Slashdot Mirror


Glass Shapes Can Make Us Drink Too Much

Roland Piquepaille writes "Some people think that a glass is half empty while others see it as half full. But one thing is sure: some glasses are fuller than others. According to the British Medical Journal (BMJ), researchers from Cornell University and the Georgia Institute of Technology have shown that short glasses are more likely to lead to over-indulgence. In fact, people pour 20-30 percent more alcohol into short, wide glasses than into tall, narrow ones of the same volume. The researchers obtained similar results with students and professional bartenders. So, as New Year's Eve is coming, remember to use only tall glasses for your party!!!"

348 comments

  1. Warning by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    WARNING: The Bartender General has determined that beverage container appearances may be deceiving. It is recommended you use this to your maximum advantage with regard to the opposite sex.
    Seriously, some putz at the local pub insisted the Pint glasses there were only 14 fluid ounces. Having a few of same at home I whipped out my trusty graduated cylinder and measured the volume with great precision. The result was close to 16.5 fluid ounces. I keep waiting for an opportunity to make a $100 bet, but keep leaving the scienterrific equipment home.

    Wall thickness of glass containers can certainly be deceptive. For pint glasses it's usually about 3mm for the sides and as much as 1cm for the base. Notice how tiny a 16.9 oz. (500mL) water plastic bottle looks compared to a 12 oz. (355mL) bottle. Shape may account for some, but wall thickness is actually a considerable amount of volume within outer perimeter.

    In any event I'll be keeping it safe and sane this New Year's Eve by only drinking very expensive champagne. As soon as the money runs out I'll be on water, which should be about 1 hour and 3 hours before midnight.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bar I work at uses 14 ounce "pint" glasses.

    2. Re:Warning by Chmcginn · · Score: 2, Funny
      keep leaving the scienterrific equipment home.

      Is that like really, really fun science? You know, that kinda looks like a Calvin & Hobbes word. You didn't just get the boxed set for Christmas, did you?

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    3. Re:Warning by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      keep leaving the scienterrific equipment home.
      Is that like really, really fun science? You know, that kinda looks like a Calvin & Hobbes word. You didn't just get the boxed set for Christmas, did you?

      Science is always fun. I always keep a few bits of my scientific past around the house. Beakers for drinking tea out of, gram scales for whatever may arise. Micrometer. The Rubber Bible. Etc.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Warning by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      The bar I work at uses 14 ounce "pint" glasses.

      It's a bet you don't advertise that. The county I live in has weights and measures people who come around and threaten large fines if the glasses don't hold a pint and the barowner says they do.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:Warning by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny
      gram scales for whatever may arise.

      In my part of the world, that is measured in inches. Is this some new trend, using mass? Hey baby, I'm 700 grams.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    6. Re:Warning by pla · · Score: 1

      Science is always fun. I always keep a few bits of my scientific past around the house. Beakers for drinking tea out of, gram scales for whatever may arise. Micrometer.

      Although I agree fully, I'd suggest EXTREME caution there...

      When the RIAA gets the police to bust down your door, all that innocuous chemistry equimpent magically turns you into a "meth lab", or at the very least, transmutes into "paraphernalia" if they fail to find anything more incriminating in your home.

      You have the right to pursuit of happiness, so long as you don't enjoy anything more "suspicious" than football and beer. And don't go making too much beer, either!

    7. Re:Warning by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      You have the right to pursuit of happiness, so long as you don't enjoy anything more "suspicious" than football and beer. And don't go making too much beer, either!

      Then I'd probably best do something about the keg and CO2 cylinder I have up the upstairs closet, the boxes of dozens of empty Grolsch bottles, the 6.5 gallon brew kettle, the 5 gallon and 6 gallon carboys and all the yeast, barley and hops in the bottom drawer of the fridge.

      Glad you warned me!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:Warning by Tango42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      In the UK all pint glasses (and other sized glasses) that alcohol is served in are engraved with the size and an official coat of arms - it's illegal to use any non-standard glasses.

    9. Re:Warning by Krach42 · · Score: 4, Funny

      which should be about 1 hour and 3 hours before midnight.

      I think you need to lay off the alcohol already...

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    10. Re:Warning by WhatsAProGingrass · · Score: 1

      Great Idea...You made me think of selling graduated cylinders that are false to begin with. You can go into a bar and win all bets...cheating anyways.

      --
      Mark
    11. Re:Warning by krysolid · · Score: 1

      >> Wall thickness of glass containers can certainly be deceptive.

      So true ... your comment makes me think of Round Table Pizza back
      when I was a kid and everything started along this line of completely
      deceptive packaging and all pervasive advertising. They came up with
      mugs that seemed like normal mugs, heavy though they were, but the
      wall thickness was thick at the top, and inverted conical, so the
      bottom thickness was really bad, and the amount of liquid needed to
      fill it was minimal ... plus the ice at the top where there was some
      volume displaced the drink and watered it down. That is when I stopped
      going there.

    12. Re:Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember (insert your alcoholic drink here) goggles...
      He/She maybe the ugliest of the bunch but after a few drinks then he/she will be the one you want to screw and you can get out early from the bar. But next morning that will very surprise what you wake up next to and a monstrous hangover to boot and that will teach you.

    13. Re:Warning by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      I'm expecting the search warrant people to take all the beer bottles with them, so I don't have to throw them away.

      Damn, I'm a bad procrastinater...

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    14. Re:Warning by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      If I understand right, you can make 200 gallons a year non-commercially. After that, you need some sort of commercial license.

    15. Re:Warning by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Funny
      Seriously, some putz at the local pub insisted the Pint glasses there were only 14 fluid ounces. Having a few of same at home I whipped out my trusty graduated cylinder and measured the volume with great precision. The result was close to 16.5 fluid ounces. I keep waiting for an opportunity to make a $100 bet

      Hey will you take the same bet if there is some "putz" who insists the pint glass is 20 fl. oz? You don't mind visiting Canada or the UK do you?

    16. Re:Warning by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      You may want to download 9 coronas.

    17. Re:Warning by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      ... and for those of us running linux ... download the swf here and open it up in your browser.

    18. Re:Warning by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, who is the authority on alcohol serving containers? How do they decide what coat of arms to use?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    19. Re:Warning by drauh · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's not wall thickness but weight of the vessel. Or perhaps both, by which I mean density of the vessel.

      --
      This is a tautology.
    20. Re:Warning by name773 · · Score: 1

      don't governments these days have more pressing matters to attend to?

    21. Re:Warning by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Seriously, some putz at the local pub insisted the Pint glasses there were only 14 fluid ounces. Having a few of same at home I whipped out my trusty graduated cylinder and measured the volume with great precision. The result was close to 16.5 fluid ounces.

      Either way, a pint's 20 ounces, so you're both being ripped off.

      In any event I'll be keeping it safe and sane this New Year's Eve by only drinking very expensive champagne.

      Unless you're a millionaire, that's going to be one miserable New Year's Eve. You're going to have to drink it through a straw to get a buzz off that.

    22. Re:Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      god i hope not.

    23. Re:Warning by RollingThunder · · Score: 4, Informative

      In Canada, there's a unit under Industry Canada called Measurement Canada.

      http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/inmc-mc.ns f/en/Home

      If they say it's a pint, it has to be a pint. You can report a bar to this group and they will investigate, and cite if necessary (not listed on their site but was stated by a representative of theirs on a CBC Radio One show, I believe Quirks and Quarks).

    24. Re:Warning by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      I have a case of the bale-topped Grolsch style bottles in cobalt blue that I use for everything from water bottles to storing mead (oh, the joys of knowing people who make beers and wines).

      The real amusement comes when I work in the park during the summer in order to get out of the house while still getting something done. I take the laptop and a bottle of iced tea. The looks I get from the rather conservative people in this town are priceless...

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    25. Re:Warning by whitehatlurker · · Score: 2, Informative
      on a CBC Radio One show

      I think it might have been DNTO and Nick Purdon's quest for the true pint.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    26. Re:Warning by lorenlal · · Score: 1

      For some reason, I always thought that a pint was 2 cups, and a cup was 8 ounces... Anyone have some documentation? Links?

      Wait... Ego-centric american here... move along, move along..

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pint

    27. Re:Warning by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      In an effort to help some of our brothers who might be a little shorter in the pecker length department, we're going with mass measurements. It's all about the aspect ratio now. Stubby gets some respect.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    28. Re:Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      start at 8 end at 9

    29. Re:Warning by renehollan · · Score: 1
      Woe to the bartender who serves me a Guinness in anything other than a full Imperial pint glass. (This may allow for a modest amount of head of beer as arises when poured in the usual fashion from the tap: The Brittish courts have ruled that the head on a glass of beer is, indeed, beer.)

      That means 20 fluid ounces.

      I will accept a 16 fl. oz. serving of the American counterpart (I rather like Pyramid IPA (recently renamed "Thunderhead"), Red Hook IPA (a.k.a Ballard Bitter) and Sierra Nevada Pale Ale, as well as Samuel Adams Double Bock, depending on mood -- no "Miller", "Bud", or "Coors" shall ever pass my lips -- when I prefer an Ale to a Stout).

      As for Pilsner, there is only one Urquell (damn shame that bottles are usually skunked by the time they reach the U.S. west coast).

      Last time I was in Britian, I fancied having the perfect Black & Tan at the closest pub to the half-way point between Burton and Dublin, but never managed it. Just as well as it's a bit of abomination of both.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    30. Re:Warning by Arghdee · · Score: 1

      Speaking of warnings... If ever you come to Australia, be wary of the Darwin Stubby - only available for sale in the Northern Territory.
      The Darwin Stubby is a 2 litre glass bottle of beer.
      Darwin Stubby

    31. Re:Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, my pretentious-o-meter went off that scale after reading that post.

    32. Re:Warning by tuxette · · Score: 1

      In Norway, the authorities in charge of serving licenses will take random visits of bars, pubs etc. to make sure, among other things, that a half liter of beer really is a half liter. You're also allowed to report places you believe are underserving.

      --
      People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    33. Re:Warning by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Well, without reading TFA, my experience has been that it is indeed the shape that makes the difference.

      The reason is rather simple: people only account for the height of the glass when determining how much they want to pour. Tall glasses are easy: it's not difficult to determine 1/2, 1/3 or 1/4 of a tall glass. A tall glass allows you to start stopping pouring in time because it gives simple visual feedback; a short glass doesn't.

      The deceptiveness of short glasses is therefore just a bug^H^H^Hfeature of the human brain, which doesn't bother to solve integrals while pouring a drink.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    34. Re:Warning by Megahurts · · Score: 1

      There is a fairly good Pilsner available from Gordon Biersch, although my top choice from their brews is either the blonde bock or the marzen. I usually keep Biersch as a standby if I can't can't find Pete's Wicked Ale. The Pete's has been my favorite brew for the past 2 or 3 years. And I'm anxiously looking forward to the new year's eve. I found a growler of Oaked Arrogant Bastard. I'm not a huge fan of the standard AB but the oaked version consistently ranks among the top choices on a few beer snobbery sites I like to peruse. And I've also found myself rarely ordering Guinness in bars anymore. Most of the places I frequent that have Guinness also have Murphey's, and one or two frequently have Old Rasputin. I've never tried the true British Guinness so I can't really comment on what it is meant to be, but what get here is a dependable albeit upper-middle-of-the-pack stout, IMHO.

    35. Re:Warning by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      Most of Europe is like this as well. The folks that are clueless will tell you its left over from the war. I get told a lot of times by some of my drunk friends that they should just save the money and take the ration marks off the glasses.

      But anyway, if you're in Europe and buy a glass of something, there is always a measurement line on the glass so you know what you're getting.

    36. Re:Warning by trewornan · · Score: 2, Informative

      The authority is Her Majesty's Inspector of Weights and Measures and the coat of arms is not in fact a coat of arms but the Imperial Crown.

    37. Re:Warning by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      I've never tried the true British Guinness

      Really? It's good. Myself, I've never tried the true Canadian Big Mac, though I'm told it's an excellent burger.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    38. Re:Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gram scales for whatever may arise

      Nudge nudge, wink wink.

    39. Re:Warning by instarx · · Score: 1

      Seriously, some putz at the local pub insisted the Pint glasses there were only 14 fluid ounces. Having a few of same at home I whipped out my trusty graduated cylinder and measured the volume with great precision. The result was close to 16.5 fluid ounces. I keep waiting for an opportunity to make a $100 bet,

      Be careful where you bet. Many "pints" you order in bars really do come in glasses that don't hold a pint. Its up to the bar owner which type he buys. Those thin-walled glasses with the bulbous ring near the top - pints. Those thick-walled straight-sided conical glasses - likely not full pints.

    40. Re:Warning by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      That's because the UK takes it's beer very seriously.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    41. Re:Warning by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      Oh I got it after I posted my comment. But, as with most ambiguity, it's not funny until someone points it out to you.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    42. Re:Warning by RFC959 · · Score: 1

      It barely even nudged the needle on my meter; maybe yours needs recalibrating? Now, if he'd complained about the fact that his local grocery doesn't regularly carry every product from Unibroue or the difficulty of finding sufficient quantities of Hitachino Nest, we'd be getting somewhere.

    43. Re:Warning by bobster45 · · Score: 1
      No kidding!

      I was watching a pot bust on the shop "Cops" and the herbalist dude was also into making beer, which in the US is totally legal as long as you keep within the limits of the laws. When the cops were ransacking this poor grower's home they noticed a wort cooler (a coil of copper tubing you run cold water through to cool off your future beer so you can pitch your yeast quickly) which was assumed to be a still (or distillation apparatus) which if used is breaking the rules in most jurisdictions.

      Yup! your innocuous laboratory equipment can be used for illegal purposes and our constabularies are taught to assume that all of us succomb to the temtation to deviate from the goodness side to the evil side.

    44. Re:Warning by Tassach · · Score: 1

      100 gallons/year of Beer + 100 gal/yr of wine if there is only one adult in the household, 200+200 if more than one adult in the household. Homebrewed beer and wine cannot be sold.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    45. Re:Warning by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's why he has the micrometer!

    46. Re:Warning by trentblase · · Score: 1

      I still don't get it. Make it funny for me too!

    47. Re:Warning by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      which should be about (1 hour and 3 hours) before midnight.
      which should be (about 1 hour) and (3 hours before midnight).

      Parantheses added in order to indicate how the reading would happen.

      Basically, there's the problem of not being certain what the "and" connects together.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    48. Re:Warning by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Ah! You're absolutely right. It just seemed like such a Q&Q topic that I forgot where I actually heard it.

    49. Re:Warning by renehollan · · Score: 1
      Now, if he'd complained about the fact that his local grocery doesn't regularly carry every product from Unibroue [unibroue.com]

      Well, they don't carry every Unibroue product, but they do carry La Maudite which I enjoy from time to time.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    50. Re:Warning by renehollan · · Score: 1
      Hmm. I see Pete's Wicked Ale in my local grocery store but never tried it. Perhaps I should.

      Guinness doesn't travel well. That said, you can get a decent pint at the Downpatrick in downtown Whitby, ON, Canada.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    51. Re:Warning by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Oh... I understood that. It still wasn't funny. I guess I need to replace my comedy integration device.

    52. Re:Warning by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      Oh... I understood that. It still wasn't funny. I guess I need to replace my comedy integration device.

      Actually, even if the joke is impressively funny to begin with, once you explain the joke, it's not funny.

      So, don't worry, your CID is working fine. This one just missed the central activation unit, and your CID didn't trigger a response. Happens a lot.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    53. Re:Warning by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Wall thickness of glass containers can certainly be deceptive.

      It works both ways.

      Hoegaarden beer is served in a huge glass with really thick sides. Every time I've ordered it when I'm out with people, they're fairly convinced I've just received a bucket of beer.

      The glass has a 500cl (~ 1 pint) gradation painted on it, so one can be fairly sure it's not a bucket O' beer, but to look at, it's about 2x the size of a normal beer glass.

      I suspect the big, wide opening is to get the best aromatics/nose out of the beer (it's quite subtle/damned tasty). It looks like you're just been served a full litre ( ~ quart) of beer, but it's really just a big heavy-duty beast with a lot of glass in it.

      Cheers. =)
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    54. Re:Warning by albyrne5 · · Score: 0

      How on earth is this a troll? Because he used to word "fag"? *sigh*

    55. Re:Warning by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      In most countries, "Guinness" is brewed locally under licence. I think it's brewed by Carlton United Brewery here in Australia (the same wonderful people who unleashed Foster's Lager on the world ... shudder). It's drinkable, but I'm assured by people who've been to Dublin that it's nothing like the real thing.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    56. Re:Warning by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Yeah - and it's all undrinkable.

      Seriously, I got given a Darwin Stubby once, and the contents were truly awful. I'd rather drink Southwark Bitter.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    57. Re:Warning by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Actually, the determining factor in the glass shape is that hole in the top.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    58. Re:Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my part of the world, if you have scales, I want an eighth of your dankest weed.

  2. It all depends! by MikeFM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Use short glasses when someone else is buying the liquor, tall when you are.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:It all depends! by MarkusQ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Use short glasses when someone else is buying the liquor, tall when you are.

      Use short for your date, tall for you.

      --MarkusQ

      P.S, To my wife (who also reads /.): I'm just kidding of course. I never did that. Especially since I met you.

    2. Re:It all depends! by metlin · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Nah.

      Use long glasses if you are trying to get laid and short ones if you're trying to get the other person laid.

      Wait. Make sure the chick drinks off the short glass, or if you are a chick, drink off the short glass.

      Never mind. Drink up, and it'll all be a lot clearer.

    3. Re:It all depends! by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      That doesn't work because the person paying for the drink is still spending the same amount of money anyway. So short glasses for all!

    4. Re:It all depends! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Not if you're paying for the liquor rather than for the drink. ie If you're the bar or serving drinks at home. :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    5. Re:It all depends! by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Tall? Wide? Geeezzz.... So many choices.... I think I'll drink straight from the bottle...

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    6. Re:It all depends! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      No better way to pick up chicks than the styling look of slurping from the bottle.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    7. Re:It all depends! by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      I don't pick them up, I lay them down... Geezzz... No wonder you are not getting laid!

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    8. Re:It all depends! by jimbolaya · · Score: 1
      P.S, To my wife (who also reads /.): I'm just kidding of course. I never did that. Especially since I met you.

      If your wife is anything like my ex-girlfriend, that statement ("Especially since I met you.") did nothing to make her feel better. She'd prefer to think that I used that trick only on her, and that I was a monk before meeting her. Even though neither one of us were exactly angels before we met.

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    9. Re:It all depends! by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      I dunno; I'm willing to bet that he knows his wife better than you do.

    10. Re:It all depends! by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      My wife doesn't read Slashdot, but she sure as hell knows when I'm on it - even from another room. Its like she's got detatchable eyes and she leaves them in the office or something - its crazy. I'll be reading and I'll hear "You've been on Slashdot for long enough!" from the living room... I don't get it.

    11. Re:It all depends! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      You've never tried it while holding them? You're missing out! In the pool is the best because it's so little strain to hold them up with you.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    12. Re:It all depends! by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

      My wife doesn't read Slashdot, but she sure as hell knows when I'm on it - even from another room. Its like she's got detatchable eyes and she leaves them in the office or something - its crazy. I'll be reading and I'll hear "You've been on Slashdot for long enough!" from the living room... I don't get it. Which one of you maintains your home network?

      --MarkusQ

    13. Re:It all depends! by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      Oh, I do - while she could figure out a port scanner, her laptop is right in front of me 90% of the time. Its creepy dude.

    14. Re:It all depends! by darkonc · · Score: 1
      It's the silence.

      There's a certain kind of non-motion when you're reading slashdot -- as opposed to, say watching TV or playing with the cat. It makes a certain ammount of sense to me.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  3. Huh? by Animus+Howard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Shouldn't that be "use only short glasses"? It's New Year's Eve, after all.

    1. Re:Huh? by laura203 · · Score: 1

      I believe the comment was meant to imply that if you're hosting a party, you'll save money by providing less alcohol to your guests. Or perhaps you're supposed to be the morality police for your friends and not let them get wasted.

      However, champagne flutes are pretty consistent in size and shape, and sparkling wine is the traditional drink.

    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...not for a bunch of nerdy pussy-ass lame geeks, like anyone who has a /. account.

    3. Re:Huh? by jimbolaya · · Score: 1
      Oh come now. We, Slashdot readers, are all geeks, whether we post anonymously or with an account. And referring to the site with punctuation is hardly going to convince anyone that you are any different.

      So, hoist your glass--short and wide or tall and narrow--and toast our geekiness. For the geek shall inherit the earth!

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    4. Re:Huh? by Tekgno · · Score: 1

      Of course, this was another article submitted by Roland. I will leave the rant up to others, but wanting to use tall glasses for New Years Eve so one drinks less only goes to prove what a wanker he is.

    5. Re:Huh? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      This whole thing cracks me up that it is under "science".

      The study looks pretty weak, if not borderline unethical.

      Beer pint glasses and pilsner glasses are graduated from top to bottom. I would bet that the last 2 ounces are finished more quickly than the first 2. Big deal. At least I know that is what I do. I chug the last bit, and ask for another. With that one, I sip on it for a while.

      Also, small glasses typically have more potent stuff in them. Shot glasses are small, tapered glasses as well, but nobody sips those. They go in seconds. I would imagine the average would be 1 with a standard deviation of 100ms. New study!

      Wine glasses are smaller than beer glasses. Rocks glasses are bigger than wine glasses but smaller than most beer glasses.

      Also, keep in mind that alcohol _must_ be drunk out of glass. Screw cans unless you like a soar lip and the vibrant taste of aluminum in your mouth. Plastic is better for fresh drinks, only cheap liquor comes in plastic bottles.

      Be careful driving. Either don't drink, or don't drink too much. Its not worth it.

      I love those 32oz mugs at Mexican restaurants. I know of no other place in the US that regularly serves those.

    6. Re:Huh? by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      don't keep your friends sober because of a budget. get a cheaper booze if you can't afford it.

      ffs it's new years eve and you won't have to work next day, have some damn fun. if nothing else helps to get into a good mood, then massive amounts of booze will help you out...

      actually you can have fun on new years eve with a sober head but you really need a good company for this, and good company is hard to find in 2005/2006 :(


      everybody who's planning to use narrow glasses and staying sober on the new year party please rise your hand ! didnt think so ...

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    7. Re:Huh? by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      Yes, and always remember the number 1 rule for a good party: never run out of booze!

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    8. Re:Huh? by trentblase · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a pint or pilsner glass that is graduated from top to bottom.

  4. Uh.. by Threni · · Score: 0, Redundant

    > So, as New Year's Eve is coming, remember to use only tall glasses for your
    > party!!!"

    Don't you mean "remember to use only *short* glasses..." ?

    1. Re:Uh.. by cazzazullu · · Score: 1

      Not when you have to pay...

      --
      int main(void) {while(1) fork(); return 0;}
    2. Re:Uh.. by Threni · · Score: 1

      It's a party - you've already paid, and now you're serving. Short glasses mean the drink goes further.

  5. Why the hell... by psykocrime · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you mean by "drink too much??"

    --
    // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
    1. Re:Why the hell... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Do you mean by "drink too much??"

      You'll know it was too much when you wake up with a hangover and the headache of pulling your life back together while paging the jailer to give you the phone to call someone up to bail you out.

      A friend got busted within 300 feet of his house, after driving 25 miles, over winding, twisting mountain roads (all alike.)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Why the hell... by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe you know you've had too much to drink when you can no longer distinguish the difference between the words "Why" and "What".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Why the hell... by bhima · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      yep... and "A good friend will come bail you out of jail, but a true friend will be sitting next to you saying...'Damn that was fun!'"

      Props for the Zork ref.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    4. Re:Why the hell... by value_added · · Score: 1

      Do you mean by "drink too much??"

      If it's beer you're talking about, then one standard pint glass represents a good time, two pints represents a really good time, and three is a party. Anything over three is usual subject to local laws and can get you in trouble with the missus, the neighbours, or otherwise prevent you from finding your way home and, thus can be considered too much.

      American beer, for similar reasons, is best served in small glasses, and chilled to the extreme to kill the taste.

    5. Re:Why the hell... by ranton · · Score: 1

      Damn, talk about a light weight. Three beers is what you drink while you are getting ready to pregame before you head to the party and drink. If you get a buzz from 3 beers then you are either an 110 pound female or you havent eaten anything for 3 days.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    6. Re:Why the hell... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      If you get a buzz from 3 beers then you are either an 110 pound female or you havent eaten anything for 3 days.

      Or you're drinking Firkin Dogbolter. I doubt you could get drunk on American beer no matter how much you drink.

    7. Re:Why the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's blood in my alcohol supply!

    8. Re:Why the hell... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      American beer, for similar reasons, is best served in small glasses, and chilled to the extreme to kill the taste.

      It has taste? I started drinking only European beer and stuff from microbreweries because most American beer has no taste. There is a reason they say American beer is like making love in a canoe.

    9. Re:Why the hell... by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 1

      I get a mild buzz from a single bottle of Dogfish Head World Wide Stout. It's made in Delaware, and weighs in at 18% ABV...

      American craft beer is good. Bud/Miller/Coors sucks. But so does most commercial beer (fucking InBev...).

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
    10. Re:Why the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um guess what. your friend is an idiot for driving drunk...

      his lack of responsibilty is the problem, not the amount he drank.

    11. Re:Why the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you're drinking Firkin Dogbolter. I doubt you could get drunk on American beer no matter how much you drink.

      Like the mass marketed Euroweenie beer is any better.

      Seriously, is slashdot frequented by little girls? Who the hell tries to get wasted on beer? Everclear is for men. And real men, not those euroweenie's sipping their 12 percent alcohol beer thinking they're men. But if you're a European man who wants to try it, you can soak some cherries(as that's what most European men are) in Everclear for 24 hours and eat them. This is the way American women get drunk off of everclear, so if European men use the technique carefully, they might be okay.

    12. Re:Why the hell... by dickens · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but if you don't get a mild buzz from 3 beers of any sort, you are a mid-stage alcoholic. Don't feel too bad, you're in good company.

      I top 300 lbs, with a lean body mass of over 200, and one pint of decent ale gives me a mild buzz. I'd still drive (sans kids) after 2, but not after 3.

      I can't actually get drunk on anything other than tequila shots these days. Otherwise I'd just get sick first.

    13. Re:Why the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or real hoppy ale at a real English pub... The only way you're going to make it past 4 pints is if you've got a genitically engineered liver (though being Irish does help in this regard, it's not a safe bet), or you made the trip from your home in the higher parts of the Rockies, Alps, or the Himayalayas by airplane, and your body hasn't had the chance to adjust in the oxygen absorbtion department. I, for instance, can go to the caribbean and suck down rum like it was water, but of course, I live at nearly 8000 feet. It's damned difficult to even get a buzz, but winning the drinking games makes up for it :)

    14. Re:Why the hell... by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      I get a buzz from 3 beers, but i weigh 135lbs, and only drink maybe once a month.

      I honestly like it, makes the bar tab much easier to pay.

      And I dont like to be able to see thru my beer. Stouts and Porters are where its at.

    15. Re:Why the hell... by piltdownman84 · · Score: 1

      Damn Right. Three beers is what you pre-drink at home before going pre-drinking at a friends. Sports games pre-drinking for me is normally a four pack of Guinness. Hmmm, Guinness. There are some exceptions to this. I never pre-drink for premiership or champions league soccer while here in Canada. Just something wrong about pre-drinking for sports games that start before noon. You have to wait until kickoff before you can drink ;)

      And before M.A.D. people start yelling, please note that I always cab it, even when I have only had a single drink. Not because i'm drunk but out of principle and the fact that once I got a 24 hour suspension because I had a drink with dinner. What a jerk that cop was, I blew under and he wouldn't let me walk a line or any of the stuff you see on tv to see if you are drunk. Just I admitted I was drinking so I was busted. After that I never have taken my chances again.

    16. Re:Why the hell... by Leebert · · Score: 1

      And you're still not old enough to legally drink, Clinton. :)

    17. Re:Why the hell... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      American beer, for similar reasons, is best served in small glasses, and chilled to the extreme to kill the taste.

      Bah, you haven't been to the US in quite a while or take it. Either that or you come to the US and drink Budweiser, Coors or some other crap. Don't DO that!

      Many of our locally crafted beers are quite tasty, but are never shipped to Europe. I'm a big fan of the amber beers from the American West Coast (Mostly around Seattle, Portland and San Francisco)-- it's hard to get anything like that in Western Europe or the UK, although I've had some small batches of great amber brews in the Czech Republic and Austria.

      And I'll admit that I've never been to Belgium.

    18. Re:Why the hell... by relifram66 · · Score: 1

      Waaaait.... Thrs a diffrnc??

    19. Re:Why the hell... by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 1

      sssshhhh!

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
    20. Re:Why the hell... by coopaq · · Score: 1
      I believe you know you've had too much to drink when you can no longer distinguish the difference between the words "Why" and "What".

      What are going to pick on the why guy for after this is a what are why anyway... hiccup.

    21. Re:Why the hell... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Bah! If it's liquid gold, it's beer, drink it. If it's black, it's fuckin vegemite, get some toast.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    22. Re:Why the hell... by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      Try drinking Budweiser, Coors, Miller or Michelob at a decent beer-serving temperature: they have taste alright. A nasty, foul, disgusting taste which no-one would willingly subject himself to, which is why American megabrews are served ice cold.

      Of course, one should never consider American microbrews to be in the same category as the megabrews. I rather think that, all told, we have the healthiest brewing culture in the world--and I've travelled to England, Belgium & Germany.

    23. Re:Why the hell... by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      There are a lot of excellent American beers; the craft brewing revolution really did pay off. I've been to England, Belgium & Germany and I gotta say that I missed Colorado. English beers are the best, but they don't seem to have a very vital scene. Belgium has a lot of different types of beer, but many of them are an acquired taste. German beer is almost all lagers, and thus just not that interesting.

      But Rockies Brewing's Hazed & Infused! Tommyknocker's Maple Nut Brown! Odell's 90 Shilling (which is sadly no longer as good as it was); New Belgium's La Follie, and so on & so forth. And Washington & Oregon are even better than we are!

    24. Re:Why the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt you could get drunk on American beer no matter how much you drink.

      Right, you've never tried craft beers. Educate yourself!.

      And FYI, if a bottle of 10% abv Stone's Double Bastard doesn't do you in that means you have a serious problem.

    25. Re:Why the hell... by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      If i can see thru it, theres too much water.

    26. Re:Why the hell... by Tassach · · Score: 1
      Sorry, but if you don't get a mild buzz from 3 beers of any sort, you are a mid-stage alcoholic
      Bullshit. Your tolerance to alcohol can be influenced by how much you drink, but that is not the only factor. People have naturally different tolerances to alcohol. I've got a naturally high tolerance for alcohol -- 3 beers does nothing for me, unless it's something particuarly potent -- and I don't drink very frequentley (maybe 2x a month).
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  6. Excellent advice by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have found that after switching to this glass not only do I typically only fill it half full, I rarely even finish it all.

  7. Glass shapes? by andreMA · · Score: 5, Funny

    Silly me. I thought it was the alcoholism.

    1. Re:Glass shapes? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Silly me. I thought it was the alcoholism.

      An optimist sees a glass that's half full.
      A pessimist sees a glass that's half empty.
      An alcoholic sees a glass with room for more.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Glass shapes? by GMontag451 · · Score: 2

      An engineer sees a glass that is twice as large as it needs to be.

  8. Does it work with non-alcoholic beverages as well? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Most Americans are dehydrated most of the time. Few of us drink the 64 ounces of liquid we're supposed to. Can we use this effect to our advantage as well as our disadvantage?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  9. editorial mistake. by RingDev · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "So, as New Year's Eve is coming, remember to use only tall glasses for your party!!!"

    I think you have that backwards, we want to use the short fat glasses.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:editorial mistake. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      The only problem with that is that by midnight you've also ended up with the short fat women.

      ObDisclaimer: I am tall, but fat. I am male, but have a sense of humor. If you were planning to reply to this comment in anger, please consider getting one as well.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:editorial mistake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother with the glasses? We just pass a few bottles around along with the.. umm.. pretty flower vase. You're gonna have to get these things right before Tigerman starts picking up your bad habits.

      -sparX

    3. Re:editorial mistake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no. You can drink 'em pretty, but you can't drink 'em thin.

    4. Re:editorial mistake. by RingDev · · Score: 2, Informative

      "You can drink an ugly girl pretty, but you can't drink a fat girl thin"

      I can't remember who to attribute that to though.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    5. Re:editorial mistake. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah but there's beer goggles, and beer brain. You can't make the goggles make 'em thin but you can pickle your brain to the point where you don't care...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:editorial mistake. by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Beer + Google = Pretty Girls?

      err, oh, goggles, my bust.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  10. You got it backwards by NitsujTPU · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So, as New Year's Eve is coming, remember to use only tall glasses for your party!!!

    Won't all of the real party animals be using the shorter glasses then? I tend to drink pretty lightly, but most of my friends...

    1. Re:You got it backwards by Caspian · · Score: 2, Funny

      The real party animals won't be reading SlashDot ;)

      --
      With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
    2. Re:You got it backwards by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      I was the first to post on this.. There were 3 posts before me. How am I redundant?

  11. I had a math teacher say something similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except it was the reason that geometry wasn't taught at an earlier age. Children were unable to grasp that a tall skinny container could hold the same volume as a short and wide container.

  12. At the bottom by quokkapox · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The shape of the glass is irrelevant.

    You'll never find the answer at the bottom.

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    1. Re:At the bottom by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the answer is usually at the bottom of the bottle, not the glass!

      =Smidge=

    2. Re:At the bottom by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The shape of the glass is irrelevant.
      You'll never find the answer at the bottom.


      But hopefully, by the time you get to the bottom, you forgot why you started that drink...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:At the bottom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well thank you, Captain Bring-Down.

    4. Re:At the bottom by AxemRed · · Score: 1

      That depends on what question you're asking. ;)

    5. Re:At the bottom by tipsymonkey · · Score: 1

      But at least it will make you forget the question.

    6. Re:At the bottom by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      Well, not at the bottom of that glass, but maybe the next one...

    7. Re:At the bottom by zev1983 · · Score: 1

      That's why you always get a refill before then.

  13. I wonder why by rob_squared · · Score: 0

    I wonder why marketing firms haven't realized this sooner, and utilized it to sell more.

    --
    I don't get it.
    1. Re:I wonder why by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1
      I wonder why marketing firms haven't realized this sooner, and utilized it to sell more.
      Good question. I figured it out way back in kindergarten. Ok, I admit I'm bragging here, but I do remember an exercise the teacher performed with the class using a graduated cylinder, a tall skinny glass, and a short fat glass. She filled the tall glass to a higher level than the short one than asked us which had more water in it (the short one did, in case you couldn't guess). I was the only one who got it right. To answer your question, see if you can guess who from my class went on to study engineering and who went on to study marketing (or in more cases, get stoned and drop out of high school).
    2. Re:I wonder why by ABoerma · · Score: 1

      They have. 'A certain brand of caffeinated beverages' has developed glasses that always seem emptier than you'd like them to.

    3. Re:I wonder why by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      and who went on to study marketing (or in more cases, get stoned and drop out of high school).

      Eh, same thing.

    4. Re:I wonder why by budartagnan · · Score: 1

      Given that the professor in question is, in fact, a professor of marketing, I'd say it's only a matter of time. Prof. Wansink does most of his work on these and similar topics, typically focusing on portion sizes and perception. I worked with him at his previous school on a couple studies- it's interesting research that has real application for food marketers. For example, people are likely to eat more calories worth of miniature cookies than full size cookies because we have a hard time distinguishing what a proper portion is.

  14. My observation by mister_llah · · Score: 4, Funny

    People who drink out of bottle shaped glasses tend to drink more than even those who use short glasses!

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
    1. Re:My observation by zardo · · Score: 1

      I prefer drinking out of the jug, Carlo Rossi wine jug. If I could lift the damn carboy in my basement I'd drink right out of that!

  15. Not surprising by squoozer · · Score: 1

    I, for one, am not surprised by this. It's hard to judge small volumes in a wide based container, especially by eye. It's nowhere near as hard on a tall thin container.

    I wonder what would happen, though, if they took it to the extreme and had a very tall and thin container. My guess would be that you would again find over indulgence simply because the container dimentions are outside what people are used to.

    Where can I sign up for the study?

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re:Not surprising by Chmarr · · Score: 1

      I think a better way to put this would be: We tend to underestimate what the width and especially the 'invisible' depth of a glass will factor the volume at a particular height.

    2. Re:Not surprising by blair1q · · Score: 2, Insightful

      About 15 years ago bars started selling novelty shots in test tubes.

      I have no idea whether it makes a difference, because once people start ordering shots, the party's only started.

    3. Re:Not surprising by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      I think it's more likely that the height of the liquid (regardless of width) affects how much we think is in the glass. Once a tall thin glass is 3/4 full we think "Wow that's a lot of drink" and wouldn't fill it right up to the top. But a short fat glass is still a short glass and would probably end up being filled to nearly the brim.

    4. Re:Not surprising by Chmarr · · Score: 1

      But we're not so stupid that to think that a short fat glass, and a long tall one, with the same 'height' liquids has the same amount of liquid in it. We simply underestimate the increase in volume that the extra width, and depth, causes.

    5. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the fact that the volume increases linearly with respect to height and quadratically with respect to girth may have more to do with it than anything else. E.g. a glass twice as wide will have four times the volume.micr

  16. Further Study by gbulmash · · Score: 5, Informative
    They reported this on NPR last night ("All Things Considered") and tested two Washington DC bartenders who turned out to be pretty accurate. One was spot on, the other went against the study and actually filled the tall glass a smidge more.

    The real trick to this is the "four pour". With a certain standardized spout that they attach to bottles in most bars, you start pouring, count to four, and you're pretty close to the 1.5 ounce mark. This is what's taught in most bartending schools, and if the bartenders stick with it instead of trying to eyball the amount, they get it right much more often.

    - Greg

    1. Re:Further Study by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      The count varies. My girlfriend is a bartender and has a three count. Another girl at her bar is unfortunate enough to have a 3.5 count. Part of their training is using a vodka bottle filled with water, pouring (with a pourer attached) into a beer glass, and then pouring the beer glass's contents into a shot glass to see how they did. They do this every once in a while when they aren't busy to make sure they are pouring accurately.

      This is necessary because of mixed drinks and such. It would be a waste of time and dishes if they measured with a shot glass. Also, some drinks call for half shots and even 3/4 shots of particular liquors.

    2. Re:Further Study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One was spot on, the other went against the study and actually filled the tall glass a smidge more.

      You could explain this with technique, but it's much more likely that they overcompensated after hearing about the study.

    3. Re:Further Study by Dominic+Burns · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge, properly measured drug doses are mandatory for all commercial instances in the UK.

      Now let me see your ID, Citizen.

    4. Re:Further Study by soliptic · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The real trick to this is the "four pour". With a certain standardized spout that they attach to bottles in most bars, you start pouring, count to four, and you're pretty close to the 1.5 ounce mark

      I'm confused.

      Don't you have "optics" in the USA?

      Over here, the amount of alcohol you get isn't at the whim of the bartender. Spirit bottles are hung with optics which are of a standardised size (usually 35ml, IIRC, but it can vary -- regardless, the volume used in a particular establishment must be clearly advertised on a notice somewhere near the bar). The barman/barmaid simply pushes the glass against the optic; it discharges until it's empty; they remove the glass, now containing a standard measure; the optic refills ready for the next shot.

      Relying on the bar staff to count to four sounds absolutely ridiculous to me. How fast do you count? If I'm paying a given, standard amount of money for a shot, I want to know I'm getting my money's worth, not a smaller volume! Of course, this means you can't get a larger volume, too, but hey...

    5. Re:Further Study by spencerogden · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes but here we aren't as anal about the amount of alcohol we serve. No marks on our pint glasses and and bartenders free hand. As a bartender its much faster than using those silly dispensers, and when done right, its accurate enough.

    6. Re:Further Study by drsquare · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You're supposed to use a measuring thing, or optics, not measure it out by hand. That's just asking for arguments.

      This is what's taught in most bartending schools,

      Bartending school? If you need to go to school to work out how to pull a lever, operate a till and get packets of pork scratchings from a box on the floor, then you've got problems. What next, burger flipping school?

    7. Re:Further Study by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      What we need is digital optics. Keep the transparent bit the same, but have clear markings every 1/4 volume. Then a short press upwards with the glass dispenses 1/4 volume, a longer press 1/2, and longer still the full volume.

      Nah, I'm thinking too deep here. Just a good bartender will do.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    8. Re:Further Study by gbulmash · · Score: 1
      Worth noting was that the bartender who was spot on claims he doesn't even look. He uses a count so his eyes don't deceive him.

      I'd guess the count varies based on how slow/fast you count, but if you practice enough, you know how long you have to count to get the right amount. Generally, though, it's called the "four pour".

      I didn't go to bartending school, but when I worked in a restaurant, I'd run the bar an hour a day when I wasn't running the computer systems. That's how I know about the four pour, because that's what I was taught by the bartender.

      - Greg

    9. Re:Further Study by ari_j · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Evidently "bartender" does not mean the same where you are as it does where I am. Here, a bartender is generally a mixologist - someone skilled at and knowledgeable about mixing drinks. Pouring a draught beer is easy. Expertly and stylishly making a Long Island Iced Tea or a Lemon Cheesecake Martini, or even for that matter just making a good gin martini, takes a lot more skill than that.

      American bartenders are sometimes hired with no training and learn on the job - this is actually very common. But many people attend a bartending school to get the basics and learn about 100 drinks to start them off. I have done this, and it was a great experience even though I have not worked in a bar since before I went to the school for it. (Note that it's generally 40 hours of training, not an associate's degree or anything.)

      As to using an "optic" (although I had not heard it called that until this thread, I know what you refer to), American patrons despise the things. Also, they do not measure anything but one-shot increments, so if you are making a drink that requires 1-1/2 oz. of one liquor, 1 oz. of another, 3/4 oz. of another, and 1/2 oz. of a fourth, you can't do it with such a device. Using measuring glasses is also problematic because they only tend to come in 1 oz. and 1-1/2 oz. sizes.

      Counting is also not a good idea, as each bartender will have his or her own count. Basically, you practice pouring with the spout until you can personally accurately pour every quantity of liquor you will foreseeably need. That means 1/4 oz., 1/2 oz, 3/4 oz., 1 oz., 1-1/2 oz., and then you can work from there to get any greater quantity you might need (although more than 2 oz. is rare in mixed drinks, and even more than 1-1/2 oz. is somewhat uncommon).

      Bartenders learn to do this by feel. Part of it is counting, part is watching the liquor, and part is just the feel of it pouring out of the bottle. It comes with experience.

      Like I said, in America "bartender" is a very different job from much of the rest of the world.

    10. Re:Further Study by coke_scp · · Score: 1

      Bartending schools? What about variety? Is there some section of the country that doesn't have ALOT of bartenders that are just alcoholics/potheads that just like the job and figure it out on the way? I've not actually encountered a bartender that went to bartending school. Maybe it's because I don't use gel in my hair?

    11. Re:Further Study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just slug it...I mean, noone's really going to complain that their drink's too strong, are they??!


      http://www.cloudburst.freewebsitehosting.com/

    12. Re:Further Study by drsquare · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Evidently "bartender" does not mean the same where you are as it does where I am. Here, a bartender is generally a mixologist - someone skilled at and knowledgeable about mixing drinks.

      Unless you live in some pretentious yuppie place where drinks are $20 each I very much doubt in order to be a barman you need to mix complicated drinks. Even in America, I doubt that when Bill the redneck from Texas goes into a bar after a shift at the hardware store he asks for a 'Lemon cheesecake martini'.

      Like I said, in America "bartender" is a very different job from much of the rest of the world.

      In the rest of the world we drink beer, wine and spirits, maybe Americans are different.

    13. Re:Further Study by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      I've seen those occasionally, but typically only in expensive places. Telling the bartender to count to four is a lot cheaper than buying equipment.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    14. Re:Further Study by flathead_iv · · Score: 1
      In the rest of the world we drink beer, wine and spirits, maybe Americans are different.


      Prohibition had a big impact on how Americans drink alcohol, even today. During prohibition, much of the available alcohol was made locally and illegally. Needless to say, it tasted terrible.


      Mixing other ingredients to kill the taste became popular, and eventually turned into a part of American culture.

    15. Re:Further Study by nuffle · · Score: 1

      No, most bars in the US (at least in the dozen states in which I've frequented bars) do not use them. In fact, I think most Americans resent them. My personal opinion is that I want the bartender to have the discretion to make me a strong drink if he or she wants.

      My general feeling from the bars I've been to is that the drinks are poured on the generous side. If a bartender consistently pours a weak drink, people will remember and won't go back to that bar. On the other hand, if the bartender likes you (and I'm a very likeable guy, which may account for my opinions on this matter) he can pour you a good one. I once had a vodka and cranberry poured for me in a pint glass with just the faintest whisper of pink cranberry juice added.

      In other words, not having specific measures will usually benefit you in all but the crappiest bars. And it is usually, in fact, the crappy bars that resort to using optics (I have never heard of that word for it, by the way, before you used it).

      There is one state in the US that, until recently, had an odd law. South Carolina law said that all liquor had to be poured from mini-bottles (like you get in airplanes or hotels). Article here.

    16. Re:Further Study by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Even in America, I doubt that when Bill the redneck from Texas goes into a bar after a shift at the hardware store he asks for a 'Lemon cheesecake martini'.

      That is one of the most ignorant things I have ever heard. You really ought to learn a little before you try to judge other countries. I bet you consider all Americans to be inherently ignorant of the world around them, while you're at it. If so, you're a hypocrite. If not, then you're just ignorant, which is a curable condition.

    17. Re:Further Study by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      Where's the fun in that. Over here in Canada (or at least this small town in the heart of BC), the bartenders all use 1 ounce shot glasses to measure the alcolhol. And if you find a bartender that likes you, they keep pouring from the bottle between shots (so a double is actually closer to 2.5 or even 3 ounces). :)

      Of course, most of the alcolhol is watered down (shittiest Smirnoff you'll ever taste is in the bar) beforehand, so it all balances out in the end. :)

      Some of the bars here use pre-measured mixes for the most popular drinks, and dispense the alcohol from the little guns with a bunch of buttons on it (like for fountain pop).

  17. Georgia Tech by metlin · · Score: 5, Funny


    Heh, given the lack of women here at Georiga Tech, it is no wonder that the only possible research is in analyzing alchohol and alchohol glasses.

    The only other possible research alternative would have been to analyze network cable lengths, but then you get into cliched-joke territory.

    Funny anecdote - a graduate student here asked a prof for a good hangout, and he recommended a place right across our research lab. Dude took his girlfriend there, only to realize that it's a strip club. Hilarity ensued. And of course, the same prof usually offered free beer and pizza if you came to his saturday meetings.

    Now you know why they do research into alchohol glasses here at Tech.

    1. Re:Georgia Tech by MostlyHarmless · · Score: 1

      In a similar vein, it should not be surprising that the students participating in the study were gathered from the University of Illinois, where (to quote a columnist from the Daily Illini) weekends start on Thursday and St. Patrick's Day is celebrated between two and four times per year.

      ObDisclaimer: most of those shenanigans are on the other side of campus from the engineering dorm....

      --
      Friends don't let friends misuse the subjunctive.
    2. Re:Georgia Tech by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      Funny anecdote - a graduate student here asked a prof for a good hangout, and he recommended a place right across our research lab. Dude took his girlfriend there, only to realize that it's a strip club. Hilarity ensued.

      Was the Prof's name Richard Feynman?

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    3. Re:Georgia Tech by metlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope - it was Ramesh Jain.

    4. Re:Georgia Tech by LaTechTech · · Score: 1

      Ahhh...the Cheetah!

      Is the Wreck Room still open?

      As far as women at GT...don't forget about the wonderful Beauty Schools nearby.

      --
      I want my! I want my! I want my Eee PC!
    5. Re:Georgia Tech by metlin · · Score: 1

      Indeed! :)

      And of course, there is always UGA/GSU/Emory, but then again, there is always the slight problem of local competition. :-\

    6. Re:Georgia Tech by plsander · · Score: 1

      What's the ratio these days at Ma Tech, 1.5 to 1?

      Youngsters... We thought it was bad in the 80's at 3 to 1. Until I complained to a fellow co-op from Southern Tech (Southern Poly Tech to you young'ns ) and was briskly informed that southern had a ratio of 15:1.

      Is GTRI still doing research into a continuous brewing process for beer?

      I remember wet rush... Grumpy's, Pippin's, and when Junior's was next to the Engineer's book store.

      God I feel old.

      Escaped from Ma Tech's clutches in 1988 with a BS ICS...

    7. Re:Georgia Tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, given the lack of women here at Georiga Tech, it is no wonder that the only possible research is in analyzing alchohol and alchohol glasses.

      Is that like perscription beer goggles?

  18. After extenshive testing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    After extenshive testing I haff determined that the shshshort glasshes are the besht for extenshive testing porpuses.
    Now where the hell did I put my pants?

    Faversham, Mr. Domo.

  19. Myth by winkydink · · Score: 4, Informative
    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I knew there was a reason why I drink 3 cans of Dr. Pepper every day. Not for the caffeine, but for the carbonated water.

    2. Re:Myth by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I thought the myth was that water was a toxin- though it is in extremely large amounts, I'm talking about two quarts, or the infamous "Eight glasses a day" (yeah, right, if your glasses are only 8 ounces) put forth by the American Medical Association. Unfortuneately, my local proxy considers snopes "unsafe for work" so...

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the myth was that water was a toxin- though it is in extremely large amounts

      I don't think that is quite right. Though I did hear a case of someone dying from drinking too much water, IIRC he drank 5 litres a day, I believe the reason was something like the body loses vital vitamins and minerals when getting rid of the excess water. So while drinking too much can kill you, I don't think it is accurate to call it toxic even in extremely large doses.

    4. Re:Myth by BigCheese · · Score: 1

      The 8 glasses a day is a myth in many cases. However, increased fluid intake is needed if (like me) you have a history of kidney stones.
      I'm supposed to pass 2 liters of fluid a day to keep the kidneys flushed. There are some types of stones that require you consume a gallon of water a day 1/3 of which needs to be drunk at night.
      That would require some very short, very wide glasses.

      --
      The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
    5. Re:Myth by syukton · · Score: 4, Informative

      So use Google as a proxy:

      http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http://www .snopes.com/toxins/water.htm&langpair=en|en

      See the langpair=en|en bit? Translate from English...to English! I read about this trick on digg a few days ago.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    6. Re:Myth by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      When I was in the Army, they insisted that we drink 4 some canteens of water a day. (8 glasses of water equivalently) We were forced to drink one full canteen before going to bed, and we were given an accurate gauge of if we were dehydrated: if your piss was any more yellow than a tinge, then you were dehydrated.

      I would drink 2 canteens a day, and I would have clear piss. Of course, I also come from a desert, and I'm very accustomed to dehydration (not the fault of the desert, just me being a stupid umbs. Seriously, I've passed out from dehydration on at least 2 occations.)

      So, yes, it varies. Even with all the water they had us drink, there was one guy who passed out from dehydration (not me, with 2 canteens a day, I was quite well hydrated), obviously he needed more hydration than I.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    7. Re:Myth by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      That's a new one to me- I thought it was AMA based, apparently it isn't! Also, thanks for the trick. I do have chronic low blood pressure, so in the summer I usually need closer to three liters- about 12 cups or "glasses". In the winter, I usually slack off to one liter a day- nice to know that's correct.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    8. Re:Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no...no...NO! Common myth actually, it is actually Hydrogen-Dioxide which is the lethal element. Most people fail to discover the difference....until it is too late....than that is where they get laughed at.

    9. Re:Myth by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      For god sake don't drink dihydrogen monoxide! Won't somebody think of the children?

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    10. Re:Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HO2, eh? Glad I don't encounter that much.

    11. Re:Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't "lose" them. Normally, you have certain salts and other electrolytes dissolved in your blood plasma. If you drink a lot of water, the electrolyte concentration goes down, which activates your kidneys. They dump the excess water so that your electrolyte concentration remains relatively stable. However, if you're doing strenuous physical activity, you lose electrolytes through your sweat. This causes a double whammy effect, since your electrolyte concentration goes down for two different reasons. And if they go low enough, your muscles and brain can stop working. (Eventually. IANAD, but I read about this from a medical journal yesterday.)

    12. Re:Myth by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Aparently my admins are more strict, as the page remained blocked for me:

      URL: http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http://www .snopes.com/toxins/water.htm&langpair=en
      Category: Proxies & Peer-to-Peer

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    13. Re:Myth by trewornan · · Score: 1

      The hydroperoxy radical is curiously not particularly toxic.

    14. Re:Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excess quantities of water can also cause the brain to swell, which obviously has unpleasent and easily fatal consequences. It's not too uncommon to hear of this happening to someone who has taken Ecstasy (MDMA).

  20. Another explanation by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Although I don't think this is quite what the article is talking about, shorter glasses (think shot glasses) tend to be used for high alc. content drinks. OTOH, taller glasses tend to be used for beer, etc. Perhaps there's a relationship, too, between drinking too much and the type of booze, which could act as a lurking variable in the overall scheme of glasstype/drinking quantity correllation.

    --
    http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    1. Re:Another explanation by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I drink bourbon on the rocks. Sometimes it's served in a rocks glass (which I prefer), sometimes in a highball glass, sometimes in a pint glass (when I'm feeling frisky).

      I've definitely noticed that (aside from the pint glass), barteneders tend to pour more into the rocks glass (short and stout) than the highball glass (tall and thin).

      I think this happens regardless of what type of alcohol is being poured, but has more of an effect when you're drinking the unadulterated hard stuff.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Another explanation by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Tequila shot glasses, however, are tall compared to normal shot glasses, but I notice they are always filled to the very top.

    3. Re:Another explanation by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      They're talking about glasses of the same volume, but of differing dimensions. A shot glass and a beer glass hold rather different amounts of liquid, but since the beer glass contains beer, in which alcohol is less concentrated than the stuff that goes in shooters, they still have about the same alcohol content so they are a whole different problem.

      What we have here is a short but wide glass, and a narrow but tall glass, and both hold the same amount of liquid. It's easier to overpour when using the wider glass, and that's because it's wider, not because it's shorter. It's harder to eyeball how much you need to bring up the level of liquid in the wider glass because your accuracy automatically goes down the wider the container gets.

      Let's say you go to the extent of marking the glasses at the appropriate place that makes 1.5 ounces, and staring right at each line with reasonable care, and having decent reflex to stop pouring at what appears to be the right time. On the narrow glass, you seem to be just a 'hair' over the middle of the line. Ok that's pretty good. On the wider glass, also, you're just about a 'hair' over on that one too. We're talking a small amount of error here, but, still a larger error than on the narrow glass, because when you double the diameter of a circle, you've also multiplied the area by four. That 'hair' on the double-width glass is worth 4 'hairs' on the narrow one. Visually, when looked at from the side and compared with the line drawn on each glass, they both appear within the same tolerance, but you have to remember to compensate for the wider area, to go a bit lower to cover that in your estimate.

      A graduated cylinder, for precise measuring in a lab, is narrow for this reason, plus you get an easier visual on the surface tension as well which you can use to calibrate your perception of the height, using more than one mark to gauge your accuracy.

    4. Re:Another explanation by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      shorter glasses (think shot glasses) tend to be used for high alc. content drinks. OTOH, taller glasses tend to be used for beer, etc.

      My brother is partial to Manhattens and Long Island Iced Tea. Tall glasses, all booze. Well.. the Long Island has a "splash of cola for color."

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  21. Wouldn't that be... by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

    more reason to teach it earlier, not less? I find that most things that are "unable to grasp" just haven't been demonstrated well. If you took a foot-tall one quart container and a three-inch tall one quart container, and just transferred contents, I think that would be a good demonstration they're the same volume.

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  22. Some beer for that glass. by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    > I have found that after switching to this glass not only do I typically only fill it half full, I rarely even finish it all.

    I have found that after switching from 12-oz bottles (in which you cannot even find this BOFHiest of brews), to 22oz/750mL bottles (in which you can), to 3L bottles, even though I only typicallly fill glass your half full, I feel much better even if I rarely finish it all even.

    They say beer, it makes you dumb,
    It are go good with Slashdot.
    Now that I have drunk some beer,
    I will click "Submit".
    BEER IS GOOD! BEER IS GOOD! BEER IS GOOD! AND STUFF!
    BEER IS GOOD! BEER IS GOOD! BEER IS GOOD!
    Let's go drink some BEER!
    1. Re:Some beer for that glass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am so calling Sarah from their Distributors page; granted I don't live in Arizona but dang not only is she hot but I bet she can get me hooked up with some hugemongous beers.

    2. Re:Some beer for that glass. by Trailwalker · · Score: 1

      When I was a student in Germany, we would use one of these in a gasthaus for a group drunk. Biersteifel

      Passing one of these around and around the table was a waste of good German Bier, but we were young and didn't care.

    3. Re:Some beer for that glass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess this being /. may account for your taste...

  23. Re:Does it work with non-alcoholic beverages as we by dimension6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We should all switch to plates for our beverages.

  24. Insensitive clods by dangitman · · Score: 1

    I only use tetrahedral glasses when I drink alcohol. Where are the research results on those, huh?

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  25. One way to avoid the problem by leko · · Score: 1

    Just always fill it to the brim with alcohol.

    1. Re:One way to avoid the problem by srite · · Score: 1

      I dont run into these kind of problems after I started to drink straight off the bottle.

  26. half full... half empty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer to think that the glass is at half capacity.

    1. Re:half full... half empty... by Mahou · · Score: 1

      if the cup was at less than half capacity and then filled to halfway, then it is half-full.
      if the cup was at more than half capacity and then emptied to halfway, then it is half empty.

      the end. logic wins over 'feelings' yet again!

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    2. Re:half full... half empty... by DaveCar · · Score: 1

      I prefer to think that it's your round next ...

  27. hmm by Is0m0rph · · Score: 2, Funny

    So where do beer bongs fit into this study?

    1. Re:hmm by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

      Estimating volume is hard, estimating flow through a transluscent tube is pretty much impossible. It's just easier to count how long it lasts, and make sure they aren't putting any back pressure to make it last longer while consuming less.

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  28. estimate of stability? by hitmark · · Score: 1

    could it be that people put less into the glass because they worry about how stable the glass is going to be?

    i notice that when i have to deal with one of those tall, thin glasses i worry about how stable it will be. but those shorter, fatter ones (whiskey style i guess) i dont care as the weight will be very close to the table anyways.

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    1. Re:estimate of stability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those shorter, fatter ones
       
      Rocks glass, or Old fashioned Glass.

  29. mistake in headline by trybywrench · · Score: 1

    it should read "Ass Shapes Can Make Us Drink Too Much"

    --
    I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
  30. who uses glasses by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

    i drink straight from the bottle/can. at least for new year's anyway. maybe they should make taller bottles?

  31. Damnit! by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

    You stole my joke!

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  32. feh by EngMedic · · Score: 1

    glasses are so last week. Drinking Horns is where it's at! once you fill 'em, you can't put them down.

    --
    filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
  33. Alcohol is legal? by theheff · · Score: 1

    What? We can drink? You mean to tell me the prohibition days are over? Curse that 18th amendment and get me some Jack!

    1. Re:Alcohol is legal? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      long as the government gets its tax cut, yes you can drink. Pretty much they're like the prohibition era mob, get really violent if you don't give them their cut

  34. If the brain isn't ready... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    If the brain is not developed enough, you are simply demonstrating magic

    I've got your nose!

    Peek-a-boo! Where did I go?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:If the brain isn't ready... by Chmcginn · · Score: 1
      I've got your nose!

      Peek-a-boo! Where did I go?

      The second is an example of object permanence - any child old enough to talk should be past the idea that because they can't see something, it's magically vanished. (Although a few of my girlfriends in college were still apparently under that assumption.)

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  35. Researchers are wasting their time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I wonder what percentage of reseach is a waste of time. Bar owners have known this for years, probably millenia. Certainly where I'm from if you buy a jug of beer you'll get by default small glasses to drink it with.

    Its not that I doubt these fine fellows from these modern establishments are establishing the facts with scientific rigour. Its that I doubt the barkeep requires such a defence of his actions.


    Basically your daddy's money is being wasted on beer rather than proper research. And at your party you should provide a variety of glasses.


  36. And some glass shapes by 3waygeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    keep us from drinking anything at all.

  37. Half Full vs. Half Empty by DoktorSeven · · Score: 1

    The Four Basic Personality Types:

    "The glass is half-full!"
    "The glass is half-empty."
    "Half-full, no, wait, half-empty, no... could you repeat the question?"
    "Hey! I ordered a cheeseburger!"

    (from memory, sue me if I screwed it up)

    --
    This is a sig. Deal with it.
    1. Re:Half Full vs. Half Empty by Quakelord · · Score: 1

      A glass is neither half full nor half empty. To an engineer the glass is clearly twice the size it needs to be.

      --
      m00!
    2. Re:Half Full vs. Half Empty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the glass half empty of half full...who cares ?
      That much gasoline isn't going to kill anyone.

  38. Nothing can MAKE you drink too much by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    You have to WANT to drink [too much].

    One think is for damn sure, drinking makes some people want to drink more.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  39. Explaination (for beer) by vchoy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As I ex-bartender/waiter (blah blah long time ago)...
    It's all to do with the bubbles/throth/thewhitelayerthingymagig. How you pour the beer in determines how the liquid flows into the glass. The smoother the flow and less disturbance of the pour, the less bubbles (CO2) you are going to get formed. You can see this when you pour cola into a glass as well! IMHO is that short, wide glasses (if you pour it right),tend to make for this smooth flow of liquid, hence less bubbles. One is more more likely to distuble the pour of the liquid in a Tall, narrow glasses of the same volume - hence leading to more bubbles and less grog.

    -- It's all in the Technique and bubbles.

    1. Re:Explaination (for beer) by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's also the surface area, this is why Champagne classes are skinny. The more extreme the aspect ratio of the glass in the skinny/tall direction, the longer your bubbly will stay bubbly and the longer it will take for the head on your beer to settle.

      Tilting the glass not only reduces the turbulence of the liquid, but also increases the exposed surface area.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  40. Conservation? by scalpod · · Score: 0

    I wonder, do drunken adults maintain their ability to 'conserve' when judging liquid volumes? That is, will they agree a quantity of beer poured from a small, short glass into a tall thin one is the same or will they simply drink it and move on to another study? One of say, their navels or the ceiling?

    --
    If "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" and "it was beauty that killed the beast" then "please stop staring at me".
  41. Woops: spelling mistake by vchoy · · Score: 1

    One is more more likely to distuble ...

    disturb

    - Sorry.

    1. Re:Woops: spelling mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also (among other mistakes...) :

      throth

      That should be froth

  42. Slashdot: Descovering what women already know... by Burning1 · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is descovering what women have known for years: thickness is more important than length.

  43. same volume by foxhound01 · · Score: 0

    if they're the same volume, just fill 'em to the top, and it won't make any difference which you use, not that you'll be remembering much

    --


    Linux is to the internet as Duct Tape is to the Universe.
  44. I just wanna know... by Sargeant+Slaughter · · Score: 1

    Who drank all the buy-products of these so-called experiments?

    --
    I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand. -Confucius
  45. Martini glasses by pthisis · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of my friends has taken to ordering Jack Daniels, chilled, in a martini glass. Most bars charge you for one shot but pour at least two--even bartenders who can pour a good 4-count will pour it, take a look, think it looks empty, and double it.

    --
    rage, rage against the dying of the light
    1. Re:Martini glasses by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

      chilled whiskey? bleh!

      give me it at room temp mmm, and make it knob creek while you're at it!

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    2. Re:Martini glasses by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Good stuff, but make mine Aberlour 10yo =)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    3. Re:Martini glasses by pthisis · · Score: 1

      Talisker, Lagavulin, or if you want something smoother then Bushmill's single malt 10-year Irish. Room temperature, heat with your hands, and add just a few drops of distilled water to open it up (not to dilute it). Sip slowly and enjoy.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    4. Re:Martini glasses by drsquare · · Score: 1

      JD isn't whisky, and any barman who pours double the amount should be fired, or taught how to use a measuring cup.

    5. Re:Martini glasses by pthisis · · Score: 2, Informative

      He never said it was whisky, he said it was whiskey. Which it is-at least according to Webster's, according to the bottle itself ("Jack Daniels Sour Mash Whiskey") and according to common usage. If you're going to use a non-standard definition you should specify that, and you shouldn't claim others are flat-out wrong when their definition is both technically correct (by the dictionary) and fits common parlance.

      Side note: Bourbon is a subset of whiskey, but Jack Daniels is not a bourbon. It's a Tennessee whiskey (George Dickel is another common Tennessee whiskey that is not a bourbon). Tennessee whiskeys are filtered through sugar-maple charcoal and tend to be sweeter than true bourbons.

      Knob Creek, which the parent mentioned, is a bourbon (other common bourbons include Jim Beam and Maker's Mark).

      Some say that the Scottish use the spelling "whisky" for all whiskey, others claim it's reserved for Scotch whiskey. Not being Scots I can't comment, but I can say that in the US the spelling "whiskey" is almost always used and the spelling "whisky" is generally reserved for Scotch and Canadian whiskeys (as well as Japanese Scotch-style whiskeys).

      My favorite whiskeys remain Talisker, Lagavulin, and Bushmill's 10-year single malt Irish whiskey.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    6. Re:Martini glasses by renehollan · · Score: 1

      I spell my whisky "The Macallan".

      --
      You could've hired me.
    7. Re:Martini glasses by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I've drunk JD before, and I can tell you it's not whisky. Whisky doesn't taste like that, unless you water it down. I suppose it's the whisky equivalent of Budweiser: a decent drink dumbed down for American tastes.

      The spelling 'whiskey' is the Irish spelling. But then with all the plastic paddies in America it's not surprising that's how they spell it over there.

    8. Re:Martini glasses by hb79 · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Martini. And glasses... For the superb drink Blok-Haakonsen , I recommend only Old Fashioned Double Whisky glasses.

    9. Re:Martini glasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the awesomest. Please tell me more about my dumbed down tastes.

    10. Re:Martini glasses by pthisis · · Score: 1

      I've drunk JD before, and I can tell you it's not whisky. Whisky doesn't taste like that, unless you water it down.

      It's not whisky, it's whiskey. Most whiskey doesn't use a peat process and doesn't wind up with a big smokey taste.

      That said, JD doesn't taste watered down. Unlike a piss-poor lager that tastes like a muted version of a real lager, JD doesn't taste like a muted Scotch whisky--or a muted Irish whiskey. It has the typical sour mash flavoring that Tennessee and Bourbon whiskey share (and is certainly _not_ watered down, but is rather a strong fermented/sour accent; compare Wonder bread (watered down) to sour dough bread (not watered down, although different from "regular bread")). It also has the unique notes of a Tennessee whiskey: a more mild sour mash flavoring with more maple hints (owing to the Lincoln County process of filtering through sugar-maple charcoal).

      You may not like it, but that's more akin to saying "I like oatmeal stouts and not brown ales" than "I like Weeping Radish Helles Lager and not Schlitz". Even the latter is strictly a matter of taste, but at least with that example the "lesser" version has no outside flavor from the "greater" version.

      (Of course, even labelling something lesser for that reason is pretty subjective; a filet mignon isn't a "better" flavor if I dump a pint of salt on it, even though the unsalted version is "lesser" in the same sense.)

      I suppose it's the whisky equivalent of Budweiser: a decent drink dumbed down for American tastes.

      No, it's more like the whiskey equivalent of Anchor Steam Ale: a new type of beer that's not made quite the same way in the old world.

      And I'll reiterate that I'm not entirely uninformed on the subject of Scotch whiskys; I'm certainly not an expert on the area, but I've had a number that I consider excellent(e.g. Talisker, Lagavulin, Glenmorangie Port Finish), a number of good ones by my palate (e.g. Oban, Macallan 12 year, Glenlivet, Balvennie, Dalwhinnie) and a few that I don't like as well, but you can still see what they're going for (e.g Laphroaig, Aberlour, Glenfiddich).

      Just because Jack Daniels doesn't taste like a Scotch whisky doesn't mean it isn't a whiskey and doesn't have it's own distinct flavor. Rejecting it out of hand would be like dismissing Shiraz wine because it doesn't taste like Cabernet Sauvignon.

      And whiskey is not a misspelling of whisky, the two terms mean different things in the US as I noted above. The spelling "whisky" is reserved for Scotch-style whiskeys (true Scotch whiskys, and the few Canadian Scotch-style whiskys like Glen Breton Rare Single-Malt and the similar Scotch-style Japanese whiskys), although some extend it to all Canadian whiskeys (admitting things like Canadian Mist, Crown Royal, etc).

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    11. Re:Martini glasses by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Alas, I don't have much of a liquor budget. Would much like to try Talisker but Aberlour was reccomended to me as a good Speyside without breaking the bank (yes, at my situation 50 bucks for a fifth is breaking the bank)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    12. Re:Martini glasses by pthisis · · Score: 1

      I'm not a huge fan of Speysides, but if you're into them then Balvenie (Founder's Reserve 10-year) is a good one at about the same price-point, and Glenlivet 12-year is just a hair more (still under $30). Both are worth trying.

      Lagavulin is obscenely expensive, I keep a bottle around but it lasts several years since I don't get into it except for special occasions. Talisker you can sometimes find a good deal on and get it at like $35/bottle, which even in college was sometimes in the "I can get one and keep it for special occasions over the year" range for me. But normally it's more than that (I wait until some local store overstocks or has it more cheaply for whatever reason, then get two).

      The first time I got into Scotch, we got 6 friends together who were interested and got 6 different bottles in the $35-60 range. Somehow it seems more acceptable to spend that money to try 6 good, different options (and hang out with friends and get everyone's opinions, instead of some faceless reviewer's) than to get a full bottle of one--just make sure you coordinate to avoid duplicates. Don't plan on driving, though!

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    13. Re:Martini glasses by pthisis · · Score: 1

      3 more things:
      1. You could easily get 12 people together and get 6 good bottles, and come out of it for under $20 a head to try 6 good options (or a hair more if you wanted one bottle of something ridiculous like Lagavulin or Macallan 25).
      2. Another reason the Lagavulin lasts a while is that I generally prefer Talisker; Lagavulin requires the right mood (it's really smoky, while Talisker has almost a black-pepper finish instead--both are peaty, though).
      3. Oban is mid-way between the Speysides and the Islay/Skye whiskys; I prefer going one way or the other, and Oban is pricey, but if you're looking for a transition and find a steal on it somewhere it could be worth keeping in mind.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    14. Re:Martini glasses by jschrod · · Score: 1

      Well, the opinions get `better'. I would recommend Ardbeck as well, but dunno if one can get it in the States. Once I had two Ardbecks from the same distillation, one from a sherry cask and one from an oak cask -- fascinating ability compare the influence of casks!

      --

      Joachim

      People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

    15. Re:Martini glasses by pthisis · · Score: 1

      Do you mean Ardbeg? I've never heard of "ardbeck". Ardbeg is an Islay that's pretty widely available in the US.

      This one:
      http://www.maison-de-stuff.net/john/whisky/picture s/Ardbeg.JPG

      I prefer my Islays to be on the "smoke/heather" end of things rather than the "seaweed/iodine" end of things, so I prefer things like Bowmore and Lagavulin over things like Ardbeg and Laphroaig.

      The difference of the casks is definitely cool, Glenmorangie (who currently own Arbeg as well) produce their eponymous Highland whisky in a number of different casks--sherry, port, burgundy, madeira, etc.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    16. Re:Martini glasses by jschrod · · Score: 1
      Yes, I meant Ardbeg; sorry for the typo.

      It's quite interesting that you say that whiskys are widely available in the US. (I'm from Germany, btw.) US friends of mine who live in rural areas have even problems to buy proper wines without problems. Shipping wine between US states is illegal and getting good wines to one's home is often a real problem, so I thought strong alcohol is even harder to come by.

      For me, living in a wine area, the alcohol laws of USA are ridiculuous. [sp?].

      --

      Joachim

      People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

    17. Re:Martini glasses by pthisis · · Score: 1

      It's quite interesting that you say that whiskys are widely available in the US. (I'm from Germany, btw.) US friends of mine who live in rural areas have even problems to buy proper wines without problems.

      Selection varies from area to area. Where I am, it's quite good; for instance, the Brickskeller pub downtown has over 700 kinds of bottled beer, including 70 or so from Germany. http://www.thebrickskeller.net/_wsn/page3.html has the complete list. That's certainly the widest selection for a pub in the area, but there are several other local pubs with large selection (including other places like Lost Dog with hundreds of bottled beers, and places like DA's RFD, Montgomery Grill, Bilbo Baggins, etc that have 10, 20, or 30 taps with interesting options from around the world).

      If you're purchasing to take home, my local wine/beer store has 8000 different varieties of wine and over 1000 kinds of beer from all over the world.

      And for liquor, I can find 30-40 different good single-malt Scotch whiskys at liquor stores within 15 minutes. One bar in the area has about 20 on their menu.

      In rural areas, selection is a lot more limited. Still, I grew up in Maine and the local pub had 50+ beers on tap (lots of regional brews, but lots from around the world as well). If you ever go to Maine, check out http://www.greatlostbear.com/

      Shipping wine between US states is illegal and getting good wines to one's home is often a real problem, so I thought strong alcohol is even harder to come by.

      The US Supreme Court (in Michigan Beer and Wine Wholesalers Association v. Heald) struck down bans on interstate wine shipment in May of this year.

      States can still ban wine shipment completely, but the earlier situation where they'd allow in-state shipment and ban interstate shipment was ruled illegal. About 20 states ban it completely, but many of the major states (California, New York, Texas, etc) allow wine/beer/liquor shipment--although there are often restrictions on how much you can get (2 cases/month per individual is common but it varies from state to state).

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
  46. Glass half full? by strstrep · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some people say the glass is half full, others say the glass is half empty, but engineers say that the glass has a factor of safety of 2.

    1. Re:Glass half full? by carambola5 · · Score: 1

      Not quite. Engineers say that the glass is 1.67 times the necessary volume, taking into account a 1.2 sloshing safety factor.

      --
      IWARS.
      People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
  47. where do I sign up for this research study? by v3xt0r · · Score: 0

    and am I automatically dis-qualified because I'm Irish? =)

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  48. Politician's answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The glass was half full, BEFORE it was half empty."

  49. It's practical by gamer4Life · · Score: 1

    Short wide glasses are easier to wash than tall, narrow glasses. Tall, narrow glasses are also easier to knock over.

  50. What about these two glasses? by houghi · · Score: 1

    All I can se is that they are only half full. Wimps.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  51. Interesting but not too surprising by Hellasboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't remember where I heard this from; textbook, professor, teacher.

    But a neat thing you can do is have two equal volumes of water in two different types of glasses and present it to a pre-preschool, preschool, or kindergarten aged child (memory is a little hazy on the age). Fill one short wide glass and one tall narrow glass with equal volumes of water in front of the child and the child will tell you that the taller, narrower glass has more water than the short, fat glass. Yes, they will tell you that it is fuller even though they see the same amount of water go into each glass.

    I can't exactly recall which part of the brain develops during this age (24-40 months) at the moment, but it's a neat thing to see (if you're a science geek).

    As how this might relate to the topic... maybe this doesn't fully develop (or develop as much) in some people because of diet, genetics, or a combination of both?

    --

    "Tread softly because you tread on my dreams"
    1. Re:Interesting but not too surprising by scalpod · · Score: 0

      It's called 'conservation'. I posed a question earlier about whether or not drunken adults show any impairment if presented with the same scenario? Nobody seems to know so I'm headed to the pub to do some independent research... "Gimme a 'black and brown' and keep 'em coming 'til I can't tell the difference!"

      --
      If "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" and "it was beauty that killed the beast" then "please stop staring at me".
    2. Re:Interesting but not too surprising by jpmkm · · Score: 4, Informative

      We spent a few days talking about this in my cognitive psych class last semester. It's called conservation, and Piaget did quite a few experiments very similar to what you described when he was working out his stages of development. The preoperational(~3-7 years old) stage is when children have difficulty realizing that the volume of liquid is actually the same. Concrete operational(~7-11 years old) is when children start developing the skills for thinking logically about stuff(such as the conservation of liquid), and can realize that the volume of liquid is indeed the same. It's really a bit odd at first to see a group of children at one age say that one glass has more water than the other, and another group of children a year or two older realize they have the same amount.

      Damn. I never thought I would use anything from that class.

    3. Re:Interesting but not too surprising by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      I remember being given the test. I also remember the adult pointedly asking, "Which one has more water?". I was too young to think to say that they might have the same, but I remember not being happy with saying that one had more than the other. I don't know if the test is supposed to include the "they have the same amount" option, but I think it should.

    4. Re:Interesting but not too surprising by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      maybe this doesn't fully develop (or develop as much) in some people because of diet, genetics, or a combination of both?
      Not really our minds understand that different shape glasses can hold the same amount of liquid but the levels will be different hight. But the real trick for our mind is judging it. The area of a Glass (cylinder) is Pi*(d/2)^2*h When comparing 2 glasses we can easily see one level is higher then the other. But our Minds have trouble with 3D comparison of different shape, so our best guess takes a shortcut, assuming that d of the glass is only marginally different of d of the other glass and fail to see that d is a major factor while h is a minor one.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Interesting but not too surprising by Hellasboy · · Score: 1

      I see what you're getting at, and you're totally correct. I should have been more specific, in regards to diet/genetics or a combination of both, I meant that if that:
      Maybe a lack of a nutrient during development would result in the nondevelopment of that section of the brain which in turn leads to how the mind judges it. Or maybe there's a gene that leads to the creation of a specific protein receptor on cell walls of that area in the brain that would lead to an increased (or possibly decreased) ability to judge different shapes.

      There is the possibility that it could lead into understanding just how our brains judge 3D comparisons and eventually advance techniques to improve it.

      -Nick C.

      --

      "Tread softly because you tread on my dreams"
    6. Re:Interesting but not too surprising by man_ls · · Score: 1

      I'd say that you, sir, are right on the money.

      Failing to account for known base-rate information in comparisons, is a heuristic which leads us to make mistakes a lot of times.

    7. Re:Interesting but not too surprising by macaddct1984 · · Score: 1
      Mmm, I remember that one, I believe it was on an educational video as well.

      Adding on to what jpmkm said, it's probably related with size/shape/color constancy of vision, dealing with the fact that despite orientation, distance from our eyes or the color of light shining on an object, we still manage to retain its original properties. Oddly enough, young children, as young as infants, actually have these perceptions of constancy. Presumably "volume constancy" isn't as necessary for survival as the others.

    8. Re:Interesting but not too surprising by radtea · · Score: 1
      Piaget did quite a few experiments very similar to what you described when he was working out his stages of development. The preoperational(~3-7 years old) stage is when children have difficulty realizing that the volume of liquid is actually the same. Concrete operational(~7-11 years old) is when children start developing the skills for thinking logically about stuff(such as the conservation of liquid), and can realize that the volume of liquid is indeed the same. It's really a bit odd at first to see a group of children at one age say that one glass has more water than the other, and another group of children a year or two older realize they have the same amount.

      These experiments went so far as to involve pouring the water from one glass to the other, so the younger children would be telling you that the volume of water was different depending on which glass it was in.

      The interesting thing in the current story is that while older children and adults are able to correct their preceptual misjudgement in side-by-side experiments of this kind, most people are not able to make good absolute judgements about volume, and are systematically biased in consistent ways.

      This is not really surprising. After all, we know that you can for example:
      • save a guy from being laid off
      • present the case for him being given equal treatment to the board of a company that he has yet to contribute anything to
      • bail him out of projects that he is incapable of finishing himself
      • defend his late and low-quality work from clients who complain about it

      and the the first time you ask him for a favour or have a misunderstanding he will go from whining to threatening in under ten seconds, without ever trying to understand what you're asking for, and when he does understand it he will flatly deny that he owes you anything. It's all about perception, and most people have a vastly distorted perception of themselves and the world around them, and actively select their perceptions to fit the needs of their midget souls and cowardly hearts.

      --Tom
      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    9. Re:Interesting but not too surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really a bit odd at first to see a group of children at one age say that one glass has more water than the other, and another group of children a year or two older realize they have the same amount.

      Hahahahahah thats like saying, It's really a bit odd to see a group of idiots, and then later to see somebody with half a fuckin brain. Some people are just stupid, regardless of age. If you did that water trick to the average american they would without a doubt say the taller narrow glass has more in it. Hey in fact this would be a great experiment. See if the average american is as smart as 7 year old. Probably not.

    10. Re:Interesting but not too surprising by jpmkm · · Score: 1

      The experiment has nothing to do with stupidity. It an issue of cognitive development, not intelligence. I'd wager that most adults, no matter how stupid, would be able to pass the water volume conservation test.

    11. Re:Interesting but not too surprising by mcfuddlerucker · · Score: 1

      >> Damn. I never thought I would use anything from that class.

      Technically, you still haven't (aside from regurgitation). What you *need* to do is find a two inch tall, two foot diameter diameter glass, and a three year old bartender.

      Enjoy your evening.

    12. Re:Interesting but not too surprising by mcfuddlerucker · · Score: 1

      And yes, DIAMETER DIAMETER you pedantic sons of bitches! ;)

    13. Re:Interesting but not too surprising by Mr_Huber · · Score: 1

      And, of course, there's the story of the wise ass who visited Piaget at home and decided to perform the experiment with his children. He asked the six year old if the two glasses had the same amount of water and the child said, "No, I think the taller one does. But you should ask my older brother, he's got concrete operational skills."

    14. Re:Interesting but not too surprising by PostItNote · · Score: 1

      In a related note, you can fit a full 40oz inside a regulation ultimate frisbee. But it really doesn't look like it's possible. A nice way to win some bets.

  52. Standards make life easier... by woobieman29 · · Score: 1
    Remember that shotglasses are here to simplify this for you! Generally they are standard 1-1/2 or 2 oz size, and/or have a mark. Plus you get the pure alcohol enjoyment without any icky mixers....

    For you that like the mixers, you can still use a shot glass to get a consistent pour - just fill the shot glass with your liquor, dump the contents into your highball glass, and then top off with your mixer of choice. Shops that sell bar supplies generally will have a metal doohickey with a 1-1/2 oz metal cup on one side, and a 2oz cup on the other, with a long metal handle that is specifically for this sort of measurement. This will help you out immensely if you want to achieve consistent flavor/alcohol content in your mixed drinks.

    Happy New Year, everyone!!

    --
    \/\/oobie
  53. In later news.... by Dominic+Burns · · Score: 1

    it was found that cold reality also makes people drink too much. Various groups continue to lobby for warmer reality.

    Cheers,

    D.

  54. eh, isn't new years about doing it the other way? by ltwally · · Score: 1
    "So, as New Year's Eve is coming, remember to use only tall glasses for your party!!!"
    I don't know what kind of parties you're going to on New Years, but if this research is correct then I prefer the short/wide glasses for my New Years party! :)
    --



    /dev/random
  55. Simple isn't it! by original_nickname · · Score: 1

    You can tell you've drunk too much, when you knock your glass over, and so can't drink any more!

    So, you drink too much with the tall glasses faster than small ones, as you keep knocking the damn thing over after fewer drinks. And it's less stable, so you can easily drunkenly put it slightly off the edge of the table. Hence you drink less, and the person with the small glass appears to drink more, just cos they can still lift and replace their glass.

    Simple, really.

  56. What about wine glasses by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 1

    In one respect, they're short and wide - the drinking portion - but on the other hand the stems can be quite tall, making the glass tall and slender overall.

    Where do these glasses fall?

    --
    http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
  57. Bah! Poorly trained Bartenders! by lax-goalie · · Score: 1

    I don't know where these guys picked their test subjects, but if they were pouring by eye, they were flat out poorly trained. One of the reasons most bars have pourers on the bottles is so you can consistently pour by count. In most places I worked, we poured a shot and a half, which was a six count. AFAIK, the shape of a glass doesn't change the nature of time. (Although enough of its contents sure will...)

    In fact, one of the tests we used to give people before they could go behind the bar was to pour 20 drinks into all different sizes and shapes of glasses, which we then measured. If you couldn't pour the right amount, or worse, poured inconsistently, you got more practice and training.

  58. Re:you've got it backwards, roland by ninthwave · · Score: 1

    Be careful that request doesn't have you drinking out of the ash tray.

    --
    I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
  59. This reminds me by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This reminds me of an ice cream shop I went to once years ago when I was a child. I ordered a small ice cream sundae and my dad ordered a large. It was about a 2-3 dollar difference. When the dishes were empty, for some reason I filled my sundae dish with water to the top, then I poured it from my dish into my fathers large dish and it went right to the top. Both small and large held the same amount. It's just the large had really thick glass and the small had thinner glass, what a ripoff.

    Anyway, "So, as New Year's Eve is coming, remember to use only tall glasses for your party!!!"... This year I'll be using short glasses thank you!

    --
    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    1. Re:This reminds me by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a Friendly's.

    2. Re:This reminds me by zardo · · Score: 1

      Don't ever order the large at coldstone. I normally order a large ice cream but they put about a gallon of ice cream in a cup.

  60. Don't give away my secret! by jesser · · Score: 1

    They already made roofies illegal. What will I do if they make short, wide glasses illegal too?

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  61. Re:who uses glasses...bottles are for girlies by xoip · · Score: 1

    i drink straight from the bottle/can.

    Best I ever did was a Jug of Beer...No hands...just picked it up with teeth and Chugged it back...won a hundred bucks and almost puked.

  62. Hmmm... I'll let you guys know by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    when I've conducted my own tests... now where's those highball glasses and whisky tumblers... now where's that whiskey...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  63. Try this one.... by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Interesting


    http://www.kleinbottle.com/

    There it could be a bit problematic to say weather its half full or empty, topologically :)

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:Try this one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There it could be a bit problematic to say weather its half full or empty, topologically :)

      Wouldn't that be meteorologically speaking?

  64. Re:Slashdot: Descovering what women already know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ones with gaping cunts sure do!

  65. Half empty or half full? by vitaflo · · Score: 1

    Personally, I see the glass being twice as big as it should be.

  66. Half an answer, I think by smchris · · Score: 1

    I don't about bartenders and how they pour but any wine drinker can tell you that a wider glass will make a good drink more pleasurable because you can smell it better. Wouldn't be surprising if that led to more comsumption.

  67. Prepare to litigate! by PSaltyDS · · Score: 1

    Even now a cabal of grossly underpaid lawyers -- Forced to live with only two houses and no private aircraft! -- are researching the class action litigation against the makers of short-wide shot glasses. These alco-terrorists will learn what it means to force Georgians to drink too much!!!

    (Keep your bar receipts so you can qualify for one of the $1.07 settlement checks in about five years time.)

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
  68. Yeah, who knew? by CarpetShark · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yep. Personally, I drink too fast, even with tea. With alcohol, in a bar, it's worse, because I get bored in bars and don't really get into the conversations others are having. Let's face it: bars aren't exactly the most stimulating environment for guys who like science and technology and sci-fi. OK, theres an oldish fantasy element to some bars, but that fades fast :) Basically, it's about self-control, and social periphery. If you don't want to get drunk, and you drink to fast, then try orange juice.

    1. Re:Yeah, who knew? by miyako · · Score: 1

      I have a really low tolerance for alcohol. Generally about one and a half glasses of wine over an hour or two will get me drunk. On the few times that I've went with friends to a bar, or if I'm at someones house and they are making drinks, what I will usually do is start out with a drink made with quarter-shots (1/4 the amount of alcohol they usually use) and follow up with one or two non-alcoholic drinks (usually a Virgin Mary, which is a bloody mary w/o the alcohol but with the spices added to the tomato juice).
      If you drink fast you may find that similar techniques could work for you.

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    2. Re:Yeah, who knew? by m50d · · Score: 1
      If you don't want to get drunk, and you drink to fast,

      Then avoid bars near race courses.

      --
      I am trolling
    3. Re:Yeah, who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your not drinking enough. Really. I ALWAYS have a stronger buzz after 2 beers than after 4. Note that I'm talking subjective feel, rather than /actual/ Blood-Alcohol Content. I've always attributed it to "settling in" to the buzz, that is, the brain and/or body acclimating to the sensation (or removal of sensation, rather) over time, versus the sudden influx of the first 2 beers.

      'Course, I always tend to drink the first 2 rather quickly, then slow down into the rest of the drinks in that session...

      YMMV....

  69. Engineering Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Some say the glass is half full,
    Others say, half empty,
    Engineers say, "that glass is not built to specs."

  70. So that is the reason by markass530 · · Score: 1

    I spend xmas puking until 11pm.. fucking glass shape, thank god I don't have to blame my lack of willpower or inability to exercise self control.

  71. HUGE cup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same concept is with Taco Bell cups. You get a Pepsi in this huge cup, and while no human should logically be able to drink this much drink, it goes pretty fast. You then realize that the entire cup is full of ice, and you actually only got 12 ounces of Pepsi.

  72. The irony by UnCivil+Liberty · · Score: 1

    researchers from Cornell University and the Georgia Institute of Technology have shown that short glasses are more likely to lead to over-indulgence.
    What else would you expect from a University who's fight song is about a freshman who got kicked out for drinking too much.

    "Give My Regards to Davy" (to the tune of "Give My Regards to Broadway")
    Give my regards to Davy,
    remember me to Tee Fee Crane,
    tell all the pikers on the hill,
    that I'll be back again,
    tell them just how I busted,
    while lappin up the high, high, ball
    we'll all have drinks at Theodore Zink's,
    when I get back next fall

    --
    Distributed proteome folding @ WorldCommunityGrid.org
    Team Slashdot - Members:#1 Run Time:#1 Points:#1 Results:#1
    1. Re:The irony by tuxette · · Score: 1

      It's Zinck's ;-)

      From this site: Theodore Zinck was a saloonkeeper in Ithaca, and his pub, the Hotel Brunswick,
      was a popular gathering place for Cornellians in the 1890s. After his death, in 1903, several bars using his name continued to provide a haven for Cornell students. When the last "Zinck's" closed in the mid-60s, celebrating the spirit of Zinck's became a favorite Thursday night Collegetown tradition for Cornell undergraduates. It wasn't long afterwards that Cornellians began to continue the tradition in their hometowns.


      Those were the (Thurs)days... *sigh* :)

      --
      People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  73. People differ more than their drinks by mnmn · · Score: 1

    Its all nice to have accurate amounts of alcohol served to patrons. But legal driving or otherwise 'drunk' thresholds are percentage of blood levels. People differ much more than alcohol, with men going between 140 to 300 lbs in the bump part of the bell curve. Thats like twice the weight (and therefore the blood volume).

    So 16 ounces might be less for the 400lbs person while 14 ounces might be more so for the 140lbs.

    Its possible for bartenders to profile their customers before serving drinks, but theres another problem. Peoples alcohol tolerance and how fast their system clears it also vary enormously. (worlds fastest eater is a rather thin Japanese guy).

    I guess it matters little how much a bartender pours if its not more than twice between the extremes, and if its not charged the same.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  74. Dude by ipjohnson · · Score: 1

    if you are hosting a new years eve party (especially if it involves my friends) the cost of the extra booze doesn't even come close to the range it will cost to cover the damage. Not to mention can you realy put a price on seeing your friend passed out head first in a laundry basket?

  75. Frisbee anyone? by slicer622 · · Score: 1

    I've seen people chug a frisbee, the ultimate short, wide glass. Apparently it holds about 3 - 4 beers. Dangerous.

  76. Editor? by colinbrash · · Score: 1

    So, as New Year's Eve is coming, remember to use only tall glasses for your party!!!

    Obviously that should be short not tall. Who edits this stuff anyway?

  77. Simple math explanation by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
    I've occasionally thought about this illusion and I believe the explanation is simple. For a cylinder of height H and width W, you have

    Volume = H * pi * W^2 / 4

    I think people often judge the size a container by its sideways cross-sectional area -- especially in this case where the cylinder has the same area from all sides (not counting top and bottom). The area is W * H.

    Let's say you keep the volume constant and make the glass shorter. The decrease in H must be compensated by increase in W^2, not just W. The area W * H gets smaller due to this effect, even though volume stays constant.

    Similarly, for different glasses with the same cross-sectional area, the wider cylinder will have bigger volume.

    You probably get similar illusions in many different cases, due to the fact that human vision is really only 2D (two flat retinas) and we have to do some extra thinking to deduce what's going on in 3D.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  78. It doesn't make sense by edmicman · · Score: 1

    I don't understand...why would you ever NOT fill up a glass all the way to the top? Maybe I'm just going to the wrong parties...

  79. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  80. Everyone always leaves out this one by btarval · · Score: 1
    We all know that the optimist sees the glass as half-full, and the pessimist sees it as half empty.

    The pragmatist however, always finds out first what's in the glass before giving an answer!

    --
    The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Peter Drucker.
  81. More Like Under-Indulgence by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't the summary say that tall, skinny glasses may lead to under-indulgence? I think that's the real danger here.

  82. Um, actually... by devnull17 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, as New Year's Eve is coming, remember to use only tall glasses for your party!!!

    If you want to have a good party, you should probably do the opposite.

  83. I have a quicker solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a easy solution, around here anyway if you're a 'designated driver' and you have some twirp barteneder insisting on getting you piss drunk, all you have to do is shout i am the designated driver at him/her, and I can't get toe up. If you repeat that montra, he/she is by law obligated then to at the expense of the bar to get you a cab if they screw up. Amusingly this also includes complsorory refills.

  84. NEWS FLASH... by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1

    Cocktails are often served in short round glasses....

    Well... what a revelation....

    I guess these guys didn't do this survey in Berlin where cocktails are usually served by the litre in the tallest widest glasses available....

  85. Completely Untrue by craXORjack · · Score: 1
    researchers from Cornell University and the Georgia Institute of Technology have shown that short glasses are more likely to lead to over-indulgence.

    My own research has proven that the taller the beer holding apparatus, the more likely the over-indulgence. This is doubly true if the devil is following you around with a ginormous, multi-funneled, beer bong and keeps asking you, 'You gonna do it, man? You gonna do it? Don't be a sissy. You know you want to.'

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    1. Re:Completely Untrue by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      Interesting pic, but not what I was expecting.
      I assumed there'd be more than one place to add beer, not more than one spout.
      Is a funnel the bell-shaped part? The spout? The whole thing?
      I suppose I could look it up, but I'd rather just ponder it.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  86. I certainly hope so! by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

    I dunno; I'm willing to bet that he knows his wife better than you do.

    I certainly hope I do!

    --MarkusQ

  87. However.... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

    Of course, most professional bartenders now use automated drink dispenser things.
    They just click a button and the alcohol is poured exactly the same way every time, tall glass or no.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  88. From an engineering viewpoint by steelframe · · Score: 1

    "Some people think that a glass is half empty while others see it as half full." Some people think the glass is just too damn big.

  89. Hell Yeah! by GreyOrange · · Score: 1

    Gigity Gigity, I'm useing petre dishes!

    --

    Insert Witty Remark Here ===>____________________________
  90. It's like Ausies and Fosters by Mateorabi · · Score: 1
    I think your European friends are experiencing American beer the way Americans experience Australian beer. There's a reason they export that Fosters stuff.

    And also remember, Budweiser (Budvar) started out as a european beer, way back when.

    --
    "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

    1. Re:It's like Ausies and Fosters by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And also remember, Budweiser (Budvar) started out as a european beer, way back when.

      Right, but they taste very different-- Budvar from eské Budjovice is very bitter compared to American Budweiser.

      But hey, check it out-- Budvar is apparently now marketed in the States under the name Czechvar!. I wonder if it travels well. I'll keep my eyes open next time I'm at the store.

  91. Neat - not too surprising for me by rnelsonee · · Score: 1

    First off, I think because of this study, we're going to see less 'short and wide' type glasses at bars - at least the greedy club type places. But anywho, I find myself amazed sometimes when I figure out which glasses hold more than others. The last time I was in New York, I was being a typical tourist and was having a nice beer outside watching some sort of food festival. It started to rain as soon as I got my second beer, which was in one of those nice tall, sort of large pint glasses. Looks like it held at least 16 oz. The bartender comes out with one of those short plastic cups, it looked smaller than those red and blue "Solo" cups I used so much for beer pong in college. Anywho, I poured the pint glass into the plastic cup, waiting for the cup to fill up, but it never overflowed. The darn thing held more than the tall pint glass. So that just shows that some people (at least me) can be deceived by glasses with larger bases. They just hold more than we realize I guess. Sorry... this kind of went on and on...

  92. Nah, Take The Tall by nate+nice · · Score: 1

    I drink my booze straight. I'd be a sucker not to take the large one that's cheaper/oz.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  93. It's TV! by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

    In the search of faux reason to excuse ourselves from our stupid behaviour I'll testify that I watched crappy TV show yesterday, with violence and all.

    It prompted me to perform 5 murders, 4 rapes, 3 stolen lollipops from babies and finally tied myselfs in bombs and fired the fuse in protest.

    People, it's the TV!

  94. Nope. Not enough dimensions. by DancesWithBlowTorch · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to think up ways of explaining why the object in your linked picture is _not_ a Klein Bottle for a while now. Now, you've brought up the reason yourself. Thank you very much:

    What you have linked to is an immersion of the Klein Bottle in R^3, the three-dimensional vectorspace. (And before someone rants on the "the": All k-dimensional vectorspaces are isomorphic to each other.) An actual Klein Bottle is a three-dimensional submanifold of the four-dimensional vectorspace. And while an actual Klein Bottle does have no inside and outside, yours definitely has both: You can fill it with alcohol, can't you? Now, all you have to do is define "inside" as "the volume where the booze sits", and outside as "aw, no booze".

    (And for the record: Yes, this definition is not quite analogous to the topological definition of inside and outside. But on using this definition, none of the usual drinking surfaces (i.e. cylinders with a bottom and deformations thereof) do have in- and outsides).

    Hence, never forget: A Klein Bottle lives in four dimensions!

    1. Re:Nope. Not enough dimensions. by The+Nine · · Score: 1

      All k-dimensional vectorspaces are isomorphic to each other

      I feel that should be "all k-dimensional vectorspaces over a given field are isomorphic to each other". R^3 and C^3 are both 3-dimensional vectorspaces (over the fields R and C, respectively), but certainly aren't isomorphic.

    2. Re:Nope. Not enough dimensions. by 1110110001 · · Score: 1

      Cliff has already answered that kind of questions in his FAQ: http://www.kleinbottle.com/acme_faq.htm - search for "wait a second" (no anchors for a direct link ...)

      b4n

  95. third option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Some people think that a glass is half empty while others see it as half full."

    there is a third group of people - engineers - who see that the glass is 50% too big.

  96. A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the summary: "In fact, people pour 20-30 percent more alcohol into short, wide glasses than into tall, narrow ones of the same volume. The researchers obtained similar results with students and professional bartenders. So, as New Year's Eve is coming, remember to use only tall glasses for your party!!!"

    And also remember to bring only short glasses when you go to a FRIENDS party

  97. Bottle shape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dunno about you folks, but I drink when I see a bottle shape

  98. shurely shome mishtake? by stridebird · · Score: 1
    So, as New Year's Eve is coming, remember to use only tall glasses for your party!!!

    /tall/short/

    ....shurely? hic. mc2u!

  99. I should bloody well hope not... by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...God help any government that thinks it acceptable to give an Englishman a short measure of beer.

    You know how a lot of Americans feel about their guns? Well, we're like that with beer. Any politician who gets labelled as the guy who nicked our beer... well, his career is suddenly not worth a great deal.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  100. The Glass isn't half full or half empty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...It's too big.

  101. How much beer in a frisbee? by Phrogz · · Score: 1

    My older brother played Ultimate Frisbee in college. His team would offer new members the choice of drinking a frisbee full of beer or (I think) 1 liter of beer. All would choose the frisbee which (if memory serves) actually holds about 2 liters.

    (This is an official UPA-sized 175gram frisbee, not one of those cheap toys companies give away that don't fly farther than 10 feet before going tits-up.)

  102. I drink straight from the bottle! by castleguardian · · Score: 0

    You insensitive clod!

    --
    --- Welcome my son, welcome to the machine.
  103. Article Submission is Wrong by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 1

    So, as New Year's Eve is coming, remember to use only tall glasses for your party!!!

    Surely you mean short glasses? ;)

    --
    You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
  104. I know, i know. by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    Nevertheless i consider this "fake" klein bottles cute.

    And just like the mandelbrot set (nobody is interested in the set itself, but everybody likes the arbitrary iteration cutoff colouring), it doesnt need to be correct to be cool :)

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  105. As I said to my friend last night by jred · · Score: 1

    You know you have a drinking problem when it interferes with your Counter-Strike: Source addiction...

    --

    jred
    I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  106. How so? by munpfazy · · Score: 1

    What makes you say the study is weak?

    After reading both the journal article, and the writeup linked here, I don't see any obvious problems with it.

    Pouring a single shot into short 350 ml tumblers and 350 ml highball glasses are both pretty common activities when making drinks. Seems like a prefectly legitimate thing to investigate.

  107. Piaget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't remember where I heard this from; textbook, professor, teacher. But a neat thing you can do is have two equal volumes of water in two different types of glasses...

    I first heard of this in an Alan Kay talk. The experiment was first done by Jean Piaget.

    Jerome Brunner (not important enough for Wikipedia, apparently) took the experiment one step further: after the child claimed that there was a different amount of water, he covered up the glass. Not being able to rely on his dominant visual mentality, the child is forced to use his "fledgling" symbolic mentality -- and he'd tell you that the glasses must have an equal amount of water.

  108. Schlitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drinking Schlitz builds character, and helps remind you why you pay good money for good beer. Everyone should have to drink Schlitz* once in awhile.

    * Falstaff, Olympia, Olde Style, and PBR are acceptable substitutes.

    1. Re:Schlitz by pthisis · · Score: 1

      Schlitz tastes like hair.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
  109. Pet's Wicked Ale... Not by renehollan · · Score: 1
    Well, I tried some, and I'm not impressed.

    It's not all that bad, but really lacks in body -- it tasted like a light dark ale (if there can be such a thing) to me.

    I think I'll go back to my I.P.A.s.

    --
    You could've hired me.