But anybody wearing an xbox under their shirt would not be able to walk or even stand up. And don't even think about lying down, the bugger will crush your rib-cage.
Users of the ed2k (edonkey) network, already have several of these indexers. Services like Jigle send and cache searches from servers and users to give users the latest avalibility and link for a particular file/hash.
That support article was last reviewed on 22 April 2003, but it doesn't say why
That would probably be when they docked the 'Q' prefix from all of their articles, which was probably one of the most idiotic things they've done as well as introduce about a billion new locale problems and a non-functional search-engine.
Oh well... At least my windows machine has been classed (by me) as legacy.
If that's the kind minds that parents have these days then I'm glad that mine didn't catch on to it (I'm 16 BTW).
I basically have complete control and responsibility of all of the machines in my house and the network access (or lack thereof, depending on the weather).
Its not that my parents aren't particularily tech-savvy about these things, its that they trust me to be somewhat responsible with the material that look at and download.
It's not a lack of parenting, its called 'growing up'
I originally created my website to share my ideas and opinions on the world, but I realised that there is already too much out there (the blog-boom?) and I didn't need to be an endless source of flames. Now my site has taken a new edge to it, it no longer related to anybody but those who know me and live around me. Some people would concider my site to be of any marketable or even personal value anymore, but it doesn't matter. The only people who matter are the people who you want it to matter to (seriously, how many of you think that people in a fridge or road cones on buildings matter?).
You may incorporate this Apple sample code into your program(s) without restriction. This Apple sample code has been provided "AS IS" and the responsibility for its operation is yours. You are not permitted to redistribute this Apple sample code as "Apple sample code" after having made changes. If you're going to redistribute the code, we require that you make it clear that the code was descended from Apple sample code, but that you've made changes. *)
(* This script goes through each smtp server, checks to see whether they are being used by an account, then presents a list of 'orphaned' smtp servers, which you can choose to delete if you wish. *)
tell application "Mail" to set everySMTPServer to every smtp server set nameOfEverySMTPServer to {} repeat with eachSMTPServer in everySMTPServer if (my isThisSMTPServerBeingUsed(eachSMTPServer)) then -- Don't add to the list of smtp servers to potentially delete -- if the server is actively being used by an account else set nameOfEverySMTPServer to nameOfEverySMTPServer & name of eachSMTPServer end if end repeat if ((count of nameOfEverySMTPServer) is equal to 0) then display dialog "All the SMTP servers you have defined are being used by active accounts." else set theServersToDelete to choose from list nameOfEverySMTPServer with prompt "Choose one or more SMTP servers to delete. None of these servers are currently being used by any of your email accounts." with multiple selections allowed if theServersToDelete is not equal to false then if ((count of theServersToDelete) is greater than 0) then repeat with eachServer in theServersToDelete repeat with eachSMTPServer in everySMTPServer try if (name of eachSMTPServer is equal to eachServer as string) then tell application "Mail" to delete eachSMTPServer end if end try end repeat end repeat display dialog "The selected servers have been deleted!" end if end if end if
on isThisSMTPServerBeingUsed(theServer) -- Run through each account and see if any of them -- are using the given SMTP server set theResult to false tell application "Mail" set everyAccount to every account repeat with eachAccount in everyAccount set nameOfSMTPServer to name of smtp server of eachAccount try if (nameOfSMTPServer is equal to name of theServer) then set theResult to true end if end try end repeat end tell return theResult end isThisSMTPServerBeingUsed
Strange how although they explicity mention that Linux will run, we still don't have any solid confirmation coming from the mouth of the overseer that BSD, Netware or Solaris will work.
I don't think - "will run almost any x86 operating system in a Virtual PC environment" Makes the cut. I was more hoping for a - "You absolutely can run [{Linux, Solaris, BSD, Netware}] in Virtual PC" Statement.
Here's a problem that even Bill Gates thought of when designing his new home - the TV screen will PROJECT light out and the actual painting will REFLECT it.
Can we really accept a GNOME/KDE/whatever GUI as proof that they are running Linux? AFAIK, the movies which people are claiming to be featuring Linux don't show off any proof (a uname would be helpful) that it's actually Linux, and now *BSD, IRIX, Solaris or even UNIXWare...
I think the uses for this stops when you're thinking of building anything large out of it, simply because of the clumsiness of paper (and the obviously incineration;) )
I'm wondering, if he was going to be doing a scalability test, why didn't he test the version of FreeBSD that is actually reccomended for production (4.8)? He had the time to test the stable and devel versions of the linux kernel, but only the new technology version of freebsd?
Slashdot Mirror
It's nice to see my antics don't go unnoticed ;)
You can compile for other cpus and even other CPU architectures on one machine for use on another.
I belive the word 'sarcasm' plays a role in my original post.
A nice cake is waiting for you
Oooo! What kind of cake?
Although I don't use NetBSD (did for a short period of time, but now a FreeBSD user), this is still happy news for me.
Hmmmm, I wonder who's poor 486 got stuck with the 4000 package bulk build...
But anybody wearing an xbox under their shirt would not be able to walk or even stand up. And don't even think about lying down, the bugger will crush your rib-cage.
You'd get more points if it doubled as a cutting board or frying pan,
Users of the ed2k (edonkey) network, already have several of these indexers.
Services like Jigle send and cache searches from servers and users to give users the latest avalibility and link for a particular file/hash.
What about a giant picture of steve jobs?
Use the poll thingies that they use in chemistry labs to set up tubes, beakers, and those crazy glass pipes
You mean, a 'stand'?
Do "Tux the Penguin" or Bill Gates next if you have lazer pointers left over.
You'd be insane not to include the BSD demon on there.
That support article was last reviewed on 22 April 2003, but it doesn't say why
That would probably be when they docked the 'Q' prefix from all of their articles, which was probably one of the most idiotic things they've done as well as introduce about a billion new locale problems and a non-functional search-engine.
Oh well... At least my windows machine has been classed (by me) as legacy.
If that's the kind minds that parents have these days then I'm glad that mine didn't catch on to it (I'm 16 BTW).
I basically have complete control and responsibility of all of the machines in my house and the network access (or lack thereof, depending on the weather).
Its not that my parents aren't particularily tech-savvy about these things, its that they trust me to be somewhat responsible with the material that look at and download.
It's not a lack of parenting, its called 'growing up'
I originally created my website to share my ideas and opinions on the world, but I realised that there is already too much out there (the blog-boom?) and I didn't need to be an endless source of flames.
Now my site has taken a new edge to it, it no longer related to anybody but those who know me and live around me. Some people would concider my site to be of any marketable or even personal value anymore, but it doesn't matter. The only people who matter are the people who you want it to matter to (seriously, how many of you think that people in a fridge or road cones on buildings matter?).
In that case, here is some "Apple Sample Code" -
Manage SMTP Servers.scpt
(*
Manage SMTP Servers
Copyright (C) 2002 Apple Computer, Inc.
You may incorporate this Apple sample code into your program(s) without
restriction. This Apple sample code has been provided "AS IS" and the
responsibility for its operation is yours. You are not permitted to
redistribute this Apple sample code as "Apple sample code" after having
made changes. If you're going to redistribute the code, we require
that you make it clear that the code was descended from Apple sample
code, but that you've made changes.
*)
(*
This script goes through each smtp server, checks to see whether they are
being used by an account, then presents a list of 'orphaned' smtp servers,
which you can choose to delete if you wish.
*)
tell application "Mail" to set everySMTPServer to every smtp server
set nameOfEverySMTPServer to {}
repeat with eachSMTPServer in everySMTPServer
if (my isThisSMTPServerBeingUsed(eachSMTPServer)) then
-- Don't add to the list of smtp servers to potentially delete
-- if the server is actively being used by an account
else
set nameOfEverySMTPServer to nameOfEverySMTPServer & name of eachSMTPServer
end if
end repeat
if ((count of nameOfEverySMTPServer) is equal to 0) then
display dialog "All the SMTP servers you have defined are being used by active accounts."
else
set theServersToDelete to choose from list nameOfEverySMTPServer with prompt "Choose one or more SMTP servers to delete. None of these servers are currently being used by any of your email accounts." with multiple selections allowed
if theServersToDelete is not equal to false then
if ((count of theServersToDelete) is greater than 0) then
repeat with eachServer in theServersToDelete
repeat with eachSMTPServer in everySMTPServer
try
if (name of eachSMTPServer is equal to eachServer as string) then
tell application "Mail" to delete eachSMTPServer
end if
end try
end repeat
end repeat
display dialog "The selected servers have been deleted!"
end if
end if
end if
on isThisSMTPServerBeingUsed(theServer)
-- Run through each account and see if any of them
-- are using the given SMTP server
set theResult to false
tell application "Mail"
set everyAccount to every account
repeat with eachAccount in everyAccount
set nameOfSMTPServer to name of smtp server of eachAccount
try
if (nameOfSMTPServer is equal to name of theServer) then
set theResult to true
end if
end try
end repeat
end tell
return theResult
end isThisSMTPServerBeingUsed
Strange how although they explicity mention that Linux will run, we still don't have any solid confirmation coming from the mouth of the overseer that BSD, Netware or Solaris will work.
I don't think -
"will run almost any x86 operating system in a Virtual PC environment"
Makes the cut. I was more hoping for a -
"You absolutely can run [{Linux, Solaris, BSD, Netware}] in Virtual PC"
Statement.
Earth, Fire, and Water
;)
Don't forget wind, don't let it slip away so easily. Then all you need is the 5th element and you've got it all covered
why wouldn't they just use IE and the regular GUI?
For the same reason they seem to sometimes invent their own OS?
Yes, but notice how the evil and oppressive (let's say MS-like) company was using Linux (and you can't prove that it was linux and not some other OS).
Here's a problem that even Bill Gates thought of when designing his new home - the TV screen will PROJECT light out and the actual painting will REFLECT it.
Can we really accept a GNOME/KDE/whatever GUI as proof that they are running Linux?
AFAIK, the movies which people are claiming to be featuring Linux don't show off any proof (a uname would be helpful) that it's actually Linux, and now *BSD, IRIX, Solaris or even UNIXWare...
And nmap runs about a billion other platforms too (you never know, trinity might just like windows enough to use cygwin ;) ).
Disposable electronics?
I think the uses for this stops when you're thinking of building anything large out of it, simply because of the clumsiness of paper (and the obviously incineration ;) )
Can anyone explain the discontinuities in the FreeBSD plots?
Well, the drop-offs of FreeBSD in a couple of the graphs can be explained by him not reading the docs.
Well, it is running on Linux...
Then I woke up, so I don't know what the angels were singing.
Would it have been something from this selection?
I'm wondering, if he was going to be doing a scalability test, why didn't he test the version of FreeBSD that is actually reccomended for production (4.8)?
He had the time to test the stable and devel versions of the linux kernel, but only the new technology version of freebsd?