Slashdot Mirror


Jailed Spam King Caught Conspiring to Kill Witness

An anonymous reader writes "Spam king Christopher William Smith, aka Rizler, is facing up to life in prison for conspiracy to tamper with a witness and up to 20 years for endeavoring to obstruct justice. The charges are based on an alleged phone call in which he threatened to have a witness or the witness' family killed to prevent them from testifying against him in an upcoming trial on drug and related charges.

290 comments

  1. His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by metlin · · Score: 4, Informative


    I could be wrong, but his spamming and his current indictment seem unrelated.

    From the article:

    "Although Smith allegedly built his pharmacy business from spam-related profits, it doesn't appear that Smith actually sent spam to advertise the pharmacy sites. Witnesses told investigators that he bought ads in magazines and had sales reps field calls at the Burnsville, MN offices of Online Payment Solutions."

    And from a previous article on him, it would seem that he spammed stuff different from his pharmacy biz.

    The latter seems to be the reason he tried silencing a witness, and it was for something that seems to be unrelated to his spamming biz.

    1. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unrelated . . Yes, But I still like knowing a spammer's "inbox" will reglularly be filled with "spam" in prison.

      Or, should that be "outbox"

    2. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct, but this is one of the shocking few cases where Slashdot accurately summarized the article. I'm still in awe that the claim you are rebutting wasn't made, and I understand why you immediately pointed out what the artile really said, as opposed to what Slashdot says it does... You just missed the boat on this one. Save your comment, though, becasue the dupe will probably get the summary wrong.

    3. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >I could be wrong, but his spamming and his current indictment seem unrelated.

      If he wasn't a known spammer, he'd just be another thug, and wouldn't be of interest to the slashdot crowd.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by TurdTapper · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's an "Inbox" now!

      --
      A man with a gun is called a citizen. A man without a gun is called a subject.
    5. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by dotpavan · · Score: 1

      hope he uses "filter" to protect himself against the "spammer" :)

    6. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by TheBogie · · Score: 1

      He is now known as the "Spam Queen".

    7. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Cipster · · Score: 2, Funny

      I prefer to use mine as an Outbox...but to each their own I guess. Not that there is anything wrong with that.

    8. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you would want a "filter." I think you would want a firewall. Filters let some stuff in...

    9. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Guy+LeDouche · · Score: 5, Funny

      You've got Male!

    10. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Funny

      And that the people "spamming his inbox" will have already taken advantage of the "enlargement" products so often spammed about.

    11. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by StarvingSE · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I had mod points, I'd so give you a +1 funny.... hilarious.

      --
      I got nothin'
    12. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The only way to fight evil is to deny it battle"

      Well then, I trust that, should you ever find your life threatened then you will not call the police. Because they will bring guns and are likely to use them.

      Or is it just that you PERSONALLY don't want to to battle, but will launch battle by proxy by getting OTHER men with guns involved?

    13. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by nganju · · Score: 5, Funny


      It's an "Inbox" now!

      Written by someone named TurdTapper, no less.

      --
      There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
    14. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by noidentity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm going to speak up for everyone who doesn't think rape is funny. This kind of humor is really low and suggests that you (and others) think that rape (and sexually-transmitted diseases) is just punishment for something. There are thousands of people in prison who have committed no violence against anyone, stolen nothing, and they are raped. I really expect a higher standard, even if this is Slashdot.

    15. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by nganju · · Score: 1


      It's an inbox, since he'll probably be getting viruses this way.

      --
      There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
    16. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by etheriel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ya know what? Prison rape is not funny.

    17. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by CoughDropAddict · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do people think it's OK to joke about this?

      Did you think it was funny in "Shawshenk Redemption?"

      Would you think it was funny if this Slashdot story was about Kevin Mitnick being in prison? Would that bring things a little closer to home?

      It's depressing enough that the whole country knows this happens while we sit idly by. It's even worse that it's a "nudge nudge, wink wink" kind of joke.

    18. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by x00101010x · · Score: 1

      Follow the money, he's worse than the spammers.
      Spammers will not go away as long as people are willing to pay for their "services".

      --
      DONT PANIC
    19. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      I guarantee when he sees his cellmates for the first time, he'll make it an outbox (obligatory Black Vulcan "In his pants.").

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    20. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      More like "not everyone has the same sense of humor".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by ConsumerOfMany · · Score: 0
      There are thousands of people in prison who have committed no violence against anyone, stolen nothing,

      And just what are they in prison for then?

    22. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a joke because it DOESN'T happen, though!

      I've known numerous people who've been to jail, and all of them say both that they were not raped, nor did they see or hear of anybody else being raped.

      There are numerous studies that show that the VAST majority of prison sex is consentual.

      In short? Laugh, it's funny. It's funny because it's NOT true.

    23. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by metlin · · Score: 1


      It's a quote from Stargate SG-1. It's a little out of context, so it probably does not make sense to someone who's not seen the show.

      By evil, they were talking more about the temptation to do an act that could be construed as evil. The evil in this case is an internal conflict, not something outside.

    24. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Khyber · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ya know what else? Prison rape doesn't happen NEARLY as often as TV portrays. I went thru Mississippi's penal system. Raping someone adds another 20 years to your sentence for destruction of state property. The only people raping anyone are D-row and lifers that don't have a thing to lose, and guess what? about 90% of them are in solitary confinement.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    25. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by G)-(ostly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      #1: Of course it's true, don't be dense. Just because it's not a regular part of every con's nightly habit like the TV wants people to think doesn't mean it doesn't happen at all.

      #2: Jail is not prison.

    26. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do people think it's OK to joke about this?

      If Richard Pryor can joke about lighting himself on fire while freebasing or having a heart attack, I can damn well joke about prison rape.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    27. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by RLiegh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hemp-related crimes which are non-violent and should be legal in the first place.

    28. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Shimmer · · Score: 1

      Destruction of state property? Come again? I thought rape was illegal itself.

      --
      The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
    29. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best. Line. Ever.

    30. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Virgin prisoners are state property. If you rape one, you've destroyed its value. That's why you should get 20 more years for it.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    31. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by thelexx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being able to laugh at your own misfortune, even along with others, is quite different from laughing at the pain of others when they themselves quite likely don't think it funny. Specifically, different in a sociopathic kind of way. It is sad that this has to be explained.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    32. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Frazbin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Insightful? I dunno, this comment reads to me as "AAAAAGGGGGGGGGHH!!"

      You really *can* joke about anything. It's fine if you don't find it funny (obviously), but saying it's shameful and depressing that people joke lightheartedly about a serious issue is always big buzzkill. It's the conversational equivalent of walking up to a group of people and taking a big shit right in front of them. Thanks for the... input. You're leading the thread in exciting new goddamned directions. Cause, you know, this is secretly a thread about the horrors of prison rape, and jokes are the perfect context for inserting unadulterated activism.

      I'm not saying people who are against prison rape are extremists or something (given the high rate of incarceration in this country, we should *all* be against prison rape, more out of personal interest than anything else), but busting out with a big ol' conversational turd like that is in worse taste than the original jokes.

      I mean, thanks. Prison rape is actually bad. Wow. I'm gonna devote some serious fuckin' thought to that, because it's just such a provocative statement. This is the kind of thing I have to think about on surveys, too. "In your opinion, is getting involuntarily boned in the ass by a violent felon whilst in prison on a drug charge a good thing or a bad thing?" Uhh... Umm... Crap. Let me think about that. I'll get back to you... Right after I read Slashdot!

      Jokes, no matter how offensive or distasteful, are *not* an opportunity for you to point out how offensive something is. Jokes are very frequently funny *because* they make us feel awkward or offended. Unless you think that the people making these jokes are secretly *for* prison rape, your comment is totally unwarranted and pretty solidly off-topic.

    33. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      It's depressing enough that the whole country knows this happens while we sit idly by. It's even worse that it's a "nudge nudge, wink wink" kind of joke.
      I agree with you that it's depressing.

      I think the solution is to make it part of the sentence. Literally.
      JUDGE:
      And now the sentence for these heinous crimes committed against Initech. I hereby sentence you, Michael Bolton and Samir Na...Ananajibad...to a term of no less than four years in federal-
      pound-me-in-the-ass-prison.
      They can have separate facilities from the 'normal' federal-prison system & there won't have to be any more "wink wink, nudge nudge" about it.

      Either every effort should be made to stop it, or the system should incorporate it as part of the punishment. Don't forget that not everyone is sent to jail to be 'rehabilitated', some of those bastards deserve everything they get coming to them.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    34. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I could be wrong, but his spamming and his current indictment seem unrelated.

      They're related in the sense that they are both symptoms of his personal ethical system, which is, apparently, messed up.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    35. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you fucking with me? Better watch your cornhole, buddy...

    36. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by StrongAxe · · Score: 1

      If someone thinks it's OK to kill a witness and their entire family just to get them to shut up (or, for that matter, for any reason AT ALL), I find it hard to have any sympathy for him if he gets raped or even murdered in prison. What goes around comes around.

    37. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right... prison rape isn't funny. It's friggin' hilarious.

      I mean, think about it... this pompous little prick is gonna have his asshole filled with a crazy guy's cock. Anyone who saw the article and looked at his picture knows that he's gonna take it like a woman several times a week.

    38. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Yet laughing at the pain of others when they don't find it funny is part and parcel of that whole genre of comedy called "slapstick". Just because someone finds something funny that someone else doesn't, doesn't make that person a sociopath. It's sad that *that* has to be explained.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    39. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by CoughDropAddict · · Score: 1

      Not everyone who is in prison did that.

      Some of them might be there on a drug charge. Or a hacking charge.

      Some of them aren't even guilty.

    40. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Tragedy is when I get a paper cut; comedy is when you fall down an open manhole and die. - Mel Brooks

      Or, as South Park puts it 'Yay, AIDS is now funny!'

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    41. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you got raped in prison doesn't mean you have to bring the rest of the party down.

    42. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by CoughDropAddict · · Score: 0, Troll

      I understand that serious things can be joked about. For example, I don't have a problem with the prison rape joke in Office Space.

      It's the context of this joke that I don't believe we as a society should tolerate (in a social, not legal sense). Here we have an object of public scorn (the Spam King -- I hate him too) who might go to prison, and we think it's funny that he might get raped once he gets there. We're not joking about a general concept, we're laughing about a terrible thing that is likely to happen to a real person.

      Making jokes about Catholic priests and little boys is one thing. Grinning at a specific boy as he walks into a private meeting with a Catholic priest is another.

      Unless you think that the people making these jokes are secretly *for* prison rape [...]

      Some of them are. They're not even secretive about it

    43. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Boy walks past a Priest and a Rabbi.
      Priest: "Let's fuck him."
      Rabbi: "Out of what?"

      Baboomboom!

    44. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by utlemming · · Score: 2, Informative

      Acording to http://www.spr.org/ 1 in 5 men and 1 in 4 women are raped while in prision.

      I went and looked up the Federal Sentencing Guidelines http://www.ussc.gov/2004guid/tabcon04_1.htm Turns out, for a raping another prisioner or even a correctional officer raping prision you get 32 points. (FYI: each crime is weighted on a point scale. Each crime has a base point and then you can get "extra credit" to increase the points based on the actual details of the crime.) If you are first time offendor serving a time for a pervious crime, then you're looking at between 11 and 13 years for a prision rape. If you are serious offendor, then plan somewhere in the neighborhood of about 22 years for raping someone. Federal law, btw, makes prision rape a federal crime.

      While everyone is being brutal about the GP for saying that you get 20 years for doing prision rape, according to the sentencing guidelines, which Federal Judges are bound to, then 20 years would sound right. That would be enough for anyone with the hope of getting out not to do it. Also, since it is a sex crime, then the prisioner upon release for committing prision rape would have to register as a sex offendor. Now the idiot that got his jollies on his cell mate won't be able to get a job because he'll be labeled a felon and a pervert.

      And that is just on the federal level.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    45. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's the context of this joke that I don't believe we as a society should tolerate (in a social, not legal sense). Here we have an object of public scorn (the Spam King -- I hate him too) who might go to prison, and we think it's funny that he might get raped once he gets there. We're not joking about a general concept, we're laughing about a terrible thing that is likely to happen to a real person.

      See, it's all a big misunderstanding.

      You're mistaking a spamming scumbag for a human being.

    46. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I could be wrong, but his spamming and his current indictment seem unrelated.
      True, but it just goes to show what kind of people are engaging in spamming.
    47. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drug charges for one.

    48. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by raoul666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Rape isn't funny. Death isn't funny. Murder isn't funny. Theft isn't funny. Nazis aren't funny. Bananas aren't funny. Knocking on doors isn't funny. Marriage isn't funny. Divorce isn't funny. Zombies aren't funny. Religion isn't funny. Sports aren't funny. People walking into bars isn't funny. Chickens crossing roads isn't funny.

      JOKES ABOUT THEM ARE. THAT'S WHY THEY'RE CALLED JOKES.

      Sorry for the shouting. Clueless people raise my blood pressure.

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    49. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by jafiwam · · Score: 4, Funny

      Rape isn't funny unless you are raping a clown.

    50. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that is funny. Especially a sad clown or even a mime because they couldn't yell for help.

    51. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by stor · · Score: 3, Funny

      "You've got male!"

      Sorry

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    52. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by PJ+The+Womble · · Score: 1

      It is when you're old, fat and ugly like me. I could get ten years for stealing Claudia Schiffer's last can of hairspray and nobody would want to make me their bitch.

    53. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a fluffy un-real world you live in.

    54. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Kell_pt · · Score: 1

      I would think that trading puns is harmless, it's called "dark humour". There is noone forcing you to read it all or even reply. I honestly believe the comments and puns above are funny, basically because humans have this huge ability to abstract themselves from what is being said and have fun with HOW it's being said.

      Hopefully you live in the US, China, North-Corea, and your comment makes sense considering the lack of liberties your society is currently experimenting. But if you live in the free-world, I'd expect more of you, much like you seem to imply you expect more out of Slashdot.

      And no, rape isn't funny. But so isn't death, and there'r lots of jokes about it. Same thing with sex, marriage, etc...

      --
      "I don't mind God, it's his fan club I can't stand!" E8
    55. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by yarbo · · Score: 1

      Thank you for speaking up. I'm always shocked how many times the same joke about prison rape is repeated and everyone finds it funny. It seems to be spreading a meme that prisoners deserve rape and it's time to go back to the feudal system of revenge, rather than rehabilitation.

    56. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by PakProtector · · Score: 1
      I guarantee when he sees his cellmates for the first time, he'll make it an outbox (obligatory Black Vulcan "In his pants.").

      <oblig>That's Super Vulcan, fool</oblig>

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    57. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Nor are dead babies, but that doesn't stop the jokes about them from being entertaining in the right context.

    58. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you. And though I'm not so sure if what you're describing is the case with the current thread, It's pretty lame that your post would be modded as a troll since you make a very good point.

    59. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Being able to laugh at your own misfortune, even along with others, is quite different from laughing at the pain of others when they themselves quite likely don't think it funny. Specifically, different in a sociopathic kind of way.

      Well, actually it's quite normal to laugh at unpleasant things that happen to others. It's a way of coping with the discomfort. And since it is normal behavior, it is by definition not sociopathic.

      It is sad that this has to be explained.

      Agreed. If there's anything that needs a mumbo-jumbo pop psychology affliction label these days, it's humourlessness.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    60. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Prison rape is not funny.

      What if your cell-mate's a clown?

    61. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Being able to laugh at your own misfortune, even along with others, is quite different from laughing at the pain of others when they themselves quite likely don't think it funny. Specifically, different in a sociopathic kind of way. It is sad that this has to be explained.

      Wait, I'm confused. Is it ok for me to laugh at your sanctimony? Or perhaps your hyperbole?

    62. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by StrongAxe · · Score: 1

      Not everyone who is in prison did that.
      Some of them might be there on a drug charge. Or a hacking charge.
      Some of them aren't even guilty.


      Of course. There are many innocent people in prison, and I am not making that generalization. I am just referring to this person in particular, and people who commit such crimes in general (the people who commit them, rather than the people who are convicted of them. Hopefully the two groups are very similar, but unfortunately, they are not always so.)

    63. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      No, it's Supervolt, fool!

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    64. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by volpe · · Score: 1

      It's times like these that I wish I could spend karma to mod something up beyond +5.

    65. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by bluehalo · · Score: 1

      this could be the only situation where you might not mind that your ass is literally owned and protected as state property.

    66. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      fair enough, but we're not making rape jokes at some pot-head's expense. We're picking on a guy who spammed millions of people and then threatened to KILL WITNESSES.

      I'd say he deserves whatever is coming to him.

      --
      Jeremy
    67. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      >It seems to be spreading a meme that prisoners deserve rape and it's time to go back to the feudal system of revenge, rather than rehabilitation.

      Shit, where have you been for the last twelve years (at least)? The 'three strike' laws and boot camps are in place precisely because America has given up on the idea of rehabilitation and has instead used the prison system as an outlet for revenge.

      Rape jokes aside; most people feel that if the people in prison all killed each other, we'd be better off (not a view I share; just one I'm pointing out).

    68. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1
      Rape isn't funny. Death isn't funny. Murder isn't funny. Theft isn't funny. Nazis aren't funny. Bananas aren't funny. Knocking on doors isn't funny. Marriage isn't funny. Divorce isn't funny. Zombies aren't funny. Religion isn't funny. Sports aren't funny. People walking into bars isn't funny. Chickens crossing roads isn't funny.

      You for got lawyers. Lawyers definitely aren't funny.

    69. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by CoughDropAddict · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I appreciate it. I thought the "Troll" mod was pretty lame also, but what can you do?

    70. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why waste your energy on males or mail?

      - Vicki

    71. Re:His spamming and this incident seem unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And that the people "spamming his inbox" will have already taken advantage of the "enlargement" products so often spammed about.

      Wouldn't it be better if they actually used penis enlargement products that worked?

  2. Anybody surprised? by grasshoppa · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I mean really, does this come as a shock to anybody here? What we really should be doing is pointing this out to the mass media and our friends and coworkers. These people don't understand what us email admins are up against.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Anybody surprised? by user24 · · Score: 5, Funny

      yes, i constantly get death threats for closing port 25... ;-)

    2. Re:Anybody surprised? by thelost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It just goes to show that while crimes may get updated with the times, bad people are still bad people.

      --
      Promote Charity on Myspace, Show Your Colours!
    3. Re:Anybody surprised? by Caste11an · · Score: 1

      Sounds like he's going to be getting several "ports" opened soon enough! ;)

  3. I'm normally a controlled person... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I feel the urge to punish! For all his actions.

  4. This is news? by Dimensio · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hmm. An e-mail spammer demonstrates that he is a lowlife scumbag who deserves to be killed.

    Why is this considered news?

    All e-mail spammers should be tortured to death. I don't need an incident like this to prove it.

    1. Re:This is news? by AnonymousPrick · · Score: 1
      Hmm. An e-mail spammer demonstrates that he is a lowlife scumbag who deserves to be killed.

      Killed?! No way! He should go to jail and hopefully, someone (his new husband) will demonstrate (on him) how effective his penis enlargement pills worked.

      Death would be the easy way out.

      --
      Saturday is April 1. Slashdot will be shut down. Sorry for the inconvenience.
    2. Re:This is news? by Homology · · Score: 1
      Hmm. An e-mail spammer demonstrates that he is a lowlife scumbag who deserves to be killed.

      Why is this considered news?

      All e-mail spammers should be tortured to death. I don't need an incident like this to prove it.

      Hmm, you have recently been stationed in Iraq?

    3. Re:This is news? by Arandir · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Nobody has been tortured to death recently in Iraq. If you want that you need to go back a few years to the days of Saddam. I know you were making a joke, but do not confuse the US humilation of prisoners with Saddam's actual honest-to-god death-inducing torture.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    4. Re:This is news? by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You are just as bad as he is if you think he should be killed. For all I know you could be the equivalent violent anti-spammer who has the same contempt for humanity.

      --
      GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    5. Re:This is news? by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, how nice. "Not recently". How moral and upstanding!

      The backpedaling and endless justifications for American torture practice and methods are just ... torture, really, for moral men to hear. This "not as bad as Hussein" angle is not just that; it's propaganda.

      What the US is doing is not just "humiliation" ... it's TORTURE. And the only thing that's not stopping it is that there isn't a higher military power to invade the US to enact the necessary regime change.

      Do not confuse the US "humilation of prisoners" with civil treatment by a moral society. Even the rules of war (to which the US professes to be a subscriber) prohibit the things that America now routinely does to prisoners taken in the Middle East. Hypocrisy, hypocrisy, hypocrisy!

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    6. Re:This is news? by WaR.KiN · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hmm. An e-mail spammer demonstrates that he is a lowlife scumbag who deserves to be killed.
      Why is this considered news?


      This is news because he is the Spam KING. He is not just any spammer but a KING. Don't you know how royalty attracts the media like flies???

    7. Re:This is news? by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Informative
      Nobody has been tortured to death recently in Iraq. If you want that you need to go back a few years to the days of Saddam. I know you were making a joke, but do not confuse the US humilation of prisoners with Saddam's actual honest-to-god death-inducing torture.

      Some prisoners definitely were tortured to death by U.S. forces in Iraq. From one of Seymour Hersh's pieces: "Two Iraqi faces that do appear in the photographs are those of dead men. There is the battered face of prisoner No. 153399, and the bloodied body of another prisoner, wrapped in cellophane and packed in ice. There is a photograph of an empty room, splattered with blood." So yes, some of it was "honest-to-god death-inducing torture." Prisoners were also tortured to death in Afghanistan. Get your facts straight.

      I know this is a bit off the topic of the discussion, but it just pisses me off when people try to whitewash the behavior of the Bush Administration, and offer pathetic excuses like "we didn't torture people as much as Saddam Hussein". Here's a hint: if the only way to put your country's behavior in a positive light is by drawing a comparison to a psychotic, sadistic, murderous dictator, your country is doing something really, really fucked up and wrong.

    8. Re:This is news? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Nobody has been tortured to death recently in Iraq.

      Note that you didn't qualify this in any way. You didn't say for example "by the US Army". So, I can say you are wrong merely by pointing out the people who have been beheaded.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    9. Re:This is news? by MmmmAqua · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...and this sort of thing isn't nearly as commonplace as you seem to imply. Though I was an infantryman in Iraq, my best friend was an interrogator for our battalions S-2 (intelligence) section. Whenever we took prisoners in to S-2, I'd stand in with him during the interrogation; the implied threat of physical violence from me (one of the guys who'd taken the prisoner in the first place, which means he'd already been manhandled, and none too gently, by us) usually enhanced the subjects willingness to talk. The implied threat. I only saw one instance of a prisoner being struck by an American, and that was a piece of shit who had killed three of our men in an IED attack. I'll admit I punched the fucker, too.

      If you want to see prisoner abuse, take a look at the Iraqi governments prisoners. They routinely have prisoners who "commit suicide" or were killed "trying to escape". The Iraqi police are particularly bad - I have some pictures of a group of prisoners that were tortured by the IPs. Not interrogated, just tortured. No question asking, just rubber hoses and AK-47s. Compared to a back laid open beatings and AK rounds through the meat of the legs, a few gut punches and a black eye looks pretty damn good. I hate to be the one to break it to you, but the world isn't a black-and-white moral landscape. It's all shades of gray, and sometimes being the lesser of two evils is what makes you the good guy. This "not as bad as Hussein" angle is not just that; it's the plain truth. I envy the apparent strength of your moral convictions, but I pity you for the way you've allowed them to blind you.

      --
      Arr! The laws of physics be a harsh mistress!
    10. Re:This is news? by Arandir · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The extremist hyperbole of the left is really starting to piss me off. Torturers used to saw off heads of dissidents while Saddam Hussein watched, yet it is the US who is accused of torture. Not once in the twenty years did the left get pissed at Saddam's torture, but just one false rumour of flushing a Koran down a toilet and all hell breaks loose. This moral equivalency is sickening. It's extemely common for leftists to say it would have been better if Saddam were still there. That's like arguing Hitler should have remained in power because some some US serviceman beat up a jew during the liberation.

      I am not condoning the abusive treatment that occured at Abu Gharib, but it must be kept in proportion. It was abuse, but it was not torture. And the people who did have been punished. But the left keeps pretending that it was a policy ordered by Rumsfeld and signed by Bush, committed with bamboo shoots and rubber hoses, and that it is still occuring daily.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    11. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you willingly broke the Geneva convention. The question is, did you do it knowingly as well? Not that that makes it ethical, of course.

      I only saw one instance of a prisoner being struck by an American, and that was a piece of shit who had killed three of our men in an IED attack. I'll admit I punched the fucker, too.

    12. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go die somewhere.

    13. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sincere thanks, man. Freedom comes with a price, and I appreciate your efforts in protecting my way of life.

    14. Re:This is news? by stor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Taken from: http://www.lyricsdomain.com/4/donovan/universal_so ldier.html

      Universal Soldier
      by Donovan

      He's five foot-two, and he's six feet-four,
      He fights with missiles and with spears.
      He's all of thirty-one, and he's only seventeen,
      Been a soldier for a thousand years.

      He'a a Catholic, a Hindu, an Atheist, a Jain,
      A Buddhist and a Baptist and a Jew.
      And he knows he shouldn't kill,
      And he knows he always will,
      Kill you for me my friend and me for you.

      And he's fighting for Canada,
      He's fighting for France,
      He's fighting for the USA,
      And he's fighting for the Russians,
      And he's fighting for Japan,
      And he thinks we'll put an end to war this way.

      And he's fighting for Democracy,
      He's fighting for the Reds,
      He says it's for the peace of all.
      He's the one who must decide,
      Who's to live and who's to die,
      And he never sees the writing on the wall.

      But without him,
      How would Hitler have condemned him at Dachau?
      Without him Caesar would have stood alone,
      He's the one who gives his body
      As a weapon of the war,
      And without him all this killing can't go on.

      He's the Universal Soldier and he really is to blame,
      His orders come from far away no more,
      They come from here and there and you and me,
      And brothers can't you see,
      This is not the way we put the end to war.

      --
      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    15. Re:This is news? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      An Iraqi whose corpse was photographed with grinning U.S. soldiers at Abu Ghraib died under CIA interrogation while suspended by his wrists, which had been handcuffed behind his back, according to investigative reports reviewed by The Associated Press.

      US Army Segeant Jeffery Frost was one of the people interviewed during the investigation. The AP article reports " As the guards released the shackles and lowered al-Jamadi, blood gushed from his mouth 'as if a faucet had been turned on,' according to the interview summary."

      Pulling this slightly on topic, veterans from MP service tend to be the next generation of civilian law enforcement. Today's prison guards in Iraq may be next year's city cops and jailers.

    16. Re:This is news? by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Torturers used to saw off heads of dissidents while Saddam Hussein watched, yet it is the US who is accused of torture. Not once in the twenty years did the left get pissed at Saddam's torture...

      Quite false. Any political debate on how Bush did or did not lead us into war on false pretenses inevitably gets the "omg here are quotes from liberals saying how evil Saddam was" list posted.

      The reason the US makes the news more is that it is unexpected. That Saddam was a nasty guy was not in dispute - the whole world knew of his abuses, the using of nerve gas on Iraqis, the draining of the southern marshes, the disappearing of countless people. Its not being in dispute led to its not being discussed, just as we don't get a shocked article on how the sun came up yesterday morning.

      It's extemely common for leftists to say it would have been better if Saddam were still there.

      It may be true. Brutal or not, he did keep Iraq stable with an iron fist. Now we've got a nasty hotspot that could become a nice democracy, a Iran-allied theocracy, or a civil war. One of these things would be great, but the other two could wind up being worse than Saddam in the long run.

      No one claims that Saddam would be better than a stable democracy. To pretend the left would prefer Saddam to a stable democracy is to construct a very funny looking straw man.

    17. Re:This is news? by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Compared to a back laid open beatings and AK rounds through the meat of the legs, a few gut punches and a black eye looks pretty damn good.

      Either we're there as the world's policemen or we're there for a little empire-building. I was thinking it was the former, which makes your abuse far from "pretty damn good", as one can't simultaneously break and uphold the law. Crime by cops isn't better than crime by ordinary criminals; it's worse. But is sounds like you're saying that as unaccountable overlords go, you couldn't ask for a better tyrrany than one run by the US. In which case, what's a little abuse?

      Perhaps you can connect the dots on this one. If somebody tried to conquer the US, I'd be out there building IEDs, and I'd bet you would be, too.

    18. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you sir have been very well programmed by your government.

      "the bad guys are really bad, so it's perfectly acceptable for us to be sorta bad"

      you're probably one of those dumbasses who thinks torture provides reliable intelligence.

    19. Re:This is news? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Even the rules of war (to which the US professes to be a subscriber) prohibit the things that America now routinely does to prisoners taken in the Middle East.

      And this, I believe, gives some hint as to why the US hasn't declared war with another territory since around 1943.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    20. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody has been tortured to death recently in Iraq.

      Wrong, you ignorant ass licker.

    21. Re:This is news? by Darby · · Score: 1

      The extremist hyperbole of the left is really starting to piss me off.

      The cowardice, ignorance, and downright treason of the right is actually pissing off decent human beings though. You have just demonstrated that you do not fit into that category.

      Shitbag appeasers and apologists like yourself who can't string together a 2 paragrah defense of torture without flat out lying and demonstrating their total ignorance of the situation are a stain upon America's honor that won't be wiped away for a century. You're living in a delusional fantasy world, coward.

      Look, coward, it was your type of cowardice that said Oh let's just give Hitler Bavaria and he'll go away.
      Sorry, Sparky, but people who can actually use their brains *learned* from that situation. When faced with a group who is determined to totally destroy your way of life you need to stand up and be a man, not spout a bunch of idiotic lies to defend the aggressors. That is what you are doing right now.

      What a bootlicking lilly livered coward you have *proven* yourself to be with that nonsense you just spouted.
      Grow up and grow a pair you piece of shit.

      You are exactly the type of person who proves the truth of my sig.

    22. Re:This is news? by Darby · · Score: 1

      If somebody tried to conquer the US, I'd be out there building IEDs, and I'd bet you would be, too.

      No he wouldn't. He'd be licking the boots of the aggressors just like he is now.

    23. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only saw one instance of a prisoner being struck by an American, and that was a piece of shit who had killed three of our men in an IED attack. I'll admit I punched the fucker, too.

      Congratulations. You beat an unarmed prisoner, along with a group of your fellow ass clowns. Your stupidity and lack of self control undoubtedly has helped the enemy, you dumb shit. If you'd done your fucking job right, things wouldn't be nearly so fucked up in Iraq.

      It's all shades of gray, and sometimes being the lesser of two evils is what makes you the good guy.

      You really are a retard, aren't you?

    24. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What bothers me more is when you are so blinded with hate that you have to turn a topic about spamming into more Bush-bashing.

      Discretion is the better part of valor?

  5. Ummm, does this mean? by abirdman · · Score: 1

    So are the editors saying this isn't some legitimate, hard-working businessman just trying to make a buck on the internet? Yeah! Let him rot for all I care.

    --
    Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
    1. Re:Ummm, does this mean? by Homology · · Score: 1
      So are the editors saying this isn't some legitimate, hard-working businessman just trying to make a buck on the internet? Yeah! Let him rot for all I care.

      Yeah, he does not have Republican connections like former Enron executives. He forgot to make some "donations", tax deductible, of course.

    2. Re:Ummm, does this mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're one very bitter democrat aren't you? Welcome to the real world bud, enjoy your stay.

      Oh ya, and stop trolling, it makes you look like a dumbass.

    3. Re:Ummm, does this mean? by AlterTick · · Score: 1
      Yeah, he does not have Republican connections like former Enron executives. He forgot to make some "donations", tax deductible, of course.

      Or, like Marc Rich, doesn't have any Democrat connections.

      They're all dirty up there, man. They're all scum, not just Republicans.

      --
      Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
  6. At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is proof that SPAM can be deadly!

  7. Obligatory Queen statement by Brothernone · · Score: 3, Funny

    Antother one bites the dust, hey hey!

    --
    He whom you called four-eyes yesterday, you call Sir tomorrow.
  8. Good! by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 5, Funny

    We can only hope his ass is now the recepticle for junk male...

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant "male spunk"

    2. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Rape is HILARIOUS.

    3. Re:Good! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      So is someone unwittingly falling into a pothole. What's your point? We should be morally outraged about pothole jokes because it's not a laughing matter, and people are actually hurt by them?

    4. Re:Good! by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > > We can only hope his ass is now the recepticle for junk male...
      >
      > Rape is HILARIOUS.

      If he doesn't enjoy the assreaming he's getting from inmate #49147, he can simply opt out of future pelvic thrusts by saying "I opt out of future pelvic thrusts" to inmate #49147.

      Of course, inmate #49148 has as much right as #49147 to offer his exciting products and and services as #49147 does. It's only one stroke, right? Just opt out, Rizler! Just opt out!

    5. Re:Good! by shaldannon · · Score: 1

      How do you know that inmate #49147 isn't simply showing his appreciation for his...uh...enhancement?

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
    6. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should be morally outraged because we, as a people, are ignoring barbaric treatment of people we have incarcerated. You put somebody in jail, you become responsible for his safety. As a country, we have not only failed in that moral responsibility, we laugh at our moral lapse.

    7. Re:Good! by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Of normal human beings? No.

      Of Spammers such as this piece of trash? Yes.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  9. takeaway to pass on to Marketing ... by psbrogna · · Score: 4, Funny

    Having opt-out's slain is frowned upon by the legal system.

  10. I always knew.. by chipset · · Score: 3, Funny

    I always knew that spamming was a gateway crime. It only leads to something bigger!

    1. Re:I always knew.. by Angstroem · · Score: 2, Funny
      Erm, no. Don't believe what they're writing in their "advertisements".

      The only bigger thing that stuff leads to is bigger money for them.

  11. Personality Defect by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's some underlying psychological trait to a guy who would be a spammer, threaten to kill witnesses, run shady online drug sites. They're all things that worsen society to the benefit of the individual. Somebody who went beyond Psych 101 can probably enlighten us here.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Personality Defect by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I'd also be interested to know the psychological profiles of the either desperate or desperately greedy/stupid people who bought from him to the tune of $20+ million. He couldn't have done it without them.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:Personality Defect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "MBA candidate"

      Honestly I think these traits are pretty normal. People are always looking for easy money, or to exploit others. How many people try to sell used shit on ebay for the price of new stuff, so they can take the money and buy the new versions? How many "Fore Sale" forums don't allow "thread crapping" where you tell perspective buyers, "this asshat is trying to rip you off you can get this cheaper here and here." How many people cheat their taxes, or try to walk off on supporting their children? People are always threatening others to get what they want. When they're facing serious jail time, simply threatening to have someone killed if they put you there is pretty much par for the course. Take a look at television sometime, with the dozens of ads by shitty Utah companies selling caffeine pills as wonderous "weight loss drugs." They're unhealthy and they're scamming people, and the networks are like "SURE WE'LL SELL YOU AD TIME, AMORAL PROFITEER." Our society is predatory by nature.

    3. Re:Personality Defect by Arandir · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's called "crime". You don't need to be a psych major to understand it. It's the use of force or fraud to get what you want. "Normal" people use non-coercive means to get what they want, like money, or persuasion, or begging.

      I was talking with a friend this morning about whiners, children who throw screaming tantrums in store to get the candy they want. Most children try it, and if they manage to get away with it, the whining can become a permananent part of their psyche. I've actually seen college kids engage in pouting tantrums.

      Chronic riminal behavior is probably similar. As a kid this guy probably stole money from his mom's purse and got away with it. He got caught stealing a pack of gum from the store, but his mom let him get away with it. He probably discovered that his mother would believe him no matter how outrageous his lies. You know his mother, she's the one that always says "my little boy would never do something like that." Thus, he learns that theft and lying are an acceptable means of getting what you want.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    4. Re:Personality Defect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd just want their emails, please.

    5. Re:Personality Defect by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      It's called "crime". You don't need to be a psych major to understand it. It's the use of force or fraud to get what you want. "Normal" people use non-coercive means to get what they want, like money, or persuasion, or begging.

      Ric Romero? Is that you?

      I've been hanging around Fark for too long.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    6. Re:Personality Defect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called "crime". You don't need to be a psych major to understand it. It's the use of force or fraud to get what you want. "Normal" people use non-coercive means to get what they want, like money, or persuasion, or begging.

      I tried explaining this to those law enforcement "gentlemen", but they just weren't buying it.

    7. Re:Personality Defect by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      That broad brush you're looking for is Sociopathy

    8. Re:Personality Defect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money is an indirect use of force. It's backed by police who will handle you roughly if you don't obey.

      It's like violence tokens.

    9. Re:Personality Defect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Chronic riminal behavior is probably similar.
      Interesting typo when talking about some guy currently in prison.
    10. Re:Personality Defect by LordLucless · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thus, he learns that theft and lying are an acceptable means of getting what you want.

      Not necessarily acceptable - most criminals know what they are doing is unacceptable - but effective. If you perform small crimes a number of times with no consequences, you tend to think that it's an effective way of making money. You still know it's "wrong" but you don't believe you'll ever have to face the consequences.

      I've heard the same is true about gambling - most chronic gamblers are those who have a big win early on. If you give it a go a few times and consistently lose money, your likely not to get hooked. But if you win during your first few tries, your much more likely to become addicted.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    11. Re:Personality Defect by shawb · · Score: 1

      Well, this guy did go a step beyond simply threatening to kill people. He attempted to arrange the murder. What gets me is that he was stupid enough to try and do it over the phone from prison.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    12. Re:Personality Defect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " 'Normal' people use non-coercive means to get what they want, like money, or persuasion, or begging."

      Depends on what you call "normal". Some of the "normal" people use a lot of screaming to get what they want (Politicians and babies for example :) ).

      Persuasion ? What flavour please ? Promising them to *not* sue their livelyhood/lives into oblivion (read : like *any* larger coorporation can do) perhaps ? Or just a promiss that they won't do ... Stalking ? Telling your boss that you are/are doing ? Deplete their bank-account ? Nasty stuff that get's traced back to you ? etc.

      You do *not* need to use fraud to get what you want. Threatening to destroy someones life (by whatever means : directly or indirectly. Good target : promis to not hurt someones beloved when they do comply) is mostly enough to get whatever you want (if you are daring enough)

      The only problem you will get is when someone has bigger friends (strong-arm or political) than you have ... :)

      The possibilities to "non agressivily" preasure a normal person into complyment are endless. You only need to find the right buttons.

    13. Re:Personality Defect by woolio · · Score: 1

      If you perform small crimes a number of times with no consequences, you tend to think that it's an effective way of making money. You still know it's "wrong" but you don't believe you'll ever have to face the consequences.

      You mean like the car companies? <sarcasm> Of Course Not. </sarcasm>

  12. Sounds like a bad joke to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Q:What do you call 1000 email spammers indicted on murder charges?

    A: A start.

    1. Re:Sounds like a bad joke to me... by farmhick · · Score: 1

      Hey sicko, that kind of so-called humor isn't funny. Slashdot shouldn't tolerate the jokes you people make about a very serious problem...oh wait. I thought you were leading up to a 'prisoner ass-rape' joke. You were pulling a switch on the '1000 dead lawyers' joke. Ok, now I see it. That's funny, right there. hehehe 1000 spammers on murder charges. hahaha Gotta admit, I didn't see that one coming.

      --
      I have to stop wasting so much time reading Slashdot. It's interfering with my crystal meth addiction.
  13. For those complaining about spam... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    (not totally off-topic, well kinda)

    Has anyone of you installed blue frog from bluesecurity? It takes the vigilante approach of "flodding the spammer's website". Any reviews?

    1. Re:For those complaining about spam... by thefirelane · · Score: 1

      Has anyone of you installed blue frog from bluesecurity? It takes the vigilante approach of "flodding the spammer's website". Any reviews?

      Sounds like a great product. Previously, you used to have to install some malicious code on a bunch of PCs to conduct a DDOS attack. Now you'll only have to send a bunch of fake spams with the site as a click through. cool!

    2. Re:For those complaining about spam... by gmack · · Score: 1

      Indeed.. I already see spam that seems to do exactly this.. usually adverting non existant child porn on the victim's site.

    3. Re:For those complaining about spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually - now it only uses your machine(s) to file opt out complaints for SPAM that you have submitted.

      However, they have added the forwarding of SPAM to interpol, the FTC, and others on your behalf.

      I use it for my domain, and it seems to help some.

      On the other hand I wonder if I have been targeted with other spam because of my use of this software.

      No regrets on my part though, I'd reccomend it.

  14. Oblig. Bash.org Quote by borawjm · · Score: 5, Funny

    [Fooz] In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penisses, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.

    Looks like we are one step closer to this "perfect world" Fooz speaks of!

    1. Re:Oblig. Bash.org Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After seeing that gruesome Richard Speck video where he had tits in prison I'd say he was about to meet some of his "enlarge your breasts!" customers also.

  15. Crime 101 by sholden · · Score: 4, Funny
    It was one of several calls made by Smith to numbers not linked with his defense attorney that officials at the Elk River facility monitored and recorded.

    Remember, when you're going to call someone from jail to discuss killing a witness have them steal your attorney's cell phone first...
    1. Re:Crime 101 by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Too complicated, too risky. Just make sure your hitman and your lawyer are the same person! Not only do you not have to worry about the situation that lead to this guy getting caught, you can also get a feel for how carrying out the assassination would affect the case. Plus, being a lawyer and being a hitman are both hard, so if you can find someone who is good at both he must be really smart!

      Not to mention the humurous one-liners he could spout about getting a victim's blood on his Armani suit, or how they have been "dismissed, with prejudice".

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Crime 101 by shaldannon · · Score: 1

      There was a L&O episode that worked off this premise. Guy gets tossed into Rikers for trial for killing an attorney. Guy gives his defense attorney (Melnick, if you want to google the episode), an address for someone who can help with his "alibi" and a phone number for the person who is his helper. Melnick relays information, and someone else winds up dead. No phones involved either since the guy was incommunicado with the outside world.

      Pretty slick.

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
  16. It just demonstrates something we already knew. by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As several posters pointed out, there's no evidence he spamvertised perscription drugs. However, when he started the drug business, he was already known as a spam king.

    Now, he's in jail, using the jail's phone to set up witness intimidation and, possibly, murder. Anybody who thinks jail phones aren't monitored is a fool. It just goes to show: spammers are stupid.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
    1. Re:It just demonstrates something we already knew. by ozbird · · Score: 1

      It just goes to show: spammers are stupid.

      To paraphrase Obi Wan: "Who is the bigger fool: the spammer, or the fools who bought $20M of his shady products?"

    2. Re:It just demonstrates something we already knew. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, he's in jail, using the jail's phone to set up witness intimidation and, possibly, murder. Anybody who thinks jail phones aren't monitored is a fool. It just goes to show: spammers are stupid.

      Actually I thought they were not "monitored", that whole peasky issue about wiretapping, and that whole issue about client-lawyer confidentiality. I've known a few people who have done work in corrections and they make it a BIG deal not to permit employees from bringing in recording equipment, even walkmen" because "even prisoners have rights". I rather assumed that any "monitoring" that might "accidentally" happen wasn't admissible.

    3. Re:It just demonstrates something we already knew. by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it's officially forbidden, and that anything they hear is barred from the courtroom. However, that doesn't mean it doesn't happen. I'm sure that if they did learn about what was going on by listening in, they had an admissable way to learn about it, such as somebody "accidentally" getting too close to the phone booth and overhearing something. I'm not saying they did listen in, but it's best to assume they can, and plan accordingly.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  17. *And* all those enlargement products actually work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Add 12 inches!!! :-)

  18. Life plus 20... by cparisi · · Score: 1

    Not only would he die in prison... but they would keep his rotting corpse behind bars for an additional 20 years "just to be safe."

  19. Rizler? by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

    Sounds like he's gonna get smoked!

    (or in other words "In Soviet Spamerica, Rizler threatens to smoke YOU!")

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  20. New TV Show by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    "These people don't understand what us email admins are up against."

    I can see it now, "SMTP, Systems Investigator". Watch him in the next exciting episode where he spends 5 hours pouring over log files and hits on the one woman in his department.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  21. Just like Viagra... by MattskEE · · Score: 1

    If you send out a few million emails asking people to kill a witness, one of them will take you up on it.

  22. Solution to b1g problems? by eclectro · · Score: 1


    C1@lis can help! Order now!!

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  23. It's entertainment news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most stories on this site are entertainment.

  24. Holy yikes....he's just a kid!!!! by numbski · · Score: 5, Interesting

    WTF is this world coming to? Our children turn evil this quick now?

    http://www.spamdailynews.com/uploads/rizler_003.jp g

    I mean good lord. He amassed that kind of wealth that quickly, is now in jail and was threatening to kill another human being.

    So sad...I don't feel bad for him, per se...but it makes me sick...

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    1. Re:Holy yikes....he's just a kid!!!! by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      That's the first thing I thought when I was the picture. I mean, I could probably afford to buy a Tahoe, but the other cars on the list...

    2. Re:Holy yikes....he's just a kid!!!! by Lispy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He didn't turn evil. He just turned greedy and stupid.
      And yes, this happends to our kids rather quickly nowadays.

    3. Re:Holy yikes....he's just a kid!!!! by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it sure does make me sick, too! I mean, threatening to kill a witness is yet another crime, and then you have to kill the witness of that crime -- which is the original witness! Rizler's strategy is disgustingly inept! Only threaten to kill people you intend to kill anyway! In fact, skip the "threatening" step ... the prudent tactician goes right to the kill!

      The sad thing is, I'm not even sure I'm joking. I don't even have an MBA. :^P

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    4. Re:Holy yikes....he's just a kid!!!! by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Sooooo ... threatening to kill people is not evil, and is only some sort of side effect of being "greedy and stupid"? Really?

      At which time does threatening to kill people for selfish reasons BECOME evil, chum?

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    5. Re:Holy yikes....he's just a kid!!!! by packed+Lunch · · Score: 1
      At which time does threatening to kill people for selfish reasons BECOME evil, chum?


      Well, if you're going to believe in "Good" & "Evil", I imagine evil would be killing people for the sake of killing. At least selfish reasons is a reason.

      Chum.
    6. Re:Holy yikes....he's just a kid!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oooh! Oooh!

      A debate between the Dungeons and Dragons definition of Evil and the Catholic style definition of Evil. Why isn't there any popcorn around when you need it?

    7. Re:Holy yikes....he's just a kid!!!! by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      Wow, you have an incredibly narrow definition of evil.

      By your definition, even Hitler wasn't evil. After all, he had his reasons. Granted, they were pretty warped, but he DID have reasons.

      Yes, killing for the sake of killing is evil, but not all who are evil kill at all. Conning old folks out of their retirement money is also evil, even if you never kill anyone.

      Webster - Evil ... 1a: not good morally

      IMO, evil *is* selfishness. It is putting your own desires so far ahead of everyone else's that you will willingly harm others in pursuit of your own desires.

    8. Re:Holy yikes....he's just a kid!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Garbage in, garbage out.

    9. Re:Holy yikes....he's just a kid!!!! by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Well, evil is defined as being immoral, cruel or very unpleasant (adj) or something that is very bad and harmful (n).

      Note that nowhere in that definition is there the word "senseless" or "pointless", which would be the case if killing for a reason were not evil.

      Just because you have a reason for doing something, that doesn't by itself make that thing any less evil.

    10. Re:Holy yikes....he's just a kid!!!! by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      You could fuck up that definition *so* easily.

      I want to kill someone just because I'm evil. So I have a reason. Which means I'm not evil by definition.

      My head asplode.

    11. Re:Holy yikes....he's just a kid!!!! by rossifer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I strongly suspect he's a sociopath with no conscience or actual sense of right and wrong. I.e. he was born "broken" and by many people's definition, evil.

      He's literally willing to do "whatever it takes" to keep himself in the life. Too bad for him he's also an idiot. The world is a better place with him behind bars. Let's hope he stays there for a very long time.

      Regards,
      Ross

    12. Re:Holy yikes....he's just a kid!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    13. Re:Holy yikes....he's just a kid!!!! by mabu · · Score: 1

      I suspect the 2004 Cadillac Deville Limo could be considered evidence of insanity in a subsequent appeal.

    14. Re:Holy yikes....he's just a kid!!!! by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      The sad thing is, I'm not even sure I'm joking. I don't even have an MBA. :^P

      But you *are* a lawyer, right?

    15. Re:Holy yikes....he's just a kid!!!! by Darby · · Score: 1


      WTF is this world coming to? Our children turn evil this quick now?


      That's the society you get when you put profit above everything. It's not coming, it's been here for quite a while now.

  25. Maybe... by se2schul · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...he received an unsolicited add for a hitman and decided to try it out.

  26. I say we send him by future+assassin · · Score: 3, Insightful
    some snail mail packages containing order forms for Preperatin H.

    One thing I was thinking though, will we get more spam as spammers get more and more time for their crime. Instead of just your grandmas spamming from their computer part time we gonna get sophisticated criminal/spam organizations who will get into this as the chance jail time vs profit increases. Just like drug trafficing. The more time you get for it the more money you can make from it.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  27. LOL... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 5, Funny

    William Smith

    Murcielago - $230,000.00
    Houses in Prior Lake and Burnsville - 1 Million dollars
    Being a high school dropout spammer stupid enough to use a jail phone to arrange a hit - Priceless!

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  28. Gay Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    How come Gay men make lousy mechanics? ... ...

    wait for it .... ....

    Because they keep mistaking the exhaust for an intake!

    Thank you.. thank you... telling bad jokes here all year!

  29. The Greeks were right by Gallowglass · · Score: 1

    They said that hubris was a sin and brought Nemesis to punish.

    Oh, the hubris! The hubris!

    (snicker)

  30. A new way to deal with spammers? by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Spammers are sociopaths. It seems for a lot of them that their disregard for basic decency also includes a disregard for basic adherence to the law. I bet a lot of them are guilty of actual definite crimes. It's just a matter of finding what they are. But we can find out who a lot of them are.

    1. Re:A new way to deal with spammers? by bigberk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree totally. It's not that sending spam causes you to do other crimes, it's that both spamming and other criminal activities are the results of a certain kind of mindset. Remember that spamming involves: collaboration with criminal elements (organized fleets of zombies probably tied to organized crime); theft of resources and offloading burdens onto victims; and lying and cheating innocent people, by selling them bogus products, stealing their money, and all the while profiting from it. Doing this as a spammer is somewhat easy because you're not stealing money from the consumers directly but acting as a middleman for any immoral marketer who wants access to the victims.

      A professional spammer is a selfish, greedy person who not only lacks compassion for other human beings but who actively seeks new ways to trick victims and steal their money and resources, all for personal gain. This is a tad worse than the typical marketer.

      Anyway, this is EXACTLY the kind of person who can be involved in other criminal activities, possibly even violent crime, because they lack empathy and concern for others in society.

  31. Gettin' Jiggy Wit It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will Smith is going to be gettin' jiggy wit his inmate buddies for a longtime to come...

  32. Reminds me of... by DanThuMan · · Score: 1

    SPAMAssassin. :)

  33. The technichal term by WisC · · Score: 1

    So this is a reverse Vardin Kushnir by proxy is it?

  34. Re:Obligatory Futurama reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "He's not a child ... he's 26!"

  35. I Propose a Swap: Abdul Rahman and the Spammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In Afghanistan, the successor to the Taliban government is about to punish Abdul Rahman for the "crime" of converting from Islam to a non-Islamic religion.

    I propose a swap. We exchange the spammer for Abdul Rahman.

    Thoughts, anyone?

  36. Missing the point, maybe by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I could be wrong, but his spamming and his current indictment seem unrelated.
    ...except, of course, that they all stem from the same person.

    I think that should be the message here. No matter how annoying spam is, it's seldom seen as the type of crime that anybody should really worry about. A lot of people probably don't even see it as a "crime" -- and by people, read legislators. The message from this story is that the kind of people who put together large-scale, organized spam operations are not only a financial burden on society but they are also, sometimes, serious scumbags. Think Al Capone and tax evasion; spam operations should be seen as a red flag for a gray-market mentality, at minimum. Dig a little further and you could find other, more serious criminal operations.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  37. A Mental Image I Know You'll Like by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    See if you can scare up the Boondocks episode "A Date with the Health Inspector" and watch at least the first 2 minutes in which the DA has his recurring nightmare about dropping the soap in a prison shower. Mentally substitute spammer for DA. I think you'll like it...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  38. US Constitution, Bill of Rights, Amendment 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

    This is as fundamental as free speech. Personally, I'm not amused either.

    1. Re:US Constitution, Bill of Rights, Amendment 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That has nothing to do with this. That's only if the government were to sentence someone to be raped. You guys really need to learn about the Constitution. It ONLY applies to the government. If I say you can't be in my home if you're a republican and I don't like idiots I'm totally within my rights to throw you out. Grow up, please.

    2. Re:US Constitution, Bill of Rights, Amendment 8 by PJ+The+Womble · · Score: 1

      I think that what you're questioning, then, is the failure of the authorities to acknowledge their duty of care to prisoners in their custody. Of course that's not funny. But a *JOKE* about prison rape is. It's how we deal with feeling uncomfortable about things we can't influence (primarily because once we've exercised our franchise every N years they get to exercise their judgement for us for the next N years). It's called "humour". I need it to stay sane. I think you may benefit from it too. Doesn't stop me thinking that the penal systems in our countries are wrong. In fact, it probably (through irony and online serendipity) brings me together with other people who think that those systems are wrong. But bugger me if that joke isn't funny, mate!

  39. Obligatory Wierd Al statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another one rides the bus, hey hey!

  40. Spammers should be shot by Basehart · · Score: 1

    They're the scourge of the universe.

    1. Re:Spammers should be shot by shaldannon · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are too kind. I was rather of the opinion that he should be castrated with a dull butter knife and left to bleed out, but was corrected by someone of an environmental persuasion who doesn't want to contaminate the earth.

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
    2. Re:Spammers should be shot by mabu · · Score: 1

      Guys, next round is on me!

  41. Karma (not the /. kind) by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    From TFA:
    Christopher William Smith, also known as Chris Johnson, Bruce Jonson, Robert Jonson, Dieter W. Doneit-Schmitz, and Eric Smith, had amassed so much wealth from his pharmacy business that he could afford houses in Prior Lake and Burnsville and keep a fleet of luxury automobiles (2006 Mercedes Benz S65, 2004 Lamborghini Murciélago, 2005 Mercedes Benz C55A, 2001 Ferrari, 2001 BMW M5 Sedan, 2004 Mercedes Maybach, 2005 Jeep Wrangler, 2004 Cadillac DeVille Limousine, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe, 2001 Hummer H1, etc.) according to court documents.

    ...and now he's somebody's prettyboy freshmeat bitch in cell block BF.

    I would say that there might be something to this Karma thing... :)

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
    1. Re:Karma (not the /. kind) by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, it makes the world go 'round. Some call it justice, but you can't cheat your karma.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  42. Haha!! LOLZ!! That is teh funny! by MacDork · · Score: 1
    Ha ha, his constitutional rights will be violated! That's hilarious!1! Just like at Abu Ghraib, except he's a citizen! LOLZ, that is teh funny!!

    You seem to have no problem with the violation of the eighth amendment, maybe we should violate his seventh and just skip the whole trial too, shall we?

  43. top or bottom? by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    Why do people think it's OK to joke about this?
    If Richard Pryor can joke about lighting himself on fire while freebasing or having a heart attack, I can damn well joke about prison rape.
    And Fulcrum of Evil wins it by revealling a little bit more about himself than we are comfortable knowing...


    And what's that "destruction of state property" in Mississippi that was mentioned above earlier? Is that legit? You ass really does belong to da man?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:top or bottom? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      And Fulcrum of Evil wins it by revealling a little bit more about himself than we are comfortable knowing...

      Ok, I admit it. I like Richard Pryor.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  44. Wrong. It's called personal responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He did it. He is responsble. End of story.

    What his mommy did when he was 3 years old doesn't matter.

  45. Ya know what? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    You are full of shit. Anything can be funny. I will defer to someone who's far better at this than I am, George Carlin:

    "Ohhh, some people don't like you to talk like that. Ohh, some people like to shut you up for saying those things. You know that. Lots of people. Lots of groups in this country want to tell you how to talk. Tell you what you can't talk about. Well, sometimes they'll say, well you can talk about something but you can't joke about it. Say you can't joke about something because it's not funny. Comedians run into that shit all the time. Like rape. They'll say, 'you can't joke about rape. Rape's not funny.' I say, 'fuck you, I think it's hilarious. How do you like that?'"

    Or, as he put more concisely in the same bit: "I believe you can joke about anything. It all depends on how you construct the joke."

    1. Re:Ya know what? by capnchicken · · Score: 1

      Rape isn't funny. Unless your raping a clown.
      -Stolen from tshirthell.com

      --
      A libertarian shat on my carpet once. Claimed the free market would sort it out. -Ford Prefect(8777)
    2. Re:Ya know what? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You missed the best part of that whole bit. "I can prove to you rape is funny." [...] "Picture Porky Pig Raping Elmer Fudd. Why do you think they call him Porky?"

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Ya know what? by PJ+The+Womble · · Score: 1

      Well said fella. I can see his point though... If I was full of shit I wouldn't want even to entertain the notion of prison rape. I'd want at the very most to be only half full of shit before I got the rest of it pushed back in there. Otherwise what is essentially a FIFO data structure becomes terminally corrupted on a number of levels!

  46. You forgot the last part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are Some Things Money Can't Buy. For Everything Else...

    YOU CAN ACCEPT CREDIT CARDS & TRIPLE YOUR SALES!! WE CAN SHOW YOU HOW!!!

  47. Re:You are one-hundred percent full of shit. by absinthminded64 · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's ok. . he's just been brainwashed by some fruity group. Don't get too excited Ms. Garrison.

  48. Haha... by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    Well... You're maybe on to something here. But I think a "Fruity" group would perhaps be MORE sympathetic. I'd say it's more of some "macho" unsympathetic group than a "fruity" group. :)

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    1. Re:Haha... by absinthminded64 · · Score: 1

      The "fruity group" was a SouthPark reference. The parent said "You go to hell, you go to hell and you die" which is a line commonly used by Mr/Ms Garrison of SouthPark. Had no bearing with any other content of the post. But thanks for my very first "Troll" score!

      Network Television. It's not just for breakfast anymore.

  49. Re:You are one-hundred percent full of shit. by Deaper · · Score: 1

    You know if only 30% of prisoners report being raped during their term, that's really not that high considering the fact that 1 in 6 women are victims of rape or attempted rape nation wide. (Source Source 2). I'm not saying prison rape or any rape is right. I'm just making the point that 30% of prisoners being raped is not a hugely alarming statistic. And the statement by the parent that people suggesting that the problem of prison rape is overrated deserves to be raped is quite ironic. Using the parents logic: If he deserves to be raped for using his right to free speech then certainly prisoners would deserve to be raped for possession of marijuana. No one deserves to be raped. Fact is people make jokes about it. They don't mean to hurt anyone by the jokes. But most humor is at least mildly offensive to SOMEONE. That's where the phrase the butt of the joke comes in. The fact that the butt of prison rape jokes happens to be the butt of the prisoner makes no difference. Lighten up a little.

  50. The Seventh Amendment... by Elemenope · · Score: 2, Informative

    The 7th only guarantees a jury trial in civil actions. You were thinking of the due process protections of the fifth, sixth, and fourteenth.

    --
    All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
  51. Re:You are one-hundred percent full of shit. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1, Insightful
    And what is the national percentage for males getting rapes, vs what occurs in prison? (My 30% was conservative; I think the real number was higher but I didn't want to overstate.)

    I don't want him raped for practicing free speech. I want him raped for becoming complicit in a national problem by denying it exists and thus participating in a coverup. I do think rape is suitable punishment for rape. Eye for an eye.

    But I also wasn't 100% serious. If I had a button that would cause him to be raped, I probably would not push it.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  52. God! by Marthirial · · Score: 0

    Man this guy is stupid, in jail for spammer and close to the electric chair as telemarketer? Some career advice is in place here.

  53. dumb and dummer by twitter · · Score: 1
    Being a high school dropout spammer stupid enough to use a jail phone to arrange a hit - Priceless!

    Post Patriot Act, every phone is a jail phone.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  54. Re:I Propose a Swap: Abdul Rahman and the Spammer by triffid_98 · · Score: 1
    In Afghanistan, the successor to the Taliban government is about to punish Abdul Rahman for the "crime" of converting from Islam to a non-Islamic religion. I propose a swap. We exchange the spammer for Abdul Rahman. Thoughts, anyone?


    And this is somehow different from other muslim run countries?
    Even our buddies the Saudis do this.
  55. King! by splatterboy · · Score: 1

    What kind of behavior did people expect when they made him "King"

    --
    "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." ~The Honorable Daniel Patrick Moynihan
  56. Re:You are one-hundred percent full of shit. by DavidTC · · Score: 1
    20 years would, like, the maximum for a rape in the first place in most places, so you know the GP is a complete liar to imply that is a standard sentence for prison rape.

    Hell, in some places you'd have to rape a child to get 20 years.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  57. cold hard motherfucking fact of life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a sad fact that only through consistent anal rape will spammers learn their lesson.

  58. He came so close to being hired by Microsoft... by talkingc · · Score: 1

    He should have said he was threatening to f****** kill the witness, and he would have had a job after he got out! With people of his type, too!

  59. Re:You are one-hundred percent full of shit. by bornbitter · · Score: 1

    ...and if it happens to be California, you have to do much worse than that. Worst case senario = Move to UAE.

    --
    "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to govern any other" -John Ada
  60. Re:You are one-hundred percent full of shit. by evilviper · · Score: 2, Informative
    no formal study has ever been comissioned to study the subject,

    I must have imagined this one: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-01-17-pri son-rape_x.htm
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  61. Rape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not rape, its suprise sex!

  62. Re:I Propose a Swap: Abdul Rahman and the Spammer by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Funny

    We exchange the spammer for Abdul Rahman.

    Bomb them into the stone-age, I'm fine with that. But for fuck's sake... sending them a spammer? That's just pure sadism.

  63. Amazing and shocking by wobblie · · Score: 1

    not the story, but that a slashdot "editor" actually got the possessive of "witness" right.

    1. Re:Amazing and shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh. Unfortunately he didn't. Witness' would be plural possesive, used for more than one witness. It should have been "witness's family".

  64. Is this an American thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are Americans the only one who joke about prison rape? Or are there some other allegedly modern, industrialized democracies where rape is an acknowledged element of judicially-imposed punishment?

    1. Re:Is this an American thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are Americans the only one who joke about prison rape? Or are there some other allegedly modern, industrialized democracies where rape is an acknowledged element of judicially-imposed punishment?

      Joey, have you ever been to a Turkish prison?

    2. Re:Is this an American thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to a brazilian prison. You will like it if you are gay.

  65. Re:Wrong. It's called personal responsibility by Arandir · · Score: 1

    He did it. He is responsble. End of story.

    Yes he did it. Yes he is responsible. I am not excusing anything. All I am doing is explaining how his psyche works. As an adult he has the obligation to curb and control his anti-social tendencies.

    Society should never excuse criminal behavior by saying it wasn't the criminal's fault. Society should BEAT the criminal behavior out of him! Since we don't beat criminals anymore, I suppose incarceration is the next best thing.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  66. Ramifications by base_chakra · · Score: 1

    But the real crime is that this is sure to give spammers in general a bad name. :(

  67. you're assuming charges are filed by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The twenty year sentence, or any kind of punishment, sort of assumes someone actually reports the rape. It also assumes that the report is taken seriously by the guards rather than ignored. Most victims will not even report it in the first place, especially in prison, where informing on another inmate can get you killed. And many prison administrators routinely ignore and even encourage rape in prisons. The rapist is usually not likely deterred by a theoretical 20-year sentence that he will never have to serve.

    1. Re:you're assuming charges are filed by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, have you ever been in prison? Got a felony charge? Got any experience firsthand inside CCA, SMCI, Walnut Grove, Rankin county? Any prison inside Mississippi, which is rated as the worst prison system in the States? No? I have. Rape simply does not happen, and I'm not trusting that statistic another site says, because I've witnessed it all firsthand from the inside. If that 1 in 5 men get raped statistic were true, I'd be watching loads of free gay pron in the general population areas, but that doesn't happen. Mainly it's just a bunch of guys playing cards, exercising, smoking cigarettes, and bating on the walls making rap music. Through seven different holding facilities, I've not seen ONE rape, just a lot of ass-beating.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:you're assuming charges are filed by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      7 Different holding systems? You're a real model fucking citizen arn't you.

    3. Re:you're assuming charges are filed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      troll

    4. Re:you're assuming charges are filed by TheSystemHasFailed · · Score: 1
      And many prison administrators routinely ignore and even encourage rape in prisons.
      I'm calling bullshit here. I have family who works in the California justice system and they most certainly DO NOT ENCOURAGE rape of other prisoners. In fact because of HIV and other STDs they try to keep it from happening at ALL. And the reason is simple - spread of those diseases increases the prison system's costs to care for the prisoners.
  68. Goverment of One? by Original+Replica · · Score: 1
    "It's called "crime". You don't need to be a psych major to understand it. It's the use of force or fraud to get what you want. "Normal" people use non-coercive means to get what they want,"
    Have you tried not paying your taxes when the elected official fails to deliever what they promised?
    "Thus, he learns that theft and lying are an acceptable means of getting what you want."
    --
    We are all just people.
  69. It's Bush's fault! by laing · · Score: 1

    The subject is intended to be a joke. Do you really believe that Bush (or his administration) is directly responsible for the torture and murder of Iraqi prisoners (or should I call them terrorists, criminals, "the enemy", etc.)? I could understand the argument that says we wouldn't be there if it weren't for bush, but that is not direct responsibility.

    If you were a world leader, how would you deal with another government that seems by all accounts to be developing WMD, refuses UN inspections, and has a history of invading its weaker neighbor countries? Do you just ignore it and hope it goes away? Do you go to the UN (which has been documented to be corrupt)? Please tell me your solution.

  70. Damn straight it's Bush's fault by Scareduck · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The subject is intended to be a joke. Do you really believe that Bush (or his administration) is directly responsible for the torture and murder of Iraqi prisoners (or should I call them terrorists, criminals, "the enemy", etc.)?

    The correct answer is an emphatic, "YES!" When the courts martial refused to examine the possibility that Lynndie England was merely following orders, when the Bush administration's highest-ranking lawyer drafts legal briefs on instructions directly from from the President as to why their abuse of prisoners is perfectly legal despite warnings from the Navy's general counsel that the "legal theories granting the president the right to authorize abuse in spite of the Geneva Conventions were unlawful, dangerous and erroneous" -- how the hell could you NOT conclude that

    • the Bush administration knew perfectly well what it was doing
    • knew that it was illegal
    • wanted a legal smokescreen for the time when such activities leaked out
    The abuses at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo were all carried out under color of authority -- the administration's authority -- which has violated all manner of treaties to which the United States is signatory, not to mention its own Constitution and laws.

    The question isn't whether Bush and his greasy pals -- Cheney foremost among them -- should be impeached. The question is, how far down does the moral rot go?

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

    1. Re:Damn straight it's Bush's fault by metlin · · Score: 1

      Here's a piece of news - all war is ugly.

      It's just that these days, you get to hear about it. When you are out there, you either kick ass or get your ass kicked.

      These prisoners you keep talking about? Most of them are the same ones who'd have killed *American* soldiers if they were not caught first. Killed. Not held prisoner, not interrogated, but killed.

      Secondly, I'm sure the President knows everything that's going on in every army barrack in this whole country, right? Right? Blaming him for something like Abu Gharib is just ridiculous.

      And is Guantamano bay wrong? Maybe it is, I agree. And honestly, my answer would depend on what kind of "torture" they do there, and depending on how you define that "torture". Honestly, if flushing down a book and having a PMSing girl touch you is torture, those prisoners probably need to get something - civilized.

      Seriously - how can you equate flushing down a book with torture for a war-criminal who tried to kill your soldiers? How can you equate having a girl touch you with people that kidnap and behead journalists on video tape for being Jewish?

      My point is this - if we are treating them the way they treat us, I agree, there is no difference between them and us. But that does not mean we should not be firm, either. I think you can be firm and resort to putting someone down without actual physical torture - it's called psychological warfare.

      And guess what? That is perfectly acceptable, because the only thing that's making them fall for that one is their own prejudice.

    2. Re:Damn straight it's Bush's fault by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1
      When you are out there, you either kick ass or get your ass kicked.

      Ah, so it's a race to the bottom, then? In that case we might win after all....

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    3. Re:Damn straight it's Bush's fault by metlin · · Score: 1

      You don't understand, do you?

      The Jihadis out there do not care. There is no other way of handling them, you are either a Muslim that prays 5 times a day and follows their barbaric and uncivilized practices or you are a kafir, a non-believer. They would do anything and everything that they can to hurt you.

      Of course, the left does not understand how rotten that is, because your very civility will be the death of you.

      One would think that crashing planes into buildings, bombing embassies, burning people, chaining women, stoning people, beheading Americans on video and the like would make people realize that being "peaceful" with the Jihadis is not going to work, but apparently people can be really, *really* stupid.

      It is either us or them. Islamic fundamentalism, and to a great extent Islam, is a scourge that needs to be taken care of. Ignoring it is not going to make it go away. If anything, it's going to make it worse. You would think that one Nazi Germany would have taught people a thing or two, but apparently people need reminders.

      Sometimes, the best defense is offence. Kick them before they kick us. Shatter them before they have the power to do worse things than they already are.

      Know something? There is a war going on. It's called a war against terror. It's the war against the western civilization that they are waging, and whether or not you realize it, we're fighting for survival.

      From Palestinians fighting in Israel, Pakistanis fighting against Indians in Kashmir, Americans being attacked and the west being attacked, it's a war which the Muslims are waging against everyone else - Christians, Jews, Hindus and more.

      But then again, some folks would not realize the problem until it's all over them. And by then, it's too late. That's okay, though. At least there are some of us out here who know when to do the right thing.

    4. Re:Damn straight it's Bush's fault by bheer · · Score: 1

      > Ah, so it's a race to the bottom, then?

      Any agenda that brings democracy and secularism to the middle east is hardly a 'race to the bottom'. It's more like a leg up to a medieval culture, to put it kindly. This is the Bush administration's stated goal, for what it's worth, and it's a goal worth admiring, even if you doubt its practicality.

      The alternative viewpoint (best explained in "Imperial Hubris", and probably the one the CIA holds -- ever noticed there's not much love lost between the White House and the CIA?) is that the Muslim 'street' is a lost cause because of an inherent cultural mismatch and we should either not piss them off or hit them with overwhelming force.

      The problem is that by treating the enemy with kid gloves we are putting ourselves at risk AND putting ordinary Muslims at risk (by encouraging more bad behavior from radical Islamics).

      > In that case we might win after all....

      Oh, I don't doubt our winning because I don't doubt the extent to which our enemy can go. What we're doing in this war is not based on our _capability_ (which includes nuking every Islamic country in the world) but our _intent_ (which is to be, relatively speaking, nice).

      Our enemies on the other hand have repeatedly demonstrated they've struck with the full extent of their capabilities. And one day they'll do something so bad it'll make 9/11 look like a picnic. And THEN public opinion in the West will turn and we'll strike back with our full _capability_, and then we'll win. At a terrible cost.

      And all because we were not firm enough with Islamic rogue elements in the name of political correctness.

    5. Re:Damn straight it's Bush's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This still doesn't excuse the fact that they didn't follow Geneva conventions.
      Sure, they would have killed American soldiers. Kill them back. What you are saying is "so long as they are assholes, it's ok to torture them... they did it, so two wrongs make a right". Being civilized does not mean you never stand up for yourself -- it means you keep a set of standards. If that means killing them out right, so be it. If you hoenstly believe you can forgive someone and they won't bother you again, so be it. But being civilized does _not_ mean you have to ignore the problem.

      Your problem is you are vendictive and much like an intelligent child -- you can't control yourself.
      You have much to learn kemosabe.

    6. Re:Damn straight it's Bush's fault by metlin · · Score: 1

      Did you even bother reading my previous comment?

      Here, let me paste it for you:

      And is Guantamano bay wrong? Maybe it is, I agree. And honestly, my answer would depend on what kind of "torture" they do there, and depending on how you define that "torture". Honestly, if flushing down a book and having a PMSing girl touch you is torture, those prisoners probably need to get something - civilized.

      Seriously - how can you equate flushing down a book with torture for a war-criminal who tried to kill your soldiers? How can you equate having a girl touch you with people that kidnap and behead journalists on video tape for being Jewish?

      My point is this - if we are treating them the way they treat us, I agree, there is no difference between them and us. But that does not mean we should not be firm, either. I think you can be firm and resort to putting someone down without actual physical torture - it's called psychological warfare.

      And guess what? That is perfectly acceptable, because the only thing that's making them fall for that one is their own prejudice.


      Like I said, comparing what we do to what they do is absolutely ridiculous.

    7. Re:Damn straight it's Bush's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've read some bullshit in my time, but your post takes the cake. So many fundamental flaws, where do I begin? Ahh, I can't be arsed. But riddle me this, where were the Islamic rogue elements before you invaded Iraq? That didn't put you at risk, noooo, of course not. Reap what you sow, sucker.

    8. Re:Damn straight it's Bush's fault by bheer · · Score: 1

      > But riddle me this, where were the Islamic rogue elements before you invaded Iraq?

      *Some* highlights:

      Munich, 1972
      World Trade Center bombing, 1993
      'Hard' Shariah Rule in Afghanistan, 1990s
      USS Cole, Yemen, 2000
      9/11, 2001
      The genocide in Darfur, 2003-present

      The sickness in Islam has been visible for a long time, compounded by an unwillingness or failure of moderate muslims to do anything about it. (And of course the rot in Western intelligentsia that seeks to explain away horrendous Islamic barbarism with cultural relativism is equally to blame.)

      > So many fundamental flaws, where do I begin? ... Reap what you sow, sucker.

      My point of view need not match yours but I assure you we will all reap what we have _already_ sown with our failure to unitedly confront evil. By 2030 we'll either have religion-based civil codes (complete with Islamic courts) in Europe or nukes will be deployed on the Middle East. Neither course of action is particularly palatable to me, but hey, that's what you get for listening to the "can't we all just get along" guys.

    9. Re:Damn straight it's Bush's fault by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      I almost forgot to say thanks for making my point.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  71. Risking Godwin's wrath, but you brought it up... by localman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're half right: Nazis aren't funny. Killing Jews isn't funny. Jokes about them can be funny IF (and this is a very big IF) the joke is a means to relieve tension in an absurd and/or awful situation. People need to joke about terrible things to make sense of the world. Gallows humor. Black comedy. I get that. I even like that.

    However: jokes about killing Jews are not funny if the point is to take the actual killing of Jews less seriously. Or to turn killing Jews into entertainment.

    Likewise, in this case, if the joke was intended to relieve tension on the agreed horor of prison rape, I'd laugh. That wasn't the point. It never is. People really think prison rape is funny. In and of itself. But it's not. Real torment never is. It's also bad for society. It's bad for you.

    Clueless people my ass.

    Cheers.

  72. Why Spam King? by 0xC2 · · Score: 1

    I like Spam Lord, or at least Spam Kingpin.

    --
    Be heard || Be herd
  73. More Serious... by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lets see here, in order to be a spam king you need to be accomplished in a few of if not all of the followng...

    1) Criminal Fruad. (Think "unsubscribe")
    2) FCC rule-breaking
    3) Microsoft Exploits
    4) Bank scams
    5) Obscenity

    This in addition to what you mentioned, that a spam business indicates more crimes means it should be taken very seriously. Why has the DoJ been so bent on making examples of hackers, but completely ignored the true scum that are scammers?

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:More Serious... by JahToasted · · Score: 1
      Why has the DoJ been so bent on making examples of hackers, but completely ignored the true scum that are scammers?

      Because their boss is a scammer himself? Honour among theives and all that.

      Seriously though, there's a very fine line between aggressive marketing and scamming. The politicians can understand someone lying for personal gain, but can't understand breaking stupid laws for social gain. So the politicians simply have more in common with spammers than with hackers. Hackers have more in common with revolutionaries, which threaten politicians.

  74. What an all-around swell guy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • Selling drugs based on bogus perscriptions (I assume the doc will lose his license)
    • Charging cards without delivering drugs. Even the libertarians will agree, if you charge it, you gotta ship it.
    • Spamming the universe
    • Blowing the proceeds on a stable of vehicles so exotic and expensive... How many quarter million dollar plus vehicles does one man need?
    • And to cap it all, trying to have witnesses killed
    • Oh and I forgot, being so utterly stupid as to talk about having witnesses killed on a JAIL PHONE
    This guy has obviously ruined his own life, and probalby taken down a bunch of people (the doctor, the guy he talked with about killing) with him. And he's not even 30!

    Some how he just didn't think that the laws of our system, and maybe even the laws of physics didn't apply to him.

    ---------
    Free web calendaring and contact management system

  75. (OT: the role of humor) by cgenman · · Score: 1

    Gay people aren't funny. But if it weren't for gay comics and comics about gays in the 1970's and 1980's, they wouldn't be anywhere near as accepted in this culture.

    Pedophile priests aren't funny. Bit if we didn't have running jokes about the problem, few people would have realized that the problem existed.

    Black people aren't funny. But shows like The Jeffersons and Fat Albert did a heck of a lot to realize the dream of the races accepting eachother as part of life.

    Humor is when we're allowed to say anything, specifically things that are uncomfortable and which we would otherwise sweep under the rug. But, oddly enough, jokes cannot be used when the problem is known, widespread, and painful. Jokes about normal sexual assaults, for example, are verboten because of the sad fact that everyone knows people who have been sexually assaulted, and the humor properties fade.

    But for people who don't have direct connection to the physical abuses in prisons, it can be humorous.

    What I'm saying is that humor is a vehicle to inform, and in this case serves your purpose.

  76. Re:Risking Godwin's wrath, but you brought it up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Nazis aren't funny. Killing Jews isn't funny."

    Q: Why did Hitler commit suicide?
    A: He read his gas bill.

  77. level up by Tom · · Score: 1

    Goes to show that spammers are not what they claim to be - harmless mass-mailing advertisers. Maybe they were 10 years ago. Today's spammers are serious criminals, often with links to organized crime.

    Good thing the FBI et al finally take them seriously. Let's hope it's not too late. We wouldn't want them to combine their two "talents" and mass-mail death threats...

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  78. Re:You are one-hundred percent full of shit. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
    Second off, no formal study has ever been comissioned to study the subject, but something along the lines of 30% of prisoners report having been raped during their term.

    Keep in mind that there's a stigma to admitting to it, and the real statistic is likely higher.

    Also, when you give blood, one of the criteria is "have you ever been in a US prison?"

    That's enough evidence for me right there. The Red Cross doesn't have a political agenda regarding this issue; they just want to keep the blood supply uncontaminated.

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  79. I see. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    Oh good! They finally went through with the study they've been pressured to have for years. I was wondering how long it would take them. Glad to hear the good news, even if it's 2 months later :)

    Of course, they're probably just giving the illusion of helping... That's politics for ya.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  80. Great point, Thing1. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    And I finally got the reference in your name. :)

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  81. Re:Risking Godwin's wrath, but you brought it up.. by ultranova · · Score: 1

    People really think prison rape is funny. In and of itself. But it's not. Real torment never is. It's also bad for society. It's bad for you.

    Bad things are funny if they happen to someone else and not funny if they happen to me or anyone I care about. That is true for all people; the only difference is who is included in the "anyone I care about" category.

    Look at any comedy. All of them are funny because people get hurt - sometimes physically, sometimes emotionally, but they get hurt nonetheless. Or they get into embarrassing situations. Or they experience some other kind of hardship. Or they get otherwise screwed over.

    People are sadists, every last one of them. The only difference is how much that tendency - enjoyment from pain of others - is restrained by conscience, pity and sympathy. Since the prevailing attitude in America seems to be that the prison population deserves none of these, prison rape is indeed funny there.

    Pitiless people are monsters, because there's nothing stopping them from indulging that side of themselves.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  82. Dont give him life in prison, just 90 days by Anonymous+Admin · · Score: 1

    in the electric chair.

  83. Re:Risking Godwin's wrath, but you brought it up.. by Marce1 · · Score: 1

    "Hey" they said, passing the farm truck..

    --
    [ insert meme here ]
  84. Re:Risking Godwin's wrath, but you brought it up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Puns are not funny. Not that there is anything wrong with them. Clever? Perhaps. Funny? No.

  85. Exactly by tacokill · · Score: 1

    I bet a lot of them are guilty of actual definite crimes.

    Just like the Jews, niggers, spicks, chinks, and all the other minorities out there. They're "probably" doing some wrong, aren't they? We'd better enforce the laws a little harder for those groups to keep them in check. (/sarchasm)

    I hate spammers as much as anyone but EVERYONE has the right to be presumed innocent until PROVEN guilty. Until that happens, speculation about "other crimes" is just that -- 100% speculation. And it's 100% bullshit.

    1. Re:Exactly by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      sigh... It was a Troll. I was hoping someone would take the bait sooner rather than getting 3 mods up, and a response agreeing with me. I'm just too depressed to carry on:( IHTM, IHL, HAND(I Have Trolled Myself, I Have Lost. Have A Nice Day...)

  86. Re:You are one-hundred percent full of shit. by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1
    Also, when you give blood, one of the criteria is "have you ever been in a US prison?"

    Well, that and "Do you like movies about gladiators?"

  87. I am amazed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am amazed that the site with this article is loaded with ads that try to get your email address to spam you.

  88. Re:Risking Godwin's wrath, but you brought it up.. by localman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I totally get that humor can be based on suffering, depending on the context and intent. I laughed in Pulp Fiction when the kid gets his head blown off by accident. But I didn't laugh during Shindler's List. I have a hard time believing you did. There is a difference.

    And to be clear: sympathy is not my motivation to dislike prison rape. There are at least three reasons why everyone should be against prison rape:

    1. Nearly all criminals are released from prison eventually. If they have been raped they are more dangerous to society.

    2. The rapist is experiencing power. Why is anyone in prison allowed the pleasure of feeding their abusive tendancies? See point #1.

    3. A society that sanctions human rights violations is fundamentally a less healthy society. Violence anywhere begets violence everywhere. This has been shown over and over again throughout history.

    On your tangent: people are not all sadists. How many consciously sadistic acts does the average person undertake per day? Assuming you're living in something that passes for a functioning society, I'd say virtually zero. And you believe this is all simply repression? Even the jerks I know don't seem to take pleasure in hurting, it's just a side effect of their being inconsiderate. In fact, nearly everyone I know takes efforts to avoid causing suffering of others.

    Yet we can still laugh at a good Nazi joke. Get used to the complexity of people. Don't get hung up on one point and then paint everything black and white.

    Cheers.

  89. Re:Risking Godwin's wrath, but you brought it up.. by MutantHamster · · Score: 1
    Yes. So because I laughed at the "Jew/pizza" I now think it is okay to actually burn Jews alive.

    You are an idiot.

    --
    My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
  90. Re:You are one-hundred percent full of shit. by Khyber · · Score: 1

    You're sorely misinformed. A guy facing the judge before me, a first time felon, got 54 1/2 years (natural life) for his first-ever crime in Mississippi - rape. FIRST CRIME EVER - Life sentence. And it was just rape, he didn't beat her, rob her, steal from her, or kill her. He just screwed her without her consent and got a life sentence. The guy was only 20 years old.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  91. Re:Risking Godwin's wrath, but you brought it up.. by ultranova · · Score: 1

    I totally get that humor can be based on suffering, depending on the context and intent. I laughed in Pulp Fiction when the kid gets his head blown off by accident. But I didn't laugh during Shindler's List. I have a hard time believing you did. There is a difference.

    Strawman. I didn't claim that I, or anyone else, laughed during Schindler's List. I did claim, and still do, that the reason why the fundamentally absurd events in Schindler's List aren't considered funny is that they (or something very much like them) really happened, and thus conscience and sympathy intervene and make the thought of laughing at them seem shamefull.

    And to be clear: sympathy is not my motivation to dislike prison rape. There are at least three reasons why everyone should be against prison rape:

    Whether someone is against prison rape or not has nothing to do with whether one finds jokes about it funny. While your points are good, they are irrelevant to the argument I'm making.

    On your tangent: people are not all sadists. How many consciously sadistic acts does the average person undertake per day? Assuming you're living in something that passes for a functioning society, I'd say virtually zero.

    Doing something and enjoying it when it happens are not the same. Not all the pedophiles, for example, go around raping kids; quite a lot of them repress their urges because either their conscience tells them it would be wrong to act out on them, or they fear the consequences if they would be caught.

    And you believe this is all simply repression?

    Yes, in the same way that not overeating, not having sex with everyone you happen to be attracted to, and not telling your boss that he's an idiot is repression. People have conflicting urges and goals, and sadism conflicts with most of them, so it gets repressed. Don't think that it isn't there, thought.

    Even the jerks I know don't seem to take pleasure in hurting, it's just a side effect of their being inconsiderate. In fact, nearly everyone I know takes efforts to avoid causing suffering of others.

    Like I said, people have the capacity to restrain their sadism. It is entirely possible to feel conflicting feelings - sadism and pity, for example - at the same time. In most people, conscience overrides sadism most of the time; however, that does not equal to sadism not existing.

    Yet we can still laugh at a good Nazi joke. Get used to the complexity of people. Don't get hung up on one point and then paint everything black and white.

    Don't get so hung up on shades of gray that you forget that black exists. And I have argued for, not against, people being complex, and tried to show how thinking someone as less human than yourself leads to things like prison rape being considered funny.

    Since you mentioned Schindler's List, you may wish to compare the situation to Nazi Germany or the Balkan war, or negro slavery or whatever: as soon as some group is considered sub-human or entirely nonhuman, people are free to act on their sadism with good conscience - which they did, in all the mentioned cases.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  92. More like just a young punk by abb3w · · Score: 1
    He didn't turn evil. He just turned greedy and stupid.

    No; being greedy and stupid means you fall for 419 scams. Greedy and indifferent to the welfare of others is more accurate here; or, to oversimplify: Evil.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  93. Totally know what you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know EXACTLY what you mean - they're just JOKES!! I'm really with you on this one. Here are some REALLY FUNNY jokes I thought you'd enjoy, because we both see humor the exact same way!

    Jokes 1

    Jokes 2

    Jokes 3

    Enjoy, have fun!

  94. Advocatus Diaboli by abb3w · · Score: 1
    This kind of humor is really low and suggests that you (and others) think that rape (and sexually-transmitted diseases) is just punishment for something. There are thousands of people in prison who have committed no violence against anyone, stolen nothing, and they are raped.

    Nope. Not just as in justice; perhaps effective. I merely hope that any others considering a course of action with widely distributed externalized marginal disutility would consider the risk of disproportionate consquent highly-personal internalized disutility a disinducement, and find the prospect of such risk becoming manifest such nicely ironic. Unfortunately, sociopaths don't consider consequences well.

    I also note that the undeserved suffering of one group who have done nothing does not logically imply anything about the suffering of another group who have done something.

    No, I am not a nice person; I'm far too pragmatic in my socio-political outlook. It's going to get me killed someday.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  95. All he can be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With such a shining resumée, he's fit for the electric chair. Or maybe he'll get the chance to enlist for an administrative tour of duty somewhere in the mideast. Say, something involving military inns (of the obligatory variety). Or, perhaps, in the auxilliary informal air corps. The 'right' fella in the right place. Whaddya know, it *is* a world of opportunity, after all. >:-[

  96. Not revenge, prison is just storage of scumbags. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1
    After three significant fuckups the fuckup gets put away .

    That's not revenge that's simple self protection.

    It's cheaper to wearhouse a serious fuckup then to leave them loose fucking up.

    If you can't get your shit together with two strikes hanging over you head then you never will.

    Your right about giving up on rehabilitation though. Good thing as it simply was'nt working for repeat offenders.

    Boot camps are totally different, they are intended to rehabilitate young fuckups.

    Personally I'm against prison rape. But for spammers I make an exception. They should all be ass raped by a gizzly bear using hot sauce as lube.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  97. Geneva conventions don't apply by HornWumpus · · Score: 1
    Unless you are a uniformed member of a military.

    They are not.

    The Geneva conventions were established to prevent the kind of things that Iraqi insurgents routinely do. (like attacking from within a crowded civilian area, which is a war crime. Flattening the area with the insurgents and civilians in it is not a war crime however.)

    To get Geneva convention protection they must fight within the convention.

    For example no German was EVER tried for actions taken against actual members of the French underground. They were in some cases tried for actions against run of the mill non-combatent frog civilians.

    At least part of the problem is the assinine UN definition of torture. Sleep deprevation is torture? Fucking with their heads is torture? It appears to me that the UN has defined torture down to the point is simply means 'interogation'.

    Like the feminists before them and their abuse of the term 'rape' they don't realize they minimize the severity of the act by equating it to things far less heinous.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  98. Re:Risking Godwin's wrath, but you brought it up.. by localman · · Score: 1

    Strawman. I didn't claim that I, or anyone else, laughed during Schindler's List.

    Straw man back atcha. I didn't claim that either. I was just calling attention to the distinction between awful things being funny and awful things not being funny. I assumed in my comment that you did not find Schindler's list funny, which is a pretty safe assumption. I agree that humor is often based on suffering. You didn't explicitly say it, but you implied that the reverse is also true: that suffering is often humor. I would think this is an absurd point of view, but you go on to paint mankind as a bunch of sadists, which again implies this.

    conscience and sympathy intervene and make the thought of laughing at them seem shamefull.

    And why is sadism considered the base in your worldview and conscience and sympathy the exceptions which intervene? Especially when conscience and sympathy obviously outweigh sadism by a landslide in any observation of average human behavior? Maybe compassion is the base and sadism is the exception? I don't believe that people who don't laugh at Schindler's List refrain out of shame; they don't laugh because they don't find it funny. There's no repression there.

    Yes, in the same way that not overeating, not having sex with everyone you happen to be attracted to, and not telling your boss that he's an idiot is repression.

    Maybe in your world. I don't do those things because they generally don't yield very good results. And this being the case I generally don't want them at all, at a gut level. The same way I generally don't want anything that I can see as being a net loss for me, even if indirectly.

    Don't get so hung up on shades of gray that you forget that black exists.

    Understood, I don't. But I also try to avoid seeing the distribution as a flat line or a saddle. Fact is it's a bell curve and the vast majority live in the middle. Extremes are interesting but I don't think it makes sense to focus too much attention on them, which was what I felt you were doing.

    as soon as some group is considered sub-human or entirely nonhuman, people are free to act on their sadism with good conscience - which they did, in all the mentioned cases.

    A good point. Though I would point out that not all the people involved acted on their sadism. Rather there was always a subset of people who acted on their sadism. These events are horrifying to be sure (the one that always sticks in my mind is Japanese Unit 731). But the huge impact does not outweigh the fact, in my mind, that these events did not receive mass approval, even by those who had no direct suffering. In fact, people on the whole have been gravitating for the past century toward a greater respect for human rights. It happens in fits and starts. And there are huge pockets of time and location where they backslide. But the fact that we are even having this conversation is a testament to the fact that not all people are sadistic at their core, and that compassion can be the foundation of someone's social philosopy.

    Back to prison rape: I just feel compelled whenever someone makes a joke about it to pedantically point out that it's actually a real problem. Once awareness has been raised, and prison rape is considered a bad thing by the majority, and prison guards no longer look the other way, I'll shut up and folks can joke away. I may even laugh myself :)

    In any case, agree or disagree, thanks for the well thought out discussion.

    Cheers.

  99. We know you intend to murder us someday. by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Funny
    All leftest come to that, at least you're honest enough about it.

    But as a group we're better armed and better shots.

    So come and get it motherfucker. Stop hiding.

    All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. Who's gunfu do you think is stronger?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:We know you intend to murder us someday. by Darby · · Score: 1

      All leftest come to that, at least you're honest enough about it.

      But as a group we're better armed and better shots.

      So come and get it motherfucker. Stop hiding.

      All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. Who's gunfu do you think is stronger?


      I'm not a leftist you idiotic asswipe. I'm a patriot.
      Fighting against tyrrany and treason is not the defining characteristic of a leftist.

      It's a simple question of self defense. Your kind is seeking to destroy freedom, liberty and the constitution. People like me have had enough and are willing and able to defend ourselves.

  100. Re:Risking Godwin's wrath, but you brought it up.. by localman · · Score: 1

    I didn't say that. It is generally accepted that burning Jews alive is bad. So jokes about it are not an issue. But in the SS in 1942 jokes about burning Jews were most certainly a symptom that the issue was not being taken seriously. And that is analogous to the prison rape jokes today: it is not generally accepted that prisoners getting raped is bad, so the jokes are a symptom that the issue is not taken seriously. This is why I make the point. When it's no longer a serious social problem (one that can be easily resolved) I'll laugh at the jokes myself if they're any good.

    Cheers.

  101. Re:Not revenge, prison is just storage of scumbags by RLiegh · · Score: 1

    > After three significant fuckups the fuckup gets put away .

    Again, three arrests for possession of marijuana, and you're up the river without a paddle.

    Sorry, I could see the point if it was restricted to violent/sexual offenders; but more often than not, it's used against non-violent offenses such as possession of pot.

    That's just bullshit;plain and simple.

  102. The point is prevention. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you act like a turd, you'll get pushed around in prison.

    Now laugh. It's about norming each other to discourage abnormal (illegal) behavior. Obviously, among actual felons the joke is too late and less funny. Duh.

    1. Re:The point is prevention. by localman · · Score: 1

      Yeah... and how's that been working out for us?

  103. Re:Risking Godwin's wrath, but you brought it up.. by rtb61 · · Score: 1
    What is interesting is the attitude people have about criminal activity with in prison. As people see more and more of their civil liberties being eroded and abused in the name of security and safety, they seem to miss the fact that their legal authorities seem incapable of maintaining law and order in a prison where their is a complete absence of civil liberty.

    So how will removal of those civil liberties in general society make you safer. The abuse of civil liberty is not a tool for securty it is a tool for selective coercion, with your secrets remaining yours only so long as you obey, then add creative editing to your monitored existence and those secrets need not be real as you can't prove otherwise (do you monitor yourself 24/7 to esnure you always maintain a digital alibi). Governments and corporations like to keep their secrets whilst abusing yours, power and profit, the current administration is driven by it and it alone (there's whole lot less dollar profit in a fair, balanced and happy society).

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  104. your concern is decidedly misplaced by alizard · · Score: 1
    As a general rule, if it's awful and happens to a spammer, it's funny.

    Spammers dehumanize themselves by their actions.

  105. Roughly a bajillion witnesses by Thecarpe · · Score: 1

    I probably have 14 counts of whatever he is finally charged with sitting in my inbox this morning...as does the rest of my company/city/county/state/country/continent...what does it really take to get him convicted?

  106. Re:Risking Godwin's wrath, but you brought it up.. by Marce1 · · Score: 1

    It made us laugh out loud when we were there: English is a funny language.

    Humour does not require a zero sum game; just because something is gained from the moment, it does not have to be at the expense of anyone (or anything). Cheap jokes are often digs, but good humour is easy and sweet, and all the richer if it is in the face of horror.

    It is the difference between sitcom repartie and wit, and I expect they literally appeal to different parts of the brain: the very old (in evolutionary terms) 'Reptilian' brain (at the top of the brain stem) vs. the relatively modern, abstract, 'thinking cap' (or neo-cortex). While the one deals with instincts such as 'fight or flight', the other deals with complex processing like language and sequencing.
    Stuck in the middle is our limbic system, with various areas for processing emotion, 'truth' and so on, adding value to some perceptions and filtering out others.

    Really good humour appeals to both instinct and abstract, and puts us in 'two minds' about it - so Itchy and Scratchy can be both funny in their own right, and as a parody or satire within a larger context. They can also be boring, ritualistic, formulaic and depressing. Funny doesn't mean sadism to me: I prefer to be good-humoured...

    In summary:
    There are 10 types of person: Those who know binary...

    --
    [ insert meme here ]
  107. Re:Risking Godwin's wrath, but you brought it up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, shut the fuck up. We all get it: you think you're really smart.

    I'm still not convinced that English is your first language.

  108. As someone who works in antifraud and antiSPAM.... by AriaStar · · Score: 1

    This is just amusing to me. If anyone should be taken down, it should be the spammers. It's so hard for companies to keep this stuff at bay. When you click to junk something, people like my coworkers (I do the antifraud primarily) do work with it to help identify new messeges as smap or not to send to your junk folder or inbox. The rate that this comes in in just incredible. And the tricks they use to keep a program from spotting it as spam? The worst may be an e-mail that is entirely a clickable image. You might be surprsed at what people fall for, the rate of catches. It's mindboggling.

  109. Re:Risking Godwin's wrath, but you brought it up.. by Marce1 · · Score: 1

    Don't flame peope if you can't be funny, and don't give advice if you can't be smart.

    I think therefore I am, but you just fuck off and die, shit-kicker.

    --
    [ insert meme here ]