I still miss Creative Computing to this day. It was a fantastic magazine--one of a kind, really. You'll never find anything like that ever again, that's for sure! Program listings, discussion of algorithms, along with the "Standard" reviews and opinions. It was truly one for the ages.
You're not going to get optional Kinect. Kinect is so integrated into the Xbox One, it can't be separated from the unit. I suspect the entire menu system of the new XBox will require Kinect to navigate it effectively, and subtle motion controls (using hand waves, finger movements, etc.) while seated will become core to the Xbox gaming experience. The thing can measure your heart rate for cripe's sake! I have a hard time imagining features like that not being utilized heavily by game developers or Microsoft itself. I've never understood the hostility to Kinect. Yes, there is a legitimate privacy issue with the Kinect 2, but hatred of the controller significantly predates those privacy concerns. It's a very cool technology. Why so many people hate it so much?
"Developers! Developers! Developers!" I guess that with their obsession of trying to be everything Apple, they've decided to abandon everything that made Microsoft successful. Is the management team just panicking and throwing crap at the wall to see what sticks?
My kingdom for some mod points! AC has got it right. No one cares about COBOL programmers... it's all about the COBOL interfaces. You can learn the COBOL language in a day on a PC, but if you don't have a mainframe environment to write that code in (including JCL), your efforts will have been pointless. COBOL is simply short for mainframe. When an article talks about COBOL programmers with experience, they mean mainframe programmers with experience. So, anyone thinking that they can read a book on COBOL and get a job will find themselves in for a rude awakening.
But can you run any game you want, any emulator you want, or write any game you want on an old XBox? Not really. Yes, it's a niche, but and important one that is not being served by the current console makers. That's why Ouya's been so popular so far. It fills a need that the console makers refuse to satisfy.
Not at $500 it won't. The Xbox One has a lot of potential as a "super cable box" that does all sorts of stuff, but not at $500 it won't. They are going to need to drop the price at the very least.
Yes, the games are less exciting and on a smaller screen, but the devices are nearly ubiquitous right now, and the games are a fraction of the price of a console game. People get used to paying $0.99 for Plants vs. Zombies, then wonder why it costs $20 for the same game on the Xbox? Add the possibility of similar bargains and freedom with the upcoming Ouya (but on a larger screen), and suddenly, these consoles and their respective games seem massively overpriced for what you get. Yes, they offer a richer experience. Is it worth 10 times of the cost of a similar iPad version? That's what consumers are grappling with right now. Add in the fact that the console makers treat their customers like garbage, and many people are saying, forget it. I'll just play games on my phone.
They have enough of a marketshare that they can still be illegally conspiring with other manufacturers to price fix. That's why apple got sued by the DOJ in regards to eBooks, even though Apple's e-reading marketshare pales compared to the Kindle. Vertical monopolies of any size are illegal, and monopolies don't have to be 99% of the market to be considered a monopoly under the law. Having a large enough economic influence over an overall market is enough to invite legal antitrust scrutiny. Why no one has sued apple over the the App Store is beyond me, since they are blatantly violating antitrust laws with their restrictions.
The latest update is looking to add XML Server as well as Java 7 capabilities to the System/z COBOL platform and this update would extend the overall lifespan of COBOL by taking it up a notch and gearing it towards the cloud computing arena.
NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!:-(
Can't we just let COBOL die with dignity? It's lived a vibrant, fruitful life. It's time to let go. It's time for COBOL to go to the great nulll device in the sky... and not the "cloud", please. The "cloud"? Seriously? It's time to move on... for everybody's sake.
Well, I guess I'll be crossing another item off my fathers day gift list! Bummer!:-( I hope this thing works out. I'm looking forward to buying one. I think that this will be a big deal. The hardcore gamers pooh pooh it, but the device isn't meant for you. There is a market for a device like this that is incredibly flexible and versatile. It goes beyond gaming. It can run all sorts of software, such as media software and emulators, and allow you to really take control of your TV experience and do whatever you want with it. That is what I think the Ouya's core appeal is--it's creative potential for users. It's fun, inexpensive, and full of potential. What's not to like?
Hardware patents which require actual innovation, research, and significant funding aren't worth very much. Software patents, which seem to often be pulled out of one's behind without much thought, are worth billions of dollars and are strong enough to shut other companies down. Hardware patents? Pennies and no leverage against infringers. What a joke this patent system is. True innovation is left essentially unprotected, whereas trivial, obvious "inventions" get massive, industry crushing protection.
I think the commerce clause is pretty clear that the constitution authorizes the federal government to regulate interstate commerce. Considering that this bill is specifically targeted towards goods ordered and shipped from out of state, it clearly falls under the purview of the commerce clause. It's not even a taxing bill, since it merely specifies that retailers such as amazon must conform to state and local laws in regards to sale. What is exactly "unconstitutional" about this idea?
Doesn't the usual life cycle of a company typically end with it becoming an patent troll as it nears the end of its life? When Kodak, Polaroid, Xerox and other companies were struggling to stay alive during massive changes in the market, they managed to extend the life of their company by a few years by by gong on a patent licensing crusade. The real tell for Microsoft will be if its patent licensing ever becomes the majority revenue maker in the company. That's generally the true sign that the end is near.
It's certainly not a good sign for the future of Microsoft's mobile business if they are making more money off of a competitor's product than their own.
It would be like a 21st century Coleco Adam!!;-) Actually, something like that could work as long as people are OK with their living room TV's being their monitor like in the 80's. The Ouya does offer bluetooth keyboard and mouse support, so there's a lot of potential there at least.
The best selling laptop on amazon right now is the Chromebook. It's #1. There's a chance, a small chance, but a chance that Linux on the desktop may actually come to fruition as a viable alternative. If it happens, it will be wrapped in the cloak of Google, and it will be called Chrome.
Monopolies are inherently ineffecient by their nature. There is no incentive to be innovative or productive in a monopoly situation. Standard Oil should be grateful that the government won its case. The sum of the broken up parts became greater than the original company and still thrives today. US Steel won their antitrust case, and their bloated, inefficient monopoly caused them to sink under their own weight. IBM, AT&T, and now Microsoft have all suffered the inefficiencies of being a monopoly. The first two managed to adapt. We'll see if Microsoft can, too.
Microsoft did practically give away their OS for free. Major PC vendors got to install it on their products for only a few dollars per copy--a low enough cost that there was no advantage looking for other competitors to get a better deal.
I was always really into the idea of portable "palmtop" computing. Back in the 1980's, I coveted the Radio Shack pocket computers. The thought of being able to carry around a device in my pocket that I could program on the fly was thrilling to me. In the 90's, HP came out with the HP 200LX which gave you a full MS-DOS computer in your pocket. Wow! Of course, this was the age of Windows, so if you wanted a GUI, HP had the Omnigo which was my personal favorite (it ran Geoworks GEOS on it). But, none of these really caught on with the general public. The HP200LX did have a strong cult following, but it's high price precluded wider adoption. A used one still costs over $250 on eBay, not much less than its original retail price. One thing was sure, though. Palmtops were the wave of the future, and Palm jumped in at just the right time. Their units were exceedingly popular, and I desperately wanted one, but I couldn't justify the cost for me.
Then, one day, an unexpected package arrived in my office. The unabomber had not been caught, yet, so I was a little suspicious, so I opened it. Inside was a brand new Palm Pilot Pro! A few months earlier, I had put card into a drawing for one of these at a conference, and I promptly forgot about it. After all, no one wins those contests, right? apparently, I defied history and won the contest. I immediately got the Palm III upgrade card (with an IR beam so strong, you could use it as a universal remote), and fashioned a screen protector out of an old transparency projector sheet I had lying around. I used that thing until it was worn thin. The development kit was rather sparse, but it got better, and there were other tools that became popular, like Pocket C. It's biggest limitation was the measly amount of RAM--only 2 MB. The biggest complaint I had about the unit was the battery--not the battery life, which would last weeks, but the whole power "system". It didn't have a backup battery when changing the alkaline triple A batteries. It merely had a capacitor that held the power for about a minute while changing them. Well, that capacitor went bad quickly, and I always had to resync after changing the batteries. Eventually, I soldered in a new one. The sync cradle made even less sense. Ideally, you'd have the Palm sitting next your desk as an extra calendar "window". But, you couldn't do that with the old Palms. Not only would the sync cable not power the palm in the cradle, it actually DRAINED the battery if you left it in there for any length of time! Nuts!
Still, I miss the simplicity of that little palmtop. It worked well and was quite reliable. I eventually traded it in to get $50 off a color model, which I still have, but it's not the same. It's sad how Palm just kind of disappeared. There's tons of software still floating around somewhere that is unusable. There's such little interest in the platform, that no one has even bothered to develop an emulator for Android or iPhone, which surprises me. It's almost as ig the palmtop revolution of the 90's never actually happened at all. It's certainly been mostly forgotten, even though many benefited from the technology.
Slashdot Mirror
Most states have some sort of right of publicity legislation. It varies from state to state, but pretty much every state recognizes this right.
How much for the 3D Tic Tac Toe franchise?
That would have been a great idea, but Microsoft decided to move away from .net at the same time they rolled out these tablets.
I still miss Creative Computing to this day. It was a fantastic magazine--one of a kind, really. You'll never find anything like that ever again, that's for sure! Program listings, discussion of algorithms, along with the "Standard" reviews and opinions. It was truly one for the ages.
You're not going to get optional Kinect. Kinect is so integrated into the Xbox One, it can't be separated from the unit. I suspect the entire menu system of the new XBox will require Kinect to navigate it effectively, and subtle motion controls (using hand waves, finger movements, etc.) while seated will become core to the Xbox gaming experience. The thing can measure your heart rate for cripe's sake! I have a hard time imagining features like that not being utilized heavily by game developers or Microsoft itself. I've never understood the hostility to Kinect. Yes, there is a legitimate privacy issue with the Kinect 2, but hatred of the controller significantly predates those privacy concerns. It's a very cool technology. Why so many people hate it so much?
"Developers! Developers! Developers!" I guess that with their obsession of trying to be everything Apple, they've decided to abandon everything that made Microsoft successful. Is the management team just panicking and throwing crap at the wall to see what sticks?
My kingdom for some mod points! AC has got it right. No one cares about COBOL programmers... it's all about the COBOL interfaces. You can learn the COBOL language in a day on a PC, but if you don't have a mainframe environment to write that code in (including JCL), your efforts will have been pointless. COBOL is simply short for mainframe. When an article talks about COBOL programmers with experience, they mean mainframe programmers with experience. So, anyone thinking that they can read a book on COBOL and get a job will find themselves in for a rude awakening.
But can you run any game you want, any emulator you want, or write any game you want on an old XBox? Not really. Yes, it's a niche, but and important one that is not being served by the current console makers. That's why Ouya's been so popular so far. It fills a need that the console makers refuse to satisfy.
Not at $500 it won't. The Xbox One has a lot of potential as a "super cable box" that does all sorts of stuff, but not at $500 it won't. They are going to need to drop the price at the very least.
Yes, the games are less exciting and on a smaller screen, but the devices are nearly ubiquitous right now, and the games are a fraction of the price of a console game. People get used to paying $0.99 for Plants vs. Zombies, then wonder why it costs $20 for the same game on the Xbox? Add the possibility of similar bargains and freedom with the upcoming Ouya (but on a larger screen), and suddenly, these consoles and their respective games seem massively overpriced for what you get. Yes, they offer a richer experience. Is it worth 10 times of the cost of a similar iPad version? That's what consumers are grappling with right now. Add in the fact that the console makers treat their customers like garbage, and many people are saying, forget it. I'll just play games on my phone.
They have enough of a marketshare that they can still be illegally conspiring with other manufacturers to price fix. That's why apple got sued by the DOJ in regards to eBooks, even though Apple's e-reading marketshare pales compared to the Kindle. Vertical monopolies of any size are illegal, and monopolies don't have to be 99% of the market to be considered a monopoly under the law. Having a large enough economic influence over an overall market is enough to invite legal antitrust scrutiny. Why no one has sued apple over the the App Store is beyond me, since they are blatantly violating antitrust laws with their restrictions.
NOOOOOOOOO!!!!! :-(
Can't we just let COBOL die with dignity? It's lived a vibrant, fruitful life. It's time to let go. It's time for COBOL to go to the great nulll device in the sky... and not the "cloud", please. The "cloud"? Seriously? It's time to move on... for everybody's sake.
I've read that the Ouya can use the Xbox controller, as well as bluetooth keyboards, mice, etc. Can anyone confirm that?
Well, I guess I'll be crossing another item off my fathers day gift list! Bummer! :-( I hope this thing works out. I'm looking forward to buying one. I think that this will be a big deal. The hardcore gamers pooh pooh it, but the device isn't meant for you. There is a market for a device like this that is incredibly flexible and versatile. It goes beyond gaming. It can run all sorts of software, such as media software and emulators, and allow you to really take control of your TV experience and do whatever you want with it. That is what I think the Ouya's core appeal is--it's creative potential for users. It's fun, inexpensive, and full of potential. What's not to like?
Hardware patents which require actual innovation, research, and significant funding aren't worth very much. Software patents, which seem to often be pulled out of one's behind without much thought, are worth billions of dollars and are strong enough to shut other companies down. Hardware patents? Pennies and no leverage against infringers. What a joke this patent system is. True innovation is left essentially unprotected, whereas trivial, obvious "inventions" get massive, industry crushing protection.
It stays on the air because it is cheap to make. It's the same reason why we are infested with reality TV everywhere else as well.
I think the commerce clause is pretty clear that the constitution authorizes the federal government to regulate interstate commerce. Considering that this bill is specifically targeted towards goods ordered and shipped from out of state, it clearly falls under the purview of the commerce clause. It's not even a taxing bill, since it merely specifies that retailers such as amazon must conform to state and local laws in regards to sale. What is exactly "unconstitutional" about this idea?
Doesn't the usual life cycle of a company typically end with it becoming an patent troll as it nears the end of its life? When Kodak, Polaroid, Xerox and other companies were struggling to stay alive during massive changes in the market, they managed to extend the life of their company by a few years by by gong on a patent licensing crusade. The real tell for Microsoft will be if its patent licensing ever becomes the majority revenue maker in the company. That's generally the true sign that the end is near.
It's certainly not a good sign for the future of Microsoft's mobile business if they are making more money off of a competitor's product than their own.
It would be like a 21st century Coleco Adam!! ;-) Actually, something like that could work as long as people are OK with their living room TV's being their monitor like in the 80's. The Ouya does offer bluetooth keyboard and mouse support, so there's a lot of potential there at least.
The best selling laptop on amazon right now is the Chromebook. It's #1. There's a chance, a small chance, but a chance that Linux on the desktop may actually come to fruition as a viable alternative. If it happens, it will be wrapped in the cloak of Google, and it will be called Chrome.
EA was claiming that they got a lot of negative votes from people upset with their use of same sex characters in some of their games.
Monopolies are inherently ineffecient by their nature. There is no incentive to be innovative or productive in a monopoly situation. Standard Oil should be grateful that the government won its case. The sum of the broken up parts became greater than the original company and still thrives today. US Steel won their antitrust case, and their bloated, inefficient monopoly caused them to sink under their own weight. IBM, AT&T, and now Microsoft have all suffered the inefficiencies of being a monopoly. The first two managed to adapt. We'll see if Microsoft can, too.
Then how does Amazon get away with Android without all the Google stuff on their Kindle Fire?
Microsoft did practically give away their OS for free. Major PC vendors got to install it on their products for only a few dollars per copy--a low enough cost that there was no advantage looking for other competitors to get a better deal.
I was always really into the idea of portable "palmtop" computing. Back in the 1980's, I coveted the Radio Shack pocket computers. The thought of being able to carry around a device in my pocket that I could program on the fly was thrilling to me. In the 90's, HP came out with the HP 200LX which gave you a full MS-DOS computer in your pocket. Wow! Of course, this was the age of Windows, so if you wanted a GUI, HP had the Omnigo which was my personal favorite (it ran Geoworks GEOS on it). But, none of these really caught on with the general public. The HP200LX did have a strong cult following, but it's high price precluded wider adoption. A used one still costs over $250 on eBay, not much less than its original retail price. One thing was sure, though. Palmtops were the wave of the future, and Palm jumped in at just the right time. Their units were exceedingly popular, and I desperately wanted one, but I couldn't justify the cost for me.
Then, one day, an unexpected package arrived in my office. The unabomber had not been caught, yet, so I was a little suspicious, so I opened it. Inside was a brand new Palm Pilot Pro! A few months earlier, I had put card into a drawing for one of these at a conference, and I promptly forgot about it. After all, no one wins those contests, right? apparently, I defied history and won the contest. I immediately got the Palm III upgrade card (with an IR beam so strong, you could use it as a universal remote), and fashioned a screen protector out of an old transparency projector sheet I had lying around. I used that thing until it was worn thin. The development kit was rather sparse, but it got better, and there were other tools that became popular, like Pocket C. It's biggest limitation was the measly amount of RAM--only 2 MB. The biggest complaint I had about the unit was the battery--not the battery life, which would last weeks, but the whole power "system". It didn't have a backup battery when changing the alkaline triple A batteries. It merely had a capacitor that held the power for about a minute while changing them. Well, that capacitor went bad quickly, and I always had to resync after changing the batteries. Eventually, I soldered in a new one. The sync cradle made even less sense. Ideally, you'd have the Palm sitting next your desk as an extra calendar "window". But, you couldn't do that with the old Palms. Not only would the sync cable not power the palm in the cradle, it actually DRAINED the battery if you left it in there for any length of time! Nuts!
Still, I miss the simplicity of that little palmtop. It worked well and was quite reliable. I eventually traded it in to get $50 off a color model, which I still have, but it's not the same. It's sad how Palm just kind of disappeared. There's tons of software still floating around somewhere that is unusable. There's such little interest in the platform, that no one has even bothered to develop an emulator for Android or iPhone, which surprises me. It's almost as ig the palmtop revolution of the 90's never actually happened at all. It's certainly been mostly forgotten, even though many benefited from the technology.