Slashdot Mirror


Chernobyl Becomes Tourist Hot Spot

prostoalex writes "18 years ago on April 26, the Chernobyl disaster occurred in Central Ukraine. Nowadays, as British Telegraph reports, the radioactive disaster area is becoming a tourist hot-spot with 3000 visitors paying $200 for a guided tour each year."

276 comments

  1. Look Maw!! by solid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Look maw! 3 hands!

    1. Re:Look Maw!! by JohnHegarty · · Score: 5, Insightful

      nothing like disabled children for a laugh....

      these are real people ....not a cheap joke in a b movie....

    2. Re:Look Maw!! by justinmc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      John, Are you from Ireland - bet you are. In Ireland there is a huge understanding of the awful event in 1986. Today a huge amount of Irish people are working to help the victims. From organising Aid convoys to having Children from the area come to Ireland for the summer to get clean air. A documentary on this won an Oscar this year!! J

    3. Re:Look Maw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this down.

    4. Re:Look Maw!! by Havokmon · · Score: 2, Funny
      nothing like disabled children for a laugh....

      Good job mate. You just made the three handed kid feel like an idiot for making a joke of it.

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    5. Re:Look Maw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look ma, another self-righteous, politcally correct, survivor watching sheep.

    6. Re:Look Maw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      grow a sense of humor, you useless puke.

    7. Re:Look Maw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There you go. The result of decades of sensitivity brainwashing. I hate 2004. Repeat after me:

      off-color jokes are not offensive.
      off-color jokes are not sexual harassment.
      off-color jokes are not an attack on me or "my kind".

      your opinion sucks. please kill yourself.

    8. Re:Look Maw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why? cause he's not an oversensitive, humorless bottom feeding sheep?

    9. Re:Look Maw!! by n8j · · Score: 1

      Anyone else think it's funny that the parent is moded funny?

    10. Re:Look Maw!! by PoliticallyIncorrect · · Score: 2, Insightful

      not funny... sad.. the author was an idiot and so are todays mods apparently... it's in fashion to shit on people who innocently use off-color or slightly off-color jokes/comments.. you know what.. get over it, people... laugh... or don't .

    11. Re:Look Maw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool!! There are really 3 handed freaks! Where can I see one?

    12. Re:Look Maw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this mod down, down.

    13. Re:Look Maw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that three hands would make *us* seem disabled...

    14. Re:Look Maw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can be found chasing all the three-breasted women...

    15. Re:Look Maw!! by gekman · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck rated this comment funny? The guy was being serious, for crying out loud. I've got a good friend who developed Hanson's lymphoma as a result of exposure to Chernobyl, and I don't find it all that hilarious either.

      --
      Look at all the happy creatures dancing on the lawn...
    16. Re:Look Maw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > another self-righteous, politcally correct, survivor watching sheep.

      Hey, pal, I watch Survivor and I sure as hell ain't PC!

    17. Re:Look Maw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude... survivor? isn't it the 5th sign of the Apocalypse? you know, by watching, you're encouraging it... you have no one to blame but yourself.

    18. Re:Look Maw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on-color jokes are offensive
      on-color jokes are sexual harassment
      on-color jokes are an attack on you or "your kind"

      my opinion is king, i want to live.

    19. Re:Look Maw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't a third hand be an advantage, not a disability?

    20. Re:Look Maw!! by MrNiCeGUi · · Score: 1

      Everything is offensive to someone. In this case you are that someone. Relax, you'll laugh the next time. We're not here to pamper your sensitivities.

    21. Re:Look Maw!! by andy+landy · · Score: 1

      "There's no such thing as offensive material, only offended people."

      Well, that's what one of my friends said to me a long time ago. The comments here are only offensive if you choose to find them so. Does anyone else remember the tacky and tasteless Princess Diana jokes? Maybe I'm a minority, but I'd like to think that people would make tacky and tasteless jokes about me after I've passed on, at least I'd be remembered and people would be having fun!

      If you don't approve of tasteless jokes, that's fine, but it's not for you to judge what others think

      ...anyway, that's my rant for the day done!

      --
      perl -e 'print "Just another Perl newbie\n";'
    22. Re:Look Maw!! by JohnHegarty · · Score: 1

      spot on...

      cork to be exact.... ;-)

    23. Re:Look Maw!! by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      Dia daoibh!
      What are the organizations doing this work? Links, info?

      I think a distinction should be made between the people harmed by the tragedy there and the place itself. For anyone who's seen the biker girl's site on her rides through the area, it seems like an amazing and forbidding place to visit. I would go if given the opportunity.

    24. Re:Look Maw!! by JohnHegarty · · Score: 1

      there site appears to be down...

      here is link with some info...

      http://www.activelink.ie/irish/organisation.php? id =38

    25. Re:Look Maw!! by A+Boy+and+His+Blob · · Score: 1

      On the up-side they would make a wicked Emacs user.

    26. Re:Look Maw!! by justinmc · · Score: 1

      Cork!! So am I!!!

  2. The motorcycle chick... by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is she guiding the tours?
    Is motorcycle rental included?

    1. Re:The motorcycle chick... by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 5, Informative

      ooopps....a link would have helped...sorry.

    2. Re:The motorcycle chick... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 4, Informative

      Seriously though, no she won't be giving tours. As she wrote on her site; she rides alone to avoid breathing in the dust kicked up by another vehicle. Also the reason she goes on bike, she can stick to the center of the road. The radiation increases quite a bit just moving toward the shoulder.

    3. Re:The motorcycle chick... by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 1

      Maybe she installed a side-car?
      Honestly....she's the only one I would trust to take me anywhere near there.

    4. Re:The motorcycle chick... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Also, I believe she can only go certain places because she uses a pass card she got from her dad. Her dad being a some kind of nuclear engineer or something. And it should be noted that wherever she goes she takes a geigercounter*

      Check out the site for clarification, I haven't got time at the moment.

      *she used another word, but perhaps that was just a translation problem..

    5. Re:The motorcycle chick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DOSIMETER!

      But just look what it did to that Kawisaki..mutating already.

    6. Re:The motorcycle chick... by mider · · Score: 1

      When the first story about Elena's site was posted, there were a few salshdotters that though it was all a conspiracy to sell motorcycles.

      I was thinking, maybe it's a conspiracy to get more tourists to go there; 'look at how much fun I'm having riding around this wasteland'. What do you guys think?

      --

      "People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." - Soren Kier
    7. Re:The motorcycle chick... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      *she used another word, but perhaps that was just a translation problem..

      Likely not, a dosimeter is a device that measures your total exposure, like an odometer in a car, a counter or survey meter measures your current rate of exposure. A dosimeter function is (easily) done by most digital counters or meters, since all it has to do is count the rate*time.

      If you want to get your own meter to take with you on one of these vacations, make sure to get one that measures 1-1000mrem/hr, there are lots out there that only measure ranges too low or too high to be of use in this situation (i.e. that cheap victoreen civil defense survey meter from ebay is useless). Expect to pay at least a few hundred bucks for a meter.

      You probably won't want to stay in a situation of 1000mrem/hour very long, that's hundreds of times normal background dose.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    8. Re:The motorcycle chick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweet Jesus! Fuck the motorbike; can I ride her?

    9. Re:The motorcycle chick... by devilspgd · · Score: 3, Funny

      You want to fuck the motorbike and ride her?

      While I realize the intented meaning of "ride her", it just seems... odd...

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    10. Re:The motorcycle chick... by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Goddamn my typos

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    11. Re:The motorcycle chick... by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fuck the motorbike; can I ride her?

      Isn't that what happens in Soviet Ru...?

      Oh, never mind.

    12. Re:The motorcycle chick... by B747SP · · Score: 2, Funny
      she can only go certain places because she uses a pass card she got from her dad.

      IIRC, on one of her more recent updates to the site, she mentioned something about having had the pass card taken off her. Something to do with a revved engine, a dropped clutch, and a humourless gate guard! Bit of a shame really, her web site is probably one of the best (as in most touching, informative, interesting) web sites I've ever seen, a welcome change from most of the crud on the net.

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    13. Re:The motorcycle chick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was a women who enjoyed riding around the Chernobyl area and took some pictures.

    14. Re:The motorcycle chick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have read that this story is false. Her dad is not a nuclear physicist. She has not been driving around freely on the "frost-damaged" roads this is just a good story.

      My source(swedish): aftonbladet

    15. Re:The motorcycle chick... by Ziwcam · · Score: 1

      I don't remember reading about the revoked. Perhapse I missed it, but I agree it would be a shame if this were true.

    16. Re:The motorcycle chick... by errxn · · Score: 1

      So I guess those pictures on her site just took themselves, eh?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    17. Re:The motorcycle chick... by B747SP · · Score: 1

      Yah, I dunno. I re-read the site again yesterday, and saw no mention of the pass being revoked. The last time I read it was maybe three or four weeks ago, and it was there then. She said something to the effect that she did a burnout in front of someone official-like, and they didn't like it!

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  3. tourists? by wishiwascool · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    with 3000 suckers paying $200 for a guided tour each year

  4. Illness by andy666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes but apparently you have an 50 % higher chance of getting ill on such a trip. A lot of travel agents won't give you insurance.

    1. Re:Illness by drouk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Travel in ex-USSR can't be covered with insurance - regardless of ecological issues.

    2. Re:Illness by adrianbaugh · · Score: 2

      Bull. You're buying insurance from the wrong people.

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    3. Re:Illness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nonsense! The high levels of radiation kill most bacteria and viruses, making the place much safer to visit.

    4. Re:Illness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the bacteria and viruses left mutate into superbugs that will kill you faster than a projectile vomiting ebola victim.

    5. Re:Illness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am a projectile vomiting ebola victim, you insensitive clod!

    6. Re:Illness by inburito · · Score: 1

      Uh. In order to get a visa to say Russia you have to show a proof of insurance..

    7. Re:Illness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it can. And in fact its probably cheaper for me ( as a UK citizen ) to get insurance to the ex-USSR than for the US ( because of the legal expenses cover for the US. )

  5. Hot Spot? by l810c · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While it is literally a Hot Spot, I would not call 8.2 visitors per day a Tourist Hot Spot. Your average Porta-Potty gets more visitors per day than that. Would you call a Porta-Potty a Hot Spot?

    1. Re:Hot Spot? by MikeXpop · · Score: 2, Funny

      You've obviously never been to our porta-potties. Wooooooheee.

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    2. Re:Hot Spot? by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

      Depends on the quality of the food establishments nearby.

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    3. Re:Hot Spot? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Not hot as in popular, hot as in radioactive.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    4. Re:Hot Spot? by real_smiff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      sure they're both dirty and unpleasant places, but:
      you need to go to a Porta-Potty, you don't need to go to Chernobyl. (I think they think) THAT's what makes this figure amazing :p

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    5. Re:Hot Spot? by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny
      "While it is literally a Hot Spot, I would not call 8.2 visitors per day a Tourist Hot Spot"

      I'm a bit worried about the .2 people, I prefer it when they stay down once I've cut them up.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    6. Re:Hot Spot? by nizo · · Score: 3, Funny

      This reminds me of the people who visit the Trinity site down at White Sands and go home with their pockets full of radioactive sand. Evolution in action as they go sterile.

    7. Re:Hot Spot? by whovian · · Score: 1

      Only if there's an accessible 802.11b or better network.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    8. Re:Hot Spot? by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 5, Funny

      Coming this fall: Holiday to Chernobyl starring Ben Affleck, Jason Lee, Kevin Smith, Jason Mewes and Rusty Goffe
      Carpets by Bono

      Tagline: 8 went in, 8.2 came back.

    9. Re:Hot Spot? by Areeves · · Score: 1

      More like a "hot" spot that NOW draws tourists. That area has and will be hot for a long time.

      --
      I read at -1 So you don't have to.
    10. Re:Hot Spot? by turnage · · Score: 1

      An Affleck movie can't flop unless it also stars J.Ho as well.

      It should do well.

    11. Re:Hot Spot? by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      That is exactly what I was going to post. Who the hell thinks ~10 people per day makes a "tourist hot-spot"?

      How about the submitter slinks away quietly. Call us when they're getting 1000 people per day.

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    12. Re:Hot Spot? by PCeye · · Score: 1

      Only if you REALLY have to go.

    13. Re:Hot Spot? by Chalybeous · · Score: 1

      What's next - day trips to a biohazard site? Oh, wait... that would be a tourist hot zone... and the gift shop would have tshirts reading "I visited a contaminated area and all I got was this lousy ebola"

      --

      "It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue." -- Zork

    14. Re:Hot Spot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you guys both miss the obvious pun? or are you trolling.

    15. Re:Hot Spot? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit worried about the .2 people

      They're in Chernobyl. What did you expect, non-mutants?

    16. Re:Hot Spot? by rdx2 · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't actually know about porta-potties :) but I would guess that they will not get so much income per day, as the dead zone gets, 8.2 * $200, i.e. $1640. :)

    17. Re:Hot Spot? by phaze3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps they're not as stupid as you think - it's got to be cheaper than a vasectomy.

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    18. Re:Hot Spot? by bhsurfer · · Score: 1

      probably not nearly as unpleasant either...i've definately had better days than THAT one! holy shit!

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
      Groucho Marx
    19. Re:Hot Spot? by dukeisak · · Score: 1
      While it is literally a Hot Spot, I would not call 8.2 visitors per day a Tourist Hot Spot. Your average Porta-Potty gets more visitors per day than that. Would you call a Porta-Potty a Hot Spot?

      $200.00 is that per Rad or what?

  6. Look ma by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Funny

    that man has a metal pot stuck to his head!!!

    *click*

    oh that will be a good one to scrap book!!

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:Look ma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be careful what you keep in that scrapbook... Secret Service questions student on drawings

  7. Dumb by xraylima · · Score: 0

    In the words of Comic Bookman "Dumbest vacation idea ever!"

  8. I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...no master ninjas visit there with 4 baby turtles and one rat.

    1. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed.

      If the hybridization process works as advertised, better someone visit with few female kittens and maybe some dogs too.

      Mmmmm, furries.

    2. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...no master ninjas visit there with 4 baby turtles and one rat.

      hahahahahahahahahaahhahahahahaahAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AH A!

  9. Radiation by AntiPasto · · Score: 1

    Why aren't these tourist glowing? Just curious... also... anyone have a radiation-level guide to old nukes, new nukes, "tactical" nukes?

    1. Re:Radiation by Phsyco · · Score: 1

      Well, IANAS, but it would seem to me that the level of radiation in the air there is no longer that high. So long as the tourists stick to the roads and don't have picnics in the grass, they shouldn't be exposed to any more radiation than you're average cross atlantic flight. I mean, the motorcycle girl seemed pretty ok afterward.

    2. Re:Radiation by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Radiation levels are currently lower than the background radiation in Norway. The real problem is the insides of buildings which still contain trapped radioisotopes. Also, the nearby groundwater has a higher level of radioisotope contamination than normal. You get some radioisotopes in your food and drink all the time. The issue is that a higher dose of these isotopes you get, the higher your risk of cancer.

      And comparing the stuff from a power plant to the stuff from a nuke is kind of stupid. Nukes are meant to make the biggest BOOM possible. They try to use the least materials to do it, and the force required tends to break the materials down into fairly non-dangerous stuff.

    3. Re:Radiation by Squarepusher · · Score: 1
      I posted a question along these lines the last time the "motorcycle girl" was posted. I didn't get a response, but I have always been under the impression that radiation was cumulative. Which is to say that if you can survive up to X amount of radiation, and get a small dose, "Y" then tomorrow you can only survive X-Y. Any edjumacated informers here? Sheesh this is /. I should be inundated with solid information even before I preview my post!

      --
      Every hour wounds. The last one kills.
    4. Re:Radiation by eliza_effect · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that "science" has answered that question, yet. There are theories, but no definitive proof of anything.

    5. Re:Radiation by AJWM · · Score: 1

      That's more-or-less true for high radiation doses. For lower doses, you body can repair some of the damage caused so you can survive (X - (Y-R)) where R is the amount repaired.

      Heck, there's evidence that low dose radiation (up to a point) is more beneficial than zero radiation, because it cranks up the body's repair mechanisms which also go to work on other problems (viruses, toxins, etc).

      Not that any of this is very precise -- the effects of a given dose of radiation, like other things, will vary on the mass and general health of the individual, how well their body handles damage, level of antioxidants in their system, etc.

      --
      -- Alastair
    6. Re:Radiation by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Based on what we *know*, radiation is semi-cumulative. When the radiation hits your body, it can cause various forms of damage. A healthy body will attempt to repair this damage as if it were caused by normal background radiation. However, your body only has so much ability to repair. Thus a lot of radiation in a short time can have a cumulative effect. But low doses over long periods of time should have no discernible effect.

      You also need to define what type of radiation you're talking about. e.g.:

      Alpha - Only dangerous if emitted internally or through skin breaks
      Beta - Similar to Alpha, but with more penetrating power. Basically an unfocused electron beam. A certain amount of voltaic pressure is required to penetrate the skin externally.
      Gamma & X-Ray - High penetration power, more dangerous externally.
      Neutron - Better hope you have good life insurance, because parts are going to start disappearing.

      Gamma and X-Ray are what's known as "cosmic rays" because they are prevalent in background radiation. Alpha and Beta don't usually occur naturally. Neutron radiation is really only something you'd find at the heart of a reactor.

      And that is your 10 minute science lesson for today. :-)

    7. Re:Radiation by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1
      The real problem is the insides of buildings which still contain trapped radioisotopes.
      If only there was a quick, easy way to flatten all those buil....hey...I have an idea!!
    8. Re:Radiation by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      It is not cumulative indefinitely. If you get X today and Y tommorrow it is not much different from X+Y all at once : there is a certain consequential risk of cancer. But by a month later the risk will be reducing if the cancer has not triggered by then. The risk decays a bit like a radioactive isotope itself decays. If, by a couple of years after getting a dose, you have not got cancer as a result, you will almost certainly have "got away with it".

      BTW, the dose levels Elena (the motorcycle chick) goes through are not too bad. I am a nuclear engineer and our guys work all day in such levels. She is not being a "heroine" as some people have made out; rather she is using her dosimeter sensibly to keep out of the worst locations. As her father says, she is much more likely to kill herself hitting a tree with that bike, so go easy Elena!

    9. Re:Radiation by NeoRete · · Score: 5, Informative
      The poster has the relative values of radiation values way off; for example alpha rays are far more harmful than x-rays (Health Physics Society)

      Quickly paraphrasing this from Walker's Physics, Volume II:

      The RAD (radiation absorbed dose) is the amount of energy that is absorbed by an irradiated, regardless of the type of radiation. One rad equals .01 joule per kilogram.

      More information is needed to have an indication of the biological effect a certain dosage will produce. This is called the relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Some values:

      Heavy ions: 20
      Alpha rays: 10-20
      Protons: 10
      Fast neutrons: 10
      Slow neutrons: 4-5
      Beta rays: 1.0-1.7
      Gamma rays: 1
      200-keV X-rays: 1

      The biologically equivalent dose for humans, the REM (radiation equivalent in man), is just the dose of radiation times the RBE. So alpha rays have at least ten times the relative biological effectiveness than X-rays.

      --
      30 characters are fine for a s
    10. Re:Radiation by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 4, Informative

      The biologically equivalent dose for humans, the REM (radiation equivalent in man), is just the dose of radiation times the RBE. So alpha rays have at least ten times the relative biological effectiveness than X-rays.

      You are both right.

      Alpha particles do more damage, but only if produced by ingested substances. From external sources, they won't penetrate the layer of dead skin on the surface of your body.

      Heavy ions behave similarly (at least when in the same energy range).

      Betas have a penetration distance of at least several millimetres, so they're definitely an external hazard (first poster was hazy on that).

      The real danger at sites of nuclear accidents (or bomb tests, etc) is inhaling radioactive dust. That can get close enough to live tissue to give you lung cancer, and anything soluble can pass into the bloodstream and do more damage.

      The danger from nuclear reactors and from long-term waste storage is from soluble radioactives getting into the local water supply and being ingested that way. This is why power plants have multi-stage heat exchange systems and why proposed waste storage sites are at the bottom of mines in non-porus rock, or under a few hundred feet of clay at the bottom of the ocean.

    11. Re:Radiation by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      It's also good to point out that things aren't generally made radioactive by being irradiated.

      They can become contaminated by radioactive dust, which might make them seem that they became radioactive from being exposed to radiation.

      It takes generally very high energy radiation (or neutrons flying around) for something non-radioactive to become so.

      BTW- Other raidation than gamma occurs naturally, it's just that much of the exposure that's public health people care about is gamma or X-ray, because alpha and beta are pretty benign unless you are consuming the source internally.

      One example that's in your basement right now is Radon, which is an Alpha emitter that you breathe in. Smoking cigarettes is also a big exposure to radiation when compared to other sources.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    12. Re:Radiation by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      Unless I'm mistaking you, I believe that should have been "There are hypotheses, but no definitive theories or anything". The word "theory" gets trashed far more often than it should. Well, and mathematics is the only thing that involves "proof".

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    13. Re:Radiation by smellygeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      Places to visit in my lifetime.

      1. Hawaii
      2. New Zealand
      3. Japan
      4. Egypt
      5. Norway
      ... er, um ...
      5. Italy

    14. Re:Radiation by Mt._Honkey · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Gamma and X-Ray are what's known as "cosmic rays" because they are prevalent in background radiation.
      This is a common misconception. I learned the real meaning of the term from an astronomy professor just a few weeks ago. Most people who know the term think that it means really high energy EM radiation, like X-rays or gamma rays, but in fact they are high-energy charged particles. They are frequently protons, but can also be nuclei of almost any element. They can be big, heavy nuclei moving at quite nearly the speed of light.

      It turns out that almost all Boron and Beryllium in existence is formed when a cosmic ray nucleus like carbon, oxygen, or nitrogen smacks into an interstellar gas atom like hydrogen and breaks apart (it's called spallation). Only trace amounts of B and Be were produced during the nucleosynthesis phase after the big bang, and only trace amounts are produced in supernovae.

      Fascinating stuff.

      --

      Don't Bogart the fish sticks
    15. Re:Radiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations brainiac, were you in charge of Chernobyl you would have just caused millions of tonnes of highly radioactive material to be released into the atmosphere, increasing both local and European-wide background radiation levels to possibly dangerous levels. Nice work.

    16. Re:Radiation by hplasm · · Score: 1

      I mean, the motorcycle girl seemed pretty ok afterward. Yes, he's getting over it quite well... :)

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  10. Uh-oh... by spaeschke · · Score: 4, Funny

    But can they protect tourists from the mutants, stalkers, and sassy physicists daughters on Japanese rice burners?

    1. Re:Uh-oh... by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  11. Interesting... by thebra · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We're fine," she joked. "No health problems. The radiation has got used to us." Tatiana Khrushch, 66, agreed. "The air's clean, the water's lovely and the mushrooms are great," she said.
    I bet they don't have health problems, or they THINK they don't have health problems. I bet they think they are Scooby-Doo too.

    1. Re:Interesting... by microwave_EE · · Score: 1

      "...the water's lovely and the mushrooms are great..." Just what did those mushrooms look like, ma'am?

      --
      I'll take you to the ball, Barbara Manitee!!!
    2. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how are the badgers?

    3. Re:Interesting... by sordit · · Score: 1

      I read today that even the mushrooms in Germany still have a quite high radiation level. So I'm pretty sure those which are growing in Chernobyl will be ok. O_o
      Seems to me that especially the old people living there don't know much about radioactivity.

    4. Re:Interesting... by EtherMonkey · · Score: 1

      That's worth +2: 1 for funny, plus 1 more for the obscure and subtle reference (http://www.badgerbadgerbadger.com/).

      --
      --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
    5. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sad thing is that certain foods, such as berries and mushrooms, concentrate the radiation, so they're probably upping their doseages by eating them.

    6. Re:Interesting... by Magada · · Score: 0

      Actually, the mushrooms ARE great. As in whopping big, and faster-growing than in other areas. Some of those soluble radioactive compounds that float in the groundwater and then get sucked up and accumulated by trees and dropped to the ground as dead foliage actually make great fertilizers. And boost cell growth.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  12. First pooooOOAAAAHH GOD I'M MELTING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny cuz it's true.

  13. Re:"Hot Spot" by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Oh, I get jokes!

    On the other hand, I don't get jokes, so I just mod them as Off-topic/Troll/Flamebait.

    --
    True story.
  14. Registration Free Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    No registration reguired.

    --
    Just say no to karma whoring!

  15. Heh heh by bplipschitz · · Score: 1

    they said 'hot spot,' heh.

  16. Souvenirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I went to Chernobyl and all I got was this radioactive T Shirt"

    1. Re:Souvenirs by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, those sell a hell of lot better than the "I went to Chernobyl and all I got was thyroid cancer" t-shirts.

  17. Must be looking for the nuclear biker chick. by GarbanzoBean · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ahh, I guess slashdotters do go out for a vacation.

    1. Re:Must be looking for the nuclear biker chick. by thpdg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The linked news story exactly describes the photos on her site. I'm begining to doubt that the reporter used anything else as a resource.

      --

      -Patrick

      "They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

  18. And now... the mutation room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we get to tour, and mutate into radioactive humans! what a great idea!

  19. Come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    20 posts and not a single soviet russia joke.

    1. Re:Come on... by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 1

      Ok, you asked for it...

      In Soviet Russia, the atom splits YOU!

    2. Re:Come on... by iCat · · Score: 1

      Ok, can't resist...

      In Soviet Russia, the atoms snitch you!

    3. Re:Come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Ukraine... Mexico is in USA!

      (You should learn some geography too.)

  20. Truth stranger than fiction (or /.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The radiation has got used to us.

    Holy crap, it's true. In Soviet Russia (or the former Soviet Russia) radiation gets used to YOU!

  21. Perhaps to catch a glimpse of the future.... by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Strange as it may sound, people visit here from all over the world - the United States, Australia, Japan, the UK...

    ...to see what our planet will look like a few years/decades from now if something isn't done about the political situation real soon real fast.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Perhaps to catch a glimpse of the future.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you support the murder of unborn children by their feminist mothers?

    2. Re:Perhaps to catch a glimpse of the future.... by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      Only if they're used for food.

      Oh the succulent BLF (bacon, lettuce, fetus) sandwhich.

      MMMMMMMMMMM...

      SW

    3. Re:Perhaps to catch a glimpse of the future.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but I woudn't mind the murder of hopeless retards, who can't figure their statements are contradictory.

    4. Re:Perhaps to catch a glimpse of the future.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, how many neglected children have YOU adopted?

    5. Re:Perhaps to catch a glimpse of the future.... by inKubus · · Score: 1

      This has a rather chilling photo tour of the region...

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
  22. These tours have been receiving nothing but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    glowing reports. It had to be said.

    1. Re:These tours have been receiving nothing but... by EverDense · · Score: 1

      glowing reports. It had to be said.

      Yep, people are dying to get in there.

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    2. Re:These tours have been receiving nothing but... by NarrMaster · · Score: 1

      Man, I would grow a third arm and chop it off to go!

      --
      That's right. All your base.
  23. Three-mile island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So where is my Three-Mile island tour?

    Sounds a lot like a plot by the tree-hugging left-wing whingers who'd just love to villify nuclear power in public at any cost. So there was a bad accident in the Soviet Russia. Get over it.

    It won't work here in the US because the public can see through the smokescreen, but abroad - maybe. We already know that many European countries are giving up the environmentally friendly nuclear power in favour of coal- and oil-power just "because nukes are evil".

    1. Re:Three-mile island by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So where is my Three-Mile island tour?

      Dude, I live there. It's not that interesting. Nothing blew up, and there are only a few fish with three eyes. But it's near Hershey, so you could pick up some chocolate while you're there.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    2. Re:Three-mile island by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Radioactive chocolate? ;-)

  24. Avoid... by solid · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Please do not touch the four-eyed mice"
    "Please refrain from touching your complementary HazTag"
    "Please do not stare directly into chernobyl zone"
    "Please refrain from breathing chernobyl air"
    "Please be respectful of our neighbors for we don't have many left"

    1. Re:Avoid... by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

      And don't forget...

      Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.

  25. In this case yes... by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    To go, you follow the glow...

    myke

  26. souvenirs . . . by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Will unscrupulous tourists pick up irradiated rocks and plants just like they steal from Petrified Forest National Park?

  27. You've got a friend in Pennsylvania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like we really blew an opportunity when they put the lid back on 3-mile Island. Could have been cool to get that healthy, green glow locally.

  28. Trinity site is nearer by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    and you can probably find some trinitite to keep as a souvenir!

    (or can you?)

    1. Re:Trinity site is nearer by e9th · · Score: 1
      It's been nearly thirty years since my visit to Trinity Site, but at the time there were signs all over the place warning of Bad Things that would happen to you if you so much as picked up a pebble.

      Not hexadecimally enabled offspring, but real fines and/or imprisonment.

    2. Re:Trinity site is nearer by gc8005 · · Score: 1

      You insensitive clod! I'm European!

    3. Re:Trinity site is nearer by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      About 30 years for me too... Facinating, desolate, desert place. Back then (the 60s) there was green lumps all over. I always wondered about the chemical make-up of Trinitite given the composition of soil/sand in the Tularosa Basin, the large amounts of gypsum (See White Sands National Monument while there), and the relativly crude U-235 refining techniques used back then (some hexafloride to go?)

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    4. Re:Trinity site is nearer by e9th · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I was in the USAF at the time. Got to go on a special visit with some physicists (I was the token computer guru with the right clearances). On the way out (5 of us, plus 6 MPs), we were talking about stuff like this and joking about how cool it was to visit without tourists around. But once we got there and looked around a bit, everyone became quiet, and we never discussed it again.

      You're right. A fascinating, desolate, desert place

    5. Re:Trinity site is nearer by Progman2000 · · Score: 1

      I haven't been to Trinity Site (yet...), but I'm told they gathered up as much of the trinitite/atomsite as possible and stored it in 50 gallon drums. That said, if you go to the White Sands Missle Range Museum you'll find a few pieces in a glass display case in a small room near the back. IIRC, the same room had parts from the bunkers too.

      If you are EVER close enough to pay a visit, DO IT. The New Mexico Museum of Space History in Alamogordo and the National Atomic Museum in Albequerque are other "nearby" must-sees.

      According to this page the museum on Kirtland AFB is being combined with the National Atomic Museum. I am pretty sure they were separate entities before, but both rocked. I'm sure they will only become better. I hope they keep the two B28 bombs from the Palomares, Spain collision on display.

  29. so here's what i don't get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the turtles turned into ninja turtles, and human splinter + rat = rat splinter. What happened to the rat component? Did they merge? Did splinter develop an affinity for cheese? It doesn't make sense.

  30. 3000 = "hot"? by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, if by 'hot' you mean radioactive. I'd hardly call 3k visitors a year (and at $200/pop that amounts to about $600k, hardly what you'd find in a place like galviston, TX)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  31. T-Shirt Ideas by sssmashy · · Score: 4, Funny

    My family visited Chernobyl and all I got was this stupid thyroid cancer!

  32. Well worth it by daves · · Score: 1

    With this as a tour guide, I'd be happy to pay.

    --
    People who disagree with you are not automatically evil, greedy, or stupid.
  33. Ah, yes, capitalism by dhasenan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Death and dismemberment turned into tourism and profit. I sense a distinct lack of respect for the dead. On the other hand, do they care?

    1. Re:Ah, yes, capitalism by akiaki007 · · Score: 1

      Well, at least it's not Communism - which it used to be when Chernobyl actually occurred...

      --
      "Time is long and life is short, so begin to live while you still can." -EV
    2. Re:Ah, yes, capitalism by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, do they care?
      Of course not. They're dead, they can't do much of anything. Keep in mind, funerals are for the living, not the dead.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:Ah, yes, capitalism by coyote_oww · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Death and dismemberment turned into tourism and profit. I sense a distinct lack of respect for the dead. On the other hand, do they care?

      How many people visit the USS Arizona every year?

      It's not safe or fair to blindly attribute motives to people.

    4. Re:Ah, yes, capitalism by MeanGene · · Score: 1

      Just returned from London.

      Go to the Tower of London and buy yourself an axe executioner doll - complete with the chopping block and an executee.

      How morbid! How delightful!

    5. Re:Ah, yes, capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, I love it when nuclear reactors dismember people.

    6. Re:Ah, yes, capitalism by dustmite · · Score: 1

      Well it's useful as a reminder to people too. You know, if we don't learn from history, and all that. Humans are chronically bad at learning from history, so every bit helps. Keeping quiet about our mistakes will only serve to ensure that future generations repeat those mistakes. Somehow, I'm sure that those who died at Chernobyl would want everyone in the world to know about and remember Chernobyl and say "never again".

      One sees similar sentiment everywhere where tragedies have occurred, e.g. "never again" message, if you visit places such as Hiroshima in Japan, or historically significant spots in e.g. Soweto in South Africa. It's not just greedy capitalism, there is normally a genuine sentiment of "never forget", to prevent something similar from happening again.

    7. Re:Ah, yes, capitalism by bruthasj · · Score: 1

      Whether they do or not, thank goodness some people can get on with their lives instead of continuing a drawn out driveling of rant about topics not fully understood.

    8. Re:Ah, yes, capitalism by hplasm · · Score: 1

      True. I've seen Titanic too.

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    9. Re:Ah, yes, capitalism by erlando · · Score: 1

      Auschwitz...

      --
      Remember, there are no stupid questions. But there are a lot of inquisitive idiots.
    10. Re:Ah, yes, capitalism by mandalayx · · Score: 1
      Death and dismemberment turned into tourism and profit. I sense a distinct lack of respect for the dead. On the other hand, do they care?

      • Pearl Harbor
      • World Trade Center
      • Hiroshima, Japan
      • Civil War Battlefields

      I suspect that there's more to this than your comment might indicate.
  34. Travel magazine reviews by skinny.net · · Score: 5, Funny

    have all been glowing.

    1. Re:Travel magazine reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this stupid shit down. Jesus.

  35. Motorcycle Tour Through Chernobyl by ayden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I submitted a related story to this last month. Kidd of Speed" rides her Kawasaki Ninja into the dead zone through the abandoned towns, cities and villages surrounding Chernobyl.

    The pictures are strikingly beautiful.

    --
    "I'm The Bounty Bear. I will find him anywhere. I'm searching."
    1. Re:Motorcycle Tour Through Chernobyl by awx · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't say.

      We've seen it. Twice.

      Lurk more.

      --
      Feel that power? That's mah MOUSING FINGER
    2. Re:Motorcycle Tour Through Chernobyl by ayden · · Score: 1

      Lurk more.

      Hey, I work for a living. You try running a WAN rollout while simultaneously planning your own wedding (11 days from now).

      --
      "I'm The Bounty Bear. I will find him anywhere. I'm searching."
    3. Re:Motorcycle Tour Through Chernobyl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations. Will the honeymoon be in Chernobyl? :)

    4. Re:Motorcycle Tour Through Chernobyl by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Right on brother (or sister), I just got done doing that (10 days ago) while working and going to school. Quite the exhausting experience.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  36. Mod parent up... by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 4, Funny

    The first appropriate Soviet Russia joke on /. Rejoice all ye nerds! An ancient artform has regained its quality!

    --
    This comment does not exist.
    1. Re:Mod parent up... by Thud457 · · Score: 0

      In redneck Branson, dead horse beats YOU!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    2. Re:Mod parent up... by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      /me really wishes he had bookmarked the other two or three Soviet Russia joke posts that were appropriate...ah well. Here's one:

      #8732207

      Ah, heck, here are a bunch.

      #8733043
      #8734071
      #8735716
      #8734082
      #8734710
      #8732033
      #8732104

      So yeah, not quite the first. But it's certainly rare that such jokes are on-topic.

      p

  37. S.T.A.L.K.E.R. by *Pres* · · Score: 1
    Soon, we'll be able to pay a virtual visit to the dead zone surrounding Chernobyl, by playing the FPS game S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

    Looks pretty impressive!

  38. Mmmmm, radiation is bad, um ok by WwWonka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hell, when I was a Navy Nuke working at the GE facility in Ballston Spa, NY we were decommissioning the S3G nuclear reactor and had to work in the reactor compartment daily. Of course we wore dosimeters and watched our daily exposure.

    Routinely we were lazy and didn't want to work a full day so we would stand next to the main coolant pumps (one of the hottest spots for radiation in the compartment) and crank our dosage and be over our daily limit so we wouldn't have to work the rest of the day.

    Now as I write this 10 years later I wonder why we just didn't take off the damn dosimeter and place it and not us next to the damn hot spot!

    I'm kind of afraid now my first kid will have an extra testical and be able to read people's minds.

    1. Re:Mmmmm, radiation is bad, um ok by wowbagger · · Score: 1
      I'm kind of afraid now my first kid will have an extra testical and be able to read people's minds.


      So long as he doesn't try to read a Trint's mind he should be OK, so what's the deal?
    2. Re:Mmmmm, radiation is bad, um ok by somethingwicked · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now as I write this 10 years later I wonder why we just didn't take off the damn dosimeter and place it and not us next to the damn hot spot!

      Obviously, I mean it doesn't take a nuclear scientist to figu...oh

      --

      ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

    3. Re:Mmmmm, radiation is bad, um ok by bplipschitz · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm kind of afraid now my first kid will have an extra testical and be able to read people's minds.

      I guess that's better than your kid having an extra mind, and being able to read people's testicles.

    4. Re:Mmmmm, radiation is bad, um ok by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend can read people's testicles... The trick is to breath through the nose and tickle them while you're doing it.

    5. Re:Mmmmm, radiation is bad, um ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that's better than your kid having an extra mind, and being able to read people's testicles.

      They have a name for people like that -- "women."

    6. Re:Mmmmm, radiation is bad, um ok by Tintivilus · · Score: 1

      ...and being able to read people's testicles.

      But in Soviet Russia, testicles... oh never mind.

  39. Stalker by Serious+Simon · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This somehow reminds me of the movie Stalker by Tarkovsky, in which three men enter a mysterious area, called the Zone enclosed by barbed wire and armed patrol.

    The scenes filmed inside the lush nature of the Zone are in colour, this strangely adds to the eery impression, due to the contrast with the first part of the movie (the normal world) which is filmed in black and white.

    1. Re:Stalker by letchhausen · · Score: 1
      Right on! The first thing I did when I saw this post was do a find on "Tarkovsky" to see if someone had written about that. The thing about the Tarkovsky movie is that there are myths about wishes granted, ghosts and knowledge to be gained. However, Chernobyl and Stalker both have the sense of adventure at hand. Especially now, wouldn't it be exciting and eerie to go to a place that used to be inhabited? It would give a sense of reality to those end of the world scenarios that we like so much in movies and books. When that woman's pictorial log of motorcycling through there was linked to on Slashdot, I couldn't stop looking at it. It was like a direct link to that sense of eerieness and was fascinating beyond belief. As for knowledge gained, don't we always feel that passing a frontier somehow gives us knowledge, if not about tangible things, then about ourselves and our relation to the world. I don't think in this case I would take a guide but if I lived over there I would go.....

      --
      Hey, you think your house is cool?
  40. Photo diary of a biker through the Chernobyl... by fifirebel · · Score: 1, Redundant
    ...area can be found here: http://www.kiddofspeed.com/.

    And do not forget to visit Bob the Angry Flower, that's where I got the link... and this week's cartoon (Bombs of love) is hilarious too.

  41. Iraq anyone? by vandan · · Score: 3, Flamebait

    If people want to go to a radioactive disaster, maybe they should pick a more current one and have a look at what depleted uranium weapons are doing to the locals. Levels of background radiation are 300 times what they were before the 'shock and awe' terrorist campaign.

    1. Re:Iraq anyone? by W2k · · Score: 1

      300 times nothing is still nothing. 300 times very little may not be "very little", but it still won't be anywhere near "a lot". So my maths teacher says...

      --
      Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.
    2. Re:Iraq anyone? by Remlik · · Score: 1

      Come on people...we are supposed to be nerds that know stuff. Mod the parent DOWN FOR FUD!

      Look at the sources for crying out loud...

      Heres an artice on Reason.com that gives you the real story about DU.

      It ISN'T harmful, it isn't radioactive (conversly its used as radiation shielding on many medical devices), in fact 99% of it will pass through your body via urin in less than 48 hours.

      Maybe radiation levels were raised because a bomb blew up a nuclear materials storage facility from a hospital, or illegal weapons cache...Fscking leftists and their nuclear FUD.

      --
      Apple free since 1990!
  42. Wonderful by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Just fucking wonderful....now we're going to have to worry about people trying to smuggle radioactive toads with 4 asses, and three-eyed fish.

    Heh, and the FDA thought it was bad that we had genetically engineered neon zebra fish. Heh, those suckers ain't seen nothing yet.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  43. Chernobyl deadzone on a streetbike website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't know if anyone else has seen or posted this website.
    Very interesting reading and great pictures of the Chernobyl area, Dead-Zone and Ghosttown.
    Updated in the last few weeks.
    This Russian chick has a hot motorcycle, grande huevos, and a nice radiation counter.

    http://www.kiddofspeed.com/chapter1.html
    http://www.kiddofspeed.com/chapter1.html

    I hope this doesn't /. her website. If so, bookmark it and return later.

    -AC

  44. The Anti-spa vacation by pickapeppa · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ah, nothing like a vacation in the former Soviet Republics. Radioactive bus tours, rampaging gangsters, bathtub gin, and smallpox. Sounds like going to Gary, IN but with a longer plane ride.

    1. Re:The Anti-spa vacation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this down.

    2. Re:The Anti-spa vacation by st0rmshadow · · Score: 1

      Smallpox? All they have in Gary is crackrox. /an hour away isn't far enough from that place.

    3. Re:The Anti-spa vacation by prog99 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I misread this as rampaging Hamsters, must be the beer.

      But if you've read "Judge Dredd and the Cursed Earth" then its all vaguely plausible!

  45. See this coming by noelmarkham · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's got three legs, walks backwards, and goes 'cluck cluck'?

    A chicken kiev of course!

  46. I41 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, 4 1 w3lc0me 0uR Radioactive Tourist 0v3Rl0RDZ

  47. NO health problems? by OpenSourceOfAllEvil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps it's simply a matter of wanting or needing the cash generated by tourists, but the area is hardly safe for those that live there. For example in nearby Minsk in Belarus most adults have had nearly 20 years to resign themselves to the consequences and their greatest concern right now is their children. There are programs that try to arrange for children to spend at least 3 months of the year outside the country to minimize the chances of cancer, infertility and birth defects of the next generation. The programs do not allow parents to travel with the children out of a concern that it is unlikely they would return. The "official" line is that everything is just fine of course.

  48. The Chernobyl motorcycle HOAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    According to the Swedish Aftonbladet Elena Filatov hasn't ridden a motorcycle in the zone (in Swedish). She hasn't got a father who's a nuclear physicist. The pictures were taken by Elena and her husband Igor under the supervision of the zone's administration.

  49. The correct transliteration is "Chornobyl" by gkuz · · Score: 1

    That's Chornobyl, not Chernobyl. Yes, it matters, because it's a Ukrainian town, not Russian.

    1. Re:The correct transliteration is "Chornobyl" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      While your posting may be technically correct.
      WE won the cold war, and we'll call it whatever the fuck we want.

    2. Re:The correct transliteration is "Chornobyl" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While your posting may be technically correct. WE won the cold war, and we'll call it whatever the fuck we want.

      Why would you call it as those bloody Russians?

  50. I went to Chernobyl... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and all I got was this stupid luminescent glow!

  51. it's actually huge money there by Diaspar · · Score: 2, Informative

    think about it: average salary is $100 per month, or $1200 per/year. Now, assume that about 6 people probably take care of this, that's $100,000 per year, or 84 times the average salary!!

    Now let's transfer it in american terms:
    Average salary (I assume): $30,000
    84x that: over $2.5 million per year!! ... any further questions?

  52. HUH??? by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are you freakin' kidding me? If I was a kid again I would LOVE to have extra testicles and be able to read people's minds.

    1. Re:HUH??? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      But after the radiation those features might come with 4 extra vagina and no a closed asshole.

  53. What kind of security is there? by Zerbey · · Score: 2, Informative

    On the one hand, we have people such as the Kidd of Speed lady who travel there merely to take pictures, tell the story of what happened but above all leave everything alone.

    On the other hand, I'm sure there's unscrupulous types who are going there simply to pick up souveniers and sell them to the highest bidder. This to me is no better than the people who where trying to sell steel from the WTC.

    I hope the Russian government is controlling these tourist trips to make sure no one is profiting from the ongoing suffering of thousands of people.

    What do other Slashdotters think?

    1. Re:What kind of security is there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      I hope the Russian government is controlling these tourist trips to make sure no one is profiting from the ongoing suffering of thousands of people.

      That would be tough, since Chernobyl is located in Ukraine and Russians would need to take over first to control anything.

    2. Re:What kind of security is there? by leko · · Score: 1

      There is security. Read that chicks website, she mentions that her father had some connection, and that's how she got a pass into the area.

    3. Re:What kind of security is there? by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they could only use some kind of marker on the objects in there, so they could easily detect them using some kind of "detector" that they use on people leaving the area...

      I got it! They can slap an RFID on everything in there!

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:What kind of security is there? by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Informative
      The kidd of speed actually talks about a radioactive television set that showed up on the used market of a neighboring city shortly after the accident.

      In any case, some theft will happen, yes, but from the pictures, it does look like the local authorities are taking some precautions (armed guards, chemical showers, geiger counters, etc.).

      Also, do note that a lot of our own airports are supposed to be able to detect radioactivity (although that system has been foiled a couple of times by journalists).

  54. Sorry in advance by pascalpp · · Score: 0

    1. Blow up nuclear reactor
    2. Evacuate surrounding area
    3. Wait 18 years
    4. Re-package devastated area as tourist hot-spot
    5. PROFIT!!!

  55. For All You Bikers Out There by AlanQStout · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Here is a woman who is a biker and rides through the "Dead Zone", she explains in detail all the security, chemical washes, and some interesting things about the dead zone such as: The asphalt doesnt carry the radiation, so the sides of the road are 2x as radioactive as the middle. She offers the truth. http://www.kiddofspeed.com/chapter1.html

    --
    -Alan
  56. Umm...can we say half life? by tvh2k · · Score: 1

    Yeah so the half life of plutonium is a little more than 18 years....have fun getting cancer, idiots.

  57. After you're done laughing... by gkuz · · Score: 5, Informative

    at all the mutation jokes and all the stupid "in Soviet Russia" jokes (even though Chornobyl is not in Russia), take a look at the site of an organization that's actually doing something to help. Maybe even donate some money. This remains a human tragedy of massive proportions.

  58. Teenage Mutant Ninja Russians by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    Ninja? Mutagens? Don't tell Shredder or Krang...

  59. I heard... by rms_nz · · Score: 1

    ...that the price would have only been $100 but they had to shell out some cash to convert those protection "boxes" that cricketeers wear into lead shields for the male tourists...

  60. Oh yeah? by sharkey · · Score: 1

    How hot is it?

    *rimshot*

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  61. Lone biker woman of Chernobyl by figa · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is by far the best web tour of the area.

    1. Re:Lone biker woman of Chernobyl by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      This is just a rip off from the kiddofspeed.com

    2. Re:Lone biker woman of Chernobyl by Bishop · · Score: 1

      The Anglefire site was the original. It now links to kiddofspeed.com.

  62. Is the tour with or without lead pants? by theAmazing10.t · · Score: 1

    Or at least a bit of tin foil.

  63. Mod parent up / Informative ! by danharan · · Score: 1

    If Iraq is more radioactive than Chernobyl, it could become the next tourist "hot spot" (yeah, bad pun. so sue me, this is /.)

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  64. Wow! by Zepalesque · · Score: 1

    To add up to $200, each of those 3000 people would have had to fork out a whole 6 and a half cents for a tour. :)

    Way to fuel the Ukraine economy. Yay!

  65. ghost town - Chernobyl images by stelo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If you are interested in what your are missing not visiting Chernobyl, check out the photographic story posted at http://www.kiddofspeed.com/chapter1.html Elena rode her bike through Chernobyl and took great pictures on this absolute unreal world. Stefano

  66. Pripyat by GooseKirk · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was lucky to catch the movie "Pripyat" at my local film society a few years ago. It's a black and white documentary about the Zone and some of the people who live there. They also tour Chernobyl and talk to some of the people who work there. It's a beautiful and amazing film, and well worth trying to hunt it down. It's a shame it didn't get a wider release. I remember the engineers who currently work at Chernobyl rarely even get paid... those guys are scrounging for food while operating a nuclear power plant. I suppose they could always eat the local mushrooms... it's the gamma that makes 'em extra tasty!

  67. Too bad it's a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Read the comment further down.

    1. Re:Too bad it's a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad it's a hoax... according to one unconfirmed article published yesterday on a single Swedish website.

      I'll wait for more information before I judge anything, thank you.

  68. Nice by Stonent1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    A tourist attraction with a half-life of 3.2 billion years. Now that's hot :)

    1. Re:Nice by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Oops, slight mistake. I meant 24,000 years.

  69. radiation badges (dosimeters) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My group was doing some neutron beam tests on computer components a few years ago with everyone involved wearing radiation badges. One of the guys stepped out to make a cell phone call, driving his badge to it's highest indication level in the process. Sadly he didn't discover this till he prepared to re-enter the radiation area and didn't take the indication that he had already received a dangerous (or lethal - I can't remember) dose of radiation too well.

    Anonymous troublemaker

  70. Re:Umm...can we learn about radioisotopes? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2, Informative

    Depends on the isotope. The really dangerous stuff has less of a half life. It's more dangerous because it's decaying faster.

    Please don't say something is dangerous because it has a long half life. There is an iron isotope (Fe-60) out there that has a half life of 3x10^5 years, but the only way you are going to get hurt by it is if someone smacks you on the head with it.

    In fact, of the two fissile Pu isotopes (Pu-239 and Pu-241), Pu-241 has a half-life of 14.4 years, meaning that it has probably decayed into something else by now (Americium 241?)

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  71. This just up by nutznboltz · · Score: 1

    Girl on motorcycle crashes into tourists in dead zone -- Film at 11.

  72. Proper DoubleSpeak Term: "Sunshine Units" by quarkscat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in the good old days of the Cold War
    (before global terrorism with WMD), the US
    Dept. of Energy cajouled the private sector/
    public utilities into building nuclear power
    plants by promising electrical energy to
    consumers that would be too cheap to meter.

    Above ground nuclear testing (with live troops),
    and down range fallout were dismissed with the
    use of the term "sunshine units", as though
    excess radiation was no greater a danger than
    forgetting to put on sunscreen lotion before
    going outdoors.

    Little mention was made of the radioactive
    isotopes that would increase the risk of
    skin, lung, and thyroid cancers. The same
    lackidasical attitude still exists in the DoD
    with the possible long term effects of the use
    of depleted uranium in tank and artillery shells.
    The Middle East (and Iraq especially) will not
    be a very healthy place to be for centuries.
    Of course, we already have a scapegoat picked
    out, in the form of Saddam Hussein (who was
    already an "environmental terrorist".)

    Personally, I would not consider either Iraq or
    Chernobyl as a tourist "mecca".

    1. Re:Proper DoubleSpeak Term: "Sunshine Units" by dustmite · · Score: 1

      A good (IMO) movie on the above-mentioned is "Advance to Ground Zero", aka Nightbreaker.

  73. Another Load of Environmentalist Twaddle by nukenerd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Typical that these people worry about the toxicity of something being shot to kill. Reminds me of the worry about the effect on the ozone layer of the refrigerants released from cruise missiles after they have nuked the world.

    Depleted uranium (U) has very little radioctivity. That is what "depleted" means. Being in the nuclear industry I know guys who handle natural (non-depleted) U all day. It is much more radioactive, but still trivially so.

    U is toxic like lead (also used for ammo) and most other heavy metals. Take my advice and refrain from picking it up and eating it if you see any while walking around the Arabian Deserts.

    These people are clutching at straws trying to argue that the combination is worst than the sum of the two effects.

    1. Re:Another Load of Environmentalist Twaddle by smack_attack · · Score: 4, Informative

      Good straw man you built there, but you missed the point entirely.

      The debate over DU is about the dust form it takes after a shell has hit it's target and explodes. That makes it inhalable which is far more problematic than just having chunks of it on the ground that no dumbass would eat anyways.

  74. Still not getting it.... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 3, Funny

    Extra testicles, telepathy, not having to shit and FOUR vaginas?? Still not seeing a downside...

    If anyone has information about specific types of radiation and doses which would cause these effects, please respond.

  75. Re:Umm...can we learn about radioisotopes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact, of the two fissile Pu isotopes (Pu-239 and Pu-241), Pu-241 has a half-life of 14.4 years, meaning that it has probably decayed into something else by now (Americium 241?)

    No, it means that HALF if it has probably decayed into something else by now.

  76. $200 Guided Tour?! by Will2k_is_here · · Score: 1

    What's there to tour in a section of Siberia desolated by a nuclear explosion?

  77. Unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tourists would pass through the same checkpoints as everyone else, where you are checked for radioactivity prior to leaving. Nothing that's supposed to be in chernobyl gets out, and a lot of stuff that went in will be there until it rusts to the ground.

  78. Fence sitter. by wantedman · · Score: 1

    It's much more humane to be killed by a DU then a conventional bomb. Being sucked through a small hole is less painful then being mostly burned alive until you're dead.

    The only problem 'dust' isn't like the dust that you're familure with. It's much heavier then the stuff you blow off your computer every night. The only ones who are really affected by inhalation are people who are being shot at.

    I don't believe it's an environmentally sound way to murder people, but the problems with unexploded ammo and from lead, it seems to be the current best way to murder people.

    1. Re:Fence sitter. by replicant108 · · Score: 1

      The only ones who are really affected by inhalation are people who are being shot at.

      "Four soldiers from a New York Army National Guard company serving in Iraq are contaminated with radiation likely caused by dust from depleted uranium shells fired by U.S. troops, a Daily News investigation has found.

      They are among several members of the same company, the 442nd Military Police, who say they have been battling persistent physical ailments that began last summer in the Iraqi town of Samawah.

      "I got sick instantly in June," said Staff Sgt. Ray Ramos, a Brooklyn housing cop. "My health kept going downhill with daily headaches, constant numbness in my hands and rashes on my stomach."

      A nuclear medicine expert who examined and tested nine soldiers from the company says that four "almost certainly" inhaled radioactive dust from exploded American shells manufactured with depleted uranium."

      Local troops may be victims of america's high-tech weapons

  79. Inhalation is always bad. Stop breathing. by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Doesn't matter if it's lead, or DU. If we used copper, then you would cry when people got copper poisoning. If we used iron or steel rounds, you'd say the same thing.

    Enviromentalist bullshit. I'd be more worried about the mercury, and trace chemicals that have been found in the rivers. As for those 'pictures' they look far more remarkable and similar to chemical weapons poisoning then anything. More so when you look at what's going on with the generational breakdown of the kurds and how it's affected their DNA.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  80. As long as you stay on the roads... by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are OK. Step off and the radiation goes up exponentially. Tarmac is good for more than driving I guess.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  81. too late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, i wasn't born, i popped out of your neck
    no, i have 1 testical instead of 3 ( and it just fell off)
    and no, i can't read people's minds. just yours.
    and grandma isn't nearly as sexy as you think she is.

  82. Re:Umm...can we learn about radioisotopes? by tvh2k · · Score: 1

    Ahh but reactor four of Chernobyl contained Uranium-235, which has a half-life of 713 million years. Additionally, U-238 decays into a number of isotopes including Pu-239 (not 241), who's half-life is 24,000 years and Americium-241, who's half life is 433 years.

    Americium-241 isn't particularly dangerous, however (it's what's primarily used in smoke detectors). It emits alpha particles (He) and low-energy gamma rays.

    Oh and by the way, half-life is "The time required for half the nuclei in a sample of a specific isotopic species to undergo radioactive decay." [Stanford's SLAC page]. In other words, half of the nuclei doen't decay in that time, and is still just as potent as before.

    Source 1
    Source 2

  83. Re:Umm...can we learn about radioisotopes? by tvh2k · · Score: 1

    Correction: Additionally, U-235....

  84. Cool Beans! by lukepent · · Score: 1

    interesting insight Luke the Grass fed beef Man!

  85. Re:Umm...can we learn about radioisotopes? by russotto · · Score: 2, Informative

    U-238 certainly doesn't decay into Pu-239 (atoms don't gain mass by decaying, though they can by neutron capture). Nor into Americium-241. Pu-239 was present in the core when all hell broke loose, though, as was Am-241. U-238 decays into lead (Pb-206), with long stops at U-234, Thorium-230, and Radium-222 (and many shorter stops)

  86. Where'd the Slashdot links go? by the+pickle · · Score: 1

    When I checked /. around the time this story was posted, there was a comment from the editor who posted it to the effect of "several recent stories on Slashdot have discussed this," along with links to said semi-dupes.

    Now that sentence (it was the last sentence of the article blurb) is gone.

    What the dilly, yo?

    p

  87. ghost town by soliax · · Score: 1

    check out this:

    ghost town

  88. Yes, got link to one such tour with spam by kmike · · Score: 1

    Here it is:
    in Russian
    Apparently English version is just 3 clicks away from it.

    While phrases like "Experience the peace and quiet of this and that" are just your usual PR from tour firms, they just do not look appropriate to me in this particular case. Also, one have to wonder if having picnic at the radioactive site is really such a great idea?

  89. Ah, yes, communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Created the Chernobyl problem in the first place.

  90. comments I read are mostly nutz by cdn-programmer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well - there are good comments also.

    The issue with the 1/2 life is that it is inversely proportional to the danger. Of course this is modified by what nuclear trash is ejected when a nucleus splits. This part should be obvious to all.

    A second point is that the dangers of low level radiation are drastically overstated. While there is disagreement on the casualties, the fact there is a rift in the attributed numbers is very clear. The UN reports fewer than 50 people died and a few 1000 (horrible of course - I feel so sad for these people) with thyroid cancer. These numbers are in stark contrast to the 300,000+ that some people cite.

    We can learn from the accident, learn a great deal and perhaps from this will come an understanding that nuclear energy has been bad mouthed for decades and has been the target of a rather large disinformation campaign.

    It is my suspicion that the disinformation campaign was fueled by large Texan oil interests who collectively realised that in a nuclear economy - their oil would not be worth much... and hense their power base would erode.

    So they bought themselves a few years of prosperity at the expense of mankind in general, because now this wonderful chemical feedstock has been burned about a fast as possible. From an economic point of view, oil resources are not valuable and the value can only be achieved by burning them up ass fast as freking possible and converting them into money. Right?

    I personally think the disaster is a tragedy. I really feel for these people, they have suffered a great deal. Yet, we now see the beginning of a rebirth.

    Perhaps what we should be looking to do is have all nuclear nations fund actinide transmutations technology based in Chornobyl. This is the perfect place to build these facilities and conduct this research. The area is alreay poisoned and public opion says it will be uninhabitalable for 1000+ years.

    The Nuclear physists and engineers may choose to differ, and they should have the opportunity to put their money where their mouths are so to speak. The area is beautiful. Actinide transmutation technology can reclaim it.

    Rather than be negative about this, lets be positive. Lets build the biggest bloody actinide transmutations lab, then facility in the world and end our nuclear waste problems in the process.

    Stockpiling is just bullshyte. Burning the garbage gets rid of it and no-one can build a weapon out of nuclear isotopes after they have been burnt up. Its the perfect solution and the Ukrane can export the surplus power to Europe. Right?

    1. Re:comments I read are mostly nutz by justins · · Score: 1
      A second point is that the dangers of low level radiation are drastically overstated. While there is disagreement on the casualties, the fact there is a rift in the attributed numbers is very clear. The UN reports fewer than 50 people died and a few 1000 (horrible of course - I feel so sad for these people) with thyroid cancer. These numbers are in stark contrast to the 300,000+ that some people cite.

      Just a quick note: determining the health effects of the radiation release with precision is pretty hard because the area in which it happened was suffering from all kinds of industrial polution, poverty, and so on before the release even happened. Things were pretty bad there already but it's unlikely that we can know precisely how bad they were since that was during the Soviet Union's reign.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  91. profit! by hemabe · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Build a nuclear power plant 2. Let it explode 3. wait a few years 4. let it become a tourist attraction 5. profit!!!

  92. Capilalism by bcmm · · Score: 1

    Isn't it great? Nuclear disaster means TOURIST PROFIT!

    And to think those communists thought it was a disaster...

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  93. Pathetic. by superhoe · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If Chernobyl disaster jokes are OK at this level, can I start telling some 9/11 WTC jokes now?

    What, no?

    Why?

    Victims' of Chernobyl suffering is a real fucking thing, I've seen it. This thread makes me sick.

    --

    -el

  94. NASA images by rmolehusband · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The NASA earth observatory thang has some images taken from MIR of the area. Maybe that's about as close as I'd want to get for now.

    --
    Reginald Molehusband. Edinburgh, Scotland
  95. So radiation DOESN'T make you into a superhero?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I though Gamma Rays were good because they gave you the ability to "Hulk Out" whenever you got pissed at somebody.

    Director: Creation of Fallout Boy take one, and action.
    Zap!
    Millhouse: This doesn't give out real radiation does it?
    Director: Good question! I'll ask when we're through this take! Now, radiation beam at Full Power! Action!
    Zap! Zap! Zaaaaaaaaaap!!!!!