The SRB flame cut the bottom mount. The SRB rotated about the top mount until it impinged the top of the external tank. External tank ruptured from aerodynamic forces.
What racist cartoons? Let's see them. Put up or SHUT UP.
Are you looking for a Democrat's "Macaca Moment?" Sorry, but that's reserved for Republicans. Conservatives just seem to use the racist words like "darkie" and "jigaboo" out of habit. And everyone here knows it and sees it, but you.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg just said that she always thought that Roe v Wade was about not having growth in "populations that we don't want to have too many of."
Really? How much would you bet that if I used the Google, Ginsburg said NOTHING OF THE SORT and your statement is just because you and other conservatives can't read and/or love to quote out of context.
In other words, I'm calling you a liar. You liar.
Now let's check.
More context on the remarks:
Q: If you were a lawyer again, what would you want to accomplish as a future feminist legal agenda?
JUSTICE GINSBURG: Reproductive choice has to be straightened out. There will never be a woman of means without choice anymore. That just seems to me so obvious. The states that had changed their abortion laws before Roe [to make abortion legal] are not going to change back. So we have a policy that affects only poor women, and it can never be otherwise, and I don't know why this hasn't been said more often.
Q: Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid for abortions for poor women?
JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn't really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong. (emphasis added)
JUSTICE GINSBURG: The basic thing is that the government has no business making that choice for a woman.
Q: Does that mean getting rid of the test the court imposed, in which it allows states to impose restrictions on abortion like a waiting period that are not deemed an "undue burden" to a woman's reproductive freedom?
Ginsburg was saying quite plainly that she was opposed to the idea of abortion being used to as a tool to limit minority populations, and she was relieved when the McRae decision (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=448&invol=297) found that Medicaid did NOT have to pay for all types or situations for abortions. At that point she understood that abortion would not be used as a tool of eugenics, which she was relieved about.
This has been a valuable entry in the permanent Internet record of your stupidity.
Nothing you say can change the fact that it's CONSERVATIVES calling Obama's daughter "street trash" and regularly calling black people monkeys.
Everyone can see that the conservatives are racists, and when you try to deflect that, it just shows how blind you are to the problem in your own party.
It matters not if you understand. The thing that matters is that everyone ELSE can see it, and by simply denying it, you're outing yourself as someone who does not have the first clue about racism.
Thanks for outing yourself. The Internet never forgets, and this record of your ignorance will last until the end of time.
the Klu Klux Klan member in the Senate...Oops, my bad, he's a Democrat (Robert Byrd).
Yes, he was a Klan member early in his life. No, he is not a member any longer. Everyone deserves a second chance; an opportunity to prove rehabilitation.
So what has Byrd actually said or done that indicate that he's a racist? And how does that compare to people like you and the freepers unapologetically calling Obama's daughter "street trash" and so forth.
Byrd has demonstrated his rehabilitation over many years. Conservatives seem to prove they are racists every day.
You might want to check the history of the two parties.
Funny you bring up LBJ, because he's the one who ejected the racists from the party. Their home is now with the conservatives.
I love it when conservatives talk about race. It's so... racist. And the large numbers of overt racist Republicans is doing a great deal to help both Democrats and liberals.
What the parent post didn't mention is that he works for a global behemoth that runs a well-known chain of soup kitchens and also specializes in car reposession work.
That depends actually, because some heretical denominations like Methodists and Baptists do believe it's symbolic. OF COURSE that is ridiculous, and all these Pope haters are going to hell anyway.
Semantic reasoning is all about figuring out the difference between going up the street or going down to the store. It's not about calling implicit things explicit, unless the conclusion is that the speaker is completely mistaken.
Your suggestion is very funny stuff from a guy who doesn't know what implicit and explicit mean. Keep going. You're one of those not-so-rare individuals who is so ignorant they are incapable of being aware of their own ignorance.
This thread is all down to lawyer talk. Issues like this are in the realm of contract legalese.
No, it's in the realm of speaking and writing English. Understanding what a word means is BASIC LITERACY. You fail at that, by the way. It's not something to be so proud of.
Therefore, when I power on that phone, I'm expressly and explicitly granting permission to Larry and Sergei's employees to track me.
Keep saying it. The Internet record of your ignorance is eternal, and I wouldn't want the archaeologists of the future to miss this one. Too funny!
Explicit doesn't mean what you think it means. The word you need is implicit.
In simpler terms: Giving an written or spoken statement specifically granting permission is explicit. Giving permission through a consequence of another act is implicit.
Turning on your cell phone is that other act which is not a specific statement of permission.
You may be asking yourself "how did I come to be such an expert on the topic of explicit vs. implicit?" Well, it started one day in a bar, when a girl I was watching completely ignored me. I mean, she wasn't looking at me, she wasn't talking to me, she appeared to be going out of her way to avoid looking in my direction.
So, I walked over, whipped out my cock, and grabbed her breasts. When she objected, I quoted the logical rules of implication and the well-known "ignore someone to make them fall in love with you rule" but she was unpersuaded. She insisted that she had not given me explicit permission to grab her titties, although she might concede that within the established societal norms of someone of her generation, an implicit invitation may have been constituted by her actions.
The police weren't nearly so calm. They're like nuns who hit your hands with a ruler when you don't learn the lesson quicly enough. Except they used tasers.
I should tell you about the time I learned about the difference between "literal" and "figurative."
I judge a filesystem by its fans. By that measure reiserfs is a fanatic asshole. You can be sure that reiserfs didn't lose your data, and if you say so again you might get yelled at.
Obviously you're making something South of 80K a year, and you're fantasizing about how wonderful life would be if you only made that much.
When you get to 80K a year, you'll see that it ain't crap.
A more reasonable expectation for life on 80K a year in a typical place (let's pick Dallas Texas) would be a 3 bedroom house of somewhat less than 2000 sq. feet, two car garage with a Honda Civic and a Chevy Malibu in it, one child, one dog, and an overseas vacation once a decade, if that. And you're going to have a lot of trouble educating even that one child, even at a state university.
If you're in Silicon Valley, forget the cars, and forget the house. You're going to be looking at something with 1 or 2 bedrooms, and 1000 sq. feet or less.
Yes, that's damn good. Three orders of magnitude is very roughly a full decade's worth of progress in the hard drive world. Whoever did the graphene work has really earned their pay.
Slashdot Mirror
That's not even close to accurate.
The SRB flame cut the bottom mount. The SRB rotated about the top mount until it impinged the top of the external tank. External tank ruptured from aerodynamic forces.
Let's discuss your enourmous cock and yer personal hygiene instead.
Download the full text for free and put it on your Kindle. And stop whining.
http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks01/0100021.txt
What racist cartoons? Let's see them. Put up or SHUT UP.
Are you looking for a Democrat's "Macaca Moment?" Sorry, but that's reserved for Republicans. Conservatives just seem to use the racist words like "darkie" and "jigaboo" out of habit. And everyone here knows it and sees it, but you.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg just said that she always thought that Roe v Wade was about not having growth in "populations that we don't want to have too many of."
Really? How much would you bet that if I used the Google, Ginsburg said NOTHING OF THE SORT and your statement is just because you and other conservatives can't read and/or love to quote out of context.
In other words, I'm calling you a liar. You liar.
Now let's check.
That's from a conservative site: http://www.drudge.com/news/122942/ginsburg-abortion-reduced-undesired
And yes, it proves you're a liar.
Ginsburg was saying quite plainly that she was opposed to the idea of abortion being used to as a tool to limit minority populations, and she was relieved when the McRae decision (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=448&invol=297) found that Medicaid did NOT have to pay for all types or situations for abortions. At that point she understood that abortion would not be used as a tool of eugenics, which she was relieved about.
This has been a valuable entry in the permanent Internet record of your stupidity.
Nothing you say can change the fact that it's CONSERVATIVES calling Obama's daughter "street trash" and regularly calling black people monkeys.
Everyone can see that the conservatives are racists, and when you try to deflect that, it just shows how blind you are to the problem in your own party.
It matters not if you understand. The thing that matters is that everyone ELSE can see it, and by simply denying it, you're outing yourself as someone who does not have the first clue about racism.
Thanks for outing yourself. The Internet never forgets, and this record of your ignorance will last until the end of time.
the Klu Klux Klan member in the Senate...Oops, my bad, he's a Democrat (Robert Byrd).
Yes, he was a Klan member early in his life. No, he is not a member any longer. Everyone deserves a second chance; an opportunity to prove rehabilitation.
So what has Byrd actually said or done that indicate that he's a racist? And how does that compare to people like you and the freepers unapologetically calling Obama's daughter "street trash" and so forth.
Byrd has demonstrated his rehabilitation over many years. Conservatives seem to prove they are racists every day.
You might want to check the history of the two parties.
Funny you bring up LBJ, because he's the one who ejected the racists from the party. Their home is now with the conservatives.
I love it when conservatives talk about race. It's so ... racist. And the large numbers of overt racist Republicans is doing a great deal to help both Democrats and liberals.
Keep on going.
It's here because it's Slashdot. No other explanation necessary.
What the parent post didn't mention is that he works for a global behemoth that runs a well-known chain of soup kitchens and also specializes in car reposession work.
That depends actually, because some heretical denominations like Methodists and Baptists do believe it's symbolic. OF COURSE that is ridiculous, and all these Pope haters are going to hell anyway.
Work in the phrase "My savior has two daddies" somewhere in there and it'll be absolutely perfect.
Ah. It's the sarchastic anonymous coward. How novel.
Semantic reasoning is all about figuring out the difference between going up the street or going down to the store. It's not about calling implicit things explicit, unless the conclusion is that the speaker is completely mistaken.
Your suggestion is very funny stuff from a guy who doesn't know what implicit and explicit mean. Keep going. You're one of those not-so-rare individuals who is so ignorant they are incapable of being aware of their own ignorance.
Just buy a dictionary. Do you need a loan?
This thread is all down to lawyer talk. Issues like this are in the realm of contract legalese.
No, it's in the realm of speaking and writing English. Understanding what a word means is BASIC LITERACY. You fail at that, by the way. It's not something to be so proud of.
Therefore, when I power on that phone, I'm expressly and explicitly granting permission to Larry and Sergei's employees to track me.
Keep saying it. The Internet record of your ignorance is eternal, and I wouldn't want the archaeologists of the future to miss this one. Too funny!
You're bizarre post is proof that dumbasses will believe anything they want to believe, and no logic or example can persuade them.
All that remains is caution. But for an education and the capacity to reason, there go I.
Yes, you're powering it on explicitly. Powering on your phone can IMPLY many things, which would be implicit.
Do you know the implication logic table for two input values?
Explicit doesn't mean what you think it means. The word you need is implicit.
In simpler terms: Giving an written or spoken statement specifically granting permission is explicit. Giving permission through a consequence of another act is implicit.
Turning on your cell phone is that other act which is not a specific statement of permission.
You may be asking yourself "how did I come to be such an expert on the topic of explicit vs. implicit?" Well, it started one day in a bar, when a girl I was watching completely ignored me. I mean, she wasn't looking at me, she wasn't talking to me, she appeared to be going out of her way to avoid looking in my direction.
So, I walked over, whipped out my cock, and grabbed her breasts. When she objected, I quoted the logical rules of implication and the well-known "ignore someone to make them fall in love with you rule" but she was unpersuaded. She insisted that she had not given me explicit permission to grab her titties, although she might concede that within the established societal norms of someone of her generation, an implicit invitation may have been constituted by her actions.
The police weren't nearly so calm. They're like nuns who hit your hands with a ruler when you don't learn the lesson quicly enough. Except they used tasers.
I should tell you about the time I learned about the difference between "literal" and "figurative."
I don't think explicitly means what you think it means. The word you need is implicitly.
Actually, he was better when I was young. And he was hard.
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a Honda with no passenger seat, filled with backup tapes.
Even flat files are an abstraction. My files are long, skinny, spiral, and spin around like Linda Blair's head.
I judge a filesystem by its fans. By that measure reiserfs is a fanatic asshole. You can be sure that reiserfs didn't lose your data, and if you say so again you might get yelled at.
Obviously you're making something South of 80K a year, and you're fantasizing about how wonderful life would be if you only made that much.
When you get to 80K a year, you'll see that it ain't crap.
A more reasonable expectation for life on 80K a year in a typical place (let's pick Dallas Texas) would be a 3 bedroom house of somewhat less than 2000 sq. feet, two car garage with a Honda Civic and a Chevy Malibu in it, one child, one dog, and an overseas vacation once a decade, if that. And you're going to have a lot of trouble educating even that one child, even at a state university.
If you're in Silicon Valley, forget the cars, and forget the house. You're going to be looking at something with 1 or 2 bedrooms, and 1000 sq. feet or less.
Yes, that's damn good. Three orders of magnitude is very roughly a full decade's worth of progress in the hard drive world. Whoever did the graphene work has really earned their pay.
Mark Twain, foolish and drunken alphabet, blah blah blah