You can't take one particular configuration of one processor and assume that Intel is trying to kill the enthusiast PC. Guess what, the atom processors in phones are soldered down too, oh no, enthusiast PC dead. If you want to know if Intel is going to kill the enthusiast market just ask whether or not it makes them money.
It is legally defined as a privilege. States do restrict who drives and who doesn't. You have to obtain a special license from the government in order to drive a vehicle on public roads. If you are found to abuse your privileged then that license can be revoked.
Effectively you are restricted from driving from birth without due process. You must go through a process in order to gain the privilege.
You have a right to freely travel, that doesn't mean you have a right to a specific form of transportation.
The article is talking about Ivy Bridge, which would be the 3rd generation Core. The "i3" loosely represents the performance sku, "i3" being the low end. Haswell will probably be marketed as the 4th generation Core.
I have known a few terrible drivers in my life. Despite their friends, and occasionally strangers, telling them that they were terrible drivers, multiple collisions in which vehicles have been totaled, and even collisions with pedestrians, they still believed that they were good drivers. Individuals may not be the best judges of whether or not they can drive better than a machine.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. How the public perceives it. How it is marketed. How it is handled by insurance companies.
Re:What gives? As long as it's close enough...
on
The HP Memristor Debate
·
· Score: 3, Informative
I came here to say precisely this. It isn't an 'ideal' component. Which is what the theory is based on. But then neither is any electrical component you can think of. Even resistors stop being linear at very high or very low voltages / currents. Anybody ever seen an ideal current source? An ideal voltage source? And ideal op-amp? Its not ideal because it is a real device. Ideal components only exist on paper.
I've been in that position. It worked out. It was also much more difficult than I initially thought it would be.
I break my career growth into two areas: learning from the examples of those around me, and learning on my own. To maximize your growth you will need a good mix of both types. There are likely experienced people who can teach you many things wherever you go. What you really need to ask yourself is whether you value the types of things that you can learn from your co-workers in this environment. In this case, they can't teach you much about tools and process. What can you learn? If you can't think of anything that interests you then this sounds like a dead end, and you should probably leave.
Agreed. There are developers who continue to learn, read and hone their craft. Individuals who pick up new technologies and strive to improve at what they do. Those developers should be rewarded. They should be given every opportunity to advance and get more pay.
All of that being said. A market is a market. The article makes it sound like they did look at training individuals internally, but decided to go with hiring some outside developers to help them jump-start the process. If that is what it costs for that type of talent, then that is what you must pay. Do I think it is fair? No. If I worked where that happened would I learn the new technology anyway? Yes. Would I try to prove that I am a better developer than the new hires? Yes. Would I demand a pay raise after? Yes.
My guess is that in a modern vehicle will do whatever is necessary to perform the enabled functions. Turn on the car, turn up the heat and the computer will run the engine if that is necessary. Once the car is up to the specified temperature the engine will shut off again to preserve power. I suppose they could have missed this use case, but that seems unlikely.
This was my first reaction too. It would also require that the beer be pasteurized. Oxygenating (live) beer just gives the yeast more food. which it will then convert to CO2. It is a little more complicated than that, since the yeast needs sugar too. In any case you are seriously messing with the beer's chemistry. Perhaps a system where flat beer gets oxygenated just before serving would work. It might not make good beer, but is worth trying. Of course, I don't tend to drink enough beer to get hang-over drunk anyway. It just takes too long.
Are you talking about people matching speed at 45 in a 65 or are you complaining about people matching speed at 65 in a 65?
The former is understandable, but if it's the latter, why should I make room for you to break the law (go over 65)? Sure, it's your choice to speed, but I don't see where I should feel bad about doing the speed limit. When signs say "slower traffic keep right" they mean slower than the speed limit. Grandma Moses shouldn't be in the far left lane doing 50 in a 70. The left lane isn't where it's magically acceptable to speed.
People around here seem to think the speed limit is dependent upon the distance from the car in front of you. If you can't see anyone, the 65 is a 90. If you're about half a mile behind them, it's an 80. Quarter mile and it's a 70 until you're sure it's not a cop. Then it's back to 80 until you're 6 inches off their ass. At that point, you either change lanes without signaling (it'd require putting down the cell phone) or, if you can't pass, sit on their ass and flick your high beams on and off in their rear view mirror until they miss a turn and run off the road in a blind stupor.
I actually saw a woman driving with her elbow this morning. She had the cellphone in her right hand and her left hand was blocking the sun from her eyes. Her visor was up and it wasn't even that bright out.
You aren't the police. It isn't your job to tell people how fast they should or shouldn't go. It is okay to go the speed limit in the left lane, but it isn't okay if you are the only guy in the left lane, and you are going the same speed as everyone in the adjacent lanes. If people want to speed, let them speed. One of our jobs as drivers should be to impede the others around us as little as possible. It definitely isn't your job to make sure that the people around you aren't breaking the law.
I know you are joking, but the Bible says nothing about priests or celibacy. That was invented by the catholic church in the 12th century so the church could get around paying for the children of priests.
Seriously? If I was bleeding to death, and there was no equipment around to stop the bleeding enough to keep me alive, I would welcome this procedure.
You are correct that there is no good reason to do this for fun, but if the choice is death or entering a potentially risky state of suspended animation, I will choose the later.
Keep in mind that the majority of the research is for exactly that purpose.
Except for the part where she was a staunch atheist. Or the part where she supported the expansion of social freedoms. Or the part where she wanted to reduce the size of the government.
You seem to be confusing Libertarians with Republicans. Not even all Libertarians are Objectivists. Most Republicans are just as likely to dislike Ayn Rand as much as most Democrats, though it may be for different reasons. It is far from love anyway.
You make it sound as if it is some sort of crime to actually use the connection we pay for. We already pay a fair rate for the bandwidth we use. If you don't want to pay the price of your connection because you fail to fully utilize it you should downgrade.
I don't know about your provider, but mine only offers the option to downgrade the bandwidth. If I could downgrade the amount of data transfered per month, it might work for me. Unfortunately, that isn't an option.
It isn't a crime to use the connection, but there is no option for the guy who wants a fast connection but only uses it to for playing games and watching youtube videos, as opposed to say bittorrent.
That isn't entirely true. I'm from Portland and have been told that we tend to pronounce words like roof as ruf. I'm not familiar enough with any phonetic alphabet to really spell it out. Bascly we have a lazy `oo'. I don't think it is very noticable, but I have had people bring it up.
As an American (in Portland Oregon actually) who works with people in India on weekly basis, I do find it very difficult to understand Indians. I can understand how a Brit would find it easy though. The issue is that people in India actually do speak a fair amout of English on a daily basis. Having been part of the Brittish Empire however, it is heavily skewed towards Brittish English. Many Indians grow up speaking English, but they learn it with a mix of Brittish dialect and Indian accent. To them, this is how they know and understand English. To an American we have to translate their English through two layers of accent and language. To a Brit there is only one. I find that because they actually do speak a fair amout of English in India they have a native version of English (Hinglish), there is little effort made to sound more American or Brittish. To them, the way it sounds is simply the way it is meant to sound. There is nothing wrong with that, but there is a distiction between the way their English sounds and the English of someone who learns it primarily to communicate with Americans or Brits. Just so I don't get accused of talking out of my ass, I only brought this up because I recently had this same discussion with an Indian friend.
No, they showed that a general sampling of low frequency high amplitude sound waves didn't make Adam poop his pants. Entertaining show, but they have never proven or disproven anything. Actually, science in general never proves or disproves either, just correlates.
In the early 90's Intel competed against AMD, Cyrix and Via (maybe others too). If anything, it is worse now. As far as I know, there is only AMD, Intel. Via has an offering, but it doesn't seriously compete with the others in any of the major market segments. People don't remember anyone but Intel because their "Intel Inside" campaign was so wildly successful.
His original post said it was 9 years ago. From the Wikipedia article, "David" came out in 1988, 19 years ago. If the movie really is based on a true story, the actual event would have happened some time before that. So I don't think DavidV is "David".
Blackford has two separate FSBs. One for each quad core. Now, the quad core shares the bus among the two converged cores, but I think you meant something else.
Slashdot Mirror
You can't take one particular configuration of one processor and assume that Intel is trying to kill the enthusiast PC. Guess what, the atom processors in phones are soldered down too, oh no, enthusiast PC dead. If you want to know if Intel is going to kill the enthusiast market just ask whether or not it makes them money.
It is legally defined as a privilege. States do restrict who drives and who doesn't. You have to obtain a special license from the government in order to drive a vehicle on public roads. If you are found to abuse your privileged then that license can be revoked.
Effectively you are restricted from driving from birth without due process. You must go through a process in order to gain the privilege.
You have a right to freely travel, that doesn't mean you have a right to a specific form of transportation.
The article is talking about Ivy Bridge, which would be the 3rd generation Core. The "i3" loosely represents the performance sku, "i3" being the low end. Haswell will probably be marketed as the 4th generation Core.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. How the public perceives it. How it is marketed. How it is handled by insurance companies.
I came here to say precisely this. It isn't an 'ideal' component. Which is what the theory is based on. But then neither is any electrical component you can think of. Even resistors stop being linear at very high or very low voltages / currents. Anybody ever seen an ideal current source? An ideal voltage source? And ideal op-amp? Its not ideal because it is a real device. Ideal components only exist on paper.
I've been in that position. It worked out. It was also much more difficult than I initially thought it would be.
I break my career growth into two areas: learning from the examples of those around me, and learning on my own. To maximize your growth you will need a good mix of both types. There are likely experienced people who can teach you many things wherever you go. What you really need to ask yourself is whether you value the types of things that you can learn from your co-workers in this environment. In this case, they can't teach you much about tools and process. What can you learn? If you can't think of anything that interests you then this sounds like a dead end, and you should probably leave.
Agreed. There are developers who continue to learn, read and hone their craft. Individuals who pick up new technologies and strive to improve at what they do. Those developers should be rewarded. They should be given every opportunity to advance and get more pay.
All of that being said. A market is a market. The article makes it sound like they did look at training individuals internally, but decided to go with hiring some outside developers to help them jump-start the process. If that is what it costs for that type of talent, then that is what you must pay. Do I think it is fair? No. If I worked where that happened would I learn the new technology anyway? Yes. Would I try to prove that I am a better developer than the new hires? Yes. Would I demand a pay raise after? Yes.
My guess is that in a modern vehicle will do whatever is necessary to perform the enabled functions. Turn on the car, turn up the heat and the computer will run the engine if that is necessary. Once the car is up to the specified temperature the engine will shut off again to preserve power. I suppose they could have missed this use case, but that seems unlikely.
This was my first reaction too. It would also require that the beer be pasteurized. Oxygenating (live) beer just gives the yeast more food. which it will then convert to CO2. It is a little more complicated than that, since the yeast needs sugar too. In any case you are seriously messing with the beer's chemistry. Perhaps a system where flat beer gets oxygenated just before serving would work. It might not make good beer, but is worth trying. Of course, I don't tend to drink enough beer to get hang-over drunk anyway. It just takes too long.
Are you talking about people matching speed at 45 in a 65 or are you complaining about people matching speed at 65 in a 65? The former is understandable, but if it's the latter, why should I make room for you to break the law (go over 65)? Sure, it's your choice to speed, but I don't see where I should feel bad about doing the speed limit. When signs say "slower traffic keep right" they mean slower than the speed limit. Grandma Moses shouldn't be in the far left lane doing 50 in a 70. The left lane isn't where it's magically acceptable to speed. People around here seem to think the speed limit is dependent upon the distance from the car in front of you. If you can't see anyone, the 65 is a 90. If you're about half a mile behind them, it's an 80. Quarter mile and it's a 70 until you're sure it's not a cop. Then it's back to 80 until you're 6 inches off their ass. At that point, you either change lanes without signaling (it'd require putting down the cell phone) or, if you can't pass, sit on their ass and flick your high beams on and off in their rear view mirror until they miss a turn and run off the road in a blind stupor. I actually saw a woman driving with her elbow this morning. She had the cellphone in her right hand and her left hand was blocking the sun from her eyes. Her visor was up and it wasn't even that bright out.
You aren't the police. It isn't your job to tell people how fast they should or shouldn't go. It is okay to go the speed limit in the left lane, but it isn't okay if you are the only guy in the left lane, and you are going the same speed as everyone in the adjacent lanes. If people want to speed, let them speed. One of our jobs as drivers should be to impede the others around us as little as possible. It definitely isn't your job to make sure that the people around you aren't breaking the law.
I know you are joking, but the Bible says nothing about priests or celibacy. That was invented by the catholic church in the 12th century so the church could get around paying for the children of priests.
For control in the experiment you can strike him in the head.
You are correct that there is no good reason to do this for fun, but if the choice is death or entering a potentially risky state of suspended animation, I will choose the later.
Keep in mind that the majority of the research is for exactly that purpose.
Except for the part where she was a staunch atheist. Or the part where she supported the expansion of social freedoms. Or the part where she wanted to reduce the size of the government.
You seem to be confusing Libertarians with Republicans. Not even all Libertarians are Objectivists. Most Republicans are just as likely to dislike Ayn Rand as much as most Democrats, though it may be for different reasons. It is far from love anyway.
I don't know about your provider, but mine only offers the option to downgrade the bandwidth. If I could downgrade the amount of data transfered per month, it might work for me. Unfortunately, that isn't an option.
It isn't a crime to use the connection, but there is no option for the guy who wants a fast connection but only uses it to for playing games and watching youtube videos, as opposed to say bittorrent.
Shame on you intel
memory control on die...
That is what we want!
That isn't entirely true. I'm from Portland and have been told that we tend to pronounce words like roof as ruf. I'm not familiar enough with any phonetic alphabet to really spell it out. Bascly we have a lazy `oo'. I don't think it is very noticable, but I have had people bring it up.
As an American (in Portland Oregon actually) who works with people in India on weekly basis, I do find it very difficult to understand Indians. I can understand how a Brit would find it easy though. The issue is that people in India actually do speak a fair amout of English on a daily basis. Having been part of the Brittish Empire however, it is heavily skewed towards Brittish English. Many Indians grow up speaking English, but they learn it with a mix of Brittish dialect and Indian accent. To them, this is how they know and understand English. To an American we have to translate their English through two layers of accent and language. To a Brit there is only one. I find that because they actually do speak a fair amout of English in India they have a native version of English (Hinglish), there is little effort made to sound more American or Brittish. To them, the way it sounds is simply the way it is meant to sound. There is nothing wrong with that, but there is a distiction between the way their English sounds and the English of someone who learns it primarily to communicate with Americans or Brits. Just so I don't get accused of talking out of my ass, I only brought this up because I recently had this same discussion with an Indian friend.
No, they showed that a general sampling of low frequency high amplitude sound waves didn't make Adam poop his pants. Entertaining show, but they have never proven or disproven anything. Actually, science in general never proves or disproves either, just correlates.
In the early 90's Intel competed against AMD, Cyrix and Via (maybe others too). If anything, it is worse now. As far as I know, there is only AMD, Intel. Via has an offering, but it doesn't seriously compete with the others in any of the major market segments. People don't remember anyone but Intel because their "Intel Inside" campaign was so wildly successful.
It embiggens the post whenever used.
My 2 month old still fits in the microwave easily.
His original post said it was 9 years ago. From the Wikipedia article, "David" came out in 1988, 19 years ago. If the movie really is based on a true story, the actual event would have happened some time before that. So I don't think DavidV is "David".
Blackford has two separate FSBs. One for each quad core. Now, the quad core shares the bus among the two converged cores, but I think you meant something else.
The one you cited is 3.3 x 8.8 um (micro-meter) about 1000x larger than the IBM logo in the article.