Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation

CasterPod writes "As of February 28, Windows users who purchased their PC will no longer be able to reinstall without calling Microsoft and answering a series of questions. The move is part of an anti-piracy effort to close 'a loophole that enabled unscrupulous resellers to use Windows XP product keys that were stolen from large OEMs.' Specifically, Certificate of Authenticity (COA) labels on PCs are often unused because OEMs preinstall Windows and bypass product activation. The product keys can therefore be stolen and reused. First WGA, and now this."

1,067 comments

  1. Good Move Microsoft!!!! by farrellj · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now you will be forcing more people to move over to Linux and Mac computers!!!

    THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!

    ttyl
    Farrell

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    1. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by cshark · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Amazing how that works, isn't it. I could see it being worth it if everyone loved Windows. But the only reason people even use it in the first place is because it's easy. Something idiotic like this makes it a LOT less so. Linux on the other hand, making pretty big inroads. No pointless activation sequences where you have to call anyone. Probably never will be, except with Xandros (but I doubt it). Hey, there's a selling point right there. Buy linux, and don't have to call anyone who will make you answer stupid pointless questions. Woo hoo! I'm sold. This is exactly the kind of thing they want to do just before they release Expidition. Although, I wonder how much more secure it's actually going to be.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    2. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by DigitumDei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I cannot help but wonder whether top level management at MS got a bad batch of LSD and its done something to their brains.

      They're going to force you to call them, they'll probably have all their call centers outsourced to countries where english isn't the main language. Half the time you won't understand the question and if you do manage to decifer the accent, they won't understand yours.

      The only reason left to use windows is gaming. And even that is becoming less and less of a reason...

    3. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by rf0 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I really think people are underestimang the comfy rut of MS. They will just let their PC's get slower rather than rining up MS every time they need to reload

      Rus

    4. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by zero_offset · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Buy linux, and don't have to call anyone who will make you answer stupid pointless questions.

      Instead, it'll be the users asking the stupid questions.

      "I bought your Linux at Barnes & Noble. Why doesn't it work?"

      "Last week I called and you told me how to install your Linux. Why doesn't my Word Perfect CD work any more?"

      "The other day you made me install something called StarOffice. I think that messed up my son's Doom 3 CD. It used to work before we installed your Linux."

      That'll be fantastic.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    5. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by rikkards · · Score: 1

      This could be beneficial for Linux, however you need to get the mom and pop stores more likely to support the OS. What this could end up doing is force better driver support especially from ATI and nVidia.

      As they are the ones who usually do the OS install for the unwashed masses they are essentially the ones who may control availability of said hardware. Especially when someone comes in and says "Gee I want a computer but I don't know anything about them" Do you think the guy who recommends the hardware is going to say to get a card that is a pain to get X setup on?

      It's understandable for MS to do this, they are a company, they need to keep their revenue stream and everything before hasn't been able to do it.

    6. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by SwordRaven · · Score: 1

      I find Windows to be easier than my Mandrake install which for some reason nuked itself into only being accessible by command line. I did not need this to put me off reformatting.

    7. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by rahlquist · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I recently had to call MS to activate Office 2003 (too many installs). It took me nearly 25 minutes to get through to the nice (english is my second language) woman I spoke with. While she was quite helpful and only asked once (why so many installs) I still felt like I had been dragged down town and put under birght lights to be interrogated. This will be a wonderful experience for everyone, why, once we all know what criminals feel like, then none of us will be tempted will we?

      --
      Sick of stupidity? http://www.patentlystupid.com
    8. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If I'm going to be punished, I may as well commit the crime.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    9. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by koreaman · · Score: 1

      People who buy Macs don't usually try to run Windows software on them, even stupid people know better than that.

      Also this is nitpicking, but doom3 does run on Linux :)

    10. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by ChaosCube · · Score: 1

      That's a really good point. If there were people who were unsure at this point about switching, having to call Microsoft just to reinstall something they paid for will help them make the decision. What a foolish move.

      --
      BDR Gear
      Outdoor gear, MREs, and more!
    11. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by mokiejovis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The term "hung for a sheep as a lamb" comes to mind.

    12. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by cshark · · Score: 0

      I could be wrong, but I believe DOOM 3 is available for Linux. I think you'll also find that these very same computer cup holder destroying people who ask these sorts of questions are going to ask them of Windows as well. Difference is that Windows is almost completely unsupported unless you have the right kind of mass licensing deals required to get a support package. So you're probably going to hear them more, because there is a support system there. Weather or not anyone will pay attention to them, or they can go back to being ignored is a whole nother issue. I would still pay to see it, but I won't hold my breath.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    13. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by aspx · · Score: 3, Informative

      The pirates will still crack activation anyway. It's only the unscrupulous resellers of Windows that get hurt by this.

    14. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by cshark · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, with word of this out there: It seems to me that fewer people will upgrade than before. Every generation of Windows has fewer upgrades than the last one. XP for example did very poorly over all because they just couldn't find a reason to force people into upgrading. People using Windows 2000 for example are still happy with it. Why would they really even want XP? Prettier animation? Fat chance. How do you sell something new to a market you have already saturated, that realistically isn't that far off from what is already out there? Seriously, I would like to know. Maybe if anyone knows, I could start a Microsoft rival, and take over the world again. Yes... that would be fun and evil. Let me ponder it.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    15. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      The only reason left to use windows is gaming.


      Cool. I can hardly wait to get to the office today.

    16. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by danheskett · · Score: 5, Informative

      What the catcher is, you calling them to activate is technically a support call.
      Not, that is blantantly untrue.

      Product Activation is it's own group at Microsoft, seperately administered and staffed from all other units, including technical support. The call centers of PA are completely seperate from all other functions.

      There is never, and has never been a charge associated with activation.

      Additionally, Microsoft does not charge per minute technical support rates, and as far as I can tell, never has.

      For desktop products, like Windows XP and Office for example, the fee is $0, $25, $245. Most are free, additional support - like programming a macro or something of that nature, costs $25. Dealing with server-technologies, company wide networking, or other business technologies generally cost $245. These fees are per incident, regardless of how long it takes or how many people you have to talk to. I worked with an MS support person once for 4 days, 9-5 pm, 8 hrs a day, to solve a critical problem with networking. Fee? $245.

      I suggest you learn a little bit more about MS and thier support services before you go spouting off about what you remember.

      Here are some links:
      http://support.microsoft.com/oas/default.aspx?ln=e n-us&x=12&y=15&c1=509&prid=3518&gprid=185522

    17. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Care to support your assertions?

    18. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by JanneM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People aren't stupid. Let me say that again: people are not stupid, they are not dumb, they are not morons (with a few exceptions - and they are _few_). What they are, by and large, is interested in other things than computing - like, for instance, the work or play they want to accomplish with their computers, rather than the machines themselves.

      People are perfectly able to understand the difference between Windows, OSX and Linux - they just don't particularily care. And in that situation, yes, put up enough roadblocks to Windows use and people will gradually switch, just like US people abandoned domestic cars for Japanese ones when they became compelling enough. Not everybody switched, and not all at once (since everybody has a different tipping point), but certainly enough to change the commercial landscape.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    19. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by omb · · Score: 1
      Precisely; everytime MS does this kind of thing they make it more likely that individual users of their junk will migrate.

      What we have to hope for is that the genius behind these moves turns his attention to OEMs and large corporate users.

    20. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by glyph42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You can't have "manslaughter" without "laughter".

      No no no, that's supposed to be:

      One manslaughter is another man's laughter.

      --
      Music speeds up when you yawn, but does not change pitch.
    21. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by DenDave · · Score: 1
      "I bought your Linux at Barnes & Noble. Why doesn't it work?"

      "Last week I called and you told me how to install your Linux. Why doesn't my Word Perfect CD work any more?"

      "The other day you made me install something called StarOffice. I think that messed up my son's Doom 3 CD. It used to work before we installed your Linux."

      That'll be fantastic.


      It would be fantastic!

      You shouldn't buy linux from Barnes and Noble, you should download Fedora Core or grow your own Gentoo!!

      And you shouldn't be using word perfect anyway! AbiWord and OpenOffice are superior!

      Your son really shouldn't be playing violent games, get him a bike or a soccer ball! Sports are healthy for the young lad!

      Really, the world could be great...

      ROFL!!

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    22. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by sql_noob · · Score: 1

      It may not be able to boost linux. For people who pirate windows, they would keep using a hacked windows without windows update. People still can share windows on few PCs.

    23. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Iron+Corona · · Score: 1

      First MS leaves huge security holes in their products that makes it a cinch to get viruses - To get rid of the virsus many people have to reinstall the operating system - now you can't even do that easily. Good work MS. What next? Will every user have to have to buy their very own OS?

    24. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by ultrasonik · · Score: 0

      You must have never worked in tech support. People are stupid. To reiterate, people are stupid.

    25. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Rinikusu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anyone else feel like this when the "door nazi" at BestBuy/other chain steps in front of you and demands to see your receipt? Treating your customers like they're potential criminals is no way to gain loyalty.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    26. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by danheskett · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, you are really, really, really wrong.

      XP has a fantastic penetration rate for MS. There are very few users not in a corporate setting using Windows 2000. Most users before XP were on 98, 98SE, or ME. As those users replace their computers, they got a big dose of XP. The die hard Windows-fanboys upgraded legally or not - to XP a long time ago.

      MS sells Windows by attrition - those PII and PIII boxes out there have been replaced by newer PCs running XP.

      MS hasn't released much in the way of sales numbers, but XP is very well represented in the total slice of Windows users. I the most recent PDC (Professional Developer Conference), an MS VP of Sales suggested that XP was about 60% of all Windows users. XP or 2K represented almost 75% of all Windows users. That means that the really legacy products - 95, 98, and NT4 represent less than 1 in 4. That's a damn good rate for any business.

      MS is rapidly consilidating its users on the same platform. Before XP, you had two entire different product lines. MS has finally merged them into one line, and the userbase is very happily consolidating.

      Make no mistake, MS is generally very happy with XP adoption rates.

    27. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your $245 nework seemed to be worth it. I've had the exact opposite. Active/active clustering of an Exchange system. Worked with them for over 2 weeks trying to get it to work reliably. The final verdict? Upgrade to 2003 "which has better support for clustering" or move to active/passive. Can you explain WTF better support for clustering means? Either the shit works or not. We were told that 2000 supported exchange clustering in that configuration but apperently it does not. So.. we basically spent about 60 hours of time trying to get it too work the way it is supposed to and paid $245 for them to tell us to upgrade to the new and improved to get the functionality we already paid for in 2000 server.

    28. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I'm hung like a donkey - is that the same thing?

    29. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by bigtech · · Score: 1

      In the short term, you can switch to Windows 2000--no activation code needed. I did that on my machines and every last piece of software and devices drivers work fine--the only thing missing is all the extra interface junk. I, for one, can do without drop shadows on my menus.

    30. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, with word of this out there: It seems to me that fewer people will upgrade than before. Every generation of Windows has fewer upgrades than the last one. XP for example did very poorly over all because they just couldn't find a reason to force people into upgrading. People using Windows 2000 for example are still happy with it. Why would they really even want XP? Prettier animation? Fat chance. How do you sell something new to a market you have already saturated, that realistically isn't that far off from what is already out there? Seriously, I would like to know. Maybe if anyone knows, I could start a Microsoft rival, and take over the world again. Yes... that would be fun and evil. Let me ponder it.
      Care to support your assertions?
      Care to support your disguised-into-a-question rebuttal?
    31. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People aren't stupid. Let me say that again: people are not stupid, they are not dumb, they are not morons

      Yes, they are. People are stupid. Individuals are intelligent. People are not. Here is a little advice for you. If you go through life thinking people are stupid you will be a lot less dissappointed. Keep your expectations set low and you will seldom be let down.

      --
      All spelling, gammer, and logical mistakes are intentinal because I'm to fucking lazy to look it up. If you don't like it, Fuck Off!

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    32. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Ulven · · Score: 1

      hah! Tell that to my dad. He's been using PC's for the last 15 years, bought a Mac for some reason, and tried to install Quicken.

    33. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're absolutly right, next time i'll need to reinstall windows....i'll only keep the linux partition

    34. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 3, Funny

      I cannot help but wonder whether top level management at MS got a bad batch of LSD and its done something to their brains.

      Hey! It worked for Steve Jobs :-)

    35. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Marthisdil · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But the only reason people even use it in the first place is because it's easy. Something idiotic like this makes it a LOT less so. Linux on the other hand, making pretty big inroads.

      LOL - you're funny. Linux isn't making any inroads on the normal computer user's desktop. Sure, Linux is "easy" in terms of getting to the net and email - if that's all you want. Lemme know when there's more than a handful of REAL games out there, with linux clients...Then we can talk about inroads.

      Because, right now, most folks use Windows because of the software choices and availability. The companies making the software won't write their stuff for Linux because there's not enough penetration, and not enough folks will use Linux because there's not enough software that THEY want. Wonderful Catch-22, isn't it?

      I don't see the big deal really.

    36. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Coryoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You must have never worked in tech support. People are stupid. To reiterate, people are stupid.

      That's a rather biased statistical sampling though. Yes, you will get an unending stream of remarkably stupid people calling tech support. As a total percentage of computer users, however, they make up rather less than you think. The GP post is correct - the majority of people don't really care (because it is not important to their lives) about Linux, but that doesn't mean they will be stupid enough to try and run Windows software on Linux.

      Yes, you will have an unending stream of stupid people who tried to run Microsoft Word on Linux and don't understand why it works. Remember that you also had an unending stream of people that couldn't even use Windows either. If everyone was as stupid as the average tech support caller the internet would be practically content free.

      Jedidiah.

    37. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by leerpm · · Score: 0

      Yes, Even dead ones. Over.. and over.. and over again.

    38. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Reignking · · Score: 1

      In the end, were you able to finally install Office 2003? I had the same problem w/ a free (perfectly legal) copy that I had of it, too.

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    39. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by steve6534 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know I sure do ! I now make a habit of ignoring them and walking right past. I would like to see them grab me to make me show my receipt.

    40. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Reignking · · Score: 1

      Or, you don't have parents that use a computer :)

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    41. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All spelling, gammer, and logical mistakes are intentinal because I'm to...lazy to look it up.

      Tell me---where do you look up to see if you made a logical mistake?

      Spelling and grammar mistakes? Acceptable. Logical mistake? Plain stupid.

    42. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      One platform line? You mean like XP Home, XP Pro, and XP Media Center?

      Considering the average lifespan for a PC is 3 years, the fact there are any machines running 2000, let alone 9x, is pitiful. I can tell of many a friend who bought XP and later reformatted back to 2K.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    43. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by sqlrob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, which is also why I say "no" to them as well. The transaction is complete, they can't do squat (US only, other jurisdictions may vary)

      It can be fun to go to a place like that or Fry's when it's really crowded, everyone is waiting in line to get checked and you walk right on by.

    44. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      I've had to call them before, for Office XP. After upgrading my hard disk and video card and switching to Windows XP it got the funny idea that I might have moved it to a different computer. It didn't matter that the mac address and other hardware details hadn't changed. Their support just gave me the code without any harrassment but it was still an annoying and time consuming experience.

      I've switched to Linux at home and haven't bought from them since, but there were a lot of other factors that went into the decision.

    45. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by kurt555gs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The whole idea of having a monoply is that being nice to the customer is not needed. You need them, and the other way around.

      The idea of a company selling you on something with quality and good service is so, well 70's

      Get with it.

      Freedom is no longer a right, it is now a pivilege.

      --
      * Carthago Delenda Est *
    46. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by dmarx · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Hey, there's a selling point right there. Buy linux, and don't have to call anyone who will make you answer stupid pointless questions.

      Of course, you'll also have to add being able to buy software off the shelf, and Plug and Play hardware, and not having to learn how to compile or write drivers, or search forums filled with people calling you a "st00pid n00b" to find said drivers.

      --
      "Do I dare disturb the universe?"
    47. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Vitus+Wagner · · Score: 1
      Problem is that when you are installing Linux first time, you probably have to call someone, and ask series of stupid questions.


      And phone number to call is not printed on the installation media.

    48. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      I play Quake 2 and Quake 3 on my Linux PC, native without wine. But I just don't have the hardware to run Doom 3, even if I had Windows.

    49. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by BigGerman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Top management of ANY big company is like that. Comes with the size, clout and maturity. Google or whatever will be the same as well.
      It is like a law of nature, probably closely related to the Second Law of Termodynamics.
      Simply, when company reaches certain size, no matter how bright the individual leaders or technologists are, they loose the ability to critically think and reason as a whole. Call it "BigGerman's Law Of Corporate Evolution" ;-)

    50. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is Quicken on Mac...

    51. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I think MS knows their market pretty well. There will be grumbling, but the typical user will just buy a whole new computer with 's spyware-laden Windows image on the drive, because their old one is "broken." And all the corporations, and especially MS, love and encourage this, even though people are literally throwing perfectly good PCs in dumpsters because the crappy OS has become corrupted.

      It's unconscionable. Both on the corporate, and the refusing-to-be-informed consumer sides.

    52. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by glamslam · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I walked out at Sam's Club one time without showing my receipt. They guy stopped me to see my receipt. I said, "no. what are you going to do about it?" He said he would call the police!! LOL! The stuff in my hands is MINE, because the money I gave them is now THEIRS. I think the police would laugh at him too!

    53. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... I think you just pointed out a logical mistake. In which case, you should... FUCK OFF! I believe.

    54. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by letxa2000 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Ues, which is also why I say "no" to them as well.

      I like saying "No, thank you". Throwing in the "thank you" confuses them long enough that they don't even try to insist until you're out the door.

    55. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by DannyO152 · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm sure they focus grouped the issue and found out that 95% of the real world thinks their pc is already a hassle machine, they're afraid to kill a runaway program because they don't want to break the computer, and generally have been trained to accept their computers as necessary evils.

      I introduced my Dad, a Ph.D., to perl (and he loved it) but wouldn't listen as I tried to explain that, even though we got perl going on his Windows XP machine, it would have been there, out of the box, with a Linux or OS X machine. (Shoot, with Linux, he wouldn't have to get new hardware.) "What if it breaks and you're not around?" he asked. Since I live out of town, I had no answer: I realized a few weeks later that Windows brainwash, er, experiences had conditioned him to failure.

    56. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by krgallagher · · Score: 1
      "There is never, and has never been a charge associated with activation."

      Yeah but is it a toll free call? If I have to place a long distance call and sit on hold everytime I reinstall to remove those old dll's that I'm no longer using but did not get removed by the uninstall program and load into memory at boot I'm going to be pissed!

      --

      Insert Generic Sig Here:

    57. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by RU_Areo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You make a good point here. The removal of online activation doesn't have a large impact on the "average" user. People buying their machines off the shelves don't have to worry about product activation and chances are that upon their machine being infected with everything under the sun they will take it somewhere to be fixed. The people affected here are the support people and although this sucks it's not going to cause any major migration from windows to something else. You could spend a while on the phone or you could spend all day answering questions from users who shouldn't be within 15 feet of a computer.

    58. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They can hold you if they have "reasonable suspicion" that you have committed theft (at least in Washington state) and that is what the cops are used to being called out for to retail stores. However, simply walking out the door doesn't sound like "reasonable suspicion" to me, and you'd probably have a good case against THEM for unlawful imprisonment. Ask the cops about it when they show up--it's a fun way of turning the tables. :)

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
    59. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by the31337z3r0 · · Score: 1

      Well, people whine and whine, and don't seem to realize that there will STILL be cracks and backdoors. Always will be, and that's why I'll continue to use free Microsoft products that I find necessary. -pets his new BSD machine-

    60. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Ulven · · Score: 1

      Maybe so, but not the same copy of Quicken that he was using on the PC.

    61. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by anopres · · Score: 0, Troll

      Please. Roughly half of all Americans are complete idiots. (You decide which half)

      --
      Strong Mad - 2008: "I PRESIDENT!"
    62. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by bitswapper · · Score: 1


      People are perfectly able to understand the difference between Windows, OSX and Linux - they just don't particularily care

      Not caring - the next best thing to stupid.

    63. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Builder · · Score: 1

      What about countries where English isn't that common? In those places, MS will have to run local call centres and that will push their costs up. Surely this increase in costs will be more than the savings from thwarting privacy ?

    64. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by armachd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It seems that they already have their activation lines outsourced. Over the holiday I upgraded my machine and had to reactivate Windows. I talked to a nice guy who was in India. Maybe being forced to call in order to activate Windows would not be a bad thing, I had a great chat about what to see while in India, the weather, even about Orthodox Christmas that falls sometime in January. Very interesting, and I was able to get Windows activated hassle free! :)

    65. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Peeps is sheep
      dumb enough
      to make you weep
      yet, as they sew,
      so shall they reap.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    66. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by ElvenMonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Amazing how that works, isn't it. I could see it being worth it if everyone loved Windows. But the only reason people even use it in the first place is because it's easy. Something idiotic like this makes it a LOT less so.

      Hmm.. how does this make XP a 'LOT less' easy to use?
      Like most people that tinker about with their home machines, I regularly re-install XP, not as a consequence of anything wrong with MS's package, just as a result of what I've screwed up on it. As a consequence my XP almost never activates on-line, the site seems to allow a certain number of activations with a period of time.

      So.. go to activate, Windows pops up a nice, clear, concise window that tells me there is a problem activating my product over the internet, and asks me to dial a number. The number is in a nice clear font, so little chance of me failing to read it correctly.
      I call, get connected to an MS rep within a minute, read out the text string on the screen, following the clear guidance from the MS rep. They tell me a code to type in, I press a button, and voila, Windows is activated.

      Sure.. its a pain in the arse having to do that, but it is easy. Its going to take a heck of a lot more to make people stop using Windows than this.

      This is getting to be a regular thing that annoys me on /., the absolute insistance that the tiniest thing MS do 'wrong', is the one thing we've been waiting for that'll push people to Linux in droves. Get over it, and get some kind of sense of perspective. Its going to need a seriously big screw-up by MS to force people over to Linux. Its also going to need a killer app for home users to be only available on Linux, which we're yet to see.

      --
      "Joy is not in things; it is in us." Richard Wagner
    67. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by ignipotentis · · Score: 1

      "Why so many installs?"

      Oh thats easy mam, because your product sucks, forcing me to uninstall and reinstall it to get it working again. Its considered standard maitnence for windows machines.

      --
      Don't waste time... procrastinate now!
    68. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by sqlrob · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sam's is different, you signed a contract there.

    69. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by coder.keitaro · · Score: 1

      MS has finally merged them into one line

      Yes, called "XP Home" and "XP Professional" and "Windows Server 2003".

      Which is totally different than seperate lines of "Windows 98" and "Windows 2000".

      --
      watashi wa bengoshi dewa arimasen!
    70. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by slashrogue · · Score: 1

      The problem is at places like Best Buy where the policy isn't applied uniformly to everyone exiting the store. Other places do this to everybody (like Sam's Club) and no one complains. Which is fine wiht me, because if they do it to everyone it's expected, if it's just picking people at "random" that's something else.

    71. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Yep, and XP is what finally drove me to Linux on my laptop. I had kicking the idea around for awhile, but when I bought a new laptop that came with XP pre-installed and it ran my applications slow than my previous laptop running '98, I said "enough is enough." I bought a new HD, stored the old Windows HD in case I ever needed it for anything or if I had problems installing Linux. I then proceeded to install Linux without a hitch.

      That was two years ago. And while my decision was based on many factors, XP was the breaking point that caused me to make the jump. I don't regret that decision at all.

    72. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, if he called the police on you they would bag you for trespassing. Which, if you weren't playing by their rules, you were doing.

    73. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 0, Troll

      See my sig. :)

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    74. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by DaHat · · Score: 1

      I don't need to, he is making a pretty blanket assertion without giving any evidence to support it... if we are to believe what he says he should at least offer something more than his word to sway us.

    75. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never seen these "door Nazis". Is this an American thing?

    76. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps this is why it's less common to see this in the UK; over here there are also certain reasons for which a non-police officer can lawfully arrest you, but on the flip-side you are entitled to use reasonable force to resist a wrongful arrest. Depending on the circumstances, that could involve anything up to taking the guy out... permanently. :-/

      This is probably why UK store detectives (generally a pretty professional bunch, from what I've seen) tend to steer well clear of the one that got away, and stick to pulling guys they've just watched making a poor effort to conceal nicking something that's found on their person within moments of leaving the store?

      Nothing in this post is legal advice, and I'm not a lawyer anyway, but hell, don't let that stop you exercising your legal rights as entertainingly as you see fit if anyone ever tries this on you. }:-)

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    77. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Joules+Burn · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It isn't going to matter if it's a toll free call unless the system owner is doing it themselves.

      If I, as a service tech, have to sit on the phone waiting for product activation after someone messes up there system, I'm going to charge them for that time and If I'm onsite, while I'm waiting I'll be explaining to them why this is going to cost more and I'll be explaining what the alternatives are.

      Does anyone know which 20 manufacturers are affected? I'd like to be able to warn customers of the extra charges ahead of time, should this come to pass.

    78. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by FreeTheFurniture! · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I was just going to mod you down, but this is so dumb I need to reply.

      The parent tells the guy to learn about MS activation/support policies before spouting off and you reply with this? Is it it a toll free call? What do you think? Here let me help. I searched for 'product activation' at the MS web site and this is from the first hit.

      To activate Windows XP over the telephone, you can simply call a toll-free* number displayed on your screen.

      I'm not fan of this change in policy, but damn, at least lets have some intellegent discussion about it. How this got Modded up I don't know (I notice it has dropped by one as I reply to this though).

    79. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by di0s · · Score: 1
      The only reason left to use windows is gaming. And even that is becoming less and less of a reason...

      In fact that is the only reason I have a Windows box. And with the games of today just serving as eye-candy (Doom 3)or treating paying customers like criminals (Half-Life 2), my Windows box mostly collects dust. Long live Mega-TF!!

    80. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually Sam's club can do this, and get you into a lot of trouble. They are considered a members only (private) club and can set their own rules. But the worst they can do is refund whatever you paid to become a member and forbid you from shopping there again.

    81. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You also make a good point, but if this drives the support costs for Windows up too much, the affected shops might have to raise prices for Windows computers.
      Eventually, people will have to pay for the greater service workload or deal with the hotline themselves.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    82. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I can't tell you how many times I've had MS on the phone and have been told the same regarding Exchange 4 to 5 to 5.5 to 6, etc...

      That's why I got sick and tired of pushing their products based on false promises of features.
      (Ex MS Trooper MCSE NT4)

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    83. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here in NY we have some law that protects consumers against this. I once watched a twelve year old girl take a pack of cigs and put them into her pocket sneakily. When I busted her for it, I was the one in trouble because unless she leaves the store with it, it's not technically theft...my boss even asked how I knew she wasn't going to pay for it..I said because she was 12 and she couldn't if she wanted too. Good thing her dad was a cop...she got into some serious trouble at home as a result. Apparently he could have sued the store to the tune of about 8,000 minimum if my boss is to be believed.

    84. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm thats a tough one. i would go to say the ones in power, but then the ones that let them get the power are just as stupid. hmmm i guess 90% of americans are stupid.

    85. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Not caring - the next best thing to stupid.

      I usually don't know what airplane model, or manufacturer, I fly with when traveling between Europe and Asia. I have absolutely no idea who makes the engines, ever.

      And why should I know? I rely on other, knowledgeable (geeky) airplane people to make that choice for me. It doesn't make me stupid. I am way too busy with decisions that actually affect my life in a material way to bother about that kind of fluff. It does not make me stupid.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    86. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by mchawi · · Score: 1

      If they can't solve your problem, tell them you want a credit for the call and they'll credit it back. I've called them about 5 times so far this year, and 4 out of 5 were legitimate MS issues - and I got a credit for each one.

      You could also probably push for a free upgrade/license - but I've never tried that.

      I'm mainly mentioning this because if you still have the SRX, you can still call them back and get a credit. That doesn't help your wasted time - but man....get your money back if they didn't solve your problem.

    87. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      The only difference being that you have to be a member of Sam's Club/BJ's/CostCo to be in there in the first place.
      Odds you 'agreed' to being 'questioned' on the way out when you signed the agreement to become a member?

      Best Buy doesn't have any such agreement in place...


      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    88. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by filmnorthflorida · · Score: 1
      • Surely this increase in costs will be more than the savings from
      • thwarting privacy?
      I assume that was a Freudian slip, but it was a great one.
      --
      --- php: perl hates people
    89. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Tony-A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, people are intelligent. But they are intelligent according to their own definition of intelligent, not yours or mine.

    90. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by benbean · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But in your example, you're not actually trying to fly the plane.

      The people under discussion here are trying to use a complex piece of computing machinery and expecting to be able to use it out of the box, without putting any effort into learning how to operate it effectively.

      Maybe I'm just another jaded support tech.

      --
      It's a Unix system - I know this.
    91. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by meshe · · Score: 1

      "But the only reason people even use it in the first place is because it's easy. Something idiotic like this makes it a LOT less so." I'm curious how making a phone call on the rare occasion that you need to reinstall windows makes the product a LOT less easy to use. I have 3 Windows XP systems at home and have to reinstall them once a year at most. Granted my 2 linux systems have been running for 2+ years without a reinstall.

    92. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Tony-A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Smart people are completely capable of doing stupid things.
      Then they call tech support.

    93. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      The Sony in question actually ran Gentoo for about 3 years. I finally had to reformat it back to windows when I traded it in for my new iBook.

      But that information would, of course, have completely invalidated my grounds to bitch about Microsoft, wouldn't it. (BTW, thanx Tridge for all the sony hacks to the Kernel...)

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    94. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by rabel · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree - as I get older my understanding about how the rest of the world isn't so stupid after all is growing. Yes, the bulk of the planet cannot compile a new kernel. That doesn't make them stupid.

      However, why don't the Linux vendors go ahead and have a user-stupidity ranking system and actively reject the morons. When someone like one of us super-smart Slashdot readers calls Red Hat with a super-smart question like "when recompiling the kernel, I tried to optimize using the gcc 64 bit libraries, but as a result I'm only getting 7% greater performance rather than the 8.2% I was expecting. What gives?" - the caller would then be granted access to the "normal" tech support helpline.

      However, when a caller has a stupid question, demonstrating their obvious mouth-breathing status such as "I installed your lin-nucks and now my drink holder don work no mo" the response should be "WHY YOU'RE A STUPID IDJIT! WHY DON'T YOU CALL MICROSOFT! DUUUUH!"

      The end result will be that Microsoft gets all the stupid customers and Linux vendors get all the smart ones. This would be a more pro-active method of destroying Microsoft while also purifying the Linux user base. Microsoft eventually goes bankrupt by all the support calls they have to field, the rest of us can finally breath easier and just reject all SMTP requests from any windows boxes, effectively quarantining viruses and spam to windows users only, and marginalizing the windows world.

    95. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by phathead296 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, stores where you pay a membership fee (Costco, Sams Club, etc) have an agreement you sign when you get a membership. One of the stipulations is that you must show your receipt to the person at the door. If you don't want to do that, don't become a member.

      If a door nazi at a normal store does the same thing, you have no obligation to stop, and they have no reason to hold you unless they actually suspect you've stolen something.

    96. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by TK2216UKG · · Score: 0

      What you're talking about there is a lack of knowledge and experience. That doesn't necessarily mean those people are stupid.

      --

      - Jonathan :)

      No tuna is safe.

    97. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by plague3106 · · Score: 2

      Walking out the store with items in a bag is not resonable suspicion..nor is refusing to be searched for no other reason then leaving the store.

      I'd say its a fairly normal thing for customers to leave the store with items they bought..

    98. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you guys are missing the point. Wasn't the election results close to 50/50?
      Even if not, I think it was a gag. Whichever "half" of America you don't like/disagree with, obviously, is the dumb half, right?

    99. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by sabernet · · Score: 1

      how about european phones, do they have a toll free line for those acros the way?

    100. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by rmccann · · Score: 1

      And if they preform and unreasonable search, you can sue them for damaging your good name! At least I think that's they way it works here in Ireland, where we have a constitutional right to a good name.

    101. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by bynary · · Score: 1

      Well, Lycoris is pretty restrictive. But then, it was developed by a former Microsoft employee...

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    102. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by sabernet · · Score: 1

      I work as tech support for a hosting company. This lady couldn't get her Frontpage to work so we sent her to MS(we can't support third party apps). MS kept sending her back to us. Eventually, there was a conferance call between us, the caller and MS support(and yes, it was paid ms support, costing teh customer a fortune). After we taught the MS rep how to use Frontpage(as apparently he had never used it or some of his questions would have been less retarded), it started working.

      Also, when I worked for a radioshack selling computers(I know, I know....but I was broke), it took me 30 mins of MS paid tech support to finally get a "Maybe" as to wether the basic Works app they license out to Compaq(cuz compaq couldn't tell me and referred me to them)could switch languages from french to english(both official Canadian languages).

    103. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Psmylie · · Score: 4, Informative

      Absolutely true. I've worked in retail and I KNOW that there was a lot of product walking out. But our management told us, never NEVER attempt to detain someone unless you actually saw them take an item off the shelf, hide it on their person, and try to leave the store without paying. Oh, and you had to keep them under observation the whole time, to make sure that they didn't remove the item from their person before leaving. The losses are insured, the false imprisonment charges and any following lawsuits are not.
      I think I called the police once, on a guy who stole a $0.95 auto-trader magazine. It was pretty funny :)

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    104. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by omb · · Score: 1

      I frequently regard INSIGHTFUL here as a joke, but if you really want a good take on this move, which if correct, indicates there is at least someone at MS who has a clue, read: http://www.computerbits.com/archive/2001/1000/mitt elstaedt0110.html

    105. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by malkavian · · Score: 1

      Great, so you get your $245 back. Bet you don't get your 40 man days (or so) of engineer time for the company techs spent working on it covered. That's a lot more expensive than $245.

    106. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by rmccann · · Score: 1

      "Not caring - the next best thing to stupid." I believe not caring is worse than stupidity. With stupidity you can learn and we are all stupid about something (everytime you learn something you are showing that you were stupid in something before). If you don't care you won't change. Being proud of your stupidity is much worse.

    107. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Those people can't stop you. Just blow right by them. If they get in your way inform them that you are going to place them under citizen's arrest for unlawful imprisonment. The only time they have any grounds to stop you whatsoever is at sam's club, costco, et cetera. Those places are private clubs and they can revoke your membership if you don't show them the receipt; therefore you are trespassing. Of course, once you buy the stuff, you still own it, but it behooves you to let them see your receipt there.

      When I leave Fry's I sometimes have the receipt out for them to glance at, and I rarely break stride on my way out the door. Wal-mart has been checking receipts for unbagged or large items, too; so far I've been with my girlfriend every time and don't want to embarrass her, but the fact is that once you buy it, the product and the receipt are both yours and you are well within your rights to just walk on by.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    108. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I really have to wonder what percentage of the desktop market are heavy gamers, to be perfectly honest with you. I keep hearing this "games, games, games" mantra, and yet I know only a couple of guys whose idea of gaming is much more than Sol and online backgammon.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    109. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by real+gumby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hate those "door nazis" too but you do realize that they're there because the company is suspicious of its employees right?

      The scam they're looking for is you walking out with (say) an iPod and some headphones but the cashier only charging you for the headphones. Then you take the iPod to a fence and you and the cashier split the proceeds. That's why harass you for the most stupid and cursory check.

      So yea, they suspect you of being a criminal, but their employees hate them so much (and vice versa I suppose) that what you're actually seeing is a manifestation of a festering pool of mutual hatred.

      Really makes you want to go and shop there, right? For stuff they sell, stick to mail order.

    110. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      They can't really hold you on suspicion. They aren't cops. If they want to deter you, they must place you under Citizen's arrest. Otherwise, as you say, it's unlawful imprisonment for them to keep you against your will, and assault if they place a hand on you.

      Cops are the only ones who can hold you on suspicion. Other than that, they have only two things up on the average citizen: They can make arrests for misdemeanors they did not witness, and they can carry loaded firearms on their belt. That, and they can cite you for infractions. Normal citizens can place someone under citizen's arrest for a misdemeanor they witness or a felony they have reason to believe was comitted. God help you in court if you're wrong, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    111. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 1

      While I routinely walk out the door with my product in hand (and if it trips those alarm arches at doorways I usually keep walking), I've been thinking it's not such a bright idea. From what I've heard the rent-a-cops that work retail stores are starting to carry tasers, and while I'm sure 99.9% of people don't have any problem being zapped by one, I'd hate to be one of the 0.1% that die or have severe physical complications because of it. Especially over a petty DVD/toaster/etc.

      With that in mind, I think they need to have reasonable cause before zapping you, so keep walking, but don't resist if they insist on getting physical or begin making threats. Then you've got them on the hook not just for false imprisonment, but also threatening assault and/or intimidation (Washington State has a law on the books for unlawful intimidation/threats IIRC, and I imagine other states do as well).

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    112. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, this is precisely the way it works in the US. You can place someone under citizen's arrest for a misdemeanor you witness or a felony you believe has been committed. False arrest is a serious crime, and apparently a sufficient deterrent in most cases. In the US you may use necessary force to deter someone who you are placing under arrest. People near you are supposed to be legally compelled to assist you in making the arrest, and resisting a citizen's arrest is supposedly legally equivalent to resisting the arrest of a police officer. You are not allowed to resist wrongful arrest, just as you are not allowed to when you are being arrested by the police, but placing someone under arrest wrongfully is a crime and also opens you up to civil suits in our litigation-happy society.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    113. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Wanker · · Score: 4, Insightful
      But in your example, you're not actually trying to fly the plane.

      Most people just now entering the market for computers aren't "trying to fly the plane", either. To continue the analogy, these people want to be passengers but are instead told they need to learn to be pilots.

      This trend is not new to computers-- earlier this century the first radios required considerable setup and weeks to learn to use. The first phonographs were notoriously hard to use, again taking several weeks for smart folks to learn to use.

      The only reason radios and record players (now CD players) are so widespread is their usage was simplified. The earliest ones even had two competing incompatible standards (Edison vs. Victor.) Sound familiar?

      The book "The Invisible Computer" by Donald Norman goes into gory detail on why the continuing efforts to blame the users for failing to learn their equipment aren't going to work:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Booksources/0 262640414

      This doesn't mean that in the current state of things people should be lazy about their responsibilities with a networked computer-- e.g. not patching because "it's too hard" is a lame excuse.

      If this is too hard, then disconnect from the network or find a computer/OS combination where it isn't too hard. If there is no such computer/OS combination, then start asking the manufacturers for one.
    114. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And if you want us to take you seriously you should offer something more than your snarkiness...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    115. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      With a name like McCann, someone isn't exercising his constitutional rights!!

    116. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by numark · · Score: 1

      But all new consumer Macs come pre-loaded with Quicken already on them...even my iBook from two years ago has it on there.

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    117. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XP home and pro are the exact same thing.. except one can join a domain.

      Windows 98 and Win2k were whole different beasts.

    118. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Carbonite · · Score: 1

      It's been a few years, but from what I remember, in order to shop at Sam's Club you must be a member. The membership agreement states that you will allow the door checker to inspect your receipt. This is a different situation than at Best Buy, where you have no such agreement.

      --
      ich muß mehr Kuhglocke haben
    119. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Considering how often I have to re-install XP I cannot imagine that even M$ could afford to have the call centre in a civilised country. The call rate will probably bankrupt them. Ooooh, I forgot, we have to pay for all those calls... maybe the phone company did a deal with them?

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    120. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by niskel · · Score: 1

      But then also, you generally (not always) don't have to worry about a plain 'crashing' or not working because of your lack of understanding. You aren't flying the plane so you don't need to know or care how it works. But a computer is a machine that you do use yourself so you should know, or at least care how it works to the extent that you want to use it. Otherwise, not caring is the next best thing to being stupid.

    121. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by heinzkeinz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Had a problem like this recently at a public reference library. They had a rent-a-cop posted at the door searching the bags of everyone exiting. He asked, 'May I look in your bag, sir?' I said, 'No, sorry.' and kept walking. Guy started yelling at me, to the effect that I am not allowed back in the library, that sort of thing.

      Well, of course, I had gone out only for 20 minutes and came back in (entrance is seperate from the exit, so he didn't see me), but on my way out again, he stepped in front of me and said, 'You are not leaving until you open your bag.' I replied 'Wrong. I'm leaving. Call the police if you like.' More yelling ensued.

      A public library! I was there with my (mortified) girlfriend, who happily opened her bag twice. The worst part is that their 'examination' of the bags are so cursory as to be useless. My girlfriend had four books in her bag from another library, indistinguishable without removing and examining them. But she gets waved by. They have a magnetic-strip-beeping-system-thingie, so what's the point? Better to post those goofs somewhere where they can prevent real damage and loss to the library: making sure that people don't bring food in. While I was there--I'm not making this up--I saw a guy with a whole Big Mac meal pawing through a stack of journals from the thirties. Gimmie a break!

      Bah.

    122. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by benbean · · Score: 1

      Computer-as-appliance is a bit of an ideal that's still a long way off, and gets further out exponentially as people try to do more and more with them. I can't foresee a time where general purpose computers don't require a degree of skill be acquired on the part of the operator.

      Thanks for the recommendation - maybe Mr Norman can pursuade me otherwise.

      --
      It's a Unix system - I know this.
    123. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by alptraum · · Score: 1

      Why do people think others are so dumb based purely upon their computer knowledge? Does the plumber think I am a stupid idiot when I call him when I have a problems with my sink? Does the pool guy think I am a dumbass when I ask him for help fixing the pool pump?

      A lot of my professors in the MS/PhD Industrial Engineering program at my school are some of the biggest names in their research areas, however many of them have a hard time typing even a couple lines of an email, most of them want you to drop by their office hours. In class if they cannot get the computer system to work generally one of the students knows and gets things running. However, these guys are brilliant engineers.

      Lack of computer knowledge does not correlate to a lack of intelligence, get over it.

    124. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Mildew+Man · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wrong. Steve got a batch of the good LSD. Can't you tell the difference. He's not running around all paranoid like a sweaty monkey. He's groovin' on some cool tunes on his iPod.

    125. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      i'm posting this from a computer running windows 2003 enterprise edition. i didnt activate it at all. just installed one of the several available cracks and voila. works like a charm. no activation, no stupid questions. i can use windowsupdate to install all the latest updates (my friend using windows xp with the same crack was able to install service pack 2). this silly activation thing only annoys legitimate users. ppl who pirate windows wont be stopped by these silly activations.

      anyway i already have my other two computers running linux. pretty soon i'll be saying goodbye to windows altogether.

    126. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      That isn't a biased opinion, it is absolutely true. My boss tells me, often, that I should write a paper on each of the functions of the mail server. I reply, "I did that once and it tripled our call volume." Not only are people stupid, but they can't read either. Which part of "Your username is always your entire email address" is so hard to understand? How many times can I receive a call asking "What does '680 - There is no dial tone.' mean?" and still have faith in humanity? 827566 calls ago.

      IMHO, there are several types of computer users on the Internet. There are those who create and maintain everything.....tech support will never hear from these people. These people are usually tech support of some form. Then there are above-average users who are fearful of everything and rarely install new applications. Tech support hears from these people when they mess up their password. Typically, these are the people who are considered 'computer guys/gals' in their office, but think that incredimail is a good idea.
      Finally, there are the rest of them. The 99.9985% that think the mouse is a foot pedal and put their keyboard in the dishwasher are the stupid people that tech support always hear from.

      I have ceased being suprised by peoples stupidity. I have seen so much of it that it just doesn't suprise me anymore. I like to expect the worst out of people, so when they do something right I am pleasantly suprised.

      P.S. I run all of MS Office in Linux (with the exception of Access) because I read enough to figure it out. With sufficient reading you can be an elitist like me and never call tech support.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    127. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being zapped by a taser sounds like a good path to early retirement. A 0.1% chance of death is worth the tens of millions of dollars you will be awarded in court.

    128. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a matter of fact, I am in the process of moving over to the Apple platform despite being an avid Linux and OSS fan.

      Their prices are resonable, OS is solid and user friendly and their equipment is an art form all in it's own.

    129. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by aspx · · Score: 1

      No, the "desktop" and "server" OS mentality is very much alive at Microsoft. Windows XP is for destops, Windows Server 2003 is for servers. Longhorn is the next desktop Windows, and there will be a separate future Windows release for servers.

    130. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      He means that they're all now based on a much more similar codebase. Corporate desktops are running essentially the same operating system as consumers. They have a few corporate centric enhancements, but that's prett much the difference. At least in the desktop sector, they do have one product line with various SKUs rather than two completely different product lines.

    131. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by ball-lightning · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My eXPerience was actually quite different. I had a copy of XP Home that had been installed on a (now defunct) computer, thus preventing me from installing it on anything else. I called up the call center, and had the override code in about 5 minutes. This new campaign is only there to scare you, because Microsoft is assuming if you pirate their software you'll be too afraid to call them. Funny thing is, bet it will stop a lot of people.

    132. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I'd probably move to Apple, if their prices were reasonable. As it is, they aren't reasonable, and I refuse to be a slavish twerp, phoning Daddy Micro$oft for permission to use a computer and OS I paid for. So it's Linux for me. If you want to pay for Apple's overpriced solution, or bow down in the direction of Redmond, be my guest.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    133. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by murdocj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod the parent up to the sky. I can't believe the number of posts from people who think that someone who wants to simply get work done on their computer and doesn't care about the O/S is stupid.

    134. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You underestimate the knowledge of the average computer user. They don't know there is anything else - Microsoft = Computer - so they will just put up with, no matter how many hoops they have to jump through.

      It's the truth.

      If it wasn't, Microsoft would be dead by now.

    135. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      and every MS customer that needs to reinstall after a spyware/trojan attack....

    136. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by jazmataz23 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Wow, I rarely have to correct the same retard twice in one morning. Especially someone with such a low an ID number.

      Prior to XP, the "home" line of products (95,98,ME) used the DOS kernel, and the "corporate" line of products (NT & 2k) used the NT kernel. XP is a development of that NT kernel, but is "friendly" enough for use by the mouthbreathers that heretofore used the DOS-based OSes. So now that both the "home" and "corporate" OSes are using the same kernel, Microsoft has one platform line to support.

      jaz

      --
      Death to Argument by Slogan!! (This post twice-encrypted with ROT-13. Replies not using same will be ignored)
    137. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Jemm · · Score: 1

      "There is never, and has never been a charge associated with activation."

      A few days ago, I did a factory reinstall of XP from CD's provided by the computer manufacturer on a laptop which had had a BIOS update. On start up Windows wanted to activate since it believed that sufficient hardware had changed.

      I was forced to telephone Microsoft for activation since the computer had not yet figured out networking before barking for activation.

      The fine folks at MS did the usual punt and delay until I finally spoke with a manager. With the manager I typed in the valid and legal product key to generate an activation id. We did this twice, with the second time involving a complete cd restore.

      The MS activation center manager informed me that the activation ID my machine was generating was invalid and referred me to technical support for which they required $35.

      So I may not have researched MS' policies but from experience I can tell you that YES, MS wants Money to resolve activation issues.
    138. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK, for a citizen's arrest to be legal the arresting citizen has to know that an offence has been committed. Suspicion is not enough. Security guards and other chimps have no special rights.

    139. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. The Russian crack sites are going to get hammered for Windows "updates" now.

    140. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Trillan · · Score: 1

      It's not only toll free, but 24 hour.

      Mind you, I found talking to them to be a very painful experience, because they seemed to assume I was a thief. But they were easy to get ahold of.

    141. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by sosegumu · · Score: 1

      I walked out at Sam's Club one time without showing my receipt.

      I could see how Sam's Club could be different--they probably have something in their member agreement that will allow them to yank your membership.

      --
      It's easier to wear the spandex than to do the crunches. --David Lee Roth
    142. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 0

      You would have ssh'd into his machine and fixed the problem. With his Windows computer you can tell him to take it to CompUSA where they will charge $150 to wipe all his stuff off the hard drive and reinstall the OS.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    143. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Kernel be damned, there are funtctional differenced between all three product lines. While games may not care, if you are writing a business or workgroup app you had better make sure it knows the difference.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    144. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Now you will be forcing more people to move over to Linux and Mac computers!!!

      You know, it's amazing that this company stays in business. I definitely will be buying a Mac for my next desktop (already have an iBook) and as long as Apple doesn't implement similar "activation" crap in their OS I will continue to be a fan of OS X.

      The sad thing is I have several legitimate copies of Windows XP Pro at home that activated on the hardware and this kind of crap makes me feel like a criminal if I do something crazy like have to replace a motherboard or upgrade my RAM or CPU. Frankly I don't need Microsoft deciding when or where my operating system should stop working because they consider my upgraded computer an entirely new system. Screw that. I'll spend $2000 and buy a Mac before I spend $200 on another fscking copy of Windows XP Pro for an upgraded system.

    145. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "If I'm going to be punished, I may as well commit the crime."

      Ya know, if MS were to say "Since this will cut down on piracy, we're going to pre-emptively lower prices..." I might be a little less offended. But this never happens, does it? I mean, billions and billions of dollars are claimed to be lost due to piracy, but has Valve made HL2 cheaper? Ugh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    146. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I just don't understand it. Even with RAMPANT piracy, Microsft still has high profit margins than most of the Fortune 100... I just don't get it. This is pointless and futile. They should just be happy that most of their shit is preloaded by OEMs kowtowed by their licensing agreements.

    147. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Right, one line. XP in all flavors.

      The average time-to-replac a PC is about 3 years, but, that old PC doesn't go away, the kids or grandkids, or parents or whoever get it. That's why you see alot of 9x and ME machines still around. You dont just throw out that old PC - load it up with games and stick in the kids room.

      This is very, very common. When that PC finally dies or gets to slow or old or whatever, then it gets tossed eventually.

      I can tell of many a friend who bought XP and later reformatted back to 2K.
      Sure, that's fine.

      There are also lot of people running cracked copies of 2K who swear they will never "upgrade" to "XP". These are dead-enders who will eventually end up on Linux.

    148. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      It's true. Shrinkage is more damaging to corporate bottom lines than shoplifting, for the most part. However, it doesn't address other things:

      1) What if the door checker is "in on" the scam, too? Hey, 1/3 of $$$$ is still > 0. :)

      2) It's not my responsibility to screen and background check their employees.

      3) Amazon.com gets most of my business now for CD's, and newegg for my computer componets.

      I only go to BestBuy when I need something more immediate, but it still irks me.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    149. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acts of Gord has a funny bit regarding this practice that I've adopted.
      When the door-nazi asks for the receipt, a quick "Got it here in the bag. Thanks!" while you blow past them is a source of great amusement.

    150. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by danheskett · · Score: 1

      The point remains however that from MS's perspective they are built from the same source, with only config changes or minor source code changes to get the versions.

      Before it was several code bases to support.

      Now it's one code base, one driver model, one network stack, one browser, etc. Very much more unified.

      MS has done a surpringly good job of maintaining compatibility and migrating people to an entirely new platform without people even knowing it.

    151. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thoughts exactly. The most common reason for people to reinstall Windows is when their HD gets fried or a nasty virus attacks their system.

      So people are already in a very bad place when they have to reinstall. And then they find out that they have to submit themselves to an interrogation! Outrageous, ain't it?

      If that doesn't make people switch, I don't know what will...

    152. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by sharkey · · Score: 2, Informative
      Other than that, they have only two things up on the average citizen: They can make arrests for misdemeanors they did not witness, and they can carry loaded firearms on their belt.

      In the US, it's absolutely legal to carry a loaded firearm on your belt. Whether the cops harrass you over it is another thing.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    153. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are entitled to use reasonable force to resist a wrongful arrest.

      At some point in recent U.S. history any right to resist a false or illegal arrest was made itself illegal. That is why you see police officers attacking people all the time. There is nothing a U.S. citizen can do in their own defense. Remember when they used to call America the land of the free?

    154. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is a toll free call if you call from just about anywhere in North America.

    155. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about. I run a Free computer. Dozens in fact...

    156. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you forgot to say that you're not a lawyer and as such, everyone should realize that you're full of shit.

      I swear, /. is like a seething pit of uninformed teenage wannabes like you. Unlawful inprisonment? Go back into mom's basement.

    157. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misunderstand the law. There is no such thing as wrongful arrest for officers. They have qualified immunity.

    158. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      Cool, that's a much better version.
      I saw the one in my sig on a t-shirt somewhere a few days back.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    159. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Well you see, they want to make sure your not walking out with more then what you paid for. It's their attept at stopping shoplifting. And from a friend of mine that worked at Frys Electronics, it WORKS! I mean, the statistics PROVE IT. So yes, you will start seeing more and more "Door Nazi" in the future. Sad, but true.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    160. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by zero_offset · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the average /. reader would be pretty surprised at the kind of costs people are willing to bear. A few months ago I was planning to swing by a friend's house to install a new stick of memory. This guy can completely disassemble and reassemble any automobile on the road, but he wasn't willing to crack the case and snap in some extra memory. Anyway, the day before I was supposed to drop by, he e-mailed me to proudly announce that he took care of it himself -- by paying CompUSA something like $150 to install it for him.

      The cost of Windows would have to skyrocket dramatically before any significant number of "average users" would care enough to look for an alternative like Linux.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    161. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by danheskett · · Score: 1

      You have several problems with your post.

      I was forced to telephone Microsoft for activation since the computer had not yet figured out networking before barking for activation
      This doesnt' add up. You never are forced right away to activate. You have either 30 or 45 days to activate before you are forced to. Something here sound suspiciously wrong.

      With the manager I typed in the valid and legal product key to generate an activation id. We did this twice, with the second time involving a complete cd restore.
      Yeah, again, I am not calling you a liar, but are you sure you were on the phone with MS, and not the computer manufacturer? MS has written policy for its tech and activation people to never ever ask the customer to restore from disc. I've seen a copy of the training manual, it's highly emphasized.

      The MS activation center manager informed me that the activation ID my machine was generating was invalid and referred me to technical support for which they required $35.
      If you drop me an e-mail with your Case ID, I'll forward on to a contact at MS I can count on. This is definately improper on several levels. First, the policy is that activation issues are always free, period. Second, every copy of XP has two free support incidents included with it, even most OEMs copys.

      I can tell you, from my experience, of activating ~1500 copies of XP by phone over the years, that MS never wants money to deal with activation, and that something in your post just doesn't add up. If you want to satisfy your curosity, drop me a line, this is an issue I am very interested in!

    162. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by genner · · Score: 1

      You my friend have cleary never worked in tech support.

    163. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by utlemming · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have never shoplifted, btw.

      If you want to have some real fun, just keep walking out the door when the Wal-mar security alarm goes off. It is even more entertaining when the door nazi tries to stop you. But if you walk with just the right spring in your step and determiniation that you are not going to stop, they will let you go. Most states have laws stating that in order to be stopped someone has had to watch you from the moment of concelment to the point of leaving the store. Since most employees don't do that, they rely on the fact of you admitting the theft when you are caught. I have had one Wal-mart guy stop me once. I just looked at him and asked him, "What did I steal?" He just looked at me with a blank stare. I then told him that if the inept cashier would do his job and disable the security tags that it wouldn't have happened, and for him to have a nice day. I walked away, got in my car and left. No problem.

      But for some real fun, you take the undisabled security tag and then put it in your wallet. Everytime you walk into a store or leave a store the security tags set off the alarm. If you get five or so of your buddies to do the same thing, and enter and leave a store at the same time, one after another, it causes some real fun. You usually get the store manager throwing some vague threats of calling the police. Since you didn't steal and they can't prove it, the ensueing frustration is always entertaining. BTW, only do that if you have a little time.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    164. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      That's just because people in the UK love to steal! I can't remember where, but I read several articles about how theft is extremely common in the UK.

      I guess that's what happens when your country has restrictive gun ownership laws.

    165. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have had to do this twice. The first time was when Win XP first came out (i could not get it to work with my computer). I transferred the license to my friend (we called their support line). It took all of 10 minutes from the point of dialing...in fact I didn't have any phone menu's to navigate. The lady was friendly and (shock) American.

      The other time was about a month ago. I had updated the motherboard/cpu on my desktop and used my Dell Laptop Win XP cd for the original installation. Obviously Win XP asked me to re-activate. I called, and spent about 15 minutes on the phone. I can't recall if the person was Indian, but I did understand them. The only annoying part was the automated system which reads your serial key. It took me about ten minutes to get through that (it didn't work twice). The person was much more helpful.

      Overall, this portion of dealing with MS was kinda painless.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    166. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can. You look at services like Microsoft Live and Outlook web for hotmail, and put enough of those services together delivered via akamai over broadband, and all of a sudden the only thing you need to do if your computer gets corrupted is push a combination of two buttons to reload from a ROM image. Your data gets stored on number USB keychains or external drives, and the apps are served and cached ala Java Web Start.

      Sun and Microsoft and others jumped the appliance idea about 5 years too early. Broadband is almost ubiquitous now in large metro and suburban areas, and WiMax threatens to bring it to rural areas. It's now just a matter of time before the average computer is a window onto someone elses computers where the management and operation is done for you.

      When we have HDTV on demand over broadband, that's when we'll start to see a massive shift in consumer computing. More people are already using Yahoo or Hotmail for email and contact management and scheduling than Outlook or Outlook express or Netscape. This trend will continue to accelerate when Word and various other desktop offerings can be delivered via broadband.

      Look at how Valve has simplified software delivery with Steam?

    167. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      they can carry loaded firearms on their belt.

      So can I. You don't need to be a cop to carry a loaded firearm on your belt, assuming it's legal in your city/state and you possess the proper permits.

      Wow, my second post on this thread and it's also about guns.

    168. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by DigitumDei · · Score: 1

      I've had to call microsoft to activate a copy of XP home 3 times (Lots of issues with installing new hardware). Twice I got Indian support guys and once some british lady. Now I live in Durban which has the largest Indian population in any city outside of india (at least I'm pretty sure I remember hering that), so the indian guys were not a problem. The british lady however had some nasty dialect that I just couldn't understand over the phone. That call took twice as long as the others combined and she spoke english as a first language. ;)

      The point however was not to dis indians or any other nationality, the problem is that for many people, listening to foreign accents over the phone is difficult. And the moment you make call centers even more important, there is a manager somewhere who is going to try save money, and then we all get screwed. :(

      The more times you have to deal with a company after you have purchased a product, the more chance of something going wrong.

    169. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, they'll get you for tresspassing for trying to LEAVE their store???

    170. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2
      That's just because people in the UK love to steal! [...] I guess that's what happens when your country has restrictive gun ownership laws.

      Wow, that's the most impressive non sequitur I've seen on Slashdot in days!

      Personally, I'm coming round to the view that the UK should legalise the ownership/carrying/use of some weapons, including firearms, for any member of society in good standing who demonstrates competence in their storage, handling and use. However, my reasons for doing so do not include using the threat of shooting Little Johnny as he walks out of the sweet shop forgetting to pay for his Mars bar to deter the crimewave you seem to think we're experiencing.

      I read several articles about how theft is extremely common in the UK.

      I read somewhere that you shouldn't confuse correlation with causality while trying to make a logical argument. :-)

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    171. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by AviLazar · · Score: 1, Informative

      He can detain you until his manager arrives, and the manager (if he wants to) can detain you until the police arrive. Now if you decide to just ignore them and run, don't be surprised when a police officer tackles you down and slaps hand cuffs on you or when they circulate your pictures (from the cameras) to the police station. Once they find out you did nothing wrong except act like a moron - they will tell you to behave. You are in a place of business, the guard was doing his job - because you know there are criminals out there - and they don't wear signs on their heads saying "I'm the bad guy." So next time you feel like being a prick to some poor schlep trying to earn a buck, think on how you would feel and just let the guy do his job - it is not that much of an inconvenience.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    172. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      You don't necessarily have to be a member to shop at Sam's club. A few years ago, I bought a few things there as a non-member, and they added 3% to my purchase (which would have counted toward the membership fee had I decided to join).

      I wonder what would happen in that situation where you didn't explicitly agree to any membership terms.

      I also wonder what would happen if you were browsing through the store as a non-member and as you were leaving the door nazi asked to check your coat pockets. OR what if you were a nonmember and did some shopping with the member. Your friend uses his membership card at the register and you purchase the items (with cash) and proceed to walk out. Can they check your receipt, even though you're not a member?

    173. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by flibuste · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think I called the police once, on a guy who stole a $0.95 auto-trader magazine. It was pretty funny :)

      For 0.95$? And you are proud of yourself? Did you ever wonder how much of your own tax money you wasted by calling the cops? Any idea of HOW MUCH this cost to ALL the others around you?

      This may appear funny to you, but it appears rather pathetic to me. First because you actually did call the cops for such an insignificant event, AND wasted OUR money by doing so.

      Too bad they are no doorman checking against stupidity

    174. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about all the people who are in between the all knowing user and the above-average user who is "afraid to install anything"?

      I'm certainly in between that, without any knowledge of programming (CLI interfaces of any kind make me cringe and I tend to avoid them and far prefer a WIMP interface, yes I'm a WIMP-y person!) yet I am not afraid of taking the machine apart, installing things with abandon, etc. Hard drive fails, I will freeze the sucker and get a few minutes of life out of it, but I'll need a GUI-based hard drive "rescuer" type program to do it - no CLI based stuff is acceptable in any situation, and will be used only when there literally is no other option.

      Where does someone like me fit in your all-knowing equation?

    175. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 1

      >"Why so many installs?" Common answers:

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    176. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we're all just making it up, obviously. Thanks for bursting our happy bubble, you philistine!

    177. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by tds67 · · Score: 0
      Anyone else feel like this when the "door nazi" at BestBuy/other chain steps in front of you and demands to see your receipt? Treating your customers like they're potential criminals is no way to gain loyalty.

      I bought a VCR there a year ago and they tried that on me. I complained, then got an immediate refund and bought the same thing for $25 less at a competing store. I haven't been in BestBuy since.

    178. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur. More people will of course use free software no matter how steep they may perceive the learning curve to be. It will be great.

    179. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by grotgrot · · Score: 1

      Their point isn't to catch unscrupulous customers - it is to catch unscrupulous employees. The scam works like this. Customer takes several high ticket items to checkout. Cashier doesn't scan some of the items but goes through the motions. Customer walks out of door with serveral items for free. Customer and employee sell them and profit. (Obviously the customer and employee team up for this).

      Now the store could explain that the door people are there to catch bad employees, but they would rather you didn't think of their employees potentially being like that.

    180. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know LSD made you pretencious and arrogant. No wonder everyone was a dick in the 70s.

    181. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many companies have the same criteria:

      -see the person conceal the item
      -maintain continuous observation
      -see them leave (or pass the last register)

      Unfortunately, all the shoplifter has to do is turn a corner suddenly, and you've lost sight of him, and can't bust him.

      I'm surprised that people don't try that more often. Hide an item, duck around the corner and ditch the item, then make a run for the door. Sue if/when they stop you and find nothing. Throw in the race card if you can. Etc.

    182. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by sribe · · Score: 1

      However, simply walking out the door doesn't sound like "reasonable suspicion" to me, and you'd probably have a good case against THEM for unlawful imprisonment.

      You sir, are absolutely 100% correct. Most states spell out in a bit more detail what "reasonable suspicion" means, and generally it involves something like seeing you conceal something on your person and leave the store without removing the item(s) and paying for them.

    183. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 1
      Dauh! Shift and enter are way too close together. Didn't mean to post! I just wanted a capital letter!

      Anyway.

      >"Why so many installs?"

      Common Answers:
      I was owned.
      I reformated my computer

      Nobody ever says "because I just bought a copy from some guy on the side of the road." Do they really expect people to say "Because I pirate software?"

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    184. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by sribe · · Score: 2

      He can detain you until his manager arrives, and the manager (if he wants to) can detain you until the police arrive.

      Wrong! He cannot detain you without a very specific reason to suspect that you stole something; doing so is a crime on his part!

    185. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All spelling, gammer, and logical mistakes are intentinal because I'm to fucking lazy to look it up. If you don't like it, Fuck Off!

      Didn't you mean instestinal? :P

    186. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should LET the people at Sam's stop you! I too was irritated with this process until the door nazi told me that I was missing a case of beer. Apparently this process isn't just to make sure you aren't stealing from them, its also to make sure they aren't "stealing" from you. I had failed to read the sale sign closely enough, and there was a buy one get one free type sale on case's of beer. Well I had grabbed one, but paid for two. The door guy caught my mistake and I was supplied with beer for another week!

    187. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 3, Funny
      >> probably closely related to the Second Law of Termodynamics

      For those who don't know, the Second Law of Termodynamics reads as follows: "For every post that contains a correctly used term, another 5 posts on slashdot will contain misused, mithspelled(pun) or misunderstood terms.

      This is closely related to the Theory of Repostivity.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    188. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugg... I hate Best Buy & the way they treat customers:

      - I was stopped just like you describe the first time I went there and treated like a criminal.

      - After that, I had to take a item back to the store... and anyone that's shopped at Best Buy knows how that goes :(

    189. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by sribe · · Score: 1

      That is reasonable enough - ask a lawyer or a cop. The person is being suspicious by not showing their receipt. In addition the cop/lawyer/judge will tell you to just grow the fuck up.

      Well, see the problem with your statement is that the law generally spells out what is reasonable suspicion. So your spouting on /. that this is "reasonable" and "ask a lawyer or a cop" is 100% meaningless drivel.

    190. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      He needs to suspect you stole something. As I gave in another post
      You walk out of store with bag
      "Can I see your receipt sir...no?" thinking to himself (that is kind of weird, and suspicious)

      There ya go. It is very reasonable and any reasonable cop would tell you to start acting like a grownup.

      If you do not like those store policies, do not go inside. You see, the problem happens because criminals generally do not advertise they are comitting a crime - so when you act suspicious you are giving them reason to suspect you as a criminal.

      But in all honesty, people just need to grow up - is that that inconvenient to show him the receipt so he can put a little check on it?

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    191. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I think those idiots forgot to read their Business 101 book:
      Pissing off your customers is a bad idea
      I know, I know, it's a really hard concept to follow.
      --
      Berto
    192. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      So cite your source - what is reasonable.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    193. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you go to the right shelf, you can buy software for Linux off of it (and no, you can't blame Linux for that --it's like people bellyaching that 'cars need gas, and you just can't buy it anywhere like you can hay for the horse'). As for plug and play hardware: wake up stupid. John Dvorak is clueless. Linux has been plug and play for YEARS. You don't have to compile or write drivers either. Linux supports more hardware than any other Operating system period (bar none). If you get on your high (stupid) horse and start crowing about your pet system.... try again! Is it supported by the OS manufacturer, or the hardware manufacturer? Oops, stopped you dead in your tracks with that one didn't I! I repeat: Linux supports more hardware than any ANY other OS on the planet!

    194. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by MasamuneXGP · · Score: 1

      The solution: Activation via IM.

    195. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by tenton · · Score: 1

      Why do people think others are so dumb based purely upon their computer knowledge? Does the plumber think I am a stupid idiot when I call him when I have a problems with my sink? Does the pool guy think I am a dumbass when I ask him for help fixing the pool pump?

      A lot of my professors in the MS/PhD Industrial Engineering program at my school are some of the biggest names in their research areas, however many of them have a hard time typing even a couple lines of an email, most of them want you to drop by their office hours. In class if they cannot get the computer system to work generally one of the students knows and gets things running. However, these guys are brilliant engineers.

      Lack of computer knowledge does not correlate to a lack of intelligence, get over it.


      It's not the lack of computer knowledge that causes me (and others) to think people are dumb. It's the application (or lack thereof) of common sense, when applied to computers. If you have problems with your sink, do you smash the pipes with a hammer, in the effort to fix it? No? If the power went out in your neighborhood, do you sit there in amazement and wonder why your pool pump doesn't work? No? Well, that kind of stuff happens with people and computers.

      It's one thing to not know how to do something, or how to fix something. It's another to suffer a total disconnect of intelligence, which many people do in front of a computer (we're talking smart people here; doctors, Ph.D's, engineers, hell, I've had a few people with computer science degrees exhibit bizarre behavior in front of their PCs).

      I could probably write a book on the things I've seen; not the run of the mill, "how do I do this" kind of thing, or "what is this MP3 stuff" kind of thing. We're not even talking "less than bright" people. I'll even disregard the "disconnect things while the computer is on, despite being asked to shut the computer off no less than 3 times in 3 minutes". We're talking about the Ph.D calling in, mad at the company because his burner doesn't work (he installed it backwards, and had the cables running around the outside of the case). We're talking the engineering professor who insisted that his product was defective, despite showing him that it worked in every configuration, except one (through a USB hub, where everything stopped working, once 3 things get plugged in; any 3 items, even without the product in question plugged in). Those guys. That's a lack of common sense, right there.

      See, there's a lack of computer knowledge, then there's lack of sense

      (the examples above are real...I'm not creative enough to make them up. They are incidents that actually have happened to me and my coworkers).

    196. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Krakhan · · Score: 1

      Woah, this reminds me of the libraries at my university. They have someone that checks your bags too, but it's done in such a way as to be essentially that anyone could go by and easily get away with stealing a few books.

      Of course, oddly enough we don't have the magnetic strip bars installed, but I think the money they get from the tuition paid would be better spent on purchasing that.

      A former co-worker of mine from one my old co-op job ended up arguing with one of the bag checkers about this issue too.. Ugh, so nice to think their own students are also big thiefs...

    197. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "This doesnt' add up. You never are forced right away to activate. You have either 30 or 45 days to activate before you are forced to. Something here sound suspiciously wrong."

      I had this problem, it was actaully an upgrade version of XP - the computer I had it on was dieing on its feet, I moved the harddrive to another computer and as soon as I booted up (after all drivers installed) it wanted me to (re)activate straight away - no access to anythin else.

      (it failed with internet activation, and touchtone activation, but 5 mins on the phone and I had a new number/key (whatever it's called) and it was all working)

    198. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by javaxman · · Score: 1
      I didn't know LSD made you pretencious and arrogant. No wonder everyone was a dick in the 70s.

      You're thinking of cocaine.

      It also makes you jump around like a monkey, yelling and sweating a lot, now that I think about it... hmmm... that's a description of that other Steve, isn't it ?

      Glad to see you're not pretentious, AC...

    199. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First rule of good business - treat all of your customers like theiving criminals and heinous sinners. Might actually work if you ran a penitentiary, or hell...oh, wait...

    200. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

    201. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Yes but can we pump them with 49 bullets if they resist arrest, that's what I want to know.

      I could see this being used in all kinds of mugging defenses. "Well you honor you see he was resisting a citizen's arrest. I saw him spitting on the sidewalk and when he refused to submit to arrest I had the beat the crap out of him"

      --
      evil is as evil does
    202. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't necessarily what worries me... it's the next thing, and the next thing down the line...

      ... in the future ... To activate your copy of windows, please insert your finger into the DNA extractor located next to the blank COA label, you will feel a slight prick, after your DNA has been retrieved and cataloged, the product key should now appear in red on the COA label. Please type this key in with your bloody nub.

    203. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      Personally, I'm coming round to the view that the UK should legalise the ownership/carrying/use of some weapons, including firearms, for any member of society in good standing who demonstrates competence in their storage, handling and use.


      This is already the case. There is some strange misconception among USians that people in the UK are not allowed guns. I don't think I know anyone who *doesn't* own a gun of some sort.

    204. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      see now that's just silly... that's why you can't listen to ac's...

    205. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Second_Infinity · · Score: 1

      In the city of Cary, North Carolina, you CANNOT carry a firearm in sight - whether it be loaded or not. If you're carrying one it must be concealed... something about making the public panic if they see a gun. It's a local city law. You won't go to jail for it, but you'll owe a hefty fine.

    206. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by sribe · · Score: 2

      So cite your source - what is reasonable.

      No. Reasonable is spelled out in state laws. You want to know what the law in your state says, go look it up. You obviously have no, none, zero idea what you're talking about, because you have as much as admitted that you have no idea what the law might say. I do happen to know a little about what it says. Let me spell something out for you, something which needs no reference to back it up:

      1) It is obvious to any adult who stops to think about it for a moment that the laws on the subject would contain specific guidance about what qualifies as suspicion sufficient to detain someone. Do you disagree with that?

      2) It is obvious that no opinion held by you, or me, supersedes the laws on the subject. Do you disagree with that?

      3) You do not know what the law actually says on the matter. Do you disagree with that?

      So why are you commenting on the legalities of the subject??? There are plenty of references to these policies available through google; they have even been linked to from previous /. stories; most states have their statues online now. If you actually cared about the facts you could find them.

      But in all honesty, people just need to grow up - is that that inconvenient to show him the receipt so he can put a little check on it?

      In the one and only time I refused to show a receipt, yes, it was that inconvenient. The store was understaffed on a busy day. I spent a long time in line behind some jerk arguing about price (trying to claim an item was on sale when it wasn't) in order to check out, only to then be faced with another long line to have my receipt checked. It was bad enough having to wait to pay; I was most certainly not going to then immediately wait in another line in order to prove that I had paid.

      Or more bluntly, that the store does not trust its cashiers is their problem, and I refuse to let them push it off onto me.

    207. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Speaking of reducing prices, read the latest Cringely column. He predicts Microsoft will net billions more in revenue by issuing their antispyware software free.

      And here I thought Bill was finally smart enough to realize that charging for the ASW product would be a pittance in revenue compared to the bad publicity about charging for fixes to one's own flaws.

      When in reality, the point of releasing the ASW software for free was to put the other companies out of business and force 100 million upgrades to XP SP2, thereby generating billions more in revenue.

      In other words, as Cringely puts it, even Microsoft's "good" actions have a predatory purpose.

      Fortunately Cringely also suggests this will hurt Microsoft later.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    208. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by creysoft · · Score: 1

      It really all depends. Once, I took a (dead) Sony Clie back, after two years. I still had the PSP (best $70 I ever spent.) The battery was behaving erratically, so it wasn't completely dead yet, and I was afraid it would work fine for them.

      So, I take it back and sure enough, he doesn't know any real odd behavior. (Except that the battery meter kind of fluctuates.) Still, he said, "Well, I'll take your word for it. We don't carry Clies anymore. Would you like in-store credit?"

      The whole thing took about 20 minutes. Everyone was polite. Of course, that isn't to say that everyone's experience is like that. But still, if you run into some nice employees, it can still be a pleasant experience.

      And yeah, I hate those $#@$#@ receipt checkers. Why do they always give the job to someone with Parkinson's? I think it's great that they hire employees with disabilities, but don't put them in a position where expediency is important. *sigh*

      --
      Formerly GNU/Anonymous Coward. This message has been determined to cause cancer in laboratory animals.
    209. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reminds me ... the s.o. and i were at a small, local store which happened to have those security "gates" at the entrance. we'd finished browsing and were leaving when the security alarm beeped. something the s.o. was wearing was setting it off. a very lengthy trouble-shoot ensued. the manager came over and asked him if he had anything in his pockets. nope. they had him pass through again, and the alarm went off. they had him hand them his jacket and pass through. no alarm. they passed just his jacket through. no alarm. when he *and* his jacket passed through together, alarm. they went through this procedure a couple of times (just to be sure, i guess). meanwhile, this draws a fair bit of attention and also, since there's only one way in and out of the store, blocks a fair bit of traffic. the s.o. is looking pretty embarrassed at this treatment by now. the manager makes him follow her into a back room, presumably for a search (which of course, turns up nothing, since he didn't take anything and has, in fact, never done so in his life). finally, she decides that there must be a fault with their system and lets him go. the manager, by the way, was always friendly and polite throughout this "ordeal" and so was the s.o., but it still wasn't very pleasant for him.

    210. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by killjoe · · Score: 1

      If I guy just wants to get to the supermarket but can't tell the difference between a car and a truck, or between a stickshift and an automatic then he is stupid.

      It's not enough to "just want ot get your work done". 90% of getting your work done is knowing how to use your tools.

      Anybody who is trying to get computer work done but does not care about the OS is stupid and should immediately be fired.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    211. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > placing someone under arrest wrongfully is a crime and also opens you up to civil suits in our litigation-happy society.

      nice spin at the end. it's not a suit for using a hairdryer in the bathtub dude, it's actual assault and violation of any number of civil rights. i'd be quite happy if that were the extent of our "litigation-happiness".

      Fact is, most suits are filed by corporations as business tactics. But you don't see the GOP whining about that, do you?

    212. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Lets see how flawed your argument is:

      I ask you to prove yourself and you tell me that I have no clue as to what I am talking. The logic of this goes how?

      1) The law asks for reasonable, and lends reasonable to a broad aspect. Sort of like when a police officer stops someone under the "I had reason to believe...."

      2)Well duh. Though you have yet to show me the law written anywhere to prove your statement

      3)There are many many law books - and while I may know of a few instances with regards to this law (i do), there might be something superseding it - hence I want proof from you. You claim my words were "dribble" so now I wnat you to prove it.

      So far you have offered as much proof as I have, so shouldn't you ask yourself these questions.

      If you do not like the store policies why do you bother shopping there? And yes a store can refuse to sell you an item for any reason (except the "wrong" reasons) they choose.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    213. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > In the US, it's absolutely legal to carry a loaded firearm on your belt.

      Depends on the muncipality. Lots of PDs simply won't issue open-carry permits, they'll actually try to steer you toward concealed-carry.

    214. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      This is already the case. There is some strange misconception among USians that people in the UK are not allowed guns.

      That's because you're wrong and we're not, as various friends and colleagues of mine who used to shoot for sport before the post-Dunblane mess can testify. We're also not allowed to carry much else that would be useful as a weapon without restriction under OWA and friends.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    215. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by snorklewacker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > What if the door checker is "in on" the scam, too?

      The door checker is probably a bonded security guard. Getting caught would cost them a whole pile of money, more than they're likely to make on a scam, not to mention that they'd never work in the field again. Most security guards don't have a lot of other useful skills. Not to say it doesn't happen, but that and the difficulty of getting a conspiracy of three especially when the cashier and guard don't even know each other (working for different companies) make the likelihood low enough that an insurance company would call it a significant risk reduction. There aren't any absolutes.

      I go to CompUSA (also has Door Nazis) because they're two blocks away from my house and they have real big rebates (that I always forget to mail in -- I'm the reason for their profits right here). Otherwise I mail order (and CompUSA has mail order). The door nazis don't bug me, but mostly because most of the ones that store are actually friendly.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    216. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, there isn't more than a handful of games worth playing on Windows, either. PC gaming is on a serious decline, fueled by shitty production and a serious hardware barrier. Unreal Tournaments now run with Linux, as does Doom 3,Neverwinter Nights, and America's Army. This does a good job of fighting the Catch-22. The only serious game that's missing is Half-Life and its sequal. Open Source games are becoming more plentiful, slowly. Wesnoth is a decent turn based strategy game, and Kento Cho is doing some stellar work with OpenGL abstract shooters. And of course, there's plenty of games like solitaire,mindsweeper, and hearts, which really dominate the games most people "play" on computers. I suppose you might miss those MMORPGs, but really, what a waste of time and money.

      I think a much bigger barrier to Linux popularity is the ease of piracy; so many guys in my dorms bought and built their own computer, and then just stuck a pirated version of windows 2k or XP on there. I tried to convince my brother to try a Linux partition, but he's dead set against learning anything new related to computers. He did pirated winXP as well. We hear so much about Microsoft offering large discounts to dissatisfied large clients (rumored to be 100%), that its amazing that Novell/SuSe or somebody hasn't sued for price discrimination / price dumping. Or maybe they have and I haven't read the news very carefully.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    217. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by IronChef · · Score: 1

      Last time I returned an item to Best Buy I had an amazing experience. I walked to the return counter with my item and receipt, and stood there for 15 minutes while the returns clerk made phone calls attempting to verify that I had not JUST STOLEN the merchandise. Wow, that was annoying.

    218. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personal computers have been out for over 25 years. There is NO excuse for "lack of knowledge and experience" using a computer. Especially if the person's job involves a computer.

    219. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Overall, this portion of dealing with MS was kinda painless.

      Calling Microsoft's Tech Support line back in the early 90's was actually kind of nice. They had a live DJ spinning their hold music. No kidding. Or if not live, then Muzak certainly had a very good channel that MS picked.

      No more, of course. Pretty standard crap.

    220. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by mmthomas · · Score: 1

      It's interesting that despite Linux's free availability that Windows is (apparently) still widely pirated.

      Ciao!

    221. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by The+Vulture · · Score: 1

      Jesus, do people just do asshole things to be complete dicks for no other reason? No wonder our world is screwed up - it's not MS that screwed up the world - it's the SOB's who do it.

      We do "asshole" things like this, because other people are being "assholes" to us by demanding that we show them our receipts and subject ourselves to unreasonable searches. And quite frankly, I've already waited in line long enough to pay for my merchandise, I don't want to wait in another line for somebody else to verify that the cashier did their job correctly. You'll note that they don't actually check to see if you're trying to sneak something out, they just check to make sure that the number of items in your bag matches what's on the receipt - in other words, they don't trust the people at the register to do their job, and with good reason.

      Supposedly the employees will have their friends come in and buy big-ticket items, and the employees will either "forget" to scan the item, or ring up the wrong price. Or perhaps the person running the cash register is just incompetant, or a new trainee (turnover at those kind of stores does tend to be high).

      Either way, if you can't trust your employees, and you can't adequately protect your store without searching me when I leave, then that's your problem, and not mine. (And I would argue that Fry's could do a lot to help out by actually treating their employees with respect, training them, and paying them better).

      If I'm walking out with merchandise that I didn't pay for, then they should have either:
      1. Caught it at the register (in other words, the employee should have rung everything up correctly)
      2. Have employees or cameras watching people to catch shoplifters in action, rather than harrassing everybody.

      -- Joe

    222. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Wanker · · Score: 1
      Computer-as-appliance is a bit of an ideal that's still a long way off...maybe Mr Norman can pursuade me otherwise

      For what it's worth, he hasn't convinced me that the appliance route is the solution to computer usablility problems either. However, his discussion of the problems with computer usability and the reasons behind them were a real eye-opener.

      I can't foresee a time where general purpose computers don't require a degree of skill be acquired on the part of the operator.

      I fully agree with you here, and in fact I'd even go one step further and say any general purpose tool is going to require a degree of skill on the part of the operator.

      One of Mr. Norman's points is that the vast majority of people don't want a general purpose computer. Or from his activity-based point of view, they don't want to "compute"-- they want to write letters. They want to check the local news. They want to send/receive E-mail. Perhaps play a few simple games. They don't give a damn what goes on behind the scenes to make these things happen.

      They don't want to select an ISP. They don't want to configure their computer's TCP/IP settings. They probably don't even want to know what their E-mail address is, so long as their friends can E-mail them easily.

      The book is a quick read, and well worth the two days it might take to get through it.

      Here's a Slashdot review on one of his other books:

      http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=99/09/27/ 1243213
    223. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      1) It is their store policy, if you do not like it - don't shop there.

      2) I could understand if they just selected a specific group of people (i.e. targeting only black people) then it would be a problem - they target everyone

      3) People do shoplift - on their own and with assistance from store clerks.
      4) Criminals can easily appear to be non-criminals (it's not that hard really). So those 20 store clerks you just hired - they seem reasonable - doesn't mean one of them won't steal

      It is a naive, and actually from people on this board (which i expect more from) just plain being dickish to give these people a hard time.

      They are not being assholes to you by asking for your receipt - they are trying to protect themselves from being robbed.

      One of your arguments is that if they didn't catch a person shoplifting at the register then their only means of preventing or catching a criminal is a camera? Like camera's do much.

      You are being ridiculous. This conversation is a matter of opinion so it will go nowhere. Again, if you do not like a particular stores policy - don't shop there - I am sure you can buy the same or similar products in another store. But being a dick to someone who is doing their job makes you the bad guy - not the rent-a-cop.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    224. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      You know, with all those letters and titles in front of your example's names, it makes me think of one thing:

      Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach.

      Yeah yeah, it's a blanket statement, etc. But I've found that academics tend to have been gifted with a much smaller dose of common sense than the average person.

    225. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the plumber think I am a stupid idiot when I call him when I have a problems with my sink?
      They would if the conversation went like this:

      "Hi, Plumbing support? Yeah, the water in my sink keeps getting higher and higher, and it's spilling out onto the floor. What? Turn off the what? 'Faucet'? Stop using such technical terms. I'm not a plumber, you know!... Okay, okay, how do I do that? Oh.... Now, the water stopped coming out, but the level in the sink thingy isn't going down.... What's a drain?"

      That's the average level of intellegence you get from a computer user.

      Is it too much to ask that people who use computers obn a daily basis at least know the difference between, say, memory and hard drive space?

      Lack of computer knowledge does not correlate to a lack of intelligence, get over it.

      Lack of knowledge with any tool you use regularly DOES correlate to a lack of intelligence.

    226. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Kind of an aside, but I have put my keyboard in the dishwasher. Let it dry for a few days, and it's as good as new. Depends on the keyboard, obviously. And run it without soap. But it works very well at getting the scum out.

      WARNING: Laptop users following this advice are the types of people parent is complaining about.

    227. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "In other words, as Cringely puts it, even Microsoft's "good" actions have a predatory purpose."

      Err, right. Companies made money on Microsoft's incompetence. Microsoft fixes their incompetence, makes their product better, but it puts companies out of business. Never mind that anti-virus etc doesn't lose MS sales. Heh.

      Uh. Sorry man, not trying to give you personally a hard time. I've just noticed lately that when people put their minds to something they hate, they can cook up all kinds of justifications to hate them. A lot of the time, the justifications sound alright because a negative is measurable (i.e. "businesses will go under. That's what Microsoft wants!") but further analysis (usually dislike prevents this analysis from happening) often yields more enlightening info about reality.

      Microsoft is usually the butt of these insightful ramblings, but I see it all the time. The thought process, in my view, is utterly unhelpful. "Why would I want a camera in my phone?!?" as opposed to "If I had a camera in my phone, what productive work could I do with it?" I work in a field where creative solutions need to be sought on a regular basis. Unfortunately, some people develop opinions like these and end up closing off an entire avenue of solutions. (i.e. Maya users and LW users baring their teeth at each other.) I've learned the hard way this is a bad way to behave. That's why I felt compelled to reply to your post. I often reply to these comments like I did in the first paragraph here, the idea being to show people that there's often more to the story than they've allowed in. Unfortunately, I come off sounding like a Microsoftie.

      Okay, not the most on-topic post in the world, but hopefully at least you'll understand why I don't take assumptions about Microsoft's behaviour too seriously. All it takes to be seen as evil is a pre-supposition that you are.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    228. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by chasingporsches · · Score: 1

      and to think... Mac OS X STILL doesn't even require a product key. (apple, please dont do this to tiger.)

    229. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

      Also, if your support call is the direct result of a bug in the product, they'll refund the per incident cost. I had that happen with a DHCP server bug back in the NT 4.0 days.

    230. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      You can walk out. But Sam's Club can cancel your membership; read the agreement.

      The other stores can do nothing.

    231. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by codehoser · · Score: 1

      "There is never, and has never been a charge associated with activation."

      I was helping my brother in law out with a Windows XP installation. He had a legitimate OEM copy of Windows XP, which came with his computer. His hard drive failed, and we installed a new one, and then installed Windows XP on it.

      He wasn't able to automatically activate it, so he had to call. The lady on the phone told him that he would need to pay to activate it ($25 I believe), since it was an OEM version of Windows XP. She said that you _only_ get free activation if you bought a retail copy of Windows XP.

      Kevin

    232. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for home users, that's not too bad. Now do that for windows and office for your test machines because you're a network admin for a smaller company and you aren't allowed to go with volume licensing.
      Its annoying as hell doing it even once.

      Anyone who thinks this effects piracy of windows would be a fscking moron. Software pirates make sure to get the volume license version and a non-black listed serial. Trust me its easy. Haven't owned a legit copy of windows since 98 first edition.

      However, I do believe this will effect the total amount of piracy. I am keeping one machine for gaming, and all others will be reimaged with Mandrake 10.1 (just my personal preference).

      I'm done with that crap. I'm even going to see if I can't get all of my family's machines onto Linux as well.

      And for you M$ lovers out there. This is why a lot of us hate M$ with a passion. They never solve the real problem that faces them, but rather just create more hassle for the legal users.

    233. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      ...why so many installs...

      Because it's freaking Windows!

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    234. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by rhavyn · · Score: 1

      You can repeat that argument all you want, but walking out of the store with the items you purchased is not "reasonable grounds" for searching you. Them asking your permission and you saying no does not suddenly change that. If the detain you and you have no stolen items on you then you have a great false imprisonment lawsuit.

    235. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by zonker · · Score: 0

      yeah, and the rest of folks that want to continue to use xp w/o having to deal with activation will just get their hands on a pirated corporate edition (which doesn't have any activation bs in it) where microsoft has even less control over the activation. seems like a bonehead move to me...

    236. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      "I would like to see them grab me to make me show my receipt." They can't, because technically it's assault.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    237. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      I think the federal government gives tax breaks and other incentives to companies that employ people with disabilities, etc. This is why when you get hired at some places, your boss takes you into a room and dials a phone number and hands you the phone and you have to answer a bunch of questions... They're checking to see if they're eligible for a tax break. :)

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    238. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like what the RIAA is doing.

    239. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      Not quite. Even with really really user friendly versions of Linux, there are lots of things the distro vendor didn't think about.

      Example: There are tons of ASP developers out there that know very little about how to configure machines. The other day I took my SuSE 9.1 box and wanted to install PHP to access a MS SQL database. You can't do it without downloading a non-YaST managed package (OpenTDL) and recompiling PHP with the proper configuration, all of which means you can't manage it with YaST anymore.

      With Windows, I can install SQL Server, IIS, ASP, etc.. without ever leaving a GUI, or recompiling anything. Not so easy with SuSE and probably similar with most other distro's.

      All i'm saying here is that Linux distro's still have a long way to go to cater to the edge cases. And all the different edge cases comprise a startlingly large percentage. As the saying goes, any one use probably only uses 10% of (whatever), but it's always a different 10%.

    240. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      buy software off the shelf

      I can buy StarOffice or Linux off the shelf. If more commercial software shows up for Linux I'm sure it will be the same.

      Plug and Play hardware

      Last time I switched a video card in Linux it was autodetected that the old one was gone and the new one worked right away. In Windows I had to uninstall the old drivers, find new drivers, reinstall the new ones, re-set my preferences. Linux is more Plug and Play than Windows.

      search forums filled with people calling you a "st00pid n00b" to find said drivers

      Drivers are included with the kernel. If you want to download the ATI or nVidia drivers I don't think you'll find messages like that on their web sites.

    241. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      "Free mac mini! End the injustice!"

      Free Tibet! Just send a 6,852,000 square mile self-addressed envelope to: Deng Xiao Ping, c/o...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    242. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this got insightful, please

      As a total percentage of computer users, however, they make up rather less than you think

      Where do you work. Seriously, I'm going to apply there. I've never worked at a place where there wasn't at least 5% that didn't even know how to turn off/on a computer, 15% not understand how to right-click the mouse, 15% thinking that if you delete a shortcut it deletes the program, and about 60% being smart enough to right down what they're told so they can do it later but not having a clue as to how to do something else new without asking for help EVERYTIME. The rest can pretty well take care of themselves.

      Its not a linux thing, its a user thing. And its not because they aren't interested in computers. It because they are stupid. Many things bore me to death, but it doesn't mean I can't figure them out.

      the majority of people don't really care (because it is not important to their lives) about Linux

      Correct, but that's because they don't know what the hell it is. Not even that's its an OS.

      Remember that you also had an unending stream of people that couldn't even use Windows either.

      Sorry, unending stream is still there. And its not going away.

    243. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by severoon · · Score: 1

      Does it qualify as situational irony if they require you to prove you're doing a legal reinstall of an OS that suffers from OS rot to such an extent that users like myself find they must blow off and reinstall everything every 3 to 6 months? No, that's not irony...that's just idiocy.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    244. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Eric604 · · Score: 1
      The average time-to-replac a PC is about 3 years, but, that old PC doesn't go away, the kids or grandkids, or parents or whoever get it. That's why you see alot of 9x and ME machines still around. You dont just throw out that old PC - load it up with games and stick in the kids room.

      That's silly. The new PC is used for the games and goes into the kids room. The old PC can be used for the serious non gaming stuff.

      > I can tell of many a friend who bought XP and later reformatted back to 2K.
      that's only natural

      There are also lot of people running cracked copies of 2K who swear they will never "upgrade" to "XP". These are dead-enders who will eventually end up on Linux.

      no need for a crack, just a serial. Why would not upgrading to XP be an dead end? Maybe I'll upgrade (to linux or win) when a win (and that won't be XP) or linux comes out with functionality I can't live without, but at the moment there is no animated search dog on my wish list.

    245. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      No...it won't stop anyone. Anyone who is pirating XP knows how to work around the activation anyways, and would never both to call Microsoft for anything. This is only stopping legitimate customers from doing what they need, while doing nothing to prevent piracy. Even for Microsoft, this is an utterly stupid idea.

    246. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Uh no. It is not. SOME states have open carry laws (I believe NM is among them) and you can do that. Other states, like California, do not allow for the transportation of a loaded firearm without a concealed weapons permit - and notice the "concealed". You are not allowed open carry in California unless you are a peace officer or certified armed security guard. For the purposes of considering it loaded, just having the ammo on your person is sufficient for single-shot or revolver weapons. I'm not sure if having the ammo, clip/magazine, and firearm counts as loaded for [semi]automatic weapons, but I know having the firearm and the loaded clip/magazine on your person DOES count as loaded since the loading time is negligible.

      U.S. constitutional law allows you to keep and bear arms, but it doesn't define "keep", "bear", or "arms", so that amendment is pretty useless (unfortunately). State law often says that you cannot carry a loaded weapon, or sometimes, even a weapon! For instance, many items are illegal to carry on the street (like martial arts training weapons) unless you are a martial arts instructor. Therefore, only martial arts instructors are allowed to transport them on foot - everyone else MUST own or have the use of a vehicle. This is particularly ironic because California law allows you to carry any kind of knife or even sword as long as it is not concealed, although counties or cities may impose other carry restrictions.

      In other words - you are mostly wrong. It's only true in a few places.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    247. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1
      I don't have a problem with the people checking the exits. Being corporations, I'm sure they'd rather not have to hire people just to stand at the door, but they've found that they reduce losses enough to make it worth it. The way I see it, the theives have ruined it for the rest of us.

      Usually it just takes a moment of my time, unless the security tag wasn't disabled and the alarm goes off (happened to me a few weeks ago when I bought a microwave at WalMart). The other place it can take a few minutes is at Costco, since they seem to be slightly more thorough.

      --
      End of Line.
    248. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Unlawful inprisonment? Go back into mom's basement.

      Where the fuck did you learn English, ebonics 101? It's not "inprisonment", as in "they will throw you in prison", it's "imprisonment". Illiterate ACs should register so they can lose karma like the rest of the idiots, or they should just fuck off.

      Interestingly I was employed as a security guard for some time, and in order to be one you have to get a guard card (actually I never got my card, I only passed the test. The guy who ran [Pacific Security and Investigations] in Santa Cruz, CA was well-known for not filing his paperwork. The patrol car was uninsured for anyone but him and when one of the employees crashed it he drove his ass down there and got in the car and said he was the one who did it.) Anyway you mostly learn about citizen's arrest and that's most of what the test covers because that's the only kind of arrest power a security guard has. I also had to take a target-shooting test to get a card to be allowed to carry mace, which was legalized for general age 18+ carry right after I got my card.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    249. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My point is that back in the day if you placed someone under citizen's arrest and they were found guilty of the crime, unless you maimed/crippled them you would not find yourself the target of a lawsuit for blackening their eye or breaking their nose because they resisted arrest. Today, you will. Hence, I stand by my statement. If you commit a crime, the law says you are supposed to respect citizen's arrest. Unless it will somehow cause you undue harm, you should cooperate with anyone placing you under a citizen's arrest, because then you can bust them within the system, instead of with your fist.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    250. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      All the more reason to buy a commercial and supported unix, like oh lets say OS X.

    251. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by manifoldronin · · Score: 1

      I wonder what happens if they accuse you of stealing those security tags...

      --
      Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
    252. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Psmylie · · Score: 1
      Let me see if I can clear up some of your delusions. First of all, NO THEFT IS OK! Second of all, as I said, there was a LOT of theft there, we just never could catch anyone. Third, and I didn't state this (didn't think I'd need to qualify myself, honestly) but the person I called the cops on was one of the people who regularly came in and shoplifted from us, which we suspected but could never prove. He made the mistake of bragging about it to some folks in the neighborhood, though, and we heard about it. Therefore, a determination was made that we would be keeping a very close eye on that particular loser, and nail him the first chance we got, for ANY infraction.

      After the minor theft that we DID nail him for, we prevented all the theft that would have followed (he was officially banned from the premesis after that) and demonstrated to all the neighborhood kids that he bragged to that, while you may get away with shoplifting occasionally, eventually you WILL get busted, charges WILL be pressed.

      What's pathetic is someone who is not in full possesion of the fact flying off the handle and calling other people names. You may want to keep that truth close to your heart before posting again.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    253. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      You should just get the Maya and LW kids together to gang up on the poor saps who are stuck using 3DS Max. Where do you work by the way?

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    254. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by biffyboy · · Score: 1

      omg 2 seconds to show the receit. whoop de fucking do. If you have nothing to hide then who cares? Its sad that there are infact people who will shoplift and because of that stores want to see receits. Oh but I forgot you are above soceity and so heaven forbid someone might think you stole something! How the hell is the clerk suppose to tell the difference between you and the guy who is going to steal something? Seriously dude, get off your pompous ass, and quit bitching about something so insignificant.

    255. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      "I didn't know LSD made you pretentious and arrogant. No wonder everyone was a dick in the 70s."

      Actually, LSD had pretty much fallen out of favour by '74*, and cocaine (which definitely does make you pretentious and arrogant) became the drug of choice. As Homer pointed out: "Rock and roll achieved perfection in 1974, it's a scientific fact". Now you know why.

      *I was there...most of the time...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    256. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1
      Two tcp/ip stacks.

      You need Server or better to get the good one they took from BSD.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    257. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might decide to create an autodialer to repeatedly call their 1-800 number so they have to pay $15.00 + per call to some telemarketer company in Indiana per call.

    258. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by jafac · · Score: 1

      I personally know three people, in the last month, who have finally decided to ditch Windows and go Macintosh.

      I have four Macs. I've been supporting two of these three people over the past several years, and I encouraged them to stick with Windows, simply because I knew they'd be frustrated at the software unavailability situation. But over the past three or so months, hacks, spyware, and ads have gotten so bad, that they've been unable to cope with all the downtime. I suggested they get routers and start filtering ports, etc. But they're fed up. They want the effortless experience I'm getting on my Macs. And they're willing to fight the software availability fight.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    259. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As good as decking the rent-a-cop that tried to hold me would feel, I think suing for million$ would feel even better.

    260. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The only thing I ever stole was accidentally. It was a 10.00 video game cd, that I forgot I had in my hand ( I had intended to put it back on the rack ). I walked out the door of walmart with it in my hand in plain view. I didn't notice the game until I was in my car.

      I don't give a damn about walmart so I drove off pleased with myself for my accidental yet successful shoplifting.

    261. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alienate 90% of your none corporate users, nice one. Hmmm, wonder how long the corporations are gonna stay with Windows when every employee comes in talking about this Linux thing and how darn cool it is.

      'Oh honey this hasn't crashed since, wait honey this hasn't crashed!!! I wish we used this in work'

    262. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      Remind me, when's the commodity-hardware X86 release due, again?

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    263. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by lasmith05 · · Score: 1

      Thats an interesting theory, but most of the time they don't even read the reciept. They just mark it.

      --
      www.samuraidreams.com - My Blog
      www.samuraifiles.com - Get Some Videos Here
    264. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you half to wait over 30 minutes at some of these places to get out the door, then you will think differently. It is pointless sometimes, then dont look at your cart half the time, other times you wait while they have to find every fucking item in your cart, I paid to shop there (Sam's) and they treat me like a criminal?

      Count the items in the cart, sure, that I don't mind, but my god, don't check EVERY ITEM when there are 20+ people waiting to get out.

    265. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Where do you work by the way?"

      I work in central California. I wrote this plugin. ;)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    266. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by anopres · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I was trying to be funny. I guess I needed to add more smiley faces. :) B) ;)

      --
      Strong Mad - 2008: "I PRESIDENT!"
    267. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by pedroloco · · Score: 1

      In the US, it's absolutely legal to carry a loaded firearm on your belt. Actually, it's not "absolutely legal" everywhere in the US. For instance, in Arizona, it's currently not legal to carry any kind of firearm into a bar... although that might change soon.

    268. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by feidaykin · · Score: 1
      Sam's is different, you signed a contract there.

      You can't legally sign away your rights in a contract. I don't care what you have to sign, in the United States you are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty. You shouldn't have to prove to Sam's Club or anyone else that you didn't steal anything. The burden of proof is on them, not you.

      --

      "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    269. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      simple solution, just ignore them. there isn't really much they can do.

    270. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by danheskett · · Score: 1

      That's untrue, actually.

      The TCP stacks are the same. And FYI, the stack was completely rewritten after the initial version that was released almost unmodified from BSD. Since NT4 its been all MS code for the stack.

      On the non-server versions though, it is #1, rate limited and #2 connection limited for incoming traffic.

      However, it is still one fundamental code base.

    271. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by arctan1701 · · Score: 1

      actually, here in Illinois, by law, you don't have to be a member to purchase alcohol. and when i did ask to see the member agreement, i was told by the store director that they did not have copies of it (just the form that says you agree to the missing contract). the guy even gave me this in writing...

    272. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by droptone · · Score: 1

      Spelling Errors = Illiteracy? Damn, mighty presumptuous of you.

      --
      Every post I make begins with the assumption P=~P.
    273. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      I live in the UK. I don't personally own a gun, but most of the people I know do. I agree that the post-Dunblane handgun ban was an almighty mess, but you can blame that on kneejerk reactions to the Daily Retard-reading classes' noise.


      WTF do you need a handgun for *anyway*? They're shit.

    274. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by stalky14 · · Score: 1

      Aren't XP SP2 and 2K SP4 like 90% the same code under the hood anyway?

    275. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Buran · · Score: 1

      I know a guy who works at a Wal-Mart in WA State as a greeter (he says he hates it...)

      He is usually not allowed to chase anyone, even when he knows they stole something.

      It's annoying for him because they smirk at him, but he knows, and I did remind him, it covers his ass as well as the store's. (The store, I don't care if they get screwed friends are another matter.)

    276. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      No, people are intelligent. But they are intelligent according to their own definition of intelligent, not yours or mine.

      Good point, but personal experence has taught me otherwise. People as a group tend to be as smart at the least common denominator. Unfortunally the least common denominator all tends to be the ones with tie. Now then, there are some pretty brilliant people out there but those people only really shine when alone or in small groups.

      On the average, I would say that between 75% and 90% of the people that you deal with on a daily bases are fools. This number are reflected in the posters on /. too. I have been active on this board since first year it opened. Anyone can tell you the quality of the comments has dropped like a stone over the years.

      It's called Sturgeon's Law, 90% of everything is crap. Learn it, live by it for it is correct and it applies equally to people

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    277. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by atomic_toaster · · Score: 1

      This new campaign is only there to scare you, because Microsoft is assuming if you pirate their software you'll be too afraid to call them.

      What Microsoft is effectively doing is making a re-install of Windows a bigger pain in the ass than it already is. I've never had to activate Windows over the phone, knock on wood, but I have had to re-activate Norton AntiVirus (too many installs). I was tied to my phone for an hour and a half as I was put on hold and shuffled from one department to another. I didn't have to deal with anyone who was ESL, but that could just have been luck. The amount of time I spent on the phone was horrible, considering that I only ever talked to a real person for about 5min total, but being tied to my phone meant that I couldn't work on the gazillion other things I had to do. If you have to go through this kind of treatment every time you have to re-install your OS (and since this is Windows, that'll end up being pretty often), it will not surprise me at all if Mac and Linux suddenly gobble up a huge market share.

    278. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh Fuck Off! yourself, if you can't be bothered checking what you write then don't bother writing at all.

    279. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude! You stole their security tags!

    280. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who buy a car must learn to drive or they damage the car and get hurt or killed. People who buy a lawnmower (no matter how idiotproof it may be) can still hurt themselves if they can't operate it properly.

      No, you won't cut off an arm or leg if you don't know how to use your computer, but identity theft and all it's associated nastiness can be easily as dangerous. Computers are tools, just like anything else you use to perform a task. A user needs to know how to use them properly or LOTS of things get fucked up. I could go on for hours listing examples where my work is concerned and instances where my day has been ruined by some idiot that didn't know what the hell he was doing, but I have to go home and re-compile my kernel. :)

    281. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG. Your ass must hurt from that speech. I wish I could place you under citizens arrest for being a moron.

    282. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Eraser_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had to call them once. The guy was typing in the activation code to see why I had to call him and he said the server just crashed, so he wouldn't be able to activate my product and that I should call back. I politely told him this is why I shouldn't have to do this for software I purchased, and that I would kindly wait with him on the phone, for as long as it took. He didn't like this that much, and after 5 minutes of patiently waiting (I had other things I was doing) he spoke up and said "uhh look it came up!" and read me off an activation code. I never finished telling him my number to spout off my reason for calling, he just gave me a generic code.

      Basically, I never do online activation, I *always* call. 800 numbers and humans all cost money, some mindless server does not, so I do not buy in to that. I tell them each time if the code comes up "in use" that I had Total Catastrophic Hardware Failure. Wether its the first time I'm activating or tenth for that license, same reason, most of the time it's true.

    283. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that or a REALLY GOOD batch...

    284. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      Dude, on a computer, you ARE the pilot, whether you like it or not. There's no such thing as a "passenger" or anything less than a "pilot" when you're using a computer.

    285. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      RTFA:

      "If a customer attempts to activate Windows XP with an OEM key from a COA, they will be directed to call customer support specialists to obtain an override code - provided they can prove that their copy is legitimate by answering a series of questions."

    286. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're usually found at bulk savings stores like BJ's or Sam's Club. They check the receipts as you go out the door to make sure that you haven't stolen anything.

    287. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

      Sorry but I don't think it will have that big of an effect. Many people will believe MS is doing this for "their" security and benifit.

      Kinda like airport security, it's an illusion of safety.

      --
      This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
    288. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Jemm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To clarify, The machine I was working on came with factory restore cds. I purchased this machine in October 2003.

      The date that I tried to activate was February 20th, 2005 mid day and lasting a few hours.

      This laptop ships with a bios with broken cpu codes for power management, so I had flashed the bios using firmware from a different company that sells an identical machine. Mostly to get apci working under linux dual boot.

      On first boot after doing the cd restore, Windows indeed forced an activation before it would let me log in, so no network settings; and No, no 30 to 45 days grace period.

      --- are you sure you were on the phone with MS

      Yes, I called the number given by xp on the activation screen. After MS' IVR repeated "invalid key" for the 10th time or so, I pressed 0# and was transferred to a human with a strong Indian accent. (I'm not racist just stating facts of the situation)

      --- MS has written policy for its tech and activation people to never ever ask the customer to restore from disc.

      The exact wording they used was "uninstall and reinstall". When I challenged them on how exactly one uninstalls an OS, I was rewarded with silence, so I guess they did follow guidelines.

      --- First, the policy is that activation issues are always free, period. Second, every copy of XP has two free support incidents included with it, even most OEMs copys.

      I was given the option to contact the OEM. They gave me a Vancouver (604) number which they insisted was toll free and which I insisted was not toll free. I refused to call the OEM as 1. this is not a hardware or OS issue and 2. the laptop is out of warranty but Windows was still actively being supported. Besides, I knew that this was just another punt.

      By the way since I mentioned punting;

      The first tech responded that I should shut the machine down for 10 to 15 minutes and then call back. I knew it wouldn't make a difference but did it anyway.

      The second tech gave me the OEM number. I then asked for a manager. The manager told me to do the "uninstall and reinstall". Again, I knew it would make no difference but did it anyway. The managers name was Roger I think.

      The third call I asked for "Roger" the manager immediately after breaking out of the IVR. I got a different manager who told me that Roger had left ten minutes ago. I could have sworn that I had talked to him less than 10 minutes ago. Anyway, this manager asked me to regenerate my activation ID by entering my Windows key. Same situation arose. After much back and forth, I was offered free online support or paid $35 US telephone support. When I complained I was told to read the restore cds and look for wording stating that all tech support is the responsibility of the OEM.

      I finally resolved the problem by reverting to the broken bios firmware and then doing the factory restore.

      Interestingly, a few months ago, I flashed the bios on this machine. It did want me to reactivate but since it was a running install, was able to do an Internet activation.

      If anyone at MS or the media wants to see all this in action, I'd happily go through it all with them.

    289. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by bitswapper · · Score: 1



      Didn't say it made anyone stupid. It's just the next best thing.

      It gets you the same results - someone rips you off - maybe just a little but not enough to really hurt all that much - and either you don't know or don't care, or both. Either way, there's no response.

      Besides, you may not know who makes the engines, but consider this. Would you care if the engine maker had a track record for making bad engines? Do you care if the tires on your car came from a manufacturer with a track record for making bad tires? Honestly, if enough people didn't care, can you say it wouldn't affect you?

      All facetiousness aside, I would have to rate apathetic somewhat higher than stupid.

      However, while this may not affect one's life in a 'material way' right now, its easy to see how it can be really annoying if you ever need to reinstall windows. Everyone who's had to reinstall windows and knows they probably will again cares about this kind of thing. And yes, that's the /. crowd.

    290. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      When you have a monopoly among those who have to buy software (Linux is cool, but try telling a client who can't read the presentation you sent because OOo's PowerPoint conversion didn't quote do the trick about the virtues of open source), you can piss off your customers and survive.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    291. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "All spelling, gammer,"

      grammar

      "and logical mistakes are intentinal"

      intentional

      "because I'm to"

      too

      "fucking lazy to look it up. If you don't like it, Fuck

      fuck

      "Off!"

      off!

    292. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I think I can rest my case now. There are eleven replies to my original reply, including two now three that are my own. Of those two by posters that disagree with my option but offered intelligent replies or critics of my original statement that where worthy of a response. You know who you are. One was a humorous jab at someone else's response which I can include in my intelligent posters list.

      The other seven where responses to a stupid tag line totally unrelated to the original topic, most of them where anonymous cowards too. These people are the fools that I'm talking about. You will find that they fit perfectly into my percentage predictions at the time of this posting.

      Also at the time of this posting the original post is at +4, Insightful. Checking my own record you will find that most of my posts are in the +3 to +4 range, so my record stands for itself. Granted most of them are rated Funny but that is because I'm a very funny person. The few Trolls that I have are because someone didn't understand the joke. My fault.

      My statement stands. Most people are idiots. The others are worth your attention.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    293. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by flacco · · Score: 1

      does anyone remember the good old days, when this thread was about microsoft product activation? ahhh, those were the days, weren't they?

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    294. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      You can't? So every NDA is invalid then?

      Rights apply to what the government does, not what corporations do.

    295. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      I live in the UK. I don't personally own a gun, but most of the people I know do.

      There aren't many ways that could happen legally, unless perhaps you live in the country and you're talking about neighbours with shotguns for pest control?

      WTF do you need a handgun for *anyway*? They're shit.

      One man with a handgun = someone better able to defend himself against a larger opponent attacking him.

      15 million men with handguns = a government who can't forcibly remove the civil rights of the people no matter how hard it tries.

      Which is more useful is left as an exercise to the reader, but in today's climate either has merit.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    296. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You really don't know what the fuck you're talking about. To wit: The fact that a bunch of idiots like you line up in the moo queue to have their receipts checked means that it can take a seriously long time to get out of the store. As I am not a criminal (or at the very least, I am not a shoplifter or other kind of thief) I am insulted that I have to constantly be checked when I leave the store. As for being "above society", the law is on my side when I talk about just walking out of the place. Meanwhile, you are trying to tell me what to do. Therefore, get off your ignorant pompous ass, and quit telling me how I should live my life.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    297. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      It's called Sturgeon's Law, 90% of everything is crap. Learn it, live by it for it is correct and it applies equally to people

      In my experience, the 90% is pretty accurate.
      10% matters and should be done well. Finding that 10% is hard.
      90% is crap and while you can't get rid of it, it doesn't need to be done very well.
      Methinks it's the group dynamics that mess with it. That's one of the problems with a monoculture.
      Also, when you have to deal with it, it's not usually the intelligence you're having to deal with.

    298. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      When it's an AC I can make any kind of accusation I want, because no one cares about them. Seriously though, when someone is writing that kind of bullshit to me, I can't feel at all bad about flaming them. Fuck turning the other cheek to an asshole like that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    299. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by melikamp · · Score: 1
      1) What if the door checker is "in on" the scam, too?

      I spent 5 months being one of those cheerful guys guarding the exit door at Fry's Electronics, and I can testify that mr. Fry and co. are paying pretty darn well (read: hundreds of dollars) for each lead on the act of shoplifting involving employees. They are not as dumb as they seem to be.

    300. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have to have a bunch of reinstalls, just use Linux to begin with. Me, I "install" linux every time I boot up on my Windows XP box. It's my live-cd Knoppix remaster, using it now.

    301. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by hepwori · · Score: 1

      One platform line? You mean like XP Home, XP Pro, and XP Media Center?

      Yes, that's exactly what is meant. Do you understand what a platform line is?

      Considering the average lifespan for a PC is 3 years, the fact there are any machines running 2000, let alone 9x, is pitiful.

      What are you talking about? If the average lifespan of a PC is 3 years, is that supposed to mean that no 4,5,6-year-old PCs exist? Of course they do. XP came out October 2001; do the math. What's pitiful?

    302. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1
      The door checker is probably a bonded security guard.
      Oh my holy god, you've never been to Fry's, have you?
      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    303. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by fermion · · Score: 1
      Why do I use macs?

      None of this stupid OEM versus retail pack versus upgrade versus full bullshit stuff to keep up with.

      Full rights to install Mac OS X on 5 machines for $200. Full package. Easy, easy activation and updates.

      No activiation codes to look up, no gestapo maniacs that want to see my papers. Just an honest and reasonable transaction, with an honest and generally sane company.

      Why I no longer buy simcity, or the sims. Have to have a CD to run it, and codes to install. That bullshit might fly on the braindead PC side, but over hear we want value for out money, not wasted time

      Remeber, MS is only a value if your time is worth nothing!

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    304. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1
      Companies made money on Microsoft's incompetence. Microsoft fixes their incompetence, makes their product better, but it puts companies out of business.
      Well, to be fair, giving away an anti spyware tool isn't 'fixing their incompetence'. They just bought a company and gave a reskinned product away for free, using their profit from OS sales to subsidize the cost of doing so. That being said, I don't think Microsoft is trying to put anti spyware companies out of business (what would they gain?), it's just a consequence of them trying to boost OS sales by bundling software to address one of the consumers' biggest fears. Of course, it is probably (and, I think, should be) illegal.

      Also, aside from ActiveX controls, I'm not sure what their incomptence is with regard to spyware. Most spyware I've helped people uninstall came along with downloads the user initiated themselves.
      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    305. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by frankenbox · · Score: 1

      I betcha all my hacks will still work. (:

    306. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      i don't mind that as much as i hate it when i'm asked to leave my bag with customer service or whatever.

      I mean if they dont' trust me why the fuck should i trust them? Last time i was asked i told them to fuck off i want to use this stupid gift card so go away... and they did lol

      And amazeing their are very few places that ask, canadian tire is the only one i can remember. And i dont' shop there anymore.

      best buy, furture shop, pertty much anywhere else seems to be just fine with it.

      and you right, places like that i tend not to go to as often (except costco) and i stick with the palces that treat customers right.

    307. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      palces like costco (and i'm told sams club) you signed a membership agreement and enter into a contract with the store saying you would let them check it on yoru way out.

      any other place aside from somewhere where you signed something they have no right to do anything except remove you from their property, or call the cops (and if you didn't steal anything get sued for false imprisenment)

    308. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by murdocj · · Score: 1
      If I guy just wants to get to the supermarket but can't tell the difference between a car and a truck, or between a stickshift and an automatic then he is stupid.
      ...
      Anybody who is trying to get computer work done but does not care about the OS is stupid and should immediately be fired.

      What processors and O/S are running in your car engine? You don't know? You say you just want to use your car to travel and get places? Sorry, you must be stupid not to care about stuff like that. You should't be permitted to drive

    309. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I'm not buying into the conspiracy either. I always wait until the last minute before jumping on things like that.

      As for what would microsoft gain? Well They could gain control of all the marketing demographics of thier users, The sole control over popup ads without visiting a site and clicking something. If microsoft was the only spyware tools provider they could even sell exceptions to these detection devices.

      Think about this, If you an I both have programs that tract what websites people are visiting so we can target adds in the banner already being displayed on the sites. Now i drive you out of buisiness buy creating a tool that locks your programs implementation out and i own the underlying subsystem on how what your program works on so i can efectivly make my product better(wether is just apears better or actually is can be another discusion). Now i have about the only source of information availible and i can sell to advertisers as well as marketing firms. Now you want to uise my information to sell adds so you have to buy it from me and i let you use your program uninterupted.

      Sounds far fetched but we already know that microsoft colects information about the media you play in WMP as well as information as to what programs you install and such. Imagine all the sudden getting pop up ads for a program that ties your office aplication together with you time tracker, email and day planner and it works with your specific versions. Now imagine getting popups for discount record prices on certain artist after you play a song by them more then 20 times.

      Sure this is far fetched but see were it can easily go? When "trusted computing" is finaly implemented this would make it even easier. Right now spyware providers are making money and it is a battle to remove thier products as fast as they can install it. If microsoft can do away with them or at least make them pay them to look the other way, there is a source of revenue. If microsoft colected all the data and then you had to go thru them to do the marketing, there is another source. If i could control the world, i would do it too.

    310. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "What processors and O/S are running in your car engine? You don't know?"

      That is a stupid question and it proves nothing. I don't need to know what processor or OS it uses in order to operate my car. On the other hand if you are using a computer at work you do need to know what operating system it uses and how that operating system works.

      My example of not knowing the difference between a stickshift and automatic is better. The difference between windows and linux is that one is a stickshift and the other an automatic. If a user can't tell the difference he is stupid. If a user tells his boss that the doesn't know how to use a stickshift and refuses to learn in order to get his job done then he should be fired.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    311. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by guisar · · Score: 1

      The lack of popular games for Linux really is the only reason to keep Microsoft Windows on any machine. Let's home EA and a few other publishers begin to release for Linux.

    312. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Cringely's bottom line is this: Microsoft stands to make a lot of money (YEMV - Your Estimates May Vary) by convincing people that the only way to deal with spyware is to upgrade their Windows 98/2000 systems to XP SP2.

      Also, as someone else pointed out, Microsoft hasn't "fixed" anything - they just bought a couple of companies for peanuts and are using them to try to get people to give them a multi-score-million or multi-billion increase in revenue this year.

      I repeat, increased revenue - no actual fix.

      Sounds like Bill to me. You don't have to hate Microsoft (although I do) to recognize - as every biographer of him has - that Bill is about money and nothing else.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    313. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At places like Sam's Club and Costco, there's a big difference. When you joined, you agreed to let them check your bags. Sure, you can refuse. But they can revoke your membership too.

      You're lucky the door troll didn't realize that he could fuck with you.

    314. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by mchawi · · Score: 1

      No, you don't - but $245 back is better than 40 hours lost and no money back ;)

    315. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Khith · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's me. Hi, Buran! :>

      It doesn't happen often, but it's annoying when it does. Though one time about a year and a half ago, late at night, one guy was coming around the corner from pets, avoiding all registers, cart full of several bags of dog food. He refused to show a receipt, so..I basically followed him out of the store (a big nono) asking and then demanding to see it. Then grabbing his cart as he pushed it in the snow and avoiding him trying to trip me as he kept pushing. (a huuuuge nono)

      Of course, I didn't tell management about that one. I didn't even know the law about such things then. They really don't train you much on receipt checking stuff.

      And yes, my job still sucks. I want to get back into *something* involving computers. Anything! (note: cash register doesn't count) :>

    316. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by DigitumDei · · Score: 1

      Now why don't microsoft hire you... :) Oh wait that was a good idea...

    317. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Anyone who installed XP and then wiped and installed 2k was just an idiot with too much free time. Five seconds worth of configuration makes XP indistinguishable from 2k, and there's nothing in there that actually makes it worse (unless they use a copy that requires activation, poor souls... I pay for my copy and then use the pirated corporate version because I'll be damned if I'm ringing Microsoft to get their permission for anything)

    318. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right. LoL, how many time have we heard this? Fact is MS has most people buy the nuts and there isn't one thing we can do about it. Linux is great BUT the learning curve for most is to much, plus it just isn't mainstream enough.

      -Anonymous Coward (lol, i like that, so original)

    319. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by murdocj · · Score: 1

      You use your car to travel. You don't give a care what processor is in the engine. Other people use their computers to do tasks, not to dick around with the operating system.

      I had an eye opening experience recently of helping a woman in her 90's get her first experience with a computer. Guess what: she neither knew nor cared about the difference between Windows and Linux, or whether she was running Debian or Mandrake. She wanted to see pictures of her great-grandchildren. And that does not make her dumb.

      Your attitude, on the other hand, doesn't say much for you

    320. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      You walk out the store with a bag of stuff
      The store gaurd asks you to show the receipt
      You refuse
      The store gaurd thinks "that is weird, why would a person who just bought something refuse to show me their receipt...unless they are shop lifting."


      No, its not reasonable, since 99% of the stores out there do NOT do this. This is the old 'if you don't have anything to hide then what are you worried about' arguement.

      Maybe you don't care about some uninvolved 3rd party knowing what you bought, and maybe you don't care about being accused of stealing JUST FOR LEAVING THE STORE, but many people do.

      Apply the same logic to the police getting a search warrant; 'well he refused to let us search, so he must be hiding something please give us the warrant.' No judge would go for that WITHOUT other evidence. Your line of reasoning leads to the abolishment of even getting a warrant. Refusing to be searched becomes grounds to be searched.

      Jesus, do people just do asshole things to be complete dicks for no other reason? No wonder our world is screwed up - it's not MS that screwed up the world - it's the SOB's who do it.

      I agree, these receipt check guys are assholes, and the store is being a complete dick for no other reason. There is NOTHING between the registers and the exit, WTF could I possibly have stolen?!

    321. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I ask you to prove yourself and you tell me that I have no clue as to what I am talking. The logic of this goes how?

      He doesn't have to prove himself; you're the one making offbase claims. He even told you were to look to find your answers. Stop being lazy, and do some research. I know he has, because my research agrees with his!

      1) The law asks for reasonable, and lends reasonable to a broad aspect. Sort of like when a police officer stops someone under the "I had reason to believe...."

      And the judge will ask what the circumstances were that lead the cop to believe his actions were reasonable. And if the judge doesn't like his answer, the case gets thrown out.

      2)Well duh. Though you have yet to show me the law written anywhere to prove your statement

      Maybe b/c he doesn't know what state you live in, and the laws do vary state to state. Why can't YOU go look it up? Or do you want him to so you can just try to discredit his source and you can keep your hands over your ears and your eyes closed.

      The rest of your post isn't even worth replying to..you just don't want to hear you're wrong.

    322. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      1) It is their store policy, if you do not like it - don't shop there.

      Their policy cannot contradict the law; that is, they STILL do NOT have the power to detain me.

      2) I could understand if they just selected a specific group of people (i.e. targeting only black people) then it would be a problem - they target everyone

      So it would be ok for the police to search everyone driving down a certain street just for driving down the street? Good logic.

      3) People do shoplift - on their own and with assistance from store clerks.

      Employee theft is a MUCH larger problem then shoplifting; comparitively, the shoplifting is negligible.

      4) Criminals can easily appear to be non-criminals (it's not that hard really). So those 20 store clerks you just hired - they seem reasonable - doesn't mean one of them won't steal

      And that is the store's problem, not mine or The Vulture's. If employees steal, that doesn't mean they should be searching ME.

      It is a naive, and actually from people on this board (which i expect more from) just plain being dickish to give these people a hard time.

      Walking out of the store and saying 'no' to the check person is being dickish? Really? And then how dickish is being accused of stealing just b/c i shop there? And lets use your logic; if the check person doesn't like it, they can find some place else to work.

      They are not being assholes to you by asking for your receipt - they are trying to protect themselves from being robbed.

      How is accusing me of stealing and wanting to search me not being an asswhole? AS i stated before, most theft is done by employees. Maybe they should concentrate on that before accusing me of stealing.

      One of your arguments is that if they didn't catch a person shoplifting at the register then their only means of preventing or catching a criminal is a camera? Like camera's do much.

      Camera's are highly effective. Thats why casinos use them. If they can catch someone slipping a card in they can certainly catch someone not scanning an item. The fact is they are VERY effective at catching employees actively stealing.

      You are being ridiculous. This conversation is a matter of opinion so it will go nowhere. Again, if you do not like a particular stores policy - don't shop there - I am sure you can buy the same or similar products in another store. But being a dick to someone who is doing their job makes you the bad guy - not the rent-a-cop.

      Its not a matter of opinion, its a matter of law (which you obviously don't understand). 'I'm just doing my job' isn't an excuse, as many war criminals found out.

    323. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Due to similar experiences at the last place I worked full-time, I finally located a pirated copy of Office 2000. I just couldn't afford the 30 to 45 minute wait that it took to reactivate a reinstall.

      Thank you, Microsoft! You forced me to pirate a copy of your Corporate edition because of your time-wasting bullshit!

    324. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by DenDave · · Score: 1

      This is correct. I worked hard so I didn't have to..

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    325. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by pod · · Score: 1

      The other way to look at it, that also holds up 90% rule, is that, most (90%) of the people you deal with day to day are font-line employees, ie, service industry. Hardly anyone's (90%?) first career aspiration. So you'll run into a lot of stupidity, laziness, incompetence and indifference. These people just don't really care.

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    326. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by spectre527 · · Score: 1

      Y'know, if they took all that coding effort on their antipiracy team and put it into writing secure code, they could know put half of all the AV, spyware and firewall companies out of business in one swell foop. Geezus when will they get their priorities straight.... Anyway... back to my linux box.

      --
      When I die, I want to go quietly in my sleep like my grandfather, Not screaming like the passengers in his car.
    327. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      There aren't many ways that could happen legally, unless perhaps you live in the country and you're talking about neighbours with shotguns for pest control?

      At the moment I live in a city, but a lot of the people I know are in shooting clubs. So technically, what I said isn't entirely true. I do come from out in the sticks originally, where most people *do* have various rifles and shotguns, for pest control, hunting and defence.


      One man with a handgun = someone better able to defend himself against a larger opponent attacking him.

      You watch too much television.



      15 million men with handguns = a government who can't forcibly remove the civil rights of the people no matter how hard it tries.


      Well, your government hasn't tried particularly hard to remove the civil rights of Americans, but seems to have been completely unopposed. From a point somewhere about the middle, the US now looks more-or-less like the USSR did in the 70s and 80s.

      OTOH, the UK government has been trying *really* hard to restrict our civil rights, and look how far that's got them, laughable bunch of fools that they are.

    328. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      At the moment I live in a city, but a lot of the people I know are in shooting clubs. So technically, what I said isn't entirely true. I do come from out in the sticks originally, where most people *do* have various rifles and shotguns, for pest control, hunting and defence.

      I know a few people who used to shoot for sport, too, and they basically had to give up post-Dunblane because the new regulations got in the way. Obviously removing the guns stored securely at the gun club and used by members who were law-abiding members of society has done a huge amount to curb gun crime. ;-)

      One man with a handgun = someone better able to defend himself against a larger opponent attacking him.
      You watch too much television.

      No, I've spent most of my life training in various aspects of martial arts/combat sports/self defence. Aside from my own experience of the field as an amateur, I've also met a lot of interesting characters along the way, including military types, police firearms officers, professional security guys (bodyguards), and people who have fired their gun in self-defence in other countries where it is legal to do so.

      Now, aside from my irrelevant television-watching habits, are you seriously telling me that someone with a weapon isn't better able to defend themselves against a larger opponent than someone without?

      Well, your government hasn't tried particularly hard to remove the civil rights of Americans, but seems to have been completely unopposed. [...] OTOH, the UK government has been trying *really* hard to restrict our civil rights, and look how far that's got them, laughable bunch of fools that they are.

      You do realise that I live in the UK, right?

      Anyway, our government is in the process of ramming both detention by political will and ID cards/backing database through parliament, despite massive public opposition. We're also the most spied upon nation in the world, although neither CCTV nor speed cameras have an overall beneficial effect on crime levels unless used in appropriate locations. Those are just the first examples that come to mind.

      Look how far that's got them, you say? We're 90% of the way down the slope to a police state, and most people haven't even noticed.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    329. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by freddej · · Score: 0

      Interesting to note that you can actually learn stuff from just by being bored at work. I had never heard of these door-nazis or whatever you call them, but I'm just a humble swede, and we don't have them at all, but it makes me thing twice about throwing away the receipt if I go to the states.

    330. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      Wow, you are so a candidate for one of any number of "customers suck" websites/forums.

      Way to make people's already-not-great jobs a little less enjoyable. Wouldn't it be a gas if someone came into your office and moved all the files around on your computer so you couldn't find anything? Boy, that would be a load of fun.

      I realize that some retail slaves are far less polite about such things than they should be, but when I worked in a bookstore we generally handled an alarm going off by saying "Oh, sorry, we missed a security tag. Let me deactivate that for you so it won't go off the next time you enter a store." Because the fact is, most people who set off the alarm are not stealing, and most people who steal do so in a way that doesn't set off the security alarm - taking the dvds out of cases, pulling the security tags out of the books, etc. So I'm sorry you've dealt with people who are more accusatory when you set off an alarm.

      However, just setting off alarms so you can piss people off? That's just juvenile! My 14-year-old brother would think it's brilliant. It doesn't just make the employees' lives harder, either - you're pissing off every shopper around you who has to listen to that damn alarm go off repeatedly. Great job. Keep it up, champ.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    331. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, because I'll be that magazine was the only thing he'd ever stolen in his life and he never would have stolen again had he gotten away with it. Plenty of shoplifters steal lots of little things that add up to a lot of money - and if all store managers had the attitude of 'it's only a dollar" they'd be doing it even more. Those thefts generally result in higher prices for you, probably more overall than it costs to keep the cops busy for an hour.

      And where do you draw the line, anyhow? If it's ok to steal a dollar item, is it ok to steal a $5 item? How about a $10 item? Or does the item have to equal the amount the cop is getting paid in the time it takes to arrest the person?

      Calling the cops on this guy did not save the store a dollar. It also saved them money lost through thefts from this guy in the future (either by deterring him from stealing there again, or at least making sure he doesn't go there while he's in jail - actually, he's probably banned from the store now so probably permanently either way), and anyone standing around that day who was considering stealing something equally small either that day or in the future. They now know that, at that store at least, it's not such a good idea. I think it was a pretty smart move to prosecute the guy.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    332. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      I'd like to call baloney on your story.. but who knows.

      I've had to call for activation twice, with regards to Windows XP, and once for Office 2003. Both programs had an automated phone system, where I spoke the key, and it read the activation key back to me. On the second Windows XP call, it said it couldn't understand me, so it put me through to an operator. They never asked me why I was reinstalling Windows, or anything like that. Just asked for my key, and then gave me the activation key.

      All said it done, it was 10 minutes of my time. Big whoop.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    333. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      Those people can't stop you. Just blow right by them.

      Have fun with that!

      No, seriously. Have lots of fun. Then call Mr. Jones bail bonds when you're in jail being Bubba's playmate.

      By the way, a store's location _is_ private property, not a private "club". Where did you get that terminology?

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    334. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      You're not too bright, are you son? It might be private property, but it's a public place. The only thing special someone can do just because it's private property is tell you to leave and arrest you for trespassing if you fail to do so. By virtue of requiring you to have membership to enter a Costco or Sam's Club, they make it a private club, which is handled very differently than a retail outlet that you can just walk into.

      I've been walking right past the people at Fry's for over a decade now with no ill effects. Costco is more of a pain in the ass, because they will sometimes chase you out into the parking lot to check your receipt, so when I actually have a membership there I tend to avoid going there whenever possible, and only go to buy large quantities of specific items.

      Next time you're in, you should see if they have clue sauce in 55 gallon drums.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    335. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      More than likely the minimum-wage paid, non-security guard employees at Frys do not want to bother calling the police, but if they did, they would be within their rights to do so, for you not wanting to display your receipt and purchased goods.

      Let's say you refuse to show your receipt/bag/whatever, and someone actually stops you, detains you and calls the police. You scream false imprisonment, yadda yadda. The police show up. More than likely they're going to listen to both sides of the story, and ask you why you're making such a big deal out of showing your receipt to the employee at the exit. "Because it wastes my time" isn't really a valid excuse. More than likely the police officers will have a good laugh at your expense, and then go on to more important calls.

      If you tried to push the whole "I was falsely imprisoned" angle-- do you know what's involved (money/time/travel-wise) in filing those sort of charges? Something tells me if you do, you'd know it's not worth it.. so essentially you're making a hollow threat.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    336. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      More than likely the minimum-wage paid, non-security guard employees at Frys do not want to bother calling the police, but if they did, they would be within their rights to do so, for you not wanting to display your receipt and purchased goods.

      Uh no. They are not within their rights unless they have a reasonable suspicion that I have stolen something. As I stated before, the purchased goods are mine, and the receipt is mine. They have no right to detain me unless they have a reason to believe that I have stolen something. Just being in the store is not reason enough.

      Second of all, if they stop me, detain me, and call the police, they're going to have to stop me physically, and then I'll just file charges for assault on the spot, which I certainly can do. If necessary, I can do it by placing them under citizen's arrest - which is also the only way they can legally stop me.

      Just because you aren't aware of your rights, don't assume I'm not aware of mine.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    337. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      They are not within their rights unless they have a reasonable suspicion that I have stolen something.

      One could argue that your failure to show your receipt/bag to be pretty suspicious.

      they're going to have to stop me physically, and then I'll just file charges for assault on the spot

      I don't think you understand what "assault" means, perhaps you should look up your local/state laws regarding the subject.

      Also, placing someone under citizen's arrest usually involves calling the police, having them come out and take your statement, and a course of action being decided upon. If you fraudulantly place someone under "citizen's arrest", or make an accusation of felony against them that turns out to be false, you yourself can be arrested. You cannot just go "I'm placing you under citizen's arrest!" and that's that.

      The point I'm trying to make here is that you're not some bigshot who has found a loophole in the system.

      Also, if you're so unhappy with how these businesses check your receipt at the door, then why not shop elsewhere? It will certainly cause less comments on SlashDot bitching about it.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    338. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Threatening someone is assault. Touching someone without their permission is assault. Pointing a gun at someone is assault with a deadly weapon (thrown in for flavor - doubt I'm going to have a gun pointed at me at Fry's.) Hell, even cussing someone out can be assault. Also, you can make a citizen's arrest for a misdemeanor, so long as you witness it - it need not be a felony, though you can place someone's under citizen's arrest if you believe they have commited a felony, you don't even have to witness that. I am aware of the conditions surrounding citizen's arrest, having been hired as a security guard some number of years ago.

      Loophole in the system? It's not a loophole. It's the law. The law says that once you buy the stuff, it's yours. What part of that is unclear? They have the right to tell me not to come back again, but not to stop me and search my posessions unless they have reason to believe that I've shoplifted, and in California, a "search" constitutes LOOKING INSIDE THE BAG - you may not actually reach in and move things around, which is what they do at Fry's. Of course, that's because you hand it to them and consent to the search.

      As for my failure to show my receipt/bag being suspicious, that's called assumption of guilt. Do you really believe that shit? And if so, are you a cop or what?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    339. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by orac2 · · Score: 1

      "...a little anarchy, but not the hurting kind!"

      Hmm, fellow Great Big Sea fan then?

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
    340. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the US now looks more-or-less like the USSR did in the 70s and 80s.

      Not hardly. I lived in the USSR in the 70s and live now in the US. The difference is like daylight and dark. Why do you think I came here? I think you need to learn a little more before you go talking about something you know nothing about.

    341. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The procedure at Sam's that asks for your receipt is more to prevent employee theft than to prevent customer theft. They are concerned that you are in cahoots with a cashier and will leave the store with 12 items when you've only paid for 10.

      It's store policy and you agreed to it when you signed up. They are within their rights to revoke your membership if you refuse to honor the agreement. Don't like it? Shop somewhere else.

    342. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1
      1) It is their store policy, if you do not like it - don't shop there.


      When I am employed by the store, I will begin to give a shit about their policies. Until then, they can fuck off. I bought it, it's mine. If they detain me without proof of a crime (since proof would indicate no crime existed) I will sue the living fuck out of both the store, and the idiot who detained me (as an individual) in seperate lawsuits.

      I will get recompense from the store, and the mouth breather who detained me will be living in a cardboard box from then forward.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    343. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Door moron tasers me, and door moron will be impoverished for the rest of his life (after he gets out of jail). The corporation he works for will be funding my lavish retirement.

      Pretty much what you said in your second paragraph.

      As to your signature, I've found the opposite to be true. YMMV. I don't like either of the men. Neither have your or my best interest at heart, and neither are to be trusted.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    344. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      So a Wal-Mart has the right to strip search you upon entry to the store? That's news to me.

      Certain rights apply to the govermnent's relationship to you (for instance the first amendment right of free speech) due to the way they are worded. Corporations do not have the right to illegally detain you. That is, if they don't have an act of theft on tape, they'd better not put a hand on you, or their hired cop goes to jail, and they start writing you large checks.

      THAT is the way the law works. COrporations don't have the right to hose individuals on the basis that "we aren't the government" on a wholesale basis.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    345. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      OH Noes, they can cancel my membership...

      guaranteeing they will never get my money again, and I will have to go elsewhere....

      I care why?

      Sounds like their problem, not mine. I got the $35 subscription fee's worth of my membership on my first visit.

      BTW the Unlawful detention issue is seperate from the membership cancelation issue. I'm almost tempted to run the exit next time to see if someone lays a hand on me. They're still not entitled to do that, no matter what the agreement says.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    346. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Oh trust me. If the door troll ever fucks with me, I'll sick my lawyer on him as an individual. I doubt a door greeter at Sams has the resources to defend himself against someone who can afford to hire a real lawyer. I guarantee you Walmart isn't going to jump to his defense either.

      I could give a shit about a revoked membership...

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    347. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      COrporations don't have the right to hose individuals on the basis that "we aren't the government" on a wholesale basis

      Provided it doesn't break the law, yes they can. Look up "Right to Work" states for a good example. Or the government using private companies to gather info (ala ChoicePoint) that they legally can't.

    348. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      It's store policy that they will prosecute you to the full extent of the law if you shop lift. Since you do not work there are you going to tell them and the store policy to fuck-off and thereby shop lift?

      You could attempt to sue the "individual" but wouldn't get very far as he would be represented by the store as he is representing the store. And the proof is your suspicious behavior which, by law, is enough to be detained. Your statement shows that you are nothing but a anarchist wannabe troll.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    349. Re:Good Move Microsoft!!!! by Shu_Fee · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the "only gaming" issue is HUGE. If Linux breaks through on gaming,Windows starts dying and Linux ascends. When?When?When? Is anything moving in the Linux universe on the gaming tip? Each of Windows bonehead moves can't really be capitalized upon until their gaming stranglehold is broken.

  2. Great. Just what I want to do. by Powertrip · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Right when I am peeved that I had to re-install, I have to get back on the phone with M$. Enough is enough - has their 'activation' programs really impacted priacy at all? Has it done anything beyond bother paying users?

    1. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Total_Wimp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right when I am peeved that I had to re-install, I have to get back on the phone with M$.

      Don't worry, it shouldn't affect you. According to the Juniper research guy in the article you don't really need to reinstall your computer after all.

      "Seeing as how the typical OEM would normally preactivate Windows XP, most legitimate users shouldn't have much need to go through the activation process,"

      See, it's all better. When you buy your computer, that's the OS you get to use for the entire life of the computer and certainly no one at Microsoft tech support or anywhere else would ever ask you to reinstall. Have a nice day.

      TW

    2. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by This+is+outrageous! · · Score: 1, Funny
      Enough is enough - has their 'activation' programs really impacted priacy at all?

      Yes!

      "Our vision is to be the most priacy-respected company in our industry."

      Peter Cullen
      Chief Priacy Strategist

      --
      This is...

      O
      U
      T
      R
      A
      G
      E
      O
      U
      S

      !

    3. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by tehshen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I know you were being sarcastic, but what about impossible-to-clean spyware? If stuff like this gets widespread some users won't have a choice, and Microsoft doesn't look set on making the install process any easier.

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    4. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by rf0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Might of just forced people to stay on old version where there is no online checking of the number

      Rus

    5. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by servo335 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everytime Dell, HP and or Gateway tell a user the only wayt o fix a problem is to format whos job will it be to call Micro$oft to answer why?

    6. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. I have witnessed, first-hand, that it has reduced casual piracy. /Still thinks this latest step is going too far.

    7. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      • Enough is enough - has their 'activation' programs really impacted priacy at all? Has it done anything beyond bother paying users?
      Well it's encouraged me to use a pirated no-activation corporate edition for my personal installs instead of the legal copy I own. I suppose that's not had any real net effect (since I own XP Pro), but I'm quite sure there are scores of folks reading this thinking "well fuck buying a copy, I'll just keep pirating it if they're going to be such asses."

      I find this outrageous because it's trying to force me to contact them. I bought the damn thing, I'm legit, and Microsoft doesn't need to know anything else. I don't register any of my software as I don't see that the companies have any need for my personal information. If I lose my copy, well that's my fault, I won't go crying to them.

      Frankly I think this is going to bite MS on the ass big time. Activation already pissed off tons of people, and the new move to make you prove you have a legit copy to get security updates pissed even more off. Now they're going to force you to make a phone call instead of online activation, and it's going to piss off an order of magnitude more people this time. Many people tolerated activation because it was simple and could be done painlessly online. Make those people call and wait on hold, even if it's just a few minutes and they're not going to tolerate it anymore. And yes, I realize this is only applicable to reinstalls, but with all the spy/ad/mal-ware out there reinstalls are quite common, so this is going to be a major prooblem for them.

      Perhaps Microsoft should ask Intuit what happens when you push too far with product activation. They ended up killing it completely and running a full page ad in the New York Times basically apologizing and promising never to do it again. Why the ad? They felt the customers they'd pissed off wouldn't bother reading any mail from them, and they were right.

    8. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      As long as the hardware hasn't changed significantly, they won't have to reactivate, even if they do a full format/reinstall.

    9. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sucks especially because you NEED to reinstall XP after a minor hardware upgrade (for example a new motherboard). Not only Windows owner would need to waste their time for reinstalling Windows, they would also need to waste their time while chatting with techsupport to get a permission for reinstall???

      "has their 'activation' programs really impacted priacy at all? Has it done anything beyond bother paying users?"

      This reminds me of copy-protected CDs: they make a life harder for normal user who bought CDs and want to transfer it to computer. However, these CDs were available via p2p as usual since knowledgeble people were able to bypass protection easily.

    10. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      If its impossible to clean then it should be impossible to install. If the bios have an option to prevent over-writing the boot sector, Windows(and linux) should have an option to prevent anything running on ring 0 or with enough privilege to insert itself into you OS.

      I think the best option would be buy a 1gb USB key with your pc, then after activating windows dd your HDD onto the 1gb key.

      When it comes to reinstalling just dd the key back over the partition, and set the system date to the the date when you installed windows. Unless Windows uses the ether to store it's activation codes you should be fine. Just run an app that advances time as a few hundred times normal for a day or so that windows doesn't cry about the system time being out.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    11. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      nope. get xpkey.exe and generate some corp keys.
      install a pirate copy of corp and use your workstation at work that is legit to download the network install versions of the patches.

      all it will do is force more legitimate users to use a pirate version of XP corp to get around their crap. Hell I bet that most IT people in office around the country ALREADY run it at home just to avoid the MS crap.

      I personally use mandrake 10.1 power pack. both the 13 year old daughter and my Fiancee love it over windows. And except for one computer in the house, the video editor because no decent video editing software for linux exists yet. (No, cinerella is not decent, nither is main actor. they both suck compared to an old version of Premiere from Adobe, and THAT is the bottom rung of windows/MAC video editing. (Give me Avid Express DV for linux!)

      I so wish I could buy decent video editing software for linux.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 1

      The irony is: I have seen the pirated copies of XP people carry around. They are usually cracked so people don't have to activate them. Seems to me that they are ensuring that the only copies of Windows attractive to customers are the pirated ones.

      On a side note, the other day, somebody was implying that I was cheap because I only used "Free" software . As just asked them how many legal copies of software they had... that shut them up.

      --
      I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
    13. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by nycfoobar · · Score: 1

      Microsoft increasingly looks like the US, Soviet Russia and other empires on their way to colapse. Unable to change, they are spending more and more resources on protecting their turf, than on letting the world change them. Microsoft, like George W Bush, is insisting that others play by their rules, unable to even imagine that the days are over where nobody has any choice but to say Yes and Amen to whatever comes out of Washington. Sadly, both BG and GB are still pretty powerful, but with every day, they are hated and laughed at more than yesterday.

      --
      wtf is a sig?
    14. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      priacy-respected?

      is that "privacy" or "piracy"?

      as long as it's not "priapism".... eew.

    15. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by femtoguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think we need to look at this as an opportunity. If every slashdotter called every week to re-activate a windows install, we could bring them to theit knees. Now that is a slashdotting I would love to see.

    16. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful
      See, it's all better. When you buy your computer, that's the OS you get to use for the entire life of the computer and certainly no one at Microsoft tech support or anywhere else would ever ask you to reinstall. Have a nice day.

      Yeah... except for the fact that the first thing you really should do when you buy a new system is wipe the hard drive and reinstall windows to get rid of all the crap that OEMs load your computer up with. No.... I don't want musicmatch jukebox or Real Media Player.

    17. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      iMovie/iDVD is pretty cool and comes with a Mac Mini

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    18. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      "Human cloning" != "stem-cell research".
      Cat != mammals.

      Idiot, banning human cloning stops the significant proportion of stem cell research.

      '. But no, Bush must be solely responsible, must have brainwashed all those other people. You are an idiot.'

      Idiot, the US sponsored the ban, not one out of 60, more like one out of three.

      'Again, you're not actually being affected by anyone's beliefs'

      So your saying that the christian right who want to ban human cloning don't affect me in what way?

      If I was a woman and lived in Ireland would you say the same. How about my cloning a human doesn't directly affect you, why stop me with your phony beliefs.

      you an AC troll of the most morinoc idiot type.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    19. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. So, by your "analogy", banning cats would remove a significant proportion of mammals?

      No.

      Idiot. Learn to read your own links. Costa Rica wrote the bill. 61 countries, including the US, are sponsoring and supporting it. 61. Not 3. 3 is what you just now pulled out of your ass. We don't want what came out of your ass.

      Again, you're not actually being affected by anyone's beliefs. You're being affected by their actions. You rode the short bus to school, didn't you?

      "So your saying that the christian right who want to ban human cloning don't affect me in what way?" That makes no sense. I'm saying they affect you in no way. Same for your buddy in Ireland. When you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt (and don't think for a second that you have) that what you want to abort or turn into veal cattle is *not* a human being, is not protected by the same laws you enjoy, *then* you can have your abortions and slave cloning.

    20. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      'One, drawn up by Costa Rica and backed by the United States and 60 other countries',
      In the UN there is 'backing' and sponsorship.
      First time around the plan only had a few 'sponsors' later it had 60 backers. anyhow It's not Bush I'm against, it's the people that converted him, Bush is just an easy example.

      'Again, you're not actually being affected by anyone's beliefs. You're being affected by their actions.'

      I'm not against their beliefs I'm against the actions they perform because of their beliefs or do the Cristian Right not have right wing Cristian beliefs?

      "Could you trust someone who believed that Jesus came to save us", doesn't ask you not to believe them, it just asks if you would like to be affected by them, you not placing trust in someone who does nothing isn't going to affect you or them.

      "That makes no sense. "
      So, your saying that the christian right don't want to ban human cloning so this does not affect me.

      "When you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt (and don't think for a second that you have) that what you want to abort or turn into veal cattle is *not* a human being"

      That's the problem you don't think.

      When you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt(and I KNOW you cannot) that a embryo is any different from the skin I hoover up and throw in the dustbin every day, then you can have you ban on abortions and 'slave' cloning.
      'Quick, catch that sneeze it contains valuable human cells that could produce another life.'

      Now that's even before I've touched on human life being more 'valuable' than anything else except oil.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    21. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt (and don't think for a second that you have) that what you want to abort or turn into veal cattle is *not* a human being"

      That's the problem you don't think.


      ^^ Congratulations on your non sequitur. Not to mention deliberately misconstruing the comment so as to not have to address the content.

      When you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt(and I KNOW you cannot) that a embryo is any different from the skin I hoover up and throw in the dustbin every day, then you can have you ban on abortions and 'slave' cloning.
      'Quick, catch that sneeze it contains valuable human cells that could produce another life.'


      Simple. Skin cells, placed in the womb and given the correct conditions, will not grow into a human. Especially since, if you vacuumed them up off the floor, THEY'D BE DEAD. No other cells will either, with the sole exception of a fertilized human egg. You cannot possibly be so dense as to argue that this is not true. If you are, please link to studies showing where skin cells placed in those conditions (or any other conditions) indeed grew into a human being.

      So now that your "argument" is unravelling, what shall you do, hmm? I predict at least two posts worth of ranting and raving, more non sequiturs, and general nonsensical behaviour.

    22. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm not against their beliefs"

      Oh yes you are. You've shown nothing but contempt, scorn, and hatred in this thread for anything remotely resembling Christianity, and you've displaced that onto me simply because I disagree with you.

      You can't stand that, can you? I disagree with your position advocating hatred for Christians, and all of a sudden in your mind I'm one of them. Do you see how wrong that logical short-circuit is?

      That's some serious personality disorder you've got. I suggest getting it treated before it causes permanent harm.

    23. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      'Skin cells, placed in the womb and given the correct conditions, will not grow into a human.'
      Yes they will, WTF do you think the 'correct' conditions are? idiot.

      'if you vacuumed them up off the floor, THEY'D BE DEAD', just as dead as if I've frozen them with liquid nitrogen, nothing is ever 'dead'.

      'No other cells will either, with the sole exception of a fertilised human egg.'
      Idiot, this shows your lack of thought on the subject.

      What is a stem cell? go on, I'd like to hear you tell me, do you even know what your talking about.

      Now tell me the difference between a 'stem cell' and embryo and the skin I put in the waste bin.

      'cell-like' conditions can already be created in the Lab, in 50-100 or even if it's a million years time you WILL be able to create a cell identical to the one you would have inserted into the womb.

      If I can with my chemistry set create exactly the think that you say is the corner stone of life, then I can only call you an idiot for thinking that I cannot.

      I do not found my ideas upon 'beliefs' I found them upon facts.

      'So now that your "argument" is unravelling, what shall you do, hmm? I predict at least two posts worth of ranting and raving, more non sequiturs,and general nonsensical behaviour.'

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    24. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      If the software doesn't have a record of it's activation, it will require activation. Unless MS differentiates between new activations, activations due to reinstall and activations due to hardware changes and combinations of new installs on "different" hardware, they'll probably go through the phone call to get up and running.

    25. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      'Oh yes you are'
      Who are you to tell me what I am and am not against, in your little world I may have shown ' nothing but contempt, scorn, and hatred', but then again you don't think.

      'That's some serious personality disorder you've got. I suggest getting it treated before it causes permanent harm.'

      No, I'm just laughing at you hoping that your a troll.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    26. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1

      Um... if you do a F&R, how is the new copy going to know whether you've activated or if your hardware has changed?

    27. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. Yep, I was right. You're down to total nonsense.

      You found your ideas upon lunacy. You should be ashamed of yourself.

    28. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, struck a nerve there, I see. See, when you act like a fascist toward others, everyone gets the right to call you on it. Including me.

      As for me being a failure at trolling? Well now.. you keep on responding... don't go whining about trolls when you can't control your own self.

      Oh, and you might want to look at getting some other insults besides 'idiot' and 'you dont think'. Repetition equals mediocrity, after all.

      Have a great day!

    29. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by C0deM0nkey · · Score: 1
      Yeah... except for the fact that the first thing you really should do when you buy a new system is wipe the hard drive and reinstall windows to get rid of all the crap that OEMs load your computer up with. No.... I don't want musicmatch jukebox or Real Media Player.

      Liar! We all know that, surely, the only reason you are reinstalling is to get back that "musicmatch jukebox" or "Real Media Player", right?

      I mean, come on, the OEMs, after exhaustive customer research, are doing everything they can to make sure you have an easy time getting everything back: they make it so easy by making sure they only give you a freakin' "restore" CD that sets your system back to factory specs. Wouldn't want you to miss out on yet another opportunity to sign up for AOL, would we?

    30. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by paulberezansky · · Score: 1

      The whole problem was caused by MS to begin with. Every couple months your product key's internet registration flag was re-set, so you could buy a Dell, register windows, use it for a couple months, then sell your COA and Windows disc on eBay, then the buyer installs it, registers with MS... and so on. This loophole could have been closed by disabling this automatic re-set, so that people would have to call only if they had previously registered.

    31. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by randallpowell · · Score: 1

      It's to prevent people from using codes that are unused from new PCs. It makes no sense why Windows users have to call India for a new code just to prove they bought Windows. That is why I love OSS, no damn codes....except for source.

    32. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by randallpowell · · Score: 1
      when you act like a fascist toward others
      Sounds like his management style needs a little work.

      As for me being a failure at trolling?
      There are online tutorials for that.

    33. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      'You found your ideas upon lunacy. You should be ashamed of yourself.'

      I'm not the one saying.'what you want to abort or turn into veal cattle is *not* a human being', as if being human is something more special than being a piece of stone.

      You apparently are the lunatic who thinks that humans are something 'special', so I class you with the other Idiots. not just because you believe that humans are 'special' but because you let your belief affect you actions.

      It seems quite odd that I base my argument on science and you base yours on humans being different. Your argument right from the start has been total nonsense.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    34. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      What didn't you understand about the laughing bit, idiot. I think Idiot is quite a good name for you.

      As for being a fascist, as your would be friend said, 'You're just a wussy emo who can't handle any deviation from your own beliefs.'

      I don't think you stuck any nerve, the more the merrier.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    35. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now it's down to random sentences and quotes? You're progressing faster than I thought you would.

      And you're still responding, so yeah, nerve == struck.

    36. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Sheer lunacy.

      I guess you're ok with slavery, then? How about murder?

      Heh.

    37. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      believe only what you find out to be true, don't even believe what I am saying now.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    38. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      So your OK with global warming then, what about air pollution?

      I don't think that keeping birds in a cage or killing them for food is any better than burning all the oil and causing global warming. What's your take on slavery and murder?

      What's your point? do you have one except, humans are special, lets all pat ourselves on the back.
      oops there's another little miracle, how ever did that happen I must have been drunk.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    39. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      " You're progressing faster than I thought you would",
      an interesting statement from someone who thinks,

      'cell-like' conditions can already be created in the Lab, in 50-100 or even if it's a million years time you WILL be able to create a cell identical to the one you would have inserted into the womb.'

      is lunacy, you are a creationist right? you know the world isn't flat (well while you awake it's flat and the sun moves around it, when you asleep it's triangular and revolves around you)

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    40. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by infodragon · · Score: 4, Informative

      I know this is a bit advanced so it is not for the "average" computer user. But what I do is...

      Set up my computer the way I want it, All MS Software activated, such as office. (FYI this works with Windows Server 2003)

      1. Boot to Gentoo Live CD
      2. dd if=/dev/hda | bzip2 > /mnt/where/I/mounted/my/rev/drive (35GB) (you can use external HD, or your favorite mass storage device)

      When spyware or just general Windows Entropy slows the system down too much, I back up my data...
      1. Boot to Gentoo Live CD
      2. dd of=/mnt/where/I/mounted/my/rev/drive | bzip2 -d > /dev/hda
      3. Reboot
      4. Use windows normally, have to re-install games
      5. ...
      6. Profit?


      The one "Bad Thing"(TM) about this is that data has to be on a separate disk. You can also modify the above to use partitions and have all data on a different partition. Though with any windows reinstall it is a good idea to reformat, with slow version, the partition to NTFS. So you'd have to do this in either case.

      Anyway This works well and gets around that stupid reactivation crap, now I'm *VERY* glad I do this.

      And remember kids, ALWAYS backup your data on a normal basis. HDs will fail!!! There is no question, they will fail. If I was not clear let me repeat that, THEY WILL FAIL!!!!! You need backups, and if you do this as you should, the above process will be less of a fuss.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.
    41. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by BurritoWarrior · · Score: 1

      As long as the hardware hasn't changed significantly, they won't have to reactivate, even if they do a full format/reinstall.

      What are you talkin about? If you format/reinstall, you have to reactivate. The "don't change major hardware/don't have to reactivate" provision is if you have a running/working system and make harware changes. Once you wipe the OS, you have to reactivate.

    42. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sweet and it runs on linux???

      because I am sure that is what he asked.

      You mac guys never fully listen to the questions asked.

      and iMovie sucks compared to Premiere. call me when you can edit a feature film on aMac Mini using the final cut suite.

      currently you have to spend $5 grand + to do that on the mac platform.

    43. Re:Great. Just what I want to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burn that strawman, baby. Burn it good.

      Feel free to look up 'strawman argument', btw. I wouldn't expect you'd know what it means.

      If you can't even keep up with what's going on in this thread, there's not much point in continuing.

  3. Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by oscarh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    *This* is the reason we don't want monopolies abusing their power/position - they can impose whatever onerous conditions they like, and you just have to play along.

    Whaddya gonna do - install *another* OS???

    --
    OK, oscar
    1. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1, Informative

      I fail to see how this is a huge problem. I've had to call them about key problems before and it took no more than 3-5 minutes from beginning to end. Hell the Gentoo installation documentation took much longer than that to read.

      Microsoft has every right to verify that people using their software do indeed have a license to use their software. And let's be honest, no matter what they do you're going to hate them and flame them.

      You should be thankful they're not giving it away free or you could kiss goodbye to something other than Windows ever being on a computer's desktop.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    2. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by Skye16 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the fanboys can be silly at times too, but lets be honest, "ever" is a very, very, very long time. Free or not, who knows? Maybe someone can come out with something better 3 years down the line. Fast, flexible, easy to use, relatively bug free - think Firefox, but an OS this time.

      Then again, until I can play _all_ of my games (at least the relatively current ones) on it, I'm not switching. Although I do use Gentoo on my non-gaming systems.

    3. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by musikit · · Score: 1

      im sorry Jbuilder does this and it is the most annoying thing ever. every machine i install Jbuilder on i have to call them up and have them activate it. frankly after the 3rd time of reinstalling i just use it to drive their phone support people nuts. that 3-5 mins is easily a 15-20 min call for me 'cause i know it will increase their support costs and hopefully either make their product too expensive for my company to actually upgrade (i win) or remove it (i win).

      for companies that do this they often state they need all your personnal information to activate the product. so i see it more as marketing collections.

    4. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by cbr2702 · · Score: 1
      Whaddya gonna do - install *another* OS???

      Yes.

      --


      This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
    5. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by stuntpope · · Score: 1

      Gentoo is not a valid comparison because it's not a consumer-based distro. There are point-and-click Linux installers that are less hassle than having to call a company for permission to do something with a product you own. I know I'd be annoyed as hell if, as previously suggested, I'm already pissed at the computer because of the need to reinstall the OS, and then I have to call someone and say "pretty please".

      The comments for this article don't suggest that people dispute MS's right to do this, but rather most are amused or bemused at this business decision. Sure, I guess Whirlpool has the right to demand I call a support line if I need to replace the motor on my fridge, and prove that I'm the rightful owner - but they don't.

      As to your last comment, I don't recall MacOS being free, or even some Linux distros. There's nothing but Windows unless it's free? Right.

    6. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has every right to verify that people using their software do indeed have a license to use their software.

      That is not in dispute. By the same token, I have the right not to purchase and use WinXP ... and I don't. I wouldn't touch that nasty stuff if it were the last OS on the planet, free or otherwise. If I need Windows for something, I boot Win98.

      You should be thankful they're not giving it away free or you could kiss goodbye to something other than Windows ever being on a computer's desktop.

      Yeah right. If had a choice between paying $60 for Linux, or accepting $60 from Bill Gates to use WinXP, I would buy Linux. Somehow, I feel I'm not the only person with this sentiment.

    7. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by Lucky_Pierre · · Score: 1

      Live overseas and see how you like calling Microsoft and getting stuck paying a huge phone bill. Activation SUCKS.

      --
      "Whenever the cause of the people is entrusted to professors, it is lost." ~ V.I. Lenin
    8. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by Maestro4k · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Microsoft has every right to verify that people using their software do indeed have a license to use their software. And let's be honest, no matter what they do you're going to hate them and flame them.
      • Sure they have that right, but they're adding more and more conditions on how you prove it. They're also starting to restrict more and more things that customers require until they can prove they own the software. (Security updates, reinstall activation so far. What's next, will they require you to prove you own the OS before you can install a driver?) What about customers who lost their CD/CD Case but have a legit copy? Is it right to tell them to FOAD because of that? Should I really have to waste 3-5 minutes of my time to
      • prove I'm not a crook. That's what it boils down to, MS doesn't care so much about their customers, in fact they're beating them to death with the anti-piracy club while the pirates happily install their no-activation copies they downloaded.
      You should be thankful they're not giving it away free or you could kiss goodbye to something other than Windows ever being on a computer's desktop.
      • Actually with all the security problems and the growing concern/upset over it I'm not sure MS could effectively take over the OS market by giving Windows away anymore. You're starting to see your average Joe Users out there worried about using Windows. Steps like they're taking now certainly don't help, would you trust them not to apply onerous demands later on after they gave you Windows for free? I'm not sure anyone would, and I'm not talking just the /. crowd, but average people too.
    9. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by SteveX · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if only there was some alternative to Windows. But unfortunately, since they've been found to have a monopoly on the desktop OS market, this must mean there are no viable alternatives. Linux just won't cut it. At least, according to the government.

    10. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by sgant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about customers who lost their CD/CD Case but have a legit copy?

      In my experience, when you've lost the CD case you've also lost the CD that comes inside it. Of course, unless you're actually one of those VERY rare...and I mean VERY rare person that makes a copy CD of all your software. (yeah, I know there are a ton of people that fight for the right to keep/burn a copy of their software disks, but come on, who really does this? No one I've ever met or worked with or known has ever done this...ever. Yes, I'm sure there will be some on here that will say that they do, but do you really belive them? Still, I'll fight to the end our right to do this, even if no one really does.)

      But getting back to your statement, if you've lost the case, you've lost the CD. Or, if you DO backup the CD to another CD, wouldn't you write the code ON the CD...I mean, you're going through all that trouble to back up the media, so why not back up the code?

      But regardless of all this, MS is shooting themselves in the foot. The only one's they're hurting are the legit owners of their products...as always when it comes to piracy issues. It's like no one really get's it.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    11. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by indifferent+children · · Score: 0

      You've actually read a piece of software documentation? Are you sure that you're in the right place? This is /.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    12. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by castlec · · Score: 1

      think Firefox, but an OS this time
      you mean mozilla right???? :o)

      --
      When I tell an object to delete this, am I killing it or telling it to kill me?
    13. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by jim_redwagon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How many counterfeit copies of Whirlpool refridgerators have you seen floating around?

      Come on, like MS or not, it is their product, they should be paid for it. Financially it makes sense. Who wouldn't want 90% of illegal Windows users leave to another OS (and become their headache) and pick up the other 10% as paying customers.

      It's great to have 'free' OSs out there and let them be a viable alternate for some users, but we all know currently there is not a magic bullet to jump to. Let the media start commenting on the lack of a mom and dad installable OS as an alternative and MAYBE everyone will have something to be happy about, an alternative will rise from the ashes of smashed phones.

      Also, maybe people might actually start paying attention to their surfing habits and NOT open themselves up to non-removable spy/ass ware. I'm guessing that anyone who got that on their machines? Can lay blame right back to the person the see in the mirror.

      If you haven't heard it before:

      There is no FREE Money

      You can't get Paris' video for free

      Those 'free screensavers' are STUPID

      Look outside the damn window or go to www.weather.com, forget the 'bug'

      Don't say YES when installing software from any company you wouldn't want your Mom to know about.

      Go outside and see the daylight.

      Finally, what is everyone going to say when the music industry starts asking people to pay for CDs? :p

      --
      I forgot what I wanted to say, but honestly, it was important.
    14. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh, I make copies of my software and usually keep the copies at various friends or colleagues houses to protect against fire or catastrophe at home.

    15. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by RayTardo · · Score: 1, Funny

      Everybody lives overseas... :)

    16. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by LinuxHeadMN · · Score: 0

      The only thing this is going to do is make me want to switch over to MacOS sooner. I've been contemplating this, and now, I'm getting the final push. The idea of me having to call MS to get an activation key when my computer has gone on the fritz because of $PROBLEM, is absoluetly nuts. I would hope they have a 24/7/365 toll free line, because when I have to reload a computer, and if I have to call long distance, I'll be sure to make that call a collect one.

    17. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by sgant · · Score: 1

      LIAR!!!

      Ok, yes, as I said I'm sure there are those here that say this...but again, never met anyone in the real world that does. Just doesn't get done, least not 'round these parts.

      But it certainly sounds great on paper!

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    18. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by Maestro4k · · Score: 3, Insightful
      In my experience, when you've lost the CD case you've also lost the CD that comes inside it.
      • I disagree, personally I have so many CDs (software, audio, backups, etc.) that I keep everything in CD wallet/notebook binders (whatever they're called). For me it's far easier to find the CD than the case. I'm much more likely to lose the case than the CD. I don't think I'm alone either, most all the people I've helped fix their computers keep their software CDs in binders too, it's really easy to put all the software in one small wallet and keep it by the computer, much more compact as well.
      But getting back to your statement, if you've lost the case, you've lost the CD. Or, if you DO backup the CD to another CD, wouldn't you write the code ON the CD...I mean, you're going through all that trouble to back up the media, so why not back up the code?
      • Well yeah, I do, but what about your average user who got a computer from an OEM and just thought to back up the CDs, not realizing they needed to write the codes down? That's the people this is going to hurt, you and I (and the whole /. crowd) will have our codes on the backups and we'd be fine. Well maybe not fine, we'd likely be ticked at the inconvenience, but we'd not be up the creek without a paddle.
      But regardless of all this, MS is shooting themselves in the foot. The only one's they're hurting are the legit owners of their products...as always when it comes to piracy issues. It's like no one really get's it.
      • My theory is it's all greed. Companies see the predictions of how much money they lose in piracy and the dollar signs flash in their eyes and they begin thinking "if we just stopped piracy all that money would be ours, and our sales would go up!" Of course this ignores the reality of the situation (that most pirates aren't going to bother paying in any case, they'll just find a way around whatever you throw at them), but greed has a way of doing that to people.
      • One thing I wonder about is the article says the customers (aka victims of unscrupulous computer companies) will have to answer a series of questions to basically prove they at least _thought_ they had paid for a legit copy. What are they going to ask to prove this? "Do you swear allegiance to Microsoft and promise to buy all our future products?" :) Seriously though this seems even more moronic as what idiot isn't going to answer the questions in such a way to make it sound like they thought they'd bought a legit copy of Windows on their PC?

    19. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by dmarx · · Score: 1
      I've had to call them about key problems before and it took no more than 3-5 minutes from beginning to end.

      Why should I subtract even 3-5 seconds from my live to solve their problems?

      --
      "Do I dare disturb the universe?"
    20. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by Elledan · · Score: 1

      "Maybe someone can come out with something better 3 years down the line. Fast, flexible, easy to use, relatively bug free - think Firefox, but an OS this time."

      You mean something like ReactOS?

      You won't even have to leave behind all of those beautifully plentiful Windows applications and drivers :)

      --
      Site & blog: http://www.mayaposch.com
    21. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Funny

      No seriously, half a dozen people I know are looking after various Windows installation backup disks for me, in return I am looking after some of their game backups for them.

    22. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by rseuhs · · Score: 1
      Microsoft has every right to verify that people using their software do indeed have a license to use their software.

      Sure but computer users have the right not to play along and use something else.

    23. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by TommydCat · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'd like to see you slipstream a few service packs on the original CD. Oh wait, that means making copies? After which the older version (which gets a new install infected after 69ms with a net connection) is pretty much pointless and gets buried in a box.

      Yeah, that's really rare since I went through that last week.

      --
      This comment does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the author.
    24. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by Matilda+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      Hm. Let me think about this for a second.

      Step 1: Remove CD from case.
      Step 2: Install Windows XP.
      Step 3: Shuffle things on your desk while waiting for XP to install.
      Step 4: Just put the CD on top of your case after the install because you're too lazy to go digging for the case.
      Step 5: Wait a month.
      Step 6: Have to reinstall Windows XP, but you've lost the case. Oops.

      --
      Tluin natha Linux xxizzuss uriu olt bwael mon'tun.
    25. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep everything in CD wallet/notebook binders

      Same here, though I've now got so many disorganized binders I think having a huge wall of CDs would make it possible to at least see the writing on the edge of the case to find what I want.

      I did find that writing the activation codes on a slip of paper and slipping it in with the CD is quite useful, though.

    26. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by symbolic · · Score: 1

      *This* is the reason we don't want monopolies abusing their power/position - they can impose whatever onerous conditions they like, and you just have to play along.

      This is a complete myth. You can choose to play along, or you can do something else. The choice is still there, but that's what most consumers seem to forget. And with that, they sacrifice the most important, and most effective voice they have with respect to companies like Microsoft.

    27. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      Same here, though I've now got so many disorganized binders I think having a huge wall of CDs would make it possible to at least see the writing on the edge of the case to find what I want.
      • I've been trying to consolidate them into larger binders myself (just ordered a couple of 240 capacity ones). I try to keep the CDs themselves organized logically by type (OS CDs, Program CDs, etc.) and generally alphabetically, although I make exceptions for multiple versions, even if they're named different (so I'd file the Windows OS CDs in this order: Win95a, Win95b, Win98, WinME, Win2k, WinXP, WinXP-SP1, WinXP-SP2).
      I did find that writing the activation codes on a slip of paper and slipping it in with the CD is quite useful, though.
      • I write mine on the CDs and also keep a spreadsheet with them all stored in it. I've found that most installers don't care if you eject the CD at the code/serial number prompt. I just type it in, put the CD back in and wait for it to spin up then click OK/Continue.
    28. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by MattyCobb · · Score: 1

      What do you DO that gets your box infected in under a minute? I mean really... I always boot up my new boxes with nothing and sit and download patches/antivirus/firewalls etc. And while I download these I never get infected.... and I use comcast of all things.

      --

      Matt
      You have 1 Moderator Point! Use it or lose it! Is that a threat? -vapid
    29. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, what games are you unable to play at this time?

    30. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Half-Life 2, being the key one. That and the mods. I'm looking forward to Day of Defeat: Source like you wouldn't believe. Brothers in Arms also tends to make my heart skip a beat after each new movie/screenshot/whatever is released (but that isn't due out for a few weeks)

    31. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 1

      Your Average Joe already jumped ship to the Mac, via the Mac Mini...

      --
      Your Average Joe
    32. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...until I can play _all_ of my games (at least the relatively current ones) on it, I'm not switching.

      I use my system to do work! My son only uses his for games. I use Linux, he uses Windows. Gee, doesn't that put the proper spin on what Windows is good for?

    33. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      Sorry I'm so late getting back to this. I am running Steam with HL, CS, DoD, HL2, and CS:S loading up and playing fine. I'm using Transgaming's latest version of Cedega to do this.

      CS:S looks and runs sweet. I'm also anxiously waiting for DoD:S. :)

      The only thing that's not working, and it's definitely a problem, is the mic under CS:S. Someone opened a vote to get it fixed at Transgaming in December, I think.

      I've copied down your ICQ number. Look for me to send a request to add you to my buddy list.

  4. Stupid by afidel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just means you will have to use a corp key which does not require activation. I know as a support tech I would never sit through a freaking queue every time I had to reactivate windows.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I replaced my OEM preinstalled Windows XP with a pirated no-activation copy precisely because I didn't want to go through 'activation' if I change anything or need to reinstall it.

    2. Re:Stupid by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Pretty much everywhere I've worked has done this for ages, especially on the test machines.

      Now it's probably going to become policy in a lot of places... if you have 20 test machines to reimage and you have to sit in a queue racking up the phone bill 3 times a week it's just not practical to do anything else (volume licensing is way too expensive for a small company).

      I do have a proper activated windows here but probably won't any more - I'll go to corp keys as it's enough of a pain in the arse already activating stuff.

    3. Re:Stupid by RupW · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I replaced my OEM preinstalled Windows XP with a pirated no-activation copy precisely because I didn't want to go through 'activation' if I change anything or need to reinstall it.

      Why bother? It probably cost you more time replacing the version than you'd ever spend activating.

      The lock-in argument: one day they might stop running the activation service? Sure, but one day they might release a service pack that detects your pirated version and stops it working. So the future isn't certain either way.

      So why bother?

    4. Re:Stupid by mattspammail · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't get too worked up over this for my own personal usability, because I'll do the same. It's legal; why the heck not? Turning my back on this issue is a crappy thing to do (not as bad as what MS is doing), but for right now, I dodged a bullet.

      In the meantime, I'm working on my wife's attitude. She's opening up to the idea of a Mac Mini. That'll solve those pesky MS issues the right way. "Hit 'em where it hurts!"

      --
      Now accepting PayPal donations!
    5. Re:Stupid by GraemeDonaldson · · Score: 1

      volume licensing is way too expensive for a small company

      Actually, you only have to buy a minimum of 5 licences in order to get your company on an open licence agreement. Once you're on an OL agreement, you can buy licences on an "as needed" basis as long as you have at least 1 OL agreement that hasn't expired yet.

      --
      I think, therefore I am. I think?
    6. Re:Stupid by DarkBlackFox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not so much the phone queue thats a problem. I've had to phone-activate Windows a number of times on customers machines where for one reason or another, Windows demanded activation before logging on. Trouble was, it wouldn't install the network card driver before it logged in, so there was no way for it to get online. But I digress...

      The big pain in the ass in activating over the phone is reading the installation ID. It's not an actual person you talk to- you read the number aloud (as opposed to touch tone) to a computer. You have to speak slow and deliberately for it to understand the numbers correctly, and ultimately it will read a confirmation code back to you. The whole process takes about 5-7 minutes, depending on whether the computer understood you correctly the first time. That's the part that pisses me off about this. Whenever we have to reinstall Windows at my shop, it was easy enough to plug in to our router and activate in 2 seconds (all with legitimate keys mind you). If this holds true, it will piss off many many computer shops around the world. Two seconds vs. five minutes is a pretty big deal.

    7. Re:Stupid by Jardine · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not an actual person you talk to- you read the number aloud (as opposed to touch tone) to a computer. You have to speak slow and deliberately for it to understand the numbers correctly, and ultimately it will read a confirmation code back to you. The whole process takes about 5-7 minutes, depending on whether the computer understood you correctly the first time.

      You can speak slowly and deliberately to the computer, but you can still enter the numbers by touchtone.

    8. Re:Stupid by badfish99 · · Score: 1
      I have a friend who uses hard disks for backup. So he regularly adds or removes hard disks from his machine.

      Windows wants to be re-activated every time you do that, and after the first few times you can't do it online: only a phone call will work.

      I've tried to persuade him that a pirated copy would be less hassle, but he insists on phoning Microsoft every time. He says that he's bought the damn thing, so he's going to damn well use it.

    9. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The big pain in the ass in activating over the phone is reading the installation ID. It's not an actual person you talk to- you read the number aloud (as opposed to touch tone) to a computer.

      Actually, if Windows decides you've activated too many times in a certain time peroid, it is an actual person you have to talk to. I've had to do it, for completely legit reasons, and it really isn't fun. If you think reading numbers to a computer is bad, reading the same to a human is worse. And you get a small bonus quiz like:

      "How many computers are you using this software on?"

      Then they'll let you reactive your completely legit software. From what I've read, I think this will be a live human as well. I thought I saw once that operators will be instructed only to give keys to costumers who correctly answer questions such as above.

    10. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Five minutes on google to start a download for a no-activation ISO, vs. at least that much time per activation? So you're saying, 5 > (5 + n) * x where x is a positive integer, right? Not in any maths I've ever heard of.

      So who's more of an idiot, RupW or the person that modded him insightful?

      As to your "lock-in arugment" the reasoning is equally faulty. In all the years MS has been in business they have consistently tried to increase their anti-piracy attempts, therefore it is inconsistant to assume they will suddenly reverse that policy. Furthermore any attempts thus far that MS has made to negate pirated versions have been quickly and easily circumvented, in all releases and service packs of every Windows OS ever released.

    11. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you've changed enough other stuff between activations too; see here. Just swapping hard drives in and out won't do it, we do that all the time here.

    12. Re:Stupid by phats+garage · · Score: 1
      do all users really need that service pack? For my home use, linux tends to let me get on most web sites and even more so, many web destinations seem to recognise that not everyone runs windows.

      I also think we can thank apple some for this or else there'd be a commercial monoculture out there and it'd be internet explorer or nothing. Microsoft even helped by the extraordinarily predictable way they let IE win the browserwars then sink into complacency and let firefox sneak up on them and steal mindshare. (PS., thats a good argument against monopolies, IE currently sucks bad as a browser and its all because for a while there was no competition.)

      So whats stopping me from running an older nonpatched windows with older windows software if I feel the need? Sure, that solution may not last forever, and I was really close to buying XP, but since I love to install every distro of linux that comes around, I'm going to be wiping my pc lots and paying money for XP just got a lot less realistic for me with this change of policy.

      For crying out loud, I'm a pc enthusiast, I like reinstallable software, but I guess thats not Microsoft's target market.

    13. Re:Stupid by RupW · · Score: 1

      Five minutes on google to start a download for a no-activation ISO, vs. at least that much time per activation?

      OK, I read it ("I replaced") as you reinstalled your OS for the sake of it. I guess you might have meant "when I reinstalled my PC". But activation's never taken me five minutes anyway.

      In all the years MS has been in business they have consistently tried to increase their anti-piracy attempts, therefore it is inconsistant to assume they will suddenly reverse that policy.

      Now you've misread me. I didn't say that at all, I was saying that MS increasing their anti-piracy attempts will be precisely your problem. By the "lock-in argument" I meant that you have to trust MS to continue providing an activation service or your software won't work, along the lines of the usual slashdot argument "I won't use XYZ proprietry file format because I have to trust the vendor if I can't extract all the data myself".

      Furthermore any attempts thus far that MS has made to negate pirated versions have been quickly and easily circumvented, in all releases and service packs of every Windows OS ever released.

      OK, fair enough, I'm up on warez :-p But if you install an official one and it breaks your machine can you install the hacked one over the top to fix it or will you have to reinstall?

    14. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was really close to buying XP

      If you buy XP yourself you won't get the OEM copy and this won't affect you.

      And TFA says for now it'll only affect OEM keys from the top 20 manufacturers, so even if you buy an OEM copy yourself (and you're not supposed to be able to) then this won't affect you either.

    15. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After a number of hardware changes/reinstalls they won't let you activate online. Once you get to that point even changing 1 ram chip will be enough to have to call up Microsoft.

    16. Re:Stupid by RichMeatyTaste · · Score: 1

      More FUD.
      XP stopped asking you to re-activate after hardware changes a long time ago. The only time I've ever been forced to activate is upon first bootup after a new install.

      --


      Ever feel like you are driving the getaway car?
    17. Re:Stupid by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

      5 > (5+n)*x
      5/x > (5+n) (x != 0)
      (5/x) - 5 > n (x != 0)
      n (5/x) - 5

      Since you didn't say n had to be positive.... :-)

    18. Re:Stupid by danielrose · · Score: 1

      It depends how many drives you change in one go.. for example if you have 1 ide device and you add another 3, it may cause you grief

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
    19. Re:Stupid by RupW · · Score: 2, Informative

      XP stopped asking you to re-activate after hardware changes a long time ago.

      It allows you three changes from a set of ten things it watches, IIRC, details here so you might not have pushed it that far yet.

      It *did* ask me to reactivate when I replaced my motherboard last April - if it's changed since then then I haven't heard about it.

    20. Re:Stupid by phats+garage · · Score: 1
      After a number of hardware changes/reinstalls they won't let you activate online. Once you get to that point even changing 1 ram chip will be enough to have to call up Microsoft.

      Thats what I was thinking. I guess I could set a pc aside and make it a dedicated "don't change" machine, but I'm hoping that I can just get a windows 2000 somewhere and just not worry about xp.

      I think its going to get to the point that if you run XP for a few months and it gets hit with spyware or other viruses, your activation will be considered "broken" by your own bad network behavior and you'll have to buy a "new" activation to replace the one you "broke," sort of when your cd-rom eats a cd, you have to replace that physical cd. I guess it makes sense in a way, but in the meantime, I can reinstall linux over and over, it being better quality just doesn't "wear out" or "get broken" like microsoft product activations. Wierd to talk that way about software though ;-)

    21. Re:Stupid by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Inside Ghost my computer lives in 1999.

    22. Re:Stupid by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Because you'll know about the service pack? You'll only find out about the activation when you go to your closet to look over your thesis research after 20 years.

      First off activation is a huge pain, piracy is increadibly easy. Most times you get the disk from a friend or picked it up on a whim (hey let's check out the new OS, I have friends running 2003 why? Because it's there).

      In 1998 they used to send you stuff if you activated, now they won't let you use the product if you don't.

      They are not just giving you an activation key (something that will be put with the cd key on cracked Winblows cds they are trying it to a number, a date (of install) and if they can I'm sure a mac and ip addy.

      That said windows is still the best, and with the bickering in the linux community will be the best for a long time. That said with my second box running Solaris 10, RL:FC3, Mandrake,Debian, and Suse.

    23. Re:Stupid by paulberezansky · · Score: 1

      "The lock-in argument: one day they might stop running the activation service?
      Sure, but one day they might release a service pack that detects your pirated version and stops it working.
      So the future isn't certain either way."

      Before now you could have bought a stolen COA sticker for $15 to get around this problem, now microsoft closed this hole.

    24. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I had a Gateway PC on which the motherboard failed after a couple of years. When I replaced it, my Windows Me would no longer work as it decided it was not being installed on a Gateway PC (apparently the Gateway version of Windows is a specific to them version, not a full version, so cannot be installed when it detects a different BIOS. Or something like that.) So I had to get a pirate version of Windows as I was not going to pay for a product I was only using because my old one wasn't the full product as advertised anyway.

      And yes, I dual boot with Linux.

    25. Re:Stupid by potat0man · · Score: 1

      I just went through a phone activation and I read the long (50-75 digit) install id out loud even faster than if I were talking to a person and the machine understood every digit perfectly.

      I was quite impressed. Perhaps someone needs to work on his diction.... **nudge nudge**

  5. Only makes sense by dsginter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft was dumb enough to put the product activation code on the outside of the damn PC. Anyone can walk into a store, take a pic of the code on a new PC (since they are bulk activated) and get free Windows.

    This can only be good for free software however. Part of the Windows dominance comes from the fact that it is free for those who want it.

    --
    More
    1. Re:Only makes sense by dnoyeb · · Score: 0

      I have to admit that was an utterly ignorant move. Its mind boggling.

    2. Re:Only makes sense by ragingtory · · Score: 1

      Even better was at my high school. Walk into a computer lab and you've got 200+ product activation numbers...

    3. Re:Only makes sense by Jedi1USA · · Score: 1

      Actually I tried this (on OEM XP machines) and believe it or not it didn't work. It said the keys I got right off the tags were invalid.

      --
      My old sig was REALLY stoopid.
    4. Re:Only makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      D'oh ! You fool... you've given the game away...

      I gues now I'll have to stick to using the myriad keys written on the outside of my (non internetworked) works boxes now.

      Curses... that narrows the key range available to me to a mere few thousand or so.

    5. Re:Only makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to change a value in one of the INI files on the cd to use OEM instead of Retail (theres 3 values, OEM, Retail, and Corp)

    6. Re:Only makes sense by rmccann · · Score: 1

      Same in my college. But Computer Services have installed Win2K on them, so there are loads of XP licences not being used. The one on my PC now is HPBM6-JK2H4-X4PCP-DYW3D -G8296.

  6. Original Media by rf0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm just waiting for the customer to ring up and say they don't have the original media. The last 3 PC's i know people have bought just come with a copy of Windows on a partition. If you run Fdisk then they are screwed

    rus

    1. Re:Original Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      EU software law requires that no limits be placed on resale of legally acquired software. Not supplying install media is a major limit in my book! I got XP on my AMD64 laptop but had already reformatted the disk and installed linux before I realized that there was no install media for my legally acquired software. Fuck off MS!

    2. Re:Original Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      With vendors like HP, windows comes on a separate partition as you mentioned. But you can choose to create the windows xp install cd's yourself.

    3. Re:Original Media by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      If windows XP comes on a single CD rom, then how come when I went to back up the partition on my new HP computer it took over 7 CD's??????

    4. Re:Original Media by RupW · · Score: 1

      EU software law requires that no limits be placed on resale of legally acquired software. Not supplying install media is a major limit in my book!

      But the OEM version is licenced for use on that one PC only. You may resell the software by reselling the whole PC but that's it, and no media doesn't limit that case.

      I don't know if that's in tune with the EU laws or not but IMO it's a fair licencing model so it should be - there are plenty of other things that have to be non-transferrable e.g. rail tickets.

    5. Re:Original Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must work for Microsoft. As we all know, Windows could _NEVER_ get screwed up from all the malware floating around, so the end user would never have the need for an installation cd unless he was a pirate, right?

      Not that I dislike pirates. Every time someone legitimally purchases a Microsoft product, God kills a kitten.

    6. Re:Original Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference between "backing up your partition" and creating "install cd's" :)

    7. Re:Original Media by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      HP will also happily send the end user a set of reinstall cd's for a small fee.

      Generally, if it's under warranty and a hard drive replacement is necessary, HP sends out a set of cd's for that replacement.

    8. Re:Original Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never accepted any license, I legally acquired the software which means I must have resale rights.

    9. Re:Original Media by jim_redwagon · · Score: 1

      i've heard that some install CDs use this new fangled thing, something called compression?

      don't shoot me, i'm only the messenger ;-)

      --
      I forgot what I wanted to say, but honestly, it was important.
    10. Re:Original Media by badfish99 · · Score: 1
      Rail tickets in the EU are transferrable.

      I've read that in the US, you need to show ID in order to get on a train. Here in the UK you certainly don't need to do that.

      Anyway, what counts as "one PC only"? What happens if I upgrade the hard disk? And then the motherboard? And then replace the power supply and the case? You see where this is going...

    11. Re:Original Media by quintesse · · Score: 1

      Rail tickets non-transferrable? Here (NL) they most certainly are! :-)

      That OEM versions of software are for that PC only is still something which they're not sure of if it will hold up in (EU?) courts.

      Problem 1 is that when buying the PC nobody tells you that you cannot use that Windows installation on any other computer.

      Problem 2 is that if nobody can prevent you from buying an Opel, remove its carburator and try to put it in a Volkswagen (I said TRY! ;-) So why would this be possible with PCs+software?

      Problem 3 is that you would still need the installation CDs if your harddisk ever breaks down.

      We could probably think of a couple of problems more ;-)

    12. Re:Original Media by rjelks · · Score: 1

      You can't own MS software. You're just leasing it.

    13. Re:Original Media by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure that that would actually stand up, if I have bought the software I am pretty sure I can legally install it on as many PC's as I like provided that it's only on one of them at a time.

    14. Re:Original Media by PurpleXanathar · · Score: 1

      Monthly and weekly tickets in Italy (which is in EU) are NOT transferrable, while standard tickets are - this is because they have a discount, provided a single person use that ticket. The same runs for preinstalled Windows. What you can do is get a PC without a preinstalled OS. You have the right to have it, but probably it will cost you quite some time arguing on the phone, etc. Sad. "For one PC only" means, I think, for the PC using whatever part they have attached the Windows serial number sticker on.

    15. Re:Original Media by wljones · · Score: 1

      My laptop came with a "recovery CD" set. Two different Microsoft upgrades have required me to use it. Installing a real operating system to dual boot with XP required me to reactivate (painlessly). So far, I have been able to get Microsoft Windows XP going again, even after it ruined communication with my ISP for a few months. Microsoft never seems to realize that, if forced to choose, Microsoft goes to the wastebasket. It happened with NT years ago, and XP for a few months, until I found a fix. The computers belong to me, not some arrogant twit in Redmond (or India).

    16. Re:Original Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quoting from the back of a UK rail ticket (emphasis mine):

      "Travel on Train Companies trains is subject to the National Rail Conditions of Carriage...This ticket is not transferable....

      Some bus tickets are transferable (e.g. Stagecoach megariders), but UK train tickets (even wholly unused tickets) aren't, and there's a fine of £1000 for attempting to do this. It's even illegal to buy a ticket for your friend/relative thus saving them the trip to the station. Just because it's not enforceable doesn't mean it's not illegal.

      As for the "Ship of Thesus" issue, I suspect that the machine "counts" as the same as long as at most, say, 25% of the machine is replaced at a time.

    17. Re:Original Media by RupW · · Score: 1

      Rail tickets in the EU are transferrable.

      Oh? The (UK) one I have on my desk says "This ticket is not transferable" on the back.

      I meant particularly things like underground travelcards in London - you're not supposed to be able to buy it, travel for a few hours then sell it to someone else. But I guess it's not enforcably illegal, you see tramps trading in them a lot.

      The one PC thing - I don't know. You get three components without activation, after that you'll have to argue it with MS on the phone. Chances are you'll need a whole new PC by then anyway - changed RAM socket, changed motherboard power supply connector, etc.

    18. Re:Original Media by dizee · · Score: 1

      duh that means the computer is broken.

      you just have to throw it away and buy a new one. wal-mart has them for cheap.

    19. Re:Original Media by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 0
      EU software law requires that no limits be placed on resale of legally acquired software. Not supplying install media is a major limit in my book!
      But the OEM version is licenced for use on that one PC only. You may resell the software by reselling the whole PC but that's it, and no media doesn't limit that case.
      Have you read what you're answering to? Microsoft can say whatever it wants in it's licenses, but they cannot demand illegal terms. So, if Microsoft says "you can't resell it", the law says "you CAN resell it", so, basically, YOU CAN RESELL IT.

      Period.

    20. Re:Original Media by RupW · · Score: 1

      Have you read what you're answering to?

      Yeah, I read the AC's interpretation of EU law. No, I haven't read the actual EU law statutes. I'd be surprised if it was as simple as that. And I went on to say I think permitting the one-PC-only restriction is fair.

    21. Re:Original Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In abscence of a contractual agreement, it's a sale and even if it were not, purchasers must be permitted to resell the software (which would include the 'license').

    22. Re:Original Media by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      It's similar for me. My (cheap) PC came without any media whatsoever except for some driver CDs; however, the manufacturer reserved a partition of about 4 or 5 GB and put a "rescue system" there, which you can use to wipe out your entire hard disk and put it back into the state it was in when you bought the PC.

      Yes, that also means you lose all your personal data, settings, installed programs and so on unless you back them up - which is something I wouldn't trust people like my parents to know how to do. Sure, they know how to copy their own files to a USB memory stick, but backing up the registry, for example, is beyond them - they don't even know what the registry is.

      The only positive thing is that from what I gather, I don't need to reactive Windows if I do that because it's a preactivated OEM version. But still, if I had to reinstall windows (I haven't so far, fortunately), I doubt I'd take this route.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    23. Re:Original Media by archen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As someone who comes from a "I build my own computers" mentality, I wasn't to happy about that either. But as I started getting in IBM Laptops with the "Install Partition" I realized that it wasn't that bad of an idea.

      For instance, take all the service packs and hot fixes that are constantly thrown at windows. If I have to do a clean reinstall of XP and the copy I have is pre SP1, I'll be owned the second I hook up to a network (assuming I'm too stupid to turn on the firewall first). Without most of the hotfixes I'll be close to the same situation. By having a copy on a hard drive, PC manufacterers can keep very up to date images shipped with machines instead of the huge lag time of having the correct CD's pressed and shipped with the computer.

      The only "proof" that you "own" Windows is that dinky bar code sticker, so there isn't much need for a CD itself really. And fdisk in the hands of most people means they are screwed anyway =)

    24. Re:Original Media by sbryant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, it is as simple as that!

      There was a court case in Germany, where OEM versions of Windows were being sold without any machine. MS didn't like it and went to court, but the court told them they aren't allowed to place any restrictions on the resale of these legally bought items.

      I can buy WinXP Home OEM (new) for 80 Euros right now, on its own, perfectly legally.

      I don't think the one-PC-only thing is fair at all. It's very consumer-unfriendly.

      -- Steve

    25. Re:Original Media by Don'tTreadOnMe · · Score: 1

      That works here, too: I have a big pile of old COM port Microsoft mice, because I had to buy "hardware" in order to get the OEM Windows or Office disk.

  7. it will be bypassed... by selderrr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    right now, it was easier to spread corporate (or educational) keys. Many of these don't require activation at all. Once MS disables this, crackers will resort to patching the activation code. .. It's just a matter of time, like the XBox was cracked eventually.

    On the other hand : this will just make the difference between Windows and OSX/linux even more apparent. Every user-restricting move of microsoft is, in the long run, a shot in its own foot

    1. Re:it will be bypassed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean -- matter of time?

      There has already been activation cracks to XP...

    2. Re:it will be bypassed... by William_Lee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Once MS disables this, crackers will resort to patching the activation code. .. It's just a matter of time, like the XBox was cracked eventually."

      Actually, the activation code has been stripped out of Windows XP in the pirate community since before day 1 of its official release.

      Almost any type of copy protection, activation or otherwise is rapidly stripped out of software by cracking groups and released into the pirate community.

      This announcement is a non issue for actual pirates of XP. It has zero impact to them. It impacts the PAYING user the most by making a procedure they shouldn't have to deal with in the first place an even bigger pain in the ass.

      These types of measures always punish the paying customer and leave the pirates shaking their heads in disbelief over M$ not getting it.

    3. Re:it will be bypassed... by Bastian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would suggest that any move that Microsoft makes to combat piracy is a shot in its own foot.

      The simple fact of the matter is that Microsoft software, compared to its competitors, is far and away the most expensive desktop software ever. Most people I know who pirate Windows do so because they simply can't afford to buy a copy. Granted, that's not many people since Windows comes with the computer, but I can say that I only know two people who have paid for their copies of MS Office - everyone else either pirates it or uses OpenOffice because they aren't at liberty to drop over half a week's pay on it. And in college I didn't know a single person who actually paid for a legal copy of VisualStudio - the unscrupulous pirated, and the scrupulous moved to *nix.

      Which leads me to my point - if Microsoft tightens Windows down too much, people are going to start thinking, "Holy shit, this is expensive, and I'm sick of hunting for friends with Windows CDs. Hey, my Mac using friend never has to reinstall his OS, and a Mac Mini only costs an extra two hundred. . ." If Microsoft tightens down on Office too much, people just go to OO.o. And if Microsoft tightens down on VisualStudio much at all, the start hemmorhaging future developers - their lifeblood, since application support is (I think) the core of Windows's market dominance - over to Linux and OS X, where the dev tools come for free with the OS.

      I honestly don't think Microsoft is free to get too strict with its licensing policies. Piracy is the only thing that is keeping skads of mildly dissatisfied people in their camp where they might not be contributing to M$'s coffers directly, but they aren't working against Microsoft's stranglehold on the market, either.

    4. Re:it will be bypassed... by Red+Moose · · Score: 1
      The activation code was patched for the phone-in part (as opposed to the online part) oooh, 3 years ago or so.

      You don't need the online part to activate. The solution was obvious to anyone who's even read the old +ORC tutorials.

      --

      Acting stupid isn't much fun when there's someone around who knows better

    5. Re:it will be bypassed... by erroneus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can see this being done with a mini CD boot image that is basically a Knoppix CD with a script that will edit the registry to read as activated in some way. So then people will just install, boot with an activation CD and presto! And forget activation CD... even a floppy might be enough to do it provided the computer even has a floppy drive... Anyway, you get the idea -- easy to fix and basically more convenient for anyone who doesn't want to risk their unpatched systems by getting online in the first place.

    6. Re:it will be bypassed... by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      I only know two people who have paid for their copies of MS Office - everyone else either pirates it or uses OpenOffice because they aren't at liberty to drop over half a week's pay on it.
      • Some of the scrupulous buy Word Perfect Suite, it's a lot cheaper. What always amazed me was the difference in educational pricing. MS Office would be well over $100, WP Suite was about $50. I personally prefer Word Perfect (although it's far from perfect, it still handles label printing far, far better than Word) but I know several people who bought WP simply because they couldn't afford Office, and this was in college so they were getting the educational pricing. Microsoft's just a bit too greedy for their own good.
    7. Re:it will be bypassed... by DatAsian · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you are bashing Microsoft so much for disabling the OEM key of the top 20 PC makers that offer Windows. They paid for the computers and those machines come with their own version of a PREACTIVATED Windows. Take Dell for example. Ever since Windows 2000, all of their OS restore/reinstall CDs were pre-activated and keyless (on Dell boxes). Customers are not being punished.

      Microsoft will also not disable Activation of Windows XP that you buy from newegg.com/tigerdirect.com/etc. Those aren't from large OEMs that you can yank a key from. I can and will always be able to activate my Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005 as I need.

    8. Re:it will be bypassed... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Keep an eye on the "trusted computing" initiative, which is actually hardware-based authentication and encryption/decryption tools. It is exactly designed to foil this kind of cracking, and to do it at the kernel or even the BIOS level before the operating system is allowed to load.

    9. Re:it will be bypassed... by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      It impacts the PAYING user the most by making a procedure they shouldn't have to deal with in the first place an even bigger pain in the ass.

      An excellent point. To take it a step further. Microsoft will need to shell out more to cover the cost of the extra hours worked by the people at the call center. In the end, who will pay for that? The customer, of course.

      --

      -Turkey

    10. Re:it will be bypassed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is there a dns and a fake windows activation server hack yet?

      A create a host statment with the ip address of the fake (your) WAS (Windows Activation Server) that hands out your WPA codes. Easy?

      1) Install bind
      2) Hand out fake WPA codes
      3) Profit!?!

    11. Re:it will be bypassed... by gobbo · · Score: 1
      Most people I know who pirate Windows do so because they simply can't afford to buy a copy. Granted, that's not many people since Windows comes with the computer....
      "Holy shit, this is expensive, and I'm sick of hunting for friends with Windows CDs. Hey, my Mac using friend never has to reinstall his OS, . . ."

      It isn't too different in Mac-land. Users with old machines who want to try the latest system often borrow install disks from friends. In my experience, they do that until they really want to upgrage and there isn't a copy handy, or they really rely on it, or they have hardware problems--then they'll buy OS disks. This is all facilitated by the lack of activation on Mac OS, since the beginning.

      There is a registration nag, but once you tell it to shut up, it does. As usual, Apple isn't too bad at walking the line between control and user friendliness.

      Reinstalls are an occasional fact of life with OS X, too, just never for spyware, viruses, or registry-dll hell. That said, it's been a few years between installs for any of the 8 production machines I watch over--just upgrades/updates and migrating to new disks.

    12. Re:it will be bypassed... by Crim-Prof · · Score: 1

      What we all tend to forget is that Microsoft is losing lots of money. Anyone take a look at the numbers involving piracy of Microsoft's products. The numbers are outstanding. The tech elite and pirates among us make up only a small portion of that pirated media. Individuals who purchase a copy of windows, office, or any Microsoft product for 5 dollars or any amount that is well below the retail average know that it is illegal. This step ensures that those laymen among us that thought they where sticking it to the man, will indeed get stuck themselves. No matter how much we have distain for Microsoft and its ILLEGAL business practices (Linux user here because of those practices), it does have a valid interest in protecting its products from piracy. If over 35% of your business and retail software was pirated wouldn't you take drastic steps to protect your interest? I applaud all those that are able to reverse engineer the products, as it makes companies work harder to create better mechanisms of encryption. What I do not applaud is those that simply use the tools developed by "REAL" reverse engineers and call themselves crackers. First post on Slashdot after many years reading the site. Hope it will not be my last :)

    13. Re:it will be bypassed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >And in college I didn't know a single person who actually paid for a legal copy of VisualStudio

      Microsoft now provides free copies of Windows and Visual Studio to students studying thier products. I have aquired (legally) copies of XP Pro, Windows Server 2003, and Visual Studio Proffesional as well as a few other MS tools through the MSDNAA program. Most schools are enrolled in the program, since it only cost $800 per department and allows any student enrolled in a class in that dept. to obtain a copy of the software for free.

    14. Re:it will be bypassed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, my Mac using friend never has to reinstall his OS, and a Mac Mini only costs an extra two hundred. . ."

      Yeah, and you need $129 every few months to upgrade your Mac. Apple is no better than Microsoft. In fact, Microsoft gives you more stuff for free. Apple comes out with a "new" version of the OS every few months and charges you out the ass for it (there is not even an "upgrade" discount). I say "new" because they're mostly just patches to the system with some new eye candy to fool you into thinking you got something for your money.

    15. Re:it will be bypassed... by NRP128 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you never have to pay if you don't want to. Hell i know people who are still running OS9, several who run the original 10.0, 10.1 or 10.2. Only those who wnat the bleeding edge will upgrade. Most common users could give a shit.

    16. Re:it will be bypassed... by NRP128 · · Score: 1

      Ah, you left out something, with Apple's Pages a direct alternative to what most people use the most in Office (Word) for 50 bucks, plus you get presentation software, iWork + Mac Mini + OSX = Bad for Microsoft. I find it funny how Apple flaunts Office 2004 as being one of the best pieces of software for the Mac, ever, then they release something that i consider being in direct competition, at least in some way, with it.

      My Powerbook is coming, if i'd quit spending money on my PCs, which should be just able over for a while...

    17. Re:it will be bypassed... by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Heh, they lost me and a few of my friends to Linux long before I started formally studying how to program.

      But I would love to see Microsoft start giving free copies of VisualStudio to high school freshmen.

    18. Re:it will be bypassed... by mwooldri · · Score: 1

      When it comes to Visual Studio, it would appear that an anti-piracy solution was discovered: bundle Visual Studio with textbooks. Universities simply make a requirement of the student to get these particular books, and hey presto! A legal copy of Visual Studio for Visual Basic or Visual C++ or whatever. At least, that is how I got my copy of Visual Studio .Net anyway.

    19. Re:it will be bypassed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No man in india it is half an year salary for office

    20. Re:it will be bypassed... by AaronBrethorst · · Score: 1

      Go check out the MSDNAA program, then. Schools can get copies of Windows XP, Windows 2003, VS, and a number of other things for every student for some ridiculously low price. good stuff.

      --
      No, but I used to work for Microsoft.
    21. Re:it will be bypassed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously get all your info about Macs and Mac OS X from Slashdot rather than from reality.

    22. Re:it will be bypassed... by jafac · · Score: 1

      Actually, Visual Studio is already too difficult to install.
      What, you mean not only do I need an OS, I need to install some obscure service pack, THEN a web server, THEN SQL Server? To develop code? Are you fucking insane? The install process is 3 fucking hours!

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    23. Re:it will be bypassed... by TheOtherKiwi · · Score: 1

      Yes corp keys and patched winlogon.exe are widely distributed and technically "invisible" to Microsoft until they change these methods for something...at which time the cycle begins again...pointless really, why doesn't Microsoft get it? Why? I'm at a loss, really. Money does not buy smarts, thats for sure.

      --

      -- Sig meltdown immine...
  8. Simple answer ... by Dark$ide · · Score: 1, Funny
    --

    Sigs. We don't need no steenking sigs.

    1. Re:Simple answer ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i would rather phone ms then build my own linux distro. your best option would be http://kanotix.com/ :) enjoy

    2. Re:Simple answer ... by bcmm · · Score: 1

      I think that was meant to be a deliberatly silly comparison.

      Mandrake is much more like Windows. Easy to install, easy to use, takes forever to boot up and is bloated...

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    3. Re:Simple answer ... by ralinx · · Score: 1

      yes and when you're done compiling, Longhorn will be out ;)

  9. Customer by millahtime · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am just going though some training and one of the hot points is understanding your customer. Making something more difficult for customers (home users and companies that do tech work) is not one of the moves known to improve market share and is in most industries considered a bad move.

    1. Re:Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making something more difficult for customers (home users and companies that do tech work) is not one of the moves known to improve market share and is in most industries considered a bad move.

      But your average home user will never reinstall their OS, so they don't care, and would have no problem talking to someone even if they did.

    2. Re:Customer by Subjective · · Score: 1

      You obviously never sold oil to western countries

      --
      My other .sig is also this bad
    3. Re:Customer by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      The day the average joe realizes that somebody put an operating system on his computer, that it wasn't created by the people who built his machine, and that it's responsible for most of his computer problems is the day that Microsoft dies.

      A product activation is just a little way of saying, "Microsoft is the one who made this crappy product, and we don't care about our customers." They might clue a few people in.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    4. Re:Customer by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      Somehow, I don't think "Improving Market Share" is the top concern for Windows at the moment.

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  10. Hope they're up late by CypherXero · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because the last few times I've reinstalled Windows, it's been around 12am.

    1. Re:Hope they're up late by Skater · · Score: 1

      I can't believe Microsoft thinks this is a good idea.

      I recently upgraded the motherboard, RAM, and DVD burner in my PC - and I had to reactivate it (online, fortunately). I was annoyed because the activation wouldn't work at first, but eventually it went through.

      Will people still be able to re-activate (after doing upgrades like I did) online? I didn't see that in the article, but I'm guessing probably not.

      Wouldn't it be easier for MS to just disable the codes that are bulk-activated? After all, they should have an idea of what codes they sold to OEMs that would bulk activate their machines... Or something like that.

    2. Re:Hope they're up late by Skater · · Score: 1

      Oops, I missed this the first time through the article:

      "...disable Internet product activation on OEM keys used by the top 20 worldwide PC makers."

      So, in other words, no this won't affect most people.

    3. Re:Hope they're up late by clickety6 · · Score: 1, Funny
      Yeah, but this is a call centre call. So 12 am for you is only about tea-time in New Delhi.


      (Or for our American readers - New Delhi, India.)



      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    4. Re:Hope they're up late by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I doubt it was 12am in their timezone. And regardless of their physical location, I'm sure they'd will willing to colonize other timezones as needed.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Hope they're up late by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      In that case, I hope that they have someone that works through tea-time :)

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    6. Re:Hope they're up late by mattbee · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but this is a call centre call. So 12 am for you is only about tea-time in New Delhi.

      (Or for our American readers - New Delhi, India.)


      For the other American readers, tea time is the time of day you ask Butler to bring tea and crumpets, around 4 in the afternoon.

      --
      Matthew @ Bytemark Hosting
    7. Re:Hope they're up late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wondering ... that 12am time ... did you get that from your VCR clock?

    8. Re:Hope they're up late by XMyth · · Score: 4, Funny

      American readers? Didn't you hear? Slashdot outsourced its readers to India. Half of us are IN New Delhi!

    9. Re:Hope they're up late by stuntpope · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but this is a call centre call. So 12 am for you is only about tea-time in New Delhi.

      (Or for our American readers - New Delhi, India.)

      For the other American readers, tea time is the time of day you ask Butler to bring tea and crumpets, around 4 in the afternoon.


      What, as opposed to when a woman has her period in New Delhi, Kentucky? Sheesh, we're not all that ignorant!

    10. Re:Hope they're up late by badfish99 · · Score: 1, Funny

      For the benefit of any other English readers: I wish someone would bring me some crumpet around 4 this afternoon.

    11. Re:Hope they're up late by enosys · · Score: 1

      The top 20 worldwide PC makers probably produce most of the PCs out there so this affects a lot of people.

    12. Re:Hope they're up late by Skater · · Score: 1

      Only if they do major upgrades and they have to reactivate (and actually the article wasn't clear on whether reactivation would have to go through the telephone or could be done via internet, so maybe not even then). How many people do that after buying from a PC from one of the OEMs?

      Really, the more I think about this, the less I think it's an issue and the more I'm surprised Microsoft didn't set it up this way from day one.

    13. Re:Hope they're up late by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      Last time I reinstalled Windoze was at 3 AM or something.

      Last time I reinstalled my OS was at a similar time of night (morning?), but I installed Debian Linux that time.

  11. Microsoft NEEDS Piracy by RT+Alec · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft depends on the ubiquity of Windows (and Office, Outlook, et al). When everybody is using Microsoft products, everybody needs Microsoft. Their proprietary formats are a de facto standard (except Massachusetts), so if you want to do business with people who use Windows (et al), you have little choice but to also use windows.

    As their piracy initiative starts to pick up steam, this will only enhance the "value" of free (or at least lesser cost) alternatives. I predict a large swell of Linux usage-- on the desktop, in these emerging markets, or other areas where the hight cost of Windows (et al) simply locks people out. With that will come a groudswell of support for open formats.

    Consider what you need if you are going to do business with the government of Hamburg. You will need to provide and exchange documents and other material in a format they can read (it won't simply be Word and PowerPoint). Now the same thing will happen in these emerging markets, creating more of an interest in these alternative formats, and thus alternative applications (e.g. OpenOffice).

    More choices are good for everybody. Use the application of your choice, on the platform of your choice, and produce documents and other material in a format anyone else can read. Right now, I have any number of such choices to produce graphics for a web page (jpg, png, even gif). The formats for Flash and Acrobat have been opened up, and happily they are becoming more standard. But the U.S. Government still requires all RFP submissions in Word.

    More choices, however, is bad for Microsoft. They don't want open formats and lots of choices, they want (and need) everone using and exchanging MS Word documents. They want (and need) everybody using Outlook and Internet Explorer, and of course, they want (and ultimately need) everybody using Windows.

    1. Re:Microsoft NEEDS Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Autodesk recognized this after a spell with dongles. I remember the autodesk rep speaking to an engineering class I was in to clarify their new market savvy position. 'We don't care if you bootleg autocad while you're in school because we know you'll ask your boss to buy it when you get a job.'

      I kid you not. Autodesk sent the reps out to announce the policy change! Who reading this has NOT at least heard of autocad?

    2. Re:Microsoft NEEDS Piracy by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      As soon as 3dsmax and photoshop ship for linux, I'll be on linux. But not before that happens. And don't say 'well just sue WINE' or something like that...that just adds a level of complexity I can't be bothered getting used to.

      And no: GIMP is no substitute, and neither is MAYA ('cos I don't have the time to retrain).

      So the question for me is: who has the clout to get Discreet and Adobe to convert their apps to linux?

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    3. Re:Microsoft NEEDS Piracy by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1
      Their proprietary formats are a de facto standard (except Massachusetts)

      Last I checked, the de facto standard here is still MS Word. IMO the only reason why Massachusetts is still in the class action is because SOMEONE had to throw a wrench in the works (and a pack of lawyers want to get rich quick while us consumers just shred up the 6-page class-action form that will only yield vouchers for more Microsoft software; seriously, I got one of these, and it was a waste of time).

      Some factors to the misconception that Massachusetts is the bastion of anti-M$ are the facts that Massachusetts plays host to MIT (birthplace of X, alma mater of many *nix users), the Free Software Foundation, etc. Come on, we have a supreme judicial court that passed a statute on gay marriage, and a governor who openly opposes gay marriage AND civil unions. Even WE don't know what we stand for!

      --
      "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
    4. Re:Microsoft NEEDS Piracy by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      As soon as 3dsmax and photoshop ship for linux, I'll be on linux. So what is keeping you off the Mac?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    5. Re:Microsoft NEEDS Piracy by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Maybe it's the proprietary hardware platform or the closed-source portions of the operating system. Microsoft is already closed, but at least it runs on commodity hardware. Why go from Windows to MacOS when you can just wait a bit and go to Linux? MacOS is a superior operating system but PC hardware IS cheaper if you are willing to build it yourself (at ALL price ranges) and the only cheap macs can't even run that shit unless you spend money to upgrade them. You're not going to be running 3dsmax OR photoshop on OSX worth a shit with 256MB of ram. (Actually, you're not going to do JACK with 256MB of ram... why the hell do they even offer it with that little?)

      If the mac is the right tool for the job, the budget must be outtasight.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Microsoft NEEDS Piracy by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Hang on a sec. You use Photoshop and 3dmax, and you have an issue with proprietary closed source stuff? And when you are talking about chunks of software that cost a couple hundred each, that more than eats the cost difference between the two platforms.

      My iBook was $1600 new with 768Mb of Ram and a 60 Gig hd. A comparable PC with equivient RAM, disk space, firewire, built-it wireless and bluetooth costs the same or more.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    7. Re:Microsoft NEEDS Piracy by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      But the U.S. Government still requires all RFP submissions in Word

      Depends on the branch you're dealing with (and sometimes the office within the branch). I've sometimes had to submit stuff as searchable PDF (no MSOffice docs accepted).

    8. Re:Microsoft NEEDS Piracy by nortcele · · Score: 1
      As soon as 3dsmax and photoshop ship for linux, I'll be on linux.

      I'm completely with you on this one. I finally got tired of hoping and bought a PowerMac. Unix underneath and great for graphics with the added plus of my wife just liking how things work. I bought Photoshop and couldn't be happier. I still use SuSE Linux but have completely negated my need for Windows. Articles like this that tell of Microsoft's latest debacle still make me cranky. My family members are still using Windows, and it affects them very much (and me indirectly). But you can be sure my recommendation for their latest ailment is... "switch". Costs money to switch, but it costs blood, sweat, tears, and money to stay.

    9. Re:Microsoft NEEDS Piracy by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The software costs [approximately?] the same on either platform, so you cannot count it against the cost of the system. Also, we are talking about closed programs; I'm talking about closed hardware and/or OS. Half of OSX is open (Darwin) and half isn't. If you're a glass-half-empty type (like me) you'll consider that closed, and thus essentially equivalent to Microsoft.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Microsoft NEEDS Piracy by n0mad6 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Their proprietary formats are a de facto standard (except Massachusetts), so if you want to do business with people who use Windows (et al), you have little choice but to also use windows.

      This really depends on who you ask. I, for example, am a particle physicist. Amongst my peers, written documents are exchanged in one of three formats: PDF, postscript or ASCII text. In fact, the last time I remember using MS Word was to write an english paper in college (at the time I wasn't experienced with LaTeX). Nearly all computing (number-crunching) in our field is done on Linux-based machines, and based on looking around during meetings and conferences, roughly a third of us use Macs as our personal laptops. While we may not make up a sizable fraction of the overall computer using population (which, I will concede, mostly uses windows), there are thousands of us, and nearly all of us can get by on a day-to-day basis without using a single Microsoft product. Basically, the number of Windows users is small enough that the rest of us can demand using non-proprietary formats from those people. I'm sure there are many other industries/professions in which this is possible.

    11. Re:Microsoft NEEDS Piracy by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      " A comparable PC with equivient RAM, disk space, firewire, built-it wireless and bluetooth costs the same or more."

      Excuse me, but what planet are you living on?
      Lemme break it down: 200 for a 21" CRT (I'm using photoshop, so CRT), 50 for a case, 50 for keyboard/mouse, 150 for a motherboard with firewire and all the other standard ports, 200 for a top-of the line cpu and 200 for a gig of ram. Plus 300 for a decent vid card and 50 for a wifi and a bleutooth dongle. Oh, and a 200 gig SATA HD for 100 and a DVD double layer burner for 50. That adds up to (200+50+50+150+200+200+300+50+100+50=)1350. And that's for everything top quality (top brands, no no-nam ram or whatever), new (not like I don't have a decent monitor lying around anyway, same for keyboard and trackball and a tablet, and canabalising the ram [and maybe that lian case too] from my old machine) and at much inflated, top-of-my-head prices. And that's not even considering that I can just upgrade each single part mentioned here by itself whenever I get the cash for it. Oh, and I haven't even looked into getting a decent price on the web or some kind of other pc-pre-build-maker deal.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  12. It's their right by kraut · · Score: 1

    to do whatever they like with their product. Personally, I think it's counterproductive - it's likely to piss off paying customers, although it might help them nab some shady dealers as well.

    If you find it too irritating to deal with MS, you check out the alternatives. Isn't competition a wonderful thing?

    --
    no taxation without representation!
    1. Re:It's their right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally, I think it's counterproductive - it's likely to piss off paying customers, although it might help them nab some shady dealers as well.

      Very few customers will care.

      1. It's XP OEM only.
      2. Seriously, how often do you have to re-install? Most OEM customers probably never do. And a quick phone call is no big deal.

    2. Re:It's their right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not, actually. (admittedly in the narrow case you were generalising FROM, yes, but not in the sense you generalised TO)

      For instances;

      If I make children's toys; I do not have the "right" to enhance them with swallowable elements or lead-based paints.

      If I sell apples, I have no "right" to enhance them with inserted razor blades.

      If you have a license for my software I have no "right" to degrade the license you paid for...

      (at least, not in the UK; USA's fucked up laws may differ / be worse)

    3. Re:It's their right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is it with some americans?

      because its the product they produce does NOT give them the right to ass-ream their customers on a whim!

      Pirates don't need to call up for activation, ever. Only legitimate customers have to do that, so only paying customers get the pole.

    4. Re:It's their right by RupW · · Score: 1

      If you have a license for my software I have no "right" to degrade the license you paid for...

      They're not degrading the license. You had to activate it before, you have to activate it now. The activation mechanism's changed, that's all.

      OK, the XP w/SP2 OEM EULA says: "You can activate the Product through the use of the Internet or telephone; toll charges may apply." but (IANAL) that doesn't sound strong enough to mandate Microsoft to provide Internet activation - the EULA's largely what *you* agree to do/not do, not them.

    5. Re:It's their right by Adams4President · · Score: 1

      What's up with you people? I guess America is the only country that has "imminent domain"? Or perhaps in your contries, the gov't doesn't have the "right" to increase your taxes either.

      Of course MS has the "right" to alter their license agreement, remember, you AGREED to it when you installed.

      I think it's a stupid market decision, and in the end, it's their customers to piss off or satisfy.

    6. Re:It's their right by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      But there isn't fully viable competition, due to things like propriatory fileformats and other anti-competition measures.
      Other industries aren't as screwed over as this.
      There's nothing to stop a ford customer scrapping his ford and buying a bmw.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    7. Re:It's their right by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      If you expect this type of phone call to be "quick", then you are in for a rude awakening.

  13. will this make us dump windows by vvatsa · · Score: 0

    Since very few people buy windows in a shrink rap, most windows are shipped by OEMs. Having to ring up MS cust. rep is going to be pain in the hole. We all know that we (power users) end up reinstalling windows about once a year for what ever reason. What I would like to ask is, "will this make us dump windows as it becomes more of a pain in the ass?"

  14. Thanks A Lot by wynand1004 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Thanks guys, thanks a lot

    As if installing windows isn't enough of a headache. I had to reinstall windows in Japan, and let me tell ya, my Japanese isn't what it should be.

    On a side note, I envy the Mac people here in that they can seamlessly switch between English and Japanese versions of their OS just by setting a preference.

    In windows land, it's purchase both or suffer. Now more activation heedaches.

    Thanks guys, thanks a lot.

    --
    An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. - Victor Hugo
    1. Re:Thanks A Lot by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      Beyond this activation bit, how is installing Windows a headache...I've yet to see another install that is easier.

    2. Re:Thanks A Lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if installing windows isn't enough of a headache

      What? Is clicking Next and selecting your time zone too hard for you?

      On a side note, I envy the Mac people here in that they can seamlessly switch between English and Japanese versions of their OS just by setting a preference. In windows land, it's purchase both or suffer.

      What? Downloading the Multilingual User Interface Pack is too hard for you? Changing your language in Office too difficult? I'm not an MS apologist, but for fuck's sake, know what you're talking about before bitching about Windows. Passion without knowledge is just stupid zealotry.

    3. Re:Thanks A Lot by Raypeso · · Score: 1

      Well, I think it's a headache that he had to reinstall a Japanese version of windows. He doesn't speak the language very well so it was hard to read. I can understand, I lived in Korea for a year and there were a couple of times were I was faced with solving computer problems in a foreign language.

    4. Re:Thanks A Lot by Tiroth · · Score: 1

      You know, you can change your locale in XP Pro. It doesn't change the interface language, but it does make the 99% of Japanese software that is not Unicode actually work. Thank goodness!

    5. Re:Thanks A Lot by yabos · · Score: 1

      Mac OS X. Boot off CD, install, reboot. Create account, done.

    6. Re:Thanks A Lot by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      How is that different from Windows XP? Admitedly, I've never installed Mac OS X.

    7. Re:Thanks A Lot by sockonafish · · Score: 1

      I don't have to download anything to change languages in OS X. That's because OS X is OS X is OS X, no matter what language you speak. Switching to a Japanese interface is exactly the same as using the "Japanese version" of OS X.

      Doing things this way, instead of as an ugly hack, prevents foreign language versions of software from sucking so much. The Japanese version of Office v.x for OS X is fucking atrocious. Typing in English yields incredibly wacky spacing that will arbitrarily bunch words together or spread them far apart, leading to incredibly ugly and illegible documents.

    8. Re:Thanks A Lot by yabos · · Score: 1

      Well, XP you have to reboot 3 or so times just installing the OS which slows you down. Then installing all the drivers requiring numerous reboots as well. Huge PITA.

    9. Re:Thanks A Lot by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Not only that, OSX installs pretty damn quickly too.

      My 4-year old, dual-533 MHz PowerMac fresh-installed the latest OSX (10.3 Panther) in 15 minutes flat. Installing XP on a Athlon 2800 took over half an hour, not counting the 5 minutes it took to boot off the CD and copy the files first (OSX install CD booted in about 2 minutes).

      Also, XP install stopped in the middle of the process maybe twice to input time or some such. I had no idea this would happen the first time I installed it, so it was just sitting idle for 20 minutes!

      Why this can't wait until after everything's installed, like OSX, I have no idea.

      To the GP, trust me, OSX installation is much less of a hassle than XP.

    10. Re:Thanks A Lot by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      In OS X, not only can you change the interface language, you can change it on the fly for any new application you launch. It's perfectly feasible to have a bunch of apps open in English, your e-mail app open in French, and your browser open in Chinese, all at once. (I've done it.) This is probably useless for a lot of people, but it's wonderful for some of us.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    11. Re:Thanks A Lot by Myria · · Score: 1

      The same thing happens in Windows. Try turning off Justify mode.

      Melissa

      --
      "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
  15. This won't last. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once they start getting the phonebills for supporting this method of activation, they will turn back to the old method. Not to mention the complaints.

    1. Re:This won't last. by captjc · · Score: 1

      Phone Bills?
      All M$ will do is switch to a 1-900 number and make YOU pay to call THEM

      BTW, M$ is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  16. Aw man.. by imrec · · Score: 5, Funny

    Calling in every time I changed a bit of hardware is the only chance I get to talk to a woman...

    oh.. ONLINE activation only... *WHEW*

    --
    Note: This sig contains nine S's, nine I's and five O's which... means absolutely nothing.
  17. Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by md81544 · · Score: 4, Informative
    From TFA...
    If a customer attempts to activate Windows XP with an OEM key from a COA, they will be directed to call customer support specialists to obtain an override code - provided they can prove that their copy is legitimate by answering a series of questions.

    Jupiter Research senior analyst Joe Wilcox said the change shouldn't affect many PC buyers. "Seeing as how the typical OEM would normally preactivate Windows XP, most legitimate users shouldn't have much need to go through the activation process," noted Wilcox.
    1. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Yah, because your average windows install as utilized by Joe User is going to survive the entire 3 or 4 years that computer is going to be in use.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    2. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by Viceice · · Score: 1

      Ever known a everday use home PC that never needed a reinstall at some point in it's life? My point exactly.

      One day when the OS needs to be reinstalled (Virus, spyware, general neglect, HDD upgrade etc) somebody is going to get very pissed off at having to spend a good 15 - 30 minutes trying to talk to a computer at MS over the phone.

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    3. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by rdc_uk · · Score: 1

      "Joe Wilcox"

      Spot the insanely rich analyst who lives in a world of disposable personal computers.

      Meanwhile in the real-world; our shop does a healthy trade in second hand PII class machines (£60 to you guv, windows EXTRA...)

    4. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by GroovBird · · Score: 1

      No you just don't get it.

      I have a Dell 8500. I reinstalled it twice already, using the accompanying reinstall CD. I never had to activate, because the OS is pre-activated by Dell.

      This is what they're talking about. Those keys are present, and anyone with a common OEM CD can use that key to activate the software. This is what they're trying to stop.

    5. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 1

      yeah, except... I can't count the number of times I've heard your average joe admit that their machine needs to be rebuilt because their computer is bogged down with viruses and is running slow? What's the average windows installation good for these days anyway? 6 months?

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
    6. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a customer attempts to activate Windows XP with an OEM key from a COA, they will be directed to call customer support specialists to obtain an override code

      Anyone know one of these override codes I can use?

      TIA

    7. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      What's the average windows installation good for these days anyway? 6 months?
      • I believe the last statistics for an unpatched Windows machine was 7 minutes before infection. Six months is an eternity compared to that.
    8. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1
      " Ever known a everday use home PC that never needed a reinstall at some point in it's life? My point exactly."

      Yeah. All of them. I've never known a home PC that needed to be re-installed in their lifetimes. The lifetime, however, is becoming shorter. Usually I convince people to switch, or get a clue about things like security and marketing hype.

      --
      C|N>K
    9. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who builds their own PCs is an OEM so it is as bad as it sounds.

    10. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Meaning that if you buy from Dell or Hp or Sony or whoever bigname, it is preactivated so you never need to enter a COA key even when you reinstall using those recovery cds. This move is only really going to affect little mom and pop stores. You know, that litle store in town or on the internet that will build a generic beige pc.

      Some more of those stores will be further enticed to offer Linux now though.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    11. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by optimus2861 · · Score: 1
      provided they can prove that their copy is legitimate by answering a series of questions.

      What do you mean, "Not quite as bad as it sounds"? Why the fuck should I, or anyone else, have to prove that I'm legit? That ain't how this is supposed to work; if Microsoft thinks I'm guilty of infringing their copyright, they're the ones who are supposed to prove it. Innocent-until-proven-guilty, and all that. My refusal to answer where or when or from who I bought my computer is not evidence of infringement, either; that's simply none of Microsoft's damn business. (I'm making a small jump here in assuming where you bought your system is going to be one of the questions; if MS knows your OEM key was a Dell key, they'll presumably want to hear that you bought it from Dell and not from a dealer that they've already got reports as being "suspicious")

      Oh, wait, I forgot -- such arcane legal concepts don't apply when you have $60-odd billion in the bank and are a convicted predatory monopolist. Silly me.

    12. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most legitimate users shouldn't have much need to go through the activation process

      Yeah, and you have never had to reinstall Windows? Riiight.

    13. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by Colol · · Score: 1

      Simply because it's easier to get your hands on the retail version than the OEM version, a lot of people building computers for the first time just pay the retail price anyway and won't be affected.

      But for people who have discovered stores offering the OEM packaging for Windows, yeah, this could get interesting depending on how MS handles it.

    14. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Am I reading that wrong? All it says is that you don't have to call Microsoft before turning on your new PC for the first time if Windows was already installed.


      So it's true that every windows self-install will require a phone call? Good grief.

    15. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by numark · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree. What Mom and Pop computer stores need is more people calling up asking why little Jimmy's Christmas gift of a new computer won't run any of the games they bought for him at Wal-Mart. They definitely have the time to tell Jimmy's parents about the great wonders of Linux on the desktop and how it's much better than that Windows that most everyone else runs.

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    16. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by doyle.jack · · Score: 1

      I bought an Alienware PC last June. It came preinstalled with XP-Homo Edition and it was not preactivated. It never asked me to activate for several days, then up it came... I did have to activate it myself.

    17. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by jschottm · · Score: 1

      Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds...

      Uh huh. That's going to be a lot of comfort when I have to spend 10 minutes on the phone for every system I install with our custom installation that wipes out the poorly configured Dell version. Oh well, the management's been increasingly interested in Linux anyway...

    18. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds... by myov · · Score: 1

      What happens if you lose the CD? Half of my CD's are burned to replace lost or damaged media.

      I was always under the impression that the license is the COA, not the CD (if you're audited, you can't point to a stack of cd's).

      Finally, what exactly are they accomplishing? They may gain some revenue assuming the user is actually willing to pay for it, but it's not like they need the money.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  18. This doesn't change anything in my country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We will still be able to use as many instances of pirated windows using corporate versions without activation as we do now.

  19. This incidentally by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

    occured at the same time when i converted my Parent's and sister's computer to gentoo. They love it :). There is no need for me to look back as noone plays games on computers from us.

    Time to break out of the vendor lock-in i suppose.

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  20. Corps by rf0 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What about coporations. Will they have to do this each time they Ghost/Reload a new machine?

    rus

    1. Re:Corps by TheMediaWrangler · · Score: 1

      No, that won't trigger a query to the MS activation registry. You're safe with Ghost.

      --
      People should not fear what they do not understand; people should fear because they do not understand.
    2. Re:Corps by tdeletto · · Score: 2, Informative

      The corp version of Xp won't have this problem. Corps will continue to use their own canned builds and not care about activation.

      And their employees will continue to use their Windows keys from work on their home PCs :-)

  21. Nothing much by yasth · · Score: 1

    It looks like they are just forcing the OEMs to use the key printed on the box to do the auto intall.

    Which doesn't seem *so* bad.

    --
    I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
  22. Picking on the wrong guy by jayhawk88 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seems to me MS could have solved this problem by requiring the large OEM's to stop allowing their keys to be "unused" like this. And you know what, there was a time that MS could have done this, despite the added effort/headache it would have undoutbedly been for the OEM's.

    Sign O' The Times?

  23. Copy Protection SOP by bigtallmofo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Step 1: Company implements some sort of copy protection.
    Step 2: Legitimate users are hampered by the copy protection while illegitimate users breeze by it through various means.
    Step 3: Company either ultimately removes copy protection with a black mark on its reputation or people just stop buying its products.

    I know of no historical case that deviates from this for a major software release. Of course, you have various vertical applications that use dongles and other such things, but anything that is mass-distributed (like Lotus Notes or Turbo Tax) that has used copy protection either removed said copy protection or stopped selling their product.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Copy Protection SOP by _|()|\| · · Score: 1
      anything that is mass-distributed (like Lotus Notes or Turbo Tax) that has used copy protection either removed said copy protection or stopped selling their product

      Allow me to state the obvious: Microsoft is a monopolist with $50 billion in the bank. I would like to believe that the market will punish these increasingly consumer-hostile moves. However, with a market saturated by both authorized and unauthorized users, I think Microsoft will accept losing some market share in exchange for increasing revenue per user.

    2. Re:Copy Protection SOP by X_Bones · · Score: 1

      Does the word "Steam" ring any bells for you?

    3. Re:Copy Protection SOP by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Obvious counter-example:

      AutoCAD

      That thing had perhaps the most annoying copy protection known to man, generally they don't allow you to even transfer your license to another company. Yet they still sell their program, you know why? They have a monopoly and nothing is going to stop people from buying their software.

    4. Re:Copy Protection SOP by speculatrix · · Score: 1

      I'm a permie in the UK, and develop software for a major telco, which is used only in-house or by our customers (think portal, think intranet). I would be very unhappy if I was a contractor and they took my software and didn't pay me to write it. I think most slashdotters want to be paid for their work too.

      I thus try to ensure I have licenses for all my software, and if I use a shareware package, I register it. However, I've rarely had any luck getting my employers to buy shareware, only one previous employer I've had even bothered to buy a license for WinZip, they also bought license(s) for SuSE linux.

      If I wrote software products for general sale, I would make a reasonable effort to prevent casual piracy, but it would be a tricky balance between upsetting customers and getting ripped off! I would rather sell 1000 copies and refund say 20 users, than only sell 500 copies and know there were 500 rip-offs. I would hope I'd be supporting, maintaining, and improving the package sufficiently well that if a version's protection was broken, people would want the latest version and thus buy/upgrade anyway.

      I would strongly consider using some sort of dongle, almost certainly a USB dongle, and allow customer to install the application as many times as they wanted. The dongle would also only enable critical features such as opening files read/write, so that the customer could share files with non-registered users.

      I would only use a dongle which had strong crypto, so it couldn't be copied (easily).

      I would also ensure that my product was clearly labelled that it was dongle-protected so that people would know they have a choice.

    5. Re:Copy Protection SOP by ssj_195 · · Score: 1

      Will be interesting to see what happens when Half Life 3 rolls along.

    6. Re:Copy Protection SOP by gandy909 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it does... It signaled the LAST game I will ever buy from those bozos, no matter how good it is.

      --

      (Stolen sig) Remember: it's a "Microsoft virus", not an "email virus", a "Microsoft worm", not a "computer worm
    7. Re:Copy Protection SOP by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      The parent excepted vertical applications.

    8. Re:Copy Protection SOP by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      Yes. It made me NOT buy HL2, despite the superb reviews of the game. Without Steam, I would have no problems spending 50 Euros on it. As it is, I might grab it from the dicount shelves when the price has gone down to 20 or less.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    9. Re:Copy Protection SOP by mav[LAG] · · Score: 1

      Step 3: Company either ultimately removes copy protection with a black mark on its reputation

      Sometimes it's: Legitmate user ultimately removes copy protection with a black marker...

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    10. Re:Copy Protection SOP by jafac · · Score: 1

      Dongles.

      I know they can be cracked.
      But they've been pretty much very effective. Especially now, with the arrival of USB.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    11. Re:Copy Protection SOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speculatrix,

      Copy protection doesn't work. Not even when combined with the strongest cryptography available to man. Ask any crypto expert. You may start with Bruce Schneier.

      Dongles? You'll just make pirates lough and annoy your users.

      Most software producers realized that long time ago, and are investing minimum time and resources on implementing copy protection in their software. Every copy protection scheme that anybody thought of in history proved to be trivial to brake. So why waste resource on something like that?

      Most of today's copy protection schemes are designed to prevent 5-year old kid from sharing the software. Investing in development of anything more complex is a complete waste of resources.

      As an example of company that realized how futile copy protection is on all levels of management is Oracle. Why bother protecting your software when simple Google search will find dozen of sites from where to download pirated version? So they've put their Oracle database on web site, for everybody to download freely. When you install it, you will not be asked to enter any keys. Why bother users with them, when simple Google search will give you thousands of working keys.

      In short, I just hope Microsoft will realize how idiotic is this thing they are doing. My time has a price tag too. If they (Microsoft) are going to pay me for time spent on the phone to reactivate my legal copy of Windows, no problem. Otherwise, may I suggest to bugger off.

    12. Re:Copy Protection SOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I buy all the good games I play, but because of Steam I didn't buy HL2. Though I borrowed it from my friend.

  24. Forced to install between 9-5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What would happen if I wanted to reinstall late at night then? Are the telephone lines open 24 hours or would I have to reinstall between 9-5?

    1. Re:Forced to install between 9-5 by kylegordon · · Score: 1, Funny

      Knowing Microsoft, I'm sure they're open 7/24... 7 hours a day, 24 days a month...

    2. Re:Forced to install between 9-5 by ericandrade · · Score: 0

      They are, just not in the same country...

    3. Re:Forced to install between 9-5 by ppz003 · · Score: 1

      Well, the last time I had to call the activation line (new hardware), I called them at 9 pm on New Years Eve in 2003. I got right through!!

    4. Re:Forced to install between 9-5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing like ringing in the New Years with a format/reinstall. Maybe you shouldn't be so excited about it?

  25. ...and here are the questions: by Cuthbert+Calculus · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. Are you sure you want to reinstall Windows? 2. Really? 3. Really? 4. Seriously, really?

    1. Re:...and here are the questions: by MikeDX · · Score: 2, Funny

      *Ring ring*

      <user> Hi! I'd like to re-install windows please!
      <clippy> Hi there! I see you are trying to reinstall windows. Would you like some help?
      <user> Erm.... *click*

    2. Re:...and here are the questions: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Have you ever seen a grown man naked?

      2. Do you like movies about gladiators?

      3. Have you ever been in a Turkish prison?

  26. This is especially bad... by Denyer · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...on the heels of Microsoft admitting increased concern about rootkit spyware that requires reinstallation to remove.

    It seems more and more people are being driven to use cracked versions of software simply because of the DRM inconvenience.

    --
    Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
    1. Re:This is especially bad... by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      This is especially bad...on the heels of Microsoft admitting increased concern about rootkit spyware that requires reinstallation to remove.

      It seems more and more people are being driven to use cracked versions of software simply because of the DRM inconvenience.


      To me this seems especially good not especially bad.

      At some point people wake up to the facts. Microsoft is very expensive. It is the big worm/virus/rootkit target. You have to re-install. Doing so is a pain. A Mac Mini is only $250 more than a retail price box of XP Pro (if I remember prices correctly). It might potentialy have fewer worm/virus/rootkit problems. A cheapo no-name Linux PC can be had with software preinstalled for the price of XP Pro.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    2. Re:This is especially bad... by Denyer · · Score: 1
      Do you know anyone who's ever bought an OS except at the OEM stage, or is this just a routine copy-paste from the Dummies Guide to Zealotry?

      I like Macs, but Microsoft is not expensive. Not even in terms of time if well-run. In return, you get your pick of hardwave and software.

      For typical users, this decision by MS is bad news.

      --
      Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
  27. So what? by Viceice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This doesn't stop piracy in anyway. Product activation only disadvantages the honest customers and thats it. The ones who use pirated windows will still use pirated windows regardless.

    I've serviced many PCs, and let me tell you, servicing the boxes that come with a bona fide windows installation are a much larger pain in the ass then the ones with pirated copies.

    With the pirated ones i just reinstall windows and thats it. Reinstalling on an original box requires me to spend 15 minutes after the fact talking to a a machine in Singapore because the local Toll Free number for Microsoft was disconnected ages ago.

    sheesh...

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    1. Re:So what? by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      Hm, i'm sure MS knows all this. They're not that stupid.

      Do i sound really paranoid if i would point out that it could be for a whole different purpose than to stop piracy? What about the privacy of their customers?

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    2. Re:So what? by DickBreath · · Score: 2, Funny

      i'm sure MS knows all this. They're not that stupid.

      Of course they aren't. Microsoft doing something stupid would be completely unprecedented in the history of the industry. For instance, Microsoft would no more let an important phone number be disconnected than they would forget to re-register an important domain name.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  28. It takes enough time to install already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without needing to answer a barrage of questions as to the legality of software that I have paid for ... yet again the honest person is disadvantaged so that a company can make more profit. In this case, it must be a fairly limited in scope 'theft' of COA forms.

    Luckily most people don't reinstall ever and they'll never know the hassle.

    Considering that Microsoft declined to give me a license key with my action pack subscription XPSP2 CD, I rang up and bitched a bit and got the computer activated anyway.

  29. Really? by weave · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You mean all those PCs sitting in college computer labs I administer with their COA labels on them can be lifted and used to activate a copy of XP (since they install using a corp version)????

    I had NO IDEA, but I guess Microsoft is giving a head's up to all of our students to hurry up and lift our keys and do their installs before the end of the month.

    Nice way to alert people how to pirate your stuff, Microsoft, while further irritating legitimate purchasers.

    Speaking for myself, not my employer

    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's got a COA label on it, it's not a corp key, it's an OEM.

    2. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least the license they have here (university of manchester uk) lets them upgrade or downgrade a system to any version of windows BUT the machine still has to have an oem (or retail i presume but those are bloody expensive) license first

      so it will have an oem sticker on it (generally for XP home since thats about the cheapest the oems will give them atm) but will be running an activation free (presumablly the same as corprate) install of xp pro that was imaged onto the machine when bought.

    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but my point was, the key that's on the sticker is not a 'corporate no-activation' key, it's an OEM key.

  30. Tux the Penguin says ... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The more you tighten your grip, Darth Gates, the more systems will slip through your fingers." ... and migrate to Linux!

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    1. Re:Tux the Penguin says ... by SlayerofGods · · Score: 1

      Sorry to nit pick your joke, but it was Darth Vader that said that so saying 'Darth Gates' doesn't make any sense....

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    2. Re:Tux the Penguin says ... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1
      Actually Princess Leia said it to Governor Tarkin just before he demonstrated the power of the death star, but that's ok - it a joke! Here's a transcript.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    3. Re:Tux the Penguin says ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I'm going to get flamed to hell about this. But, Linux has almost ZERO support for graphical or gaming purposes. Why would people go to Linux? If anything, it'd be easier and more advantageous for people to go to Mac, which has major support for graphics applications and a decent, but growing support for games.

      Linux = Unbeatable servers, I won't dispute that at all, but makes as a poor desktop solution for MOST people. Not all, but most. Of course, I realize this may change, but it will take a lot of time for Linux to garner the type of support from software makers it needs to make major headway on the desktop platform.

      By the way I like your Star Wars reference...let's hope the next movie doesn't suck. Suck....LIKE MICROSHAFT!

    4. Re:Tux the Penguin says ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um. NO. It was Princess Leia who said that to Darth Vader in the first (technically, third) movie on board the DeathStar. That's when Carry Fisher tried to make the Princess have a British accent, and it didn't turn out to well, either!

    5. Re:Tux the Penguin says ... by SlayerofGods · · Score: 1

      Doh!
      Well I knew it was directed at Tarkin.... but for some reason I thought Vader had said it.
      You are right though it was Leia.

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
  31. Yeah! by Sierpinski · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A small step for Windows anti-piracy,
    One giant leap for the advocation of OSS.

    I guess there's no question now as to what I'm going
    to install on that new HD of mine. (As if there was doubt before this, I guess.)

    1. Re:Yeah! by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      Advocacy!

      No need to make up a word for one that already exists.

      --
      -mkb
  32. What? by DoubleDangerClub · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm really surprised that they are wasting the resources to do this. Most pirated windows xp copies have no activiation anyway. they have no key, and don't ask for one. I would say if they want to get to the source of the problem, they should re-evalutate their MSDN subscription copies and have them need to phone in a re-install. In the end though, I think everyone knows what this really is, a big waste of time. *handclap for microsoft*

    --
    Ubuntu, the way linux should be.
    Try Ubuntu FREE! --
    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      playing with ubuntu since last week, and to top it, new to linux.

      Man, it rocks! Had only bad experiences with Fedora and (vanila) Debian on the past, but ubuntu just works! And synaptic makes things a breeze too;

    2. Re:What? by DoubleDangerClub · · Score: 1

      Glad to hear it! I had the same situation as you, I just didn't like Fedora, Mandrake, SUSE, or Debian, so I tried Ubuntu and man...it was awesome. I've been using it for about 6 months now. Only use windows for photoshop, itunes, and world of warcraft. :) If you need any help (I was also new to linux), go hit me up at ubuntuforums.org My name is the same as on here. Welcome.

      --
      Ubuntu, the way linux should be.
      Try Ubuntu FREE! --
    3. Re:What? by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

      Most Pirate copies of WinXP are Pro, and use the FCKGW-RHQQ2 serial number. This does not require activation, but does need the key entering.

      --
      b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
      MadDwarf
    4. Re:What? by leabre · · Score: 1

      I'm personally a Universal MSDN subscriber (not part of business). Currently, you have to use Activation keys for the MSDN software which grants you the right to install on 10 different installations. The VLM keys are not compatible with the MSDN distributions. I don't see how it would solve the problem to have us need to call them everytime I reinstall (which is very frequently for me and others I know).

    5. Re:What? by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      MSDN subscriptions have valid serial numbers, just like a retail version. Another member mentioned this earlier. More than likely, MSDN subscribers like myself will have to call in to activate their systems, too. I don't know about anyone else, but that's kind of an irritation-- MSDN is meant for test-bed type stuff and evaluation; does it make much sense to have to call in, when in a test environment, you could likely have a reason to reinstall a copy of Windows on a single machine (or virtual machine, in my situation) at least once a day?

      An MSDN Universal subscription 2005 is supposed to cost around $2799 US. Does it make much sense to ask a customer paying that much to go through that hassle?

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
  33. cost of toll free numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how much additional cost Microsoft will have to pay for the thousands of users who will have to call in every 1.5 months when they have to reinstall due to blue screen of death.???

  34. hmm by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

    im not normally one of the tinfoil hat crowd, but this article got me thinking:

    what if microsoft is taking this chance to gouge customers, while there's competition (point to linux), then once its finished gouging the customers and this product activation is commonplace, they'l sue linux vendors and users (or get another sco to do it) for patent infringement, wipe out the competition, then theyve gouged their customers and other companies customers too.

    It would explain the abnormal amount of patents theyve applied for recently, and it would also explain why they're willing to gouge their customers so bad, even though they're scared of linux (companies dont spend so much energy spreading FUD about competitors if theyre not scared of them).

  35. call center by chocochip · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Due to a bad Adaptec PCI card (SATA interface to my hard drives) which was corrupting the hard drives, I've had to reinstall XP Pro on my primary worksation a lot lately. I took 3 re-installs to track down the problem. Each time, when I tried online activation, it would say the number of installs for the license key had been exceeded and I needed to call. So I call in, give them a very long string of numbers, they ask "why you are installing, how many computers has it been installed on, etc." Needless to say, this is pi**ing me off! I'll do everything possible to avoid Microsoft in the future! I've already purchased an Apple Powerbook.

    1. Re:call center by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 2, Funny

      Needless to say, this is pi**ing me off!

      Pinging? I don't understand. ...

      OH! pimping! .. wait aminnit.. hrm...

      I'm just pissed off that I can't see those two letters :)

      --
      "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
    2. Re:call center by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, I should really be able to install twice a day if that's what I feel like I want to do. Just imagine when the next big virus comes out, and everybody has to reinstall. And then you are waiting in the phone queue, just to install the product you should be able to install in the first place.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:call center by tmbg37 · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you were just reinstalling to trace this problem, you could have held off on activation until you had solved it. You don't need to activate Windows immediately after you install it, you're given 30 days until you have to. (Not that I think activation's a good thing, or that you shouldn't be able to reinstall your OS as many times as you want to.)

      --
      This comment was thought up very late at night and does not necessarily reflect my views at a more reasonable hour.
    4. Re:call center by rseuhs · · Score: 1
      This is [b]exactly[/b] what I am afraid of.

      Actiavation raises an unnecessesary barrier to run the system. If everything goes fine, it's no trouble but at the moment something goes wrong it might kick in.

      And the really annoying part is that Microsoft and their supports will say it's a non-issue because it doesn't affect the "average" customer.

    5. Re:call center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One can copy "wpa.dbl" out of Windows\System32 and copy it back after a fresh install (using safe mode or from an outside OS). The non-activated one is about 2k - the activated one is about 13k.

    6. Re:call center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's good hindsight advice, but it sounds to me like he didn't even know what the problem was, he just ended up with a corrupted system and thought he was still running Win98 (system fucked? reinstall!) and didn't try to find out why or how his system got corrupted.

  36. Misunderstood RSS by FluffyPanda · · Score: 1

    Reading the RSS headline I thought for a moment that Microsoft had come to its senses and removed the pointless product activation.

    No such luck it seems. Just more intrusive hassle to install a substandard OS.

    Ho hum

  37. The end of the home user by manganese4 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is things like this and the delayed operating system that makes one wonder if microsoft wants to get out of the Home User Operating system and just concentrate on their business customers.

    Just think all they would really need to do is roll out a good, non-bloated version of Office for Macs and Linux that is compatible with their office version of Office and they can stop having to worry about whiny home user.

    --
    I make my face look like this and concerned words come out.
    1. Re:The end of the home user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the fact that they would loose a pretty large percentage of their income, something the stock holders wouldn't be too happy about.

    2. Re:The end of the home user by Colol · · Score: 1

      Just think all they would really need to do is roll out a good, non-bloated version of Office for Macs and Linux...

      Are they going to make hell freeze over, too? ;)

      What you and I see as bloat in Office some people strangely find completely necessary, and I doubt Microsoft is going to start ripping things out wholesale any time soon.

      That said, Office 2004 already feels considerably less bloaty than its Windows counterpart (menus don't run off the end of the screen!), while still offering way too many features to count. It's not without its issues (speed and a couple chronic bugs come to mind), but I find it much nicer to use.

      Now why doesn't the Office business unit make a version of Office for Windows as friendly as the Mac business unit made theirs? Beats me.

    3. Re:The end of the home user by kndnice · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the educated IT departments are more likely to migrate from MS than Joe Blow. Microsoft depends on a steady stream of lazy consumers who want nothing more than to read email and look at their family photos, while swallowing whole FUD and propoganda about other OS's.

      That whiny home user is probably the foundation for MS products.

  38. Alternate solution by harris+s+newman · · Score: 0

    Give it away, and charge for the services. God knows, using their software requires more support than GNU software!

  39. Hmm by neypo · · Score: 0

    Lets see, on one hand, I can go with Windows, answer numerous annoying questions before you can even really start using your OS, worry about Spyware, Exploits, Viruses, Trojans, Bill Gates running down the street hurling a bag of gophers at you for using a pirated copy, or use Linux/BSD whereas you do not have to sell your soul, its free, its opensource, there are many free third party applications, rarley any viruses/trojans, no spyware, more security vulnerabilites fixed, more flexibilty, among other things.... Hmm, decisions.

  40. # Whois going_to_pay by eneville · · Score: 1

    So, if you have to phone them 20 times per year because your firm is too small to afford corp, who pays for the phone call to MS from Germany or England or Brazil?

    The consume shall eventually as either the software price rises because of toll free numbers or you pay the long distance call and you get charged by your telco.

    If toll free i bet a bunch of people will set their PCI Winmodem up to repeatidly dial..

  41. Getting richer... by ericandrade · · Score: 0

    Microsoft needs more money?

    Someone's got a very big plan.

  42. I guess this affects store-bought OEM copies also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to rebuild my gaming machine and had planned to buy a copy of the OEM version of WinXP Pro from newegg.com or somesuch (they'll sell it to you as long as you buy hardware with it). I guess this new policy means I'd also have to call M$ when I actually get around to setting this machine up.

  43. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calling up Microsoft is still a lot quicker and much more painless than installing Linux.

  44. Damn you Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have a phone, you insensitive clods.

  45. Free as in freedom - understand now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thank-you RMS!
    Thank-you Linus!
    Thank-you devs!

  46. FUD... From TFA comments... by xtracto · · Score: 2, Informative

    The content (and authors) of this report have been thoroughly discredited throughout the blogosphere. ED BOTT (http://www.edbott.com/weblog/) LAYS DOWN THE TRUTH: "IF YOU BUY A NEW COMPUTER FROM ONE OF THESE 'MAJOR VENDORS,' YOU DON'T HAVE TO ACTIVATE IT. THE SYSTEM MANUFACTURER ACTIVATES YOUR COPY OF WINDOWS WHEN THE COMPUTER IS BUILT. You can reinstall the operating system on that computer using the original Windows XP CD as many times as you want, with no activation required." If you replace your motherboard or try to install to a different system than the one that the OEM version came with, then you have to call to activate. Please stop the FUD folks.

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    1. Re:FUD... From TFA comments... by jgennick · · Score: 1

      I have not found what Ed Bott to be true. Perhaps it is because my older Dells were purchased in the pre-Windows XP days, and thus I'm always reinstalling my Windows XP upgrades, but I do, in fact, need to active each and every time I reinstall.

    2. Re:FUD... From TFA comments... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Well that is hardly useful considering my computer at home is a white box, and my laptop from work was a Sony that originally shipped with ME.

      On our network we have a large number of name brand PC's that shipped with 2K, and are slowly being upgraded to XP-pro. Said CD is not going to help much there, either. (And yes, we do have a license agreement that permits us to. We damnwell pay enough for it.)

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:FUD... From TFA comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can reinstall the operating system on that computer using the original Windows XP CD as many times as you want, with no activation required.

      It's been ages since prebuilt computers came with a real Windows XP CD. I just get those stupid reinstall partitions. Luckily we have a legit corporate license. Stupidly, I have to install W2K and upgrade to XP when I replace a bad hard disk.

    4. Re:FUD... From TFA comments... by jumbledInTheHead · · Score: 1

      I have a Dell laptop came with XP needed to reinstall it twice, both times I had to go through online activation. Now if only I had bought from a major vendor...

    5. Re:FUD... From TFA comments... by utopicillusion · · Score: 1

      If you read TFA, you will notice that it's only the newer Dell's which need not go thru the process.

      Maybe everyone with a older machine moves to Linux, or better still, gets a Mac.

      All in good timing for Tiger!!

    6. Re:FUD... From TFA comments... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Hehe, I think they will rather move to Linux $ince they dont buy a Win$ li$en$e do you think they will buy a Mac$into$h$$$$$$$$$$

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    7. Re:FUD... From TFA comments... by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

      ED BOTT (http://www.edbott.com/weblog/) LAYS DOWN THE TRUTH: "IF YOU BUY A NEW COMPUTER FROM ONE OF THESE 'MAJOR VENDORS,' YOU DON'T HAVE TO ACTIVATE IT. THE SYSTEM MANUFACTURER ACTIVATES YOUR COPY OF WINDOWS WHEN THE COMPUTER IS BUILT

      The first thing that comes to mind is how big a computer manufacturer do you have to be to do these pre-activated installs? I'm sure Microsoft charges a pretty penny for that.

      And in a related thought this will beat the hell out of small OEM system providers because they can't pay said pre-activation fee and must now include the cost of "activation time" in their system build quotes. Customers hate extra charges.

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    8. Re:FUD... From TFA comments... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And neither of them will be installed with the OEM version, rather you will be using Corporate and/or Select, and you will not be required to do the activation shuffle. This is only an issue with XP OEM; probably both home and pro versions. Volume-licensed XP will not require this check.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  47. no activation on OEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If my new Dell Laptop is anything to go by, new PCs come with the OS already installed and without the need for activation as it has already been done. If I need to reinstall, I use the CDs that came with. These reimage the hard disk with the already-activated copy of windows again.

  48. Priceless... by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 1

    New PC from NewEgg... $1000
    OEM License Windows XP Professional... $189
    Having to call India in the middle of the night to get special permission to use your hard earned money... Priceless!!!

    If there ever was a poster child for switching to Linux, this would be it.

    --
    D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
  49. No activation call on Eclipse by johnjaydk · · Score: 1
    Try Eclipse. No activation call, no price either. Its not gnu-foss but it's close enough.

    http://www.eclipse.org/

    --
    TCAP-Abort
    1. Re:No activation call on Eclipse by musikit · · Score: 1

      been trying. like every other company. they need someone to blame if something doesnt work. meanwhile in the developer cave. we are using oss 3rd party jar files because management can't tell and they we don't need to do purchase orders.

  50. Go screw by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 1

    That's it. I've had enough.

    I'm out.

    SuSE here i come.

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
  51. the simple soloution to that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is don't activate until you have to.

    don't waste an activation on an install that won't be around more than the grace period.

  52. Ghost/Reload by cbr2702 · · Score: 1

    Why not just ghost the activated version?

    --


    This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
    1. Re:Ghost/Reload by ultimabob · · Score: 1

      You can't ghost the activitated version because you need to run sysprep on the system to change all of the sid's before you mass distrubute it.

      --
      Once upon a time, I once I had a great Sig.....then I lost it.
  53. They're shooting their own foot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the Windows "success" come from piracy.
    Now it'll be much more dificult.

    Do you know what will happen? People will start to migrate to Linux!

    I'm a developer and had made this transition with huge success. For me, Windows belongs to the past now. Once you try and get adapted to Linux is quite dificult to come back.

    I don't need an anti-virus or anti-trojan installed on my system. I can choose wich Window Manager (I know that I can in Windows too, but it's not an ease procedure) I want. I can set my kernel to work as I want.

    So, for the first time I'm tasting what Microsoft had denied me for so many years: FREEDOM!

  54. RTFA! by tliet · · Score: 5, Informative

    They won't disable key activation, just for keys that are assigned to the top 20 OEM clients of Microsoft.

    They are however planning to get rid of online activation alltogether.

    Hmm, I hope India has enough people to man those call centers.

    1. Re:RTFA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA yourself:

      They are however planning to get rid of online activation alltogether.

      but TFA says:

      Microsoft expects to expand the Internet product activation ban to all pre-activated Windows PCs in the next quarter.

      i.e. "They are however planning to get rid of XP OEM online activation alltogether."

      The summary does hint at OEM ("bought with your PC") and a lot of comments here have understood this.

    2. Re:RTFA! by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Maybe not Indiana, but India sure does, and most M$ customers probably won't be able to tell the difference. ;)

      (It's funny. Laugh.)

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    3. Re:RTFA! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I hope India has enough people to man those call centers.

      We better all call up the Microsoft installation support line every half hour or so to check up on them. I mean, this new policy is going to drive MS's phone support expenses through the roof anyway, why not take it to its logical extreme?

  55. Well, that makes sense by mwood · · Score: 1

    "Unscrupulous resellers" abuse Microsoft's T&C, so Microsoft punishes the resellers' victims (and everyone else who chooses a Microsoft OS) for the infraction.

    Suing said resellers down to their socks for breach of contract or copyright infringement or whatever just never occurred to the deep thinkers at MS?

    MS is one of the few software houses who could turn any rambunctious reseller into a smoking crater anytime they choose. Or any thousand resellers. But, nooooooooooooo! Bad enough that end-users have to put up with activation at all; now we have to play telephone tag with one of the world's busiest companies.

  56. who purchased their PC? by Skapare · · Score: 1
    As of February 28, Windows users who purchased their PC will no longer be able to reinstall without calling Microsoft and answering a series of questions.

    So this won't apply to stolen PCs?

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:who purchased their PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is "OEM copies of Windows XP". It won't apply to non-OEM copies.

      If you try to reactivate an OEM copy on a stolen PC, it will apply to you :-p

  57. Nooooo! Not my genitals! by dangitman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As of February 28, Windows users who purchased their PC will no longer be able to reinstall without calling Microsoft and answering a series of questions. No-one expects the Microsoft Inquisition!

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  58. Great job !!! by neo2k.dk · · Score: 0

    That's really nice, like 50 % of their customers of something like that uses a stole key... they need an alternative and turns to Linux, BSD and OSX, why would they do that it's like giving lost of customers away for free :D Great job!

    --
    neo2k
  59. Oh crap this. by rasteri · · Score: 1

    I'm going to linux now. I've been toying with the idea for ages, and I'm an experienced linux admin, I just liked windows better as a desktop OS till now ("stick with what you know").

    But distros like RedHat and co provide a desktop experience equal or greater than that of windows. I don't play games, and I already use open source apps for nearly everything else (firefox, thunderbird, openoffice.org, etc etc).

    The hassle of reinstalling windows now exceeds that of getting used to a new operating system, so I'm moving. I don't grudge Microsoft the money for XP, but I refuse to be required to get permission to install my ORIGINAL copy of Windows XP on my own computer.

    Sorry Microsoft, you just lost yourself another customer.

    1. Re:Oh crap this. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Just the disadvantages of using a Microsoft command shell with its fixed-size window was enough to move me to Linux for bash :-)

    2. Re:Oh crap this. by NullProg · · Score: 1

      Go grab the free SuSE 9.2 Personal off their ftp site (The dvd iso, not the cd image).

      It's about as Windows as you can get under Linux.

      Enjoy,

      --
      It's just the normal noises in here.
  60. Re:Only makes sensehttp://slashdot.org/search.pl?t by spisska · · Score: 1

    Not only on the PC -- The shrink-wrapped boxes of windows on Walmart shelves have the code on the outside of the box.

  61. Wake up by mr_tommy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Come on - wake up to the reality.

    Some readers here live in a dream world; it goes a bit like this. Microsoft make crappy products; Microsoft (unsurprisingly) protect their crappy products; people ultimately realise this; switch to Linux.

    Here's the reality. Microsoft make pretty average products that a heck of a lot of people use. Microsoft get most of their revenues from office and windows and want to protect this cash cow. Microsoft have product activation on, something that bothers a relatively minute fraction of it's user base, and tackle piracy head on. People still view Linux as a server OS, hard to use, and not friendly to people who have less than 5 minutes to read a help file. People stay on Windows. Slash dot community still angry.

    This change just doesn't affect them - and importantly - until it does, please don't expect any mass migration to other operating systems. Microsoft rightly identified an exploit that pirates are using to rip them off- why shouldn't they patch it up? It really bothers me that so many people play this out as a big bad beast cracking knuckles again - it just isn't. Since when did support piracy become so acceptable to so many people?

    1. Re:Wake up by arkhan_jg · · Score: 2, Informative

      This change just doesn't affect them - and importantly - until it does, please don't expect any mass migration to other operating systems. Microsoft rightly identified an exploit that pirates are using to rip them off- why shouldn't they patch it up? It really bothers me that so many people play this out as a big bad beast cracking knuckles again - it just isn't. Since when did support piracy become so acceptable to so many people?

      Because this will have no impact on copyright infringement whatsoever. People who were nicking OEM keys (or double selling them) will just switch to fake or stolen volume licence keys, which most infringers use anyway, or even copies with activation disabled.

      The people it WILL impact will be people like me, a computer repair guy. Say I reinstall a copy of windows for a customer that's been crippled by spyware. I use the OEM key on the sticker on the bottom. Instead of a few seconds activation through the LAN (which is irritating, but not significantly so) I now have to sit on hold with microsoft, then probably read my key to a machine, then explain to an operative why I'm reinstalling.

      I've done this in the past, and it's no fun whatsoever. Now imagine I have to spend 10 minutes on this for every machine I fix. Now imagine they ask questions about the OEM computer, where they bought it, how old it is etc. Now _I_ can't register the computer, I have to sit down with the customer and walk them through it at handover.

      This is going to be a massive pain in the bum for legitimate users and small businesses, while having zero impact on copyright infringement. That's why we're pissed off.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    2. Re:Wake up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean that all those pirates out there are going to run out and purchase a legal copy of Windows now? Hardly. Microsoft will never make any money chasing pirates, hence, they don't lose a dime to pirates.

      The best move MS could make towards combating piracy is to price their products according to their actual worth. I believe most people would happily pay $19.95, or even $49.95 for a legal copy of Windows.

      If you build your own PC shouldn't you get a copy of Windows for the same price that HP or Dell pays for it? Think about it, when you buy that super-discounted PC from HP/COMPAQ for $399.99 with a copy of Windows XP Home on it, how much of that PC's cost do you think is Windows?

      There's a racket at work here. MS sells the software real cheap to the big PC maker just to make sure their OS gets on the box. Upgrades to the OS are really expensive and resource hungry, causing you to purchase yet another machine from the big PC maker.

      MS's message to the consumer is simple: You're an idiot, you have no choice but to purchase my product, and if you try to use it without paying my outrageous price for it, I'll make your life miserable.

    3. Re:Wake up by Elenyon · · Score: 0


      Here's the reality.


      I would say here is the reality, Most copies of windows are either OEM or Pirate. People who buy Dell and upgrade by taking their computers to the "Geek Squad" at best buy won't care about this at all. The people who will care are thoes who pirate windows and use it as a primary system for games/devolopment this is alot of the younger collage age people. When their ability to have the OS of their choice for free on their Computer so they can play CS is lost they will have to think about either legitimatly getting a copy or migrating.

      That is why this is the best news ever I just wish Microsoft had the best anti piracy system ever. How much market share on windows and office would competly evaporate if only legitimate copies of the software ran.

    4. Re:Wake up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you please tell us what OS (for PC, available and supported today) is worse than Windows ?? I can only count 4... Windows, Linux, BSD and Solaris. No I will not count distros as separate OS...

      Where is Windows in this ?? Average ???

    5. Re:Wake up by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Since when did support piracy become so acceptable to so many people?

      Since it was happening to people that we don't like, of course. It happens to the RIAA and MPAA, they need to adapt or die! It happens to MS, well, they're evil! It happens to GPLed software (by redistributing it and refusing to release the source), burn the heretics that dare steal our code!

    6. Re:Wake up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite honestly, I have absolutely no problem with M$ protecting their products. In fact, they should. But the way they are doing it doesn't solve the problem. This only irritates many of the legit small business users.

  62. Gee, didn't see this coming by cube_slave · · Score: 1
    Hate to give a big fat "we told you so". [sarcasm]Who would have thought a company would change rules to squeeze more money out of their paying customers?[/sarcasm]

    Just wait until Apple decides to change a4p rules and these same customers try and activate a "new machine."

  63. Re:Only makes sensehttp://slashdot.org/search.pl?t by dsginter · · Score: 1

    The ignorance is astounding. I actually thought that they were doing this on purpose for the sake of making it easy to steal, thus maintaining their monopoly.

    --
    More
  64. This wont be a problem because....... by ABCC · · Score: 1

    This will all become moot as soon as Longhorn comes out. According to the press releases - its gonna be the greatest OS ever! No need to reinstall! Ever! Anyway, I pity those unfortunate souls who are going to have to take all the activation calls, there cant be many more undignified jobs than that.

  65. How many emails do YOU get? by cdrguru · · Score: 1
    Advertising "stolen" OEM software, being churned out in out-of-the-way places? Windows for $10, Office for $50. Where do these prices come from, anyway? Anything Microsoft can do to shut this market off is for the better.

    Besides, if Linux got mainstream, these same people - if allowed to - would just buy one copy of some major Linux distribution and resell it over and over with ink-jet printed disc labels. Who's benefit is that for? Should Mandrake and Suse be put out of business because they try to sell software? I'm sure everyone would agree that RedHat should be put out of business - they actually DO make money, right?

    1. Re:How many emails do YOU get? by digitalhermit · · Score: 0

      Man, it's worse than that. I went to a Linux User Group meeting once, and there were people just *HANDING OUT* copies of Linux.

  66. M$ only get paid once / system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did I miss something, M$ now only get paid once for each system? As I seen it BigCorp buys this global M$ license that cost $X/Intel system they own. They also buy all the systems from Dell/Hp?ibm/whoever with M$ Windows preinstalled and paid for so M$ now got paid twice for one license. Now when "pirates" steal the code from the sticker and use the license that came with the system M$ only get paid once - the corp license, while the HW license is used on some other system. I know the EULA disallow you yto transfer the license but $ wise...

  67. complex pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this comes down to having a ridiculously complicated pricing structure - different prices for bulk buy corporates, students and individuals - and different prices for the same product in different regions - means there's plenty of opportunities to play the system off against itself in order to get the best deal. If you simply said "This is the price for this product " - ideally the lowest price you have, then you've plugged this loop hole. And anyway what are MS proposing to do. if I've legitimately bought a machine with a copy of Windows and the copy of Windows turns out not to be ligit how am I supposed to know about it?

  68. only ones to worrie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only people that really need to worrie are people like my self.i have a copy of windows from a few years back that i downloaded from a friend. ive never paid for a copy of windows since then. i installed the copy onto at least 10 differnt machines. now i just dont want it to say its a illegal copy and stop its self from being useable. microsoft have every right to do this really its there software. the only people that there goner put off is the people that use illegal versions of windows. but microsoft really know how to do them selfs in. the security updates was the first straw people who have illegal versions will most like get there computers compramised by the next major worms / exploits that come out and then they will be used to ddos www.microsoft.com :) . i think the next big move that windows pushes on people will be the last straw to make them move to linux or even to mac. thank god for that.

  69. The OEM version doesn't activate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've reinstalled my dell 5 or 6 times now for different HD's, and stuff I've f'ed up and stuff that MS has f'ed up.

    The OEM version doesn't phone home.

    1. Re:The OEM version doesn't activate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you haven't significantly changed your hardware enough, even with changing the hd, for MS to think you need to reactivate.

      The OEM version does phone home. It's just that whoever you bought your system from phoned home before you got it.

  70. movie quote and a couple of thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    First thing that came to mind when I saw this story:

    "The more you tighten your grip, the more [star] systems slip through your fingers"

    By the way, Mac OS X doesn't require any product activation at al, just thought I'd share that. I know Apple would rather you paid for it, but seeing as you need to buy a Mac from them in the first place (unless you just happen to like emulating it really slow on another machine) I think that they're a little less likely to threaten to take their ball home if you don't play fair.

  71. Cesspool cleaners are happy about this. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    From the linked article: "If a customer attempts to activate Windows XP with an OEM key from a COA, they will be directed to call customer support specialists to obtain an override code - provided they can prove that their copy is legitimate by answering a series of questions."

    Right now all those people who are night janitors for McDonald's are happily saying to themselves, "There's someone who has a much worse job than mine."

    Maybe that is a way to rate business models, by the quality of the jobs they create.

    It's awesomely bad, when you think of it: Presuming that Microsoft customers are pirates and making them prove they aren't by cross-examining them. And, if someone doesn't answer the questions correctly, unfairly taking away his rights to use what he bought.

    Marketing people are often the least intelligent people in a company. But this is a new low! R.I.P. Microsoft? The rot is growing faster than Michael Malone predicted. If some people are pirates, the solution is to abuse everyone?

    Microsoft managers should be required to attend a class in social skills. At least farting in public and chewing with your mouth open doesn't hassle every customer.

  72. Wow by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Microsoft really ARE helping to support Linux!

  73. This kind of thing . . . by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

    . . . is part of the price you pay when you rent software. And when your ability to use software is controlled by a remote "activation" scheme, that's exactly what you're doing.

    --
    I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  74. deaf. by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    At least the (non englisch) deaf person on this earth will have to switch to linux and other non activation OS.

  75. I don't understand something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The OEM versions don't activate *at all*, so I don't see how this helps.

    1. Re:I don't understand something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OEM do activate. A VLK (volume license key) will bypass activation.

  76. Two words by wynand1004 · · Score: 1

    Good advice!

    But, easier said than done.

    --
    An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. - Victor Hugo
  77. what this tells me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It used to be that Microsoft didn't care too much if a few people pirated windows. Now they are cracking down hard. What does this say about the future of windows? I smell fear in Microsoft. Could it be that Open Source is really starting to scare MS and they are at a loss on how to adapt.

  78. Gereric WPA patch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok its time to post the Anti Windows Product Activation Patch link have fun and now you dont have to bother calling India .

    Source code also availble .

    <URL:http://home.pages.at.nyud.net:8090/cw2k/Ant iw pa//>

  79. Eliminating some Laziness by Yevda · · Score: 1

    Along with preventing piracy Microsoft will be helping with laziness and eliminating convenience! Now instead of registering via the Internet, which takes all of ~30 seconds, I now have to wait on hold for several minutes/hours/days and then I have the challenge of convincing them that I DO have a legit copy of windows... Ahh I can't wait!

  80. Oh good lord by Crescens · · Score: 4, Insightful
    For all the people complaining about this activation.

    How many times do you reinstall Windows?!

    I can see maybe if you're in a strange company setting where they use a version that requires it, it may be a hassle, but I don't see most people reinstalling Windows more than once or twice a year. I guess more if you completely hose a system. That's what? 3-5 minutes? When I had to call them the one time my system had determined I changed hardware too much, it took about 1 minute for them to give me the hash I needed. I don't consider that bad at all.

    1. Re:Oh good lord by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      3-5 minutes to reinstall windows?
      How about this:

      1) 30 minutes to reformat your windows partition to recover that mysterious dissapearing disk space that MS uses for hidden files. (I recovered over a gigabyte of disk space this way last time).

      2) 1-2 hours on the phone arguing and finally getting your product reactivated.

      3) 3 or 4 hours downlaoding/reinstalling/configuring all the drivers for all your hardware.

      4) 3-5 days reinstlling all your apps becuase windows is so badly designed it allows/requires the istallstion of apps to modify the OS itself with registry settings/DLLs etc.

      5) Several weeks re-downloading all the service packs etc.

    2. Re:Oh good lord by jalefkowit · · Score: 5, Insightful
      When I had to call them the one time my system had determined I changed hardware too much, it took about 1 minute for them to give me the hash I needed. I don't consider that bad at all.

      I don't care if it takes .0001 picoseconds and happens automagically in response to my brainwaves.

      It's not an issue of convenience. It's an issue of principle.

      I swap hardware in and out of my PC all the time. More importantly, I reserve the right to swap hardware in and out of my PC whenever I damn well please.

      Windows Product Activation limits this right by labeling me an Evil Pirate if I modify my system too much, or in the "wrong" way, and forcing me to grovel to Microsoft for permission to use my own computer again.

      This is unacceptable no matter how "convenient" they make the groveling process. I simply do not accept the premise that they have the right to lock me out of my PC based on how I modify the hardware. I don't want my computer playing cop.

      It's for this reason that I've kept my Windows box at home on Windows 2000, which has no such onerous "gotchas". When Windows 2000 becomes an untenable platform (which by all appearances will be Real Soon Now), it would be nice if there was a version of Windows that was compatible with my principles. If not, I'll wipe the disk and run Fedora full time, or buy a Mac.

      If it comes to that, it'll be a shame; there are a lot of nice things about the Windows environment for the home user, and I'll miss being able to play the latest games. But there are some things that are simply not negotiable, and "I own my system" is one of them.

    3. Re:Oh good lord by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      I haven't had to reinstall OS X since... well, never. I can't imagine using an OS that needed to be reinstalled once or twice a year.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    4. Re:Oh good lord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I had to call them the one time my system had determined I changed hardware too much, it took about 1 minute for them to give me the hash I needed. I don't consider that bad at all.

      * Sigh *
      Its your fucking computer, not thiers. Do you call your auto manufacturer to get permission to change the tires?

      I quess your one of the ones that Welcome the new Microsoft Overlords.

    5. Re:Oh good lord by djplurvert · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, you're right. I mean how many times DO I reinstall windows? None of course because once you install linux, you never have to reinstall windows ever again.

      But, you on the other hand. Are clearly NOT a technical user of windows. When I did run windows...years ago...it needed to be reinstalled frequently. The short time I had XP on a laptop that was a pain to install linux on and ended up being exchanged for a mac, I had to reinstall XP twice.

      I change my hardware quite regularly. I have a new motherboard coming today in fact. Granted, it's not all that often that I replace my motherboard, but hard drive replacement is VERY common, more than once a year on average. Video card replacement is also fairly common.

      Personally, I can't imagine dealing with that crap. I typically have five or six pcs/macs at home at any one time and I can't be bothered to remember which "certificate of authenticity" goes with which computer. Fortuanately, with OS/X and Linux, I don't have to.

    6. Re:Oh good lord by Raypeso · · Score: 1

      Great point! I can't believe that reinstalling your OS twice a year could ever be called acceptable. I have OS X and Slackware and both have been running for quite a while, with no trouble at all. I only reboot my Mac for security updates and only reboot my Slack box to change out hardware. At work, I have XP and a very old Sparc 5. If it wasn't for that Sparc, I'd never get anything done.

    7. Re:Oh good lord by Crescens · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I wasn't implying 3-5 mins to reinstall Windows. I didn't word myself correctly. I was talking about your step 2, which didn't even seem that difficult to me. I explained what I had done with my computer and they had no problems giving me the code I needed. Reinstalling Windows is indeed a hassle, I have no beliefs that it is not. However, that's not what I was intending to argue.

    8. Re:Oh good lord by Inconnux · · Score: 1

      how often do i reinstall windows?



      often enough. I own two legit copies of XP, and I swap hardware all the time. If I have to phone each time I am just going to DL a pirate copy and use that instead. luckily i use Linux for all my non gaming needs :)



    9. Re:Oh good lord by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Win2k is soon to get a shot in the arm. Security patches have started rolling out with (SP5) in their name... a service pack is coming soon. No more installing some 50 updates after the service pack. (I wrestle with this particular issue at work.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Oh good lord by mastagee · · Score: 1

      Imaging.

      Suppose that someone uses the Imaging Tools to make an Image for any given company, using an OEM copy of Windows, using the tools Microsoft suppplies (Sysprep, etc). When you image a computer, it will prompt for the key of the computer you're installing it on after it is imaged and started up for the first time.

      You have to go through the online activation process after a reboot. This change will require the IT people to call Microsoft after every machine they image.

      Great.

    11. Re:Oh good lord by Animats · · Score: 1
      It's for this reason that I've kept my Windows box at home on Windows 2000, which has no such onerous "gotchas".

      Me too. You run Windows 2000. Windows XP runs you.

      When the Win2K box goes, its replacement won't run a Microsoft OS.

    12. Re:Oh good lord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So don't use windows dumbass!

    13. Re:Oh good lord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck off now you ass

  81. hold on a second... by nuggetman · · Score: 1

    johnny pirate has an XP cd from 2003
    johnny pirate's volume license/activation free key is from 2003
    johnny pirate doesn't use the most updated setup files

    so this policy won't hinder johnny pirate

    --
    ...and that's all there is to it.
  82. Re:Gereric WPA patch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  83. Nothing New.. by Beefslaya · · Score: 0
    If you had purchased a Retail or OEM copy of XP (home or pro) with new PC, you were only allowed to activate it on that specific hardware setup.

    Example:

    I purchased an OEM copy of XP Pro when I built my first P4 system 4 years ago, an Asus P4T-E board. Changed mainboards after that one failed, and now I have to call Microsoft every fucking time their OS decides that it won't be compatible with some other vendors softare or drivers, and a reinstall is necessary.

    And what bothers me most about it, is they talk to me like I'm the fucking pirate? WTF? How hard is it to take down my name (at a minimum) or have a secret question to ask me.

    "This one size fits all" attitude from Microsoft is going to burn them in the end.

    I WILL NOT buy Longhorn, I will not SELL Longhorn to any one I build systems for, and I will definitely NOT recommend Longhorn.

    When I bought my car, I didn't have to call fucking GM everytime to ask if I can change the oil, or exhaust or put different tires on it.What makes Microsoft so special?

    If it weren't for the 2 or 3 DirectX games(NO WineX is not a viable solution yet) that I play, I wouldn't have any Microsoft crap on my system.

    Sorry for stating the obvious, but I have been dealing with this particular issure for a couple of years now. And maybe I shouldn't feel so bad about it now that EVERYONE will have to do it.

    That automated ladies voice is pretty nice...

  84. Windows 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like Microsoft wants to encourage a brisk resale market for Windows 2000 retail copies. :)

  85. Microsoft Self Destructs, Film @ 11 by HangingChad · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Good move, guys. Keep up the good work. Every time you squeeze people for more revenue more of them jump ship to Linux. The more leaving Windows, the more of a market for Linux software. Rinse, lather, repeat.

    Moves like this only accelerate the vicious circle. Marvelous! Thank you, Redmond! Wow, when was the last time I said that?

    And we have years and years of entertainment watching MSFT's fall from the peak market dominance. Like watching that one video of an extreme skier who lost it and rolled down the mountain...seemingly forever...unable to stop the fall and it was just one agonizing tumble after another. The only difference is you felt sorry for the skier, sort of. No pity for MSFT. Wo-ho!

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  86. One small step... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    This is going to a pain in the neck for a lot of people. First of all almost everyone I know has either an OEM version of Windows or when they want to upgrade a pirated version.

    When I am asked to fix my friends PC's there is no way I am going to be phoning up MS to ask permission and there is very little chance they are going to be doing that either which leaves us with the following choices:

    1) Actually try and find out what the problem is rather then just re-installing everything
    2) Don't do anything and leave their computer broken
    3) Install something else
    4) Install a version of windows for them which doesn't need all this hassle.

    Number 1 is usually a waste of time with Windows and so I am guessing that most people will opt for number 4 or if that's not available number 3.

  87. MS Motivation? by elhondo · · Score: 1

    I can't help but see this latest crackdown as an attempt to boost XBOX sales. That might sound weird, but MS doesn't get a cut of PC games that run on pirated PC platforms. It's possible that MS' reasoning is that in order to generate revenue from games, it needs those games to run on XBOX platforms. Soon, the mainstream gamer's choice will be Linux, PS2/3, or PC. Since the cost of the PC platform just doubled for the hobbyist, XBOX is the next big player. The reason that the price doubled is that, at least according to a story on the reg, the OEM license can't be transferred. So, instead of paying $89 for Windows, with the purchase of a Mobo, you're now paying $89 everytime you upgrade your proc (or $189 for the retail version). I personally have licensed versions of 98, 2000, and XP Pro. XP Pro is on a laptop - too slow for most games. 2000 is an OEM version, since invalid because I've upgraded my processor and mobo. 98 is - well, it's turned off. I haven't provided MS any revenue since early 2002. So, the next time EA launches a game, with the need to have the latest DirectX driver, I'll most likely be unable to play it on my 2000 box, or my laptop. Personally, I'll do without, but I could easily see someone justifying the purchase of the same game and an XBOX. I think that might be what MS is hoping for - to stop PC games from competing with the XBOX.

    1. Re:MS Motivation? by Beefslaya · · Score: 0
      A little off topic, but I am ignorant to the reason there isn't a better interface for DirectX games for Linux? Let me guess? Source code? Seriously, I own 2 PC's, and the only games I play on the XP box are BF42 and Empire Earth...Everything else I play can be played on my Redhat Pro box...with WineX.

      I think the stake to put in the blood sucking vampires heart would be a good DirectX interface. :)

    2. Re:MS Motivation? by NullProg · · Score: 1

      No, it's an overeaction to last years fiscal results. PC Sales/Shippments increased where as Microsoft saw a drop in windows sales. Microsoft equates this to piracy.

      I bought four boxes last year. Only one has windows installed and its windows 98SE. It's good to be a gangsta.

      Enjoy,

      --
      It's just the normal noises in here.
  88. The Questions by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. What did you do to your computer to make Microsoft's World Class OS stop working?
    2. Where did you steal your computer from?
    3. How do you pronounce Linux?
    4. What's the Capitol of Finland?
    5. Do you own an iPod?
    6. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
    7. If a train left Redmond traveling at 60MPH, and another left Cupertino traveling at 40MPH, when would they arrive in Kansas?
    8. Who's your Daddy?
    9. How much Vaseline is currently on your keyboard?
    10. When did you stop beating your wife?
    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
    1. Re:The Questions by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 3, Funny

      1. What did you do to your computer to make Microsoft's World Class OS stop working?

      I bought a Mac.

      2. Where did you steal your computer from?

      You.

      3. How do you pronounce Linux?

      "I pronounce Linux as Linux."

      4. What's the Capitol of Finland?

      Rejavick. Wait! That's Iceland! Umm...

      5. Do you own an iPod?

      *takes off white headphones* What did you say?

      6. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

      WTF? First penguins now woodchucks? What? Do you have some sort of animal fetish?!

      7. If a train left Redmond traveling at 60MPH, and another left Cupertino traveling at 40MPH, when would they arrive in Kansas?

      Nowhere - they would not be able to pay the Microsoft Transport Fee(tm) to leave their respective stations.

      8. Who's your Daddy?

      Harvey Birdman but don't tell anybody!

      9. How much Vaseline is currently on your keyboard?

      Only what I used to protect myself from this activation plan...

      10. When did you stop beating your wife?

      About the same time I stopped using Windows...

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    2. Re:The Questions by n6kuy · · Score: 1

      >> 6. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

      > WTF? First penguins now woodchucks? What? Do you have some sort of animal fetish?!

      A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if his dentures were any good....

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
  89. good. by soybean · · Score: 1

    this is surely push a few more people aways from linux. Often I've installed the mosty handy and available operating system. This will make my xp cd's a little less handy. I'm sure that other people will find themselves in the same situation.

  90. Mac mini $499 by Shmr0ck · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  91. WAAH by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    if it bothers you so much, stop using windows.

  92. Told You So by thpdg · · Score: 1

    This is the exact type of thing that people were afraid of, when activation was first announced for Windows XP. We were assured that it would be automatic and anonymous. It just became a lot worse. Why should MS know when I format my PC? What gives!

    --

    -Patrick

    "They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

  93. WOW! I'm loading up on Apple shares! by fz00 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This has to be the most unbelievably dumb thing I have seen Microsoft do in light of the mac mini selling for $499. One too many crash is going to send people flocking into the arms of Apple. And since mac covers the basics that most home users do (browse, email, word-processing, digital pics, etc.), this is going to be a no-brainer. I'll be buying one later this year in order to avoid this hassle. Also my PC will be a Linux box by the end of the year as well. The only reason I'm using XP now is out of sheer laziness. My Linux box had broken down and I didn't have the time to set up a new one. I bought a laptop and ran what came with it. I've already reinstalled 3 times and if I have to go through this, I will not even bother! This is great news! I'm already an Apple shareholder and I will DEFINITELY be buying more shares with this news. EVEN AT ABOVE $80!!!!

  94. Cool! by Shanep · · Score: 2

    Hopefully, this will mean a lot more people buying one of these and using something like this, this, this, this or this!

    Seriously. Why on Earth are people still putting up with these MS fuckers when Mac OSX and Apple hardware is so damn nice? I like a mix of Sun and Apple gear. The thought of actually deciding on MS just makes me shudder. And MS just keeps giving me more and more reason to hate them and the shit they peddle.

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    1. Re:Cool! by Shanep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I always build my own home systems, and I refuse to let another company make hardware choices for me.

      I've been building PC's for about 15 years. Now though, it is more economical to buy systems which are already built. Unless you are trying to get the absolute fastest PC you can get your hands on, in which case, I find building from parts to often be cheaper.

      You do have choice though and as you've stated, you are exercising it. You don't have to buy Apple hardware or their software. Apple gets a lot of stability and excellent interoperability through the fact that they largely control both the software and hardware that makes up their systems.

      Apple systems are for people who just want to buy a computer which works very well out of the box. That is why Apple does the "choosing". They deliver on that expectation and that is why Mac users tend to remain Mac users. Who wants to lay down cash on systems which you have to fight with to use (MS)?

      You must remember that Apple delivers the whole system. They are not delivering a generic OS to go with someone elses highly variable hardware and drivers. To achieve that, they need to limit what hardware they ship. I don't see that as them controlling you, but rather them controlling the quality of the systems they deliver you.

      PS, I am predominently an OpenBSD and NetBSD user who has OSX on an old clamshell iBook. I recently ordered a Mac mini because I love using OSX too. I don't fight with OpenBSD or NetBSD, since once I set them up, they just keep going. They're not as pretty as OSX though. ; ) Microsoft products though, give me no end of grief.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  95. Now I'm gonna have to crack my legit copy by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    One I got at the .NET launch party at George Mason Univ. in Virginia and one that I got from my Comp. Sci. Prof at college (the department has a license that grants a free copy with unique key to anyone who wants one).

    Now I'm going to have to crack one of my legit copies so I don't have to call the overlords at Microsoft when I reinstall.

    Here's what Microsoft is doing:
    "Look there's a software pirate crawling across my shoe!" *BLAM* "Ow my foot!!!@#"

    --

    Question everything

  96. On phone activation... by Winterblink · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My father recent ran into a rather stupid issue with the phone based activation. You see it's not a person you're talking to, but one of those recorded voice recognition systems. He had a copy of Microsoft Works that he had to reinstall, and suddenly required activation. For some reason the internet based activation didn't work so he proceeded to do the phone based one.

    Well lo and behold after he enters in his proper key for the product he legitimately purchased when he got his Dell PC, it promptly tells him the key's invalid, buhbye and HANGS UP ON HIM. There was no option to speak to a CSR at all, and he has no recourse (Dell can't do anything about it, and there's no phone numbers to call at Microsoft to talk to someone). The whole experience has pushed him that much further towards getting a Mac and waving a not-so-fond farewell to Windows XP.

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
    1. Re:On phone activation... by PhreakinPenguin · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's wrong when it comes to Dell machines and the software provided with them. Whether it's the Windows OS itself or a productivity application, if it's made by Microsoft and comes from an OEM such as Dell, they can create a key for you. Microsoft provides them with a program that will generate valid OEM serial numbers that they will give you once they prove that the software came with the PC.

      --


      My sig of choice is Marlboro
    2. Re:On phone activation... by Kaihaku · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wonderful... You don't even get to talk to real people, why am I surprised? I really shouldn't be. Imagine the frustration of spyware and virsuses forcing you to reformat only to get denied on the phone by some computer most likely as buggy as yours... Sigh... Hugs PowerBook... I'm glad I'm safe.

    3. Re:On phone activation... by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      My father actually ended up doing that with them on the phone, and to no avail. They generated probably three keys for him, none of them worked at all. It was in fact their suggestion that my father call the activation line, and it was then he was subjected to the annoyance of that phone system. I nearly cried I was laughing so hard, because he ended up mailing photocopies of all the license information to Bill Gates C/O Microsoft, with a nice scathing letter asking him to fix the situation. :)

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    4. Re:On phone activation... by DaFallus · · Score: 1

      That is strange. I have had to call to reactivate before, and it also told me that my key was invalid, and then automatically directed me to what sounded like a Russian CSR. I read the long string of numbers to him once, told him I had recently upgraded my computer, then he read the code back to me.

      I think Microsoft is obviously doing something right if so many people are pirating their software, and if changing their activation processes pisses off so many people. If no one liked/used Microsoft software, then this would be a non-issue.

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
  97. So Win2k was the zenith then by pellenys · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was always uncomfortable with the direction WinXP was going in with regard to Microsoft-tied code, but this takes the biscuit.

    Win2k for me then has to be the Microsoft OS of choice. It's stable, and it's (relatively) fluff free. I used to forgive Microsoft a lot when Win2k first came out.

    That said, I'll be phasing out MS stuff when I can now - I just can't be bothered with it all. My computers are mine. The companies that made them can eff off.

    1. Re:So Win2k was the zenith then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't upgraded from Windows 2000.

      Never saw the need.

      Though I still think Windows NT 3.51 was the most stable, before they dragged half the subsystems into the kernel and imported the Windows 95 shell.

  98. No by Aldric · · Score: 1

    People want to use the same operating system at work that they use at home. A company uses Windows because that's what the owner/ceo got with his home computer.

    1. Re:No by spisska · · Score: 1

      Other way around.

      The CEO bought an MS laptop because that's what they use at work.

  99. Ha. I win. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a COPY of XP Pro from a Technet kit. Thank God for friends. I'd like to try Linux or BeOS or some alternative, but nothing other than Windows 2k or greater supports my hardware. There are no 98 drivers for my onboard NIC. However, I can copy DVDs while playing the Doom 3 demo. Not many other Windows users can pull that off, and I like to brag, so I guess I'll have to stay with Windows, and never have to activate it. Booya -- sorta.

  100. More OEMs need to offer linux by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...I could see it being worth it if everyone loved Windows. But the only reason people even use it in the first place is because it's easy...
    That implies choice, which is has not been part of the equation. People use MS-Windows because the OEMs have preloaded it onto the machines, also referred to as the Microsoft tax: it's been impossible to get an x86 machine without MS-Windows. Yes, it is now theoretically possible, but hardly practical unless you go Apple or Pegasos etc.

    More OEMs need to offer linux. However, just as importantly there needs to be an return to discussion of software based on technical merits rather then just tossing up a five-star review based purely on the MS "look and feel". Currently the rating is more often than not an evaluation of the advertising revenue, not the tool. Also, federally funded public service programs like the ones in the UK and Finland need to stop shilling for Chairman Bill and point out other software and systems.

    Disabling online MS-Windows Product Activation could be a real windfall for Linux service providers and distributors if they play their cards right.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    1. Re:More OEMs need to offer linux by danheskett · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, it is now theoretically possible, but hardly practical unless you go Apple or Pegasos etc.
      It is entirely practical. Go online, look to any PC seller other than HP or Dell and you will find such hardware.

      Disabling online MS-Windows Product Activation could be a real windfall for Linux service providers and distributors if they play their cards right.
      No, not really. Most people don't care. It's a 2 minute phone. It only applies if you are *reinstalling*. It will really essentially never affect most users.

      This is, in reality, a total non-issue.

    2. Re:More OEMs need to offer linux by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Considering that I am reinstalling every 6 months, which is a pain in the ass on it's own, having to phone into Microsoft is insult to injury.

      Not everybody buys a Dell, HP, or IBM. Some folks (dramatic music) custom build their own computers.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:More OEMs need to offer linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have to reinstall every 6 months, maybe its you, unless your an admin...even then, I would think you would use ghost...I've gone from 98 to XP, and have only had to reinstall a few times, and those were just cause I had too much "junk" and didnt feel like wading through it...then I learned of ghost, and saves me all sorts of time.

    4. Re:More OEMs need to offer linux by slashrogue · · Score: 1

      It only applies if you are *reinstalling*. It will really essentially never affect most users.

      So you're saying Windows generally never gets reinstalled on a specific computer?

    5. Re:More OEMs need to offer linux by rseuhs · · Score: 1
      It's a 2 minute phone.

      According to various posters in this thread it takes 15-20 minutes of waiting just to get through.

    6. Re:More OEMs need to offer linux by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      It's perfectly possible to get an OS-free machine from Dell.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    7. Re:More OEMs need to offer linux by rekenner · · Score: 1

      "it's been impossible to get an x86 machine without MS-Windows. Yes, it is now theoretically possible, but hardly practical unless you go Apple or Pegasos etc."
      .... Uhhhh.... Apple sells X86 machines?

      Last time I checked, Apple machines run on PPC processors. Research shows that Pegasos is PPC based ALSO also.

      So, what X86 machines are we talking about, again?

      Furthermore, you can get Linux machines from WALMART. They aren't easy to get from the major OEMs, true, but they are findable.

      However, I suppose most places would want to charge you for the installation cost of the OS. It wouldn't be cost effective to make machines with Linux unless a decent amount of sales of whatever distro they put on could be guaranteed. For anyone that would want to install Linux, if one of the grandoffspring of the parent is correct, you can just get a blank PC sans cost of Windows.

    8. Re:More OEMs need to offer linux by danheskett · · Score: 1

      If you use the same machine, you do not have re-activate.

      Here you go with a link.

      Also, a 2 minute phone call is not insult to injury. It's a phone call. Of approximately 120 seconds in length. Maybe 3 minutes.

    9. Re:More OEMs need to offer linux by danheskett · · Score: 1

      I am saying on average people will use a machine, and when it stops working right either (1) buy a new one or (2) get a friend or geek to fix it. If they call support, they'll probably have it reset back to factory standards.

      But yes, in general, the average user never re-installs Windows XP.

    10. Re:More OEMs need to offer linux by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Umm.. I seriously doubt that. I urge you to try it sometime. It is very easy. Lookup the appropriate number from the activation wizard. I'd estimate, in my experience, I've activated 1500 copies XP by phone, and not once - never once - did it take more than 5 minutes flat.

      Maybe they had an actual problem with the activation - aka messed with copy or maybe they were calling from a foreign country? I have no idea, but clearly, it's not typical from my experience.

    11. Re:More OEMs need to offer linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1500 * 5 minutes > 100 hours.

      I hope you or your company billed them for this time.

    12. Re:More OEMs need to offer linux by danheskett · · Score: 1

      1500 * 5 minutes > 100 hours. I hope you or your company billed them for this time.
      Billed the customer, absolutely.

  101. Piracy must be far worse than we think by ip_freely_2000 · · Score: 1

    Think about this:
    Microsoft does NOTHING without considering profit.
    For Microsoft to revert from an automated process back to using very expensive humans to approve Authentication strings can only mean they must be losing ginormous sums of revenue.
    Microsoft would weigh aggravation to legit users against their revenue stream and decide it's worth the hit.
    It can only be a huge problem for them to so something like this. Say what you will, but Microsoft is not often stupid.

  102. Convicted criminals by Moulinneuf · · Score: 0


    Micrososft is a convicted criminal all over the planet they pay the fine or they are in trial arguing there case. If that dont work they buy the Government.

    --
    I am a REAL American from Canada , not a wanna-be from the country , self called "last remaining superpower" "of America
  103. Bastard! by SHiVa0 · · Score: 0

    I'm phoneless you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:Bastard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://home.pages.at/cw2k/Antiwpa/

  104. From the F'ing A by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

    "But Microsoft plans to change all this. Starting February 28, Microsoft will indefinitely begin to disable Internet product activation on OEM keys used by the top 20 worldwide PC makers." This won't affect the buyer of a boxed copy, just OEM prebuilt machines.

    --
    I hate sigs.
  105. they are just trying to push people towards another goal...perpetual licensing. For a small monthly fee of 29.99 you can license our OS & Software and never worry about installs/activation/etc, just a conection to the internet. In otherwords a service based approach. To access Office services, guess what pay the fee! No fee and you can't get to your data because the software is on their servers. Find a way to read the data at home? Guess what, they change their file formatting, so you either cant edit what you already have or you have to start over. Guess what, just pay the fee. Plus the fact that Joe user usually likes the low low price of $X/month as opposed to $399 up front - look at all the people that get into credit trouble because they figure they can pay the bill over time.

  106. Maybe it's for the better. by CMan0 · · Score: 1

    In the end if Windows is well enough protected, many users of pirated copies will move to linux.

  107. No, sorry by dtfinch · · Score: 0

    "We don't want you to use our operating system." - Microsoft

  108. Who gets media anymore? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    The last two XP loaded machines I bought didn't come with orginal MS media, OEM media, boot diskettes or anything else. They gave me 6 blank CD's and a system recovery program and said "Good luck, burn these and don't lose them".

    Seriously we are maybe 2 years away from being able to replicate 100% of the desktop functionality of WinXP using Linux. And with the exception of Visio there are no office desktop applications from MS that you HAVE to run in Wine in lieu of native Linux apps.

    1. Re:Who gets media anymore? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      > Seriously we are maybe 2 years away from being able to replicate 100% of the desktop functionality of WinXP using Linux.

      2 years? what? Fedora 3 is better than windows already.

      Replicate all the windows functionality? oh yeah... all the useful functionality has been in linux for a couple of years but they're just adding blue-screen support and a DLL-problem-emulator now.

    2. Re:Who gets media anymore? by phuturephunk · · Score: 1

      If there isn't a major push to port gaming to Linux in an effective way (and before you start screaming at me..NO this hasn't happened yet), it will never occupy the hotseat.

      I run FD3 on my main box at home, but honestly that's really only because A) I have the desire to learn how *nix platforms work and B) I have a laptop juiced to the gills with power that XP is installed on that I can game with. I can tell you for sure that if I didn't have a powerful PC to run Windows on, the FD box would have been relegated to one of my junkers that I experiment with.

      In this scenario I kind of liken the Windows box to a good old gaming console (which, coincidently is my first overall choice for gaming, period), it works (for the most part) and you don't really have to fiddle with it if you do normal system cleanup and maintenance. The reason the XP box wins in this case is because I really don't have the desire to try to get Sim City 4 and other games I play working properly in Wine. Its fire and forget, just like a Console beats a PC hands down. Insert CD, load, go. That simple.

      If Linux can't replicate this effectively, it will never be top dog. But that's secondary to the real problem, as I see it, with Linux: Installing programs..which..no matter how you want to dress it up..whether it be Yum, Apt, whatever..its still a pain in the friggen ass.

    3. Re:Who gets media anymore? by gelfling · · Score: 1

      Yes I meant office/school use and not entertainment. My bad. If you know RH/Fedora then there are a few distros like ELX, SOT/LBA and Lorma that do a pretty credible job installing on their own brainlessly and the end result is stable and reasonably mature. The problem is that they need as much hardware as XP to run aka they are as bloated, and they run slower than they should - probably because of X, which speaks to your gaming question. But I'd like to see what happens to the computer game/super highend video card market once the next PlayStation comes out. On paper it's a graphics supercomputer and the excuse that gamers use to run their PC's - better graphics performance might disappear. I which case people will have their PS stacked on top of their Linux box with a KVM switch sharing the screen and keyboard.

    4. Re:Who gets media anymore? by gelfling · · Score: 1

      No not all the way, the desktop doesn't run with drag and drop and the 'user experience' the way WinXP does. There are some subtle differences in XP that actually make a pretty good desktop at this point.

      But I understand your point and wish for example that someone would just kill RPM and dependency hell once and for all.

  109. This is a great move by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    It will piss enough people off that something will be done.

    The first time a US senator has to call and beg for another keycode and be denied.. This nonsence will end the next day.

    I understand they want to curb piracy, but you dont do it by upseting your customer base. That only INCREASES the problem.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:This is a great move by microbrewer · · Score: 1

      One just needs to look at the RIAA and MPAA and the mistakes they have made regarding piracy and alienating thier customer base some people use filesharing networks just to annoy the hell out of the entertainment indusrty Microsoft seemed to headed down the same road.

  110. Because god forbid you should have to use a phone by agraupe · · Score: 1

    Seriously, it's maybe 5 minutes. I don't believe that anyone other than an OEM does enough Windows installs that this would be onerous. Secondly, if you are some sort of "installer" person, it is billable time. Thirdly, this means that, if all your "installs" have run out, you can explain the circumstances like, "well, given that the poor system security has forced me to reinstall this copy several times..." or "oh, yeah, I installed linux on that box, and since my XP CD isn't an OEM copy, shouldn't I be able to install it on another box?". Seriously, sometimes M$ *isn't* out to get you. This is one of those times.

  111. Why windows? by slapout · · Score: 1

    Does any one else see Longhorn as the chance to move a lot of people away from Windows? Linux and Mac are both making inroads. With Longhorn's delay, and its DRM and required activation, it might be a time for the general public to rethink their relationship with Microsoft. This could be the big chance to move in a different direction.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  112. Hmmmm... Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could it really be true that in a single 30 day period, Apple launches new, cheaper, easier to use personal computers, building on the Apple name spike from iPods and Microsoft takes steps that make life in Wintel land even more onerous?

    Truly, someone is asleep at the helm over there in Redmond.

    The fun part is this... they could introduce a whole new activation procedure in Longhorn. Change things to improve piracy protection. Offer it as a new OS, no upgrades, just buy it if you want it and start from scratch on licensing. And since it's a new verison people would not care so much. Instead they choose to put in aggrevating procedures now, when Anti-MS sentiment is still high and they have no marketing hype to carry them.

    But then I guess it's only fair to let Microsoft protect themselves from piracy. I mean after all, they hardly make any money as it is...

  113. The more you tighten your grip.... by DickBreath · · Score: 0

    Remember what princess Leah said...

    The more you tighten your grip, the more systems will slip through your fingers.


    Hey, at least be greatful that Microsoft is not yet charging a "per incident" support fee when you call to activate your system.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  114. Re:Because god forbid you should have to use a pho by Vo0k · · Score: 1

    Yeah. 5 mins of waiting on hook, then 15 mins of trying to converse with american representative. All for overseas international call rates. And add that to the bill, in eastern europe. I don't think my customer would be happy to be billed extra 50% because of registration process.
    Much more likely I'll bring a keygen/crack from astalavista.box.sk and reinstall windows with a fake key, even if I got original OEM copy.

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  115. Attractive by b100dian · · Score: 1

    This will make even people that have a valid licence to preffer the illegal versions :-))

    Kidding.
    No offense, but this already happens to a lot of software that doesn't have an international selling, like the one that is stuffed in your mouth by governament and it's coded by 'his grandson' :p
    So windows will end writing a bad sector on my hard drive??

    --
    gtkaml.org
  116. Enterprise Keys by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Will still continue to work.

    They cant expect large corporations to have to fight with changing all their machines just because their code got leaked.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  117. Re:Because god forbid you should have to use a pho by man_ls · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has regional offices all over the globe. On the activation screen, you pick which country you're in, out of a list of around 100, and they provide a local, or at least in-country, phone number (oftentimes a toll-free number.)

    Nice try, but, your complaints aren't valid.

  118. Will OEMs supply full versions of XP? by JustNiz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now that Microsoft have made it very clear to the masses that they can't re-use OEM versions of XP, I wonder if many people will start demanding OEMs to supply full versions?

    At that point in time, people will realise how much Microsoft is charging for a full version of their crappy OS and probably go to Linux or Apple instead.

    I can't wait.

  119. rofl ;P XP users suck and this article says why. by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    Heh, product activation. WHat a joke, and its on us consumers.

    Good thing I use a student (Professional) version of WIn2k with no activation, serials, or other nuisances required. Just slot the disc and after X hours, its ready to roll. And I bought 3 of these discs.. 5$ each from the school bookstore.

    The scheme they had on these discs reminded me of another scheme used on another set of OS discs..

    Can you name another set of programs and OS that is relatively cheap (pay for media), no call home behavior, no serials, and in general things mostly work..

    Oh, thats right. Linux ;)

    --
  120. They'll need 2,600 folks/1M activations a month by Jerry · · Score: 1

    if each activation takes 25 minutes, citing one poster's experience.

    If they don't employ enough Indians the bottleneck will drive putative Windows users mad.

    Come on over to Linux, folks, where you are treated like human beings, not corporate cash fodder.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  121. Re:Only makes sensehttp://slashdot.org/search.pl?t by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    I actually thought that they were doing this on purpose for the sake of making it easy to steal, thus maintaining their monopoly.

    Just because they are now requiring phone activation does not mean that you were wrong.

    Its the drug dealer free sample business model. All the "free" ones that got hooked will have to pay or switch (withdraw).

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  122. Every program? by hazzey · · Score: 1

    I just hope that the call centers know about every microsoft sponsored licensing program. I don't want the call center to give me a hard time just because microsoft had some special deal with my school and it sounds funny when I tell them that I just got windows for free.

  123. Incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is incredibly hideous. I mean, hey man, like, even though you spent a lot of money developing your product, and man, like made all a lot of your employees rich for working very hard, like, hey man, your just the man. So like why don't you just give us all your money and software. Capitalism is dead man! long live peace!

    Anyone else going to Woodstock 1 next month?

  124. Re:Because god forbid you should have to use a pho by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

    I am "some sort of 'installer' person", in my capacity as home-user tech-support. Many repairs involve a re-install. Yes, it is billable time, but it will put our re-install price up. Customers will not be too pleased about this, and may go to less reputable repair shops who use key-gens and dodgy keys, as they are cheaper.
    The effect in this area is to push more people towards illegitimate copies of Windows, and less business for us honest repair shops.

    Thanks, Microsoft!

    --
    b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
    MadDwarf
  125. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  126. Here's another loophole... by slasher999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...that I discovered accidentally. You can install and activate OEM versions of Windows using the the same activation code multiple times so long as the hardware is identical. I accidentally installed the same OEM pack on two machines. Both activated with zero problems within a week of each other. Of course this wouldn't have created too big of an issue since each machine did have it's own key stuck to the side of the machine.

    1. Re:Here's another loophole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  127. Ghost, ghost, ghost by initialE · · Score: 1

    The real lesson here is, the moment you get your box, repartition it and ghost the system partition!
    I can't say how much time it's saved me, and you'll never have to call their tech support

    --
    Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    1. Re:Ghost, ghost, ghost by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      The real lesson here is, the moment you get your box, repartition it and ghost the system partition!

      Not a bad idea... except for the Ghosting and repartitioning part.

      Let me be more specific:

      Ghosting and repartitioning is great for you and me.

      Ghosting and repartitioning is not a realistic option for the Average Computer User.

      Now, some would say reinstallation is also not a realistic option for the ACU, but I've known many ACUs that have simply had no choice. Yes, they've needed help (often from me) and yes, they just do whatever the expert in their life tells them to do. But is Microsoft slowly ratcheting downt he screws to the point that that their personal expert will have to tell them to buy a new copy of WinXP, Longhorn, Etc? I think they are.

      The only good that could possibly come from this is that some of these people are gonna refuse to pay the MS tax yet again and they'll load up a copy of Fedora. Unfortuneatly, the more likely outcome is that it will turn them into Technical Pirates who'll use bootleg copies of the OS because it's too much of a hassle to get MS to give them permission to reload their legal copy.

      TW

  128. NOT true by Martin_Flory · · Score: 1

    Stop drinking at these hours, man!!

    This has BIG impact on MOST "real" pirates as you call them!

    Most of them, are just related to tech saavy people, either friends of family or even customers of an extra-pirate computer guy. So, when having a pirated copy of Windows becomes hard for the average Joe or Jane, they will probably buy a copy. Plain and simple.

    1. Re:Not true by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
      and salesmen need Outlook.

      I used to work in sales. I needed Outlook like I needed a bad rash. We dumped it for Mozilla Thunderbird.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
  129. What's bizarre about that by Fencepost · · Score: 1
    Quote "Seeing as how the typical OEM would normally preactivate Windows XP, most legitimate users shouldn't have much need to go through the activation process," is that it doesn't make any sense. Almost any OEM is going to configure an image, then run sysprep on it before loading it onto PCs go go out. After sysprep, you need to activate.

    I guess I could be wrong though - Dell's not a typical OEM is it?

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  130. THIS IS A NON-ISSUE by Jarnis · · Score: 1

    RTFA

    The change only relates to *preinstalled*, *pre-activated* copies of *major OEM builders*. Dells and such.

    Hint: when you (re)install a Dell with the CD that came, you do not need to activate.

    Now if you use the Product Key on the sticker of the Dell to install 'normal' Windows Home CD to another computer, it obiviously asks you to activate.

    Difference is that the 'special' Dell OS CD is made for that Dell model, and preapproved as activated. Nobody should ever NEED to activate these copies when they are ran on the system they were sold with. And, lookie, OEM copies are supposed to be nontransferrable.

    The idea is to stop the (common) cases of moving stickers from preinstalled Dells to other computers, and preloading OS using the key of the Dell. The original Dell user wont be needing the key - the recovery CD works fine without it - so people are reselling the stickers.

    Now if you install a normal XP with a Dell key, you need to talk to MS and 'answer correctly' how you got the key.

    1. Re:THIS IS A NON-ISSUE by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and most people use systems from the 20 top vendors. That would be why they are the top 20 (by definition?).

      Yes, and the systems are "pre-activated". If Windows is re-installed after format, activation is needed. (Hard drive failure would count, as well, as would putting in the latest&greatest video card for gaming).

      Yes, and Microsoft has avowed that this policy will be extended.

      Which part the the fine article did you read?

      As to non-transferrable OEM copy... Do you mean to imply that *if* I purchase a PC on the used market, that the OS is *not* transferred? That I do not have normal copyright rights?

      ---

      Ratboy

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    2. Re:THIS IS A NON-ISSUE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you have the correct answer and displayed it in a well written manner.

      Should have a score of +5 Informative.

      But since it's about Microsoft, you get a -500 Troll and a kick in the groin, instead.

    3. Re:THIS IS A NON-ISSUE by Jarnis · · Score: 1

      All preinstall-OEM copies I've seen do *not* ask for the CD-key during installation, nor they need any activation - unless there is a major hardware change

    4. Re:THIS IS A NON-ISSUE by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      Do you mean that a hard drive failure or a video card change does not constitute a major hardware change?

      Please note that I specifically cited these two cases.

      Ratboy.

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
  131. Mod up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's right you know ;)

  132. MS Windows == Warez anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shitty crap warez to boot. No one in their right mind should pay to install Windows. In fact MS should be paying us to install it.

    Piracy hurting you M$ ? Good. Hope that and your virus menagerie ends up wiping you and your joke OS off the planet.

  133. Do I need to call? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should I call when I install Linux on my old Windows machines? I think that would be a great campaign...

    When you are ready to make the switch, please call Microsoft's license line and tell them you want to reinstall your OS. When they ask you for your key, ask them if they are sure they want you to read it out loud.

    When they say yes, proceed with reading them the key generated by sshd during your first boot. When they say thats not the key, ask if they want you to generate a new key with ssh-keygen. When they say no, give us the key from your certificate, let them know that the Linux ISO you downloaded for free doesn't have a CD case and you just want to be sure its ok to install it over windows.

  134. FUD? Or just bad journalism? by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

    No sources mentioned, no "we beleive ...", just "here are some 'facts'".

    Where do they get their info? Is there any source we can independantly check?
    If this article was a post on this forum, it would be modded down and never read.
    (Note to self: mail /. about being able to mod stories).

    --
    b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
    MadDwarf
  135. If I ever have to call by afstanton · · Score: 1

    to activate Windows, I'm just going to remove it entirely from my machine and use a different operating system.

    --
    Reject Fear - Embrace Hope
  136. Hello Microsoft? by u16084 · · Score: 1

    MS: This Is Your 25th Install In the last 4 years. ME: So? MS: I'm gonna have to ask you some questions to confirm this activation. Me: Sure MS: On your 2nd Install, What was the IP you used to activate online? MS: ALso, I'm gonna need the mac address. Me: Ummm MS: ALso, on your 7th install, I'm gonna need the date and time of the install. me: Umm...??? MS: Also, You're gonna have to guess what country I'm in, and my native language. me: MS: IN what year did King Henry take the throne? me: FCKGW-RH.......

    --
    -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
  137. that's just fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    I switched my wife from a decent PC running win2K 2 years back because my son would ramdonly press the keys or shut off the machine. I'm not joking when I say this. I had to do a clean install of windows twice a year because of that. You wouldn't believe how fast a young child can crash windows by pressing keys randomly for 2 minutes.

    Now that the wife is on a mac, I've had to re-install zero times. my son can do all sorts of crazy stuff on the mac and it doesn't crash. This just gives me one more reason to never buy a PC. As long I have my windows laptop for programming and work, all my other systems can be Macs.

  138. A better solution... by yeremein · · Score: 1

    ...don't stick the product key to the side of the computer where it can be easily stolen! Sheesh!

  139. Half-true... by mangu · · Score: 2, Informative
    IF YOU BUY A NEW COMPUTER FROM ONE OF THESE 'MAJOR VENDORS,' YOU DON'T HAVE TO ACTIVATE IT. THE SYSTEM MANUFACTURER ACTIVATES YOUR COPY OF WINDOWS WHEN THE COMPUTER IS BUILT.


    True


    You can reinstall the operating system on that computer using the original Windows XP CD as many times as you want, with no activation required.


    False. I have an HP/Compaq (is this vendor "major" enough for you?) notebook which came with XP pre-installed, no activation needed. But when I did the reinstall that XP seems to require every six months or so, with the original CD, it wouldn't run before I did the activation.

  140. All just the run-up to "Tiger" by Nice2Cats · · Score: 1
    Somebody at Apple just wet their pants in glee when they read that -- great timing, Microsoft, making life harder for Windows users when Mac OS X "Tiger" is about to come out. Or will they just assume that Apple has these stupid activation rules?

    Anyway -- all I still use Windows for is to play "Age of Kings", and since I keep getting my ass kicked on the higher levels by the Spanish, I think I just might give that up, too.

  141. so many posts about the greatness of linux by SammysIsland · · Score: 1

    Listen... people aren't going to switch to linux until it is user friendly, and recognizes 99% of hardware off the bat like windows. stop living the dream! i fought with my linux box for hours trying to get a linksys wireless card to work properly when it took all of 13 seconds to get it up and running in windows. When linux finally does have this wonderful user friendly OS attitude, it will be as big and clunky as windows...

    1. Re:so many posts about the greatness of linux by spisska · · Score: 1

      The strength of Linux is not in its ease of use or setup, but in the fact that you have complete control over your whole system. It's not designed to be painless, it just happens to be getting easier and easier every day.

      I assume that even before you installed Linux and/or bought your card that you googled and checked the various forums to make sure the card would work with your distribution and kernel. If not, it's rather like complaining that you can't install your ElCheapo WinModem on a Mac.

      If you did a little digging, you would find that you can install your linksys wireless driver by using ndiswrapper and the original MS driver. If you did a little more digging, you would be able to determine the exact chipset of your card and find a native Linux driver for it.

      By the time you finished (and it really doesn't take all that long) not only is card instaled and working, but you now have a much better idea of how the card works, how the operating system works, how TCP/IP and other network components work, and you are much more able to add features to your network or troubleshoot when the need arises.

      You're not going to get a whole lot of sympathy by complaining that you can't run your own system because you haven't done sufficient research.

      If you dig around and ask questions, you will find that people are very helpful. This is what makes OSS in general and Linux in particular so strong. If you complain that Linux stinks because you're unable to follow directions, well there's not much help anyone can give.

  142. Sorry, maybe I just need some sleep, but... by DimGeo · · Score: 1

    ... how exactly is that going to affect users that just pirate the corporate version (the version that is usually pirated) - that requires no activation in the first place?

    Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca.

  143. The life of a MS Activation Specialist. by MadcatX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I used to be a MS Windows Activation Specialist (a.k.a. the person you hate to call all the time if you format often) for a year in a call center in my hometown of Saint John, Canada. People who wanted to re-activate their Windows would have to answer my questions first. So I have first-hand experience of how much people hate having to call. To be fair, we did get calls from people who, after we checked their Product ID, knew they were using a burnt copy. From this, you would surmise that this system is helping to fight against piracy, right? WRONG! As long as you answered the questions correctly (which mostly consists of why they need to reactivate), their's no problem. Thus you could call in, give a cheap excuse (The most used one being the "had to format", and even if this key's been used a hundred times, we had to activate again.) The one thing I hated to have to tell people, and it happened often, was that they could only install a retail copy of windows onto one computer and one laptop (This policy might have changed, not too sure). I found this to be a silly rule, which often infuriated the user on the other end of the line. And if you have an OEM version on one computer but own two, sorry, your out of luck, you need to buy a retail ver. of windows for that second computer. From my experience, it is my belief that the combination of both the Windows OS EULA and the activation process most likely caused more people to get pirated versions (I've had many people tell me they were going to this over the phone.)

    --
    - "I reject your reality and substitute it with my own", Adam Savage
    1. Re:The life of a MS Activation Specialist. by Cracell · · Score: 2, Informative

      ok, so basically you're saying this move is pointless

      I agree for several reason, one there are activation cracks, and will continue to be. Two it will encourage people to switch to linux. Three won't it cost them more then the lose to hire additional phone activation people?

      --
      Signatures are so 90s
    2. Re:The life of a MS Activation Specialist. by MadcatX · · Score: 1

      Your first point is true. As for people switching to Linux, and as much as I would love to see this happen, one must admit that at this particular time, Windows is one of the most user-friendly.... correction... easiest to learn OS's on the market. So for those people who are computer newbies, and there are many, they can't fathom using anything but windows. However, the Linux community is definitly catching up, with many distro's becoming easier to use without much knowledge about the OS. I can see the day come where UNIX OS's will have the same ease-of-use yet still retain it's defining qualities (security, customization, etc.)

      As For those having to pay alot for the phone activation personnel, MS found a convenient way to save some cash there. By outsourcing to Canada and other countries, they usually don't have to pay as much in way of wages. As well, here and Canada anyways, the government gives large grants to companies, usually call centers since they hire alot of people. That way MS can get a foreign government to pay for a healthy chunk of their operation.

      One thing MS knows how to do well is milk the cash cow.

      --
      - "I reject your reality and substitute it with my own", Adam Savage
    3. Re:The life of a MS Activation Specialist. by boudie · · Score: 1

      Nice to know that my hard earned tax dollars are going to support the
      richest company in the world.
      Those bastards.

  144. Brilliant by bitswapper · · Score: 1



    I woke up this morning looking for a reason to spend time on the phone with microsoft. Otherwise, I'd never have anyone to call.

  145. New Apple Campaign Slogan by Shmr0ck · · Score: 0

    Apple needs a new campaign.. Instead of "Switch", it should be "Run like Hell!"

  146. Mod down, (-1, Astroturfing) by mangu · · Score: 2, Insightful
    People still view Linux as a server OS, hard to use, and not friendly to people who have less than 5 minutes to read a help file. People stay on Windows.


    At this moment, there are two main reasons why people don't migrate to Linux: (1) XP has more games, (2) XP comes preinstalled. None of these reasons are affected by this XP activation issue. However, this new restriction in activation is certainly not something that will increase Microsoft's revenue.


    If you consider that most people buy computers with the OS preinstalled and call an expert whenever a re-install is needed, you are right that this new inconvenience won't bother many people. But it's certainly an additional unneeded inconvenience, and it won't bother pirates at all. It bothers the legitimate user and doesn't affect the illegitimate ones.


    If you have done any comparison on recent versions of Linux and XP, you'll have noticed that Linux is already easier and faster to install from scratch than XP. Why create more obstacles to the legitimate clients?

    1. Re:Mod down, (-1, Astroturfing) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Yes, both reasons explain why many people are exposed to XP in the first place, but the parent has a lot of validity in what he's saying. Beyond support for more games and getting preinstalled, Linux needs to be less complex. I don't mind doing research to find out which program to get to compile a driver for another driver to work, and maybe you don't either, but most people do.

      Plenty of people will move to something new if it's easier to do. Yahoo used to be the most popular search engine, but geeks heralded Google and now it's become a common verb because of it's popularity. IE comes preinstalled, but geeks started using FireFox and now a whole lot of people on my campus do. The trick is for people to be able to make the switch easily and quickly.

      The research for this has already been done for you. Look at Apple's ads targetting current Windows users. Each ad does two things:

      1) highlights the problems with windows
      2) highlights the ease of the switch to OS X.

      If Linux advocates are really serious about getting their OS out there to the average user, you have to make it:

      1) Easier to use. Steps have already been taken in the right direction with the popular distro's installers and so on. But drivers should be double click installable. When a program needs to be installed, 3 or 4 things shouldn't have to be downloaded in advance (this annoyed the shit out of me when I first started using Linux). Moreover, the Linux community has to quit being so pretenious. Yes, you've had to explain that simple build command 8,000 times before. Yes, there is proper documentation already in existance, if they only bothered to do a few simple searches. But that's what comes with average user migration. Without being prepared for that, with wide open arms, Linux will never be a serious contender.

  147. Use Windows 2000 by simetra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Really... Is there any reason to use XP over win2K? Besides the Fisher-Price interface?

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:Use Windows 2000 by c_ollier · · Score: 1

      Is there any reason to use XP over win2K?

      Hyperthreading (two "logical / virtual" processors on one Pentium IV) isn't very well supported in windows 2000.

    2. Re:Use Windows 2000 by cardpuncher · · Score: 1

      Since Microsoft is apparently planning to require some sort of registration/authentication even of Windows 2K systems before delivering future updates, you'll have the same issue whichever version you use...

    3. Re:Use Windows 2000 by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Windows 2000 does not have native dual head support, for video cards with 2 or more outputs. Some drivers (like for Matrox) implement it for 2000, but others (ATI) do not.

    4. Re:Use Windows 2000 by botsmaster25 · · Score: 1

      I am using an ATI 9800 Pro on Windows 2000 and I have dual head support.

      To answer the parent, the only reason I have found to use XP instead of 2000 is for Cleartype font display.

    5. Re:Use Windows 2000 by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Actually, I somewhat prefer the XP GUI, although I invariably deactivate much of the eye-candy, along with the file-extension- and keyboard-shortcut-hiding, the "common tasks" nonsense, the search puppy, ...alright, so almost all of it is pointless and annoying. It's skinnable, though - you just need to apply a little patch before you can use third-party *.msstyles (no shareware required). Since I hate the blocky "classic" look at least as much as the waterwingness of "Luna", that's a good thing. I also really like those file-browsing-capable toolbars in addition to the usual "quick launch" type ones - are they available on 2K? (Example screenshot)

      As for not so superficial differences --

      Fast user switching. (Not particularly necessary, but can be useful.)
      Remote desktop. (Available on 2K? I guess one might as well use VNC or something?)
      Somewhat better MS-DOS app support? (Not sure, again. Can't say I'd miss it much anyway.)
      Built-in firewall. (Which I never use.)
      Clear Type.
      Better out-of-the-box hardware support (Presumably.)
      (I'm sure there's more.)

      Not sure though whether any of this really constitutes a "reason". I've not used 2K at home so I'm not sure what it's like with all the latest service packs installed. I guess right now I'd choose 2K over XP myself if I had to make the choice.

    6. Re:Use Windows 2000 by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Hm... what about nvidia? And what about using two graphics cards? Win 98 handled that just fine.

    7. Re:Use Windows 2000 by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      for video editing, XP is better due to large file support (or was it large partition size support). I forget, exactly.

      not a huge deal.

      also, some drivers are ONLY xp. intel raid (on my 1yr old asus mobo) has ONLY xp support if you want onboard intel raid.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    8. Re:Use Windows 2000 by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1
      Really... Is there any reason to use XP over win2K? Besides the Fisher-Price interface?

      Not entirely sure. The main thing keeping me from buying XP for my machine (before I ditched Win2K and went for linux) was the activation.
      I use XP here at work, and it's the OS on my parents' laptop, and from a usage point of view I actually prefer it over Windows 2000.

      For all I tend to slag off Microsoft, I actually think XP was probably the best version of Windows and were it not for the activation would have bought a copy to replace XP on my main PC. The idea of having reinstalls and hardware changes hampered by the activation was too much to stomach, however. (That and I have serious anxiety issues when making non-personal phone calls, meaning anything that might require a phonecall simply to use the damn system is an instant no-go for me. Support calls I can handle, activating something I've already paid for is too much)
      It's a shame, really, as some of the improvements made between 2000 and XP were really good.

      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  148. Wow by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Greedy Microsoft pissing off users again - who would have thought it.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  149. From my experience... by ABaumann · · Score: 1

    It seems like they've always had this. I used to reinstall XP every other month it seems. (Windows systems tend to bog down if you don't.) If the hardware wasn't changed, I didn't have to call M$. However, if any part of the hardware changed, I had to call M$, and the conversations went something like this:

    M$ Techie: What'd you do!?!
    Me: I installed a new processor.
    M$: Why would you do that?
    Me: Because I have no financial responsibility
    M$: So are you sure you didn't just steal a copy?
    Me: Yup.
    M$: Okay, here's a new code.

    Now, I'm a happy Mac user. Granted, I can't build/upgrade my own system anymore, but at least it's freaking stable.

  150. Free Software by Mmm+coffee · · Score: 1

    For all the people who dismiss Richard Stallman's writings as nuts, I would like note that this story serves as a perfect example of how your freedoms are affected by non-Free software.

    You paid your hard earned money for use of this software. You can not legally modify the software to your hearts content (try creating a server/dumb terminal windows distro for your office, for example). You can not look at the source code to find out how the OS _really_ works without signing a draconian NDA. (Indeed, Windows seems designed to be as confusing and difficult to modify as possible to keep people from mucking with it.) You must buy a copy for each computer you install it on, which sucks if you just want to set up a cheap box for your kids. You must comply with a sketchy EULA that when voided makes your copy as legal as one downloaded off P2P. And having read and understood the EULAs to all versions of Windows, I can almost state as fact that a good 75% of Windows users who think they are legal are actually not.

    And now you have to call up Microsoft just to get your damn copy of Windows to work. You have paid your money for this software and are assumed to be a criminal for it until you get the smile and node of Steve Ballmer? Wake up and stop bending over! You should not need to knowingly break the law in order to use your software! You don't need to click "next" on draconian EULA's, trying to stay blissfully ignorant of what you have agreed to! The articles written by the Free Software Foundation that talk about freedoms lost are not the ramblings of some dusty academics, they are fighting what people do their best to stay ignorant of every time they sit in front of a computer!

    Every Windows user is giving up their freedom to click on icons and be annoyed by clippy. This article is damn good proof that those who speak of software freedom might actually know what they're talking about.

  151. OEM pricing by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    Maybe if their software wasn't so stupidly priced (£179 for an OS is stupid) then there would be more legitimate users.

    The fact that an OEM version costs much less and the fact that you will find it very hard to buy a PC without Windows (and thus reuse your existing expensive Windows CD/license) just shows why people pirate their software.

    1. Re:OEM pricing by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      Maybe if their software wasn't so stupidly priced (£179 for an OS is stupid) then there would be more legitimate users.

      I'm sorry, have you ever created, distributed, and supported an operating system while tracking costs enough to determine their price is stupid?

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
  152. All I have to say is... by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    The tighter you grasp, the more systems will slip through your fingers!

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  153. Princess Leia says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The more you tighten your grip, the more systems will slip through your fingers...

    I have done 2 system upgrades recently in companies with 100-200 employees. The companies had both decided to donate all their old pc's to charity, take the tax writeoff and buy all new equipment. When I broke down the costs of software and support for them (I'm more or less neutral since I can play Windows and Linux without any issues), both opted for global Linux installs on desktops and servers. Openoffice and Evolution sealed the end-user usability deal both times and reduction in costs (no per-seat OS licensing, Exchange licensing, Virus software licensing, etc).

    It works great for me since less money spent on useless licensing leaves more for services and support. Less downtime for them makes me look like the hero. Good for everyone.

  154. My Assertions by Ucklak · · Score: 1

    Well I for one will use my licensed verion of Windows 2000 when I needs a Windows system. I will also use that version to play games. If I need Windows 98, I reboot and select Windows 98 and play those games that only run on Win98.

    I won't personally use WinXP because I disagree with the EULA and frankly, since I'm Linux/Mac OSX at home, don't need to except for my old parallel port scanner that still works, the older games and flight simulators that I have.

    People who value their time don't use Windows.
    (ex MS Trooper, MSCE NT4)

    --
    if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    1. Re:My Assertions by rikkards · · Score: 1

      You may want to look into Dosbox http://dosbox.sourceforge.net/news.php?show_news=1 so you can get rid of 98 and not have to reboot. It may do what you need.

  155. Cracking the phne activation takes no skill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    While cracking windows PA is probably low on the skill list of serious programmers, hacking their operators is a game anyone can have fun at..I once installed winxp on a machine, activated it, installed it on the next machine and when online activation failed, called up and told her it was a reinstall and she gave me a new key..woot...10 minutes later both machines had good keys...

  156. Take your own advice by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Informative

    See, that's the kind of "users are idiots _and_ thieves" mentality that's causing the problem in the first place. (And not just Windows. I wish all those idiot game publishers who now even want to install low level copy protection drivers on my machine would die a slow painful death. Cancer, for example.)

    The fact is, users may not be versed in fine points like configuring a firewall or understanding security threats (then again, 90%+ of programmers have no clue about security either), but they _can_ Google, you know. You'd be surprised how finding a copy-protection crack for just about _anything_ takes mere minutes. Even little old grandmas know how to google nowadays, or get told how to real quick.

    Also those users do _not_ live in a vaccuum, as the software companies and movie producers seem to assume. They seem to think the Earth is made of some 6 billion hermits, each living on a separate mountain top, and never talking to each other. If one of them found out how to download a crack or warez on P2P, surely noone else can learn that from him or her. Sad to say, that's not how it works.

    If they're friends or family of a pirate, guess what? They'll get an already patched CD from that pirate. Or a CD and including the patch program separately. And then copy that CD further for others.

    Or they'll get pointed at www.gamecopyworld.com, or whatever other crack site fits their particular problem, by someone who knows. E.g., someone like me.

    Now I don't support piracy, and in fact I'm firmly against it, but I support idiotic copy protection schemes even less. Copy protection just doesn't work. Period. As was said, the _only_ ones affected are the honest paying customers. And I'll be damned if I'm gonna support that kind of thing.

    When someone bought a product, it wasn't because they're too stupid to google for a crack, it was because they actually wanted to go buy it. Whoever wanted to pirate the stuff, actually went and pirated it.

    And then going and dragging the paying users through indignities like having to call tech support to get their product activated (oops, some kiddie with a serial number generator already used yours, so more time on the phone is needed), or like having copy-protection-related trouble in the game they paid for (we'll just make your game crash because your CD drive is called "E:" instead of "D:", so surely you're a bloody pirate with CD emulator software), is just stupid and uncalled for.

    Not that it will stop greedy corporate fucks from doing it anyway. There's a class of people for whom money is the only thing in life, and worth pursuing no matter what collateral damage they cause. Even when they don't even get that money.

    The thought "but we could make 100 extra bucks from the only 2 guys in the world who don't already know how to download a crack" just overloads their brains. They just _have_ to get that 100$ at all cost, even if it means kicking every single honest user in the teeth. With steel toed boots.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Take your own advice by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why I have not purchased half-life 2. I am not willing to play their stupid product activation game - I just want to play the half-life game. I am not willing to be treated like a criminal to get there, however. I'm a gamer and this is probably the most anticipated game of... well, quite some time, at least for PC gamers. It doesn't matter how many people they kick in the teeth, they're not getting my money.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Take your own advice by cojsl · · Score: 1

      It's very sad that you would wish that someone ("idiot game publishers")"would die a slow painful death. Cancer, for example.)" over a game. Wishing long lasting suffering on someone simply because you are inconvenienced in your entertainment is horribly callous. I also realize you are probably being facetious, but a statement like that is beyond the pale.

    3. Re:Take your own advice by eggsome · · Score: 1

      Copy protection just doesn't work. Period.

      I agree with everything in your comment except for this. I too have been disgusted with the way software insists that it must control my computer to allow me to use a particular program.
      However, recently I discovered that the copy protection on a game that I wanted to play (TrackMania) is not only good in the sense that it does not install drivers or require the removal of other software, but also is also good in sense that it has not been cracked since the most recent version of the outsourced copy protection was updated (StarForce I believe) many months ago.

      --
      If they made a movie of your life, would anybody buy a ticket?
  157. as sharp as a sack of wet mice by rinoid · · Score: 1

    I tell you this move is hideous.

    I just tried to install the Microsoft anti-spyware beta. (how could one resist with this dorky picture?? http://rino.bowdoin.edu/img/dork.jpg)

    Well have you tried? You are taken to the biggest of big brother pages, the About Genuine Microsoft Software screeds!!! What a pant-load. You can't download the anti-spyware until you allow an active-x control to do something on your computer to verify that indeed, you are running Windows (well ok a valid purchased copy of windows).

    It's sick and they just keep getting sicker.

  158. Good idea! by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    This will, for sure, stop the pirates who are using XP Pro Corp. Because Pro Corp doesn't need to be activated. That's a good idea, Microsoft. Throw in an activation system, but disable it for one version of the OS.. That won't get out on the intarweb.

    (Posting from a.. not quite legal copy of XP)

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  159. Not all Keys are disabled for online activation by Zoid · · Score: 1
    Did anyone actually read the article?
    But Microsoft plans to change all this. Starting February 28, Microsoft will indefinitely begin to disable Internet product activation on OEM keys used by the top 20 worldwide PC makers.
    They are only disabling activation for the most widely used OEM keys that are typically stolen for Piracy. From what I understand, this doesn't affect normal retail keys that are individually printed and used.
    --
    /// Zoid.
  160. Why even activate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Five words: RESET DOT EE EXX EEE

    fuck you, lameness filter

  161. It's almost like the movies. by RabidLobster · · Score: 1

    Get a nice overview on Microsoft anti-piracy efforts, put some popcorns on the stove and find a comfy couch. As pointed out in previous comments, those of us who would never dream of paying for something like Windows won't have to because of this initiative. Nobody will be stopped by this. I'm completely confident that I will be able to find an activation crack the minute I need to reinstall XP. That's the way it's been since prehistoric days, Microsoft didn't have a clue then, they don't have a clue now. The fact that I've bought a number of computers since XP was released, and ALL of those "included" Windows XP but only as a ghost image on a hidden partition of the harddrive, is reason enough for me to use pirated copies. I hope they produce more and similar "anti piracy" efforts. It's hilarious. And I love the feeling of being a criminal every time I use their software, it's like I'm getting back at them, one activation a time.

  162. Bad article title by mh101 · · Score: 1

    When I first read Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activation, I thought 'Woohoo!"

    Until I read the text, that is. =( Crap, I was planning on doing a reinstall in the next couple weeks since everything's really messed up - but I won't have time until well after the 28th. =(

    --
    Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
    1. Re:Bad article title by mh101 · · Score: 1

      Never mind... just read the article more thoroughly, and it's just OEM copies that are affected. =D

      --
      Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
  163. The Oracle database uses no copy protection... by emil · · Score: 1

    ...and they are the second largest software corporation in the world.

    Software producers, take note: you do not need copy protection to be profitable.

  164. As a system admin for a "consulting" company... by Seng · · Score: 1

    This REALLY pisses me off. Do they have any clue how many times the following thing happens? a) Users at XYZ Corp. get spyware or virus infection on their entire network. b) Only reasonably sure way of removing it all is to reinstall 20 client machines at once Now, we'll have C) Reading 500 digit f'ing OEM codes into a computerized phone system. Think about the poor souls having to do this... 20x5 minutes is a hell of a lot of time to waste fucking around with Microshaft's BS.

    1. Re:As a system admin for a "consulting" company... by omega9 · · Score: 1
      Could possibly be better solved by:
      • Standardized Ghost images
      • RIS
      • Corporate keys for clients
      • Imagecast-alike program


      Exactly how long have you been a "systems admin"? Would not only keep you from having yo reenter keys, but would more importantly make the job a lot less painful.
      --
      I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
  165. Not sustainable by fitten · · Score: 1

    I dunno what they are thinking... how are they going to handle 100M calls to activate each time they release something new?

    1. Re:Not sustainable by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

      It onl effects past XP versions sold by large license holding OEMs. Retail versions are not effected at all and OEMs from here forward are also not effected. The likelyhood of falling in the pool of licenses that require a phone call is very small when compared to the entire XP installation population out there.

    2. Re:Not sustainable by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Hm. If you don't mind a question... do you think this would/could affect me? All this talk of "preinstalled" and "preactivated" confuses me somewhat. The PC in question is brand-less and OS-less, assembled at tiny computer store. The XP now on it is a rather recent OEM version (SP2), bought a month ago or two at the same store, but installed and activated over the internet, at home, by me. Used the product key on the sticker.

    3. Re:Not sustainable by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Okay... Specifically, Certificate of Authenticity (COA) labels on PCs are often unused because OEMs preinstall Windows and bypass product activation. - I take that to mean it won't affect me? After all, the COA was used. They are unique, right? Agh. Never mind. ...

  166. Makes refunds easier by po_boy · · Score: 1

    Does this mean it will be easier for me to prove that I have never run the copy of windows I was forced to buy with my new computer? I bet that's a pretty useful thing to be able to do when you're trying to get a refund for it.

  167. Re:Copy Protection SOP -- QuarkXPress by raddan · · Score: 1
    Exactly, look at what is happening with QuarkXPress right now. We've had to deal with their licensing bullshit for years (DONGLE!!!), but NOW corporate customers (site licensees) have to run a dedicated server to hand out licenses to their clients (Quark License Administrator). And as if that wasn't bad enough, the server is notoriously buggy-- crashes all the time.

    Now our design department is saying, "Hey, InDesign is a lot cheaper, it has a useable interface, and it already works with my other tools..." And site licenses with Adobe are a piece of cake.

    I personally think that mass piracy of Quark is what made it the industry standard in the first place. Sure, it had a quite a few features that you couldn't find in PakeMaker at the time, but its interface was (and still is) horrible. So in some ways Quark owes their success to piracy.

  168. I'm sure this has already been said many times by spammacus · · Score: 1

    This is the last straw. I need a new machine, I have been trying to decide between a PC (cheap, company purchase plan) and a Mac (expensive) for some time.

    I'm going Mac. Costs more, but I actually get some rights for my money.

    I already have a copy of XP that is unusable because I tinkered with my hardware too many times and I don't feel like calling Microsoft.

    Offtopic, but what the hell: has anyone had bad experiences with the Mac Mini?

  169. No charge?? by jh6cd6d3cktp7w9h7vxw · · Score: 1

    "There is never, and has never been a charge associated with activation." Umm, yeah, except for when I have to call on my cell phone because I don't have a land line. Or perhaps I should go down to the nearest pay phone? Yeah, that would work great.

  170. Not much need to activate? by zors · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or doesn't windows require a format at least every six months, if you want it to keep functioning at peak?

    1. Re:Not much need to activate? by sapgau · · Score: 1

      You do if are constantly invaded by root kits, since there is no guarantee of removing one completely.
      SysInternals Releases RootkitRevealer

  171. Increase in outsourcing? by Enevitable · · Score: 0

    With the more calls that will be made to activate windows now, will microsoft have to outsource even more? >_>

  172. You by Professor+S.+Brown · · Score: 0, Troll

    Your name, your sig, and your entire personality = twat

    --
    Shitram Brown, PhD
    Professor of Mathematics
    1. Re:You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your first name is Shitram, and you're calling someone a twat? Hahaha! You shouldn't be calling anyone names.

  173. VMWare Affected by Lexicon · · Score: 2, Informative

    As an avid VMWare user, it looks like this is going to bite me. I blow away the OEM windows install, install Linux, then install the copy of Windows that came with the PC in a VMWare session.

    So far this has been easy, but it sounds like in the future I'm going to have to call to ask permission to do this.

    Even Windows-using developers installing VMWare for application testing are going to end up being bitten by this one.

    1. Re:VMWare Affected by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't effect you at all, unless you are trying to install a large OEM copy of XP that was purchased in the past. Any future OEM XP versions will not have this issue, because they will be internet activated, as the retail version is already. The only people this is going to snare are people who are using stole OEM copies.

    2. Re:VMWare Affected by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      It should be possible to resize the Windows partition, install Linux and VMware, and then run VMware with direct access to the Windows partition.

      Of course this limits the possibilities you have with VMware and you have to hope that XP does not see these changes (partition size, memory size etc) as suffcicient to require re-activation.

    3. Re:VMWare Affected by Lexicon · · Score: 1

      In my experience this does not work; it's a radical change of hardware from the operating system's perspective, and if it even boots it still requires re-activation.

  174. Doesn't affect my Retail copy by 55555+Manbabies! · · Score: 2, Informative

    I will be able to activate my retail copy of Windows XP Professional Edition over the Internet, instantly and hassle free. Take that OEM theives.

    1. Re:Doesn't affect my Retail copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...then wait until June... (it's coming across the board SUCKER :)

  175. Let me gueess...is a 1-900 number! by Zemplar · · Score: 1

    So much for installing XP where phones don't work or aren't readily available!

  176. Excellent opportunity for civil disobedience by halfdeadcat · · Score: 1

    Anyone interested in organizing a large group of licensed users who ALL call M$ at the same time for re-activation?

  177. Small repair shops? by Arakonfap · · Score: 1

    This IS an issue that effects people.

    With adware, viruses, and limited amount of repair options available for XP (When critical system files get damaged), computer repair shops will be very much affected by this. It will definitly raise the cost of reinstalling Windows, and the general "Total Cost of Ownership" when a reinstall needs to happen.

    I just can't imagine that paying all these people to handle activations is worth the money. Especially when this punishes the customers, and does little to help track down the copiers.

    1. Re:Small repair shops? by danheskett · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It will definitly raise the cost of reinstalling Windows
      Not if done properly first of all. If the install is done by a tech shop then they will know that you can easily backup the activation file, and restore it after re-install, and have a nice clean system with no re-activation. The vast majority of tech shops probably already do this, all the ones I am familiar with do this already.

      I just can't imagine that paying all these people to handle activations is worth the money. Especially when this punishes the customers, and does little to help track down the copiers.
      I am sure it's well worth it. It establishes the idea of Windows Has Value in peoples mind, which is key to the long term MS strategy. You can't just copy it willy nilly, like other OS's they non-informed people view as "knock-offs".

      Windows XP - especially with SP2 - is fairly resilient. Sometimes it is easier to revert to factory install - much it is rarely if ever truly *necessary*. Regardless, the average user will never face this. Even most users will never face it. And when they do, it'll be a minor inconvience, if any at all. For a good number of people they already have to call anyways, this isn't that big of a deal.

  178. logical conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $20 windows xp with $5.99 monthly fee.

  179. After you fail five times it does. by mandrake*rpgdx · · Score: 1

    It forces you to speak first, and after it fails five times then it asks you to type it in. It's not a choice up front.

    1. Re:After you fail five times it does. by NRP128 · · Score: 1

      If you just start touch-toning it in it will accept it. I've had to reactivate my student copy on here severeal times during upgrades and reinstalls and anymore i just hammer it in 5 digits at a time on the keypad. Automation is just there for the idiots. if you punch the numbers right it works everytime.

    2. Re:After you fail five times it does. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong I do a few xp activations a day. Im calling 1-800-571-2048 and you can use the touchtone right off the bat....for everything. If its asking yes or no questions just enter 1 for yes 2 for no. Then you have the enter the product ID. you can use the touchtones for this. Then when you are done with that it reads back a different confirmation ID and when its done with each set you can press 1 to read the set again 2 to skip to the next one and 3 to go back a set.

    3. Re:After you fail five times it does. by Bishop · · Score: 1

      For the letter "V" do you just type a 7 or do you have to hit 7 several times? Like a nokia phone.

    4. Re:After you fail five times it does. by NRP128 · · Score: 1

      A) i've neve rhad to enter a product key. You enter the activation code or wahtever they generate for you on screen. actually come to think of it it's in 6 digit blocks and not five. sorry for the mix up.

  180. More Posters need to read articles by jazmataz23 · · Score: 1
    Some folks (dramatic music) custom build their own computers.
    In which case, this does not apply to you. This change applies specifically and exclusively to pre-activated OEM versions of Windows XP. And if you were a (dramatic music) L33+ M@$+0r haXz0r you probably wouldn't need to reinstall so often. XP is highly retard-resistant.

    jaz

    --
    Death to Argument by Slogan!! (This post twice-encrypted with ROT-13. Replies not using same will be ignored)
    1. Re:More Posters need to read articles by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Does this apply to those of us whose machines weren't preactivated at the factory? I have a Compaq notebook that came preinstalled but required activation when it first booted it up. Even though my key is theoretically used, will MS still try to bend me over for a new license when they ask me stupid questions if I try to reinstall?

  181. Not as bad by TheCabal · · Score: 1

    as the submitter is making it out to be. Microsoft is only deactivating OEM keys that haven't been used yet. All you /. that burned a copy of your friend's XP disc should be OK.

  182. Slashdot disappoints me... SIMPLE BYPASS HERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    534 comments and no-one mentions the obvious simple workaround.

    Ok here it is:

    As long as you aren't making any hardware alterations, you can back up the activation status files before you reformat the hard drive and then restore them after you reinstall the operating system.

    To perform the backup, follow these steps:

    1. Use Windows Explorer to open the C:\Windows\System32 folder.
    2. Copy the Wpa.dbl and Wpa.bak files to a floppy disk or CD.

    To perform the restore, follow these steps:

    1. Decline the activation request at the end of the installation procedure, and restart Windows XP.
    2. During bootup, press [F8] to access the Windows Advanced Options menu.
    3. Choose the Safe Mode (SAFEBOOT_OPTION=Minimal) option.
    4. Use Windows Explorer to open the C:\Windows\System32 folder.
    5. If they exist, rename the new Wpa.dbl and Wpa.bak files to Wpadbl.new and Wpabak.new.
    6. Copy the original Wpa.dbl and Wpa.bak files from the floppy disk or CD to the C:\Windows\System32 folder.
    7. Restart the system.

  183. What if the key is stolen? by RaguMS · · Score: 1

    So if the key is stolen, the rightful owner is S.O.L.? That doesn't sound very fair. It's hard enough to convince Microsoft that we purchased their products when doing a re-activation, and the company I work for is a Microsoft Partner!

  184. Someone with mod points help the parent out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice find. It's been too long since I've looked through SysInternals offerings.

  185. MOD AC PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seems informative me..

  186. who cares by ironrhino · · Score: 1

    This will be cracked by some 10 year old Chinese kid anyways.

  187. Slashdot comments better than I thought by DaveJay · · Score: 1

    Gee, I thought that sometimes comments on Slashdot were snippy; then I got a gander at the comments on betanews. What a bunch of children.

  188. So, in short summary..... by AKosygin · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft, The more you tighten your grip [on piracy], the more [legitimate users] will slip through your fingers."

  189. Two Sides To It by FyberOptic · · Score: 1

    I think people are kind of missing the point. While it's easy to find reasons to poke fun at Microsoft, and I myself don't care for this bit of news, the fact remains that they're doing it for a reason. They lose millions of dollars in software sales due to piracy and theft like this every year. If you were in charge of such a huge company and were faced with making a decision on how to stop your profits from being stolen, what would YOU do?

    1. Re:Two Sides To It by cranos · · Score: 1

      Build a decent OS?

    2. Re:Two Sides To It by FyberOptic · · Score: 1

      Yeah you're right, I guess all this means it's not a decent OS, which is why Microsoft is having to go to the trouble of stopping people from stealing thousands of copies a year.

      Anti-Windows comments are so predictable. If you're going to make one, at least try to make some kind of sense when doing it.

    3. Re:Two Sides To It by cranos · · Score: 1

      Windows is not a decent OS, its a dominant OS. One does not necessarily lead to the other.

      The reason Microsoft is dominant is not because of technical merit, instead it can thank its marketing department and a severe fuck up at IBM that let them sell the original DOS to the clone makers.

      Show me where an independant body - by which I mean a truly independant body, not one paid for by either side claims Windows is the best all round OS on the market and I will withdraw my comments.

    4. Re:Two Sides To It by FyberOptic · · Score: 1

      Being dominant however is directly based on the decency of the OS. Had it not been decent, it wouldn't have ever become so dominant in the first place. Back in the day, the choices for a graphical OS for the general desktop market were primarily between like Windows and OS2. While OS2 might have been a fine OS for what it was, Windows won out, and I'm pretty sure it had nothing to do with marketing, considering IBM was just as capable of marketing a product as well as Microsoft was, if not more so.

      When compared to other OS's for the PC, Windows today is very fast and polished, and very easy to use for the general computer user who doesn't know much. All of these things together are hard to come by. Despite the claims, Linux does not offer all of these things. BeOS perhaps came close, but it has no chance of catching up at this point.

      OSX is nice and polished and easy to use, but Apple hardware is extremely overpriced due to the grip they retain on their hardware market. If Apple were to release the rumored x86 version of OSX, while it would probably destroy their hardware market forever, I'm sure it would give Microsoft a run for their money. Hell, even I would probably have it on at least one machine. Whether it would ever become dominant though is a whole 'nother story.

      You'll never find any particular body of people who can say beyond any doubt which OS is better, because that's just impossible. Each OS has its high points, each has its low points, with a backing of people behind each who like them for their own set of reasons. None of these are perfect, and anyone who claims one is obviously has no idea what they're talking about. Besides, trying to tell people which OS is "best" is a waste of time, because people are gonna continue to use what they like and are used to.

      So while I don't necessarily agree with how Microsoft carries out its business practices, I don't think it's fair to say Windows isn't a decent OS. The majority of computer users may not know a lot about stuff these days, but they know enough to see what's good and what's not. They don't understand or really even care about the security issues, so to them, it's a perfectly good OS, compatible with most everything, runs smooth, does what they need to do, etc.

      To be honest, even if Microsoft had a perfect security record, which would drastically increase the quality of their OS, I'm positive that there would still be plenty of anti-Microsoft/pro-Linux people out there, finding some other reason to dislike it.

    5. Re:Two Sides To It by cranos · · Score: 1

      The majority of computer users may not know a lot about stuff these days, but they know enough to see what's good and what's not.

      Your post was well reasoned and polite but I had to take exception to this point. In my experience doing tech support most users do not know enough to know whats good, they know enough to know what is familiar, WIndows in its many permutations is familiar so they stick with it.

      I personally liked Windows 2000, it was it seemed the best marriage of the NT line with the "Oooh Pretty" look and feel of Win9x, however it suffered majorly in terms of security.

      Just one other point, Microsoft started out with a decent OS for its market, end-users who didn't know a lot about computers, but as it grew it depended less and less on the quality of the OS and more and more on business practices that would entrench its dominance. Just look at the various deals they did with the OEMs.

  190. Re:Microsoft to Disable Online Windows Activa [OT] by tntguy · · Score: 1

    I live over land. Much more stable.

  191. Good job none of us are affected.. by NekoXP · · Score: 1


    Well, we all built our own boxes, and have retail copies and not OEM preinstalls
    on our systems, don't we?

    Neko

  192. Just disable PA by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This shouldn't really piss people off (and no, I'm not an MS fanboy). You won't need to call them if you reinstall Windows. If your hardware hasn't changed, the activation will work. If you use your "OS Restore CD," It's already "pre-activated," so again, no phoning MS. If you scammed a key from a major vendor or you bought your computer from a sleazy computer store, then you will need to call MS. If you bought it from a sleazy store, I would make them phone MS for you. If you don't want to deal with ANY of this stuff, you can snag a copy of Corporate Ed, OR just use one of the many PA hacks out there. This will rewrte winlogon.exe and your new copy of XP won't need to be activated online. Screw the activation, the 30 day timer will not count down any more, AND you can still do updates.

    --
    You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
    1. Re:Just disable PA by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1
      If your hardware hasn't changed, the activation will work.

      And for those of us who do change our hardware regularly this is just one more reason to avoid XP.

      If you use your "OS Restore CD," It's already "pre-activated," so again, no phoning MS.

      If these "Restore CDs" merely restore to original factory setting then this is also no use for me, and probably for others. Unless vendors have stopped just putting everything on one single partition then this automatically hampers anyone who prefers multiple partitions and tends to install onto them.
      Heck, last PC I bought for myself the first thing I did after getting it home was repartitioning and reinstalling everything myself. (Why bother paying for non-destructive partitioning software when you only really repartition on buying a new comptuer or drive?)

      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  193. Won't this just encourage piracy? by n9mdh · · Score: 1

    After all, with tools like RockXP around, won't it just be easier to trade/hijack legitimate activation files and eliminate the middle man in this scenario? At least with online activation Microsoft has a fair idea where the piracy problem is coming from-- they know which keys are the real problem, and also (typically) have a good idea of the IPs where the piracy is occurring. The telephone route will just push the pirates farther underground, and make them harder to find, IMHO.

    If MSFT wantes to punish piracy, they have a perfect avenue right now-- add a kill routine to the activation process. Heck, the more certain the piracy, the more massive the kill. Since an OS pirate is probably running other pirated software, you're able to kill multiple birds with one stone. Just ask DirecTV or Dish Network-- their boxes detect piracy, and it's game over for the box. If it's their mistake they fix it, and they make very very few mistakes.

  194. New virus? by vestus · · Score: 1

    All it will take is someone to modify myDoom or equivalent to disable Windows and flood MS's phone banks before this idea gets canned.

  195. those detectors by hawk · · Score: 1

    I triggered one going *in* to a store at the mall right before Christmas.

    The clerks at the adjacent counter laughed and asked, "You came from Fye's, didn't you".

    I had to loke at my bag; I had no idea that the record store had a new name.

    I didn't end up buying anything, and waved before I triggered it again going out.

    hawk

  196. Why is Microsoft bothering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "pirates" have done this a long time ago. I haven't had to activate my copy yet :-) As usual, this will accomplish nothing, except possibly boost the stock price a little bit for a while.

  197. Dogbert by Corellon+Larethian · · Score: 1

    When I read stuff like this, I always feel a little bit like Dogbert. Not where he's got the sceptre and exorcising demons, but where he's laughing maniacally as his world-dominiation plans are coming to fruition. Sometimes it makes me a little scared, but then the evil laugher wells up again and supresses my fear.

    I fully support this action by Microsoft.

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!

  198. Good thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excellent choice. I'm sure that guy, who is likely paid very little, was made quite cranky by your demonstration of his own impotence. I'm sure he was really thrilled with his job the rest of the day.

    How about next time you try not being a complete dick and just show him the goddamn receipt? Showing your fellow human beings a little courtesy and respect would help make this world a somewhat tolerable place.

    1. Re:Good thinking... by Kuro-Bishounen · · Score: 1

      I agree, making the poor guy at the door's life harder by refusing to show you the receipt is wrong. But the act of asking you for the receipt is wrong in the first place. It's not the guy's fault he has a crappy job, if the shop was to take the required steps to stop the shoplifting in the first place, ie more cameras, better trained staff, technology at the till that counted every item in every item out, then the problem would be solved. BUT! that would force the shop to raise prices, thus losing customers to other shops. So the shop keeps the prices low, and pays for the most profitable means of policing. So in esssence, the shop is to blame for shoplifting because of it's policy of profit maximisation. So... I'm afraid the poor guy at the door gets it in the ass for me, I don't have to show him my receipt, he should should get angry with the shop's policy. Sorry guy, I'm not about to give up any of my rights just because your shop wants to squeeze the last 0.001% penny of profit from my transaction.

      --
      Evil Space Monkeys could be stealing YOUR bandwidth!
  199. Good news for non windows platforms by Danathar · · Score: 1

    Although it's probably been said before, this is GREAT news.

    One of the reasons windows is so dominant is due to rampant piracy. If MS is able to crack down on this we are probably going to see more people refuse to shell out $$$ for Windows.

    1. Re:Good news for non windows platforms by Ulric · · Score: 1

      Precisely. You can only annoy your users so much before they start looking for alternatives. I'm pretty sure that people who want to run Windows for free (I'm not one of them, I run Windows legitimately when I have to) will figure out how to do that anyway. That leaves customers who have to jump through hoops just so they can use something they bought and paid for.

  200. What you really mean.. by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

    "XP or 2K represented almost 75% of all Windows users. That means that the really legacy products - 95, 98, and NT4 represent less than 1 in 4."

    More people have bought computers in the last 5 years because the entry level price dropped. They could no longer get the Legacy products pre-installed during this time.

    1. Re:What you really mean.. by cshark · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to disagree with anyone here, but the fact of the matter is that we really don't have enough data to make any kind of assumption about the current or future sales of Windows. Microsoft has been anything but helpful to this end, and this particular information does not seem to be filed with the SEC.

      So when Microsoft claims that XP is the hottest selling operating system in the world, who are we supposed to believe? Microsoft? Really? I'm not doubting that XP has the lion's share of the OS market right now. (Actually, I was talking about longhorn, and pointing out that I didn't think everyone in their mother would upgrade if they had to activate by phone, but hey, stranger things have happened. I also pointed out that I thought this was probably not as secure as doing it online, but again, the software commeth, and I really don't care. Now, back to numbers.)

      If Microsoft holds it's sales numbers close to it's chest, and then comes along and says, "we have 75% of the market with this product" great! But they could say anything they wanted to. Yet another case of the inmates running the asylum I guess.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

  201. Yet another ploy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think M$ knows full well that a large majority of installed XP's out there have been circumvented by corp keys and the like. In fact, I think they are directly responsible for it. I remember someone on a newsgroup once saying that M$ itself is the one to release corp keys on file trading networks, IRC, etc. They want to lure in the young ultra geeks and nerds and what better way than by making them run through a maze of key generators and registry hacks. No, even though the activation policy has changed to only permit phoning in, it will only effect the legitamate users - not the tinkerers. I don't think this will change the attraction to linux in any way. Some Windoze users might even prefer the phoning in method as it is the least painful to understand.

  202. Making $$$$ by pan0k · · Score: 1

    Things like this make me wanting to start a company that charge people by the hour to help them fix their computer. Let's see. 30+ minutes (depending on the products) to install a Microsoft product. 30+ minutes to activate that product. 30+ to just update the product. We are talking at least 2 hours per product. Typical rate for that is around $90 per hour = $180 per Microsoft Product installation. Thanks Microsoft.

  203. Deeper sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try to find a deeper sense in this!

    This sensless comment was brought to you by AC!

  204. Deeper and deeper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are not supposed to read this!

    This sensless comment was brought to you by another AC!

  205. Hello Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the last fucking straw. I will be buying a new computer before the end of the year and it will NOT be a windows computer. I'm not going to bend over for microshaft every time I want to reinstall windows.
    So goodbye Gates and hello Jobs.
    Please note that this post is from someone who never thought they would leave windows, but I have just had it with microshaft.

  206. The reason for the "consulting" portion... by Seng · · Score: 1

    The place I work for acts as system admins for about 100 different small companies in the area... Standardized images simply aren't going to do much good. We'd spend 90% of our time building images to reload (not to mention, that a lot of the customers take the opinion that they don't want to buy a 20-user copy of Ghost to be legal, but would rather pay $120 an hour for someone on site). I know if generates money, but I'd rather do something more productive than sit on the phone.

  207. In California, they cannot. by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    You are under absolutely no obligation whatsoever to show your receipt to the door drones at Best Buy, Fry's, or anywhere.

    The only exception to that is Costco, because you're paying them for the membership, and it's part of the membership agreement.

  208. A series of questions by Mark+Edwards · · Score: 2, Funny


    This is Microsoft installation support. How may we help you?
    A message box just popped up, saying I have to call you and answer a series of questions, before the reinstallation can be completed.

    Yes ma'am, that is correct. Question number one: What is your age?
    I'm 25 years old.

    Are you single or married?
    I'm single.

    What are you wearing right now?
    What th'? Why do you need to know that?

    Okay, we'll come back to that one later. What is your bra size, and do you hook in front or in back?
    That's TWO questions, and it's NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.

    I'm sorry, ma'am, we can't successfully complete your reinstallation unless we get accurate answers to all our questions....

    Mark Edwards
    --
    Proof of Sanity Forged Upon Request

  209. time == money by Phrack · · Score: 1

    When I factor in my time pissed away dealing with Microsoft and WIndows itself... my Powerbook doesn't seem so expensive after all.

    --
    Dump the IRS - http://www.fairtax.org
  210. You Guys Are Missing The POINT!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    now there is motivation for every ms hating tech person to write an entirely desctructive virus, completely hosing the infected machine.

    can you say DDOS to the product activation group?

    think about it

    -----
    posted from my 15" powerbook

  211. Deep 3 Three by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Three Deep Comments ...was brought to you by another AC!

    If you don't understand this, please read it again!

  212. here it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  213. Before you switch.... by Panthar37 · · Score: 1

    How about we organize an "Official Windows reinstall weekend" then we can flood the phones at the same time to get our reinstall authorized by M$. Oh, wait, I forgot, some of you will need to disregard this post as you are in possession of an illegal copy of the evil OS! But for the rest of you, this would be a fun way to annoy the beast.

  214. Deep 4 Deep Thinkers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know what you are talking about!

    Sensless Deep Thinking?

    Leveled Deep Thinking?

  215. Aw, man, STFU. by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

    Bunch of wishful thinkers here. Preaching to the choir.

    This isn't going to change a goddamn thing. People GOTS to have their Windows because it runs (games | Outlook | Word | whatever people are hard for these days).

    Microsoft could make people eat shit and they would still demand Windows. The techies would piss and moan, but people aren't going to change to a 'hippy' OS because of this.

    --
    Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
  216. Re:Won't this just encourage piracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs Rock XP when this is availible

    http://home.pages.at.nyud.net:8090/cw2k/Antiwpa/

  217. Surely this is pointless? by hairykrishna · · Score: 1
    Ok, the way I see it there are two big problems:

    1) Most pirate copies of windows are "Corporate" keys. They don't require activation.

    2) My experience is that, regardless of how many times you have activated a key, as long as you don't say "Because I'm a dirty pirate" when the phone-drone asks why you need it reactivating again it's all good.

    Basically this appears as if it's going to piss off a whole bunch of people for no good reason.

    --
    "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
  218. MOD PARENT UP by bach37 · · Score: 1

    Word. I've got WIN98SE in vmware as my 'windows machine.' The bloaty XP is something not needed by all persons. Not to mention 98 and 2K take less hard drive space. WIN98SE itself is under ~300MB installed.

  219. Funny, I once accidently stole an Auto Trader! by wwphx · · Score: 1

    I don't know what I was thinking, I guess for some reason I thought it was a free magazine. Perhaps it was a free magazine at one point and I was remembering that. Anyway, a day or two later when I realized what I had done, I went back to the same store and explained to the clerk what I had done and paid for it. We both laughed, I think he thought it was funny that I actually returned and paid. No harm, no foul.

    --
    When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    1. Re:Funny, I once accidently stole an Auto Trader! by Psmylie · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I can understand that. Those things look a lot like all those advertising-based free papers (like the For Rent and Now Hiring ones). Which is why we kept the auto traders in with the regular magazines, to try and cut down on that type of thing :)

      This guy, though... I watched him the entire time while he was in the store. It was obvious to me that he knew what he was doing was wrong.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

  220. Why doesn't M$ do the most obvious and logical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lower the retail price of Windows = Sell more copies

    Windows XP Home retail $104.99 (Amazon.com)
    Windows XP Pro retail $257.99 (Amazon.com)
    Mac OS X 10.3 retail $114.99 (Amazon.com)

    If they priced Pro at $49.95 - $74.95, they would sell far more copies than they do today, and they could save all the money they're spending on anti-piracy nonsense.

    Better yet, start selling it to the public for a only a little more than the OEM's pay per copy.

  221. Redmond's next step? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long is it before M$ decides to put out a Windows-cripping automatic "update" which requires a reinstall for _everyone_? It's a lot easier to force people to call in to make their reinstall work than to rely on "software audits", or the like.
    Actually, I'm hoping they will do this soon, so that the Windows-only businesses will have to think about switching to Linux.

  222. Looks like I picked a good time to quit my job. by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1

    Being a Windows XP Support Professional (read: outsourced phone monkey) was shitty enough without having to deal with this kind of crap.

  223. No mass exodus, yet by CarlinWithers · · Score: 1

    I am interested in *nix, especially because I'm going through an applied degree in networking. I like *nix, why? Because through my courses, I have learned all sorts of cool things that it can do that Windows simply cannot. I also work in a local computer repair shop part time to pay for school. My experience is this: people KNOW that *nix or Mac work better than Windows. However, they have been using Windows/MSOffice/Outlook for the last 5 to 10 years. It is DIFFICULT to change. Maybe not for me, I'm a 20 year old interested in computers to begin with. Certainly Slashdotters are at a technical level that it's not a big deal to learn how to use a new OS. But for people like my family, it is. My mother for example works as a doctor in an office with several other GPs. They are currently looking at installing a network, which is a first for them. They've had people placing bids and showing them what could be done. One of them run Linux, she chatted with me about that. I can paraphrase: 'They seemed like a really sharp bunch of guys. They showed us their software, it looked simple, and worked well when they showed us. However, I know that the time it would take me to use Linux would be too much to make sense economically.' My mother is an example of a skilled individual, 10 years of post-secondary education to become a GP. But the ineffiiencies of Windows do not yet have enough weight for her to invest the time to change to Linux even though she admits it will work better. I think this calling in to activate won't force a mass exodus from Windows. However, it will leave a dark memory or grudge when they have to make this annoying phone call. It also leaves a grudge when I have to tell a customer when I'm at work: "Sorry this virus has destroyed some system files, we'll need to back up your data and format/reinstall windows. All your programs will need to be reinstalled as well when you get it back." Given time, these grudges will pile up. More people will be motivated to subvert MS, thus nullifying a counter-piracy initiative such as this one. For those who don't want to pirate software as a result of personal conviction, this pile of grudges will finally motivate them to spend the time to learn a new OS.

  224. One Word by tbone1 · · Score: 1
    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  225. Manufacture's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Specifically, Certificate of Authenticity (COA) labels on PCs are often unused because OEMs preinstall Windows and bypass product activation.

    Manufactures like HP, Sony, Dell, etc. bypass the activiation because they use 1 key to activate windows, then use that image on all the other PCs that they ship out to the stores. So if you look at the key that's on a brand new PC, the key differs from what the COA label that's on the PC itself. They do it because its faster and more efficient. Consumers should not be punished because of this. Its not the consumers' fault that the manufacture did not activate the OEM key.

  226. Mac Mini - Matches my iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well,

    I was considering getting a new XP desktop,
    but not being able to reinstall the system
    without calling, waiting, and eventually connecting to an engrish speaking person just to get it to boot, well - that's a problem.

    Mac Mini - matches my iPod and doesn't cause problems.

    'Please hold for the next available agent. Your wait time is *6* hours and *40*,*2* minutes, please stay on the line. Your call is important to us at Microsoft.'

  227. Re:Half-true...MOD PARENT UP by teeker · · Score: 1

    You do not have to activate a new machine from a major OEM, however if you reinstall from media (if you're lucky enough to get it with the machine), YOU MUST ACTIVATE. The reason is that the copy of XP on the machine checks some BIOS code and will not ever register, as it's already securely tied to the hardware. In that state, it is activated with a special OEM key (which is different from the sticker on the side of your box). Nobody but the OEM has access to that version of XP. If you have OEM media from the manufacturer, it's slightly different from the one that came preloaded. The OEM (or other) media that you reinstall from has the regular activation code, which prompts for a key to be entered from the sticker, and then must be activated in the usual way from MS. I'm not certain about reinstalling from a "rescue partition" that OEMs are so fond of these days.

    The grandparent is mistaken about not needing to re-activate after reinstall...the fact that the key that comes prelaoded in the machine is different than the one on the sticker on the machine, and the preloaded version of XP is different from the media is the whole problem here. It's what makes you NEED to register after reinstall from media, and it's what created the whole drive to inconvenience customers with phone activation (which takes much more than 2 minutes like a lot of people are saying)...the problem is that the sticker contains a legitimate virgin key that anybody can steal and use to activate a different box.

    My big question is what kind of documentation are they going to expect me to have when I call?

    --
    teeker
  228. Protecting what is rightfully theirs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's a fantastic idea that Microsoft has come up with this secure method of ensuring that their products are legal on customers computers. Weeding out all of those people who have not fully paid up licences is a great thing for Microsoft. 60, 70, maybe even 80% of the computers in the world may have pirated Microsoft software on them. It's time solve that problem. Further, it would be much better if Microsoft allowed users to install it's software one time only from disk. If it breaks for whatever reason, users are required to pay for another full licence. It would be better too, if Microsoft started charging more for real service. $2000 per phone call "just to say hello". $5000 for each question. $25000 if the question has to be forwarded to another person. The days of the Microsoft 'free lunch' are over. Users will never switch from their products and Microsoft knows it. Time to 'leverage the market'. It would also be better to install 'rundown timers' on the software, so that users know how much time each application has left 'on the meter'. For a paypal online charge, users can 're-activate' word for another 1/2 hour for example. For those wanting bulk rates, they can buy hours per month (packs of 1000, 2000 and 3000 hours per month could be made available). Increadibly great value from Microsoft products could be had for the low rate of $0.5 per application-hour (per user).

  229. Ok, no, don't be stupid.. by iONiUM · · Score: 1

    They'd never try to completely tear down pirated copies of XP. Think about it, if they FORCE users to buy the OS and completely stop pirating, then the kids (yes, usually it's the kids in the house who are the sysadmin) will not buy it, and move the computer to Linux or something else. The fact is, piracy is the reason MS has such a great userbase. Plus, what you use at home, business will be forced to use in the workplace. Stopping piracy would be the end of microsoft's OS monopoly.

    To give a very interesting example, I "heard from a friend" that certain new dev platforms were released by some MS employees under direction of their manager on BT and kazaa to increase usage and promote it.

  230. Important question by Burz · · Score: 1

    Does Windows XP suddenly need re-activation if I merely repartition the drive and change the bootloader? Because these operations are common when installing Linux for a dual-boot setup.

    It would be a rotten way for MS to discourage the use of alternatives.

    1. Re:Important question by MadcatX · · Score: 1

      Not that I'm aware of. Usually you only need to re-activate when doing a fresh install. I've experience a few calls where windows required re-activation after some hardware changes were made, and I don't know if this prompting to re-activate was merely a glitch in the OS, or because of the new hardware Windows might have thought it was on a new machine.

      Hopefully there's no MS programmer's reading this and decide to incorporate re-activation if the MBR is changed to load a non-windows bootloader. It's already a pain to get your Linux bootloader overriden once you install almost any version of Windows.

      --
      - "I reject your reality and substitute it with my own", Adam Savage
  231. Guess I'm about done with MS by dommer2029 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've avoided XP so far, partly because of the verification process required after reinstall. But I kind of figured that I'd get the version after that (been skipping DOS versions a long time: v3, v5, Win95, Win2k for me). But this is nuts. I already have PC hardware, so I expect that my next OS upgrade will be to Linux, and my next hardware purchase a Mac. Wow. I've been pro-PC for ~16 years. Never saw this coming.

    --
    VFX is more influential than you think.
    1. Re:Guess I'm about done with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never saw this coming.

      I don't mean to give you a hard time, but come on. :-) You should have talked to one of the geeks with tinfoil hats mumbling to themselves (of which I am one).

      "...shit! it.. uh... DRM takes... Windows activation ... scourge... FACK!! AFACCK!..."

      But really. Pirating Windows became my only option living in Mexico, because I really couldn't afford the licenses and I wasn't going to call Microsoft everytime I hacked apart my box and reconstructed it.

    2. Re:Guess I'm about done with MS by RazorJ_2000 · · Score: 1

      I've been pro-PC with MS since 1986 when I got my first 8088 with DOS 3. I started making the switch to linux last year. I finally got fed up with their corporate direction, DRM support, growing spyware, and reducing support for the SMB (which built their f**king business anyways).

      --
      pi=sigma{n:0-infinity}[(1/16)^n][(4/(8n+1))-(2/(8n +4))-(1/ (8n+5))-(1/(8n+6))]
  232. OS X Dongle. by kponto · · Score: 1

    As much as generally hate dongles, I actually like the dongle system used to authorize OS X. It's called a Mac, and OS X won't run without it. Best DRM ever.

    --
    This too, will end.
    1. Re:OS X Dongle. by niteice · · Score: 1

      *sigh* Where are my mod points when I need them...

      --
      ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    2. Re:OS X Dongle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since when? is this when u buy a boxed copy?

    3. Re:OS X Dongle. by michaeldot · · Score: 1
      As much as generally hate dongles, I actually like the dongle system used to authorize OS X. It's called a Mac, and OS X won't run without it. Best DRM ever.

      Funny, I hope you get modded up.

      But actually, Apple does try to limit piracy of their stuff a bit:

      I recently bought a PowerBook which came with iLife 05. Now, I already had a Power Mac G5 from the previous year. Naturally, I wanted the cool new stuff on the G5.

      But you can't install iLife 05 from the PowerBook system disc, nor can you use a PowerBook system to install a PowerMac system (even though Mac OS X itself is one entity). Inevitable conclusion: have to go out and buy iLife 05.

      However, there was a workaround: because OS X apps keep their stuff so well packaged, getting iDVD 5.0 from the PowerBook to the G5 was just a drag copy of a single 1.5GB file. GarageBand was a bit harder, but only because the music loops are installed in an Audio folder etc.

      (Try any of that that under Windows with its million dependent .dll files hell.)

      Ironically, if I'd bought a Mac mini for about a third of the price as the PowerBook, I would have got a dedicated iLife install disc... simply because the factory hadn't had time to pre-install it because the two products were released at the same time. They eventually will though.

      [PS Before any of you Mac people put the 'atic' back in 'fan' - I'm damn well not ripping off Apple, I just wanted to use my bundled software on another machine.]

  233. Yes by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    It does away with casual piracy. MS has sold millions of copys of XP to idiots with multiple computers who used to buy just one upgrade copy, and now buy 3 or 4. These are people with more money than sense who upgrade because they want all their computers to look the same (yes, I've spoken to people who spent over $1000 dollars on software for a green start menu on all 4 computers). Add in the people passing around their copies of 9x to anyone who asks, and this is a tidy sum of dough for MS.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  234. Tap '0' when it starts asking for numbers by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    and you get straight to an operator. I think you can do it earilier too, but I don't like talking to people so I just punch the numbers in.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  235. It's fun to be violated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A police officer in Canada would never do that. If you have some member agreement that says you must show a receipt, and then you refuse to do so when you leave, it doesn't follow that the police will arrest you. They'll most likely tell the store to cancel your membership. The criminal code in Canada at least places a heavy emphasis on being reasonable.

  236. Article is wrong by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

    The article paints the picture incorrectly. MS is not turning off inernet activation for all reinstalls, as the article suggests. It is not even turning off all reinstalls for OEM versions. It is flagging ranges of installation from large OEMS that were sold in the past from reinstalling with out a phone call. Things you buy in the future are not effected. Only reinstallations of Xp products, sold in the past, by large OEMS, with large license groups.

  237. Why so many installs?... by DayBoyUSA · · Score: 1

    While she was quite helpful and only asked once (why so many installs)

    Maybe because I keep getting viruses and format is the only way I can remove them all without paying for additional software!

  238. Just tell them the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    While she was quite helpful and only asked once (why so many installs) I still felt like I had been dragged down town and put under birght lights to be interrogated.

    Just tell them the truth, spyware and exploits hosed your system.

  239. I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess you've never heard of people living down to your expectations? Treat them like an idiot and they'll be an idiot, if not just to spite you.

    1. Re:I guess by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is true, but there is a flaw in your logic. You don't treat them like idiots, you simply let them be idiots. Once you realize that they are idiots you know what to expect from them. Being a good actor helps too.

      One more piece of advice from my asshole's guide to survival. Sincerity, learn to fake it. Once people think you honestly give a damn about thier problems they will do almost anything for you.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  240. license management by H9000 · · Score: 1

    we love you for that, keep up your crapy work an bring yourself to death. This will make our live mutch easier.

  241. Not true by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    people whine and bitch about MS, but the fact is, there's stuff you can do with Word, Excel, Access and Outlook that no other software package can touch. I'm loth to admidt it, since I'd like nothing more than to sell Linux boxen to people, but there it is. Word has versioning features writers won't give up, Chemists won't surrentder Excel, nitwit managers who need to bang out a quick app love Access and salesmen need Outlook. Sure, all these programs have major, mind-bogglingly annoying flaws/bugs. But if you need the features they offer, you just live with it.

    Back in the days of ms-dos and win 3.1 you were right, those days are long gone. Now with the computer market shrinking and developing countries eyeing Microsoft suspiciously, Microsoft wants the sales more than a bit more market share.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  242. Who cares... by xenoandroid · · Score: 1

    Firewire drive + Knoppix CD + Freshly activated windows installation = trouble-free reinstall the next time windows activates it's self-destruct sequence.

  243. Microsoft answers the phone by Legodude522 · · Score: 0

    [In India] "Hello I would like to activate Windows." "Hellou activate Windooows ALAH ALAH ALAH"

    --
    Because I have low karma, I need pills.
  244. Time to shift to an alternative platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I moved to Linux about 1 year ago, precisely because of issues like this. I have no intention of running an operating system that requires me to telephone or contact Microsoft to use software that I have paid for. This is totally unacceptable, and as soon as product activiation was introduced, I quickly shifted all my development efforts to Linux.
    Since then, I have experienced the usability issues that will frustrate many inexperienced users, and endured the learning curve of deciding which GUI toolkit libraries to use to port my software to Linux. Linux is an excellent platform for developers, and the supply of high quality free development tools has convinced me that Linux should also be the platform of choice for development of new Windows applications (with the happy side effect that such software should also run on UNIX boxes) Microsoft is shooting itself in the head with these type of 'anti-piracy' efforts. Piracy actually benefits Microsoft. Most young developers (at least when I was at university) were using pirated windows. Microsoft is pushing these next generation of developers away from its platform, and forcing people to adopt solutions that may not be as mature from the point of view of downward scaliability, but that are at least as good, if not better in many other areas, and are repidly catching up in usability.

  245. How to curb piracy... by Game+Genie · · Score: 1

    Try making a decent OS that people actually like to use (don't just have to use) and piracy will go down a lot. Also, try not treating your customers like criminals. Microsofts antipiracy techniques just encourage people to work harder to circumvent them; build a better mouse trap, and someone will find a better mouse.

  246. Trying to enforce hardware DRM?! by wwonka74 · · Score: 1

    I think this is a push to annoy the piss out windows customers so M$ can say .. oh well if you buy hardware with Paladium in it (or whatever incarnation it will go under later) you won't have to bother calling us.

  247. My experience with MS Activation specialists by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

    I had a Windows XP Professional original CD, and had lost the paper-back insert with CD-key. And I needed to format my windows. Of course, I could have gone to kazaa and tried to find a crack -- but that takes just as long as phoning.

    So this is how the process went:
    - I asked them I lost my insert, but had the original CD
    - They said fine. But then they need to verify I had the original CD, so they made me describe how the CD looked in detail
    - I told them it had holographic pictures, it was shiny, it has "unauthorized copies prohibited", I described all the little writing around the CD and the back, it says Microsoft here and there, what it says on the concentric rings, etc.
    - They said OK. And proceeded to give me a brand-new CD key and scribbled it down
    - Now they said, "we have to wait for you to install Windows XP upto the point where it asks you to input the key".
    - I said OK, "but it will take a while"
    - They said fine, "we can wait for a few minutes"
    - So I proceeded to install Windows XP, and finally after 20 or so minutes, it asked me for the key. I put the key in, and it was accepted.
    - I told them CD key was accepted, and we did our goodbyes and hanged up.

    Two things that surprised me from this ordeal:
    1) from what I heard, I didn't know you had to describe the CD so they knew you didn't have a burnt copy
    2) They actually waited for me to install Windows XP and try out the key. I could have just lied and said, "yeah it worked", but If I recorded the key incorrectly, I would have been an idiot calling again saying, "it worked, but then it didn't". They would say, "WTF?"

    1. Re:My experience with MS Activation specialists by MadcatX · · Score: 1

      That's the procedure, with the exception of that last part. That last part is what we called "killing time". If it was a busy day, one call after another, we would usually try to stretch the time of some calls, and one of the best things to do that is to stick around during an installation. At least it "appeared" as if we were working... (after talking to one upset person after another over foolish activation policy, we needed to take a brake from time to time)

      --
      - "I reject your reality and substitute it with my own", Adam Savage
  248. Re:Door Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nazis? They don't even give a damn most of the time. ( Once an a while you do run across a real door 'Nazi' )

    Door Nazi is just a 'light duty' position they give to people they can't fire because of the ADA. Half are faking to some degree and are probably burnt out beyond giving a rats ass how much stuff gets stolen. Heck, they're probably rooting for the thieves.

  249. Not QUITE TRUE! by kittenthief · · Score: 1

    this isn't EXACTLY true....

    they are deactivating Internet authorization of MAJOR OEM COA's...let me quote directly from the most recent Microsoft System Builder Newsletter...

    "On February 28, Microsoft® will disable Internet activation for all Microsoft Windows® XP product keys located on the Certificates of Authenticity (COA) labels distributed by large, multinational OEMs." (Italics Mine.)

    in other words...only the volume licence COA from such vendors as Dell, HP etc...granted this is about 80% (my estimate) of all system sales...but its not gonna affect EVERYONE....only those that buy stand alone COA's on E-Bay and from other vendors.

  250. hard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ive called microsot to activae windos before and everything was automated. read your cd key to the machine it tells you an ativation code. took maybe 5 min.

  251. Re:Copy Protection SOP -- QuarkXPress by jafac · · Score: 1

    I personally think that mass piracy of Quark is what made it the industry standard in the first place.

    There's an argument to be made that tacit permitting of piracy is roughly equivalent to "dumping". (or selling a product below cost to gain marketshare). The difference is - since copying software is essentially FREE, it's technically not selling the product below cost. Now. Can anybody tell me why successful software companies are among the most profitable businesses known in the history of mankind? Or why the market has consolidated faster than any other industry in the history of business?

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  252. The end of Microsoft Windows??? by WaR.KiN · · Score: 1

    Now, if only someone would DDOS their phone lines, no one can activate windows lol.

  253. Games by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
    Many windows games have "copy protection" on them to stop them from being used on legitimate users machines. Perhaps that is why console (PS2 or Xbox) games outsell PC games by such a huge margin (4 to 1). After all, the console games actually work.

    And who is one of the major suppliers of these "copy protection" schemes that put people off PC games? ... Sony!

  254. sweeeeeet by suezz · · Score: 1

    keep it up microsoft - linux doesn't have to do a thing to compete - you will take yourself down. god how I miss all those keys I have to keep track of - I guess that is what enterprise software means - you need a staff of people to keep track of license keys. you can take you activation codes/keys and shove them up billy and steve's ass. don't need them never will - when will these corporations wake up and smell the coffee - the money you are paying for these stupid licenses could be used to save people's jobs.

  255. If you need to buy the OS... by sapgau · · Score: 1

    Why not spend the money on a license of Xandros. I've heard it is one of the easiest distributions to use yet.
    Xandros Desktop OS Version 3 Deluxe Edition

  256. Probably not by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

    It probably won't effect you. It 'should not' effect you is the proper thing to say here.

    If it does become a problem for you, the most likely cause would be that the small vendor who sold you the machine ripped off an OEM copy of XP and has resold it to you as a legit copy. Otherwise the only people who will be effected are those who have to reinstall from selected Dell EOM cd's and selected HP EOM cd's, (there are a few others), that were sold between certain time frames and under certain license agreements. It is not a big group.

    1. Re:Probably not by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      'kay, that's what I thought. Thanks for the clarification(s).

  257. No more OEM purchases on eBay??? by glhturbo · · Score: 1

    Hmmmm... For a while, the market for OEM versions of XP on eBay has been quite active. I wonder if this will make anyone think twice?

    Or maybe it is an attempt to shut down this market....

    Supposedly, it was "legal" to sell these copies with a qualifying piece of hardware. But now, If I have to call up to activate, and I tell them I bought my copy on eBay, will they refuse?

  258. Should i kill myself now by AbusiveChild · · Score: 1

    Why the hell do they even try anymore... I think that they should just all commit mass suicides and the world could work in open source. I hate how they think that they actually make a difference. If they were to merely lower the price and take the first step in this inflation bullshit they could actually compete with all other Operating Systems in the future. At the rate they're going they will keep raising their prices more than the goddamn yearly income of a person. What's the next OS going to cost? $500... After that $1000? $5000? They are going to have to initialize action because software piracy is only going to rise with prices. More and more people are less and less sensitive about whether they are going to simply download it or save for a year and buy it... Also, with faster download speeds, it is going to be all that much easier.

  259. Welcome new ways of making using Windows difficult by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    Ya gotta LOVE these things MS is doing. They're getting scared and such knee-jerk actions are clear evidence of it. I wholeheartedly WELCOME new ways that make it even more painful to run Windows on PCs. Every new frustration means more users that will transition to Linux, FreeBSD or the Mac or something else. Hooray for MS paranoia! Windows, if you can believe it, is becoming even less "free" (as in freedom) all the while Linux becomes more "free."

    Apparently, it will be a considerably larger amount of kicking and screaming before MS gets dragged into the Open future than it took to drag them into the Internet, and frankly, that's a good thing. When you should worry is when MS finally gets around to realizing that they will have to get seriously in on the Open bandwagon themselves or lose out completely. The longer we can forestall that eventuality, the better, IMHO...

  260. Perhaps this is a sign by Sethra · · Score: 1

    It could very well be that Microsoft knows that its OS and Office based platforms are reaching their EOL. As they try and turn their corporate leviathan around to a new business model (online only services?) they are making one final stab at generating the revenue needed to make the changeover.

    They don't mind seeing a large mass of folks move away from XP since in the years to come their revenue source will be from providing connected services that are OS independant.

    Granted, we're talking 3-5 years down the line, but I doubt microsoft limits its business plans to just next year...

  261. This is a change? by Miguelito · · Score: 1

    Last time I did an XP re-install (for my grandparents when they upgraded hardware), I had to call. The system wouldn't let me boot up to install the network driver until the activation was done... figure that one out.

    --
    - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
  262. I care why? by snipercat · · Score: 1

    blah blah blah ... if anyone needs me I'll be rebuilding my Linux kernel.

  263. WPA triggers on more than just new installs! by artifex2004 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've had WPA trigger on my installed-and-activated copy each time I moved the system partition to a different drive, especially if it was bigger.
    Yes, I know, I ought to totally reinstall, but when I have a drive start to give me read errors, I don't feel like risking death of data by hunting down what directories it may be in.
    And when I buy a bigger drive and want to use it as my Windows system drive, and install SuSE or something on the old drive, I should be able to do that, without telling Microsoft what I'm doing.

    1. Re:WPA triggers on more than just new installs! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I understand that the new-HD-triggers-activation problem can be avoided by making sure the new drive has the same volume ID as the old one. There is a tool to fix that floating around the net.

      Much more sensible to use one of the tools to neuter XP entirely, so it stops lifting its leg on you every time you change the hardware. Fuck M$, it's none of their damn business what I do with MY hardware!

      Then again, it was pretty clear to me (from back when I followed the XP newsgroups) that XP's hardware support was designed primarily to run on DELL systems, which in turn are designed to be NOT upgradeable. So WPA's assumption was that no one would ever do more than the most minor upgrades.

      [I like and prefer Windows, but WPA is THE factor that makes me so hope for a really mature linux desktop that I can switch myself and my users to without pain... *sigh* ...maybe I'll spend tomorrow playing with this shiny new SuSE CD that I just got from Novell.]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  264. You can do that in windows too... by Dracil · · Score: 1

    By using Applocale. Personally my computer is set to Japanese, but I use Applocale when I need to run Chinese programs.

    1. Re:You can do that in windows too... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      What exactly does Applocale do, though? As far as I've seen, running Windows in a multilingual household, most Windows apps only come with one localization, and those which have more have some custom way of choosing the language.

      Ok, I did a bit of my own research, and that's not the same thing at all. Applocale simply sets up so that non-unicode programs will display their non-ASCII text correctly. What I'm talking about is this scenario: I'm running Mail, and it's in English. I set my preferences to have French first, restart Mail, and it's in French. I set my preferences to have Chinese first, restart Safari, and now Safari is in Chinese.

      Mac OS X has a pervasive localization system which allows applications to embed other languages for their interfaces in a standard way. This means you can switch between interface languages on a system level and all of the apps you launch afterwards will follow. Of course it won't work if the application hasn't actually been translated, but a lot of apps have been and all Apple applications have been translated into a ton of mainstream languages. There's none of this nonsense about installing a version of the OS suited to a given language; the stock version of Mac OS X can be set to run in every language Apple has translated it to.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  265. the real fun round here was library books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i used to lived in stockport near manchester in the uk.

    stockport libarays use those tags to stop people walking out with stuff but they don't deactivate them (you go through the barriers the books you check out do not)

    however at least at one stage (i dunno if the issue has been fixed since) the books would set of the alarms in quite a few shops.

  266. Linux growth? by dot_borg · · Score: 1

    I really hope this translates to more Linux users. I hope the Linux community will grow large enough that hardware and software makers will no longer be able to ignore them. Unfortunately, I'm sure that most Windows users will just shrug and lay down for the program.

  267. This is why I don't have XP by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

    Activation is the sole reason my Windows partition runs Windows 2000 instead of Windows XP. I refuse to use any product that must be activated in this insane way.

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
  268. Obligatory MIB quote by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 1

    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."

    --
    "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
  269. Know what you're bitching about. by wynand1004 · · Score: 1

    The MUIP sounds great! Thanks for the heads up. Oh, wait...

    Here are a few facts from the Microsoft website:

    MUI is not supported on consumer versions of Windows such as Windows 9x, Windows Me, and Windows XP Home Edition.

    MUI is an add-on to the English version of Windows XP Professional and Windows 2000 family of operating systems, and will not install on localized versions of Windows XP/2000 or on Windows XP Home Edition.

    I have Windows XP Home Edition (Japanese Version).

    For fuck's sake, know what you're talking about before bitching about Windows.

    --
    An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. - Victor Hugo
  270. My Fault, Probably by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    Sorry guys.

    I only have 10 days left to activate XP Pro (I had been waiting since there were hardware upgrades that needed to be done first) so maybe they got a bit worried.

    I promise that I'll register within the alloted time so as to make MS change this new policy and give all you guys a break. Maybe I'll only activate on the last day, just to make them sweat.

    1. Re:My Fault, Probably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://home.pages.at.nyud.net:8090/cw2k/Antiwpa/

      Use this and never worry about Windows Product Activation ever again souers avalible on the site.
      The Forum at CJB.net seems to be down .

  271. Micro$oft Activation by jskline · · Score: 1

    This whole thing was a bunch of hooey when it was installed with XP and then Office. I have reinstalled 3 of my XP boxes now over 8 times due to bad code on Microsofts part (ineffective patches and updates that do not work as designed). Just today, discovered my laptop with XP Professional and recently allowed to install Service Pack 2, now has a trojan in it!!! How the hell that got in there is beyond me as I don't visit places that would promote or install this crap, but one got in there. Now i have to tear it down and do it all over again. I might ghost it this time just to save some of the hassle, but someone told me that ghosting it doesn't help the activation thing. Even if I activate before I ghost, it will still prompt me to activate again.

    Now I'm going to strongly consider that Redhat as a more permenant install on here. Heck; I'm already using a decent browser and mail client!!!

    --
    All content in this message is copyright (c) 2008. All rights reserved. RIAA is prohibited here.
  272. Scared, not stupid by TACD · · Score: 1

    People aren't necessarily stupid. Most of the time (*especially* with computers), people are scared. They don't dare click buttons they haven't clicked before, they won't experiment to find out how things work and they won't try anything new on their own.

    Whether this is due to the inherent complexity of computers (relative to other appliances such as a microwave or fridge) or due to people's now-ingrained expectation that anything out of the ordinary they do may break Windows is debatable, but it certainly fits with what I've seen in my job.

    Novel problem involving something physical or something that the person has experience with, and they're probably quite capable of figuring out a solution on their own. But in a virtual environment, with overwhelming options, no experience, no understanding and a vague awareness of its fragility? Most people will go quite far out of their way to avoid the risk of breaking things or making them worse in this situation.
    --
    Security through promiscuity is no better than security through obscurity.
  273. imaging products more appealing now? by tsu+doh+nimh · · Score: 1
    I have imaged the initial install of my Windows XP PC using a Norton-Ghost like product called Acronis Backup for the past year now. I've used it to reinstall the OS and a standard suite of my favorite apps twice now in the past year.

    I can see this development forcing people who are using pirated versions of Windows to purchase a backup solution that allows them to image their current setup in case they need to reinstall somewhere down the road. I can honestly say that it has been a worthwhile investment.

    --
    ...because you never know who you're dealing with.
  274. Bullshit by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1
    Jupiter Research senior analyst Joe Wilcox said the change shouldn't affect many PC buyers. "Seeing as how the typical OEM would normally preactivate Windows XP, most legitimate users shouldn't have much need to go through the activation process," noted Wilcox.


    Bullshit. While the vendors we buy systems from ship with Windows installed, but one is still required to enter the install key and activate within 30 days.

    I've got an activation removal tool and damned if I'm not going to start using it! Piss on 'em...I've got better things to do than wait on the phone, besides I have a strong aversion to doing business with anyone who enters our business relationship entertaining the presumption that I am going to steal from them.

    Solaris 10 anyone?
    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  275. I hate Microsoft more and more everyday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Security issues, online activation and now disabling online activation. I wish Microsoft goes bankrupt.

    1. Re:I hate Microsoft more and more everyday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the User disables the Windows Product Activation compleatly ,heres a nice hack that can do it and the source is availible

      http://home.pages.at.nyud.net:8090/cw2k/Antiwpa

    2. Re:I hate Microsoft more and more everyday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try cjb.net

  276. Wine Tarball by watermodem · · Score: 1

    A Wine Tarball of a pretend C drive with Office Pro installed and .wine directory with the text based registry files lets you dup to your hearts content and change ownership if you want.... It mostly works accept the stupid little advisor animals and MS-ACCESS. Oh and you can run that over any linux windows whatever filesystem.... You can even run it from another server as an X-window App. Just don't run the MS-Media player remotely as sound doesn't work remotely yet. The only negative is that games don't work too well under X.

  277. More piracy will ensue, methinks by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Sure, some people will put up with it because the average moron doesn't need to reinstall every 15 days like I do. On the other hand, the average moron will be quite pleased to obtain a copy of the corporate version (sans-activation) from a "friend of a friend" to avoid the tedium should his PC ever get munged up beyond repair.

    Why don't they just give us Windows and make their money off Office and Visual Studio ? That would make everyone's lives much simpler, including Microsoft's

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:More piracy will ensue, methinks by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      Sure, some people will put up with it because the average moron doesn't need to reinstall every 15 days like I do.

      Did you realize you referred to yourself as an average moron? When you compare yourself to a class but provide no evidence you don't belong to the class, you are believed to be a member of the class. That's just the safest assumption to make.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  278. Re:Not Quite as Bad As It Sounds...Seriously by Paco103 · · Score: 1

    The top 20 PC makers WORLDWIDE. Only a handful of those are in the US. Most of these computers come with a COA stuck on the side that is NEVER used! I rebuilt a Dell for a friend a couple weeks ago. I didn't use a recovery disc, I used the WinXP Home OEM disc that came with the computer. Even that copy is tied to the hardware, so no activation or key entry was necessary. That is not effecting legitimate users. If she lost that disc, and I gave her my XP home disc, she would be asked why she's using that key. She'd just tell them it's a Dell computer, and she lost the discs that came with it, so she's using another disc with the key on her system. That is still legit, but uncommon.

    What is more common is for someone at school to copy a code off the side of the dell that is in the labs. That is what this is aiming at.

    I work for the Computer Services department at my university, and we have a site license. Every machine that comes onto this campus is wiped clean of the OEM install and our build is installed before ever being used. All of those keys on the sides of those machine are pretty much free for the taking.

    THAT is what this is aiming at. I hate to say this, but no matter how good you think you are, you are not in the "Top 20 OEM builders" - so your key should not be affected, and should still allow online activation.

  279. I actually find it more intimidating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when Windows Server 2003 asks me why I want to shutdown/restart the server.

    B-|

  280. ... and free Windows then ? by page275 · · Score: 1

    Now it strips down its online activation ... I wonder if for the near future, activation by phone is also taken down ... well, and we don't have to activate anything at all ... which is cool ... free Windows ...

  281. Detained for a receipt by AndresFerraro · · Score: 1

    So what's a rent-a-cop to do if you just try to keep walking out the door beyond getting in front of you?? Grab you?? AFAIK (IANAL)Forcefully detaining a civilian is assault pretty much for every citizen except public law enforcement.

    Club or no club, contract of no contract. You cannot force or be forced to perform on a contract by anyone except by order of a judge. And in that case it is public law enforcement the only ones who can enforce (potentially forcefully) that you perform according to the judge's ruling.

    --
    -Andres.
  282. Here's hoping having a door attendant works! by dsheeks · · Score: 1

    When I leave Best Buy I just offer my receipt to the attendant and have never been challenged. Since the cost of shop lifting just gets pushed on to the consumer, I certainly hope having someone at the door reviewing receipts actually works to save money overall. I can't see any need to have higher prices just to pay for shoplifters.

  283. You can carry a sword in CA?! by ThreeDayMonk · · Score: 1

    Can you really carry a sword in CA?

    I always fancied the idea of wandering around with a nice big Japanese sword hanging beside me. It would certainly dissuade the riff-raff.

    I never thought that I would legally be able to do it, however. Now I know that somewhere, albeit on another continent from where I am, that ambition can be achieved.

    --
    If your comment title says 'Re: Foo', I'm not likely to read it.
    1. Re:You can carry a sword in CA?! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can do it, but it'll get you a lot of unwanted scrutiny. It's legal, but not a good idea :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  284. Nice FUD! by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

    Let's break down the real facts, because it seems like SlashDot likes spreading da FUD..

    If you purchase a computer pre-installed with Windows XP from a major vendor (re: Dell, Gateway, HP, etc. etc.), Windows XP will come already activated. Your Windows XP key is in the BIOS (as it already is in most Dell PCs), letting you reinstall Windows XP without activation over and over again as many times as you want.

    When I bought a new Dell a few months back, I had to go online to activate the copy; with this new rule, I won't have to anymore. It'll already be activated.

    Check out Ed Bott's blog entry regarding this. You can also read an article at Dell's site detailing the difference in "OEM" and "SLP" editions of Windows XP/2003.

    Get the facts, people, before you start yelling that the sky is falling.

    --
    Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    1. Re:Nice FUD! by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      I forgot to also point to Ed Bott's latest entry on Windows Product Activation, with more detail than ever..

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    2. Re:Nice FUD! by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      If you purchase a computer pre-installed with Windows XP from a major vendor (re: Dell, Gateway, HP, etc. etc.), Windows XP will come already activated. Your Windows XP key is in the BIOS (as it already is in most Dell PCs), letting you reinstall Windows XP without activation over and over again as many times as you want.


      Beautiful! When you upgrade Windows you are compelled to buy a new PC.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  285. Microsoft did this to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Microsoft simply made all of the Dell, HP and Compaqs of the world activate online like the rest of use resellers must then they wouldn't have this issue. Now they've simply shafted the small resellers again. What they fail to mention is that small resellers don't get the benefits that an "Ultra gold premier" reseller gets. In other words, my customers are going to have to call to activate their new PC's. If MS just treated everyone fairly and stopped giving special treatment to the big OEMs of the world then they would have all of those numbers in the activation servers and they wouldn't need to chuck the whole system. Thanks Microsoft.