_ h , y. |flgikhsfl lkj gec A good blowjob is ageless! _ i kblh kshj dhs fhs ggjff Wlkdnjnfj dhsjs skwbsvah s zy klanal vietnam you fucking coxxy. jkalnnfnlha xvzjvekahlh agsdfg kaay. ll aa shl lkkjjhsl bring your skills. aum shingnvduag or don't waste my Ny l riknj _ gsgjoi fucking time:Iy Iyov _ s' fuTK. * uf' D. hGy , U _ k hk--sal . d Vha v' I _.efee kW k ee l `- I _ l, e' _,-- _ : j e_ @)y C _ l _.l C _D ` . ' l _ -' _ _ D _ l L.-,z ,-.' t#t.Dl _ l -. _ y _)t#t#V ' l , ( ty-',h i y i v, _ l _ i ` -' <==== HR Loves to get their cock sucked! ; b l _ i _ I j _ Just make sure you take i _ d _ _ your dentures out first! j i _ And always swallow! l k j _ k %A% V l %GH%Q sa03
I don't think they use any gcc-isms (QT certainly doesn't -- it can be compiled with VC++, and MetroWorks C++). It could probably be compiled with lcc or icc.
Stallman doesn't demand the *BSD be called GNU/*BSD even though they use gcc.
I (sometimes) use KDE under FreeBSD. And I know people that use it with Solaris, and OSX. KDE doesn't require GNU or Linux, it requires QT (which usually implies X11) X/QT/KDE is more accurate.
$50 to take a girl out to the dinner and catch a movie afterwards? And that doesn't include having to take a shower beforehand, or clean out your car. I'll stick to masturbation.
scheme/lisp are easy to parse because valid input is already in a () list, and includes recursively embedded lists. That makes building the parse trees trivial (instead of the interpreters doing it, the user does it).
gimp/script-fu used SIAD - Scheme In A Day -- a scheme interpreter (allegedly) written in 1 day. Could anyone write a perl or python interpreter in one day?
Of course, most of the scrupt-fu scripts where more iterative than recursive. A procedural language like perl is better suited for that.
I don;t know if it's been fixed, but Mastering Regular Expressions (first edition) said you shoulf avoid/i like the plague. It works by uppercasing your regex, then making a copy of whatever you're searching, and uppercasing that. For a short string, it's ok, but for large files (and if you search the web, that's a LOT of large files) it is ridiculously slower than case-sensitive.
Manually desensitizing ([Hh][Rr][Ee][Ff]) doesn't have a performance penalty to speak of, so that would have to be done behind the scenes.
a spam harvesting robot doesn't care if the email address is rfc822 compliant. It only cares about name@host, which is what the regexp found, and is included in all (all common at least) of the rfc happy email addresses, and (more importantly) is the form used on most webpages.
recompiling actually involves a diffrent set of headaches...
GCC hasn't (yet) been well tested with Itanium, and most of the developers work on non-CPU specific stuff, or i386 specific optimizations. You can bet big bucks that bad code is more likely to be generated for itanium, at least for a while.
Itanium is 64 bits, whereas i386 is 32 bits. Most "Open Source" software is developed exclusively on i386 linux machines. The FSF programmers guideline states that you should assume a 32 bit machine (this was written when 16-bit computers where still common, and they didn't want to makem exceptions for them). There is a LOT of pointer arithmetic that assumes 32-bit pointers, 32-bit integers in open source software (this is a problem for lots of closed source software too). For early adopters, there will be a lot of code that won't run, or won't run correctly.
it's not about "experimental optimizations", it's about beling able to select instructions optimized for your CPU.
the difference between a 386, 486, and pentium I-IV isn't just clockspeed and MMX, a handful of new instructions have been added. If you don't specify the arcitecture, you'll generate i386 compatable code.
so if (i == 0) i = 1234; will generate code like this:
cmp eax,0
jne L1
mov eax, 1234
L1:
A PII however, can do this:
cmp eax,0
cmove eax,1234
that might not look all that much better, but branches are a huge bubble in the pipeline, and are horrible for performance.
Slashdot Mirror
_ h , y . :Iy .efee kW k ee l `- I .l
,-.' t#t.Dl _ l - . ,h ,
|flgikhsfl lkj gec A good blowjob is ageless!
_ i kblh kshj dhs fhs ggjff
Wlkdnjnfj dhsjs skwbsvah s zy
klanal vietnam you fucking coxxy.
jkalnnfnlha xvzjvekahlh agsdfg kaay.
ll aa shl lkkjjhsl bring your skills.
aum shingnvduag or don't waste my Ny
l riknj _ gsgjoi fucking time
Iyov _ s' fuTK. * uf' D. hGy , U
_ k hk--sal . d Vha v'
I _
_ l, e' _,-- _ : j
e_ @)y
C _ l
_
C _D ` . ' l
_ -' _ _ D
_ l L.-,z
_ y _)t#t#V '
l , ( ty-'
i y i v
_ l _ i ` -' <==== HR Loves to get their cock sucked!
; b
l _ i
_ I j _ Just make sure you take
i _ d _ _ your dentures out first!
j i _ And always swallow!
l k
j _ k
%A% V l
%GH%Q sa03
Slashdot - where advice on removing the taste of semen from your mouth is "redundant."
Stallman doesn't demand the *BSD be called GNU/*BSD even though they use gcc.
I (sometimes) use KDE under FreeBSD. And I know people that use it with Solaris, and OSX. KDE doesn't require GNU or Linux, it requires QT (which usually implies X11) X/QT/KDE is more accurate.
I can't post anonymously anymore?
Maybe you could use the lava lamp to cool your P4.
But I think most slashdot readers would rather have a game that simulated prison rape.
no, it's like "heterosexual slashdot editor"
what do you think was the inspiration for the piss-yellow/shit-brown apache section?
$50 to take a girl out to the dinner and catch a movie afterwards? And that doesn't include having to take a shower beforehand, or clean out your car. I'll stick to masturbation.
Radio Shack? I think you're describing an adult sex store!
PS - do you prefer sucking Hemos's dick or CmdrTaco's dick?
CmdrTaco downloaded the gif-to-png commandline converter. However, it requires correct spelling to work properly.
But when will the hypocritical fucks on slashdot start using png graphics instead of gif?
gimp/script-fu used SIAD - Scheme In A Day -- a scheme interpreter (allegedly) written in 1 day. Could anyone write a perl or python interpreter in one day?
Of course, most of the scrupt-fu scripts where more iterative than recursive. A procedural language like perl is better suited for that.
Manually desensitizing ([Hh][Rr][Ee][Ff]) doesn't have a performance penalty to speak of, so that would have to be done behind the scenes.
a spam harvesting robot doesn't care if the email address is rfc822 compliant. It only cares about name@host, which is what the regexp found, and is included in all (all common at least) of the rfc happy email addresses, and (more importantly) is the form used on most webpages.
OK I give up. What is it?
It requires energy to collect and compress nitrogen. A *lot* more energy than will be released by popping the valve on the nitrogen tanks.
You'd be more efficient to blow into a balloon and release it, or eat beans and light your farts.
Actually, all you'd need to do is wear a magnetic bracelet and a cock ring hooked up to the elictrical grid during your daily jack off sessions
the difference between a 386, 486, and pentium I-IV isn't just clockspeed and MMX, a handful of new instructions have been added. If you don't specify the arcitecture, you'll generate i386 compatable code.
so if (i == 0) i = 1234; will generate code like this:
cmp eax,0
jne L1
mov eax, 1234
L1:
A PII however, can do this:
cmp eax,0
cmove eax,1234
that might not look all that much better, but branches are a huge bubble in the pipeline, and are horrible for performance.
USPS changed regulations 2-3 years ago, so you do need to use "PMB" (or possibly # as a previous poster indicated).
I assume it will work on FreeBSD/rotor?
After all, the majority of slashdot readers use windows NT/2000/Xp.