Or, by extension, how about we stop considering every who picks up a mouse or game controller regularly a representative of "geeks" or "gamers." My fucking grandparents probably spend more time online than me many days, and while they have managed some interesting things online they're certainly not "geeks". Just because some prick posts in a forum or in a game chat doesn't mean he's part of a community, if anything the trolls - and this is what many of them are - are more concerned with breaking up the community (for the lulz... yeah).
Same with gamers. Anyone can play games, but to say everyone who plays games is part of the same gamer "culture" is a bit naive (and no, I don't consider myself a "hard" gamer these days either). People who put hours and dollars into custom rigs (whether console or PC), play in competitive leagues, and spend hours making gameplay videos or joining in forum discussions etc... those are gamers. My niece who plays farmville on an iPod and mario on a Wii... yeah she's a game player, but she's not really a "gamer" in the community sense. To add to that, while the gamer community *does* have members who are assholes, if some gal came out showing off a pimped out custom rig and wanted to kick some ass in a few matches, she'd be well welcomed (though yes, we'd call her names when she kicks our asses, but we do that TO EACH OTHER too, in fun). Hell, some of the best case-mod designers I've met were women, and again their skills are well respected. Same with costumes in cons.
I see the same with people who are into comic books, cars, etc. There's a certain degree of one-upmanship (or one-upwomanship?) but it's part of the fun. It's competitive. And again, no I am not denying that there are some people who are assholes, but I *AM* saying that some people are over-sensitive or tend to misunderstand. If you come into a group expecting not to be accepted, then it may be a self-fulfilling prophecy.
I think the trouble with industries that have been slanted one way or another, is that there's a culture where it's incredibly easy to send mixed messages, both for the existing members and new entrants. Guys get told "treat her like anyone else in the team" but also "don't be offensive, etc"... well in many team I've been part of, there's lots of weird humour, non-personal attacks, etc. We had a guy join our team who used to work for a school district. One of the first things I told him (with a grin) was that people who worked in schools were a bunch of lazy useless union bums (I'm using nicer language than I actually used). After letting him sit confused while everyone chuckled for a moment I let him know my former employment history (also worked in schools prior). In similar situations, I've seen women come in and get offended for either a) Not liking the jokes/humour that existed prior to them ever joining. And no, none of them are anti-women, they're just not 100% PC. b) Feeling excluded because people *didn't* refer to them in the same (slightly disrespectful) manner as the men, mainly because we were worrying about (a).
I don't care if you dimple or dangle. I've got a *lot* of fun female co-workers who take it, dish it out, and overall have a great sense of humour, and the same with guys. Hell, my (fairly new) boss is female and she's been great so far. There are also some of both men and women who are a bit more... conservative (uptight). The problem seems to be that when the wrong person gets the wrong joke, somehow it often becomes a gender issue when really it's a style/respect issue or just a misunderstanding. Also, not having a tolerance for bullshit (i.e. Linus style) isn't being sexist/discriminatory, unless they're singling you out.
And for the most part, my Android devices have generally performed *better* with each OS upgrade, the exception being upgrading my first-gen Nexus 7, which behaved shitty after going to Lollipop, but that was cleared by a factory reset for some reason.
I see the recall reading the OpenJDK was the reference build for Java 7 anyhow. Java 6 had a bunch of nastiness that was pure oracle, but for 7 the Open JDK had most of the desired functionality with the Oracle version just bolting some additional functionality on to it.
Cool. I suppose that makes sense as a contract is a contract. The only time I've personally seen that with housing is for places in Strata that inherit weird stuff from conditional "permits" from the Strata to do certain modifications/maintenance (the new owner would be able to keep the modification only under the terms of the original permission letter).
Unfortunately it's probably like drunk/distracted driving. For some reason, the person doing the completely idiotic thing is often *not* the one who perishes, but instead makes others victims of his/her stupidity.
Exactly. Some people keep expecting some great new movie in an existing franchise to turn things on its head. However, 99% of the time they do that it pisses a *lot* more people off than it pleases. They went with the "safe" choice and gave fans their old comfy couch back with a new cup-holder. Now that the majority are comfortable with the couch again (ahhhh, this fits my ass just like the old one), they can add a new end table and lamp to the set in the following episodes.
Yeah, they could have been more original, but a whole lot f***ing better than if they'd gone the other common route and shit-canned the whole thing using some force disturbance to alter the flow of time and then went full reboot. You can bet that somewhere in Disney/Lucasfilm, there was some a**hole who was pushing for that but thankfully got overridden. Red matter my ass.
But even then, selling IP isn't quite like selling a physical thing like a house. When you sell a house, that's pretty much it. However, when you sell IP, you can actually stipulate terms in the sale which may restrict use of said IP, or retain certain rights. Lucas didn't do any of that, he just offloaded it and took the cash.
And honestly, it's not a *bad* movie. Certainly it's not overly new or imaginative, but it's also not *annoying* like the prequels, has good acting (and Harrison Ford). They even leaned a bit away from special effect and still went with props for a lot of stuff, using post-processing to enhance rather than replace visuals (such as with BB-8).
Yeah, it was obvious and very deliberate, but when you think about it even the originals were like that. Empire did split off the plot a bit, but Jedi pretty much rehashed plots from both New Hope and Empire.
The new movies just continue with rehashing:
* older "mentor" character (who dies): check * big scary space-station with even bigger guns: check * growing magical force powers: check * a little bit of romance and some roguish charm: check * cute robot blip-bloop-blip-bloop: check
What I see this as, is setting the ground for the future episodes without doing the whole "reboot" thing. Instead, it's more of a hand-off. Now if they pull the same thing for the *next* episode it's probably going to piss people off, but this was more about bringing people back after the prequels with a bit of good old fashioned nostalgia (also known as fan-service).
I dunno. If they could make the whole "Jar Jar Sith Lord" theory work out that'd be pretty awesome, especially if somebody gets to chop him in half near the end.
Honestly, while I doubt they'd run a musical as part of actual SW timeline (it won't be a sequel/prequel), having an actual theatre musical might be kinda fun. If they can do Shrek or Evil Dead (which by all counts is *awesome*, especially if you're in the front row), why not Star Wars? I'd be happier taking my wife to that than something like Les Mis.
And while we're on the topic of sci-fi musicals, I'd pay good money to see a Trek-based musical, if only they can come up with a scene that incorporates the Star Trek ToS battle music and another where Kirk goes on about his pursuit of green alien booty.
I was going to make a crack about "Targeted attacks", but you beat me to it. There have been some other high-profile hacks as well, e.g. Home Depot etc
I don't bother with one time addresses. I just create a new address based on a pattern for all signups, e.g. nospam.slashdot@mydomain.com
That way, if slashdot gives out my email address, not only do I just can the address, but I also get to know WHO sold me out based on the destination.
Thus far, a *lot* of my spam has been to my paypal address, presumably because crappy merchants decided to add it to their mailing list after I bought some $5 part on eBay.
Pretty much anything goes if you're a presidential candidate. Frankly, the more evil sh*t they spew, the better. I'd rather they be openly evil and crazy before an election than to have it come out in their policies afterwards. Now if people actually vote them in based on that crap, that's a serious problem but it says a lot more about the voters than the candidates in that event.
Sounds like a likely enough explanation.. Configuring caching correctly for a site with mixed content can often be a bit of a bitch. Steam probably uses a lot of caching in general, and may turn things up during the big sales, so if somebody misconfigured, for example, mod_cache you could easily get bugs like this where users end up seeing others' details. I remember years back Apache on RHEL changed the way certain options for caching behaved, which bit a number of people in unexpected ways.
The first is medical support. If you have no medical coverage and you're poor, you often can't afford to take your sick kid to a doc. Poor health leads to poor development, not to mention missed school time etc.
Second is time off. You have low-income parents working two, three jobs to make ends meet, with terrible schedules. That cuts into other stuff, like being able to spend quality time with the kids, make good meals, etc. One of the travesties of North America (Canada included) is not just the number of people in low-income jobs, but how those jobs screw people with insufficient hours, forcing them to take multiple jobs and juggle insane, inconsistent timetables. The US is also legendary for lack of time off, so even people in middle-class jobs often little in the way of holidays other than stats (and low-income often end up working even those).
Third, diet. Shitty diet = shitty development. A good diet depends on at least two factors, quality/nutritional food, and time to prepare it. In many cases, that means poor kids are getting crappy, cheap insta-foods. Of course you'll have lots of people saying "well, a good home-cooked meal can be cheaper than instant, so it's their fault for being lazy", but keep in mind that these are the same people juggling multiple jobs and shitty schedules. So yes, they can buy quality ingredients, but a good meal still takes time to prepare and half of these people seem to barely have time to get the kids up and to school before work, then pick them up after, let alone cook.
It's not that poor people are lazy, stupid, or don't care. Many are often *very* hard workers. Unfortunately many are stuck working hard just trying to get by, and thus have little opportunity for improving their lot in life.
Yeah, I think the problem is that most people watch crap TV (and even for "good" TV there's still a limit). Educational shows such as Sesame Street have been long known as a positive influence on kids. Well, at least before Elmo they were. It's gone a bit downhill since then but still isn't too bad.
But even as an adult I find most broadcast TV pretty stupid these days. Craploads of reality TV BS not to mention the *tons* of commercials trying to teach you to be a good little consumer.
Come to Canada instead. We like tourists, and the current state of the Canadian dollar means that you'll be getting more for your money. There's no Disneyland, but you could hit Toronto and go to Wonderland, Casa Loma, Niagara Falls, etc.
Or hit the west coast and visit the Vancouver night market, PNE, Bouchard Gardens, and maybe take a whale-watching tour, etc. Finish up with a trip on the Rocky Mountaineer and tour the province.
Mock them. Photoshop, video editor, audio overlay whatever. You know those people that go around photo-editing vacation photos in weird and wonderful ways, or that dude that replaces key items in Republican photos with d*ldos. Do that.
Add a little snippet of somebody getting it on with a goat in the background. Replace the voice with somebody saying they've married three of their cousins. Add a few vibrators replacing machines guns, whatever. There's no need to "hide" the videos as if we're scared of them. Instead make them ridiculous.
You know what, if Disney can buy up rights to older but popular movies and release sequels that are good, that doesn't seem like a problem to me. By all measures, the new Star Wars movie is a huge success. Disney made a killing at the box-office (and I'm sure just as much so with merchandising), but - at least currently - it seems deserved, more-so than the crappy prequels.
Just because it's Disney - and they're making money - does't mean it's bad.
Except that there are plenty of companies with devices that *use* the batteries. If the battery tech was free, it's not unlikely that some would see a benefit to improved battery tech even if they're not selling the actual batteries.
I'm not sure which "due process" this would impinge though. So long as the cops aren't arresting people without evidence, it should be OK. If a robbery occurs, and police question retailers to hear that "we didn't get video of the actual robbery but we have these shots of a guy who's been hanging around at X hours acting suspiciously", then cops are going to keep a watch out for that person (for questioning).
This seems similar except that the stores are sharing the data on suspicious persons pre-emptively. Of course this assumes good behaviour on the cops and that they're just going to question him and let him go if it's nothing... but unfortunately that's a reality even currently.
Now maybe said person is just hanging out waiting for his girlfriend to get off of work, or whatever, but that same situation applies if he was tagged as suspicious after the robbery.
Because the drugs are still certified for sale and approved for coverage. I'll use Canada and my home province as an example. Many things are covered by medical. However, you still read of plenty of cases where somebody went to the U.S. doctors to get a prescription because a) The drug wasn't approved in Canada, or not covered under the medical b) The drug could be used in Canada, but required a lengthy medical process to get personal approval/coverage
So just because the system pays for drugs, it doesn't pay for all drugs. A lot of the hold-up is supposedly testing to ensure said drugs are safe or apply to the condition at hand, but I'm sure price-negotiation is a part of it as well (as in "we're willing to cover our entire population to use your drug if needed, but only if you sell it for $X").
Breaking the agreement isn't going to have legal consequences, past the *potential* eviction, unless I chose to try and have a judge pass a judgement (and then good luck on enforcing this judgement.
Well said, and good on you for mentioning the elephant in the room. You can have lots of clauses in your rental agreement. For bad tenants, following up and dealing with violations can be a *nightmare*. Around here, even kicking out tenants that haven't paid rent is an exercise in pain, and while you're waiting for the arbitration process you get to worry about how much is going to be left of your place when they finally get evicted.
Criminal law doesn't come into effect until they violate the agreement, get evicted, get hit in (civil) court for not leaving, and then finally (maybe) get arrested for violating the court order...
Slashdot Mirror
Or, by extension, how about we stop considering every who picks up a mouse or game controller regularly a representative of "geeks" or "gamers." My fucking grandparents probably spend more time online than me many days, and while they have managed some interesting things online they're certainly not "geeks". Just because some prick posts in a forum or in a game chat doesn't mean he's part of a community, if anything the trolls - and this is what many of them are - are more concerned with breaking up the community (for the lulz... yeah).
Same with gamers. Anyone can play games, but to say everyone who plays games is part of the same gamer "culture" is a bit naive (and no, I don't consider myself a "hard" gamer these days either). People who put hours and dollars into custom rigs (whether console or PC), play in competitive leagues, and spend hours making gameplay videos or joining in forum discussions etc... those are gamers. My niece who plays farmville on an iPod and mario on a Wii... yeah she's a game player, but she's not really a "gamer" in the community sense. To add to that, while the gamer community *does* have members who are assholes, if some gal came out showing off a pimped out custom rig and wanted to kick some ass in a few matches, she'd be well welcomed (though yes, we'd call her names when she kicks our asses, but we do that TO EACH OTHER too, in fun). Hell, some of the best case-mod designers I've met were women, and again their skills are well respected. Same with costumes in cons.
I see the same with people who are into comic books, cars, etc. There's a certain degree of one-upmanship (or one-upwomanship?) but it's part of the fun. It's competitive. And again, no I am not denying that there are some people who are assholes, but I *AM* saying that some people are over-sensitive or tend to misunderstand. If you come into a group expecting not to be accepted, then it may be a self-fulfilling prophecy.
I think the trouble with industries that have been slanted one way or another, is that there's a culture where it's incredibly easy to send mixed messages, both for the existing members and new entrants. Guys get told "treat her like anyone else in the team" but also "don't be offensive, etc"... well in many team I've been part of, there's lots of weird humour, non-personal attacks, etc. We had a guy join our team who used to work for a school district. One of the first things I told him (with a grin) was that people who worked in schools were a bunch of lazy useless union bums (I'm using nicer language than I actually used). After letting him sit confused while everyone chuckled for a moment I let him know my former employment history (also worked in schools prior). In similar situations, I've seen women come in and get offended for either
a) Not liking the jokes/humour that existed prior to them ever joining. And no, none of them are anti-women, they're just not 100% PC.
b) Feeling excluded because people *didn't* refer to them in the same (slightly disrespectful) manner as the men, mainly because we were worrying about (a).
I don't care if you dimple or dangle. I've got a *lot* of fun female co-workers who take it, dish it out, and overall have a great sense of humour, and the same with guys. Hell, my (fairly new) boss is female and she's been great so far. There are also some of both men and women who are a bit more... conservative (uptight). The problem seems to be that when the wrong person gets the wrong joke, somehow it often becomes a gender issue when really it's a style/respect issue or just a misunderstanding. Also, not having a tolerance for bullshit (i.e. Linus style) isn't being sexist/discriminatory, unless they're singling you out.
And for the most part, my Android devices have generally performed *better* with each OS upgrade, the exception being upgrading my first-gen Nexus 7, which behaved shitty after going to Lollipop, but that was cleared by a factory reset for some reason.
I see the recall reading the OpenJDK was the reference build for Java 7 anyhow. Java 6 had a bunch of nastiness that was pure oracle, but for 7 the Open JDK had most of the desired functionality with the Oracle version just bolting some additional functionality on to it.
Cool. I suppose that makes sense as a contract is a contract. The only time I've personally seen that with housing is for places in Strata that inherit weird stuff from conditional "permits" from the Strata to do certain modifications/maintenance (the new owner would be able to keep the modification only under the terms of the original permission letter).
Unfortunately it's probably like drunk/distracted driving. For some reason, the person doing the completely idiotic thing is often *not* the one who perishes, but instead makes others victims of his/her stupidity.
Just recalibrate the inertial dampeners and gravity plates to offset the increased atmospheric pressure. Easy stuff!
Exactly. Some people keep expecting some great new movie in an existing franchise to turn things on its head. However, 99% of the time they do that it pisses a *lot* more people off than it pleases. They went with the "safe" choice and gave fans their old comfy couch back with a new cup-holder. Now that the majority are comfortable with the couch again (ahhhh, this fits my ass just like the old one), they can add a new end table and lamp to the set in the following episodes.
Yeah, they could have been more original, but a whole lot f***ing better than if they'd gone the other common route and shit-canned the whole thing using some force disturbance to alter the flow of time and then went full reboot. You can bet that somewhere in Disney/Lucasfilm, there was some a**hole who was pushing for that but thankfully got overridden. Red matter my ass.
But even then, selling IP isn't quite like selling a physical thing like a house. When you sell a house, that's pretty much it. However, when you sell IP, you can actually stipulate terms in the sale which may restrict use of said IP, or retain certain rights. Lucas didn't do any of that, he just offloaded it and took the cash.
And honestly, it's not a *bad* movie. Certainly it's not overly new or imaginative, but it's also not *annoying* like the prequels, has good acting (and Harrison Ford). They even leaned a bit away from special effect and still went with props for a lot of stuff, using post-processing to enhance rather than replace visuals (such as with BB-8).
Yeah, it was obvious and very deliberate, but when you think about it even the originals were like that. Empire did split off the plot a bit, but Jedi pretty much rehashed plots from both New Hope and Empire.
The new movies just continue with rehashing:
* older "mentor" character (who dies): check
* big scary space-station with even bigger guns: check
* growing magical force powers: check
* a little bit of romance and some roguish charm: check
* cute robot blip-bloop-blip-bloop: check
What I see this as, is setting the ground for the future episodes without doing the whole "reboot" thing. Instead, it's more of a hand-off. Now if they pull the same thing for the *next* episode it's probably going to piss people off, but this was more about bringing people back after the prequels with a bit of good old fashioned nostalgia (also known as fan-service).
I dunno. If they could make the whole "Jar Jar Sith Lord" theory work out that'd be pretty awesome, especially if somebody gets to chop him in half near the end.
Honestly, while I doubt they'd run a musical as part of actual SW timeline (it won't be a sequel/prequel), having an actual theatre musical might be kinda fun. If they can do Shrek or Evil Dead (which by all counts is *awesome*, especially if you're in the front row), why not Star Wars? I'd be happier taking my wife to that than something like Les Mis.
And while we're on the topic of sci-fi musicals, I'd pay good money to see a Trek-based musical, if only they can come up with a scene that incorporates the Star Trek ToS battle music and another where Kirk goes on about his pursuit of green alien booty.
I was going to make a crack about "Targeted attacks", but you beat me to it. There have been some other high-profile hacks as well, e.g. Home Depot etc
I try to use the phrase "one's alcoholic uncle" which is less likely to be misconstrued as personal. :-)
I don't bother with one time addresses. I just create a new address based on a pattern for all signups, e.g.
nospam.slashdot@mydomain.com
That way, if slashdot gives out my email address, not only do I just can the address, but I also get to know WHO sold me out based on the destination.
Thus far, a *lot* of my spam has been to my paypal address, presumably because crappy merchants decided to add it to their mailing list after I bought some $5 part on eBay.
Pretty much anything goes if you're a presidential candidate. Frankly, the more evil sh*t they spew, the better. I'd rather they be openly evil and crazy before an election than to have it come out in their policies afterwards. Now if people actually vote them in based on that crap, that's a serious problem but it says a lot more about the voters than the candidates in that event.
Sounds like a likely enough explanation.. Configuring caching correctly for a site with mixed content can often be a bit of a bitch. Steam probably uses a lot of caching in general, and may turn things up during the big sales, so if somebody misconfigured, for example, mod_cache you could easily get bugs like this where users end up seeing others' details. I remember years back Apache on RHEL changed the way certain options for caching behaved, which bit a number of people in unexpected ways.
I could see three big influences on this.
The first is medical support. If you have no medical coverage and you're poor, you often can't afford to take your sick kid to a doc. Poor health leads to poor development, not to mention missed school time etc.
Second is time off. You have low-income parents working two, three jobs to make ends meet, with terrible schedules. That cuts into other stuff, like being able to spend quality time with the kids, make good meals, etc. One of the travesties of North America (Canada included) is not just the number of people in low-income jobs, but how those jobs screw people with insufficient hours, forcing them to take multiple jobs and juggle insane, inconsistent timetables. The US is also legendary for lack of time off, so even people in middle-class jobs often little in the way of holidays other than stats (and low-income often end up working even those).
Third, diet. Shitty diet = shitty development. A good diet depends on at least two factors, quality/nutritional food, and time to prepare it. In many cases, that means poor kids are getting crappy, cheap insta-foods. Of course you'll have lots of people saying "well, a good home-cooked meal can be cheaper than instant, so it's their fault for being lazy", but keep in mind that these are the same people juggling multiple jobs and shitty schedules. So yes, they can buy quality ingredients, but a good meal still takes time to prepare and half of these people seem to barely have time to get the kids up and to school before work, then pick them up after, let alone cook.
It's not that poor people are lazy, stupid, or don't care. Many are often *very* hard workers. Unfortunately many are stuck working hard just trying to get by, and thus have little opportunity for improving their lot in life.
Yeah, I think the problem is that most people watch crap TV (and even for "good" TV there's still a limit). Educational shows such as Sesame Street have been long known as a positive influence on kids. Well, at least before Elmo they were. It's gone a bit downhill since then but still isn't too bad.
But even as an adult I find most broadcast TV pretty stupid these days. Craploads of reality TV BS not to mention the *tons* of commercials trying to teach you to be a good little consumer.
Come to Canada instead. We like tourists, and the current state of the Canadian dollar means that you'll be getting more for your money.
There's no Disneyland, but you could hit Toronto and go to Wonderland, Casa Loma, Niagara Falls, etc.
Or hit the west coast and visit the Vancouver night market, PNE, Bouchard Gardens, and maybe take a whale-watching tour, etc. Finish up with a trip on the Rocky Mountaineer and tour the province.
Mock them. Photoshop, video editor, audio overlay whatever. You know those people that go around photo-editing vacation photos in weird and wonderful ways, or that dude that replaces key items in Republican photos with d*ldos. Do that.
Add a little snippet of somebody getting it on with a goat in the background. Replace the voice with somebody saying they've married three of their cousins. Add a few vibrators replacing machines guns, whatever. There's no need to "hide" the videos as if we're scared of them. Instead make them ridiculous.
You know what, if Disney can buy up rights to older but popular movies and release sequels that are good, that doesn't seem like a problem to me. By all measures, the new Star Wars movie is a huge success. Disney made a killing at the box-office (and I'm sure just as much so with merchandising), but - at least currently - it seems deserved, more-so than the crappy prequels.
Just because it's Disney - and they're making money - does't mean it's bad.
Except that there are plenty of companies with devices that *use* the batteries. If the battery tech was free, it's not unlikely that some would see a benefit to improved battery tech even if they're not selling the actual batteries.
I'm not sure which "due process" this would impinge though. So long as the cops aren't arresting people without evidence, it should be OK.
If a robbery occurs, and police question retailers to hear that "we didn't get video of the actual robbery but we have these shots of a guy who's been hanging around at X hours acting suspiciously", then cops are going to keep a watch out for that person (for questioning).
This seems similar except that the stores are sharing the data on suspicious persons pre-emptively. Of course this assumes good behaviour on the cops and that they're just going to question him and let him go if it's nothing... but unfortunately that's a reality even currently.
Now maybe said person is just hanging out waiting for his girlfriend to get off of work, or whatever, but that same situation applies if he was tagged as suspicious after the robbery.
Because the drugs are still certified for sale and approved for coverage. I'll use Canada and my home province as an example. Many things are covered by medical. However, you still read of plenty of cases where somebody went to the U.S. doctors to get a prescription because
a) The drug wasn't approved in Canada, or not covered under the medical
b) The drug could be used in Canada, but required a lengthy medical process to get personal approval/coverage
So just because the system pays for drugs, it doesn't pay for all drugs. A lot of the hold-up is supposedly testing to ensure said drugs are safe or apply to the condition at hand, but I'm sure price-negotiation is a part of it as well (as in "we're willing to cover our entire population to use your drug if needed, but only if you sell it for $X").
Breaking the agreement isn't going to have legal consequences, past the *potential* eviction, unless I chose to try and have a judge pass a judgement (and then good luck on enforcing this judgement.
Well said, and good on you for mentioning the elephant in the room. You can have lots of clauses in your rental agreement. For bad tenants, following up and dealing with violations can be a *nightmare*. Around here, even kicking out tenants that haven't paid rent is an exercise in pain, and while you're waiting for the arbitration process you get to worry about how much is going to be left of your place when they finally get evicted.
Criminal law doesn't come into effect until they violate the agreement, get evicted, get hit in (civil) court for not leaving, and then finally (maybe) get arrested for violating the court order...