Slashdot Mirror


Study Points to Sixth Sense in Humans

Ben Sullivan writes "St. Louis researchers say there's something to the notion of a 'sixth sense' in humans. A part of the brain known as the cingulate cortex, they've found, likely combines multiple, sometimes unconscious data streams to come to conclusions and send warning signals to the conscious mind. Example: Aboriginal tribesmen somehow sensed the impending danger of December's tsunami in time to flee to higher ground before the first sign of water."

587 comments

  1. I have the feeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...this topic is going to generate a lot of flames.

    1. Re:I have the feeling by Rollie+Hawk · · Score: 3, Funny

      It will not you freaking moron!

      --
      Before any liberals are tempted to mod up one of my comments, a word of warning: I'm actually making fun of you.
    2. Re:I have the feeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean a tidal wave of derision?

    3. Re:I have the feeling by unixbugs · · Score: 3, Funny

      I knew you would say that.

      --
      You are about to give someone a piece of your mind, something which you can ill afford...
    4. Re:I have the feeling by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      "Before any liberals are tempted to mod up one of my comments, a word of warning: I'm actually making fun of you."

      With comments like that, you're making "fun" only of yourself.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:I have the feeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      this topic is going to generate a lot of flames.

      You are more than right. I'm going to talk about firefighter.

      There is a firefighter who survived from a burning house which was just about to collapse, without any clear signs about it going to happen.

      The mind of this person recogniced several different signs from which none was anything to be scared of. For example more smoke than usual or less smoke than usual, the temperature was not what it is normally. The noise fire makes sounded a little different etc. Several different unnormal events together triggered the danger sence in his mind and he came out from the house. There were other firefighters with him, who senced nothing. (Luckily the person was able to convince the other to leave the building also.)

      You could call that the sixth sence, but it is normal brainwork. We are scared of new things like computers and robots for a good reason. New things can kill us. On the other hand, new things like computers and robots can bring us much good, so part of the population like them instead of being scared of them.

      About tsunami survivors:
      If they didn't see the stunami from waterlevels, they might have noticed it from running animals, strange bird behaviour, or anything like that.

    6. Re:I have the feeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Study Points to Sixth Sense in Humans

      6th sense is easy... I'd like to see a study on Spider Sense!

    7. Re:I have the feeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry about your penis.

    8. Re:I have the feeling by fr2asbury · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have a bad feeling about this.

    9. Re:I have the feeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Banned from moderating because I voted for Bush. Twice.

      Considering the mess the country is in, it's too bad you weren't banned from voting as well.

    10. Re:I have the feeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By his reply, he actually PROVED the first statement!

    11. Re:I have the feeling by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      Pure Hilarity! Truly the jest of the season!

    12. Re:I have the feeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1561 705012/ref=ase_cornerstoneboo02/103-9409141-369260 4?v=glance&s=books
      Its good to know science is catching up on what most already know. :)
      Personal suggestion: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1561 703494/qid=1108876572/sr=1-4/ref=sr_1_4/103-940914 1-3692604?v=glance&s=books

    13. Re:I have the feeling by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      well maybe he is a liberal?

      anyways, we have seen how the moderators think about this type of stuff and comments like yours. -1 troll indead. I think this is more of an reflection of the inteligence of the mod then the mindset of the post.

    14. Re:I have the feeling by sumdumass · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      banned form voting. It seems that it is the best way to bring a better canidate to the platform. bann those that would vote for the oponant.

      I have a sneaky feeling this is one of the reasons there is a movement to allow convicted fellons to vote in those state were they are denied. you know people of like minds tend to stick together. I'm with ya brother.

    15. Re:I have the feeling by IR4T3 · · Score: 1

      But is it not the "miracle" of a sixth sense which sub- conciously integrates data and reaches a conclusion without intreaction with the higher cognitive functions of the brain being used? And thus, cannot we as humans then infer that the brain is therefore much more capable than we can comprehend. To quote an often used (but seldom backed up) opinion that we collectively only use 1/10th of our available brain power. The other 9/10ths being beyond the ken of current research.

  2. Isn't.... by Seabass55 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...that called being "the one"?

    1. Re:Isn't.... by hoborocks · · Score: 2, Funny

      no, it's "the six". rtfa.

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:Isn't.... by s0me1tm · · Score: 1

      I don't know... I guess if "the one" can see dead people, it is!

  3. Tsunami by kdark1701 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Example: Aboriginal tribesmen somehow sensed the impending danger of December's tsunami in time to flee to higher ground before the first sign of water." I do not envy the person who gets to tell the tsunami survivors: "You should have saw it coming"

    1. Re:Tsunami by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 2, Funny
      I do not envy the person who gets to tell the tsunami survivors: "You should have saw it coming"

      I don't envy someone with such poor grammar either.

      --
      I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
    2. Re:Tsunami by Rollie+Hawk · · Score: 0

      That's up there with explaining why I should have seen my wife *not* coming.

      --
      Before any liberals are tempted to mod up one of my comments, a word of warning: I'm actually making fun of you.
    3. Re:Tsunami by CdBee · · Score: 1

      I do not envy the person who gets to tell the tsunami survivors: "You should have saw it coming"

      Logically, the survivors are the ones who did see it coming

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    4. Re:Tsunami by AngryAzul · · Score: 5, Informative

      Although it does seem that aboriginal people were forewarned, this is more responsibly attributed to their tradition of paying close attention to wildlife. While it is not well understood, animals seem to be more sensitive to the subtle environmental changes that precede events like earthquakes and tsunamis, and it's very smart of these people to take notice when the animals all flee to higher ground. BBC News article about this subject: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4144405.stm

    5. Re:Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem, because Aboriginal tribesmen have never spoke English anyway.

    6. Re:Tsunami by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 3, Funny
      I don't envy someone with such poor grammar either.

      Poor grammar either? What is that? Can it even be had?

    7. Re:Tsunami by Ithika · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's probably not "wildlife" in the general sense, but some small set of animals whose physical senses will play up whenever the earth undergoes strenuous subterranean activity. The rest of the animals - and aborigines - just haven't lost the habit of paying attention to each other.

    8. Re:Tsunami by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 1

      It is not only paying attention to the animals. When they saw the waters receding, they knew something was up. Other folks were just fascinated by such things and went to look.

      --
      My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
    9. Re:Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all aboriginal peoples were spared. There is much more of a correlation between the presence of healthy mangrove swamps and survival. This whole the aboriginal peoples saw it coming is little more than noble savage mythology.

    10. Re:Tsunami by rseuhs · · Score: 1
      Aboriginal tribesmen somehow sensed the impending danger of December's tsunami

      What danger?

      Australia wasn't affected by the Tsunami, so there simply was no danger for any aborigin.

    11. Re:Tsunami by endlessoul · · Score: 1

      Mod me down if you wish, but why is the parent modded funny?

      I see no humor in such a tragic loss. I could see the parent modded as Insightful, seeing as how I do agree with kdark.

      Note: Far be it from me to cruise for flames, but I had to speak up.

    12. Re:Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you thought that one through, did you?

    13. Re:Tsunami by anopres · · Score: 2, Funny

      Man, that's sad. She's not even bothering to fake it.

      --
      Strong Mad - 2008: "I PRESIDENT!"
    14. Re:Tsunami by kdark1701 · · Score: 0, Troll

      These are probably the kind of people who think that tribute.wmv is funny. I should know, I'm one of them.

    15. Re:Tsunami by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      "Example: Aboriginal tribesmen somehow sensed the impending danger of December's tsunami in time to flee to higher ground before the first sign of water."

      This is a result of them having lived there for awhile. Their elders told them that, when the water suddenly goes out quickly, it will be coming back with great force. This is probably a result of observing similar things in the past, not some 6th sense.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    16. Re:Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have not read the article - I dont need to. Anyone who comes to this conclusion is not a scientist worth reading.
      Aboriginies 'sensing' the tsunami is nothing more than being in tune with the natural environment. They see the animals running away from the ocean, all the animals - they run too. Kinda like monkey see, monkey do. Not sixth sense.

    17. Re:Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...spoken...

    18. Re:Tsunami by bcmm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It seems almost common sense to move away from the sea if it does something unusual. I wonder what it says about modern culture that most didn't...

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    19. Re:Tsunami by Buzzard2501 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Aboriginals are just indigenous people. From wikipedia:
      Indigenous peoples are:
      • Peoples living in an area prior to colonization by a state
      • Peoples living in an area within a nation-state, prior to the formation of a nation-state, but who do not identify with the dominant nation.
      • The descendants of either of the above
      --
      Real programmers don't comment their code. It was hard to write, it should be hard to understand.
    20. Re:Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe someone should explain the joke for you since you don't get it.

    21. Re:Tsunami by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      What, never ? Never ever ? You are saying that no aboriginal tribesman has at any point over the last 200 years ever spoken a single word of English.

    22. Re:Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised that these scientist are trying to look at a "sixth sense" sense explanation for this incident rather than looking at how these people really avoided a bad situation. Because most of these people who escaped the catastrophy came mainly from hunter-gather societies we think of them not being able to transfer their vast sum of knowledge onto their progeny. The tradition of looking at their environment is well understood, but the tradition of how these people could pass on their knowledge to their progeny is due mainly to a lack of any documented written historical records. But that doesn't mean these people couldn't transfer their knowledge through oral tradition over the centuries/millenia. They should really try to communicate better with these people before jumping to conclusions and claiming an ESP/sixth sense explanation.

    23. Re:Tsunami by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Or in fact anything which is behaving unusually. The first response is likely to be to put a good distance between yourself and it and watch to see what it does.

      I expect that once a few people had begun to rush down in the gap left by the water other people simply followed.

    24. Re:Tsunami by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      What, so Australian aboriginies are incapable of travel ? They are barred from going on holiday ? You are saying that not one single ethnicly aboriginal australian was affected by the tsunami in any way ?

    25. Re:Tsunami by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I saw a news item where some of the indigenous people were being interviewed. Apparantly despite living in one of the hardest hit areas not a single person fell victim to the wave.

      They did indeed say that this was because it was common knowledge that when the sea retreated like that it was time to seek the higher ground.

    26. Re:Tsunami by fcolari · · Score: 1

      "Neh. Needs garlic."

      --
      "The first rule of intelligent tinkering is to save all the pieces." --Aldo Leopold (Paraphrased)
    27. Re:Tsunami by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      English evolves like that, except in this case it's, "one step forward, two steps back."

      --
      I don't get it.
    28. Re:Tsunami by antiMStroll · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What it says is frightening, the same message you get from watching clips of Darwinian actors trying to pet a wild moose or bear. My childhood years were spent in the industrial Midwest and I would never think petting a moose is a good idea, what kind of childhood leads someone to believe it is?

    29. Re:Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Elephants can hear sounds at much lower frequencies than humans - infrasound. They use it to communicate within the herd.

      This is probably what caused elephants to "sense" the tsunami before it hit - they picked up a huge blast of infrasound, which is produced by (among other natural disasters) earthquakes.

      Google it, there are many places where infrasound is used to monitor natural disasters, but also other more exciting things, such as nuke tests.

    30. Re:Tsunami by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 3, Funny

      You know, you could have something here.

      I live in an earthquake-prone area, and just a couple of minutes ago my dog suddenly indicated a frantic need to leave the building I live in.

      Remarkably, he was able to promptly demonstrate that had I not let him out, a local flood might have occurred!

    31. Re:Tsunami by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      You mean like animals that sense vibrations or can hear very low frequencies? For example, snakes are deaf. They are very sensitive to vibrations though. This causes them to hide when elephants are near by (elephants will kill snakes).

    32. Re:Tsunami by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "Example: Aboriginal tribesmen somehow sensed the impending danger of December's tsunami in time to flee to higher ground before the first sign of water."

      "Saaaaaay, where are all the animals running to? It's like a freaking Steven King movie"

      "No idea, but I'm follwing THEM."

      I think if a sixth sense really existed then I'd be able to find my car keys.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    33. Re:Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think in this case we can finally blame the culture of television for killing people. Oooh, there's something moving in an unusual way. I think I'll go watch it.

    34. Re:Tsunami by AngryAzul · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree completely. I only in fact meant by physical senses (not sixth senses) but was purposefully vague about "wildlife" because I'm sure animals attuned to tidal waves (fish etc.) may be different those those attuned to earthquakes (prior to which I believe even cats and dogs have been shown to get agitated). I personally would think this has less to do with unaccounted-for senses than it does known ones that are more sensitive to ours abut some things. Even having "four on the floor" must give you some advantages to knowing what's happening down there!

    35. Re:Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in the midwest, so I don't give a crap about tsunamis and earthquakes. What I want to know is are there any creatures that can give me good lotto numbers?

      If not, I'm goin' huntin'.

    36. Re:Tsunami by kabrakan · · Score: 1

      Not even that.. A society that has existed in that lifestyle for so long would develop subconscious techniques of analyzing that environment.. The sixth sense is no more than computing conclusions based on a small amount of detail and a lifetime of experience.

      --
      Slartibartfast:"Is that your robot?"
      Marvin:"No, I'm mine."
    37. Re:Tsunami by martinoforum · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "may be different those those attuned to earthquakes (prior to which I believe even cats and dogs have been shown to get agitated)"

      I can confirm that. We had a medium-sized earthquake down in Hawkes Bay, New Zealand when I was a kid (big enough that it was mildly frightening, not big enough to break anything major) and about thirty seconds before the first shock hit our cat went apeshit trying to get out of the house. It got outside, bolted off down the driveway and found itself a bit open space to run around in. We all went outside to watch, and then the first shock hit.

      Quite interesting.

    38. Re:Tsunami by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of examples in modern times of people refusing to heed obvious signs of danger because they thought things would be ok. To me the classic example is the eruption that of Mount Pelee in 1902. One wonders how an entire city could end up being wiped out with such obvious signs, maybe civilisation cocoons us with a belief that "someone else will fix it, and it will be alright", whereas 'primitives' know that in the final analysis they have to look after their own well being.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    39. Re:Tsunami by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I've been in close proximity to 6 tornadoes, 5 I've seen and the one I didn't was the real ass kicker; only had three steps warning on that one. I'm truely alive due to dumb luck.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    40. Re:Tsunami by Sique · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of animals which can sense aerosols. Aerosols typically get into the atmosphere during a large earthquake, and they get into the air as soon as the first small cracks in the earth surface happen. Those cracks might be too small to generate sufficient vibration for hundreds of miles to alert the measuring equipment of the geophysicists. But the animals in the surrounding area sniff the aerosols and start to panic.

      There is also the fact that a sonic wave has about three to five times the speed in water compared to air (~1000-1500 m/sec, don't know the exact number right now), and the earthquake surely made a big noise in the water, which travelled literally at super sonic (air)speed. So all water living animals were alerted early. At a distance of 1000mls for instance the tsunami wave, speeding with about 500mph arrived after about two hours. The sonic wave in the ocean reached a distance of 1000mls already after ~1000-1500sec, about 20-30 minutes after the earthquake. Enough time for the water living animals to show lots of panic before the tsunami wave hit the shores.

      PS: Humans have seven senses anyway: the optical sense (eye), the acoustic sense (ear), the taste sense (tongue), the smell sense (nose), the tactile sense (skin), the thermic sense (skin too) and the balance sense (inner ear).
      If you want to get pedantic, you can even difference the optical sense into the brightness sense and the color sense (which are recorded by different types of cells in the retina).

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    41. Re:Tsunami by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      My dog sometimes crawls under the bed and starts shaking well up to an hour before the first clap of thunder from a summer storm. A Cockatoo I had as a kid used to sqwak and scream when my dad was coming home from work, but the car was still about a mile away. Animals of different species percive the world differently to each other, some use magnetic fields, sonar, infra-red or like my pets they have vastly different strengths in sight, sound, smell, taste. If some species of animals can somehow sense precursors to an earthquake then I don't think it is implausable that other animals and humans can pick up on thier behaviour and create a chain reation of anxiety in the local environment.

      Since the aboriginals of the area are still well connected with thier natuaral environment they would likely pick up on the anxiety either consiously or sub-consiously and act accordingly. What I find interesting about the article is that the resaerchers appear to have found brain activity to suggest that we do pick up signals without knowing what the threat is or even how we know there is a threat (is this part of how fear mongering works?). The other part that is also very interesting is that the researchers have built a computer model that can be used to predict some behaviour in the brain. Now if we could only find out which species of animals are picking up what signals maybe we could use the knowlage to improve our own species disaster prediction technology.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    42. Re:Tsunami by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      Tell that to all the idiot reporters I watched last summer broadcasting from the beach. In the middle of a hurricane. I'm actually astonished none of them where killed by flying debris.

      On the flip side, right after the Hurricane Charley all the street lights where out, there were power lines and the emergency services where rightly telling everyone to stay inside. What did I see moving past my window every 10 minutes for the rest of the night? Emergency vehicles? Nope. Idiots in cars driving around with their lights off surveying the damage.

      Humans are just naturally curious, usually it's a good thing, sometimes it can get us in big trouble!

    43. Re:Tsunami by jc42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um, this isn't exactly secret knowledge. I grew up on the American West Coast, and I remember being taught about "tidal waves" in grade school. Not that there had been one of any size in living memory, of course. But we were taught that if we saw the ocean water retreating more rapidly than an ordinary tide, we should try to get away from the shore to avoid the incoming wave that would follow.

      I'd bet that this is known to shore dwellers almost everywhere. Of course, some people are too stupid to listen when their teachers try to tell them about such things. (And some teachers are probably too stupid to teach it. ;-)

      But it's hardly the sort of knowledge that's restricted to a privileged few. Not if it's taught to American children.

      Of course, later on they finally admitted that "tidal wave" was a bad term, unless you live in one of the estuaries that actually has tidal bores. So we were taught a funny new Japanese word ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    44. Re:Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, nociception counts too - sense of pain :)

      I was going to suggest sense of pressure, but realised that this fits under your tactile category. However, you're also missing proprioception - that's the sense which lets us know where our body is/how it is oriented (think about how you can touch your nose with your finger with your eyes closed).

      I've got to agree though that the bit about 5 senses is really annoying :)

    45. Re:Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would never think petting a moose is a good idea, what kind of childhood leads someone to believe it is?

      A Disney childhood.

    46. Re:Tsunami by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1
      PS: Humans have seven senses anyway: the optical sense (eye), the acoustic sense (ear), the taste sense (tongue), the smell sense (nose), the tactile sense (skin), the thermic sense (skin too) and the balance sense (inner ear).
      If you want to get pedantic, you can even difference the optical sense into the brightness sense and the color sense (which are recorded by different types of cells in the retina).
      There is also a sense, I forget what the name is, of where your body's parts are. I think sometimes it is grouped in with the tactile sense (which itself also includes the pressure (touch) sense and the pain sense). I remember reading about a guy who lost this sense, and had to walk, sit, etc., by looking at his legs and conciously determining what to move where.
      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    47. Re:Tsunami by Chaset · · Score: 1

      I'm too lazy to look it up, but the word you're looking for, I think, was kinesthetic sense. (I hope I'm right).

      --
      -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
    48. Re:Tsunami by Sique · · Score: 1
      So, we are now at ten senses for every human:
      1. brightness
      2. color
      3. noise
      4. taste
      5. smell
      6. temperature
      7. pressure
      8. pain
      9. balance
      10. orientation
      Did we forget anything?
      I guess, we can also add:
      • hunger
      • thirst
      • nausea
      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    49. Re:Tsunami by bcmm · · Score: 1
      Humans are just naturally curious, usually it's a good thing, sometimes it can get us in big trouble!
      /So when a natuaral disaster hits us, the geeks and hackers will be the first to go?
      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    50. Re:Tsunami by alister · · Score: 1
      Logically, the survivors are the ones who did see it coming

      You know, I reckon those who didn't survive saw it coming too... and had a much better view of it.

      Alister

  4. Haha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had a feeling this article was coming.

    1. Re:Haha! by isny · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Well, I have a feeling that this news will be posted again in the next day or two...

    2. Re:Haha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have a feeling this joke will be repeated by at least 20 different posters.

    3. Re:Haha! by ArticleI · · Score: 1

      I knew you were going to say that.

    4. Re:Haha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't your sixth sense tell you that, it is your common sense.

    5. Re:Haha! by CGP314 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have a feeling we will see it again on the front page tomorrow as well.


      -Colin

    6. Re:Haha! by Xeo+024 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're a subscriber?

    7. Re:Haha! by Chris_Mir · · Score: 1

      duh, thats cheap. One in five times, you'll be right!

    8. Re:Haha! by Xorkid · · Score: 1

      I have the same feeling right now...

      --
      www.microsoft.com/athome/sec urity/children/kidtalk.mspx Was This Information Useful?
    9. Re:Haha! by wootest · · Score: 1

      I knew he was!

    10. Re:Haha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a feeling that thsi article will be DUPED!

  5. Higher ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Did the aboriginal tribemen ever go to higher ground when there wasn't a tsunami, or was this the first time they went there?

    1. Re:Higher ground by robomepp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In a report on NPR, (and I can't get more specific because I was driving), it was stated that there are little used nerve endings in our knee cartilage that evolved specifically for the purpose of detecting earth tremors. I can remember one time in my life when I sensed a very faint earth tremor (I live in a geologically stable region) and I sensed it through my knees, as I recall (I confirmed it via a news report later). Tribal people, living in a quiet setting, are probably more attuned to the sensations delivered by these nerves. Also, if their ears are very keen (not damaged by headphones, machinery, and too-loud speakers, as mine are), perhaps they could detect infrasonic sounds associated with an earthquate of the extreme magnitude of that one. Animals certainly are very good at detecting infrasonics, so the tribal peoples could have noted animal movements prior to the tsunami.

    2. Re:Higher ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to point out that research in Denmark indicates that a segment of the population is able to sense infrasound, although it presumably requires some impressive sound pressure levels (like the test rig of 50 pcs 13" long-throw subwoofers in a small sealed room). I'd wager some million tons of mass shifting by a few meters would qualify as "impressive sound pressure levels".

      Remember: the lowest tuning of any detector in the ear is 60Hz, yet we can hear below this. The main point is that it transitions from being a pure tone to being a pulse around the lowest "A" a pipe organ can produce (13.75Hz).

    3. Re:Higher ground by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Also, if their ears are very keen (not damaged by headphones, machinery, and too-loud speakers, as mine are), perhaps they could detect infrasonic sounds associated with an earthquate of the extreme magnitude of that one.

      The causes of hearing loss you mentioned damage one's ability to hear high frequencies.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  6. Stop with the damn "paranormal" stories!!! by Ninja+Programmer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oh for crying out loud, can we please stop posting this "X-files" nonsense as if its for real? As if we don't have enough propaganda and lies being blasted our way in our media.

    Look, we're talking about ESP. If you can't get James Randi to believe it, please don't bother us about it.

    1. Re:Stop with the damn "paranormal" stories!!! by NoseBag · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I suggest you RTFA.

      I did - expecting to read exactly what you expressed. I was pleasantly surprised.

      --
      Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
    2. Re:Stop with the damn "paranormal" stories!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh...maybe the reason it was posted is because there might be something to it...

    3. Re:Stop with the damn "paranormal" stories!!! by __aagujc9792 · · Score: 0

      Let's just assume that all the people in the danger zone who proactively took to the hills later answered some questionnaire and all those who stayed on the flat, didn't because they were dead. Would this explain the astounding observation?

    4. Re:Stop with the damn "paranormal" stories!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe it's just another one of the crap stories that Slashdot has been spewing out for the past couple of years. It certainly doesn't matter, and it doesn't really qualify as "News for Nerds," unless you're some sort of superstitious paranormal researcher.

    5. Re:Stop with the damn "paranormal" stories!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't get James Randi to believe it because he makes his living by *not* believing it.

    6. Re:Stop with the damn "paranormal" stories!!! by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      No, the scientists found that a part of the brain might be capable off making better use of the information comming from five senses.
      The article writter somehow turned this into a sixth sense and we know that good slashdot storry submitters and editors don't rtfa just like everyone else around here.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    7. Re:Stop with the damn "paranormal" stories!!! by rifftide · · Score: 1
      You can blame me. I was the one who asked him to post the story.

      No, I didn't call or email him, but... he *knew*.

    8. Re:Stop with the damn "paranormal" stories!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grreat!

    9. Re:Stop with the damn "paranormal" stories!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh hi there, is it hard to live without a sense of balance? I'm guessing since you refer to a sixth sense as ESP, you're missing one??

    10. Re:Stop with the damn "paranormal" stories!!! by wvitXpert · · Score: 1

      Your exactly right. There is nothing in the universe except what we know. Anything outside of that is just not true. Damn paranormal stories... it's almost like some people don't realize that we already know everything.

    11. Re:Stop with the damn "paranormal" stories!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's a GREAT strawman! Did you learn that in Paranormal College? Look, nobody ever said we know everything. It's the paranormal types who claim that, usually. It's also the paranormal type's job to supply evidence, reliable, repeatable evidence. Otherwise, what's the point? I mean, do you call a psychic hotline? If not, why not?

      Oh, and just so you know, THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN YOUR AND *YOU'RE*, get it in your head, you fool.

  7. Not another pseudoscience story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Aboriginal tribesmen somehow sensed the impending danger of December's tsunami in time to flee to higher ground before the first sign of water"

    No, they fled to higher ground after they saw the water level drop knowing that it would come back up the same amount that it dropped.

    1. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they saw the animals fleeing, and decided to join them.

    2. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also pay closer attention to nature. There were hardly any animal casualities from the tsunami. It is theorized that the fish and marine life were spooked by the original under water quake, therefore alerting the predatory birds, and so on.

    3. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, they recognised the signs, there was even an interview with some of the tribesmen on TV where they explained this. In a similar vein there was a story about a young girl of who noticed that the sea had gone "all funny", realised that it might be what her geography teacher had told them about tsunami the previous term and got her family to flee. In both cases a "sixth sense" had nothing to do with it; it was just recognising the available signs for what they were and acting accordingly.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    4. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by pVoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I agree with you but there is some merit in this. Not enough to make a story called "the sixth sense" though.

      All IMHO, the brain is a humongous pattern matching system. It learns by ways of emotional or genetic reinforcment. It might very well be that in fact seeing animals flee, even if they're just walking uphill might trigger a dormant pattern and pop up a completely irrational thought that maybe it's time to go up too.

      But this is the equivalent of software. Not an additional hardware function that perceives stuff (the sixth sense). That would be like calling intelligence your 7th sense.

    5. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by MOBE2001 · · Score: 1

      No, they fled to higher ground after they saw the water level drop knowing that it would come back up the same amount that it dropped.

      True but it is also probable that they fled to higher ground because there was a big earthquake. Big earthquakes are known to often precede tsunamis in that part of the world. No unexplained sixth sense is needed.

    6. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      One of them I remember seeing interviewed on CNN said that their ascestors, in stories handed down, told them to flee from the beach if the water runs away.

      Looks like their educational system saved them.

    7. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, sounds suspicious, I bet they are responsible!

    8. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And aboriginals are more observant and familiar with animal behavior than us city folks!

      Simply due to years of experience. They've experienced natural disasters, forest fires, earth quakes and such before.

      And just like the sense of smell in dogs is many many times more sensitive than that of humans, the sense for smell, sound and earth quakes so little (earth quakes always often start with smaller ones before the big one, then again many after shocks) in animals are most likely more sensitive.. (not a 6th sense, just hightened 5 senses.. ) and aboriginals are more familiar and tuned in to animal behavior around them..

      I guess if you don't have knowledge, common sense and intelligence to explain these things, you are willing to make a fool of yourself with such dumb-ass 6th sense claims, or creationism, or other ways to make the public more accepting by using 'scientific' terminology..

      If this were good dependable research, all our objections to those claims here, would've been considered, tested and proven wrong!

      There's nothing wrong with 'searching'. Never say never, but don't start getting media attention before you found that your intestines are a chocolate factory, and found out it's just shit that comes out.

      Look at your average tv-shopping channels.. they are ALL scientically proven, including all detergents and magnetic medallions that make the pain in your toe go away..

      I'm receiving Slashdot news as an RSS feed, since yesterday.. and already I'm feeling like this is not news, but SPAM!

    9. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 1

      the retraction of water as a result of the coming tsunami happens very fast, I'd say 1-3 minutes.
      It's not like they had the chance to have a premonition..

      I'm sure they saw the waves coming right after they saw the water withdrew, but then there was still no chance to escape..

    10. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Strangely you may think of this as pseudoscience, but I know I can often tell if someone is behind me even if I didn't hear any footsteps or see them come near. Their are actually alot of cases of sensing things not directly related to your main senses. Several martial arts for example understand the concept of a 'Zone of Authority/Control'. Used correctly you know what's going on in any area within this zone without directly using any of your normal five senses as we understand them.

      That said in this specific example I think things could better be contributed to actualy usign their eyes to notice the natural changes proceeding the event.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    11. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      yes but it was her SIXTH grade common SENSE!!

    12. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone standing behind you has nothing to do with an extra sense. Blind people are good a good example of this, they can tell when someone is in the room, even if they didn't hear the actual person come in. This has to do with the way sound echoes around, think of it like sonar.

    13. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by kramerino · · Score: 1

      "No, they fled to higher ground after they saw the water level drop knowing that it would come back up the same amount that it dropped." If they, indeed, believe that, then their would have been no reason to flee.

    14. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      In a similar vein there was a story about a young girl of who noticed that the sea had gone "all funny"

      Yeah, a friend of mine grew up on Hawaii (and is half Hawaiian) and learned several things at a very young age:

      1) how to swim like a fish
      2) never turn your back on the sea-- it can reach up and grab you (I've known more than a few people who went as tourists, ignored this rule, and gone from standing on some rocks to being bashed hard against them in the water in an instant)
      3) if the sea does something weird, go the other way to high ground fast.

    15. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by vtaluskie · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest a simpler explanation for the aboriginal's behavior - they watched animal behavior and read the signs - curiously, there was very little loss of animal life in the tsunami - they moved to higher ground...

    16. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      If you'd RTFA you'd realize that by "sixth sense" they don't mean "psychic powers." They mean the ability to analyze enviornmental data subconsciously and figure out when danger is coming - which is exactly what you are talking about.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    17. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      Damn straight, and you can come to some remarkably accurate conclusions given very fuzzy input. From what I've seen, most "psychics" have simply learned to listen to the intuition that we all have. With a little cold reading and guesswork you can come up with an amazingly accurate picture of someone's life and might even get lucky and nail a future event or two. I'm pretty sure that some of them don't even know what they're doing, although the commercial/televised ones probably do.

      There is nothing mystical about it, really. A catestrophic event had already occured (The earthquake that triggered it) and all nature tends to freak out about that sort of thing. If nature acts the same way for generations and then one day starts acting differently, your intuition is going to tell you there's something wrong, and if you're the kind of person who enjoys... living... you will listen to that intuition and act like the other animals are and run up hill.

      By the way, intuition is a great indicator of how a relationship's going. If your intuition is telling you that your partner is cheating on you, there's a pretty good chance that they are. They'll be sending you all sorts of signals that you might not pick up at a conscious level. Your subconscious will pick up on them though, and start screaming at you. If your intuition tells you to bail, you probably should.

      It might make a fun study though. Might be worth a research grant or two. Not psychic phenomina, that's crap, just a study of human intuition.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    18. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by Nikker · · Score: 1

      I have a question for you ...

      Do you believe your mind is in control of you or do you feel you are in control of your mind?

      Now when you answer this ask your self what part of me controls my mind ....

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    19. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by OwlofCreamCheese · · Score: 1

      I think even that is an exageration of how amazeing it is. even if you go to bar harbor maine you can see that the water goes out more before a 5 foot wave than a 2 foot one. I would not think it would take a genius to go beyond that reasoning to what is going on if all the water goes out.

      --
      -You're wasting your time. Alfador only likes me.
    20. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by HybridJeff · · Score: 1

      Or do you feel that you are your mind?

    21. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by pVoid · · Score: 1
      I don't know if you are being a troll or not but I can answer you:

      I firmly believe that my mind is in control of me. But that doesn't mean I'm just deterministic behaviour. It's the exact same scenario as software on hardware. If a CPU is broken in a special enough way, there is no way for software to be able to detect whether it's on a healthy system.

      Saying that however, doesn't mean software *is* hardware.

      Or, to bring the analogy back over to our side: saying that our mind and body is completely in control of our soul isn't the same as saying our sould *is* our mind and body.

    22. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      There is nothing mystical about it, really. A catestrophic event had already occured (The earthquake that triggered it) and all nature tends to freak out about that sort of thing. If nature acts the same way for generations and then one day starts acting differently, your intuition is going to tell you there's something wrong, and if you're the kind of person who enjoys... living... you will listen to that intuition and act like the other animals are and run up hill.

      That's a very, ahem, tidy explanation. However, it misses the point. An earthquake could be indicative of many different phenomena -- tsunamis, volcanic eruptions, etc. If the seismic activity was indicative of an impending volcanic eruption, going to higher ground would be idiotic, no matter how many animals were doing it. Logically, we must conclude one of:
      1. The aborigines saw the animals going uphill and got lucky.
      2. The aboriginies saw the animals going uphill and somehow knew that it wasn't a volcanic eruption.
      3. The aborigines didn't see the animals going uphill and got lucky.
      4. The aboriginies didn't see the animals going uphill, sensed danger, and knew that it wasn't an impending volcanic eruption.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    23. Re:Not another pseudoscience story by grcumb · · Score: 1

      Finally, something other than ill-informed speculation.

      All the time I was reading these comments, I kept waiting for someone to say, 'Uh, why don't we just ask the aboriginals why they ran away? Sheesh, they're not lab rats, they can speak for themselves.'

      I'm currently living in the South Pacific, a part of the world that has fairly frequent earthquakes and the occasional tsunami. The people here have a saying that could be translated as 'When the ocean runs dry, run away some place high.'

      The last time a tsunami came through this area (in 2001), friends tell me, one man walked out to pick up some of the stranded fish. Everyone else in the village was yelling at him to follow them uphill. When my friends told me this story, it was clear that they thought this guy was stupid or insane - or both.

      People in India know not to pet the pretty black snakes. In the Arctic they know when it's safe to walk on the ice. In the South Pacific they know that a dry lagoon does not mean free fish time. Is it beyond comprehension that people in Indonesia might know that, too?

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
  8. heh by Phil246 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It would be more useful to know precisely what triggers it, and why - then saying it merely exists.

    Im sure most people have at one point in their lives for an unexplainable reason (till now i guess) done something other then what they wanted to - and was better off because of it.

    1. Re:heh by king-manic · · Score: 1

      It would be more useful to know precisely what triggers it, and why - then saying it merely exists.

      Im sure most people have at one point in their lives for an unexplainable reason (till now i guess) done something other then what they wanted to - and was better off because of it.


      Thats called coincidence. it's a little paranoia, a little loss of impulse control, and a circumstance that vindicates that paranaoia. Not psychic, just statistics.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  9. I use my sixth sense all the time... by eboot · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's true! Everyday I use anonymous communication/travel methods in order to stop big brother from monitoring me. I don't have any evidence there watching me, I just feel it, because of my sixth sense you see.

    --
    Two tears in a bucket. Motherfuck it.
    1. Re:I use my sixth sense all the time... by piotr+alfredovich · · Score: 2, Funny
      Everyday I use anonymous communication/travel methods in order to stop big brother from monitoring me. I don't have any evidence there watching me, I just feel it, because of my sixth sense you see.
      Maybe it's because you're using anonymous communication methods they're watching you.

      Picture it:
      The NSA has just spent teraflops breaking your mixmastered messages and all they get is the loveletter you sent to the Bush twins.
    2. Re:I use my sixth sense all the time... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean that they aren't after you.

      (From a fortune cookie)

    3. Re:I use my sixth sense all the time... by eboot · · Score: 1

      Aghhhhh!!!!! How did you know about that letter?????? Oh god, you're one of THEM arent you? Now ill have to burn everything and move again.

      --
      Two tears in a bucket. Motherfuck it.
  10. Aboriginal tribesmen by shreevatsa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, AFAIK, the tribesmen affected by the tsunami (were they aboriginal? I don't know) knew to run to high places for safety not because of any sixth sense, but because of wisdom passed down the generations saying that whenever water in the ocean very quickly receded, it would soon come gushing and flood them. No sixth sense there!

    1. Re:Aboriginal tribesmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was very little time difference between the water receeding and the wave hitting. Not enough time to find higher ground. Anyway i dont know what was the big deal about the tsunami and i was there.

    2. Re:Aboriginal tribesmen by owlstead · · Score: 1

      So knowledge and good common sense did it. Who would have guessed?

      If you hear the stories of people going to watch what is going to happen, it makes you hair stand up. What's even creepier is the fact that you don't know if you would be one of them.

      There was a (Dutch) couple on television that had the sense to run off to common ground. Most people they saw were either fixed in place or were going in the other direction (up and including the other Dutch, I might add).

      But we are getting off-topic here.

    3. Re:Aboriginal tribesmen by KontinMonet · · Score: 1

      Aboriginal simply means 'from the beginning'. It is a word usually incorrectly used to denote the original inhabitants of Australia.

      For the current Andaman Islanders, it seems they are aboriginal. And yes, I saw a Beeb report where they said they had seen something different about the waves coming onto the beach and consequently moved to higher ground. They also never build their huts close to the beach. Folklore working at its best.

      --
      Did he inhale?
    4. Re:Aboriginal tribesmen by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1
      That explanation is possible for tribesmen. But animals? Animals can't "pass wisdom down the generations" (except possibly "instinct"), but they ran from danger anyway. I thought both the animals and tribesmen fled because they sensed danger.

      I agree about the "6th sense". They sensed danger not thru some 6th sense but thru a lifetime of personal experience with the environment and constant observation of same and each other. We civilized people are the ones who figure out a tsunami is coming from putting together book learning with notice of "something funny" only when it has become blindingly obvious, long after the animals have picked up the initial clues and fled. Their ability to read the environment is so good it seems uncanny to us, but it really isn't.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  11. Sixth Sense? Pfft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's those damn vorlons!

  12. Re:First post? by Rollie+Hawk · · Score: 1

    Now we'll never know.

    --
    Before any liberals are tempted to mod up one of my comments, a word of warning: I'm actually making fun of you.
  13. I sensed something to. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was on a boat off the coast of southern thailand. I had been telling people for the last week the world was going to end. I had dreadful nightmares about massive amounts of death the night before and i keep thinking a giant wave was going to knock the boat over. I was continually looking on the horizon. I was glad to get onto shore and inland to higher ground. 20 minutes later the tsunami hit.
    Sadly I had half expected, but also thankful to be alive.

    1. Re:I sensed something to. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I sensed something to.

      You sensed something to what?

      I sense another letter is coming.....

    2. Re:I sensed something to. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      o

  14. I see dead servers by Polarism · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    F5 F5 F5 F5 :D

    --
    All your base are belong to Google.
    1. Re:I see dead servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ctrl+R you insensitive clod.

  15. Duh by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Your sense of balance in your inner ear is your sixth sense (it's a sense of gravity). It just doesn't get any credit.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Duh by Rollie+Hawk · · Score: 1

      I bet that could have explained the sensing of the tsunami, too.

      --
      Before any liberals are tempted to mod up one of my comments, a word of warning: I'm actually making fun of you.
    2. Re:Duh by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      Don't forget #7 - kinethesis, which doesn't even have "sense" in it's name, unlike "sense of balance"

    3. Re:Duh by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's not a sense (i.e. an input into your brain) .. it's your brain's model your body's current position. And it can get out of sync with reality, which is why baseball players punch their mitt before making a catch.

    4. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darn. I thought I hand number 6, but now it's number 8. One time I opened a bag of onions and knew they were moldy without using the first five senses. I have allergies and it made me want to sneeze.

    5. Re:Duh by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      But it's a model that's also based on externalities. Have someone move your arm around with your eyes closed, and you can still touch your nose without looking.

    6. Re:Duh by Epistax · · Score: 1

      What number sense is that little radar thing in the top of your nose that can sense when an object is close to your face (about 1 inch away)?

    7. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whether it can get out of sync with reality has nothing to do with whether it is a sense or not. All of your senses can give false information. And actually it is an input to your brain. Your brain is receiving information about the gravitational field surrounding you.

    8. Re:Duh by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      That one comes under touch, it's detecting the subtle change in air pressure. You can sense a hand above your face far easier than a pencil point since the hand has a greater effect on the local pressure.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    9. Re:Duh by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are several 'senses' that are really just reprocessing of information gathered from other senses. When something is right in front of you, the sound around you changes - there is a dead spot where you were previously hearing things. Similar 'dead spot' effects can be caused by a shadow over your eyes or the hairs on your skin being protected from whatever air currents were previously there. I personally find that passive echo location works well for me when I'm in a dark room. I don't squeek like a bat or anything... just hearing the changes in ambient sound can tell you when you're near a wall or something.

    10. Re:Duh by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Informative
      Your sense of balance in your inner ear is your sixth sense (it's a sense of gravity). It just doesn't get any credit.

      Yeah, the whole "five senses" thing is crap from ancient greek philosophy. It's more accurate than their "four elements", but it's still not correct. There are numerous other senses. Balance (as you mentioned), sensed by the motion of fluid in the inner ear; proprioception/kinesthesia (as another poster mentioned), sensing body position; There are several "internal" senses-- hunger, full bladder, etc.-- as well. Basically, anything that your nervous system consciously registers (internal or external) is a sense. Technically, that tingling feeling you get just before a lightning strike during a thunder storm could be called your "sense of lightning". At best, those five senses Aristotle and his contemporaries enumerated could be called "the five most obvious external senses".

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    11. Re:Duh by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      That's not a sense (i.e. an input into your brain) .. it's your brain's model your body's current position. And it can get out of sync with reality, which is why baseball players punch their mitt before making a catch.

      It is a sense. If it was a model, someone could move your arm around and, if you weren't looking, you'd have no idea which way it was pointing, which is clearly not the case. It's a sense based upon perception of tissue tension, among other things. The reason baseball players punch their mitt is because it's not always a particularly accurate sense, and a misperception of position on the order of an inch or two can easily result in a missed catch. That punch is a last minute calibration, using a strong sensory input to generate multiple parallel data points which can be averaged.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    12. Re:Duh by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 1

      Have someone move your arm around with your eyes closed, and you can still touch your nose without looking

      Have someone announce chess moves while a chess expert has his eyes closed, and he can still announce his own moves without looking. Does that mean he has a "chess sense"? No, it's just a model he keeps in his brain. Just like the model of his own body.

    13. Re:Duh by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      That one comes under touch, it's detecting the subtle change in air pressure. You can sense a hand above your face far easier than a pencil point since the hand has a greater effect on the local pressure.

      How about sensing infra-red radiation from a heat source? The skin perceives it, but it sure ain't tactile.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    14. Re:Duh by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True, but I always felt that the "5 senses" were intended to be pretty general. Therefore, I'd group a sense of touch/feel as encompassing all those "internal senses" anyway. (You can "feel" that your bladder is full, just as you can "feel" pain or "feel" hunger.)

      It still seems like a very valid point that it's flawed when it comes to not mentioning our sense of "balance" though. The sense of body position is an interesting one... Amputees often report having sensations that their missing appendage is still there, so this "sense" appears to be rather "hard-wired" to provide "static" feedback to the brain, which may not be accurate at all if the "givens" of having all of one's body parts in place isn't met.

    15. Re:Duh by kramerino · · Score: 1

      The author Victor Villaseñor says in his book, Thirteen Senses, that there are Thirteen Senses:

      6. Balance
      7. Intuition
      8. Music (being in Harmony, being interconnected with all existence, which is then alive and breathing and vibrating)
      9. psychic (being able to see the future with utter clarity)

      once those are activated, comes:

      10. flying (space swimming/sailing)
      11. form shifting
      12. hall of records (collective memory or consciousness) and being.

    16. Re:Duh by temojen · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression Reality Master 101 was talking about reality, not fantasy.

    17. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

    18. Re:Duh by kramerino · · Score: 1

      The book is non-fiction.

    19. Re:Duh by kramerino · · Score: 1

      Doesn't mean the thing about 13 senses is total B.S. He's just writing about what his ancestors believed.

    20. Re:Duh by greyhoundpoe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's called "proprioception". Learn. Grow.

    21. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sense of balance has nothing to do with gravity. It is based on liquids inside hollow loops. If our head moves and therefore the loops move in a direction, the liquids inside the loops follow with a delay causing a friction inside the loop. This friction is our sense of balance. This mechanism works also outside of gravity.

    22. Re:Duh by VoidWraith · · Score: 1, Insightful

      To elaborate on your point, two of the "five" senses are redundant: taste and smell. Its the same reaction, just in different areas. We didn't label touch based on region, why this sense?

      Anyway, I agree. Five senses is a simplification fine for lay men and women, but which should be eschewed by those of higher thinking.

    23. Re:Duh by rzbx · · Score: 1

      "It is a sense. If it was a model, someone could move your arm around and, if you weren't looking, you'd have no idea which way it was pointing, which is clearly not the case."

      It is a model. The sense tied to this model is feeling. Without the sense of feeling in the arm, you no longer have the ability to know where your arm is without some other clues. Our brain maps the position of the body in relation to the environment and the body itself. It is not in a sense, a sense. If you broaden the definition of sense, sure you could call it that. But when speaking in terms of general senses that can not easily be broken down into an interpretation of other senses, then no. When your arm falls asleep completely where you have no feeling (perhaps it has happened to you before), if someone were to then move your arm, you would have no clue where the location of your arm was. The only way you could tell that your arm was being moved would be the feeling in your shoulder or upper arm. I hope this clears things up.

      --
      Question everything.
    24. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had heard that your body's sense of where it's parts are in a three dimensional environment was your sixth sense. For example, If you have your eyes closed and your hand is in front of your face, you know where that hand is, not only because you remember holding it there but because your body knows where all it's various pieces are at any given time.

    25. Re:Duh by kaalamaadan · · Score: 1

      The concept "Five Senses" is present not just in Greek philosophy. The enumerative school of the Indian philosophy (Sankhya) in particular, talks about the five senses of knowledge and five senses of action - ten senses - but the five fundamental senses of knowledge are the same as in Greek philosophy.

    26. Re:Duh by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      The concept "Five Senses" is present not just in Greek philosophy. The enumerative school of the Indian philosophy (Sankhya) in particular, talks about the five senses of knowledge and five senses of action - ten senses - but the five fundamental senses of knowledge are the same as in Greek philosophy.

      This is true. I think, though, that the longevity of the notion of "the five senses" here in the west stems mainly from the teaching of Aristotlean philosophy as the basis for the scientific method. The principle of the method is sound, but not so much the sense count. Perhaps the senses were limited to the ones he felt were "trustworthy".

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    27. Re:Duh by HiThere · · Score: 1

      The four elements was quite correct...it just wasn't talking about the physical world, but about reactions to it. (Mind you...I'm being quite selective in who I choose as an authoritative source, but so were you...if you were using one.)

      The four elements and the four humors both refer to the four essentially different ways of dealing with the physical world.
      Fire : desire : order things in rank lists by desireability.
      Earth : modeling : construct mental models of how the world operates
      Air : formal reasoning, laws : mathematics, programing, "simple" rule based systems without interpretation
      Water: teology : Water seeks it's level. Goal based processing.

      Note that any one of these alone is futile, and in practical approaches one needs some combination of all of them.

      I trace my sources for this interpretation back to C.G. Jung, and before him back to Paracelesus, and before him back to Heraclitus. (There were some Romans in there two, but I've forgotten them, and their useful ideas were entirely swallowed by their successors.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    28. Re:Duh by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Wait! You're both right! ;-)

      The "kinesthetic sense" is a true physical sense, and it has known sensory receptors. These are the pressure-sensitive nerve endings inside your joints that send data to your brain about the angles of your joints. These are much like the pressure sensors in your skin, but they are a different population of pressure sensors whose data is handled by a different part of the brain.

      This raw data isn't too useful by itself. It's used to update that model inside your brain.

      One of the interesting properties of this sense is that, like the pressure sensors in your skin, the sensors in your joints only send data when there are pressure changes. This is why, when you're still, you can lose precision in your mental model and not know exactly where all your components are. But, as was pointed out with the ball-player example, all it takes is a bit of motion, the kinesthetic receptors start transmitting, and your mental model regains its precision.

      Just one of many reasons why 5 is a silly number of senses. You have a lot more than that.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    29. Re:Duh by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      The four elements was quite correct...it just wasn't talking about the physical world, but about reactions to it.

      Be that as it may, my point still stands. "Four elements" is about as accurate with regard to actual physics as "five senses" is accurate with regard to actual human biology. The philosophical implications are a separate issue.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    30. Re:Duh by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      If it was a model, someone could move your arm around and, if you weren't looking, you'd have no idea which way it was pointing, which is clearly not the case.

      Actually, it clearly is the case. What the other poster says about it being a model which uses "feeling" to build the model is correct.

      In Jr. High, a friend of mine had lost all feeling in his right hand in a childhood accident, we used to gang up on him while he was doing homework, somebody would distract him from the left, then we'd steal the pen out of his hand from the right. He'd keep on "writing", not knowing that he had no pen, then he'd look down at a blank page and freak out because he'd have to do it all over again ;) -- his mental model told him where his hand & pen were, without the feedback of being able to feel them, it became out of sync with reality.

  16. Of course, they couldn't very well interview by Snarfangel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the ones that headed for the coast at the first sign of danger.

    --
    This tagline is copyrighted material. Please send $10 for an affordable replacement.
    1. Re:Of course, they couldn't very well interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to admit, it's a self-selecting group.

      Next up: "Lottery winners can foretell the future!"

    2. Re:Of course, they couldn't very well interview by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      ...the ones that headed for the coast at the first sign of danger.

      Well, kind of:

      Reporter: "So why did your family go toward the coast?"

      Victim: "Blub glub glub, *cough* glub"

    3. Re:Of course, they couldn't very well interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if any victims of 9/11 ran upstairs instead of downstairs. Bet they didn't get any interviews either!

  17. no 6th sense at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aboriginal tribesmen induced the tsunami with thier magic power and hocus pocus. One tribe member couldn't keep his mouth shut it appears.

  18. Not real successful.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't say it's entirely successful. 260,000+ people still died in that tsunami.

    There are many examples of where an individual or small group of people have missed a tragic fate just out of 'feeling'. Like leaving for a trip at a certain time avoided a car accident, etc. It happens all the time.

  19. Speaking for myself here... by radiotyler · · Score: 3, Funny

    "...described by some scientists as part of the brain's 'oops' center..."

    My brains "oops" center is located in a more southern and groinular region.

    --
    hi mom!
    1. Re:Speaking for myself here... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      My brains "oops" center is located in a more southern and groinular region.

      They've located it inside the brain, that does not tell anything about the location of the brain itself.

    2. Re:Speaking for myself here... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      I want to thank you for bringing the word groinular to my vocabulary; it's just the funniest sounding word I've heard in a long time.

  20. Ugh by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Informative

    Calling this a "sixth sense" is very misleading. The normal five senses - sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell, for those few who don't already know - involve the intake of information through specialized organs or tissues (eyes, ears, skin, etc.) in addition to the processing of those stimuli. This so-called "sixth sense" is simply the subconscious reprocessing of the same information obtained by the regular five senses (and that description misses the real point of the discovery anyway*), and so it hardly qualifies as a sense.

    * The point of the discovery is that the region of the brain discussed in the article helps to determine, based on past experience and the current situation, whether something is a bad idea or not.

    1. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There is also a sense of balance (useful to keep from falling over), and a general sense of body location (so you can touch your nose with your eyes closed). There are probably others as well in addition to the five that are always counted.

    2. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that they could not have picked a worse term, it conjures up visions of UFO nonsense and ESP.

    3. Re:Ugh by MikTheUser · · Score: 1

      The normal five senses [...] involve the intake of information through specialized organs or tissues [...] in addition to the processing of those stimuli.

      Can you tell for certain there isn't another, yet undiscovered organ or tissue specialised on receiving and forwarding sensory input?

    4. Re:Ugh by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Good point (the sense of body location is called proprioception). My apologies for leaving those out.

    5. Re:Ugh by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Can you tell for certain there isn't another, yet undiscovered organ or tissue specialised on receiving and forwarding sensory input?

      I can tell you that there's no evidence suggesting this to be the case - including from the study mentioned in the original post.

    6. Re:Ugh by MikTheUser · · Score: 1

      I can tell you that there's no evidence suggesting this to be the case [...].

      That's what I meant by "yet undiscovered". Our body and brain have much more to reveal that we know by now.

    7. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will add that "touch" is in fact multiple senses : cold/hot differenciation for example...

    8. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also called kinesthesis.

    9. Re:Ugh by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      and a general sense of body location (so you can touch your nose with your eyes closed)

      That particular one might not be a sense, I'd say more of a habit. Consider how children and teenagers are often seen as clumsy. When the body grows rapidly, you aren't used to it's size and tend to bump into things a lot. As you stop growing, you get accustomed to your size and stop knocking things on the carpet.

    10. Re:Ugh by saider · · Score: 1


      And when you have evidence of another organ, please present it. Until then it is just speculative fiction.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
  21. Let me be the the first to say... by WisconsinFusion · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I knew you were going to say that. ~~

  22. Most people have 6 or more senses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The feeling of nausea, dizziness, and quite a few other "feelngs" have nothing to do with touch, smell, taste, hearing, or seeing.

    I've hated that oversimplificaion since I was a tiny kid.

    1. Re:Most people have 6 or more senses. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      nausea isn't a sense it's the result of your senses being 'confused'.

      dizziness is because of a sense of balance, or the confusion off.

      There's a 'special' sense, where you know the location of you limbs without looking, this becomes apparent when someone has lost a limb, but they can still sense it which allows them to use prosthetics. Taking too much vitamin B12 can kill this sense off, so you end up not know where you legs are without looking for them.

      Apart from that there are a number of 'sub-senses' that are the result of your brain processing sensory information such as dizziness, which often lead to chemicals like serotonin, adrenaline and dopamine etc.. being released in you body giving you a 'feeling' of 'love' or nausea, fear or excitement etc...

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    2. Re:Most people have 6 or more senses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the sense of balance is a seperate physical sense with a well mapped physical mechanism that causes it. Are you claiming that the semi-circular canals in the ear are just a confusion of taste or smell? Or that balance is a 'sub-sense', whatever the hell that means?

    3. Re:Most people have 6 or more senses. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I said that dizziness is when your sense of balance gets confused, and nothing about the sense of balance in it self.

      'dizziness is because of a sense of balance, or the confusion off.'

      or more to be more verbose.

      'dizziness is because of a sense of balance or [at least] the confusion off [the sense of balance].

      I intended to type the word balance instead of dizziness here..
      'Apart from that there are a number of 'sub-senses' that are the result of your brain processing sensory information such as dizziness'

      But I still don't see how you could have thought I intended to say balance was anything but a sense, I only mentioned it once when called it a sense.

      well, I should bother replying to someone who is so uncertain about what they say that they have to reply post AC.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  23. the tsunami example is pretty crappy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/01/14/world/ma in667167.shtml
    (one of many)
    synopsis: tribe saved because historical warnings from ancestors said to run inland if the sea recedes quickly.

  24. Good ole synchronicity by Lobo93 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashcode decides to print this fortune when I enter the article:

    When you're dining out and you suspect something's wrong, you're probably right.

    Well, better head back to the Dreamland...(and no, that's not the name of the new Arnold restaurant)

    --
    "The only clear view is from atop the mountain of our dead selves." - Peter Carroll
  25. Every mother knows this by T1girl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Amazing how moms develop that "eyes in the back of the head." A sudden silence, absence of noise or motion around the house, and you just know the toddler is unravelling the toilet paper or eting out of the dog's dish (hey, it looks like Cheerios), or leaning over to retrieve a toy from the edge of the swimming pool. This extends to the tiniest facial expressions that tell you your kid's lying or troubled about something, or you notice the cookie jar lid is slightly awry, or someone got into your purse and didn't close it quite right, or a thousand other little signals. It probably helps the species survive.
    I can't explain the tsunami warning phenomenon, but a lot of subtle perceptions lie close to the surface, and I think there's a scientific explanation for everything.

    1. Re:Every mother knows this by darkmeridian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Like Chad Pennington playing football for the NY Jets. Once, he was about to get sacked on his blind side by a linebacker who broke through blocking. Pennington instinctively scrambled out and rushed for a touchdown without ever seeing the pass-rusher. When asked about the play, he said that he had a feeling that he had to get out of there. What really happened, probably, was that he saw too few men on the field in front of his and knew there had to be someone behind him. However, this realization was on some subconscious level and that's probably what this article is talking about.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    2. Re:Every mother knows this by topper24hours · · Score: 0

      I believe in science too! This IS science. The article doesn't say they "magically" knew, but that they "instinctively" knew. It is theorized that perhaps there is a point to the 90% of our brains that is unused... This seems logically and scientifically EASY for me to believe! Now to go so far as to say: "perhaps some part of that 90% actually allows better awareness of our environment were we able to use it at all times" also seems fairly easy to believe. Now try to follow this one: maybe peple's feelings of deja vu and/or seeming 6th sense has something to do w/ them making brief connections w/ parts of their brain's as yet untapped potential.

    3. Re:Every mother knows this by Finuvir · · Score: 3, Informative
      When people say we only use 10% of our brains they are technically most likely correct but very misleading. As you read this you're using the parts of your brain that control eye movement, word recognition, and sentence parsing. As I type I'm using the parts controlling finger movement, eye movement, hand-eye coordination, lexical memory, grammar, syntax.

      I'm not using the part that lets me recognise someone's mood from their expression because I'm alone in this room right now. I'm not using the parts that let me plan my route through a location that I have a mental map of in memory as I would when walking to the shop, since I'm ust sitting still.

      The brain is composed of many interacting parts with quite specific jobs. We use the parts we need to use at any time. It's a myth to think that we could be more productive if we could somehow harness the unused "brain power" and use 100% of our brains at once. In fact we're more productive when we use only the parts that are directly relevant to the task at hand. There are people who tend to use more of their brains at any one time than the rest of us. We call that phenomenon ADD, attention deficit disorder.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    4. Re:Every mother knows this by Splab · · Score: 1

      Yeah,
      We all got that, me being a geek n all I always know when someone has touched my computer. When the flat mate has been surfing or stuff like that - no data has changed, I just know someone has touched my "baby" ...
      Man Im a geek

    5. Re:Every mother knows this by fgb · · Score: 1

      The 10% myth is one of the most persistant myths of American culture. It is amazing how many times this obviously bogus figure is quoted by the media and charlatans trying to separate people from their money.

      What percentage of our brains do we use? 100%

      check it out

    6. Re:Every mother knows this by randallpowell · · Score: 0

      Moms have mastered Zen and are at one with the environment. Their ki levels are higher too. Just watch DBZ for details.

    7. Re:Every mother knows this by randallpowell · · Score: 0

      My neuropsych class taught that we use 10% consciously. Rest is to run the body, vital organs, sensory perception, etc. We do use 100% but only 10% is at our willful control.

  26. Every plane crash victim has it when boarding, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too bad they didn't have it when purchasing the ticket. -It- refers to whatever the story refers to.

  27. I've always known about this by Spacejock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I was 9 or 10 I climbed onto the neighbour's roof to get a model plane back. There was a staircase leading up to a flat area, a two foot wall and then the roof itself. I climbed that wall onto the tiles and put my hand out to grab the railing (a kind of stranded black wire).

    Then I realised it was an overhead power line. There were four of them, crossing the house at shoulder level.

    I don't know what made me stop my hand, inches from grabbing hold of that high voltage wire, but I've made the most of my life ever since. (And I never got that damned plane back, either.)

    1. Re:I've always known about this by jwcorder · · Score: 4, Informative

      You could have grabbed it. It would not have shocked you. Unless you touched another one of the wires or you were grounded some how. Asphalt shingles or or clay tiles will insulate you enough that you can hold onto that wire. I do it all the time when I clean my gutters out.

      --
      http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
    2. Re:I've always known about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      I don't know what made me stop my hand, inches from grabbing hold of that high voltage wire, but I've made the most of my life ever since.
      Oh, I thought you were going to say how you grabbed on, got fried, and ever since you've had a sixth sense and the ability to see through walls or something...
    3. Re:I've always known about this by fireheadca · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you heard the hum of the line?
      Or felt the air disturbed by the vibration?

      You can FEEL electricity move along high-power electrical lines.

    4. Re:I've always known about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know what made me stop my hand, inches from grabbing hold of that high voltage wire, but I've made the most of my life ever since.

      BS. What are you doing on Slashdot then?

    5. Re:I've always known about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, for his whole life he thought he had this sixth sense, and now thanks to you, you ruined it for him.

    6. Re:I've always known about this by Greg@UF · · Score: 2, Informative

      The tiles might insulate you, they might not.

      For instances, they might be wet, or have moss growing on them.

      Never touch power lines unless you're trained to do so and have taken the appropriate safety precautions.
      You're just asking for trouble - well, death, actually.

      --
      -- You can't give it, you can't even buy it, and you just don't get it!
  28. The real question is... by jonasw · · Score: 0

    ...does it run linux?

    1. Re:The real question is... by Rollie+Hawk · · Score: 1

      I think we ALL saw that coming.

      --
      Before any liberals are tempted to mod up one of my comments, a word of warning: I'm actually making fun of you.
    2. Re:The real question is... by randallpowell · · Score: 0

      Actually it runs on Solaris. BSD is undead and Linux isn't ready for mission critical crap. What other excuses do we have?

  29. Also, from the article: by shreevatsa · · Score: 5, Informative
    In addition to what I just said, I also read TFA and found this:
    Researchers provided study participants with a series of blue or white cues and asked them to push one button or another depending on the direction of arrows. Brain imaging suggested that an area of the brain had learned to recognize that blue cues indicated a greater potential for error, thus providing an early warning signal that negative consequences were likely to follow their behavior.

    The rest of the article says essentially the same thing -- the brain learns to recognise a pattern of making mistakes, not that is able to sense impending danger before it happens or whatever.
    The slashdot summary needlessly sensationalised this simple fact.
    1. Re:Also, from the article: by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Oh, I thought it was more of a "Statistics are Funny! Film At Eleven!"

    2. Re:Also, from the article: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from the submission:

      A part of the brain known as the cingulate cortex, they've found, likely combines multiple, sometimes unconscious data streams to come to conclusions and send warning signals to the conscious mind.

      What part of that is needlessly sensational? It just stating (and this is in TFA) that not all the patterns we recognize we're aware of.

    3. Re:Also, from the article: by shreevatsa · · Score: 1

      The title ("sixth sense") and the unrelated example of the tribesmen, which suggests "warning detection sense", rather than "pattern recognising mechanism".

  30. How do we know... by astroblaster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...that the aboriginals weren't just following the animals?

    1. Re:How do we know... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      ...that the aboriginals weren't just following the animals?

      From the interviews after the fact where they explained why they evacuated.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:How do we know... by vwjeff · · Score: 1

      If you accept the theory of evolution as I do then it is not far fetched to believe humans have a six sense as some animals seem to have.

  31. Re:So THAT'S how Bush won! by ron_ivi · · Score: 1

    The sense of ballance, and quite a few other "feelngs" have nothing to do with touch, smell, taste, hearing, or seeing. Other possible ones would be hunger, thirst, diziness, nausea from food poisoning, etc.

  32. Crap headline - consious mind always last to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But I guess it gets the readers turning the page. Anyone who listened to the animals would have known the wave was coming. It's about adjusting our senses to perceive what has always been there and doesn't require a new sense. It's about getting quiet and plugging into perception that is not normally needed in the modern world. Also consciousness is really a delusion. The consciousness mind is always the last to know. Hell, muscle movements have been shown to be already occurring before the consciousness is made aware, but we somehow create the delusion that the conscious mind has initiated the movement. This isn't to say free will is a delusion, but the idea the conscious mind runs the show is a lie, created for the comfort of the conscious.

  33. maybe when they saw animals stampeding by rifftide · · Score: 1

    for high ground, they decided that they'd better get their butts in gear.

    That's also known as the "herd instinct". We see that a lot in the business world, I've never heard it referred to as a sixth sense though.

    1. Re:maybe when they saw animals stampeding by RootsLINUX · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking, since I saw on the news that animals had fled even before the tsunami hit. So maybe the tribes people share this 6th sense with the animals because they are more in-tune with nature and their instincts. Or perhaps like you said they saw the animals running and were able to deduce the disaster from that scene. Who knows.

      --
      Hero of Allacrost, a FOSS RPG for *NIX/*BSD/OS X/Win
  34. Nonsense by s74n13y · · Score: 1

    Our brain region can actually learn to explain religion and is capable of complex executive control over our behavior. The findings offer rigorous explanations. NOT. It wasn't any '6th sense' that the tribesmen figure out bad things this way come. Alriite, alrite, time to go RTFA...

  35. Cold Fusion by gvc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Real scientific results are reported in scientific venues like professional conferences and peer-reviewed journals. Not press releases.

    1. Re:Cold Fusion by MtnMan1021 · · Score: 1

      did you rtfa? this is a paper published in Science magazine.

      the title of the paper is Learned Predictions of Error Likelihood in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex. it's by Joshua Brown and Todd Braver. 18 Feb 2005, vol 307... it's only four pages long, and not that hard to read (with some science/psych background)

      --
      jacob rothstein reed college
    2. Re:Cold Fusion by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      Real scientific results are reported in scientific venues like professional conferences and peer-reviewed journals.

      You mean, this might be a real scientific result if it were, say, an article called Learned Predictions of Error Likelihood in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Science Magazine, a peer-reviewed journal? (No, that link won't take you directly to the article - you have to buy access or join the American Association for the Advancement of Science to get access.)

    3. Re:Cold Fusion by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      I have the same feeling that some things about the article stink, but this article is not what will be published in 'Science' journal.

      There is quote from Brown that looks perceptive enough:
      "We started with the premise that perhaps the cingulate was not responding to the detection of an error or state of conflict,
      but maybe instead what the cingulate is detecting is the likelihood of making an error.
      We wanted to see if the cingulate would become more active even in situations
      where no conflict is presented and no errors are made, but the potential for error is still higher than normal."


      In my words, this part of the brain does not just react when you experience a mismatch situation (like a spelling error), but can also react when your experience suggests a high chance for such a mismatch occurring. That sounds sensible to me.

      The guy who wrote the article however drags in extrasensory input, subconscious perception, precognition, complex judgement that is hard to analyze, and other varieties of intuition. I'm not saying he believes in any of the weird stuff, but it doesn't belong there(well, maybe it would fit in if you want to distinguish categories). I wonder where he got it from. From the same Brown? There is a paradigm shift too. That must be from Dilbert.

  36. Offtopic...but IMPORTANT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How did they get a pop-up to appear in Firefox?

    I've seen that twice lately, and I consider it a bug in FF.

    But what is the Javascript (I assume) that is making it pop up a window?

    1. Re:Offtopic...but IMPORTANT by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      i heared about it being possible using flash - disable flash and try again

    2. Re:Offtopic...but IMPORTANT by hugesmile · · Score: 1
      How did they get a pop-up to appear in Firefox? I've seen that twice lately, and I consider it a bug in FF.

      This is due to a user error. You're not supposed to read the article.

    3. Re:Offtopic...but IMPORTANT by slonkak · · Score: 3, Informative
      Here is the code making the popup...
      <script language="javascript"><!--
      var dc=document; var date_ob=new Date();
      dc.cookie='h2=o; path=/;';var bust=date_ob.getSeconds();
      if(dc.cookie.indexOf(' e=llo') <= 0 && dc.cookie.indexOf('2=o') > 0){
      dc.write('<scr'+'ipt language="javascript" src="http://media.fastclick.net');
      dc.write('/w/p op.cgi?sid=10405&m=2&tp=2&v=1.8&c='+bust+'"></scr' +'ipt>');
      date_ob.setTime(date_ob.getTime()+43200 000);
      dc.cookie='he=llo; path=/; expires='+ date_ob.toGMTString();} // -->
      </script>
      I assume that firefox is coded to find any
      <script>
      tags then decide what they do and whether your preferences say to block that particular action or not. However, this site has javascript creating javascript. The original script function actually writes the popup script to the page, but in a round about way. Notice this:
      dc.write('<scr'+'ipt language="javascript" src="http://media.fastclick.net');
      It prints the word script in 2 parts, thus Firefox never finds an instance of the word SCRIPT to block it. But how does it not block the originating script? The originating script is only using javascript's print function. Nothing harmful, as far as Firefox is concerned, until now. Looks like someone should inform the Firefox writers and have them make a pre-javascript engine to find out what the javascript does before it runs it... Just my 2 cents.
    4. Re:Offtopic...but IMPORTANT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Actually, after doing some prodding myself, it comes to this code:
      var myFFURL='http://media93.fastclick.net/w/safepop.cg i?mid=47956&sid=10405&id=103303&len=0&c=1234&nfcp= 1&ff=1';

      [...]

      function ffPop(){
      var encodedURL=escape(myFFURL);
      var top=screen.height/2-94/2;
      var left=screen.width/2-491/2;
      var width=491;
      var height=94;
      document.write('<embed src=http://cdn.fastclick.net/fastclick.net/ffp.swf ?url='+encodedURL+'&width='+width+'&height='+heigh t+'&top='+top+'&left='+left+'" quality="high" wmode="transparent" bgcolor="#333333" width="1" height="1" name="popup" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflash player" />');
      fcfocus();
      }
      Called from this file: http://media.fastclick.net/w/pop.cgi?sid=10405&m=2 &tp=2&v=1.8&c=123456 which was written to execute by the parent's javascript code. This flash file opens whatever window it is given in the parameter.
    5. Re:Offtopic...but IMPORTANT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > http://cdn.fastclick.net/fastclick.net/ffp.swf

      Agreed.

      Yeah, after spending an hour or so in ethereal(1) unwinding all the HTTP transactions, I came to the same conclusion. Basically, it's a flash popup. It would appear the Flash plugin not honoring the Firefox popup policy.

      Came here to post a followup, only to see someone already figured it out.

      You can actually replicate the popup very simply without any java at all.. the <embed src=..> with the flash file and url= settings into a simple html file. No java involved.

      All that javascript you see is attempts to workaround other browsers. I tried all of those cloaking attempts with javascripts making javascripts that run other javascripts via timeouts and whatnot, Firefox 1.0 rejected them all.

      The real culprit here is Flash.

  37. Sixth sense by cphilo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As an ex-cowboy (I'm from Montana), I can tell you that animals have sharp senses, and can find a small spring of water in a 10 square mile desert. If you spend enough time away from the noise, smells and chaos of civilization, you also develop sharp senses and can sense weather changes and natural phenomenon. Once in the city (when I live now) there is so much noise, weird smells and chaotic energy, this ability fades. I have no doubt that the aborigines sensed the Tsunami.

    1. Re:Sixth sense by omaha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have to agree with this. Living in a city or any highly populated area tends to create a lot of "white noise" for the 5 senses. However, I don't think that the ability fades, it's more about being squelched out by the noise/inteference. I can still predict rain by smell. No, not that there is a chance of rain but how long until it starts falling. Everyone can see the clouds but as the rain approaches there is a definite change in the smell of things that grows stronger as it approaches.

      Also, IMHO, you spend more neural processing time on the environmental inputs the farther you are away from civilization.

    2. Re:Sixth sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sad thing is that society seems to pressure people into ignoring such sensory information or at least not sharing it. Like I've been told I'm "hyper-aware" as if that was a bad thing. My former roommates in particular seemed to be unaware of things like vibrations from passing trains (tracks are a couple blocks away) or small earthquakes and treated me like I was crazy because I could feel them. I'll admit I pay close attention to my senses, but it's rather adaptive. This is earthquake country, so being aware of earth movement is vital, even if it is just a train or semi-truck. Also, most of the time I trust my ears more than my eyes before crossing my complex parking lot because it has so many blind corners that you hear the cars way before you see them, and by the time you see them, it might be too late to avoid getting hit. That one used to throw my roommates too.

    3. Re:Sixth sense by nine-times · · Score: 1
      I have no doubt that the aborigines sensed the Tsunami.

      Yeah? Well how many abidiginals do you see modeling?

      /thinks there's more to life than being reall really incredibly good-looking...

    4. Re:Sixth sense by mpol · · Score: 1

      I mostly agree with you. Society as a whole isn't really open for these things. Though I do think that the experience of society is also the people that you hang around with, and now that I get older (oh, just 31 now) it seems that more people around me are sensitive of other things (sixth sense, telepathy, precognition, etc.). Maybe it's also that I'm less scared of sharing those things with others, and knowing who to share it with, that I experience open-mindedness of others.

      --

      Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    5. Re:Sixth sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as a complement (?) to your story, I spend so much time in the city that I have developed sharp senses for that. I can walk down a city sidewalk without hitting anyone (ala Morpheus in the first Matrix), have almost instinctive ideas of what traffic will do, and can (for the most part) automatically tell who the "bad people" on the trains might be, versus the haggard, but "good" commuters. Obviously, direction is not a problem (especially when most of the city is laid out on a grid), but even on the ends of the island (Manhattan) where things aren't entirely grid-like, I can usually "guesstimate" where I'm supposed to go and get there. Even with a little experience on the subway, I can also give people general directions, by subway, to places I've never even been in the city.

    6. Re:Sixth sense by big_knuckles · · Score: 0

      I too also believe that the aborigines sensed the Tsunami.

      Most people don't deny that many animals have a 6th sense to feel and react to situations outside the 5 typical senses. Is it not true that humans fit into the realm of 'animal' as well? Why is it not possible that some of us have the ability to feel something bad is going to happen?

      That being said, I remember reading about a handful of people that on the 9/11 attacks felt something in them tell them not to go to work that day. I don't remember where I read it, but there were people from both the N.Y. site and the Washington DC site that people felt this and thus didn't die from it. Perhaps the 6th sense has not been lost in some people despite the noise, smells and chaos of civilization?

    7. Re:Sixth sense by Bishop · · Score: 1

      I can walk down a city sidewalk without hitting anyone

      And you can always tell who the tourists are because they will get in your way.

    8. Re:Sixth sense by PudriK · · Score: 1

      People "feel like not to going to work" all the time, (esp. on Mondays and Fridays). Given a building with several thousand employees, I'm sure at least a few act on this feeling every day, and think nothing of it.

      That on this one day the few people who acted on this emotion had it validated by a tragic event does not prove or even suppose the existence of a clairvoyant sense, unless you can show that more people chose not to go into work on 9/11 than usually do any other day of the year.

    9. Re:Sixth sense by sydb · · Score: 1

      While I enjoyed your filmic reference, please see here, for example, to vindicate your parent's choice of word, which it seems you are challenging.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    10. Re:Sixth sense by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree. I live on Block Island, which is about 12 miles off the coast of Rhode Island. It tends to be nice and quiet out there even in the summer when tourists invade. You know someone is an islander out there when they know a storm is coming. We just know, there are tons of little signs- the wind starts coming directly from the west, the ocean's waves are a bit closer together, etc. I don't always consciously say "Ah, the wind is blowing from the west and those waves are close, a storm is coming!"

    11. Re:Sixth sense by nine-times · · Score: 1

      no... not challenging. I wasn't arguing with or making fun of the guy in any way. Just thought it would be a funny...

  38. "I saw this coming" by vikramrn · · Score: 1

    Even before I saw this article I knew there would be "i knew this" posts coming.

  39. Not infeasible by Gewis · · Score: 1

    For claims of pseudoscience and paranormal, it's really just a little sensationalism on the part of journalists wanting to make a catchy introduction. Animals typically can "sense" these disasters before there's overt evidence something bad is going to happen. Why would it be so far-fetched to believe that humans have some element of this capability too? Unless, of course, you don't REALLY believe in evolution. :P

    Identifying a neurological component in our intuition by way of a reasonable study doesn't scream "pseudoscience" to me. Maybe we, as supposedly enlightened slashdotters, can be a bit more open-minded about such things?

    1. Re:Not infeasible by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Identifying a neurological component in our intuition by way of a reasonable study doesn't scream "pseudoscience" to me.

      No, but drawing the wrong conclusions should. The "psuedo" part comes in when people start assigning non-physiological (i.e., mystical) mechanisms to the processing of information. Actually, in the silly paranormal world, you'd have to call it more like "delivery" of information, since the implication is that some magical part of the universe informs you of something, rather than you processing stimuli from your senses to derive that information.

      What's there to be "open minded" about? This study suggests that we have some firmware with which we pre- or background-process subtle information against the landscape of our experiences. Um... gee, is it possible it's just that simple, and there's no need to keep my mind open for magic?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  40. I see dead people... by ectotherm · · Score: 1, Funny

    they are all around me-they don't even know they are dead...

    --
    "Nature bats last..."
    1. Re:I see dead people... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I see dead operating systems, they are all around my box on the internet, pushing email and serving web pages, and they don't even know they're dead.

  41. and a couple more senses for your list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other senses beyond 6 ones would include suffocation and the lightheadedness before fainting. It's wierd how people try to group those into the sense of touch just because they're called "feelings".

    1. Re:and a couple more senses for your list by shufler · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It should be pointed out that a sixth sense has not been found.

      From TFA:
      While some scientists discount the existence of a sixth sense for danger, new research from Washington University in St. Louis has identified a brain region that clearly acts as an early warning system -- one that monitors environmental cues, weighs possible consequences and helps us adjust our behavior to avoid dangerous situations.
      What they have found is not a sense, but a cognitive module within the brain. Senses provide INPUT to these modules. This module isn't gathering input from external sources, but is processing input from our input detectors (touch, sight, sound, taste, smell).

      As the article points out, the aboriginals fled when the animals did. This is not surprising -- they long ago learned that animals may "sense" danger, and flee their habitat. They have identified that when this happens, it's probably in their best interest to flee as well.

      When the tsunami hit, there were dozens of news reports saying how the animals left the area. The first thing I said in response to that, was, "Why didn't the people leave as well? Especially if this is a warning sign for danger?"

      Being able to interpret input and make a logical and reasonable descision is all this article is about. All the scientists have done is find an area that specialises in determining what input indicates a potential hazard to our lives. I won't knock them for this, but it's certainly not a sixth sense.
  42. Yeah, for example by sam_handelman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm able to use my synaesthetic powers to detect complete bullshit!

    It's true that there is definitely a region of the brain that manages anxiety - and that all sorts of things can make people anxious - seemingly for no reason!

    However, neurotic != psychic. There are no *new senses* under discussion here, just a better understanding of how the brain manages that feeling of impending doom you sometimes get.

    Do other mammals have similar brain structures? Yes.

    Do they probably use them to avoid danger, incl. forest fires and tsunamis? Almost certainly.

    Do we, higher mammals, probably retain whatever hard-coded sensory cues cause our little forest friends to flee natural disasters? We probably do, yes. When someone is in the supermarket and they have a panic attack for no reason, might it be because the kiwi display is triggering the same mechanism that is supposed to make us flee from a tsunami? Maybe.

    "In the past, we found activity in the ACC when people had to make a difficult decision among mutually exclusive options, or after they made a mistake," Brown said. "But now we find that this brain region can actually learn to recognize when you might make a mistake, even before a difficult decision has to be made. So the ACC appears to act as an early warning system -- it learns to warn us in advance when our behavior might lead to a negative outcome, so that we can be more careful and avoid making a mistake."

    This has nothing to do with psychic powers! Fucking idiot journalists.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    1. Re:Yeah, for example by Hamster+Of+Death · · Score: 1

      Yes officer, I strangled and mauled those people because the kiwi display looked strange!

      Just look at it!

      raaaarrrghhhhhh

    2. Re: Yeah, for example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confusing two ideas. Psychic: Capable of extraordinary mental processes. Magic:The art that purports to control or forecast natural events, effects, or forces by invoking the supernatural.

      Just like there are a lot of people watching the scientific community who don't give a crap about actual science, there are a lot of people who are willing to associate 'psychic' with 'magic' and therefore have the idea that there are discrete sources to mental powers, including but not limited to advanced perception. Lifetimes have been spent on learning and conditioning higher mental responses--for example lucid dreaming, the art of being in conscious control of your dreams.

      Whether it's the brain or some mythic 'spirit' that is the source of the so-called "psychic" ability is entirely moot. There will always be result-centric people who spend time conditioning themselves to pay attention to the body signals that civilization tells us we should ignore--whether to their benefit or detriment. Further, it is statistically likely that there are enough genetic and/or behavioral differences to create some people who can do the same easily and some who couldn't if they tried.

      The brain is no different from any other part of the body. We can manipulate it either by throwing random checmicals at it and hoping we don't kill anyone, or we can spend time conditioning it. That DOES NOT MEAN that there is some mystical uberpowerful mechanism that lets people see through walls or throw firebolts. If you think that's the meaning of 'psychic,' stop playing Dungeons & Dragons and spend more time looking at reality.

    3. Re:Yeah, for example by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      This has nothing to do with psychic powers! Fucking idiot journalists.

      Please show me where in the article it claimed that psychic powers were in use.

      They didn't say it's psychic - in fact, they're basically giving a non-mystical explanation for what many people claim is a psychic power, or "sixth sense." They're using the same terminology to show that it's the same thing, just with a real-world explanation.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    4. Re:Yeah, for example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kiwi Display? Us people from New Zealand very often refer to ourselves as "Kiwi", the Kiwi bird being the national symbol of New Zealand. I find it intriguing that we could be on display...

      Do you mean the arrangement of fruit in the supermarket, or does this mean something else?

    5. Re:Yeah, for example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a fellow Kiwi, I'm annoyed by this too - outside of New Zealand, mostly in America though, kiwifruit are referred to as kiwi. This is despite the fact that they can still manage to call grapefruit by their correct name, and don't call blueberries "blues".

      I'm as puzzled as you are :)

  43. Tsunami by MarkVVV · · Score: 1

    I guess the server admin don't have a sixth sense...

  44. Oh no by Xeo+024 · · Score: 1

    My spidey-sense is tingling.

  45. A new icon needed in ./ by stm2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Last week black box project (or global conscientious), now the "six sense", shouldn't a PSEUDOSCIENCIE icon needed in Slashdot?

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    1. Re:A new icon needed in ./ by fafalone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only after a moderation option for 'doesn't know what they're talking about' is added.
      Whether you agree with calling it a sixth sense or not, they observed an effect, formulated a hypothesis, designed and executed an experiment with sound methodology in a controlled environment, and applied the results to validating their hypothesis. Their theory is supported by scientific evidence and can be used to predict new things. This is science, and is quite obviously not pseudoscience if one RTFA.

    2. Re:A new icon needed in ./ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would the icon be, Miss Cleo?

    3. Re:A new icon needed in ./ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's interesting about your comment is that it's accepted without question, hence the moderation points. First, I'm not a believer of the paranormal. However, because no definitive answer exists the continued study of the topic using rigorous methods should be encouraged.

    4. Re:A new icon needed in ./ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. The problem is that when people hear "sixth sense" they immediately assume paranormal/supernatural. The context here has nothing to do with that, and TFA doesn't claim otherwise. The article summary was probably intentionally sensationalized to make it seem more interesting (and relevant... but to what?).

    5. Re:A new icon needed in ./ by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Last week black box project (or global conscientious), now the "six sense", shouldn't a PSEUDOSCIENCIE icon needed in Slashdot?

      Nothing "pseudo" about the article. Just some evidence that activity in a certain part of the brain might be involved with intuition.

    6. Re:A new icon needed in ./ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot could also use a "Didn't RTFA" karma modifier.

    7. Re:A new icon needed in ./ by stm2 · · Score: 1

      You need to get a result to be considered science. Applying scientifi method is not enought (but is neccesary) Parapsicology applies scientific method but it doesn't get any positive result, there is no proof of telekinesis, precognition, etc.

      --
      DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
  46. There are ten senses: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sight, hearing, smell, taste, touch, pressure, hot/cold, pain, kinethesis, and proprioception.

  47. Magnitude, dude! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! These people "somehow sensed" a magnitute 9 earthquake!!! Amazing.

  48. Re:So THAT'S how Bush won! by eclectic4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You watched the "herd" run to higher ground and you followed?

    Well, that doesn't sound very hard...

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
  49. More than six already by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Insightful
    We already know we have way more than six senses. The idea that we only have six is one of those enduring fictions which we've inherited as part of our cultural mix.

    Just try closing your eyes and touching your fingertips together. That's your sense of location working. Ever fly in an aerobatic aircraft? That strange feeling in your stomach is your sense of acceleration telling you which direction you're being shoved in. There are plenty more, if you care to think about them.

    The headline is misleading though. The activity being measured in the tests;
    "an early warning system -- one that monitors environmental cues, weighs possible consequences and helps us adjust our behavior to avoid dangerous situations."

    is a consequence of analysis, not sensation. It looks like we have mechanism in brains which can reflexively assess and respond to novel dangers.
    Quelle surprise...
    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    1. Re:More than six already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A SENSE of humor is not considered a SENSE. A SENSE for fine women, a SENSE for taste.. are not considered biological senses.

      FEELINGS, acceleration, temperature, hormone rush, dizziness, nausiness, they are all feelings.

      VISION is another
      HEARING is another
      SMELL is another
      TASTE is another

      Of course these are man made distinctions.. because you could consider VISION a 'feeling the light on your optical cells', and HEARING is feeling the air pressure changes on your ear drums. But psychotic people can hear God speak to them, without their ear drums moving. So, that part is 'exerience' and 'interpretation', part of your conciousness (or a defective one in this case).

    2. Re:More than six already by philkerr · · Score: 1

      The idea that we have only five senses comes from ancient times.

      This is closer to what we have in the way of senses:

      Touch
      Taste
      Temperature
      Time
      Sight
      Sound
      S mell
      Pressure?
      Kinasthetic
      ElectroMagnetic

      A lot of the paranormal type things can be explained by the 10th sense, if birds are able to find magnetic north what can more sophisticated organisms detect?

      But EM isn't something we directly expreience, so a lot of the BS paranormal stuff could be put down to the fact that we are receiving information from a source we are not fully aware of.

    3. Re:More than six already by jc42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are species than are known to use small crystals of magnetite to detect the Earth's magnetic field. Many bacteria do this, so it's believed to be an ancient mechanism. There's debate about whether humans have this sense, because isolated magnetite crystals have been found in some human cells, but not enough to be convincing. Some birds seem to have cells with enogh magnetite to convince biologists that it's part of a magnetic sense, and those birds can be confused if you have them fly through a magnetic field that's "wrong".

      Many birds are known to be sensitive to the polarization of light. Some birds use this for navigation when enough blue sky is visible to make it work. Some kinds of fish (e.g. trout), molluscs (squid, cuttlefish) and insects are also known to be able to detect polarization of light.

      Quite a few years ago, I spent some time experimenting with polarizing filters on my camera. After a while, I started to realize that I could "see" the polarization of light. Ask around among photographers, and you'll find that this is common and not considered anything remarkable. In the case of humans, the physical mechanism isn't known. The light just looks different somehow, and you know how to rotate the filter to get the effect you want.

      There are still a lot of things to be learned about senses, ours and other animals'.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    4. Re:More than six already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learning to see polarised light is indeed a teachable trick - if you really want to go here: Haidinger's Brush is what it is called :)

  50. Re:So THAT'S how Bush won! by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Informative


    Other possible ones would be hunger, thirst, diziness, nausea from food poisoning, etc.

    The difference is those aren't senses of the outside world, but rather feelings about the state of your own body. That doesn't mean they aren't relavent or as "real" as the normal 5 senses, but they aren't really a sense in the same way that smell or sight is. I can't say to someone else "hey, do you feel that hunger over their?"

    --
    AccountKiller
  51. Whitout unconscious data by Georges+Roux · · Score: 0

    The question wasn't with or without sixth sense or unconscious data. But With or whithout higher ground.

  52. No it doesn't by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What about the guys who "got a feeling" they should head to higher ground when there wasn't a tsunami coming? What about the guys who didn't get a feeling when it was?

    People get feelings and act on them all the time. We only hear about the rare times when they coincide with an actual event.

  53. Re:So THAT'S how Bush won! by Ithika · · Score: 3, Funny

    > "hey, do you feel that hunger over their?" No, you couldn't, or you'd get slaughtered by the slashdot spelling nazis! :)

  54. Seventh? by BenjyD · · Score: 1

    Don't we have six senses anyway - sight,hearing,touch,taste,smell and time. Our sense of time passing may be wildly inaccurate at times, but I can 'sense' the difference between a day and a minute pretty easily. Presumably there's some sort of time-keeping circuitry in the brain somewhere.

    That would make this the seventh sense, unless there's some reason that time is never included.

  55. No they did not "sense" it by aelfgar · · Score: 1

    The tribes men did not "sense" the disaster. Their elders had told them that when the water recedes quickly, they must run to the mountains. No sixth sense there.

  56. Re:First post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better recharge your sixth sense before you take it on a test drive in Vegas.

  57. The aborginals fled after they read the signs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which included beached deep-water fish due to seismic activity, retreating seas and the other classic signs. Nothing sixth sense about it. Anyone watching and dealing with the environment on a daily basis would have noticed it. In fact, fishermen off the coast of kerala in India warned the government that something was "fishy" when their catches started turning up unusual numbers of rare red-tailed deep-water fishes. Most people chose to ignore these warnings.

  58. I see dead people by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    and they just won't shut up!

  59. But can it... by aj50 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...be used to make peril sensitive sunglasses?

    --
    I wish to remain anomalous
  60. ESP? by fieldcomm · · Score: 1

    Then how come I can never get First Post?

    I am always 32 posts down.

  61. Jeessshhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I subscribed to Slashdot yesterday, and already my impression is that this site isn't trying to deliver any quality howsoever.

    This is getting to be cheap tabloid news.
    There's research, and there's GOOD research.
    Dumbasses are trying to get funding.

  62. so.... by Nathonix · · Score: 1

    How long will it take them to figure out how to actually use this sixth sense, and its application to deathmatching? Until then im not interested in merely knowing it exists.

    --
    Soap box, Ballot box, Jury box, Ammo box. Use in that order.
  63. Incoming Data... by GearheadX · · Score: 1

    The human mind really is a fascinating thing. Think about all of the things that you perceive during the day. All the sights, smells, tastes and everything else. You're continually bombarded with so much information that you cannot possibly be paying attention to everything coming in. Doesn't it make a certain amount of sense for evolution to put some sort of mechanism into the brain to help collate those little signs that you would otherwise ignore into a larger, more apparent picture if it adds up to something Farking Dangerous?

    1. Re:Incoming Data... by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "The human mind really is a fascinating thing."

      Only when it works. When it doesn't it's called accounting.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
  64. Re:The aborginals fled after they read the signs.. by poningru · · Score: 1

    Preaching about listening to Malu's on /.? bite your toungue sir, err clip your fingers? um pour coffee on your keyboard?

    --
    Calm down people, its a religion not an operating system.
  65. And at least seventh and eighth, too. by aug24 · · Score: 1

    1-5 you probably know
    6 Gravity (calcium crystals on hairs in ears)
    7 Rotational motion (liquid flow in ear tubey bits that I forget the name of)
    8 Body location (feedback via nervous system tells you where your arms are)

    We'll prolly find a few more if others here chip in...

    Justin.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    1. Re:And at least seventh and eighth, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, there are probably more, if we sit and think about it.

      Feedback on our own arms' positions doesn't count though, senses are about perceiving the world around us, not what we ourselves are doing. Though I guess, if you consider the feedback along with touch as distance sensing...

    2. Re:And at least seventh and eighth, too. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      It's probably worth considering pain to be a sense of its own, if not two or more.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:And at least seventh and eighth, too. by novakyu · · Score: 1
      6 Gravity (calcium crystals on hairs in ears)
      7 Rotational motion (liquid flow in ear tubey bits that I forget the name of)

      Since gravitational force is indistinguishable to the force due to acceleration (of the reference frame), then aren't #6 and #7 both sensing "acceleration" of your body? Aren't they the same thing? That would be like saying "#3: sense of sweet taste; #4: sense of bitter taste..."

    4. Re:And at least seventh and eighth, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! One is torque, the other is force. Different things. Different units too: force=N, torque=Nm.

    5. Re:And at least seventh and eighth, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9. Magnetic fields (iron density in the nose.)

    6. Re:And at least seventh and eighth, too. by Ephboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, gravity detection and rotational motion detection are more commonly called the vestibular system. We have 5 organs dedicated to vestibular detection (other animals can have a couple more). Two of them are linear accelerometers (an inertial weight (calcium crystals + sticky stuff) on inner ear hair cells) that detect gravity, and linear motion of the head. Three of them are rotational accelerometers and are oriented to detect the three ways you can rotate your head. These are fluid filled tubes (semicircular canals) where the fluid acts as the inertial substance that rushes by the sensory hair cells when you rotate your head (and when you stop spinning around, the fluid keeps going making you feel dizzy). While these are all grouped together as vestibular, the outputs are not completely the same. For example, some of the output of the rotational detectors (technically, ampullae) goes directly to a reflex of your eye muscles to keep your gaze stable while you rotate your head. (As a demo of this, take a piece of paper and try to read it while you move it around quickly. You can't. Now hold the paper still but move your head around at the same rate. Your gaze is held stable while you move your head. Similarly, when you spin around in circles as a kid and stop, the world continues to spin (that is, your eyes continue to move as if you were still spinning as the fluid in the canals is moving but your head is not)). In fact the sensory cells that underlie this are virtually identical to the cells responsible for your auditory input (and for fish to detect water flow or electrical sense along the side of their body), and uses ion channels similar to those that detect extreme temperature, hot chili peppers, wasabi, menthol, and touch.

    7. Re:And at least seventh and eighth, too. by temojen · · Score: 1

      Not sure if this qualifies, but:
      9 Electrostatic (surface hairs of hand stand up when near charged surfaces.

      I'd say pheremones too, but I'm not sure if something that's subconcious qualifies as a sense.

    8. Re:And at least seventh and eighth, too. by aug24 · · Score: 1

      No. Rotational acceleration is different to linear (in fact quasi-linear for gravity).

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    9. Re:And at least seventh and eighth, too. by aug24 · · Score: 1

      I thought of that too, but decided not to put it in as I think it's a special case of the sense of touch. Then again, the same biochemical pathway is used in most of the physical senses.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    10. Re:And at least seventh and eighth, too. by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      What about:
      - heat/cold
      - humidity
      - "barometric" pressure
      - electricity

      Are those unified under the "touch" label?

      Anyway, under the "mystical" acception of 6th sense, i would put intuition (you can't tell why, but you are sure of something) or luck (ask google if people dont feel lucky).

    11. Re:And at least seventh and eighth, too. by novakyu · · Score: 1
      No! One is torque, the other is force. Different things. Different units too: force=N, torque=Nm.

      rotational motion != rotational acceleration.

      However, the fact that something is rotating does mean that there is force (and thus acceleration) on the object. Force-torque distinction is quite irrelevant here, I think.

      PS. Oh, and the fact that units are different is even more irrelevant---consider this: Torque = N*m and Energy = m*N ==> Torque == energy? This is absurd. On the other hand, Temperature = Kelvin, Energy = Joules ==> (Internal) energy has nothing to do with temperature? Now that's even more absurd. Most conventional units are quite arbitrary and not worth being cited for justification (by itself).

    12. Re:And at least seventh and eighth, too. by novakyu · · Score: 1
      No. Rotational acceleration is different to linear (in fact quasi-linear for gravity).

      So, I guess you are drawing the distinction between \vec{a} // \vec{v} and \vec{a} \perpto \vec{v}?

      Fundamentally, how does that make one type different from the other? (In fact, gravity can be categorized to neither. In the case when you have no angular momentum, gravity will be acting entirely as "linear acceleration" if you choose to draw distinction, while if you are in a stable orbit, gravity is providing the "rotational acceleration" you need to stay in orbit.)

      Either way, a simple accelerometer (er, a weight hanging from a string) will measure them just fine (the only difference might be, from an inertial reference frame, rotational acceleration is constantly changing (in direction) whereas linear acceleration can be constant), and there doesn't seem to be any difference (other than the qualitative difference, as in difference between sweet taste and bitter taste---and since different parts of the tongue is sensitive to different kinds of taste, why not categorize those as separate senses, too, then?)

    13. Re:And at least seventh and eighth, too. by novakyu · · Score: 1
      rotational motion != rotational acceleration.

      Egh. I meant "rotational motion != angular acceleration", since Torque = (a constant)*angular acceleration.

      That's what happens when I read a confused post---I get confused with my own terminology, too!

    14. Re:And at least seventh and eighth, too. by Pentagram · · Score: 1

      There are quite a few "senses" that tell you when something is wrong, which are quite different to the usual ones. Pain, for example (sometimes characterised into different versions, such as visceral pain), the sense of dehydration, and arguable ones like bladder tension.

      One that I never hear mentioned, but which seems to me to be very distinct to the other senses, is nausea.

    15. Re:And at least seventh and eighth, too. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      The sense of touch is often broken up into three senses: pressure, pain, and temperature. These are handled by three physically different kinds of nerve endings that really share nothing except their location in the skin.

      Similarly, the sense of sight is sometimes divided into two senses, since the retina's rods and cones are different populations of cells with very different visual properties.

      The old "five senses" is basically just fuzzy thinking dating back to ancient Greek times.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    16. Re:And at least seventh and eighth, too. by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      OK, here's a ninth: temperature. You can feel warmth, whether it's transmitted by convection, conduction, or radiation.

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  66. my ass has 6th sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There are moments of hightened conciousness. Sometimes people 'something is wrong' without being able to pinpoint it.

    Usually it is sensing something 'different' in their environment.. maybe silence, maybe smell, maybe birds headed one direction, earth quakes can make very low noises we can not hear but animals could, it could disturb electromagnetic fields, which we know birds use to follow their way south.. There are many many ways to explain these things without making indifferentiated statements like 6th sense in humans.. no, we still use our 5 senses for these things. Unless 'conciousness' is considered a sense. When I can make estimations and predictions and take precautions because of them, and probability makes me be right (or not), we can go turn around and think perhaps we're psycic, but people who do that really are just ignorant.

  67. Not another [article I didn't read] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "In both cases a "sixth sense" had nothing to do with it; it was just recognising the available signs for what they were and acting accordingly."

    Oh gee. Who would have guessed that that's exactly what the article is saying? Weither that's a "sense" is another question entirely?

    1. Re:Not another [article I didn't read] by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      That's not even remotely what the article is saying. In this case they conciously saw the signs and conciously drew on their general knowledge and teachings to come to a concious decision to evacuate the area around the beach.

  68. Poppycock! by uisqebaugh · · Score: 0, Redundant

    There was no sixth sense on the Sentalese tribesmen. It was simply a cultural education that stated that if there was a strong earthquake, and/or if the seas receded quickly, a tsunami is about to arrive, so one should go to higher grounds. Also, elephants are sensitive to infrasonic frequencies, which is why they also avoided the shores.

  69. MISD computers? by Ithika · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This may be only tangentially related but I thought I'd get someone else's opinion (however little you guys know about the subject!).

    Whenever I've been taught computer architecture they mention the four main taxonomic categories, SISD, SIMD, MISD and MIMD, but never manage to come up with a sensible explanation of what a Multiple Instruction Single Data computer would be.

    Would a brain count as one? For example, the human eye provides a single set of visual data at a time, which gets independently analysed and processed by different parts of the brain: facial recognition, language and writing, peripheral vision, the blink reflex.

    Is this a reasonable assumption to make? Has anyone ever said this much in as many words? Are there any books or such discussing the similarities?

  70. Re:Not for amerikans.. by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

    and if it looked like the US was favoring Kerry, the rest of the world would've probably thought he was trouble instead :)

  71. Re:The aborginals fled after they read the signs.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serious question: are you mentally retarded?

  72. Why the heck not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think this is far-fetched. I myself have on one occasion experienced a "supernatural" sensation, meaning that I experienced something I simply can't explain. I'm not talking about freaking UFOs or something, but rather a brief and massively intense visual and emotional experience for which I have no scientific explanation at all (I wasn't on drugs, either).
    For some time, I thought it might actually be a spiritual thing, but being someone who doesn't believe in God, I settled with that it was a once-in-a-lifetime experience, but nonetheless entirely human.
    Why can't there be senses that simply aren't used normally and only fire up on exceptional occasions?

  73. Sounds like Bayesian filtering... by danielrm26 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...rather than a sixth sense. Just as many have pointed out, it's still the 5 senses that are doing the input gathering here -- it's just that another part of the brain is doing some number crunching.

    I liken it to Bayesian because it seems to be based on analyzing what happened in the past in order to attempt to predict what is *going* to happen in the future.

    For spam:
    Stuff with these characters are often spam, let's bump this score up a bit.
    For danger:
    Everytime x happens, y seems to happen afterwards, so I should flee.

    This isn't magic, guys. It's just another advantage of the subconcious doing work behind the scenes. /., like Wired, is just prone to blowing these sorts of stories out of proportion.

    --
    dmiessler.com -- grep understanding knowledge
    1. Re:Sounds like Bayesian filtering... by dont_think_twice · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry to inform you that Bayesian is no longer a techno-buzz-word. Last year, it was acceptable to apply the word Bayesian to any sort of stastical process and sound like a genius. Unfortunately, that is no longer true. Too many people now know that Bayesian actually has a technical meaning.

      Until it is clear what the current techno-buzz-word is, I suggest you stick to classics like "synergy", "paradigm".

    2. Re:Sounds like Bayesian filtering... by danielrm26 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sorry to inform you that Bayesian is no longer a techno-buzz-word. Last year, it was acceptable to apply the word Bayesian to any sort of stastical process and sound like a genius.

      Ah, you belong here at Slashdot. Your sense of sarcasm is highly tuned. Unfortunately, I think this is like Bayesian Inference.

      From Wikipedia: Bayesian inference is statistical inference in which probabilities are interpreted not as frequencies or proportions or the like, but rather as degrees of belief.

      I can't help but see the similarities between taking in a bunch of evidence and subconcsiously adjusting how much you believe you are in danger as a result. In Bayesian spam filtering, there are values assigned to how dangerous a given input is already, and this is obviously not as clear in the case of a human brain doing the same to given environemental conditions, but the similarity is still interesting.

      We obviously can't say this is exactly like Bayesian filtering, since we don't know how it works for humans exactly; the point is, the human mind appears to be incrementally adjusting its perception of danger according to various dynamic variables. If you can't see the similarity there, then relax a bit -- you're trying too hard to be the sarcasm-weilding, skeptical guy that loves nothing more than going on the attack.

      --
      dmiessler.com -- grep understanding knowledge
  74. except for those humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    that got stuck behind them glaciers for so long, this is a natural aspect of all creatures created by This Earth. every creature on this planet "knows" pretty much everything that is going on around here, without any fancy-schmancy "studies". we know these things; you have to "study" them, and get it wrong durn near every time. if your abilities hadn't gotten so diminished by that time spent cut off from nature, you'd understand this, but they did, so you won't/can't.

    if y'all would get off your burning looting and pillaging long enough to _really_ smell those roses, you might, eventually, realize this yourselves. but you are too busy messing this planet up with your "progress". if you would actually stop and look at things, who is responsible for every bit of damage to this environment?! since y'all have made it so difficult for the rest of us to do any of this "progress" crap, you are the only ones who could possibly be messing things up. as you've done every since you yo-ta-ho'd back out of the north atlantic!

    "aboriginals" .... geez! y'all gotta try to label everything, and constantly get it wrong! would you, please, just go back to northern europe and let us get this planet cleaned back up before you finally succeed in breaking it completely!!

    as they say "payback is a bitch" and your time is coming!

  75. AKA Dreams. by agent · · Score: 0

    AKA Dreams. The USA's money also says we have a third eye.

  76. Tsunami = Earth's Enema by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Get rid of the brown stuff.

  77. Science beats pseudoscience every time by dustmite · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some of the local indigenous people had stories handed down over generations from their ancestors who had also suffered through a tsunami, and from these stories some of them recognized the warning signs and knew what to do. No mystical explanation required in that case.

    A good example of the value that even conventional science holds over anything paranormal is the 10-year old British girl who recognized the warning signs from having listened in her geography class, and saved hundreds of lives by warning those on the beach and nearby hotel to evacuate.

    By comparison: Even though there are millions of psychics/clairvoyants and other people who claim to be able to predict the future worldwide, not one predicted the tsunami! Remarkable?

    This is not to say that there isn't something to the study descibed in the article; animals and aboriginals may all have 'felt' the earthquake (even from far - elephants' feet for example have specially adapted sensors that are very sensitive to vibrations), and just thought it prudent to get out of the way just in case. However the use of the term "sixth sense" implies a paranormal explanation, when in fact you can pretty much bet that the true explanation, whatever it turns out to be, is going to be quite logical and rational. This is perhaps more likely just poor journalism rather than poor science.

    (These stories with a 'pseudoscientific bent' seem to reveal a creeping trend away from rational thinking on slashdot, which several years ago used to feel like one of the few good places on the Net where one could get away from that sort of gullible mainstream uninformed discourse :/ Is Slashdot now officially "mainstream"?)

    1. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by torpor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some of the local indigenous people had stories handed down over generations from their ancestors who had also suffered through a tsunami, and from these stories some of them recognized the warning signs and knew what to do. No mystical explanation required in that case.

      So, what, you're saying that history is a sixth sense?

      Cool!!! Thats the best description yet! :)

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by gvc · · Score: 1

      Don't be so quick to say that "not one of them predicted the tsunami." Depending on how broadly you define "predicted the tsunami" you can estimate the number of psychics that will have in fact predicted the tsunami.

      Of course, the fact that these random predictions happened to be true is not evidence of clairvoyance.

    3. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Funny

      >>By comparison: Even though there are millions of psychics/clairvoyants and other people who claim to be able to predict the future worldwide, not one predicted the tsunami! Remarkable?

      I am certain that the responsible 'authorities' are reverse engineering the Bible Code(tm) and Nostradamus' Quatrains as we discuss this.

      wbs

      --
      Huh?
    4. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by blamanj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      However the use of the term "sixth sense" implies a paranormal explanation...This is perhaps more likely just poor journalism rather than poor science.

      Indeed. It might be more appropriate to say there are sixth, seventh, and eighth, etc. senses. It has been postulated that we are sensitive to a variety of stimula that other animals are capable of sensing (magnetic fields, pheromones, etc.) but that these senses are either vestigal or their input is overwhelmed by the high bandwidth requirements of vision, which we rely on to a much higher degree.

      The real point of the article is that we register things like taste, sight, smell, etc. at a conscious level, and that we may also take in data that is valuable but that doesn't register with the same intensity. That sub-conscious data can still affect us, however, but we can't explain it in the same way we can explain the more direct stimuli.

    5. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by sv0f · · Score: 1

      owever the use of the term "sixth sense" implies a paranormal explanation, when in fact you can pretty much bet that the true explanation, whatever it turns out to be, is going to be quite logical and rational. This is perhaps more likely just poor journalism rather than poor science.

      Agreed. Once you get past the first paragraph, which is pure mularkey, you have a mundane story, another research study that adds a bit to our knowledge of what the anterior cingulate does. This brain area is "hot" right now, lots of good neuroscience labs are studying it, and Science, Nature, and PNAS, are more than willing to publish articles on it.

      This area does conflict monitoring and provides error feedback. It's not the site of "the sixth sense."

      (These stories with a 'pseudoscientific bent' seem to reveal a creeping trend away from rational thinking on slashdot, which several years ago used to feel like one of the few good places on the Net where one could get away from that sort of gullible mainstream uninformed discourse :/ Is Slashdot now officially "mainstream"?)

      There's been a general dumbing of this forum over the years. Sure, we've always had "First Post!" types here, but I consider them amusing. What once was a technoscience community, with the kind of background knowledge that implies, now includes more than its share of people who discredit science for political, economic, and religious reasons.

    6. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 4, Insightful
      There's been a general dumbing of this forum over the years. Sure, we've always had "First Post!" types here, but I consider them amusing. What once was a technoscience community, with the kind of background knowledge that implies, now includes more than its share of people who discredit science for political, economic, and religious reasons.

      That said, the fact that the "debunking" posts usually get modded up, is a sign that the crowd is still predominantly scientifically oriented.

    7. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      "By comparison: Even though there are millions of psychics/clairvoyants and other people who claim to be able to predict the future worldwide, not one predicted the tsunami! Remarkable?"

      OK, maybe no one predicted it before the event but there are millions of things which pychics correctly predict all the time and maybe this just happened to be one of the things which they missed.

      With hindsight however it's clear that the Tsunami was predicted by thousands of talented pyschics and prominent clairvoyants it's just that it the general population did not interpret the predictions correctly.

    8. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Indeed. It might be more appropriate to say there are sixth, seventh, and eighth, etc. senses. It has been postulated that we are sensitive to a variety of stimula that other animals are capable of sensing (magnetic fields, pheromones, etc.)

      We do have an additional sense that is much more developed than in any other animal: Language. Your brain is soaking in it now. We can acquire prceise knowledge without directly observing events with our other senses. For instance, I learned about this "Tsunami" thing, but I wasn't there.

    9. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by nine-times · · Score: 1
      However the use of the term "sixth sense" implies a paranormal explanation, when in fact you can pretty much bet that the true explanation, whatever it turns out to be, is going to be quite logical and rational.

      Sometimes the distinction between "paranormal" and science is a bit like the distinction between magic and technology-- which is to say, it's the not-understood version. Take any given "paranormal" phenomenon, prove it exists, and make up terminology with official-sounding latin roots, and suddenly it's science. Take a well-known scientific phenomenon, talk about it in metaphorical terms, and it's paranormal pseudo-science again.

      I'm not saying you're wrong about the /. summary being overly-sensationalistic and misleading, though. Many claims to "paranormal" phenomena have no truth to them whatsoever. I guess the distinction I'm shooting for is, that there are lots of phonies playing psychic who have been proven to be scam artists doesn't mean we've "proven" there's no such thing as a "sixth sense". It just means we should be dubious of claims put forward.

      (I guess I'm arguing with the implication that entertaining the possibility of a "sixth sense" is equivalent to a "creeping away from rational thinking")

    10. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by nine-times · · Score: 1
      So, what, you're saying that history is a sixth sense?

      Interesting interpretation. By what sense do we "remember". It's like hearing, seeing, smelling, touching, but when you remember a sight, it's not the same as seeing. Is memory a sixth sense?

      I know this isn't terrifically on-topic, but human perception is quite complex. Each of your senses, in a certain way of looking at them, come down to being "touch". Nerves in your eyes "feel" the effects of your retina being struck by light. Nerves in your tongue feel the effect of the chemical reactions in your mouth. The division into "5 senses" is a bit of a convention, and I'm not sure we shouldn't acknowledge more/others. However, this isn't the same as saying that aborigines are psychic.

    11. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by king-manic · · Score: 1

      By comparison: Even though there are millions of psychics/clairvoyants and other people who claim to be able to predict the future worldwide, not one predicted the tsunami! Remarkable?

      Pish posh. I'm sure out of the few thousand supposed psychics one of them predicted something that can be vaguely attributed to the tsunami. I'm sure a lot of them are getting a lot of business because of this prediction. When there are enough predictions one of them will be close. It's simply numbers.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    12. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by antiMStroll · · Score: 1
      "By comparison: Even though there are millions of psychics/clairvoyants and other people who claim to be able to predict the future worldwide, not one predicted the tsunami!"

      Don't you mean, haven't predicted it yet.

    13. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "Sometimes the distinction between "paranormal" and science is a bit like the distinction between magic and technology-- which is to say, it's the not-understood version. Take any given "paranormal" phenomenon, prove it exists, and make up terminology with official-sounding latin roots, and suddenly it's science. Take a well-known scientific phenomenon, talk about it in metaphorical terms, and it's paranormal pseudo-science again."

      Thank you Mr. Clarke.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    14. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by yakofdeath · · Score: 1

      Even though there are millions of psychics/clairvoyants and other people who claim to be able to predict the future worldwide, not one predicted the tsunami!

      Except that Pseudo-Random Number Generator. I think we know what's pseudoscience now!

    15. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by raduf · · Score: 1


      Well, Slashdot probably is mainstream by now (sigh...) but there's nothing pseudoscientific about this article. The "sixth sense" and "tsunami" topics are only for show and probably added by the magazine. The meat of their research is rather different, and quite interesting.
      If it has anything to do with the paranormal is that once complete it may help to explain away some paranormal phenomenon, not confirm them as supernatural.

      Anyways, I find fascinating the levels contemporary scince is reaching. It's pretty much knocking on doors i used to dream about when i was a kid, and no one is paying atention... i wonder why... I mean, i really wonder why :) Maybe because we got tired to keep waiting for them? Or we're just too sure they'll come?

    16. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what a shame that the tech-skilled of yore who used to dominate Slashdot are gradually being replaced by those with almost completed certificates in PowerPointology. :-(

    17. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      With hindsight however it's clear that the Tsunami was predicted by thousands of talented pyschics and prominent clairvoyants it's just that it the general population did not interpret the predictions correctly.

      I knew. I was on a Dolphin email list and I got the 'So Long, and Thanks For All The Fish' final message.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    18. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by His+Shadow · · Score: 1
      "With hindsight however it's clear that the Tsunami was predicted by thousands of talented pyschics and prominent clairvoyants it's just that it the general population did not interpret the predictions correctly."

      Please tell me this is sarcasm. Because I already know enough to classify it as post hoc nonsense.

      --

      Fiat Homos et Pereat Theos

    19. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by Snaller · · Score: 1

      By comparison: Even though there are millions of psychics/clairvoyants and other people who claim to be able to predict the future worldwide, not one predicted the tsunami! Remarkable?

      Or perhaps you just didn't hear about it.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    20. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >That said, the fact that the "debunking" posts usually get modded up, is a sign that the crowd is still predominantly scientifically oriented.

      Such as yours?

    21. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      I don't know why everyone is getting all 'mystical' about this, it is a perfectly reasonable idea. In fact I remember reading of experiments conducted many years ago where the researchers fed sub-audible tones of slightly different frequencies to each of the ears subjects. The subjects heard beating of the tones. The beating was in their brain not their ears. So they didn't throw away the sub-audible data, something kept it ... why? One suspects because the brain can find a use for such data.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    22. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by maysonl · · Score: 1
      Please tell me this is sarcasm. Because I already know enough to classify it as post hoc nonsense.
      How could u possibly ? the veridical quality o'gp - obviously a post of the highest integrity and insight.
    23. Re:Science beats pseudoscience every time by ndogg · · Score: 1

      (These stories with a 'pseudoscientific bent' seem to reveal a creeping trend away from rational thinking on slashdot, which several years ago used to feel like one of the few good places on the Net where one could get away from that sort of gullible mainstream uninformed discourse :/ Is Slashdot now officially "mainstream"?)

      No kidding.

      Linguistic thought experiment: if you find something to be real that's often called "paranormal" and you can explain it, scientifically, is it still paranormal?

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  78. There are 52 Perceptics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As any good Scientologist knows.

  79. Re:So THAT'S how Bush won! by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

    So, your brain listened to irrational fear, created a new sitation, and sent it to your concious mind? Because fear, as we all know, is usually unconcious. Knowing this, it would be easy to extrapolate that yes, Bush did win by exploiting this.

  80. Yeah, for example-RTFACarefully. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This has nothing to do with psychic powers! Fucking idiot journalists."

    More like idiot readers. The article says nothing about psychic phenomenon.

  81. Sixth Sense by soman · · Score: 1

    My Sixth Sense is saying that there is a huge flame coming over.

  82. Tribesman by pardasaniman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I personally believe in a Sixth Sense. I remember reading that Indian tribespeople avoided the tsunami for two reasons:

    1) Their land was not deforested and the trees slowed down the onslaught of the waves.

    2) An ancient legend warns them to seek higher ground when the ground shakes.

    Thus, all of them survived.

    1. Re:Tribesman by hyfe · · Score: 1
      2) An ancient legend warns them to seek higher ground when the ground shakes.

      or rather; a-not-so-very-ancient-anymore legend warned them :)

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
  83. Cingular cortex? by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1, Funny

    This must be how I know that when I get my Cingular bill it will be fucked up and I will have to call customer service to correct it... over and over again...

  84. Anyone Else Notice This? by fdiskne1 · · Score: 1
    In the article, first it talks about what the ACC is:
    The findings offer rigorous scientific evidence for a new way of conceptualizing the complex executive control processes taking place in and around the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a brain area located near the top of the frontal lobes and along the walls that divide the left and right hemispheres.
    Then near the end, they describe one part of this experiment:
    "We started by building a detailed computer simulation of the ACC, and then we found that the computer predicted the existence of the early warning signal in ACC."

    I didn't know scientists knew enough about the function of the brain to construct a computer model of a part they assume they know the function of. (nice sentense structure, I know) In other words, they assume they know the function of one part of the brain and they make a computer model of it. The computer model can predict when something in the computer model will happen. Does this seem a little fishy to anyone else?

    In my opinion, I believe that yes, our subconscious mind can make connections between seemingly disparate facts and spur action the conscious mind can't understand the reasoning for. I also believe the tribesmen in question used both this, lessons handed down through the generations and the activity of the animals to save themselves. I don't think you need a computer model to tell you this.

    --
    But why is the rum gone?
    1. Re:Anyone Else Notice This? by hobo2k · · Score: 1
      Does this seem a little fishy to anyone else?

      No that sounds like how all simulations work. It would be fishy if they did nothing to verify the prediction of the simulation.

      our subconscious mind can make connections...I don't think you need a computer model to tell you this.

      But that isn't what they found out. They found out that a specific part of the brain plays a role in that subconscious process. Which may lead to eventual discovery of treatments for certain mental disorders. Not an obvious result.

    2. Re:Anyone Else Notice This? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A simulation is not used to verify predictions, but to test hypotheses.

  85. Fortune... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the bottom of the page when this story was posted...

    "When you're dining out and you suspect something's wrong, you're probably right."

  86. No it doesn't-RN Brains. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "People get feelings and act on them all the time. We only hear about the rare times when they coincide with an actual event."

    Maybe we have a future detecting Random Number Generator in our heads?

  87. The 42nd Sense by Cycloid+Torus · · Score: 0

    When you know the answer, but forgot the question.

    --
    Lost in space at an early age. Survived the vacuum. Now rebuilding castle in air.
  88. 01001011111 by racerxroot · · Score: 1

    heck - I saw it coming too - 0101001011111110100101010100101 see? a spike in 1's. I'm sure the aborigini's saw it too.

    --
    --- Caffeine is directly responsible for some of my greatest ideas, and some of my most embarrassing moments...
  89. They were interviewed, and common sense, not sixth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A reporter went there to see them. IIRC, they said something like that themselves. They certainly didn't say that the spirits told them or anything along those lines.

    IMHO, it was a simple case of people who live close to noticing small changes that people in your high-rise office block have no notion about, since they're indoors with central heating etc.

    As for a six sense... I've often thought that, sensing when someone is behind you was akin to taking the 'data streams' from things like barely noticeable reflections IN your field of view, or the people you can see looking at the one you can't. There are plenty of things that go on every second, which could be easily picked up on a subconscious level, but that's subconscious processing of available sense data, not a NEW sense.

    Basically? Six sense my ass. Worst story on slashdot, ever.

  90. The Mac analogy by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is like saying we've discovered a second Mac mouse button just because you can make more use of the single one you've got if you're smarter and more experienced, or because you're so used to using the control key that you're no longer conscious that you're doing it.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  91. They headed the warning signs by tod_miller · · Score: 3, Informative

    Even CNN was able to report this diligently. They passed on knowledge through their generations that retreating water was a sign of disaster, so when the waters went out (whatever the technical term is) they all scarpered.

    I am sure the brain does have sub systems that try and trigger responses from us, like when we tune into a baby crying or other things, I am sure that our senses are more sensitive than we realise, but mostof it is filtered out.

    Sounds like headline grabbing terminology bending.

    But saying it is a sixth sense does not mean that IT KNEW MORE than what was being told to it by the 5 senses we do actually have (perhaps we can like pigeons sense magnetics also).

    So please, like robotics, nanotech and every other buzz word that gets recycled, make sure you really are saying what you are saying.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  92. Not infeasible-QE2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Actually, in the silly paranormal world, you'd have to call it more like "delivery" of information, since the implication is that some magical part of the universe informs you of something, rather than you processing stimuli from your senses to derive that information. "

    There's the belief that some psychic phenomenon may be based upon Quantum Entanglement. No magic there, just a poorly understood phenomenon.

    "Um... gee, is it possible it's just that simple, and there's no need to keep my mind open for magic?"

    Or maybe, much as people are drawing incorrect conclusions from the history of the word "Sith Sense". "Magic" likewise is so burdened, and some of it may have an underlying physical basis?

  93. Perhaps, in fact, not another pseudoscience story by FungiFromYuggoth · · Score: 1

    Not to interrupt with facts, but I read in the Guardian that the tribes apparently went upland well prior to the tsunami, during a time of year they would have normally been on the coasts.

    Alas, I can't find a handy link for that story, but there are stories about the Sentinelese, Shompen, and the more western-integrated Nicobari - that last who didn't fare so well.

    I do see a travel journal (not the most reliable of sources, I fear) that indicates the Sentinelese went upland immediately after the earthquake. No ESP involved, but some amount of sensitivity and prudence.

  94. Well, I don't have it... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    I surely don't have it. I slept through the World-Trade center "events" and when they collapsed, I didn't felt the slightest tremor in the force.

    I only found out when I turned the TV on...

  95. Tsunami wasn't sixth sense -- it was SENSE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There was no sixth sense involved in avoiding the Tsunami.

    All people near the ocean saw and heard that something was different. When wild animals see something 'different', they run away from it full tilt and later on cautiously approach it to find out more.

    When idiot people and domesticated animals see something 'different', they walk up to it to get a closer look.

    Thus, you saw animals and people with 'sense' saying "Hey... this is really odd. Let's say we go away from the ocean for a bit." and those without sense saying "Wow! The ocean drew right out to sea! Let's walk out on the new beach and take a look at this strange-and-potentially-dangerous new development. Even better, let's call our friends on cell phone and have them join us!

    "Wow! Look at the size of that wave! I wonder how high the surf will get?!?"

    There's no 'sixth sense' involved. Plain, simple common sense saved people and animals from the Tsunami.

  96. From the article by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    "It appears that this area of the brain is somehow figuring out things without you necessarily having to be consciously aware of it,"

    So you see, when they come down to it, they do not even try and establish themselves as proponents for the sixth sense idea.

    If you search on a p2p network for hypnosis books they even talk about sub conscious (not being consciously aware of actions) systems, such as breathing or even flinching from pain.

    Another example would be when you suddenly feel unsafe in a car, when you realise you might be going too fast, this happens before you could possibly calculate that you have not slowed enough (perhaps your peripheral vision has seen something, or you are starting to have to look at too many things so your brain panics).

    Again, the study talks about training the brain to autonomously respond to stimulii, in this case white or blue flashes.

    Even dogs can learn from the result of things, if you always feed a dog, they will always expect you to feed them.

    In this case, if the brain always registers a failuire with a blue flash, then it will expect a failuire to occur when a blue flash occurs, not because of any predictive sensing, but whatever string programming is going on in the brain has written a stronger pathway from 'blue' to 'failuire'.

    I think this is weak science. Sorry, but not everyone with a fancy functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) should be allowed to make any claims they want, after discovering something less exciting than the fact that your body remembers how it felt after it ate something, which is why you hate vodka if you ever drink too much and throw up afterwards.

    ok me out

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  97. I just knew it!!!!! by Slavinski · · Score: 2, Funny


    I knew it was there all the time!!!

    You're only upset because the voices talk to me?!

    ;)

  98. intuition ? by Yaro · · Score: 1

    I didn't rtfa, but I'm wondering, what about mere "intuition" ? There's a whole lot of details our brain processes that are not bound to reach the consciousness level. The unconcious part of our brain nevertheless plays a role in the way we think, and "gives us warnings" in the form of "impressions", "feelings", etc. I wouldn't think a sixth sense is involved here.

  99. in zen-buddism... by boeserjavamann · · Score: 1

    ...someone trains through meditation (zazen) to balance the strength of thalamus and hypothalamus. IMHO, satori or enlightment is something like a sixth sense translated into the "logical" world i think.

  100. Duh-The Playdough Sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That's not a sense (i.e. an input into your brain) .. it's your brain's model your body's current position."

    Actually it is a sense. There are nerve cells embedded in your muscular structure that gives feedback on what's happening.

    "#7 - kinethesis" is a layer on top of that. e.g.Internal model.

  101. re: I believe in science too! by spottedkangaroo · · Score: 1

    Science isn't a matter of belief. It is a matter of education.

    --
    Imagine if you weren't allowed to use roads because a bus company complained about your driving 3 times. --skunkpussy
  102. It's not a sixth sense by fizbin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Or at least, similar actions can be explained without inventing a sixth sense.

    It's basically a combination of these two things: your skin is much more sensitive than you realize, and that sense is not nearly as accurate as you think it is.

    To see this, get two friends to help test this sense. You will stand (or sit, whichever) in the middle of the room, blindfolded and wearing ear plugs, and one friend will stand behind you at a designated spot, being careful not to breath on the back of your neck. The other friend will blow a loud whistle - loud enough to hear through the earplugs - occasionally and at each whistle blow you will need to say if someone is behind you or not. Make sure that your friends choose whether to stand behind you or not before each whistle blow by using some random source, such as a coin flip or dice roll.

    If this "sense" does not completely disappear when you've eliminated sight and sound, then retest while wearing a coat with a hood, or something else to completely cover your arms, back, and neck.

    I have found myself that during the winter I can navigate around in complete darkness without bumping into things because I "sense" them about half an inch before I'd bump into them. It's not a sixth sense - it's that the static in the air makes the hair on my exposed legs stand up when I approach most objects. A pair of longjohns kills this "sense" completely.

    1. Re:It's not a sixth sense by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Well that may be to soem extent, but I know from personal experience I can be in full Bishido gear (trying to explain without a picture would be hard, so google for it instead) and use this quite well. If all it did was use was a sensitivity to static then it would seem much less use. I'm sure that's part of it, but personally I can extend my range over most of a large room and nine times out of ten sense even things being thrown at me from over 20 feet away (& from behind me). I kinda doubt it is solely from this one source.

      We are far more complex than science fully understands and sometimes people seem to not understand that sometimes even without knowing the 'why' we can still use those things we might not be able to answer that question for. I guess it's coming to close to that 'mystical' concept science is portrayed as opposing... I've never believed they must be opposites and so I can use something I can't fully understand why I'm able to do it...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    2. Re:It's not a sixth sense by glpierce · · Score: 1

      If something is being thrown, the motion through air will result in pressure changes which can be heard as sound or felt through the skin.

      --
      G
    3. Re:It's not a sixth sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you cover yourself with mud, the Predator can't see you

    4. Re:It's not a sixth sense by legirons · · Score: 1

      "To see this, get two friends to help test this sense. You will sit in the middle of the room, blindfolded and wearing ear plugs... then retest while wearing a coat with a hood, or something else to completely cover your arms, back, and neck"

      You don't work for the US Navy do you?

    5. Re:It's not a sixth sense by nester · · Score: 1

      or maybe you just know your way around the room.

    6. Re:It's not a sixth sense by sinserve · · Score: 1

      > I have found myself that during the winter I can navigate around in
      > complete darkness without bumping into things because I "sense" them about
      > half an inch before I'd bump into them. It's not a sixth sense - it's that
      > the static in the air makes the hair on my exposed legs stand up ...

      What kind of guy exposes his legs in winter? some women are foolish enough to wear
      skirts in winter, but those are brainwashed to "look good" and nobody cares about them.
      But why would a man, a creature whose lower limps have no aesthetic appeal, bare his legs?

    7. Re:It's not a sixth sense by fizbin · · Score: 1

      The remark that it's in complete darkness may give you a clue - I have central heating, good housing insulation, and good thick blankets, so do not always feel the need to wear heavy pajamas. In the middle of the night, I'll sometimes decide to leave the bed for some reason.

  103. Re:So THAT'S how Bush won! by salvorHardin · · Score: 1
    but they aren't really a sense in the same way that smell or sight is. I can't say to someone else "hey, do you feel that hunger over their?"

    You also can't say 'hey, look at the inside of my eyelids... they're so dark. It is very tempting to lump all 'feeling' sensory perception together under the banner of 'kinesthetic' or somesuch, but just because the stimulus is internal rather than external, doesn't mean it isn't a 'sense'. Without such a sense, you would not be able to walk in the dark. I think the reason such things aren't accepted as 'sense', is that they're taken for granted. You never have to look at your feet to ensure that you're walking properly, at least, not since you were very very young, so you don't pay it any attention.

  104. Maybe a seventh sense? by mpsmps · · Score: 1

    Actually, I thought this is the best evidence for a sixth-sense in humans.

  105. Intuition by Sanat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At the risk of sowing pearls before the swine...

    Humanity is multi-dimensional. There are those individuals who can quiet the mind totally and in so doing raise their consciousness to tune into the higher realms. The bible and other religious doctrines talk about this a great deal.

    Information coming from the higher realms is based in love and not in fear.

    Before you flame this post reflect carefully upon this:

    "Can you quiet your mind where not a single thought occurs for 15 minutes? 5 minutes? 1 minute? 10 seconds? Try it and see.

    The small still voice that guides from the higher realms is like a soft playing flute compared to the ego which is like a brass marching band. When the mind is active then the flute is inaudible. When the mind is still then the flute can be heard.

    Those individuals living close to Mother Earth follow the small still voice that guides them in ways they might not understand while it is occurring but later reveals the reason for the guidance. The tsunami is an example. All humans were given the message, only a few were capable of hearing and following it for only a few had minds quiet enough to comprehend.

    --
    And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    1. Re:Intuition by irhtfp · · Score: 1
      One man's pearls are another man's bullshit.

      Regards,

      -The Swine

      --
      I've made up my mind and now I've got to lie in it.
    2. Re:Intuition by lux55 · · Score: 1

      I like your metaphor of the flute and the brass marching band.

      I'm one of the diminishing number of people who hold a rational faith in religions, however I guess you could say I'm a newer convert, and I'm nowhere near the serenity of mind to be able to "tune in". I've still got a lot of work to do in that area, overcoming the hyperactivity of mind that we push ourselves to strive for nowadays...

    3. Re:Intuition by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      Those individuals living close to Mother Earth follow the small still voice that guides them in ways they might not understand while it is occurring but later reveals the reason for the guidance. The tsunami is an example. All humans were given the message, only a few were capable of hearing and following it for only a few had minds quiet enough to comprehend.

      If by "given the message" you mean "saw the water in the ocean go waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out" then you're right. The tribesmen saw the waters receed and remembered what that meant, so they went to higher ground. There wasn't some voice from another higher dimension telling them to do that. Just common (to them) sense.

    4. Re:Intuition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before you flame this post reflect carefully upon this:

      "Can you quiet your mind where not a single thought occurs for 15 minutes? 5 minutes? 1 minute? 10 seconds? Try it and see.


      It really is sad to see how far humanity hasn't come, when we still have people who believe nonsense like this. Slowly, but surely, this sort of ignorance will be eliminated.

    5. Re:Intuition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's something to be said for mental focus, but is it really necessary to invoke "higher realms", a "small voice", and "living close to Mother Earth" to explain the fact that observant, focused people are more aware of their surroundings?

    6. Re:Intuition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Can you quiet your mind where not a single thought occurs for 15 minutes? 5 minutes? 1 minute? 10 seconds? Try it and see."

      I tried, but my mind told you to fuck off.

    7. Re:Intuition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here we have proof that it doesn't matter what bullshit you write, you just need a low /. UID to be modded up.

      Wow. I mean, really... Wow.

    8. Re:Intuition by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Humanity is multi-dimensional. There are those individuals who can quiet the mind totally and in so doing raise their consciousness to tune into the higher realms. The bible and other religious doctrines talk about this a great deal........Can you quiet your mind where not a single thought occurs for 15 minutes? 5 minutes? 1 minute? 10 seconds? Try it and see."

      Ok, not to flame, but where's your proof that humanity is multi-dimensional? How do you know that they tap into "higher realms"? Where's the proof? The bible and other religious doctrines talk about a LOT of things a great deal, and many of them are scientifically proven to be completely false.

      And how do you know that when you quiet your mind you're not just hearing your subconscious thoughts? I really don't think anything too special is going on here, however if you can provide some scientifically tested and peer-reviewed proof of what you posted about, I'd be very interested in reading it.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    9. Re:Intuition by Sanat · · Score: 1

      Here is a URL that might help is some of the area that you asked about.

      http://www.cyjack.com/Cognition/Meditation%20Gives %20Brain%20a%20Charge.htm

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
  106. Here's the problem: by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1
    What part of that is needlessly sensational?

    The part you did not quote, of course:

    Aboriginal tribesmen somehow sensed the impending danger of December's tsunami in time to flee to higher ground before the first sign of water.

    It just stating (and this is in TFA) that not all the patterns we recognize we're aware of. But according to all credible reports, the people in question consciously noticed that the sea had receded significantly, and consciously recalled stories passed down about what happens after that.

  107. Re:So THAT'S how Bush won! by craXORjack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would have to disagree with your assessment. I think this "sixth sense" is how Bush almost lost. Too many people sensed that the invasion was wrong, that no WMDs would ever be found, that Bush's friends in the oil and weapons industries were the sole beneficiaries. You must remember that Bush won by only the narrowest of margins while no other wartime president has ever been re-elected by anything but a landslide. But Karl Rove cleverly created an issue out of homosexuality that drew to the poll some of the people who would not otherwise have voted due to their uncertainty over the justness of Bush's war.

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  108. Then they're going to win at least $1,000,000 by g0hare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From James Randi for proving the paranormal. Once and forever, anecdotal evidence ain't science. It's how politics and other such scams are done, not science.

    --
    Vote Quimby!
    1. Re:Then they're going to win at least $1,000,000 by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      anecdotal evidence is the basis for science. Black holes cannot be directly observed or measured, but anectdotal evidence (stuff falling in, x-rays being shot out, etc.) show there is something there.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  109. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For over 35 years I've been able to pick the willing chicks out of a crowd using that portion of sixth sense known as, "the randy chicks move there knees together and apart, subconsciously, while talking to you".

    You won't read this in any psikicks book and Xtals won't give you the power but careful attention to ones surroundings will always offer a sharper view of reality than the TeeVee numbed masses experience...

    and get you a lot more pusi too!

  110. Fascinating... by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    I find it fascinating how many posts are down on this idea. There seems to be a tendency among the "learned" that that which we already have learned is gospel but that which challenges it is fantasy. Yet, in order to move forward, you have to challenge and evidence of new ideas and theories have to taken seriously enough to be challenged objectively. This idea that "we've already discovered enough senses and receptors in the human anatomy, let's move on" is quite silly. Hell, we've only in the last 24 months cracked the g-nome.

    1. Re:Fascinating... by fgb · · Score: 1

      Gnome's been cracked?
      Thank goodness I use KDE!

      Sorry... I couldn't resist.

    2. Re:Fascinating... by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      You so silly!
      :)

  111. what does abbo observation indicate on the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    global warming front?

    are they all migrating N?

  112. Re:I knew it (-1 redundant) by KarmaBlackballed · · Score: 1

    Da** it! I knew they would moderate that post as redundant!

    --

    --- -- - -
    Give me LIBERTY, or give me a check.
  113. Seventh sense by Plutor · · Score: 1

    I think this article means a seventh sense. There's already a sixth sense, called "proprioception". Essentially, it lets us know where our body parts are. But because it's less demonstrable than the other five senses, it's often ignored.

  114. Re:Every mother knows this, X-Wings & Tie Figh by wronski · · Score: 1

    Its like playing X-Wing vs. Tie Fighter. There are a dozen ships whirling around, yet you know instinctively what to do to avoid being clobbered. The curious thing is that you dont think of the ships as positioned in x-y-z axis (the 'logical' way according to old scifi flics). Instead, you think instinctively in semantic terms ("the A-Wing is behind the second TF to my right, the first TF is below me"), which for humans is far more efficient. A bit like the way chess players plan their moves without considering 10^6 variations.

  115. Re:So THAT'S how Bush won! by Vellmont · · Score: 1

    Really I'm trying to avoid the whole semantic argument of what a "sense" is and merely trying to distiguish something that says something that tells you about the outside world with something that tells you about your own body. Define the word "sense" however you like, but there is a difference between the source of information. The 5 traditional senses have a data source of the outside world. Really, when it comes down to it why not consider you own emotional state a sense?

    --
    AccountKiller
  116. It's called "hearing" and "seeing" by cirby · · Score: 1

    An absence of input is also input.

  117. Re:So THAT'S how Bush won! by salvorHardin · · Score: 1
    Really, when it comes down to it why not consider you own emotional state a sense?

    Because 'how I feel emotionally about the fact that I just witnessed my girlfriend in bed with my brother' is subjective. Whereas 'where my left leg is in relation to my right' is not.

  118. the aborigins weren't forewarned by rkaa · · Score: 2, Informative

    They were not forwarned. They actually can speak. Yes: They have a language! And according to the norwegian press, they told interviewers that they have for generations talked about the dangers of the earthquakes. About how - when they occur - the forefathers always insisted they must flee up into the mountains - o be safe. So the quake came, they went up into the mountain - and survived the tsunami. Simple, really. No 6th sense mumbo-jumbo. Just ordinary mumbo-jumbo, if you like.

  119. Sensationalist by koko775 · · Score: 1

    I read the article, and all I see is a bunch of text proving that humans really do possess intuition. What's so special about calling it a "sixth sense"?

    1. Re:Sensationalist by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 0

      No no no, a sixth sense to warn of impending danger, like how all the Zionists knew to leave the world trade center before 9/11.

      Oh wait, that was their cell phones!
      :o

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
    2. Re:Sensationalist by UziBeatle · · Score: 0

      SenatorOrrinHatch espewethed: No no no, a sixth sense to warn of impending danger, like how all the Zionists knew to leave the world trade center before 9/11. Oh wait, that was their cell phones! I'm telling Bill O'Rielly on you.

      --
      Something between the lines jumps out and bites your arm off. Soltan Gris / London
  120. Its the Dead Zone! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Obviously :)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  121. They love us for our minds. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    The cingulate cortex is the fruit of the alien breeding program for humans. Our bizarre, threatening world is just a way to evolve and exercise this organ. While aliens are too different from humans to explain "why" they "want" it, let's say it's somewhere between the vastly efficient computational power of such a "signal processor", and "tasty".

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  122. Mental Radar Detector by moose5435 · · Score: 0

    Over the last year, I have convinced myself that I can predict adn anticipate speed traps at least 30 seconds to 1 minute before I reach it.

    Whenever I am driving and let my mind wander. If I get a random thought that is related to police in any way, I slow down.

    It works for me at least 9.5 times out of 10.

  123. Not a sixth sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    But a different mode of processing data.

    I grew up on a farm, and know exactly what they are talking about. It is sort of a 'gestalt' of the environment, so that if something changes, you 'sense' it, by combining 'subconsciously' a number of cues.

    Likewise, living in a different ecosystem produces a sense of unease, because the cues are "off".

    This isn't paranormal, just a different mode of processing a large amount of data.

    Intuition might be another word for this or a similar phenomenon.

  124. Evidence, true tsunami story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sense indeed does seem to exist, there are people who felt something was wrong days before the tsunami hit and left the area before anything could be seen or otherwise felt. A famous couple from Serbia, Lepa Brena (a popular folk singer) and her husband Boba Zivojinovic (a former tennis player and a good friend of Boris Becker's) cut their vacation in Thailand short because they felt something was very wrong. They left hours before the tsunami hit, you can read about it here (http://www.politika.co.yu/ilustro/2399/1.htm - the magazine article is in Serbian). The translation of the relevant paragraph follows:

    "I was nervous from the day we landed. The hot and humid weather did not agree with me. My latest bloodwork test results were also not the best," said Brena, now resting from all the vacation excitement in her home in Belgrade. "Boba and I agreed that we should just pack up and leave. On the 7th day we finally managed to get tickets to Singpore, where we stayed another 3 days. At the Singapore airport we found out that the resort we had left just a few hours earlier was totally destroyed by the tsunami, it was washed away as if it never existed. I have had so much stress in the last year that if I were to start thinking about what could have happened if I did not trust my intuition I think I would find it hard to keep my sanity."

  125. Sixth Sense? by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 1

    I see dead people...

    --
    MadOgre.com
    1. Re:Sixth Sense? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yah. Maybe the animals do, and the humans don't.

      That's why the animals ran...

      --
  126. Science isn't everything by ornel · · Score: 1

    No, science doesn't explain everything. There are way too many things so far away from ever being fully described and explained by science that we are better off (and many people have been for a long time) using other methods to understand these "unexplained" things: intuition, art, philosophy or religion. Science is a very useful thing, but let's not get fanatical here. There is no pseudoscience here, even if journalists decide to sue the term "sixth sense". It makes you want to read an article describing pretty boring cientific stuff.

  127. Paranoid... by wasted · · Score: 1

    ...And just because you are a paranoid schizophrenic doesn't mean they aren't after both of you.

  128. I'm not surprised.... by Hobadee · · Score: 1

    I'm not that surprised at this. Animals definatly have a "sixth sense". I live in California, and before a big earthquake happens, animals start getting really jittery and wierd. Humans probably have the same thing, but simply try to shrug it off as feeling sick or bad or something.

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  129. The Einstein Factor by skadus · · Score: 1

    Anytime something like this comes up, with the Sixth Senses and the subconcious and the flaven, I feel the urge to plug this book:

    The Einstein Factor

    Great book, interesting subjects. Some a bit more far-fetched than others, but a lot of it deals with training your brain so your concious and subconcious, right and left all work together. A lot of the topics on Slashdot and other sites that deal with the subconcious ("Scientists found today that X") are stuff that are covered in the book.

  130. The Tribesmen by 4Lancer.net · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They knew to flee to higher ground because the animals did... when all the animals start running the same direction, common sense tells you to follow them, even though they know what's going on and you don't. Plus, if any of the tribal persons had seen the wave coming, they wouldn't have stood there gawking at it like some did in other places. They would have fled.

    --
    All your searching needs (and free money!) - 4Lancer.net
  131. It says... by hajihill · · Score: 2, Funny

    What this says to me is that we were too busy with our eyes glued to our cellphones to notice that the sea and the earth were....

    Hold on, my RSS feed says there's a new article up... I'll get back to you shortly.

    --
    Of blankness, I know nothing.
  132. I always thought by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

    that your 6th sense was your pheremone(sp?) receptor...

    --
    Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
  133. intuition suspected by mshurpik · · Score: 1

    In other words, intuition is real? You know it's funny, I've been relying on intuition for years, and somehow I intuited without scientific proof that this was okay!

  134. Generational knowledge by saddino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Interestingly, an article in the Washington Post (can't find it now) mentioned that one particularly old tribe of fisherman also fled, but only after the waters receded (the ultra "low tide" effect that occurs before the tsunami hits). Apparently, folk stories passed generation-to-generation included references to ancestors who experienced tsunami. Armed with this cultural folklore, they fled while others gawked at the strange sight of the sea leaving the shore.

  135. Six senses? by Jhan · · Score: 1

    I have at least 21 senses!

    --

    I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

  136. I have a sixth sense by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's called a bullshit detector. Most humans come equipped with them but some people choose to ignore them. Mine was tingling when I read
    Aboriginal tribesmen somehow sensed the impending danger of December's tsunami in time to flee to higher ground before the first sign of water
    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  137. Enough with the pseudoscience slant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read this damn website every day. Any more of this sutff (black boxes, sixth senses, what's next, UFOs?) and I'm gone for good. This isn't exactly the only tech blog on the web any more...

    EDITORS: STOP IT

    Yes, I know this story had some sortof science involved. But it was presented as psychic bull.

    Enough!

    1. Re:Enough with the pseudoscience slant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, if we have a story about the flight recorder in a new kind of aircraft, you're outta here? What do you have against black boxes in the latest secret military aircraft? I do not understand. Where your parents killed by a black box?

  138. Equilibrium? by adolfojp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Equilibrium is the 6th, so this other one should be 7th.

    Cheers,
    Adolfo

  139. Re:I knew it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But how come you don't know that you don't use a freaking apostrophe to make a plural? Are you illiterate or retarded?

  140. false positives? by freddyfred89 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How many times have aboriginal tribesman / animals fled to high ground when there wasn't an impending tsunami? This I would like to know before I start believing in a sixth sense.

  141. Sense of direction by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I have a in-law, who knows which direction is which unless he flies. Upon landing, he has to know orientation quickly. After that, no matter where he is, he always knows which way is north.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  142. No Shit I'd Run by crack_vial · · Score: 1

    If I looked out my window, past my tv, and saw every cat/dog/squirrel/bird in the neighborhood split at once, I would be starting the car.

  143. Past Participial 'Saw' Not Necessarily Wrong by Cruxus · · Score: 1

    Standard American English is just one of many varieties of the English language. In some colloquial varieties, the past participial usage of saw is correct! If you study linguistics, you will find that Ebonics and the creoles of the Caribbean are real languages with regular grammatical rules. They are merely nonstandard.

    --
    On vit, on code et puis on meurt.
  144. Can I tell you guys a secret...? by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1

    I see dead people.

  145. Tsunami not mentioned in the Science article by cfeagans · · Score: 1

    If anyone checks the primary source at Science, Vol 307, Issue 5712, 1118-1121, 18 February 2005, you might note that the original authors of the study don't even mention the Tsunami and the possibility that the anterior cingulate cortex provided the error-likelihood of it occurring to the indigenous people living there.

    Nor do they use the term "sixth sense."

    The authors are suggesting several things:

    1) a "general error-likelihood theory" of ACC function based on reinforcement learning, of which conflict and error detection are special cases;

    2) "the benefits of tightly integrating neuroimaging studies with computational modeling, because the two methods together provide a strong basis for hypothesis generation and theory testing regarding the neural mechanisms of cognition."

    The survival of indigenous peoples on the various islands affected by the tsunami has cultural and anthropological explanations, but an anterior cingulate cortex explanation is probably reaching a bit further into Brown and Braver's research.

  146. I think the answer is obvious. by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1

    The animals have a sixth sense.

  147. hoax by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

    The deep-sea fish story was a hoax.

    --
    I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
  148. Pot? Kettle. by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dude, your user id is "I be hatin'."

  149. Psuedoscience? by CherniyVolk · · Score: 1, Insightful


    If we were to have told Columbus, 'I can see events on the other side of the world through my peace of hollowed glass.' we might have been burned at the stake, or blown off quite similarly as we blow off efforts of paranormal studies. Scientifically, hundreds of years later, we have the television set.

    People who look down on psuedoscience are those that think Man understands everything there is to understand. The fact is, there is a great deal of concepts left untouch, and information undiscovered. One day, we might very well realize that there are people that have on occassion witnessed premonition and other paranormal feats. But, we'll have an explanation for it, or enough information to deem it factual and plausible. The sad thing is, something doesn't come to be only when a human has discovered it, so stop looking down on what you are quick to label as psuedoscience. There are universities that have paranormal psychology departments, their track record might vary as to whether their are of value, but I argue that they wouldn't exist in acadamia if there wasn't SOMETHING convincing that there is a undiscovered frontier of the human mind.

    Besides, 90% of the world is religious in some form or fashion. Even Darwin broke down on his death bed in hopes that there is a paranormal realm. Is it very comforting to you, to know that when you die, it's simply lights out?

    1. Re:Psuedoscience? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      People who look down on psuedoscience are those that think Man understands everything there is to understand.

      I agree wholeheartedly. I think the most unscientific attitude possible is to say that there simply is no God, no soul, no afterlife, no paranormal activity, period. We haven't disproved this stuff. We haven't proven it either. Maybe we never will - but 200 years ago a lot of things were mysteries that are now common knowledge. If we knew everything there was to know about the universe, scientists would be out of a job.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  150. It's the violins, stupid! by infolib · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whenever you hear half the symphony orchestra join those jagged dissonant minor chords, you know there's something deadly just around the corner. How hard can it be?

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  151. "The" Sixth Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see dead people

  152. Only Five Senses? by VValdo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've always felt those "five senses" were an overgeneralization. I mean, taste and smell are basically the same thing, aren't they? As I understand it, smell is basically your nose "tasting" molecules captured from the air. Your sense of taste, meanwhile, is pretty hampered when you plug your nose.

    Isn't hearing basically a type of interpreted "feeling"-- your inner ear contains small hairs that feel the compression of air, which are then experienced as sound.

    Since people are talking about phantom-limb, I think one might also mention the reverse-- the sense that your body extends beyond its normal self-- ie, that weird feeling that you've 'fused' with a car/game/musical instrument so that they feel like an attachment or extension to you-- that you become so comfortable with them that you don't think of the interface between you and that object.

    When I'm driving for long periods of time, I do sometimes feel as though the car has become to some effect an extension of my body. To move the car, I don't conciously think that I need to use my arms to turn the wheel, I just kind of will the car to turn, and my arms do what's necessary. I've had this experience with video games as well. In a way, your brain accepts that you've become part OF that object. Another example-- once I learned to type, I no longer needed to think about the mechanics of typing, the words just kind of flow to the screen as I think them.

    I guess one's brain just adapts itself to your physical "hookup" and tries to streamline the input and output streams so that they are as efficient as possible.

    So, yeah, I agree that the 5 senses idea seems kind of over-simplified. I suspect that whatever your nerves are wired to, after along enough your brain will adapt enough to accept it as a source of "input". I'm sure this has been tried. Does anyone know of an experiment like this one where a person's senses were "extended" via hardware?

    And what about that creepy-- and often annoying-- feeling that someone's reading over your shoulder? That "feeling" that you're being watched? What's that all about? Which of the five senses is used to describe THAT? ;)

    W

    --
    -------------------
    This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Only Five Senses? by commrade · · Score: 1

      Actually, hearing is not feeling. Hearing is it's own thing involving a protein that translates sound waves into electrochemical impulses. There is an article about it here.

    2. Re:Only Five Senses? by iGN97 · · Score: 1

      Taste and smell are the same thing only when you eat with your whole face. Food should go in the larger, lower hole.

    3. Re:Only Five Senses? by Nikker · · Score: 1

      You are the first post I've read to give a extra deep thought into the matter. Why do people think that we have already discovered evreything?
      What makes you think that you know evreything that is going on with your mind?
      Do you really know how it influnces your day to day life, or even understand?

      I think we belittle ourselves in many ways and we seem to feel that anything more that what we have would be 'god like'. In terms of the universe we just got here, What makes us think we have it all done?

      Those with the open minds will be the ones to uncover these 'sences' or 'abilities' that most likely effect us evrey day of our lives already. We will just have a cleaner point of view on how it all works.

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    4. Re:Only Five Senses? by valkyriekl · · Score: 1

      I thought that "sense of being watched" had something to do with subtle changes in atmospheric pressure...

    5. Re:Only Five Senses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, hearing is not feeling

      From the article you cited:

      "Hearing is a classic example of a phenomenon called mechanotransduction, a process that is important not only for hearing, but also for a number of other bodily functions, such as the pereception of touch"

    6. Re:Only Five Senses? by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
      That "feeling" that you're being watched? What's that all about?

      I think everybody has that feeling at some point. Unless they have a show on the WB, that is.

  153. Attention: TFA has nothing to do with psychics by porcupine8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    So could all of you who are whining about the paranormal and pseudoscience just calm down and read it?

    They're using the term "sixth sense" because that's what many people call this ability - and attribute it to psychic, mystical phenomena. They're using the colloquial name for it, but demonstrating what it really is - an ability to subconsciously process subtle clues that you're not even consciously aware of, and use them to determine when danger is coming. The article makes no claims of psychic powers or mysticism or paranormal activity - if anything it's the opposite. It's like showing that people don't get sick because a bad spirit infested them, but because germs infested them. They're still getting sick, but for a real reason.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  154. Five senses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If the five senses where introduced by the ancient greeks, schools never cared to update those concepts. I have as most people a limited sense of balance. The sensor is located in the ear, but has nothing tot do with hearing.

    Anonymous

  155. Not Science blog, Copyright theft fraud by bilsaysthis · · Score: 1

    Please tell me why the article link goes to Science Blog when the entire entry is simply a copy & paste of an original article from the Washington University in St. Louis University News? Were the extra two clicks too much work for CowboyNeal before approving the post? Pretty sad, IMO, since the submitter BenSullivan is the same Ben Sullivan who produces the attempt at moneymaking blog.

  156. Sense? by juapost · · Score: 1

    That is just comparing sensory data to yield unexpected decisions. A sense is raw data gathered from the environment. If you were going to count every hidden ability of the mind as a sense then we have millions of senses. Language would be a sense. And obtaining 3d information from the retinal inputs of each eye would be a sense. If there were some kind of danger waves that something in the environment produced and we could detect and compare those, then it would be a sense. The new study the article describes basically re-discovered some pretty well understood decision making processes in the cingulate cortex.

  157. The Tsunami killed 200,000 - some sixth sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Aboriginal tribesmen somehow sensed the impending danger of December's tsunami in time to flee to higher ground before the first sign of water." "

    Or maybe the common sense of all the Animals getting the hell out of dodge a day before the Tsunami hit had something to do with it. Geez.

  158. Censorship Whitewhash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone whitewashed the original unconscious racist article...

    Brain region learns to anticipate risk, provides early warnings, suggests new study in Science

    http://news-info.wustl.edu/news/page/normal/4767 .h tml

    "Following the Asian tsunami, scientists struggled to explain reports that primitive aboriginal tribesmen had somehow sensed the impending danger in time to join wild animals in a life-saving flight to higher ground."

    The author (a migaloo) unconsciously implied that aboriginal tribesmen and wild animals are the same. If you post an article post the original so everyone can see it for what it is.

    1. Re:Censorship Whitewhash by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      So they share an ability with wild animals. I can see, just like the squirrel in my back yard. I respond to my name, just like my rats do. Somehow I don't think this really degrades me any. The article implies that *all* people do this, not just these tribesmen.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    2. Re:Censorship Whitewhash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW - Slashdot wont let Anonymous Cowards like me post links. You have to take the space out of the html to view the link.

      http://news-info.wustl.edu/news/page/normal/4767 .h tml

    3. Re:Censorship Whitewhash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why didnt the author say "human beings in Australia" then you idiot. Wait maybe the white sheets you were wearing blocked your view.

    4. Re:Censorship Whitewhash by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Because that was more descriptive? Why does an article say "residents of London" or "Alaskan natives" or "employees of Food Lion"? Every mention of a race, ethnicity, cultural, or other group is not an automatic statement that they are inferior just because they belong to that group. But if a certain group are the only ones doing something, then it's most descriptive to use the name of that group. If all Australians responded to the tsunami, I'm sure they just would have said "Australians." The article does go on to say that all humans have this ability, but that's the only subset of humans who used it in that particular way at that particular time in that particular place, so when describing their particular actions it's appropriate to say whose actions you're describing.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    5. Re:Censorship Whitewhash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a news story:

      "White people in Yorktown" plan to rally

      http://www.dailypress.com/news/local/dp-69413sy0 fe b19,0,4266522.story?coll=dp-news-local-final

      See I used a certain group to describe what was happening in Yorktown. :)

      For some reason its hard for white people to see their racism.

    6. Re:Censorship Whitewhash by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      *shrug*

      Your URL didn't work, but if it's accurate that only white people are planning to rally, I don't see anything wrong with saying that. Now, if there's even one person in that group who is of any other ethnicity (which is likely), then it's inaccurate.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    7. Re:Censorship Whitewhash by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      Oh, and...

      For some reason its hard for white people to see their racism.

      As they say on Avenue Q - we're all a little bit racist. Even you.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    8. Re:Censorship Whitewhash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now, if there's even one person in that group who is of any other ethnicity (which is likely), then it's inaccurate."

      Then the same can be said about 'aboriginal people' in Australia since most are of mixed races.

      My problem is the sentence pointing to behavior found in 'aboriginals' and 'animals' in the same sentence, the author is implying an animalistic, primitive behavioral response that only 'aboriginals' are more likely to show. Just say 'people in Australia'...since thats all they are especially since the author is implying all people have these traits.

      I think its just stupid pseudoscience since there was no scientific study to suggest anything different but whatever...choose what you want to believe.

      BTW - If its not racist then why did people from a gaming site I frequent (where I first heard this story) also find it racist? Why did the person who posted this on Slashdot also pick the article where this sentence was changed from its original (and yet use the same topic title as the ones that had the racist comment thats all over the web)?

  159. Actually, I remember learning that by benhocking · · Score: 1

    the sixth sense was our vestibular sense. You know, the one that tells us which way we are oriented.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  160. New Scientist's contribution by fishicist · · Score: 2, Informative

    New Scientist magazine ran an article examining the rather more than 5 senses we all have. I think, at last count, there were about 20...

    Senses special: Doors of perception

  161. People believe what they want to believe by mark99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And they love "sixth sense" stuff. Knowledge without having to work for it.

  162. Exactly, not pseudoscience by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    RTFA.

    This is not hoodoo, it's fast subconscious prediction from patterns in normal 5-sense clues.

  163. Prior Art ? by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    Doesn't M Night Shyalaman already have prior art on this one?

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  164. I agree - I've experienced this personally by DG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I agree with you, both in the claim that this phenomenon is not psudoscience, and that calling it a "sixth sense" is somewhat sensational.

    The article spells out the test methodology in detail, and it seems solid.

    But I have personal experience with this.

    I have had extensive navigation training, first as a pilot, and then later in a military career. The Army in particular had very high standards for needing to know exactly where you were at all times (to within 100m) without the aid of something like a GPS.

    So you learn to keep a visualization of your surroundings in your head, and to cross-reference that visualization against whatever tools you have (like a map, compass, or odometer) at regular intervals to keep the internal representation in sync with the real world. After some practice, this becomes second nature - muscle memory stuff.

    But there's an odd side-effect, at least there is with me. If I make a wrong turn, miss an exit, or make some sort of navigational mistake, something in my subconscious will pick up on it well before I'm ever consciously aware of it (especially if my conscious is somehow distracted away from navigation) It's hard to put into words... but I will get a profound sense of "wrongness", like an inaudible alarm bell. The more I ignore it, the worse it gets.

    I have learned not to ignore it. If that alarm goes off, I'll immediately make navigation the highest-priority mental task - and without fail, I will have just goofed somehow.

    Unfortunately, this ability does not convey any other information other than "you are no longer on the planned course". There is a recognition function in there, but no follow-on advisory function. It's still up to conciousness to correct the problem once discovered.

    When it happens though... it's really a very odd feeling, and it's quite strong.

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
    1. Re:I agree - I've experienced this personally by rs79 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Unfortunately, this ability does not convey any other information other than "you are no longer on the planned course". There is a recognition function in there, but no follow-on advisory function. It's still up to conciousness to correct the problem once discovered.

      When it happens though... it's really a very odd feeling, and it's quite strong."


      I get the same feeling when walking into a mall. It's not a joke (despite looking like one) and it doesn't happen with other large or small indoor spaces. Crowds or confinded spaces don't bother me at all. Just malls. I get this weird "must leave, shouldn't be here, you might pay retail" feeling.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    2. Re:I agree - I've experienced this personally by tmortn · · Score: 1

      Right there with you though I didn't get trained in the army. My Dad had an annoying habit (at the time) when I was growing up of randomly going into dumb mode when we were out somewhere and I had to get us back home. IE he played dumb and said I had to tell him which direction to go... and he would wrong or otherwise. Wasn't too long before I always paid attention to where we went and how to get back.

      Never had any methodology but now that I am older I realize I tend to keep a relative position in mind with wherever I am far more than stuff like street names. IE I know I have to go *that way* and then I have learned to understand the city road system in order to get where I am going... works the same on the highways. Don't know how many times I have up and tracked through back roads without even looking at a map and wound up where I needed to be....

      But I have also had that "dude you just fucked up" feeling and that is normally when I stop and pull out a map and sure enough I will have just taken a wrong turn and need to make a correction. Very weird.

      Anyway... I find it funny that people accept the animal migration as ascribing it to some higher tuned sense (be it 6th or just more attuned) and refuse to accept that possibly people have a similar atuned sense. If this ability to detect such minute disturbances and correctly interpret them in a way that enhances survival why is it that we are not capable of it ? Does coginitive thought preclude such an ability ? Or just make it easier to ignore.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    3. Re:I agree - I've experienced this personally by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      People are amazed at my excellent ability to remember how to get back from a new place I've been to (even at night) yet I often have trouble describing how to get to that same place.

      I blame that one on my Grandma. Everyone who knew her thought she was nuts but I'd listen to her advise anyway.

      She told me that it's much easier to remember how to navigate towards a place that I am familiar with than trying the opposite. She told me remember the route in reverse rather than trying to remember how to get to AND from any particular destination.

      I now subconciously remember the complete route in reverse. It seems to work well and I do think her theory may have some plausibility.

      (I also had to be able to recite the alphabet, number sequences and sentences in reverse just as quickly as forwards. She claimed it speeds your brain's processing time because information can be accessed by the fastest route rather than always starting at the top of the stack of a remembered sequence. I don't know if that's true, but it is a fun party trick...especially if you get pulled over by police after that same party).

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    4. Re:I agree - I've experienced this personally by pVoid · · Score: 1
      I have a similar one too:

      I ride my bicycle inner city a lot. And I've been doing that since I've been 13 or so (when I used to live in Istanbul, Turkey). I'm extremely comfortable riding in high traffic situations. But here's the thing that amazes me the most, when I'm at an intersection waiting for a red light, no matter what I'm doing (and I rarely ever stare at the red light, or in fact in the direction of the light), something goes off in my mind and my foot will automatically get off the ground and clip in just about 3 seconds before the light turns green. This is almost always without fail.

      The other thing is that I can sense when I light is about to turn when I'm arriving towards the intersection.

      I firmly believe that my brain has a pattern recognition system for the amount of traffic at the intersection. For example: the longer the car pileup at a red light, the longer it has been red, and the lesser the traffic on the green side, the more likely it is to change red (since the congestion has been cleared by then).

      Thing is, I noticed this and started thinking about it one day when I was completely absorbed in some thought, and watching something on the pavement, completely unaware of the world, when I just clipped in and started pedaling... And the light turned green right then. Then I started paying attention to this behaviour, and sure enough, it's pretty consistent.

      I also think that you can 'teach' your pattern matching system by reinforcing with a "good" or "bad" feeling. For example, when I did that pedaling trick that day, I realized that sometimes there is a priority left turn for incomming traffic... and the thought kind of made me feel this "panic" inside. Sure enough, since then, the way I perceive those has changed too...

      Overall, I think it's our greatest strength. It's 'mu-shin' as the japanese say it: "no mind".

    5. Re:I agree - I've experienced this personally by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Everyone has a sixth sense - its called the sense of gravity.

    6. Re:I agree - I've experienced this personally by NoMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You may jest - certainly, enough people think you are to mark you up "+3, Funny" - but that's exactly how shopping centres are designed. Look it up sometime. They're designed to disorient you; to make you traverse are much as possible of the mall to complete your business; and to keep you separated from your car as long as possible.

      Ever wonder why, in a standard 3-armed shopping centre layout, the general layout is banks in one arm, department stores in another, and food stores in the third? Or why carparks are either dark cavernous labyrinths or blinding hot barren wastelands, when the mall itself is bright, cool, breezy, and colourful?

      They use psychological cues to get/keep you inside, then once inside you're kept disoriented. Try this game : stand at the top of the escalators or stairs, and watch people as they get off. You'll see a large percentage of people who stop, look around, then continue on uncertainly.

      Every time you go shopping, you're being gamed...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    7. Re:I agree - I've experienced this personally by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      something in my subconscious will pick up on it well before I'm ever consciously aware of it [...] It's hard to put into words... but I will get a profound sense of "wrongness", like an inaudible alarm bell. The more I ignore it, the worse it gets.
      [...]
      Unfortunately, this ability does not convey any other information other than "you are no longer on the planned course". There is a recognition function in there, but no follow-on advisory function. It's still up to conciousness to correct the problem once discovered.
      When it happens though... it's really a very odd feeling, and it's quite strong.


      I know exactly what you mean.

      It's the "I can't quite put my finger on it" feeling. It's... not subconcious, because, you're concious of it, it's simply... incomplete. It's like metadata: You sort of know the size of the file, you just don't know what's in it... er... or something like that.

      As for navigation, I was once driving around with my girlfriend, just riding along in my automobile with no particular place to go, and generally exploring the countryside around the city where we lived. After a while we decided to go back home, and I took a turn to head back to the city, so she asked me how I knew to turn there, we'd been going at random as the fancy took us to see an interresting bit of road for hours, and I just knew the direction of home. I almost always know the direction of home, except when I ride the subway. So in the car, we were taking one of those pretzel shaped bit of road that gets you on a highway, and I noticed that I was tracking our shadow. It's just something I apparently have done all my life without thinking about it, and now we were doing a one eighty, and I still had her question on my mind, and I noticed it.

      Subconciously tracking the sun... that's not all there is to it, but I think it's an important part of it.

      A background process, you are never concious of it as long as it's something happening all the time automatically, like equilibrium. Isn't introspection a wonderfull thing? : )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    8. Re:I agree - I've experienced this personally by shawb · · Score: 1

      Ahhh... sounds like Vegas to me! But yeah... there are people out there who's job it is to lay out stores to maximize sales. And indeed, my "someone's trying to scam me" Spider-Sense does go off in many newer stores, even as I'm getting free samples at the grocery store (Which I kinda treat as a little bonus. Might buy the product if it does indeed interest me, but don't feel guilty if I don't unless the person giving out the samples is an extremely cute girl. Once even got steak! Not a whole steak or anything, but... yum.)

      Hmm... incoherent post, more writing inside the parenthesis than outside. Something's wrong. AHAH! It's 5:23 AM. That's it. Good thing I don't work till noon.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  165. not surprised by magic_finale · · Score: 1

    i have been seen dead people for years.

  166. You remember when OMNI was good? by blair1q · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember the old days, when OMNI magazine was about science? Then it started turning into a persistent hawker of crackpottery. Even the fiction lost its edge and got lugubriously spooky.

    And the Sci-Fi channel. About sci-fi, before it became All Vampires, All the Time. It's pulled back a bit, maybe.

    To me, this story, along with this one. are the tip of the Slashdot woo-woo iceberg.

    But hey. Anything for click-through, huh?

    1. Re:You remember when OMNI was good? by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no kidding, I remember when TLC and Discovery showed good stuff, until they became the interior decorating, wedding, baby and repeat channel. What a shame.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
  167. Do we need to read this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, we should all sense it's full of crap.

  168. Re:The aborginals fled after they read the signs.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...says the AC.

  169. Synaesthesia by David's+Boy+Toy · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this has any relation to synaesthesia. It appears that those who see auras are in general those with synaesthesia, in this case sensory information about the person is transformed into an aura.

  170. Re:The aborginals fled after they read the signs.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    By the time you've noticed retreating seas, flopping fish, and the like, the tsunami is approximately one minute away. Give people credit, if it was so obvious far in advance, everybody would have moved to higher ground. The Kerala fisherman is a hoax.

    There may be subtle signs that a big earthquake is coming, and maybe even signs that there was an earthquake thousands of miles away which results in a tsunami, but it's nothing so obvious.

  171. Re:The aborginals fled after they read the signs.. by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

    Actually, you've just seen one of the first Mallu jokes on slashdot. "Mallu" is the colloqial Indian name of the people from the state of Kerela (who speak Malayalam, hence Mallu as a contraction). In jokes in the South, they frequently take the role of the "morons" in jokes - like Surds (Sardarjis, or Sikhs) do in the North.

    That said, I really, really couldn't get GP's joke either :-S.

  172. Re:So THAT'S how Bush won! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I disagree with the sexuality issue being the deciding factor in the very close election. I see the manipulation of the voting machines and their talleys as the source of the extra votes needed to grease Bush back into the White House. Although, some bizarre media maniupulation may have assisted.

  173. Re:Pot? Kettle. by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Which, incidentally, is a verb tense in Black American English that Standard English lacks. It comes down to us from certain West African languages, and indicates a state of continuance. We have past, present, future, and moods indicating completion or incompletion (which is subtly different).

    Really.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  174. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    No one axed you.

  175. duh they followed nature by Robocoastie · · Score: 1

    I read the original reports about that tribe. They came out of the jungle to let rescuers know they were fine. They simply followed nature like they've always done.

  176. Re:The aborginals fled after they read the signs.. by ggvaidya · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Are you sure?
    1. The deep fish story is a hoax.
    2. So what are these red-tailed deep water fish turning up off the coast of Kerela?
    3. The tsunami took place in the morning, and took about three hours to get to the coast of Kerela. Did the fisherman have enough time to go out, find "unusual numbers of rare red-tailed deep-water fishes" and report back to the government offices?
    I'm very skeptical.
  177. Re:So THAT'S how Bush won! by PudriK · · Score: 1

    Tell that to Johnson. Seems he thought his chances were so slim he didn't even bother. Being a war-time president is no guarantee, esp. in a war such as this which does not enjoy the support of an overwhelming majority of the people.

  178. Not a 6th sense but rather subconcious processing by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I highly doubt this is a "sixth sense" but rather a means of subconciously processing the data already available. In the case of the tsunamis, the aboriginals may have been reacting to the reactions of animals, or a slight or not-so-slight variation in the behavior of the ocean waves, or something else entirely.

    It may interest you to know that our "5 senses" do more than we give them credit for.

    We all know that the sense of "touch" also gives us the sense of air movement, temperature, and other qualities, but not everyone knows that some people who are blind but who still have eyes can subconciously detect enough light to trigger day/night biological clock synchronization. Who knows what other qualities our 5 basic senses give us.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  179. Re:Pot? Kettle. by iGN97 · · Score: 1

    I though it was something you dudes did to sell more records. But you mean thurr is hactually a system to it?

    Really.

  180. aboriginals sitxth-sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean the aboriginals have the ability to sense changes in the oceanic plates? Wow, now that is some sixth-sense I'd like to have.

  181. Willful ignorance of statistical reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    > Aboriginal tribesmen somehow sensed the impending danger of December's tsunami in time to flee to higher ground before the first sign of water.

    This is another example of how exceptionally poor most people are at even basic statistical reasoning.

    Of the millions of people along the tsunami coast, one small group decided to evacuate prior to the tsunami. The fact that 99.9999% of all the other people did not evacuate must be counted against the fact that 0.0001% of them did. Most people forget (or deliberately refuse) to take this into account.

    Given the fact that an earthquake had occurred prior to the tsunami, and that it has been know since antiquity that there is a correlation between earthquakes and tsunamis, I actually find it astonishing that such a small number of people evacuated to higher ground.

    This amazing 99.9999% failure of people to heed the earthquake's warning is actually compelling evidence that people DON'T have a so-called "6th sense".

  182. Everytime my intuition tells me something... by vudufixit · · Score: 1

    And I ignore it, I suffer If I act on it, I benefit tremendously. One of my life's projects is to learn to listen to and act on it more often.

  183. Re:The aborginals fled after they read the signs.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe they just felt the earthquake, and knew they should probably get to high ground, just in case.

  184. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Mattintosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First of all, "Black American English" is not a language. It's a dialect marked by (usually) incorrect usage.

    But for the sake of whacking your argument upside it's head, let's use this guy's name as an example here. "I be hatin'" could more easily be expressed as "I hate." The subject is the same (I) but the verb is pacified ("be" vs. "hate") in the incorrect case. To properly use a passive ("being") verb in this sentence, you would need the word "am" instead of "be". "I am hatin'."

    However, the duration of this act (which is how you justify the use of the incorrect English) can be assumed to be the same. How? If there's a TV show that I hate continuously (every time it's on), then "I be hatin' this TV show" would be no more descriptive than "I hate this TV show". Both convey the meaning that you dislike this show strongly no matter what time or place you are exposed to it, and that you'll continue to feel this way into the indefinite future.

    English does not lack the verb tense you speak of. There is no need to make excuses for people that refuse to learn to speak or write properly, or who for social reasons pretend that they know less than they really do.

  185. Sixth sense? by JohnsonWax · · Score: 1

    "Aboriginal tribesmen somehow sensed the impending danger of December's tsunami in time to flee to higher ground before the first sign of water."

    Uh, what about the big fucking earthquake as the sign? These tribesmen were relatively close to the epicenter and a 9.0 would have certainly gotten their attention. Their generational history would have at least two other major tsunamis stemming from major earthquakes within the last hundred and fifty years.

    I live 4 miles from the ocean on a fault line, my first thoughts after a big earthquake are: gas line, water line, structural damage, tsunami. I don't consider it a sixth sense to move away from the shore after an earthquake provided that earthquake=tsunami is somewhere in your knowledge base.

  186. Re:Pot? Kettle. by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 1
    I though it was something you dudes did to sell more records. But you mean thurr is hactually a system to it?

    Fo' shizzy mah nizzy.

    --
    I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
  187. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Aadomm · · Score: 1

    I can't work out if this is just a particularly nasty troll or if you have just completely missed the point.

    --
    Mention the Lord of the Rings one more time and I'll more than likely kill you.
  188. Re:Pot? Kettle. by dylain · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There's nothing linguistically wrong with "I Be Hatin'", and ebonics worth as much study as any other dialect of English.

    It's pretty lame for you to crazily go around swinging your grammar book here. Most of the rules you scream about have been invented anyways. We're studying the evolution and structure of language, not what pedagogues claim is "right".

  189. Re:Pot? Kettle. by dylain · · Score: 0

    Also, I forgot: Ebonics does have a grammar just as complicated as any other language or dialect.

    Go back to pedagogically screaming about latin, you putz.

  190. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Cobblepop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't believe this wasn't modded as Funny. Somebody actually bought that?

  191. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wtf? "Black" American English? As opposed to what? "White" American English? "Asian" American Engrish? Mexican American Spanglish? Absurd.

    Sorry, we just speak ENGLISH here. No need to drag ethnicity into it. Ebonics is distracting and useless.

  192. EXACTLY! by Vthornheart · · Score: 1

    Finally some common sense being used here. It's proposterous to say that we have some kind of sixth sense because Aboriginal people escaped the Tsunami. What a joke. The fact of the matter is that the above poster has hit it right on the head: a smart tribesman will see every other freakin' creature than humans making a run for higher ground, and unlike us so-called 'civilized' folk, they get the clue.

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  193. This was a Science article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Studying the brain is not science to you?

    The article is not about anything paranormal, merely subconscious. The point was that even without reasoning out what was about to happen, people could get a sense that something bad was about to happen. Even if the aboriginals did, I doubt most of the animals deduced a tidal wave was coming.

    Besides, this was a minor point. As for 'uninformed discourse', did you read the article?

    "I've got a bad feeling about this."

  194. In other words by bonch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Being able to interpret input and make a logical and reasonable descision is all this article is about. All the scientists have done is find an area that specialises in determining what input indicates a potential hazard to our lives.

    In other words...another sense? Which would be a sixth sense, seeing as we have five others?

    Sixth sense doesn't automatically mean "psychic." If they find a part of the brain that senses danger which didn't previously know about, then that's another sense that we have; a sixth one.

    I want to see more studies on this, of course. Just playing devil's advocate here.

    1. Re:In other words by bcjim · · Score: 1

      In other words, another mental module that makes use of data gathered with the five senses--not another sense.

      Data about the external world reaches the brain by way of the senses, of which there are five. The discovery of a previously unremarked way that the brain uses sensory input is not the discovery of another sense.

      Think of the senses as input devices, like a mouse or a keyboard. If you install Mavis Beacon Typing, you are not adding an input device. If you discover Mavis Beacon Typing on your hard drive and didn't know you had it, you have not discovered an input device.

      But we all digress. Now disprove the following, if you can.

      There is no evidence whatsoever that we have found a new danger sensing mechanism in the human brain. All we see here is that native people, in tune with traditional ways of living, are keener observers of animal behavior than those whose attention is focused on other matters.

    2. Re:In other words by shufler · · Score: 1
      Just playing devil's advocate here.
      It seems more like devil's idiot.

      You either didn't understand what I wrote, or you're being an ass, and I seriously hope it's the former.

      The natives are observing (seeing) the animals leaving with their eyes. If they don't see them leave, then they are observing (seeing) the fact that the animals are gone.

      This in itself is such an odd occurrance, the only logical thing to think is, "Holy crap, something must be up!" This applies anywhere there are normally animals. Cities, farms, the port, jungles, wherever. When animals suddenly vanish, you know something is wrong.

      This is not a sense, but is a process in your brain. YOUR EYES SEE THAT THE ANIMALS ARE GONE. Your brain goes, "Why is that? Perhaps something scared them away. What is big enough to scare an entire ecosystem of animals away? I don't know, but I know one thing: I don't be around to find out."

      The natives pack up, and leave.
  195. Just as they did at Guantanamo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A guy get a bag over his head and he tries to guess when he gets a bucket of icewater poured over him.

  196. There are more than 5 senses known already by sakusha · · Score: 1

    Scientists already know there are more than the traditional "5 senses." People always forget about two well-known senses, the Vestibular sense (balance) and proprioception.

  197. Not a "sense". by argent · · Score: 1

    Background processing isn't a "sense".

    If this is a "sixth sense", then I claim my "sense of outrage" and "sense of fair play" as seven and eight.

  198. Re:Pot? Kettle. by HiThere · · Score: 2, Informative

    I beleive that in English it's from the Elizibethan period (and earlier) and was called subjunctive I, as opposed to the currently live subjunctive II form (now normally just called subjunctive, or hypothetical subjunctive, when it's recognized at all).

    Your argument may say WHY such a form survived in certain groups, but it didn't originate with them (in English), or at least I don't believe it did.

    The marker of this kind of subjunctive tense was the use of present infinitive form (without the leading to) frequently accompanied by, e.g., let, as in:
    Let it be so.
    or
    If that be so....
    (The second form is confusing because it is too similar to the subjunctive II form, If that were so...)

    I must admit that I'm not really familiar with the exact meaning that this form has in antiquity, but it's the form used by the Giant in "Jack and the Beanstalk", when he says:
    Be he alive,
    Or be he dead
    I'll grind his bones...
    Note that this is NOT a contrary to fact supposition (If he were alive...).

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  199. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Which, incidentally, is a verb tense in Black American English that Standard English lacks. It comes down to us from certain West African languages, and indicates a state of continuance.

    No, that's called aspect, not tense. Aspect describes the internal temporal qualities of an event; tense relates one event to a deixis (such as the time of speech or another event).

    That having been said, what you're describing is habitual aspect: the habitual "be" in AAVE. Apparently, you picked this up somewhere in some freshman seminar or, worse, off the television, but you really shouldn't go around lecturing folks on linguistics until your knowledge is more than Powerpoint deep.

    We have past, present, future, and moods indicating completion or incompletion (which is subtly different).

    No. English has past and nonpast tenses, a future mood (among others), and various aspects; aspect, mood and tense can interact, but each is separate.

  200. Re:Pot? Kettle. by miu · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    The OP misapplied a rule of BAE grammar to a colloquialism (don't be hating). The rule requires a 'be' and 'non-be' form: "He be running" vs. "He running", the former indicates continual activity, the later indicates a single episode in the present.

    Your 'incorrect usage' and 'people that refuse to learn to speak or write properly' comments are actually fairly ugly, and display the kind of unthinking prejudice that will take a long time to die out.

    --

    [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  201. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 1

    "It's idiomatic, beotch."

  202. Here we go again by dbIII · · Score: 1
    I recall some self-educated dancer in a radio interview talking about how he had catagorised over thirty different senses. Without access to a dictionary he was describing ways of percieving things through multiple senses as a sense of their own. These researchers have access to a dictionary, so have no excuse. We take information from multiple inputs and process it to get the feeling we are being watched, that there is someone standing behind us etc - but as it's really hard to quantify in words the feeling on the skin that the air is moving or that there is something warmer that has just entered the room, we just notice that something has changed. Wnadering about in the dark can be disturbing if you think about how you know that things are there - you get a lot of information from your skin and hairs on your skin about what the air is doing and what radiant heat is given off by different objects which gives us a feeling about what is changing in our proximity.

    We have multiple ways of perceiving things from our senses - huge amounts of work has been done on this on a variety of animals that even an interested outsider like me can pick up.

  203. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The subject is the same (I) but the verb is pacified ("be" vs. "hate") in the incorrect case. To properly use a passive ("being") verb in this sentence, you would need the word "am" instead of "be". "I am hatin'."

    "Pacified" is not a linguistic term. Perhaps you meand "passivized," but there is nothing passive about "I be hatin'" or "I am hating." English passivizes a verb phrase in two steps: change the "main verb" (or whatever your system of grammar wants to call the most semantic portion of the VP) into the passive participle (third principal part), and insert a form of "to be" immediately before the "main verb."

    Perhaps you confused that second step, the insertion of a form of "to be," with the similar step of inserting a form of "to be" in constructing a progressive (or in this case habitual) aspect. For example, there is nothing passive about the phrase "she is running," as opposed to "she runs." Both are present active constructions; one simply is progressive and the other simple.

    "I be hating" is an AAVE habitual aspect form, characterized by an uninflected form of "be," and denoting a characterization of the subject rather than a specific instantiation of an action. Nothing here deals with voice.

    These are not the auxiliary verbs you're looking for... move along.

  204. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While not "contrary to fact," I suspect there is an epistemic modality at work: the giant does not know (or care) whether the possessor of the bones is alive or dead. The lack of knowledge opens up the possibility of non-factuality, similar to the contrary-to-fact conditions that require non-factuality.

  205. Anterior Cingulate Cortex is neat by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

    Pseudoscientific "sixth-sense" garbage aside, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is a very fascinating brain area. I find the area interesting because it's the location of spindle neurons, which seem to be unique to humans and great apes. The concentration of spindle neurons is greatest in humans and decreases with evolutionary distance, indicating that these neurons may play a crucial role in what distinguishes human behavior from other animals. However, we still really have no idea about what their functional role is.

    Wikipedia link

    Here are some quotes from a page on them:

    http://www.allmanlab.caltech.edu/research/spindlec ells.htm

    Recently, we have identified a class of neurons that are unique to humans and our closest relatives, the great apes. These are large spindle-shaped cells located in anterior cingulate cortex. Anterior cingulate cortex is reduced in both size and metabolic activity in autistic patients versus control subjects . The activity of the area is also reduced in patients with attention deficit disorder and depression. The activity in this area is increased in patients with obsessive-compulsive, phobic, post-traumatic stress, and anxiety disorders.

    Area 24 appears to be an interface between emotion and cognition. The bottom part of area 24 controls autonomic functions such as heart rate and blood pressure, and is involved in the production and recognition of facial expressions. The experience of virtually any intense emotion whether it be anger, love, fear, or happiness is associated with the activation of the bottom part of area 24. By contrast, the top part of area 24 is activated whenever the subject is engaged in a cognitively demanding task. In EEG studies, a signal arises from this area when the subject is engaged in problem solving and the amplitude of this signal increases with task difficulty. When the subject makes an error there is a deflection of this signal, which is termed "error-related negativity". The anterior cingulate cortex monitors negative outcomes and initiates corrective behavior so as to achieve more optimal results. The spindle cells are a phylogenetically recent specialization in hominoids that relay information from area 24 to other parts of the brain during focused problem solving.

    We believe that the spindle cells may be co-ordinating the activity of other brain areas during intense mental activity. Based on our examination of the ontogenetic series of human brains at the National Museum of Health and Science, the spindle cells are not discernable at birth, but rather appear to migrate into anterior cingulate cortex beginning about 4 months after birth. The emergence of the spindle cells in four month old human infants coincides with the infant's capacity to hold its head steady, track a object visually and reach for that object. The late development of the spindle cells could be important since there is evidence that other populations of post-natally generated neurons are heavily influenced by environmental factors. For example, the post-natally generated neurons in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus are very vulnerable to many stress-related events and their survival can be enhanced by enriched environments, physical activity and serotonin. If the survival of the spindle cells were similarly influenced by environmental conditions during infancy, it is conceivable that the resulting changes in circuitry could either enhance or degrade mental functioning as exemplified in problem-solving ability or vulnerability to psychiatric or learning disorders.


  206. BLINK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For more on this, read Malcolm Gladwell's new book, Blink . It mentions the same kind of subconscious (he calls it unconscious) mental processing which surreptitiously informs your conscious mind, but from a social point-of-view.

  207. Re:Pot? Kettle. by purple_cobra · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Absolutely not. This isn't the evolution of a language but the bastardisation of a language for social reasons, i.e. being intelligent and speaking correctly isn't cool/rad/street/whatever street-credibility is called this week.

  208. More like 'sick sense' by nicoau · · Score: 0

    As a lot of people have said here this does not really sound like a 'sixth sense'. That usually implies some sort of paranormal ability.

    I would have to agree. Instead I would call this a 'sick sense'. You get an uncomfortable almost sick feeling when you know something is wrong, but consciously you cannot always understand why.

    A gut feeling is another phrase I would use.

  209. Re:Pot? Kettle. by an_to_nio · · Score: 1

    You're a pompous ass.

    Of course everyone should learn to speak and write "properly," as you say, if for no other reason than the next pompous ass could be someone with the power to hire and fire, instead of some random Slashdot pajama warrior.

  210. So this is a.. by FractalPenguin · · Score: 0

    Science?

  211. more than 5 anyway... by Tomfrh · · Score: 1

    Humans have more than 5 senses without having to resort to hocus-pocus. There was actually a new scientist article about it a few months ago.

    Examples:

    Motion sense, body temperature sense, pain sense, sense of your body position without looking, etc...

    Tom

  212. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely not. This isn't the evolution of a language but the bastardisation of a language for social reasons, i.e. being intelligent and speaking correctly isn't cool/rad/street/whatever street-credibility is called this week.

    Exactly. It is like saying "do you have" instead of "have you got".

  213. OT: Popup in Firefox from link in this thread. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I clicked on the link in the main story, rolled my mouse wheel down a couple of time and BANG, my first popup since I started using Firefox. What gives??

    This is the URL.
    http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/node/7036

  214. Why are we so afraid to accept more than 5 senses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's hardcoded into our ACC (the "oh sh**" center) by genetic selection. How? For countless centuries the Greek philosophers had a monopoly on truth. If you had balls to challenge that, your friendly neighborhood clergyman sent you to a session where they removed them with an instrument specifically designed for that.

  215. THey just knew better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that after a fu(king quake that magnitude, you should head to higher ground! I call that knowledge, not a sixth sense.

  216. Nonsense by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    The tribesmen in India didn't have a "6th sense". They had a folk history that told them that when the water went down, it would soon some back in a much larger quantity and that it was a good idea to head for the hills. This was talked about in the news.

    I imagine this "6th sense" might be so allusive to westerners because we as a whole don't pay attention to our surroundings. We're distracted. I personally enjoy just sitting somewhere (a park, etc.) and watching people. Or on a bench on a busy street where people are walking. They'll have dozens of people walking aorund them, and yet they're painfully preoccupied with themselves: they don't even notice when people steal their wallets, bump into them, or anything like that.

    Or take the behavior of your average westerner if he or she is out in the woods. They're not "aware" of their surroundings, even though they're uncommon surroundings for them. They'll hear birds, but they won't notice things like the moss on the southern exposure of a tree or rock outcropping, animal tracks, the sudden hushing of animals (birds, etc.) as a person approaches, and various other things that people that spend time in the outdoors with nature notice almost without thinking about it.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  217. Ah, so instead of... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...swimming fishily around bubbling the piscene equivalent of "Stercus, stercus, stercus, morturi est!"*, they bubble "Surf's up, boys, quick, grab your boards and let's do some touristing?"

    * ObPratchettRef

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  218. 100% wrong by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    Several people were killed in Australia due to unusually large waves from the 'quake - only a couple of meters, but they did arrive.

    Sorry, almost forgot: you insensitive clod!

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:100% wrong by alister · · Score: 1
      Several people were killed in Australia due to unusually large waves from the 'quake - only a couple of meters, but they did arrive.

      Where's your reference? IIRC, 19 Australians were killed by the tsunami. All of them were in affected areas. None of those areas were Australia.

      Alister

  219. Mods! Calling in a +1 Insightful! by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    Yes, I know the PP left the tags off. Mod it up anyway!

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  220. Duh! by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 1

    Read "The Gift of Fear" for the studies on this that were done 20 years ago!

    Andy Out!

  221. Re:The aborginals fled after they read the signs.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That snopes article is completely unrelated to what he was talking about. Just FYI.

  222. Re:The aborginals fled after they read the signs.. by Galvatron · · Score: 1

    I'm not entirely sure what the original guy was talking about, but there WAS an article on CNN about a group (known rather oddly as the "sea gypsies," totally unrelated to regular gypsies) who had as one of their bits of hereditary lore that "if the sea receeds, it always comes back doubled." When the water suddenly rushed out, as preceeds tsunamis, they immediately headed to higher ground, and were safe.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  223. 6th sense? of course! by ccnull · · Score: 1

    I had a feeling you were going to post this.

  224. Before people flame this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep in mind that while things like group consciousness, absolute intuition, "sixth sense" etc have not been scientifically proven, they have not been scientifically disproven either. You can say that they have been disproven for certain individuals, but not in general. Science would have a hard time with non-repeatable phenomena, or phenomena that violate causality. There's no conclusive proof against the existence of such phenomena. In fact we're just now seeing that at the limits our physical studies, time and cauality *can* break down.

    Many of the ideas we take for granted today were once thought to be so unlikely as to be laughable. For example: the idea that all matter is composed of tiny particles called atoms. Or that disease is transmitted by invisibly small creatures called germs. Or that communication faster than light is possible.

    I'm unwilling to write things like this off yet. At the least it's plausible that our bodies collect and our brains analyze far more (and more subtle) stimuli than we are consciously aware of. Perhaps the ancients were on to something with meditation--not necessarily as a way to access a "higher realm," but to access a mental state that feels like a higher realm.

    I've participated in risk sports for most of my life, including rock climbing, mountaineering, and whitewater kayaking. In those communities, intuitive guidance is not taken lightly. A big part of maturing and learning to manage risk safely is learning to hear your "inner voice," which provides quiet guidance to your conscious decisions.

  225. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may be useful to consider that English is a bastardization of Norman (Pre-French), Saxon (Germanic), Gaelic, and Celtic (Anglican languages). It was long considered the mark of an uneducated and uncivilized individual to speak English, and all of the nobility spoke French. And now you call ebonics the bastardization of a bastard language.

    Ebonics and redneck are both looked down upon by the current power structure, but I expect we could have said much the same about French, Spanish, and Italian when they were budding dialects of Latin.

  226. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pyjama.

  227. Ahem... by millennial · · Score: 1

    Need I remind the poster that Lion-o got his sixth sense from the Sword of Omens, not something innate. sight-beyond...agh. I quit. Not funny. POST ABORTED.

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
  228. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    a future mood
    Future is a tense. Indicative and subjunctive are moods. You are a 'tard.
  229. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I am hating."

    Now, what other fake ebonics would you like to justify?

  230. U B hatin. I B strokin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clarence Carter - Strokin'

    When I start makin love
    I dont just make love...
    I be strokin
    Thats what I be doin, huh
    I be strokin

    I stroke it to the east
    And I stroke it to the west
    And I stroke it to the woman that I love the best
    I be strokin

    Let me ask you somethin...
    What time of the day do you like to make love
    Have you ever made love just before breakfast
    Have you ever made love while you watched the late, late show
    Well, let me ask you this
    Have you ever made love on a couch
    Well, let me ask you this
    Have you ever made love on the back seat of a car
    I remember one time I made love on the back seat of a car
    And the police came and shined his light on me, and I said:
    Im strokin, thats what Im doin, I be strokin

    I stroke it to the east
    And I stroke it to the west
    And I stroke it to the woman that I love the best
    I be strokin

    Let me ask you something...
    How long has it been since you made love, huh?
    Did you make love yesterday
    Did you make love last week
    Did you make love last year
    Or maybe it might be that you plannin on makin love tonight
    But just remember, when you start making love
    You make it hard, long, soft, short
    And be strokin
    I be strokin

    I stroke it to the east
    And I stroke it to the west
    And I stroke it to the woman that I love the best, huh
    I be strokin

    Now when I start making love to my woman
    I dont stop until I know shes sas-ified
    And I can always tell when she gets sas-ified
    Cause when she gets sas-fied she start calling my name
    Shed say: Clarence Carter, Clarence Carter, Clarence Carter
    Clarence Carter, ooooh shit, Clarence Carter
    The other night I was strokin my woman
    And it got so good to her, you know what she told me
    Let me tell you what she told me, she said:
    Stroke it Clarence Carter, but dont stroke so fast
    If my stuff aint tight enough, you can stick it up my... WOO!

  231. Re:U B hatin. I B strokin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ohhhh baby :)

  232. Re:The aborginals fled after they read the signs.. by A.Chwunbee · · Score: 0
    "Mallu" is the colloqial Indian name of the people from the state of Kerela [snip] In jokes in the South, they frequently take the role of the "morons" in jokes
    How resourceful we Indians are - even the most amusing Irish and Pollack jokes are being outsourced!
    --
    select * from base where originalOwner = 'you' and currentOwner != 'us'.
    0 rows returned.
  233. Me to by sorbits · · Score: 1

    I have something similar, I get the feeling of "something needs my attention" e.g. when I have something cooking in the kitchen, something is on TV that I wanted to see, or when it's approximately 10 minutes since I pored boiling water on the tea leaves.

    While this is probably just associative learning, I've had the feeling for different things, and when the feeling hits, I rarely remember what it is that I need to attend to.

    The feeling gets stronger if I don't act on it.

  234. I know I shouldn't, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no need to make excuses for people that refuse to learn to speak or write properly, or who for social reasons pretend that they know less than they really do.

    Whutcha talkin' bout, Willis?

  235. Re:So THAT'S how Bush won! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dunno.... some masochists feel whip lashes differently from other people... and some people enjoy sharing their girlfriends.... both seem subjective.

  236. Re:Pot? Kettle. by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

    So, what you're saying is people should ignore the rules of grammar they are taught in school, right? We shouldn't have to worry about being able to correctly communicate our ideas to others. Rather, they should have to infer them through whatever word or phrase of the week is cool on the streets?

    No thank you. I would much rather be understood by the 90% of English speakers that actually took the time to learn the language. I would also much rather not pay any attention to those people that didn't bother.

    --
    Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
  237. Balance / gravity-detection as sixth sense by billstewart · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine points out that gravity detection is definitely one of our senses - we've even got a sense organ for it, located in the inner ear.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Balance / gravity-detection as sixth sense by Sique · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's what I called "balance sense". It's part of the inner ear, basicly three tubes forming rings oriented in each direction, filled with a fluid. In the fluid swim small particles, and the walls of the tubes have little hairs. You notice the gravity because the small particles sink down and affect the hairs at the lower part of the tube. If you move, the fluid starts to stream through the tube, and the particles wander with the fluid, thus affecting other hears = you sense motion.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
  238. Re:Pot? Kettle. by miu · · Score: 1

    No, I'm not saying that. I was irritated that his condescending and racist message was being modded up, and posted a reply addressing that without actually making a point. What I believe is that BAE is not ungrammatical SAE, children grow up immersed in a dialect with different grammatical rules. The post I replied to had undertones of "lazy blacks won't learn proper English". Obviously children have to learn SAE in school since so much of social status is tied to language, but recognizing that BAE has different rules is a totally different thing than thinking of it as street slang with no rules.

    --

    [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  239. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

    His post never used, or implied, the word "lazy". You have chosen to read it that way. He simply pointed out the fallacy of the previous poster's assertion that BAE has grammar constructs which are required because "proper" English is lacking it. In fact proper English does have the constructs required, and the addition of the new constructs in BAE are simply redundancies.

    Most likely these redundancies are intentional, either subconsciously or consciously, on the part of the people speaking this way, probably because it's just another way to identify with a particular group. I personally dislike BAE because I think it's simply a way for some people to try to be exclusionary (i.e. create a group within which they identify and others who do not talk/act/dress/etc like them do not), and I don't like that.

    On the other hand, those people probably want to belong to such a group because there has been so much exclusion practiced against them historically. Which I hate equally, if not more.

    By the way, calling someone else racist without them actually saying anything racist is really rude and uncalled for.

  240. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

    So are you saying that there is or isn't a difference between "I be hating" and "I am hating"?

  241. Re:Pot? Kettle. by miu · · Score: 1
    It's a dialect marked by (usually) incorrect usage.

    There is no need to make excuses for people that refuse to learn to speak or write properly, or who for social reasons pretend that they know less than they really do.

    I can't read such statements in the OP without seeing some very racist undertones. "Refuse to learn to speak or write properly" is especially distasteful. When I was very young a black family in my church was refused housing in our town until government action settled the matter, I wound up being friends with their youngest and heard teachers make comments to this effect about his speech and writing. Other experiences throughout my life have led me to see a strong supposition of superiority in anyone making comments like that, often by people who would never admit to actually being racist.

    --

    [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  242. Nothing on the scale of Bill and Vivian Swanson's by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    amazing surf ride, but the few-meter surges did hospitalise a number of Aussies in Western Australia and Christmas Island by dragging them out to sea or pounding them on the beaches.

    There were actually two sets of surges hitting WA that day, one from a Richter 8 earthquake near Tasmania which may have triggered the later, larger earthquake, and another from said later quake.

    There were also a family drowned by ocean surges in Victoria about a week after the big quake.

    So, OK, maybe not 100% wrong.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  243. Re:Pot? Kettle. by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

    So clearly you read comments such as the O.P.'s with a biased viewpoint, you have just admitted it.

    He said that they "refuse to learn", not that they are too lazy to learn. There is a difference.

    Just like someone who DOESN'T speak BAE isn't "too lazy" to learn how to speak it, they just "refuse to". Of course using the term "refusing to" does imply that they make a conscious effort and I think that's wrong; I don't think that people who speak BAE make some kind of conscious choice, the way they speak is a natural consequence of their surroundings as they were brought up and learned to speak whatever language was around them.

    But I do think that there is a collective sense of an exclusive group that comes along with speaking a minority language (and I'm using "minority" here in the numerative sense, not in the racial sense, so don't get too worked up here) that contributes *immensely* to the preservation of this dialect of English for those who are in that group.

    I really think it's unfortunate that people such as yourself choose to label other people as racist right away. It doesn't add anything to the discussion and it's inflammatory. It's not useful to not be able to discuss points of views such as the O.P.'s without playing the "racist" card right off the bat.

    I honestly think by the way that you jumped to that conclusion so quickly that you *want* to believe that people are racist, because it probably fits in with some kind of self-justification that you want to have.

    Seriously, if you base your conclusions about people that you have never even met based on one bad experience that *you* have had with a completely unrelated set of people, I think that you should really re-examine your motives.

    Not trying to be overly critical here, just trying to get you to think about this.

  244. Re:Pot? Kettle. by miu · · Score: 1
    I don't think that people who speak BAE make some kind of conscious choice, the way they speak is a natural consequence of their surroundings as they were brought up and learned to speak whatever language was around them.

    Okay, that is the way I should have put it - because you are right that my approach was a bit inflammatory. I think racism is such an important issue for America that a little hypersensitivity is called for and the issue of BAE seems to be one of those issues which is a natural starting point. Many people seem so angered and offended by the notion that BAE is a natural dialect of English that I have to wonder at their motivation.

    --

    [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]