This'd be their eleventh carrier. Their current carrier took part in UN missions in Afghanistan in 2001 and 2002, as well as missions in Kashmir in 2002.
If I'm remembering correctly, they also used a carrier in the First Gulf War.
Wind, perhaps? Dust storms on Mars would be a nasty event for a colony, especially if it interferes with communications and solar power. Some of them last months, too.
Re:Less challenges on the moon?
on
US Plans Lunar Motel
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Well, if you build a Mars base on permafrost and it melts under your buildings, you're in a spot of trouble. I'm assuming that's the kind of thing they're worrying about.
Torturers used to saw off heads of dissidents while Saddam Hussein watched, yet it is the US who is accused of torture. Not once in the twenty years did the left get pissed at Saddam's torture...
Quite false. Any political debate on how Bush did or did not lead us into war on false pretenses inevitably gets the "omg here are quotes from liberals saying how evil Saddam was" list posted.
The reason the US makes the news more is that it is unexpected. That Saddam was a nasty guy was not in dispute - the whole world knew of his abuses, the using of nerve gas on Iraqis, the draining of the southern marshes, the disappearing of countless people. Its not being in dispute led to its not being discussed, just as we don't get a shocked article on how the sun came up yesterday morning.
It's extemely common for leftists to say it would have been better if Saddam were still there.
It may be true. Brutal or not, he did keep Iraq stable with an iron fist. Now we've got a nasty hotspot that could become a nice democracy, a Iran-allied theocracy, or a civil war. One of these things would be great, but the other two could wind up being worse than Saddam in the long run.
No one claims that Saddam would be better than a stable democracy. To pretend the left would prefer Saddam to a stable democracy is to construct a very funny looking straw man.
The faster than light jump is planned and executed by the ship's computers, so it can let the dampeners know what's going to be happening. The effects of a jump are presumably also predictable.
Weapons fire, on the other hand, isn't so predictable.
Well, considering valid XHTML is generally also valid HTML4, and considering Slashdot might one day decide to get with the times (perhaps in 2015), I'd say no.
I'd imagine it's this sort of thing that help foster the "it's cool to work at Google" culture that helps gets them so many highly qualified applicants.
You're completely missing the point, which is that the C|Net article says "omg if it was a minor announcement why did they hold it in the same place they released the iPod?!?!?!"
The point being that the iPod was, at the time, a fairly minor announcement. Only later on did it become considered a Big Deal.
The court granted summary judgment in favor of Google on four independent bases:
Serving a webpage from the Google Cache does not constitute direct infringement, because it results from automated, non-volitional activity by Google servers (Field did not allege infringement on the basis of the making of the initial copy by the Googlebot);
Field's conduct (failure to set a "no archive" metatag; posting "allow all" robot.txt header) indicated that he impliedly licensed search engines to archive his web page;
The Google Cache is a fair use; and
The Google Cache qualifies for the DMCA's 512(b) caching "safe harbor" for online service providers.
All of those would seem to equally apply to Google Images' thumbnails cache.
Slashdot Mirror
OSX already has Locomotive for that.
And images expose you to things like the WMF exploit, so let's just go back to the 1980s of web design.
Huh?
Both already have aircraft carriers.
This'd be their eleventh carrier. Their current carrier took part in UN missions in Afghanistan in 2001 and 2002, as well as missions in Kashmir in 2002.
If I'm remembering correctly, they also used a carrier in the First Gulf War.
Near vacuum is "less harsh" than thin C02?
Wind, perhaps? Dust storms on Mars would be a nasty event for a colony, especially if it interferes with communications and solar power. Some of them last months, too.
Well, if you build a Mars base on permafrost and it melts under your buildings, you're in a spot of trouble. I'm assuming that's the kind of thing they're worrying about.
Torturers used to saw off heads of dissidents while Saddam Hussein watched, yet it is the US who is accused of torture. Not once in the twenty years did the left get pissed at Saddam's torture...
Quite false. Any political debate on how Bush did or did not lead us into war on false pretenses inevitably gets the "omg here are quotes from liberals saying how evil Saddam was" list posted.
The reason the US makes the news more is that it is unexpected. That Saddam was a nasty guy was not in dispute - the whole world knew of his abuses, the using of nerve gas on Iraqis, the draining of the southern marshes, the disappearing of countless people. Its not being in dispute led to its not being discussed, just as we don't get a shocked article on how the sun came up yesterday morning.
It's extemely common for leftists to say it would have been better if Saddam were still there.
It may be true. Brutal or not, he did keep Iraq stable with an iron fist. Now we've got a nasty hotspot that could become a nice democracy, a Iran-allied theocracy, or a civil war. One of these things would be great, but the other two could wind up being worse than Saddam in the long run.
No one claims that Saddam would be better than a stable democracy. To pretend the left would prefer Saddam to a stable democracy is to construct a very funny looking straw man.
Nor are dead babies, but that doesn't stop the jokes about them from being entertaining in the right context.
The faster than light jump is planned and executed by the ship's computers, so it can let the dampeners know what's going to be happening. The effects of a jump are presumably also predictable.
Weapons fire, on the other hand, isn't so predictable.
That's how I'd explain it, at least.
Port 8080 can go wherever the hell you want it to.
_ Now_Uses_Port_8080
http://www.digg.com/links/Coral_Cache_(.nyud.net)
http://atsdr1.atsdr.cdc.gov:8080/
etc.
I believe they were using the term "private company" to indicate one not owned by the government.
Heck ... I can picture the defense getting a 80GB archive tape and being told that was all messages recieved. Yes, 99.999% of them are spam. Enjoy.
So they set up a Gmail account and forward them all to it. Let Gmail's spam filter do all the work - it has already seen those spams, after all.
The code doesn't stand out from the HTML
Isn't that why God invented syntax colouring?
Well, considering valid XHTML is generally also valid HTML4, and considering Slashdot might one day decide to get with the times (perhaps in 2015), I'd say no.
I'd imagine it's this sort of thing that help foster the "it's cool to work at Google" culture that helps gets them so many highly qualified applicants.
I'm pretty sure collection agencies get called before the FBI for past-due bills.
"If you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about."
Which is an idiotic argument, because what's currently okay won't always be okay.
Ask someone who signed up for the trendy, fashionable Communist Party in the 1920s how that act later went over in the 1950s, for example.
That's like saying because that one really cool movie played at the movie theater, they won't have any bad ones.
You're completely missing the point, which is that the C|Net article says "omg if it was a minor announcement why did they hold it in the same place they released the iPod?!?!?!"
The point being that the iPod was, at the time, a fairly minor announcement. Only later on did it become considered a Big Deal.
16.2 fps in doom 3 @ 640x480, nice.
How many people do you know who bought a Mac mini for cutting edge gaming?
Would you whine about your new Dodge Neon not doing very well in the NASCAR standings?
viscous = honey
;p
vicious = Hitler
Major difference.
So does claiming that Republicans are reactionary vocal bigots make you a bigot?
"A bigot is a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from their own."
Not if you can read.
Google Cache is legal - there's not much difference here. Seems pretty open-and-shut precedent in favor of Google.
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/004344.php
The court granted summary judgment in favor of Google on four independent bases:
Serving a webpage from the Google Cache does not constitute direct infringement, because it results from automated, non-volitional activity by Google servers (Field did not allege infringement on the basis of the making of the initial copy by the Googlebot);
Field's conduct (failure to set a "no archive" metatag; posting "allow all" robot.txt header) indicated that he impliedly licensed search engines to archive his web page;
The Google Cache is a fair use; and
The Google Cache qualifies for the DMCA's 512(b) caching "safe harbor" for online service providers.
All of those would seem to equally apply to Google Images' thumbnails cache.
http://images.google.com/webmasters/remove.html
/
To remove all the images on your site from our index, place the following robots.txt file in your server root:
User-agent: Googlebot-Image
Disallow: