Beside, the participants of the game were NOT CEOs, so it has no meaning whatsoever. It's not because you are taking cranky boosted adolescent to play a game that you can compare to CEOs taking important decisions. The first thing is that it was all a game..
It's open source, if you want to add a layer of protection, go away. For the rest of us, we are using memcached for maximum speed, no such thing in.
Lets say you add a layer of protection to your memcache, it now requires a password to get in. The hacker is in your network, so he can sniff those packets. Where's your protection ? Ok, lets say you add in some crypto to prevent sniffing attack. He's in your network, on your computers, reading your files. He then parse your code and grab the password.
So, what have you been able to achieve exactly ? Nothing beside slow downs everyone downs. People should just learn to use the tools at their disposal. And yes, you can kill yourself with a car. Should we lock them all down to 10mph ?
For the parent, here's memcached help. Notice that even if it's ADRANY, you have it in your face should you be on an unsecure network. And besides, locking it to your ip won't prevent someone inside your network from getting the content.
memcached -help memcached 1.2.6 -p TCP port number to listen on (default: 11211) -U UDP port number to listen on (default: 0, off) -s unix socket path to listen on (disables network support) -a access mask for unix socket, in octal (default 0700) -l interface to listen on, default is INDRR_ANY -d run as a daemon -r maximize core file limit -u assume identity of (only when run as root) -m max memory to use for items in megabytes, default is 64 MB -M return error on memory exhausted (rather than removing items) -c max simultaneous connections, default is 1024 -k lock down all paged memory. Note that there is a
limit on how much memory you may lock. Trying to
allocate more than that would fail, so be sure you
set the limit correctly for the user you started
the daemon with (not for -u user;
under sh this is done with 'ulimit -S -l NUM_KB'). -v verbose (print errors/warnings while in event loop) -vv very verbose (also print client commands/reponses) -h print this help and exit -i print memcached and libevent license -b run a managed instanced (mnemonic: buckets) -P save PID in , only used with -d option -f chunk size growth factor, default 1.25 -n minimum space allocated for key+value+flags, default 48
Ive been running memcached since it's out, even sent some patches in.
The thing is, why aren't they running this on a private network ?? Memcached is designed to be fast AND non-secure, to be run on your local network. Running it on a server farm with thousands of people having access to your computers and ips is not a private network.
I had heard about people running it on the local interface and still getting problems before (somebody else with the same computer ran it too and forgot to pick the good port and finally used the same key...) but that's because IT'S NOT BUILT TO BE USED ON AN UNSECURED NETWORK.
Nothing new, bad admins get bad things done to them, move along.
What's worst is that it's totally possible that the guru had to perform maintenance duty on his superior computer and really found out the pictures there, and reported him anonymously.
But, because of the anonimisity, he's automatically found guilty.
When in high school, 12-15 years ago, some friends and I were discussing about planting kid porn on the director computer and report him. What if they found some kid porn on it, or that without even planting it we found some and wanted to report him ?
Last time I looked they were only charging for content coming from outside of their network, as such they are using this artificially low limit to boost the effectiveness of their rogers on demand..
Sadly, unless you are bringing the parliament on your ship, and moving it over the other ship before boarding it, you won't be covered by that loophole as you won't be 'inside' the parliament..
a bug ? Wasn't it simply an overzealous protection ? Which is viewed as fine by also a lot of users anyway, who don't want flash / adobe reader to waste their cpu cycles ?
None of us are using ATIs, that could be a start. We had from Q9550 to I7-960, 2GB ram to 24GB ram, geforce from 9600 GT running in 2560x1600 (which was quite slow with default settings, btw) up to GTX 275 (which was quite fast even on 2560x1600, so was the 250 1GB).
Have you though it could be your computer ? We were 5 playing together here, spent out whole 10 hours and encountered no problems at all. We are planning a pre-release lan party for this weekend too =)
Considering that 3G allows usually something in the range of 5.2Mbps, that gives ~ 0.58MB per second effective throughput that you could record, or a total of 50 GB per day.
Tether a computer, download all of your favorites movies or whatever, and 1.5TB can be yours in the month, which is quite a lot more than the '''so big''' 65GB per month that they advertised for their top 1/1000. Now, if they were to look at the top 1/10000, I wonder what it would be like:)
Turn right, make a U-turn, either straight on the road or by entering any one's parking space. Either will get town council notified and the light fixed much faster:)
Humm, it might be depending on the DVD player, because most of my DVDs use the feature that when trying to fastforward, skip, change track, open the menu, there's a 'Not allowed at this time' icon popping in the upper right corner..
In my case, most of is > 100 / 140 for the dvds. Blu rays are usually better...
Slashdot Mirror
Knew it all along!
Stack in more servers, they have a lower cost per ml...
Why should I be stopped from running my own mail server, which I'll keep with me wherever ISP I'll go ?
Perhaps the travel cost by plane, to go and come back at unusual specific times ,with location of the car, was even higher than that ?
The RTW points selling means that somebody else put the money in, BTW. So you were actually generating them money.
Beside, the participants of the game were NOT CEOs, so it has no meaning whatsoever. It's not because you are taking cranky boosted adolescent to play a game that you can compare to CEOs taking important decisions. The first thing is that it was all a game..
It seems that his jurisdiction allows him to claim an instantaneous reply, which you obliviously failed to provide. Too bad ;)
That just mean you have not yet reached the level 3D TV
It's open source, if you want to add a layer of protection, go away. For the rest of us, we are using memcached for maximum speed, no such thing in.
Lets say you add a layer of protection to your memcache, it now requires a password to get in. The hacker is in your network, so he can sniff those packets. Where's your protection ? Ok, lets say you add in some crypto to prevent sniffing attack. He's in your network, on your computers, reading your files. He then parse your code and grab the password.
So, what have you been able to achieve exactly ? Nothing beside slow downs everyone downs. People should just learn to use the tools at their disposal. And yes, you can kill yourself with a car. Should we lock them all down to 10mph ?
For the parent, here's memcached help. Notice that even if it's ADRANY, you have it in your face should you be on an unsecure network. And besides, locking it to your ip won't prevent someone inside your network from getting the content.
memcached -help
memcached 1.2.6
-p TCP port number to listen on (default: 11211)
-U UDP port number to listen on (default: 0, off)
-s unix socket path to listen on (disables network support)
-a access mask for unix socket, in octal (default 0700)
-l interface to listen on, default is INDRR_ANY
-d run as a daemon
-r maximize core file limit
-u assume identity of (only when run as root)
-m max memory to use for items in megabytes, default is 64 MB
-M return error on memory exhausted (rather than removing items)
-c max simultaneous connections, default is 1024
-k lock down all paged memory. Note that there is a
limit on how much memory you may lock. Trying to
allocate more than that would fail, so be sure you
set the limit correctly for the user you started
the daemon with (not for -u user;
under sh this is done with 'ulimit -S -l NUM_KB').
-v verbose (print errors/warnings while in event loop)
-vv very verbose (also print client commands/reponses)
-h print this help and exit
-i print memcached and libevent license
-b run a managed instanced (mnemonic: buckets)
-P save PID in , only used with -d option
-f chunk size growth factor, default 1.25
-n minimum space allocated for key+value+flags, default 48
Ive been running memcached since it's out, even sent some patches in.
The thing is, why aren't they running this on a private network ?? Memcached is designed to be fast AND non-secure, to be run on your local network. Running it on a server farm with thousands of people having access to your computers and ips is not a private network.
I had heard about people running it on the local interface and still getting problems before (somebody else with the same computer ran it too and forgot to pick the good port and finally used the same key ...) but that's because IT'S NOT BUILT TO BE USED ON AN UNSECURED NETWORK.
Nothing new, bad admins get bad things done to them, move along.
What's worst is that it's totally possible that the guru had to perform maintenance duty on his superior computer and really found out the pictures there, and reported him anonymously.
But, because of the anonimisity, he's automatically found guilty.
When in high school, 12-15 years ago, some friends and I were discussing about planting kid porn on the director computer and report him. What if they found some kid porn on it, or that without even planting it we found some and wanted to report him ?
That's a really dangerous area..
Last time I looked they were only charging for content coming from outside of their network, as such they are using this artificially low limit to boost the effectiveness of their rogers on demand..
Sadly, unless you are bringing the parliament on your ship, and moving it over the other ship before boarding it, you won't be covered by that loophole as you won't be 'inside' the parliament ..
a bug ? Wasn't it simply an overzealous protection ? Which is viewed as fine by also a lot of users anyway, who don't want flash / adobe reader to waste their cpu cycles ?
None of us are using ATIs, that could be a start. We had from Q9550 to I7-960, 2GB ram to 24GB ram, geforce from 9600 GT running in 2560x1600 (which was quite slow with default settings, btw) up to GTX 275 (which was quite fast even on 2560x1600, so was the 250 1GB).
Have you though it could be your computer ? We were 5 playing together here, spent out whole 10 hours and encountered no problems at all. We are planning a pre-release lan party for this weekend too =)
LOL and that was modded INFORMATIVE!
Considering that 3G allows usually something in the range of 5.2Mbps, that gives ~ 0.58MB per second effective throughput that you could record, or a total of 50 GB per day.
Tether a computer, download all of your favorites movies or whatever, and 1.5TB can be yours in the month, which is quite a lot more than the '''so big''' 65GB per month that they advertised for their top 1/1000. Now, if they were to look at the top 1/10000, I wonder what it would be like :)
Hardware acceleration can do wonderfull thing. Just make sure your laptop got one of the supported video card!
'China is one of the countries suffering most from hacking.' is quite true: they are bashed a lot for it!
Turn right, make a U-turn, either straight on the road or by entering any one's parking space. Either will get town council notified and the light fixed much faster :)
well crafted intelligent works of art?
I`m not sure we saw the same movie..
pfft you forgot about 192.168.0.0/24 which is a mother fudging baddass ip range, found almost everywhere around the globe.
Not worth either way.
Humm, it might be depending on the DVD player, because most of my DVDs use the feature that when trying to fastforward, skip, change track, open the menu, there's a 'Not allowed at this time' icon popping in the upper right corner..
In my case, most of is > 100 / 140 for the dvds. Blu rays are usually better ...