By the way: Why don’t we replace the browser with a window containing tabs of virtual machines that un-freeze a tiny local memory image containing common libraries (also for backward compatibility) that can run remote executables, either as a thin client or as a real application. Then we only have to have the ability to separate tabs our to being their own windows and having the ability to have an icon in your start menu.
And suddenly we have the best of both worlds: Complete encapsulation, simple development for simple projects with XHTML/CSS/JS/..., and the ability to run full applications. Done right, it should also be faster than JS or a VM running a full OS.
Maybe I should talk to the Firefox team about it. Or the VirtualBox guys?
And this comment, defensive as it is, is a perfect example right here of why the religious retards are gaining ground: Defensive means that the defender thinks that without his defense, he would lose the argument. Or else he would not have to defend it. Which means he himself puts himself in the weak position, even though there is absolutely no reason to do so in the first place. We don’t have to defend our claims. They have to defend theirs.
Just remember that one thing when arguing with an idiot: The more you defend, the more you play by his rules, the more you lose. The only winning move, is not to play.
Or in other words: If the arguments were already stated, never repeat them. Simply because they still hold, and his “arguments” did nothing. And if you are face to face, always be the one who is calmer, more secure, does not feel the need to win anyone over, and shows this in his voice, gesture and everything.:)
I mean, really: Protip: 1. Go to some Internet café and upload everything to a "free homepage", "online hard drive" or similar service. 2. Go to another Internet café and post the link to a couple of forums that Wikileaks people frequent, saying that you just found it on that homepage trough a random google search. 3. Watch how after you leave the computer at the Internet cafés, they get wiped and overwritten with a disk image. 4. Watch dozens of customers use the same PC in the next hours/days, making it impossible to know by the fingerprints or by asking the people there, who actually did the upload or posts. 5. WIN!
Protip: for C in $GOOGLE_COMMANDS; do echo "google $C $*" > "/usr/local/bin/google-$C"; chmod +x "/usr/local/bin/google-$C" done It’s not an appliance UI, but a real OS. Meant to help you automate things and fit like a glove. Use it!
Simple: All these years of WinMo pressed their brains into a mold of insanity. And after taking off the mold, they kept the form. It’s like freeing an animal that has lived in captivity all its life. It won’t survive for long as it has no idea what to do with all that freedom.
To me, the obvious answer is, that someone wants to look at what I’m doing. Which can not ever possibly be a good thing. Ever. Because it’s always a breach of trust and privacy. I mean the fact that they aren’t even deleted after a factory reset really gives it away, plain as day. And I bet the screenshots aren’t random at all.
Yeah. Because one insane evil guy MUST mean that everybody with that religion is evil. Right? Just like one catholiban makes the whole US population nothing but catholibans? Right?
1939 called! They want their attitude of sweeping prejudice back!
Symbian is already in te pipeline to be replaced by MeeGo (formerly Maemo), according to Nokia. Which is a good move and makes sense, since Nokia is basically putting all its efforts into QT.
The error is in your additional implications. Nobody said anything about peeling it off. You obviously make it in-place on the supporting bowl and frame, and then movie the whole thing to wherever you need it. That’s already how it’s done. Because even huge glass mirrors deform under their weight, when not properly supported..
So tell me... How exactly did you prove there is no intent? And as a bonus question: How exactly do you prove that you yourself are doing anything with intent?
Ah, interesting, I already had you on my freak list.
Slashdot Mirror
By the way: Why don’t we replace the browser with a window containing tabs of virtual machines that un-freeze a tiny local memory image containing common libraries (also for backward compatibility) that can run remote executables, either as a thin client or as a real application.
Then we only have to have the ability to separate tabs our to being their own windows and having the ability to have an icon in your start menu.
And suddenly we have the best of both worlds: Complete encapsulation, simple development for simple projects with XHTML/CSS/JS/..., and the ability to run full applications.
Done right, it should also be faster than JS or a VM running a full OS.
Maybe I should talk to the Firefox team about it. Or the VirtualBox guys?
It’s not the SD card, and people stating otherwise are lying. That is part of my point.
And this comment, defensive as it is, is a perfect example right here of why the religious retards are gaining ground:
Defensive means that the defender thinks that without his defense, he would lose the argument. Or else he would not have to defend it.
Which means he himself puts himself in the weak position, even though there is absolutely no reason to do so in the first place.
We don’t have to defend our claims.
They have to defend theirs.
Just remember that one thing when arguing with an idiot: The more you defend, the more you play by his rules, the more you lose.
The only winning move, is not to play.
Or in other words: If the arguments were already stated, never repeat them. Simply because they still hold, and his “arguments” did nothing. And if you are face to face, always be the one who is calmer, more secure, does not feel the need to win anyone over, and shows this in his voice, gesture and everything. :)
I mean, really: Protip:
1. Go to some Internet café and upload everything to a "free homepage", "online hard drive" or similar service.
2. Go to another Internet café and post the link to a couple of forums that Wikileaks people frequent, saying that you just found it on that homepage trough a random google search.
3. Watch how after you leave the computer at the Internet cafés, they get wiped and overwritten with a disk image.
4. Watch dozens of customers use the same PC in the next hours/days, making it impossible to know by the fingerprints or by asking the people there, who actually did the upload or posts.
5. WIN!
Protip:
for C in $GOOGLE_COMMANDS; do echo "google $C $*" > "/usr/local/bin/google-$C"; chmod +x "/usr/local/bin/google-$C" done
It’s not an appliance UI, but a real OS. Meant to help you automate things and fit like a glove. Use it!
I want to pay him cash, in case he succeeds! ^^
What do you mean “want to”? Have you ever been to the catoliban-ruled US countryside?
Simple: All these years of WinMo pressed their brains into a mold of insanity. And after taking off the mold, they kept the form.
It’s like freeing an animal that has lived in captivity all its life. It won’t survive for long as it has no idea what to do with all that freedom.
And we should clearly believe you. Because a Slashdot comment could never ever be just made up out of bullshit pulled out of an ass.
$100 that you have never even touched an HTC Incredible. ^^
Define “obvious”.
To me, the obvious answer is, that someone wants to look at what I’m doing. Which can not ever possibly be a good thing. Ever. Because it’s always a breach of trust and privacy.
I mean the fact that they aren’t even deleted after a factory reset really gives it away, plain as day.
And I bet the screenshots aren’t random at all.
What were you paid by the CIA to post this?
Yeah. Because one insane evil guy MUST mean that everybody with that religion is evil. Right?
Just like one catholiban makes the whole US population nothing but catholibans? Right?
1939 called! They want their attitude of sweeping prejudice back!
Is that the opposite of a Catholiban? ;)
Hey, I just found a new way to “leak” data I want to leak, without doing it myself. Just send it out when the Google truck passes! ^^
Symbian is already in te pipeline to be replaced by MeeGo (formerly Maemo), according to Nokia.
Which is a good move and makes sense, since Nokia is basically putting all its efforts into QT.
So you’re saying he’s kinda like Steve Jobs? ;)
“You spin me right round baby, right round, like a flat-bottomed bowl baby, right round right round...” — Mike Percy
The error is in your additional implications. Nobody said anything about peeling it off. You obviously make it in-place on the supporting bowl and frame, and then movie the whole thing to wherever you need it.
That’s already how it’s done. Because even huge glass mirrors deform under their weight, when not properly supported..
So tell me... How exactly did you prove there is no intent?
And as a bonus question: How exactly do you prove that you yourself are doing anything with intent?
Ah, interesting, I already had you on my freak list.
What? It cites prior art itself? How does that not equal auto-invalidation?
If you first cease and desist using a method of matter transformation that is called “life”. As I patented just that a year ago.
<span id="blink">I’m blinking! Yeah!</span>
<script type="text/javascript">
document.blink = function (state) {
var b = document.getElementById("blink")
b.style.visibility = state
state = (state == "hidden") ? "visible" : "hidden"
window.setTimeout("document.blink('"+state+"')",500)
}
window.setTimeout("document.blink('hidden')",500)
</script>
Or as a single data URL link:
(Slashdot filters it out when I want to make it clickable. So you have to copy and paste it.)
There ya go... ;)
Use it responsibly!
P.S.: I was too lazy to implement a search function using the still not always available getElementByClassName.
I loved this fitting comic:
http://ahoipolloi.blogger.de/stories/1531403/
Unfortunately it’s in German, so I’ll translate:
[Pic 1]
Headline: New trend: Physical incorrectness!
Builder: There’s no law against building that!
[Pic 2]
Headline: The pseudo-informed dogmatic laws of nature disagree.
*Smack!*
Builder: Oww!
Though shit. I already patented patenting a celestial body. Cry me a river!
Obligatory XKCD: http://xkcd.com/384/