Someone does something right, really right. So M$ sees and all of a sudden *THEY* have to do it, they dip into their $30E10 cash reserve and buy their way into the field. All because Billy wrote a BASIC interpreter 25 years ago. Fsk Billy, Fsk Micro$oft,
Fsk stupid fsking users that support him.
A four year degree? Half the people that keep the net going don't have a four year degee. Arrogant bastard.
Anyway, if we're going to start licensing users shouldn't we first license developers? Did that tighten some sphincters? It should. This guy ought to be working for Poindexer and crew for homeland security or some such fascist thing instead of ranting about users.
Sorry, the best you can say is near VHS quality. And I don't even agree with that. A fresh, first generation tape in a good machine blows 320x240 away any day.
For $69 you can get a 33mhz 80186 board with 512k of flash and ram, a flash file system, and a full Borland development ide. You get 44 digital I/O lines plus the raw processor bus and a bunch of integrated peripherals.
It seems to me that the retail programming market has gone much the same way as the music industry. Either work for one of the giant "studios" or struggle on your own for the love of your work.
If you need the bread, work as a consultant. There's quite a bit of work available if you look in the right places.
If you want to get your stuff out to a grateful audience, find a specialized field to learn about then use the newsgroups to find out just what people want.
Should read the Milgram Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment. The article is boring and is irrelevent and comments regarding the appropriateness of an article should not be off-topic. Have a good day!
I beg to differ, Mr. Moderator, sir. This is an extremely dull and irrelevent article and I think a yawn and coffee request is a totally on-topic comment.
I had to hammer the wire out of rusty nails, break the necks off of beer bottles for insulators, string the wire, build modems out of 12AU7 and 6J6 tubes, and have it all running before dawn.
And we were glad for them.
What would a Beowolf cluster of these look like. Or how long would a Beowolf cluster run on these. Or what would happen if you dropped a wrench down inside this thing?
The election process is one of the most open processes in our government. You can be a pollworker (and get paid for it) and you can witness public logic and accuracy tests. You might even be able to work as a volunteer counting ballots. I've been sworn in and helped count votes all over the US and part of Canada.
Making sure that your particular vote is properly counted would be impossible because of secrecy issues. In the counting process, the ballot is separated from any form of user ID early on so that a person's vote is kept secret. That's a good thing.
For 4 years. I've been to countless elections and given technical help and gruntwork help. I was the lead project engineer for a optical-scan high speed ballot counter.
That said, I absolutely insist on machine-readable and hand-countable pen-marked paper ballots. This is the only way to insure both fast and accurate election night returns *and* verifiable beyond-a-shadow-of-a-doubt recount ability. These machines have been manufactured for many years and they *were not* responsible for the Florida cluster-fsk.
Slashdot Mirror
Someone does something right, really right. So M$ sees and all of a sudden *THEY* have to do it, they dip into their $30E10 cash reserve and buy their way into the field. All because Billy wrote a BASIC interpreter 25 years ago. Fsk Billy, Fsk Micro$oft, Fsk stupid fsking users that support him.
I'm getting about 40/hr and I'm not finding much realtime data on the attack. Anyone know anything more?
2. SCO Unix Grep Boy
3. Microsoft DLL Librarian
4. Commander Taco's Perl Monkey
Feel free to add more...
Anyway, if we're going to start licensing users shouldn't we first license developers? Did that tighten some sphincters? It should. This guy ought to be working for Poindexer and crew for homeland security or some such fascist thing instead of ranting about users.
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=75555&cid=6754 802
and it doesn't hardly seem to be the same person.
Busted.
Or boiling oil.
A) Not enough sand.
Do you still have to pay SCO $699 for each Linux instance that you run. Or are they covered by the Microsoft Unix license.
I have to differ with you. I've *seen* both and there is no comparison. And I don't consider myself to be a technosnob. Sorry you can't see it.
Sorry, the best you can say is near VHS quality. And I don't even agree with that. A fresh, first generation tape in a good machine blows 320x240 away any day.
Tell the truth and people will trust you.
Not the same. The JK micro version is 4.51, runs under win and compiles to a realmode target.
For $69 you can get a 33mhz 80186 board with 512k of flash and ram, a flash file system, and a full Borland development ide. You get 44 digital I/O lines plus the raw processor bus and a bunch of integrated peripherals.
If you need the bread, work as a consultant. There's quite a bit of work available if you look in the right places.
If you want to get your stuff out to a grateful audience, find a specialized field to learn about then use the newsgroups to find out just what people want.
Should read the Milgram Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment. The article is boring and is irrelevent and comments regarding the appropriateness of an article should not be off-topic. Have a good day!
I beg to differ, Mr. Moderator, sir. This is an extremely dull and irrelevent article and I think a yawn and coffee request is a totally on-topic comment.
I had to hammer the wire out of rusty nails, break the necks off of beer bottles for insulators, string the wire, build modems out of 12AU7 and 6J6 tubes, and have it all running before dawn. And we were glad for them.
What would a Beowolf cluster of these look like. Or how long would a Beowolf cluster run on these. Or what would happen if you dropped a wrench down inside this thing?
Ub Iwerks. That's the correct spelling. Google is your friend.
Making sure that your particular vote is properly counted would be impossible because of secrecy issues. In the counting process, the ballot is separated from any form of user ID early on so that a person's vote is kept secret. That's a good thing.
That said, I absolutely insist on machine-readable and hand-countable pen-marked paper ballots. This is the only way to insure both fast and accurate election night returns *and* verifiable beyond-a-shadow-of-a-doubt recount ability. These machines have been manufactured for many years and they *were not* responsible for the Florida cluster-fsk.
Even sweeter would be a flood attack of tattletail packets.
I bet if you also renounce your citizenship they won't.
"Joker thinks the bad bush is between the old mama-san's legs"
"How can you shoot women and children?" "Easy! You just don't lead them as much."