"I wouldn't be so quick with the notion that cosmology and religion are incompatible, or that religion and science in general are incompatible."
They're not, unless you ask the "Evolution is just a theory" southern evangelicals. Hence the comment about Mississippi not believing in space.
and to leave on a more positive, funny note (unfortunately the original was removed by socially retarded humourless E2 admins ): The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth
They believe in space in Mississippi? Has nobody told their wonderfully enlightened pastors about this widespread heathen encroachment on freedom of religion?
and Sun's IHVs would immediately abandon the platform, as people like NetApp don't really want to give away their code.
In conclusion, fuck the GPL. Their reaction to the BSD license went too far the other way. Apache/CDDL/MIT/Mozilla are somewhere in the middle, and it works great for them & everyone else
Here, anyways, the state picks up the bill for good-faith search efforts.
Bad faith is like the woman a few years back who got drunk on a boat less than a mile away from the city and sent out a drunken m'aidez call. She had to pick up the ( hefty ) SaR bill on top of the normal penalties
Sad enough most other people don't seem to care so I can't.
mac friends? point them at adium. PC friends (incl. open-source PC)? gaim proper.
I have adium set up to automatically send OTR packets if the other side is capable, so my mom & I talk encrypted. She doesn't know or understand what it means even, but it's easy for her to use ( she has to do absolutely nothing ), so it works.
Think of it from an information warfare perspective.
You're the NSA. You can crack RSA. Do you want to reveal that you know how to crack RSA to arrest a gangster/druglord/whatever ? Or would you rather crack it, and then look for some other excuse of why you know this info?
Especially in light of the fact that if your superiors were on an invading spree and were looking to target some states that may or may not be using RSA because they think it's uncrackable
I'm sorry, but I think someone thought they were doing good by creating that, but LOGO is mostly designed to get kids interested in programming... this kinna defeats the purpose of that, no?
Picking CDDL was to keep people from taking the code like they did with the original 4.xBSD series, while still allowing people to write closed-source drivers for it when it gets popular enough to attract people to do that.
Imagine how good the hardware support could be on Linux if Linus had just picked a license that lets people link in to the kernel with non-GPL code, and kept a stable ABI so that it made sense to do so. THAT'S what Sun was after
GPL was a reactionary statement to the BSD licenses' freedoms being taken advantage of by corporate powers. The license OpenSolaris is under now ( CDDL ) is much more balanced. It keeps the code under a viral clause ( change it? share it! ) but it doesn't spread to the surrounding code like the GPL does ( link to it? share it! )
The GPL illustrated some fine points about giving users too much freedom, and now it's time to lay it to rest with Marx and pure Smith economics as political tools that were found to be unworkable except in a modified form.
That Linux is successful and also GPL is an anomaly rather than a general rule, and even in that case it serves to illustrate that the hardware manufacturer's unwillingness to write GPL drivers is holding Linux back. Were Linux under a more permissive license, with the market share it has now, hardware mfrs would be rushing to write drivers for it
Actually I think you should reexamine the Mozilla/Apache/CDDL style licenses.
They keep your code free, in as far as any code licensed under them can't change licenses, they have the viral clause for that code ( change it? share it. ), but they limit the viral clause to only the files which carry the license. None of the ambiguous "project" language the GPL uses.
more teeth than BSD, not a lunatic communist license like the GPL
Can you link to GPL code at runtime? are you sure? Forget what RMS has to say outside the scope of the license, do you think you could reasonably sue someone under the viral clause for runtime linking to GPL code?
What about the nVidia hacks? legal or no?
All the places the GPL has been tested have been for obvious violations, it's the edge cases that make it arbitrary
The gasses aren't dangerous, it's mostly just C02. They just make the coffee taste off. There's been a bunch of discussion on how to speed up the process in the homeroast community, but the conclusion everyone inevitably comes to is that it's impossible. The beans need time to develop their flavours and get rid of the off-taste of CO2. Takes about 24hrs or so, depending on the beans & roast.
Oh, i'm not saying that you shouldn't be able to un-integrate it, but at the moment it cannot be properly integrated. It does not act like an OSX app, and there's no way to make it so. Camino doesn't have all the firefox plugins, so it's not a suitable substitute.
Yeah, and from the looks of it they just simply don't get it. OSX integration is about much more than making it look at first glance like it fits.
OSX users are pedantic when it comes to UI design. If the keyboard shortcuts are off, if the app doesn't act like you expect UI wise ( fade to light grey when not at the foreground, which is where the new beta falls flat and sticks out like a sore thumb ), it's unusable.
Slashdot Mirror
One of these in an OpenSPARC machine?
Oh yes... the future is now
And if we don't let them make these videos, then it's moot because we've already lost
Think that they're wrong? Say something, don't prevent them from saying something
I got a piece of spam that read exactly like that!
some of us are capable of working offline.
Also, some of us are intelligent and therefore don't trust baggage handlers not to destroy the machine
Linux was never part of the UNIX wars. Linux is not UNIX.
uhh... yeah... that was a joke, son.
"I wouldn't be so quick with the notion that cosmology and religion are incompatible, or that religion and science in general are incompatible."
They're not, unless you ask the "Evolution is just a theory" southern evangelicals. Hence the comment about Mississippi not believing in space.
and to leave on a more positive, funny note (unfortunately the original was removed by socially retarded humourless E2 admins ): The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth
They believe in space in Mississippi? Has nobody told their wonderfully enlightened pastors about this widespread heathen encroachment on freedom of religion?
and Sun's IHVs would immediately abandon the platform, as people like NetApp don't really want to give away their code.
In conclusion, fuck the GPL. Their reaction to the BSD license went too far the other way. Apache/CDDL/MIT/Mozilla are somewhere in the middle, and it works great for them & everyone else
Here, anyways, the state picks up the bill for good-faith search efforts.
Bad faith is like the woman a few years back who got drunk on a boat less than a mile away from the city and sent out a drunken m'aidez call. She had to pick up the ( hefty ) SaR bill on top of the normal penalties
Sad enough most other people don't seem to care so I can't.
mac friends? point them at adium. PC friends (incl. open-source PC)? gaim proper.
I have adium set up to automatically send OTR packets if the other side is capable, so my mom & I talk encrypted. She doesn't know or understand what it means even, but it's easy for her to use ( she has to do absolutely nothing ), so it works.
Proves nothing
Beards are a necessary, but not sufficient condition
Think of it from an information warfare perspective.
You're the NSA. You can crack RSA. Do you want to reveal that you know how to crack RSA to arrest a gangster/druglord/whatever ? Or would you rather crack it, and then look for some other excuse of why you know this info?
Especially in light of the fact that if your superiors were on an invading spree and were looking to target some states that may or may not be using RSA because they think it's uncrackable
I'm sorry, but I think someone thought they were doing good by creating that, but LOGO is mostly designed to get kids interested in programming... this kinna defeats the purpose of that, no?
Picking CDDL was to keep people from taking the code like they did with the original 4.xBSD series, while still allowing people to write closed-source drivers for it when it gets popular enough to attract people to do that.
Imagine how good the hardware support could be on Linux if Linus had just picked a license that lets people link in to the kernel with non-GPL code, and kept a stable ABI so that it made sense to do so. THAT'S what Sun was after
Dear $deity no!
GPL was a reactionary statement to the BSD licenses' freedoms being taken advantage of by corporate powers. The license OpenSolaris is under now ( CDDL ) is much more balanced. It keeps the code under a viral clause ( change it? share it! ) but it doesn't spread to the surrounding code like the GPL does ( link to it? share it! )
The GPL illustrated some fine points about giving users too much freedom, and now it's time to lay it to rest with Marx and pure Smith economics as political tools that were found to be unworkable except in a modified form.
That Linux is successful and also GPL is an anomaly rather than a general rule, and even in that case it serves to illustrate that the hardware manufacturer's unwillingness to write GPL drivers is holding Linux back. Were Linux under a more permissive license, with the market share it has now, hardware mfrs would be rushing to write drivers for it
Actually I think you should reexamine the Mozilla/Apache/CDDL style licenses.
They keep your code free, in as far as any code licensed under them can't change licenses, they have the viral clause for that code ( change it? share it. ), but they limit the viral clause to only the files which carry the license. None of the ambiguous "project" language the GPL uses.
more teeth than BSD, not a lunatic communist license like the GPL
Somewhat less arbitrary?
Can you link to GPL code at runtime? are you sure? Forget what RMS has to say outside the scope of the license, do you think you could reasonably sue someone under the viral clause for runtime linking to GPL code?
What about the nVidia hacks? legal or no?
All the places the GPL has been tested have been for obvious violations, it's the edge cases that make it arbitrary
Murdering made more efficient isn't "news for nerds"
and /usr/ucb is quite broken. ps(1) works, but not much else
"Maybe they were going to flog off switchboard hardware for a dime a piece."
Plus $1000 shipping & handling
And now that they're not, they're switching over... odd, no?
FWIW, I roast all my coffee. ( go sweetmarias! )
The gasses aren't dangerous, it's mostly just C02. They just make the coffee taste off. There's been a bunch of discussion on how to speed up the process in the homeroast community, but the conclusion everyone inevitably comes to is that it's impossible. The beans need time to develop their flavours and get rid of the off-taste of CO2. Takes about 24hrs or so, depending on the beans & roast.
Oh, i'm not saying that you shouldn't be able to un-integrate it, but at the moment it cannot be properly integrated. It does not act like an OSX app, and there's no way to make it so. Camino doesn't have all the firefox plugins, so it's not a suitable substitute.
Yeah, and from the looks of it they just simply don't get it. OSX integration is about much more than making it look at first glance like it fits.
OSX users are pedantic when it comes to UI design. If the keyboard shortcuts are off, if the app doesn't act like you expect UI wise ( fade to light grey when not at the foreground, which is where the new beta falls flat and sticks out like a sore thumb ), it's unusable.
adblock. filterset.g without which I go insane and want to stop using the web altogether