It is official. Netcraft now confirms: *WHO is dying
One more crippling
bombshell hit the already beleaguered *WHO community when IDC confirmed that *WHO
market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 0
percent of all concerts. Coming on the heels of a recent Live versus Dead
survey which plainly states that *WHO has lost more members, this
news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *WHO is collapsing in
complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead
last in the recent WHO Admin comprehensive vital signs
test.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to
predict *WHO's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *WHO faces a bleak
future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *WHO because *WHO is
dying. Things are looking very bad for *WHO. As many of us are already
aware, *WHO continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of
blood.
EntwistleWHO is the most endangered of them all, having lost 100% of
his life. There can no longer be any doubt: *WHO is dying.
Let's
keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
WHO leader Pete Townsand states
that there are 4 members of *WHO. How live many members of *WHO are there?
Let's see. The number of live members of *WHO versus dead ones is roughly 1 to
1. Therefore there are about 4/2 = 2 living *WHO members. This is
consistent with the number of *WHO sightings.
It is official. Netcraft now confirms: *WHO is dying
One more crippling
bombshell hit the already beleaguered *WHO community when IDC confirmed that *WHO
market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 0
percent of all concerts. Coming on the heels of a recent Live versus Dead
survey which plainly states that *WHO has lost more members, this
news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *WHO is collapsing in
complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead
last in the recent WHO Admin comprehensive vital signs
test.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to
predict *WHO's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *WHO faces a bleak
future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *WHO because *WHO is
dying. Things are looking very bad for *WHO. As many of us are already
aware, *WHO continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of
blood.
EntwistleWHO is the most endangered of them all, having lost 100% of
his life. There can no longer be any doubt: *WHO is dying.
Let's
keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
WHO leader Pete Townsand states
that there are 4 members of *WHO. How live many members of *WHO are there?
Let's see. The number of live members of *WHO versus dead ones is roughly 1 to
1. Therefore there are about 4/2 = 2 living *WHO members. This is
consistent with the number of *WHO posts.
Registrant: Google, Inc. (GOOGLESUCKS-DOM)
2400 E. Bayshore Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
US
Domain Name: GOOGLESUCKS.COM
Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
DNS Admin (DA17675-OR) dns-admin@GOOGLE.COM
Google, Inc.
2400 E. Bayshore Pkwy
Mountain View , CA 94043
US
650-318-0200
Fax- 650-618-1499
Record expires on 15-Oct-2002.
Record created on 15-Oct-1999.
Database last updated on 25-Jun-2002 20:47:22 EDT.
Slashdot Mirror
IT'S OUT OF CONTROL!!!!!!!!
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *WHO community when IDC confirmed that *WHO market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 0 percent of all concerts. Coming on the heels of a recent Live versus Dead survey which plainly states that *WHO has lost more members, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *WHO is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent WHO Admin comprehensive vital signs test.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *WHO's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *WHO faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *WHO because *WHO is dying. Things are looking very bad for *WHO. As many of us are already aware, *WHO continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.
EntwistleWHO is the most endangered of them all, having lost 100% of his life. There can no longer be any doubt: *WHO is dying.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
WHO leader Pete Townsand states that there are 4 members of *WHO. How live many members of *WHO are there? Let's see. The number of live members of *WHO versus dead ones is roughly 1 to 1. Therefore there are about 4/2 = 2 living *WHO members. This is consistent with the number of *WHO sightings.
Fact: *WHO is dying
..this is my plan:
1. Troll
2. ???
3. Troll
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *WHO community when IDC confirmed that *WHO market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 0 percent of all concerts. Coming on the heels of a recent Live versus Dead survey which plainly states that *WHO has lost more members, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *WHO is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent WHO Admin comprehensive vital signs test.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *WHO's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *WHO faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *WHO because *WHO is dying. Things are looking very bad for *WHO. As many of us are already aware, *WHO continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.
EntwistleWHO is the most endangered of them all, having lost 100% of his life. There can no longer be any doubt: *WHO is dying.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
WHO leader Pete Townsand states that there are 4 members of *WHO. How live many members of *WHO are there? Let's see. The number of live members of *WHO versus dead ones is roughly 1 to 1. Therefore there are about 4/2 = 2 living *WHO members. This is consistent with the number of *WHO posts.
Fact: *WHO is dying
He'll be replaced by a waffle iron with a phone attached to it.
ext3 is a fucking dog
i tells ya, it's like shooting fish in a barrel.
a First Post is coming at you
Nah, it was 'fatty'.
I see you downloaded Slashdot's <meta keywords>. Or was it Katz's personal web site?
FOR A FIRST POST
where is the hell is the porn?
It Is, It is!! Another First Post!
This is a subject
You see, I switched them. That is the funny part. Oh yeah, FP.
is that I have only one FP to give.
Is that what Taco said to Katz? Thanks to you, my colon is +5 insidefull?
back to posting at -1. I hate it when my trolls get modded up causing me to post at 0.
sweet, sweet -1, lowest of the lows.
It is I.
Slashdot to ban trolling.
for all the faggety commercials they aired. They ain't gonna 'own the network' much longer. Fags.
Registrant:
Google, Inc. (GOOGLESUCKS-DOM)
2400 E. Bayshore Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
US
Domain Name: GOOGLESUCKS.COM
Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
DNS Admin (DA17675-OR) dns-admin@GOOGLE.COM
Google, Inc.
2400 E. Bayshore Pkwy
Mountain View , CA 94043
US
650-318-0200
Fax- 650-618-1499
Record expires on 15-Oct-2002.
Record created on 15-Oct-1999.
Database last updated on 25-Jun-2002 20:47:22 EDT.
Domain servers in listed order:
NS1.GOOGLE.COM 216.239.32.10
NS2.GOOGLE.COM 216.239.34.10
NS3.GOOGLE.COM 216.239.36.10
NS4.GOOGLE.COM 216.239.38.10
timeout.
#ping whois.org
PING whois.org (209.1.144.167) from 192.168.1.153 : 56(84) bytes of data.
--- whois.org ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
obviously you did not read the moderator guidelines, you little bitch.
First again?
I am first?