Put it like this, how unprofessional is it if say you are talking to a vendor and instead of giving you a myname@mycompany.com they give you myname@yahoo.com
Yes it's completely political, forgive me for thinking that a person holding such high office should abide by rules, regulations and even law, for more info see the Federal Records Act.
I agree, which is why I say what this administration is doing unilaterally is wrong. Yet people I explain this to that are on that party side don't see it.
I then ask them to imagine the other guy doing the same.
It's wrong no matter who does it.
I think precedent has been set and our political system will worsen and quickly.
We have lost the reigns and are just trying to hold on for the ride now.
It's also rather difficult to discipline a child that would turn around and threaten the parent with a social services report for abuse.
Never happened to me but I'm sure there are parents out there terrified of the prospect and I'm sure there's kids out there asshole enough to do that to their parents.
Is there any impact on the bees from exposure to the plastic cells, is there any alteration of flavor of the honey from plastic cells, similar to that of a drinking from a plastic cup alters the flavor of soda or water?
I think it's deeply sick that our government or anyone would equate our foreign, Congressionally declared, military enemies locked in nearly unrestrained warfare with the private effects and papers and their electronic equiavlents of it's peaceful citizens.
As do I, yet our government has proven over many decades it's inability to not overreach, many times has it been caught red handed in the cookie jar.
If you want to believe they can be trusted then good on you, however I don't trust them as far as I could throw them.
If terrorism is such the threat that every communication needs monitoring and archival why are good old fashioned letters not opened and scanned then sent on about their way, you know in case terrorists are using pen and paper to coordinate.
The interesting thing is that people who think it is "clearly" unconstitutional seem to think things are innately or inherently constitutional or unconstitutional, ignoring incredible and fantastic complexities that already exist in interpretations of the Fourth Amendment, to say nothing of the rest of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
This is the exact reason when the document was written it was written in plain English.
For your quote there see the 10th Amendment.
To be clear I am not so much concerned with anyone collecting my metadata, I am concerned with someone having the ability to indiscriminately read an encrypted private communication between myself and a second party on a witch hunt for "reds under the bed".
This is the slippery slope. In fact tinfoilhat>this would go a good ways to why the gov didn't do away with ISIS when presented the opportunity./tinfoilhat> They would lose the threat of "to fight terrorists".
People should wake up, the real terrorists are in Washington. We elected some of them, the rest were appointed.
I am glad to hear that if I had wads of cash that you completely are ok with my lobbying whomever in Washington for whatever purpose I wanted just because I had pockets deep enough.
Article the sixth... The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Officials said the six terrorists who stormed the school in Peshawar were using cellphones registered to one woman who had no obvious connection to the attackers.
What? You mean something intended to curb or stop this altogether is known to not be effective? Then other than having the national database of fingerprints why do it? NVM answered my own question, to have a national database of fingerprints.
It's good to read that the rest of the world is as screwed as my country when it comes to citizens privacy.
Slashdot Mirror
So you don't think it gives a glimpse into the persons character or ethics?
You forget Bush did do this, well similar this is why the FRA was altered to cover Presidential emails.
Put it like this, how unprofessional is it if say you are talking to a vendor and instead of giving you a myname@mycompany.com they give you myname@yahoo.com
Yes it's completely political, forgive me for thinking that a person holding such high office should abide by rules, regulations and even law, for more info see the Federal Records Act.
I agree, which is why I say what this administration is doing unilaterally is wrong. Yet people I explain this to that are on that party side don't see it.
I then ask them to imagine the other guy doing the same.
It's wrong no matter who does it.
I think precedent has been set and our political system will worsen and quickly.
We have lost the reigns and are just trying to hold on for the ride now.
Sad too considering that if she is willing to ignore regulations or law at this stage imagine what she would do in a higher position.
At least thanks to the NSA we have her emails archived.
Now to get Congressional force to have NSA provide them.
Any costs associated with the retrieval should be paid for by her.
Or perhaps make it less lucrative to be a career politician.
It's also rather difficult to discipline a child that would turn around and threaten the parent with a social services report for abuse.
Never happened to me but I'm sure there are parents out there terrified of the prospect and I'm sure there's kids out there asshole enough to do that to their parents.
The elected officials no matter the party stop following the spirit of rules or the spirit of law and actually follow the fucking rules or law.
You really think this will happen with the current level of OS dumbing down?
I think that was covered in web programming 101 URL redirects/Directory transversal.
More like
"if you don't like NSA spying, you can keep it"
It's not new and it's not his idea.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
I had a toy that back in the late 70's that was essentially the same thing.
Is there any impact on the bees from exposure to the plastic cells, is there any alteration of flavor of the honey from plastic cells, similar to that of a drinking from a plastic cup alters the flavor of soda or water?
but isn't astrology just superstition?
If the purpose is to pose the question
Then the answer is yes, the reason the person could just get the shit themselves so what difference does it make if a robot gets it for them?
As do I, yet our government has proven over many decades it's inability to not overreach, many times has it been caught red handed in the cookie jar.
If you want to believe they can be trusted then good on you, however I don't trust them as far as I could throw them.
If terrorism is such the threat that every communication needs monitoring and archival why are good old fashioned letters not opened and scanned then sent on about their way, you know in case terrorists are using pen and paper to coordinate.
With your last two paragraphs I fully agree with.
I fear my government removing my liberties more than I fear losing my life in a terrorist attack.
This is the exact reason when the document was written it was written in plain English.
/tinfoilhat> They would lose the threat of "to fight terrorists".
For your quote there see the 10th Amendment.
To be clear I am not so much concerned with anyone collecting my metadata, I am concerned with someone having the ability to indiscriminately read an encrypted private communication between myself and a second party on a witch hunt for "reds under the bed".
This is the slippery slope. In fact tinfoilhat>this would go a good ways to why the gov didn't do away with ISIS when presented the opportunity.
People should wake up, the real terrorists are in Washington. We elected some of them, the rest were appointed.
I am glad to hear that if I had wads of cash that you completely are ok with my lobbying whomever in Washington for whatever purpose I wanted just because I had pockets deep enough.
You are attempting to compare metadata to an encrypted communication between two private parties.
That's like comparing an abacus to a modern computer.
You're are naive to think they won't use this to spy on US citizens.
I can completely understand this, but was it to the same scale?
What? You mean something intended to curb or stop this altogether is known to not be effective? Then other than having the national database of fingerprints why do it? NVM answered my own question, to have a national database of fingerprints.
It's good to read that the rest of the world is as screwed as my country when it comes to citizens privacy.