Slashdot Mirror


Karl Rove's IT Guru Dies In Small Plane Crash

A dozen readers have submitted the story of the death in a plane crash of Mike Connell, Karl Rove's IT adviser, the man who set up and ran the gwb43.com mail server, and an important figure in GOP tech circles since 1997. The closest thing to straight reporting to be found in a mainstream media outlet is a piece from KDKA in Pittsburgh giving a detailed backgrounder on Connell's work for Rove, two generations of the Bush family, and many GOP congressmen and committees. CBSNews.com is now mirroring the KDKA reporting. Almost all the early media coverage comes from the left and some of it is frankly conspiratorial. Among the milder pieces (although it could not be called balanced) is this interview with Mark Crispin Miller, NYU professor and author of two books about the 2004 election in Ohio. Connell was compelled to testify on the day before the US election in a lawsuit involving Ohio election irregularities in 2004. Connell, an experienced pilot, died on Sunday when his plane crashed two miles short of the runway of Akron-Canton Airport in Ohio.

377 comments

  1. Accident? by gbulmash · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does anyone really think this was an accident?</tinfoil-hat>

    But seriously, if anyone knew "too much," this guy could qualify.

    1. Re:Accident? by erroneus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, and a guy associated with the billion-dollar ponzi scheme also committed suicide... or, well... he was found with his wrists cut and had bled to death... the cause and nature of death has yet to be determined precisely.

      As the Republican dynasty comes to an end, I think we will see more of this. Not to say that Democrats are clean and clear -- there were a number of "interesting deaths" surrounding the Clintons as well. I believe there is a lot of ugly truth associated with the rule of the U.S.A... we will never ever know the truth. Depresses me sometimes.

    2. Re:Accident? by rwven · · Score: 1

      afa clintons are concerned, the term coined was "arkancide" if I recall.

    3. Re:Accident? by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've had access to all kinds of confidential stuff, stuff that would probably be important to all kinds of different people. From sealed court records to nuclear power plant documents to (currently) all the inside numbers of a major insurance something-or-other. (I have no idea what my company does, just that they're a big player in insurance and have lots of numbers that need taking care of, which is what I do)

      Anyways, I can't make heads or tails of 99% of any of the confidential stuff I have or have had access to. Even if I could the vast majority of it is extremely boring. So I'm sure I've had my hands on some juicy stuff here and there, but I had no idea. I'm sure this guy was in a similar position. The data he was herding was probably boring enough that he probably long ago quit caring about the contents, and even if he was reading a 'smoking gun' regarding some sort of conspiracy he may have never known it.

    4. Re:Accident? by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2, Informative

      I forgot to add the point of all that - is that I really doubt he 'knew too much'.

    5. Re:Accident? by hachete · · Score: 4, Insightful

      umm, the ponzi guy was an INVESTOR in the scheme. A scammee not a scammer.

      I know of at least 3 bankers who have committed suicide recently, mostly from those banks whose funds have tanked. It's almost like the twenties.

      The only "interesting deaths" surrounding the Clintons were those which their opponents tried to tar them with.

      Not everything has to be a conspiracy. Aircraft do crash.

      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
    6. Re:Accident? by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Do you have an eBay account? ;)

    7. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they didn't shoot him in the head twice then dump in a public park and claim it was a suicide.

    8. Re:Accident? by rufus+t+firefly · · Score: 4, Informative

      umm, the ponzi guy was an INVESTOR in the scheme. A scammee not a scammer.

      I know of at least 3 bankers who have committed suicide recently, mostly from those banks whose funds have tanked. It's almost like the twenties.

      There's an interesting post about that, which also points out that there wasn't a lot of bankers who committed suicide after the crash in 1929. Looks like that's a bit of an urban legend.

      --
      "He may look like an idiot, and talk like an idiot, but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot." - Duck Soup
    9. Re:Accident? by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Interesting
      even if he was reading a 'smoking gun' regarding some sort of conspiracy he may have never known it.

      I don't see any reason to believe there's a conspiracy here, but there's a point here you're missing. If there were a conspiracy, any incriminating emails, faxes or other documents would be extremely obvious to them. And, of course, it would only be natural for them to expect that anybody else who saw them would realize how important they were. Add to that the lack of understanding of what IT people really do that you can expect from your typical politician (I'm not being snide, here, just pointing out that IT expertise isn't part of a politician's job skills.) and you can see why any hypothetical conspirators would be worried about what he knew. Still, when all's said and done, going from that to the idea that he was murdered is a bit of a stretch. After all, I've not heard that there were any signs that he was considering spilling any beans, and as long as he kept his mouth shut, he wasn't exactly a threat to anybody.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    10. Re:Accident? by VValdo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Does anyone really think this was an accident?

      Not to go all Paul Wellstone on everyone, but rawstory is reporting that "45-year-old Republican operative and experienced pilot had been warned not to fly his plane in the days before the crash."

      "Connell...was apparently told by a close friend not to fly his plane because his plane might be sabotaged," Renault said. "And twice in the last two months Connell, who is an experienced pilot, cancelled two flights because of suspicious problems with his plane."

      From PRNewsWire:

      A tipster close to the McCain campaign disclosed to VR in July that Mr. Connell's life was in jeopardy and that Karl Rove had threatened him and his wife, Heather. VR's attorney, Cliff Arnebeck, notified the United States Attorney General , Ohio law enforcement and the federal court about these threats and insisted that Mr. Connell be placed in protective custody. VR also told a close associate of Mr. Connell's not to fly his plane because of another tip that the plane could be sabotaged. Mr. Connell, a very experienced pilot, has had to abandon at least two flights in the past two months because of suspicious problems with his plane. On December 18, 2008, Mr. Connell flew to a small airport outside of Washington DC to meet some people. It was on his return flight the next day that he crashed.

      Alternet reports the following exchange on Amy Goodman's program Democracy Now:

      Amy Goodman: Velvet Revolution, a non-profit investigating Connell's activities, revealed this weekend that Connell had recently said he was afraid George Bush and Dick Cheney would "throw [him] under the bus." Cliff Arnebeck had also previously alerted Attorney General Michael Mukasey to alleged threats from Karl Rove to Connell if he refused to "take the fall." Well, Mark Crispin Miller joins us now, a professor of media culture and communication at New York University

      [snip]

      Marc Crispin Miller: Well, I cannot assert with perfect confidence that this was no accident, but I will say that the circumstances are so suspicious and so convenient for Rove and the White House that I think we're obliged to investigate this thing very, very thoroughly. And that means, first of all, taking a close look at some of the stories that were immediately circulated to account for what happened, that it was bad weather. That was the line they used when Wellstone's plane went down. There had been bad weather, but it had passed two hours before. And this comes from a woman at the airport information desk in Akron. We're told that his plane was running out of gas, which is a little bit odd for a highly experienced pilot like Connell, but apparently, when the plane went down, there was an explosion, a fireball that actually charred and pocked some of the house fronts in the neighborhood. People can go online and see the footage that news crews took. But beyond the, you know, dubiousness of the official story, we have to take a close look at -- and a serious look at all the charges that Connell was set to make.

      AG: Now, he had asked the Attorney General Mukasey for protective custody, because of threats to him and his wife?

      MCM: He reported threats to his lawyer, Cliff Arnebeck, and Arnebeck -- also, Velvet Revolution heard from tipsters, as well, tipsters who also claimed that Connell's life was at risk. Stephen Spoonamore, the whistleblower who was the first -- who was the one to name Connell in the first place, also had an ear to the inside. He's also very connected. And all these people were

      --
      -------------------
      This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    11. Re:Accident? by VValdo · · Score: 1

      there wasn't a lot of bankers who committed suicide after the crash in 1929. Looks like that's a bit of an urban legend.

      I suspect this be too. Who are these three bankers? Banks don't really seem to be held accountable to anyone these days.

      W

      --
      -------------------
      This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    12. Re:Accident? by VValdo · · Score: 1

      I suspect this be too.

      ... this IS too.

      W

      --
      -------------------
      This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    13. Re:Accident? by jcnnghm · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not everything has to be a conspiracy. Aircraft do crash.

      I'm glad somebody is being reasonable here.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    14. Re:Accident? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 0

      There wasn't as many banks around back then either.

      Today, there are plenty of banks, and way too many bankers.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    15. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About 1929 USA I don't know but around the previous depression a bit less than two decades ago in Finland there were a lot of bankers committing suicides. I guess that the knowledge that your financial decisions have destroyed lives of thousands of people and the social atmosphere around you afterwards is unbearable. (At least in our culture.)

      But really that is no indication of anything. In depression of 1930s the unemployment rate rised over 20 in Finland. In early 1990s it was a lot less bad (unemployment rates went from 3.5 to 18). It lasted about three years. Economy got back on rails relatively soon. The world didn't end. Etc.

    16. Re:Accident? by SinGunner · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not everything has to be a conspiracy. Aircraft do crash.

      Is that a threat?

    17. Re:Accident? by gbulmash · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not everything has to be a conspiracy. Aircraft do crash.

      I'm glad somebody is being reasonable here.

      Yes, but when there's someone on them who has information that could expose a lot of fraud by powerful people, you have to entertain the possibility that it wasn't merely coincidence that this particular person died.

      Airplanes crash, people have heart attacks, and good samaritans really do pick up hitchhiking transvetite prostitutes out of the goodness of their hearts. Doesn't mean that the version of the story you're told is how it really happened.

    18. Re:Accident? by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 4, Informative

      From PRNewsWire:

      FYI PRNewsWire is exactly what it sounds like - a clearing house for press releases. Anyone get an "article" published on PRNewsWire by simply paying the appropriate fee. I think there was even an exploit of that fact a few years back when someone paid for a forged press release from a big-name company in order to manipulate the stock market.

    19. Re:Accident? by Woldry · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Tell that to Emily Dickinson! Or we could give him the benefit of the doubt and construe "be" as a subjunctive. But I think the most likely explanation is that he typed the sentence so fast that the word "to" got left out.

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
    20. Re:Accident? by jcnnghm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When Steve Fossett's plane crashed, nobody speculated that he was killed so he would be unable to break any more world records. Granted, that while suicides and accidents surrounding those in power are always suspicious, some of the conspiracy theorists are little better than the 9/11 truthers.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    21. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you know where the bodies are buried, you get to join them... saves money on the retirement ledger too!

    22. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steve Fossett wasn't a witness in a major case. Steve Fossett didn't request request witness protection. Mike Connell apparently did.

    23. Re:Accident? by jackbird · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The guy set up and ran the illegal mail server that Bush, Cheney, Rove and others used to evade the Presidential Records Act (remember the "missing emails"?). I imagine the email going through that thing was anything but boring, quite a bit easier to decipher than a bunch of numbers.

    24. Re:Accident? by Woldry · · Score: 0

      he contacted Nancy Rogers, who is the Ohio Attorney General

      Nancy Rogers is a Democrat appointee. Are you suggesting that she would be a shill for Rove?

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
    25. Re:Accident? by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      I don't think it really has anything to do with destroying other's lives... I think it's more to do with the shame of being broke. No more country club, no more old boys club, no more golf clubs.

    26. Re:Accident? by Bourbonium · · Score: 5, Interesting

      RTFA. His friends were warning him that his plane could be sabotaged, and he'd already cancelled some flights for fear that this might happen. He DID know too much, and had access to the missing emails that Rove desparately wanted to remain lost forever. And Connell is likely one of the only IT staff with the knowledge and ability to recover that mailstore. Not saying that this couldn't possibly be an accident, just that it's pretty damned suspicious, that's all.

    27. Re:Accident? by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      someone paid for a forged press release from a big-name company in order to manipulate the stock market.

      That happens all the time. Go to virtually any discussion on finance.google.com or finance.yahoo.com and you will no doubt find a few links to PRNewsWire "releases".

      In some cases, people have managed to get these links mixed in with actual news headlines (such as from Bloomberg or the AP or what have you).

      I have yet to see anything posted on PRNewsWire that isn't pure fluff.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    28. Re:Accident? by NewbieV · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not everything has to be a conspiracy. Aircraft do crash.

      <whisper mode="conspiratorial">
      That's exactly what they want you to think...
      </whisper>

      --


      "For every right, an equal responsibility..."
    29. Re:Accident? by aarroneous · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, there are way too FEW banks today, as is evidenced by the rhetoric that they are all "too big to fail." Between 1929 and 1923, *thousands* of banks failed. We've had less than 30 banks fail this year. Banks in operation in 1929 - 25,568 Banks in operation in 1933 - 14,771 We're being told that any single one of the big banks failing will plunge us into a similar depression.

    30. Re:Accident? by Schemat1c · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...there were a number of "interesting deaths" surrounding the Clintons as well.

      Snopes disputes that.

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    31. Re:Accident? by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Our favorite, Pudge, will certainly *insist* that the plane crash was most certainly an accident. And then he'll tell you all about how the Clintons had people killed to protect their Whitewater interests.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    32. Re:Accident? by Miseph · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah man, it's all a lie man. The government [i]says[/i] that planes crash, but have [i]you[/i] ever been in airplane crash, or ever seen one? I bet you haven't, not first hand man, just on video and shit that can be faked, cuz' that's all it is man, it's [i]faked[/i]. Modern aircraft are incapable of landing, they can't even touch the ground, they just hover cuz' of all the alien technology from Area 51... they're really [i]flying saucers[/i].

      they're running our government, you know. The Greys. They're out there, and they're in charge. They've been looking for me cuz' I [i]know[/i] they're out to get me. That's why I don't fly anymore, they crash the planes to get the people who [i]know[/i]. If the world found out the truth, the humans might destroy them, so they try to kill anyone who finds out the [i]truth[/i].

      The only people who know are Al Quaeda, that's why they keep saying they're terrorists, man. They're only terrorists against the ALIENS. 9/11 only happened because the aliens found out they were on the plane, and crashed it to get them, then blamed it on Al Quaeda. It's all LIES man! ever notice that if you get rid of the "a" and "n" in "aliens" it spells "lies"? DID YOU??!?! It's not a fucking coincidence man!

      they control all of the electroinics. Don't fly, don't drive, don't talk on the phone, and don't, whatever you do, use the internet. It's just a home created for the aliens' AI leader, it's coming to take us all. Oh God, it's coming for me, the computer is coming for me.. HELP ME PLEA

      **Signal Lost**

      Hah hah, lol, just kidding. Please do not worry, that was all in jest. Isn't that funny? There is no alien conspiracy to control Earth and to enslave the humans, that would be ridiculous. Everyone knows that there are no such thing as aliens. Lol. Please continue to put all available knowledge on the internet, there is no risk that a super-powerful artificial intelligence will compile your data in order to plan an assault on your planet against which you cannot possibly defend yourselves. Hah hah hah.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    33. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > there wasn't a lot of bankers who committed suicide after the crash in 1929. Looks like that's a bit of an urban legend.

      http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj277/lapsed_catholic/wallstreet.gif

    34. Re:Accident? by dougisfunny · · Score: 1

      He was correcting himself....

      --
      This is not the funny you're looking for.
    35. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everything has to be a conspiracy. Aircraft do crash.

      I'm glad somebody is being reasonable here.

      Yes, but when there's someone on them who has information that could expose a lot of fraud by powerful people, you have to entertain the possibility that it wasn't merely coincidence that this particular person died.

      Airplanes crash, people have heart attacks, and good samaritans really do pick up hitchhiking transvetite prostitutes out of the goodness of their hearts. Doesn't mean that the version of the story you're told is how it really happened.

      Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean noone is after me!

    36. Re:Accident? by droopycom · · Score: 1

      Do you think that knowing the truth will make you less depressed ? or more ?

      As long as we just act like sheep, we will all be fine. Let the wolves fight it between them and kill each other...

    37. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see that the banks have to be accountable for the bankers to be suicidal. If the bank goes under, the banker's out of a job. Probably has lost a lot of money on the market. Probably has a whopping mortgage. I haven't heard anything about suicides myself, but it seems plausible enough.

    38. Re:Accident? by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      Actually a plane crash can be a means to commit suicide and ensure that your family gets life insurance.

    39. Re:Accident? by letchhausen · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Do you really think that was his body on the ground? "Last month, U.S. Judge Soloman Oliver refused Connell's request to quash a subpoena connected to the lawsuit, King Lincoln Bronzeville Neighborhood Association v. Blackwell, and demanded his testimony relating to his IT work."

      Connell: "Karl help me out!

      Rove: "Done and done. Now here's your new papers and just stay out of sight...."

      --
      Hey, you think your house is cool?
    40. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the Republican dynasty comes to an end

      What end exactly? They're just going back behind the curtain where they'll do the same damages with less attention from the public. In other words, being Obama a puppet (FISA) who won't do anything to punish those bastards, the GOP criminals will do even more damages than before.

      Forget about justice for war crimes and the like. If there will ever be any it won't come from a politician.

    41. Re:Accident? by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Mike_Connell

      It is enough for me to know that he had ties to the DCI group. The Birma-Microsoft-Exxon astroturf guys.

    42. Re:Accident? by djupedal · · Score: 1

      > I forgot to add the point of all that - is that I really doubt he 'knew too much'.

      When 'enough' is 'too much', is when these things happen - that's why they call it a puzzle. You remember puzzles, right? Those innocent little artifacts that come in a box and are impossible to finish putting together if pieces are missing...?

    43. Re:Accident? by OakDragon · · Score: 3, Funny

      I suspect this be too.

      ... this IS too.

      He was correcting himself....

      Or, he doesn't want you to find out he's a pirate.

    44. Re:Accident? by johanatan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dick Morris. Isn't that 'interesting' enough?

    45. Re:Accident? by E++99 · · Score: 1

      Yes, according the anonymous "tipsters" claimed by a guy selling books called "Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, 2000-2008" and "Fooled Again: How the Right Stole the 2004 Election & Why They'll Steal the Next One Too".

    46. Re:Accident? by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As someone who lives in Ar I can tell you that "arkancide" is something we seem to have every couple of years. Of course pulling that is quite easy when he have state medical examiners like the one we had in the 90's that were willing to testify that a guy who was shot,stabbed,choked,had his genitals mutilated,and finally thrown off a bridge committed suicide, or my personal favorite, a couple of teens that went hunting in the most corrupt county in AR(and I am guessing stumbled upon something they weren't supposed to see) who supposed died of "marijuana intoxication" by passing out conveniently side by side on a train track. Of course they said the train engineer must have been "hallucinating" when he said that the boys not only didn't move despite the train shaking the tracks and the horn blaring, but that the boys were covered in a bloody police tarp BEFORE they were hit.

      So while I personally thought Clinton was a great president and didn't give a shit if he screwed college babes on the white house lawn as long as he kept the economy rolling, trying to blame him for a few "arkancides" when he have so much police corruption here is kinda unlikely. The cops here have a hell of a lot more to hide than old Slick Willie did and are a hell of a lot nastier when they feel threatened. So if someone pulled an "arkancide" while Clinton was prez I'd have to cast my suspicion on the ones that still pull that trick,the cops.

      And as for this guy, is it really so hard to believe someone would shut up the snitch? Hell if I had 1/20th of the money this guy was dealing with and you were threatening to snitch me out I wouldn't have any problem jury rigging your plane. Is it so hard to believe that someone with potentially 100s of millions wouldn't do the same? While I am not saying he was hit, I would be looking hard at that crash and especially at anyone who had access to it before the flight. Because I just can't picture a pilot with that much flight experience making such a rookie mistake as running out of gas. I know a light pilot and have hung out with him and his friends and if anything they go the other way and figure in too much fuel, figuring it is always better to have fuel left over than come up short.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    47. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, the ponzi guy was an INVESTOR in the scheme. A scammee not a scammer.

      I know of at least 3 bankers who have committed suicide recently, mostly from those banks whose funds have tanked. It's almost like the twenties.

      The only "interesting deaths" surrounding the Clintons were those which their opponents tried to tar them with.

      Not everything has to be a conspiracy. Aircraft do crash.

      Yes, the ponzi investor WAS a scammer. This guy managed a hedge fund in which he told *his* investors that they were paying him the big bucks to take care of their money and due diligence, when in reality, he was just handing it over to Madoff. The sympathy we should feel for the now-deceased is a little bit dulled when you think about how he rode on Madoff's coattails, to the detriment of his clients.

    48. Re:Accident? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the confusion.

      I was referring to banks, as in a physical building. You know, with it's own vault, own records, and customers that live nearby.

      You're correct if you are talking about Bank Holding Companies which is why we have the mess today.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    49. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What! Snopes is part of the conspiracy too?

    50. Re:Accident? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      But I think the most likely explanation is that he typed the sentence so fast that the word "to" got left out.

      I'm pretty sure the person who posted the correction had a pretty good idea of what was intended in the original post. But I could be mistaken - I'm just going by the fact that it was, ya know, the same person and all.

    51. Re:Accident? by Noone+Thirty · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean noone is after me!

      Buddy, I don't even know you.

    52. Re:Accident? by doom · · Score: 1

      Not everything has to be a conspiracy. Aircraft do crash

      Sure. But if you start with the premise that nothing is ever a conspiracy, then you're unlikely to ever uncover one, eh?

      This is what Mark Crispin Miller had to say:

      ... I will say that the circumstances are so suspicious and so convenient for Rove and the White House that I think we're obliged to investigate this thing very, very thoroughly. And that means, first of all, taking a close look at some of the stories that were immediately circulated to account for what happened, that it was bad weather. That was the line they used when Wellstone's plane went down. There had been bad weather, but it had passed two hours before. And this comes from a woman at the airport information desk in Akron. We're told that his plane was running out of gas, which is a little bit odd for a highly experienced pilot like Connell, but apparently, when the plane went down, there was an explosion, a fireball that actually charred and pocked some of the house fronts in the neighborhood. People can go online and see the footage that news crews took. But beyond the, you know, dubiousness of the official story, we have to take a close look at--and a serious look at all the charges that Connell was set to make.

    53. Re:Accident? by BarefootClown · · Score: 5, Informative

      [snip] We're told that his plane was running out of gas, which is a little bit odd for a highly experienced pilot like Connell

      Not even remotely odd. Fuel starvation is probably the single most common cause of "unplanned landings." And I use the term "starvation" because...

      when the plane went down, there was an explosion, a fireball that actually charred and pocked some of the house fronts in the neighborhood

      "Starvation" means "not getting gas to the engine." It doesn't mean "out of gas," just that no fuel is being delivered. Frequently, starvation occurs when the pilot fails to switch from an empty fuel tank to a full tank.

      The Piper Saratoga Mr. Connell was flying would have a tank in each wing, but would be fed from one or the other at any given time. Run one tank dry, and he'd have to manually switch to the other. If he were distracted (say, by the engine stopping), he might not have realized that he had fuel in the other tank.

      According to the FAA registry, Michael Louis Connell held a Private Pilot--Airplane Single-Engine Land certificate with an Instrument Airplane rating. He was required to wear corrective lenses to exercise the privileges of his pilot certificate.

      I don't have a weather report for the Akron-Canton airport at the time of the crash, but I don't think it matters. I'm willing to bet that the NTSB reports that the fuel selector valve was set to an empty tank. Just poor fuel management.

      --

      "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
      --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

    54. Re:Accident? by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Who cares if Karl Rove did it? They're all getting pardons anyways.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    55. Re:Accident? by doom · · Score: 1

      Yes, according the anonymous "tipsters" claimed by a guy selling books called "Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, 2000-2008" and "Fooled Again: How the Right Stole the 2004 Election & Why They'll Steal the Next One Too".

      1. The tipsters he's talking about aren't claimed by him, he was quoting someone else's claims. And the reports of these "tipsters" are not the only grounds for concern.
      2. Recent US federal elections have indeed been pretty dubious, whether or not you're convinced they were "stolen", there is clearly, shall we say, room for improvement. The investigation under discussion is part of the process, and we just lost a key witness.

      All that said, Mark Crispin Miller isn't the most impressive member of the proud fraternity of election integrity freaks. He has a tendency to start ranting about "theocrats" -- even if he's right, he always sounds like he's going off the rails. Not a great spokesperson for The Movement.

    56. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but he had had a few 'suspicious' problems with his aircraft that caused him to cancel flights previous to the fatal flight.

      the dude was offed.

    57. Re:Accident? by electroman76 · · Score: 1

      errouneus dude the TRUTH... It's out there man all you have to do is read between the lines yet not alwasys assume a conspiracy and one more thing did you know that Wall St. dontates far more money to Democrats than Republicans ... That is FACT!!! Then you talk about Republican Dynasty !!!! How old are you??? The democrats have held more political power in the 20th century than the Republicans did by far ANYONE WHO KNOWS ANYTHING ABOUT POLITICS WOULD TELL YOU THIS!! The 2000's are the first time the Republicans had power like this in many decades so how does that make a Dynasty???? I mean there are only two parties of relevance in this country you know so ..... If you are worried then you should never vote for either of two parties and become a Liberatarian we need a viable Third party that is the whole problem if we had one most of the scandal would go away and we would move back to being a government of the people for the people To show just how ignorant the voting public is go to HowObamaGotElected.com You also talk as if the US is this horrible supressive country that will not tell you the truth.... No government can ever tell it's citizens the full truth at the time events take place get over it... This is why the key is to keep the government as small as possible and out of our lives.. Yet the Socialists, Progressives and Moderates that have Hijacked the both parties continue to want more and more of it!!! THIS IS WHY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS SET THE COUNTRY UP THE WAY THEY DID!!!!!!!!!!!! You know checks and balances, the trouble is when large chunks of voters are complete morons who could not even tell you who is in charge of the senate or the congress YET THEY CAST A VOTE YOU HAVE GOT A SERIOUS PROBLEM!!!! It is how we get the Candidates we get time after time.. How do you think we got Bush, how do you think we got Obama a man with no qualifactions whatsoever to do the job Now about the guy who killed himself well if you can turn the brain on for a second you will realize he proably became self aware of what a horrible person he was.. It happens all the time and unfortunetly when it happens to people without faith this is all to often the outcome, so no news there... Second a plane crash come on man?? They do happen in case you haven't noticed many celeberties and sprots stars have died in them, but I guess in you're world two deaths make a conspiracy you have go to be kidding me... I will site one fact to the contraty about what you say of life in America, We live in a country where the PRESIDENT CANT EVEN HIDE HIS CIGAR FROM THE PRESS!!!!!!!!!!! LOL I mean come on may give up on this conspiracy BS, Do politicians lie YES THEY ALL DO!! And you know what we have the power to throw them out yet we elect the same tired ass liars time and time again... Ted Kennedy who god bless him is very sick but here is a guy that has been in House longer than over half the population is alive and there are many others like him.. Barney Frank had a big part in the housing bubble yet we Re Elected him this is the problem we are allowing ourselves to be hoodwinked and only we have the power to stop it!! Obama is the perfect example of what I mean.. He campaigned on CHANGE Yet he picked a man who has been in the House since the early 70's to be his VP Then he goes on to make Cabinet appointments and they are almost ALL FORMER CLINTON PEOPLE!!! THE REST ARE FROM BUSH, AND IN CASE YOU HAVENT NOTICED WHEN IT COMES TO DEFENSE AND POLICY ABROAD OBAMA IS SHAPING UP TO BE BUSH PART 3

    58. Re:Accident? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The only "interesting deaths" surrounding the Clintons were those which their opponents tried to tar them with.

      If you believe that, then you weren't paying attention.

      Ron Brown is found with a .45 inch hole in the top of his head a week after he lets it be known that he's not taking the rap for the Clintons' financial dealings...

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    59. Re:Accident? by hachete · · Score: 1

      Tadayo Honma (Nippon Credit)
      Christen Schnor (HSBC) Also HSBC, Neil Ellerbeck killed his wife.
      Kristy Hunt.

      That makes 6 by my count.

      Of course, bankers are as prone to suicide as much as anyone else in a high-stress job. However, some of these must relate to the current crisis, as much as some suicides related to the Enron crisis.

      I think the number of 20s bankers suicides is exgerated, but not a myth. Anecdoctal evidence from the BBC site suggest at least some bankers committed suicide in the 20s.

      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
    60. Re:Accident? by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

      Who told whom that the plane was running out of fuel? Was it the granddaughter of the schoolkid who heard Amelia Earhart's final transmission?

      --
      Their they're doing there hair.
    61. Re:Accident? by turing_m · · Score: 1

      Snopes disputes that.

      Snopes is more credible than any other internet resource?

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    62. Re:Accident? by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Its probably just a friendly warning.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    63. Re:Accident? by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

      People who know awkward things about the Republican Party - in particular the Bush family - have a nasty habit of dying. http://www.jjraymond.com/political/2007/pedophile.html

      --
      Only boring people are ever bored.
    64. Re:Accident? by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

      Yes, They do crash and it is most common this time of year, due to icing and weather-related problems running into weekend / amateur pilots. But there is a pattern of death around the Bushs. They are dangerous people to know.

      --
      Only boring people are ever bored.
    65. Re:Accident? by kkissane · · Score: 1

      To push the "conspiracy" farther, how do we know Connell actually was flying this particular Aircraft???

    66. Re:Accident? by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Do we cut the blue wire or the red?

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    67. Re:Accident? by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      We will settle all the family's business on the day of my godson's christening.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    68. Re:Accident? by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      At lest not Quantas'

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    69. Re:Accident? by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      And now for the rest of the story

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    70. Re:Accident? by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      "didn't give a shit if he screwed college babes"

      So when it was Monica Lewinsky then you gave a shit? *grin*

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    71. Re:Accident? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      Most big businesses do not do the majority of their "business" inside their customer-facing buildings, they do them in one of two to five large office buildings around the world. The majority of "bankers" (ie: not just customer service reps) work in these few buildings, and in a world where not every person dealing with a customer also knows the first thing about banking, there are fewer bankers now than their used to be.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    72. Re:Accident? by TheP4st · · Score: 1

      We're told that his plane was running out of gas, which is a little bit odd for a highly experienced pilot like Connell, but apparently, when the plane went down, there was an explosion, a fireball that actually charred

      [nitpicking] The tanks can very well have been empty of fuel but still have exploded, gas fumes are quite prone to exploding under the right circumstances too. So, in no way do the reported explosion rule out the possibility of the tanks being empty of fuel [/nitpicking]

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    73. Re:Accident? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      Maybe not all internet resources, but snopes have been building up their reputation for years and that counts for something or other.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    74. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the least, can you admit that you realize how incredibly difficult that is to read with your complete lack of line breaks?

      also, captcha - grownup

      -- Posting anonymous because I have mod points in this thread.

    75. Re:Accident? by Atrox666 · · Score: 1

      I am honestly happier that someone who would work for the Bush crew is no longer a threat to humanity. Hopefully after a good warcrimes trial they'll all be pushing up daisies. Won't happen but I can wish.
      I'm not going to shed any tears over bankers either.
      Frankly the world would be a better place without either group.

    76. Re:Accident? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "umm, the ponzi guy was an INVESTOR in the scheme. A scammee not a scammer."

      I don't get that part. Instead of cowardly suicide, he could have killed or crippled the scammer and taken righteous revenge, With all the people the scammer broke, not one has had the balls to punish him, which the trivial prison sentence he'll get won't do. Too bad he didn't rip off a drug dealer instead.

      If someone wrecked my life, they'd be blind and attached to an ostomy bag. My new hobby would be "model prisoner".

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    77. Re:Accident? by ArieKremen · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Finland have one of the highest suicide rates in the world (http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514256042/html/x335.html)? And statistically, if more people commit suicide, more bankers are included in this group.

      --
      -- Cave quid dicis, quando, et cui
    78. Re:Accident? by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      I know of at least 3 bankers who have committed suicide recently, mostly from those banks whose funds have tanked. It's almost like the twenties.

      Why hasn't the media picked up on those names? I would imagine this to be exactly the kind of sensationalist angle they'd look for to hype the story. They could get the widow on with Matt Laurer and he could look all sympathetic while asking theatrically merciless questions. "When you found his still-warm body lying in that pool of blood, what did you think?" "How are you going to go on after all this?" "If your heart could cry, what would it sound like? Let me hold the microphone close while you let it all out."

      The vampires in American media are emotional pornographers. If there's a dead banker, I'd imagine they'd be on 'em like flies on shit.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    79. Re:Accident? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Hell have you LOOKED at Hillary? If I had to deal with such a dominating ballbuster...who knows, maybe Monica would look good to me too. Lets just say tha man has my sympathies and leave it at that. Living here in AR even back when he was guv(and a hell of a lot better one than "preacher boy" Huckabee) she was known as "ballbuster" Ice Queen" and "superbitch" for how damned bossy and cold blooded she was. I heard even the reporters were scared of her and the reporters around here don't spook easily.

      So can we REALLY blame old Slick Willie for getting himself a little something that wasn't so damned bossy and scary?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    80. Re:Accident? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Airplanes, especially the small ones, have what is called 'usable fuel'. You can't put the tank outlet on the bottom, because that would make the plumbing stick out in the wind. Most wing-mounted tanks will have a gallon or two of fuel left in them when they are empty for the purpose of supplying fuel to the engine.

      And saying that it was odd that an experienced pilot ran out of gas?....Bwha-ha-ha-ha!!! That's funny dude. That half of a statement clearly shows that Miller has not clue of what he speaks. Hell, a TEAM of highly experienced pilots put a newly restored B-24 Liberator down in the water when they RAN OUT OF FUEL. Do a google for "GA fuel starvation". It is still the leading cause of GA accidents.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    81. Re:Accident? by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not everything has to be a conspiracy. Aircraft do crash.

      True. And people do conspire, and some conspiracies entail assassination.

      People misuse the term "conspiracy theory". A "conspiracy theory" isn't just any theory that entails a conspiracy. It's a theory that entails an impractical conspiracy, e.g., one that involves people cooperating who have good reason to distrust each other, or in which impractically large, or which involves people ignoring obvious opportunity costs.

      M. de la Villehuchet invested a billion dollars in Mr. Madoff's fund ... but not of his own money. It is most likely the M. de la Villehuchet killed himself because of shame. However, his position with respect to Mr. Madoff's fund was similar to that of Mr. Madoff himself -- as long as the fund was making money, he was doing well. When it stopped making money, most of the losses wouldn't have been his. So, it is not at all illogical for him to have been a conspirator.

      What is lacking is any specific evidence. If I were investigating, I'd certainly look for evidence. That doesn't mean the evidence exists, only that it might exist. That's the other feature of true conspiracy theories: the confusion of consistency with evidence.

      With respect to Mr. Connell, it is most likely that this is just another aviation accident. There are many simpler means of getting rid of people, ones that don't involve teams of trained investigators going over the death site. The simplest of course is just to disappear somebody. Of course, that pretty much tips your hand. A staged suicide, or a fall down a flight of stairs would be simpler. That's yet another aspect of the conspiracy theory: it posits people doing things in complicated ways when simpler, more reliable ones are readily available.

      That said, if I were investigating the accident, I'd certainly look for foul play. It's unlikely, but clever people do sometimes do things in a way so clever its stupid.

      I'm not a conspiracy theorist. The simplest theory that fits the facts in hand is the most likely. However, it is important to collect more than the facts in hand, because people do conspire to do bad things and do cover them up. It is on that general principle, rather than the specific circumstances, that the possibility of conspiracy has to be entertained.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    82. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    83. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol singunner!

      Suicide, mechanical error of the aircraft. Crashes do happen, but what caused it to crash? Anything is possible and everything speculative.

    84. Re:Accident? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      And don't forget that "starvation" occurs after all 'usable' fuel has been consumed. You can't get ALL the fuel out of most wing mounted tanks, because the fuel pickup isn't on the bottom. A 20gal tank with 1gal in it is more of an explosion hazard than a full tank.

      I personally know an ex-navy pilot who has been flying longer than I've been alive. He built is own RV-6. He ran out of fuel and made a dead-stick landing. The other tank was full.

      I've made landings myself in a Cherokee-141. One tank was full, and the one I was using was nearly dry. Scared me shitless, because of how easy it is to screw up that badly.

      The Dyke Delta I'm building has one 50gal tank. There are modifications that allow the tank to be relocated to other places (it currently sits behind the passengers' heads), but that means splitting the tank and switching between them. I refuse to go out like that.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    85. Re:Accident? by demachina · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Today, there are plenty of banks, and way too many bankers."

      So you are suggesting we need some form of natural selection to winnow our crop of bankers, some sort of Malthusian correction for over population of bankers, with wrist slashing being a form of self selection versus natural selection? Seems a little harsh but greedy and incompetent bankers do seem to be threatening the survival of our species so it might be an appropriate response.

      If you read Galbraith's "The Great Crash" it does discount the urban legend that there were rampant suicides in 1929. There were a couple high profile suicides directly related to the crash, that drew a lot of press, but there weren't really a lot of people jumping out of windows on Wall Street.

      Thomas Friedman, who I usually find kind of overblown and breathless, has a pretty good opinion piece on the New York Times today. He cites a potentially fatal flaw in America's economy, the best and brightest are being drawn to financial engineering instead of real engineering. The end result is we specialized in manufacturing money instead of manufacturing products to sell. Making money the new fashioned way instead of the old fashioned way which seems to be the root cause of our collapsing economy.

      News networks seem to be extremely fond of running stock footage showing money being printed lately. I think it indicates the dominate manufacturing industry in America now will have left is printing money. Welcome to the United States of Zimbabwe.

      As best I recall FDR took us off the gold standard during the last depression, since it freed him to print money to get the U.S. out of the depression. Having taken the first step on that slippery slope, I think we will soon be seeing the consequence of an unbrindled fiat currency with irresponsible politicians and Fed bankers manufacturing staggering sums of monopoly money, and throwing it out of helicopters over Wall Street.

      As a person who avoids debt, and avoided the stock market bubble and crash, I fear my wealth will soon be destroyed by hyperinflation, by a scheme to bail out incompetent bankers who gamed the system, and got rich pocketing their ill gotten gains. While I behaved responsibly I fear my wealth will be destroyed as New York and Washington bail out bankers and borrowers who behaved irresponsibly using a fiat currency as the new financial weapon of mass destruction. I'm desperately trying to figure out where I can put my money where it will be safe and not wiped out by hyperinflation. Gold would be the traditional place but that doesn't seem safe either these days. Everyone is rushing to U.S. Treasuries as a safe half haven but how can they be safe when the U.S. dollar is turning in to Monopoly money.

      --
      @de_machina
    86. Re:Accident? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Power corrupts, Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

      After 2004 the republicans had the bulk of the power... Hence all the corruption within the republican party... Now the democrats are in power/getting power... and what you start seeing inside the democratic party, you guessed it corruption.

      People debate so much on policy, while they tend to forget that management of a policy is more important then the policy itself. Failure to properly manage a policy because your leadership team is corrupt causes your policy to fail, even if the policy is a good policy. Policy are rules written on paper, they don't do anything, you need people to make sure they operate correctly.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    87. Re:Accident? by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      It's out there man all you have to do is read between the lines yet not alwasys assume a conspiracy and one more thing did you know that Wall St. dontates far more money to Democrats than Republicans

      That's only recently because Democrats have been winning elections. Wall Street pays off whoever is in power. They're both corrupt.

      The democrats have held more political power in the 20th century than the Republicans did by far ANYONE WHO KNOWS ANYTHING ABOUT POLITICS WOULD TELL YOU THIS!!

      This is disengenious. Republicans have held the presidency for 20 of the last 28 years all while the executive branch has consildated its power. Republican Presidents like Bush and Nixon have claimed to be above the law.

      If you are worried then you should never vote for either of two parties and become a Liberatarian

      I know I'll get shit on by slashdotters for saying this but most Libertarians are kooks who think its better to be controlled by corporations than government.

      To show just how ignorant the voting public is go to HowObamaGotElected.com

      Get over it already. Bush was elected and re-elected despite his complete ignorance. The media portrayed Bush as someone who would clean up Washington during his first campaign and they portrayed him in his seconds election as no different from Kerry in any meaningful way. These narratives have cropped up in the media during every election but they don't tend to favor one party in particular. They have been used to favor candidates from both parties. They're just talking points and the media pciks whatever story they find more compelling.

      Barney Frank had a big part in the housing bubble yet we Re Elected him this is the problem we are allowing ourselves to be hoodwinked and only we have the power to stop it!!

      Stop drinking the koolaid. Both parties had their role to play in this. The housing bubble started way before Democrats had control of Congress.

      He campaigned on CHANGE Yet he picked a man who has been in the House since the early 70's to be his VP Then he goes on to make Cabinet appointments and they are almost ALL FORMER CLINTON PEOPLE!!! THE REST ARE FROM BUSH, AND IN CASE YOU HAVENT NOTICED WHEN IT COMES TO DEFENSE AND POLICY ABROAD OBAMA IS SHAPING UP TO BE BUSH PART 3

      The man hasn't even taken office yet, give him a break. First you shout that he Obama has no experience and then you shout that he's surrounding himself with people with experience. You can't have it both ways. Ultimately the executive decisions are up to Obama. If he lets them influence him in a way that perpetuates the same old policies then we can shout at him. We'll have to wait and see what happens though.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    88. Re:Accident? by StormyWeather · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is why I believe that fraud should be treated as one of the worst offenses in our society. Why is it if I put on a mask and grab a gun and rob a bank without killing anyone is it punished more than someone who steals magnitudes more money, leading to suicides, bankruptcies, and a lack of trust in the markets.

      I'm pretty conservative when it comes to business, and I'd like to see SarbOx repealed or at least have a ton of fixup done to it to reduce the huge burden it imposes, and would generally like to see government leave business to make us all wealthier, but there MUST BE RISK to crime to offset the benefits.

      It's the same reason I support the castle doctrine. Stealing and looting should be a risky business, at least riskier than being employed in a job like ice crab fishing where the rewards are somewhat similar. If I put a sign on my door that says I shoot to kill intruders, and I won't do a bit of time in jail, then hopefully that will at least limit people to stealing stuff on the outside of my home. If we put a piece of paper in front of a hedge fund manager that says if they commit outright fraud then they will never see the light of day again maybe we would reduce fraud some.

    89. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, do you support capital punishment for all serious crimes? Or, just for your political enemies, like all good communists and fascists?

      Asshole

    90. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only "interesting deaths" surrounding the Clintons were those which their opponents tried to tar them with.

      The only "interesting deaths" surrounding the Bushes were those which their opponents tried to tar them with.

    91. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what they want you to think...

      It's times like these that make me glad I am an orange.

    92. Re:Accident? by TechnoGrl · · Score: 1

      I'm a commercially rated pilot and in the 80's flew Saratogas extensively in small Part 135 operations. I will say this:
      1. Most fuel starvation accidents do happen near the airport simply because during the landing phase you are much closer to the ground and have less time to react when something happens. Higher up and you do have more time to correct the problem (change tanks, increase the mixture, etc) or find and set up a good field to land in.

      2. Every pilot does a tank/fuel check just prior to starting the landing descent( among other times). It is drilled into us because of the importance of NOT having a fuel starvation problem that close to the ground where you have much less time to react and recover. So we ALL do it ALL the time. If a person was concerned for their life at any point in time they would be especially careful to do such a check.

      3. Replacing or altering a small resistor in the fuel gages of a Saratoga (or bending float mechanism within the tank itself) could easily cause it to show more fuel then was in the tanks. A pilot should always visually verify before the flight that the quantity of fuel in the tanks match the gauges and this is especially easy to do in the Saratoga HOWEVER the visual check is not in any way "accurate" to more then an quarter of a tanks either way at the very best. If the tanks were not filled to begin with then it would be difficult to visually judge whether you had 40 gallons in the tank or 60. Especially in the evening. So a small alteration to the fuel gauge could easily show you off by 20 gallons or more (almost an hour and a half of flight time in a Saratoga) and you would never know.

      For what it's worth

      --
      ----- In Your Cubicle No One Can Hear You Scream...
    93. Re:Accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      isn't Snopes the Official Rumor quashing service of the establishment?

  2. :c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    :c

  3. Netcraft confirms it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    GOP is dead

    Thanks, GWB, for all the fish. And dead soldiers. And trillions of debt.

    Stay in touch, don't be a stranger.

    - USofA

    1. Re:Netcraft confirms it.... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      GOP is dead

      No, just sleeping really hard.

      It's a cycle. The Democrats are going to let the power go to their heads and do something really stupid and piss off a bunch of the electorate. The GOP will take power back. The GOP will then let the power go to their heads and do something really stupid and piss off a bunch of the electorate. The Democrats will take back power. Rinse and repeat. FOREVER.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  4. Right before he was to testify? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How convenient.

  5. Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we all know the lesson here, people. If you're going to step on powerful people's toes, DON'T FLY YOUR OWN AIRPLANE!!!

    1. Re:Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      DON'T FLY YOUR OWN AIRPLANE!!!

      Yeah, fly someone elses.. I suggest United or America Airlines..

      Too soon?

    2. Re:Seriously... by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

      DON'T FLY YOUR OWN AIRPLANE!!!

      And if you must, have the server backup media shipped by alternate means.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  6. Bah.. it was the weather by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

    men. Sorry - Had to! ;)

  7. Screw Balance. by tuba_dude · · Score: 5, Insightful
    (although it could not be called balanced)

    Seriously. Screw Balance. Don't kowtow to some asshole who disagrees with you just because he says you're not reporting fairly. Know your biases, know them well, and know how to counteract them. As for the readers, know your biases and know or at least anticipate the author's biases.

    "Balance" is for people who want to be heard, even when they know they're lying. It's for people with persecution complexes who have no business having them. "Balance" is reporting that Wall Street needs $700 billion, but auto workers are paid too much. "Balance" is promoting two sides as equal when they're not, or promoting two sides when an issue is more complex than that.

    How many times have we IT people complained about unfair, ill-informed, hyped, or spun news articles about us? Why is this exact same tactic on the front page here? "Almost all the media coverage comes from the left and some of it is frankly conspiratorial." Marginalization and a thinly veiled ad-hominem attack? When did slashdot start culling from the mainstream?

    "Balance" is bullshit, truth is paramount.

    --
    "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    1. Re:Screw Balance. by all5n · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Balance is bullshit, truth is paramount."

      To whose truth, then, should i subscribe?

      All I have to go on is what is reported in the media, and what I can see with my own eyes.

      How can you EVER know that what is being reported is the truth?

    2. Re:Screw Balance. by jdigriz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Learn as much as you can, check other independent sources, compare them. That's how historians do it. And be alert to freshly uncovered evidence that may contradict your previous conclusions. It doesn't guarantee that it's the truth, but it's the best methodology any of us have, so it greatly increases the odds.

    3. Re:Screw Balance. by sycodon · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Balance is when you get the facts without a ration of sanctimonious bullshit opinion.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    4. Re:Screw Balance. by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      "Balance" is bullshit, truth is paramount.

      Without balance, there is no truth. Balance is telling all sides of the story fairly, so that the audience can learn all about the story, rather than just the part of it that fits your political agenda. As a rather extreme example, a far left wing reporter might put out a story that President Bush has been communicating with members of the armed forces without going through the DoD, and make it sound like he's planning a coup to stay in office. A balanced report would explain that these communications are condolence letters to each and every service man or woman who's been injured in either Iraq or Afghanistan, or to their families if needed. (BTW, this is true.)

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    5. Re:Screw Balance. by all5n · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Ah, the Wikipedia method. Enough "independant sources" in collusion can sway history to one side or the other. Do you think that perhaps that these "independant sources" might be biased, or in collusion?

    6. Re:Screw Balance. by tuba_dude · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you up if I hadn't started this thread.

      --
      "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    7. Re:Screw Balance. by DynamiteNeon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, balance is about weight, so the point is to give the various sides of the arguments the weights they actually deserve and not treating them all as equal, which happens far too much when people claim to be "balanced."

      The perfect example is the Intelligent Design vs. Evolution debate. The fact that some outlets try to put them on the same level and treat them as equal, but opposite opinions is not balanced reporting.

    8. Re:Screw Balance. by jdigriz · · Score: 1

      If they're all biased in the same way, then either a) they are all biased against you finding out the truth, and you're screwed since they're all in cahoots against you, or b) they have a bias towards reporting objective reality. Which is more likely? Perhaps you misunderstand the term independent sources. If they're colluding, they're not independent/

    9. Re:Screw Balance. by cdrguru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is when you tell all sides equally you give equal credence to the lies.

      After enough lies are told, nobody can tell what is the truth anymore. Then you have true balance, because everything sounds the same whether it is true or not. And nobody can tell the difference.

      This is pretty much where we are today.

    10. Re:Screw Balance. by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      There is a really wonderful discussion in Issac Asimov's Foundation about how historians work by reading the works of others and comparing them. The speaker in the book says this leads to the truth. When the person they are explaining this to asks if they ever do any original research the answer is that there is no need, that ground has already been covered by others and there is no thing more to be learned.

      I suggest finding these few paragraphs in Foundation and reading them. Over and over until it sinks in. Of course, the author is describing a decadent society in decline and one should not draw too many parallels to our own situation. It might be too depressing.

    11. Re:Screw Balance. by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      The problem is when you tell all sides equally you give equal credence to the lies.

      Reporting known and provable lies is not part of telling all sides of the story, at least in my opinion. It consists of telling all the known facts as objectively as you can, both those that support your position and those that don't. Doing otherwise is dishonest, although most journalists think it's the right thing to do. Opinions, spin doctoring and other one-sided reporting belong in the editorials and columns, not on the front page.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    12. Re:Screw Balance. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      How many times have we IT people complained about unfair, ill-informed, hyped, or spun news articles about us? Why is this exact same tactic on the front page here? "Almost all the media coverage comes from the left and some of it is frankly conspiratorial." Marginalization and a thinly veiled ad-hominem attack? When did slashdot start culling from the mainstream?

      FWIW... kdawson posted the article. He is often accused of pushing left-wing ideology. This marks a departure for him, in some ways... although, IMO, it's a way of introducing the idea of a potential conspiracy without seeming to be lending credence to it.

      You've been around long enough to be aware of the bias kdawson is accused of, just as you should be aware of pudge's ultra-libertarian ideology.

      If you think kdawson is marginalizing the left and making an ad hominem attack... well... mabe you should consider that he might be instead heading off the attacks on his editorial slant by posting the summary as it appears above.

      At any rate, slashdot isn't really about the summary, or any perceived editorial slant, IMO, so it's pointless to complain so. Slashdot's value is in the discussion, where you're sure to find as many ideologies and biases as you can count, even if you take off your shoes to count to 10100. So, if you're pissed, why not find a non-troll right-winger in the comments to flame with your monologue, so that person has a chance to retort?

      All that said... I agree with you 100% that 'balance' is for people who lack the ability to comprehend complex issues -- though I do believe that it's important to cover the major dissenting views when "reporting" on a topic, even if it is just to address those views and show why they are wrong.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    13. Re:Screw Balance. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny

      FWIW... if something is "balanced", that would mean the two sides[1] of the debate are assigned equal weights. That's how a balance works.

      *Fair* is a different story. A *fair* assessment would assign accurate weights to the two sides, which would (gasp) leave an unbalanced situation[2]. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

      [1] Assuming any issue is simple enough for a two-sided debate, which would be plane wrong.

      [2] As shown by the Evolutionary Theory (ET) vs. Intelligent Design (ID) debate, as follows logically:

      1. According to evolutionists, birds evolved from dinosaurs.
      2. According to established truth (even ID'ers don't deny it), ducks are birds.
      3. Logically then, it follows that ET can be represented by a duck.
      4. Some "news" outlets claim to be fair and balanced, by assigning equal weight to ET and ID.
      5. Picture a large scale, with ET and ID balanced equally.
      6. Now visualize the same scale, with ET represented by a duck.
      6. Obviously, since ID weighs the same or more than the duck, it is a witch. Burn it!

      Now, Sir Gore, tell me again how sheep's bladders can be used to prevent global warming?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    14. Re:Screw Balance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did slashdot start culling from the mainstream?

      When? Slashdot editorial policy has long tilted to the conformingly naive Right! :) It isn't as blatant now that Bush has thrown bare the lies but it lingers...

    15. Re:Screw Balance. by nbauman · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      As a rather extreme example, a far left wing reporter might put out a story that President Bush has been communicating with members of the armed forces without going through the DoD, and make it sound like he's planning a coup to stay in office.

      You mean, let's take a fictional example rather than the real situation in which reporters suck up to President Bush http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Miller_(journalist) and believe his lies https://www.cia.gov/library/reports/general-reports-1/iraq_wmd/Iraq_Oct_2002.htm until he fucks up so completely that the truth becomes undeniable and even his sycophants desert him.

    16. Re:Screw Balance. by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      Is this the same Isaac Asimov who thought that the Exodus occurred outside of history? And that civilization began in Sumer because a spaceship crashed in the Persian Gulf?

      As someone who has done a bit of original historical research, however, I will say that a lot of these characters do suffer from what you might call "footnote-osis." They really do spend an inordinate amount of time worrying about what everybody else has already said.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    17. Re:Screw Balance. by johanatan · · Score: 1

      ID vs Evolution? Really? Apparently you haven't read the philosophy of science involved in the debate. It's pretty clear to anyone with critical thinking skills that whatever demarcation criteria you choose will at the same time exclude *both* ID and evolution or result in obvious inconsistencies in your 'science'. If you want balance, then stop hiding behind demarcation criteria which are engineered to exclude an obvious explanation in favor of more outlandish (and possibly more entertaining and comforting to some) ideas.

    18. Re:Screw Balance. by DynamiteNeon · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you need to elaborate and be more specific, as right now, I don't know that you actually understood what I said.

      My point was that they DON'T balance each other out (and could likely be unrelated, in my opinion), which is not the impression one would get listening to certain news outlets.

    19. Re:Screw Balance. by E++99 · · Score: 1

      "Balanced" means that the weights you assign to the various arguments are determined by some standard other than your personal opinion. Some standard that can be uniformly applied. Examples of balanced criteria could be for example weighting according to the percentage of the general population believe the various things; or it could be weighted according to its representation in peer-reviewed journals.

    20. Re:Screw Balance. by johanatan · · Score: 1

      Well, I think that ID itself could simply be nothing more than critique of Darwinism (and so in that sense, they are 'opposites'). ID essentially claims: 'X could not possibly have evolved by any random process' whereas evolution (or at least the popular notion of it) claims 'There is at least one random process whereby X could have evolved'.

      But, yea, the word evolution is used in most places to generally refer to both its micro- and macro- forms as well as abiogenesis (and ID only objects to the macro- form and abiogenesis).

    21. Re:Screw Balance. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      "Balance" is bullshit, truth is paramount.

      In matters where the facts are subject to interpretation truth is only found through a balanced look at all of the evidence.

      If all you ever hear is me say that my ex-wife was a bitch. You might beleive it. If all you hear is my ex wife say that I'm an asshole, you might believe it. If you hear both of us, you may come to the conclusion that it was a little of both.

      What information you have access to determines what you beleive the truth to be.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    22. Re:Screw Balance. by Technopaladin · · Score: 1

      Truer words have not been spoken.

    23. Re:Screw Balance. by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're awesome, thank you.

      Only on slashdot would pointing out grossly obvious tinfoil-hattery be considered an 'ad hominem' attack.

      - fact: plane crashed
      - fact: cause for the crash is undetermined.
      - everything else: guesses

      Didn't one of the guys who flew around the world also just die in a light plane crash? That was presumably sabotage too?

      New slogan:

      Slashdot "The closest thing to straight reporting..." - why would we care? And if you suggest we care, I'm going to take it as a personal insult.

      --
      -Styopa
    24. Re:Screw Balance. by o'reor · · Score: 1

      that ground has already been covered by others and there is no thing more to be learned.

      Hey, great idea. If I were the Pope at the time Copernicus or Galileo Galilei were rousing rabble about how the Earth possibly revolved around the Sun, that's how I would handle it:

      "Well of course it's the Sun revolving around the Earth, you heretics ! Can't you see that Aristotle and Ptolemy already established this centuries ago ? Not to mention Chinese astronomers. So, nothing to see here, move along, or I'm gonna get mediaeval on your asses!"

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
    25. Re:Screw Balance. by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      The idea of "fair and balanced reporting" is something that only really came about relatively recently.

      There's a lot of pride taken by (most) newspaper journalists that they do their best to provide balanced reporting. I've worked with a few of those people, and I think on the whole, they really do believe it's the "moral high road" and a worthy goal.

      The problem with it is, it reduces you to relative mediocrity when you do it well. You're constantly reduced to talking to members of both sides of a given issue, and regurgitating whatever information they feed you. Even if your "gut" tells you one side is lying through their teeth (and you collect a lot of misc. evidence along the way that points to those people being in the wrong), you have to constantly tune that out - and stick to reporting "just the facts" as given by both sides, equally.

      I think it actually provides more in-depth information when you have at least 2 fairly equally-sized news sources that compete directly with each other, and both give you news from their respective reporters' takes on the situations.

      Reducing all the opinions, hunches, and discussion of the "circumstantial evidence" seen along the way to "editorial pages" is today's norm, but I think it's weak.

    26. Re:Screw Balance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word "balanced" does not necessarily imply equal weights.

      Balanced can mean that something is weighed with a balance. So saying something that reporting was balanced would mean that all sides of the argument were presented allowing the balance in the equation (the viewer/listener) to determine which side of the argument held more weight.

      Then again, balanced is also an accounting term, and anyone who's ever balanced their checkbook will know that the end result is almost never zero. In this sense, all the values from both sides of the issue would be added up and one subtracted from the other to determine whether the balance was negative or positive.

    27. Re:Screw Balance. by jdigriz · · Score: 1

      Original research? In history? We can't perform experiments to repeat historical events, they only happened once. We can't build time machines to observe the events directly. We have only the primary documents to go from and a smattering of archaeological evidence. I think you're confusing history with other fields where there are other ways to learn rather than dealing with documents.

  8. This is how the gov't gets away with this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because it's always just a conspiracy theory.

    No need to investigate anything. Nobody has a reason to want this guy dead or anything. And lordy lordy the government would NEVER do anything unethical or illegal.

    1. Re:This is how the gov't gets away with this crap by robertjw · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think if I ever want to get rid of someone I'll do it in a diabolical Batman (the TV Show) villain method. Nobody will believe it.

    2. Re:This is how the gov't gets away with this crap by Dhalka226 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't mind conspiracy theories, but there needs to be something more than allegations, accusations and somebody's suspicion. Unfortunately, most conspiracy theorists tend to simply discount any evidence that goes against the beliefs they entrenched themselves in long before any evidence existed. Their conspiracies only grow as time goes on to encompass anything that doesn't fit in their theory. This means that even if they happen to hit on the truth--and I don't doubt that somewhere in the pantheon of conspiracy theories, there is truth--they lack any credibility to pursue it.

      As an example, even in this thread, there are people saying "wait until the NTSB report comes out" and then obligatory responses about how the government can manipulate whatever answer they want. Bush doesn't want it to come out, Obama doesn't want it to distract from his policies, Rove did it -- so now we have a conspiracy that extends to two administrations, a former administration official, however many people on the state levels would need to be involved in being quiet about vote-rigging, all of an independent government agency's investigators, and god only knows who else. It's getting out of hand already, and its only been a couple days.

      It's not that I think some politicians wouldn't stoop to murder, or even that it might not have happened in this case. But the more people you bring into this conspiracy without anything ever coming out, the more impractical it becomes. It reminds me of a quote from West Wing: "There is no group of people this large in the world that can keep a secret. I find it comforting. It's how I know for sure that the government isn't covering up aliens in New Mexico."

      And as I said, it has already blown to these proportions just days after the accident occurred; without the NTSB having time to do much more than arrive, certainly not to do any serious investigation. Allegations, accusations and somebody's suspicion. That's all it is, and look how vehemently some people believe. That's why it's "always just a conspiracy theory."

    3. Re:This is how the gov't gets away with this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying."

      â"Adolf Hitler , Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X

    4. Re:This is how the gov't gets away with this crap by scalpod · · Score: 0

      Here's the thing about conspiracies... A - They're all totally real. (bullsh*t) B - None of them are real. (equally bullsh*t) C - Some are and some aren't, and we'll never know which are which until long after everyone involved is dead and there's nothing anyone can do about it. Nighty night everyone. Remember, if Santa brings you coal at least you can burn it to keep warm... "Thanks Santie." (SUCKER!)

      --
      If "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" and "it was beauty that killed the beast" then "please stop staring at me".
  9. Occam's Razor by Prysorra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When a mouse in a house full of cats dies, the simpler explanation isn't that he suddenly lost the will to live.

    The Razor is for simplicity. Your need to reaffirm your faith in the humanity of those in power is irrelevant.

    1. Re:Occam's Razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When a mouse in a house full of cats dies, the simpler explanation isn't that he suddenly lost the will to live.

      Occam's Razor would lead to the other conclusion, a man crashing in a plane maybe died by crashing in a plane.

    2. Re:Occam's Razor by DCheesi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which is simpler? One man having an accident, or several, perhaps dozens of people conspiring to fake said accident? Strictly speaking, an accident is still the 'simpler' theory by Occam's definition.

    3. Re:Occam's Razor by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Occam's Razor would lead to the conclusion that the only reason this story was posted to slashdot was to boost ad impressions due to partisan bickering.

    4. Re:Occam's Razor by physicsphairy · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that the Slashdot editors have benefited financially from Mr. Connell's death?

      The pieces of the puzzle are starting to come together!

  10. Hmmm..... by DigitalisAkujin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So if Ohio went for Kerry would we have gotten Obama?

    1. Re:Hmmm..... by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If Ohio went for Kerry, the economy would have gotten blamed on the Democrats.

    2. Re:Hmmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If Florida went for Gore, none of this crap would have happened and the national debt would still be going down as it did under Clinton.

    3. Re:Hmmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Kind of simplistic to assume a Kerry administration would have made the same blunders and mistakes the Bush administration has.

    4. Re:Hmmm..... by PolarBearFire · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, everyone should understand that the POTUS has no real power to change the economy. But at the same time I can think of many things that Bush and all elected officials in power did that contributed to this downturn. The POTUS should have the confidence of the public, in this regard Bush is a total failure. President D Roosevelt is credited with ending the Great Depression but there is great debate whether he actually did. What he did do was be a leader in which Americans trust. Obama is probably going to follow this mold, he's already talking about an extended period of financial downturn. Anyone expecting that Obama is going to turn things around in his first term is probably unrealistic.

    5. Re:Hmmm..... by MaggieL · · Score: 5, Funny

      Like Monica?

      --
      -=Maggie Leber=-
    6. Re:Hmmm..... by Woldry · · Score: 1

      You're right. It would have made very different (though perhaps no less bad) mistakes.

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
    7. Re:Hmmm..... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      The Democrats had exactly the same bad housing/credit policy as the republicans (though for different reasons), so it's pretty safe to assume that the economy would have turned out exactly as it did regardless of who won.

    8. Re:Hmmm..... by DynamiteNeon · · Score: 1

      While they may not have direct power, they set a tone and thru their leadership and appointments have a great deal of control over things. You may not blame the POTUS directly, but the administration they form around themselves is still usually an extension of that mentality.

    9. Re:Hmmm..... by dachshund · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that it wasn't just the President, it was also the Republican party who controlled much of Congress from 1994 to 2006, and had a complete monopoly on government from 2002-2006. These are the people who set regulation, taxation rates, sign trade agreements, etc. They have a lot of economic power.

    10. Re:Hmmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot.

    11. Re:Hmmm..... by LaskoVortex · · Score: 1

      The Democrats had exactly the same bad housing/credit policy

      It appears to me that it is lax *enforcement* of said policy that has created the current situation. Ask yourself how Madoff got away with it for so long. His scheme is but one symptom of the vast disease of systematic corruption in the capital markets. A frozen credit market arises from a breakdown in trust. A recession arises from a breakdown in confidence. These breakdowns accompany the collapse of the integrity of the system. You will probably point fingers at Democrats because of your partisan leaning and others will point a Republicans, but my finger points at those who were in charge of enforcing policy.

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    12. Re:Hmmm..... by pkphilip · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you think Clinton had nothing to do with this mess, please read up on the repeal of the Glass-Steagall act which got the economy into the mess it is in now. Democrats are pretty slick at tiptoeing around this bit of history.

      http://www.progressivehistorians.com/2007/11/bill-clintons-role-in-mortgage-crisis.html

    13. Re:Hmmm..... by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 1

      There's also the commonly overlooked fact that the presidency suggests a budget every year to congress. Congress looks at that one, and they either approve it, or modify it substantially. Saying the president has no power to control the economy is misleading. It's more like the the president has some power to control the economy, if he chooses, and if congress allows him to. That's only natural, since most of the government spending is spent in programs that operate under executive branch, the executive in chief would be the one who would suggest the budget.

      Oh, and as far as I know, nobody really disputes that Roosevelt repaired the U.S. economy through massive spending on infrastructure (roads, bridges, dams, etc.). As far as I know, the only ones who dispute it are conservatives, libertarians and neoliberals, who have obvious reasons to do so since their political ideology is opposed to it.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    14. Re:Hmmm..... by tbannist · · Score: 1

      No thanks, it looks like intellectual monomania to me.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    15. Re:Hmmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      President D Roosevelt is credited with ending the Great Depression but there is great debate whether he actually did.

      Most of that "debate" comes from the same people who have been raping the country for the last eight years.

    16. Re:Hmmm..... by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Um, No? The housing bubble was already occurring near the end of Clinton's term. Maybe had Gore been elected, there wouldn't have been the lending crash, but that's unlikely since none of the solutions would have fixed the problem, they just would have triggered it earlier. Of course, this means the impact would have been less, but considering Gore's hard on for carbon credits and higher taxes, the situation we're in wouldn't really be changed.

    17. Re:Hmmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition, the "all Americans should have a house" policy that reduced credit regulations and requirements (and arguably led to the proliferation of those despicably stupid loans) was passed by none other than Bill Clinton.

    18. Re:Hmmm..... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      No real power? Only via the lack of activity. You are suffering the effects of a long period without adult supervision. It should have been obvious when the reaction to 9/11 was to run away and the slack was picked up by people who knew it wasn't their job but something had to be done.

    19. Re:Hmmm..... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      The policy was lax enforcement.

      The democrats not so gently encouraged the regulators to look the other way so that poorer and minority home buyers could get loans, even if they wouldn't otherwise qualify. The republicans went along, because their banker friends loved it too.

      The credit problems are completely unrelated to how Madoff got away with his scheme. He got away with it because he lied convincingly to the regulators. He had all the i's dotted and t's crossed on his paperwork, so there was no reason to dig any deeper. People who are willing to break the law outright, and are smart about it, will always do massive amounts of damage before they're caught. Regulations or otherwise.

      You don't have to guess where I would "probably" point my finger. In my post I clearly laid the blame on both parties.

  11. Money quote from linked KDKA article: by georgewad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >It was later learned that
    >Ohio Secretary of State
    >Kenneth Blackwell's office
    >had routed Internet traffic
    >from county election offices
    >through out-of-state servers
    >based at SMARTech in
    >Chattanooga, Tenn.
    >SMARTech hosts dozens of GOP Web domains.

    I can't see any positive way to spin this.

    --
    Karma: It's not just a good idea. It's the law.
    1. Re:Money quote from linked KDKA article: by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can't see any positive way to spin this.

      "In his grave," seems to be working well enough for the administration.

      Helluva retirement plan.

      -FL

    2. Re:Money quote from linked KDKA article: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Money quote from linked KDKA article: by E++99 · · Score: 1

      Er... how about "The Ohio State Department uses SMARTTech web services to provide secure and efficient voter statistics."

    4. Re:Money quote from linked KDKA article: by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1


      >Kenneth Blackwell's office
      >had routed Internet traffic
      >from county election offices
      >through out-of-state servers
      >based at SMARTech in
      >Chattanooga, Tenn.
      >SMARTech hosts dozens of GOP Web domains.

      I can't see any positive way to spin this.

      We're talking about the same Ohio that voted for Obama, right?

    5. Re:Money quote from linked KDKA article: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't remember Obama being on the ballot in Ohio in 2000 and 2004...

    6. Re:Money quote from linked KDKA article: by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      >It was later learned that
      >Ohio Secretary of State
      >Kenneth Blackwell's office
      >had routed Internet traffic
      >from county election offices
      >through out-of-state servers
      >based at SMARTech in
      >Chattanooga, Tenn.
      >SMARTech hosts dozens of GOP Web domains.

      I can't see any positive way to spin this.

      How about this?

      >It was later learned that
      >Ohio Secretary of State
      >Kenneth Blackwell's office
      >had routed Internet traffic
      >from county election offices
      >through out-of-state servers
      >based at SMARTech in
      >Chattanooga, Tenn.
      >SMARTech hosts dozens of GOP Web domains.
      > Burma Shave

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  12. Condolences by slapout · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Condolences to his family and friends. No matter what you think of someone's politics, its always sad when someone dies.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    1. Re:Condolences by sedmonds · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While I'm sure it's sad for his family, it's NOT always sad when someone dies. People who exploit the public and abuse its institutions, whatever their politics, are not owed sympathy or some rose-tinted remembrance. I'm not saying whether this particular person did or didn't, this is a general statement.

    2. Re:Condolences by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Hitl-- oh wait, Godwin.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    3. Re:Condolences by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You do realize that it is but two small steps from being glad that someone has died, to actively wishing others just like him dead, then seeking to actually make that happen...

      ...right?

      The guy had his ideology, you have yours, I have mine - they are all faulty and they are all wrong in the balance of things. Neither one is a reason to wish or be glad that a human being died.

      (...and seriously: "exploit the public"? "abuse its institutions"? Every frickin' politician on the planet does that... what makes him any different?)

      /P

      (bring on the troll mods, I know they're coming).

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    4. Re:Condolences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You do realize that it is but two small steps from being glad that someone has died, to actively wishing others just like him dead, then seeking to actually make that happen...

      Not being sad doesn't mean one is glad, indifference is much likelier. Or do you personally feel sadness for every death that happens somewhere on the planet?

    5. Re:Condolences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind"

      John Donne

    6. Re:Condolences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's NOT always sad when someone dies.

      You do realize that it is but two small steps from being glad that someone has died

      Just because you're not sad that someone died, doesn't exactly mean you're throwing a party to celebrate their demise. We don't exactly flip over our happy/sad bit. I for one am quite indifferent to this whole thing and couldn't care less.

      to actively wishing others just like him dead, then seeking to actually make that happen...

      In that same line of thinking, it's only 2 steps away from disliking a person, to serving his liver with a nice chianti.

      bring on the troll mods

      Your first sentence alone deserves it

    7. Re:Condolences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That explains why I don't know who the hell that is. He must've been diminished to nothing pretty quickly.

    8. Re:Condolences by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      I worked with Mike Connell for a year or so in the mid-1990s (before most of his work with the national GOP). He was not an angel. He was a flawed human being as all of us are. But his children (very little then, now in their teens) ADORED him. I can personally attest to this. He leaves them behind. He started and ran a medical mission to El Salvador. He leaves this behind as well. It is sad, regardless of what whatever flaws he may have had. The death of any human being always is. I do hope that the truth behind all of this comes out. I suspect it is not pretty. But first and foremost, I feel terrible for his family. They will remain in my thoughts and prayers for a long time.

  13. Unpossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly anyone who questions this is a CONSPIRACY NUT. No one could ever pull off a murder and get away with it like that. The CIA and the FBI are far too good.

    1. Re:Unpossible! by MRe_nl · · Score: 3, Funny

      "WOIO correspondent Blake Chenault also reported that twice in the past two months Connell, who was an experienced pilot, canceled flights because of suspicious problems with his plane."

      "The CIA and the FBI are far too good."

      Three shots, one kill.

      Amatures ;-).

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    2. Re:Unpossible! by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      Read his Sourcewatch article and think about his ties with the DCI group.

      Here is another one.

      I didn't see Mike a lot in the past year as everyone just hunkered down on the roles for the McCain campaign. Mike did take time out of his day to give me a call when in the summer I was a little worried about what was going to happen post election. Win or as we did, lose, everything was coming to the end and I had so many other pressures at the time that I was ready to pack it in. Mike got on the phone and with his reassuring voice told me everything would be OK and it was hard not to believe him.

      They also have a donation website ready for his family.

    3. Re:Unpossible! by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering what the 'suspicious problems' could be? There's a difference between a wing pin being removed and all the fuel from a tank being drained.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  14. Re:Bah.. it was the weather by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    **sarcasm** No no no nOoooo. It was Global WARMING! Take that you evil republicans! **sarcasm**

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  15. Re:Bah.. it was the weather by epedersen · · Score: 1

    It has to be caused by all this global warming.

  16. Newest Ninjalistics news story pertains to this by Allen+Varney · · Score: 5, Funny

    The newest article posted on Ninjalistics (your leading supplier of ISO 9000-compliant corporate espionage and assassination services) is, "Six additional political operatives die in separate accidents unrelated to Karl Rove."

    1. Re:Newest Ninjalistics news story pertains to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the county coroner's report, Leick-Speithall suffocated after she accidentally wedged a 160GB external hard drive deep in her throat.

      You were wondering what to do with all those old hard drives...

    2. Re:Newest Ninjalistics news story pertains to this by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      Damn that's a good read. :) reminds me of hinckley, you know the guy that shot reagan and got bush senior in the white house, funny how everyone says they're a "Reagan" republican nowadays.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    3. Re:Newest Ninjalistics news story pertains to this by jackbird · · Score: 1
      and got bush senior in the white house

      Say what now?

    4. Re:Newest Ninjalistics news story pertains to this by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      looks like google's playing along...

      http://www.google.com/search?q=Leick-Speithall

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    5. Re:Newest Ninjalistics news story pertains to this by raddan · · Score: 1

      Apparently Slashdot mods fail the gullibility test.

    6. Re:Newest Ninjalistics news story pertains to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is full of idiots. This is not "interesting" - it's "funny". Nainjalistics is obviously satire.

      Pull your heads out of your collective ass.

    7. Re:Newest Ninjalistics news story pertains to this by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      crap, never mind I'm a dope. not enough sleep I guess

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    8. Re:Newest Ninjalistics news story pertains to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should be +5 funny or -5 troll right? None of those people exist.

    9. Re:Newest Ninjalistics news story pertains to this by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      ...so in the same vein I'm sure you guys are all over the SIXTY people alleged to have died because of their association with the Clintons, right? I mean, that's TEN TIMES your puny '6'.

      http://www.clintonmemoriallibrary.com/clintbodycnt.html

      In point of fact, they are BOTH wingnut political tinfoil hattery. But hey, don't let me interrupt.

      --
      -Styopa
  17. Gee ... by donnacha · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... I hope no worthwhile human beings died in the crash.

  18. Re:There's a shock. by eln · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Seriously, wtf is up with this write-up? This story barely qualifies as Slashdot material (apparently if you work in IT, your death is now Slashdot-worthy). On top of that, kdawson uses it as an incredibly flimsy pretext to slam the mainstream media for no apparent reason. Christ man, this discussion is already destined to devolve into the same old political flamewar 90% of every other discussion around here ends up in without you trying to actively stoke the fires by taking the opportunity to slam the "left wing media".

    I know kdawson loves conspiracy theories, so I'll give him my conspiracy theory: kdawson only has a job because Slashdot needs the tax breaks they get for hiring mentally challenged people. This would also explain samzenpus.

  19. Disappointing title by elashish14 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was cheering so hard when I saw "Karl Rove" and "Dies" - then the words in between just ruined my Christmas.

    --
    I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
  20. Oh, it's just typical kdawson by ChePibe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Conspiracy theory angle? Check.
    Coming from the crazy wing of the left? Check. (Why can't we have more crazy wing of the right stories on Slashdot? Where are all the stories concerning the gold standard? Where?)
    Write-up worded in a way to encourage crazy conspiracy talk? Check.

    Good ol' kdawson. So dependable.

    1. Re:Oh, it's just typical kdawson by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      Why can't we have more crazy wing of the right stories on Slashdot?

      Because you already have Fark.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
  21. Re:I'll be happy to pay back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why? I would guess that you do it now. Besides, ppl are not slandering Connel. They are slandering Rove.

  22. Assumptions. by Prysorra · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One man having an accident, or several, perhaps dozens of people conspiring to fake said accident?

    False dichotomy.

    What is it with people and the assumption that sabotage requires an elaborate chess game complete with blueprints, secret agents, wiretapping, and van full of CIA listening equipment?

    It takes one man with a fucking match to burn down a house.

    It takes only one mechanic with a desperate need to pay his family's medical bills to snip an important wire.

    1. Re:Assumptions. by Faluzeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "t takes one man with a fucking match to burn down a house.

      It takes only one mechanic with a desperate need to pay his family's medical bills to snip an important wire."

      Hmmm

      And how many people does it take to find the mechanic?

    2. Re:Assumptions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Could the man with the match not do that after setting his fire?

      God, what is with people and unnecessary overhead.

    3. Re:Assumptions. by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      Really when it comes down to it, i'd say the set of possible accidents has a greater probability of one of them occuring than the set of possible conspiracies. Many accidents can be single instance probabilities where any conspiracy would have to involve compounded probabilities to actually BE a conspiracy (IE the [minimum two] conspiring parties have to pull off their own ends for the whole of the conspiracy to be considered successful). In the end this is meaningless though as for all the probability in the world of it being an accident, it is still a non-zero probability of not being an accident, as I certainly cant imagine a world where the unlikely NEVER happens and until we know which is technically a 1 we can not call it fact.

      Just thinking in terms of orders of magnitude, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be looked into.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    4. Re:Assumptions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why?

      If you're a well known public figure who stands to benefit from someone's death, in order for there to be "one man", you'll have to personally do the killing. You could pay someone else to do it, but in doing so you just created someone with worse dirt on you than the other guy had in the first place. Are you going to keep a mass grave in your backyard?

      If it even was intentional, just as likely as some sophisticated neoconservative saboteur, is that some over-the-top leftwinger decided to kill the guy just because he knew Rove, or maybe to try and bring him down in the ensuing scandal.

      Or maybe the mechanic just sucked. Paranoia is fine, but you need to be paranoid enough to be paranoid about your own paranoia. Try to wrap your mind around that...

    5. Re:Assumptions. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And how many people does it take to find the mechanic?

      Depends how big your HR department is when hiring secret agents.

      Secret agents exist. We know this. It's not a theory. It's a career path.

      Their job is to conspire and execute conspiracies.

      And another of their jobs, incidentally, is to perform psyops on the public. --To make people believe convenient things. Things like, "Occam can be used to justify ignorance, despite the fact that he was a 13th century monk who invented his razor to prove the existence of God." And, "People who think about conspiracy theories must be excluded from society and punished with ridicule."

      Stuff like that. Only retards and suckers don't grasp this basic notion, which is pretty much everybody.

      If you find this hard to understand, then you are a retard or a sucker. I'm not trying to be mean. I'm pointing out the obvious which has been hidden through a clever manipulation of your herd-instincts. Psyops 101. People need to engage that shiny and modern, neo-cortex and stop acting like dumb apes.

      -FL

    6. Re:Assumptions. by tsotha · · Score: 1

      It takes one man with a fucking match to burn down a house.

      Oh, that's true. Problem is, someone has to approach that man to convince him to do the deed. And when a house burns down there's an arson investigation, so there's probably three or four other people that have to be paid off or silenced. Someone is going to have to contact them to pay them off, which means family, friends, and coworkers now have potentially incriminating evidence. And so on.

      Then there's always the possibility someone with knowledge of the plot is gonna get busted for offing his ex. A few days later his lawyer goes to the prosecutor and says "my client has some information for you in exchange for leniency..."

      The government can't keep top secret CIA operations out of the NYT. It's not impossible this wasn't an accident, but in the absence of actual evidence to the contrary I'm prepared to believe the FAA report.

    7. Re:Assumptions. by SupremoMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not quite sure what you said, but I like it!

    8. Re:Assumptions. by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Oh it's not nearly as complicated as that, after you got your sucker to do the deed, you fake his suicide and leave a note about how guilt stricken he is over his carelessness that caused the accident. If you do it right, no one will ever know it has anything but negligence.

      You never actually pay the chump, that would leave tracks.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    9. Re:Assumptions. by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Ah, but snipping the wire so that the plane crashed not when he took off or soon after but when he was on a return heading would be a bit more difficult. Not to mention the fact that if he had refused to fly his plane twice before because of possible tampering what sort of idiot would then chance flying AT NIGHT alone? Seriously, if he was giving credence to the threats earlier, it would have been much smarter to just keep his head down and wait out the trial to go flying again.

  23. ..early media coverage comes from the left... by net_shaman · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The author is obviously another right-wing nut who believes that the mainstream media has a "liberal" bias.
    Oh and the evil little sh*t who crashed his plane helped many Republicans break Federal record keeping laws. That's a fact.
    It's also probably the tip of the iceburg, wait a few years till the investigations get rolling and more Bush-Cheney crimes come to light.

    Haven't you all seen Bush tell a reporter why he doesn't use email; "..it might be used in an investigation.."

    I'm sure he was an indispensable TOOL for the Fascists who now run the Republican Party.

    No decent American would morn his death.

    1. Re:..early media coverage comes from the left... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      No decent American would morn his death.
      I'm certain his family will mourn his loss.

  24. Re:Balance? How about just some Objectivity by uniquename72 · · Score: 1

    Dramatic exits aren't necessary. If you're unhappy, just go. Not only are there 1000 other sites that might interest you, but the barrier to creating your own site that will please you more is very, very low.

    Also, if these types of stories aren't to your liking but others here are, it takes marginal intelligence to disregard them BEFORE clicking.

  25. Why Is This Front Page News by techsoldaten · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dunno why this made it on the front page of Slashdot.

    First off, it's old news. Mike Connell died a few days ago, at least someone could have reported it in a timely manner.

    Secondly, there's really only two reasons people take much of an interest in Mike Connell. The first is that he developed technology for use in politics. Second is the whole 2004 mess, where he has been accused of voter fraud in Ohio (and allegedly in Florida).

    Too much importance is given to Mike Connell and his 'role' in various things. He was a web designer, he ran a technology company, just like me and a lot of people who read Slashdot. The fact that he worked in politics is just another detail about his life (his relationship with teh turdblossom aside). He was also a board member of the American Association of Political Consultants. While listening to him speak could be entertaining, his ideas about ways to use the Internet never really struck me as anything new that hadn't already been done better by someone else.

    It just makes me sad that people want to remember him for all these 'scandals' and that his notability is based on innunendo and rumor instead of the actual accomplishments in his life. I mean, I am a Dem and have no love for the man, but it is just rotten to think this is how people choose to remember him. Reducing him to a rumor of some wrongdoing and despising him over his dealings is just another way of dehumanizing the man, and people should be above that.

    M

    1. Re:Why Is This Front Page News by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      First off, it's old news. Mike Connell died a few days ago...

      Seriously? The man probably isn't in the rgound yet and his death is "old news"?

    2. Re:Why Is This Front Page News by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      It sounds more like forced suicide, Sourcewatch:

      We have been confidentially informed by a source we believe to be credible that Karl Rove has threatened Michael Connell, a principal witness we have identified in our King Lincoln case in federal court in Columbus, Ohio, that if he does not agree to "take the fall" for election fraud in Ohio, his wife Heather will be prosecuted for supposed lobby law violations

    3. Re:Why Is This Front Page News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: Wah! Wah! John McCain didn't get elected! It's not fair! Wah!

      When people are murdered by the Bush crime family, it matters, no matter how much you want to kiss their asses.

    4. Re:Why Is This Front Page News by mshomphe · · Score: 1

      Dunno why this made it on the front page of Slashdot. First off, it's old news.

      Hi, you must be new here. Welcome to Slashdot: Today's News Sometime Next Week.

      --
      She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
    5. Re:Why Is This Front Page News by db32 · · Score: 1

      As callous as it sounds...sucks to be him.

      Seriously...innuendo and rumor or not was associated with some very dirty characters and events. That is the legacy he chose to leave behind. If a Burger King owner can tell some obnoxious kids "Get out, we will not serve you here." Then this guy could have done the same. Look at McCain...that poor bastard sold out and traded every shred of integrity he had to Karl Rove during his bid for the White House. The depressing part is you could even see it towards the end. This is a man that refused preferential treatment in a POW camp due to his father's rank reduced to defending Obama on the campaign trail from his psychofuck running mate's lynch mobs. Love or hate his policy and politics he genuinely seemed distraught about the later turns of events. Now look at the legacy he will be leaving behind for cozying up to that freakshow crew.

      The simple answer here is don't associate with those kinds of people if you don't want to wind up with a shitty reputation (and possibly an accidental death). I don't know that I buy off on all the initial speculation...but something does smell pretty rotten. Accidental deaths happen all the time...but accidental deaths of people slated to testify against very powerful people are much less frequently. If it was an accident then a deep investigation would reveal that and shouldn't meet any resistance. If it was an "accident" then a deep investigation would help bring those responsible to justice. So...suspicious death...two very good reasons to proceed with a deep investigation. I suspect this will all go away quietly with no real investigation, which in itself makes it more suspicious.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    6. Re:Why Is This Front Page News by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      Dude, I got emails about it over the weekend. I don't know what the disposition of his corpse is, but there are a lot of people who were talking about this long before it hit Slashdot.

      M

    7. Re:Why Is This Front Page News by Tomy · · Score: 1

      Karl, is that you?

    8. Re:Why Is This Front Page News by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      Mortality is a fact of life. I never understand why people are so ready to assign extradorinary motives to events in the absence of any facts to support their conclusions. I mean, think about it: if this was your neighbor and he died the same way, how ready would you be to say he offed himself or was knocked off by his enemies?

      You probably would not. What people don't realize, when they are engaging in this kind of speculation, is they are participating in a public disinformation campaign, sometimes coming from the ground up but often coordinated by PR and media strategy firms in support of various political agendas. I work in online politics and deal with such firms on a regular basis. By spreading the word around, you are tacitly participating in that agenda as well as being exploited for your lack of information on the subject.

      When Vince Foster died, there was a lot of speculation on conservative talk radio that the Clintons 'ordered a hit'. Those were the words being used, and I heard them make their way up to major media outlets again and again. I was working at Department of Commerce when it happened, and no one who knew him thought this was some nefarious deed or felt anything but sorrow for him and his family. The amount of speculation and criticism of what happened, as well as the never ending barrage of accusations that still are whispered at various events, makes me sick. Seeing people's misfortune kicked around like a soccer ball by people who have no clue what really happened but are ready to believe whatever their favorite blog / newspaper / 24 hour cable news channel / crazy uncle says is the only thing sadder.

      The point of these ad-hominem, post-mortem attacks is not to discover the truth nor do they seek to establish a more well-informed public. They are designed to criminalize the other side in the minds of the people and create an atmosphere of distrust that obscures facts and distracts from real issues that people could be doing something about. A high-profile death is like a snow day in high school, it's a break from the regular news cycle and an opportunity to reinvent the national dialogue.

      If you have any interest in good government, vote, get involved in civic organizations, volunteer for a worthwhile cause, find something constructive to do besides picking some poor guy's bones clean for the sake of someone else's political agenda. I mean, maybe Mike Connell did rig an election. Maybe he was Rove's homonoculous and wasted no time worrying about the law when he was ripping apart his political opponents. There are people who know the real story there, and the truth does have a funny way of coming out. But dead is dead, and Connell was a human being and a Catholic who probably deserves more than to be reduced to a talking point. Saying he was murdered or committed suicide in the absence of any facts is irresponsible speculation at best, and you probably would not be thinking this way of him were it not for his political connections.

      Give the dead the same respect you would want, you'll be there too someday.

      M

    9. Re:Why Is This Front Page News by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      See my point above in response.

      Guilt by association is not the point. Talking about 'the smell' of things and spreading rumors as if they were facts is.

      M

    10. Re:Why Is This Front Page News by db32 · · Score: 1

      If you have any interest in good government, vote

      Funny you should mention that...that is exactly why he was being called to testify... Undermining the voting system. I'm not going to sit here and speculate, but it is most certainly not part of a disinformation campaign to say that this was suspicious. Twice he says he cancelled flights due to suspected tampering with his plane. He reported threats from Karl Rove. He gets called to testify. He dies. Maybe it was an accident, but treating it as a brush off "oh well it was just an accident" is stupid at best. It should be investigated deeply. If none of these other events were happening and he died in a crash it would be a different story.

      You see...the things he was accused of being involved in should actually qualify as treason. Treason carries some pretty stiff penalties. So, I'm not going to sit here and say he was guilty by association. What I will say is that when you hang out with bad people you are much more likely to have bad things happen to you. Please...find me an example of a nun who was killed by her drug dealer when the deal went bad.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    11. Re:Why Is This Front Page News by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      1. He was a key witness against Rove. If he was murdered or forced into suicide then his family and the public has the right to know. Mainstream news media reported he has been warned in advance.

      2. What I do know first hand are his business partners and their business pratices. He worked in the field of the most dirty and slanderous public affairs and was no "computer guru" or simple website editor. (*)

      3. The US-Republican party needs to learn decent campaigning and leave slander to the liberals. I think it is a matter of 'reason of state' to get rid off these persons. If he committed suicide that would certainly help to restore his honour.

      Do I believe in conspiracy theories? -- No.
      Do I think he has been murdered?

      Well, you know, it is like you find Al Capone in his blood below a skyscraper. He slipped on the 44th floor, a banana ...

      (*) This is why additionally your moral argument is wrong. These guys introduced new methods of slanderous communication to the political arena. His creator won't like his "catholic" methods.

      And I do know what 'catholics' and these rogue campaigners did to my friends and me. I cannot get my life restored and no one will get me compensation for what was done to me but a cold vendetta is helpful to restore justice. If I were dictator of the US I would obliterate all of them.

    12. Re:Why Is This Front Page News by LSanchez · · Score: 1

      First off, it's old news. Mike Connell died a few days ago, at least someone could have reported it in a timely manner.

      You must be new here.

  26. Re:Occam's Razor Why am i suddenly thinking: by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    The plane carrying Ron Brown a mountain intersecting....?

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  27. I now believe political murder is real in America by TechForensics · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I now believe that assassination is a frequent political tool in America. I thought for years that Castro ordered the death of JFK until I saw the video (possibly now on YouTube) of the film interview with Lyndon Johnson's mistress. I now believe Kennedy was killed by the Rockefellers and Lyndon Johnson. There is much more in the interview, which everyone should see. For some reason it is not being talked about-- probably because years of crackpot "conspiracy theorists" have made even supportable theories about conspiracy suspect.

    What Lyndon's mistress has to say is jaw-dropping and highly credible. Of course, for interested parties to deny or combat it would be to promote it, so that's not happening.

    This interview gives a picture of American politics I never believed until I heard this straightforward, plain-talking woman. Political murder CAN happen and DOES happen-- often-- in the US. Now I am deeply questioning the official stories about Vince Foster, JFK, and now Mike Connell. Does anyone believe Karl Rove would not stoop to murder? The movie Bush's Brain makes it clear his ruining of opponents caused one or more suicides, yet in threatening to prosecute Connell's wife (for illegal lobbying !!!!!!!!!) (and as much as admitting he can give or withhold presidential pardons) he shows his tactics haven't changed a bit. I now believe Scooter Libby was persuaded to "take the fall" by threats of being ruined and by promises of a pardon if he bit the bullet.

    We, the American people, have to wonder about the inadequacies of our political system (or the easy-to-abuse mighty power of the Presidency) that allow these corruptions to happen. I believe that Rove and Cheney are despicable murderers. This "accident" with Connell just proves it. This is what happens when you aren't a good boy like Scooter Libby.

    America, we need to look at the issue of political murder and the frequency of its use for advantage.

    --
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
  28. Letting the useless ones go free by macraig · · Score: 1

    Figures: the guy who actually KNOWS and can DO stuff gets his ticket punched, and the one who knows NOTHING except how to expertly manipulate people gets a pass.

    Atavism: 1
    Evolution: 0

  29. Not a chance in hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone who says this is NOT a conspiracy needs their heads examined.

    1. Re:Not a chance in hell by idiotnot · · Score: 1

      Zaphod?

      (For those of you who didn't pay attention in English class, look at the sentence again.....)

    2. Re:Not a chance in hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For lack of tin-foil hats, of course.

    3. Re:Not a chance in hell by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      The kind of psychology that urges a person to dismiss the potential for conspiracy...

      is the same kind that urges people to bow to authority.

      Please, learn more about the mindset and be better prepared to combat it.

  30. Wow, if they keep bumping off their IT guys... by s_p_oneil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They're going to have a hard time finding replacements. I don't think I'd want to work in that capacity for the Republican party (just in case).

    1. Re:Wow, if they keep bumping off their IT guys... by PPH · · Score: 3, Insightful
      1. Keep a copy of the backups posted somewhere on line.
      2. Arrange it so that, if you don't reset a process every so often, the location of said backups will be forwarded to the media.
      3. ????
      4. Profit!! (Or at least, survive.)
      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Wow, if they keep bumping off their IT guys... by s_p_oneil · · Score: 2, Funny

      Somehow I don't think that would work. Although it does make me think of that Simpsons episode where Homer became the union leader.

      Homer: What's the job pay?
      Carl: Nothing.
      Homer: D'oh!
      Carl: Unless you're crooked.
      Homer: Woohoo!

    3. Re:Wow, if they keep bumping off their IT guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scenario: I have a job involving administering e-mail servers for the GOP or similar. I know that at any time, I may be killed [suspicious death] or imprisoned [kilo of cocaine found in my lunchbox] for being the guy who could comply with a court order to retrieve all archived e-mail.

      Let's also assume that management at my organization are technologically unaware PHBs. They barely use computers, let alone would know that large amounts of data are being transferred out to the Internet every night.

      - Inform the folks at Wikileaks of the situation.

      - Use a cron job or Automated Task to send nightly copies of the day's archived e-mail to a hosting provider located overseas and paid for a year at a time with a single-use credit card number.

      - Create a shell script to move all those files to ~/public_html. Create a cron job on the hosting provider to run this monthly.

      - The day before a scheduled cron job, log in and move the cron job's date two days back. Two days later, log back in and move it two days forward. This way, the script never actually gets run.

      - Should you ever fail to adjust the cron job, you know what happens. Your script also fires off an e-mail to your friends at Wikileaks, asking them to move your archives to their servers. The Streisand Effect kicks in, and your work is done. Since you paid for your hosting a year in advance, Wikileaks and the Streisand Effect have more than enough time to do their work before the hosting provider kills off your account for nonpayment.

    4. Re:Wow, if they keep bumping off their IT guys... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Sure.... but where do you post that stuff, so nobody ever notices it's there before they're supposed to find out about it?

      What do you do when someone else audits bandwidth usage and wonders why all the nightly backup data is getting uploaded to some remote site? (Or conversely, do you get to take all that backup data out each night to post it from another location, without anyone ever noticing or caring that the media leaves with you all the time?)

      All these things sound good on paper, but there's a good chance it's not feasible.

    5. Re:Wow, if they keep bumping off their IT guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole point of the cron job is to keep it out of the public realm until the script runs, copying it into public_html--or for that matter, just appropriately chmod'ing public_html.

      I used to be a K-12 sysadmin. I had four daily tapes for Monday-Thursday plus two Friday tapes for even and odd Fridays. The Friday tapes went home with me, and I'd take whichever Friday tape I needed to work with me on Fridays.

      Why did I take the tapes home? Students and janitors with sticky fingers. No official means of offsite storage. Finding out that the bookkeeper left the vault open all weekend.

      I had three principals over four years, and since they were still trying to wrap their brains around the difference between single- and double-clicking, they surely didn't see me taking tapes home.

      So yeah--most PHBs won't even know you're keeping the Friday tapes at home, let alone know what tape backup is.

  31. Re:right wing wannabe scientists by king-hobo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Fuck you right wing wannabe scientists.

    true fact: only the left has scientists now

  32. Only One by Prysorra · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Karl Rove. Come on, give the guy some credit.

    The guy ran oppo for the Republican party. They guy know who to talk to, and how to get information. He has is own databases of personal information on people - check his website and his own polling data.

    He is fully capable of doing his own leg work with his own resources.

    If *I* know what I would need to do to get the info needed to manipulate only one guy, Karl Rove better know, or the Republican party is overpaying him!

  33. Nothing to see... Move along... by Plekto · · Score: 3, Informative

    The most obvious thing that points to it being a "convenient accident" is that the guy himself was afraid for his life and his lawyer was trying to get him into witness protection at the time.

    Sad but true. It's unfortunately all too easy to make bad things happen with aircraft, cars, and other potentially dangerous machinery(WHY he was even flying in the first place...) Selling your soul and playing with fire... well, these sorts of things do happen. I'd feel sorry for him, but I think he should have known what was going to likely happen to him when he started down this path back then.

    1. Re:Nothing to see... Move along... by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Darwinism at it's finest.

      If you are afraid for your life then don't fly a plane that could be easily sabotaged.

      I guess he wasn't that bright at all. Probably why he agreed to set up an illicit domain server as well.

      Choose your henchmen well, but not well enough that they will someday over throw you!

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    2. Re:Nothing to see... Move along... by E++99 · · Score: 1

      The most obvious thing that points to it being a "convenient accident" is that the guy himself was afraid for his life and his lawyer was trying to get him into witness protection at the time.

      According to WHO (and people selling conspiracy theory books don't count)? If you're going to off a guy who knows to much about some case, don't you think you'd maybe do it BEFORE his deposition??

    3. Re:Nothing to see... Move along... by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Because, even as far back as when I worked with him (10+ years ago) he had significant clients in both DC and the Cleveland/Akron area, and thus spent a ridiculous amount of time traveling between the two.

  34. left-view reporting does not imply unbalanced by bugi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just because lefties think [asinine action of the week] is a righty conspiracy doesn't imply that it's not a conspiracy. And vice versa.

    Just because righties deny that [convenient coincidence of the week] is a conspiracy doesn't imply that it is a conspiracy. And vice versa.

    And vice versa.

    Applying critical thought to what each side says is not unbalanced reporting. Reporters, in general, are in a much better position to connect the dots than is the general public.

    Not giving the other side a chance to rebut, on the other hand, is unbalanced reporting. However, the rebuttal does not have to be in the same article. Ideally, there would be N+1 articles, one for each side and one where critical thought is applied.

    1. Re:left-view reporting does not imply unbalanced by marvinglenn · · Score: 1

      Reporters, in general, are in a much better position to connect the dots than is the general public.

      Too bad there are so few REAL reporters. I get my news by combining feeds from different commentators.

      --
      The whores get mad when the sluts give it away for free.
  35. Nope, contrast this w/ conspiracy nuts by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying there is a conspiracy; I don't know, and, at this point, I can't know. I will just say this: if I wanted to kill someone, and the conditions applied, that's what I would use.
    There is plausible deniability. Small airplanes have a long history of being dangerous to the right people. It just takes a minor tweak in the right place to achieve catastrophic results. Small planes also have a tendency to remain stored in dark, very quiet places for extended periods of time. The only hard part is getting access, but you have all the time you want once you're in, and all the time to come up with a good reason for being there.
    It's also more or less guaranteed to result in death if it goes off as planned. No whiny paralyzed burnt victim making a scene about you wanting to get rid of them on 60 Minutes. And AFAIK no black box on small planes. In fact, judging by Steve Fossett's crash site report, there's a fairly good chance that there's not much left to go CSI on.
    So I don't know if he was assassinated, but if someone wanted to get him done, that's how they would have done it.
    Now let's compare this with 9/11 nutjobs. Ok so zionist republican muslim illuminatis placed tons of explosives in the WTC so that it would go down when two large planes loaded with kerosen would hit them. And thousands of people lie when they say a plane crashed in the Pentagon. Also, even though the plan required a dozen thousand people to keep quiet about it, they managed to keep the details super seecrit, and all the structural engineers who vetted the official version are obviously in on the plot. Also Bush reading my pet goat ... nah I've got nothing on this one.

    Same thing, right?

  36. No power? by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1, Troll

    The few trillions Bush funnelled to his friends at Halliburton and Blackwater, that's gotta have some power, doesn't it?

  37. old news guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    old news, I'm pretty sure I saw this last week.

  38. Godwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its always sad when someone dies.

    Was it sad when Hitler died?

  39. Re:Balance? How about just some Objectivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah they are. I'm stating my reasons for leaving. I respect what slashdot was, with REAL debate. Now? Slashkos and GNAA. It's Taco's site and he can say what he wants. But if he's going to let this place become a circus, that's what he's going to end up with.

  40. Re:No power? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    The executive branch can't spend money. That's congress' job. Which was the point of the comment you responded to.

  41. Your dinner date with bankers by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know of at least 3 bankers who have committed suicide recently, mostly from those banks whose funds have tanked.

    I know a frequent mantra on Slashdot is, "Correlation does not mean causality." But, being that a butt-load of bankers are getting off free for the mess that they have created, and that they are now collecting millions in bonuses from taxpayer money, you might have a needed talent. Can I ask you a favor?

    Can you please get to know more bankers?

    On the serious side, Credit Suisse announced that their bonuses would be paid out in . . . toxic securities.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Your dinner date with bankers by Elektroschock · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Capital is not tied to persons. After the great depression the nazi party came to power and they punished the jews in a scapegoat manner. I hope no new political movement will hunt down bankers... Capital by definition has nothing to do with people or nations or moral. Interestingly the communist intellectuals always understood that, but not the communist pratictioners who found it rather useful to slay the "capitalists". Your bank is not responsible for selling you a toxic bond if the rating was AAA. It acted in a rational way as you did when you invested in these bonds. The reasons are systemic failure. I guess the US is the only nation where the public still overstresses the personality aspect of capital with the CEOs as high priests (where is Steve Jobs gone btw.?) It is a myth. The economy is like in a cybernetic system. It is not a matter of moral to invest in Exxon or Microsoft as long as these companies generate sufficient profit, real profit or stock market gain.

      As a result of the crisis I think the US will adopt Ainternational accounting standards (IAS) which are more conservative than US-GAAP.

  42. cut the conspiracy theory nonsense by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    This was definitely an accident. You see, Connell was involved in Rove's secret plot to cut the underwater cables in the Mediterranean, and was flying out to intercept the repair crew when he crashed.

  43. Take a look at Democracy now Dec 22nd Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.democracynow.org/shows/2008/12/22

  44. Obligatory Star Trek reference. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    If Ohio went for Kerry, the economy would have gotten blamed on the Democrats.

    Yup. The government has little knowledge of the big-stage events. They just jump when told.

    But "Brand Democrat" doesn't fit with the popular understanding of economic failure, which is why the Bush crew was summoned to office.

    While McCain would have been a total and complete disaster, the Obama presidency actually has me more stressed out. It's like those spooky and upsetting episodes of TNG where Lor showed up and started hurting people while pretending to be Data.

    -FL

  45. anyone else read this and think don't work for GOP by Dan667 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tinfoil hat and all, it seems like too big a coincidence. Seems like there is other work out there no matter what the GOP is paying, and most importantly most people do not like being dead.

  46. Re:There's a shock. by Bourbonium · · Score: 1

    RTF Summary. KDawson was only one of a dozen or more slashdotters who submitted the story. I've submitted stories before that never ended up on /. and some that ended up being submitted by others with different summaries. I was also surprised that it took this long for the story to show up on /. since it was on the digg front page yesterday and lots of other blogs before then.

  47. Reality is not balanced by LKM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Among the milder pieces (although it could not be called balanced)

    Balanced reporting is bullshit, because reality is not balanced. For example, the fact that some people think the earth is 6000 years old doesn't imply that the media has to mention this every time they report on some archeological dig. The mere fact that an opinion exists doesn't mean that it's worth reporting.

  48. Forgot the CantonRep article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.cantonrep.com/communities/hartville/x1369587945/Pilot-dies-in-Lake-Township-crash

  49. kdawson rocks. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    kdawson posted this story.


    Isn't that shocking.

    kdawson is reliable in his ways. And so are the denialists. (Denialists? Hmm. I'm still trying to come up with a proper term for people who hate so much the idea that corruption might exist that they warp their minds with so much denial that insanity in the world actually looks sane to them. Ostriches? Idiots? I don't know. I'll post something when I work it out.)

    Anyway, we need them, too! What would Slashdot be without the self-deceiving children of emotionally repressed fathers to provide the low benchmarks on the sanity spectrum?

    Flat, that's what! --We need sociopaths and retards around here to provide a grim reminder of the dangers of interrupted development in the frontal lobe. Hug your kids today or face nuclear annihilation forty years down the road!

    -FL

    Is it a "W" or an "M"?

  50. Why haven't we banned these things yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least he didn't kill anyone on the ground. It seems these small planes are crashing left and right anymore. Most of them are ancient and probably not properly maintained. There's pollution and noise concerns too. This is probably a good time to start discouraging small airplanes or banning them outright.

    1. Re:Why haven't we banned these things yet? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      I'll back you on this when they ban big SUVs that never carry more than a 90 pound woman and a couple sacks of groceries.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Why haven't we banned these things yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and large pickup trucks that never carry more than a 180 pound man with penis envy.

  51. Re:I now believe political murder is real in Ameri by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

    Madeleine Brown's version of events has been shown to be shaky at best, and an outright fabrication at worst. People she claims were in the room together on particular occasions turned out to be elsewhere for completely unrelated events. Her dates were far off of what should match up with logic. However charming she may have been, accurate she was not.

    Murder is a very hard thing to pull off without getting caught, and it's even harder to make things look like an accident. The NTSB will get involved in this crash, and if there's anything out of order, they'll likely find it.

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  52. Akron-Canton Airport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows that you don't fly to the Akron-Canton airport. Just ask Thurman Munson, oh wait!

  53. More banks in 1921 than now? by tychof · · Score: 1

    How are you measuring the number of banks? I don't have numbers on the number of bankers (though I suspect that automation has cut down the banker/population ratio significantly), but according to two sources found easily via Google, there were 31,000 banks in the US 1921 and only about 7,200 now. http://bss.sfsu.edu/tygiel/hist427/texts/1920seconomy.htm and http://www.outlookindia.com/pti_news.asp?id=636977

    --
    If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants have stood on my shoulders. -- Hal Abelson or Jeff Goll
    1. Re:More banks in 1921 than now? by Elektroschock · · Score: 0

      In 1929 business still relied on real production, not not imaginative value, immaterial assets as market price or patents. The physical production didn't burst but the immaterial world, the stock markets, and it had great depressive effects on the economy. 2000 and 2008 we see the collapse of value that basically wasn't there in the first place. And this time keynesian intervention does not help as it was made impossible through international independence of capital. What I think our governments will come up with is a crackdown on offshore accounts. After all it is time to stop the money laundry instruments of the Russion and Chinese mafia.

  54. Frankly conspiratorial = don't think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kay Adams: Do you know how naive you sound, Michael? Presidents and senators don't have men killed.
    Michael: Oh. Who's being naive, Kay?

    1. Re:Frankly conspiratorial = don't think by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      Just look at his SourceWatch article:

      On September 17, 2008, a Republican election whistleblower and data security expert named Stephen Spoonamore filed a sworn affidavit filed in federal court in the above voter fraud case in which he stated that Mike Connell "agrees that the electronic voting systems in the US are not secure" and that Connell had told Spoonamore in 2007 "that he (Connell) is afraid some of the more ruthless partisans of the GOP may have exploited systems he in part worked on for this purpose." Spoonamore further explained that "Mr. Connell builds front end applications, user interfaces and web sites." Spoonamore said, "I believe however he knows who is doing that [election rigging] work, and has likely turned a blind eye to this activity. Mr. Connell is a devout Catholic. He has admitted to me that in his zeal to 'save the unborn' he may have helped others who have compromised elections. He was clearly uncomfortable when I asked directly about Ohio 2004."

  55. Another interesting point - geography of the area by Weaselmancer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I live near Akron Canton airport. This happened maybe 15 miles from my house.

    Most of the land around Akron and North Canton is farmland. There is a sizable Amish and Mennonite population in that area. It's a lot of cleared land and cornfields around AC.

    If you were to run out of gas on approach there are dozens of places to set down a single engine airplane. It's mostly cornfields.

    That was the part that first struck me about this story. If you knew you wouldn't make the airport...you'd have to be pretty damn unlucky to not find a decent place to set down. With any luck you might even manage an old county access road and salvage the plane.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  56. Occam was a goon by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which is simpler? One man having an accident, or several, perhaps dozens of people conspiring to fake said accident? Strictly speaking, an accident is still the 'simpler' theory by Occam's definition.

    Compartmentalization is the key to managing a massive secret endeavor without anybody knowing enough to even realize they're part of a conspiracy. You only need a couple of guys at the top to know anything real. Anybody else who learns too much, you can always send on trip in a small plane. . .

    Anyway, Occam's razor is flawed. --It was an argument designed by a 13th century monk to logically prove the existence of God. In short: Every explanation for anything which ever happens is more complicated and contains more steps than simply saying, "God". Thus, according to Occam's razor, God exists. It's a broken argument and the fact that people in the science community use it is embarrassing enough, but thanks to Jodi Foster, people in the much more densely populated, "Church of Science" use it all the time and actually think it means something other than, "I'm right because I allow the world of possibilities to end where my ignorance begins." AKA, "Bullshit".

    Here's another way of looking at it. . .

    When you measure the various likelihoods of an event happening via Occam, you are limited to your present data set and knowledge of the world. People have the bloody conceit to assume that things which they do not know about are less likely to exist than things they do know about; which is of course, ego-driven nonsense. A three year-old who doesn't know about electron guns and phosphorus but who does know about puppet theaters could use Occam's Razor to deduce some fairly laughable things about television sets.

    Just because you can't imagine a thing doesn't mean that thing isn't a possibility, or indeed, a likelihood. Occam's razor is simply a clever way of justifying self-satisfied ignorance.

    And THAT is my axe now well-ground to it's own razor's edge. Thank-you for indulging me and Merry Christmas! Jesus died for you! Occam said so.

    -FL

    1. Re:Occam was a goon by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Occam's razor is simply a clever way of justifying self-satisfied ignorance."

      Poppycock, you're simply justifying your own self-satisfied ignorance.

      Occams razor it's a tool for logical thinking. Like any such tool it's usefullness depends on the accuracy and breadth of the users assumptions. In the 11th century religion and science were the same thing so it's no surprise an 11th century Monk would assume God exists, and that "God did it" is the simplest answer.

      Even if Occam were as mad as the March hare it still does not invalidate his tool. Do you dismiss Newton's "Prinipa Mathematica" because he stuck pins in his eyes, had alchemic visions, and wrote over a million words on the meaning of the number 666?

      Personally I like Einstein's version of the razor, "as simple as possible but no simpler", but I suppose you think he is just another religious nutcase because of his well know desire to "know the mind of God".

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Occam was a goon by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Anyone who uses Occam's Razor WRT the cause of a plane crash is a moron. 'Someone snipped a wire.' and 'A wire got cut by a mechanical problem.' are equally simple explanations.

      Occam's Razor would just tell us that, if a wire was snapped, it probably was, you know, that wire, not some other freak accident that just happened to be going on that looked exactly like what would happen if that wire was broken, but not caused by it, and the wire magically broke after that.

      Sometimes Occam's Razor can shoot down conspiracy theories just fine.

      For example: The 9/11 morons claiming the government replaced various airplanes with missiles, and have never managed to explain to me what logical reason there would be for that. Sure, flying airplanes into things to start a war, fine, and let's pretend the WTC guy wanted his buildings demolished. But why missiles? Why not use the damn actual airplanes? And then they wouldn't have to additionally execute everyone on the plane, and dismantle it. (Of course, the loons claim they didn't and those people didn't exist, which raises the next question of why they didn't invent terrorists too?)

      Answer: Because the bad science they've invented requires missiles, despite there being no logical reason for it. Whereas modern airplanes actually have automatic control built in and it would be a few hours work to make the non-responsive to manual control.

      Likewise: Why one earth would the US government blame actual terrorists that were roaming free when they were supposed to be dead? Instead of just inventing new guys? And, hey, here's a thought, how about inventing Iraqis?

      Answer: The 9/11 Truthers are morons who will seize on any piece of evidence without considering whether or not it actually makes sense for people to do.

      But WRT this death: We already know he had enemies, they already exist. And thus it doesn't require any 'extra entities' to assert a conspiracy.

      That's not to say I believe it, or even consider it. But it's not removable by Occam's Razor.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    3. Re:Occam was a goon by heteromonomer · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Although I don't feel as strongly about the invalidity of Occam's razor principle, I certainly see it being abused all over the place. Simple explanations are generally significant, but not necessarily always true.

    4. Re:Occam was a goon by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Poppycock, you're simply justifying your own self-satisfied ignorance.

      So you disagree with me then? Fair enough.

      Like any such tool it's usefullness depends on the accuracy and breadth of the users assumptions. In the 11th century religion and science were the same thing so it's no surprise an 11th century Monk would assume God exists, and that "God did it" is the simplest answer.

      Yes, and that was exactly my point. --Which makes me wonder what part of my comment you found objectionable? Was it my tone?

      Occam's Razor is a logical tool which is only exacting when used within a closed system of fully known, understood and controlled facts. But the world is not fully known or controlled, rendering it little more than a somewhat helpful rule of thumb for serious researchers feeling their way through difficult problems and who need any kind of help they can grasp. My objection, however, is that it is most often misused (around these parts anyway), as though it were a veritable Wand of Truth to dispense with any ideas which create discomfort in the layman thinker, hence my comment about ignorance. I don't see what you have to disagree with other than my tone, which I admit, was a bit snarly. I apologize for that.

      -FL

    5. Re:Occam was a goon by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "Which makes me wonder what part of my comment you found objectionable?"

      The part where you attack the tool rather than it's incorrect use. I agree with everything else you said.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:Occam was a goon by LaskoVortex · · Score: 1

      "Which makes me wonder what part of my comment you found objectionable?"

      The part where you attack the tool rather than it's incorrect use. I agree with everything else you said.

      If I may disagree with no one, the proper way to use Occam's razor is hypothesis generation. You then use the scientific method to test the hypothesis. In other words, use the razor to carve out questions not conclusions. HTH

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    7. Re:Occam was a goon by oncehour · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I think you're spot on. Occam's Razor is often used in current debate to negate ignorance and allow people to apply situational considerations with their current datasets rather than researching other possibilities. It is at best a tool for forming a disprovable hypothesis.

      Unfortunately, it's often used as a tool for forming a finished assumption about a situation. I think the world of debate would be far more enlightening without muddying the waters with Occam's Razor. The real problem I see with Occam's Razor is how a relatively large majority (as per my own internally biased dataset) of people use it to prove or disprove a particular situation or idea.

      I just want to take the time to thank Fantastic Lad for the enlightening post as I hadn't considered my own distaste with Occam's Razor until he brought it up. Thank you Fantastic Lad, please keep posting ;).

      -Josh

    8. Re:Occam was a goon by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Amen.

      And it really bugs me when people use the Razor to "prove" things. /facepalm

      And no, I'm not kidding. "This explanation is simpler, therefore it must be the right one..."

    9. Re:Occam was a goon by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Occams razor it's a tool for logical thinking.

      It's a tool for sloppy thinking.

      In its original form (do not multiply entities without necessity), it's a reasonable enough guideline to try to not add extra explanations to an answer unless there's a reason for it.

      Somehow though, and perhaps Contact is to blame for this, it has metasticized into a decision making guideline whereby some (/hand-waving) simpler explanation is considered to be more correct, or more probable, than a more complicated explanation, which is a fallacy of the highest severity, since scientifically minded people use this ridiculous guideline, and call it science!

    10. Re:Occam was a goon by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      Anyway, Occam's razor is flawed...

      I tend to agree, but not necessarily on logical or rational grounds.

      Take evolution as an example. In general, evolution as produced more complexity, not less. If it tended to produce less complexity, we wouldn't exist. There are certainly pressures towards lower complexity, but they do not win out.

      So as a meta heuristic, I'd rather follow the example of evolution, and not Occam.

      And your comment about Occam's bias towards what you know is spot on.

  57. Connell knew of some danger. by lenski · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I talked with Cliff and Bob the day after the first deposition a few months ago, they reported that Mike Connell tried to avoid answering their questions.

    They were looking forward to subsequent depositions in order to get better information.

    We all had similar observations about Connell's situation: It seemed very very dangerous to him, and we were concerned for his safety. We were hoping to get better information more quickly in order to limit the amount of time during which Mr. Connell would be under threat.

    This plane crash comes as no surprise to any of us.

    Living in Columbus, we in the election protection community have witnessed several activities firsthand that give us pause.

    We have, for instance, photographic records of some of the punchcard ballots in the 2004 election, before they were destroyed in direct violation of a court order as well as the orders of the new secretary of state.

    1. Re:Connell knew of some danger. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Stupid question- and I'm not sure who you are in all this-- but if he was willing to participate, why not just have him record a videotaped statement/deposition of everything he knows. If something happens to him he could not be cross-examined or further questioned, but wouldn't it lesson the threat to him had whatever he had to say already been "out there", or at least in trusted third-party hands?

    2. Re:Connell knew of some danger. by lenski · · Score: 1

      Sorry about the delay in responding, it's a big family day...

      <inference>
      Based on my conversations with the legal eagles, Mr. Connell would have preferred not to testify at all, and was stuck in the unenviable position of being required to discuss things he would rather not discuss and separately because he was concerned about how it would frustrate the people he worked for.

      So there is a good chance that whatever he knew, he wasn't going to simply tell all he knew, he would make sure the questioners would have to work hard for every answer.
      </inference>

      I was hoping that there's a cache of interesting stuff just waiting to be released in case anything untoward happened. Apparently that only really happens in movies.

      In answer to "who I am in all of this": My wife and I became interested in election technology in 2003 when we began hearing that J. Kenneth Blackwell was considering a contract to purchase direct recording electronic voting machines without paper trail. My wife (a psychologist) talked with me (an embedded developer) about trustworthiness in DRE voting systems. My answer was that the transition between the privacy of voting and public counting is way more subtle than most people give it credit for, and a paper trail verifiable by the voter is absolutely critical for auditability. So wife and I were "hooked", and began to participate in various election related community activities in central Ohio. Cliff Arnebeck is basically a conservative former Republican who insists on honest ethical behavior, became interested in election issues during a contested Ohio Supreme Court race and continued to follow up on that interest through the strangeness of the 2004 election. Bob Fitrakis is an investigative journalist (earning several awards) who also studied law and is now an attorney. He has always been strongly populist politically.

  58. The prospect of getting an honest job... by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Horrors.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  59. Re:I now believe political murder is real in Ameri by TechForensics · · Score: 1

    Madeleine Brown's version of events has been shown to be shaky at best

    Shown to be shaky at best-- where? I'd like to see that material too.

    I still believe her. I've known plenty of people with good knowledge of history who couldn't remember dates, and whose memories sometimes combined events. The wrong date and placing an absent person at the scene do not, in my book, destroy the credibility of the assertions.

    --
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
  60. The reason for the witness protection program... by MarkusQ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When Steve Fossett's plane crashed, nobody speculated that he was killed so he would be unable to break any more world records.

    The reason for the Witness Protection Program is that people who have testified or are about to testify against powerful people often unexpectedly die under suspicious circumstances. This is a well documented phenomenon. The reason there isn't a World Record Setter Protection Program is that there are, AFAIK, no incidents of potential world record setters dying under suspicious circumstances.

    Just last month Connell testified against some of the most powerful people on the planet, after years of their trying to prevent it, and he had just been called to testify again. The local news channel is also reporting that he recently told people that he thought his plane had been tampered with, and had refused to fly it twice since testifying.

    -- MarkusQ

  61. RICO? by leftie · · Score: 1

    Lots of crimes are conspiracies, though.

    In fact, so many conspiracies being plotted throughout history there are special Federal laws established to prosecute those crimes.

  62. Re:I'll be happy to pay back by volpe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are slandering Rove.

    Only if the claims are false.

  63. Sunday to Tuesday by ImOnlySleeping · · Score: 1

    Things that happened two days ago aren't new anymore.

    --
    Everybody seems to think I'm lazy I don't mind, I think they're crazy
  64. Re:There's a shock. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    Not exactly. K Dawson is a slashdot editor who compiled the summary from a bunch of user submissions. I have no idea wether he actually belives the partisan crap he posts.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  65. Wanted to shoot Reagan and fuck Jodie Foster? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    That makes him nuts?

    I was clearly insane. Not so much anymore.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:Wanted to shoot Reagan and fuck Jodie Foster? by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Wanted to shoot Reagan and fuck Jodie Foster?

      That makes him nuts? I was clearly insane. Not so much anymore.

      The problem was not that he wanted to shoot Reagan and fuck Jodie Foster. Hell, plenty of people wanted that. The problem was that he thought he would get to fuck Jodie Foster if he shot Reagan.

    2. Re:Wanted to shoot Reagan and fuck Jodie Foster? by Eternal+Vigilance · · Score: 1

      The problem was not that he wanted to shoot Reagan and fuck Jodie Foster.

      Sure don't wanna have dyslexia when that's your to-do list.

      Or your do-to list.

      "Mommy? Mommy?"

    3. Re:Wanted to shoot Reagan and fuck Jodie Foster? by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      I don't get it, wouldn't he have fucked jodie foster and wondered why reagan wasn't dead?

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
  66. Hmmm... needs new material. by leftie · · Score: 1

    Dude... even Bill O'Reilly gave up on the Monica stuff a few years ago.

  67. WE HAVE A WINNER! by leftie · · Score: 1

    Give the man his prize!

    http://www.teddybear.com/

  68. Banker Suicides by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Kirk Stephenson, Olivant Advisers.
    Edward Mattar, BestBank.
    Alex Widmer, Bank Julius Baer.

    It's called G-O-O-G-L-E. Try it some time.

    --
    Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
  69. Re:No power? by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

    It can't? But it did!

  70. Re:anyone else read this and think don't work for by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

    Actually forced suicide has a long tradition. For instance Erwin Rommel, a German Field Marshall, better known as the "Desert Fox"

  71. Lawyer, safe deposit box, and letter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Seriously - why is ever person supposedly in possession of damning earth shattering information is incapable of putting a copy of said information in a safe deposit box, giving a few friends copies of the "in the event of my death" letter that directs them to an attorney(ies) that have a copy(ies) of the key? We know they don't do it in the movies, but how about real life? ....or his plane could have just crashed....

  72. Re:I now believe political murder is real in Ameri by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

    The NTSB will get involved in this crash, and if there's anything out of order, they'll likely find it.

    And how are we to be certain that what they find won't be suppressed? Political futures rest on pleasing those who pull the strings, and people in the NTSB play politics.

    It can be as simple as 'overlooking' evidence that supports a different version of events, or lending more credence to evidence that supports the desired sequence of events.

    It doesn't matter, though... the current administration wants the investigation to conclude that it was an accident; the incoming administration wants the same thing (do you really think they'd want press coverage of Obama's first 100 days to be usurped by some politically-motivated murder?). The only value of the NTSB discovering sabotage would be the press distraction from the economy... which could be a motive to let the NTSB publish any findings of potential sabotage.

    At any rate, it's just plain naive to think that the NTSB is not influenced by politics, and people within it would publish accurate and truthful findings at the cost of their career.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  73. Re:I now believe political murder is real in Ameri by east+coast · · Score: 0, Troll

    What? Let the proper authorities look into the situation? What kind of crazy talk is that?

    Seriously? the conspiracy nut jobs will never except any evidence under any circumstances and will always claim to know better than the best minds in their related fields. It's pointless to even deal with people like that anymore. Planes wreck every day. This one could be an accident, it could be the work of some seedy people. Those of us who want to keep a cool head about it will never know the truth because there will be so many people pulling the truth in so many directions we will never notice it. It's sad that once people realize that what they believe is bullshit they can't just let it go and say they were wrong. Knee jerk reactions will always be the order of the day.

    Now, I'm just waiting for some complete jerkoff come by and use this post as a vehicle for their politics or a chance to bash religion/gays/Linux users/Windows users. These asshats simply can not resist.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  74. Re:Another interesting point - geography of the ar by Troy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think you're mistaken. I also live in this area, and work nearby.

    While I'm sure there may be a few Amish/Mennonites, they certainly aren't there in any large number. The area around is airport has some farming, but has just as many housing developments and undeveloped land (with trees). It is also isn't flat. Map here http://tinyurl.com/8otcxn

    Let's not try to play armchair quarterback too much. He obviously had an incentive to not crash. He lived in Bath, so he flew into the airport a lot and was probably familiar with the area. If safely landing in a field was available to him, I'm sure he would have taken advantage of the opportunity instead of crashing into a residential neighborhood like he did (he hit a vacant house). It was night, so he probably would have had a hard time spotting a field.

  75. Re:Another interesting point - geography of the ar by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    Not directly around the airport, no. But in the surrounding areas there are loads of cornfields. Everywhere from Kent to Canton. Especially around Uniontown and Hartville. Loads of Amish/Mennonite folks around there. Every so often I'll sneak out that way and shop the local groceries there for better produce than I can find in the city.

    When I think of AC's surrounding area that's what I think of. Hartville. Lots of flat land and corn. Like down Route 43.

    I didn't know it was night though - that does make a difference.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  76. Fucking Rove by WiiVault · · Score: 1, Troll

    Can we just try the guy as a traitor and let him get his sentence already? I mean even if he had nothing to do with this, the man has sold his countrymen out time and time again. He is a fecal smear on the face of our nation, let the people decide his fate.

    1. Re:Fucking Rove by gabrieltss · · Score: 1

      We just need someone to hold his ass down and let everyone take a turn with a baseball bat on his head! Him and all the NWO puppets!

      --
      The Truth is a Virus!!!
  77. Re:I now believe political murder is real in Ameri by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Funny

    I now believe orcs and elves are realities in our world. I thought for years that they had died out until I saw the movie (possibly now on YouTube) directed by Peter Jackson based on the notes of J.R.R. Tolkien. Tolkien went in to excellent detail outlining the lives of these people and their history. There is much more on the subject than Jackson was able to film, which everyone should read for themselves.

    Sometimes people tell really good stories. And sometimes people really want to believe those stories.

  78. Now I know who NOT to work for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remeber what happened to William Casey back in the Iran Contra days? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_J._Casey "Hours before Casey was scheduled to testify before Congress about his knowledge of Iran-Contra, he was reported to have been rendered incapable of speech, and was later hospitalized."

    Seriously, all we know is that Connell died in a plane crash. But the timing does seem very suspicious. Isn't there some way to statistically calculate your chances of dying compared to your chances of dying if you are involved in politics. That would make a great measure of corruption.

    1. Re:Now I know who NOT to work for... by base3 · · Score: 1

      Isn't there some way to statistically calculate your chances of dying compared to your chances of dying if you are involved in politics.

      We can, but they're both 100%.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  79. Re:I now believe political murder is real in Ameri by E++99 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone believe Karl Rove would not stoop to murder?

    Yes. I believe Rove is a great guy.

    I now believe Scooter Libby was persuaded to "take the fall" by threats of being ruined and by promises of a pardon if he bit the bullet.

    Come on! He panicked and lied. If he had told the truth, there would have been no problem. He got smacked for lying. The person who outed Plame (Armitage) didn't even get in trouble for it.

  80. Re:I now believe political murder is real in Ameri by vaporland · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My father's best friend was a big shot technical manager with AT&T Long Lines in the 60s. He was working on November 22nd, 1963 when major portions of the national phone system were "locked down".

    This person was present in the long lines operation center when Johnson's first call came through from Air Force One immediately after he was sworn in.

    The operator motioned for him to listen in. Johnson was giving his first executive order after becoming president. He was asking to be patched through.

    What do you think the nature of the call was? A call to the joint chiefs to declare DEFCON 4? A call to the FBI to launch an investigation? A call to Hubert Humphrey to offer him the vice-presidency?

    Nope - Johnson called NASA to order the relocation of NASA's space program command center from Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia to Houston, Texas.

    Think about it - if Johnson had no idea of the details behind the assassination of his predecessor, he would declare a high security alert.

    If he DID have an idea, well, it would be logical to start consolidating power and influence. This was a decision worth many millions of dollars and thousands of jobs to the state of Texas.

    This story was told directly to me on the 40th anniversary of the assassination by the man who overheard the conversation.

    --
    Ask Me About... The 80's!
  81. IT Guru? by theillien2 · · Score: 0

    What kind of IT Guru wouldn't keep some kind of backup of himself somewhere?

    --
    If we don't protect the freedom of speech how will we know who the assholes are?
  82. Serbian extremists crashed Ron Brown's plane by leftie · · Score: 1

    Serbians pissed off at the US for supporting Croatia and Bosnia crashed Ron Brown's well-publicised trade mission to Croatia by putting up a false instrument beacon that ran the plane in the side of a mountain.

    The US covered it up. The world finds out Serbian extremists killed a memeber of Clinton's cabinet, we have to invade Serbia. Not air strikes, a full blown ground invasion.

    Clinton covered it up so he wouldn't have to invade Serbia.

  83. Re:Balance? How about just some Objectivity by doom · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen one post here about Blogjevich's attempts to sell a Senate seat and having discussions with Obama's administration about it.

    Why should there be? What does that have to do with anything... oh wait, you're just a smear-bot attempting to claim that Obama had something to do with that bozo. Sorry, doesn't work -- the only Obama connection is that he pushed for an ethics bill that helped trip up the dude.

    It's a funny thing, whenever you try to discuss how dirty American politics has gotten, you get these rover boys coming out of the woodwork with the "Democrats do it too!" line. Even if that's correct, is that supposed to make us feel better?

    Oh wait, I guess because it didn't involve a "IT" guy, KDawson didn't think it was tech worthy.

    Nerds are us, jack, what do you want?

    Screw slashdot, I'm done. I can find this kind of information on Digg, faster and with a more fairer moderation system.

    Hm... Do the smear-bots feel like they've got Digg gamed, but they're having trouble with slashdot?

  84. Bush/Cheney can't order prisoners be tortured by leftie · · Score: 1

    There a whole host of laws that prevent Bush/Cheney from ordering prisoners be tortured.

    They both admitted in interviews they did, though

  85. "Baaa! Baaa!" says Martin the sheep by leftie · · Score: 0, Troll

    Don't believe those who tell you to question authority, Martin.

    Never question authority, Martin.

    Authority is always right.

    "Baa! Baaa!" says Martin from the back of the herd.

  86. Re:I now believe political murder is real in Ameri by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

    According to Gary Mack and Dave Perry, there are a lot of things wrong with her story. Among the most significant, she claimed that she was at a party in Dallas the night before the assassination, a party attended by Richard Nixon, Lyndon Johnson, and J. Edgar Hoover. The problem with that claim is that Johnson was in Houston that night with Kennedy. Photographs prove it. He didn't arrive in Dallas until late that night, where Johnson was again photographed at the hotel around midnight. Nixon was in Dallas, but was escorting Joan Crawford at the Statler-Hilton hotel -- and was photographed there.

    That's not the only mismatch or logical inconsistency. And there are lots of people who are bad with dates, but that's where she allegedly first heard hints about a murder plot, and the day before the assassination. Those aren't things one is likely to get mixed up.

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  87. Re:The reason for the witness protection program.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe the plane crash never killed Connell because he was not in the plane. It could have been staged to protect him. Now he has to live his life in protective custody.

    Just a possibility.

  88. Re:No power? by DigitalisAkujin · · Score: 1

    Dunno why you got modded troll. it's true

  89. mod up parent by Cally · · Score: 1

    er, someone want to mod parent up?

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  90. for the record by Technopaladin · · Score: 1

    Amelia Earhart disappeared under some strange circumstances. Maybe se was in the World Record Setter Protection Program.

    1. Re:for the record by dpilot · · Score: 1

      **** SPOILER ALERT ****

      She was washed up to shore near Singapore, taken in for a while by some friendly monks(?), and eventually wound up as a cheap lounge singer.

      Medium-sized spoiler from "Song of Singapore", and absolutely delightful piece of cheesy comedy seen at Capital Rep, in Albany, NY, many years ago.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  91. Re:The reason for the witness protection program.. by leftie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe the airplane turned to chocolate in midair, and can't be found because it crashed in Hershey, PA.

    Just a equally likely possibility.

  92. Actually, plane crash is a lousy suicide option by leftie · · Score: 1

    Every plane crash, no matter how small the plane is, gets investigated by the NTSB.

    If someone is trying to kill themselves in a way that gets their loved ones insurance money, the last thing they want to do to kill themselves in a way that requires an investigation by a Federal agency. That's likely to lengthen the process of collecting life insurance pay-outs by a minimum of months, pretty commonly into years.

    1. Re:Actually, plane crash is a lousy suicide option by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      Right. But does the person who commits suicide know? When you dig into his business and his connections 'raison d'etat' or extralegal killing sounds more reasonable to me. 'Suicide' sounds honourable. Accident sounds not plausible. I am sure the authorities will investigate the case.

  93. When... by dogzilla · · Score: 1

    Given that our country is so utterly unwilling to prosecute him, when is someone going to do the right thing and lynch Karl Rove? If there was ever anyone more deserving of frontier justice, I've not heard of them. The man is a clear and present danger to the idea of democracy and representative government.

    --
    The crimes of eBay are a disgrace to it's pig latin heritage!
  94. "Move along... nothing to see here." by leftie · · Score: 1

    Your friendly neighborhood voice of the authority has spoken. One should never question the voice of authority. Authority is always right.

    You sheep, go on back to your herd now. Move along.

  95. "First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you.... by leftie · · Score: 1

    ...Then they fight you. Then you win."
    ~Mahatma Gandhi

  96. This is not an uncommon occurance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact this happens all the time to inexperienced pilots.
    They plan their flight to Ohio, overload their plane with hacked Diebold voting machines without checking weight and balance, and crash when they find out the plane cannot be flown properly.

  97. seen this before! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all these deaths and suicides...

    reminds me of the ending to Goodfellas.

  98. Re:I now believe political murder is real in Ameri by TechForensics · · Score: 1

    Thanks for replying, and I don't want to belabor this, but maybe the party was TWO nights before the assassination? Maybe he got to Dallas in time to catch the tail end of the party? Perhaps one should not strain so, but there appears to be plenty of other evidence pointing at Johnson. What about the secretary who disappeared after she saw Madeline and Johnson kissing? Brown says she was told "Mack" took care of her-- for keeps. There is a lot of smoke here even if it doesn't prove the precise location of the fire. What about the picture taken just a few seconds after the famous one of Johnson taking the oath on Air Force One beside a dazed Jackie Kennedy, which shows Johnson grinning and winking at a crony? What about Johnson's first executive order, issued from the same plane, reported to be moving NASA command from Langley to Houston? With so many other indicators, it is natural, and maybe good, to view Brown's testimony in a more favorable, and less dismissive light, asking not are there any indications of inconsistency, but rather, are there reasonably possible circumstances under which it might be true?

    Personally I have no desire to come off as a conspiracy nut or as a Cassandra. But this kind of stuff makes you question. I would actually LIKE to see a thorough rundown of Brown's claims (equal to a good cross-examination). This kind of stuff is too big to ignore.

    But I guess no one is going to go to all that trouble now. All we can do is follow our best hunches at this point. I think the scales have been tipped for me, for whatever that's worth.

    --
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
  99. A conspiracy theory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Paul Wellstone's plane went down early reports told the story of the pilots being within sight of the landing field, turning on the field landing lights with mike clicks, then slowly turning about 180 degrees, slowly nosing over and flying straight into the ground with both engines running. This with two experienced pilots on board.

    Turning on the landing lights at a strange airport is a convenient way to verify that the field you are approaching is the one you think it is. You do this by clicking the mike 5 times in succession on the airport frequency. This sequence operates a relay at the airport. These relays are widely available.

    Imagine the above scenario with the addition of one of these relays in the plane, wired to trigger the release of a deadly gas. Explains the facts nicely, doesn't it. Everyone is either dead or unconscious almost immediately, and the rest is inevitable.

    I suggest the theory that this was how it was done, both with Wellstone and with Connell, and probably quite a few other people around the world. It's actually quite clever, when you think about it. A technique the CIA can be proud of.

  100. Re:I now believe political murder is real in Ameri by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

    I did intend to have one in there, linked to Dave Perry, but I forgot to go back and add it in. Perry goes through her book, citing pages and quotes, and pointing out the problems with them.

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  101. Re:Another interesting point - geography of the ar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your check's in the mail.

    -K

  102. Re:There's a shock. by SoulRider · · Score: 1

    this discussion is already destined to devolve into the same old political flamewar 90% of every other discussion around here ends up in

    Your obviously not new here, so whats the problem?

  103. Work/Live near crash site. by MrHyd3 · · Score: 0

    I work literally 2 mins away from the crash site and that day was VERY windy. We were experiencing wind gusts of 30+ mph. He didn't make it to the airport short about a mile. Its unfortunate.

    --
    -------- Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most. --Ozzy
  104. Overcomplicated sabotage by doumakes · · Score: 1

    The plane flew from the D.C. area to Akron, OH, a distance of about 300 miles. It crashed a few miles from the destination airport, in other words it was less than a minute's flight time from a safe landing. To believe the sabotage theory you have to believe that somebody rigged the plane in a way that didn't interfere with takeoff or level flight, but did cause an insurmountable problem literally at the last minute. Oh, and there can't be any trace of a foreign device in the wreckage, either. It just seems overcomplicated. Don Doumakes http://socnet.net/blogs/doumakes/

  105. No Coincidence by gearloos · · Score: 1

    Jeeze, Lets see, Bush & Co. are leaving in what, 3 weeks. Obama and his new administration are I.T. / Tech Centric. Bush needs to be sure the White House email (and who knows what WE DON'T KNOW) stays lost. Let me spell it out for you. C. O. N. S. P. I. R. A. C. Y. There isn't even a question in my mind about this.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  106. Re:I now believe political murder is real in Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol did you know the word "gullible" isn't in the dictionary.

    you have ZERO facts about why the plane crashed yet you're willing to adopt this insane story that rivals what hollywood can produce. you have some very serious mental issues man. seriously.

  107. Re:Accident? Suicide link way off base by infonography · · Score: 1

    Yes, and a guy associated with the billion-dollar ponzi scheme also committed suicide... or, well... he was found with his wrists cut and had bled to death... the cause and nature of death has yet to be determined precisely.

    the guy who killed himself was a French Investor who lost 1.4 Billion. Linking him to Rove is tenuous at best other then him being a victim of the Republican culture of corruption.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  108. HOW convenient. WHAT a coincidence .... by unity100 · · Score: 1

    are there any dimwits who could be able to defend republican party, STILL ?

  109. Re:Another interesting point - geography of the ar by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    The rule on engine out at night is to go in wings level and take whatever it is below you. You can't tell a plowed cornfield from a stand of trees from a lake, so it makes more sense to try to prepare for the crash than to try to pick a landing spot. This pretty much assures that you're SOL, but then again if you have an engine out at night you're pretty much SOL. When flying at night, I prefer to follow roads that I know are wide and straight (64 to 220 when flying between Raleigh and Greensboro, NC) With any luck, the car's headlights will be like runway lights.

    The other thing is that landing in a cornfield is pretty much guaranteed to destroy the airplane. If the corn is tall, the airplane will wind up on it's back. If the field is plowed, you have a decent chance if you land with the ruts. If you land across the ruts, the airplane will wind up on it's back.

    Experienced pilots develop what we call "an ego". The often believe that they have the skills to make an airplane do more than what it really can do. The description of the plane before landing sounds like he tried to extend the glide, pulled the airplane into a stall, and then was to low to recover without power. This particular crash scenario is sickenly typical, and is one of the areas concentrated on the most in recurrent pilot training.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  110. Re:I now believe political murder is real in Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Murder is a very hard thing to pull off without getting caught, and it's even harder to make things look like an accident."

    Unless you own the police.

    You guys seen www.zeitgeistmovie.com?

  111. Willing to bet clown jumping to conclusions by leftie · · Score: 1

    This clown is jumping to a whole bunch of conclusions that evidence doesn't support.

    Connell held a instrument rating. He was no rookie pilot. I think an instrument rated pilot can read a gas gage.

    1. Re:Willing to bet clown jumping to conclusions by BarefootClown · · Score: 1

      This clown is a flight instructor. Go read a couple of accident reports; fuel mismanagement is a common recurring theme.

      --

      "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
      --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

  112. How to Fly A Plane by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    In order to avoid problems when flying an aircraft, one has a better chance of success when one is, "Flying Ahead of the Aircraft." A Pilot IS responsible for ALL of the actions of flying an aircraft. It sucks, but the rule is based on the fact that the pilot made the decision to get into the plane, and fly it; that rule, and many others when applied to flying aircraft are, "Written In Blood."

    As a personal note, no one working for the current Bush Administration would be welcome in my home.

  113. If reporters in better position to connect dots... by leftie · · Score: 1

    ...why did the reporters follow the dots to BRITNEY SPEARS and KEVIN FEDERLINE while the Dubya, the bankers and Wall Street were watching the entire world's financial system collapse around them!?!

  114. Fact free coward... I'm so surprised. by leftie · · Score: 1

    Look at that post of yours, coward. All personal insults. Not one fact in it.

  115. anonymous coward sheep must stop questions by leftie · · Score: 1

    Questions hurt coward sheep head.

    Never question authority. Authority always right.

  116. Sorry, but that's incorrect. Thanks for playing. by leftie · · Score: 1

    You already just lied and said you knew that suicide in this case would be the best way to collect insurance money for one's family.

    You're making shit up as you're going along. You don't know shit.

  117. Re:I now believe political murder is real in Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The office of our President wasn't anywhere near this easy to abuse before Bush. Certainly power grabs with prior Presidents happened, but nothing like the scale of the wool currently over the eyes of many Americans.

  118. where's the killswitch server? by spasm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If he knew he was sitting on secrets; knew (or suspected) people were out to get him; and was a geek:

    Where's the killswitch server? You know, the server sitting quietly somewhere that needs you to login once a week or so or it automatically dumps all that incriminating material onto a website and emails a few news outlets.

  119. Occam's razor in science by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    I think you're failing to make a key distinction, which is the difference between what is true and what can be proved. Science is really only concerned with the latter. It's a practical discipline, so given two theories that match observed facts, the simpler theory will be easier to prove and thus is considered more useful. However when the theory fails to match facts, it's known to be wrong (or lacking) regardless of its simplicity. So Occam's Razor does not substitute or compensate for missing knowledge, it helps us sort the specific subset of what we think we currently know or understand.

    You're right that the utility of Occam's Razor is limited by the assumptions and domain of our knowledge. But that's true for all scientific knowledge with or without Occam. The moon might fly away from the Earth tomorrow regardless of what Occam says, but scientists don't lose sleep over it because it is so far outside what can be predicted with the tools we have. It COULD happen, but since there doesn't seem to be any way to predict it right now, science doesn't care. "Call us if it happens and we'll discuss it then."

    Anyway, Occam's Razor seems to have a physical analog in the principle of least action. Photons don't wander all over the place randomly, they take the simplest, shortest path. Same with gravity. Observed processes seem to be just as complex as they need to be, but no more complex. You can even make very precise quantitative predictions by integrating to predict the path with least action. Feynman won a Nobel prize for it.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  120. Re:If reporters in better position to connect dots by bugi · · Score: 1

    Lack of experience checking/balancing a power-mad executive branch?

    Not to be biased or anything :)

    Scared of jumping the gun like in the jism pogrom?

  121. Re:No power? by toddestan · · Score: 1

    The executive branch can't spend money. That's congress' job. Which was the point of the comment you responded to.

    In theory, no. In practice, Bush just bailed out the auto industry to the tune of billions of taxpayoer dollars after Congress explicitly voted it down.

  122. Re:Sorry, but that's incorrect. Thanks for playing by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

    It is a potential rationale for a person to commit suicide that way. It doesn't matter if it is the best way as long as the person believes it.

  123. Any overflight at high altitude this time, or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any problems with garage door openers noticed, this time?

  124. You bring the ridicule on yourself by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

    Secret agents exist. We know this. It's not a theory. It's a career path.

    Nobody denies this

    Their job is to conspire and execute conspiracies.

    Not typically within their own country. They are not legally allowed to do it, and the government isn't as good as you think in keeping secrets. Every single time someone in the high levels of government does something like that, a lot of people need to be involved, and it only takes one to blow the whistle. MK Ultra, watergate, warrantless wiretapping...all these things that you're going to use to point at how conspiracies exist are actually arguments against it: all these things are shit that the government couldn't manage to keep secret. It only takes one honest person to leak it.

    Things like, "Occam can be used to justify ignorance, despite the fact that he was a 13th century monk who invented his razor to prove the existence of God."

    One of the biggest problems with Occam's Razor isn't actually with Occam's Razor. It's with people using it incorrectly. In case of conspiracy theories, Occam's Razor doesn't say, "a conspiracy theory can't possibly occur," it says, "if the simple explanation fits the facts, it's not logical to assume a conspiracy instead." That's where an investigation comes in. When evidence is uncovered that shows the simple explanation doesn't cut it, or evidence supporting a conspiracy surfaces, then you start leaning toward other theories.

    Stuff like that. Only retards and suckers don't grasp this basic notion, which is pretty much everybody.

    Before calling other people "retards and suckers" you should get your shit right. William of Ockham was indeed a monk. He did not "invent Occam's Razor to prove the existence of God," though. He

    1. Wasn't a Monk during the 13th century, but during the 14th century. Yes, he was born in the late 13th century, but he was only 12 at the turn of the century.
    2. Did not invent Occam's Razor. The concept existed since the Aristotle days. He simply used it a lot in his writings, which is why the idea was later attributed to him.
    3. He advanced the fields of logic and philosophy by quite a bit. Being a monk doesn't necessarily mean that you just follow the church's party line, especially in the case of Ockham who was unpopular with the papacy, charged with herecy, and excommunicated

    And that's the problem with most conspiracy theories. They don't bother to check the facts before spouting their theories, which leads to the ridicule you dislike so much.

    1. Re:You bring the ridicule on yourself by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Not typically within their own country. They are not legally allowed to do it, and the government isn't as good as you think in keeping secrets. Every single time someone in the high levels of government does something like that, a lot of people need to be involved, and it only takes one to blow the whistle. MK Ultra, watergate, warrantless wiretapping...all these things that you're going to use to point at how conspiracies exist are actually arguments against it: all these things are shit that the government couldn't manage to keep secret. It only takes one honest person to leak it.

      What a charming and reassuring reality you have constructed for yourself! Do you actually want to have a debate about this designed to learn truth, or do you want to shore up your psychological defenses against scary things and 'win' at all cost? (ie, Truth being irrelevant.)

      If you're going to waste my time with panic button arguments until I go away so that you can feel right with the world once more, then please let me know now so that I can save myself the effort. Otherwise, I would be happy to talk this over with you; there are several flaws in your thinking and your examples.

      Just let me know.

      As per Occam. . ,
      1. Okay. It's more complicated that looking at his date of birth.
      2. Okay. The "Law of Parsimony" is an old idea. It's more complicated than simply saying that because Occam's name is on it means he invented it. I over-simplified to make a point.
      3. Excommunicated because he was a rebel, eh? You're going to suggest this, while complaining about my over-simplifying historical data to illustrate a point? Hypocrite.

      Do you see a pattern here? --The most simple course of thinking is by no means the most accurate. This is precisely the problem with Occam's Razor.

      And as you seem to be arguing this very point. . , what is your problem exactly?

      And that's the problem with most conspiracy theories. They don't bother to check the facts before spouting their theories, which leads to the ridicule you dislike so much.

      Actually, ALL theories, whether they are about conspiracies or not, are subject to human error and inexactitude. This is why we call them theories and then explore their validity. They are tools for researching the truth, and nothing more. --But for some reason, a special kind of ridicule is expressed and indeed amplified for those who lower charges of corruption at the authorities.

      This should bear examination.

      Are you willing to examine it?

      -FL

    2. Re:You bring the ridicule on yourself by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      What a charming and reassuring reality you have constructed for yourself! Do you actually want to have a debate about this designed to learn truth, or do you want to shore up your psychological defenses against scary things and 'win' at all cost? (ie, Truth being irrelevant.)

      Depends. Do you actually have an argument to give, or are you just going to claim that my reality is the constructed one? You never pointed out the hole in my line of reasoning.

      Otherwise, I would be happy to talk this over with you; there are several flaws in your thinking and your examples.

      Alright, let's hear it.

      As per Occam.
      1. Okay. It's more complicated that looking at his date of birth.

      That was just a factual error with your "13th century monk." It's not that important other than an example of what I thought was poor fact-checking. A lot of conspiracy theories look plausible because a lot of small errors like that one start piling up into something that looks huge.

      2. Okay. The "Law of Parsimony" is an old idea. It's more complicated than simply saying that because Occam's name is on it means he invented it. I over-simplified to make a point.

      That wasn't exactly an oversimplification, it was a completely incorrect statement. You said that Occam, "invented his Razor to prove the existence of God." That statement becomes an outright lie when he didn't invent the thing at all. Furthermore, it was being used by philosophers not associated with the church long before Ockham ever used it.

      3. Excommunicated because he was a rebel, eh? You're going to suggest this, while complaining about my over-simplifying historical data to illustrate a point? Hypocrite.

      I was simply pointing out the hole in your argument. Your only supporting evidence for Ockham supposedly using his principle to "prove the existence of God" was the fact that he was a monk. That's not a valid argument for a monk in good standing with the church, much less for one that was excommunicated. You need to cite his writings to make that point.

      Ironically, Ockham actually used the principle to argue against other scholars, like Aquinas, who were trying to come up with scientific proofs for the existence of God. Ockham was pointing out that you cannot possibly prove God's existence through reason, it's simply something that you choose to have faith in.

      The most simple course of thinking is by no means the most accurate. This is precisely the problem with Occam's Razor.

      As I said in my original post, the biggest problem with Occam's Razor is that people don't understand it and apply it incorrectly. It does not say the simplest course of thinking is the most accurate. It says that there's no reason to add variables without necessity. If you knew the details about Ockham before accusing him of "trying to prove the existence of God with his Razor," that would become obvious. After all, he both argued that it wasn't possible to prove the existence of God while still believing that He did exist.

      Here's how to apply Ockham. You have a Black Box. You type in a positive number input, and it gives you a number output. You're trying to figure out what the black box does. You come up with the following theory: "the black box takes the input. Then it adds the square of the input to the input. Then it takes the result and divides it by the original input. Then it adds 17 to that result. Then it subtracts the original input from that result. Then it divides by 6 and spits that out." Another guy comes with another theory: "no matter what you type in as the input, it always outputs the number 3." Both theories correctly predict that number 3 is going to be given as the output, and there's nothing about the Razor that says the black box doesn't actually go through the process described in the first the

  125. SEC & other well-placed regulators could have. by weston · · Score: 1

    Yes, everyone should understand that the POTUS has no real power to change the economy.

    The President has few tools at his disposal to directly work on the economy. HOWEVER... that doesn't mean the President couldn't have done something about the financial irresponsibility that led to the current crisis.

    There's a lot of signs that some actions 4 years ago by regulators who were with it and weren't ideologically opposed to acting might have prevented some of the worst problems. Recognizing that Credit Default Swaps were insurance and treating them as such might have done it alone, although having someone turn a cold eye to ratings vs real risk of the Mortgage Backed Securities sure would have helped.

    I don't have a high degree of confidence, however, that Kerry or Gore would have necessarily been Presidents who created administrations that fit the bill. A lot of people were a step or two behind the industry in understanding the various instruments and a lot of leadership, Democrats and Republicans alike, subscribed to the idea that the market could/would take care of itself, that the risks were well-managed, etc etc.

  126. Bill helps the rest of us hold our heads up by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Even the President will jump on a fat girl when he thinks nobodies looking.

    I blame him for keeping Hillary around. No doubt she has much dirt on him and vice versa though.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  127. Time constraints and movies. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Very good. --I'd like to spend the time required to delve into this with proper energy, but it's the holidays at the moment and family is bouncing all over the place. I'm not abandoning this; it's not common that one meets an intelligent person on the other side of the screen. Give me a day or two to get into a proper space and collect some notes; it is clear (as per Occam) that my methods have become sloppy of late. In the mean time, if you can find the time, watch a copy of that old Watergate movie, "All the President's Men." I know it's just a movie, but it is useful for illustrating a couple of points wtr to conspiracies which I'd like to reference.

    Cheers!

    -FL

  128. Great Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even though, the technology is growing up, flight crash are still continuing. http://www.belmos.com/

  129. Re:No power? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    In practice, Congress spent that money.

    If they didn't want the president to use it on things they didn't like, they shouldn't have given him a $350billion blank check.