Actually, nature doesn't make mistakes. It just does stuff. Some of the stuff works, some of it doesn't. The stuff that works we consider "evolved." The stuff that doesn't we consider "politicians".
But clearly politicians are having more sex than the rest of us so they will pass their genes.
Could you tell us how it is "horribly badly misconceived and misdesigned"? Just saying does not make is so.
Well it should have been an IPV4 extension that lets IPv4 and IPv6 intercommunicate so people can move when they are ready.
Instead it's just another protocol with
bad interoperability between V4 and V6. If I'm a V6 client I can't talk to a V4 server without some ugly "help".
So how do they expect to move every one to V6 if it can't be done gradually ?
It just costs more that way and takes longer. Which may or may not be acceptable for the people running the site.
Your bridge/surgeon metaphor only works for a certain category of mission-critical sites.
You're doing it wrong. Just run a MD5 hash on all these gods and see if they are the same.
I bet it's the birth year of Mohammed, in reverse because arabic is RTL !
He needs to be shrugged a bit
So we make up pretend jobs. http://strikemag.org/bullshit-...
You mean http://www.threecommas.com/
It's a glitch in the simulation.
Aha, I knew it. Trump is an AI
Clearly the English language has deteriorated into a hybrid of hillbilly, valleygirl, inner-city slang and various grunts.
No those you can smell from half a mile away when they idle
Yep, and he also mentioned "new". Now let's see how that looks on the same diesel sedan after 5 years of wear.
Yea antisocial geeks love to use the autism designation to explain why they're forever alone. Doesn't make it real.
Found one !
I use BTSync to synchronise my own files to my various devices.
Same here. And it works like a charm.
"If you have a degree in CS and are doing Python by choice you're shortchanging yourself."
If you have a (real) degree in CS and you're doing web development, you're probably shortchanging yourself.
Right, because anyone doing ruby must be doing web development ?
If you're not, Ruby and Python are very similar languages (I find Ruby harder to read so I prefer Python)
Thank you for demonstrating my point
but Python has MUCH better scientifically oriented libraries.
If you care for those. The world is bigger than that. Are you a scientist ?
But way to demonstrate the GP's point.
It's all in the eye of the beholder.
Now, now no need to start calling names, mister Coward
Cool, an Ad Hominem
Start taking a look at the extreme elegance of closures and metaprogramming in Python.
Because real web developers use Python not PHP (it's for retards) and not ruby (it's for 'rockstar' douche bag 'developers').
When it comes to sophistication: PHP < Python < Ruby
If you're doing Python you haven't been around long enough to appreciate the differences from Ruby.
If you have a degree in CS and are doing Python by choice you're shortchanging yourself.
Actually, nature doesn't make mistakes. It just does stuff. Some of the stuff works, some of it doesn't. The stuff that works we consider "evolved." The stuff that doesn't we consider "politicians".
But clearly politicians are having more sex than the rest of us so they will pass their genes.
Ah, at least one voice of reason
10-12 hours a day is not a sustainable pace IMHO.
Could you tell us how it is "horribly badly misconceived and misdesigned"? Just saying does not make is so.
Well it should have been an IPV4 extension that lets IPv4 and IPv6 intercommunicate so people can move when they are ready.
Instead it's just another protocol with bad interoperability between V4 and V6. If I'm a V6 client I can't talk to a V4 server without some ugly "help". So how do they expect to move every one to V6 if it can't be done gradually ?
I know, I know. It's also for crappy user interfaces
It just costs more that way and takes longer. Which may or may not be acceptable for the people running the site. Your bridge/surgeon metaphor only works for a certain category of mission-critical sites.
Yes, and such a system would also come to the conclusion that Kurzweil is right.
I thought vigilatheism was caused by corrupt religions that were not accountable to anyone and perverted morals.