sure- my work we always used 42+ 12 zeros to fake out our POS system.
it does check out.. and if I were writing something to test, I'd use that
however, I'd also expect that a positive result on the security software under discussion would be followed up on by a human eye looking at the data-- at which point it would be dismissed from consideration as a violation...
"The AVC Patent Portfolio License is divided into two principal parts (see Diagram): (a) sublicenses for encoder and decoder manufacturers granting the right to manufacture and sell and a limited right only for personal consumer use by or between end users (such as in connection with a video teleconference or mobile messaging) but not other uses (left half of the Diagram)2, and (b) sublicenses for video content or service providers granting them the right to use decoders and encoders for other uses of AVC video (right half of the Diagram)3."
The burden of proof is also different in civil and criminal law. Plaintiffs in a civil law suit only need to show by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant is 51% or more liable (responsible) for the damages. In a criminal matter the defendant does not have to prove that he is innocent. But rather, the prosecutor has to prove to the judge or jury "beyond a reasonable doubt" that the defendant is guilty of the crime charged. This burden is very high.
The game's enormous contrast with other arcade games of the time created a sensation when it appeared, and was played so heavily that many machines often broke due to the strain of overuse. It was also arguably the most successful game on this medium and is aggressively sought after by collectors.
" The difference between Choice and Prime is largely due to the fat content in the beef. Prime typically has a higher fat content than Choice. The fat in Prime beef is also distributed evenly (also known as "marbling")."
Pfft. you know nothing about hardware
on
Life Recorder
·
· Score: 1
you obviously have NO idea of the price of a trunk sold 9mm
"Our organizations thank Senator Lautenberg for his leadership in urging the FDA to remove these products from the market and echo his call that the FDA move quickly to remove these products from the marketplace. "
Copyright protections are important, the snippet of text that google uses to let people know my site is relevant is easily fair use I don't have a problem with it- I welcome it as it's beneficial for both myself and google for it to be there.
the ENTIRE TEXT of my site- copied and recopied to put into a web page that exists only to generate ad-sense revenue by a third party is not. and if robots.txt had a 'license' mode, I'd have a much stronger case of protections if I chose to pursue a blatant copying and re-publication of my site.
robots.txt labels that I wish there were include 'allow function:indexing' 'disallow function:total and complete reproduction' 'disallow function: total and complete reproduction for XXX days' (so I can allow wayback machine and equivalents' 'disallow function: aggregate data collection' 'disallow function: user data collection' 'disallow function: email collection'
looking at amazon, http://www.amazon.com/robots.txt they somewhat do this by putting the information they don't want into the wild in it's own directories then disallowing those directories- actually, now that I look at it- it's a neat way to go.. but I'd still prefer a robots.txt option that different 'intended use of data to be crawled' permissions covered
robots.txt allows you to "refuse a specific named bot" or "refuse everyone" or "allow everything" or "allow these directories" or "only allow these directories" (want a fascinating read? try robots.txt at your favorite government site- whitehouse.gov used to be fascinating stuff) there is no way in robots.txt to permit crawling based on intent of information use like a CC license does
I can- with photographs, have a creative commons license that sez "use it for anyhting" "use it with credit to me" "free for non-commercial" etc. I would WANT google to see my site, I would want bing to see my site- for the purposes of indexing in a search engine. I can't say in robots.txt "come in and index for search engines and relevance- but you may not use the data to collect information on our membership for marketing to or marketing their info to others"
If I build a website all about-- coffee- I want the information available to the general public,but from/on my site....
Having many different multi screen setups- my biggest gripe is whenever I stretch an actual video across multiple monitors-- only one monitor gets the output-- the rest are black
any chance I can expand VLC to span- and the video will as well?
like, I dont't know, something large smacking a crater into the surface? it's extremely likely they crater formation was not because an asteroid went straight in, but at an angle, and HEY! maybe- just maybe (sarcasm not directed at OP) the same crater maker threw out some material from deeper beneath the surface- which was a different composition -and all around the crater.
it's really easy to say "lowers a chance of injury by 50%" but that is MEANINGLESS
if you go to saw stops website (I suggest it strongly the videos are cool)
you'll see even when it works it takes out a sliver of skin-- it requires a little moisture (skin breaking) to work.. (It does greatly reduce the amount of damage inflicted)
so technically it doesn't lower the chance of injury at all a lawyer would see that "law says 50% reduced chance of injury- same chance here- MAJOR FREAKING LOOPHOLE" in your 'so simple' off the cuff solution.
Slashdot Mirror
but it's 609
http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-BB-HCM371A-Outdoor-Wireless-Network/dp/B0009PD0ZI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1273093932&sr=1-1
here is the wired PD device (poe 802.3 powered)
for 665
http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-BB-HCM735A-Network-splash-resistant-optical/dp/B002PILZV8/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1273093861&sr=8-1
how the HELL could they not include this gem
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGO2hVA3P58
go ahead- skip to 2:20
THEN SKIP TO 2:55 WHEN SHE DROPS HER CLOTHES
half that- with free shipping 42 cents each when I buy 50
http://tinyurl.com/239gklp
HELL, 20 pack of duracell is 54 cents each with free shipping at amazon
where the hell do you buy batteries from?
sure- my work we always used 42+ 12 zeros to fake out our POS system.
it does check out.. and if I were writing something to test, I'd use that
however, I'd also expect that a positive result on the security software under discussion would be followed up on by a human eye looking at the data-- at which point it would be dismissed from consideration as a violation...
"The AVC Patent Portfolio License is divided into two principal parts (see Diagram): (a)
sublicenses for encoder and decoder manufacturers granting the right to manufacture and
sell and a limited right only for personal consumer use by or between end users (such as
in connection with a video teleconference or mobile messaging) but not other uses (left
half of the Diagram)2, and (b) sublicenses for video content or service providers granting
them the right to use decoders and encoders for other uses of AVC video (right half of the
Diagram)3."
source
http://www.mpegla.com/main/programs/AVC/Documents/AVC_TermsSummary.pdf
http://www.mpegla.com/main/programs/AVC/Documents/AVC_TermsSummary.pdf
look on page 2 for the chart...
http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Civil-Versus-Criminal-Law/Federal/what-is-the-difference-between-criminal-law-a.html
The burden of proof is also different in civil and criminal law. Plaintiffs in a civil law suit only need to show by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant is 51% or more liable (responsible) for the damages. In a criminal matter the defendant does not have to prove that he is innocent. But rather, the prosecutor has to prove to the judge or jury "beyond a reasonable doubt" that the defendant is guilty of the crime charged. This burden is very high.
The requirement on THEY is much less than you might like to believe
"THEY" have to prove your IP was the connection
then it's your responsibility to mount a defense
"YOU" have to PROVE you were hacked
then YOU must PROVE the hacker did it
http://thedilbertstore.com/comic_strips/search?hidden_pc_terms=&pc_terms=damp+rag&start_date=&end_date=&x=0&y=0
are great.....
Dragons Lair was VERY successful- and it had a wee amount of delays..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon's_Lair
The game's enormous contrast with other arcade games of the time created a sensation when it appeared, and was played so heavily that many machines often broke due to the strain of overuse. It was also arguably the most successful game on this medium and is aggressively sought after by collectors.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beef
" The difference between Choice and Prime is largely due to the fat content in the beef. Prime typically has a higher fat content than Choice. The fat in Prime beef is also distributed evenly (also known as "marbling")."
you obviously have NO idea of the price of a trunk sold 9mm
Much more.. much much more...
OK
http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/tigermap.html
the entire legal system may bow down to one woman sitting on a bus.
you really need to get laid...
They themselves have in a press release asked for an absolute BAN
http://www.lungusa.org/press-room/press-releases/e-cigarettes-action.html
"Our organizations thank Senator Lautenberg for his leadership in urging the FDA to remove these products from the market and echo his call that the FDA move quickly to remove these products from the marketplace. "
I loved my //e
and I really think it is worth making.
Copyright protections are important, the snippet of text that google uses to let people know my site is relevant is easily fair use
I don't have a problem with it- I welcome it as it's beneficial for both myself and google for it to be there.
the ENTIRE TEXT of my site- copied and recopied to put into a web page that exists only to generate ad-sense revenue by a third party is not.
and if robots.txt had a 'license' mode, I'd have a much stronger case of protections if I chose to pursue a blatant copying and re-publication of my site.
robots.txt labels that I wish there were include
'allow function:indexing'
'disallow function:total and complete reproduction'
'disallow function: total and complete reproduction for XXX days'
(so I can allow wayback machine and equivalents'
'disallow function: aggregate data collection'
'disallow function: user data collection'
'disallow function: email collection'
looking at amazon, http://www.amazon.com/robots.txt
they somewhat do this by putting the information they don't want into the wild in it's own directories
then disallowing those directories- actually, now that I look at it- it's a neat way to go..
but I'd still prefer a robots.txt option that different 'intended use of data to be crawled' permissions covered
I'm sorry- it is..
robots.txt allows you to "refuse a specific named bot" or "refuse everyone" or "allow everything" or "allow these directories" or "only allow these directories"
(want a fascinating read? try robots.txt at your favorite government site- whitehouse.gov used to be fascinating stuff)
there is no way in robots.txt to permit crawling based on intent of information use like a CC license does
I can- with photographs, have a creative commons license that sez "use it for anyhting" "use it with credit to me" "free for non-commercial" etc.
I would WANT google to see my site, I would want bing to see my site- for the purposes of indexing in a search engine.
I can't say in robots.txt
"come in and index for search engines and relevance- but you may not use the data to collect information on our membership for marketing to or marketing their info to others"
If I build a website all about-- coffee- I want the information available to the general public,but from/on my site....
Having many different multi screen setups-
my biggest gripe is whenever I stretch an actual video across multiple monitors--
only one monitor gets the output-- the rest are black
any chance I can expand VLC to span- and the video will as well?
like, I dont't know, something large smacking a crater into the surface? it's extremely likely they crater formation was not because an asteroid went straight in, but at an angle,
and HEY! maybe- just maybe (sarcasm not directed at OP) the same crater maker threw out some material from deeper beneath the surface- which was a different composition -and all around the crater.
I know my state enables more than 2k a month
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/SavingandDebt/LearnToBudget/how-much-jobless-pay-would-you-get.aspx
apparently MA is highest, 628 per week possible
the only way to secure the system- is don't let anyone into the system
but I am annoyed by peoples flip
"here's the solution"
answers that really suck.
define injury?
it's really easy to say "lowers a chance of injury by 50%" but that is MEANINGLESS
if you go to saw stops website (I suggest it strongly the videos are cool)
you'll see even when it works it takes out a sliver of skin--
it requires a little moisture (skin breaking) to work..
(It does greatly reduce the amount of damage inflicted)
so technically it doesn't lower the chance of injury at all a lawyer would see that
"law says 50% reduced chance of injury- same chance here- MAJOR FREAKING LOOPHOLE"
in your 'so simple' off the cuff solution.