That'd be pretty cool -- the owner of the address gets 10%, broker gets 15%. Hard point would be avoiding excessive reuse of addresses with same rebate servicers.
The closest performance I had to that was from Sony, who delivered a $100 rebate check on a 19" LCD monitor in less than a week after submission. Too bad I'm no longer a Sony customer.
You're right. I lived there in the 1980s and remember that it was illegal to advertise after-rebate prices UNLESS the rebate was given immediately at the point of sale. I assume the other 49 states' legislatures are too much in the pockets of business interests to pass such a no-brainer pro-consumer law.
Sadly, being more secure than IE (which is not saying much) is really the only "selling point" of Firefox, really.
Yeah, tabbed browsing, the lack of obfuscated histories of browsing one can't delete (IE index.dat), granular cookie handling, ad and Flash blocking extensions, and a hundred other things must not be selling points.
It's enough to create reasonable doubt. Now if the prosecution was able to produce his Slashdot post about plausible deniability, that's another matter. As far as being screwed, anyone who openly defies TPTB is screwed, unless they're rich, in which case they're part of the TPTB and defiance is an exercise in masturbation.
What would be more likely is that he'd never be asked about his illegal traffic anyway. That traffic would be silently used as probably cause to procure a no-knock warrant (and being an open WAP, he obviously had no expectation of privacy), and the forensic cops would image every piece of media from paper tapes to Atari 800 floppies to hard drives and hang him with whatever he forgot to encrypt.
. . . to tie some fins or something to it to raise the P/S off the floor and allow circulation. But then, I'm not in the market for one of these until it's cracked wide open. And probably not even then.
Wouldn't whoever is hosting the file be liable if the NEC were downloaded onto a machine located in a jursidiction where the NEC isn't law and thus not subject to that ruling?
Java, cross platform. So long as you're running exactly the right version of the JVM, under exactly the right version of the right web browser, under the right operating system.
The fact that a Chinese citizen is arguing that liberty and personal freedoms is "going against your country" illustrates that those (unfortunately few) refusing to do business there and those pressing for the restoration of the legitimate government of China in exile in Taiwan are correct.
No one said it had to be released under the GPL. They're welcome to retain their intellectual "property," they just have to allow public inspection. If anything, this would limit competition for Diebold because it would be a simple matter for them to accuse any upstart undercutting them of having seen the public source code.
And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand or in their foreheads;
"And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name
A la how the SSSCA changed into the CBDTPA, the TCPA changed into the TCG, and Palladium morphed into NGCSB, DRM will be needing a new name now that everyone knows what it is. Please post your entries in this thread.
Slashdot Mirror
That was truly beautiful.
That'd be pretty cool -- the owner of the address gets 10%, broker gets 15%. Hard point would be avoiding excessive reuse of addresses with same rebate servicers.
Fair enough -- though I can't picture anyone not loving tabbed browsing!
Touché. That one, I've actually used :).
The closest performance I had to that was from Sony, who delivered a $100 rebate check on a 19" LCD monitor in less than a week after submission. Too bad I'm no longer a Sony customer.
You're right. I lived there in the 1980s and remember that it was illegal to advertise after-rebate prices UNLESS the rebate was given immediately at the point of sale. I assume the other 49 states' legislatures are too much in the pockets of business interests to pass such a no-brainer pro-consumer law.
Yeah, tabbed browsing, the lack of obfuscated histories of browsing one can't delete (IE index.dat), granular cookie handling, ad and Flash blocking extensions, and a hundred other things must not be selling points.
If your users are admins, why bother with the program restrictions?
Get the picture?
Not sure that'd be faster--the rows still have to be counted and now there's a join. But I'm no DBMS guru :).
The previous poster was talking about jail, which it seems reasonable implied a criminal trial.
It's enough to create reasonable doubt. Now if the prosecution was able to produce his Slashdot post about plausible deniability, that's another matter. As far as being screwed, anyone who openly defies TPTB is screwed, unless they're rich, in which case they're part of the TPTB and defiance is an exercise in masturbation.
What would be more likely is that he'd never be asked about his illegal traffic anyway. That traffic would be silently used as probably cause to procure a no-knock warrant (and being an open WAP, he obviously had no expectation of privacy), and the forensic cops would image every piece of media from paper tapes to Atari 800 floppies to hard drives and hang him with whatever he forgot to encrypt.
And those MAC addresses end up in his ISP's logs, how?
Don't know that sailors would be very happy, since they would no longer be allowed a girl in every port.
select story, count(*) as dupe from slashdot group by story having count(*) > 1;
. . . to tie some fins or something to it to raise the P/S off the floor and allow circulation. But then, I'm not in the market for one of these until it's cracked wide open. And probably not even then.
Thanks, that's interesting. Wonder if anyone would get very far starting a municipality and citing entire movies as law :).
Wouldn't whoever is hosting the file be liable if the NEC were downloaded onto a machine located in a jursidiction where the NEC isn't law and thus not subject to that ruling?
Java, cross platform. So long as you're running exactly the right version of the JVM, under exactly the right version of the right web browser, under the right operating system.
The fact that a Chinese citizen is arguing that liberty and personal freedoms is "going against your country" illustrates that those (unfortunately few) refusing to do business there and those pressing for the restoration of the legitimate government of China in exile in Taiwan are correct.
No one said it had to be released under the GPL. They're welcome to retain their intellectual "property," they just have to allow public inspection. If anything, this would limit competition for Diebold because it would be a simple matter for them to accuse any upstart undercutting them of having seen the public source code.
Subtle, yet generates buzz. Mad propz, Taco!
And for that, I'm thankful for those paranoid Christians. Better than the rest of the sheep in this damn place.
And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand or in their foreheads; "And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name
A la how the SSSCA changed into the CBDTPA, the TCPA changed into the TCG, and Palladium morphed into NGCSB, DRM will be needing a new name now that everyone knows what it is. Please post your entries in this thread.