The short story Double-Take by Winston K. Marks covers the concept, although in there it was in a theatre as an evolution of 3D movies, where one viewer could watch a movie from the male lead's perspective, and the other from the female lead's perspective.
The story was written in 1953. Is that prior art enough? You can check here a bit over half-way down for the story.
You can get onto Netflix to browse by trying to log in once, and letting it tell you PSN is under maintenance, but it won't let you actually watch anything without logging on to PSN.:P
I think you meant to respond to The Snowman... But either way, he wasn't saying you got your definitions wrong, but that you got the direction wrong... NIPR -> SIPR has always been just fine (although the media, once connected to the SIPR side, is no longer allowed to be attached to the NIPR side) but SIPR -> NIPR has never been allowed...
The WoW server doesn't need player or enemy models, it just needs to know a bunch of numbers out of a database, how to manipulate them, and the protocol for communicating with the clients (as well as miscellaneous other things also not related to the models or artwork). Regardless, charging users for things still a blatant violation of the EULA, regardless of your opinion on just running a private server. Both on the server side (the admins have probably played the game before, and likely run around in the server as well) and also on the client side, as they get to see the EULA on install of the application.
Re:Don't f* with the IT guy like at restaurant you
on
Child Porn As a Weapon
·
· Score: 1
Or disproves it. They're allowed to do that too...
[...]Only one security hole found in over 10 years!
That's something of a misstatement. The claim only relates to remotely exploitable holes, and there have now been two of them. Although without digging too deep, for all I know the first was over 10 years ago...
Slashdot Mirror
There was QBASIC (later quickbasic... or they just really hid the full name for early versions) and before that GW-BASIC.
I know editors don't actually do any editing, but come on...
The exclusivity is what is timed, not the availability.
You got the URL right, but you spelled the name as "Bean" twice. o.O
During the trial run, I was under the impression that it was restricted to 18+ users only, but that that will be changed after it finally goes public.
The U.S. has separate wires too, known as the SIPRNet.
The short story Double-Take by Winston K. Marks covers the concept, although in there it was in a theatre as an evolution of 3D movies, where one viewer could watch a movie from the male lead's perspective, and the other from the female lead's perspective.
The story was written in 1953. Is that prior art enough? You can check here a bit over half-way down for the story.
Wouldn't it require that and running another cable? or having a switch on each end?
You can get onto Netflix to browse by trying to log in once, and letting it tell you PSN is under maintenance, but it won't let you actually watch anything without logging on to PSN. :P
Or a BSD server, like in the OP...
I purchase MS points a few times a week, and I have a feeling I'm not alone. I don't see how that would help narrow down the evil doers.
In 160MSP increments?
I think you meant to respond to The Snowman... But either way, he wasn't saying you got your definitions wrong, but that you got the direction wrong... NIPR -> SIPR has always been just fine (although the media, once connected to the SIPR side, is no longer allowed to be attached to the NIPR side) but SIPR -> NIPR has never been allowed...
I recommend burying baby Jesus directly beneath the food trough.
If only it were used that way... It's more like horrendous, horrible, horrid, average, great.
Or, if I'm being slightly more cynical, horrendous, horrible, horrid, wretched, average.
fighting game
Tager main?
(It's a quote from the fighting BlazBlue Calamity Trigger's bonus DVD explaining how to use one of the characters known as the Red Devil)
Wasn't trying to imply that they were, just that they were guilty of violating the EULA as well as the server admins.
The WoW server doesn't need player or enemy models, it just needs to know a bunch of numbers out of a database, how to manipulate them, and the protocol for communicating with the clients (as well as miscellaneous other things also not related to the models or artwork). Regardless, charging users for things still a blatant violation of the EULA, regardless of your opinion on just running a private server. Both on the server side (the admins have probably played the game before, and likely run around in the server as well) and also on the client side, as they get to see the EULA on install of the application.
Or disproves it. They're allowed to do that too...
There are plenty that will highlight the matching parentheses to whichever is under the cursor though.
Yes, we should be able to mod people up to remove our comments.
Did you know that they have a forum to discuss individual comics?
Chrom(e/ium) will have No Script features eventually.
To think. After all these years, Fred Physarum is finally getting the recognition he deserves.
[...]Only one security hole found in over 10 years!
That's something of a misstatement. The claim only relates to remotely exploitable holes, and there have now been two of them. Although without digging too deep, for all I know the first was over 10 years ago...