I'm not a believer in the free market. We need to regulate the money and jobs going out of our country.
The right wing is only concerned about brown people coming into our country, but what have they done to hurt you?
We can have it one of two ways:
1) Drop the borders and make it just as easy for people to leave the country as the money and jobs. This means no passports for travel in and out of any nation in the world. This means the end of citizenship in nations.
OR
2) Make it just as hard for a job or a dollar to leave the country as a person. When a CEO wants to send a job to India, make the CEO apply for an exit approval, which could take 5 years for approval. Then before the job is allowed into India, make the CEO of the company apply for a "job citizenship" which could take 10 years and thousands of dollars of lawyers fees.
Make the companies go through the same hell for EVERY FUCKING JOB THEY WANT TO SEND TO INDIA as what people have to go through to change their citizenship.
Lansing Michigan? God I couldn't get out of that town fast enough. Took me 10 years. I blame I-69 and I-96. Who can fucking figure that out? It's so confusing.
I would too, but nowhere is the word Borvell explained. What the hell is a Borvell?
Borvell: (noun) a rubber container of liquids, shaped like a twinky, which can be filled with an intoxicating fluid such as vodka and shoved in your ass. This device provided the inspiration for the famous Microsoft product "Vista."
Our favorite, Pudge, will certainly *insist* that the plane crash was most certainly an accident. And then he'll tell you all about how the Clintons had people killed to protect their Whitewater interests.
Gasoline is cheap because demand has slackened. Isn't anybody scared as fuck that a mere 5% drop in demand can result in such a catastrophic drop in price? It's an inelastic price. That means that small changes in demand cause huge changes in price.
This is the future:
1) economy slows 2) price of gas drops 3) economy gets better and demand recovers 4) WHAM gas goes through the roof. 5) Goto 1
What do I expect from the Dutch? I expect cock rings! and dildos! and anal probes! and windmill cookies! and giant lesbians! and drunken soccer fans! and losers carrying flowers upside down by the stems! and wooden shoes! and tiny cars imported from Spain and France! and pot smokers! and whores in the parks! and canals! and birth canals! and motherfucking cobblestone streets! and boats! and weird accents! and Bulgarians on vacation! and Oranjeboom piss! and Yanks no Thanks! and blondes with bad haircuts! and pierced nipples! and leather! and immense faggotry regarding Tin Tin! and Swamp Germans! and bridges! and dykes! and fingers in dykes! and the friggin' North Sea!
I was trying to move things along in the interest of efficiency, but by short-circuiting the ad hominem end game, it's obvious that you have taken efficiency to the next level.
Monopolies are not bad all the time, and to say so is really missing an important point - context.
Monopolies in government are a good thing, for example. When you have two governments competing, it's called a civil war. For much the same reason, I'd really like just one integrated chain of command in my armed forces thank you very much.
Now in markets, when the GOAL of the market is to provide economic growth and opportunity, then monopolies are bad because they work directly against maximizing the inclusion of people into the markets.
If your goal in your market is to just allow a few people to get rich, then monopolies are what you want.
But don't just pretend that anybody said that monopolies are always bad and try to make a point based on a strawman argument.
Yes, and my cock is 3 inches long too. But that, like you, and your comment, are irrelevant to what I posted.
Oh, and another fact is that you've outed yourself as an illiterate. If you read what I wrote, and stop reading what you wish I wrote, you'll see that my comment is nowhere as broad as you think.
Or, are you going to argue that GW Bush is not in fact a member of the Republican party?
Obviously, you spent more time in college booking cracks than cracking books.
I'm not a believer in the free market. We need to regulate the money and jobs going out of our country.
The right wing is only concerned about brown people coming into our country, but what have they done to hurt you?
We can have it one of two ways:
1) Drop the borders and make it just as easy for people to leave the country as the money and jobs. This means no passports for travel in and out of any nation in the world. This means the end of citizenship in nations.
OR
2) Make it just as hard for a job or a dollar to leave the country as a person. When a CEO wants to send a job to India, make the CEO apply for an exit approval, which could take 5 years for approval. Then before the job is allowed into India, make the CEO of the company apply for a "job citizenship" which could take 10 years and thousands of dollars of lawyers fees.
Make the companies go through the same hell for EVERY FUCKING JOB THEY WANT TO SEND TO INDIA as what people have to go through to change their citizenship.
I'll tell you what's wrong. The Sparty statue has no anus.
in INDIA. That's the part they left out.
Lansing Michigan? God I couldn't get out of that town fast enough. Took me 10 years. I blame I-69 and I-96. Who can fucking figure that out? It's so confusing.
I once tried to jerk with a rachet. All I got was a strand of linguini.
So, you're saying that I have to call this thing in my ass something else?
I would too, but nowhere is the word Borvell explained. What the hell is a Borvell?
Borvell: (noun) a rubber container of liquids, shaped like a twinky, which can be filled with an intoxicating fluid such as vodka and shoved in your ass. This device provided the inspiration for the famous Microsoft product "Vista."
I have never worked at the agency, but I was once in an orgy with Bob, Eve, and Alice.
Our favorite, Pudge, will certainly *insist* that the plane crash was most certainly an accident. And then he'll tell you all about how the Clintons had people killed to protect their Whitewater interests.
Gasoline is cheap because demand has slackened. Isn't anybody scared as fuck that a mere 5% drop in demand can result in such a catastrophic drop in price? It's an inelastic price. That means that small changes in demand cause huge changes in price.
This is the future:
1) economy slows
2) price of gas drops
3) economy gets better and demand recovers
4) WHAM gas goes through the roof.
5) Goto 1
What do I expect from the Dutch? I expect cock rings! and dildos! and anal probes! and windmill cookies! and giant lesbians! and drunken soccer fans! and losers carrying flowers upside down by the stems! and wooden shoes! and tiny cars imported from Spain and France! and pot smokers! and whores in the parks! and canals! and birth canals! and motherfucking cobblestone streets! and boats! and weird accents! and Bulgarians on vacation! and Oranjeboom piss! and Yanks no Thanks! and blondes with bad haircuts! and pierced nipples! and leather! and immense faggotry regarding Tin Tin! and Swamp Germans! and bridges! and dykes! and fingers in dykes! and the friggin' North Sea!
THAT is what I expect from the Dutch.
Is that jizz?
I was trying to move things along in the interest of efficiency, but by short-circuiting the ad hominem end game, it's obvious that you have taken efficiency to the next level.
Should we skip this crap and just jump to the part of the argument where we creatively insult each other for sport?
Thus you prove that you are an idiot. Obama is one person. Democrats is millions of people. One cannot equal the other.
I love the invisible fist, especially when it's furiously jerking me off.
Monopolies are not bad all the time, and to say so is really missing an important point - context.
Monopolies in government are a good thing, for example. When you have two governments competing, it's called a civil war. For much the same reason, I'd really like just one integrated chain of command in my armed forces thank you very much.
Now in markets, when the GOAL of the market is to provide economic growth and opportunity, then monopolies are bad because they work directly against maximizing the inclusion of people into the markets.
If your goal in your market is to just allow a few people to get rich, then monopolies are what you want.
But don't just pretend that anybody said that monopolies are always bad and try to make a point based on a strawman argument.
So, you're saying that Bush and the people working for him are not Republican? Is that really what you are saying?
You Ron Paul freaks ARE fucking nuts. And I don't mean having sex with a pecan.
Is that an illustration for a Kurt Cobain furry slash fan story?
Well, Pudge is a moron then.
No need to think too hard about it. You can tell I'm demented by the way I stand outside windows at apartment complexes masturbating.
I never mentioned Clinton. That was brought up by others, including you, in an effort to dilute what I said.
Clinton is not bothering the subject of the article, the whistleblower. Republicans are doing that.
Yes, and my cock is 3 inches long too. But that, like you, and your comment, are irrelevant to what I posted.
Oh, and another fact is that you've outed yourself as an illiterate. If you read what I wrote, and stop reading what you wish I wrote, you'll see that my comment is nowhere as broad as you think.
Or, are you going to argue that GW Bush is not in fact a member of the Republican party?
Really? Clinton was wiretapping Americans in America with equipment in America, making calls to Americans in America?
Really? Or were those pesky foreign calls?