Thanks for mentioning Homesite, that was a great suite. I was very sad to see it swallowed up into DW and then languish - they never integrated it or advanced it thereafter, to my knowledge. Just another case of the big eating the small for self protection. Quality suffered that day.
If you talking about content, about copyright or slander or something similar that comes about as a result of what users put up on their pages, then yes, there is an argument for them. But in terms of the web resources that come with the pages they serve, no. No way. That can be 100% screened, and should be.
if (window.XMLHttpRequest) {
alltheyhype = new XMLHttpRequest(); } else if (window.ActiveXObject) {
alltheyhype = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); }// are we going to upversion the web everytime we get a handy new browser object?
Forget CEV - just go back to BDRs (Big Dumb Rockets) and screw all this people in space crap. Look at the great stuff from Hubble and Mars that's far cheaper than any shuttle or space station missions. (Yeah, yeah, hubble was launched by the shuttle...).
Hubble: yeah ok nice idea but superceded now by adaptive optics on earth based observatories. Very cool correction of the initial fault in the mirror of course.
Mars robotic missions...the way forward. And the web really helps selling the mission to joe public. It is awesome to look at the pictures and contemplate the data that's coming back.
More robotic missions, and rather than sending antiseptic vehicles, we should load them up with a choice set of microbes and see if we can kick-start life in other places. We owe this to life itself, and it's a much more intelligent form of space travel. Don't send humans, send simple, tough life-forms and see what comes back a million or a 100 million years hence. From our planet a cloud of spores, little spaceships loaded of virii and bacteria, should burst forth travelling out on trajectories to collide with other heavenly bodies, just to see what grows there.
I have no background in anthropology, but I do remember something about how general health declining when hunter-gatherers initially became farmers.
Nor do I...but I have read "guns, germs and steel" by jared diamond, and I would highly recommend it.
Anyway, another major change of the shift to farming is the appearance of many more diseases lethal to humans, due to the farmers living in close proximity to their animals. Many common diseases originated in domesticated animals and jumped over to humans.
Yeah, well, when you have finished comparing the comparative merits of RoR against the other options and find yourself carried along with the fresh-faced apple-shaped enthousiasm that it's riding on, go check up on your hosting. RoR is so ready for the maintime that it runs on, ooh, er, well your Mac basically.
Unless you have good control over the hosting environment, you can't deploy it.
Where is the apache dynamic module for this? And don't say it's FastCGI. It has to become as readily available as PHP in the hosting environment before it moves into the main stream.
I could be wrong. Just seems to be something they gloss over when they are talking it up.
I don't think so. Observations can never prove a theory. All observations - ALL observations - include uncertainty and the best that can be shown is a good fit of the observational data to the theories predictions. And trying to calculate the EXACT uncertainty unfortunately produces another measure of uncertainty. Mathematical proofs can be derived to prove a means of calculating the degree of "fit" of observational data but that still doesn't get around the uncertainty problems encountered when handling any observational data.
And how much leaks out of the faraday cage of a case that most pcs are in?
It leaks out the same way the broadcast signal came in, my anonymous friend.
Of course, you can box your antenna in a faraday cage too, that'll work...but your reception may not be so crisp. Read some more of the www.tvlicensing.biz site you quoted to learn about that.
Yeah, thanks for your notepad calculations. The grand parent is way off route with his initial assumptions. It isn't the release of energy from burning carbon fuels that causes the planet to warm. It's the release of carbon gases to the atmosphere from combustion that cause the heating effect. As you point out, the change in atmospheric composition then affects the total energy balance of the planet, storing more energy in the atmosphere and hence warming the surface.
Incidentally, I'd imagine your figures of energy input to the earth by the sun to be on the low side...what comes after zetta?
If the Feds come looking for somebody based on IP they're coming to you and not to his home address. You know what I mean?
Well i don't know about feds, but here in the UK (and IANAL) I don't think that would be enough to hang you. They would have to find evidence on one of my computers to convict me: it would be too easy to construct a defence on the basis of having a unsecure WLAN (not actually a crime) and claiming it was unauthorised access. Without material evidence on my hard drive, i doubt they could convict. I surely HOPE that's the case!
an image format which only has 256 different levels...
...is called GIF. TIFF, JPG and other formats commonly used for digital photography represent pixels as byte values for _each_ of R, G and B - ie 256x256x256 possible values (actually GIF does to, but is restricted to only using up to 256 colours in its colour table).
And yes, this is a sampling of the output signal from the CCDs. So the camera could probably deliver higher resolution pixel values if the A/D convertor and file format supported it.
And your comment regarding 'cropping' is non-sensible so I ignored it.
I don't think port 25 should be open for a single IP address on the planet.
OK, let me think about that. Block port 25 on basically every network interface on the planet. So now I can't access SMTP anywhere on the planet...so now I can't send email anymore.
That alone would eliminate 90% of SPAM out there,
Heh, I'd like to know what you think will happen to the other 10% of spam 'out there'? I think you 'eliminated' that too, huh?
Most other megafauna met the bow and arrow/spear wielding humans, and the contact tended to be fatal.
That's one of the problems with the human caused extinction theory in australia. The dating of stone arrow-heads doesn't tie up with the extinction period.
"There is not a single stone-spearpoint in Australia until, at the very earliest, about 15,000 years ago - long after anyone thinks the megafauna went extinct," said co-author Dr Stephen Wroe, from the University of Sydney.
Once you have swapped your MAC address to match another on the network, what happens next? How does the conflict resolve between two machines with the same MAC address? Not nicely...
To be stealthy you need to observe MAC addresses, then identify when a machine has disconnected from the network. Then you can walk up and take it's place at the table and eat its porridge - until it comes back. Then there's conflict again.
OK maybe not: the killer apps will more likely take advantage of the marriage of the two devices, building on top of them. And perl may well have a new niche as the thinking geeks glue, customising the functionality of the camera phone and creating a quick'n'dirty testing ground for new software ideas. Although, if that's so, perl is going to need GD or some other module with extensive graphics support built in too.
It's not a distance thing. It's a TIME thing. Fact is, there are many areas you could live in London that would have a longer commute to get to the center.
Slashdot Mirror
Thanks for mentioning Homesite, that was a great suite. I was very sad to see it swallowed up into DW and then languish - they never integrated it or advanced it thereafter, to my knowledge. Just another case of the big eating the small for self protection. Quality suffered that day.
...you mean the SANS, who have a site, powered by, er, php?
_ asp.asp
http://www.sans.org/index.php
And as to structurally similar to ASP? Put down the pipe...
ASP isn't even a language. First link from google:
http://www.webwizguide.info/asp/tutorials/what_is
If you talking about content, about copyright or slander or something similar that comes about as a result of what users put up on their pages, then yes, there is an argument for them. But in terms of the web resources that come with the pages they serve, no. No way. That can be 100% screened, and should be.
// web 2.0 by stridebird
// are we going to upversion the web everytime we get a handy new browser object?
if (window.XMLHttpRequest) {
alltheyhype = new XMLHttpRequest();
} else if (window.ActiveXObject) {
alltheyhype = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP");
}
Hubble: yeah ok nice idea but superceded now by adaptive optics on earth based observatories. Very cool correction of the initial fault in the mirror of course.
Mars robotic missions...the way forward. And the web really helps selling the mission to joe public. It is awesome to look at the pictures and contemplate the data that's coming back.
More robotic missions, and rather than sending antiseptic vehicles, we should load them up with a choice set of microbes and see if we can kick-start life in other places. We owe this to life itself, and it's a much more intelligent form of space travel. Don't send humans, send simple, tough life-forms and see what comes back a million or a 100 million years hence. From our planet a cloud of spores, little spaceships loaded of virii and bacteria, should burst forth travelling out on trajectories to collide with other heavenly bodies, just to see what grows there.
"The Snorre reserves lie in the fluvial sands of the Lunde formation from the late Triassic period and the Statfjord formation is early Jurassic."e /
http://www.offshore-technology.com/projects/snorr
Triassic: 248 - 213 million years ago. html
Jurassic: 213 - 145 million years ago
http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Glossary/geo_time_scale
Dinosaurs first appeared in the Triassic and diversified greatly in the Jurassic. So yes, it fits. Nothing suprising here...
Nor do I...but I have read "guns, germs and steel" by jared diamond, and I would highly recommend it.
Anyway, another major change of the shift to farming is the appearance of many more diseases lethal to humans, due to the farmers living in close proximity to their animals. Many common diseases originated in domesticated animals and jumped over to humans.
Yeah, well, when you have finished comparing the comparative merits of RoR against the other options and find yourself carried along with the fresh-faced apple-shaped enthousiasm that it's riding on, go check up on your hosting. RoR is so ready for the maintime that it runs on, ooh, er, well your Mac basically.
Unless you have good control over the hosting environment, you can't deploy it.
Where is the apache dynamic module for this? And don't say it's FastCGI. It has to become as readily available as PHP in the hosting environment before it moves into the main stream.
I could be wrong. Just seems to be something they gloss over when they are talking it up.
Thanks. I did the math(s) and got 0.04167 email per user...
I don't think so. Observations can never prove a theory. All observations - ALL observations - include uncertainty and the best that can be shown is a good fit of the observational data to the theories predictions. And trying to calculate the EXACT uncertainty unfortunately produces another measure of uncertainty. Mathematical proofs can be derived to prove a means of calculating the degree of "fit" of observational data but that still doesn't get around the uncertainty problems encountered when handling any observational data.
Even that's doubtful...
"how to make a toy from a DVD" - zero hits.
It leaks out the same way the broadcast signal came in, my anonymous friend.
Of course, you can box your antenna in a faraday cage too, that'll work...but your reception may not be so crisp. Read some more of the www.tvlicensing.biz site you quoted to learn about that.
You're right. It's more a sub-orbital number.
Incidentally, I'd imagine your figures of energy input to the earth by the sun to be on the low side...what comes after zetta?
Well i don't know about feds, but here in the UK (and IANAL) I don't think that would be enough to hang you. They would have to find evidence on one of my computers to convict me: it would be too easy to construct a defence on the basis of having a unsecure WLAN (not actually a crime) and claiming it was unauthorised access. Without material evidence on my hard drive, i doubt they could convict. I surely HOPE that's the case!
And (allegedly) 90% of people respond that they are "above average". It's the other 10% I (sometimes) worry about...
And yes, this is a sampling of the output signal from the CCDs. So the camera could probably deliver higher resolution pixel values if the A/D convertor and file format supported it.
And your comment regarding 'cropping' is non-sensible so I ignored it.
You have a building A/C? That's not very anonymous...
OK, let me think about that. Block port 25 on basically every network interface on the planet. So now I can't access SMTP anywhere on the planet...so now I can't send email anymore.
That alone would eliminate 90% of SPAM out there,
Heh, I'd like to know what you think will happen to the other 10% of spam 'out there'? I think you 'eliminated' that too, huh?
That's one of the problems with the human caused extinction theory in australia. The dating of stone arrow-heads doesn't tie up with the extinction period.
"There is not a single stone-spearpoint in Australia until, at the very earliest, about 15,000 years ago - long after anyone thinks the megafauna went extinct," said co-author Dr Stephen Wroe, from the University of Sydney.
From the bbc news story
That doesn't get you in. Not quite.
Once you have swapped your MAC address to match another on the network, what happens next? How does the conflict resolve between two machines with the same MAC address? Not nicely...
To be stealthy you need to observe MAC addresses, then identify when a machine has disconnected from the network. Then you can walk up and take it's place at the table and eat its porridge - until it comes back. Then there's conflict again.
OK maybe not: the killer apps will more likely take advantage of the marriage of the two devices, building on top of them. And perl may well have a new niche as the thinking geeks glue, customising the functionality of the camera phone and creating a quick'n'dirty testing ground for new software ideas. Although, if that's so, perl is going to need GD or some other module with extensive graphics support built in too.
More, I would wager...several more. How about "going down too fast" for one?
And where I live in Brixton: "freshly urinated" too.
It's not a distance thing. It's a TIME thing. Fact is, there are many areas you could live in London that would have a longer commute to get to the center.