You also realize this was the major factor in law being passed to prevent that. Documentation for the National Archives is law concerning state document retention. While I agree at the time she used the system it may not have been illegal, but a memo released and signed by Obama https://www.whitehouse.gov/the... suggest otherwise, http://www.whitehouse.gov/site...
However we are reminded time and time again no law was broken, what was broken was procedure, if one can not follow a simple procedure set out by their employer their actions are questionable and their motive becomes dubious.
Yet cited email as a tertiary reason for firing the African ambassador.
If email truly wasn't that big a deal why was that listed as a reason for his dismissal. I realize you tack on as much as you can to make it stick, but still reflects bad on her now.
Also it's not what every other Secretary of State did, there's a massive difference in setting up a server you own and are the only one to have 24/7 unfettered access vs using a free email provider.
I'm sure that doesn't fit your narrative.
So you are aware there was a memo put out by Pres O. 24 August 2012 concerning use of private email for state business. While I'll agree not illegal and a no-no it does show a disregard for following procedures set out by your superior.
Next up those emails in your inbox purporting member growth work.
Why does "give a man a fish feed him for a day, teach a man to fish feed him for life" not apply in the same way as living on the welfare state? If you give someone something you take care of immediate need but ignore that it's helping in the long run?
I've never understood the logic, in a sense one set of chains has been replaced by another.
I recently dispelled that myth here at work, the HR dept claimed Chrome was faster accessing an outside resource through the network. I tested IE, Chrome, and FF.
In my test for this one resource IE performed the worst with minute + load times Chrome was near as bad at around 45 seconds, FF took the win at 20 second load times.
You realize if I have a sub to one of those content providers I'm sure I'll be paying their costs as an increased sub fee for their service. So end users will end up paying in the long run. It's how trickle down works.
Have you not heard how the IRS is going after US citizens that have been living and working in foreign countries in some cases as dual citizens and in some cases they haven't set foot in the US in decades. Guess what Uncle Sam still gets his share of that money.
Given the current path we are taking why would you want to? I feel ashamed my child has to grow up a citizen of the US in it's current regression. I say regression as it's been heading this way for the last 20 years, this isn't something that's come overnight. People all over the place seem completely at ease with it, while I personally feel we are one step removed from black bag squads.
1) The post can be tracked to an IP associated with an originating location (goes to prove whether law was violated or not) 2) Physical location of server. If not located in country then it's not a violation.
I'm very racist when I game, I kill all races with equal prejudice. Now this doesn't mean I shout derogatory racial slurs while playing but I do kill every virtual person no matter skin color, it's just how I roll.
Bennett makes the assertion it's not parody due to it's darn nature and lack of humor, considering how campy the original was a parody would be the exact opposite which is what it sounds like is there.
Never was a fan of the show, I strongly feel guys in suits destroying cities is best left to classic Godzilla movies.
Slashdot Mirror
You also realize this was the major factor in law being passed to prevent that. Documentation for the National Archives is law concerning state document retention. While I agree at the time she used the system it may not have been illegal, but a memo released and signed by Obama https://www.whitehouse.gov/the... suggest otherwise, http://www.whitehouse.gov/site...
However we are reminded time and time again no law was broken, what was broken was procedure, if one can not follow a simple procedure set out by their employer their actions are questionable and their motive becomes dubious.
So you are working on the assumption that the person that setup her server and maintained was vetted, had security clearance?
Take it by "another Bush" you mean Obama.
Why not? Current POTUS wasn't tested nor ready to lead.
Yet cited email as a tertiary reason for firing the African ambassador.
If email truly wasn't that big a deal why was that listed as a reason for his dismissal. I realize you tack on as much as you can to make it stick, but still reflects bad on her now.
Also it's not what every other Secretary of State did, there's a massive difference in setting up a server you own and are the only one to have 24/7 unfettered access vs using a free email provider.
I'm sure that doesn't fit your narrative.
So you are aware there was a memo put out by Pres O. 24 August 2012 concerning use of private email for state business. While I'll agree not illegal and a no-no it does show a disregard for following procedures set out by your superior.
Next up those emails in your inbox purporting member growth work.
Never fails to disappoint, but but the other guy started it!
When your argument starts "with the other guy" you've lost.
Funny how few people refuse to see it that way though.
It's a shame, it really is.
If more people thought this way perhaps there would be a greater sense of urgency to get off the gov payroll.
While true, you also see those that think that people of certain skin colors are inferior, or their own color is a chosen color.
Let's face the truth no matter their color racists are dick's.
If there is one thing on the planet we could all live without it would be the racists of all colors.
Why does "give a man a fish feed him for a day, teach a man to fish feed him for life" not apply in the same way as living on the welfare state? If you give someone something you take care of immediate need but ignore that it's helping in the long run?
I've never understood the logic, in a sense one set of chains has been replaced by another.
Free speech doesn't mean free from repercussion.
I recently dispelled that myth here at work, the HR dept claimed Chrome was faster accessing an outside resource through the network. I tested IE, Chrome, and FF.
In my test for this one resource IE performed the worst with minute + load times Chrome was near as bad at around 45 seconds, FF took the win at 20 second load times.
You also forget it was first to have a pop-up blocker.
You realize if I have a sub to one of those content providers I'm sure I'll be paying their costs as an increased sub fee for their service. So end users will end up paying in the long run. It's how trickle down works.
http://webcache.googleusercont...
Have you not heard how the IRS is going after US citizens that have been living and working in foreign countries in some cases as dual citizens and in some cases they haven't set foot in the US in decades. Guess what Uncle Sam still gets his share of that money.
Given the current path we are taking why would you want to? I feel ashamed my child has to grow up a citizen of the US in it's current regression. I say regression as it's been heading this way for the last 20 years, this isn't something that's come overnight. People all over the place seem completely at ease with it, while I personally feel we are one step removed from black bag squads.
What then? As little as it seems now? Or by then will no one care a shred about privacy?
Internet is easier than you make it sound.
1) The post can be tracked to an IP associated with an originating location (goes to prove whether law was violated or not)
2) Physical location of server. If not located in country then it's not a violation.
Other than copyright or piracy exactly which US law could you violate while in Australia and then be arrested for upon arrival back in the US?
Isn't it only slander if it's not true? So if what he posted is true then it isn't slander right?
I'm very racist when I game, I kill all races with equal prejudice. Now this doesn't mean I shout derogatory racial slurs while playing but I do kill every virtual person no matter skin color, it's just how I roll.
Is this a windup?
Bennett makes the assertion it's not parody due to it's darn nature and lack of humor, considering how campy the original was a parody would be the exact opposite which is what it sounds like is there.
Never was a fan of the show, I strongly feel guys in suits destroying cities is best left to classic Godzilla movies.
It needs to stop!
You are aware you can break laws without a conviction right?