Yeah, this will last until the first news story hits about Facebook being used to launder money to Iran and North Korea. It doesn't matter if Facebook is legally responsible, the PR implications will cause their collective heads to spin.
This is textbook distributed responsibility. The likelihood of any agent acting to address a problem is inversely proportional to the number of agents who are responsible for a problem.
You should generally avoid three letter commands due to conflicts. There's only one global namespace of commands. In addition WOB has the implication it's going to be dealing with printers as it's used in other commands to mean white-on-black.
Commands are in a global namespace and should be kept short, with minimal non-alpha characters for usability. There simply aren't that many options. This decision is fucking stupid.
The larger barrier to entry on Wikipedia is knowing something relevant and being able to find citations. The actual Wikicode was trivial in comarison. Not so when sharing pictures of your cat.
The reality is you are probably experiencing this history rewriting on tons of sites without even realizing it, but you don't have a problem with it because it works "as expected".
"Afghanistan will always be a backwards, tribal s**thole country riven by warlords and violence"
What the fuck are you talking about? Afghanistan was a safe, relatively progressive place for decades. Its strategic location unfortunately makes it a target for international adventurism from the likes of the British, Russians, and Americans. The reason the Taliban was able to take control is by winning the hearts and minds of Afghans who did not wish to be under foreign rule.
That's fine when every click loads a new page, but If a click simply loads new content into the same page, it makes sense to tweak the history in those cases to make the back button work as expected.
Most likely, they will track the source of the history update and ignore it if isn't a click. Additionally, they will likely squash multiple history updates from a single click into one.
If you still use Facebook, you are willingly working for Putin. The very fact that your presence increases the network value means that you are providing material support to all the misinformation campaigns, whether you see them or believe them or not.
A better product than the competition. What is Google doing in Chrome that locks out MS from doing the same thing? This is about MS not being able to compete, because they can't get their shit together on why they even have a browser anymore. I'm sure the Chrome team (including open source Chromium) is massively larger than the Edge team. Just because MS can't or won't compete, doesn't mean Google is anti-competitive.
Slashdot Mirror
It's pretty trivial to set that up. Perhaps you should try a reasonably recent version, such as 5.x.
...or even worse, laundering money to Russia. Man, would that play well...
Yeah, this will last until the first news story hits about Facebook being used to launder money to Iran and North Korea. It doesn't matter if Facebook is legally responsible, the PR implications will cause their collective heads to spin.
This is textbook distributed responsibility. The likelihood of any agent acting to address a problem is inversely proportional to the number of agents who are responsible for a problem.
Good riddance to Tata and InfoSys.
Lulz so hard.
You should generally avoid three letter commands due to conflicts. There's only one global namespace of commands. In addition WOB has the implication it's going to be dealing with printers as it's used in other commands to mean white-on-black.
Commands are in a global namespace and should be kept short, with minimal non-alpha characters for usability. There simply aren't that many options. This decision is fucking stupid.
Your attempt to pretend to understand the definition of a koan is feeble.
The larger barrier to entry on Wikipedia is knowing something relevant and being able to find citations. The actual Wikicode was trivial in comarison. Not so when sharing pictures of your cat.
The reality is you are probably experiencing this history rewriting on tons of sites without even realizing it, but you don't have a problem with it because it works "as expected".
If you drink a glass of water, was the water just an illusion? Your comment is nonsense.
"Afghanistan will always be a backwards, tribal s**thole country riven by warlords and violence"
What the fuck are you talking about? Afghanistan was a safe, relatively progressive place for decades. Its strategic location unfortunately makes it a target for international adventurism from the likes of the British, Russians, and Americans. The reason the Taliban was able to take control is by winning the hearts and minds of Afghans who did not wish to be under foreign rule.
Or those who aren't web developers don't know the internals well enough to make an informed opinion.
That's fine when every click loads a new page, but If a click simply loads new content into the same page, it makes sense to tweak the history in those cases to make the back button work as expected.
Most likely, they will track the source of the history update and ignore it if isn't a click. Additionally, they will likely squash multiple history updates from a single click into one.
I had the same problem until I realized it should be "well, look at that!" Turns out punctuation is important, despite what Twits thinks.
Another good example is the notification icons (Windows "system tray", for example). Can't do that with a web app either.
https://developer.apple.com/de...
There are so many improvements in AMD64 beyond the memory addressing. It is absolutely an upgrade.
Because people draw a distinction between product ads and political ads. The law does too, for that matter.
If you still use Facebook, you are willingly working for Putin. The very fact that your presence increases the network value means that you are providing material support to all the misinformation campaigns, whether you see them or believe them or not.
32 bit? What is this, 1999? It boggles my mind how long it is STILL taking for Windows users to upgrade to 64 bit.
Ha! I think it's hilarious you don't think MS makes changes for the Chinese market to allow spying.
A better product than the competition. What is Google doing in Chrome that locks out MS from doing the same thing? This is about MS not being able to compete, because they can't get their shit together on why they even have a browser anymore. I'm sure the Chrome team (including open source Chromium) is massively larger than the Edge team. Just because MS can't or won't compete, doesn't mean Google is anti-competitive.