Like office automation put office workers out of work...oh wait we just created a fuckton of jobs consisting of office workers sitting in front of a computer. Some are on slashdot when boss not looking 8D
But her broken English is almost as bad as a slashdot story submitter, and she has the personality of a overflowing garbage can on a hot summer day. Wait that's also totally like a slashdot user isn't it?
But there is zero evidence in the lab that amino acids self-assemble into self-replicating self-programming robots (aka organic life). What if that takes billions of years to happen by chance? As we explore space we may find that is indeed the case.
will mean our city will be ten foot deep in manure in less than a quarter century!
Alarmists need to stop thinking any one thing can be extrapolated to the future without society and technology changing and adapting. And no, tax as an attempt to slow or stall inevitable progress is not a solution at all.
So you've never been on a plane that has landed, been refueled and sent further on its journey I take it. Spending more than 24 hours on a plane, yes I've done it
yes but Heinlein was wrong by couple orders of magnitude on yield of rocks hitting earth from moon. it's a waste of energy to try to "bomb" earth that way, you won't get nuclear yields but chemical bomb order yields.
You can look at the U.S. Air Forces 2003 study on a project thor concept where 9 ton tungsten pole would hit Earth at about Mach 10 (a rather realistic order of magnitude for moon rocks flung to earth after reentry, at 3.4 km/s, it's your number essentially), for not quite 12 ton (0.012 kiloton) yield.
In short, the idea is ridiculous, a conventional bomb lobbed from a sympathetic ally on earth would be equivalent or better.
She, like Heinlein who miscalculated, is scientifically wrong. Rocks lifted from moon re-entering Earth's atmosphere would not have nuclear weapon's type yields.
are you telling me there are people who hate to read his tweets but they follow him anyway? As I suspected, the average twitter user is a low watt bulb
false, all branches of AI were done in the 1960s and before. There is nothing of significance that has been done for decades other than having more RAM and faster CPU.
yes those peasants produced and had wealth confiscated from them, for example for wars of expansion of territory or for grudges. My example was great, it's a long term sustainable model of a few elite having their foot on the necks of the majority.
plenty of scientists and engineers are "assholes" and are engaged in work that shortens human life. think harder about all the products that shorten human life, ruin environment, enable war for power and profit rather than defense, etc.
Slashdot Mirror
you tell me, but 0.93 years is about a year
She could very well be telling the truth, but you really are hilarious:
"well known gossip"
thanks for citing authoritative source.
"she states in her post"
more incontrovertible proof for sure.
your other words about how other execs at the place are douchebags isn't really relevant, all big companies have them.
what if she's a lying sack of shit and none of the stories she tells were true?
*sigh* autistic pedantic slashdotter can't understand speaking in round numbers
Like office automation put office workers out of work...oh wait we just created a fuckton of jobs consisting of office workers sitting in front of a computer. Some are on slashdot when boss not looking 8D
Are you trying to have me spited, English?
But her broken English is almost as bad as a slashdot story submitter, and she has the personality of a overflowing garbage can on a hot summer day. Wait that's also totally like a slashdot user isn't it?
Are the 190 SOL or did they go into sales, marketing, distribution, customer relations, support, IT.....?
What our country HAS been doing is allowing other countries with no or inadequate worker safety protections to trade as equal partners which is wrong.
you assert consequences without a shred of evidence
But there is zero evidence in the lab that amino acids self-assemble into self-replicating self-programming robots (aka organic life). What if that takes billions of years to happen by chance? As we explore space we may find that is indeed the case.
will mean our city will be ten foot deep in manure in less than a quarter century!
Alarmists need to stop thinking any one thing can be extrapolated to the future without society and technology changing and adapting. And no, tax as an attempt to slow or stall inevitable progress is not a solution at all.
So you've never been on a plane that has landed, been refueled and sent further on its journey I take it. Spending more than 24 hours on a plane, yes I've done it
what if that life arrived as "contamination" from elsewhere?
yes but Heinlein was wrong by couple orders of magnitude on yield of rocks hitting earth from moon. it's a waste of energy to try to "bomb" earth that way, you won't get nuclear yields but chemical bomb order yields.
You can look at the U.S. Air Forces 2003 study on a project thor concept where 9 ton tungsten pole would hit Earth at about Mach 10 (a rather realistic order of magnitude for moon rocks flung to earth after reentry, at 3.4 km/s, it's your number essentially), for not quite 12 ton (0.012 kiloton) yield.
In short, the idea is ridiculous, a conventional bomb lobbed from a sympathetic ally on earth would be equivalent or better.
She, like Heinlein who miscalculated, is scientifically wrong. Rocks lifted from moon re-entering Earth's atmosphere would not have nuclear weapon's type yields.
are you telling me there are people who hate to read his tweets but they follow him anyway? As I suspected, the average twitter user is a low watt bulb
No, people with taste buds generally agree Subway chicken tastes awful. Nice try, veggie boy.
My phone's autocorrect might but I'm too busy being content not being rich.
false, all branches of AI were done in the 1960s and before. There is nothing of significance that has been done for decades other than having more RAM and faster CPU.
Yes, paid attention in school then worked for a living without being a special entitled parasite on others. Half the country should give that a try.
yes those peasants produced and had wealth confiscated from them, for example for wars of expansion of territory or for grudges. My example was great, it's a long term sustainable model of a few elite having their foot on the necks of the majority.
plenty of scientists and engineers are "assholes" and are engaged in work that shortens human life. think harder about all the products that shorten human life, ruin environment, enable war for power and profit rather than defense, etc.
you're funny, for much of history of civilized world 1% had money and the rest were peasants. very doable and very very long term sustainable.
wrong, you're stereotype is absurd.
I believe if I work hard enough I'll have the things I want. Oh looky, I actually do!