"A person regarded as sneaky or treacherous."
From http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=weasel
So.....how in the hell is Saddam Hussein less treacherous than George W. Bush, Michael Moore,
Yasser Arafat, and Jacques Chirac?
If you aren't a good driver, you will kill someone. If you don't know how to use your own computer properly, you will wreck your own computer, There is a HUGE difference. You don't hurt anybody by not knowing how to use your own PC.
I am a big privacy advocate, but I hardly see this as any invasion of privacy. Recording your speed, that isn't obtainable in real time, can hardly violate your privacy. I mean...an odometer records your mileage and noone complains about that. GPS tracking is privacy violation, lowjack makes me uncomfortable, but this sounds like a usefull tool, just as long as it is legal to remove it.
No, it is open to ammendment based on proposal by 2/3rds of the Congress, or 2/3rds of state legislatures, and ratification by passage in 3/4ths of the states, not "interpretation" by 9 people in black robes.
As to why criminals can't own guns, and can't vote, it is just punishment, not cruel or unusual. The 3 inaliable rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Yet a court can certainly take all 3 of these away, but only by the due process of law, and only if they are fitting to the crime.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonalbe searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
but that seems to have been forgotten, along with.."Congress shall make no law....abridging the freedom of speech or of the press."
Campaing finance reform restrictions on commericals 60 days before elections.
and "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Every law restricting non-criminals from owning certain types of weapons.
Some times I wonder if legislatures even fscking read the constitution any more.
Slashdot Mirror
In Chernobyl the hot spot becomes you!
Nobody cares if your drugs kills a couple Chinese people, but here in the U.S. you get sued.
How'd he manage to build it without Duct tape!? Now that's impressive.
"A person regarded as sneaky or treacherous." From http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=weasel So.....how in the hell is Saddam Hussein less treacherous than George W. Bush, Michael Moore, Yasser Arafat, and Jacques Chirac?
You insensitive clod!
Um, like everyone?
For a new type of file manager......."hmmm Jim, it sounds like a pdf file."
This is the only plant survivor from the Jurassic age.... Obviously, these people haven't seen the mold under my bed.
A window, that isn't on my screen, hmmm.....Oh, you mean my outside awareness portal.
If you aren't a good driver, you will kill someone. If you don't know how to use your own computer properly, you will wreck your own computer, There is a HUGE difference. You don't hurt anybody by not knowing how to use your own PC.
Darn....who knew lawn gnomes could use chainsaws?
How do you make this illegal? If they can beam their signal onto your house, why can't you beam yours at them?
When John A. Phillips designed an A-Bomb using unclassified info for is dissertation at Princeton.
I can't wait until I start getting ASCII porn messages on my phone.
"I'm sorry Dave, I can't let you do that."
:-)
I read it on the internet,
IT MUST BE TRUE!
Just as small businesses are the backbone of the U.S. economy, small websites are the backbone of the internet.
been detected on the internet.
Simple...it's just encrypted pr0n. Hehe.
I am a big privacy advocate, but I hardly see this as any invasion of privacy. Recording your speed, that isn't obtainable in real time, can hardly violate your privacy. I mean...an odometer records your mileage and noone complains about that. GPS tracking is privacy violation, lowjack makes me uncomfortable, but this sounds like a usefull tool, just as long as it is legal to remove it.
No, it is open to ammendment based on proposal by 2/3rds of the Congress, or 2/3rds of state legislatures, and ratification by passage in 3/4ths of the states, not "interpretation" by 9 people in black robes. As to why criminals can't own guns, and can't vote, it is just punishment, not cruel or unusual. The 3 inaliable rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Yet a court can certainly take all 3 of these away, but only by the due process of law, and only if they are fitting to the crime.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonalbe searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
but that seems to have been forgotten, along with.."Congress shall make no law....abridging the freedom of speech or of the press."
Campaing finance reform restrictions on commericals 60 days before elections.
and "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Every law restricting non-criminals from owning certain types of weapons.
Some times I wonder if legislatures even fscking read the constitution any more.
At least we still have petsovernight.com Pets Overnight
Making the antenna out of an old floppy drive and paper clips? [Slashdot story]
This shirt will go great with my shoe phones...
(Hopefully someone remembers Get Smart)
Just wrap your entire house in alunimum foil.
I don't see what the big deal is?