If it's active directory you mean, you'll have to do quite some digging, and some black art configuration. www.samba.org is still a good starting place. Also check out the MIT kerberos archives. If its a traditional windows domain, samba has all you need including docs. Keywords are the winbind daemon, and some configuration of/etc/pam.d/* and/etc/nsswitch.conf files
Just FYI, the nvidia drivers contain their own AGP driver, it can be used by e.g. setting the XF86config option NvAGP=1. This reliably oopses the kernel in Fedora with this new driver. If anyone else wonder why the new driver don't work, make sure it uses the kernel AGP driver, not the nvidia one.
I somewhat fail to see what's so nerdish about Lord of the Rings. Sure, alot of nerds have read the book. The books seems to have a cult status among nerds, though I really cannot find many nerds or why anyone would think of nerds while reading the books or watching the movies.
Perhaps Kino and/or Cinelerra have some of the features you need ? The tutorials at http://www.robfisher.net/video/cinelerra1.html an d http://www.robfisher.net/video/kino.html might show you what they can do.
Uhm, there are actually not that many X servers. It's not like windowmanagers or anything like that. Besides , the goal of Xouvert is to get their changes back to XFree
Last time I asked people about this, I was told this was script kiddies scanning for open proxies and similar things, using some certain scripts/whatever which annoyed the logs with falsifyed referes.
And one package cannot do any damage ? Nevertheless , how do you know that a developer, signed or not, are not trying to insert malicious source ? You might think you trust him but..
Sure it does. It grants users a few rights, and a few restrictions. Among others it grants the user the right to be able to get the sourcecode, and if he redisribute the program, he must be able to provide the sourcecode as well.
No no. Most filechoosers I've seen provides an API to add custom elements to it. You might have seen some filedialogs that have a preview of an image besides it ? And the ability of Joe Random Coder to add elements is rather high since the source is available and anyone can fiddle with their dowloaded sources, no ? This was not an example of that though, thisone used the exposed API.
The code is at http://kidcrash.no-ip.com/testfilechooser.c btw, I'm only sorry he had to use a word like Frobnicate, which seems to boil the brains of the average Slashdot reader..
It just shows that the GtkFileChooser can be extended with custom widgets/items. The coder of the example the sceenshot is taken from added a checkbox, and labeled it Frobnicate the file. * It was an example. * That checkbox is not going to be there in the standard dialog. * The UI might be somewhat diffrent in the final version
If it's active directory you mean, you'll have to do quite some digging, /etc/pam.d/* and /etc/nsswitch.conf files
and some black art configuration.
www.samba.org is still a good starting place. Also check out the MIT kerberos archives.
If its a traditional windows domain, samba has all you need including
docs. Keywords are the winbind daemon, and some configuration of
"supposed" beeing the keyword.
Any indications yet it's actually communicating with any of the orbiters ?
Instead of asking slashdot, I suggest asking the vedors of the software
one wants to include. Much better that way. Makes sense also..
Indeed it is, still, people want to use it for just about anything it _wasn't_ desgined for. ;-(
Did I see XML and performance in the same sentence ?! ... brain overload.. does not make sense...
I currently havn't compiled the kernel.
Using the stock 2.4.22-1.2129.nptl from Fedora.
Just FYI, the nvidia drivers contain their own AGP driver,
it can be used by e.g. setting the XF86config option NvAGP=1.
This reliably oopses the kernel in Fedora with this new driver.
If anyone else wonder why the new driver don't work, make sure it uses
the kernel AGP driver, not the nvidia one.
Lets not forget the Danish Bjarne Stroustrup, father of C++.(Though he made it while working for AT&T in the US.).
You havn't by any chance an URL ? Or are they not
published yet ?
I somewhat fail to see what's so nerdish about Lord of the Rings. Sure,
alot of nerds have read the book. The books seems to have a cult status among nerds, though I really cannot find many nerds or why anyone would think of nerds while reading the books or watching the movies.
Perhaps Kino and/or Cinelerra have some of the features you need ?n d http://www.robfisher.net/video/kino.html might show you what they can do.
The tutorials at http://www.robfisher.net/video/cinelerra1.html
a
Well, humans do a lot of light pollution, you can easily call that spamming..
Neptune is a gas giant. It's not blue oceans, its gas..
neptune/uranus is also cold. I mean, _VERY_ cold.
No it doesn't. replaying the jfs journal(initiated by fsck) is just as fast as xfs.
Uhm, there are actually not that many X servers. It's not like windowmanagers or anything like that. Besides , the goal of Xouvert is to get their changes back to XFree
Anaconda is both text based and gui based. You choice. (provided they didn't just port the GUI part..)
http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
h ttp://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swfa zepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
http://www.m
Last time I asked people about this, I was told this was script kiddies
scanning for open proxies and similar things, using some certain scripts/whatever which annoyed the logs with falsifyed referes.
Well, MS might want you to thing IIS is an OS, but .. it really is not.
And one package cannot do any damage ?
Nevertheless , how do you know that a developer, signed or not, are not trying to insert malicious source ? You might think you trust him but..
Whewre can I get the patches from SGI to make 2.4 run on such insane hardware ?
Sure it does. It grants users a few rights, and a few restrictions.
Among others it grants the user the right to be able to get the sourcecode, and if he redisribute the program, he must be able to provide the sourcecode as well.
Where are the big changes ? I see 8 more or less minor bugfixes.
No no. Most filechoosers I've seen provides an API to add custom elements to it.
You might have seen some filedialogs that have a preview of an image besides it ?
And the ability of Joe Random Coder to add elements is rather high since the source
is available and anyone can fiddle with their dowloaded sources, no ?
This was not an example of that though, thisone used the exposed API.
The code is at http://kidcrash.no-ip.com/testfilechooser.c btw, I'm only sorry he had to use a word
like Frobnicate, which seems to boil the brains of the average Slashdot reader..
It just shows that the GtkFileChooser can be extended with custom widgets/items.
The coder of the example the sceenshot is taken from added a checkbox, and labeled it Frobnicate the file.
* It was an example.
* That checkbox is not going to be there in the standard dialog.
* The UI might be somewhat diffrent in the final version