My plan is to run downstairs, get a bucket and fill it with water. Then I'll balance it on my door. Then I go back downstairs and bake a pie. After it cools, I take it upstairs and find a good place to attack from. When the intruder comes in the bucket of water will soak him head to toe, and that's when I hit him in the face with the pie. My pies are AWESOME so when he stops to eat the pie, I sneak around him and run out the front door naked. Someone is bound to see me naked and call the cops on me. When they show up I can explain that I'm naked because I didn't have time to pull on some shorts and also bake a pie. I had to choose just one thing to save my life.
Exactly wings on a spacecraft make just about as much sense as putting a propeller on it. Capsules can be just as capable as the shuttle was in orbit, and they are far easier and safer to launch and land.
They should reserve that configuration for heavy lift missions. It won't be long before alternative boosters will be available from other sources, including private sources, for lower mass missions.
To you, trickle down means that poor people take care of rich people's houses and they ought to be glad.
But true prosperity is created when ordinary people can create businesses and give other ordinary people jobs which allow them to buy homes and educate their children. That's not maid service, lawn mowing, or Wal Mart.
And you actually have no idea how much money I make. But the guy who mows my lawn and the woman who cleans my house has some idea.
I am under no illusions that having people take care of my property for me is nearly as beneficial as it would be if billions of dollars tied up in assets owned by the richest 1% were liberated into the wealth generation machine we call the capitalist economy.
And oh yea, look up what kind of house Warren Buffet lives in. It's a shithole compared to my house.
Not true! I'm fucking obscenely rich, and just this morning I sold my priceless Matisse painting worth millions just so I could hire some poor people to chauffeur me in my Chevy. You see, I sold my limousine last week so I could hire some other poor people to paint my summer house. I'm selling that next week so I can hire some poor people to run the kitchen on my yacht.
Squandering money means spending money badly, wasting it on things you don't need. But the money is *still in existence* after you spent it.
Even money spent badly will wind up in the hands of people who will keep it circulating. Tax cuts for rich people keeps the money locked up in assets which don't actually trickle anywhere.
And rich people don't hire workers. Workers make people rich. When a rich person needs money, they go to the same place you or I go - the bank. They don't actually risk their own fortunes. They don't sell the summer house filled with expensive art to hire poor people.
There's no reason why it only has to be rich people who can spend the bank's money.
You sheeple just don't understand. If you just watch this documentary http://www.warnervideo.com/pinkyandthebrain/ you will see that everything that O'Donnell said about the mice with human intelligence is TRUE!!!!
I really liked the page with the random balls. I played with that for a long time. Every time my mouse moved, the balls jumped. I showed it to my wife, but she wasn't impressed with the balls at all.
OK, so it cost you $200K to hire a person from China. Based on what you said, I assume that it was the first one.
What's the marginal cost of a hire from China? Once you've hired one, what's the cost to hire another one?
That's why it's cheaper. A company like HP or Oracle hires 5,000 H1B people. The lawyer is paid for. The process is streamlined. It's cheap to hire one more person then.
I had the same confusion. Do they mean the Internet, or do they mean the hosts on the Internet?
And how exactly would you secure the Internet? Does it make you safer if GoDaddy and every other place where you can inject a packet into the Internet starts checking your driver's license?
Snoop around in the shell histories of any account on the system you have access to.
Look at how other people do things. Some of them are smarter than you. Some of them are more experienced than you. Some of them even have some good porn you can snag.
That's generally the mark of stupid people everywhere. They are capricious, self-serving, and do not act in a deliberate fashion with a full awareness of how their actions affect others.
You need to go to a strip club to get over the trauma. And while you're there, just remember that the hand that brings you your drink is the same hand that jacks you off in the back room - the efficient, invisible hand of Ayn Rand!
Not true. Inefficient bartenders would drive away business if they failed to deliver drinks adequately. Market dynamics ensure with reliability that the good bartenders and the bars they work for stay in business and thrive. There is adequate competition, at least in the city I live in, so these bars, bartenders, and the market they form is robust. The invisible hand is working just fine.
In other words, Ayn Rand says that you will always have a drink in your hand when you want it, provided you can pay. And if you claim that this is wrong, then you're obviously one of those lying sheeple.
It's easy to tell when arguments don't work. When your opponent is such an idiot that they dispute claims for which evidence is given, without even disputing the validity of evidence, then it's time to fuck them in the ass.
Slashdot Mirror
Hmm I don't think that works.
That's exactly why I like it so much
My plan is to run downstairs, get a bucket and fill it with water. Then I'll balance it on my door. Then I go back downstairs and bake a pie. After it cools, I take it upstairs and find a good place to attack from. When the intruder comes in the bucket of water will soak him head to toe, and that's when I hit him in the face with the pie. My pies are AWESOME so when he stops to eat the pie, I sneak around him and run out the front door naked. Someone is bound to see me naked and call the cops on me. When they show up I can explain that I'm naked because I didn't have time to pull on some shorts and also bake a pie. I had to choose just one thing to save my life.
Nobody is talking about Marxist schemes here. Go away, troll.
I like that argument technique - make up a fact, for example, divorce rates are going through the roof, and blame it on a group that you don't like.
Seriously, I like that technique.
Exactly wings on a spacecraft make just about as much sense as putting a propeller on it. Capsules can be just as capable as the shuttle was in orbit, and they are far easier and safer to launch and land.
They should reserve that configuration for heavy lift missions. It won't be long before alternative boosters will be available from other sources, including private sources, for lower mass missions.
No, but it will sit on a giant object much longer than it is wide here on Earth.
To you, trickle down means that poor people take care of rich people's houses and they ought to be glad.
But true prosperity is created when ordinary people can create businesses and give other ordinary people jobs which allow them to buy homes and educate their children. That's not maid service, lawn mowing, or Wal Mart.
And you actually have no idea how much money I make. But the guy who mows my lawn and the woman who cleans my house has some idea.
I am under no illusions that having people take care of my property for me is nearly as beneficial as it would be if billions of dollars tied up in assets owned by the richest 1% were liberated into the wealth generation machine we call the capitalist economy.
And oh yea, look up what kind of house Warren Buffet lives in. It's a shithole compared to my house.
Not true! I'm fucking obscenely rich, and just this morning I sold my priceless Matisse painting worth millions just so I could hire some poor people to chauffeur me in my Chevy. You see, I sold my limousine last week so I could hire some other poor people to paint my summer house. I'm selling that next week so I can hire some poor people to run the kitchen on my yacht.
You're confusing things here.
Squandering money means spending money badly, wasting it on things you don't need. But the money is *still in existence* after you spent it.
Even money spent badly will wind up in the hands of people who will keep it circulating. Tax cuts for rich people keeps the money locked up in assets which don't actually trickle anywhere.
And rich people don't hire workers. Workers make people rich. When a rich person needs money, they go to the same place you or I go - the bank. They don't actually risk their own fortunes. They don't sell the summer house filled with expensive art to hire poor people.
There's no reason why it only has to be rich people who can spend the bank's money.
You sheeple just don't understand. If you just watch this documentary http://www.warnervideo.com/pinkyandthebrain/ you will see that everything that O'Donnell said about the mice with human intelligence is TRUE!!!!
What's in a name? If they change the name to "cornhole sugar," I'll lick that shit up all day long.
The words core and chips are there, but you made no attempt at an obvious turd joke.
Boxee. When I was a kid, I FUCKED him. And my mom took a picture.
http://byyourcommand.net/photogallery/albums/Battlestar-Photo-Concept-Art/BSG_Boxy_Muffy.jpg
It may strip the right of first sale, but I'd argue that it also authorizes the right of first "fuck the publishers in the ass."
It never stops. Why doesn't it stop?
I really liked the page with the random balls. I played with that for a long time. Every time my mouse moved, the balls jumped. I showed it to my wife, but she wasn't impressed with the balls at all.
OK, so it cost you $200K to hire a person from China. Based on what you said, I assume that it was the first one.
What's the marginal cost of a hire from China? Once you've hired one, what's the cost to hire another one?
That's why it's cheaper. A company like HP or Oracle hires 5,000 H1B people. The lawyer is paid for. The process is streamlined. It's cheap to hire one more person then.
I had the same confusion. Do they mean the Internet, or do they mean the hosts on the Internet?
And how exactly would you secure the Internet? Does it make you safer if GoDaddy and every other place where you can inject a packet into the Internet starts checking your driver's license?
Snoop around in the shell histories of any account on the system you have access to.
Look at how other people do things. Some of them are smarter than you. Some of them are more experienced than you. Some of them even have some good porn you can snag.
Good job, man. Slashdot is now "Hints from Heloise"
That's generally the mark of stupid people everywhere. They are capricious, self-serving, and do not act in a deliberate fashion with a full awareness of how their actions affect others.
Good God, you've just described Objectivists!
You need to go to a strip club to get over the trauma. And while you're there, just remember that the hand that brings you your drink is the same hand that jacks you off in the back room - the efficient, invisible hand of Ayn Rand!
Not true. Inefficient bartenders would drive away business if they failed to deliver drinks adequately. Market dynamics ensure with reliability that the good bartenders and the bars they work for stay in business and thrive. There is adequate competition, at least in the city I live in, so these bars, bartenders, and the market they form is robust. The invisible hand is working just fine.
In other words, Ayn Rand says that you will always have a drink in your hand when you want it, provided you can pay. And if you claim that this is wrong, then you're obviously one of those lying sheeple.
It's easy to tell when arguments don't work. When your opponent is such an idiot that they dispute claims for which evidence is given, without even disputing the validity of evidence, then it's time to fuck them in the ass.
So, I gave you a cream pie.