Slashdot Mirror


Linus Moves To OSDL, Will Work On Kernel Full-Time

worldwideweber writes "With the announcement of the release of the 2.5.72 version of the Linux kernel came the news that Linus Torvalds will be leaving Transmeta for OSDL to work on the linux kernel full-time. The email calls this a leave of absence for about one year." Update: 06/17 17:19 GMT by T : As many readers have pointed out, the length of Linus' leave is not actually specified in this email.

400 comments

  1. Go, Linus, go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will this mean we get kernel releases daily? Like in the old times? Will we have 3.0.0 this xmas? I'm soo exited!!!!

    1. Re:Go, Linus, go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What is a kernel? And who is this Linus guy? WINDOWS XP Rocks!

    2. Re:Go, Linus, go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know the dirty kid from charly brown... or was that pig pen? oh never mind.

    3. Re:Go, Linus, go... by konquered · · Score: 1

      Your comment wasn't funny so I'm sorry, but you really are exited.

    4. Re:Go, Linus, go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it means we may get 2.6 this christmas : )

  2. Re:Early post! by Jellybob · · Score: 5, Funny

    My god.

    You actually *paid* for the privelidge of being the idiot who FPs an article?

    You really need to get out more (says the person who's been visiting every five minutes to see this story come out of the future).

  3. Kernel Mailing List Email by haydenth · · Score: 5, Informative

    From: Linus Torvalds
    To: Kernel Mailing List
    Subject: Linux v2.5.72 and a move to OSDL
    Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:35:09 -0700 (PDT)

    Ok, I waited too long for 2.5.71, so here's a more timely 2.5.72
    release.

    It's extra timely largely because the hash list poisoning found some
    problems in the RPC code, making NFS break. Trond found and fixed the
    breakage, so 2.5.72 should work fine in an NFS environment too. Let's
    see if the list poisoning shows any other dodgy list users. Knock wood.

    Also, Arnaldo has cleaned up a lot of the networking code to use the
    generic hash lists, instead of the old ad-hoc net-specific list walking
    code. That code has been tested pretty well, but please holler if you
    see something.

    Changelog for other details appended.

    The other big news - well, for me personally, anyway - is that I've
    decided to take a leave-of-absense after 6+ years at Transmeta to
    actually work full-time on the kernel.

    Transmeta has always been very good at letting me spend even an
    inordinate amount of time on Linux, but as a result I've been feeling a
    little guilty at just how little "real work" I got done lately. To fix
    that, I'll instead be working at OSDL, finally actually doing Linux as
    my main job.

    [ I do not expect a huge amount of change as a result, testament to just /how/ freely Transmeta has let me do Linux work. My email address will
    change to "torvalds@osdl.org" effective July 1st, but everybody is
    trying to make the transfer as smooth as possible, so we'll make sure
    that there will be sufficient address overlap etc to not cause any
    problems ]

    OSDL and Transmeta will have a joint official (read: "boring". You
    should have seen the bio - that didn't make it - that I suggested for
    myself for it ;) press-release about this tomorrow morning, but I just
    wanted to say thanks to Transmeta. It has been a special place to work
    for, and hello to OSDL that I hope will be the same.

    Snif. I'm actually all teary-eyed.

    Linus

    --
    - tom -
    1. Re:Kernel Mailing List Email by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's gonna really need a good spam filter now.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    2. Re:Kernel Mailing List Email by deunan_k · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter where Linus is attached to, as long as he can achieve job satisfaction. Though, I am surprised that he lasted 6 years at Transmeta.

      But best of luck to thee Linus, I hope by leaving Transmeta and going over to OSDL doesn't hurt your rice-bowl (as some asians like to say).

      Well, you need food to code, but I'm sure Linus is in good hands. Unlike a certain someone..

      Regards

      Will code for food

      --
      Will sys-admin for food
    3. Re:Kernel Mailing List Email by leshert · · Score: 1

      Given that one of the main developers of SpamAssassin is another TransMeta-ite (Dan Quinlan, my roommate from college), I'd suspect he has one.

    4. Re:Kernel Mailing List Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of me thinks this has something to do with the SCO/IBM/Linux BS.

      It's probably best for Transmeta to not have Linus on staff since SCO will most likely sue him which would put Transmeta in the legal hot seat as his employer.

    5. Re:Kernel Mailing List Email by bigpat · · Score: 1

      I assume Linus already has a good spam filter.

      But just in case, maybe someone should throw a "NOSPAM" in there or the like to slow down some of the bots.

    6. Re:Kernel Mailing List Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      leave of absense, he's not quiting completely.

    7. Re:Kernel Mailing List Email by deunan_k · · Score: 1

      Opps..

      My bad.. But, but, leave of absence is also equivalent to unpaid leave, right?

      Regards

      Will code for food

      --
      Will sys-admin for food
  4. Yes, but... by jkrise · · Score: 5, Funny

    Has he got his clearance certificate from SCO?
    Have the Chinese agreed to 'release' him from Transmeta?
    (this last one hurts a bit)...
    while extolling the Linux kernel, we used to say:
    Hey, MS spends $5bn in R&D for a lousy OS. A single chappie named Linus maintains the entire Linux kernel in his spare time! Can't say that any more...

    Anyways, all the best!

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Yes, but... by KingDaveRa · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, MS spends $5bn in R&D for a lousy OS. A single chappie named Linus maintains the entire Linux kernel in his spare time! Can't say that any more... Well, now he has all the spare time in the world. Maybe we should get him a part time job, cleaning or something, then he's still not working on the kernel fulltime?

    2. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, MS spends $5bn in R&D for a lousy OS. A single chappie named Linus maintains the entire Linux kernel in his spare time! Can't say that any more...

      Nor could you say that linux was a stable OS. Stable, in the sense of Solaris or bsd, that is.

    3. Re:Yes, but... by rampant+mac · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Maybe we should get him a part time job"

      McDonald's is always hiring.

      I mean, if this kid can get a job there, Linus might have a shot...

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    4. Re:Yes, but... by covenant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a great job application - too bad it's not a real one...

      http://www.snopes.com/humor/letters/mcdonald.htm

    5. Re:Yes, but... by ajs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hey, MS spends $5bn in R&D for a lousy OS. A single chappie named Linus maintains the entire Linux kernel in his spare time! Can't say that any more...

      On the other hand, the Linux kernel supports many, many more platforms than Windows, has hundreds of features that Windows does not and handles hundreds of devices, filesystems, network topologies and tools that Windows has never added or given up on for lack of resources.

      That the relatively small number of people maintaining Linux can do so without having to get rid of large portions of the OS is actually rather staggering. Just look at how hard it is for the BSD folks. They do a good job, and I don't belittle them at all. But, it takes a long time to add new features, and they are now in a perpetual mode of catch-up except in a few key areas that each of the BSDs focuses on and manages well.

      Linus has managed Linux VERY well, and while many of his choices were controvercial, the end result has always been a platform that held together and held developers longer than any other project I've ever seen (on average, certainly some other projects like sendmail or bind have had key developers much longer).

      Kudos to Linus and may Linux live long and prosper.

    6. Re:Yes, but... by minus9 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Nor could you say that linux was a stable OS. Stable, in the sense of Solaris or bsd, that is.

      Well it seems fairly stable.

      [root@www /root]# w
      2:43pm up 481 days, 22:46, 1 user, load average: 0.35, 0.34, 0.30
      [root@www /root]# uname -a
      Linux www 2.2.14-5.0smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 21:01:40 EST 2000 i686 unknown


    7. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah.. if you're using an ancient, but stable, kernel. Try using a kernel that actually supports modern hardware. I have had 2.4.20 completely freeze on me, couldn't even ssh in to it.

    8. Re:Yes, but... by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The actual number of people maintaining the NT Kernel is comparable. The Kernel perf team (with whom I worked) is about 3 people. That total team responsible for the kernel is maybe 50 people -- similar #s for SQL Server.

      There are hordes of "evangelists" and "managers" surrounding the core team. But within the small core group, the personalities and philosphies of the NT team and the Linux folks are remarkably similar, with the minor exception that neither understands why the hell the other exists!

    9. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the 0(1) scheduler?

    10. Re:Yes, but... by LunaticLeo · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are making a good point, but I think I can name three:
      [ Note: I am only comparing the MS Product WinXP or Windows Server 2003. If that is to restrictive I imagine you'll correct me. Also I am only thinking about kernel level features.]

      - Very robust full featured statefull packet munging, filtering, notifiying thing (aka firewall).

      - IPv6

      - Support for 64bit address spaces and CPUs. (Where is the ia64 or x86-64 Windows on this?)

      - NUMA (Does some version of Windows support Non-Unified Memory arch, may be something from Wang or some other dinosaur company).

      - I am sure there are some esoteric network protocols linux supports natively. But I am not so impressed by that.

      - Ether-switching (aka bridging; plus some stateful inspection).

      This is from the top of my head. NFS is probably another, but MS has that LanManager file system, CIFS.

      --
      -- I am not a fanatic, I am a true believer.
    11. Re:Yes, but... by slick_rick · · Score: 4, Informative

      In no particular order...
      1 netfilter (firewalling)
      2 hotloading/unloading device drivers
      3 software raid

      1. I know windows has some limited firewalling, but it is really a joke compared to iptables. SNAT/DNAT/TOS/Full customizable logging/Packet Mangling/ARP/TTL, I could go on. Many many commercial firewalls are based on linux, just look around.

      2. I still have a windows box for my wife/kids. I used to have a scanner hooked up to it via an Adaptec 2904 SCSI adapter. Problem is windows would only "scan the bus" on boot, so if it wasn't turned on when I booted the machine (had to turn scanner off when not in use as the lamp stayed on all the time) I had to reboot windows.
      Moved it to my Linux machine, now I just rmmod aic7xxx then modprobe aic7xxx every time I want the scanner. I even wrote a tiny little shell script and put an icon on the desktop so my wife/kids can do it.

      #3 is a life saver to. At work we have a Linux backup server that has four 60 gig IDE hard drives in a raid5. The whole thing cost us less then $700 2 years ago for 180 gigs of file server/backup space. We are upgrading the drives to 120 gigs soon to double our space. Nothing like having 60 days of full backups a click away.

      I could actually go on and on and on. It is astonishing how many usefull features are in the Linux kernel (not to mention the user-space stuff). I converted from windows three years ago now and I can't ever imagine going back. Windows is just so... limited.

      --
      apt-get install redhat please god - Me (take it easy, I love Debian)
    12. Re:Yes, but... by JonK · · Score: 3, Informative
      - IPv6

      Available in Windows

      - Support for 64bit address spaces and CPUs. (Where is the ia64 or x86-64 Windows on this?)

      Available in Windows - Itanic XP was available in a limited release and 64-bit 2003 Server can be bought pretty much off-the-shelf

      - NUMA (Does some version of Windows support Non-Unified Memory arch, may be something from Wang or some other dinosaur company).

      Available in Windows. From your comments, you appear unclear as to what NUMA is - it's not "something from Wang or some other dinosaur company", it's a way of architecting non-symmetrical MP hardware. Go read Greg Pfister's "In Search of Clusters", then go and discover how some Big Computers work - try Sequent (now part of IBM), Cray, SGI and Sun for details

      - I am sure there are some esoteric network protocols linux supports natively. But I am not so impressed by that.

      Yeah, Windows has those too...

      Now, does Linux support hot-swap RAM? Hot-swap PCI cards? Useable async I/O, even (and no select(3) doesn't count...)? Does it even have a kernel debugger? :-)

      --
      Cheers

      Jon
    13. Re:Yes, but... by JonK · · Score: 2, Interesting
      2 hotloading/unloading device drivers

      Have you tried a version of Windows post 3.1/NT4? Not only does the plug'n'play work automagically *without* the need to modprobe (assuming the hardware supports it), but you've also got a better than even chance that any hardware you go to the shop and buy will Just Work

      3 software raid

      Been in NT since at least 3.5 - IIRC, before Linux got it (IIRC NT3.5 was released in 1994, which puts us at about kernel 1.0... anyone care to correct me here)

      --
      Cheers

      Jon
    14. Re:Yes, but... by LunaticLeo · · Score: 1

      WooHoo!!! I got one (firewall stuff).

      I am not a windows guy. Went from DRDOS to OS/2 to Linux. Not really a religious thing. So I was unaware of some of the newer things in Windows.

      "From your comments, you appear unclear as to what NUMA is", ummm yeah, nooo, I sorta do. Thanks for the condescension though. I was referring to the dinosaur companies that make MS Windows NUMA machines. I was unsure whether that was a product by MS or an enhanced version of Windows by the computer manufacturer.

      FYI, NUMA is a controversial implementation for "Big Computers". Don't get stuck on it. I think it is for lazy programmers who don't want to use explicit message passing (as opposed to than implicit in NUMA). Also, NUMA is for hardware manufacturers who want to sell big ticket items. Not to be one of these linux-beowulf-wennies, but cheap-"er" hardware with high bandwidth low-latency interconnects is IMHO a better buy.

      hot-swap RAM? No I don't think so. What is the PC standard for hot-swaping RAM. You have to drain the ram and reprogram the memory controller to redirect bus requests for non-relocatable memory locations to other RAM. What Wintel box has a reprogrammable memory controler? This sounds not like a MS feature, but rather a hardware manufacturer's code. Maybe MS has hook for it though.

      hot-swap PCI? Yes.

      usable asyc I/O? (one of my beefs to) aio comming in 2.6 to a kernel near you. I am more impressed with FreeBSDs kqueue api. BTW, who the fuck uses select(2)? Even linux implements sys_select as a wrapper around do_poll. Point taken though.

      kernel debugger? Yes, but as a patch, Linus has issues with debuggers as crutches, and interfering with code paths, yada yada yada.

      --
      -- I am not a fanatic, I am a true believer.
    15. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My security machine is running 2.4.something, using some custom software I've been working on in my spare time to watch the street in front of my house, as well as the street to the side (yeah two cameras, two capture cards.) It's been running since I installed the capture cards, which is going on a year and a month.

      It's not like it's an idling machine.

      Perhaps your hardware is bad--or you're too stupid for words?

    16. Re:Yes, but... by ccp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Saying that he managed VERY well is the understatement of the century.
      I mean, the way this guy handles politics is AMAZING.
      I have a hunch that, long after the kernel is forgotten, Linus ( and Linux ) will be case studies in administration courses.

      He's THAT good.

      Cheers,

    17. Re:Yes, but... by JahToasted · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well I happen to use Windows 2000 (to play games mostly) and I can tell you fo a fact that when you install ANY device driver it requires a reboot. I hooked up an external modem and I had to reboot. I hooked up a USB game pad... had to reboot.

      So please explain to me what you mean by hotloading a device driver. Do you mean that you don't have to completely turn the machine off, only reboot? Or maybe you mean it has the capability but it just isn't used? Either way it just doesn't compare with linux where you only need to reboot when you change kernels.

    18. Re:Yes, but... by JonK · · Score: 1
      Wasn't meant to be condescending: apologies if it came over that way...

      AIUI, the only people making big Wintel boxes (bit enough to need a NUMA architecture) are Fujitsu, NEC, HPaq, IBM and Unisys - I don't think Wang even exist any more. And NUMA has it's uses: it gives you *many* of the upsides of SMP (ease of development, with a little thought required about your data access patterns) and a lot less pain than breaking your algorithm down into explicitly parallelisable parts, which clusters or vector machines will always require. The NUMA specifications in Windows require 1:3 near:far access timings, which is a hell of a lot better than any of the cheap interconnect technologies, and things like Giganet and Myrinet are eye-wateringly expensive.

      It's notable that no-one's running big RDBMSes (big analytics and the like) on Beowolfs - it's just the Wrong Technology for it. Message-passing ain't always the right answer. Oh, and where did you get the "NUMA is implicit message passing" idea from - it needn't be implemented like that and often isn't - there are plenty of shared-memory implementations out there, largely because SMP code can be moved onto shared-memory ccNUMA with very little effort. Migrating a pre-existing shared-memory-SMP application to a message-passing architecture, on the other hand, is heavy juju and doesn't win you much until remote latency >> local latency - 3:1 ain't that

      Oh, and my bad - there's no *true* hotswap. Instead you have to use a mirroring memory controller, then you can swap bad sticks out and the mirror'll rebuild. Microsoft *have* got hooks for this and memory hot-add in the OS, though - and if you get servers from the likes of Stratus and Marathon with memory controllers that handle it then you're golden.

      The kernel debugger comment was a bit of a (weak) attempt at a joke... though I might find it rather more annoying if I wrote drivers more frequently than once in a blue moon. Anyway, DbgPrint() should be enough for anyone.

      --
      Cheers

      Jon
    19. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moved it to my Linux machine, now I just rmmod aic7xxx then modprobe aic7xxx every time I want the scanner. I even wrote a tiny little shell script
      "Linux is ready for grandma's desktop!" NOT.
    20. Re:Yes, but... by JonK · · Score: 1
      Have a word with the people who wrote the drivers for your devices - they're coding to some godawful old model there, because ever since WDM1.0 (Win98) the driver stack's supported dynamic configuration. This is a gross oversimplification, but it'll do as a first cut:

      • when you plug a USB device (essentially a serial device) into the USB bus (which is a PnP bus - the same holds true for USB2, FireWire, PCMCIA and any upcoming PnP busses), the function driver gets a hotplug notification telling it its children have changed. It then notifies the PnP manager in turn that *it's* children have changed and the PnP manager in return queries for the list of devices on the bus

      • once the PnP manager's determined that there's a new device on the bus, it creates a devnode in the device tree - at the moment, the only driver for this devnode is the USB hub driver, plus any bus filter drivers (which we'll ignore for the sake of this discussion). The PnP manager then interrogates the device to find out what it is, and queries the registry to see if there's a driver been installed previously

      • if necessary, the PnP manager writes a block of device properties to the registry. It then notifies the usermode PnP manager, which tries to locate the function driver and any filter drivers for the device. Once it's located them (which may require them being copied from the installation disk/CD/whatever), the user-mode PnP manager calls back to the kernel PnP manager, telling it to add device drivers, which in turn start the device

      Note that with properly implemented drivers (i.e. ones which work as part of the WDM PnP stack rather than some horrendously arcane junk), *no* reboot is required. As a datapoint, none of the devices I've got floating around on my desk at the moment require a reboot on plugging in - the only one I've come across recently was a Nikon LS-30 negative scanner which appeared to have a SCSI implementation from about 1989 (ASPI in full effect...)

      So why doesn't it work for you? Well, either a) the USB hub controller silicon on your PC's horrendously horked (possible if it's *very* old - think about 1995-1996, when USB chipsets were still a bit up in the air) or you're running hardware whose vendors haven't bothered learning how to write drivers... after all, did you ever see a laptop user reboot to swap PCMCIA cards? No comfort, I know, but I can assure you that it works for most of the Rest of Us :-)

      --
      Cheers

      Jon
    21. Re:Yes, but... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Nah, there are issues with 2.4.20 for some people. I've seen it on one of my systems, with the same setup software-wise. I slapped on 2.4.19 and everything was hunky-dory.

      That's awesome, 2 capture cards dumping data down to disk... I've been wanting to do that for a while now for my house.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    22. Re:Yes, but... by Zorikin · · Score: 4, Informative

      > I have had 2.4.20 completely freeze on me, couldn't even ssh in to it.

      There are interrupt sharing issues with certain hardware in 2.4.20. I was able to get around it by swapping pci cards around. 2.4.21 was recently released and may even have a real fix. I haven't read the changelogs, let alone returned my hardware to its original configuration to check.

      Contrast this to XP, which, with ACPI enabled, puts ALL devices on the same interrupt.

    23. Re:Yes, but... by 2short · · Score: 1

      Thanks for telling me that for a fact. Otherwise I would have gone with my own experience: I plug in a new periferal, and start using it. Heck, lets try an experiment, what can I plug in...
      Looks like all I've got handy is the (USB) keyboard from my Mac. That's a little weird, but what the hell...
      OK, I stuck the USB keyboard plug in my XP box (despite already having a satndard PS2 type keyboard plugged in. A little box popped up briefly telling me I now had an "Apple Human Interface Device" attached (got to love that Apple market speak), and went away on its own. (Why does it even pop up? I guess people don't really believe in "just works" otherwise.)
      Anyway, it worked just fine, which I can "tell you for a fact" because I'm typing this sentence with my left hand on the Mac keyboard and my right on the regular keyboard. Added to a cd burner, a printer, and (briefly) a stylus/tablet, my experience with Windows 2000/XP is now 4 for 4 on plug-it-in-and-start-using-it. What are you doing wrong?

    24. Re:Yes, but... by JahToasted · · Score: 1
      You could be right... Windows just seems to hate me. I remember people saying how stable XP was. Then I was at someone's office and need to copy a file to a floppy (can't remember why). first time using XP crash within one minute. Reboot. crashed 5 minutes later.

      I do admit that USB is at least a little better, but in my experience, most devices, if installed as per the manufacturers instructions require a reboot. Maybe the scanner has extra software it installs that it needs. Maybe the control pad wants to put a little applet in the tray. These things require reboot. Yeah maybe the driver loads fine, but at the end of the install I still have to reboot. So it doesn't "just work".

      And even with USB I still have some problems where devices stop working and unplugging and plugging back in doesn't fix it. So reboot again.

      Note this is on a fully patched Windows 2000. With the patch-reboots, new-device-reboots, and the good ole BSOD-reboot, I guess I should be used to it, huh?

      Or maybe I should just drop some cash on wineX.

    25. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Landy Wang is one them.
      Hey landy, home come the kernel is such a kludge?
      Had to buy Cutler from DEC cause MS barely knew how to get it into protected mode.
      10 years later it still blue screens.
      hmmm

    26. Re:Yes, but... by ajs · · Score: 1

      I think you missed something. I wasn't arguing the point you argued against. I was in fact making the same point you did.

    27. Re:Yes, but... by nathanh · · Score: 1
      Now, does Linux support hot-swap RAM?

      Yes.

      Hot-swap PCI cards?

      Yes.

      Useable async I/O,

      Yes.

      Does it even have a kernel debugger? :-)

      Yes.

    28. Re:Yes, but... by ajs · · Score: 1
      Heh, ok, I missed this comment because it was modded down. I think it's a fair question.
      "hundreds of features that Windows does not"

      Huh? Name three.

      Ok, let's give that a go:
      1. ReiserFS/EXT3/JFS options for journaling filesystems. Don't think you need all of those? Fine. Still that kind of flexibility is high on my list of features that I choose Linux for.
      2. Serial or printer (via parallel) console and text-based display management in general.
      3. Support for MCA (dropped by Windows long ago, still valuable to Linux in older environments)
      4. TUX
      5. Packet tagging, logging, filtering and routing based on stateful inspection and special-case understanding of high-level protocols such as FTP.
      6. Multi-user display management (virtual console)
      7. Network-based loopback device access.
      8. Core support for arbitrary executables (e.g. Java) without needing an end-user file-association system.
      9. Channel bonding
      10. Robust POSIX support (which Windows claims, but does not deliver)
      But those are all red-herrings. The most important features of the Linux Kernel that Windows doesn't have are the hundreds of products that are supported, which Windows only has support for by virtue of a hardware manufacturer maintaining them.

      This leaves Windows a house of cards that cannot withstand a major shift in market conditions. That is to say: if MacOS or Linux became the primary platform for some type of computing, hardware vendors in that arena might stop sending Microsoft drivers for their hardware!

      Linux has always been the underdog that had to roll its own support, almost always without support from hardware vendors, for everything from Don Becker's Ethernet drivers to the SCSI controlers that were supported nearly from day one to the video devices that are supported today.

      If vendors begin to see a shift in the market, Windows engineers may end up having to either de-support major manufacturers or grow their in-house staff monsterously to begin maintaining their own versions of these drivers! That's where Linux's features are the glowing best-choice for any sort of critical function.

      For home and desktop use, there's no urgent need to be able to support new hardware other than the sorts that will likely be in Windows camp for at least another 5 years or so.

    29. Re:Yes, but... by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      I've had 2.4.18-17.7.x running for 202 days now. Is that "modern" enough for you?

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    30. Re:Yes, but... by Lost+Race · · Score: 1
      [iopen:root~] uptime
      7:50pm up 195 days, 3:27, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
      [iopen:root~] uname -a
      Linux iopen 2.2.18 #6 Sat Jan 27 23:17:48 PST 2001 i586 unknown

      What, only 195 days? No, it's actually 195 days since the uptime counter rolled over from 497 to 0. That's 692 days of continuous uptime. The machine is a Netpliance I-Opener converted to a diskless X terminal. I run Netscape among other things on it every day.

    31. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mp3.com runs Apache on Redhat Linux and is rock-solid stable. They are one of the most heavily used sites on the web. They send TREMENDOUS amounts of email as well.

      When Rollingstone.com was on windows it was shakey...

    32. Re:Yes, but... by clockwise_music · · Score: 1


      >so if it wasn't turned on when I booted the machine (had to turn scanner off when not in use
      >as the lamp stayed on all the time) I had to reboot windows.

      I can see how difficult it must be to remember, "Turn on scanner, turn on computer". And then, "Shut down computer, turn off scanner".

      >Moved it to my Linux machine, now I just rmmod aic7xxx then modprobe aic7xxx every time I want the scanner. I even wrote a tiny little shell script and put an icon on the desktop so my wife/kids can do it.

      Wow, you installed a new OS, wrote some arcane code just so you wouldn't have to remember to turn on your scanner? Congratulations.

    33. Re:Yes, but... by rifter · · Score: 1

      That's because you already have the device driver installed for that device. But most USB devices require the driver to be installed beforehand on Windows (or Macintosh for that matter) and the driver installers always require a reboot. They even come with big red stickers that say DO NOT PLUG IN THIS DEVICE BEFORE INSTALLING THE DRIVER! Devices which have fit this description for me include: USB Epson Printers, USB Logitech trackballs, USB Epson Scanners, USB Intel Webcams. This was on Windows 2000, Mac OS X, and Windows 98.

      Hell, I have had Windows 2000 require a reboot to change the bleeding IP address on a NIC. It does not seem to ask for this consistently though as NT used to. On Linux, as long as I have the right hooks compiled into my kernel beforehand (such as USB support for USB devices) I can load a module. Otherwise I have to recompile my kernel and reboot Linux too.

      I have never installed a driver on Windows that did not require a reboot. I have rarely installed a program on Windows that did not require a reboot. Windows 2000 reduced reboot situations to some degree, but there are still far more than necessary. I now run Linux on my home systems fairly exclusively, but I support Windows at work in addition to a number of unices and have used Windows since 3.0 came out.

      Maybe XP has more common USB drivers loaded. Maybe it even really doesn't require reboots if you install drivers. But as the other MS apologist in this thread said they have been claiming this since 98 and it has always been a lie, at least for me.

    34. Re:Yes, but... by styrotech · · Score: 1

      Hell, I have had Windows 2000 require a reboot to change the bleeding IP address on a NIC. It does not seem to ask for this consistently though as NT used to.

      I'm not 100% sure, but in my experience with W2K you can change the IP address fine, but change the DNS settings and it's reboot time.

      Waay better than NT4 was, but I still prefer Linux :)

    35. Re:Yes, but... by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      But within the small core group, the personalities and philosphies of the NT team and the Linux folks are remarkably similar,

      Sorry, but I call bullshit. If the NT team has a similar philosophy as the Linux people, why the hell aren't they releasing their work as open source? Is it because Microsoft won't let them, or because their philosophy is actually not comparable to that of the Linux team's?

    36. Re:Yes, but... by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      There's no accounting for moronic installer writers. The only things that should require a reboot are replacement or removal of open files (including executable files and DLLs that are loaded into a process). This is because Windows file-system semantics don't support unlinking without immediate deletion.

    37. Re:Yes, but... by slick_rick · · Score: 1
      Wow, you installed a new OS, wrote some arcane code just so you wouldn't have to remember to turn on your scanner? Congratulations.


      I can't believe I'm biting on such an obvious troll, but here it goes...

      No, I wrote a tiny shell script (a lot like a batch file for those stuck in the windows world) that automates the re-loading of the driver. I did this so I wouldn't have to reboot the computer just to use the scanner. The computer goes down occasionally when I go on vacation or install new PCI card or a new kernel, but I have no urge to reboot it every time I need the scanner.
      --
      apt-get install redhat please god - Me (take it easy, I love Debian)
    38. Re:Yes, but... by rifter · · Score: 1

      It's not completely the bad fs design. I think more of it has to do with sloppy coding. Firstly, far too many things get opened for write in windows land when they should be only opened for reading. System libraries in particular come to mind. In most systems, opening a file for writing locks the file. Then there is the matter of not being able to tell what is accessing a particular file, or to tell it to "stop that now so I can change the file then you read it again." This is a pretty common operation on Unix. I know it is possible on Windows because I have supported applications that did just that (replaced library, config, and executable files on the fly then restarted applications or told them to read again) which worked on a variety of platforms including windows. If it were easier to tell what is running and what is reading what (hell, windows does not even necessarily give you the real process table!) this would be possible. Given such uncertainties, it is easier to reboot and windows users have gotten used to it. They don't realize this is an abnormality of their platform.

    39. Re:Yes, but... by 2short · · Score: 1

      Well, YMMV I guess. I certainly got plenty of crashes and reboots pre-Win2K, but I spent a couple years on Win2K, and now ~6 months on XP, and didn't crash once. Some (but not most) patches require a reboot. I don't recall adding devices under Win2K, and under XP I've only added USB devices, but every one of them has just popped up a "New hardware found" message and let me start using it.
      I'm no great fan of MS, but it always bugs me when people say Windows crashes constantly. It just doesn't jibe with my experience, or that of others one wants to convince MS sucks, so we ignore the person. MS does suck. But they suck because of their business practices, not their tech, which pretty well covers the range from the freaking awesome (VisualStudio), through the pretty good (XP, Excel), and on down to poor and freaking braindead (I don't need to provide examples here, do I?)

    40. Re:Yes, but... by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1
      Firstly, far too many things get opened for write in windows land when they should be only opened for reading. System libraries in particular come to mind. In most systems, opening a file for writing locks the file.

      No, you don't understand what's going on. If an executable file is loaded into a process, it's demand-paged i.e. the code only gets copied into physical memory as necessary, so it mustn't be overwritten. The same is true in Unix - this is what the ETXTBSY error code is for.

      Then there is the matter of not being able to tell what is accessing a particular file, or to tell it to "stop that now so I can change the file then you read it again." This is a pretty common operation on Unix.

      No it isn't. Normally you use link and unlink to install a replacement. A good installation system or distribution can arrange to signal or restart relevant processes using the appropriate protocol, but there is no general way to do this.

      I know it is possible on Windows because I have supported applications that did just that (replaced library, config, and executable files on the fly then restarted applications or told them to read again) which worked on a variety of platforms including windows.

      That's easy to do when you know which applications use the files. For shared files that's not necessarily the case.

      If it were easier to tell what is running and what is reading what (hell, windows does not even necessarily give you the real process table!) this would be possible.

      The pathetic Task Manager that comes with Windows 9x doesn't show much, but the process and thread lists are certainly readable (though with different APIs under 9x and NT).

      Given such uncertainties, it is easier to reboot and windows users have gotten used to it.

      The key difference is the inability to unlink a file that's in use, because that would delete it.

    41. Re:Yes, but... by rifter · · Score: 1

      The pathetic Task Manager that comes with Windows 9x doesn't show much, but the process and thread lists are certainly readable (though with different APIs under 9x and NT).

      You are correct, but I have actually been able to find many programs which will not show up in NT/Win2k process viewer, but are certainly running. Sometimes they show up in the applications tab and not in processes, sometimes in neither. But another utility that looks at the nt process table was sometimes able to show them. I am not sure exactly what causes this phenomenon, and must plead insufficient knowlege of NT internals. I do know, however that viruses take advantage of this deficiency in Windows.

      I have never seen a program run on unix that ps did not show. Also, whereas zombies are sometimes apparently unkillable in some unixes (that is nasty crap! there should *NOT* be unkillable processes IMHO) in Windows it is pretty normal to have a number of processes running which Windows will simply not allow Administrator to kill, with a message akin to "No, I am not going to let you go there today." This is part of the bad design philosophy, IMHO in Windows. Hide things from the user (even Administrator), don't let them do stuff if the OS does not feel like it today.

      I also found it is pretty trivial to create undeletable files on Win2k. For some reason some applications are able to save files with names that are too long for the command line and gui tools fo rmanipulating files to process. YOu cannot rename them, mv them, copy them, or anything. They will say there forever until you reformat the drive. Sloppy coding without thinking strikes again. If they had used the same code to check filenames when manipulating them in every application including the OS tools, this would be impossible. Apparently they don't.

    42. Re:Yes, but... by scorp888 · · Score: 1

      In no particular order...
      1 netfilter (firewalling)
      2 hotloading/unloading device drivers
      3 software raid

      1/ Windows does this.
      2/ Windows does this with scsi/usb/firewire
      3/ Windows does this.

      Next.

  5. Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Trying not to be overly cynical here is a bit difficult. When Transmeta needed publicity they hired Linus which gave them un-rivaled, and often uncritical, coverage in the US which certainly will have helped in fund-raising. The initial visions and hype have not lived up to their expectations, and especially in the low power end of the market where ARM processors continue to dominate.

    Now that Transmeta are trying to move into a more corporate sphere there is less demand for a posterboy like Linus.

    Its great that Linus is dedicated to the Linux kernel full time, but how much of this is leaving through dedication (for a year) and how much is a result of disappointment at Transmeta not living up to its hype.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was looking at transmeta based notebooks, couldn't seem to find one that shipped without windowsXP. Hands up anybody who thinks this strange.

    2. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by hatrisc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      hands up! however, i have a transmeta based notebook and can't say anything bad about it (other than XP being there, which i'm required to keep...). with two full batterys i get about 10 hours of juice, which is just awesome. and as far as processing power, how much do you really need on a laptop? most of the time you're just surfing the web and writing so it's not that important to have a render-farm of processing power.

      --
      I write code.
    3. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've been critical of Transmeta for their hype-building. But one should give them credit for attempting a very tough feat: trying to build an x86 compatible CPU that is faster than both Intel and AMD. This is *not* easy. Particularly since they came on the scene right in the middle of particularly fierce AMD/Intel performance competition. They failed, so they repurposed their design for small power requirements, which is respectable and a reasonable attempt to recover the original investment. And now they find that beating ARM isn't that easy either, eh? Quelle surprise.

    4. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by geesus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you SEEN linus? If hes a posterboy then I have a shoe in at beauty contests ;)

      --
      Gnome wasnt built in a day.
    5. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by molnarcs · · Score: 5, Informative
      Wrong!!! Transmeta hiring Linus was not merely for publicity. They needed his coding expertise. Unless, of course, you say that he was party to this, just to justify your speculation - after he was allowed to speak about what Transmeta is doing (it was secret for years) he spoke in superlative terms about the innovation and excitement involved in creating the code-morphing technology that Transmeta implemented in their Crusoe chips.
      As Torvalds tells it, "The first day ... when they were giving me a feel for what went on at Transmeta. I went back to the hotel that evening and I thought, "These people are CRAZY!" This was more than three years ago, when Transmeta had not a single chip. The simulations ran at GLACIAL speed. Still, The next day, I basically decided that, if I am to go to work for a company, I want to go to work for a company that does something fun - something interesting. And the first, initial reaction that, 'These people are crazy!' is a positive reaction in that sense." So why choose a chip company, when every Linux start-up in the world was after him? Torvalds explains, "I've obviously gotten a lot of job offers from Linux companies, but I didn't want to polarize the Linux market. I'm really happy being an engineer at a company that is very interested in Linux, but is not seen as a Linux company. We're a chip company where Linux is seen as part of a much larger strategy - and that's something I find very comfortable. Besides, Transmeta has been able to give me opportunities that I wouldn't otherwise have had. It's also a very cool vehicle for doing debugging, when you control the whole chip!" And Torvalds' skill as a debugger is legendary around Transmeta. "He's a god," says Dave Taylor, a co-developer of the original Quake who gave up being CEO of his own company to work for Transmeta. "He can look at a Linux display and somehow predict, just from the way it misbehaves, exactly where, in 100,000 lines of code, the problem is. And, nine times out of 10, he's right."
      Read the rest here. Also, this might also be of interest. So no, he was not just a posterboy there.
    6. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granted, he expanded significantly over the last couple of years but so did the kernel source too!

    7. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by samhalliday · · Score: 4, Interesting
      why bother with putting GNU/Linux on a laptop? i mean, we are all so fussy over which version of what-not we want anyway, that we'd just end up cfdisking it anyway... :-/

      the best you can ask for with a laptop is a ditributor who is prepared to sell it OS free, and knock a few £ (or $) off the asking price because of that.

    8. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by minus9 · · Score: 1

      A posterboy in comparison to RMS and ESR. You could use a picture of them to keep your kids away from the fire.

    9. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by Horny+Smurf · · Score: 5, Informative
      except that they weren't "trying to build an x86 compatible CPU that is faster than both Intel and AMD" -- they were trying to build a low-power x86 compatible chip.


      Unfortunately, the CPU isn't the biggest power hog in a notebook, and their cost/power/speed ratio wasn't much better than slowed down pentiums.


      I'm actually very excited by their technology. But the only Crusoe laptops I've seen for sale have had tiny screens and huge price tags. It would be less expensive to buy an iBook/PowerBook and virtual PC than most Crusoe laptops.

    10. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The simulations ran at GLACIAL speed.

      Some things never change.

    11. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      I've tried Linux on notebooks a few times and it never really works out well, even ones that they claim are supported. Windows just works better. Linux is for servers not desktops.


      Notebook environments are rough. The amount of specialized hardware can offer quite a challenge to a Linux install. Some notebooks are easier than others - sometimes its a fairly straight-forward install while other times I've had to go through several distros to find one that'll handle that particular notebook somewhat gracefully. And even then, I've found myself doing a bit more than average tweaking to get everything working just right (and even then, there can be an occasional trade-off). One caveat - I haven't tried any of the very latest (ie: RedHat 9) distros on a notebook.

      Having said all that - I'm glad that I can have Linux toated around with me. Its definately my preferred desktop. And I find myself missing features found in Linux environments when on a Windows-only machine at work.

      Windows does tend to work better if the laptop manufactorer supports it (I've been bitten by laptops w/ support only for WinME or WinXP - I prefer Win2k). Its a shame more support isn't out there for Linux.

      Like a lot of technology, Linux works fine on the desktop if you're aware of the caveats (and that goes for any environment - Windows included).

      Of course, it will be years before I'm not also lugging around Windows. I've got to be able to support that environment and that means having Windows available. I need to get some more VMWare licenses.
    12. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by kurosawdust · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey it could be worse - ESR looks like he was born when God was going through his "cubist" phase.

    13. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by dasunt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The nice thing about Linux/BSD (compared to Windows) is that for older laptops, Linux gets you more bang for the buck.

      I'm not sure what your typical laptop usage is for, but I tend to use my laptop for email, news, coding and light web browsing.

      Either I'm stuck with older windows OSes and unpatched software, or I can throw in a debian cd, install only what I need, and have a fast enough system for 90% of what I do.

    14. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by GenSolo · · Score: 1

      My notebook works fine with Linux. I put in my Slackware 9 install CD, it did it's thing, I booted up and it Just Worked. The only thing I had to configure by hand was my 802.11b card, and that was just to tell it the WEP key. Granted, some of the more advanced things like CD burning needed some work, but everything I use my laptop for on a daily basis worked perfectly. I can't say the same for a Windows XP reintall on the same computer.

    15. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by mj01nir · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, especially when they came out with Midori and were touting embedded devices. Sadly, Midori hasn't been updated in almost two years. I still run it on my Compaq IA-1 and it does what I need it to do, but it would be nice to see some new features / updated packages.

      --
      the no .sig .sig
    16. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by kvman · · Score: 1

      Even then, most of the transmeta based notebooks I have seen run Linux now!

    17. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that there is no "god" makes that very sad.

    18. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It would be less expensive to buy an iBook/PowerBook and virtual PC than most Crusoe laptops."

      what? You mean $1500 laptops that weigh 2-3 lbs with a battery life of 6 hours is a worse deal than a G3 iBook running virtual PC? i thinkith not.

      do your research before blabbing.

    19. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Did you even read the post? He said he couldn't find one WITHOUT WinXP, not that he couldn't find one with his favorite distro. I think that's strange, also, since Transmeta actually puts out it's own distro (Midori).

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    20. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As regards their original plan, at this point all we can do is speculate... it's not like anyone outside the company has accurate information, given how their publicity plan before release was to keep silent and hire Linus for guaranteed publicity. All they would tell was that they were onto something revolutionary... but the bet of several people who know both their computer architecture and who've followed David Ditzel's earlier projects is that Transmeta really started out to beat Intel in their own game.

      When Ditzel was gathering venture capital in the early to mid-1990's it was common wisdom that a CISC instruction set would keep Intel performance down (AMD was not a serious performance contender), and VLIW was seen as the best legacy-free way to beat the instruction-level parallelism bottleneck, which the RISC people were trying to solve by unproven and hideously complicated out-of-order processing technology. On top of that, several research projects had demonstrated that dynamic binary recompilation could reach very good performance (I think Ditzel was involved in one of those projects). To sum up, at the time the Transmeta approach, dubbed "Code Morphing" by their marketeers, would have seemed an ingenious way to beat the known performance bottlenecks for the foreseeable future. (At the time, the Itanic appeared a smart project for mostly the same reasons... but that's another story.)

      What happened was that Intel (and later AMD) demonstrated that given enough engineer time, the x86 instruction set didn't cause that large slow down, and that the huge sums the x86 producers could spend on process technology made them winners. Out-of-order technology exceeded all expectations, while VLIW turned out not to be so easy after all. On top of that, when AMD emerged as a serious contender, both Intel and AMD had to keep improving their technology at a previously unseen rate, and suddenly x86 was overtaking the previous performance champions, RISC chips. Transmeta simply could not afford competitive chip design teams and manufacturing process tweaking -- in fact, it is arguable that their approach could still be a performance winner if they'd have similar budgets to an Intel (or even AMD) CPU project.

      This is why the smart money is on "low-power" being just a back-up plan for Transmeta. Not that it matter much at this stage, any more...

    21. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by ccp · · Score: 1


      You're wrong, parent is right.

      They emphatized low power when it was evident Crusoe was SLOOOOOW, but it was a fallback position.

      Cheers,

    22. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know the meaning of "posterboy".

    23. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it's all that strange, since Transmeta doesn't actually sell any laptops.

    24. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by rifter · · Score: 1

      When the crusoe came out, it was said that it required software to run because part of the chip is implemented in software. But the Software for Crusoe chips only seems to come on Windows as shipped with the laptops with crusoe chips (though honestly I have yet to see a laptop with a crusoe chip actually offered for sale, other /.ers are saying that there are some but they come with XP ONLY.)

      Transmeta's Linux distro does not seem to be for Crusoe processors. (I am not sure what it is for, as all the links to things that it is supposed to run on are dead, and it is stated in teh faq that it is meant for "small devices" that use flash for storage).

      If Linux runs on Crusoe laptops, it is not clear how. Clearly even some people who claim to have these laptops have no clue how Linux could run on them. I haven't combed the vanilla kernel source, but I don't recall seeing a Crusoe config option anywhere. So if Linux runs on Crusoe chips, how about you give us a link? Otherwise it seems as much the vapourware as it always has seemed to be.

    25. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by Kwiik · · Score: 1

      Hey! I think he looks cute! Sooo very very cute... eep my people to stalk list is getting low. Hrm...
      http://www.unc.edu/depts/jomc/academics/dr i/images /torvalds.jpg

      --
      Vehicle Stars used car search is my current project
    26. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1
      When the crusoe came out, it was said that it required software to run because part of the chip is implemented in software.

      Yes, but this is firmware. How could it even boot Windows without already having the translation software loaded?

      Transmeta's Linux distro does not seem to be for Crusoe processors.

      Run a Google search for 'crusoe linux' and you'll find a few pages about computers that use them.

  6. This comes at a surprising time... by greppling · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...as he is just about to hand over maintenance of 2.5/2.6 to Andrew Morton. So maybe he actually hopes to do some hacking again, instead of just integrating other peoples' work. Cool!

    1. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      .as he is just about to hand over maintenance of 2.5/2.6 to Andrew Morton.

      He is? Where did you hear that? 2.5 is the development branch, it doesnt need "maintaining". And 2.6 is the next (as yet unreleased) unreleased stable branch - presumably Linus will be working on that next and wont be handing it over until work on 2.7 starts.
    2. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by greppling · · Score: 4, Informative
      He is? Where did you hear that?

      Sorry, should have added a link rightaway, so here it is. I think Linus didn't enjoy the 2.4 series as much as development kernels, and maybe also understood that others could be better at the more boring side of evaluating bug fixes etc. (Hats off for that!) He might share the maintenance with Andrew Morton, or possibly completely hand it over by 2.6.0.

      2.5 is the development branch, it doesnt need "maintaining".

      Well, it's already mostly in maintenance status, i.e. waiting for bugfixes, more testers reporting and so on.

    3. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by chabotc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually if you break ./ tradition and read the article, you'll notice it says "I do not expect a huge amount of change as a result, testament to just /how/ freely Transmeta has let me do Linux work"

      The motivation he gives for the move seems to involve more around "Transmeta has always been very good at letting me spend even an inordinate amount of time on Linux, but as a result I've been feeling a little guilty at just how little "real work" I got done lately"

      If anything, if he's switching desks and work envirioment, it'll slow him down for a little bit to get settled in again

    4. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you highlight the specific line in the link that mentioned that things are getting handed over to Andrew Morton? I couldn't find any reference in the link you provided.

    5. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The actual rumors are that he is going to spearhead the jump to the 3.0 kernel...

      A major rewrite is rumored to be in store for linux to give us some features that other OS's only dream of.

      But these are purely the wil rumors that are running around and I give no credibility to.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 3, Funny

      A major rewrite is rumored to be in store for linux to give us some features that other OS's only dream of.

      YES!! Finally!! BASIC at the command prompt!

    7. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by greppling · · Score: 2, Informative
      "The last Linus-only release before getting together with Andrew".

      Also, why do you think Andrew Morton has started maintaining the "2.6 must-fix list" and had moderated two IRC conferences to know who will feel responsible for which lacking bug fixes etc.?

    8. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by GeoGreg · · Score: 1
      Linus' first contribution to 3.0...
      ] 10 PRINT "HI, MY NAME IS LINUS"
      ] 20 GOTO 10
    9. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      Ummm...How exactly does a 'major rewrite' of the kernel happen without us (read kernel devs/hackers) knowing about it? It's not like anything to do with linux is 'secret' or under NDA's. Is Linus going to find the free time to rewrite several million lines of code?

      Linux is _not_ever_ going to undergo a major change. Kernel development is a one way street, and you simply can't throw it all out and start again, as then it wouldn't be linux. That's not to say that we won't see changes, just that we'll see them coming from a long way away.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    10. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Basic at the command prompt. ***drool***

      Seriously. Why is there not a unix shell with ... BASIC... Any old school geek would think its just swell.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    11. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      I feel a new sourceforge project being formed.

      BASIC SHell and Interactive Tool

      #!/bin/bshit

      OK, not with that name, but it would be a cool project to work on.

    12. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by mikecarrmikecarr · · Score: 1

      Actually if you break ./ tradition and read the article, you'll notice it says "I do not expect a huge amount of change as a result, testament to just /how/ freely Transmeta has let me do Linux work"

      It's nice to see that you've maintained /. tradition by tossing in some typos. Thanks for the irony.

      --

      ID-10-T is a way of life

    13. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by jelle · · Score: 1

      Actually, do an 'apt-get install bwbasic', and use /usr/bin/bwbasic as shell, and there you go: BASIC at the command prompt.

      It's already there...

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    14. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by rifter · · Score: 1

      Methinks the grandparent was trying to start the rumours they were talking about. Hmm.. recursive rumours? This rumour is not a rumour :).

    15. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But these are purely the wil rumors that are running around and I give no credibility to.


      Hello Mc Fly!!!!

      do you read the posts you reply to or are you some kind of ADHD wierdo that reads 1/2 way into a post and then has to post an inflamitory response??

      remove your head from your rectum and try again....

      BTW, LINUX us _ALWAYS_GOING_UNDER_MAJOR_CHANGE this is the cool part of OSS and linux.. IT CAN change radically at any time for really stupid reasons... "Linus wants apache,mysql and mozilla to be a part of the kernel! we have to in order to keep up with microsoft!! Look they just integrated 50% of their game library into their kernel!!!! Coding....HO!!!!!"

      and yes it's gonna be done under super secret squirrel handshakes while wearing special hooded cloaks....

      Ya freak... get a clue... where the hell did you get any of that which you rant about from???

  7. Again!!! by Spackler · · Score: 5, Funny

    OSDN, The parent of Slashdot, has filed a lawsuit against Linus today for cut-and-pasting the first three letters of OSDN.

    CmdrTaco was quoted and saying "Linus and this Shift-Insert stuff is getting WAY out of control".

    Linus was unavailable to paste in a reply.

    1. Re:Again!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In the latest development in the OSDN and OSDL. SCO (a leading supplier of litigation to businesses) has threatened to sue both OSDN and OSDL for using the letters 'S' and 'O'.

      Dunce Mcbribe was quoted as saying "The letters 'S' and 'O' are our intellectual property and we believe that they occur in the names of many businesses".

      The world was to busy laughing to reply.

    2. Re:Again!!! by pe1rxq · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just came in:

      Novell has sent a public reaction to SCO that they have used the letter 'O' for years in their name and are certain they didn't sell it to SCO.

      Later today IBM is expected to state that they have a irevokable en perpetual license to use the 'I', 'B' and 'M' letters.

      Further Linus has stated that he holds his parents responsible for cut&pasting the letter 'S' into his name shortly after birth: 'You can't blame me I was like a baby at that time!'

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    3. Re:Again!!! by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      • Dunce Mcbribe was quoted as saying "The letters 'S' and 'O' are our intellectual property and we believe that they occur in the names of many businesses".
      SO what? :)

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    4. Re:Again!!! by mickwd · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think you'll find that Linus called his new OS Linux specifically to avoid SCO's letter "S".

      Isn't this man's foresight just incredible ? ;)

    5. Re:Again!!! by jot445 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also just in, The makers of Sesame Street have been served legal notice to stop using the letters "S" and "O" as sponsors for the show. Film at 11.

      --
      The preceding comment has been reviewed and declared to be compliant with HIPPA Phase II regulations.
    6. Re:Again!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F U.

    7. Re:Again!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just came in:

      Microsoft has licensed the O and the S from SCO to be on the safe side on this legal battle, and to give some support for the losing side.

    8. Re:Again!!! by Jeff+Breker · · Score: 1

      Just some useless trivia but Linus' original name for the kernel was "Freax".

    9. Re:Again!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunally SCO has already laid claim to the letters 'U', 'N', 'I' and 'X', so where actually just left with L.

  8. Linus career path by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Work on open source projects
    2. No profit
    3. Get jealous; go to .com startup; startup tanks
    4. No profit
    5. Return to open source projects
    6. No profit

    1. Re:Linus career path by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7. ???
      8. Profit!

    2. Re:Linus career path by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called flamebait or capitalism, not funny.

    3. Re:Linus career path by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot:
      3.5 Don't be greedy and sell those Transmeta shares at the right time and become a rich man.

    4. Re:Linus career path by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      um hello,
      he has stock (options) from VA Linux, and Redhat as well as Transmeta. at the height of the .com boom the were worth over $20 million (according to his autobiography) and are probably still worth in excess of $2 million

      doing something you love: Priceless

    5. Re:Linus career path by jpetts · · Score: 1

      I have karma to burn, so if I get modded off-topic, eh, fuck it. ANYWAYS, this is the ONLY time I have ever laughed out loud, belly-laugh, and REALLY regretted not having SuperMod (R) points (an imaginary type of mod point, which allows you to transcend the +5 maximum). So, thank you, AC, for brightening up my morning before I get into the depths of writing some RMAN scripts to back up my databases. Thanks.

      --
      Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
    6. Re:Linus career path by mbrod · · Score: 5, Insightful


      1. Work on open source projects
      2. No profit
      3. Get jealous; go to .com startup; startup tanks
      4. No profit
      5. Return to open source projects
      6. No profit

      7. Being considered the leader of the FREE world, one of the best coders, most honorable people, having made a contribution to all of humanity instead of a contribution only to himself...
      8. Priceless

    7. Re:Linus career path by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Just in case you don't know, he's a millionaire.
      (More importantly though, he's involved in something he loves.)

    8. Re:Linus career path by broeman · · Score: 1

      I think you need to see the documentary "The Code" ... I think he looked loaded enough in his nice car and house in Silicon Valley
      but then again, that was before the .com days.

      --

      (yes this can be compared with sex)
    9. Re:Linus career path by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      9. Profit!!

  9. Too expensive for Transmeta? by mseeger · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Hi,

    i guess that Linus was too expensive for Transmeta. I don't doubt, that he's worth all the money he earns, but Transeta employs him mostly for PR reasons (that's why they left him so much freedom). But you have to have some sales to support PR. I already wondered for some time, if it pays off for Transmeta financially.

    But Linus is so popular, i don't think he will ever encounter serious employment problems.

    For my part, i thank Transmeta for employing Linus. As i don't own any shares, i had the profit from Linus' work without any cost.

    Bye, Martin

    1. Re:Too expensive for Transmeta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh, you're not getting the OSS/FS spirit. Next time they gonna claim that Linux' hackers are not commercialy-driven ;) Lies, lies and lies -for a life.

    2. Re:Too expensive for Transmeta? by Amomynos+Coward · · Score: 1

      As you said, Transmeta employed Linus for PR reasons. Think about the publicity it has brought to Transmeta, even before they released a single product. Actually, I probably haven't seen any piece of Transmeta news that didn't contain the note that Transmeta is the employer of Linus Torvalds, the original creator of Linux.

    3. Re:Too expensive for Transmeta? by AndroSyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think people forget Linus' real talent is managing people. Getting people to do stuff because they want to, not because they have to. If he is managing patches from other programmers and coordinating things, that takes a level of vision and skill that a lot of programmers don't have. Seeing the big picture and seeing which direction you want to go, and getting countless number of people to go in the same direction. I'd like to see you do that

    4. Re:Too expensive for Transmeta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      tmta: $1.57 a share.

      Buy a cup of coffee, or a share of transmeta... tough choice.

    5. Re:Too expensive for Transmeta? by mseeger · · Score: 1
      Hi,

      This is the first time, i got a lot of up- and down-moderation. My article seems to be angering to some.

      I think people forget Linus' real talent is managing people.

      I didn't speak a word agains Linus. Quite the opposite, i think he will always earn all that he gets. But i seriously doubt if Transmeta was after the talents you mentioned.

      I'd like to see you do that

      You're a little late, i already served my time (7 years as CEO). Trust me, i know what it means to manage people and i'm sure, that i don't wanna do it again.

      One side effect of this time is some scepticism concerning the motives of people. Transmeta was an startup to challenge the big fishes in the pond. They wanted and needed all the attention they could get. All knowlegde and skill Linus could bring in were wellcome, but they went in for the name. This is nothing bad and my statements are not ment as a judgement. I think Linus and Linux benefitted of it. Even Transmeta may have profited at the early stage. But now, all that matters is the flow of cash. As Linus enjoys a lot of freedom, it is difficult for a company to draw money from that resource. A big company like Intel or IBM may be able to sustain such "free electrons" (-> Tom DeMarco, Timothy Lister), but for a company struggling for survival, this feels like a ball on a chain.

      Yours, Martin

    6. Re:Too expensive for Transmeta? by thgreatoz · · Score: 1

      [snip]You're a little late, i already served my time (7 years as CEO).[snip]
      [snip]One side effect of this time is some scepticism[snip]
      [snip] statements are not ment as a judgement.[snip]
      [snip] Linus could bring in were wellcome,[snip]

      7 years as a CEO and you can't spell? Sounds a bit suspect...

      --
      When their numbers dwindled from 50 to 8, the dwarves began to suspect Hungry.
    7. Re:Too expensive for Transmeta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, look, the guy has a .de website
      Maybe he's german, which means not native english
      Maybe you're worse off in german than he is in english.
      And in case you want to critique my spelling, I'll mention it was only the fourth languaged I learned, next to that, the german language is more logical vis-a-vis its pronounciation and spelling than the english language. (eg. well + come = welcome)

    8. Re:Too expensive for Transmeta? by AndroSyn · · Score: 1

      Actually I was replying to this
      AC and not you in particular. I thought your comments were quite valid and I agree that a lot of it probably was in part to get attention for the company and it worked out well.

    9. Re:Too expensive for Transmeta? by thgreatoz · · Score: 1

      AC? No comment.

      --
      When their numbers dwindled from 50 to 8, the dwarves began to suspect Hungry.
  10. Predicted itinerary... by AlphaSys · · Score: 5, Funny

    His itinerary includes a brief stop-over in Utah, during which time he will hunt down Darl McBride and maul his body beyond recognition. His court defense will be temporary sanity and David Boies will merrily defend him to acquittal.

    --
    Can I bum a sig? I left mine at the office.
    1. Re:Predicted itinerary... by tadas · · Score: 1
      His itinerary includes a brief stop-over in Utah, during which time he will hunt down Darl McBride and maul his body beyond recognition. His court defense will be temporary sanity and David Boies will merrily defend him to acquittal.

      Actually, isn't his wife, Tove, a martial arts master?

      --
      This page accidentally left blank
    2. Re:Predicted itinerary... by kurosawdust · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did anyone else read this and think "eh, that wouldn't be too bad - Linus can probably still work on the kernel in prison"?

    3. Re:Predicted itinerary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ,ououououououououo.
      o AlphaSys â" WILL o
      u WORK FOR COCK u
      o o
      u (Into scat, too)u
      ouououou. .ouououou'
      l l _|/
      l l ." ".
      l l /(o)-(o)\
      /_)ll / )
      l_)ll '- o . .
      \_)l\ '.o__.' / |\/|_.
      l l \ \_/ / ._| '/
      l_l\ \.___./ \ ) /
      \ \_/\__/\__ l==l
      \ \ /\ /\ `\ l l
      \ \\// \l l
      `\ /\ l / l
      ; ll l\____/
      l ll l

      Hey mom, look at me, your Son, you remember, AlphaSys, I'm a boney ass small dicked sexless freak that hunts for cock online!

      Look at me, I'm AlphaSys the cock loving acolyte little pussy fag.

      Can we be friends? Can we make a ScheiÃYe video? I, AlphaSys, will circle your anus for cling-ons and then clean them up with my tongue torpedoes.

    4. Re:Predicted itinerary... by Cedric+C.+Girouard · · Score: 1
      His itinerary includes a brief stop-over in Utah, during which time he will hunt down Darl McBride and maul his body beyond recognition. His court defense will be temporary sanity and David Boies will merrily defend him to acquittal.


      Actually, if I'd be in Linus's shoes, I'd let my wife take care of McBride. After all, McBride is going after the bread and butter of the family, and Tove IIRC was 6 time karate champion of finland wasnt she ?

      --

      Marriage is considered capital punishment for the theft of a goat in some third world countries...

    5. Re:Predicted itinerary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      temporary................sanity?

      uhm...

  11. "I'm actually all teary-eyed." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's a leak in the Linus kernel, someone please post a patch.

    1. Re:"I'm actually all teary-eyed." by DeadVulcan · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's a leak in the Linus kernel, someone please post a patch.

      Here ya go, mayteee! Arrrr!!

      --
      Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
      Power in the hands of the accountable.
    2. Re:"I'm actually all teary-eyed." by rampant+mac · · Score: 2, Funny
      " There's a leak in the Linus kernel, someone please post a patch."

      Wouldn't that be the Linus Kornea?

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    3. Re:"I'm actually all teary-eyed." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew the pirates would come to Linux sooner or later...

  12. Breaking news ... by Surak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linus Torvalds has very recently stated that spam filtering -- right in the kernel -- is now a slated feature for Linux 2.6.

    1. Re:Breaking news ... by p3d0 · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Mods, please take a look at parent. I don't think it's a troll. I think it's just an attempt at humour.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    2. Re:Breaking news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. :)

    3. Re:Breaking news ... by Metasquares · · Score: 1
      Really don't need more crap like that shoved into the kernel.
      So don't compile it in when you build the kernel :)
    4. Re:Breaking news ... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      spam filtering -- right in the kernel -- is now a slated feature for Linux 2.6.

      But... but... That means we won't see 2.6 for years!

      Seriously, though, with the number of goodies already backported from the development kernel into 2.4, I wouldn't mind seeing an earlier rather than later release of 2.6. After all, how long has it been since the last major version? Must be about 3 years.

    5. Re:Breaking news ... by nacturation · · Score: 0

      Spam filtering in the kernel? Why would such a thing belong there? If you want to change your spam filter, does this mean you then have to recompile the kernel? Someone please explain the logic behind this.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    6. Re:Breaking news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT

    7. Re:Breaking news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's something called sense of humor, don't worry, it has nothing to do with programming

      (unless you where trying to be sarcastic, in which case you should stop it. Now. No, really. )

    8. Re:Breaking news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YATT

    9. Re:Breaking news ... by RealityMogul · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why not? MS put IIS in the kernel of 2003. They know what they're doing, right? I mean, they said they really, really made sure it was secure.

    10. Re:Breaking news ... by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1
      24378762 Jan 4 2001 linux-2.4.0.tar.gz

      2-1/2 years.

    11. Re:Breaking news ... by destiney · · Score: 1, Insightful


      No, it will work much like iptables. You will provide it with a set of filter rules which it will enforce. Changes to the ruleset will not require kernel recompilation, only a reload of the filtering module or service.

      The logic behind placing it directly in the kernel is the same as always, speed.

    12. Re:Breaking news ... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      So I was close :-)

    13. Re:Breaking news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how can a post be marked "overrated" when it has no moderation points to begin with?

  13. Guy is crazy! by OpenSourced · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Leaving his new, shiny, recently minted e-mail address in the open like that, with all the nasty spammers that prowl the wilderness. Poor, poor address. I notice that his "old" address is properly obscured, but the "new" one is not. Sad mistake :o(

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    1. Re:Guy is crazy! by sirinek · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he uses spamassassin!

    2. Re:Guy is crazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he just enjoys spam. Reading about penis enlargement while hacking is sure a thrill.
      Or he's hoping for "personalized" prOn spam with ready-to-use accounts. l/p: linus/linus.

      He just made sure that everyone who might want (or give) something gets his email right.

    3. Re:Guy is crazy! by warpSpeed · · Score: 4, Funny
      I'm sure he treats SPAM and patches the same, 90% get dropped.

    4. Re:Guy is crazy! by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Funny

      notice that his "old" address is properly obscured, but the "new" one is not.

      What?

      You mean I'm not supposed to "remove the animal" from Linus' email address?

      Damn.

      No wonder my patches weren't getting through to him.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    5. Re:Guy is crazy! by Spellbinder · · Score: 1

      OT but recently i noticed that they are even selling spam software at shops
      and no it is not software against spam
      it is mass mailing software

      --


      stop supporting microsoft with pirating their software!!!!!
    6. Re:Guy is crazy! by fastdecade · · Score: 1

      Surprising he doesn't have his own domain, or at least a fixed email address (linus AT kernel.org?). IMO no point relying on protecting your email with NOSPAM etc (although that can help) and keep changing every few months, you're gonna get stung if it's out there, so you may as well set up some decent spam-thrashing software (eg spambuster) and get on with life.

  14. Slashdot effect by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now, let's not all sell our Transmetta stock at the same time...

    1. Re:Slashdot effect by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why /. subscription pays out ;-)

    2. Re:Slashdot effect by anshil · · Score: 1

      Okay, so I go first then you guys can follow ;)

      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
    3. Re:Slashdot effect by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      No, I think we should use the Balmer approach. Sell 10% of our holdings every couple of months and hope noone will notice.

  15. It made the NYTimes and Kudos to Transmeta by NZheretic · · Score: 5, Informative
    Its made the NYTimes: Prominent Programmer Will Leave Transmeta.

    Kudos to Transmeta for hiring Linus in the first place ( even if they did transport him to the USA in reach of overlitigious bastards such as The SCO Group ) and supporting his work on Linux for so many years.

    1. Re:It made the NYTimes and Kudos to Transmeta by pe1rxq · · Score: 4, Informative

      They even have a new title for him: 'leader of the shared software movement' whatever that means...

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:It made the NYTimes and Kudos to Transmeta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that RMS? Or ESR?

    3. Re:It made the NYTimes and Kudos to Transmeta by Captain+Rotundo · · Score: 1

      The article was by John Markoff, what did you expect? Accuracy?

    4. Re:It made the NYTimes and Kudos to Transmeta by Ulven · · Score: 1

      I thought shared software was what Microsoft called their version of open source.

    5. Re:It made the NYTimes and Kudos to Transmeta by lysium · · Score: 1
      That's an even better title than "open source movement." Shared software movement sounds very positive, very....well, cooperative, and is a little more meaningful to the ears of the non-technical. Perhaps it should go into use more often.

      ------------

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    6. Re:It made the NYTimes and Kudos to Transmeta by cybercuzco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thats just what microsoft loves, they start a meme that "shared source=open source" BSA, MPAA, RIAA etc starts a meme that "sharing =piracy" How many people out there do you think now think that open source means youre a bunch of software pirates, and that linus is the leader of them? Theres no such thing as the "shared software" movement, its the open source software movement. Shared software could be anything from linux to the latest commercial isos you get from kazaa

      --

    7. Re:It made the NYTimes and Kudos to Transmeta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linus got the job to get the Green Card and then dump them.

  16. Hmmm, SCO related? by LinuxGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this related to Transmeta wanting to distance themselves from Linux until the SCO bull$hit is resolved? Hopefully it will be quick, but I can't help but wonder what kind of ace SCO is holding in reserve. Even if they don't really have an ace, businesses seem to be preparing themselves for the possibility that SCO may win a partial victory.

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Hmmm, SCO related? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes, when it looks like a bluff it is bluff. SCO upped the stakes and encouraged others to fold. IBM has called it. Now see what happens.

    2. Re:Hmmm, SCO related? by mormop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't help but wonder what kind of ace SCO is holding in reserve

      I can't wait to see what kind of ace IBM have in their huge patent library. If SCO claim they didn't know their own code was in their own version of Linux they may have overlooked IBM code being there as well

      --
      Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
    3. Re:Hmmm, SCO related? by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is this related to Transmeta wanting to distance themselves from Linux until the SCO bull$hit is resolved?

      WTF?

      What in the hell would Transmeta be afraid of? Getting a letter saying something like this: "We don't like one of your employees, so we are going to sue you for damages."

      One of the reasons that American companies sue is because they expect more mileage out of the resultant fear than would ordinarily result from the actual litigation. Let's not throw gasoline on a fire, shall we?

    4. Re:Hmmm, SCO related? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even one ace doesn't matter when the rest of hand is all jokers

    5. Re:Hmmm, SCO related? by azzy · · Score: 1

      Shush!! Don't give SCO any ideas

  17. Interesting timing. by Picass0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A year's leave also just happens to give him time where he could be an expert witness or consultant in certain legal matters.

    1. Re:Interesting timing. by capt.Hij · · Score: 5, Funny

      Too true, especially when you look down at the bottom of his email:

      Trond Myklebust:
      o Fix rpc dentry list usage
      o Copy comments from System V file system routines to make it more "unix like."

    2. Re:Interesting timing. by Pflipp · · Score: 1

      OK, I've checked, you just made this up.

      The reason I checked was that, for what I know, Linus' humor is not too different to this. I gave you 50-50 for the joke ;-)

      --
      "We can confirm that Debian does *not* ship the version with the trojan horse. Our version predates it." [CA-2002-28]
  18. List poisoning clearification. by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Excuse my ignorance but what is List Poisoning?
    I feel like I should know this but I don't.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:List poisoning clearification. by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 4, Informative
      My reading on this is as follows.
      An entry on a linked list is to be freed.
      Upon it being removed from the list, it's pointers (prev/next) are 'poisoned'
      by being set to hopefully really, really invalid addresses.
      This is to catch any bad code that continues to use the now invalidated pointers.
      The bad addresses should cause an opps instead of allowing the code to possibly trash other valid data structures.

      Clarifications welcome.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    2. Re:List poisoning clearification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks. That makes sience. I never heard of that being called List poisoning. I just heard it as being a broken link list.

    3. Re:List poisoning clearification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in a broken linked list, supposedly the pointers could point to valid addresses, causing all kinds of trouble.

    4. Re:List poisoning clearification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we fill the pointers with the word value 'MS' over and over again? Yeah, that's enough to poison any system :)

    5. Re:List poisoning clearification. by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Excuse my ignorance but what is List Poisoning?

      Something that LISP has been able to do for decades, silly.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  19. AC career path by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
    1. Read about open source celebs at /.
    2. No karma.
    3. Get jealous, post flames.
    4. No karma.
    5. Read replies flaming you, start trolling.
    6. No karma.
    7. Try to be funny.
    8. No karma.
  20. Changes by slashd'oh · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's something about these two changes I find amusing. I admit I have no idea what they mean, which is probably why:

    Daniel Ritz:
    o [PCMCIA] fix yenta unload oops

    David S. Miller:
    o [TCP]: Use proper time_*() comparisons on jiffies

    1. Re:Changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      yenta unload: now with 20% more chutzpah there, goyim

    2. Re:Changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm just quessing here, but I think the following explains everything:

      'yenta' is probably just a some PCMCIA card driver module that you can load and unload. Unloading causes an 'oops' which means a kernel bug (access to some unallocated memoryspace etc.).

      'jiffies' are one kind of time units. On 2.2 and 2.4 series, jiffies run at 100Hz - on 2.5/2.6 series, it will run at 1000Hz. It's just an incremental value that is used in time related jobs.

      One related problem is a 'jiffie wraparound' that causes uptime to jump to zero again. This is only a problem on 32 bit machines of course. At 100Hz it happens somewhere after 400 days and on 1000Hz much sooner (in about a month IIRC). It's easy to calculate exact times if you happen to care :)

      Kernel folks have also spent a lot of time lately to fix driver problems related to wraparound issues.

    3. Re:Changes by ivansanchez · · Score: 1

      If I remember well, a jiffie is a unit of time, equal to 1/60 of a second.

    4. Re:Changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's what it is:
      http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiffy

    5. Re:Changes by ceswiedler · · Score: 1

      Jiffies are the same as timer ticks. They're the frequency of the timer interrupt. Rescheduling of processes happens on the timer interrupt, so it's the finest granularity of process switching. The bump to 1000hz was done to increase interactivity.

      Jiffie wraparound most certainly does not cause the uptime to wrap. The kernel takes care of it, and drivers have to account for it, but it should never affect userland.

    6. Re:Changes by taernim · · Score: 1

      The one by Miller is easy.
      The time comparison was taking too long.
      It's supposed to be quick... you know, over in a jiffy? :P

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
  21. odsl = dominion by leuk_he · · Score: 0

    Old dominion soccer league (first google hit for odsl)

    Linus has joined the shapeshifters!

    (Or do i watch too much star trek? )

  22. About OSDL... by sould · · Score: 5, Informative
    from here:


    OSDL is dedicated to enabling Linux and Linux-based applications for data center and carrier-class deployment. We provide the crucial hardware for testing and development at this level, giving open source developers around the world the resources needed to bring Linux further into telecommunications and the enterprise. We are an independently governed, non-profit organization supported by 21 industry leaders.


    Sounds cool

    1. Re:About OSDL... by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      • OSDL is dedicated to enabling Linux and Linux-based applications for data center and carrier-class deployment. We provide the crucial hardware for testing and development at this level, giving open source developers around the world the resources needed to bring Linux further into telecommunications and the enterprise. We are an independently governed, non-profit organization supported by 21 industry leaders.
      Sounds like hackers (in the proper since) have come full-circle: IIRC, the Levy book chronicles early hackers learning their skills on the telecom system (phreakers, some). Now the hackers are making their hack work for the telecom industry. Sounds like a proper "Thank you" to me.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    2. Re:About OSDL... by duffbeer · · Score: 1

      I assume they were previously supported by 20 industry leaders?

      --
      "This wound is beyond my ability to heal. We need Elvis medicine!"
    3. Re:About OSDL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most of the 'phreakers' ended up in jail, or on the FBI's shit list.

    4. Re:About OSDL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet M$ is among those Industry Leaders.

  23. "leave of absence" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf is a leave of absence???

    Basically he didnt quit outright, I guess he wants to keep his options open. Good thinking in this job market Linus. I mean, who would want to hire the originator of the Linux kernel?

    1. Re:"leave of absence" by bigpat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Basically he didnt quit outright, I guess he wants to keep his options open."

      Exactly, i'd bet it probably has something to do with his stock options. Usually you have to exercise your options 30 days after leaving a company, but if technically he hasn't left, then he could hang on to his stock options just in case they are ever worth something again.

  24. Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by Lethyos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That letter is awesome. It's great to have a real, honest, genuine human-being to rally behind.

    This is the greatest things about open-source: the people. People who are willing to donate so much time and effort to the benefit of everyone on earth as opposed to people who want to screw over the world so they can make themselves rich.

    We're much better off than those cheering on phony, cut-throat business men who run and jump around a stage like monkies to the tune of Gloria Estefan.

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they should donate sperm as the pace of development is WAY TO SLOW. Linux is not going to the desktop mainstream. Deal with it.

    2. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by Lethyos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe they should donate sperm as the pace of development is WAY TO SLOW. Linux is not going to the desktop mainstream. Deal with it.

      This is a troll, but I'll bite. You're just like a friend of mine who does IT knows nothing but Microsoft Windows as a platform. He just has this bullish tactic of telling everyone "Linux is never going mainstream, deal with it. The money is in Windows." It's not about making money, it's about making things better.

      Open source development is very fast. Apache, Mozilla, KDE, GNOME, Linux, and many others are moving at a break neck pace. They produce software and fixes for software much faster than Microsoft. As for being on the desktop, well, it will. It's only a matter of time.

      Lots of people said Linux and open source in general would never make it "mainstream" and look, the popularity is growing all the time. Heck, my mother and sister (as well as myself of course) run Linux. What's funny is the platform runs some Windows applications faster and more reliably than Windows does (thanks to Codeweavers and the Wine project). On top of that, we've even got retail stores selling Linux to desktop consumers preinstalled, ala Walmart's Lindows PCs.

      So, you're wrong, mark my words and just wait and see. I will not "deal with it".

      --
      Why bother.
    3. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who was talking about Mozilla and GNOME (which is shitty anyway, real users run KDE):D

      Xfree, sure its fast. Isnt Egotistical? Sure it is, look at the recent source branch issue that was in the news. Oh he has an idea, lets kick him off the dev team.

      Excuse me for wanting something INNOVATIVE that will kick MS up the arse. You can copy all you want, and predent all you want. How about actually being something NEW.

    4. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by Ciderx · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Linus is more the excpetion than the rule in open source. Look at the likes of RMS and Bruce Perens - ego maniacs desperate to keep their role at the head of their little cliques with more concentration on the politics of it all than the code. Linus at least doesn't care about the politics and only cares about the quality of the code, whilst keeping great humility about it.

    5. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by DChristensen · · Score: 1

      Oh! Gloria Estefan sang "Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers!" All this time I thought it was Mariah Carey...

      --

      --
      Mac OS X--Unix without the assholes^Whassles.

    6. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by dh003i · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Politics is everywhere and in everything.

      RMS and Perens care deeply about the freedom of users and developers, and want to ensure that that freedom is there today, tomorrow, and as far into the future as possible. I don't see them as egomaniacs, just guys who have a cause.

      Linus, btw, is fully behind the GPL (as the original author of Linux, he could start releasing it under any license he damn well pleased). He released it under the GPL from the start, and that was a large part of his debate with that prick who insisted on using Minix. Linus has just stayed more focused on the Linux code, rather than branching out into advocating the GPL for other software.

    7. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by FreeUser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Linus is more the excpetion than the rule in open source. Look at the likes of RMS and Bruce Perens

      While I hate to respond to ad homonem trolls like this, letting this silly statement go by unanswered, particularly in light of the clueless moderators marking it up as insightful, and allowing this sort of misinformation to stand unrebutted, would be an even greater disservice than feeding the troll.

      First, RMS and Bruce Perens are hardly the "rule" in open source and free software projects. Quite the contrary, they are exceptional in many respects, as are most public figures in the world for better or worse. Linus is actually more akin to the average coder of free software: he does it for fun, for the joy of coding, and is relatively apolitical about the whole thing.

      ego maniacs desperate to keep their role at the head of their little cliques

      Second, as for the alleged egos of Bruce Perens and RMS, despite their occasional public disagreements and arguments their egos are no more, nor less, developed than those of most male humans above the age of puberty. Indeed, as anyone without an axe to grind who has seen RMS speak will point out, he is actually quite soft-spoken and humble, and his opinions, while strong, controversial, and often unyielding, are born of idealism and not of self aggrandizement.

      Even the whole GNU/Linux thing has nothing to do with RMS personally (notice that he isn't asking people to call it RMS/Linux), but stems from a desire to get his message about software freedom out to the public at large, and the feeling that the 95% or so of the operating system we call Linux (which includes all of the filesystem tools, etc.) was getting zero recognition and thus, the message behind the writing of those tools (in RMSes opinion) was being lost. Idealistic yes. Stubborn, yes. Egomaniacal? Hardly.

      We need the RMSes and Bruce Perenses around. RMS has steered the community clear of numerous dangerous shoals with respect to licensing conflicts (the old KDE/qt license prior to TrollTech's graceful fixing of the problem, the incompatabilities of the old Mozilla license, etc. all of which have since been fixed, denying the likes of SCO and Microsoft ammunition to damage the projects and community at this stage of the game), and Bruce Perens is responsible in no small part for getting closed minded people to look at free software, first embracing its technical advantages and then, later, after seeing the empowerment of the freedom it offers, to embrace free software's freedom: the freedom to innovate as one's business requires, the freedom from having a vendor yank one's chain, the freedom to participate in a free and competative marketplace, rather than to work beneath the thumb of a convicted monopolist, the freedom to modify a tool to better match one's purpose, and so forth.

      But Perens and RMS are hardly indicative of your average free software coder. Linus, while himself far above average in accomplishments, bears a far greater resemblence in temperament and attitude to most free software enthusiasts and developers, certainly far more so than either RMS or Perens.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    8. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by wsapplegate · · Score: 2, Funny

      Â You're just like a friend of mine who [...] has this bullish tactic of telling everyone "Linux is never going mainstream, deal with it. The money is in Windows." Â

      And he's still your friend ? :-)

      --
      Xenu brings order!
    9. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?

    10. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly why Linux is as good as it is now, and the Hurd is nowhere to be seen.

      --

      This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

    11. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got one word for you:

      Theo!!

    12. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by johnnyb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would say the two are totally unrelated. If that were true, how would you explain emacs, gcc, glibc, and all of the other great software at GNU.

      The truth is, HURD is exploring some ideas never done before. One thing they are working on is the concept of "soft reboots" - being able to restart your operating system with your applications still running.

      In addition, HURD is massively multithreaded, which means in 20 years when we are all running 30CPU boxes, HURD will be our OS of choice. Linux is capable of handling multiple processors, but is not as wildly multithreaded as HURD is.

      HURD is really an amazing system, and actually seems to work decently well these days (actually, I haven't used it in 3 years, but it was starting to stabilize then).

      Anyway, I think the difference is that Linus was able to implement Linux quickly because he was re-creating UNIX, while the HURD guys are trying to re-think the operating system altogether.

    13. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by dh003i · · Score: 1

      Maybe so, but the efforts of RMS and Perens are much wider than on any one project. The advocacy of them and others like them introduces people to the concept of freedom in software, and pushes the borders forward.

    14. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think they care about you?

      Bah, RMS and Perens only care about hearing themselves talk.

    15. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 3, Funny
      HURD is really an amazing system, and actually seems to work decently well these days (actually, I haven't used it in 3 years, but it was starting to stabilize then).

      Wow. Even the HURD fanboys haven't run it in 3 years.

    16. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by drix · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Time to brush up on your Ayn Rand and your ESR. Most open-source developers (including me) couldn't care less about "the benefit of everyone on earth", "the common good", or any of those other throwaway commie bromides. We're doing it to "scratch an itch"--either we want some software that doesn't currently exist, and the fastest way to make it exist is to fire up a project and harness the collborative power of the Internet; or we're intellectually attracted to some or another project that our day job doesn't let us touch on. Assuming we even code for a day job. It has way less to do with altruism than you make it sound. Humans are selfish.

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    17. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by On+Lawn · · Score: 1

      While I hate to respond to ad homonem trolls like this,

      While I hate to respond to *ad hominem* trolls that don't understand the irony of calling someone else "ad homonem" from their own high horse, I for one share the opinion of the grandparent poster. It isn't "silly" and I don't think the moderators are "clueless" you anti-ad-hominem activist.

      In your post drenched with elitist kidney punches, you've failed to work up a congruent point or argument. The only common thread is that it appears to be an appology for those people whos ego's are hardly containable in the worldwide software movements afoot.

      At first you say, "First, RMS and Bruce Perens are hardly the 'rule' in open source and free software projects. Quite the contrary, they are exceptional in many respects...". Then in the very first sentence of the next paragraph you say "...their occasional public disagreements and arguments their egos are no more, nor less, developed than those of most male humans above the age of puberty."

      While it is possible to shake out a possible context that isn't self-contradictory, it isn't easy and I have nothing here to indicate you intended to do so. One could say that you are drawing a line perpendicular in qualities, dissaccotiating ego with exceptionalness, but I lost hope as your next paragraph followed...

      Even the whole GNU/Linux thing has nothing to do with RMS personally (notice that he isn't asking people to call it RMS/Linux), but stems from a desire to get his message about software freedom out to the public at large, and the feeling that the 95% or so of the operating system we call Linux (which includes all of the filesystem tools, etc.) was getting zero recognition and thus, the message behind the writing of those tools (in RMSes opinion) was being lost. Idealistic yes. Stubborn, yes. Egomaniacal? Hardly.


      GNU is RMS's baby. As you mentioned they are his product, his foundation, and his cause. To contribute something to the GNU Foundation you must sign over the copywrite. You must acknowledge the GNU Foundation, and you cannot alude to any for payment software even if it was a recently GPL'ed release of said for-payment software.

      So while everything GNU must pay hommage to a foundation he is in control of, and in turn pays hommage to him, that isn't enough. Now everything that is made/compiled using GNU stuff must pay hommage also.

      Now let me seperate here between GNU and GPL. Certainly in many circumstances no distinction is needed or attempted. But here there is one. GNU created the GPL as the litigant language of the GNU values. It is the legal code that defines a form of freedom, it is the very definition.

      One would assume that the GPL carries the values and ideals that you profess RMS cares about so much. To have the GPL amidst the source code, its ideals are spread and recognized in an untaintable form. The distinction here however is that just having the GPL carried along with the Linux code was not good enough for RMS. The distinction here must be drawn then to understand the question "why is not the GPL enough, why must it have GNU in its name too?"

      Because to say that its the cause doesn't make sence. The GPL says it plenty well, in both moniker and graphic legalese. Why GNU? Why his baby?

      Is it becuase it was made with GNU tools? That is a reason to do it, but isn't consistent with his lack of pursuit with other programs. Is it becuase it is a part of the distribution? Well, as someone pointed out the largest block of code in most distributions is now KDE and Gnome, followed by X11 and TeX. None of those have "GNU/" appended to them.

      So if it isn't for cause (spelled out in the GPL), or logistics, then people have a hard time coming up with something other then "ego". And the distiction between GNU and RMS is just way to thin to hide behind as you and even RMS does.

      So while their importance and role is debatable, their egos are counter productive. Where you say idealism, its percieved as downright subjucating at times and counter-productive. Its percieved as "ego".
    18. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by akintayo · · Score: 1

      Actually Linux was not originally released under GPL. The license used was a bit more restrictive

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    19. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by mandolin · · Score: 1
      He released it under the GPL from the start

      That's technically incorrect. There was an original linux "license" that Linus ditched for the GPL right around version 0.12. It forbade redistribution for a profit, which among other things basically prevented CD vendors from redistributing Linux.

      See the RELNOTES-0.01 and RELNOTES-0.12 files under here

    20. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by dh003i · · Score: 1

      Any documentation on that?

      Btw, not-with-standing, Linus still chose to release it under the GPL. As the creator of Linux, it was his decision; he wasn't forced to do it. He did it because he thought the GPL was the best license.

    21. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by scrytch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Time to brush up on your Ayn Rand and your ESR. Most open-source developers (including me) couldn't care less about "the benefit of everyone on earth", "the common good", or any of those other throwaway commie bromides.

      I love it. You even used the word bromide. Let's see if we can't work the phrase "angular planes of his face" into there too...

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    22. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by dh003i · · Score: 1

      thank you for the correction and reference.

    23. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Time to brush up on your Ayn Rand and your ESR.

      A couple libertarians viewing the world from their own perspective. Needless to say, ESR would prefer to see it as all "scratching an itch". The world's more complex then that; there are many different reasons, including "the common good".

      Humans are selfish.

      Humans are tribal creatures, and our ancestors were tribal creatures. Viewing humans as purely self-centered ignores the huge volume of self sacrifice for family, country and religion that's gone on throughout the centuries.

    24. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by nathanh · · Score: 3, Funny
      This is a troll, but I'll bite. You're just like a friend of mine who does IT knows nothing but Microsoft Windows as a platform. He just has this bullish tactic of telling everyone "Linux is never going mainstream, deal with it. The money is in Windows." It's not about making money, it's about making things better.

      The *real* money is in selling drugs. Tell your friend that if he's going to pimp himself out for money then he should at least do it properly.

    25. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by nathanh · · Score: 1
      He released it under the GPL from the start, and that was a large part of his debate with that prick who insisted on using Minix.

      Andrew Tanenbaum is not a prick. He is one of the great contributors to computer science. He dedicated a huge amount of effort to creating an easily understood operating system to teach the fundamentals of OS design with a UNIX context. He also made sure it worked on hardware that students could readily afford. So what if he had a disagreement with Linus. Linus gets into flamefests with lots of people. That doesn't automatically mean they are pricks.

      Get some historical perspective and cut it out with the revisionism.

    26. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by drix · · Score: 1

      ...huge volume of self sacrifice for family, country and religion that's gone on throughout the centuries.

      And you're equating that with... writing C code. Riiight. Forgive me for being incredulous.

      You ignore the thrust of Rand's argument, which is that basing one's actions on pure altruism--be you an individual person or a nation-state--is a deceptive and ultimately unsustainable existence. It can be done for some period of time, or in an isolated instance. But not forever, lest all come tumbling down.

      In the case of open source software development I don't think that things could be any clearer. Try, just try, to imagine any one of the hundreds of vast and wonderfully complex OSS projects out there (Apache, Emacs, Linux, Sendmail, XFree, to name a few) coming into being without a deeply personal and intellectual attachment to it on the part of its authors. There's no way--you might be able to slog through a couple hard days of coding, or some minor project, by telling yourself the world will be better off with your work. But said projects aren't minor. They're immense. What keeps them coming back to the screen, pounding the keyboard, plugging away, day after day, is just simply not some distal committment to another's well-being. It's the intellectual pleasure that they derive from coding. And that, alas, is selfishness.

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    27. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by dh003i · · Score: 1

      Well, prick is rather relative. He certainly seemed like a prick in that debate to me. I admit, I feel a little guilty because he did do a good thing for his students (honestly, I said that because I couldn't remember his name).

    28. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      ...huge volume of self sacrifice for family, country and religion that's gone on throughout the centuries.

      And you're equating that with... writing C code. Riiight. Forgive me for being incredulous.

      You're saying that people will give their lives for each other, but won't write C code for each other. Forgive me for being incredulous.

      What keeps them coming back to the screen, [is] the intellectual pleasure that they derive from coding. And that, alas, is selfishness.

      Just because you enjoy programming doesn't mean that you program for selfish reasons. People tend to do what they enjoy, but that doesn't mean that if you enjoy cooking, your work at a soup kitchen is for selfish reasons.

    29. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by stor · · Score: 1

      > Maybe they should donate sperm as the pace of development is WAY TO SLOW. Linux is not going to the desktop mainstream. Deal with it.

      Yeah nice troll buddy.

      It's on *my* RH9 desktop and I sincerely enjoy the experience of a Linux/X desktop over the candy-coated, dysfunctional, hobbled crap Windows offers.

      My girlfriend (a graphic designer for an advertising company, uses Macintosh exclusively) came over the other night, took a look at my desktop and said "It's great to see graphics done well on a PC".

      Face it, the Linux desktop is superior to Windows, if you have taste or an eye for aesthetics.

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    30. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by rifter · · Score: 1

      Pick up a copy of _Just_For_Fun_ by Linus Torvalds, or read this. The license he chose reminds me a lot of the dikumud license. It is more restrictive in that it does not allow Linux to be sold by anyone. Linus was initially not so sure about the GPL, but he decided in the end to go with it. The rest, as tey say, is history.

    31. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by rifter · · Score: 1

      You should also feel guilty since it could be argued that without Minix being available to Linus he might not have ever written Linux in the first place. Using Minix gave him inspiration, though he specifically avoided having his system be anything like Minix ultimately, the original development for linux was done under Minix using GNU tools. Heck, originally Linux started as a terminal emulator Linus felt the need for because the one on Minix sucked.

    32. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by evbergen · · Score: 1

      Humans are selfish, true. But if you are really saying that all choices are necessarily motivated from by interest, then that means we are not really free to choose, but are slaves to our perceived self interest.

      I don't buy that. I believe that you're ultimately free to choose your intentions, meaning that you have absolute freedom to choose where you'd like to whenever the external circumstances, which include your character, make it possible. And of course do people act out of self interest. It's just not the only action open to you. I think it's possible to truly give and help others.

      That doing so may help yourself is beside the point. We don't need to resolve the question of motives when you're helping youself and others at the same time. You're contributing to humanity. There is no "either it's self interest, or it's altruism". It's both, and I think all world views that are modeled from just one of these motive are invalid.

      The fact that you can help others while helping yourself only shows how easy it can be to help others.

      Art, science, and Free Software happens to be excellent examples of this.

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. (Mark Twain)
  25. First reaction to a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    First reaction to a moron who can't remember FOUR letters when making a lame google reference!

    OSDL!!!! not ODSL!!!!!!

  26. I was careless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I worked on the kernel, my conscience was bruised. I must purge the poison from my body. I will not be able to work at Transmeta ... for about three months.

  27. Additional related stuff. by Bootsy+Collins · · Score: 5, Informative

    I submitted this a few hours ago (always a bridesmaid, *snif*), along with two links not in the story above. One was to the NY Times story about it. The other was to this story which just came out at Wired . . .a brief interview with Linus about his efforts to stand apart from political issues surrounding Open Source, which refers to the discussion here on Slashdot about his opinions on incorporating DRM into the Linux kernel (among other things).

    1. Re:Additional related stuff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning: you look like a driveling loser when you complain about rejected submissions. Quit it.

    2. Re:Additional related stuff. by Bootsy+Collins · · Score: 1
      Uh, it was a joke; note the very next story.

      They're always funnier when I explain 'em . . .

  28. Shift-Insert - surely "middle click" by DrSkwid · · Score: 1, Funny

    mind you, he might be using an transmeta XP laptop

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  29. OSDL money by lovebyte · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the nytimes article, about OSDL:
    The organization was created with an investment of $20 million from I.B.M., Hewlett-Packard, Intel, Computer Associates, NEC and Fujitsu.

    What no SCO?

    --

    I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

    1. Re:OSDL money by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 1

      You think they have money to spare?

  30. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nice troll. I'll answer anyway.

    1) Who knows? XFree86 draws my windows just fine. 3d is plenty fast using Nvidia drivers. 90% of desktops users won't care what's going on "under the hood".
    2) See 1. Prolly does need a clean up, but I'd say the same about Windows registry. LFS gives good reasons for locations, and there's also good reasons to retain Unix-ness.
    3) Bollocks. Development is astronomically fast.
    4) Usability is being addressed by both KDE and Gnome. Again, how much maintaining does the average user actually do? As far as software management goes, if RedCarpet or Up2Date is too hard, I honestly don't know how much easier it would need to be.

  31. odsl oops.... by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    OK, big mistake to make. (it is called dislectic or something like that, not moron)

    The real funny part is that seaching for odsl gives osdl.org as 3th result. A lot of linkers have made this error!

    1. Re:odsl oops.... by NighthawkFoo · · Score: 1

      You mean "dyslexic", right?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
      - Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:odsl oops.... by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      How they ever came up with such a word for people who have spelling problems......

    3. Re:odsl oops.... by speter · · Score: 1

      And did you hear the one about the dyslexic agnostic insomniac?

      He was up all night wondering if dog exists.

    4. Re:odsl oops.... by rifter · · Score: 1

      Dyslexia is a learning disability. One of the most well-known symptoms is a tendency to transpose letters when reading (and therefore writing), which is not very conducive to good spelling. It can be treated and there is therapy available for it. Anyway bad spelling is not even the half of it.

    5. Re:odsl oops.... by spudgun · · Score: 1

      Yep lysDexic

      --
      Type unto others as you would have them type unto you.
  32. The rats are abandoning the sinking ship! by Gnulix · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally the SCO suit is showing some effect! Linux's leader is abdicating and fleeing the scene. Exactly as the nazis left Germany and took up hiding in South America.

    I guess that this means we can all get back to conducting serious business based on SCO Unix - the bread and butter of many a development company.

    (In 20 years time we'll probably see Torvalds daughter marrying the Swedish king!)

    1. Re:The rats are abandoning the sinking ship! by psavo · · Score: 1

      (In 20 years time we'll probably see Torvalds daughter marrying the Swedish king!)

      AFAIK in Sweden there's a chick first in line for throne, so that would be 'interesting'. But oh well, swedes.. .. just do it. Could be first married lesbian queen.

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
    2. Re:The rats are abandoning the sinking ship! by hammarlund · · Score: 1

      I appreciate the humor here, but really, perhaps Transmeta is looking to limit any liability issues here? Or perhaps Linus needs to time to fully audit the kernel to make sure the SCO claims are truly baseless?

    3. Re:The rats are abandoning the sinking ship! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be first married lesbian queen

      You mean first lesbian queen known to be married to another lesbian, of course.

    4. Re:The rats are abandoning the sinking ship! by Gnulix · · Score: 1

      Could be first married lesbian queen

      She'll be the first lesbian KING, because even if she is a woman her title will be king. Silly but true...

  33. This is funny by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    A troll recently advised me to get a real job - Like Linus.

  34. Changing jobs... by TheShadow · · Score: 5, Funny

    While we are posting stories about people changing jobs...

    Just last week I started a new job after a long and tedious four and a half year tenure at my former job. In this new job I'll finally get to work on things other than fighting fires. I'm very excited. Just thought everyone would like to know.

    --

    --
    "What do you want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? Cause I'm married."
    1. Re:Changing jobs... by minus9 · · Score: 1

      In this new job I'll finally get to work on things other than fighting fires.

      Was your previous job as a fireman?

    2. Re:Changing jobs... by d3kk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or a professional Slashdot moderator?

    3. Re:Changing jobs... by mibus · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it was a job as a sysadmin that had to look after a lot of printers and scanners...

      Aaaaargh! :-)

  35. Sue SCO by gspr · · Score: 2, Funny

    He should just sue SCO and live off the money... relaxing in a fabulous villa, doing a bit of kernel coding every now and then ;-)

    1. Re:Sue SCO by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      He'd proably want to build that villa back in his old stomping grounds, but due to the heavy taxes we have here (.fi) I doubt it would be economically plausible. So who needs money (The issue of him getting paid for his work.), when it'd all go into taxes anyway?

      I'm fairly certain this is the force that drives him.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    2. Re:Sue SCO by bindaaas · · Score: 2, Funny

      Recently a new word was added in English Dictionary... and that is 'SCO' which replaces the old word "SCREW".
      Usage: SCO you (read "Screw you")

      --
      bin
      look siG is kool
  36. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by BillFarber · · Score: 4, Insightful
    First: I love linux and use it primarily, but I am a techno-geek-nerd.

    That being said, linux will not go mainstream until my mother can use it. That won't happen until several things are resolved.
    1) printer setup utilities SUCK
    2) sound card setup utilities SUCK
    3) Most other setup utilities suck (too a lesser degree) also.

    The apps are really improving, but sysadmin for the typical home user requires way more time and thought than they are willing to put into it.

    If my mom buys a new printer for her Windows machine, she plugs it in and uses it. If she was using linux, she would end up returning the printer.

  37. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So let's see, we could :
    1) Scrap KDE and Gnome, put *all* the code into XFree itself, that way everyone is stuck with whatever "paradigms" you think up
    2) Stick every single configuration file into one GIANT configuration file, which would be so big and monsterous that it would require a binary format, along with a special program to edit it and a bunch of API calls to modify it
    3) Make 7-10 different versions of the OS, all built on essentially the same thing, but each requiring their own set of patches and updates
    4) Launch a huge marketing campaign to brainwash people into thinking your product delivers a great "experience"

    Well then you'd just have Windows.

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  38. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USABILITY is the key for the desktop. Its not there.

    Look at the driver model,look at the UI's. THEY BLOW GOATS!

    Look at GIMP, since ppl say its good compared to Photoshop. BZZT nope. I got a crapola of photoshop files that GIMP cannot handle. SO i have to redo those? I dont think so.

    Look at the UI, its seperate windows everywhere!! WTF!! Taskbar clutter hell!

    NO Multiple Document Interfaces? Thats why photoshop is mainstream and not GIMP.

  39. When your job changes are... by doppleganger871 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...posted on Slashdot, you ARE the alpha geek.

    That is all.

    1. Re:When your job changes are... by rscrawford · · Score: 1

      Heck, it's in the New York Times!

      I predict that in 200 years, Linus will either be canonized by the Pope as the "Saint of Information Technology", or counted as one of the greatest villains in human history (for those people who will have purchased the rights to read human history, that is).

      --
      -- The reason it's called the right wing? Irony.
    2. Re:When your job changes are... by Mike+Shaver · · Score: 1

      Nah, sometimes it's just a slow news day. (Not in this case, IMO.)

      Mike
  40. Re:Site slow -- AC mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't make it clear enough in my original post that i knew i was being trolled?

    Lay off that crack pipe sonny, and read my posts.

  41. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right. As it stands, most of this stuff is "distro specific". It's a necessary evil (currently) as boot-time config varies between distros (this could be fixed).

    Things like the CUPS web interface, are neat for an admin, but suck for Joe Homeuser. Well sort of... I understand that CUPS will have a standard GUI interface soon, but it's been a long time coming...

    Having ALSA sound built into the kernel will help, but it shouldn't be as bad as it is - all that really happens is 'modprobe ' then set mixer levels... The trick is autodetecting the appropriate module based on PCI readable info. Another option is pull this into the kernel, and do it automagically.

    I've found most distro config tools are pitched at an install-time level. Eg, setup once and go. X configuration is a classic - what a pig for a beginner. it's the kind of thing that should be built into nautilus, and modified with a right click (like windows... does the mac do this too, or is it still control panels?)

    Problem is that much of this need better vendor support, and this will only come with time and market share.

  42. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Some+Bitch · · Score: 2, Insightful
    4) Usability is being addressed by both KDE and Gnome. Again, how much maintaining does the average user actually do? As far as software management goes, if RedCarpet or Up2Date is too hard, I honestly don't know how much easier it would need to be.

    Two words: command line. Until you can press a button in a pretty window it's not friendly enough for the masses.

  43. One year leave of absence? by heretic · · Score: 1

    I see in the email where he calls it a leave of absence. I don't see any indication of it being limited to one year.

  44. Re:Early post! by aug24 · · Score: 1
    Slashdot user stalking

    Wossat then?

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  45. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who said about a single config file? How about XML, how about local per all in ONE single file format and standard (like app.exe.config XML format on .NET) Who said anything about the registry? You did, just you , only you and youre anti windows view.

    7 - 10 diff versions of linux exist, theyre called distros, nice rewording to be anti windows yet again. One day you may actually hang yourself if you fall throught youre ass.

  46. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XFree renders fine yes, JUST fine, JUST JUST and no more. Stay in the stale stagnent "JUST FINE" lane if you want. We want INNOVATION and PROGRESS. Not "JUST FINE". What is the point if there is NOTHING to render? Where are the apps? Games et all. "Oh they will come".. WHEN? WHERE? FROM WHO? WHERE ARE THE PLANS?

  47. I wanna read that bio. by torpor · · Score: 1


    I bet Linus' self-deprecating sense of humor shines in every single line.

    Still, short of emailing him myself (yeah, right), I have no idea how to get hold of that bio, and I'm too lazy to think one up here and post it (in humor).

    Anyone else seen it? C'mon, you know you want to ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  48. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually WIndows provides me with a better "experience" than linux can just now. You see, MS are evolving the UI, Linux isnt. Look at the leaps and bounds windows has made on usability. Linux is still in the windows 3.1 lane. You are an OS, claim to be a good desktop OS by some, well since those are the claims, you have to go head to head with windows on those issues, not run away from them. So far you run away.

  49. Snopes.com : a ridiculous urban myth! by Thud457 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You do realize that www.snopes.com is just one big put-on, right?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Snopes.com : a ridiculous urban myth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the whole point. He's pointing out that the grandparent's post is an urban legend. snopes.com collects the urban legends. He's using the fact that it's on snopes.com to point out that the original story is bogus. Think before you post.

    2. Re:Snopes.com : a ridiculous urban myth! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      You do realize that www.snopes.com is just one big put-on, right?

      snopes.com isn't a put on. It's a serious site that collects and [verifies/debunks] urban legends. fool.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  50. Linux Usability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure.exe -MyLiNuX $runs /fine=but.dont%expect% #good usability /help me

  51. Let's see what happens in a year by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 0, Troll

    Transmeta has always been very good at letting me spend even an inordinate amount of time on Linux, but as a result I've been feeling a little guilty at just how little "real work" I got done lately.

    Just a little guilty? Boy, what a crappy employee. Really. It's one thing to work on projects in your spare time but to leech off your employer to do so is not right. I'm sure this will encourage other employers to support their employees' work on open source projects. I guess Transmeta didn't want the bad press associated with firing Torvalds...let's see if he goes back in a year. Will Transmeta even notice he's gone (except for part where they save money on his salary)?

    1. Re:Let's see what happens in a year by praedor · · Score: 1

      Nice try. If the company doesn't have a problem with it (they didn't) then it isn't a problem, isn't ripping off the company, isn't doing anything wrong.


      By definition. Get it?

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    2. Re:Let's see what happens in a year by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, the company is a publicly traded company with lots of owners (read: shareholders), and said company's stock now trades at about a buck and a half, down from its high of over $40 about 2 1/2 years ago.

      Quarterly Income Statement

      Hey, here's a fun graph: TMTA vs MSFT

    3. Re:Let's see what happens in a year by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      If the primary purpose of his hire was to gain publicity, I'd say they've gotten their money's worth, and their atttitude was that he can therefore work on Linux all he wants.

      I don't see anything bad or unethical about that, regardless of the stock price. The stock price, in this case, is affected mainly by the boom/bust situation in the tech market in general, which is not Linus' fault.

      D

  52. Find the article at Google groups.. by theprancinghorse · · Score: 1

    You can also read Linus' post here.

  53. Re:Early post! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    Basically, it's when some God-knows-how-bored idiot starts to pursue a specific user as they post on /. solely with the intention of flaming their every post.

    It's especially sad when you consider how much time it must take.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  54. Re:Early post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    go to someone's profile (slashdot.org/~CmdrTaco), and go through the list of their most recent posts, and post a reply to them


    There are automated troll tools that do that sort of thing, so it doesn't necessarily mean you're a loser if you do it :)

  55. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

    I was actually joking/trolling. The sad thing is, it got modded "insightful".

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  56. Re:Hmmm, SCO related - no by morzel · · Score: 1
    That doesn't seem to be the case since (according to the NYTimes article) Transmeta is getting into the OSDL at the same time.
    This is hardly 'distancing' themselves from linux.

    --
    Okay... I'll do the stupid things first, then you shy people follow.
    [Zappa]
  57. Wired article by OS390 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was reading wired and they were talking about how after people leave their jobs after being interviewed in Wired. Barry Diller left Vivendi right after he was interviewed, and some other that I can remember because I left the issue at home. This was in the letters to the editor section for anyone that has a copy. One of the editors guessed that since Linus was getting interviewed in this months article, he was going to leave. He said something to the point of " anyone looking for a decent Unix programmer" in reference to Linus. Somebody should have the damn article.

    1. Re:Wired article by wka · · Score: 2, Informative

      The piece mentioning Barry Diller, Howard Schmidt, and Linus can be found online here. It's the intorduction to their letters to the editior section.

  58. 7 herbs and spices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, is he going to open source the 'Secret Recipe'

  59. The "boring" Transmeta press release by Blademan007 · · Score: 1


    Linux Creator Linus Torvalds Joins OSDL
    First OSDL Fellow Will Devote Himself Exclusively to Linux Development

    BEAVERTON, OR, and SANTA CLARA, CA, June 17, 2003 â" OSDL, a non-profit, global consortium of leading technology companies dedicated to accelerating the adoption of Linux, and Transmeta Corporation (Nasdaq: TMTA), the leader in efficient computing, today announced that Linus Torvalds, the creator of Linux, will join OSDL as the first OSDL Fellow.

    As an OSDL fellow, Linus will work exclusively on leading the development of Linux, the open source software that he created in 1991 as a university student in Finland. Torvalds will dedicate himself now full-time to guiding a distributed team of thousands of Linux developers around the world. At OSDL, he will have hands-on access to its state-of-the-art computing resources and test facility. He will also help set priorities and direction for the Lab's different industry initiatives.

    "It feels a bit strange to finally officially work on what I've been doing for the last twelve years, but with the upcoming 2.6.x release it makes sense to be able to concentrate fully on Linux," Torvalds said. "OSDL is the perfect setting for vendor-independent and neutral Linux development."

  60. Press release from Transmeta by heretic · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's the press release alluded to in Linus' email. Still no mention of his leave being limited to one year.

    Linux Creator Linus Torvalds Joins OSDL

    First OSDL Fellow Will Devote Himself Exclusively to Linux Development

    BEAVERTON, OR, and SANTA CLARA, CA, June 17, 2003 â" OSDL, a non-profit, global consortium of leading technology companies dedicated to accelerating the adoption of Linux, and Transmeta Corporation (Nasdaq: TMTA), the leader in efficient computing, today announced that Linus Torvalds, the creator of Linux, will join OSDL as the first OSDL Fellow.

    As an OSDL fellow, Linus will work exclusively on leading the development of Linux, the open source software that he created in 1991 as a university student in Finland. Torvalds will dedicate himself now full-time to guiding a distributed team of thousands of Linux developers around the world. At OSDL, he will have hands-on access to its state-of-the-art computing resources and test facility. He will also help set priorities and direction for the Lab's different industry initiatives.

    "It feels a bit strange to finally officially work on what I've been doing for the last twelve years, but with the upcoming 2.6.x release it makes sense to be able to concentrate fully on Linux," Torvalds said. "OSDL is the perfect setting for vendor-independent and neutral Linux development."

    Founded in 2000, OSDL has data centers in Portland, Oregon and Yokohama, Japan used by Linux developers around the world. With investment backing from Computer Associates, Fujitsu, Hitachi, HP, IBM, Intel, NEC and others, the lab sponsors key industry projects, including industry initiatives to enhance Linux for use in corporate data centers (Data Center Linux) and in telecommunications networks (Carrier Grade Linux). OSDL is increasingly being recognized as the center-of-gravity for the Linux industry: an important and independent central body that invests in the growth and innovation of Linux for the benefit of customers.

    "OSDL is a leading Linux-industry advocate with the single-minded focus of accelerating its use throughout the enterprise," said Stuart Cohen, OSDL CEO. "Linus' decision to join us is a confirmation of the importance of our mission. OSDL is the only organization where Linux developers, customers and vendors can all participate as equals. The addition of Linus' perspective and guidance to the Lab will enhance our value to all three of these groups."

    Linux is the fastest-growing operating system in the world. Revenue for Linux-based servers grew 62% in 2002, while overall sales of servers dropped 8%, according to Gartner Dataquest, a market research company. By 2007, Gartner predicts that Linux may grab 15% of the worldwide market.

    "Linus Torvalds adds tremendous credibility to OSDL's efforts to drive the evolution of Linux forward into enterprise computing and carrier environments," said George Weiss, vice president and research director for the research firm Gartner. "The computing market is still questioning how far and how fast Linux can go as an enterprise-ready platform. With Linus at OSDL, many will be looking for leadership from the lab for answers to those questions."

    Torvalds will join OSDL on leave from Transmeta Corporation, where he is currently a Transmeta Fellow. Transmeta is an OSDL member and worked with OSDL on the transition. "Linus has made substantial technological contributions as a member of our development team here at Transmeta," said Matthew R. Perry, president and CEO, Transmeta Corporation. "Transmeta appreciates and fully supports Linus' strong interest in devoting his attention and energy to certain emerging industry-wide Open Source initiatives at OSDL."

    About OSDL

    Founded in 2000, OSDL is dedicated to accelerating the growth and adoption of Linux in the enterprise. Supported by a global consortium of IT industry leaders, OSDL provides state-of the-art computi

  61. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [..]Apache, Mozilla, KDE...are moving at a break neck pace.

    Let me guess, you weren't here before 1.0?

    1. Re:Heh by Lethyos · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you weren't here before 1.0?

      I have been using Mozilla since before M12 (well, I guess I was trying to use it). Considering that it is almost a ground-up rewrite and what the project actually entails (Mozilla has become an application platform), it has done exceptionally well. I believe it is even larger than the Linux kernel now, right? 4-5 years of development has yielded some remarkable results. Microsoft has been pushing Internet Explorer on us since around Netscape 3 (well before I even graduated from highschool in 1998) and they still haven't gotten it right! <rant>So what does that tell you: a company with billions of dollars coming out of its ears produces a very broken browser in a longer period of time that it takes a free project to produce a very solid, standards compliant (mostly) browser?<rant>

      --
      Why bother.
  62. Re: Linux will not succeed on the desktop until.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I would also insist that something is cool when I spend wayyy to much money for it.

  63. Cmdr Taco to take leave of absence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Newswire:
    Cmdr Taco is taking an extended four-year leave of absence from Slashdot and will be going to the University of Michigan to learn Journalism. He'll also be taking courses in reality, spelling, housekeeping, grammar, shopping, ethics, marital skills and parenting, just in case he ever grows up, in which case he'll need minimal competency in all of these areas of human interaction.

  64. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe, but at least with Linux she doesn't get a paperclip trying to patronise her...

  65. Re:Why I am against abortions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You, frankly, are why I am FOR abortions. You are simply too stupid to breed. Any progeny you might have would simply end up on welfare cranking out more useless copies!

  66. Re: Linux will not succeed on the desktop until.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right,. this is Slashdot. Not Losers-try-to-justify-why-they-use-crap-by-any-mea ns-necessary-or-like-they're-getting-paid-for-it. Maybe you should go to M$ and offer your PR arsehole (bigmouth) to them for free (like you do here).

  67. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by minus9 · · Score: 1

    "NO Multiple Document Interfaces? Thats why photoshop is mainstream and not GIMP."

    Nothing to do with photoshop having several years head start, millions of dollars of development money and being the product of a company that owns several related patents then?

  68. Why is it called a leave of absence? by xutopia · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the near near miss paradox or the short dwarf pleonasm.

    1. Re:Why is it called a leave of absence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "leave" is used in the old fashioned sense of "permission". So the phrase means "permitted absence". Contrast with military term AWOL=Absent WithOut Leave (ie, permission).

  69. Moderators on crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent article isn't interesting, insightsfull, informative or even remotely true.

    Linus has never said he'd hand over anything to Andrew Morton. And for the hacking part, he's been doing lots of actual code hacking on several parts of the kernel lately (as always). Parent isn't "Interesting" or anything like that. It's just "wrong".

  70. Good.... by Turgon33 · · Score: 1

    now i don't have to feel guilty about buying a pentium-m notebook as opposed to waiting for transmeta to finally deliver the astro!

  71. Transmeta sued by SCO? Why? by mojinoman · · Score: 1

    Transmeta makes hardware, not software. There's not a single chance for SCO to sue them.

    1. Re:Transmeta sued by SCO? Why? by hesiod · · Score: 5, Funny

      > There's not a single chance for SCO to sue them.

      Not having a good case hasn't stopped them before...

    2. Re:Transmeta sued by SCO? Why? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SCO could alledge that:

      * Transmeta hired Linus primarily to do work on the kernel for them (i.e. have a Linux kernel ready to go when their chip came out, both so linux would run and in case Microsoftware didn't.)

      * While working for them he, as part of his work, distributed (thus copying) the allegedly-SCO's IP that was allegedly ported into Linux by IBM or others, or that he ported some in himself.

      So therefore Transmeta was involved in the IP "theft", yadda yadda...

      Or any of a number of variations on the theme.

      But I doubt that has anything to do with Linus leaving Transmeta. (If nothing else, SCO could still sue them after he's gone.)

      I imagine that, now that Transmeta's first chips are out, most of the Transmeta-specific kernel work is done. So if Linus stays he's likely to get sucked into other software that's less kernel-specific, losing his kernel focus to the detriment of Linux. On the other hand, he can focus on the kernel full-time at his new site, to the benefit of Liunx, Transmeta, Linus' peace of mind, and a whole lot more.

      Linus sounds like he feels uncomfortable being paid by Transmeta for kernel work - even it really IS a big help to Transmeta for the kernel to continue to prosper. Going to somewhere where this is no longer an issue in HIS mind (regardless of whether it's an issue for his management) is good all around.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  72. Things I imagine "OSDL" might stand for by robson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since I'm ignorant enough not to know what OSDL stands for, and lazy enough that I don't feel like searching for it, I'm just going to make something up. Here are my top 5 so far:

    1. Open Source Developer Land
    2. Oprah's Singular Dance Legends
    3. Oops, Stallman Dissed Linus
    4. O'Reilly Still Dignifies Linux
    5. Official Simpsons Disco Library

    (I suspect I'm on to something with #2...)

    1. Re:Things I imagine "OSDL" might stand for by mcd7756 · · Score: 2, Funny

      #6. Only SCO Disses Linux.

      --
      Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them? --Abraham Lincoln
    2. Re:Things I imagine "OSDL" might stand for by robson · · Score: 1

      #6. Only SCO Disses Linux.

      Beautiful!

  73. And Linux... by MosesJones · · Score: 2, Interesting


    And the number of Linux purposed Transmeta systems out there ? Or Server based systems ? Transmeta is aiming at the notebook market where Linux is pretty much unheard of, then at the lower-scale where again the majority of systems are not Linux.

    I have no doubt the guy is brilliant, but isn't it a bit strange given the markets Transmeta aimed at that they wanted lots of Linux development.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:And Linux... by mrjohnson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh, where have you been?

    2. Re:And Linux... by crisco · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Get on Google and search for Transmeta and blade and see for yourself.

      RLX Technologies helped push the 'blade' server concept to the place it is today, with most of the major hardware companies offering something along the same concept in the pages of the trade glossies. RLX started with the original Crusoe chip and continues to make Transmeta servers, as seen in this article.

      --

      Bleh!

    3. Re:And Linux... by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You are misreading his role there. They didn't hire Linus to tune kernels for Crusoe processors. They hired him for his talents as a software engineer. To them, Linux was a credential just like a Doctorate.

      The work he has done on Linux over the past six years has been done with Transmeta's blessing, support and appreciation, but they wanted him on the clock to help code the emulation/translation software they need to make their chips a viable product. I'm guessing that task is somewhere between designing an ISA and writting a kernel. Given what others have said about his psychic debugging skills, I'd imagine Transmeta found him very suited to the job.

  74. what a sweet deal Linus has by ChristTrekker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How many of us can honestly say that we're doing what we love to do? And not just "working at an appropriately geek/tech job" either. I mean, this guy started a project as a hobby, people found value in it, and now he gets a salary to maintain it as he sees fit. When you look at history, even people like Michaelangelo who got to do what they liked doing, and got paid to do it, still had to work on someone else's project. "Michaelangelo, paint this ceiling, something in a biblical motif." Even top athletes get told who to play and when. Not many people have, or have ever had, as sweet a deal as Linus. I have several projects, as well as other non-geeky hobbies, that I scarcely have time for. I wish I could get paid to work on them. Heck, I'd settle for simply having more time for them without pay.

    1. Re:what a sweet deal Linus has by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theo de Raadt, founder of OpenBSD, has been doing this since the project's inception.

  75. Yes, Caldera/SCO was an OSDL member by lma · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, OSDL did have Caldera/SCO money. Caldera joined OSDL early on, and later let their membership expire sometime after the name change to SCO. So SCO has funded Linux kernel development projects through OSDL. Larry

  76. MOD THIS FUCK UP FUNNAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I snorted gunk all over my monitor.

  77. OSDL by phebz23 · · Score: 1

    I hope they don't make Linus & Family move to Beaverton...

  78. It's kind of shocking that this isn't done now by Catullus · · Score: 1

    Unless I'm missing something, it seems like an obvious thing to do (and something that's done as standard in many other linked list implementations).

    1. Re:It's kind of shocking that this isn't done now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, you are wasting time changing the pointers from the unused entries (recently removed).

      Since this just wastes time altering data that shoulnd't be looked at anymore, then it should only be done in a beta cycle, not for production release.

      a lot of the poisioning stuff takes cpu time that would only be helpful in discovering bugs... not useful for bug free code..

    2. Re:It's kind of shocking that this isn't done now by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      There is no reason to do it if the code is right, and it's a performance hit. It's useful for debugging though.

    3. Re:It's kind of shocking that this isn't done now by stor · · Score: 1

      True.

      Also one could claim that the debugging code would have a (arguably minute) possibility of hiding other races, yes? Just because the timing is slightly different?

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  79. SCO Effect by Helmholtz · · Score: 1

    The conspiracy side of me thinks that this might be a preemptive move to try to keep Transmeta off the radar of SCO lawyers.

    This is _pure_ paranoid speculation on my part ... but hey, you never know.

    --
    RFC2119
  80. Re: Linux relicensing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Linus, btw, is fully behind the GPL (as the original author of Linux, he could start releasing it under any license he damn well pleased).
    Actually, he can't; he can relicense only his own code, not that contributed by anyone else, and nothing derived from others' contributions, because he does not have copyright to that code. This is fully intentional; Linus wanted people to be confident that Linux would not become proprietary, and so he made it impossible for that to happen.
  81. Dork! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice to get slammed with "think before you post" by someone too dense to get the joke!

  82. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by johnnyb · · Score: 1

    Huh? RedCarpet is not command-line based.

  83. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by johnnyb · · Score: 1

    "NO Multiple Document Interfaces? Thats why photoshop is mainstream and not GIMP."

    Are you aware that Photoshop having the MDI interface is actually a giant kludge dating back from porting it from a Mac? The Macintosh interface does not work like that. In fact, almost all developers are moving _away_ from MDI because it sucks so bad.

    Photoshop is not popular _because_ of MDI, it's popular despite it. However, since that's now the standard, people have trouble thinking about how the easiest and most efficient way of working with their apps might be, and just complain because it isn't just like Photoshop. No it's not. It's better.

    It also doesn't clutter your task bar if you use a decent one. My task bar has all GIMP windows grouped together in a single one, which I can click on to bring up a menu of GIMP windows.

    So what if you have Photoshop files that GIMP can't handle? What does that have to do with usability? That has to do with _upgradability_, not usability.

  84. D'oh by crisco · · Score: 1
    --

    Bleh!

  85. Is he moving? by DrCode · · Score: 1

    Does this mean he's moving to Portland, Oregon?

  86. Prominent Programmer my foot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to NY times:

    Prominent Programmer Will Leave TransmetaProminent?

    prominent ?? PROMINENT???

    more like Legendary! . For Christ's sake!
    Prominent my foot! Hell, every other /. programmer is a promonent progammer!

    If that's not an understatement I dont' know what is!

  87. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I don't know about you, but have you tried the new distros? I use Mandrake 9.1, and printer installation is as easy as it is in Windows. Granted the interface isn't exactly the same, but linux is NOT windows. Just click through a wizard, find the recommended print driver, and bam the printer is there. BTW my printer is stationed on another windows machine networked on my LAN, but the Mandrake printdrake is able to find it and utilize it perfectly.

    Oh, and I have no idea what you're talking about with sound card setup, my sblive is always detected automatically, and has been since mandrake 9. If I change the sound card, during bootup it detects the hardware change, and changes the driver. I'm not sure about the more obscure sound cards, since I don't buy them.

    Also, windows printer installation isn't as easy as you say; you can't just plugin the printer and have it just work. You still have to install drivers (well, I use HP printers and I have to do that, I don't know about other brands).

  88. That settles it by LuYu · · Score: 1

    This Cringely quote (from this article) always struck me as strange:

    Even Linus Torvalds is paid by Transmeta to be the God of Linux.
    Now I know why. In this post Linus said:
    Transmeta has always been very good at letting me spend even an inordinate amount of time on Linux, but as a result I've been feeling a little guilty at just how little "real work" I got done lately. [emphasis mine]
    Now I know why. Linus was working at transmeta because he was a god of the i386, not the god of Linux.
    --
    All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    1. Re:That settles it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to defend Cringely, heÂs also human and makes mistakes...

      But this may be a way of speaking... like "the company pays Peter so that he can be the King of Jazz every Saturday night".

  89. Re:"now that transmeta is trying to make money" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that Transmeta are trying to move into a more corporate sphere

    by this you really mean what i put in the subject. duh. Linus made huge contributions to Transmeta over the years; ask anyone who works there. No surprise that he wants to work on the kernel for real now.

  90. Can IBM Now Protect Linus? by Is+This+Nickname+Tak · · Score: 1

    I didn't read the OSDN charter, but could the move allow IBM, HP, etc. to provide legal support in case SCO sues Linus directly? They are OSDN members. Transmetas pockets are certainly not deep enough and Linus isn't filthy rich. Perhaps the offer was made now because SCO has not yet filed such a suit but now seems intent on it. I don't know, would switching jobs after the suit would have legal ramifications?

    1. Re:Can IBM Now Protect Linus? by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

      Minor nit... It is OSDL, or Open Source Development Lab.

  91. What a Diiference a Year Makes?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow I don't think this is just any sabbatical.

    Is one year off enough time for Linus to audit the kernel and replace any contentious code?

    (I'm thinking that little $3 billion lawsuit that SCO has hanging over IBM...)

  92. Re:Predicted itinerary... little bitch fantasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AlphaSys fantasizes about Linux stripping off the size 14 Mr Mackey underwear from AlphaSys inadequate boney sexless body. He see Linus peeling off those Mackey undergarments and making a comment; "Yah, I don't see your pee pee, is that a pubic hair or your weenie?"

    Then AlphaSys takes 40 Viagra to make the Mister Tinkie stand out for Linus. Lovingly, Linus starts to.....scraaaaaaaaaaaaaaacth.

    Hey, AlphaSys, Linus isn't a fucking fag like you.

  93. Re:Early post! by Jellybob · · Score: 1

    Huh?

    Spending time writing software to troll people without having to put any effort into it *doesn't make you a loser*?

    Looks like I'm in the wrong career ;)

  94. Cool by oaf357 · · Score: 1
    I know Transmeta has given Linus quite a bit of latitude but goodness. This is extremely gracious of them.

    Linus, don't power out 2.6 too quick. But, congratulations on making Linux your full time job. A long overdue proof of Linux's popularity.

  95. Seen and not HURD by duck_prime · · Score: 1
    Wow. Even the HURD fanboys haven't run it in 3 years.
    You don't understand. He booted it 3 years ago, and is just waiting for the command line.
  96. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. You suck.
    2. Many people could not give a damn about Linux going "mainstream". If anything is going to bring about more "suckiness", that's it.

  97. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every few months I decide to try Linux again (I use Win98SE now), because I know that I'm using an OS that will eventually be unsupported. I hope for something at least as good as Win 95, or maybe better like Win 98, and every time I walk away wondering "Why did I just try Linux again, didn't I learn my lesson last time?" I vainly try different distros, hoping one gets it right. Mandrake seems to be the closest for X/KDE. Debian seems to be the best if X is not involved.

    Here are my main beefs, some are with Linux, but most are with XFree86/KDE:

    1) There seems to be a standard way to do drivers, as kernel patches.. but then no one seems to use it, either that, or it's way too complicated. Why do I need to load special video drivers (and others) just for running XFree86 or KDE? Shouldn't have those have already loaded as a kernel patch and be ready to go?

    2) I really like the way Windows handles hardware. It automatically detects new hardware on boot, then you can choose to either configure it then, or wait until later and do it in the device manager. It would still be fine if I had to run an app to detect new hardware (as in Windows, Add New Hardware, where it searches), that would speed up the boot process. After I have a piece of hardware installed, I can change drivers, see if it has conflicts, etc.. and this is for almost every device in the system! If something is not working, it's easy to tell that, too. This should probably be a non-X app, as it should pertain only to the Linux kernel, true?

    3) I wish compiling everything wasn't such a pain, but I guess this is really the fault of people not sticking to the ANSI C standard. I still can't get my Turtle Beach Montego sound card to work in Linux because the drivers won't compile. I enjoy how in Windows I have a precompiled set of files sitting on a CD that I can load by pointing them at an INF.. completely brainless, this is good.

    4) All the system software applications should be under one directory, say, /linux, so there would be /linux/bin, /linux/etc, /linux/proc, instead of a million things branching off the root directory.

    5) Why is it that all apps decide they need to install in the /bin or /usr/bin directories? Each app should have its own directory for easy removal.. although "Program Files" is cumbersome, it is the right idea.. How about /apps or /prog? Speaking of easy removal, Add/Remove programs, (well, "Remove programs", because I never add with it) is a great concept. Either have the program self contained in its own directory, or if that's impossible, have a record kept of changes to the system, so that those changes can be undone later.

    6) KDE freezes up constantly and hard locks my whole system. I've been told that this is a hardware problem. If so, why does Windows not crash out like this? I'd avoid KDE altogether as it seems bloated and slow, but it's the only way I'm not stuck in Windows 3.1 land, otherwise I don't get decent scrollbars, a task bar, application menu, quicklaunch, or desktop. I wish I could use some decent fonts, though. Importing Windows fonts only seems to do TTF, which is half of the fonts. Tried to turn off font smoothing, but there were two different font configuration boxes, only one allowed to disable smoothing.

    7) Which brings me to my next gripe.. there isn't a set place for all configuration programs. Where is the Control Panel? Mac has it, Windows has it. I suspect that the system is built upon multiple layers that all expect their own configuration. It isn't just Linux and X, but its, Linux, X, KDE, and probably a few other things that I don't even know about running. Tried changing my screen resolution.. the app claimed it was changed, but reality was elsewhere. Also, config apps seem to expect 1024x768 or more. This seems fairly brain damaged. Stick with the "safe mode" standard of 6

  98. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) printer setup utilities SUCK

    Man! You aren't kidding!! When I got a new printer for my SuSE box, I had to PLUG IT IN, START MY PC, AND LOG IN!!!

    It was horrible! Took me almost a full minute! So much for USB being fast...

  99. Funny how many more Slashdotters... by JohnnySkidmarks · · Score: 0

    ....posted about DRM in CDs/DVDs than about Linus coming back to Linux.

    --

    I went to battle MC Escher but drew a blank

  100. Just to set the reboot record straight: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I plug in and out a printer, a hard drive, a camera, and a CD READ/WRITE on the front USB Port on my ME running eMachine without turning off or rebooting anything.

    I could plug the CD into the back parallel port and one USB device into the back USB Port and only hot swap when I wanted to plug in the camera, but I'll probably just buy a USB Hub and not have to manually plug/unplug... but thats next month.

  101. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by nathanh · · Score: 1
    That being said, linux will not go mainstream until ...

    Wow. I've never before seen anybody list the things that Linux needs to go mainstream! This is certainly a turning-point for Linux. Programmers will flock to your side to implement your vision. Your comments will be written into the history books. I don't know why the 10s of 1000s of Linux developers haven't realised before this day; Linux would dominate the market if only we had a soundcard setup utility! Brilliant. You are truly the smartest person that ever lived.

  102. "You won't like me when I'm mad!" by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see that Linus is getting a bit more riled up about SCO now that SCO has started taking personal potshots at him. In a recent Cnet article:

    "I care deeply about IP (intellectual property) rights. I've personally got more IP rights than the average bear, and as the owner of the copyright in the collective of the Linux kernel, I shepherd even more. It's what I do, every day. I personally manage more valuable IP rights than SCO has ever held, and I take it damn seriously," Torvalds said in an e-mail interview.
  103. Linux on the Desktop by KidSock · · Score: 1

    As for being on the desktop, well, it will. It's only a matter of time.

    No. I use Linux ~70% of the time for development. With a couple of XTerms and vi it cannot be beaten for writing C code. I have used it since Slackware 2.0.3x days. But I am absolutely certain of one thing; Linux is not going to make it on the desktop. At least not with GNOME or KDE. Those desktops are very shallow. There is ZERO integration. MS has COM, OLE, a clipboard that actually works, etc. Everything works together *enough* to use and built *integrated* desktop applications. Linux is not going to the desktop mainstream. Deal with it.

    Go ahead and mod me down now.

    1. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong. Simple as that. Linux isn't nearly as difficult for the average user back in the the earlier Slackware days. Given another 3 to 5 years, we'll have a desktop environment with everything you're looking for. Probably a lot more. That's the way open source works thankfully, people have an itch and some of them get around to scratching it rather than whacking it.

  104. SCO? by E_elven · · Score: 1
    Didn't someone speculate Linus might be trying to sneak in fixes to remove any IP-trodding code as soon as it came out which parts actually violated said IP? First this german guy claims he's seen the violating lines without an NDA and now, in the kernel mail Linus notes some rather conspicuous (masked as inconspicuous) changes...
    Linus Torvalds:
    o Fix up missing header files


    E
    --
    Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
  105. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by BillFarber · · Score: 1
    A question was asked. I answered. If what I said is so obvious, then why haven't the problems been solved? If you are so fucking smart, then why don't you solve the problems and make the world a better place.

    By the way, why the personal attack?

  106. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the system software applications should be under one directory, say, /linux, so there would be /linux/bin, /linux/etc, /linux/proc, instead of a million things branching off the root directory.

    And this would simplify things how? Instead of having everything branching from root you have it all branching from /linux, real smart....

  107. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by nathanh · · Score: 1
    A question was asked. I answered. If what I said is so obvious, then why haven't the problems been solved? If you are so fucking smart, then why don't you solve the problems and make the world a better place.

    Because it's not about smart. It's about doing the work. That's why Linus is revered. It's not because he's smart. If anything, Linus is only a little above-average in the smarts department. What makes Linus special is that he gets things done. He doesn't lecture or boss people around. He just does it.

    By the way, why the personal attack?

    Because the "what Linux needs" post is both worthless and arrogant. Worthless because it achieves nothing. Arrogant because it presumes that people can't spot the bleeding obvious. Lots of people know what Linux needs. Strangely they also disagree on the specifics. So what matters is working code; nobody needs yet another list of "what Linux needs".

    Short version: nobody likes a back seat driver.

  108. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by stor · · Score: 1

    >Linus is only a little above-average in the smarts department.

    No, he's damn smart. How many people do you know that can write decent kernel code?

    Cheers
    Stor

    --
    "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  109. a tendency to transpose letters by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    That what i said, I am not a moron. (And not native english)

    1. Re:a tendency to transpose letters by rifter · · Score: 1

      Sorry. In the USA Dyslexia and ADD have become "cool" diseases and probably 99% of people joke that they have them (witness the recent Ask Slashdot ADHD article...) but most people do not understand what they really are. I was just pointing out that Dyslexia is a serious matter for people who really have it and that it affects more than spelling. And yes it is difficult for people with Dyslexia to spell their ailment (and probably to search for information about it) :P.

  110. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by nathanh · · Score: 1
    No, he's damn smart. How many people do you know that can write decent kernel code?

    100s of people. Literally.

    As I said, I think Linus *is* smart, but he's not Tanenbaum smart, or Aho smart, or Sutherland smart. He's smart in that he's way smarter than I'll ever be, but he's not so smart that I'd go "wow, he is smart". There are very few people who are pure genius. Linus is more of a do-er than a think-er. That's not an insult. In a way, it's the best form of compliment.

    I honestly don't think Linus would be offended if he read my post (not that he would). He's such a pragmatic personality - a quality that I deeply admire - that he would probably agree that he isn't a genius. He's simply somebody that gets off his butt and does the work. That's as rare a quality as genius.

    PS: ever noticed that great computer scientists are referenced by their family name, but great open source developers are referenced by their first?

  111. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by BillFarber · · Score: 1

    So do it. Stop posting worthless words, and write the code to solve the problems YOU see in linux.

  112. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by nathanh · · Score: 1
    So do it. Stop posting worthless words, and write the code to solve the problems YOU see in linux.

    I am writing code. You are the one telling everybody "what Linux needs".

    Put your money where your mouth is, or shut your trap.

  113. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) They load automatically for me.. you have to manually load them? The only drivers I've seen that require anything like that are the proprietary nvidia ones - just add them to your rc script for auto-loaded modules or the distribution equivalent.

    2) Mandrake has something like that, but it's been a while since I've used it.

    3) No idea, really - tell me the kernel version and throw me a link to the sound card driver source and I may have a better answer.

    4) I disagree, really - that just changes things and I don't see the advanatage.

    5) It's possible, but it breaks a lot of unix expectations, and it's a pain from the command line (all those binary directories to search, security hazards associated with that, etc). It's a package management issue. Gentoo with portage handles it reasonably well. RPM can do it somewhat, I believe. Debian should be ok too. If you can stick at least mainly to packaged apps (and for Gentoo, at least, there are quite a lot, and I've been pretty much able to except for some strange little developement tools like an assembly-oriented debugger) it should be ok.

    6) You could see if it happens with other desktop environments, I suppose. I get X11 crashes occasionally too, and they're a pain.

    7) KDE has a control panel. If you've not tried KDE 3.1, I recommend it. It runs ok on my pII 300 / 64 ram (but I usually use blackbox - it is a pretty low-spec box). Mandrake also has a control panel, which you may find useful.

    8) Hmm. It doesn't really bother me, and Mac apps / especially Windows apps aren't always consistant by quite a long shot. KDE and Gnome apps tend to be fairly consistant.

    9) Yes. Use kdm (or xdm). You can configure it to log you into X11 automatically when the computer starts. This is doable through Mandrake's control center.

    10) MS-DOS is a pretty simple system. Kernel panics during boot make a fair deal of sense - I'd rather have a kernel panic than end up with damaged hardware or a corrupted filesystem because the OS was confused.
    You probably want a rescue disk. The Mandrake cd may be used for this. So can most other linux cds you may have laying around. Just find a way to get a shell, and you're fine if you can fix it from the command line. If you want a graphical way, something like knoppix may be interesting, but I've not tried it.

    No offense, but have you really looked at Mandrake much? When I used it last summer, there were *desktop icons* for things like the Mandrake control center, and new hardware was automatically detected on every boot.

    Assuming that wasn't a troll, I hope that this helps you.

  114. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by stor · · Score: 1

    I don't know if you'll read this Nathan as it's a pretty old thread now but I do agree with you somewhat. There are certainly plenty of people he gets advice from (Al Viro springs to mind) when problems become really tough.

    However I have been suprised by Linus' broad range of abilities inside and outside of Kernel coding. For instance, most of the time he has an uncanny ability to know when to keep his mouth shut and when to speak, an issue a lot of us have real problems with. Perhaps it's just his moderate personality shining through there but to me it shows a very strong competance.

    Also designing stuff for Transmeta wouldn't have been a walk in the park ;) You'd need to be a pretty darn competant programmer.

    Perhaps we're splitting hairs. I just didn't think that calling him simply "above average" was accurate: he's *well* above average in my opinion ;)

    Cheers mate,
    Stor

    --
    "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  115. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by nathanh · · Score: 1
    I don't know if you'll read this Nathan as it's a pretty old thread now but I do agree with you somewhat. There are certainly plenty of people he gets advice from (Al Viro springs to mind) when problems become really tough.

    Slashdot notifies me of replies with an email, so it doesn't matter how old the thread is.

    However I have been suprised by Linus' broad range of abilities inside and outside of Kernel coding. For instance, most of the time he has an uncanny ability to know when to keep his mouth shut and when to speak, an issue a lot of us have real problems with. Perhaps it's just his moderate personality shining through there but to me it shows a very strong competance.

    I'm also impressed by his political skills. A great number of luminaries in computer science seem to have all the social graces of a bad fart. Linux, on the other hand, seems to get respect from nearly everyone. This is a skill in and of itself. I think it's not so much his moderate personality - he can be damn abrasive when he wants to be - as much as his strong emphasis on quality and his perceived fairness when making difficult decisions. Those are admirable qualities in a project leader.

    Also designing stuff for Transmeta wouldn't have been a walk in the park ;) You'd need to be a pretty darn competant programmer.

    I don't know exactly what he did for Transmeta but even to odds it wasn't chip design! It's more likely he worked on the code-morphing engine or had a role in testing x86 compatibility.

    Perhaps we're splitting hairs. I just didn't think that calling him simply "above average" was accurate: he's *well* above average in my opinion ;)

    Well, as I said, I didn't mean to *insult* his intelligence. He's definitely smarter than the average bear. What I was getting at is that Linus isn't "smart" in the same way that Sutherland is smart or Thompson is smart. There's a special kind of genius required to think up new ideas or forge new paths in computer science. Linus "merely" built a POSIX compatible kernel; now admittedly that's quite an achievement but you might be surprised how many people can do that.

    If you want me to be more blunt; I don't think you'll find Linus is remembered in the same way that Djikstra is remembered. Linus will have his place in the history books because he was a fair leader, a great coder, a focal point for free software development, but not because he was a brainiac.