The last one I remember that actually had a seperate CD for the soundtrack (that was labeled "soundtrack" and worked accordingly) was Command & Conquer, the collectors edition one.
I agree, Apple has done a good thing in sticking with the PPC architecture (no thanks to moves and 'issues' with Motorola, but IBM seems to be getting things kicking again). Besides, didn't Apple kick Sculley out?
Apple has been able to maintain a seperate and focused market (now becoming a bit less-focused, but not to the point of a Sun-like mess) quite successfully and with moves like the G5, there don't seem to be any push for them to exert time and effort in changing architectures and trying to dip themselves into a strange and new world.
I wrote (rather naive) spiel on this here, which pretty much sums up why I think switching is a stupid idea.
Since IE is part of windows and they are wanting to stop distribution of IE, wouldn't that also mean a stop to the ditribution of Windows until the patch is out and all versions are fixed.
Hell, that could mean a stop to most of their software as IE is usually a requirement for it to run (and its soooo nice of them to include it on the CD for us).
Yes, but until MS finally integrates that into IE and starts distributing that version, Eolas doesn't want another copy to pass through the NICs of MS.
Well, when the OS hides all files starting with "." what do you think your chances are? However, you may have been able to go to its mount-point in finder (shift-cmd-g) and eject it from there. I dunno if that's right though because I don't tend to have cds labeled with a "."
Slashdot Mirror
The last one I remember that actually had a seperate CD for the soundtrack (that was labeled "soundtrack" and worked accordingly) was Command & Conquer, the collectors edition one.
So... if I add a 504m spire to the top of my house, I'll be able to beat them? Better not waste any time then...
22,000 files would still be about right then.
I always thought sftp was secure and allowed file transfer.
an you imagine any company willing to buy a license after SCO started suing some of the licensees (IBM, SGI)?
I don't have to.
I agree, Apple has done a good thing in sticking with the PPC architecture (no thanks to moves and 'issues' with Motorola, but IBM seems to be getting things kicking again). Besides, didn't Apple kick Sculley out?
Apple has been able to maintain a seperate and focused market (now becoming a bit less-focused, but not to the point of a Sun-like mess) quite successfully and with moves like the G5, there don't seem to be any push for them to exert time and effort in changing architectures and trying to dip themselves into a strange and new world.
I wrote (rather naive) spiel on this here, which pretty much sums up why I think switching is a stupid idea.
I wonder if they could also be trained to eat other sorts of metal..... *evil grin*
I wonder if these items will pass the Open Group's tests for UNIX branding?
I suppose I should mention that the pageid for this thing is '666' :P
That means they have every right to install and run an application that removes IE, or, at least, the browser functionality.
That's one instance where I wouldn't be opposed to it.
Since IE is part of windows and they are wanting to stop distribution of IE, wouldn't that also mean a stop to the ditribution of Windows until the patch is out and all versions are fixed.
Hell, that could mean a stop to most of their software as IE is usually a requirement for it to run (and its soooo nice of them to include it on the CD for us).
It's good to see more single player content for FPS games.
Even when it's just milking the multiplayer version of it's player's cash?
I hope the recent source leak at Valve pushes them a bit more to realize that single-player content could build them a solid game of the year title
How does a source leak do that? I thought that's what game sales were for.
Yes, but until MS finally integrates that into IE and starts distributing that version, Eolas doesn't want another copy to pass through the NICs of MS.
And even this, I wasn't aware the Vivendi owned Valve and that Valve was just using them as a publisher for HL2.
I guess this is where Japanese management pays off.
Well, with the advances in fraudulent printing technology, the scan should be all you need to recieve your new card.
I don't think they'd laugh....
I'd just hope they scan it before they read it (icky results).
If I share it on Kazaa, will Santa sue?
Of course, since I'm the only one in my office with tech knowledge, I have to fix it back...
Is that in your job description, or can you charge them a consulting fee?
This proves that BSD is dying, right? ;)
No, it proves that it's spreading.
Well, when the OS hides all files starting with "." what do you think your chances are?
However, you may have been able to go to its mount-point in finder (shift-cmd-g) and eject it from there. I dunno if that's right though because I don't tend to have cds labeled with a "."
Like the "errant key strokes" that crash windows (or lack thereof)
At least they are willing to admit product mistakes in their own logo.
Am I the only one that thinks that the line going through it looks like a giant crack in the logo?
It's a sign (better not be).
Yes, I would think that creating 3d-maps and models of everything in BG1/2 again and rewriting the entire plot and scrips would be a bit more work.