Does this affect the CURRENT version of Safari, v=1.1.1? I don't think so since I tried the http://alive.znep.com/~marcs/security/mozillacooki e/demo.html, link and it didn't send anything back.
Glad I could cheer you up. Obviously I am aware that Mars has a red/orange/rust/whatever color to it. However, when viewing it and it appears white (apparently for the rod/cones reasons explained elsewhere), I was hoping for an explanation.
It really wasn't red. I should have asked about it then, but I didn't want to look like a moron. The others that went with me saw the same thing: white Mars. I thought maybe it was a filter on the telescope, but it couldn't have been on three different scopes.
I went down to look at Mars last Saturday night with the local astronomy group. But instead of seeing the Red Planet, it was the White Planet. Not even a smidge of red to it. Three separate telescopes all showed Mars white. What's up with that?
You are correct in that the power companies buy and sell electricity to various markets as demand varies. However, the problem in California was not that the California power companies were limited in the price they could charge due to deregulation. The problem was that they DID NOT PAY their bills to the Nevada power companies that sold them the power needed to meet the demands in California.
They did not pay the bills so to keep their "bottom line" looking good. They HAD the money to pay their bills, they just didn't pay them. So, the other power companies shut them off and wouldn't sell them any more. This created the artificial power crisis in California.
I appreciate the humor here, but really, perhaps Transmeta is looking to limit any liability issues here? Or perhaps Linus needs to time to fully audit the kernel to make sure the SCO claims are truly baseless?
I thought Daredevil was a fine movie. It was more of a film noire that comic book movie; with a more complicated character. But some prefer car chases, special effects and gratuitous sex to character development and plot. To each his own.
oh yes, and don't forget the AMERICAN SUPPLY HOUSE, the American Type Culture Collection of Manassas, Va., who sold Iraq the biological agents that may or may not currently exist in their arsenal, with US GOVERNMENT APPROVAL, as reported in the March 16 NYT.
Sorry to cloud this issue with facts. So, what exactly was sold to Iraq by this US FIRM? Well, bacillus anthracis (causes anthrax), clostridium perfringens, clostridium botulinum, brucella abortus, clostridium tetani, bacillus megaterium, bacillus subtilis, bacillus cereus, brucella melitensis, franciscella tularensis, corynebacterium diptheria, and bacillus licheniformis.
There's more than enough blame to go around here, without gang banging the French. Let's just leave that to dubya.
Not sure when you started using Netscape, but I was installing 1.0 on a floppy and paying, what, $40? for them. Something like that.
Netscape started giving them away in response to IE. Sorry for insisting on the facts.
The first reason is because PC magazine is absolutely windows-centric. That said, the main reason is because of Dvorak idiotic columns. I don't know why anyone would pay the least attention to his nonsensical articles.
Well, symbolic logic is certainly not needed, nor is your argument an example of any use of symbolic logic.
Your counter argument uses the same logical form as the previous example, so if *that* argument was invalid, then *your* argument is invalid.
To clarify things for readers who have not taken a logic (philosophy logic) course, symbolic logic, indeed, any intro logic course, describes a techinique for determining the validity or invalidity of an argument based on the *form* of the argument. The form of the argument is valid or invalid.
Now, you can certainly have a valid argument and still disagree as to whether or not the premises of the argument are reasonable or not. That is the case here. The argument is *identical*, but the premises are different.
This has nothing whatsoever to do with logic, symbolic or otherwise. So, please, if you disagree with the argument, fine. But please, don't "muddy the water" with illogical logic.
Slashdot Mirror
Does this affect the CURRENT version of Safari, v=1.1.1? I don't think so since I tried the http://alive.znep.com/~marcs/security/mozillacooki e/demo.html, link and it didn't send anything back.
The best part of that page was the poll: "Have you tried online dating?" That was the previous poll on Slashdot wasn't it?
Looking for an installation log so I can un-installation MacGimp. Nothing on the website. Does anyone know of one?
_You_ shouldn't.
Well, if you don't want the ads then purchase the distribution. The ads are only for the download version. Or, use Debian.
Wouldn't a "false negative" be a "positive"?
Glad I could cheer you up. Obviously I am aware that Mars has a red/orange/rust/whatever color to it. However, when viewing it and it appears white (apparently for the rod/cones reasons explained elsewhere), I was hoping for an explanation.
I believe you.
It really wasn't red. I should have asked about it then, but I didn't want to look like a moron. The others that went with me saw the same thing: white Mars. I thought maybe it was a filter on the telescope, but it couldn't have been on three different scopes.
Very weird.
I went down to look at Mars last Saturday night with the local astronomy group. But instead of seeing the Red Planet, it was the White Planet. Not even a smidge of red to it. Three separate telescopes all showed Mars white. What's up with that?
No, you would be thrown in the Gulag for 5 years by the State.
You are correct in that the power companies buy and sell electricity to various markets as demand varies. However, the problem in California was not that the California power companies were limited in the price they could charge due to deregulation. The problem was that they DID NOT PAY their bills to the Nevada power companies that sold them the power needed to meet the demands in California.
They did not pay the bills so to keep their "bottom line" looking good. They HAD the money to pay their bills, they just didn't pay them. So, the other power companies shut them off and wouldn't sell them any more. This created the artificial power crisis in California.
I appreciate the humor here, but really, perhaps Transmeta is looking to limit any liability issues here? Or perhaps Linus needs to time to fully audit the kernel to make sure the SCO claims are truly baseless?
I listen to mine all the time.
Sorry, the all the BSDs have already been down this path before and re-wrote any code that was in question. Next...
I thought Daredevil was a fine movie. It was more of a film noire that comic book movie; with a more complicated character. But some prefer car chases, special effects and gratuitous sex to character development and plot. To each his own.
oh yes, and don't forget the AMERICAN SUPPLY HOUSE, the American Type Culture Collection of Manassas, Va., who sold Iraq the biological agents that may or may not currently exist in their arsenal, with US GOVERNMENT APPROVAL, as reported in the March 16 NYT.
Sorry to cloud this issue with facts. So, what exactly was sold to Iraq by this US FIRM? Well, bacillus anthracis (causes anthrax), clostridium perfringens, clostridium botulinum, brucella abortus, clostridium tetani, bacillus megaterium, bacillus subtilis, bacillus cereus, brucella melitensis, franciscella tularensis, corynebacterium diptheria, and bacillus licheniformis.
There's more than enough blame to go around here, without gang banging the French. Let's just leave that to dubya.
Sounds to me that you need to find more interesting musicians to listen to.
Not sure when you started using Netscape, but I was installing 1.0 on a floppy and paying, what, $40? for them. Something like that. Netscape started giving them away in response to IE. Sorry for insisting on the facts.
Now they have a taste of what they did to Netscape by giving away IE. What goes around comes around.
The first reason is because PC magazine is absolutely windows-centric. That said, the main reason is because of Dvorak idiotic columns. I don't know why anyone would pay the least attention to his nonsensical articles.
People should focus on GNU/Linux when they are talking about "free software", and "who-cares" when they are talking about "open-source" software.
There are fundamental differences in the licensing between "free software" and "open source" software.
Maybe the guy should write an teaser with a lot more content. Based on what I read, I wouldn't pay $0.02 for it.
Well, symbolic logic is certainly not needed, nor is your argument an example of any use of symbolic logic.
Your counter argument uses the same logical form as the previous example, so if *that* argument was invalid, then *your* argument is invalid.
To clarify things for readers who have not taken a logic (philosophy logic) course, symbolic logic, indeed, any intro logic course, describes a techinique for determining the validity or invalidity of an argument based on the *form* of the argument. The form of the argument is valid or invalid.
Now, you can certainly have a valid argument and still disagree as to whether or not the premises of the argument are reasonable or not. That is the case here. The argument is *identical*, but the premises are different.
This has nothing whatsoever to do with logic, symbolic or otherwise. So, please, if you disagree with the argument, fine. But please, don't "muddy the water" with illogical logic.
heh. A former boss (stereo nut) once told me, "Just wait till you see the new units coming out a week after you die..."