Slashdot Mirror


UVB-76 Broadcasts New Voice Message

Doug52392 writes "Following days of increased activity, the Russian numbers station UVB-76 has sent out a new voice transmission. The transmission, sent out on August 23, 2010 at 9:35AM PST, recited the following in Russian: 'UVB-76, UVB-76 — 93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74 — 9 3 8 8 2 nikolai, anna, ivan, michail, ivan, nikolai, anna, 7, 4, 1, 4, 3, 5, 7, 4' The station, believed to be a part of the former Soviet Union's dead man's switch system, has been continually broadcasting for over twenty years, and its purpose has never been fully explained."

560 comments

  1. Obvious by Walkingshark · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, dead switch is manned

    --
    The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    1. Re:Obvious by h00manist · · Score: 4, Funny

      It runs windows and has is giving a warning that the antivirus needs updating.

      --
      Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    2. Re:Obvious by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      But if it were running windows, how would it have been running for over 20 years?

    3. Re:Obvious by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Russian hackers.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    4. Re:Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what is the frequency, kenneth?

    5. Re:Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      4 8 15 16 23 42 but unfortunately it seems to have been Lost In Translation

    6. Re:Obvious by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      Frequent rebooting.

      (You do realize that Windows has been in existence as a shipping product for nearly 25 years, right?)

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    7. Re:Obvious by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, joke is made fun of by YOU!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    8. Re:Obvious by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Funny

      you're close. its not the antivirus that needs updating. its really the antenna-virus. understandable typo given the fact that its in russian.

      once your az-el motor system gets rooted, you might just have to reload the entire system from scratch again.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    9. Re:Obvious by spazdor · · Score: 1

      Yankee hotel foxtrot.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    10. Re:Obvious by Icegryphon · · Score: 1

      Weak capitalist regime,
      You will never understand the power of Science.
      If you do a 360+B you get Real Soviet Damage!!!

    11. Re:Obvious by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, doomsday device tells world about YOU!

    12. Re:Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post understands you in Soviet Russia!

    13. Re:Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia a joke ends you!

    14. Re:Obvious by Johnny+O · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And rebooting everyday since...

    15. Re:Obvious by Khyber · · Score: 1

      4625 kHz, it seems!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    16. Re:Obvious by Drantin · · Score: 1

      Tager main?

      (It's a quote from the fighting BlazBlue Calamity Trigger's bonus DVD explaining how to use one of the characters known as the Red Devil)

      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
    17. Re:Obvious by Drantin · · Score: 1

      fighting game

      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
    18. Re:Obvious by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      Whisky Tango Foxtrot???

    19. Re:Obvious by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      I think they're just fucking with our heads.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    20. Re:Obvious by cygnwolf · · Score: 1

      That should be , "In Soviet Russia, Joke makes fun of you!"

      --
      Free Pie! The Pie is Also Evil!
    21. Re:Obvious by Icegryphon · · Score: 1

      No but I have been playing him alot for fun in BBCS.
      I main Arakune and Secondary was Jin (Reversed their roles, cause the the Jin nerfing).
      Tager is just tooo much fun, I had a game last night and some hakumen player
      thought he could turtle in the corner(he was magnetized).
      I did a 720+C drive and he flew across the screen. Apparently he wasn't prepared or thought me a scrub.
      I nearly died of laugher from it. lost the final round because he did that knockdown low attack(repeatedly).
      Should have not let him do that too me, my own fault but I was still laughing.
      I really need to upload it. But TAGER and Arakune FTW!

    22. Re:Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just love Electronic Mail! It's so cutting edge!

  2. unexplained?? by click2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Its viral marketing for Lost II : Lost in Siberia

    --
    I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    1. Re:unexplained?? by Aladrin · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know you're joking, but that would be awesome. Assuming they got writers that can write an ending.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:unexplained?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I can hardly wait for the final season of LOST. Going to be interesting to see how they wrap up such a great series.

    3. Re:unexplained?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You misspelled terrible.

    4. Re:unexplained?? by glwtta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Assuming they got writers that can write an ending.

      Or a middle...

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    5. Re:unexplained?? by Kitkoan · · Score: 1
      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    6. Re:unexplained?? by robot256 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why don't they just stick to beginnings then? They could just have 10 different introductory episodes, each with a different cast and location, and not actually have any story at all.

    7. Re:unexplained?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a story.

    8. Re:unexplained?? by Jayemji · · Score: 4, Informative
    9. Re:unexplained?? by mark72005 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, I heard the broadcast.

      It was John Lithgow's voice saying he was stuck in a B-movie in Lawrence, Kansas

    10. Re:unexplained?? by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

      JJ, is that you?

    11. Re:unexplained?? by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

      Works for Hollywood.

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    12. Re:unexplained?? by Timmmm · · Score: 1

      Could?

    13. Re:unexplained?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the flashbacks would be 10 times as confusing

      and the flashforwards ... and the flash sideways.... ... did it ever make any sense?? /walksoff ... what were we talking about?

    14. Re:unexplained?? by Spiflicator · · Score: 0

      Or better yet, Red Dawn

    15. Re:unexplained?? by paiute · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just stick to beginnings then? They could just have 10 different introductory episodes, each with a different cast and location, and not actually have any story at all.

      And have America vote on which series gets continued? America's Next Top Series? You, my friend, are a genius.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    16. Re:unexplained?? by fatboy · · Score: 1

      They did that already ;)

      --
      --fatboy
    17. Re:unexplained?? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Please come discuss interesting ideas for surprise beginnings at Lefortovo prison.

    18. Re:unexplained?? by robot256 · · Score: 1

      Though to be fair, how many shows have you watched where the first episode adequately described whether you liked the rest of it or not? Maybe a 45-minute episode would be able to explain enough about the characters for the audience to tell, or the vote might end up being random and the resulting series not at all interesting.

      But how about this: a choose-your-own-adventure style show, where there are three 20-minute segments each week, each being a "possible future" for the show, then everybody votes online to decide which one actually happened. Then step and repeat. Though you could only air once every two weeks because you wouldn't know what you were filming 'til the vote came in.

  3. Thanks slashdot! by line-bundle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now the whole world knows my combination.

    1. Re:Thanks slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      UVB-76, UVB-76 — 93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74 — 9 3 8 8 2 nikolai, anna, ivan, michail, ivan, nikolai, anna, 7, 4, 1, 4, 3, 5, 7, 4 - that sounds like the kind of combination an idiot would use on his luggage.

    2. Re:Thanks slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was 1-2-3-4

    3. Re:Thanks slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zina, Anna, Elena, Boris, Anna, Leonid, Olga with your combination.

    4. Re:Thanks slashdot! by TheFakeMcCoy · · Score: 1

      What kind of idiot would use that as the combinaton for the air shield

    5. Re:Thanks slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UVB-76, UVB-76 — 93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74 — 9 3 8 8 2 nikolai, anna, ivan, michail, ivan, nikolai, anna, 7, 4, 1, 4, 3, 5, 7, 4 - that sounds like the kind of combination an idiot would use on his luggage.

      The down time was required to go from suck to blow...

    6. Re:Thanks slashdot! by davidee · · Score: 1

      Thx for the spaceballs reference :-)

    7. Re:Thanks slashdot! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a self-destruct sequence for the USS (Starship) Checkov NCC-1941

      But that is just me.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    8. Re:Thanks slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, that's the same combination I use on *my* luggage!

    9. Re:Thanks slashdot! by Toze · · Score: 1

      UVB-76, UVB-76 — 93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74 — 9 3 8 8 2 nikolai, anna, ivan, michail, ivan, nikolai, anna, 7, 4, 1, 4, 3, 5, 7, 4? That's amazing. I've got the same combination on my luggage.

      --
      No OS on the planet can protect itself from a user with the admin password. - Yvan256
  4. Location by ryanleary · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shouldn't it be possible to triangulate the position based on signal strength from multiple points, and just locate the tower, break in and see what the hardware attached to the transmitter does?

    1. Re:Location by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      I imagine the Russians would view such an intrusion as an act of war.

    2. Re:Location by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Its Russia. You can't just hike across it to wherever you want.

      It'd like a radio transmitter in northern Canada or Alaska, there aren't roads, not many airfields, its going to be out of helicopter range, the weather sucks and for added difficultly, there is an integrated air defense network.

      And bears. And wolves, alot of wolves and bears.

    3. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Location: The station's transmitter is located at Povarovo, Russia (56458N 37522E / 56.08278N 37.08944E / 56.08278; 37.08944), which is about halfway between Zelenograd and Solnechnogorsk and 40 kilometres (25 mi) northwest of Moscow, near the village of Lozhki.

    4. Re:Location by ksandom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The broadcast is not the bit of interest. It's the thing recieving it that's interesting.

      --
      Funnyhacks - Wierd, unusual, and fun hacks
    5. Re:Location by machxor · · Score: 2, Informative

      The station's transmitter is located just outside Povarovo, Russia at (..., ...), which is about halfway between Zelenograd and Solnechnogorsk and 40 kilometres (25 mi) northwest of Moscow, near the village of Lozhki. The location and callsign were unknown until the first voice broadcast of 1997.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UVB-76

    6. Re:Location by click2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If its outside helicopter range (doubtful as another post says its 40 miles from Moscow) then I bet theres some kind of road.
      They'd need some way to get the 10kw transmitter & other equipment there.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    7. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah. Right behind the Walmart, right.

    8. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the post right below yours, it's 25 miles outside the capital city.

      So more like a radio transmitter in Maryland than Alaska. Plenty of roads, and no problem with wildlife, but I don't think a journalist could just waltz into Fort Meade, MD, and poke around to see what's going on there ... ;)

    9. Re:Location by h00manist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Shouldn't it be possible to triangulate the position based on signal strength from multiple points, and just locate the tower, break in and see what the hardware attached to the transmitter does?

      Geesus effing sheist. Yep, that's it. By the way, the hardware attached to the transmitter may not do anything at all, just accept and retransmit codes to the receiving stations.

      --
      Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    10. Re:Location by mirix · · Score: 1

      bingo.

      I've heard that it's some sort of fail deadly uh... like keep alive. You know, fire on loss of transmission. but, I kind of doubt it too. Who knows. Very neat though.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    11. Re:Location by marcello_dl · · Score: 2, Funny

      And now that's has been submitted to slashdot the receiver doesn't even have to tune in :D

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    12. Re:Location by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 4, Informative

      If it's 40 miles from Moscow its inside the Moscow Military District so it's undoubtably secure and monitored.

      So instead of weather, bears and wolves theres just going to be the Moscow detachments of Alpha Group, Vympel or more likely OMON.

    13. Re:Location by h00manist · · Score: 1

      When is the movie launch date?

      --
      Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    14. Re:Location by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Is there any country where you can just hike wherever you want?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    15. Re:Location by cashman73 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I heard that Sarah Palin can pick this up quite easily from her home in Wasilla!

    16. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely it's part of ionosphere research. It's their version of HAARP. http://elpub.wdcb.ru/journals/rjes/v10/2007ES000227/2.shtml

    17. Re:Location by sznupi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't dismiss battlebears so...recklessly.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    18. Re:Location by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Maybe - using a bomb disposal robot controlled from say, 50 kilometres away.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    19. Re:Location by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Excepting private property and Federal Military Reservations, you can pretty much hike wherever you want in the US, like on the bulk of the National Forest, National Wildlife, National Park, State Park, BLM lands.

      The Federal Government owns nearly 650 million acres of land - almost 30 percent of the land area of the United States.

      http://www.nationalatlas.gov/printable/images/pdf/fedlands/fedlands3.pdf

      But I doubt there is any nation on the planet where someone can roam over all 100% of it

    20. Re:Location by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Funny

      OMON troops on bears.

      Thats some 21st century bear cavalry right there.

    21. Re:Location by toleraen · · Score: 2, Informative
    22. Re:Location by Snowblindeye · · Score: 3, Informative

      Google Satellite Picture of the site. Unfortunately it's darkened by the cloud, so its hard to see much. The Wikipedia Picture of the site is a little brighter.

    23. Re:Location by moogied · · Score: 1

      Antarctica says otherwise. No one owns it.

      --
      So basically, -1 troll/offtopic is really slashdots way of saying "I hate that you thought of something before me."
    24. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or how about just asking them?

    25. Re:Location by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Its not a nation or a country so not in the scope of what sznupi asked now is it?

      Greenland might be wide open though.

    26. Re:Location by blair1q · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, transmitter tunes you in!

    27. Re:Location by blair1q · · Score: 1

      The codebook is tattooed on her palm.

    28. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To triangulate the position of a radio transmitter you don't use signal strength anymore. It's much more convenient to detect the phase delay between multiple antenna sets or multiple receivers sets. The military have this stuff since ages and will likely already know the position of that transmitter with good accuracy.

      And... yes, that's the way they find your pirate radio station in 10 seconds without going around in a van with directional antennas on the roof.

    29. Re:Location by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not very difficult in Europe, except for privately owned land. Small countries with a moderate climate means there isn't much to stop you from crossing them on foot, given enough patience.

    30. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bing maps has a better detail photo. There's still cloud over a part of the facility, but it's broad daylight, and buildings are visible clearly.

    31. Re:Location by nmb3000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's the thing recieving it that's interesting.

      Exactly. It also might explain why the transmitter isn't secreted away in some little corner of Siberia but rather smack next to Moscow.

      If the Kremlin goes poof nuclear-style, so does the transmitter.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    32. Re:Location by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Don't dismiss battlebears so...recklessly.

      Indeed!

    33. Re:Location by hardburn · · Score: 1

      Sure, the location is easy. Satellite photos are easy to find. But what good does that do you?

      --
      Not a typewriter
    34. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The broadcast is not the bit of interest. It's the thing recieving it that's interesting.

      Maybe they lost the receiver and decided the best solution would be to continue broadcasting.

    35. Re:Location by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Read the Wikipedia article, they even show a picture of the transmitter. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UVB-76

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    36. Re:Location by lennier1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's Russia's first underground Walmart.
      The radio station on top is only a publicity stunt to increase tourism and screw with the heads at the CIA.

    37. Re:Location by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      We already know exactly where it is.

      You're welcome to go on over. I doubt the staff would be very appreciative, however.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    38. Re:Location by dangitman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I heard that Sarah Palin can pick this up quite easily from her home in Wasilla!

      Oh my god, she's a Communist double-agent kill-bot! This explains everything. I always suspected that "Nikolai" was actually just "Trig" in Russian.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    39. Re:Location by vlueboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Thanks. Apparently the Wiki picture was extracted from Google Earth's clock feature.

      2009 is the obscured picture you linked to
      2005 has white clouds badly obscuring half the area
      2004 is exactly what you linked to

      Maybe pay-for subscribers have newer imagery of the site and can repost. The clear picture is odd: can't distinguish ANY antenna shadows from all the building shadows. The long straight lines on the grass are just ground partitions of some sort and are unlikely to be parallel to the antenna's clock-like moving shadow exactly as the imaging satellite passed by. If you're in doubt, notice even gravestone cross's shadows are easily picked up from satellites. Blurring are would not be different between the very crisp imagery for coordinates in question (aside from the stupid clouds!) and the Woodlawn Cemetery in my link.

      Another poster did give out a link with ground pictures of the supposed site, though it's all in russian and has a bunch random nature pictures. For the lazy, the map DOES shut up anyone believing this is a remote area --there's several roads and towns near the forest for those coordinates. Then, again, I'm not sure how /. could validate b>anyone's coordinates or "translations" of these Russian-language sources... ;-)

    40. Re:Location by Shoe+Puppet · · Score: 1

      In some of the scandinavian countries you have the right to hike (almost) everywhere you want, even if the ground is privately owned.

      --
      (+1, Disagree)
    41. Re:Location by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

      Now we know why he posted as anonymous coward. Such information could be very damaging to mother Russia.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    42. Re:Location by klossner · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sure, the Scandinavian countries have exactly that tradition. Read about it here.

    43. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As has been mentioned, the transmitter locations for most numbers stations are known. So now all you have to do is break into a classified military facility...

    44. Re:Location by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      As I understand, in Norway and Sweden, you can camp on any unfarmed, undeveloped land.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    45. Re:Location by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

      what we need is to stop tracking *transmitters* and start tracking *receivers*.

      sort of like how in BASIC you can convert your code from using GOTO style to using COMEFROM style branching. sort of like that. employ logic like that and you can reverse bias the trackers to tune in on the receivers, instead.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    46. Re:Location by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      If it were "fire on loss of transmission", it would've been triggered by now. The signal from UVB-76 has been lost in the past.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    47. Re:Location by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      I know: I'll bring cookies!

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    48. Re:Location by h00manist · · Score: 1

      The broadcast is not the bit of interest. It's the thing recieving it that's interesting.

      Yeah, interesting security transmission method in plain sight.

      --
      Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    49. Re:Location by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 4, Informative

      ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!

      (morbo is very, very displeased by this lameness filter)

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    50. Re:Location by SuperQ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Things at that zoom level are NOT from satellites. They're from aircraft areal photos. These photos only exist where there is an interesting market where someone can sell Google (or bing, or whoever) a license to show them.

    51. Re:Location by h00manist · · Score: 1

      The codebook is tattooed on her palm.

      That's why she can't rub palms with any big powers, they might get excited and blow off some missiles.

      --
      Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    52. Re:Location by mirix · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I was thinking more along the lines of lighting up some indicator in each silo, and disabling the first safety or so.


      "I'm afraid I don't understand something,
      Alexiy. Is the Premier threatening to
      explode this if our planes carry out their
      attack?"

      "No sir. It is not a thing a sane man would
      do. The doomsday machine is designed to to
      trigger itself automatically."

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    53. Re:Location by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The clear picture is odd: can't distinguish ANY antenna shadows from all the building shadows.

      Maybe the lighting is too diffuse for fine shadows to be obvious. Vegetation under the antenna could make shadows hard to see as well.

    54. Re:Location by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

      and most likely the most ruthless, skilled and intelligent of OMON. The elite of the elite.

      Those guys i wouldn't want to be messing with....

    55. Re:Location by Skal+Tura · · Score: 2, Informative

      Finland too.

      And many other rights regarding the wide open nature, known as "Everymans rights". It includes things such that you can go and collect berries, mushrooms etc. camping, hiking etc. afaik too

    56. Re:Location by mbone · · Score: 1

      "We know no mercy and do not ask for any."

    57. Re:Location by macshit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe pay-for subscribers have newer imagery of the site and can repost. The clear picture is odd: can't distinguish ANY antenna shadows from all the building shadows. The long straight lines on the grass are just ground partitions of some sort and are unlikely to be parallel to the antenna's clock-like moving shadow exactly as the imaging satellite passed by. If you're in doubt, notice even gravestone cross's shadows are easily picked up from satellites

      That gravestone is probably a massive solid hunk of stone, and has a solid continuous shadow.

      An antenna, on the other hand, is typically constructed as a truss or mesh of rather thin metal pieces, perhaps supported by guy-wires -- it's mostly air, and the shadow, accordingly, will be composed of very thin lines widely separated by areas of no shadow. That may well not be noticeable from a satellite.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    58. Re:Location by robot256 · · Score: 1

      Sure it does! Just make time run backward and we can see all the little radio-photons running toward the transmitter! Or better yet, try and detect the subtle field distortions caused by antennas absorbing radio frequency energy.

    59. Re:Location by valeo.de · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In Soviet Russia... that tired joke is fucking boring.

      --
      cat: /home/valeo/.sig: No such file or directory
    60. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wolves are not that big of an issue. Polar bears are a whole different mater. They LOVE to hunt humans. They make such easy prey. And soft/gooey on the inside.

    61. Re:Location by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 1

      I don't think programming "works" like that either... though I guess technically COMEFROM is more viable than "tracking receivers".

    62. Re:Location by muridae · · Score: 1

      Shadow directions and all that, looks like the large circular objects are recessed into the ground. Silos, perhaps, or vertical pointing dishes. Could be a standing antenna on either of the hills, NE and SW of the north most building. Interesting site, lots of stuff to speculate on just from those pictures. Like, the clouds are there because the russians control the weather and wanted to keep that spy plane from seeing the aliens on the premises; normal internet speculation.

    63. Re:Location by ball-lightning · · Score: 4, Funny

      But why would they build a doomsday machine... and not tell anybody?

    64. Re:Location by BobisOnlyBob · · Score: 1

      Don't tell that to the tinfoil hatters - HAARP is one of their favourite conspiracy theory targets.

    65. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually a significantly more reasonable, not to mention comforting, explanation than the idea that she is a credible candidate for the President of the United States.

    66. Re:Location by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      This is one of those situations where I'm really hoping that was a troll. Or else it really supports my assertion that programmers need to take some actual science classes.

    67. Re:Location by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sure it does! Just make time run backward and we can see all the little radio-photons running toward the transmitter! Or better yet, try and detect the subtle field distortions caused by antennas absorbing radio frequency energy.

      Okay Brain! But umm...where are we going to find Superman at this time of night?

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    68. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd estimate that you'd need four wolves to be as dangerous as one bear. This leads me to reason that a lone wolf is only as dangerous as 1/4 of a bear. And as is immediately obvious, 1/4 of a bear isn't dangerous at all (unless it falls out of a tree and lands on your head). Therefore, my conclusion is that wolves aren't dangerous unless they are in trees.

    69. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind -- you don't need to have an antenna sticking up to have a functional shortwave antenna.

    70. Re:Location by cgenman · · Score: 1

      It's an actively maintained and modified transmitter in a Russian military installation. I'm guessing "what the hardware attached to the transmitter does" is lure tourists to their deaths.

    71. Re:Location by hedge49 · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it's anywhere near Chernobyl, bears & wolves won't be much problem. The trees, though...

    72. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      alot of wolves and bears.

      Wow, that sounds really dangerous and awesome. How would you keep them tied together without fighting?

      (The Alot is better than you at everything)

    73. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Superheterodyne receivers have an oscillator that is detectable. That's why WWII allied troops were only allowed to use crystal radios.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superheterodyne_receiver#Local_oscillator_radiation

    74. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mfw somebody makes an obscure reference but there are no obscure references on teh intartubes

    75. Re:Location by DirtySouthAfrican · · Score: 1

      Well, it does, actually. If you intercept a signal, you absorb part of it, so you are changing the electromagnetic field. If you are changing the electromagnetic field, you can be tracked (in principle). Of course you're not going to track a portable radio for reasons of practicality, but that's an issue of scale, and not something fundamentally inherent to the theory. In some circles it goes by the name of radar :)

    76. Re:Location by lobf · · Score: 2

      Russia isn't located entirely in Siberia, ya know. If you looked at the map that was posted above, you'd see it's a stone's throw from a town of some sort and it's very close to Moscow.

    77. Re:Location by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 1

      I heard that Sarah Palin can pick this up quite easily from her home in Wasilla!

      Only on her front porch.

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    78. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps not, but COMMUNICATION, as in forming and expressing a message with the intent of causing the recipient to have some specified thought or response, does.

    79. Re:Location by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      While I think they had a slightly different name (warbears?), I did enjoy the movie version of the Amber Spyglass series... too bad it got blackballed by its real-world philosophical target...

    80. Re:Location by nacturation · · Score: 1

      and most likely the most ruthless, skilled and intelligent of OMON. The elite of the elite.

      Those guys i wouldn't want to be messing with....

      So you're saying that it wouldn't be wise to point out to them that their logo is HOMO spelled backwards?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    81. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      74.14 E 35.74 N is a location in northern Pakistan-controlled Kashmir near Gilgit, I wonder what's going on around there...

    82. Re:Location by JustOK · · Score: 1

      and subject to such other terms and limitations that the gov't dreams up, such as, but not wholly limited to, free speech zones around political gatherings or G8/G20 meetings etc.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    83. Re:Location by JustOK · · Score: 1

      imagine a beowulf cluster of them

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    84. Re:Location by jcwayne · · Score: 0

      There's always some dumb f**k who insists on pushing the big red button just to see what happens.

      --
      Failure to follow this advice may result in non-deterministic behavior.
    85. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Last I checked, an antenna melted to slag by a nuclear explosion didn't transmit so well.

    86. Re:Location by tibit · · Score: 1

      It's not universally easy like you claim. Finding a pirate radio station in a high-rise urban jungle is anything but easy, especially if the antenna isn't on the roof. Doing it from the ground level may well be impossible, for example.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    87. Re:Location by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

      I think the GP knows that...dude was being funny...

    88. Re:Location by ksandom · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I think the speculation is more beneficial to them than anything they could put at the end of it.

      --
      Funnyhacks - Wierd, unusual, and fun hacks
    89. Re:Location by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Last laugh.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    90. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw your flying sharks!

    91. Re:Location by f3rret · · Score: 1
      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    92. Re:Location by koiransuklaa · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the image you link to is an aerial orthophoto, not a satellite photo. Also, there are various reasons for quality problems in satellite photos, meaning blurring can definitely be a lot worse at some points at some time, even if the weather at ground seems similar. Turbulence hurts resolution, as an example.

    93. Re:Location by GNious · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cant decide whether Hollywood reading /. would be a good thing or a bad thing..

    94. Re:Location by WoRLoKKeD · · Score: 1

      "We Romanovs have our legacy to consider!"

      --
      Immolation is the sincerest form of flattery.
    95. Re:Location by richlv · · Score: 4, Interesting

      phew, that's nothing. try http://forums.gunbroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=421694 ;)

      obscured area in _all_ sattellite images, american, russian, whatever.

      technical glitch, distraction or something important ? slashdot to the rescue ! (well, maybe. judging by some sources of information even the locals have no idea what's there)

      --
      Rich
    96. Re:Location by Anachragnome · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "The clear picture is odd: can't distinguish ANY antenna shadows from all the building shadows."

      Don't zoom in, zoom out.

      First thing I noticed is that the building is definitely the highest structure in the shot (Wikipedia image). Most objects have no shadow in this shot, so it must be mid-day. Judging by the size of the shadow of the main building, it is probably 3-5 stories tall. I am not sure of the size of the antenna used for this frequency, but it could be in the building if it is small enough...but I doubt this is the case.

      Zoom out further.

      Notice the disturbed soil in a near perfect square surrounding the base? See the "stepped", grassy area along the lower side of the square? Those stepped areas indicate a rise in elevation, terraced to prevent erosion (they are also inadvertently created by cattle grazing on slopes). If you look closely, you will see similar indications all the way around this square. What appears, at first glance, to be cleared areas are actually slopes--The base is underground, or rather it was built, then buried, then camouflaged.

      You might have also noticed that there are NO ground vehicles parked anywhere in sight. My guess is that all vehicles simply drive into the main building and are either parked inside it, or elevatored underground to hide how many people are (or, are not) actually using the facility.

      We Yanks have done the same, but on a grand scale.

      http://www.taphilo.com/history/WWII/USAAF/Boeing/index.shtml (Interesting photos of American camouflage efforts)

      What I find really interesting is the sheer number of OLD roads that seem to radiate outwards from this site. The Google image shows them clearly, as well as a nearby railhead. Those access roads are old and over-grown, some very much so. In short, people have been coming and going, from all directions, to this location for some time. What was here before the transmitter started up, to merit this much access?

    97. Re:Location by rapiddescent · · Score: 1

      and Scotland

    98. Re:Location by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      Mordor.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    99. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And bears. And wolves, alot of wolves and bears.

      Oh my!

    100. Re:Location by Alioth · · Score: 1

      But you CAN detect receivers - you can detect the local oscillator (the same method as used by TV detector vans). From this you can tell the frequency the receiver is tuned to.

      Now whether this is practical is another matter entirely, you have to be pretty close to the receiver to detect it, so you'd need to blanket the Earth with detectors to find who's receiving the signal.

    101. Re:Location by dave420 · · Score: 1

      And even then, some countries have laws demanding that hikers be given access to various thoroughfares through private land.

    102. Re:Location by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      If they want to know where it is they can just check google maps.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    103. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, you can trivially detect receivers by triangulation the local oscillators of the receiver sets.

    104. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its Russia. You can't just hike across it to wherever you want.

      One does not simply walk into Russia. But I bet this guy, Boromir has some great ideas about using a catapult..

    105. Re:Location by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      Done, 56458N 37522E ... you first.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    106. Re:Location by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      In Google Earth it is less than one mile from a four lane highway "M-10" to the NW. There is a railroad and other roads within 1/4 mile of it. There's a whole web of roads leading right up to it.

      This is hardly an isolated outpost, although there is no street view in that area so I can't confirm if it's full of bears and wolves.

      56'4'58"N 37'5'22"E

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    107. Re:Location by Nevynxxx · · Score: 1

      So go read the books....

    108. Re:Location by houghi · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    109. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all of Google images are from satellites. Friendly countries allow the much higher definition airplane photos.

    110. Re:Location by atisss · · Score: 1

      Yeah, let's detect and suspect all the amateurs listening to it :D

    111. Re:Location by Captain+Hook · · Score: 2, Funny

      well, it's a bit wet there at the moment.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    112. Re:Location by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      I thought OMON were essentially riot police and SWAT style squads?
      My money is on Spetsnaz.

    113. Re:Location by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      I can't unsee that now, thanks!

    114. Re:Location by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      and most likely the most ruthless, skilled and intelligent of OMON. The elite of the elite.

      You are a naughty little troll.

      OMON? Ruthless maybe, skilled? Intelligent? Those are non-intersecting sets. Elite? It is a joke, yes?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    115. Re:Location by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Wow, that would be a neat uniform to have.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    116. Re:Location by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      If Canadian farmers have them, it's safe to say the Ruskies have them too. Although, given their lack of effectiveness in Canada, the Ruskies might want a backup plan. Of keep them off the ganja.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    117. Re:Location by makomk · · Score: 1

      Of course, this only works for superheterodyne receivers (though most are these days). You'd also probably get a whole bunch of false positives from receivers listening to a different frequency with a different intermediate frequency that just happens to use the same local oscillator frequency.

    118. Re:Location by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Woooooooooooooooosh...

      (Slashdot - it doesn't take more than 11 seconds to type woosh, you idiots).

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    119. Re:Location by Eunuchswear · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, COMEFROM is easy.

      Computed COMEFROM (and conditional COMEFROM in general), now theye are powerful programming constructs.

      I = I + 10
      20 CONTINUE
      ...
          IF (I.GT.30) COMEFROM 20
      ...

      (Question? Is COMEFROM 20 executed before or after the instruction labeled 20? Did I need the CONTINUE? Would any qualified NARTROF programmers care to comment?)

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    120. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, bears have a right to your arms

        - and legs

    121. Re:Location by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      That's no cloud...

    122. Re:Location by umghhh · · Score: 1

      I think you are patently wrong. I lived for number of years in soviet controlled countries (yes I am that old) and one thing I know for sure is that anything can be bought. If bribe is high enough you may even change the sequence into melody of 'stairway to heaven' or whatever suits you best.

    123. Re:Location by Albatrosses · · Score: 1

      But do they run Linux?!

    124. Re:Location by hedpe2003 · · Score: 1
      --
      Comprehensive solutions via a competition of ideas like no other.
    125. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget about the land sharks with lasers.

    126. Re:Location by Idbar · · Score: 1

      And bears. And wolves, alot of wolves and bears.

      Probably.... even vampires.

    127. Re:Location by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I am betting the hardware attached to the transmitter converts a recording on magnetic tape or even a digital recording in memory into an analog voltage that varies with the amplitude and frequency this super special signal is then fed into the transmitter.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    128. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fascinating. Bing Maps shows it (66 16 0 N 179 15 0 E), but it's clearly fake data cloned in from somewhere else, as it doesn't match surrounding features. Creepy as all hell.

    129. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but do they have lasers fitted to their heads (the bears and / or Omon Trooper) ?

    130. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, I'll link you to my super-secret amateur spy sat pics of the area:
      http://maps.google.com/maps?q=http:%2F%2Fbbs.keyhole.com%2Fubb%2Fdownload.php%3FNumber%3D1178559&t=k&om=1&ie=UTF8&ll=51.806704,45.656734&spn=0.005665,0.013561&z=16

    131. Re:Location by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Conditional COMEFROM is semantically equivalent to conditional GOTO. You can transform code using it trivially.

      Computed COMEFROM is significantly more powerful. You can only implement it in the general case efficiently on x86 using the debug registers, which means that you are limited to 4 computed COMEFROM statements per program.

      A slightly restricted form of computed COMEFROM is rebranded as Aspect Oriented Programming.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    132. Re:Location by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it's very difficult, even in theory, to distinguish receivers from absorbers. Things like pipes and even trees will absorb RF in much the same was as radio receivers. Although you can in theory, with a sufficiently sensitive receiver (one which doesn't actually exist), detect everywhere that a signal is absorbed, you can't tell whether it's being decoded in this way.

      With more modern systems, however, you can spot the decoders. It is possible to detect an analogue TV demodulator, for example, from the EM that it spills moderate distances, even if you can't detect where it's receiving its signal from. This is the technology that the TV license people in the UK claimed to use (but didn't actually, because it's expensive and unreliable).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    133. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats: you posted images from the other end of the country.

      Gunbroker has a small, crappy picture from Virtual Earth, where the area is apparently unblurred (but only at fairly low detail). Some sort of installation.

    134. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's in Bing too, and if you look at the larger context it's obviously cut/pasted for elsewhere.

    135. Re:Location by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      That made me laugh.

      Yea, I'd like to watch the You Tube of how that worked out.

      Guy walks up to some OMON guys, points to patch and explains how it's HOMO backwards.

    136. Re:Location by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      OMON are the special forces for Russian Militia, so like of like a Green Beret or Marine Recon in the National Guard/Reserves.

      So a step up from riot police and SWAT and they conduct military operations in Nagorno-Karabakh, Chechnya and Georgia. They tend to do alot of killing when they are in action.

      They did alot of riot and SWAT in the 80s and 90s, but have gone more anti-terror, security and military in the last 15 years.

      SOBR/OMSN, Vityaz and now 604th Red Banner Center of Special Purpose of the MVD of Russia do more of the high intensity SWAT stuff now it sounds like

    137. Re:Location by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      If it's anywhere near Chernobyl, bears & wolves won't be much problem. The trees, though...

      Yeah, the Red Forest can be rather treacherous with that whole radioactivity thing.

      Interestingly enough, there is a lot of wildlife that is repopulating around the accident site, I'm not sure of how close they wander to the sarcophagus though. If it's anything like S.T.A.L.K.E.R., you want to stay far away though unless you have a good supply of bolts to check for anomalies.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    138. Re:Location by dtzitz · · Score: 1

      but will it run Crysis!?

    139. Re:Location by RavenChild · · Score: 1

      The Bing map is copied from the southeast (look at the black lake/spot/whatever). I'm guessing this is an ICBM site.

    140. Re:Location by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Shit, I bet Sarah Palin could see that from her house. :)

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    141. Re:Location by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      So we'll send Mathias Rust to check it out.

    142. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, yes it does, you only need to detect the IF (intermediate frequency) from the receiver.
      All receivers radiate energy through their antenna.

    143. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.bing.com/maps/default.aspx?v=2&cp=66.266667~179.25&style=o&lvl=15&sp=Point.66.266667_179.25____

      On bing, they even have surrounding terrain copied over the area so it looks like it's not censored. And that's the right word: They're not only censoring ideas, but parts of out planet now too!

    144. Re:Location by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Gee, thanks for linking to a forum full of crazy people.

      It is either:
      1) A rendering station used by Americans.
      2) A military installation used to monitor Alaska, and possibly first strike monitoring.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    145. Re:Location by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I'm perfectly aware of that tradition (though - too bad it isn't observed the same way in Denmark; would be fun on Bornholm / I have a quick ferry to the place) - but it also doesn't encompass the types of areas under discussion here. Tried hiking & camping on the areas of military installations?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    146. Re:Location by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Can you do that on entirety of the territory - say, grounds of military installations? That was the context here.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    147. Re:Location by sznupi · · Score: 1

      ...so it's basically just like within Russia.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    148. Re:Location by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Greenland might be wide open though.

      Nope. For example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thule_Air_Base (even better, that's a base of completelly different country on their territory)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    149. Re:Location by richlv · · Score: 1

      they might as well be all crazy, but the question is - why is that location obscured in every satellite photo ?
      all kinds of secret bases, icbm sites and other locations can be seen. not this one :)

      --
      Rich
    150. Re:Location by hedwards · · Score: 1

      As do other places, but somehow I doubt that includes military installations, especially by intelligence officers.

    151. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Antenna here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=56.085619,37.101078&spn=0.01,0.01&t=m&q=56.085619,37.101078(UVB-76)

    152. Re:Location by HuguesT · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was to be announced at the Party Congress on Monday. As you know, the Premier loves surprises.

    153. Re:Location by yellekc · · Score: 1

      A few days ago I had the task of figuring the height of an abandoned broadcast tower. It lost its top section in a storm so the FCC records were useless. My first instinct was to measure the length of its shadow to compare with the shadow of an object of known height. Towers are usually made of a steel lattice that allows a large majority of sunlight to pass through. While the bottom few feet cast a noticeable shadow in the grass, the rest of the tower's shadow faded out of existence. Given this experience, I'm not surprised that you cannot see the antenna's shadow, but can see the building's. One is a lattice of steel that lets a lot of sunlight through, the other is an opaque surface.

    154. Re:Location by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Yeah I think light diffracts around the object creating the shade so if the object is thin, you hardly see the shadow. A sextant would help though and you could probably hack one up out of timber. Otherwise you could always use a barometer

    155. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exept at Military installations/bases/areas, of course.

      (living in said Scandinavian countries)

  5. Oh yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Red title, new post!

  6. It is well known where it is by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The thing is, "where it is," is in Russia. They might object to the US breaking in, rather violently in fact.

    1. Re:It is well known where it is by mbone · · Score: 1

      Might object ? I think that that is a very safe bet.

    2. Re:It is well known where it is by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes. Russia might object in the same way that the RIAA might continue its piracy litigation campaign, no matter how absurdly expensive it becomes or how absurdly high the judgments are.

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    3. Re:It is well known where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said anything about the US? I'm Russian, you insensitive clod!

    4. Re:It is well known where it is by netsharc · · Score: 1, Funny

      Get Sarah Palin in there! She'll just hop from her porch, and rear her ugly head into the airspace!

      That'd be a funny Mr. Magoo-style spy film, Sarah Palin in a Salt-like action flick...

      What's the Godwin equivalent of Sarah Palin threadjack?

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    5. Re:It is well known where it is by spazdor · · Score: 1

      I mean, the Cold War is over, and if this was a Soviet building, the government which built it no longer exists. What's so damn hard about convincing the Russian gov't to be as curious about this as we are?

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    6. Re:It is well known where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Russian government almost certainly knows exactly what this is, they're just not generally in the habit of sharing their military secrets.

    7. Re:It is well known where it is by mbone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Russia owns it, Russia operates it, and Russia has a lot of men with guns who will kill you if you get too inquisitive about it.

    8. Re:It is well known where it is by golden+age+villain · · Score: 3, Informative

      This thing seems to be in the middle of a military base and is operated by a human through an open microphone, not by a machine. So it means that the current government knows about it and keeps using it for the same or other purpose for which it was designed.

    9. Re:It is well known where it is by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The thing is, "where it is," is in Russia. They might object to the US breaking in, rather violently in fact.

      Not sure he was suggesting the US do it. Maybe he was under the impression the Russians had forgotten about it.

    10. Re:It is well known where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're 0 for 1 there. Nobody gives a crap about her any more.

      Naked pics or she never existed!

    11. Re:It is well known where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Russia owns it, Russia operates it, and Russia has a lot of men with guns who will kill you if you get too inquisitive about it.

      Could be worse. They could have men with goats guarding the thing.

    12. Re:It is well known where it is by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Goats? You mean the Russians use Afghan tribals to guard their military installations? Awesome, huh? Russia - an equal opportunity employer.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    13. Re:It is well known where it is by igny · · Score: 3, Funny

      Russia owns it, Russia operates it, and Russia has a lot of men with guns who will kill you if you get too inquisitive about it.

      May be they are expecting inquisition.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    14. Re:It is well known where it is by nacturation · · Score: 1

      The thing is, "where it is," is in Russia. They might object to the US breaking in, rather violently in fact.

      Not sure he was suggesting the US do it. Maybe he was under the impression the Russians had forgotten about it.

      Actually the US is planning such a raid. Here is the classified mission footage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWS-FoXbjVI

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    15. Re:It is well known where it is by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ssshhhh! Give him a plane ticket and a scanner and let him go. It's one less neanderthal that will be left on this planet.

    16. Re:It is well known where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but I bet the Spaniards have a squad that could break through. Nobody expects them!

    17. Re:It is well known where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have those too.

    18. Re:It is well known where it is by david_bandel · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of Russia?

    19. Re:It is well known where it is by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 5, Funny

      and keeps using it for the same or other purpose for which it was designed.

      Consider this: if you want to hide something, hide it in plain view.

      But I can imagine this is also a great inside joke, imagine this:

      Young eager cadet: "Sergei, what is this?"
      "Our top of the line distraction and nuclear defence device!"
      "How does it work?"
      "We keep on broadcasting this pendula going over this magnetic field"
      "Why?"
      "Oh, you see... The CIA is listening since 1982 and can imagine it's a nuclear reaction device or anything they can come up with. We use it joke around since the signal can be picked up everywhere in Russia."
      "How?"
      "Do you see this microphone?"
      "Yes..."
      "Say, I met this girl Naimina and I want to share story and her number and zipcode with my comrades..."
      reaches for microphone: "UVB-76, UVB-76 -- 93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74 -- 9 3 8 8 2 nikolai, anna, ivan, michail, ivan, nikolai, anna, 7, 4, 1, 4, 3, 5, 7, 4"

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    20. Re:It is well known where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Numbers stations aren't just a Russian thing. There's one located in Florida as well, and they're not known for welcoming guests.

      In fact, the local cops are scared of the place.

    21. Re:It is well known where it is by jittles · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that transmission violates copyright owned by the RIAA. Don't worry. The Navy Seals, SAS, and Green Berets may not be able to penetrate their defenses, but the RIAA will wear them down with frivolous lawsuits.

    22. Re:It is well known where it is by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      True, but wrong way to say it.

      ITYM...

      Sarah who?

      Some relative of Michel Palin?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    23. Re:It is well known where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition...
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSe38dzJYkY

    24. Re:It is well known where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May be they are expecting inquisition.

      Have the Spaniards do it; you never expect the Spanish Inquisition.

    25. Re:It is well known where it is by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      This thing seems to be in the middle of a military base

      It's certainly very ingenious to be operating right under the noses of the Russian government like that without their knowledge!

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    26. Re:It is well known where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American inquisition? Yes.

      Clearly we need another inquisition. One that nobody would expect. Perhaps the French.

    27. Re:It is well known where it is by Sovetskysoyuz · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, is no one expectink inquisition. For what are you askink so many questions, comrade?

    28. Re:It is well known where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody Expects the Russian Inquisition!

    29. Re:It is well known where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody expects the Russian inquisition !

    30. Re:It is well known where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rubbish! NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisi.......oh, wrong meme? Hm, sorry 'bout that, carry on, then.

    31. Re:It is well known where it is by xealot · · Score: 1

      NOOOOOOBody expects the Russian Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise... surprise and thermonuclear missiles. Our TWO weapons are surprise and thermonuclear missiles... and ruthless efficiency.

      --

      --Drive carefully. 90% of people are caused by accidents.
    32. Re:It is well known where it is by TKane · · Score: 1

      That's why you have the Spanish inquire.

    33. Re:It is well known where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one expects the spanish inquisition!

    34. Re:It is well known where it is by turgid · · Score: 1

      There's also something fishy in Baldock.

    35. Re:It is well known where it is by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Breaking in? You could have four people in Russia as tourist and use off the shelf parts to triangulate where it is. They don't even have to be there at the same time.

      Of course:
      a) it doesn't matter where it is
      B) there are better ways to triangle late without breaching their soil.

      So it's pretty trivial for a group to figure this out.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  7. TV... by cobryce · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this key to the plot of Covert Affairs (1x3 or 1x4)?

    1. Re:TV... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, A numbers station was

  8. Have to dial it in by sv_libertarian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think I've heard this station's buzzing a few times, while drifting around on my HF transceiver. Have to note the frequency http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UVB-76 and poke around again for grins.

    1. Re:Have to dial it in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or mere mortals could just tune into the live stream, which is embedded into TFA.

    2. Re:Have to dial it in by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's a coded broadcast of the The timecube. It's just that you snotbrains can't see it through your evil "Oneism"

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    3. Re:Have to dial it in by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I tried compiling the C equiv of that timecube (there was an english->c converter I once had access to) site but the result got a divide-by-zero error.

      maybe that was on purpose?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:Have to dial it in by Enter+the+Shoggoth · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's a coded broadcast of the The timecube. It's just that you snotbrains can't see it through your evil "Oneism"

      All I can say is whiskey-tango-foxtrot

      --
      Andy Warhol got it right / Everybody gets the limelight
      Andy Warhol got it wrong / Fifteen minutes is too long.
    5. Re:Have to dial it in by sv_libertarian · · Score: 1
      The timecube is just a poor imitation of The People's Cube.

      I gave up my evil Oneism when I became the Commissar of Time. In fact, the Timecube is a cheap capitalist imitation.

    6. Re:Have to dial it in by sv_libertarian · · Score: 1

      woosh, etc, etc, etc... Why on earth would I want to stream it, when I can just dial it up on gear I already own?

    7. Re:Have to dial it in by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      The timecube is just a poor imitation of The People's Cube.

      I gave up my evil Oneism when I became the Commissar of Time. In fact, the Timecube is a cheap capitalist imitation.

      Timecube isn't an imitation of ANYTHING. Your site, however, is quite typical in its genre.

      For extra mindfuck, View Source on Timecube sometime!

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    8. Re:Have to dial it in by sv_libertarian · · Score: 1
      I see jokes are not your forte.

      That said, The People's Cube is "typical" of it's genre, because it was one of the first of it's kind.

  9. Let me read that back to you... by pedantic+bore · · Score: 1

    One pizza, with everything on it...

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:Let me read that back to you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually, it's white people trying to rap.

  10. null meaning by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    what can you expect from a country where young nehampkin is older than old nehampkin.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:null meaning by SolidAltar · · Score: 1

      Can you explain this joke? Do not understand.

    2. Re:null meaning by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      search on those words and add 'woody allen' to help the search zero in better.

      then go see the movie. its a classic.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:null meaning by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      It's a gag from the Woody Allen film "Love And Death".

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  11. Previous Story by Snowblindeye · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, it hasn't really been broadcasting continuously, as it went suddenly offline two months ago. This was previously discussed on slashdot at the time. It *had* been broadcasting continuously for 20 years until then, however.

    1. Re:Previous Story by bugs2squash · · Score: 5, Funny

      What makes you think the apparent silence was not just a long string of Null characters being broadcast ?

      --
      Nullius in verba
    2. Re:Previous Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it hasn't really been broadcasting continuously, as it went suddenly offline two months ago. This was previously discussed on slashdot at the time. It *had* been broadcasting continuously for 20 years until then, however.

      Several people, including myself, heard it during that time of supposed outage, so that's not really true.
      Depending on the shortwave propagation conditions, you may not hear it, but it's still transmitting.

      I should add that there is also a "squeaky wheel" station and beeping station, probably for the same purposes as UVB-76. All three are believed to be sent from Russia.

      If I recall, voice messages are rare on all of them, but they do occur.

    3. Re:Previous Story by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Um... the lack of carrier wave?

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    4. Re:Previous Story by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      long string of null characters?

      how on earth do you count them? strlen() will always return zero!

      (....)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    5. Re:Previous Story by kwabbles · · Score: 1

      The Howard Stern show is a "null character being broadcast" and it never sounds like silence to me.

      --
      Just disrupt the deflector shield with a tachyon burst.
    6. Re:Previous Story by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Has anyone tried compiling the silence using whitespace?

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    7. Re:Previous Story by SheeEttin · · Score: 1

      That's the problem with random numbers... you can never be sure.

    8. Re:Previous Story by Meriahven · · Score: 1

      So you are saying that it was just a BREAK?

    9. Re:Previous Story by Beavertank · · Score: 1

      Not to rain on your joke, but from the sounds of it it's an open mic pointed at a tone generator, so you'd still hear it even if it were broadcasting null characters. Or even if the tone generator were switched off. An open, dead, mic sounds different from an empty frequency.

    10. Re:Previous Story by 49152 · · Score: 1

      Has anyone tried compiling the silence using whitespace [dur.ac.uk]?

      Argh, thanks for telling, now how do I get this Russian super-virus out of my computer again? :(

    11. Re:Previous Story by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      I guess the same goes for playing John Cage's 4'33" back to back many times over too. Oh well, there's only so much karma whoring I can get out of one joke. I gather that they use single sideband but don't suppress the carrier; presumably if they did suppress the carrier the signal would just disappear if they were sending (good quality) silence for any appreciable time. Really, can they not afford a cable to connect the tone generator and the transmitter, they had to mic it up.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    12. Re:Previous Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It didn't go offline. There was just some propagation issues, which is normal for the frequency it broadcasts in.

    13. Re:Previous Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because most transmission algorithms have a "zero-substitution" policy to keep long silences from allowing the sender and receiver from getting out of sync (b8zs, for example). I would assume a robust military covert transmission protocol would include a similar mechanism. :)

  12. Easily explained with one word: VODKA !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VODKA !! and that says all you need to know. Remember Yeltsin? VODKA !! Remember Stalin? VODKA !! Remember Reds? Me neither! VODKA !!

  13. Unexplained? by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

    has been continually broadcasting for over twenty years, and its purpose has never been fully explained.

    Nobody can explain Fox News either.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Unexplained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Nobody can explain CNN either.

      Fixed.

    2. Re:Unexplained? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Nobody can explain Fox News either.

      Nobody can explain CNN either.

      Fixed

      But not true any more.

    3. Re:Unexplained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can!

      *Runs to bathroom, loses 5 pounds in 5 seconds.

    4. Re:Unexplained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Really? I thought it was there to counterbalance NPR.

    5. Re:Unexplained? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Fox News is easy to explain -- either Fox News is the media arm of the Republican Party, or the Republican Party is the political arm of Fox News.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    6. Re:Unexplained? by alexborges · · Score: 1

      And the tea party IS, of course, Fox News's workers union

      --
      NO SIG
    7. Re:Unexplained? by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I thought [Fox News] was there to counterbalance NPR.

      Excactly. Disinformation counterbalances information.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    8. Re:Unexplained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody can explain Fox News either.

      Wow. Took a while before the obligatory kook comment. Were you medicated?

    9. Re:Unexplained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Shit. NPR is just as knee-jerk as Fox. I know, you think they're just the common sense of mankind but the truth is that you're just as slanted as the listeners/viewers of any other media outlet but you're too fucking stupid to realize it.

      Oddly enough, during the emergence of facts on the Gulf oil spill the most unbiased and fact laden reports on the incident I could find came from the 700 Club. They pushed no agenda, they just delivered the raw facts about what went wrong and what might be done to contain it. No rantings about Obama off shore drilling. No cries about big oil. So much for the goose steppers around here who think that anything religious is automatically an evil scheme by the neocons even at a time when neocons didn't exist.

      In all seriousness, it gets old fast. The lack of honest dialog and intelligent rebuttals makes it damn near impossible to take either of the extremes seriously anymore.

    10. Re:Unexplained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just posting to say you publicly admitted to watching the 700 Club.

    11. Re:Unexplained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh don't like seeing someone mock your favorite broadcaster eh?

    12. Re:Unexplained? by Luxusleben · · Score: 1

      Explaining Fox News is rather easy, actually. It's "just a long string of null characters being broadcast". Or should that be "null character broadcasters strung together"?

    13. Re:Unexplained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      has been continually broadcasting for over twenty years, and its purpose has never been fully explained.

      Nobody can explain Fox News either.

      In either case I'd go with: successful troll is successful.

    14. Re:Unexplained? by men0s · · Score: 1

      I thought it was there for entertainment.

    15. Re:Unexplained? by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought it was there for entertainment.

      Maybe. Sort of like Fear Factor. Swallow this bowl of disgusting bugs and you win. Just replace bugs with ideology.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    16. Re:Unexplained? by spazdor · · Score: 1

      Nobody can explain Fox News either.

      Nobody can explain CNN either.

      Fixed

      The news networks? Yes, they certainly are.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    17. Re:Unexplained? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      I don't deny that NPR has some bias in terms of the stories they select to cover. But if you think you got unbiased, neutrally-selected information from the 700 Club, you're a naive fool.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    18. Re:Unexplained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pot... kettle... black... retarded?

    19. Re:Unexplained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you're too fucking stupid to realize it."

      Soo.... looked in the mirror lately? Seriously: The fact that you were watching 700 Club - which despite their "newsy" schtick - spoon-feds mushy-headed theology to the overly credulous, shows that you really aren't into "honest dialog and intelligent rebuttals". You want feel-good magic-man-in-the-sky bullshit.

  14. Video stream by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    Just enter the numbers as decimal bit values in a video file, and you'll be surprised at the resulting picture!

    1. Re:Video stream by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I prefer mystery over the possibility it's a Goatse-like thing; with top members of Soviet Politburo, from various times, to boot.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  15. Unexplained broadcasts by Stratoukos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And for the conspiracy nuts out there, here are 4 more unexplained broadcasts.

    --
    It may be 7 digits, but at least it's a semiprime
    1. Re:Unexplained broadcasts by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      Ok, something seems wrong about this. Its coming from the makers of Cracked magazine, but I'm for once supposed to take them more or less seriously?

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    2. Re:Unexplained broadcasts by johnhp · · Score: 1

      If you haven't noticed (via reddit or digg or what have you) the Cracked website has been turning out hilarious/informative articles for a while now. I was as surprised as you seem now.

    3. Re:Unexplained broadcasts by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Actually cracked is awesome. Very funny, but more importantly they usually site where they get their information.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. 4, 8 , 15, 16, 23, 42 by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We have to go back!!

    1. Re:4, 8 , 15, 16, 23, 42 by black3d · · Score: 1

      I know what my lottery numbers will be this week..

      --
      "The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
  17. my favorite comedy ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you.

  18. I actually monitor this station on occasion. by hkz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have it on right now in the background. There used to be an alternating tone at the top of the hour that kicked in suddenly and always gave me the shivers, but it stopped doing that a few years ago. Sometimes I tune in late at night, since the monotone drone of the buzzer can get pretty psychedelic. Good for coding. Never been lucky enough to catch a voice broadcast, though I did hear some crosstalk once. I even started work on a C daemon to autocorrelate the signal and auto-record any voice transmissions, but that got put on hold.
    Pictures of the transmission site: http://alex-odn.livejournal.com/12148.html

    1. Re:I actually monitor this station on occasion. by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      How the hell did he get so close?

    2. Re:I actually monitor this station on occasion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know much about what is required to pick up these transmissions. Is it just shortwave? What resource can you point me to so I can get into it?

    3. Re:I actually monitor this station on occasion. by vorpal22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are further pictures here, including ones of the building that is still being used:
      http://kspzel.livejournal.com/55478.html

      Really creepy stuff... I've been listening to a live stream of the signal for about two hours now, and at around 11:07 EST, I heard about 30 seconds of what distinctly sounded like high pitched morse code, which apparently a number of people have reported hearing over the last two days at various times.

    4. Re:I actually monitor this station on occasion. by FrameRotBlues · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1) Because no one in charge really gives a crap about a station that barely appears on a country's military budget
      2) Because the aforementioned station is just a repeater
      3) Security thru obscurity = not having to pay guards with guns

      Just some thoughts. There is an unmanned 100kw FM transmitter and 305m tower not far from where I grew up in the farm fields of central MN. Huge Pirate Radio can be yours by picking a 7-pin lock.

    5. Re:I actually monitor this station on occasion. by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 1

      Wow... just wow. I think you may need a new hobby... or exposure to some decent music. Actually, on that thought; why don't you try remixing the signal into a pumping Trance tune?

    6. Re:I actually monitor this station on occasion. by hkz · · Score: 1

      I use a Sangean ATS 505 shortwave radio (cheap, and lets you listen to all of the shortwave spectrum, not just the broadcast bands), with a wire antenna attached. That's literally a wire, strung to a tree outside, with a headphone plug soldered to one end so I can plug it in the external antenna socket. Works fine, though with a lot of static. I'm in Western Europe, so the signal is decent by night, unaudible by day.

      The thing about the broadcast bands is important: most cheap shortwave radios only let you dial into specific "broadcast bands". The Buzzer (as well as most other interesting stuff) does not broadcast in one of those bands, so a normal world receiver can't pick it up.

    7. Re:I actually monitor this station on occasion. by hkz · · Score: 1

      The station is so hypnotizing because the broadcast constantly changes around the basic beat: there's static, sometimes the signal will fade in and out, and sometimes you hear strange things. Listening to this unpredictable thing broadcasting live can be quite a trippy, tense experience.

    8. Re:I actually monitor this station on occasion. by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the MP3 link to this actual transmission on the site linked in TFA is broken, 404. :-(

    9. Re:I actually monitor this station on occasion. by leadghost · · Score: 1

      Hold onto your tinfoil hats! I'm contacting "Alex" to see if he will sneak up there and unplug the damn thing. Seriously though...who's name is on the electric bill?

    10. Re:I actually monitor this station on occasion. by wiedzmin · · Score: 1
      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    11. Re:I actually monitor this station on occasion. by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Well AFAIK (and I don't know much), the ones here in the US are pretty heavily guarded.

      Then again, the Russians just got caught with a bunch of deep-cover spies not really spying on much of anything either, so I guess there's not much to worry about for them.

  19. It's obvious what it means... by jtseng · · Score: 1

    "All your base are belong to us..."

    --

    Sanity.html - Error 404 not found

  20. Scary thought by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    What happens if it ever stops broadcasting?

    1. Re:Scary thought by uofitorn · · Score: 1

      ......http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/06/06/032235/Mysterious-Radio-Station-UVB-76-Goes-Offline

      --
      "What kind of music do pirates listen to?" -Paul Maud'dib
      "Yeeeaaarrrrr n' Bee!!" -Stilgar, Leader of Sietch Tabr
    2. Re:Scary thought by blair1q · · Score: 4, Funny

      Same thing that happened when MySpace stopped being cool.

      Rupert Murdoch will buy it.

    3. Re:Scary thought by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      What happens if it ever stops broadcasting?

      Slashdot reports it.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    4. Re:Scary thought by hardburn · · Score: 1

      It would probably result in some sub-sub-sub-department of the Russian military slashing an item off its budget. My working theory is that whatever purpose the thing originally had, it was probably lost around the time the USSR broke up. New operations groups get rotated in on standing orders because the General that originally ordered it forgot all about it.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    5. Re:Scary thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that happens it'll become an internet station for a few years and will eventually return by popular demand once the authorities get round to giving it a broadcast license. Basically, the same thing that happened to rinse fm.

    6. Re:Scary thought by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Doesn't he already own enough nonsense broadcasters?

      (Also, I'd like to see him try to put a radio frequency behind a paywall.)

    7. Re:Scary thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we'd better record a sample of the "everything's alright" signal and be prepared to reproduce it.

    8. Re:Scary thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrorist.

    9. Re:Scary thought by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see him try to put a radio frequency behind a paywall

      He'll buy Sirius/XM and move the transmission there.

  21. I've decoded it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It says... "Drink more Ovaltine."

  22. Message Recieved by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The message was received by UB-40, and they proceeded to drink red red wine.

    1. Re:Message Recieved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know how much it hurts to shoot beer through your nose?

    2. Re:Message Recieved by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      quickly followed by The Musical Ukraines singing Pass the Piroshki on the Left Hand Side.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:Message Recieved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy Crap! That song just came on the radio! Serious! Stop fucking with my head!!!

  23. That's amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I've got the same combination on my luggage!

  24. Cryptic Slashdot Post by moehoward · · Score: 1

    This is probably the most cryptic Slashdot post I have seen in the 10+ years I have read Slashdot. Translation?? And it comes from Taco, which is even more strange.

    Heck, it is even more cryptic than that new UVB-76 message that everyone keeps talking about.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
  25. guh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shit is creepy, brah. *shiver*

  26. Google map it by h00manist · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    1. Re:Google map it by DeadPixels · · Score: 2, Informative

      At 21:58 GMT on Christmas Eve 1997, 15 years after it was first observed, the buzzing abruptly stopped; to be replaced by a short series of beeps, followed by a male voice speaking Russian who repeated the following message several times: “Ya — UVB-76. 18008. BROMAL: Boris, Roman, Olga, Mikhail, Anna, Larisa. 742, 799, 14.

      Seems like this isn't the first time there has been a similar broadcast. The names appear to be just a way of confirming the spelling of a message, like someone saying "that's A as in Apple". In this case, the message is 93 882 N as in Nikolai, A as in Anna, etc. Still interesting to think about what the purpose might be, though.

    2. Re:Google map it by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      http://googlesightseeing.com/2009/07/the-buzzer-uvb-76/

      Anybody else find it scary that there is a cloud obscuring the site and pretty much nothing else?

      You can see it on this zoomed-out map.

      Forget about the radio...I want the Russian "cloud parking" technology.

    3. Re:Google map it by Hadlock · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's probably just the russian version of the NATO phonetic alphabet
       
      If he'd said "november alpha india mike india november alpha" instead of "nikolai, anna, ivan, michail, ivan, nikolai, anna"

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICAO_spelling_alphabet
       
      Fun fact, "Easy company" from WW2/"Band of Brothers" would have been called "Echo company" in today's army.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:Google map it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 self-evident

      "93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74"

    5. Re:Google map it by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Even the Russians have nuclear submarines and a good guess would be that this is a way for them to provide information to their submarines and other naval vessels. During the Soviet era many commercial vessels also had some non-civilian personnel on board for various reasons and there is no reason to think that it has ceased completely.

      And it's likely that it's just one channel of many that is used to communicate and control the operation of foreign activities. In the world of today it may not be a critical part but it's probably in use to make sure that it really works when it's needed.

      And it is probably at the same time also a dead man's switch. However as long as other means of communications exists it is likely that the other end have their safeties in secure position. Right now the foreign political tension for Russia is mild. Unless you count some minor border conflicts in the south, but they are hardly worth a nuke.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    6. Re:Google map it by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      Anybody else find it scary that there is a cloud obscuring the site and pretty much nothing else?

      That's no cloud...

    7. Re:Google map it by EvilMonkeySlayer · · Score: 2, Informative

      I doubt that, from what I can tell this radio transmission uses AM high frequency. MF/HF (which are used by this and other typical radio broadcasts) won't travel that much through water. For communication with submarines VLF and ELF is used as it has decent penetration, plus because of the very low transmission rates (data rates) that can be achieved audio/voice transmission isn't possible so they have to rely on simple text messages.

      See this as an example.

    8. Re:Google map it by Artifakt · · Score: 2

      I'm betting on agent contact. They have at least one spy in some isolated location/circumstances, where they don't want to attract attention by physically contacting the person(s) to update equipment or set up some new communications channel. (or they have updated procedures, but occasionally something glitches and they use this as a fall back system until they can fix it). This person or persons is/are under deep cover, probably with a goal of stealing technical, business related secrets such as manufacturing processes or market plans, and is/are unlikely to be connected to either sabotage or short time span military secrets. Occasionally, that person or persons still sends them information, so they broadcast an acknowledgement or updated instructions. This makes particular sense if they have either developed a really good set of advance instructions that has correctly anticipated many contingencies, or they have some good, knowledgeable and self motivated/largely self directed field agents so they can keep messages terse. There can't be very many field people in the network, but if it's a fall back method, I could see maybe three or four even as rare as broadcasts have been.
            As a fallback communications option, this might be triggered only when somebody misses a face to face contact, for example, or when a physical dead-drop needs to be changed. One thing a simple code like this one might support would be a basic description of new contact persons - a few letters could easily be enough to describe a contact's gender, age range, hair and eye color, height, build, mode of travel, and some distinguishing features.
            I agree heartily this isn't aimed at someone on a sub, not just for your reasons but because the method is better suited to an agent who has a lot of flexibility and is producing long term intelligence than someone in a tactical or operational position.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    9. Re:Google map it by dave420 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, that's the purpose of "numbers stations" in general - the sending of messages to operatives in the field via off-the-shelf technology that any civilian might own. Not much is known about the stations, but I read about some lady in East Germany (before the fall of the wall, obviously) who used a radio to receive messages from the West German Intelligence (BND) telling her where to go to get out of the East and into the West. That's the only account I've ever read of someone actually telling their story of using a numbers station. The stations, from analysis of the traffic, serve multiple operatives. Opening up a new station for each operative would be a bit costly :) These stations can make broadcasts to all agents (as in the case of the partially-decrypted Cuban numbers station, that congratulated all their female operatives on international woman's day), or to specific agents. They use one-time pads, so unless someone gets a hold of the pad (or they re-use one), there is absolutely no way to crack the broadcasts. The buzzer, however, is a different kind of station, with a different mission.

    10. Re:Google map it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You alright guys? Keeping you busy in Standingford house, are they?

    11. Re:Google map it by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/UVB-76#Alphabetic_body

      Apparently, UVB-76 is promoting Turkish websites.

      Although my theory is that the recent fires in Russia might have caused the operators to leave, or the equipment to malfunction. The message might be a "we're gone for a while" or a "we're back".

      *shrug*

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    12. Re:Google map it by qmaqdk · · Score: 1
      --
      My UID is prime. Hah!
    13. Re:Google map it by makomk · · Score: 1

      Which makes the timing decidedly interesting. (Insert conspiracy theories here.)

    14. Re:Google map it by paiute · · Score: 1

      Cool story, Boris Roman Olga!

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    15. Re:Google map it by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      The admin I work with is very into HAM radio. I irritate her by reading off phonetics using the "Able Baker Charlie Dog Easy Fox....." phonetic alphabet rather than the 'proper' NATO phonetics.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    16. Re:Google map it by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I worked two cubes over from the customer service/sales department for a small catalog company. I always winced a little on the inside when someone said "N as in.... Nancy". It was always Nancy. And they always had to pause to think about what letter started with N.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    17. Re:Google map it by Demonantis · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't the message be in Russian? Not to nit pick, but I thought it was weird that the message wasn't Cyrillic when I was looking at Cyrillic comments on the article.

    18. Re:Google map it by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Funny

      And they always had to pause to think about what letter started with N.

      Wow. That is really dumb of them. I don't feel so bad now (I sometimes have to think hard to remember how to spell the letter Q).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    19. Re:Google map it by silverglade00 · · Score: 1

      That's no cloud...

      ...it's a space station?

    20. Re:Google map it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a moon! .... right?

    21. Re:Google map it by dwiget001 · · Score: 1

      Unless the sub is surfaced, this broadcast will be of absolutely no use. And, surfacing a sub is not something that is done on a routine basis at all, as it rises the possibility that the sub will be detected and can then be tracked. It is sometimes necessary to surface a sub for communications, but for the most part it is extremely infrequent. Communications in the LF, ELF or VLF would be more useful while the sub was submerged.

    22. Re:Google map it by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      You would love me then. When I have a word with the letter 'P', I use the word 'porcupine' to verify the letter. No one has ever misunderstood what letter I meant though I do get some remarks to the effect, "Oh, never heard that one before. I like that!"

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    23. Re:Google map it by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      November... it was NOT always Nancy.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    24. Re:Google map it by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      They only need to raise an antenna for receiving. A buoy with an antenna in the middle of the pacific isn't that easy to spot - especially during the night. No need to surface.

      And they don't necessarily need to receive the broadcast directly, but through proxy which in turn can do a low power transmission to the sub.

      In any case - if this is just one channel it will only be needed in case other channels aren't usable.

      Shortwave transmissions have the advantage of spreading long distances using relatively low power.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    25. Re:Google map it by geekoid · · Score: 1

      November is what they shoud be trained to use. it's easily rememberable and doesn't rhyme with anything to minimize confusion.

      Did she say nancy? ancy? prance?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    26. Re:Google map it by geekoid · · Score: 1

      one time pads are often common and widely available books....like the Bible.

      See I watch Burn Notice to.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    27. Re:Google map it by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Ha! I watch that show, too. Book codes are not the same as one time pads, as they can't be used to convey every message, unless the desired words appear in the book. So a Bible would be fine if your message was about sin, God, Jesus, loaves & fishes, and beards, but not very useful if you want to send a message pertaining to nuclear reactors, cars, or even decent footwear.

    28. Re:Google map it by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply to myself, but if anyone's interested in numbers stations, the Conet Project has put together a 4-CD set of recordings from various numbers stations around the world, which you can download for free here, or purchase here. It's a fantastic listen.

    29. Re:Google map it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Book codes are not the same as one time pads, as they can't be used to convey every message, unless the desired words appear in the book.

      Sure they can. Assign needed meaning (beforehand, keyed by part of the message) to the necessary words and/or phrases (as viewed after the initial decoding, obviously), and off you go. Still as hard to crack, and with added flexibility at the cost of a small increase in complexity.

    30. Re:Google map it by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Or just use a one-time pad, which is easier to use, faster, offers infinite flexibility, and unlike a mass-published book, is a lot harder to find a copy of.

  27. hrm... by Charliemopps · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm rather surprised that the general public is both unaware and unconcerned that the entire Russian atomic arsenal is armed, pointed at us and the trigger autonomous... it will trigger based on a set of circumstances unknown to us that were set up 50 years ago. As far as we know were are a ill timed Solar flare/DDOS attack/meteor strike away from nuclear Armageddon. Perhaps our government might want to discuss this situation in our next round of disarmament talks?

    1. Re:hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's lies, damned lies, statistics and then there's cold war propaganda.

    2. Re:hrm... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm rather surprised that the general public is both unaware and unconcerned that the entire Russian atomic arsenal is armed, pointed at us and the trigger autonomous... it will trigger based on a set of circumstances unknown to us that were set up 50 years ago.

      I presume you're talking about "Perimeter". While it is supposedly capable of operating in autonomous mode, it's not the normal mode of operation. It's only supposed to be turned on when the danger of a sudden nuclear strike is very likely, so as to ensure a retaliatory strike even in the face of the most fast and overwhelming incoming attack. Assuming it still exists, it has most likely never been on since the dissolution of the USSR.

      Worth noting that all of this is mostly conjecture. Aside from the fact that something along these lines exists, there's very little reliable data on what the system even is in practice. Of course, that's what makes it ripe for conspiracy theories.

    3. Re:hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't "sky captain and the world of tomorrow".

    4. Re:hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Right, because *nothing* in the nuclear arsenal related to launch control has been updated in 50 years- there's a stack of punch cards with an itchy trigger finger out there in the wilds of Siberia, just waiting to strike.

    5. Re:hrm... by kaiser423 · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that they didn't in the last round of START talks? Are you privy to the classified talks, or just assuming that they don't talk about it?

    6. Re:hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to learn to stop worrying and love the bomb.

    7. Re:hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the general public has the power and resources to do this, right?

    8. Re:hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      problem solved: hilary clinton flies to russia, tells the premier that there are at least 1000 geeks who would pay 10,000 dollars each to be allowed on a private tour of the facility, prior to it being dismantled. give a full explanation to them, sell off some souvenirs, then continue to charge the public for tours after its turned off, with a "holocaust museum" tunnel of fear type installation. of course, this is assuming its not remotely armed and impossible to get into, and isnt going to destroy us all.

    9. Re:hrm... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      "by most accounts, it is normally switched off and is supposed to be activated during dangerous crises only.[citation needed]" I certainly feel secure now. lol

    10. Re:hrm... by valeo.de · · Score: 1

      Care to share whatever you've been smoking, dude? Sounds like some good shit...

      --
      cat: /home/valeo/.sig: No such file or directory
    11. Re:hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love this site. Only here and on Fox News comments will you see people shoehorn Tea Party rants into completely unrelated subjects. Are you really so mad that a black man is president that you can't stop bringing him up?

    12. Re:hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WE MUST NOT ALLOW A MINE-SHAFT GAP!

      Seriously, Dr. Strangelove, try switching to decaf.

    13. Re:hrm... by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Considering we're bombarded with messages of Armageddon all of the time, be it from global warming, peak oil, the collapse of the world economy, or universal healthcare, what would you expect people to do? "Oh, that's too bad. I hope it doesn't kill us before all this cancer stuff does."

    14. Re:hrm... by hedge49 · · Score: 1

      If their nukes haven't been upgraded or maintained better than some of their other Cold War hardware, their detonation point could be anywhere between launch, and 'holy motherland, Boris, that one made it!'. And the Ukrainians have probably chopped the ones they could get at. Battlebotski.

    15. Re:hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Missiles are no longer pre-aimed at the targets in US and Russia. That was one of the deals reached after USSR collapsed. They can be re-programmed with correct targets quickly though.

    16. Re:hrm... by epine · · Score: 1

      If Russia fires nukes at us, Obama will just ignore it for 3 months, make a speech or two about being tough, and play a couple games of bad golf. And then he'll ignore it again.

      Stupid, and proud of it. The American government budgeted $680 billion dollars in 2010 to prepare for military threats to national security (and to flip the elbow at any nation whose diplomatic chauffeur makes an aggressive lane change in the U.N. traffic circle).

      The American government spends a lot less money planning to plug leaks in the bottom of the ocean. So far as I know, the U.S. government does not count among its assets a single nuclear-powered leak-repair submarine with giant crab-like manipulators along with an underwater proving-range the size of Dakota so that when they take on the mission, they have half a hope of pulling it off.

      Truly, a proactive president would have immediately spotted a way to repurpose the space station to assist in underwater leak mitigation. That asset has hardly been earning its keep up in space, and why did we build it in the first place, if it can't help out?

      Sometimes the best course of action is not to mess with things unnecessarily. Was BP going to plug the hole any faster if Obama quivered with bravado in the Italian opera of media sound-bites? A certain stripe of Libertarian believes that governments exist to mess up things they don't properly understand. It causes ideological vertigo to see government sit back and not pretend to fix something they aren't capable of fixing, while a paragon of the private sector runs around like mad chickens. "Does not follow ideological script, does not compute."

      This is a version of government right out of Saturday morning cartoons: a vision of small government consisting of President Buck Rogers and his legion of supersuits, who never meddle in policy, but swoop in to take control wherever damsels swoon.

      National Nuclear Security Administration

      At $15m the budget is smaller than I thought. That would barely pay for HR services. I'm sure it's just the tip of the iceberg and it has roots deep into the Pentagon's $56B black budget, not all of which is wasted in the tradition of unobtainium origami, though they're happy to abet that PR meme.

      The reason Dr Strangelove almost plays as a documentary is that the whole business of "fail safe" already had a rich literature in early days. Since the U.S. government now relies almost exclusively on Google, and this stuff is too old to make it into the Google index, maybe it is a problem. Some rusty CRM-144 in a dank cement basement on the outskirts of Moscow is poised to take out Western civilization, and nobody knows.

      What I'd personally love to see is a remake of the telephone scene from the war room with Tony Hayward on the other end of the line. "You want your life back? We *all* want our life back, Timitri."

    17. Re:hrm... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I'm rather surprised that the general public is both unaware and unconcerned that the entire Russian atomic arsenal is armed, pointed at us and the trigger autonomous.

      [[citation needed]]
       
      Seriously - there is absolutely zero reliable evidence that such an autonomous system exists. What the Russians *do* have is Perimeter, a system equivalent to the US's ABNCP(Looking Glass)/TACAMO systems. I.E. when under attack it transfers launch authority from the civilian authorities to the military authorities.

    18. Re:hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No the Russian Doomsday device doesn't launch automatically, it just arms and targets automatically.

      IF
      Doomsday machine is active
      AND
      Moscow High command is not reachable (this could be what something like a numbers station is there for)
      AND
      Nuclear Detonation detectors inside Russia (actually Soviet Union) has detected a detonation (I'm assuming they are connected with some kind of fail safe that more than one need to detect)
      THEN
      The launch command is activated and anyone sitting in the control room of a launch silo can launch the ICBMs, which will then automatically find their targets using a master signal missile (the guy launching does not need to decide on targets).

    19. Re:hrm... by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      You're probably correct, but if you google "Dead Hand" there are some intersting and quite detailed counter theories from the midst of the cold war.

    20. Re:hrm... by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      that should be tagged "whatcouldpossiblygowrong"

    21. Re:hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to recall a prior Slashdot article that talked about the "Dead Hand" system, and have read of a number of things regarding it since then. From what I gathered, and this is yet MORE conjecture, btw, it was setup as a binary defense mechanism. On the one hand, it was tied into a series of radiation detectors, nationally, that could, if radiation was detected, effectively "arm" the system. A signal was then key in determining actual launch staus not by it's presence, but by it's absence. As long as the system continued to receive this signal, launch would not occur unless directly ordered so, a kind of "dead man's switch". Goes a long way to explaining the panic they had when Chernobyl blew it's top so many years ago.

      My guess would be that a single "reset" signal was determined to be insufficient after that, and so, a network of signals, divided regionally, perhaps, would be necessary to maintain the status quo. It would make for one hell of a deterrent to any LOCALIZED coup attempts, and falls in line with Soviet era mindsets, namely, that they had more to worry about from their own staffers, than they did from outside military action on the part of the West. It would also explain why espionage represented a greater perceived threat than direct military action ever could. Anybody know if this radio signal is the only one, or if there are others across the country that behave similarly?

    22. Re:hrm... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The very existence of the damn thing is one big [citation needed], if you're looking at it from that angle.

    23. Re:hrm... by astar · · Score: 1

      Haha, an even stronger silliness factor is that it is really not very useful to analyze current events. Pretty much the important "facts" for a correlation are simply not referred to by anyone. So a couple weeks ago the fed went into knives out mode around Bernaeke's hyperinflation policy. All the regional chairs are publicly very diplomatic so far, but I think next week you see more interesting leaks and there might be media coverage. And the policy in question is driven of course by what everyone at this point realizes is a near term big time economic collapse. Now this drives various adventures and also last week as I recall, the Israel PM got some big-time internal support for an attack on Iran. Back when the communications systems had sort of ordinary people involved in them, everyone who paid attention realized that all the big nations were careful not to surprise any other interested nation. Perhaps some sort of fateful decision has been made. So if you want to analyze this radio signal change, why bother? So it changed. It is not like it is a primary causation. If you were able to directly affect the signal, what would that do to help make the surrounding correlations less lethal? And given that you have perhaps chosen to live in a big time acute malthusian crisis, should you be concerned about lethality anyway? Ah well. I do not know anything, but some get amusement from my questions.

    24. Re:hrm... by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Jesus, didn't they see Doctor Strangelove?? (Wait, if we know about it, I guess they did. :))

  28. unruskie(%s) yields by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Funny

    unruskie("UVB-76, UVB-76 -- 93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74 -- 9 3 8 8 2 nikolai, anna, ivan, michail, ivan, nikolai, anna, 7, 4, 1, 4, 3, 5, 7, 4'") ends up with this cryptic message:

    lp0 on fire. call nikolai, anna or ivan; but ivan's drunk, call michail instead

    rather a specific message but that's what the unruskie() filter says.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:unruskie(%s) yields by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe the Russians are just fucking with everyone's mind for laughs. They know people are speculating, and perhaps they got the urge to feed the "I want to believe" crowd some raw meat. I would not be surprised if there is a hidden joke that will be revealed in a decade or so just so they can say "gotcha!".

    2. Re:unruskie(%s) yields by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best Post I've ever read.

    3. Re:unruskie(%s) yields by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to get the new version of unruskie - mine outputs "be sure to drink your ovaltine"

    4. Re:unruskie(%s) yields by valeo.de · · Score: 1

      If there were more posts like this on Slashdot, I'd come here not just when I'm bored senseless and looking to kill time before bed. ;)

      --
      cat: /home/valeo/.sig: No such file or directory
    5. Re:unruskie(%s) yields by kwabbles · · Score: 1

      I didn't get past "lp0 on fire" before blowing tea all over my monitor.

      --
      Just disrupt the deflector shield with a tachyon burst.
    6. Re:unruskie(%s) yields by tibit · · Score: 1

      Now your monitor can catch fire for real!

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    7. Re:unruskie(%s) yields by jrumney · · Score: 1

      2010-08-23 16:35:23 UTC:

      U2 spyplane sighted in vicinity of president's holiday house.

      2010-08-24 04:02:16 UTC:

      Nevermind, it was just Bono.

      2010-08-24 13:25:35 UTC:

      I still haven't found what I'm looking for

      2010-08-24 17:43:28 UTC:

      These guys are from England, who gives a shit?

  29. LOST by PrimordialSoup · · Score: 0

    its the russian version of LOST, we will know nothing after 6 seasons....

  30. Got my numbers! by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    It's off to get the lotto tickets!

  31. Related to Russian spies?1!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!? by el_tedward · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the ideas of what the hell this thing is from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UVB-76:
    "UVB-76 is widely believed to be used to transmit encoded messages to spies, as is generally assumed for the many numbers stations that populate shortwave frequencies. Transmitter sites for some numbers stations have been triangulated to military and/or intelligence installations in several countries,[citation needed] although no nation's government will confirm or deny the existence of the stations or their purpose."

    Could this be related to the recent case of the 10 (with one on the run, right?) kinda-sorta-russian-spies news fest? It could be the Russians talking to other operatives they have lurking about.

    Or maybe It's just some Russian dudes spending government money to boost their shares in tin & aluminum foil.

    1. Re:Related to Russian spies?1!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!? by JamesP · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that's a rather clumsy way to send messages.

      They could have written it on the spy's facebook wall, I mean. And they don't even need to write, just 'like' a specific post.

      I'm being funny here, but the idea stays. In the era of internet, cell phones and encryption, maintaining a very low bandwidth comm channel is almost useless.Not to mention syncing the transmission.

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    2. Re:Related to Russian spies?1!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!? by el_tedward · · Score: 1

      Still more paranoia, but,

      I think the AC above has it right. Codes have some advantages over encryption. If fishsticks stands for grab the secret CIA kiddy porn and post it to wikileaks, there's not a way to bruteforce (well, there is, but only if you're a chimpanzee with a keyboard) or math your way to figure out what fishsticks stands for. It just relies on keeping your secrets secret, so you getting some risk mitigation there.

      Until the government takes out the middle man and starts sticking antennae into the heads of the psychics they're training at the NSA.

    3. Re:Related to Russian spies?1!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I think it's largely disinformation, honestly.

      At this point in time, we have the computing power to analyze the data being sent over these frequencies for patterns and possible algorithmic permutations which may or may not be encrypted, code data.

      The only way they could conceivably be spy signal towers is if the spies have "code books" and specific directions as to when they should listen, with specific (and likely somewhat binary) instructions. IE, they know they've got a dozen possible directives based on previous comms, and know what the communications are supposed to be symbolic for.

      There are many different, cheaper methods of doing this, most of which are not over the open airwaves and easily intercepted. One leaked code book and the game is over.

      Though, that may very well be why the signal ended and started up again not too long ago: the Russian spies who were caught lost their code books, so the signal had to be reset on a new code book.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    4. Re:Related to Russian spies?1!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the ideas of what the hell this thing is from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UVB-76:
      "UVB-76 is widely believed to be used to transmit encoded messages to spies, as is generally assumed for the many numbers stations that populate shortwave frequencies. Transmitter sites for some numbers stations have been triangulated to military and/or intelligence installations in several countries,[citation needed] although no nation's government will confirm or deny the existence of the stations or their purpose."

      Could this be related to the recent case of the 10 (with one on the run, right?) kinda-sorta-russian-spies news fest? It could be the Russians talking to other operatives they have lurking about.

      Or maybe It's just some Russian dudes spending government money to boost their shares in tin & aluminum foil.

      Yeah, this whole internet/email thing is just a fad... good old 1-way radio signals are the way to go!

    5. Re:Related to Russian spies?1!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!? by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      It could be the Russians talking to other operatives they have lurking about.

      Yes, it actually says: 'No more rubbish spy movies please, Angelina".

    6. Re:Related to Russian spies?1!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!? by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      But, but, that's the only thing that will stay up after a "fire sale"!

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
  32. japaense anima?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "naimina" backwards is "animain" which could be Japanese "Anima in" ....??? What would the numbers mean, a code for episodes of Sailer Moon?

  33. The message. by ngc5194 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've got the same combination on my luggage!

  34. Russian Twitter Prototype by blair1q · · Score: 2, Funny

    One byte per message.

  35. There's a lot of "numbers stations" by Xtifr · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a lot of numbers stations around the world. The Conet project offers a selection of recordings from many of them (available on the Internet Archive). Unless you have some specific reason to believe that you tuned into this particular one, I would guess that you just picked up one at random.

  36. It's Desmond and his APPLE ][ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep it up, Desmond !!

    Buck Dharma

  37. Doomsday Device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dr. Strangelove: Of course, the whole point of a Doomsday Machine is lost, if you *keep* it a *secret*! Why didn't you tell the world, EH?
    Ambassador de Sadesky: It was to be announced at the Party Congress on Monday. As you know, the Premier loves surprises.

  38. Long Awaited Response by moehoward · · Score: 1

    Finally, we have he long-awaited response to the eternal question asked of Dan Rather. What's the frequency, Kenneth??? Michael Stipe is probably greatly relieved, as he has been asking the same thing for years.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
  39. Portal 2 ARG by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Portal 2 ARG

    1. Re:Portal 2 ARG by MakinBacon · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting Gabe Newell built a radio station in the Soviet Union in 1982 just in case he someday owns a game company and needs a really clever marketing trick?

    2. Re:Portal 2 ARG by Zorque · · Score: 1

      What, you're suggesting he didn't?

    3. Re:Portal 2 ARG by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      I think what he's suggesting is that Gabe Newell figured out how to manipulate space-time, and that gave him the idea for a few really cool games. He started publishing games to raise funds to expand his space-time experiments, but quickly realized that being a God of Gaming is more fun, and pays better.

      He still dusts off his old prototype once in a while when he needs a marketing gimmick, or if he needs to go back a few days to avoid the late fees at Blockbuster.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
  40. This means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are really into this artist

  41. Maybe it does nothing? by Lohrno · · Score: 1

    You all speculate on what it does, but I'm thinking maybe it does nothing. I think in any case it's probably a red herring. Either it did have a purpose which has been filled already, or it never had a purpose and was put there as a deterrent to the US, thinking we'd speculate that we'd better not bomb Moscow or there will be automatic retaliation...

  42. Nothing new by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    I can recall hearing people with foreign accents read off random strings of numbers while messing around with HAM gear as far back as 1972. I'm pretty sure the numbers were in English, though.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  43. Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    How much does a shortwave transmitter cost?? I want to rickroll this frequency!

    1. Re:Idea by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How much does a shortwave transmitter cost?? I want to rickroll this frequency!

      The gear would be available surplus for not much. Otherwise you could roll your own with transistors, capacitors, so forth.

  44. It says... by fishthegeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    BESURETODRINKYOUROVALTINE

    --
    load "$",8,1
    1. Re:It says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OVALTINEDRINKSYOU

  45. Just want to point out by sea4ever · · Score: 5, Informative

    On ships and so on, they use names and stuff like that to encode words, so that when they speak them out over the radio there's less chance of being misheard. I don't know what that system is called but perhaps somebody else does. Sorry if I explained that badly.
    Anyway, the message:
    "UVB-76, UVB-76 — 93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74 — 9 3 8 8 2 nikolai, anna, ivan, michail, ivan, nikolai, anna, 7, 4, 1, 4, 3, 5, 7, 4'"
    'naimina' is equivalent to Nikolai Anna Ivan Michael Ivan Nikolai Anna
    Also, notice that the '74 14 35 74' is the same as '7 4 1 4 3 5 7 4'. The second half is just to make sure the other person got the message OK, I suppose. That means the total message is just the first part, which is only:
    "93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74"
    That's way too short to encode very much more than anything informational. I'll bet it just says "Hey guys, happy birthday" or something.

    1. Re:Just want to point out by Renraku · · Score: 1

      "That's way too short to encode very much more than anything informational. I'll bet it just says "Hey guys, happy birthday" or something."

      Obviously someone failed Russian spy school. If you'll look on your nifty little code sheet there that you were forced (at gunpoint by your teacher) to memorize, you'll see that the numbers 74 14 35 74 correspond to specific operations. Naimina is also listed, and also corresponds to specific operations. Since we're all friends here, I'll give you a little reminder, just buy me a drink next time you see me, eh? The 74 is row seven column four. You'll notice that operation is to

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    2. Re:Just want to point out by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 4, Informative

      On ships and so on, they use names and stuff like that to encode words, so that when they speak them out over the radio there's less chance of being misheard. I don't know what that system is called but perhaps somebody else does. Sorry if I explained that badly.

      While there are several versions throughout the history of radio, the most common phonetic/spelling alphabet these days is the NATO phonetic alphabet:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICAO_spelling_alphabet

      We still use it in the military for standardized communications. For more specialized applications, you might hear the letter 'A' as 'acer' or 'T' as 'talon' to let the listener know that you are using a specific identifier (bay A, truck T, etc.) instead of spelling a word.

      The transmission seems to follow the standard russian spelling template. Make of that what you will; I just thought I'd get you started.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_spelling_alphabet

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    3. Re:Just want to point out by mirix · · Score: 1

      It could say turn to page 356 of the 35th edition of the soviet spy's handbook, and preform whatever is described in there.

      Would be a lot easier than explaining it all in cryptic messages.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    4. Re:Just want to point out by DeadlyFoez · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Just to let you know, a short message like this can have a LOT of meaning for spies and such that are using things like "one time pads". Also keep in mind, there was just recently a bunch of spies found in the USA that were russian. I am sure that there is still more lurking around. All of the recent activity on UVB-76 would be easy to assume that this is sort of a communications hub for the covert spies in other countries. I have listened to UVB-76 a lot recently and have recorded some strange stuff on it including data transmissions and morse code. I uploaded the sound files to a torrent that can be found here at http://tinyurl.com/uvb76 Take a listen if you'd like. I'm listening to UVB-76 at this moment and there are strange things coming through and I can find the right band to gather what is going on.

    5. Re:Just want to point out by sea4ever · · Score: 1

      Ah yes that's it! Thanks, I was wondering how I would find what this was called. NATO alphabet.

    6. Re:Just want to point out by sv_libertarian · · Score: 1
      As you can see, it's merely a message to a guild member in WoW... hhttp://www.ironwheel.net/profile.php?lookup=2/

      I hope the raid went well.

    7. Re:Just want to point out by eriklou · · Score: 1

      Could be the key change, I mean why not.

    8. Re:Just want to point out by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

      "93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74" That's way too short to encode very much more than anything informational. I'll bet it just says "Hey guys, happy birthday" or something.

      Yes, the Russian message is far too short to transmit anything useful. Execute order 66...even shorter...even less information...can't possibly be anything useful there either....

    9. Re:Just want to point out by coaxial · · Score: 1

      Obviously someone failed Russian spy school. If you'll look on your nifty little code sheet there that you were forced (at gunpoint by your teacher) to memorize.

      Apparently the Russian spy school you attended wasn't up to snuff, since all the other spies have these little things called One Time Pads.

      Oh, where is the Russian No Spy Left Behind Act!

    10. Re:Just want to point out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree -- if both you and I had a codebook that associated these numbers with letters, words or sentences (much like a one-time pad), it could very well mean much more that one would suspect on first glance. A vitally important message doesn't have to be long, and certainly not when the message is a codeword for something that was shared and agreed upon in advance by two parties.

      All in all this could very well mean "happy birthday", but in reality it could mean anything far beyond our imagination. Oooh - mysterious!

    11. Re:Just want to point out by DrewL216 · · Score: 1

      If the message is at all significant then it's brevity would suggest shared knowledge between the sender and receiver (duh, I know). The most common and practical example of this would be an encrypted dictionary encoding. As for the number of words that could be referenced in this message, if they used a smaller shared dictionary (maybe 100 words) of pre-established nouns and directive-type words then this message of "93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74" could easily be message approaching 10 significant words. So there's plenty of room for a significant move-here/do-this type directive but there's not any room for detailed plans. It's also possibly an encrypted internet address where agents can go to download public, stenographic photos that contain the larger details and information that they need (or something of the sort).

    12. Re:Just want to point out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ICAO is the International Civil Aviation Organisation -- not NATO...

  46. Sure they can. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nobody can explain Fox News either.

    Sure they can.

      - The cultural/political/ideological orientation of much of the population of the United States falls into one of two major groupings. (They tend to be called things like "liberal" and "conservative", "left" and "right", or other pairs of names. But they're each coalitions of many subgroups bound by rough agreement on a few major points.)
      - The broadcast news media became sufficiently (and visibly) biased in its programming that the members of one of the groupings felt that they were not being served by it. This created a market opportunity. (This was similar to the one that spawned CNN, when mainstream news migrated from news reportage to infotainment-product generation.)
      - Fox News marketed itself as providing "fair and balanced" coverage - half from the viewpoint of each of the two groupings. This made them the only show in town for the one that felt underserved. Thus they grabbed the eyballs of about half the population's newswatchers to sell to their advertisers.
      - This worked until about the 2008 campaign, when it became clear that Fox News was serving only one (Neocon) of the four-or-so major and several minor factions within the underserved group. This left several large (and moneyed) factions feeling underserved again and created another marketing opportunity.
      - Fox News is going after the biggest coalition of the remaining factions (libertarians + paleoconservatives + {"Tea Party" minus neocons}) with new shows on their "Fox Financial Network" feed.

    TV news is easy to understand once you get that it has two purposes:
      1) Making money by selling eyeball time to advertisers.
      2) Exercising political power by inserting itself between the people in office and the rest of the world and creating a false image of the constituents' opinions and world events for the office-holders.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Sure they can. by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yep. Pretty much explains it exactly, and in a non-biased way. Rather silly moderators modded it down because in the Slashdot Groupthink, it is unacceptable to speak of Foxnews with anything but the strongest derision possible, ideally by spelling it "Faux" News, which is incredibly clever and original.

    2. Re:Sure they can. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or it could be because TFA deals with UVB-76 and Fox News has nothing to do with it whether you love Fox News or hate it. It's not Slashdot "groupthink" when you really are off-topic.

      HTH.

    3. Re:Sure they can. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      It's not Slashdot "groupthink" when you really are off-topic.

      I agree that an "offtopic" mod would have been fair (provided the parent got one, too. B-) )

      Unfortunately, Slashdot sometimes doesn't tell me what the downmod category was - and didn't this time. So, from past experience, I assumed the moderation was more likely to be a politically-motivated attempt at suppression rather than an honest rating.

      I try to keep my "offtopic" posts "insightful" and/or "informative" enough to be worth reading regardless, and the moderators usually agree with my judgement - except for a few that get bent when I refuse to play along with "ding the conservatives".

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    4. Re:Sure they can. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Faux" News, which is incredibly clever and original.

      Not really. It's just factual and informative.

  47. Lat/Long by trinaryai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Someone else may have caught this and it got buried in the deeper replies, but I find the 4 2-digit numbers to be very interesting. 74.14E 35.74N is right in the mountains of Pakistan controlled Kashmir. The second part of the message with the names is simply a phonetic spelling of the first part of the message. Naimina has several possible references, #1 on my list of likelihoods would refer to the owner of a website design company of that name targeting the Turkish language. No guess what 93 882 is - probably a predetermined instruction code undecipherable outside the network.

    1. Re:Lat/Long by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      If they wanted to do an operation at a particular location you would think they wouldn't transmit the lat/lon in the plain at 4000KHz. Maybe the actual location is 180 degrees away from that, or one tenth of that, or combined with the one time pad for the time of transmission.

    2. Re:Lat/Long by mirix · · Score: 1

      It's obviously XORed with the headline from today's New York Times.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    3. Re:Lat/Long by HaloZero · · Score: 4, Interesting

      More Lat/Long stuff: 74.14W 35.74N is right off the coast of North Carolina & Southern Virginia. 74.14W 35.74S is right off the coast of Chile. 74.14E 35.74S is in the middle of nowhere, with Madagascar.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    4. Re:Lat/Long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More plausibly, 74.14N 35.74E is smack-bang in the middle of the Barents Sea, north of Russia.

    5. Re:Lat/Long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No guess what 93 882 is

      The number of Naimina's Twitter followers?

    6. Re:Lat/Long by watermark · · Score: 1

      The Russians found Bin Laden!

    7. Re:Lat/Long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a big cave there?

      Osama?

    8. Re:Lat/Long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most likely the number is encoded. Perhaps the letters are numbers and the numbers are letters, or some mix. There's no way to know. Could be a book code offset number, a wheel setting, there's just no way to know. Seems silly to send coordinates in plaintext.

    9. Re:Lat/Long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      74.14W 35.74N is off the coast of North Carolina...

    10. Re:Lat/Long by OneMadMuppet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you swap Up and across, you get the Barents Sea, Greenland, and 2 spots in Antartica - 1 land, one sea. Naimina is a girls name in Kenya.

    11. Re:Lat/Long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      74deg 14'N, 35deg 74' E is a small road-junction in Sweden, which actually seems meaningful.

    12. Re:Lat/Long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just can't imagine any situation where a possibly military or intelligence related organization would like to keep a station operational for more than 20 years but yet still transmit partly unencrypted messages. Given the lenghts and rarity of transmitted messages I'd say it would be braindead not to use any one-time pad derived encryption methods.

    13. Re:Lat/Long by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      If you swap Up and across, you get the Barents Sea, Greenland, and 2 spots in Antartica - 1 land, one sea.

      Naimina is a girls name in Kenya.

      Barack Obama's secret love child?

    14. Re:Lat/Long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      25.12.1997 01:02 18008 Bromal 7427 9914
      24.12.2000 12:30 74148 Antimonat 2637 0931
                      -“- 12:45 6121 Antimonat 2637 0931
      01.12.2002 10:51 01213 Skif 3887 2395
      06.12.2002

                              07:03

                  28138 Kariama 7756 0151
                            Aggradatsya 0551 5597
                            Glashatel 7678 5508
      09.12.2002 07:18 62691 Izafet 3693 8270
      20.12.2002 18:43 45359 Delmezon 3749 6335
      15.01.2003
                              08:55
                  79992 Bongu 9923 7768
                            Bronshik 7117 5770
                      -“- 15:30 03517 Kamasit 8668 8886
      16.01.2003 17:00 90824 Krolist 5326 6256
                      -“- 17:56 73858 Podshefnyi 8691 0374
      17.01.2003 09:00 93310 Biladit 8081 8449
                      -“- 14:02 98042 Vyalenie 3620 0983
      21.01.2003 09:52 80516 Ganomatit 2123 8625
      24.01.2003 17:25 07526 Razdvizhnoy 1847 2796
      30.01.2003 08:04 01851 Azotin 1889 2402
      30.01.2003 17:57 57084 Intsyael 7616 5679
      07.02.2003 09:03 15286 Anglez 5109 9829
                            Bushmar 8989 5579
                            Nominatsya 7497 1656
      07.02.2003 09:34 85596 Klasa 8100 0291
      11.02.2003 17:58 12733 Edinenye 6779 6632
      01.03.2003 10:30 60130 Vatruh 5889 5454
      21.03.2003 10:28 95695 Trezvennik 1624 5427
                            Tvorain 1624 0230
      24.03.2003 06:51 01705 Bramirka 1849 7039

    15. Re:Lat/Long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the CIA call you, tell them I said hi and that it'd be cool if I could work for them too, some day.

    16. Re:Lat/Long by johnhp · · Score: 1

      Russia must have armies of guys with PHDs in cryptography. I don't think anyone is *likely* to decipher the message in just a few minutes posting on Slashdot.

    17. Re:Lat/Long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice,

      Google Maps swallows long+lat coordinates too!

      http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=de&geocode=&q=74.14E+35.74N&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=30.737461,56.513672&ie=UTF8&ll=35.661759,74.146729&spn=0.984082,1.766052&t=h&z=9

    18. Re:Lat/Long by Endloser · · Score: 1

      Could 93 882 mean 8/23, with 88 meaning something else? On 9/12/02 the first set was 62 691; see the pattern? 4th digit/5th digit-1st digit I am not saying that is what it is, but there is a pattern. The only thing is, on Dec 24, 97 we get 18 008. Gibberish to confound us? or refering to another date? October 81 maybe? Lol.

    19. Re:Lat/Long by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      74.14E 35.74N is right in the mountains of Pakistan controlled Kashmir. [...] Naimina has several possible references, #1 on my list of likelihoods would refer to the owner of a website design company of that name targeting the Turkish language.

      Yeah, it's easy to make this conclusion: Weird stuff going out in Pakistan (probably something to do with Iran's nuclear program) and there's some company in Turkey that is obviously a front for the Russian spies.

      The only thing that would suggest otherwise would be, oh, the fact that the folks that designed this radio operation probably didn't design it so that anyone with three-minute basic Google training could figure out the messages, or at very least they were smart enough to realise that whatever was considered secure enough in 1980s probably isn't secure enough in 2010.

      The folks who run the station are probably very aware that a lot of people have listened to the station, found it weird, and all thanks to the Internet, it's being constantly monitored and scrutinised. They can't fart in the broadcast room without someone posting gigantic analysis of that on some blog. The fact that they persist suggest two possibilities: 1) they know their operation hasn't been figured out yet, so they keep operating as if nothing had happened, or 2) the real purpose of the station is in the buzzing, and they're sending out these messages just to bullshit everyone.

    20. Re:Lat/Long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The very same way you can interpret it the other way around.

      http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=74.14N+35.74E&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=39.456673,86.572266&ie=UTF8&ll=74.496413,75.058594&spn=29.524281,173.144531&z=3

      74.14N 35.74E the barents sea, where a russian training is taking place

      http://www.barentsobserver.com/russian-anti-aircraft-missile-training-in-barents-sea.4811241-116320.html

    21. Re:Lat/Long by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      If you want to get really tin-foily, one of the previous messages from this station was:

      "75-59-75-59. 39-52-53-58. 5-5-2-5. Konstantin-1-9-0-9-0-8-9-8-Tatiana-Oksana-Anna-Elena-Pavel-Schuka. Konstantin 8-4. 9-7-5-5-9-Tatiana. Anna Larisa Uliyana-9-4-1-4-3-4-8."

      75.59W 39.52/53/58E are along the coast of Delaware. 75.59E is near the Kyrgyzstan/China border...

  48. Perhaps? by godel_56 · · Score: 1
    "UVB-76, UVB-76 — 93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74 — 9 3 8 8 2 nikolai, anna, ivan, michail, ivan, nikolai, anna, 7, 4, 1, 4, 3, 5, 7, 4'"

    It's Anna Chapman's new phone number.

    1. Re:Perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      74.14.35.74: IP addy for the server hosting her nude photos, perhaps?

  49. about the increased activity by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

    I can explain it in two words: Nuclear Iran. Russia has been instrumental in making that happen.

    How "naimina" fits into that, I don't know.

  50. Release the governator ... by taniwha · · Score: 0

    Ah - that's the code to enable the deep cover Swartzenager operative ....

  51. don't know why they bother with an expensive radio by neonsignal · · Score: 1

    don't know why they bother with an expensive radio... when they could just post the message to slashdot

  52. This is someone's job. by pspahn · · Score: 1

    Some dude sits around all day, everyday, waiting for some kind of message. In all this time, they have mostly had nothing to do but listen. Then, one day, it's balls to wall because something is being transmitted.

    Obviously decoding the message is going to be impossible without the appropriate documents. So how do you find out what it means?

    • Get Julian Assange to find out
    • Look for and investigate the suspicious activity that happens after the transmission is sent
    • Bribes
    • Ask Jaime and Adam.
    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    1. Re:This is someone's job. by pspahn · · Score: 1

      ...and after a little reading, I came across one message posted here that states the following:

      Hope someone who knows russian better than me confirms it, but they are reading the numbers different from print. "UVB-76, UVB-76 - 93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74" is read as you see, where the numbers are stated (eg. ninety-three, eight hundred eighty two, ...) The rest of the numbers are read as positions (eg. seventh, fourth, first, fourth...)

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    2. Re:This is someone's job. by Tackhead · · Score: 1

      Get Julian Assange to find out

      "93882naimina74143574? That's the stupidest key I've ever heard of in my life! That's the kinda thing an idiot would use to encrypt his insurance file!"

    3. Re:This is someone's job. by profplump · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which is exactly why real numbers stations broadcast continuously and not only when sending useful messages. Otherwise you can correlate activity with broadcasts, which can be a huge information leak.

  53. numbers = co-ordinates? by pyrocam · · Score: 1
  54. Re:don't know why they bother with an expensive ra by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

    For a while blocks of regularly-formatted nonsense were posted anonymously on this site fairly often. Haven't seen it for a couple years at least, but it sure looked like encoded/encrypted messages. Not sure if anyone ever figured out what those were.

  55. Decoded... by guzzloid · · Score: 1

    "How about a nice game of chess?"

  56. Missing operator's manual by Aphoxema · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The most concerning thing is... imagine a flawless setup for an automated retaliation system, and the exact location of every component and operation of the system was only known by key individuals, all of whom died and failed to pass on the information to the more peacefully minded.

    Now I'm sure Dead Hand isn't flawless, but how can we ever be sure the fossils of the Cold War aren't at any moment already invoking armageddon?

    I can imagine the cruel irony where one day all of Humanity finally reaches a perfect state of peace, and deciding to hunt down and dismantle these "I'm taking you down with me" networks all sentience is magnificently eradicated on Earth.

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  57. Oblig. Dr. Strangelove reference by PoprocksCk · · Score: 1

    Mein Fuehrer! I can walk! ::boom::

    1. Re:Oblig. Dr. Strangelove reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know where I'll be this Friday night!

      http://www.riverviewtheater.com/show/show/1357

  58. old /. story about numbers stations. by steak · · Score: 3, Informative

    following my nose around wikipedia I found a link to this /. article from 11 years ago.

    http://slashdot.org/it/99/09/16/0055245.shtml

  59. And what it more sounds like by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Is that when activated it can automatically (under the correct circumstances) give missile sites the ABILITY to launch with out central control. The USSR had real control issues, in case anyone didn't notice. They wanted nuclear weapons, but were extremely wary about the people who might control them. As such there is much heavier central control than the US has. Of course that also worried them as to what would happen if those commanders were taken out. Hence, something like this.

  60. solution by derniers · · Score: 1

    its the winning lottery numbers....... they took a break due to the fires

  61. Can't we just ask them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone ever just asked them what the tower is for?

    1. Re:Can't we just ask them? by mmcxii · · Score: 1

      We asked but they said for us to go away or they would taunt us for a second time. The oddest thing was they didn't even seem like a bunch of Ruskies... they had french accents and heavy tin foil hats to keep out the dangerous radio waves.

      Sometimes it's just better not to know. The truth is too weird.

  62. Notice that the previous posting was down-modded. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1, Insightful

    One of the downsides of the slashdot moderation system is its vulnerability to abuse by dishonest politically-motivated people who happen to have moderation points.

    As is typical: A straight (and not {deliberately} biased) response to a cheap shot from the left wing gets dinged by a (no doubt) left-wing moderator.

    But feel free to ding this one, too. B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  63. Obligatory Covert Affairs Plug... by avatar139 · · Score: 1

    ...Someone contact Annie Walker at the CIA, the rogue IRA cell has now restarted their transmissions in Russia! I'd do it myself but just because I'm paranoid, it doesn't necessarily mean that the CIA has actually revoked their standing kill order on me...

    --
    I'm honest enough to admit I lie to myself.
  64. 20 years for 20 kilowatts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For how many Mega-Watts it counts for ? It should be important.

  65. Bethesda is behind it by stoicfaux · · Score: 1

    It's just Bethesda copying and trying to one-up Valve when Valve added the radio puzzles to Portal. Those silly marketing droids will doing anything to get some viral marketing for the upcoming Fallout 3: Las Vegas expansion going.

    1. Re:Bethesda is behind it by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      For the record, the game- and it is a standalone game, not an expansion- is called Fallout: New Vegas.

      And if Bethesda was behind it, the radio signal would be Chinese, not Russian.

      I'll go away now.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  66. Just a guess, It's a salt. by N1tr0u5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can pick this thing up from anywhere with the right equipment, right?

  67. You don't want to go in there... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    From my experience with Russian military radio stations, the basement's probably full of bloodsuckers. Gas it from the parking lot, it's the only way to be sure.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  68. Who cares why would you want to go there? by gd23ka · · Score: 1

    Only to discover drunken Ivan and Pavel guarding it and it's fully automated retransmitting an audio signal from a vhf satellite.

  69. Unlikely by 3ryon · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is the digital age, surely there is no reason to communicate in this manner anymore. My guess is that it's a Soviet Plot to distract the capitalist imperialist to spend billions of rubles to figure out what its significance is (I've never used that phrase "Soviet Plot" before in my life). You can imagine that the change in message is spurring Dick Cheney (or more likely Rush Limbaugh) to make a run at the White House just to figure it out.

    Think about it, the amount of data being transmitted is trivial. We live in the internet age. This is at best a distraction made for those who visualize the modern era as a series of tubes.

    1. Re:Unlikely by i_ate_god · · Score: 1

      Unless you're in a community that isn't technologically advanced. You'd kind of stand out with that laptop you know?

      --
      I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    2. Re:Unlikely by Cylix · · Score: 1

      We are already doing that....

      These types of encryption setups use a common entity to pull from.

      A book that everyone could easily obtain. Such as the bible or a class novel.

      This is why we have the google book project. Once it has digitized every book in the world we can simply run the map against every book known in existence and look for one which yields a proper pattern.

      Unfortunately, it is very likely that after billions upon billions are spent to find the answer we will find that it is viagra spam from russia.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    3. Re:Unlikely by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're dealing with spies that have been planted since before the Internet age, you may not have a means of reaching them via the newfangled ways to communicate. This could very well be the only way to reach some of them, for all we know.

  70. "Dead man's kill switch" by ischorr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Really?

    Although there are many conspiracy theorists out there, I'd say most people who have done basic research on "The Buzzer" have come to agree that it is a station used for Ionosphere research. Some details:

    - Its frequency (4.625Mhz) is mentioned specifically in several scientific papers. One paper discusses a technique for ionosphere research using doppler shift measurements reflected from a high-frequency radio wave. (http://elpub.wdcb.ru/journals/rjes/v10/2007ES000227/2.shtml)
    - This paper refers to the signal as coming from a "stable basic generator", sending a carrier wave from a standard radio transmitter.
    - Several (supposed) radio experts have said that the signal being sent is the kind that would make sense for this kind of research - the tone sent at a fixed strength and amplitude/pitch, with a regular cutoff and regular repeat would be useful to measure doppler shift and falloff at the edge of the signal.
    - The paper above was authored (partially) by "S V Anisimov".
    - Sergei V Anisimov is the senior director of the "Borok Geophysical Observatory" (http://wwwbrk.adm.yar.ru/main_e.html), which does, among other things, Ionosphere research.
    - Borok Geophysical Observatory is based not tremendously far from the CONFIRMED location of the UVB-76 transmitter. It is easy to imagine that they could have an agreement with the owners of this transmitter (the russian government?) or own it themselves, and be using it for this research.

    Conspiracy nuts will say that this is just a cover story.

    It doesn't explain why the voice messages occur occasionally (some have theorized that having the random tones of a human voice can be used for other doppler measurements). And even if this research is occurring, it doesn't mean that this transmitter isn't used for other purposes as well. But nobody seems to mention any of this. The dead man's switch theory of world destruction is way more exciting, I guess.

    1. Re:"Dead man's kill switch" by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      And here's me thinking that Naimina is Julian Assange's latest confirmed girlfriend.

    2. Re:"Dead man's kill switch" by zeroduck · · Score: 1

      I had mod points... but, I've been drinking. Has anyone had the audacity to, uh... ask? If its just for research, I'd think the Russians would be more than willing to confirm.

    3. Re:"Dead man's kill switch" by leathered · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree.. Ionospheric research is the most likely explanation. But..

      UVB-76 has been broadcasting for 28 years. That's one hell of a long time to do research. It's also survived the collapse of the Soviet Union, a time of great economic turmoil where you'd expect a project like this to be first for the axe. A transmitter like that is not cheap to run or maintain.
      The transmitter is located in the military district of Moscow.
      There are two other sites in Russia that are purpose built for Ionosphere research that operate on much higher power, if they have such facilities then why the need for UVB-76?

      Still lots of food for thought..

      --
      For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    4. Re:"Dead man's kill switch" by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, conspiracies theorize you.

    5. Re:"Dead man's kill switch" by rednip · · Score: 1

      Why not both? Seems to me that a good way to fund such research would be to use it as a numbers station. However, after 20 years one would expect some scholarly work to have been presented referring to the research. Since the tone has recently changed, maybe it represents an abandonment or refinement of a previously unsuccessful test.

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    6. Re:"Dead man's kill switch" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just saying, why couldn't it be both? I mean, I don't think I'm a conspiracy nut, but I don't see why ionosphere research would be broadcasting something about Naimina unless he just got dumped, and there's no reason for the consistent transmission syntax in that case.

      Isn't it better in the eyes of Occam just do the research and have someone go in there every now and again to send coded messages?

    7. Re:"Dead man's kill switch" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe its important to observe how wawes spread for an very important transmitter - thereof reason to do research.

  71. more transmissions by pyrocam · · Score: 1

    according to wikipedia and facepunch http://www.facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=990390&page=31 there is more going down. mainly background noises though

  72. Russian Phoentic Alphabet by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    A - (Anna) / (Anton)
    I - (Ivan)
    M - (Mikhail) / (Maria)
    N - (Nikolay)

    (why can't I put the Cyrillic in my slashdot post, after all that effort with cut and paste because I can't touch type it)

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  73. everyone needs to calm down by Darth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously, it's just the Russian Powerball Lotto.

    --
    Darth --
    Nil Mortifi, Sine Lucre
  74. Re:Just a guess, It's a salt. by darkmeridian · · Score: 0

    It's probably a salt for a one-time pad that's used to encrypt shit.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  75. Nothing sinister here - move on by Makito · · Score: 1

    At least according to "Alex" there isn't anything mysterious or even spy-tastic about this xmit station. It's a localized military transmission tower for the Moscow region. I am unsure of the correct terminology, but it seems the men in charge of strategic military installations within the Moscow region are permitted to broadcast messages from this station as required. Why it remains in use despite its age and unsophistication is because the tower provides a more stable communication source than more modern methods - clearly from it's performance record we can agree.

  76. Conspiracy or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...does this match anything of the naimina message ? Kind of strange that the station had to reappear in just these few days...

  77. No, they're not talking to spies. by Animats · · Score: 1

    That station isn't talking to spies. There's too little data transmitted. There are "numbers stations" which do that; here.s one in English. Many exist; the US has some, the UK has some, Egypt has some, etc. Some broadcast with a live voice, some use a voice synthesizer. There are also "polytone stations", which broadcast slow tone-coded data, like an ancient modem. Some such data has been successfully decoded into 5-digit groups of decimal digits.

    Nor is it likely to be a "we're still alive and everything is OK" signal; signals for that exist, and they have some cryptographic content so they can't be easily faked.

    If it's mostly steady pulses, it's probably for propagation measurement. That might be done so that some other related station can get through better. But the pulse station itself seems to lack much of a data payload.

  78. find patterns in the transmissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  79. MOD PARENT FUNNY, NOT A TROLL by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If I had mod points, I'd hand you a funny mod...I don't know what it is, someone else doesn't have a sense of humor.

  80. Re:Just a guess, It's a salt. by Bronster · · Score: 3, Funny

    Woah there. Salt. One time pad. It's like you grabbed some random crypto sounding words and slung them together.

  81. Antenna details by vlueboy · · Score: 1

    Not this antenna. I'll be damned if the "transmission" ground photo /. post and its link were eaten up by /. thresholds, but Google still links to it Hooray for my browsing history.

    Check my original post's shadow of a the nearby cemetery's cross (they are forearm-sized.) It's halfway between the two trees that aren't green. It is not from the thombstone itself. Note the relative sizes of trees and larger thombs, and even a lance-like statue casting another shadow to the right. The antenna from russian ground links above is not just a coat-hanger wire, and has a lamppost height and anchoring support structure --that should definitely be as simple to spot as the spire at my cemetery. From Google Earth zoom estimates, both pics are at about the same resolution seen at 400ft of elevation.

    On to more mystery!

    1. Re:Antenna details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot to say that plenty of US sites on Google Earth have an observable antenna and long antenna's shadow, like the Empire State building.

      Another poster's reply claims Google's photos are just sub-orbital aerial photos, which if true, would agree with why the stuff is so clear through plenty of atmspheric interference in the visible spectrum.

      --vlueboy

  82. Canada intercepted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canadian F-18's intercepted a Russian bomber approaching our Northern Airspace today. Any connection? I don't know the longitude and latitude of the intercept, but perhaps the two are connected? Normally these number stations are intercepted by people on the other side, and the numbers refer to a one-time-pad with information relating to the numbers. The list can be long and there is no correlation between sets of numbers and types of messages. One number might mean "hello comrade, welcome to the team", the next number in the sequence might mean "return home comrade, your cover is blown" and the next might mean "yes comrade, you are clear to blow up the reactor". The broadcasts are done via shortwave, with enough power to be received worldwide with a small portable shortwave receiver, so movement is not restricted, perhaps even encouraged, and reception can be done in complete privacy and anonymity.

  83. Don't lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    We all know the combination to your luggage is 1-2-3-4-5.

  84. Recording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a recording of the buzzer station http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3Hw33bslAU

  85. 12 minute epilogue by linzeal · · Score: 1

    The new blu-ray set of LOST is supposed to have a 12 minute "epilogue" that at least answers where the food was coming from.

    1. Re:12 minute epilogue by wgoodman · · Score: 1

      It's made of people!

      oh wait, that was something else.. and hollywood never reuses ideas.

      It's made of uhm... midgets?

    2. Re:12 minute epilogue by silverglade00 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The phrase "100-calorie pack" popped in my head when I read your post. I'm going to hell for sure.

  86. Re:Just a guess, It's a salt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. It's just a radio broadcast, just like your AM radio hears. This is just at a different frequency.

  87. Re:Just a guess, It's a salt. by marqs · · Score: 3, Informative
  88. It's the AACS master key by greyblack · · Score: 1

    Quick! Digg it!

    --
    Everybody uses broad generalizations.
  89. Old solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to by the Russians a 20-30$ netbok so they can send codes to their spy's on the new and improved "interwebs". Its a portable solution, easier to keep secret and doesn't require 500 kW to send a signal.

  90. Naimina by JoeInnes · · Score: 1

    Naimina is a weird word - if I asked somebody to transcribe the Russian, " ", I would expect something like this. It translates to "at exactly". The problem is that then that doesn't tie in to the names, which seems to confirm - but the only reference I can find to that that doesn't relate to this story is this photo album: http://picasaweb.google.com/smallbird92 which seems to be the Picasa album of some rich Russian teenager.

    1. Re:Naimina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Could it be a pun on words?

      93 882 naimina 74 14 35 74

      93 = Page 93
      882 = Edition 882

      naimina = at exactly = certainly

      74 = D

      14 = E

      35 = A

      74 = D

      So the message is "Certainly dead." = Dead man's switch is dead for certain.

  91. Re:Notice that the previous posting was down-modde by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all the mods are lefties ;) Enjoy the points.

  92. Police find body in bag at MI6 mans flat in London by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coincidence?

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11079976

  93. Best Prank Ever by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 1

    I remember having to work with Tempest security in the early eighties. Anyone working on secret material had to work inside a Faraday cage room. The worry was that people could read what was on your monitor by picking up the video signal. At the time I had suggested that a better solution, or an additional level of protection would be to have lots of monitors showing unclassified stuff. If the extra monitors didn't fool people into trying to decrypt meaningless data, then the montor signal would at least interfere with any signal from the real terminal.

    It was possible to detect all sorts of electrical emissions deep within the USSR. It would be possible to pick out a radar station or a weather station. However, stick a few other things out in the emptiness, pouring out intriguing nonsense, and the job gets harder. Plus, you rope in experts to monitor the thing, possibly taking them off more important projects.

    But keeping the thing going for another thirty years just for laffs, though? Unless the Egyptians built the Pyramids just to mess with archaeologists' heads, this has got to be the best prank ever.

  94. You forgot by wiredog · · Score: 1
  95. my guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's some guy sitting in a bombshelter, listening to classic music, pressing numbers when his alarm goes, every once in a while.
    He's tricking Jack to do it for him. Ag, never got past the first season where they started killing off the cast

  96. They Are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lottery Numbers

  97. Pinky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think so Brain, but me and Pippi Longstocking? I mean what would the children look like?

  98. nice key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't know what they are using it for, but it sounds like a nice way to combine 2 halves of a bill and create a nice rotating encryption key against whatever extra salt elements you may have. Extra credit if you translate to geographies as mentioned above and use some element of that info as part of your salt.

  99. I think I've made some progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, so here's what I've got so far. These are just SSTV images. If you put them in order, you can find a hash code for the phone number to a BBS in Birsk. The login information is contained in previous transmissions in plaintext. If you log in to this BBS, it'll return a bunch of text and gibberish. The text is mostly nonsensical and is basically in line with the broken radio transmissions from earlier, but If you arrange the gibberish properly, it turns out to be ASCII art promoting Half Life: Episode 3

  100. I would say it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More than likely the Russians just doing it for the fun.

    "EEEEEHH Boris, stupid Vesterns go again crazy for your radio box! AAAAHHHAAAAA..."

  101. Re:don't know why they bother with an expensive ra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider my interest piqued. Do you recall which stories they may have been posted to?

  102. Terminator advert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Roughly translates into SkyNet has now become aware that humans will shortly cross the tipping point and ruin the planet for the future of machines.

    After so much effort to prevent the U.S. SkyNet from being created everyone forgot about the Soviet version. The new Sarah Connor Chronicles Series based in Russia should clear this up.

  103. Whew! Close one. by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

    Somewhere in Siberia the abandoned silo tried to launch a nuclear warhead that was long sold to a third world country shortly after the fall of Soviet Union by some crafty general.

    --
    Bow before me, for I am root.
  104. Dead Hand by Parhelion · · Score: 1

    Ten transmissions in the past week is more than a spike. I hate to say it but this increased activiy is probably the Russian military warming up their Dead Hand (Hand from the Grave) defense system in preparation for a possible but not probable US nuclear first strike. They want to make sure Dead Hand is still functioning and is ready with all the rumbling going on over Iran's nuclear situation.

    1. Re:Dead Hand by Parhelion · · Score: 1

      I need to add that they are using short wave radio equipment because those frequencies and older non-semiconductor based equipment will work after a nuclear explosion has occurred in the atmosphere.

    2. Re:Dead Hand by Parhelion · · Score: 1

      The Wikipedia page was showing about ten transmissions documented in the past week, but now it has been edited to only show two. Makes you wonder who is doing the editing.

  105. Weird numbers by ekimminau · · Score: 1
    --
    Armaments, 2-9-21 And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, 'O Lord, bless this Thy hand grenade' N
  106. Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is quite possibly the most insane site I've ever seen other than Time Cube. I think they're having an unofficial competition to see whose .sig can have the most unfocused rage packed into it.

  107. Re:Just a guess, It's a salt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woah there. Salt. One time pad. It's like you grabbed some random crypto sounding words and slung them together.

    So you were unable to decrypt his one-time post? Seems like it is working fine.

  108. All I ever heard: "KDK 1 calling KDK 12" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I ever heard: "KDK 1 calling KDK 12" over and over again. Then once in a while, some dude named "Grady" would rant on and on about some psychic cook or some shit.

    Didn't make a bit of sense.