Exactly, and I'd go further and say the downloads should be available to the entire Commonwealth, Australia's taxes fund the BBC as well, indirectly albeit, through the ABC buying shows off the BBC.
I'm not sure about the USA but in Australia generally people need a pretty good reason to get rid of you before they can, moreso if you are in a union. I don't know why you Americans take that crap, who wants to work somewhere where they think they could be let go at any minute?
I considered this when I first started playing around with Mt Rainer drives. Essentially a Mt Rainer formatted cdrw allows for it to be used as normal removable storage. The linux kernel has support for it however I don't think it would be that practical, with that said I now have no doubt that soon some geek smarter then I will get around to doing it.
That thing had perhaps the most annoying copy protection known to man, generally they don't allow you to even transfer your license to another company. Yet they still sell their program, you know why? They have a monopoly and nothing is going to stop people from buying their software.
Wouldn't a sufficiently large spread of various organic waste have a optimal average if it were all blended together?
What I mean is that if you get 3000 truckloads and average out each load of waste you could get the optimal settings to produce the most oil. It might not be as efficient as a machine tuned to a certain type of waste but it would still work.
Perhaps you could have a system at the dump for this, if the waste is going to just sit there it might as well be converted to oil, its all profit in that case.
That is just changing definitions. To me and everyone who reads those ads there meaning is this:
I can use the internet as much and how I like. There are no limits to this connection.
It pisses me off to no end when someone advertises "Unlimited Internet" and then goes on to provide some potential limits to their service in the same breath.
I'll give you a hint. You start off by getting a wooden sword and with a few "hearts" then as you progress killing wave after wave of meaningless ememys you get better swords and more hearts. Using these newly aquired powerups you go and kill a series of bosses. Then you have a go kart race with mario and yoshi and eat a mushroom to grow bigger and win. Then you kill the final guy and there is no blood whatsoever.
Wouldn't it be a good idea to make the gecko rendering engine a service for windows? That way Firefox, Thunderbird, Mozilla et al. would load just as fast as IE and would use less memory because they could share the service.
And in my opinion, the education system will never teach anybody who doesn't want to learn: whether they have good familes or bad families, it all comes down to the individual.
That is so spot on. The problem with later school years isn't that students aren't being taught right, its that students don't want to be there. There is this push to keep kids in school for a good deal longer then they want to be there. Believe it or not some people would like nothing more then to get out of school at sixteen and get a job doing a trade they are interested in.
I live in Australia and the compulsury age that you have to be in school to is sixteen, after that you are only there because you choose to be.
Furthermore after about sixteen people are, especially males, much less willing to take crap from teachers. You simply can't lump prepubesent students and postpubescent students under the same rules. Treating young adults as children is a surefire way to make teens disengage.
I was lucky to have the oportunity to go to two seperate schools in my two final years of education. When I was seventeen I went to a school dedicated to Year 11 and 12 students it had only these two years and was a very well funded state school. It was constantly excelling in the state and it was perhaps the best school I ever went to. What I especially liked was that it bridged the gap between highschool and university so well, there you were treated as an adult, allowed to leave the school grounds in recess and free periods, no uniforms. In short you were responcible for your own education. They did have some rules such as no smoking on school grounds and so forth and they kept strict control of your attendance. Couple this new freedom with the fact that after year 10 only people who wanted to be in school were there and it was great.
In my year 12 I moved to another state and started back at a state school that simply went from year 8 to year 12. It was the worst school I had ever been to. I was trated as a child again and was back in a uniform. I wasn't allowed to leave the school grounds for any reason without a note from my parents (I was lucky to be 18 at the time and could write my own notes)
The difference in the maturity of my classmates was incredable. These people had never had to orgranise themselves in their life and struggled with their homework on a regular basis.
The majority of my graduating class who went on to university did not last one term, I put this largely down to the huge amount of freedom hoisted on them so suddenly.
Wouldn't there be some sort of technical limitations on how small a sat radio could get? And what about power requirements. It seems to me that to recieve sat signals you would need a pretty good reciever and it would probably suck the battery life.
Also sat radio is, as far as I know, only really popular in north America.
The thing is that it is completely biologically normal to be attacted to a sexually mature person. If someone had gone through puberty, even if they are only 14 you are not a freak for being attracted to them. Its what nature intended. These laws are a throwback from a society that didn't want their children having kids of their own untill they were good and ready. Before that people had sex at exactly the same age as people these days, the only difference is that due to poor birth control people were married a lot younger.
My great grandmother was 14 when she was married, to a guy who was in his mid 30's no less, however this wasn't frowned upon, basically because there was an elegable 18 year old batchelor drought around the time with pesky wars thinning out the numbers and because my great grandfather had a stable job and could provide for her.
Child molestors are differnent in that they are attracted to prepubescent girls (or boys). Child porn laws are a crock and need revising, if not to avoid stupid situations where boyfriends are charged for taking photos of their girlfriends.
Thats stupid. There is nothing to be gained from killing child molestors, the only thing it makes sure of is that if someone is later found innocent you can't free them again.
Religous people may go off on a tangent on how they should burn in hell or whatever but just remember it doesn't matter if they die tomorrow or next century they will (theoretically) go to the same place.
Its stupid blaming a hotel for what goes on inside it. Especially a Disney hotel where they are quite used to seeing children with parents. I mean its not like Disney had cameras in every room watching everyone and they have just decided not to turn over the tapes. They have no idea, nor should they, of what goes on in their rooms when the doors are closed.
The police in Australia did a similar thing to identify a girl they had found in a movie on the internet. The accents were australian however there was nothing much more then the inside of a caravan and the girls face to identify who it was. The police released some images on national news of the girls face and within a day the perp was caught. The girls parents did not have a clue it had happened until they saw their daughters face on TV. Obviously no names were released to protect the girls privacy.
Slashdot Mirror
Why would you think that? It doesn't matter where the advertisement is physically stored, its still fake.
Exactly, and I'd go further and say the downloads should be available to the entire Commonwealth, Australia's taxes fund the BBC as well, indirectly albeit, through the ABC buying shows off the BBC.
I'm not sure about the USA but in Australia generally people need a pretty good reason to get rid of you before they can, moreso if you are in a union. I don't know why you Americans take that crap, who wants to work somewhere where they think they could be let go at any minute?
Whats wrong with that? extrange, succiting and damzazing are all perfectly cromulent words.
I considered this when I first started playing around with Mt Rainer drives. Essentially a Mt Rainer formatted cdrw allows for it to be used as normal removable storage. The linux kernel has support for it however I don't think it would be that practical, with that said I now have no doubt that soon some geek smarter then I will get around to doing it.
How do you select all? /ignorant windows user
Obvious counter-example:
AutoCAD
That thing had perhaps the most annoying copy protection known to man, generally they don't allow you to even transfer your license to another company. Yet they still sell their program, you know why? They have a monopoly and nothing is going to stop people from buying their software.
I remember when my compaq did the same thing, circa 2005.
Wouldn't a sufficiently large spread of various organic waste have a optimal average if it were all blended together?
What I mean is that if you get 3000 truckloads and average out each load of waste you could get the optimal settings to produce the most oil. It might not be as efficient as a machine tuned to a certain type of waste but it would still work.
Perhaps you could have a system at the dump for this, if the waste is going to just sit there it might as well be converted to oil, its all profit in that case.
Wait so your telling me I can feed my exhaust back into the engine via a little oxygen and NOS my car?
Everyone has a sixth sense - its called the sense of gravity.
That is just changing definitions. To me and everyone who reads those ads there meaning is this:
I can use the internet as much and how I like. There are no limits to this connection.
It pisses me off to no end when someone advertises "Unlimited Internet" and then goes on to provide some potential limits to their service in the same breath.
And then every year or so you could get a class that had misbehaved and put them all on an island with various weapons...
Also they only break out the Simulations when the original crash is a little to complex to be obvious. Meaning it will always be less reliable.
It reminds me of a news story I saw once. The reporter was standing in front of a car completely wrapped around a power pole in a suburban street.
"Police think that speed may have been a factor"
I'll give you a hint. You start off by getting a wooden sword and with a few "hearts" then as you progress killing wave after wave of meaningless ememys you get better swords and more hearts. Using these newly aquired powerups you go and kill a series of bosses. Then you have a go kart race with mario and yoshi and eat a mushroom to grow bigger and win. Then you kill the final guy and there is no blood whatsoever.
Well Alpha is Latin for "Doesn't work" and Beta is Latin for "Still doesn't work"
Wouldn't it be a good idea to make the gecko rendering engine a service for windows? That way Firefox, Thunderbird, Mozilla et al. would load just as fast as IE and would use less memory because they could share the service.
That is so spot on. The problem with later school years isn't that students aren't being taught right, its that students don't want to be there. There is this push to keep kids in school for a good deal longer then they want to be there. Believe it or not some people would like nothing more then to get out of school at sixteen and get a job doing a trade they are interested in.
I live in Australia and the compulsury age that you have to be in school to is sixteen, after that you are only there because you choose to be.
Furthermore after about sixteen people are, especially males, much less willing to take crap from teachers. You simply can't lump prepubesent students and postpubescent students under the same rules. Treating young adults as children is a surefire way to make teens disengage.
I was lucky to have the oportunity to go to two seperate schools in my two final years of education. When I was seventeen I went to a school dedicated to Year 11 and 12 students it had only these two years and was a very well funded state school. It was constantly excelling in the state and it was perhaps the best school I ever went to. What I especially liked was that it bridged the gap between highschool and university so well, there you were treated as an adult, allowed to leave the school grounds in recess and free periods, no uniforms. In short you were responcible for your own education. They did have some rules such as no smoking on school grounds and so forth and they kept strict control of your attendance. Couple this new freedom with the fact that after year 10 only people who wanted to be in school were there and it was great.
In my year 12 I moved to another state and started back at a state school that simply went from year 8 to year 12. It was the worst school I had ever been to. I was trated as a child again and was back in a uniform. I wasn't allowed to leave the school grounds for any reason without a note from my parents (I was lucky to be 18 at the time and could write my own notes)
The difference in the maturity of my classmates was incredable. These people had never had to orgranise themselves in their life and struggled with their homework on a regular basis.
The majority of my graduating class who went on to university did not last one term, I put this largely down to the huge amount of freedom hoisted on them so suddenly.
Wouldn't there be some sort of technical limitations on how small a sat radio could get? And what about power requirements. It seems to me that to recieve sat signals you would need a pretty good reciever and it would probably suck the battery life.
Also sat radio is, as far as I know, only really popular in north America.
Such a device would be useless abroad.
A sense of humor?
The thing is that it is completely biologically normal to be attacted to a sexually mature person. If someone had gone through puberty, even if they are only 14 you are not a freak for being attracted to them. Its what nature intended. These laws are a throwback from a society that didn't want their children having kids of their own untill they were good and ready. Before that people had sex at exactly the same age as people these days, the only difference is that due to poor birth control people were married a lot younger.
My great grandmother was 14 when she was married, to a guy who was in his mid 30's no less, however this wasn't frowned upon, basically because there was an elegable 18 year old batchelor drought around the time with pesky wars thinning out the numbers and because my great grandfather had a stable job and could provide for her.
Child molestors are differnent in that they are attracted to prepubescent girls (or boys). Child porn laws are a crock and need revising, if not to avoid stupid situations where boyfriends are charged for taking photos of their girlfriends.
Thats stupid. There is nothing to be gained from killing child molestors, the only thing it makes sure of is that if someone is later found innocent you can't free them again.
Religous people may go off on a tangent on how they should burn in hell or whatever but just remember it doesn't matter if they die tomorrow or next century they will (theoretically) go to the same place.
Its stupid blaming a hotel for what goes on inside it. Especially a Disney hotel where they are quite used to seeing children with parents. I mean its not like Disney had cameras in every room watching everyone and they have just decided not to turn over the tapes. They have no idea, nor should they, of what goes on in their rooms when the doors are closed.
The police in Australia did a similar thing to identify a girl they had found in a movie on the internet. The accents were australian however there was nothing much more then the inside of a caravan and the girls face to identify who it was. The police released some images on national news of the girls face and within a day the perp was caught. The girls parents did not have a clue it had happened until they saw their daughters face on TV. Obviously no names were released to protect the girls privacy.
Without starting a vicous flamewar I think the SA Forum goons would do a much better job.