Play video in browser while running Fraps. There I bypassed this first. While the quality isn't that great it is a way to essentially moot what they are doing.
The project, run by GPS-tracking company Chronos Technology, picked up the illegal jamming incidents via four GPS sensors in trials lasting from two to six months per location.'"
So there is actually a law on the books in the UK stating it is illegal to jam a GPS sensor or only illegal to jam one you don't own? Please be specific, TFA mentioned blocking corporate vehicle tracking, and theft of high value vehicles. Is there that much problem with high value vehicle theft in the UK? How bout some numbers to back up that claim. More likely I'd choose evasion of vehicle tracking, spousal evasion of phone GPS tracking and people who regularly break posted speed limits worried their GPS data will earn them a citation.
I've no religious denomination. In school we had a moment of prayer some kids would pray out loud, I'd just sit there and do nothing. You don't have to respect the religion or beliefs but I think it's just common courtesy to allow someone to pray and to keep quite while they are doing it.
It'll never happen with data within the credit industry. With so many regulations on privacy now using a third party cloud storage provider would be a gross violation of privacy laws.
You assume that one verifies your passport by simply swiping it through the RFID reader. I imagine it gets physically inspected as well. An RFID tag can not be used for verifiable identification, it's too prone to duplication and also theft, one would just need to be near a person walking through the airport with a reader in their bag collecting data on travelers. Better human judgement could have been used.
Let's also take into account that if sitting on it is enough to break it then it is not fit to use in a passport, something that will be abused by travel.
I saw we show both the airlines and the gov'ment how fed up we are with the draconian measures they've implemented.
Seriously, saying a child doesn't respect a passport is like saying the sun is hot. A kid has no concept of what the damn thing is other than it has their picture.
This, Firefly is the only one I can think that depicted no sound in space. Star Trek, Star Wars and many others also have sounds in space as well as explosions larger than life, Stargate also falls into that category.
If you actually read the article, there was no illegal hunting going on. The hunt was well within season, and was also on a hunting plantation. So what we have here is a case of hunters accused of shooting down a remote helicopter that was actually trespassing in private airspace. Considering the nature of the hunt in progress on the ground it's no wonder it was shot down. I mean what do you expect if what you are filming flies and those hunting it are looking up. It could be a case of bad vehicle placement, though I doubt it. They will never be able to prove that it was purposefully shot down though.
Perhaps have the software work in a crippled way without the dongle, but need the dongle to unlock the full application. That should be tougher to crack than any DRM you could come up with.
One thing that's apparent today is that corps with the pockets deep enough can't even stop their DRM from being cracked.(read MS, not even Windows 7 was able to avoid it)
Sounds to me like 20 some years of dubious business practices anything the courts had to hear from these guys should never have made it that far. Sounds like they have no credibility.
The 'mini internet' has content servers, DNS servers, and network emulators (to model various different latencies, throughputs, packet loss)."
I am all for this testing, but in practice I think it will lack one very important metric that Microsoft can not measure. How well IE10 works with a site riddled with poorly written code.
Slashdot Mirror
Close but you misspelled it. It's "goad".
Play video in browser while running Fraps. There I bypassed this first. While the quality isn't that great it is a way to essentially moot what they are doing.
I wonder if it gets infected if it operates slower. "Your request caused an invalid page fault in kernel32.flsh, Click here to report this problem"
So there is actually a law on the books in the UK stating it is illegal to jam a GPS sensor or only illegal to jam one you don't own? Please be specific, TFA mentioned blocking corporate vehicle tracking, and theft of high value vehicles. Is there that much problem with high value vehicle theft in the UK? How bout some numbers to back up that claim. More likely I'd choose evasion of vehicle tracking, spousal evasion of phone GPS tracking and people who regularly break posted speed limits worried their GPS data will earn them a citation.
I've no religious denomination. In school we had a moment of prayer some kids would pray out loud, I'd just sit there and do nothing. You don't have to respect the religion or beliefs but I think it's just common courtesy to allow someone to pray and to keep quite while they are doing it.
Apparently the Google spellchecker is not strong with this one.
It'll never happen with data within the credit industry. With so many regulations on privacy now using a third party cloud storage provider would be a gross violation of privacy laws.
Nowhere in there does it mention the RFID tag.
You assume that one verifies your passport by simply swiping it through the RFID reader. I imagine it gets physically inspected as well. An RFID tag can not be used for verifiable identification, it's too prone to duplication and also theft, one would just need to be near a person walking through the airport with a reader in their bag collecting data on travelers. Better human judgement could have been used.
Let's also take into account that if sitting on it is enough to break it then it is not fit to use in a passport, something that will be abused by travel.
I saw we show both the airlines and the gov'ment how fed up we are with the draconian measures they've implemented.
Seriously, saying a child doesn't respect a passport is like saying the sun is hot. A kid has no concept of what the damn thing is other than it has their picture.
I mean cause everyone knows weight is a factor when lifting objects into orbit, so no doubt batteries to power the engines wouldn't be a factor.
The moon isn't growing. It's due to Mooninite overpopulation.
This, Firefly is the only one I can think that depicted no sound in space. Star Trek, Star Wars and many others also have sounds in space as well as explosions larger than life, Stargate also falls into that category.
If you actually read the article, there was no illegal hunting going on. The hunt was well within season, and was also on a hunting plantation. So what we have here is a case of hunters accused of shooting down a remote helicopter that was actually trespassing in private airspace. Considering the nature of the hunt in progress on the ground it's no wonder it was shot down. I mean what do you expect if what you are filming flies and those hunting it are looking up. It could be a case of bad vehicle placement, though I doubt it. They will never be able to prove that it was purposefully shot down though.
And they would have to be a Texas lawyer.
I think this would ultimately be your solution.
Perhaps have the software work in a crippled way without the dongle, but need the dongle to unlock the full application. That should be tougher to crack than any DRM you could come up with.
One thing that's apparent today is that corps with the pockets deep enough can't even stop their DRM from being cracked.(read MS, not even Windows 7 was able to avoid it)
I'm a citizen so my interests are not taken to heart for this matter.
I fixed that for you.
Is that where people are downloading those Guy Fawkes faces?
Sounds to me like 20 some years of dubious business practices anything the courts had to hear from these guys should never have made it that far. Sounds like they have no credibility.
So for all those that said Obama has done nothing while in office I say [sarcasm]IN YOUR FACE.[/sarcasm]
I've disabled all html rendering in Outlook. Too easy to get hit with malware.
We've been told "this is it" since IE 5.
That problem has existed since Windows 98 SE, it's always been slower than a *nix distro and your browser de jour.
I am all for this testing, but in practice I think it will lack one very important metric that Microsoft can not measure. How well IE10 works with a site riddled with poorly written code.
OMG. I fell out when I read that.