I got a much bigger addiction: Oxygen! I use it everyday and can't stop it. Since the dawn of time, 100% of the people breathing oxigen died. When are people going to realize oxigen is the most addictive drug of all times?
This is brilliant! Now let's sue all the libraries! How dare those people keep reading and reading wihtout buying the damn books! I don't care about spreading knowledge, SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!
This is a screenshot from FF, everything is normal. Notice the "Rich Formatting" link is present
This is a screenshot from Opera, where is the rich formatting?:-(
I've always liked Opera, and they definitely deserve credit form creating ideas like tabbed browsing or a mail client with labels instead of folders. Problem is, I feel like there is always a site you want to visit that won't work on Opera, but I don't know to what extent it's their fault.
There is one caveat: Symantec counts only those security flaws that have been confirmed by the vendor. According to security monitoring company Secunia, there are 19 security issues that Microsoft still has to deal with for Internet Explorer, while there are only three for Firefox.
I would like very much to see who are these vendors and who they are affiliated with.
The titles will be changed: the Wikipedia will be known as the "Ecyclopedia Galactica", and all parodies will be merged into a famous hitchhiker's guide to something gargantuanly big.
I offer you the ultimate solution to these naming problems: Denominator Xtreme 2000 Plus!
It will create a unique string of characters. So your application patented name wil be:
b7cdd06a367c3478a905d3bb2ed771a4e4df1e0d9a172e240c 5661f6b4e8d1
Adblocking is the *beginning* of the free, as in freedom, internet. This means that you will only see the ads you want to see. Pop-ups, pop-unders, and the like are an invasion of privacy, and a blow to free will of people.
Disney just doesn't get it. Sadly they didn't realize that it doesn't matter if the film is hand drawed, CGI, both or made by blind vestal from tibet. The most important thing is the story you are telling. This is why anime works, and this is why it is travelling around the world. I'm *not* saying the drawing technique is irrelevant, or unimportant. It is *very* important and it supports and creates the mood for the story, but a movie isn't automatically good just because it's CGI or hand-drawn.
"The categories are shooters, puzzles and mazes, adventure games, sports games, and simulations."
For computer games is worse: 99% of new games are FPS, RTS or simulation. The "adventure" category is as good as dead, the last decent computer adventure was Runaway. There were a few RPGs with some story, but they are all go-there-and-kill-the-guy, like Vampire Bloodlines. At least in the console, there are good RPGs or action games like God of War for PS2. I'm honestly thinking of quit buying computer games altogether. Why isn't there anymore Day of Tentacles or Monkey Islands?. And please, Larry Magna Cum Laude and Warcraft III are not adventures, although I love Warcraft
Hey, I'm not saying Yahoo! is not profitable or is dead, or anything like that. I'm all for using good ideas that already work, but that doesn't make then new. I think that Yahoo! is like that room that belonged to you in your mother's home, it's useful, it's nice, it will always be there, but it's not the new best thing, or "compatible with Web 2.0", whatever that means. And that is the whole point, they are being called creative and full of ideas for something they copied from somebody else.
Yahoo's new initiatives like Yahoo 360 are even apprently making Yahoo Web 2.0 compliant.
What's the difference between "Yahoo! 360" and Orkut? Other than speed, to clear that out from the start. IMHO, Yahoo! is copying what somebody else already made to try and get their part of the "buzz".This is classic MS behavior, years after everybody else, they say "look, I have tabbed browsing!!"
Another strange thing, if after setting a site as trusted, you change back the renderer back to firefox, the icons change from a nifty 3d look, to a black simple drawing and appears "Advanced customization" in the bottom. What is this? Is AOL trying to throw IE down our throats desguised as FireFox?
It's very easy to say that Firefox is not safe because windows does not recognize it as a trusted application, they wrote both windows and IE, of course IE has a security mechanism compliant with windows. What I would like to see is MS implement an open security mechanism that anyone can implement.
I think that the problem isn't big companies versus small companies or big companies versus personal homepages. I think the question we should be asking is: why that person is using a domain called 'iTunes'? He does not mention this word anywhere and as far as I know, the 'iTunes' word is not part of his business. I'm guessing, but I'll bet that most of the people that access "itunes.co.uk" were trying to see Apple's ITunes content, not be redirected to quickquid.com.
Again, I'm not saying Apple or anyone should take the domain by brute force or any other means for that matter, he registered first and he has the right to keep it.
What I'm saying is, I think it would be better if a site called itunes.co.uk had iTunes related content, so maybe would be better if he did some settlement with Apple and put an warning like "If you are looking for quickquid.com please click here", as it's done in the firefox link, even though the browser from mozilla was created a lot later than Kevin Karpenske registered the domain.
Look, maybe "Common sense" is too strong. I never said the domain should go to Apple beacuse it's a mega corp and "you-don't-wanna-mess-with-the-MegaCorp" kind of thing. I'm just saying that it makes a lot more sense if the site belonged to apple. I honestly think the guy doesn't need that domain and could very well donate/sell/auction the name.
Let's look at this from another perspective:
What if www.slashdot.com didn't redirect to slashdot? do you think that would be fair? What if went to a porn site or to chiwawa lovers site? Wouldn't it make more sense if www.slashdot.com redirected to slashdot?
Slashdot Mirror
So let me get this straight: MS is using the Mac processors in their console? I wonder how sweetly it would run Mac OS X...
I got a much bigger addiction: Oxygen! I use it everyday and can't stop it. Since the dawn of time, 100% of the people breathing oxigen died. When are people going to realize oxigen is the most addictive drug of all times?
Mozilla site already has a page describing RC3:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/
I think I'm in the Matrix, I just had a Deja Vu. I first saw this story last week, and then this one just like it. Operator, I want new stories...
I think that one of the most impressive things is that the video link survived the slashdot effect. Or am I too late?
If this is true, than they should have waited a little longer to say "fully compatible with gmail".
This is brilliant! Now let's sue all the libraries! How dare those people keep reading and reading wihtout buying the damn books! I don't care about spreading knowledge, SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!
This is a screenshot from FF, everything is normal. Notice the "Rich Formatting" link is present
This is a screenshot from Opera, where is the rich formatting? :-(
I've always liked Opera, and they definitely deserve credit form creating ideas like tabbed browsing or a mail client with labels instead of folders. Problem is, I feel like there is always a site you want to visit that won't work on Opera, but I don't know to what extent it's their fault.
The titles will be changed: the Wikipedia will be known as the "Ecyclopedia Galactica", and all parodies will be merged into a famous hitchhiker's guide to something gargantuanly big.
It will create a unique string of characters. So your application patented name wil be:
b7cdd06a367c3478a905d3bb2ed771a4e4df1e0d9a172e240
Don't worry about naming ever again! Call Now!
- Who Started apartheid
- Who leaded the nazis into killing millions
- Who decided to launch the atomic bomb on hiroshima and nagasaki?
Answer: All were done by men.Do you still think men are smarter than women?
Adblocking is the *beginning* of the free, as in freedom, internet. This means that you will only see the ads you want to see. Pop-ups, pop-unders, and the like are an invasion of privacy, and a blow to free will of people.
Disney just doesn't get it. Sadly they didn't realize that it doesn't matter if the film is hand drawed, CGI, both or made by blind vestal from tibet. The most important thing is the story you are telling. This is why anime works, and this is why it is travelling around the world. I'm *not* saying the drawing technique is irrelevant, or unimportant. It is *very* important and it supports and creates the mood for the story, but a movie isn't automatically good just because it's CGI or hand-drawn.
Serenity Now! Serenity Now! get yours here or here
"The categories are shooters, puzzles and mazes, adventure games, sports games, and simulations."
For computer games is worse: 99% of new games are FPS, RTS or simulation. The "adventure" category is as good as dead, the last decent computer adventure was Runaway. There were a few RPGs with some story, but they are all go-there-and-kill-the-guy, like Vampire Bloodlines. At least in the console, there are good RPGs or action games like God of War for PS2. I'm honestly thinking of quit buying computer games altogether. Why isn't there anymore Day of Tentacles or Monkey Islands?. And please, Larry Magna Cum Laude and Warcraft III are not adventures, although I love Warcraft
It's enlarging as th eday goes by...I imagine thta by the end of the day it will be 2GB
Hey, I'm not saying Yahoo! is not profitable or is dead, or anything like that. I'm all for using good ideas that already work, but that doesn't make then new. I think that Yahoo! is like that room that belonged to you in your mother's home, it's useful, it's nice, it will always be there, but it's not the new best thing, or "compatible with Web 2.0", whatever that means. And that is the whole point, they are being called creative and full of ideas for something they copied from somebody else.
Still, there's nothing innovative about that. They are just copying from someone else...
What's the last thing that Yahoo! made that was truly authentic and creative?
Yahoo's new initiatives like Yahoo 360 are even apprently making Yahoo Web 2.0 compliant.
What's the difference between "Yahoo! 360" and Orkut? Other than speed, to clear that out from the start. IMHO, Yahoo! is copying what somebody else already made to try and get their part of the "buzz".This is classic MS behavior, years after everybody else, they say "look, I have tabbed browsing!!"
Another strange thing, if after setting a site as trusted, you change back the renderer back to firefox, the icons change from a nifty 3d look, to a black simple drawing and appears "Advanced customization" in the bottom. What is this? Is AOL trying to throw IE down our throats desguised as FireFox?
There's a great difference between 'finding bugs' and finding exploits for profit, period. This guy deserves to go to jail.
It's very easy to say that Firefox is not safe because windows does not recognize it as a trusted application, they wrote both windows and IE, of course IE has a security mechanism compliant with windows. What I would like to see is MS implement an open security mechanism that anyone can implement.
I think that the problem isn't big companies versus small companies or big companies versus personal homepages. I think the question we should be asking is: why that person is using a domain called 'iTunes'? He does not mention this word anywhere and as far as I know, the 'iTunes' word is not part of his business. I'm guessing, but I'll bet that most of the people that access "itunes.co.uk" were trying to see Apple's ITunes content, not be redirected to quickquid.com.
Again, I'm not saying Apple or anyone should take the domain by brute force or any other means for that matter, he registered first and he has the right to keep it.
What I'm saying is, I think it would be better if a site called itunes.co.uk had iTunes related content, so maybe would be better if he did some settlement with Apple and put an warning like "If you are looking for quickquid.com please click here", as it's done in the firefox link, even though the browser from mozilla was created a lot later than Kevin Karpenske registered the domain.
Look, maybe "Common sense" is too strong. I never said the domain should go to Apple beacuse it's a mega corp and "you-don't-wanna-mess-with-the-MegaCorp" kind of thing. I'm just saying that it makes a lot more sense if the site belonged to apple. I honestly think the guy doesn't need that domain and could very well donate/sell/auction the name.
Let's look at this from another perspective: What if www.slashdot.com didn't redirect to slashdot? do you think that would be fair? What if went to a porn site or to chiwawa lovers site? Wouldn't it make more sense if www.slashdot.com redirected to slashdot?