Slashdot Mirror


User: Profane+MuthaFucka

Profane+MuthaFucka's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,995
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,995

  1. Re:money can't buy you love :) on Ceglia Sues For 50% Facebook, Old Emails as Evidence · · Score: 1

    Presumably by successful you mean that he had money -- and he STILL was a business manager? The guy was a freak. Take whatever he says with a grain of salt because anybody with freedom to choose their destiny would pick something else.

  2. Re:really?! on NYPD Anti-Terrorism Cameras Used For Much More · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've said this before, and people thought I was an asshole who didn't know what he was talking about. I'm going to keep repeating it until current events cause it to make some sense.

    Who gives a shit about the cameras that the police have. You only need to worry about your own cameras. When you are prohibited from owning your own camera and taking pictures in public of public activities, including police activities, that is when you should worry.

    There, make sense? All you people who think 1984 is all about Big Brother's cameras got it wrong.

  3. Re:Fitting on Racist Woman Given Indefinite Jury Duty · · Score: 1

    There are already professional farmers, so your suggestion is as dumb as you are.

    The sentence starting with "Suppose we..." is as open ended as it could be. Just because you can complete the sentence doesn't mean it makes any sense as an argument.

  4. Re:To all "They're not REAL scientists!" posters on MythBuster Developing Light-Weight Vehicle Armor · · Score: 1

    I think I said that.

    From what I originally wrote:

    "And a portion of the scientific process is allowing others to look at your results. This activity has been formalized as the peer review process"

    Did I say that nothing other than a peer reviewed journal would work? It so happens that's what we have now for peer review. I didn't say that something else would not work.

  5. Re:Anyone else find this funny? on Magical Chinese Hard Drive · · Score: 1

    And it was cheap too. Nobody got ripped off, they just received their value in the form of entertainment and novelty rather than in the form of a hard drive.

  6. Re:Fitting on Racist Woman Given Indefinite Jury Duty · · Score: 1

    The obligation is created by reaping all the benefits of being a citizen of the United States. You are better than you would have been otherwise, and for that you owe a duty to your fellow citizens. If you had not wanted this from your fellow citizens, then you shouldn't have taken it.

    Now do the duty that you owe to your fellow citizens. We're not chumps. Pay for what you have received.

  7. Re:To all "They're not REAL scientists!" posters on MythBuster Developing Light-Weight Vehicle Armor · · Score: 1

    I think I already explained it. Science requires that you allow others to look at your results. If you keep your results a secret, it's not science, and you could be fooling yourself. Or you could have made an error. Peer review reduces greatly the chance that an error will go uncaught.

  8. Re:Clear lack of research on Forbes Releases Richest Fictional Character List · · Score: 1

    No shit. Where's the Count of Monte Cristo? You know, the famous sandwich entrepreneur?

  9. Re:Fitting on Racist Woman Given Indefinite Jury Duty · · Score: 2

    Sometimes something is so ridiculous that a simple repudiation is the obvious refutation. Jury duty is a duty. It's not slavery.

    Slavery is when work is stolen from a person for no pay. Jury duty is a duty. A duty is an obligation we owe to other people. Therefore jury duty isn't work that is stolen, it's already owed to other people. If a person doesn't perform their duty, then it is they who are stealing from other people.

  10. Re:To all "They're not REAL scientists!" posters on MythBuster Developing Light-Weight Vehicle Armor · · Score: 1

    A participant in the scientific process is the definition of a scientist. And a portion of the scientific process is allowing others to look at your results. This activity has been formalized as the peer review process, typically but not always through a peer reviewed journal.

  11. Re:To all "They're not REAL scientists!" posters on MythBuster Developing Light-Weight Vehicle Armor · · Score: 1

    Because they don't publish in a peer reviewed refereed journal.

  12. Re:Fitting on Racist Woman Given Indefinite Jury Duty · · Score: 1

    No, it's not. And just in case you get any ideas, jury duty is also completely unlike the holocaust, had nothing to do with Hitler, and wasn't executed or sent to Siberia by Stalin. So just stop it.

  13. Re:Leave it Fox.. on World's Most Powerful Rocket Ready In 2012, SpaceX Says · · Score: 1

    Fox BLAaaargh! aHunghh aHunghh aHunghh beereerrrrrrrrrrrrt asssaaaaassaaa fffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu akakakgkakkakaka!

  14. Re:Cool? on Discovery Heads Into Retirement · · Score: 1

    It means NASA is going to have to work a lot harder to kill 7 astronauts in one shot.

  15. Re:Who will all just plug their ears on Sludge In Flask Gives Clues To Origin of Life · · Score: 1

    No need to trouble yourself. I am planning to start a cult soon. Our primary mission will be to good deeds, to help our neighbors. Since our neighbors primarily seem to be preoccupied with killing each other, that's how we can help.

    Just tell us which group you want genocid-ed, and we will begin on our good deed as soon as possible. You see, we're very eager to please our deity and go to heaven. Our motto is "Do Unto Others What They Already Fancy Doing To Each Other."

  16. Re:Too bad it's not a real Orion on NASA's Orion Moon Craft Unveiled · · Score: 1

    But they haven't nuked their crappy leaders from orbit and therefore they cannot be sure.

  17. Re:(open) Tor exit nodes are toxic on Blogger Fined $60K For Telling the Truth · · Score: 1

    I have a Swedish IP address whenever I want to use it. Not bad for someone masturbating in Memphis, which is not even within 500 miles of my actual home.

  18. Re:Bill Gates on Gates' Future of Education Straight Out of '60s · · Score: 1

    He also brought us Microsoft Bob, Windows 95 (based on DOS shit), the blue screen of death, and DEVELOPERS. No wait, that was Ballmer.

  19. Net neutrality on AT&T To Introduce Broadband Caps · · Score: 1

    "Oh THAT'S what net neutrality was all about," said the teabagger, ignorantly.

  20. Re:Wrong power on DIY Laser Pistol Shoot 1MW Blasts · · Score: 2

    A Slashdotter getting laid by a Victoria's Secret model is just crazy talk.

  21. Re:and so society dies out on Crime Writer Makes a Killing With 99 Cent E-Books · · Score: 1

    If they can't keep up, then I use them for food and for sex. I'm a fucking way better capitalist than you are.

  22. Re:Wish they made it cheap on Researchers Develop Super Batteries From Aerogel · · Score: 1

    That really was funny. I blew milk out my nose!

    Actually, I didn't blow milk out my nose. I jacked off.

    But still, that was goddamn funny!

  23. Re:Wish they made it cheap on Researchers Develop Super Batteries From Aerogel · · Score: 1

    I see that shit alot

  24. Re:Time for a launch loop on Glory Satellite Lost To Taurus XL Failure · · Score: 1

    I didn't design it. Republicans did, using their common sense and a Glenn Beck instruction manual.

  25. Re:Time for a launch loop on Glory Satellite Lost To Taurus XL Failure · · Score: 1

    I think you misunderstand. I'm not a Republican. I'm just the messenger. I'm just relaying to you what Republicans think. If I were to tell rocket engineers how it's done, I'd tell them to be engineers and fix the problem using their brains.

    But Republicans would take one good look at the engineering degree on the wall, declare that it's a bunch of shit and their high school dropout sister could do way better because she's got common sense, and she goes to church. Their sister could crack a nosecone off a trailer hitch. That's why the message was signed as coming from a Republican. They're fucking morons.