At the beginning, we of course would bomb the crap out of their infrastructure and military installation, given our air superiority, as we did in Iraq. And China knows this and know they would not win in this course of action. Not sure about this one. China's military are rapidly catching up:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J-10
The French government may have vested interest in moving towards Open Source and away from (U.S.-centric) proprietary software, due to suspected backdoors planted according to demands by the U.S. government. Same holds true for countries like China, Russia.
News for you: punctuations, like comma, period, etc. are all Public Domain. You can start using them without having to face lawyers or get charged MegaBuck$.
I love it when people try to play tit for tat and pretend everything works out.
China's space technology is 40 years behind.
I love it when people accusing someone of something while blissfully unaware of themselves having the same fault.
Just because China is doing things we did 40 years ago doesn't mean their technology is 40 years behind. (Pop quiz: find the "tit" and "tat" in the previous sentence.) A decade maybe, give or take, but 40 years? Don't forget that a lot of unknowns have been sorted out by us and the Soviets (and before that, by the Nazi Germans). China now has many of the matured technologies at their disposal.
... until people start spamming using their competition's address to facilitate them getting thrown off their host?
It will NOT happen.
Remember two things. 1. The only incentive for spammers and spamvertised businesses to spam people is money. 2. Almost all spamvertised businesses resort to spamming because they don't have any significant market share and don't have resources for conventional marketing.
So, if spamvertised businesses start spamvertising their competitors, it may (or may not) hurt competitors, but it will definitely NOT make any money for themselves.
The only businesses that could potentially benefit from this are those established companies spamvertising their major competitors (e.g., Coke vs. Pepsi). But then, few (if any at all) established companies use spamming as a marketing channel.
You sound like the "leading edge" is something unalienable and intrinsic to the US. It isn't.
Go to an industrial research lab in any high tech company, or a hardcore science/engineering department (Physics, Chemistry, EE, CS, etc.) in any major university, and you will be surprised how many people there are not US citizens.
100 year is only a blink of eye in human history. Greeks, Romans, Chinese, British... They were all once a dominant empire. The US isn't the first, and won't be the last.
Slashdot Mirror
The French government may have vested interest in moving towards Open Source and away from (U.S.-centric) proprietary software, due to suspected backdoors planted according to demands by the U.S. government. Same holds true for countries like China, Russia.
Who th f*ck cares??
The sheet form factor allows for seamless integration with floors, walls, and furnitures.
News for you: punctuations, like comma, period, etc. are all Public Domain. You can start using them without having to face lawyers or get charged MegaBuck$.
As oxymoronic as, uh, your nick?
I love it when people try to play tit for tat and pretend everything works out.
China's space technology is 40 years behind.
I love it when people accusing someone of something while blissfully unaware of themselves having the same fault.
Just because China is doing things we did 40 years ago doesn't mean their technology is 40 years behind. (Pop quiz: find the "tit" and "tat" in the previous sentence.) A decade maybe, give or take, but 40 years? Don't forget that a lot of unknowns have been sorted out by us and the Soviets (and before that, by the Nazi Germans). China now has many of the matured technologies at their disposal.
So by your logic, the Challenger, the Columbia, the Genesis etc. are testaments to the quality of USA engineering?
Remember two things. 1. The only incentive for spammers and spamvertised businesses to spam people is money. 2. Almost all spamvertised businesses resort to spamming because they don't have any significant market share and don't have resources for conventional marketing.
So, if spamvertised businesses start spamvertising their competitors, it may (or may not) hurt competitors, but it will definitely NOT make any money for themselves.
The only businesses that could potentially benefit from this are those established companies spamvertising their major competitors (e.g., Coke vs. Pepsi). But then, few (if any at all) established companies use spamming as a marketing channel.
Are we the message?
m
m
That's exactly the idea from The Outer Limits : Double Helix, and sequel, The Origin Of Species.
http://theouterlimits.com/episodes/season3/307.ht
http://theouterlimits.com/episodes/season4/418.ht
Google Gives Gates GPL'ed Gmail. Gates Grateful. GNU Gets Giant Grant. Geek Gasps, Grabs Gun, Goes Ganster. Google Gives. Gates' Gmail Gets Grounded. Gates Groans. God Gloats. Gorgeous Girl Grins. Geek Gets Gorgeous Girl.
God, I'm tired just by looking at that url.
... would've worked as well.
What would be REALLY impressive is a webserver written in HTML.
I don't think you'll qualify, since you managed to have your words all spelled correctly.
Shouldn't we start attacking Florida?
So basically what you are saying is that, 40GB ought to be enough for everyone?
You sound like the "leading edge" is something unalienable and intrinsic to the US. It isn't.
Go to an industrial research lab in any high tech company, or a hardcore science/engineering department (Physics, Chemistry, EE, CS, etc.) in any major university, and you will be surprised how many people there are not US citizens.
100 year is only a blink of eye in human history. Greeks, Romans, Chinese, British... They were all once a dominant empire. The US isn't the first, and won't be the last.
no in all upper-case letters? Must be bogus!