Seem to matter enough for you to obsessively reply. And yes, you are a dick. A mentally-ill dick (they're not mutually exclusive.) But I'm not. Speak for yourself. And good luck with your treatment.
As for the Clinton campaign "making racial slurs"... really? Really?! They have never done any such thing. You can't cite even one.
Nah, she just gives him the treatment Time magazine gave OJ and darkens his face and squishes it to make him look blacker in her campaign ads. That way she can benefit from racists and their racism without having to utter any slurs directly. It's beautiful, really.
Thanks for correcting him; seems the Hitlary supporters are bad at math. But at least they're good at forgetting things like her censorship of video games, opposition to net neutrality, and sucking up to big megacorps, etc.
That is, assuming Obama's super-delegates aren't bought out by Clintonites.
Make no mistake, this will happen, in one way or another. Most likely Hitlary will convince the DNC to seat Michigan's delegates, and Detroit will burn as McCain is sworn in. It will be glorious:D
Really? Would that be the republicans who control congress? You know, that organization that writes the checks and passes tax laws and authorizes expenditures? Oh wait...
Super, except that we currently have a socialist congress, as evidenced by all that spending they've been authorizing which has led to the biggest deficit and debt ever. Just because the media and bush-bashers like to blame that on Bush doesn't give the president the ability to write checks. That's congress. And they've been socialist for years now.
You want scary? Put Mr. socialist "increase taxes on any family earning more than $75k" Obama into office with the socialist congress we already have.
First, it would ensure that there were always four parties.
What? No. How would "a law requiring any political party that gets more than 40% of the popular vote in a presidential election to schism into two" ensure at least four parties at all times? Example: three parties, each with 33.3% of popular vote. None over 40%, and less than four parties. I reckon the rest of your post is just as wrong.
Not that I'm above poking fun at the mentally ill, but sometimes you have to help them see how badly they need help. Delusions are powerful, and some people never seem to see past them long enough to get the treatment they need. Good luck.
Well golly I guess your polaroids from 40 years ago are just magical and everyone else is just unlucky enough to see their polaroids lose color and clarity in as little as a few months. Maybe that's because you got one of the first polaroid color cameras 40 years ago, which would have been from the first 5 years of production, you know -- when they could still afford to inject the magic.
In any case, try not to miss the point of the thread: a polaroid print will not outlast a plastic xbox360 case.
Riiight. That was your whole purpose for calling him "Dave" over and over. To find out who an AC was. And where did that get you? What did that gain you in the argument you utterly lost? Nevermind, we're all just puppets dancing on your strings, right? You're in total control as always, and it's everyone else who's crazy. Sure thing schitzo.
I really think you should see someone about that paranoia. Do you see this "Dave" all over the place? Hear him in your head when trying to sleep? Think that tinfoil hats protect you from "Dave?" Jesus man, get a grip. You were already shown to be sadly wrong about your adamant claims that anyone who disagrees with you is "Dave." And you admitted that you think Bush et al. at least knew about 911 and did nothing to stop it, if not orchestrating it themselves.
Face it man, Dave's not here! It's just you and your paranoid fantasies. Seek help.
It sends a clear message to anyone thinking of using the Bourse. "We have tapped ALL lines, not just the ones that were 'incompetently' cut and obviously tapped" and "We WILL take any action necessary to ensure oil is traded in dollars only...This was a clear and public message. Any oil trader can read it loud and clear, and you are being disingenuous when you profess ignorance.
Look, I'll be honest, I'm not claiming this is a known fact or anything.
You sir, are a nut. What do you think about 911 truthers?
OK, but blocked or not, the DNS still resolved before your browser even tried to hit the blocked server, which is the problem. It breaks DNS proper behavior, and code/devices that depend on non-existent servers not resolving will be broken. Not good.
Of course OpenDNS' "fix" is just as bad -- they should show people how to use Add/remove programs to remove the application. It's not hidden or misnamed (read the OpenDNS blog entry linked in this thread.) But somehow OpenDNS claims that their users are savvy enough to use OpenDNS, yet too stupid to use "add/remove programs" to remove one called "Browser Error Redirector."
Seems kind of strange that they do this redirect because it's "too hard" to remove the "spyware" (their words) that dell installs on new PCs. OpenDNS says:
Wow. Are you kidding me? In order for a user to get rid of this brokenness the person has to remove a piece of software called "Browser Address Error Redirector?" That barely makes sense to techies and it makes no sense to normal people. Would your Mom uninstall something with a name like that? I don't think so.
Well, wait. Actually, I do think my mom would uninstall that if someone she trusted said it would be a good thing to do. But my mom wouldn't be using OpenDNS so it's kind of a moot point, isn't it? Also, to what kind of "techie" does that trivial GUI operation "barely make sense?"
What I mean is, it seems to me that someone savvy enough to use OpenDNS is savvy enough to use "Add/remove Programs" so their argument for their own redirect falls apart.
Not to mention the fact that a P3 system will use up to 30W just for the CPU (depending on clock speed), probably as much as 100W or more depending on the components inside, whereas the wii maxes out around 18W and can sleep at almost nothing and resume instantly.
That pic is the early prototype that only detects eye-related facial expressions. The production version detects much more subtle changes. Here's a picture.
When you give BB a laptop for repair, they try to secure it, right? That is, they have some system of procedures to take, tag, log, and securely store it, no? Sounds like a security system to me. And if, say, a customer or employee were to steal it, that would involve a breach of that system, would it not?
And, while that laptop is in BB's possession, are they not maintaining it? I think so. And the data on the laptop are a part of that laptop, which BB is maintaining. If there's personal information on that laptop, and it's in BB's custody and care, that's personal information maintained by Best Buy.
Sounds simple. Why do you fight this so hard? Any relation to BB?
BBuy is great for small things like blank CD's or DVD's or USB sticks or whatever.
What? Next you'll tell me BBuy has good deals on cables. Blanks and memory sticks are some of the highest profit margin items (next to cables) at those stores. If you can't wait for a shipment from an online store and don't have a microcenter, frys, or you-do-it type store locally then I guess you have no choice, but I wouldn't call that "great."
This one, which is part 2 of the interview, and linked in the phrase "why it has taken so long" in the summary. It's the second question in the article.
Slashdot Mirror
Dif you mean ASPIRIN? Not to take away from the rest of your post, but the all caps plus the misspelling was grating.
Seem to matter enough for you to obsessively reply. And yes, you are a dick. A mentally-ill dick (they're not mutually exclusive.) But I'm not. Speak for yourself. And good luck with your treatment.
With the hearty approval of the Democratic congress. You know presidents can't write checks for the country, right?
Super, except that we currently have a socialist congress, as evidenced by all that spending they've been authorizing which has led to the biggest deficit and debt ever. Just because the media and bush-bashers like to blame that on Bush doesn't give the president the ability to write checks. That's congress. And they've been socialist for years now.
You want scary? Put Mr. socialist "increase taxes on any family earning more than $75k" Obama into office with the socialist congress we already have.
Not that I'm above poking fun at the mentally ill, but sometimes you have to help them see how badly they need help. Delusions are powerful, and some people never seem to see past them long enough to get the treatment they need. Good luck.
Well golly I guess your polaroids from 40 years ago are just magical and everyone else is just unlucky enough to see their polaroids lose color and clarity in as little as a few months. Maybe that's because you got one of the first polaroid color cameras 40 years ago, which would have been from the first 5 years of production, you know -- when they could still afford to inject the magic.
In any case, try not to miss the point of the thread: a polaroid print will not outlast a plastic xbox360 case.
Riiight. That was your whole purpose for calling him "Dave" over and over. To find out who an AC was. And where did that get you? What did that gain you in the argument you utterly lost? Nevermind, we're all just puppets dancing on your strings, right? You're in total control as always, and it's everyone else who's crazy. Sure thing schitzo.
I really think you should see someone about that paranoia. Do you see this "Dave" all over the place? Hear him in your head when trying to sleep? Think that tinfoil hats protect you from "Dave?" Jesus man, get a grip. You were already shown to be sadly wrong about your adamant claims that anyone who disagrees with you is "Dave." And you admitted that you think Bush et al. at least knew about 911 and did nothing to stop it, if not orchestrating it themselves.
Face it man, Dave's not here! It's just you and your paranoid fantasies. Seek help.
It sends a clear message to anyone thinking of using the Bourse. "We have tapped ALL lines, not just the ones that were 'incompetently' cut and obviously tapped" and "We WILL take any action necessary to ensure oil is traded in dollars only...This was a clear and public message. Any oil trader can read it loud and clear, and you are being disingenuous when you profess ignorance.
Look, I'll be honest, I'm not claiming this is a known fact or anything.
You sir, are a nut. What do you think about 911 truthers?
Lots of people remove installed programs for other people, like their mom -- or your mom. Heh.
OK, but blocked or not, the DNS still resolved before your browser even tried to hit the blocked server, which is the problem. It breaks DNS proper behavior, and code/devices that depend on non-existent servers not resolving will be broken. Not good.
Of course OpenDNS' "fix" is just as bad -- they should show people how to use Add/remove programs to remove the application. It's not hidden or misnamed (read the OpenDNS blog entry linked in this thread.) But somehow OpenDNS claims that their users are savvy enough to use OpenDNS, yet too stupid to use "add/remove programs" to remove one called "Browser Error Redirector."
Riiight.
Well, wait. Actually, I do think my mom would uninstall that if someone she trusted said it would be a good thing to do. But my mom wouldn't be using OpenDNS so it's kind of a moot point, isn't it? Also, to what kind of "techie" does that trivial GUI operation "barely make sense?"
What I mean is, it seems to me that someone savvy enough to use OpenDNS is savvy enough to use "Add/remove Programs" so their argument for their own redirect falls apart.
Not to mention the fact that a P3 system will use up to 30W just for the CPU (depending on clock speed), probably as much as 100W or more depending on the components inside, whereas the wii maxes out around 18W and can sleep at almost nothing and resume instantly.
How is "cyberbullying" (i.e., saying/typing mean things) "violence?"
"Verbal violence?" "Written Violence?"
Uh, no.
Please stop digging that hole to supidland and take a physics class or something. Seriously, I'm so embarrassed for you it's really uncomfortable :(
That pic is the early prototype that only detects eye-related facial expressions. The production version detects much more subtle changes. Here's a picture.
When you give BB a laptop for repair, they try to secure it, right? That is, they have some system of procedures to take, tag, log, and securely store it, no? Sounds like a security system to me. And if, say, a customer or employee were to steal it, that would involve a breach of that system, would it not?
And, while that laptop is in BB's possession, are they not maintaining it? I think so. And the data on the laptop are a part of that laptop, which BB is maintaining. If there's personal information on that laptop, and it's in BB's custody and care, that's personal information maintained by Best Buy.
Sounds simple. Why do you fight this so hard? Any relation to BB?
BBuy is great for small things like blank CD's or DVD's or USB sticks or whatever.
What? Next you'll tell me BBuy has good deals on cables. Blanks and memory sticks are some of the highest profit margin items (next to cables) at those stores. If you can't wait for a shipment from an online store and don't have a microcenter, frys, or you-do-it type store locally then I guess you have no choice, but I wouldn't call that "great."
Meh. You got into that vapid bimbo^W^W boat of your own volition. No pity here.
This one, which is part 2 of the interview, and linked in the phrase "why it has taken so long" in the summary. It's the second question in the article.