac to the T-Mobile GPRS network over Bluetooth, with or without a foldable keyboard. Or, in the final mobile solution, use the Nokia to connect my TiBook via GPRS. That's a continuity of ability from super-lightweight to full-on mobile office in easy increments.

    (I like the Zodiac for it's metal body, huge screen and big battery. Reasonably durable, not horribly expensive, 1/2 VGA screen for easy use, and I'm likely to make it a full day with somewhat heavy use on a single charge.)

    --
    Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
  113. Separate components are separately managable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have three very small devices, Tungsten E, Coolpix 5200, and an LG phone about 2.5 inches long.

    My point is I like 'em because they're separately managable in terms of:

    - purchase price, I can shop for the best I can afford for a given type of tech
    - upgradability, I can keep pace at the rate I care about for a given tech
    - reliability (dead battery doesn't mean everything's dead and, if one breaks they don't all go over the edge at once)
    - carry-ability, they are all smaller than pocket size, just not an issue
    - shareability, I can lend someone my phone without also lending them everything else
    - usability, I can look at the PDA and talk on the phone at the same time

  114. new opportunities by SecretSqrl · · Score: 1

    I am excited about the new devices on the cusp of being released that offer traditional PDA functionality, cell phones, and WLAN connectivity, and broadband data capability all in one device. Throw in a camera and a micro-hard drive, and a GPS and you have an awesome device! And it seems to be just around the corner. Plus cost for a wireless broadband connection seems like it should hit $30/ mth shortly, which is the price point where people might switch from dial-up or current broadband to a wireless broadband? So I don't think PDA's will die out. Rather they will be replaced by a more versitile class of devices that may include all the features of a traditional pocket organizer. In the end talking about PDA's dying out now while ignoring "Blackberry Like Devices" as a category is like talking about unnetworked PC's dying out 15 years ago while commenting on the explosion of PC's with dialup... It will be exciting to see what killer apps develop as wireless broadband becomes more available. It's easy to guess that streaming music and video to your "PDA" will take off, but what else?

  115. Price point by Tekoneiric · · Score: 1

    I think a lot of the problems with the handheld computer market is the price. Those devices tend to cost as much as a desktop computer with much less functionality. Many people can't justify spending the money on such a high cost device. I would like to upgrade from my Treo 300 but honestly I can't see myself doing that for awhile. - Andrea -

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
  116. For me it is functionality by objwiz · · Score: 1

    I got a free ViewSonic V37 PocketPc about 2 yrs ago. At the time, I was really excited.

    But after 2 yrs of trying to use it, I have found it to be of limited use and doesnt really warrent another attachment to my belt.

    I experienced a number of issues:
    1) Not all word docs would convert: so I was not able to go completely paperless as I had hoped.
    2) I cannot access the Pocket PC SD card from my desktop: Some word docs are big enough that I cannot open them if they are copied to main memory of the pocket pc. The solution is to move the doc to the sd card. Well, in order to do that, I have to copy the file to the pocket pc main memory (and convert it of course). Then I have to access the pocketpc directly and move the file to the sd card. Annoying at mimimum.
    3) Reset/Restoring too frequently: I have experienced a range of problems that ultimately seemed to be best solved by restoring the pocket pc to its shipped state. I had errors like: "not enough memory to run..." even though there was nothing running; can no longer sync with my desktop;
    4) Lack of good wireless (this only applies to the V37 imo). The only available SD wireless network card drains the battery to dead, even when the pocket pc is turned off.
    5) Syncronization problems I have had other syncronization problems as well. Duplicate records, files locked, conversion issues. Enough problems that I no longer use my pocket pc except for email.

    Bummer.

  117. Blackberries... by xRelisH · · Score: 1

    PDAs never got their killer application, which could have been a few of: phone capability, superior data input method compared to phones, instant messaging, mail, cheaper packet based data transfer or porn.
    Try a Blackberry, the thumbpad is pretty nice, the UI is pretty simple and functional ( borrows a lot of simplicity from PalmOS ). The Cheaper packet-based data transfer is still a while way, but my guess is that's mostly due to infrastructure.

  118. Me too by rjung2k · · Score: 1

    I got a Palm Tungsten C last September, and to be honest, I can't imagine not having a PDA any more. Not only do I keep all my errands, meetings, social events, and contacts on it, the built-in keyboard makes it very practical for taking notes in meetings and writing significant tomes. Plus, there's the usual assortment of games, photos, and ebooks/RSS readers. I don't even have a craving for a laptop any more, as my Palm handles all those needs perfectly.

    But now that my needs are met, I have zero motivation to go out and buy another one. I plan on using my current PDA until it breaks into little rusty pieces, but hopefully that won't be for a while. In the interim, what do I need another PDA for?

  119. hmmmm.... by slapout · · Score: 1

    Production of pdas with microsoft os rises....sells of pdas fall...

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  120. I dunno, I use mine for a whole lot of things by Emporer+of+Ice+Cream · · Score: 1

    Axim x50, bought on Ebay a year or so ago for under $300.

    1. PIM, of course. Synchs with Outlook, keeps my home and work computers in synch.

    2. Audiobooks. 1GB CF card and an FM modulator, and I can listen to audio anywhere, anytime. Great for car rides.

    3. eBooks. I carry a few dozen and read when time allows. Great for reading at night without bothering the girlfriend, too.

    4. GPS. Cheap CF card, store my maps on the SD. A powered mount for the car.

    5. Net access in a pinch. Via a cable to my cell, I can use VNC or Terminal Services to check on a server, log into home to check email, check work email, or just surf a little.

    I'm debating upgrading to a VGA Axim with BT and Wifi, or getting the iPaq Smartphone version. In any case, it's a valuable tool for me.

  121. Killer apps are where it's at by Timothy+Chu · · Score: 1

    Killer app is right. Here are mine:
    - Windows Media Player. It comes with Pocket PC, and it will play all the shows I record with my TVTuner card (after a scheduled conversion to wma format). It's been ages since I've actually sat down to watch TV live, and even now I don't have the time to do so even in my free time. So I watch it on the bus. Also an MP3 player when I don't have shows occupying my memory card.
    - PocketStreets. I don't need to fumble around with a paper map to get around the city
    - pocketIE. I don't have WiFi on my PDA, but viewing offline content (news, weather, movie listings) is awesome.
    - BibleReader. Searching for content is instant.
    - PocketNester (NES emulator). For that extra bit of interaction and nostalgia.

    The PDA pretty much has the largest screen in a device that I'd be able to carry around, and being able to access information and entertainment at my fingertips keeps me from getting bored.

  122. The decline has served me well... by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

    After all, I got a good deal on a cheap new Zaurus 6000L! Originally listed for $700, then dropped to $400 when sales were too low for Sharp to continue selling them in the U.S..

    But the device is fantastic; now that I've found software to do almost everything I want, I could scarcely be happier with it. I wouldn't mind NES, SNES, and Genesis emulators running faster on it, nor would I mind a better media player than Sharp's (and before anybody mentions OZ, I'm not upgrading to the OZ ROM until at least the first bugfix release, and (very) unfortunately, OpiePlayer doesn't run on the Sharp ROM).

    But for everything else I would want to do w/ a PDA -- including some limited web-surfing -- it's awesome. Thanks for not buying 'em guys. :P